Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Effects of Heat Treatments on the Thermoluminescence and Optically Stimulated Luminescence of Nanostructured Aluminate Doped with Rare-Earth and Semi-Metal Chemical Element

Written By

Sonia Hatsue Tatumi, Alexandre Ventieri, José Francisco Sousa Bitencourt, Katia Alessandra Gonçalves, Juan Carlos Ramirez Mittani, René Rojas Rocca and Shiva do Valle Camargo

Submitted: December 8th, 2011Reviewed: July 9th, 2012Published: September 26th, 2012

DOI: 10.5772/51414

Chapter metrics overview

4,202 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

1. Introduction

Ionizing radiation dosimetry plays a very important role in several fields, useful in the ordinary life, such as radiotherapy, nuclear medicine diagnosis, nuclear medicine, radioisotope power systems, earth science, geological and archaeological dating methods, etc.

The phenomenon of Thermoluminescence (TL) has been known since 1663, when Robert Boyle notified the "Royal Society" in London, which observed the emission of light by a diamond when it was heated in the dark [1]. Afterwards, a large number of scientists began to work with TL; as did Henri Becquerel, whose work described IR measurements spectra [2] and the effect of TL, too. Marie Curie, in 1904, noted that the TL properties of the crystals could be restored by exposing them to radiation from the radio element mentioned in her doctoral thesis. In the middle of the 1930’s and 1940’s, Urbach performed experimental and theoretical work with TL [1] and in 1945 Randall and Wilkins developed a first theoretical model [3] of thermoluminescent emission kinetics.

The use of thermoluminescence in dosimetry date from 1940, when the number of people working on places with radiation sources such as hospitals, nuclear reactors etc. exposed to ionizing radiations (-rays, X rays, α and β-particles, UVA and UVB) increased and efforts to develop new types of dosimeters began [4]. Among the pioneers of TLD we have Daniels, 1953, with LiF, Bjarngard, 1967 with CaSO4 and Ginther and Kirk (1957) with CaF2. After these works search in other materials such as natural fluorides or synthetic as, LiBO3:Mn, CaF2:Dy, CaSO4 and MgSiO4:Tb. They usually obtained as monocrystalline samples Czochralski, Bridgmann, etc.

However, Cameron, 1961, with their research on the application of LiF: Mg and Ti obtained the first thermoluminescence dosimeter (TLD-100) [5], which is still one of most popular TLD phosphor, due to tissue equivalent Zeff = 8.04, which is an important characteristic for personal dosimetry. Akselrod et al., 1990 [6] carried out studies on TL properties of carbon doped Al2O3 (TLD-500), a very sensitive material to radiation exposure, showing few TL peaks, with dose interval of detection between 0.05 µ to 10 Gy and fading rate of 3% by year (when kept in the dark). This high sensitivity of the material is attributed to oxygen vacancies created during the crystal growth procedure; the electrons can be trapped at these vacancies creating F- and F+ centers, which act as recombination centers yielding a bright emission.

In order to increase the luminescence emission response with dose of some thermoluminescence dosimeters (TLD), heat treatments procedures were frequently performed. Halperin et al., 1959, [7] noted that the thermal treatment enhanced the intensity of various TL glow peaks of NaCl by factors of a few thousands; on prolonged heat treatment. They observed that the intensity of TL peaks locate above RT decreased, while those at lower temperatures continued to grow even after 80 hours of heat treatment at 550 °C. Mehendru, 1970 [8], studied the effects of heat treatment on the TL response of pure KCl; they associated the peaks at 95, 135, and 190 °C with the F centers, these last created due to the background divalent cation impurities, and with the first- and the second-stage F centers, respectively. Kitis et al., 1990 [9], studied the sensitization of LiF:Mg, Ti as a function of irradiation at elevated temperatures, pre-irradiation annealing, and post irradiation annealing between 150–400 °C; the results showed that the first and third conditions cause an enhancement of the sensitivity; after more two works about preheating and high temperature annealing on TL glow curves of LiF:Mg, Ti [10] and in LiF TLD100 [11] were published. Holgate, 1994, [12] investigated TL and radioluminescence (RL) spectra of calcium fluoride samples doped with neodymium and variations of spectra with Nd concentrations and thermal treatments were observed. Nowadays, it is possible to find oxides, sulfates, sulfides and alkali haloids doped with rare-earths and transition metals as commercial dosimeters.

The optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) was pioneered used to determine environmental radiation dose received by geological samples [13]. However, the idea of using OSL dosimetry was first suggested in 1956 [14]. The first experience was made using MgS, CaS, SrS and SrSe phosphors doped with different rare-earths [15,16]. Nanto et al., 1993 [17], investigated the OSL properties of single crystals of KCl:Eu; after, Akselrod et al. 1998 [18], proposed the use of Al2O3:C for OSL dosimetry, because the high sensitivity of the crystal to visible light. At the present time, the crystal is the principal OSL dosimeter [19-22]. Currently, there are various materials proposed for OSL dosimetry as KBr:Eu [23,24], LiAlO2:Tb, Li2Al2O4:Tb, Mg2SiO4:Tb, Mg2SiO4:Tb, Co CaSiO3:Tb [25]. Some morphological studies was introduced in the science of OSL materials, using high-resolution microscope (TEM) coupled to punctual electron diffraction analysis in nanoscale, showed that dopants formed nanocrystalline structure located at surface of the matrix elements as Al2O3:Mg, Yb:Er, Nd and KAlSi3O8:Mn [26-30].

Nowadays, luminescent dosimetry materials can be used in personal dosimetry, radiotherapy, nuclear medicine and diagnostic and environmental dosimetry they are widely used due to high sensitivity, linear response to the dose, the response is independent with radiation energy (within a certain range), their reusability, etc.

The aim of this chapter is to present a very comprehensive research about new materials consisting in aluminate crystals doped with rare-earths, for radiation dosimetry using TL and OSL.

Some features on fabrication of aluminates dosimeters will be shown relating the luminescence response according to the relative concentration of several rare-earths and transition metals. A study in nanoscale effects, size, shape and surface morphology using TEM, SEM, EDS and electron diffraction measurements will be shown too. The physicochemical properties of the doped materials are strongly related to the fabrication process as well the experimental parameters as temperature of thermal treatments, calcination time, heating rates, etc.

As materials science has developed down to nanoscale, the exceptional properties of nanoscaled rare-earth materials are only now being recognized and performed intentionally.


2. Experimental part

Polycrystalline powder samples of α-Al2O3:Er, Yb; Mg; Tb and Nd were obtained by sol-gel and Pechini process. In the sol-gel procedure stoichiometric amounts of tri-sec-butoxide of aluminum was dissolved in distilled water and hydrochloric acid. The dopants Er, Yb, Nd and Tb oxides were added during the sol stage, with different concentrations. Some portions of the resulting powder were calcinated at different temperature from 1200 to 1600 °C. Experimental parameters of the calcination process, as heating and cooling rates and set point values were varied, in order to verify the effect on the luminescence response.

Pechini is a chemical routine that produces, at the end of the stage, an organic polymer with metallic ions, which will be responsible for the formation of the desired material. The polymer is obtained after low temperature reaction among ethylene glycol, citric acid and aluminum nitrate. Once the polymer is ready, a number of heat treatments are carried out in order to (1) collapse the polymeric structure and allow the gradual oxidation reaction of the metallic ions with atmospheric oxygen, and (2) obtain the desired structure of the material. This technique is known to obtain uniform composition and controlled grain size distribution, due to the slow oxidation reaction and the viscosity of the polymer, which avoid precipitation.

The morphological characteristics of the samples were analyzed using a Philips CM200 TEM equipped with EDS operating at 160 keV, some Cu contamination from the sample holder can be observed in the all the EDS results, the samples were located at 400 mm from the source. The X-ray powder diffractions were recorded with the MiniFlex II model diffractometer of Rigaku Corporation.

TL and OSL measurements were performed in an oxygen-free nitrogen atmosphere using Daybreak Nuclear and Medical Systems Inc, model 1100-series TL/OSL reader and RISØ TL/OSL reader Model DA - 20.

TL was detected using the BG-39 (340-610 nm) optical filter and heating rate of 10 °C/s. OSL measurements were made using an array of blue (470 nm) LEDs for sample stimulation and detected in the UV with a Schott U-340 optical filter.

The irradiations were performed at RT in a 60Co source with dose rate of 28.7 Gy/h and with a beta source (90Sr/90Y) coupled to the RISØ TL/OSL reader, with dose rate of 0.08 Gy/s.


3. Results and discussion

3.1. XRD

Figure 1a shows the XRD of pure alumina produced by sol –gel without any dopants. A very well agreement with standard α-Al2O3 pattern is observed (Figure1a). On the other hand, doped samples show additional peaks related with new structures formed by the dopants and the alumina matrix, for example, in the case of Tb doped samples it was verified the Tb3Al5O12 crystalline structure (Figure 1b), and for Nd doped sample the AlNd structure (Figure 1c).

