Open access

Protection Against Oxidative Stress and “IGF-I Deficiency Conditions”

Written By

Úrsula Muñoz Morón and Inma Castilla-Cortázar

Submitted: November 10th, 2011 Published: October 3rd, 2012

DOI: 10.5772/51047

Chapter metrics overview

3,808 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

1. Introduction

Oxidative stress is thought to contribute to the development of a wide range of diseases including neurodegenerative (Alzheimer, Parkinson, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis…), diabetes, cancer, rheumatoid arthritis, cardiovascular and liver diseases several of them are related with low levels of IGFs such as degenerative and aging disorders [1-8].

Oxidative stress represents an imbalance between the production of ROS/RNS and a biological system's ability to detoxify the reactive intermediates or to repair the resulting damage. In normal conditions ROS are reduced into water. For these reason cells are protected against oxidative stress by an interacting network of antioxidant enzymes. This detoxification pathway is the result of several enzymes, with Superoxide Dismutase (SOD, EC catalyzing the first step O2 into H2O2 and Catalase (CAT; EC. and Glutathione Peroxidase (GSH-Px; EC removing H2O2 into H2O by two different pathways. Disturbances in the normal redox state of tissues can cause toxic effects through the production of peroxides and free radicals exert deleterious effects on cell through direct attack on DNA, proteins or membrane lipids (including mitochondrial lipids). These oxidative damages lead to the cellular death. The mechanisms of oxidative cellular damage are summarized in Fig. 1.

The main sources of ROS/RNS are: exogenous (γ irradiation, UV irradiation, drugs, xenobiotics, and toxin metabolism) and endogenous (metabolic pathways, mitochondrial respiration, oxidative burst, fagocytosis, enzyme activities, aging and diseases).

Although the exposure of the organism to ROS/RNS is extremely high from exogenous sources, the exposure to endogenous sources is much more important and extensive, because it is a continuous process during the life span of every cell in the organism.

Figure 1.

Mechanisms of oxidative cellular damage. Free radicals are reduced into water with the cooperation of the three main antioxidant enzymes: SOD, Catalase, and GSHPx. The generation of hydroxyl radicals from hydroperoxide produces the development of oxidative cell injury: DNA damage; carboxylation of proteins; and lipid peroxidation, including lipids of mitochondrial membranes. By these pathways, oxidative damage leads to cellular death. [5]

Mitochondria are the major endogenous source of ROS underphysiologycal conditions, because 2% to 3% of the O2 consumed is converted to O2-. Intramitochondrial ROS production increases after peroxidation of intramitochondrial membrane lipids. Furthermore mitochondria are particularly sensitive to ROS/RNS-induced injury in the pathogenesis of disease. Oxidative stress exerts deleterious effects on mitochondria function by directly impairing oxidative phosphorylation through direct attack of proteins or membrane lipids. ROS/RNS can also induce mitochondrial DNA deletions and mitochondrial membrane permeability transition (MMPT). MMP pore opening activates caspases, which is an endpoint to initiate cell death. Recently, a large number of studies have associated mitochondrial dysfunction caused by ROS/RNS to both accidental cell death (necrosis) and programmed cell death (apoptosis).

Continuous exposure to various types of oxidative stress from numerous sources has led the cell and the entire organism to develop defense mechanisms for protection against reactive metabolites. Mitochondrial like a source of ROS are summarized in Fig. 2.

Figure 2.

Mitochondrial damage is an intracellular source of ROS. Oxidative stress exerts deleterious effects on mitochondria function by directly impairing oxidative phosphorylation through direct attack of proteins or membrane lipids. Mitochondrial damage produces mitochondrial dysfunction decreasing MMP and ATP synthesis and increasing ROS production.

Understanding that mitochondria are the most important cellular targets of IGF-I [5, 6, 7] and it is the main intracellular source of ROS our results show a novel mechanism for oxidative stress regulation through mitochondrial protection and normalization of antioxidants enzymes activities by IGFs signaling pathways.


2. Oxidative Stress: Mitochondrial damage and antioxidant denfences

2.1. Mitochondrial damage

Mitochondria play a central role in many cellular functions including energy production, respiration, heme synthesis, and lipids synthesis, metabolism of amino acids, nucleotides, and iron, and maintenance of intracellular homeostasis of inorganic ions, cell motility, cell proliferation and apoptosis [8, 9]. Mitochondria contain their own DNA (mtDNA). The mtDNA occurs in small clusters called nucleoids or chondriolites. The number of mtDNA molecules in nucleoids varies in size and numbers in response to physiological conditions. While nuclear DNA encodes the majority of the mitochondrial proteins only a few of these proteins are encoded by mitochondrial DNA. A recent mitochondrial proteomic study in S. cerevisiae identified at least 750 mitochondrial proteins that perform mitochondrial function [10]. The last decade has witnessed an increased interest in mitochondria, not only because mitochondria were recognized to play a central role in apoptosis but also since mitochondrial genetic defects were found to be involved in the pathogenesis of a number of human diseases [9,11].

A variety of cellular systems, including NADPH oxidase, xanthine oxidase, uncoupled eNOS (endothelial NO synthase) and cytochrome P450 enzymes, can generate ROS, but, in most mammalian cells, mitochondria are the principal organelles for ROS production. The production of mitochondrial ROS is a consequence of oxidative phosphorylation at the respiratory chain complexes I and III where electrons derived from NADH and FADH can directly react with oxygen or other electron acceptors and generate free radicals [12-14]. Indeed, the increase of the redox potential at complex I and complex III induces ROS generation [15, 16]. Mitochondria are also a major site for the accumulation of low molecular weight Fe2+ complexes, which promote the oxidative damage of membrane lipids [17-19].

Mitochondria do not only represent the major source of ROS production but they are also the major targets for their damaging effects. Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) seems to be highly vulnerable to oxidative challenges compared to nuclear DNA for three main reason: 1) its close proximity to the electron transport chain (ETC), 2) it is continuously exposed to ROS generated during oxidative phosphorylation (it is estimated that up to 4% of the oxygen consumed by cells is converted to ROS under physiological conditions) [20] and 3) its limited capacity of DNA repair strategies and the lack of protection by histones [21]. ROS also produce more than 20 types of mutagenic base modifications in DNA [22]. These DNA lesions cause mutations in mtDNA that can lead to impairment of mitochondrial function [23]. Taken together, this makes clear that mtDNA is extremely susceptible to mutation by ROS-induced damage. Given that mitochondria are the major producer of ATP, it is also likely that mitochondrial dysfunction leads to the reduction in ATP level that may affect ATP-dependent pathways involved in transcription, DNA replication, DNA repair, and DNA recombination. Mitochondria are intimately involved in deoxyribose nucleoside triphosphate (dNTP) biosynthesis [24]. It is conceivable that mitochondrial damage contributes to muta-genesis of the nuclear genome in part due to impaired nucleotide biosynthesis. In fact, it is well established that an imbalance in the dNTP pool is mutagenic to cells [25]. Studies demonstrate that a dNTP pool imbalance can induce nucleotide insertion, frame-shift mutation [25] sister chromatid exchange, recombination and double-strand break [26].

Mitochondria also play a key role in regulation of apoptosis under a variety of pathological conditions, including ischemia, hypoxia, and myocardial infarction [27-30]. The electrochemical potential across mitochondrial membrane, MMP, is known to be highly sensitive to apoptotic stimulation. As an index of mitochondrial function in living cells, MMP can be measured with an indicator dye, e.g., rhodamine 123 (Rh123), which fluoresces in direct proportion to MMP [31]. Decreased MMP occurs in cells undergoing apoptosis induced by oxidative agents, such as H2O2 in primary neuronal cultures [32]. Injured mitochondria can release cytochrome-c into the cytoplasm when cells are treated with proapoptotic stimuli [33]. Cytochrome-c activates the apoptosome containing the caspase-activating protein Apaf-1 and subsequently the caspase cascade that induce apoptosis [34].

Because macromolecules in mitochondria (including mtDNA) are particulary susceptible to oxidative damage of mitochondrial turnover is critical for the maintenance of a healthy mitochondrial phenotype, normal energy production, and the promotion of healthy aging [35]. Mitochondria are highly dynamic organelles, and deregulation of mitochondrial turnover is likely one of the intrinsic causes of mitochondrial dysfunction, which contributes to deregulation of cell metabolism, oxidative stress, and altered signal transduction during the aging process.

Autophagy is a catabolic process that contributes to the maintenance of cellular homeostasis through the degradation of damaged mitochondria in lysosomes. The available evidence suggests that there is an age-dependent decline in autophagic function, which likely contributes to the accumulation of damaged non-functional mitochondria. In addition, dysfunction of the proteasomes [36] may be also contributed to the accumulation of damaged mitochondrial proteins in the age diseases.

Mitochondria are important cellular targets of IGF-I [5, 6], different groups have described that IGF-I decreases mitochondrial superoxide production [37] and low levels of IGF-I have been linked to increase in oxidative stress damage [3, 5, 40-42]. IGF-I also acts as an anti-apoptosis factor of multiple cell types, and its anti-apoptotic effects occur through engagement with IGF-I receptor (IGF-IR) and thought to activate an intracellular signal transduction pathway that may modulate the mitochondria, cytochrome c and caspase pathway [38, 39]. Recent studies show that treatment of aged rodents with IGF-I confer mitochondrial protection, including an attenuation of mitochondrial ROS generation in the liver [40-42]. The available data suggest that treatments that increase circulating IGF-I levels exert citoprotective effects in aging and degenerative diseases [1-3, 5-7, 42]. Thus, further studies are necessary to determine the role of mitochondrial mechanisms in beneficial effects of IGF-I treatment, including the effects of IGF-I on autophagy of dysfunctional mitochondria and apoptosis.

