1. Introduction
Metals play a significant role in human life since the Bronze Age. Metals’ important advantages include higher toughness and predictable fracture behavior in all directions, which are fundamentally essential for engineering applications. In coarse-grain polycrystalline alloys, the plastic deformation is mediated by dislocations within the grains. Micromechanisms of dislocation-based plasticity have been well investigated. Taylor, Polanyi, and Orowan’s speculative models and Hirsch and Whelan’s experimental results clearly demonstrate that the existence of dislocations in the metals, like a double-edged sword, enhances the ductility, while reducing the theoretical strengths of most of the metallic crystalline systems [1]. However, the toughness depends on the integration of both strength and ductility. Hence, designing of advanced metallic materials to answer the challenging strength-ductility dilemma become an urgent call. There is natural limitation on the conventional polycrystalline metallic alloys. In practical uses, there are always some inherent defects in the crystalline phases, which degrade the alloys properties. Recently, the limitation of the crystalline-material strength was passed when the metallic alloys with amorphous structures were successfully synthesized in many material systems through advanced manufacturing methods[2]. Although most of the metallic elements exiting in the nature are present with crystalline structures which are the most stable structures with the lowest energy state, sometimes they can be made by various ways into metastable amorphous solid forms, such as rapid quenching techniques [3-5], mechanical alloying [6-8], accumulative roll bonding [9-12], and vapor condensation [13]. The characteristics of the mechanical, thermodynamic properties of such category of metallic materials are very similar to ceramic glasses, and thus they are also called as metallic glasses. Moreover, by introducing specific crystalline phases, such as crystalline dendrites, in an amorphous matrix, bulk metallic glass-composite materials demonstrate the improved plasticity and toughness, compared with monolithic amorphous materials [14]. These metallic systems have the capacity of revolutionizing current metal-forming technologies and manufacturing industries.
2. The development of metallic glasses
In 1960, Klement
In 1974, the rods of Pd-Cu-Si alloy about 1~3 mm in diameter, the first bulk metallic glasses were prepared by Chen [17] using simple suction-casting methods. In 1982, Turnbull’s group [21-22] pushed the diameter of critical casting thickness of the Pd-Ni-P alloys up to 10 mm by processing the Pd–Ni–P melt in a boron oxide flux and eliminated the heterogeneous nucleation. A series of solid state amophization techniques that are completely different from the mechanism of rapid quenching had been developed during that time. For example, mechanical alloying, strain-induced amorphization in multilayers, ion beam mixing, hydrogen absorption, and inverse melting [23]. The thin films or powders of metallic glasses can be acquired as well as by interdiffusion and interfacial reaction of the temperature just below the glass transition temperature.
In the late 1980s, Inoue’s group [24-25] in the Tohoku University, Japan, developed new groups of multicomponent metallic glass systems with lower cooling rates in Mg-, Ln-, Zr-, Fe-, Pd-, Cu-, Ti- and Ni- based systems. The Inoue group found exceptional glass forming ability in La-Al-Ni and La-Al-Cu ternary alloys system [24]. By casting the alloy melt in water-cooling Cu molds, the cylindrical samples with diameters up to 5 mm or sheets with similar thicknesses were made fully glassy in the La55Al25Ni20 alloy. Similarly, the La55Al25Ni10Cu10 alloy, fabricated by the same method, was even big with a diameter up to 9 mm.
In the 1990s, the Inoue group further developed a series of multicomponent Zr-based bulk metallic glasses, such as Zr-Cu-Ni, Zr-Cu-Ni-Al, etc., along with Mg-based, e. g. Mg–Cu–Y and Mg–Ni–Y alloys, all exhibiting a high Glass Forming Ability (GFA) and thermal stability [26-29]. For one of the Zr-based BMGs, Zr65Al7. 5Ni10Cu17. 5, the critical casting thickness was up to 15 mm, and the largest critical casting thickness was 72 mm in the Pd–Cu–Ni–P family [30]. With Inoue’s advancement of the aforementioned bulk metallic glass alloys, the BMGs were no longer laboratory curiosity. The possibility of promising engineering applications became reality. One of the examples was that the Zr-based bulk metallic glasses were applied in the industries just three years after it was invented [31]. Subsequently, a set of the very famous empirical rules in order to direct the selection of alloying elements and composition of glass forming alloys have been summarized by Inoue and Johnson as follows [32-33]: (1) Multicomponent alloys with three or more elements; (2) More than 12% atomic radius difference among them; (3) Negative heat of mixing between constituent elements; (4) The deep eutectic rule based on the Trg criterion. These rules concluded critical criteria for the design of the BMGs until 1999. However, the exception was found in the binary systems, such as the Ni-Nb [34], the Ca-Al [35] the Zr-Ni [36], and the Cu-Zr [37-38] alloys. The above systems can also produce BMGs with the size up to several millimeters without the limitations of the eutectics. In summary, the formation mechanism and criteria for the binary BMGs might not follow the traditional multi-component systems. These results suggest that there are many other potential forming systems of the metallic glasses to be discovered.