Sample doped with Er and Yb and calcinated at 1200 °C supplied a broad background, related to amorphous phase, and many other peaks associated to Yb2O3, Er2O3 and Yb3Al5O12. For the sample calcinated at 1600°C it was not observed the background, but the peaks of Yb2O3, Er2O3 with predominance of the Yb3Al5O12 (Figure 1d and e) were noted.

Figure 2 shows XRD patterns of alumina powder obtained by Pechini process. Applying crescent calcinations temperatures, we can obtain alumina in gamma and alpha phase (Figure 2a and 2b). The Mg addition promoted the formations of MgAl2O4 crystals (Figure 2c). When the doped sample is heated up to 1100 °C (Figure 2d), most of the material is converted to α-Al2O3, except for a few low intensity peaks related to the occurrence of magnesium spinel (MgAl2O4). This observation will be corroborated in the next section through TEM images.

3.2. Thermoluminescence

TL glow curves of samples obtained with different calcinations temperatures, and detected in UV and VIS regions are shown in Figure 3a and 3b, respectively. It can be seen that calcinations at 1600 °C favored the increase of 190 °C TL dosimetric peak and diminution on intensity of high temperature peak simultaneously. The TL intensity in VIS region is higher than those found in the UV one.

Figure 1.

XRD pattern of the α-Al2O3 samples, a) undoped sample, b) doped with Tb, c) doped with Nd, d) Er and Yb (1 and 2 mol%) doped and calcinated at 1200 °C and (e) Er and Yb (1 and 2 mol%) and calcinated at 1600 °C.

Figure 2.

XRD patterns from Al2O3 samples obtained from Pechini routine. a) shows undoped samples annealed at 600 and 900 °C and standard patterns found for -Al2O3 and α-Al2O3. b) shows XRD from undoped sample annealed at 1100 °C and the standard α-Al2O3. Magnesium doped sample annealed at 900 °C is shown in (c) with the standard pattern of magnesium spinel (MgAl2O4). After annealing at 1100 °C, magnesium doped sample produced the XRD shown in (d).

Figure 3c and 3d show results of TL responses in UV and VIS regions with set point times varying of 30 min, 1, 2, 4 and 8 h. In the UV region, the thermal treatment of 4 h promoted a high increment of the 190 °C peak while in VIS region, the time was of 8 h. It is known from literature that the emission mechanism of these two luminescence regions is different. In the case of UV emission, the responsible is the F+ center according the mechanism:

F+h+F+*F++325nm(stimulation process,TL/OSL)E1

Where the recombination of the F center with a hole (h+) generates an excited F+*, which decays into the ground state (transition 1B 1A) emitting a photon at 325 nm. Therefore, the calcinations at 1600 °C stimulated an increase of F centers concentration.

In the other case of VIS emission, it is believed that the luminescence occurs as follows [31, 32]:

FF++e-(irradiation process)E2
F++e-F*F+410-420nm(heating process,TL)E3

Figure 3.

TL glow curves of pure alumina samples obtained by sol-gel process, study of effects of calcination temperatures and time on the TL response. a) UV emission with different calcinations temperatures; b) VIS emission with different calcinations temperatures; c) UV emission with different set-point times and d) VIS emission with different set-point times.

Where F center loses an electron after absorption of high energy radiation and become F+ center. On thermal stimulation, the recombination of the electron and the F+ center produces an excited F center (F*), which decays into its ground state (3P transition state 3S) with the emission of photons at 410-420 nm.

Therefore, following our results the long set point time (~ 8 h) favored the electron traps formations, and in the case of UV emission we have the great rate of formation of hole traps after 4 hours of calcinations.

Figure 4 shows TL glow curves of pure alumina obtained with different heating and cooling rates. In all cases the slow rate of 3 °C/min supplied the best result, confirming that longer calcinations time can promote a better diffusion of the defects and ions and also eliminates the internal tension forces in the crystalline lattice, which can homogenize the crystal.