2.2. Antioxidant defenses

ROS and RNS consist of radicals and other reactive oxygen/nitrogen factors that can react with other substrates. Examples of ROS and RNS are superoxide, nitric oxide, peroxynitrite and hydrogen peroxide. Under physiological conditions, these are counterbalanced by an array of defense pathways, and it needs to be emphasized that ROS and RNS have many physiological roles that include signaling. In excess, or in situations where defenses are compromised, ROS and RNS may react with fatty acids, proteins and DNA, thereby causing damage to these substrates. Under normal conditions, antioxidant defenses include the enzymatic and non-enzymatic defense systems regulate the ROS and RNS produced. Antioxidants regulate oxidative and nitrosative reactions in the body and may remove ROS and RNS through scavenging radicals, decreasing the production of ROS and RNS, thus preventing the damage caused by ROS and RNS.

  1. Enzymatic defense systems.

Enzymatic defense systems such as Superoxide Dismutases (SOD), Catalases (CAT), Glutathione Peroxidases (GPx), Glutation Reductases (GSR or GR; EC and Glutathione Transferases (GST; EC protect mitochondria and DNA from oxidative stress. It has been proposed that polymorphisms in these enzymes are associated with DNA damage and subsequently the individual’s risk of wide range of diseases susceptibility [42, 43].

Superoxide Dismutases catalyze the dismutation of O2- to H2O2 and O2, rendering the potentially harmful superoxide anion less hazardous. SODs require a metal cofactor for function and can be grouped by the bound metal ion [44-46]. Iron containing SODs have been found in prokaryotes and some plants. Manganese SODs (MnSOD) are found in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes and are localized primarily to the mitochondria. MnSOD is encoded by the SOD2 gene mapping to chromosome 6 in human. The third class represents SODs, which require both copper and zinc as cofactors (Cu-Zn SODs). Cu-Zn SODs are homodimers in eukaryotes and are located predominantly in the cytoplasm. In most prokaryotes, Cu-Zn SODs exist as homodimers found in the periplasm. Human Cu-Zn SOD, encoded by the SOD1 gene mapping to chromosome 21, has been implicated as the source of some cases of familial Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) [47, 48]. The eukaryotic extracellular SOD is a subset of the Cu-Zn variety but functions as a tetramer rather than the usual dimmer found in eukaryotes. Human extracellular Cu-Zn SOD, encoded by the SOD3 gene mapping to chromosome 4 [49], SOD3 protein can be measured in plasma, lymph, cerebrospinal, and synovial fluids [50, 51]. Almost all human tissues contain measurable levels of SOD3 and at least eight different tissues; including heart, lungs, and placenta, synthesize SOD3 mRNA. SOD3 is the primary enzymatic antioxidant defense of the vascular wall. The physiopathological role of SOD 3 has been examined in vascular-related diseases, atherosclerosis, hypertension, diabetes, ischemia-reperfusion injury, lung disease, various inflammatory conditions, and neurological diseases.

Catalase catalyzes the reduction of H2O2 to water using either an iron or manganese cofactor [52, 53]. CAT is a common antioxidant enzymes found in nearly all-living organisms that are exposed to oxygen and they can also remove organic H2O2 to oxidize toxins including phenols, formic acid, and hydroperoxides. CAT is present only or primarily in the peroxisome fraction and is absent in mitochondria of mammalian cells, except rat heart mitochondria [54]. Therefore, the only enzymatic defense system against hydrogen peroxide in mitochondria is the glutathione redox cycle system.

CAT is a homotetramer encoded by ctt1 gene mapping in chromosome 11 [55].

Genetic polymorphisms in catalase and its altered expression and activity are associated with oxidative DNA damage and subsequently the individual’s risk of cancer susceptibility [56]. A few polymorphisms have been described for the catalase-encoding gene; these are normally related with the development of mental disorders [57]. Humans with low catalase levels (acatalasemia) have an increased risk for diabetes mellitus; while the clinical features of acatalasemia are oral gangrene, altered lipid, carbohydrate, homocysteine metabolism and the increased risk of diabetes mellitus [58] and lower levels of catalase activity in other tissues, seem to be asymptomatic.

Glutathione Peroxidase (GPx) are critical intracellular enzymes involved in the reduction of hydrogen peroxide H2O2 to water and lipid peroxides to their corresponding alcohols using selenium cofactor in the majority of the cases. GPx are present both in the cytosol and in mitochondria [59]. There are at least eight GPx enzymes: GPx1–GPx8 [60, 61]. The GPx 1-8 genes mapping to chromosomes 3, 14, 5, 19, 6, 6, 1 and 5 respectively. Whereas GPx1 is the most abundant selenoperoxidase and is ubiquitously expressed in almost all tissues [60, 61], GPx2 expression is most prominent in the gastrointestinal tract [62]. Expression of GPx3 is greatest in the kidney, although this enzyme is expressed in various tissues and is secreted into extracellular fluids as a glycoprotein [63, 64]. Different from other glutathione peroxidases, GPx4, or phospholipid hydroperoxide GPx, is not a tetramer, but rather a monomer, and is the only GPx enzyme that reduces phospholipid hydroperoxides [65]. In addition, GPx4 contains a mitochondrial isoform that mediates the apoptotic response to oxidative stress [66, 67] and has a peroxidase independent structural role after sperm maturation [68]. GPx6 was identified as a selenoprotein in the human genome by homology search [69]. However, GPx6 from rodents and GPx5 from both humans and rodents do not contain Sec or Se [69]. Recently, GPx7 and GPx8 were also identified as selenium-independent GPx can act as true H2O2 scavengers, as expected of the selenium-dependent members [70-73]. Lower GPx activity predispose towards an impaired antioxidant protection and consequently stress oxidative damage to membrane fatty acids and functional proteins and, by inference, to neurotoxic damage, and hence the process of neuroprogression that accompanies severe or persistent illness [74].

Glutathione Reductase, also known as GSR or GR, is an enzyme that reduces glutathione disulfide (GSSG) to the sulfhydryl form GSH, which is an important cellular antioxidant [75, 76]. GSR is a homodimer found are present both in the cytosol and in mitochondria.

For every mole of oxidized glutathione (GSSG), one mole of NADPH is required to reduce GSSG to GSH. The enzyme forms a FAD-bound homodimer. Human GSR gene mapping to chromosome 8. The GR is conserved between all kingdoms. In bacteria, yeasts, and animals, one gr gene is found; however, in plant genomes, two gr genes are encoded. Drosophila and Trypanosomes do not have any GR at all [76]. In these organisms, glutathione reduction is performed by either the thioredoxin or the trypanothione system, respectively [77, 78]. In cells exposed to high levels of oxidative stress, like red blood cells, up to 10% of the glucose consumption may be directed to the pentose phosphate pathway (PPP) for production of the NADPH needed for this reaction. In the case of erythrocytes, if the PPP is non-functional, then the oxidative stress in the cell will lead to cell lysis and anemia [79].

Glutathione Transferases have also been called glutathione S-transferases, GST. These enzymes catalyze nucleophilic attack by reduced glutathione (GSH) on nonpolar compounds that contain an electrophilic carbon, nitrogen, or sulphur atom. Their substrates include halogenonitrobenzenes, arene oxides, quinones, and α,β-unsaturated carbonyls [80-84]. Three major families of proteins that are widely distributed in nature exhibit glutathione transferase activity. Two of these, the cytosolic and mitochondrial GST, comprise soluble enzymes that are only distantly related [85, 86]. The third family comprises microsomal GST and is now referred to as membrane-associated proteins in eicosanoid and glutathione (MAPEG) metabolism [87].

Cytosolic GSTs of mammals have been particularly well characterized, and were originally classified into Alpha, Mu, Pi, Theta, Zeta and Omega classes on the basis of a substrate/inhibitor specificity, primary and tertiary structure similarities and immunological identity [88]. The alpha class genes (GSTA1-5), located in a cluster mapped to chromosome 6, play an important role in cellular protection against oxidative stress and they are the most abundantly expressed glutathione S-transferases in liver. Decreased in alpha class GSTs has been observed in stomach and liver tumors. A significant decrease of glutathione transferase activity was described in amygdala, hippocampus and inferior parietal lobule in patients with AD [89]. The Mu class of GSTs has five genes (GSTM1–5) [90] that are found in a gene cluster on chromosome 1 [91]. The GSTM1 gene contains four alleles that have been associated with a decreased risk of bladder cancer [92]. Neurodegenerative diseases such as PD and schizophrenia are characterized by the degeneration of dopaminergic neurons. GSTM2-2 has been shown to catalyze the conjugation of GSH to aminochrome, a ROS generated in the redox cycling of orthoquinones within dopaminergic neurons [93]. Hence, GSTM2-2 has been proposed to play a protective role against neurodegenerative diseases. The Theta class of GST has a null phenotype whereby individuals do not express catalytically active protein. The lack of enzyme activity, and therefore, an inability to detoxify carcinogens is associated with an increased risk toward a variety of cancers. The null phenotype is associated with an increased risk of tumors of the head and neck, oral cavity, pharynx, and larynx [94, 95]. The chromosomal locations of the genes that encoded for the different types of GST and the related diseases are summarized in table 1.