TL glow curves of the samples doped with Er and Yb are shown in the Figure 5a and 5b. Samples calcinated at 1200 °C supplied one peak at high temperature (Figure 5a), which did not increase proportionally to the dose and another peak at low temperature region with very low intensity. After calcinations at 1600 °C, two prominent peaks at 224 °C and 442 °C were observed (Figure 5b). For the sample doped with Er (1 mol %) and Yb (2 mol %), the peak temperature changed to 203 °C and an increment about 1.4 time in the TL intensity was observed. In all the samples, the TL response of the high temperature peak is not proportional to the dose. For samples doped with Tb (2.5 mol%) and Nd (2.5 mol%) an increased in UV intensity of the 190 °C peak was also noted, the first one increased 3.5 times and for Nd was 2.5 times, when compared to undoped one (Figure 5c).

Figure 4.

TL glow curve of pure alumina samples obtained by sol-gel process a) UV emission with different heating rates b) VIS emission with different heating rates; c) UV emission with different cooling rates d) VIS emission with

Figure 6 shows TL glow curves of pure and Mg doped samples obtained by Pechini process, the curves are slightly different from those obtained by sol-gel. High intensities for 190 °C TL peak from pure samples were obtained at 1100 oC for VIS region (Figure 6a) and at 1350 °C for UV one (Figure 6b). On sample doped with Mg high intensities were detected in both cases UV and VIS with calcinations at 1600 °C, the same value found in sol-gel samples.

Figure 6 shows TL glow curves for samples produced via Pechini method. As the calcination temperature increases, different observations can be made, depending on the composition and the measurement spectra. In Figure 6a, showing TL emission of undoped sample in the visible region, all the peaks intensities decrease for higher temperatures, but mainly low temperature (90 °C) and high temperature (410 °C) peaks. In this case, the best sample would be the one calcinated at 1350 °C, due to its high intensity and low competition among the trapping centers (more stable TL signal). High temperature treatments can destroy as well as create trapping and recombination centers, and that explains why some TL peaks may disappear, whilst others may rise or increase.

Figure 5.

TL glow curve of α-Al2O3 obtained by sol gel: a) doped with Er, Yb (1, 2 mol%), calcinated at 1200 °C and irradiated with -rays, b) doped with Er, Yb (1, 2 mol%), calcinated at 1600 °C and irradiated with -rays and c) TL glow curve UV emission of sample doped with Nd (2.5 %) (black open circle) and Tb (2.5 %) (red triangle), both calcinated at 1600 °C and irradiated with 10 Gy.

Figure 6.

TL glow curves from Al2O3 (a and b) and Al2O3:Mg (c and d) samples obtained from Pechini routine and annealed at 1100, 1350 and 1600 °C. Measurements were taken in both visible (a and c) and UV (b and d) spectra.

Figure 6b is the TL emission of undoped sample in the UV region, which indicates that high temperature peaks tend to fade when the sample is calcinated at higher temperatures. Once again, the sample calcinated at 1350 °C showed the best glow curve. For the undoped sample, calcination at 1600 °C seems to increase the competition, which decreases the overall intensity. It is not likely that the high temperature is damaging the material, since the melting point is still too far away (around 2050 °C). Also, the high temperature may be causing the crystallites to grow, decreasing the surface area exposed to the incoming radiation, thus changing the trapping dynamics at some level.

The incorporation of magnesium atoms in the crystalline lattice made a great deal on the TL response of the samples. In the first place, both visible and UV emissions (Figures 6c and 6d, respectively) increased with the increasing of the calcination temperature, which was not observed for undoped samples. Secondly, the high temperature peak (355 °C) of the visible emission had its intensity increased by a factor of 3; a minor difference on the relation between the main dosimetric peak and the high temperature one was also observed for the UV emission.

It is important to observe that only samples calcinated above 1100 °C exhibited some appreciable TL emission; this means that α-Al2O3 acts as a better ionizing radiation sensor than other phases (δ and ). For samples calcinated below that temperature (600 and 900 °C), most of the trapping and recombination centers may not yet be active.

One reason for the high luminescence of α-Al2O3:C comes from the theory of point defects. It is known that the synthesis of carbon doped alumina is done in a highly reductive atmosphere of carbon ions, resulting into a great production of oxygen vacancies in the crystalline lattice. If these vacancies are occupied by two electrons we have the formation of the neutral F center. Otherwise, if the vacancy is occupied by only one electron, we have the formation of F+ center. In the latter situation, the presence of charge compensation is demanded for the F+ center formation; in the case of the α-Al2O3:C it is C2+ impurity, which replaces Al3+ ion in the crystalline lattice. In our case we suppose that the Mg is acting as C impurity.