  1. Non-enzymatic defense systems.

Examples of non-enzymatic defense systems are scavenger antioxidants (coenzyme Q10, vitamin C and E, and glutathione) and some proteins which act as antioxidants by binding ROS and RNS, e.g. thioredoxin (Trx), SS-peptides and acute phase proteins such as albumin, transferrin, haptoglobin and ceruloplasmin. These antioxidant systems thus protect the tissues against ROS and RNS.

Coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10) is an endogenous compound found in the inner mitochondrial membrane, is essential to electron transport and ATP production via the respiratory chain. CoQ10 is a strong anti-oxidant that confers resistance to mitochondrial damage by decreasing ROS/RNS production and that may suppress the production of proinflammatory substances, like nuclear factor κ B (NFκB) gene expression and the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines [95-100]. CoQ10 and vitamin E are lipophylic antioxidants that are target to mitochondrial matrix by Tripenylphoshonium ion (TPP+) (mitoQ and mitovitamin E). These mitochondrial-targeted drugs can achieved concentrations in the mitochondrial matrix 100- to 1000-fold higher than those in the cytosol because of their strong positive charge, as mitochondria have a highly negative membrane potential between -150 mV and -180 mV. Both clinical and rodent studies have reported moderately beneficial actions of CoQ10 in reducing blood pressure, decreasing blood glucose, forestalling myocardial damage secondary to chemotherapeutic administration, limiting tumor growth, enhancing endothelial function and improving cognitive function in both Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease patients [101]. However, one of the major limiting factors in the use of CoQ10 as a supplement is its bioavailability and delivery to the source of ROS generation.

Several other studies have used MitoQ10 in a variety of animal models of disease [102] and the results indicate that MitoQ10 protects against liver damage in an animal model of sepsis

Antioxidant EnzymesE.C.SubtypesSubcellular
Chromosomal LocationRelated Diseases
(Cu-Zn SODs)
CytosolChromosome 21Familiar Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS)
Superoxide DismutasesSOD, ss
MitochondrialChromosome 6Cancer, asthma and degenerative disease
(Cu-Zn SODs)
ExtracellularChromosome 4Vascular-related diseases, atherosclerosis, hypertension, diabetes, ischemia-reperfusion injury,lung disease, various inflammatory conditions, and neurological diseases
Peroxisome fractionChromosome 11Mental disorders, Diabetes mellitus.
GPx1Chromosome 3
GPx2Chromosome 14
GPx3Chromosome 5Mental disorders
Glutathione PeroxidasesGSH-Px,
GPx4Cytosol/MitochondrialChromosome 19
GPx5Chromosome 6
GPx6Chromosome 6
GPx7Chromosome 1
GPx8Chromosome 5
Glutathione ReductaseGSR or GR,
Cytosol/MitochondrialChromosome 8Red blood diseases
Alpha, A1-1Chromosome 6
Alpha, A2-2Chromosome 6
Alpha, A3-3CytosolChromosome 6
Alpha, A4-4Chromosome 6
Alpha, A5-5Chromosome 6
Mu, M1-1Chromosome 1
Mu, M2-2Chromosome 1
Mu, M3-3Chromosome 1
Glutathione TransferasesGST;
Mu, M4-4Chromosome 1Neurodegenerative, liver diseases and cancer
Mu, M5-5Chromosome 1
Pi, P1-1Chromosome 11
Theta, T1-1Chromosome 22
Theta, T2-2Chromosome 22
Zeta, Z1-1Chromosome 14
Omega, O1-1Chromosome 10
Omega, O2-2Chromosome 10
Kappa, K1-1Mitochondrial/peroxisomeChromosome 7
gp I, MGST2Chromosome 4
gp I, FLAPChromosome 4
gp I, LTC4SMicrosomalChromosome 1
gp II, MGST3Chromosome 1
gp IV, MGST1Chromosome 12
gp IV, PGES1Chromosome 9

Table 1.

Enzymatic defense systems

[103], contributes to the aetiology of the metabolic syndrome and atherosclerosis in a mouse model [104] protects pancreatic β-cells against oxidative stress and improves insulin secretion in glucotoxicity and glucolipotoxicity [105] and even protects against oxidative stress and cell death in the brain of rats exposed to the insecticide dichlorvos [106]. Importantly, the first clinical evidence of a potential benefit of MitoQ10 in humans comes from a study that MitoQ10 reduces liver damage induced by hepatitis virus infection [107].

Glutathione is formed in the liver from three amino acids, namely glycine, glutamine and cysteine. Cysteine is the rate-limiting step in the synthesis of reduced glutathione (GSH), the active form of glutathione. Glutathione has three major functions: 1) it is a strong antioxidant that protects cells against damage caused by free radicals and it recycles vitamin C and E, so that they again become active as antioxidants after been used in antioxidant processes. b) Glutathione is employed by the white blood cells as a source of energy used for lymphoproliferation. Therefore, glutathione may help increase the resistance to bacterial and viral infections. c) Glutathione is a natural purifier and therefore high concentrations are found in the liver.

SS-Peptides the Szeto-Schiller (SS) compounds are tetrapeptides with an alternating aromatic-cationic amino acids motif, and demonstrated in the inner mitochondrial membrane more than 1000-fold in comparison with the cytosolic concentration [108-110]. Although the positive charge might explain the mitochondrial-targing effect, the mitochondrial uptake of these SS peptides appears to be on mitochondrial potencial, as they are concentrated even in depolarized mitochondria [91, 92]. SS peptides are capable of scavenging H2O2 and ONOO− and inhibiting lipid peroxidation. By reducing mitochondrial ROS production, these molecules inhibit MMPT and cytochrome c release and so prevent oxidant-induced cell death [111]. Using these peptides in an animal model of ischaemia/reperfusion injury improves cardiac function [112]. Whereas treatment with SS peptides attenuated mitochondrial H2O2 release induced by a high-fat diet and preserved insulin sensitivity in skeletal muscle [113]. Importantly, pre-clinical studies support the use of these peptides during ischaemia/reperfusion injury and neurodegenerative disorders [114].

Thioredoxin (Trx) is a multifunctional low-molecular weight protein containing an active thiol/disulphide site and possessing oxido reductase activity. Originally discovered in E. coli, Trx was later found in many prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells. The major Trx isoforms are cytosolic Trx1 and mitochondrial Trx2. Thioredoxins evolved similarly to chaperone-like proteins, whose function is maintenance of the dithiol/disulphide structure of proteins. A highly conservative amino acid sequence of the active centre (Trp-Cys-Gly-Pro-Cys- Lys) contains two active Cys residues (Cys32 and Cys35 in human Trx1 and Cys90 and Cys93 in human Trx2) that are oxidized into corresponding disulphides due to the transfer of two reducing equivalents from Trx to a disulphide-containing substrate. The disulphides formed in the active centres of Trx1 and Trx2 are reduced by thioredoxin reductase (TrxR). TrxR is an NADPH-dependent homodimer of oxidoreductase which reduces the active centre of disulphide in oxidized Trx and has two major isoforms, cytosolic (TrxR1) and mitochondrial (TrxR2). The Trx system plays a key role in cell function by limiting oxidative stress directly via antioxidant effects and indirectly by protein – protein interactions [115]. Cellular redox regulation of many processes is provided by the cooperation between the Trx and glutathione systems [115, 116]. Trx and GSH systems are involved in a variety of redox-dependent pathways such as supplying reducing equivalents for ribonucleotide reductase and peptide methionine sulphoxide reductase, the latter being involved in antioxidant defense and regulation of the cellular redox state [117]. The promoter of the Trx gene contains a series of stress responsive elements, various transcription factor binding sites, such as SP1, AP-1, NFkB and antioxidants response elements (ARE) [118].

  1. Antioxidant defense systems against mitochondrial ROS formation.

The mitochondrial respiratory chain, located in the inner mitochondrial membrane (IM), is composed of four multimeric integral membrane proteins complexes (complexes I-IV), coencymeQ (CoQ), and cytochrome c (cyt c). Complex I accepts electrons from NADH and complex II accepts electrons from succinate. Electrons then move down an electrochemical gradient through CoQ to complex III, from complex III to cyt c, and from cyt c to complex IV, which uses four electrons to reduce molecular oxygen to water (Fig. 3). The production of mitochondrial ROS is a consequence of oxidative phosphorylation at the respiratory chain complexes I and III where electrons derived from NADH can directly react with oxygen or other electron acceptors and generate free radicals [12-14]. Indeed, the increase of the redox potential at complex I and complex III induces ROS generation [15, 16]. Mitochondrial and cell cytosolic antioxidant systems can neutralize excess mitochondrial ROS under most conditions. With the exception of generation at complex III, ROS production in mitochondria is exclusively directed towards the matrix where MnSOD catalyses dismutation to H2O2 [119] which is then reduced to H2O by GSH and Trx systems (Trx2) [120]. As the regeneration of GSH and reduced Trx2 depends on the NADPH/NADP+ redox state, an efficient mitochondrial bioenergetic function is required to maintain antioxidant activity. Matrix ROS can also pass through the MMTP, formed by voltage-dependent anion channel (VDAC), cyclophilin D (cyp D) and the adenine nucleotide translocator (ANT), directly to the cytosol where Cu-Zn SOD catalyses dismutation to H2O2 [119] which is then reduced to H2O by catalase. Complex III generates ROS on both sides of the mitochondrial inner membrane and in the intermembrane space, where Cu-Zn SOD converts O2− into H2O2, which diffuses in the cytosol where catalase reduces it into H2O. Thus the efflux of H2O2 from the mitochondria is relatively modest, but may be modulated by either mitochondrial ROS themselves or changes in antioxidant defenses.