3.3. Thermoluminescence spectra

TL spectra of pure and doped with Tb, Er-Yb, and Nd alumina are shown in Figures 7a) to 7d) respectively. On visible region from 360 to 600 nm luminescence bands due to rare-earth elements are observed on doped samples. However all the samples pure and doped showed an intense luminescence band between 650 and 800 nm not identified yet in the literature. However, from fluorescence results, this band is usually associated to Cr3+ impurity incorporated in raw materials used for alumina production [33].

When the dopant are incorporated, other bands are detected related to the rare-earth elements (Figure 7b, 7c, and 7d). The Tb doped sample shows, in addition for the first at 694 nm, another broad band at 428 nm, with 187 nm of width, due to the transitions of Tb3+. The results are in agreements with the transitions of 5D3 and 5D47Fj (j=1-6).

Figure 7.

TL spectra of Alumina, a) undoped sample, b) Tb doped sample, c) Er and Yb doped sample, d) Nd doped sample.

In the case of Al2O3:Er:Yb sample, the band is centered at 528 nm (448-589 nm) and the emission mechanism can be related to these rare-earth elements. It is well known that Er3+ has high efficiency for the infrared to visible light conversion and cooperative sensitization properties. The 4I11/2 (Er3+) level and 2F5/2 (Yb3+) state are very closely matched in energy, thus the exposition from the 0.9 to 1.1 µm range will excite both Er3+ and Yb3+ ions. The visible emission can occurs because the Yb3+ transfers the excitation energy to Er3+ and the final state of this process is the population of the 4F7/2 state and nonradiative relaxation to the 4S3/2 level, from which green photon (547 nm) is emitted. The excitation routes for red emission at 660 nm are not clear yet; in this case the Yb3+ transfer energy to Er3+ and the red emission occurs in the 4F9/24I15/2 transition [34].

For Nd doped sample, it was noted emission at 396 nm (364-460 nm). It is known that Nd3+ can emit in UV region and the possible transitions related to these emissions are: 4D5/2 4D3/2 4P3/24I9/2; 4D5/2 4D3/2 4P3/24I11/2 [35].

3.4. Optically stimulated luminescence

As seen in TL emission curves showed previously, the response of OSL signal also increased for samples calcinated at high temperatures, for both samples obtained by sol-gel (Figure 8a) and Pechini process (Figure 8b). Figure 8c and 8d show an example of OSL increment about 3 times, after calcination at 1600 °C.

OSL decays can be fitted by exponential functions [36], depending on the number of the traps involved in the process, for example for two traps we have:


Where IOSL is the total OSL intensity, I1 and I2 are the initial intensities of exponentially decaying from faster and slower components of the shinedown curve; 1 and 2 the respective decay constants.

Sample –
Pechini Process
temperature (°C)
Al2O316002.27±0.0511.5 ± 0.2
Al2O3: Mg11002.49±0.0913.8±0.6
Al2O3: Mg13502.6±0.112.6±0.9
Al2O3: Mg16002.22±0.0511.3±0.3
Sol Gel Process
Al2O3 :Yb:Er160022.5±1.0-0-
Al2O3: Nd160013.3±0.854±11

Table 1.

Values for decay constants obtained from theoretical fitting of the OSL curves of alumina (equation 4).

Table 1 shows the decay constants obtained for the studied samples. All the OSL decay curves can be fitted by second order exponential function, except for Er and Yb doped sample, which followed first order decay. For samples obtained by Pechini process the high temperatures calcinations diminished the constants values, the fast component value for both pure and Mg doped samples heated at 1600 °C supplied almost same constants decays. In the case of samples made by sol-gel, the Tb doped sample has constants similar to those determined by pure alumina. However, the incorporation of Nd, Er and Yb changed the constants values. The OSL curves of the samples obtained by sol-gel supplied greatest decay constants. Yang et al. [37] showed some OSL fitting results of α-Al2O3: C excited by green light and detected in the UV, and they found that 1 vary from 4.6 to 11.3 s-1 and 2 from 24.1 to 30.1 s-1. They attributed the variations to different concentrations of F and F+ centers in the sample. Nevertheless, our results indicated that values are constant and do not depend of dose values delivered to the samples, the results for 1 are similar to those found in the literature, however 2 are relatively higher.

Figure 8.

OSL curves of alumina, a) undoped samples obtained by sol-gel with different calcinations temperatures, b) undoped samples obtained by Pechini process with different calcinations temperatures, c) Er, Yb doped samples calcinated at 1200 °C and irradiated with gamma-radiations, d) Er, Yb doped samples calcinated at 1600 °C and irradiated with gamma-radiations and e) Nd and Tb doped samples calcinated at 1600°C.