Figure 3.

Antioxidant defense systems against mitochondrial ROS formation

  1. Regulation of enzymatic antioxidant defense systems.

In order to prevent oxidative stress, the cell must respond to ROS by mounting an antioxidant defense system. Antioxidant enzymes play a major role in reducing ROS levels; therefore, redox regulation of transcription factors is significant in determining gene expression profile and cellular response to oxidative stress. There are different transcription factors involved in regulation of antioxidant enzymes and they can be regulated though IGFs signaling and others pathways related with receptors tyrosine kinases (RTKs). The most studied transcription factors are:

Nrf2 transcription factor: Phosphorilated Nrf2 translocates to the nucleus and binds the ARE. ARE driven expression of detoxifying and antioxidant enzymes and the cystine/glutamate transporter involved in GSH biosynthesis [121,122].

The PI3K/Akt/PP2A/GSK3ß and PKC/GSK3 play a role in regulation of Nrf2 and antioxidant gen regulation. PI3K pathway, consisting of p110 cataytic subunit and p85 regulatory subunit, is tighly coupled with RTKs activated by various growth factors such as IGFs, Epidermal Growth Factor (EGF), Platelet-Derived Growth Factor (PDGF), Nerve Growth Factor (NGF), and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF). PI3K is recruited to activate RTK dimers through a SH2 domain in the PI3K p85 regulatory subunit. PI3K catalyzes the synthesis of the second messenger phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5 triphosphate (PIP3) from phosphatidylinositol 4,5 bisphosphate (PIP2), wherein the membrane bound PIP3 serves as a signaling molecule to recruit proteins containing the pleckstrin homology (PH) domain. These PH domain proteins, such as the phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase (PDK) and protein kinase B (AKT) serine/threonine kinases are thus activated and mediate further downstream signaling events [123]. The synthesis of PIP3 is negatively regulated primarily by the phosphatase and tensin homology (PTEN) phosphatase, which dephosphorylates PIP3 back to PIP2 [124]. Through PTEN, the PI3K pathway is subject to reversible redox regulation by ROS generated by growth factor stimulation. H2O2 was shown to oxidize and inactivate human PTEN through disulfide bond formation between the catalytic domain Cys-124 and Cys-71 residues [125, 126]. It was also demonstrated that endogenously generated ROS following treatment with peptide growth factors such as IGFs, EGF, or PDGF causes oxidation of PTEN leading to the activation of the PI3K pathway [127]. PTEN oxidation is reversed by peroxiredoxin II, a cytoplasmic peroxiredoxin isoform that eliminates H2O2 generated in response to growth factors [125]. It is noteworthy that various oxidants and ROS-producing chemicals activate transcription of a battery of antioxidant genes through a PI3K-NFE2- like 2 (Nrf2)-antioxidant response element (ARE) mechanism, where PTEN knockdown enhances transcription of ARE regulated antioxidant genes [128]. However, it is not known whether these oxidants induce PTEN oxidation and inhibition of phosphatase activity leading to gene activation. This leads to antioxidant gene expression that protects the cell. A role for NRF2 in drug resistance is suggested based on its property to induce detoxifying, drug transport, and antioxidant enzymes.

FOXO transcription factors: FOXO-mediated upregulation of MnSOD expression results in considerable lowering of cellular ROS [129]. Increase in ROS enhances FOXO transcriptional activity, and thus functions as a feedback mechanism. An increase in ROS levels induces activation of the small GTPase Ral, which will in turn lead to the phosphorylation and activation of the stress kinase JNK. Active JNK induces the phosphorylation of on FOXO. Phosphorylation of these residues is essential for FOXO transcriptional activity as shown by mutational analysis. Consistent with this, H2O2 treatment increases FOXO transcriptional activity and translocation of FOXO from the cytoplasm to the nucleus and activation of the transcription factor. Activation of FOXO through can now induce transcription of MnSOD and CAT, leading to a decrease in ROS levels. Thus, activation of FOXO by oxidative stress is part of a negative feedback loop to reduce the levels of oxidative stress in a cell, preventing damage to DNA, lipids and proteins.

Activation of PI3K/PKB signaling decreases FOXO activity and thus the levels of FOXO target genes like MnSOD and catalase [130]. Their regulation via PI-3K/PKB/FOXO signaling therefore implies that insulin, through this signaling cascade, may modulate the cellular ROS level.

Based on oxidative stress is an imbalance between the production of ROS and antioxidative defenses systems, IGF-I decreases mitochondrial ROS production and IGF-I/Akt pathway is involved in Nrf2 and FOXO activity, both transcription factors involved in the antioxidative enzymes regulation. We propose that IGF-I can exert direct effects on cells and can alter in opposite ways the expression of antioxidant enzymes depending on the ROS levels. This regulation may contribute to the citoprotective effects of treatment with low doses of IGF-I in experimental “IGF-I deficiency” conditions [2, 5, 6, 40-42]. This model is summarized in Fig. 4.

Figure 4.

Regulation model of antioxidant enzymes mediated by IGF-I. IGF-I exerts a dual role depending on ROS concentration. High ROS levels increase antioxidant enzymes expression via Nfr2/ARE and low ROS levels decrease antioxidant enzymes expression via FOXO.


3. Aging and others conditions of “IGF-I deficiency” and oxidative stress

Mechanisms that cellular protection against oxidative injure are not well understood. It is known, however, that factors that promote the generation of ROS and/or impair antioxidative processes contribute to oxidative damage. Oxidative damage accumulates with aging and is likely responsible for the progressive decline in physiological systems. The identification of physiological regulators of antioxidative processes is critical to the understanding of degenerative diseases and aging processes. GH, IGF-I, IGF-II concentrations decline with age. The IGF-I is an anabolic hormone produced mainly in the liver in response to GH stimulation [131]. Circulating IGF-I serum levels decline by more than 50% in healthy older adults [132, 133]. Our team results show that exogenous administration of low doses of IGF-I restores IGF-I circulating levels and some age-related changes, improving glucose and lipid metabolisms, increasing testosterone levels and serum total antioxidant capability, and reducing oxidative damage in the brain and liver associated with a normalization of antioxidant enzyme activities and mitochondrial protection [5]. From these results we suggested that aging seems to be an unrecognized condition of “IGF-I deficiency.” The best-known condition of “IGF-I deficiency” is Laron’s dwarfism [134], characterized by an absence of GH receptors in the liver. Another condition of IGF-I deficiency is liver cirrhosis. In cirrhosis the reduction of receptors for GH in hepatocytes and the diminished ability of the hepatic parenchyma to synthesize cause a progressive decrease in serum IGF-I levels [135]. We have also shown previously that short courses of treatment with low doses of IGF-I in rats with carbon tetrachloride-induced cirrhosis had many systemic beneficial effects, and showed hepatoprotective and antioxidant properties, including mitochondrial protection [2, 3, 6, 41].

Oxidative Stress is one of the most important mechanisms of the cellular damage in aging [42,131] and in others “IGF-I deficiency” conditions such as liver cirrhosis where there are a diminution in IGF-I levels but not in GH levels followed of a decrease in liver biosynthetic capacity. In order to reproduce of “IGF-I deficiency” condition and the possible benefices of treatment with low doses of IGF-I, we used two different experimental models:

  1. Experimental model of cirrhosis: Male Wistar rats in which liver cirrhosis was inducted using CCl4. IGF-I therapy or saline was administrated the last 4 weeks [2, 6, 41, 137-139].

  2. Experimental model of aging: Healthy male Wistar rats were divided into two groups according to age: young control of 17 weeks, and aging control rats of 103 weeks. Old animals were randomly assigned to receive either saline or human IGF-I [5, 32,139,140].

In these experimental groups we measured the oxidative stress by determination of: Total serum antioxidant status [40], liver contents of pro-oxidative metals [138] (iron and copper), parameters of oxidative damage such as lipid peroxidation (MDA), protein carboxyl content (PCC) and activities of antioxidant enzymes in homogenates of brain and liver.

Understanding that mitochondria are one of the most important cellular targets of IGF-I [5, 6, 7] and they are the main intracellular ROS sources we studied the mitochondrial function by MMP, ATP synthesis, activities capase-3 processing and apoptosis in liver homogenates and isolated liver mitochondria [5, 41, 42] and intramitochondrial antioxidant capability of isolated liver mitochondria.

In these conditions of “IGF-I deficiency” low doses of IGF-I induced: a increase in the total serum antioxidant capacity closely related with serum IGF-I levels [40], a correlation between the SODs levels and MDA as shown in Fig. 5, a decrease of oxidative cell damage reducing MDA and PCC and improving antioxidant enzyme activities and a mitochondrial protection improving MMP, proton leak and reducing intramitochondrial ROS production and increasing ATP synthesis (Fig. 6), leading to reduced apoptosis [5, 41, 42].

All these data together provide evidence of the beneficial effect of IGF-I replacement therapy inducing anabolic [139] and antioxidant [5, 40, 41,139] actions in both experimental “IGF-I deficiency” conditions: cirrhosis and aging and experimental basis for further studies at exploring the potential IGF-I like a bioprotector due to its antioxidant, hepatoprotective and neuoroprotective effects. Recently, we have also shown that IGF-II exerts similar effects [139,140]. The IGF-II is a peptide hormone that belongs to the family of IGFs. It plays an important role in the embryology development but the physiological function of IGF-II in the adult life are not fully understood [139,140]. IGF-II concentration decline with the age. Recently, we have also shown that low doses of IGF-II in aging rats exerts similar hepatoprotector and neuroprotector effects than IGF-I low doses therapy.

Figure 5.

A) Correlation between TAS and IGF-I levels B) Correlation between SOD activity and MDA concentration

Figure 6.

Different mitochondrial parameters were measure by cytometry in isolated liver mitochondria from healthy young control animals, old rats and old rats treated with low doses of IGF-I: A) MMP is considered a good marker of mitochondrial function, B) ATP synthesis, C) Proton leak and D) ROS intramitochondrial production.


4. Conclusions

Our results show that the cytoprotective effect of IGFs is closely related to a mitochondrial protection, leading to the reduction of intramitocondrial free radical production, oxidative damage, and apoptosis, increased ATP production and a normalization of antioxidant enzyme activities. Further studies are necessary to elucidate all mechanisms involved in the IGFs mitochondrial protection, including the effects of IGF-I on autophagy of dysfunctional mitochondria and apoptosis. In agreement with these results, it has been reported that IGF-I differentially regulates Bcl-xL and Bax. Previously, we reported that low doses of IGF-I restored the expression of several protease inhibitors such us the serine protease inhibitor 2 in cirrotic rats [137], which could contribute to the described mitochondrial protection. Our work provides new evidence of beneficial effect of IGF-I replacement therapy in degenerative diseases including aging.



Adenine Nucleotide Translocator (ANT)

Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS)

Antioxidants response elements (ARE)

Catalase (CAT)

Coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10)

Copper and Zinc SOD (Cu-Zn SODs)

Cytochrome c (cyt c)

Deoxyribose nucleoside triphosphate (dNTP)

Electron Transport Chain (ETC)

Glutathione (GSH)

Glutathione Peroxidase (GSP)

Glutathione Ttransferases (GST).

Glutation Reductases (GSR)

Growth factor hormone (GH),

IGF-I receptor (IGF-1R)

Inner mitochondrial membrane (IM),

Insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I)

Manganese SOD (MnSOD)

Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA).

Mitochondrial Membrane Permeability Transition (MMPT)

Nerve Growth Factor (NGF)

Nuclear Factor κ B (NFκB)

Pentose phosphate pathway (PPP)

Phosphatidylinositol 3, 4, 5 triphosphate (PIP3)

Phosphatidylinositol 4, 5 bisphosphate (PIP2)

Platelet-Derived Growth Factor (PDGF)

Protein Carboxyl Content (PCC)

Reactive Nitrogen Species (RNS)

Reactive oxygen species (ROS)

Rhodamine 123 (Rh123)

Superoxide Dismutase (SOD)

Szeto-Schiller (SS)

Thioredoxin (Trx)

Tripenylphoshonium ion (TPP+)

Tyrosine Kinases (RTKs)

Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF)

Voltage-Dependent Anion Channel (VDAC)