3.5. TEM

According to TEM images, it was verified that all the doped samples present nanocrystals formations on the surface of alumina grains (Figure 9a). In Tb doped sample, it was verified the presence of Tb3Al5O12, the chemical structure was determined by electron diffraction and EDS results (Figure 9b). Nanocrystals of AlNd are easily observed with its well developed faces (Figure 10a), in most of the case, the nanocrystals average size is about 200 nm, these aluminates composition was also verified by the EDS (Figure 10b).

Figure 9.

TEM image from Tb doped Al2O3 and electron diffraction showing the presence of nanocrystals of Tb3Al5O12. b) EDS results with Tb peak.

Figure 10.

a) TEM image from Nd doped Al2O3, b) EDS results with Nd peak.

Figure 11a) shows an example of TEM images obtained for α-Al2O3 doped with 1mol% of Er and 2mol% of Yb, and calcinated at 1200 °C. EDS analysis show the presence of Er and Yb dopants in the α-Al2O3. Electron diffraction analysis identified the crystal as Yb2O3, however by XRD analysis showed plus two new composition in the samples doped and attributed to Er2O3 and Yb3Al5O12 (Figure 1e). The results of TEM analysis give the following average nanocrystals diameters D = (36±2) nm for the sample calcinated at 1200 °C and D=(182±8) nm for sample calcinated at 1600 °C (Figures 9 d), these results and the homogeneity in the crystalline size suggests that the nanocrystal powder growth is depending on thermal treatment temperature. The growth and cluster formations of the nanocrystals are the consequence of the reduction of grain boundary area and therefore the total energy of the system.

In the case of Mg doped alumina there is a formation of Mg spinel (magnesium aluminate) nanocrystals dispersed on the surface of alumina grains, with size about 40 nm (Figure 12). It is considered that the high temperature calcination makes magnesium atoms to diffuse to the surface of the clusters, creating a thin layer of magnesium spinel, due to the high local concentration of the dopant.

Figure 11.

Results of TEM, EDS and Electron diffraction analysis obtained for for α-Al2O3 doped with 1 mol% ofErand 2 mol% ofYb, and calcinated at 1200oC and 1600°C, (a) TEM images sample calcinated at 1200oC, (b) TEM images sample calcinated at 1600°C.

Figure 12.

TEM image from magnesium doped Al2O3. It is considered that the high temperature annealing makes magnesium atoms to diffuse to the surface of the clusters, creating a thin layer of magnesium spinel.


4. Conclusions

Polycrystalline powder of α-Al2O3 was successfully obtained using sol-gel and Pechini process. A second phase was found in doped samples, forming nanocrystals of aluminates and lanthanides oxides on the surface of alumina grains. We did not observe the incorporations of the dopants inside the alumina structure. Strongly dependent of temperature calcinations, the nanocrystallinity of the sample was retained after calcinations at higher temperatures, and an increase in the crystallite size was already perceptible.

The average diameter of nanocrystals depended on the dopant specie: for Yb and Er doped samples, it was D = (36 ± 2) nm for the sample calcinated at 1200 °C and D= (182 ± 8) nm for one calcinated at 1600 °C, therefore increased by 5 times. The approximately size of the AlNd is 200 nm for sample calcinated at 1600 °C during 4 h and for Tb3Al5O12 crystals the size is about 300 nm in the same calcination conditions.

The TL emission mechanism in the visible region can be related to F center and to the lanthanide (Ln) relaxation. During the irradiation the Ln3+ ion is reduced to Ln2+. It is not completely known if the reduction is due to the transfer of an electron or a hole; however, the process of reduction of trivalent lanthanide ions by irradiation was previously verified in literature [18, 19]. During thermal stimulation an electron can recombine with the Ln2+ forming Ln3+* in excited state, which emits a photons returning on this way to the ground state. In the case of Mg spinel, probably the Mg ions promoted the oxygen vacancies stabilization, improving the luminescence response in the visible spectra, causing the main peak to increase 5 times in comparison with the undoped sample. It is believed that the occurrence of the nanometric spinel layer created an interface between both materials (Al2O3/MgAl2O4) with high concentration of defects.

OSL shinedown curves, supplied by undoped samples calcinated to 1200 and 1600 °C, could be fitted by second for all the samples except to α-Al2O3:Yb, Er, which was fitted by first order exponential decay. TL intensity of 190 °C peak and OSL responses with the dose increased linear for low doses region, from 80 to 1000 mGy, and the minimum dose detected value was 5 mGy obtained for TL (UV) and 350 µGy for OSL α-Al2O3 + Tb3Al5O12.