  1. 1. OliveiraA. C.MuguerzaB.TosarA.QuirogaJ.Castilla-CortázarI.SantidriánS.PrietoJ.”.Lowdoses.ofinsulin-like.growth-Ifactor.improvenitrogen.retentionfoodefficiency.inrats.withearly.cirrosis”J, Castilla-Cortázar I, Santidrián S, Prieto J.”Low doses of insulin-like growth factor-I improve nitrogen retention and food efficiency in rats with early cirrosis”. J Hepatol. 1997Jan; 261191202
  2. 2. Castilla-CortázarI.PrietoJ.UrdanetaE.PascualM.NuñezM.ZudaireE.GarcíaM.QuirogaJ.SantidrianS. ”.Impaired intestinal sugar transport in cirrhotic rats: correction by low doses of insulin- like growth factor IGastroenterology1997Oct; 113411807
  3. 3. Castilla-CortázarI.GarciaM.MuguerzaB.QuirogaJ.PerezR.SantidrianS.PrietoJ.Gastroenterology ”Hepatoprotective effects of insulin-like growth factor I in rats with carbon tetrachloride-induced cirrosis”. 1997Nov; 1135168291
  4. 4. RamalingamM.KimS. J. .Reactive oxygen/nitrogen species and their functional correlations in neurodegenerative diseasesJournal of Neural Transmission2012
  5. 5. García-FernándezM.DelgadoG.PucheJ. E.González-BarónS.CastillaCortázar. I. ”.Low doses of insulin-like growth factor I improve insulin resistance, lipid metabolism, and oxidative damage in aging ratsEndocrinology2008May; 1495243342
  6. 6. MuguerzaB.Castilla-CortázarI.GarcíaM.QuirogaJ.SantidriánS.PrietoJ. “.Antifibrogenic effect in vivo of low doses of insulin-like growth factor-I in cirrhotic rats”Biochim Biophys Acta. 2001May 31; 1536(2-3):185 EOF95 EOF
  7. 7. Castilla-CortázarI.PicardiA.AinzuaJ.UrdanetaE.PascualM.GarcíaM.PascualM.QuirogaJ.Prieto“.Effectof.insulin-likegrowth.factorI.onin.vivointestinal.absorptionof.D-galactosein.cirrhoticrats.”. J.Am J Physiol. 19992763742
  8. 8. In“.MitochondrialD. N. A.Mutationsin.AgingDisease.Cancer”Singh. K. K.EdSpringer.NewYork, NY.
  9. 9. RavagnanL.RoumierT.KroemerG. “.Mitochondriathe.killerorganelles.theirweapons.”.CellPhysiol. J. 2002192131137
  10. 10. SickmannA.ReindersJ.WagnerY.JoppichC.ZahediR.MeyerH. E.SchonfischB.PerschilI.ChacinskaA.GuiardB.RehlingP.PfannerN.MeisingerC. “.The proteome of Saccharomyces cerevisiae mitochondriaProc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 20031001320713212
  11. 11. SinghK. K. “.Mitochondrial me and the Mitochondrion”. Journal. Mitochondrion2000112
  12. 12. AndreyevA. Y.KushnarevaY. E.StarkovA. A.“.Mitochondrial metabolism of reactive oxygen speciesBiochemistryMosc.) 200570200214
  13. 13. JezekP.lavataL. H.“.Mitochondria in homeostasis of reactive oxygen species in cell, tissues, and organism”Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 20053724782503
  14. 14. MullerF. L.LiuY.Van RemmenH.Complex“.releasesI. I. I.superoxideto.bothsides.ofthe.innermitochondrial.membrane”J.Biol. Chem. 20042794906449073
  15. 15. KushnarevaY.MurphyA. N.A.Andreyev “Complex I-mediated reactive oxygen species generation: modulation by cytochrome c and NAD (P)+ oxidation- reduction state,, Biochem. J. 2002368545553
  16. 16. ChenQ.VazquezE. J.MoghaddasS.HoppelC. L.E. J.Lesnefsky “Production of reactive oxygen species by mitochondria: central role of complex III,J. Biol. Chem. 20032783602736031
  17. 17. Williamson,D.“The curious history of yeast mitochondrial”.DNA. Nat. Rev. Genet. 20023475481
  18. 18. SickmannA.ReindersJ.WagnerY.JoppichC.ZahediR.MeyerH. E.SchonfischB.PerschilI.ChacinskaA.GuiardB.RehlingP.PfannerN.MeisingerC. “.Theproteome.ofSaccharomyces.cerevisiaemitochondria.”.Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 20031001320713212
  19. 19. NaviauxR.SinghK. K. “.Manipulations of the mitochondrial germ line must be openly debated and followed up”. Nature. 2001
  20. 20. Abd El-Gawad HM, Khalifa AE. “Quercetin, coenzyme Q10, and L-canavanine as protective agents against lipid peroxidation and nitric oxide generation in endotoxin-induced shock in rat brain”.Pharmacol Res. 200143325763
  21. 21. YakesF. M.Van HoutenB.Mitochondrial“.damageD. N. A.ismore.extensivepersistslonger.thannuclear. D. N. A.damagein.humancells.followingoxidative.stressProc.Natl Acad. Sci. USA 199794514519
  22. 22. ArltS.BeisiegelU.KontushA. “.Lipid peroxidation in neurodegeneration: new insights into Alzheimer’s disease”. Curr Opin Lipidol 200213328994
  23. 23. BarbaroG.Di LorenzoG.SoldiniM.BellomoG.BelloniG.GrisorioB.etal. “.Vagal system impairment in human immunodeficiency virus-positive patients with chronic hepatitis C: does hepatic glutathione deficiency have a pathogenetic role?” Scand J Gastroenterol. 1997321212616
  24. 24. LofflerM.JockelJ.SchusterG.BeckerC. “.Dihydroorotat-ubiquinone oxidoreductase links mitochondria in the biosynthesis of pyrimidine nucleotides.” Mol. Cell Biochem. 1997174125129
  25. 25. SongS.WheelerL. J.MathewsC. K. “.Deoxyribonucleotide pool imbalance stimulates deletions in HeLa cell mitochondrial DNA”. J. Biol. Chem. 20032784389343896
  26. 26. PopescuN. C. “.Sister chromatid exchange formation in mammalian cells is modulated by deoxyribonucleotide pool imbalance” Somat. Cell Mol. Genet. 1999
  27. 27. SudaO.TsutsuiM.MorishitaT.TanimotoA.HoriuchiM.TasakiH.HuangP. L.SasaguriY.YanagiharaN.NakashimaY. ”.Long-term treatment with N(omega)-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester causes arteriosclerotic coronary lesions in endothelial nitric oxide synthase-deficient mice”. Circulation 200210617291735
  28. 28. Beal MF.Mitochondrial dysfunction in neurodegenerative diseases”. Biochim Biophys Acta 19981366211223
  29. 29. LemastersJ. J.NieminenA. L.QianT.TrostL. C.HermanB. “.The mitochondrial permeability transition in toxic, hypoxic and reperfusion injury”. Mol Cell Biochem 1997174159165
  30. 30. LiY.WuH.KhardoriR.SongY. H.LuY. W.GengY. J. “.Insulin-likegrowth.factorreceptoractivation.preventshigh.glucose-inducedmitochondrial.dysfunctioncytochrome-c.releaseapoptosis”Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2009384259264
  31. 31. SatohT.EnokidoY.AoshimaH.UchiyamaY.HatanakaH. “.Changesin.mitochondrialmembrane.potentialduring.oxidativestress-induced.apoptosisin. P. C.cells”J Neurosci Res 199750413420
  32. 32. LiY.MeyerE. M.WalkerD. W.MillardW. J.HeY. J.MAKing“.Alphanicotinic.receptoractivation.inhibitsethanolinduced.mitochondrialdysfunction.cytochromec.releaseneurotoxicityin.primaryrat.hippocampalneuronal.cultures”2002J Neurochem 81853858
  33. 33. ReedJ. C. “.Cytochromec.can’tlive.withit-can’”Cell 199791559562
  34. 34. DeshmukhM.JohnsonE. M. “.Evidenceof. a.novelevent.duringneuronal.deathdevelopment.ofcompetence-to-die.inresponse.tocytoplasmic.cytochromec”.1998Neuron 21695705
  35. 35. Lopez-LluchG.IrustaP. CaboR. “.Mitochondrialbiogenesis.healthyaging”.Exp Gerontol. 200843813819
  36. 36. LiF.ZhangL.CraddockJ.Bruce-KellerA. J.DasuriK.NguyenA.KellerJ. N. “.Aging and dietary restriction effects on ubiquitination, sumoylation, and the proteasome in the heart”. Mech Ageing Dev. 2008129515521
  37. 37. CsiszarA.LabinskyyN.PerezV.RecchiaF. A.PodlutskyA.MukhopadhyayP.LosonczyG.PacherP.AustadS. N.BartkeA.UngvariZ. “.Endothelialfunction.vascularoxidative.stressin.long-livedgh/igfdeficient.amesdwarf.mice”.Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2008H1882H1894.
  38. 38. DelafontaineP.SongY. H.LiY. “.Expressionregulation.functionof. I. G.F-I. G. F.R.I. G. F.bindingproteins.inblood.vessels”Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 200424435444
  39. 39. GomesA.FernandesE.LimaJ. L. “.Fluorescenceprobes.usedfor.detectionof.reactiveoxygen.species”JL “Fluorescence probes used for detection of reactive oxygen species”. J Biochem Biophys Methods 2005654580
  40. 40. FernándezM.Castilla-CortázarI.Díaz-SánchezM.DíezCaballero. F.CastillaA.DíazCasares. A.Varela-NietoI.González-BarónS. “.Effect-Iof. I. G. F.ontotal.serumantioxidant.statusin.cirrhoticrats”.García- J Physiol Biochem. 2003591456
  41. 41. PérezR.García-FernándezM.Díaz-SánchezM.PucheJ. E.DelgadoG.ConchilloM.MuntanéJ.Castilla-Cortázar“.Mitochondrial protection by low doses of insulin-like growth factor- I in experimental cirrosis”. I. World J Gastroenterol. 20081427319
  42. 42. PucheJ. E.García-FernándezM.MuntanéJ.RiojaJ.González-BarónS.CastillaCortazar. I. “.Low doses of insulin-like growth factor-I induce mitochondrial protection in aging rats”. Endocrinology. 2008May; 149.
  43. 43. NazirogluM. “.New molecular mechanisms on the activation of TRPM2 channels by oxidative stress and ADP-ribose.” Neurochem Res 20073219902001
  44. 44. DringenR. “.Oxidative and antioxidative potential of brain microglial cells.” Antioxid Redox Signal 2005712231233
  45. 45. AlscherR. G.ErturkN.HeathL. S.“.Role of superoxide dismutases (SODs) in controlling oxidative stress in plants”. J. Exp. Bot 20025313311341
  46. 46. FridovichI.Superoxide radical and superoxide dismutases. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 19956497112
  47. 47. ZelkoI. N.MarianiT. J.FolzR. J.“.Superoxide dismutase multigene family: a comparison of the CuZn-SOD (SOD1), Mn-SOD (SOD2), and extracellular SOD (SOD3) gene structures, evolution, and expression”. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 200233337349