In summary, calcination conditions are of great importance for materials production that are being used as radiation sensors, once it greatly influences the stabilization of intrinsic defects, diffusion of dopants and the occurrence of new phases, due to the incorporation of dopants alongside the matrix, and others. These new phases also seem to play an important role in the luminescence emissions, due to the creation of new trapping and recombination centers, producing materials with unique properties that can be exploited to obtain better dosimeters.


The authors wish to thanks to FAPESP, CAPES and CNPq for financial support.


  1. 1.Aitken MJ1985Thermoluminescence Dating. Academic Press. 3 p.
  2. 2.Becquerel AH1883Maxima et Minima d’excitinction de al Phosphorescence sous l’Influence des Radiations Infra-rouge. Comptes Rendus9618531856.
  3. 3.Randall JT, Wilkins MHF1945Phosphorescence and Electron Traps. I. The study of Trap Distributions. Proc. Royal Soc. Lond.184366389.
  4. 4.McKeever SWS1985Thermoluminescence of Solids. Cambridge University Press. 8 p.
  5. 5.CameronJ. R.SuntharalingamN.KenneyG. N.1968Thermoluminescent Dosimetry. University of Wisconsin Press.
  6. 6.Akselrod MS, Kortov VS, Kravetsky DJ, Gotlib VI1990High Sensitive Thermoluminescent Anion-Defect α-Al2O3: C Single Crystal Detectors. Radiat. Prot. Dosim.33119122.
  7. 7.HalperinA.KristianpollerN.Ben-Zvi1959, Kristianpoller N, Ben-Zvi A (1959) Thermoluminescence of X-Ray Colored NaCl Crystals. Phys. Rev.11610811089.
  8. 8.Mehendru PC1970Effects of Heat Treatment and Background Divalent Cation Impurity on the Growth of F Centers in Highly Pure KCl Crystals. Phys. Rev. B1809814.
  9. 9.KitisG.CharitidisC.Charalambous1990(1990) Thermoluminescence Sensitization of LiF: Mg, Ti Under Heat Treatment Between 150 and 400 °C. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms 51, 3:263 EOF268 EOF.
  10. 10.Piters TM,1996os AJJ, Van der Burg B (1996) Effects of Annealing on Glow Peak Paramenters of LiF: Mg, Ti (TLD-100) Dosimetry Material. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 84, 1-4: 201-206.
  11. 11.Bhatt BC, Menon SN, Mitra1999(1999) Effects of Pre- and Post-Irradiation Temperature Treatments on TL Characteristics and Radiation Induced Sensitisation of Various TL Peaks in LiF (TLD-100). Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 84, 1-4:175 EOF178 EOF.
  12. 12.Holgate SA, Sloane TH, Townsend PD, White DR, Chadwick AV1994Thermoluminescence of Calcium Fluoride doped with Neodymium. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter692559266.
  13. 13.Huntley DJ, Godfrey-Smith DI, Thewalt MLW1985Optical Dating of Sediments: Nature313105107.
  14. 14.Antonov-Romanovsky VV, Keirum-Markus IF, Poroshina MS, Trapeznikova ZA1956IR Stimulable Phosphors. Conference of Academy of Sciences of the USSR on the peaceful uses of Atomic energy. USAEC Report AEC-tr-2435 Pt.1239250.
  15. 15.BräunlichP.SchafferD.Scharmann1967(1967) A Simple Model for Thermoluminescence and Thermally Stimulated Conductivity of Inorganic Photoconducting Phosphors and Experiments Pertaining to Infra-Red Stimulated Luminescence. Luminescence Dosimetry:5763.
  16. 16.Sanborn EN, Beard EL1967Sulfides of Strontium, Calcium and Magnesium in Infrared-Stimulated Luminescence Dosimetry. Luminescence Dosimetry:183193.
  17. 17.Nanto H, Murayama K, Usuda T, Taniguchi S, Takeuchi N (1993) Optically Stimulated Luminescence in KCl: Eu Single Crystal. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 47: 281-284.