  48. 48. DengH. X.HentatiA.TainerJ. A.IqbalZ.CayabyabA.HungW. Y.GetzoffE. D.HuP.HerzfeldtB.RoosR. P.WarnerC.DengG.SorianoE.SmythC.PargeH. E.AhmedA.RosesA. D.HallewellR. A.PericakvanceM. A.SiddiqueT.“.Amyotrophic-lateral-sclerosis and structural defects in Cu,Zn superoxide-dismutase”. Science 199326110471051
  49. 49. RosenD. R.SiddiqueT.PattersonD.FiglewiczD. A.SappP.etal. “.Mutations in Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase gene are associated with familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis”. Nature 19933625962
  50. 50. HendricksonD. J.FisherJ. H.JonesC.HoY. S. “.Regionallocalization.ofhuman.extracellularsuperoxide.dismutasegene.to4pterq21”.Genomics 19908736738
  51. 51. KarlssonK.MarklundS.L.”Heparin-induced.releaseof.extracellularsuperoxide.dismutaseto.humanblood.plasma”Biochem J. 19872425559
  52. 52. Marklund S.”Extracellular superoxide dismutase in human tissues and human cell lines”.J Clin Invest 19847413981403
  53. 53. ChelikaniP.FitaI.LoewenP. .Diversityof.structurespropertiesamong.catalasesCell Mol Life Sci. 2004612192208
  54. 54. ZámockýM.KollerF. .Understanding the structure and function of catalases: clues from molecular evolution and in vitro mutagenesis". Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 19997211966
  55. 55. RadiR.TurrensJ. F.ChangL. Y.BushK. M.CrapoJ. D.FreemanB. A. “.Detection of catalase in rat heart mitochondria”. J. Biol. Chem. 19912662202822034
  56. 56. QuanF.KornelukR. G.TropakM. B.GravelR. A. “.Isolation and characterization of the human catalase gene”. Nucleic Acids Res. 19861453215335
  57. 57. MAKhanTania. M.ZhangD.ChenH. .Antioxidantenzymes.cancer2010Chin J Cancer Res 2228792
  58. 58. LevinsonD. F.MMMahtaniNancarrow. D. J.BrownD. M.KruglyakL.KirbyA.etal. “.Genomescan.ofschizophrenia”.AmJ.Psychiatry1998155741750
  59. 59. GóthL.RassP.PáyA. “.Catalase enzyme mutations and their association with Diseases”. Mol Diagn. 2004831419
  60. 60. VitoricaJ.MachadoA.SatrusteguiJ. “.Age-dependentvariations.inperoxide-utilizing.enzymesfrom.ratbrain.mitochondriacytoplasm”1984J Neurochem. 42351357
  61. 61. DrevetJ. R.FrancavillaF.FrancavillaS.FortiG. “.Glutathione peroxidases expression in the mammalian epididymis”. Andrology 20002000427461
  62. 62. Drevet JR.The antioxidant glutathione peroxidase family and spermatozoa: a complex story”. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 20062507079
  63. 63. ChuF. F.EsworthyR. S.HoY. S.BermeisterM.SwiderekK.ElliottR. W. “.Expression and chromosomal mapping of mouse Gpx2 gene encoding the gastrointestinal form of glutathione peroxidase, GPX-GI”. Biomed. Environ. 1997Sci. 1015662
  64. 64. TakahashiK.AvissarN.WhitinJ.CohenH.Purification and characterization of human plasma glutathione peroxidase: a selenoglycoprotein distinct from the known cellular enzyme. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 198725667786
  65. 65. YoshimuraS.WatanabeK.SuemizuH.OnozawaT.MizoguchiJ.etal. “.Tissue specific expression of the plasma glutathione peroxidase gene in rat kidney”. J. Biochem. 199110991823
  66. 66. ThomasJ. P.MaiorinoM.UrsiniF.GirottiA. W.1990Protective action of phospholipid hydroperoxide glutathione peroxidase against membrane-damaging lipid peroxidation. In situ reduction of phospholipid and cholesterol hydroperoxides”. J. Biol. Chem. 26545461
  67. 67. AraiM.ImaiH.KoumuraT.YoshidaM.EmotoK.etal. “.Mitochondrial phospholipid hydroperoxide glutathione peroxidase plays a major role in preventing oxidative injury to cells”. J. Biol. Chem. 1999274492433
  68. 68. NomuraK.ImaiH.KoumuraT.AraiM.NakagawaY. “.Mitochondrial phospholipid hydroperoxide glutathione peroxidase suppresses apoptosis mediated by a mitochondrial death pathway”. J. Biol. Chem. 199927429294302
  69. 69. al.Dual function of the selenoprotein PHGpx during sperm maturation. Science 1999285139396
  70. 70. KryukovG. V.CastellanoS.NovoselovS. V.LobanovA. V.ZehtabO.etal. .Characterization of mammalian selenoproteomes”. 2003Science 300143943
  71. 71. VernetP.RigaudiereN.GhyselinckN. B.DufaureJ. P.DrevetJ. R. “.In vitro expression of a mouse tissue specific glutathione-peroxidaselike protein lacking the selenocysteine can protect stably transfected mammalian cells against oxidative damage”. Biochem Cell Biol. 199674125131
  72. 72. VernetP.RockE.MazurA.RayssiguierY.DufaureJ. P.DrevetJ. R. “.Selenium-independent epididymis-restricted glutathione peroxidase5 protein (GPX5) can back up failing Se-dependent GPXs in mice subjected to selenium deficiency”. Mol Reprod Dev. 199954362370
  73. 73. HerbetteS.Roeckel-DrevetP.DrevetJ. R. “.Seleno-independentglutathione.peroxidasesMore than simple antioxidant scavengers”. FEBS J. 200727421632180
  74. 74. ChaboryE.DamonC.LenoirA.KauselmannG.KernH.ZevnikB.GarrelC.SaezF.CadetR.Henry-BergerJ.SchoorM.GottwaldU.HabenichtU.DrevetJ. R.VernetP.Epididymis selenoindependent glutathione peroxidase 5 (Gpx5) contributes to the maintenance of sperm DNA integrity. J Clin Invest. 200911920742085
  75. 75. BerkM. “.Neuroprogressionpathways.toprogressive.brainchanges.inbipolar.disorder”Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 20091244415
  76. 76. MeisterA. .Glutathionemetabolism.itsselective.modificationJ. Biol. Chem. 198826333172058
  77. 77. MannervikB. .Theenzymes.ofglutathione.metabolisman.overviewBiochem. Soc. Trans. 19871547178
  78. 78. KanzokS. M.FechnerA.BauerH.UlschmidJ. K.MüllerH. M.Botella-MunozJ.SchneuwlyS.SchirmerR.BeckerK. .Substitutionof.thethioredoxin.systemfor.glutathionereductase.inDrosophila.melanogaster2001Science 29155046436
  79. 79. Krauth-Siegel RL, Comini MA "Redox control in trypanosomatids, parasitic protozoa with trypanothione-based thiol metabolism".Biochim Biophys Acta 2008178011123648
  80. 80. Keen JH, Jakoby WB. “Glutathione transferases.Catalysis of nucleophilic reactions of glutathione”. J. Biol. Chem. 1978253565457
  81. 81. Hayes JD, Pulford DJ.The glutathione S-transferase supergene family: regulation of GST and the contribution of the isoenzymes to cancer chemoprotection and drug resistance”. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 199530445600
  82. 82. Armstrong RN. “Structure, catalytic mechanism, and evolution of the glutathione transferases”.Chem. Res. Toxicol. 199710218
  83. 83. Hayes JD, McLellan LI.Glutathione and glutathione-dependent enzymes represent a co-ordinately regulated defence against oxidative stress” Free Radic. Res. 199931273300
  84. 84. SheehanD.MeadeG.FoleyV. M.CADowd“.Structurefunction.evolutionof.glutathionetransferases.implicationsfor.classificationof.nonmammalianmembers.ofan.ancientenzyme.superfamily”Biochem. J. 2001360116
  85. 85. Ladner JE, Parsons JF, Rife CL, Gilliland GL, Armstrong RN.Parallel evolutionary pathways for glutathione transferases structure and mechanism of the mitochondrial class Kappa enzyme rGSTK1-1. Biochemistry 20044335261
  86. 86. RobinsonA.HuttleyG. A.BoothH. S.BoardP. G. “.Modelling and bioinformatics studies of the human Kappa class glutathione transferase predict a novel third transferase family with homology to prokaryotic 2-hydroxychromene-2-carboxylate isomerases”. Biochem J. 200437954152
  87. 87. Jakobsson-JP.MorgensternR.ManciniJ.Ford-HutchinsonA.PerssonB. “.Common structural features of MAPEG-a widespread superfamily of membrane associated proteins with highly divergent functions in eicosanoid and glutathione metabolism”. Protein Sci 1999868992
  88. 88. MannervikB.DanielsonU. H. “.Glutathione-structuretransferases.catalyticactivity”.Crit. Rev. Biochem. 198823283337
  89. 89. LovellM. A.XieC.MarkesberyW. R. “.Decreased glutathione transferase activity in brain and ventricular fluid in Alzheimer’s disease”. Neurology. 19985115621566
  90. 90. PearsonW. R.VorachekW. R.XuS. J.BergerR.HartI.VannaisD.etal. “.Identification of class-mu glutathione transferase genes GSTM1- GSTM5 on human chromosome 113Am J Hum Genet 1993
  91. 91. De JongJ. L.MohandasT.CPTu“.The human Hb (mu) class glutathione S-transferases are encoded by a dispersed gene family”. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 19911801522
  92. 92. SmithG.StanleyL. A.SimE.StrangeR. C.WolfC. R. “.Metabolic polymorphisms and cancer susceptibility.” Cancer Surv 1995252765
  93. 93. BaezS.Segura-AguilarJ.WiderstenM.ASJohanssonMannervik. B. “.Glutathione transferases catalyse the detoxication of oxidized metabolites (o-quinones) of catecholamines and may serve as an antioxidant system preventing degenerative cellular processes”. Biochem J 1997Pt 1):25-8.
  94. 94. Strange RC, Fryer AA. “The glutathione S-transferases: influence of polymorphism on cancer susceptibility”.IARC Sci Publ 1999199923149
  95. 95. Chenevix-TrenchG.YoungJ.CogganM.BoardP. “.GlutathioneS-transferase. M.polymorphismsT.susceptibilityto.coloncancer.ageof.onset”Carcinogenesis 19951616557
  96. 96. Champeet.alBiochemistry.FourthEdition.Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. 2008
  97. 97. SchmelzerC.LorenzG.RimbachG.DöringF. “.Influence of Coenzyme Q_{10} on release of pro-inflammatory chemokines in the human monocytic cell line THP-1”. Biofactors 2007
  98. 98. SchmelzerC.LorenzG.LindnerI.RimbachG.NiklowitzP.MenkeT.etal. “.Effects of Coenzyme Q10 on TNF-alpha secretion in human and murine monocytic cell lines”. Biofactors 20073113541
  99. 99. SchmelzerC.LindnerI.RimbachG.NiklowitzP.MenkeT.DöringF. “.Functions of coenzyme Q10 in inflammation and gene expression”. Biofactors 2008
  100. 100. Abd El-Gawad HM, Khalifa AE. “Quercetin, coenzyme Q10, and L-canavanine as protective agents against lipid peroxidation and nitric oxide generation in endotoxin-induced shock in rat brain”.Pharmacol.Res20014325763
  101. 101. Chaturvedi RK, Beal MF.Mitochondrial approaches for neuroprotectionAnn N Y Acad Sci 20081147395412
  102. 102. BarbatoJ. C. “.Haveno.fearMito. Q.ishere”.Hypertension200954222223
  103. 103. SmithR. A.MurphyM. P.Animal and human studies with the mitochondria-targeted antioxidant MitoQAnn. N.Y. 2010Acad. Sci. 12019610386
  104. 104. MercerJ. R.YuE.FiggN.ChengK. K.PrimeT. A.GriffinJ. L.MasoodiM.Vidal-PuigA.MurphyM. P.BennettM. R. “.The mitochondria targeted antioxidant MitoQ decreases features of the metabolic syndrome in ATM+ /− /ApoE− /− mice” Radical Biol. Med. 201252841849
  105. 105. LimS.RashidM. A.JangM.KimY.WonH.LeeJ.WooJ. T.KimY. S.MurphyM. P.AliL. “.Mitochondria-targeted antioxidants protect pancreatic β-cells against oxidative stress and improve insulin secretion in glucotoxicity and glucolipotoxicity”. Cell. Physiol.Biochem. 201128873886
  106. 106. WaniW. Y.GudupS.SunkariaA.BalA.SinghP. P.KandimallaR. J.SharmaD. R.GillK. D. “.Protective efficacy of mitochondrial targeted antioxidant MitoQ against dichlorvos induced oxidative stress and cell death in rat brainNeuropharmacology20116111931201
  107. 107. GaneE. J.WeilertF.OrrD. W.KeoghG. F.GibsonM.LockhartM. M.FramptonC. M.TaylorK. M.SmithR. A.MurphyM. P. “.The mitochondria-targeted anti-oxidant mitoquinone decreases liver damage in a phase II study of hepatitis C patients2010Liver Int. 3010191026
  108. 108. GaneE. J.WeilertF.OrrD. W.KeoghG. F.GibsonM.LockhartM. M.FramptonC. M.TaylorK. M.SmithR. A.MurphyM. P. “.The mitochondria-targeted anti-oxidant mitoquinone decreases liver damage in a phase II study of hepatitis C patients2010Liver Int. 3010191026
  109. 109. ZhaoK.ZhaoG. M.WuD.SoongY.BirkA. V.SchillerP. W.SzetoH. H. “.Cell-permeable peptide antioxidants targeted to inner mitochondrial membrane inhibit mitochondrial swelling, oxidative cell death, and reperfusion injury”J Biol Chem. 20042793468234690
  110. 110. Doughan AK, Dikalov SI.Mitochondrial redox cycling of mitoquinone leads to superoxide production and cellular apoptosisAntioxid Redox Signal. 2007918251836
  111. 111. Bakeeva LE, Barskov IV, Egorov MV, et al.Mitochondria-targeted plastoquinone derivatives as tools to interrupt execution of the aging program: 2. Treatment of some ros- and age-related diseases (heart arrhythmia, heart infarctions, kidney ischemia, and stroke)Biochemistry20087312881299
  112. 112. ZhaoK.ZhaoG. M.WuD.SoongY.BirkA. V.SchillerP. W.SzetoH. H. “.Cell-permeable peptide antioxidants targeted to inner mitochondrial membrane inhibit mitochondrial swelling, oxidative cell death, and reperfusion injury”2004J. Biol. Chem. 2793468234690
  113. 113. ChoJ.WonK.WuD.SoongY.LiuS.SzetoH. H.HongM. K.Potent mitochondria-targeted peptides reduce myocardial infarction in rats.2007Coron. Artery Dis. 18215220
  114. 114. AndersonE. J.LustigM. E.BoyleK. E.WoodliefT. L.KaneD. A.LinC. T.PriceI. I. I. J. W.KangL.RabinovitchP. S.SzetoH. al.MitochondrialH. O.emissioncellularredox.statelink.excessfat.intaketo.insulinresistance.inboth.rodentshumans2009J. Clin. Invest. 11957358
  115. 115. RochaM.Hernandez-MijaresA.Garcia-MalpartidaK.BanulsC.BellodL.VictorV. M. .Mitochondria-targetedantioxidant.peptides”2010Curr. Pharm. Des 1631243131
  116. 116. YamawakiH.HaendelerJ.BerkB. C. “.Thioredoxina.keyregulator.ofcardiovascular.homeostasis”Circ Res 20039310291033
  117. 117. ChoC. G.KimH. J.ChungS. W.JungK. J.ShimK. H.YuB. P.YodoiJ.ChungH. Y. “.Modulation of glutathione and thioredoxin systems by calorie restriction during the aging processExp Gerontol 200338539548
  118. 118. Arné. r. E. S.HolmgrenA. “.Physiological functions of thioredoxin and thioredoxin reductaseEur J Biochem 200026761026109
  119. 119. KimY. C.YamaguchiY.KondoN.MasutaniH.YodoiJ. “.Thioredoxin-dependent redox regulation of the antioxidant responsive element (ARE) in electrophile response”Oncogene20032218601865
  120. 120. PerryJ. J.ShinD. S.GetzoffE. D.TainerJ. A.The structural biochemistry of the superoxide dismutases.Biochim Biophys Acta 20101804245262
  121. 121. RheeS. G.YangK. S.KangS. W.WooH. A.ChangT. S. “.Controlled elimination of intracellular H2O2: regulation of peroxiredoxin, catalase, and glutathione peroxidase via post-translational modification” Antioxid. Redox Signaling 20057619626
  122. 122. UngvariZ.Bailey-DownsL.GautamT.SosnowskaD.WangM.MonticoneR. E.TelljohannR.PintoJ. CaboR.SonntagW. E.LakattaE.CsiszarA.Age-associated vascular oxidative stress, nrf2 dysfunction and nf-kb activation in the non-human primate macaca mulattaJ Gerontol Biol Med Sci. 201166866875
  123. 123. CaboR.SonntagW. E.CsiszarA.Vascular oxidative stress in aging: a homeostatic failure due to dysregulation of nrf2mediated antioxidant response Am J Physiol. 2011H363-H372.
  124. 124. CantrellD. A.Phosphoinositide“.3-kinasesignalling.pathways”J.Cell Sci. 200111414391445
  125. 125. Leslie N.R., Downes C.P., “PTEN: The down side of PI 3-kinase signaling”.Cell. Signal. 200214285295
  126. 126. Kwon J., Lee S.R., Yang K.S., Ahn Y., Kim Y.J., Stadtman E.R., Rhee S.G., “Peroxiredoxin as a Peroxidase for as well as a Regulator and Sensor of Local Peroxides”.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 20041011641916424
  127. 127. LeeS. R.YangK. S.KwonJ.LeeC.JeongW.RheeS. G. J. “.Reversible Inactivation of the Tumor Suppressor PTEN by H2O2Biol. Chem. 20022772033620342
  128. 128. Seo J.H., Ahn Y., Lee S.R., Yeol Yeo C., Chung Hur K., “The major target of the endogenously generated reactive oxygen species in response to insulin stimulation is phosphatase and tensin homolog and not phosphoinositide-3 kinase (PI-3 kinase) in the PI-3 kinase/Akt pathway”.Mol. Biol. Cell 200516348357
  129. 129. KopsG. J.DansenT. B.PoldermanP. E.SaarloosI.WirtzK. W.CofferP. J.HuangT. T.BosJ. L.MedemaR. H.BMBurgeringForkhead transcription factor FOXO3a protects quiescent cells from oxidative stress”Nature2002419316321
  130. 130. Sakamoto K., Iwasaki K., Sugiyama H., Tsuji Y., Role of the tumor suppressor PTEN in antioxidant responsive element-mediated transcription and associated histone modifications.Mol. Biol. Cell 20092016061617
  131. 131. Sara VR, Hall K.,“Insulin-like growth factors and their binding proteins”.Physiol Rev 199070591613
  132. 132. JDVeldhuisLiem. A. Y.SouthS.WeltmanA.WeltmanJ.ClemmonsD. A.AbbottR.MulliganT.JohnsonM. L.PincusS.StraumeM.IranmaneshA. “.Differential impact of age, sex steroid hormones, and obesity on basal versus pulsatile growth hormone secretion in men as assessed in an ultrasensitive chemiluminescence assay”J Clin Endocrinol Metab 19958032093222
  133. 133. CedaG. P.Dall’AglioE.MaggioM.LauretaniF.BandinelliS.FalzoiC.GrimaldiW.CeresiniG.CorradiF.FerrucciL.ValentiG.HoffmanA. R.Clinicalimplications.ofthe.reducedactivity.of-Ithe. G. H.-IG. F.axisin.oldermen.J Endocrinol Invest 20052896100
  134. 134. LaronZ.Shortstature.dueto.geneticdefects.affectinggrowth.hormoneactivity.N Engl J 1996Med 334463465
  135. 135. WuA.GrantD. B.HambleyJ.LeviA. J. .Reduced serum somatomedin activity in patients with chronic liver disease"Clin Sci Mol Med 197447359366
  136. 136. KenyonC.ChangJ.GenschE. A. “. C.elegans mutant that lives twice as long as wild type.” Nature1993366461464
  137. 137. MirpuriE.García-TrevijanoE. R.Castilla-CortazarI.BerasainC.QuirogaJ.Rodriguez-OrtigosaC.MatoJ. M.PrietoJ.MAAvila“.Alteredliver.geneexpression.inC.Cl4-cirrhoticrats.ispartially.normalizedby.insulin-likegrowth.factor-I”Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 20023424252
  138. 138. García-FernándezM.Castilla-CortázarI.Díaz-SanchezM.NavarroI.PucheJ. E.CastillaA.CasaresA. D.ClavijoE.González-BarónS. “.Antioxidant effects of insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) in rats with advanced liver cirrosis”. BMC Gastroenterol. 2005
  139. 139. KnegtR. J.PayerasM.QuirogaJ.SangroB.HerreroJ. I.Castilla-CortazarI.FrystykJ.FlyvbjergA.YoshizawaC.JansenP. L.ScharschmidtB.PrietoJ. “.Insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) replacement therapy increases albumin concentration in liver cirrhosis: results of a pilot randomized controlled clinical trial”J Hepatol. 2005436306
  140. 140. Castilla-CortázarI.García-FernándezM.DelgadoG.PucheJ. E.SierraI.BarhoumR.González-BarónS. “.Hepatoprotectionneuroprotectioninduced.bylow.doses-Iof. I. G. F.inI.agingrats”.JE, Sierra I, Barhoum R, González-Barón S “Hepatoprotection and neuroprotection induced by low doses of IGF-II in aging rats”J Transl Med. 2011103 EOF
  141. 141. Garcia-FernandezM.SierraI.PucheJ. E.GuerraL.Castilla-CortazarI. “.Liver mitochondrial dysfunction is reverted by insulin-like growth factor II (IGF-II) in aging rats”J Transl Med. 2011123 EOF

Written By

Úrsula Muñoz Morón and Inma Castilla-Cortázar

Submitted: November 10th, 2011 Published: October 3rd, 2012