  18. 18.Akselrod MS, Lucas AC, Polf JC, McKeever SWS1998Optically Stimulated Luminescence of Al2O3. Radiat. Meas.29391399.
  19. 19.McKeever SWS, Akselrod MS1999Radiation Dosimetry Using Pulsed Optically Stimulated Luminescence of Al2O3: C. Radiat. Prot. Dosim.84317320.
  20. 20.McKeever SWS2001Optically Stimulated Luminescence Dosimetry. Nucl. Instr. Meth. Phys. Res. B1842954.
  21. 21.Yukihara EG, McKeever SWS2006Spectroscopy and Optically Stimulated Luminescence of Al2O3: C using Time-Resolved Measurements. J. Appl. Phys. 100,083512 EOF(9 pages).
  22. 22.ItouM.FujiwaraA.Uchino2009(2009) Reversible Photoinduced Interconversion of Color Centers in α-Al2O3 Prepared under Vacuum. J. Phys. Chem.1132094920957.
  23. 23.DouguchiY.NantoH.SatoT.ImaiA.NasuS.KusanoE.Kinbara1999, Nasu S, Kusano E, Kinbara A (1999) Optically Stimulated Luminescence in Eu-doped KBr Phosphor Ceramics. Radiat. Prot. Dosim.84143148.
  24. 24.GazaR.Mc KeeverS. W. S.2006A Real-Time High-Resolution Optical Fibre Dosemeter Based on Optically Stimulated Luminescence (OSL) of KBr: Eu, for potential use during radiotherapy of cancer. Radiat. Prot. Dosim.1201419.
  25. 25.MittaniJ. C.Proki´cM.YukiharaE. G.2008Optically Stimulated Luminescence and Thermoluminescence of Terbium-activated Silicates and Aluminates. Radiation Measurements43323326.
  26. 26.Bitencourt JFS, Tatumi SH2009Synthesis and Thermoluminescence Properties of Mg2+ Doped Nanostructured Aluminium Oxide. Physics Procedia2501514.
  27. 27.BitencourtJ. F. S.VentieriA.GonçalvesK. A.PiresE. L.MittaniJ. C.TatumiS. H.2010Comparison Between Neodymium Doped Alumina Samples Obtained by Pechini and Sol-gel Methods using Thermo-Stimulated Luminescence and SEM. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids35629562959.
  28. 28.Gonçalves KA, Bitencourt JFS, Mittani JCR, Tatumi SH2010Study of Radiation Induced Effects in the Luminescence of Nanostructured Al2O3: Yb, Er crystals. IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering 15: 012080.
  29. 29.Pires EL, Tatumi SH, Mittani JCR, Caldas LVE2011TL and OSL Properties of KAlSi3O8: Mn Obtained by Sol-gel Process. Radiation Measurements46473476.
  30. 30.PiresE. L.TatumiS. H.MittaniJ. C. R.KinoshitaA.BaffaO.CaldasL. V. E.2011TL, OSL and ESR Properties of Nanostructured KAlSi3O8: Mn Glass. Radiation Measurements4614921495.
  31. 31.Summers GP1984Thermoluminescence in single crystal α-Al2O3: C. Radiat. Prot. Dosim.86980.
  32. 32.Lee KH, Crawford JH1979Luminescence of the F Center in Sapphire. Phys. Rev.1932173221.
  33. 33.KristianpollerN.RehaviA.ShmilevichA.WeissD.Chen1998ehavi A, Shmilevich A, Weiss D, Chen R (1998) Radiation Effects in Pure and Doped Al2O3 Crystals. Nuclear Instruments and Methods141343346.
  34. 34.Ropp RC1991Luminescence and the Solid State. Elsevier. 401 p.
  35. 35.Jaque D, Capmany J, Luo ZD, Garcia Sole J (1997) Optical Bands and Energy Levels of Nd3+ Ion in the YAl3(BO3)4 Non-linear Laser Crystal. J. Phys: Condens. Matter 9: 9715-9729.
  36. 36.McKeever SWS, Chen1997(1997) Luminescence Models Radiation Measurements 27 5/6625661.
  37. 37.YangX.LiH.BiQ.ChengY.TangQ.SuL.Xu2008(2008) Growth of Highly Sensitive Thermoluminescent Crystal α-Al2O3: C by the Temperature Gradient Technique. Journal of Crystal Growth31038003803.

Written By

Sonia Hatsue Tatumi, Alexandre Ventieri, José Francisco Sousa Bitencourt, Katia Alessandra Gonçalves, Juan Carlos Ramirez Mittani, René Rojas Rocca and Shiva do Valle Camargo

Submitted: December 8th, 2011Reviewed: July 9th, 2012Published: September 26th, 2012