3. How to describe the mechanical behavior of the bulk metallic glasses
Over the past four decades, considerable research efforts have been made on the BMGs due to their potential opportunity based on the high yield strength, relatively high fracture toughness, low internal friction, high fatigue resistance, as well as better wear and corrosion resistance [31-32, 39]. Although the bulk metallic glasses (BMGs) are one of such species of materials which are considered for future industrial applications, the insufficient plastic deformation at room temperature is still the Achilles’ hell for the industrial applications regardless of its highly scientific value. In general, metallic glasses (MGs) are disordered materials which lack the periodicity of long range ordering in the atom packing, but the atomic arrangement in amorphous alloys is not completely random as liquid. In fact, many scholars believe that amorphous structures are composed of short range ordering, such as icosahedra clusters or other packing forms related to the intermetallic compounds that would form in the corresponding equilibrium phase diagram [40-41]. The short range order is identified as a structure consisting of an atom and its nearest neighbors perhaps two or three atom distance. Recently, the study of medium range order is highlighted as a new ordering range between the short range order and the long range order in the amorphous structure [42]. When an amorphous structure is achieved by quenching, it may be composed of icosahedral local short-range ordering, network-forming clusters medium-range ordering, and other unidentified-random local structures [42-43], that is, a complex association in their topology. How to build the atomic structural model in BMGs and how to fill three dimension spaces with these local structural units are still important issues although only limited research has been done so far [44-47]. Due to the difference in the structural systems between metallic glasses and crystalline alloys, it has an unusual performance on the mechanical properties [48-51]. For example, most metallic glasses exhibit evident brittle fracture under an uniaxial tensile loading, but sometimes give very limited plasticity before failure by means of shear-band propagation. Also, BMGs can perform a large global plasticity through the generation of multiple shear bands during unconfined or confined compression test. Activities of shear band are viewed as the main factor on the plastic deformation of BMGs. The more shear bands on the lateral surface of deformed samples, the larger plasticity is obtained. Liu
The studies in the microstructures of metallic glasses in this shortest length scale by laboratory X-Ray, scanning electron microscope (SEM), and Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) are usually excellent and interesting, but they are relatively less in the theoretic models either in the statistic or continuum simulation computing than those in experiments. Through the studies of simulation methods to compare with experimental data, such as electron scattering data and pair distribution functions, it is expected to be able to investigate the shear-band mechanisms and the microstructures of BMGs in depth. Also, a completely theoretic model could be built up due to the combination of computing model and experiments, not only to explain the current experimental phenomena but also to predict the probative behavior in the future.
Molecular dynamics (MD) simulation is one of important simulation methods provided significant insight into material properties under the atomic level. The major advantage of MD simulations is to see a detailed picture of the model under available investigation, and so they have been very instrumental in explaining the connection of macroscopic properties to atomic scale [54]. For instances, MD simulation has been carried out successfully in the studies of various metallic systems such as point defect movement [55], dislocation mechanisms [56-57], and grain-boundary structures in polycrystalline materials [58-61] in recent years. However, a number of limitations in the simulations will also be confronted, while simulations are treated as key insights in the study. Generally, there are three limitations in the current MD simulation, namely the availability of MD potential, time-scale limitations, and the limit on the system size. Two of the later can be alleviated in the promotion of computer efficiency and by adding the parallelization techniques in program, but the former is still challenged on the accuracy of material specificity and on the development for the multicomponent system, especially for the BMGs. Hence, some pioneering attempts [42, 62-64] have shown the possibility of the MD to resolve the mysterious of the BMGs.
4. Microstructures in metallic glasses
In 1959, a structural model of dense random packing of hard spheres is first suggested by Bernal [65] to be a simple model for metal liquids, and subsequently indicated by Cohen and Turnbull [66] that this simple model can be also applied to describe the metallic glasses. In 1979, Wang [67] supposed that the amorphous metal alloys may be a special class of the glassy state whose short-range structure is random Kasper polyhedral close packing of soft atoms similar to those in the crystalline counterparts. This short-range structure is described based on a new type of glassy structure with a high degree of dense randomly packed atomic configurations. The density measurements show that the density difference is in the range 0. 3~1. 0% between bulk metallic glasses and fully crystallized state [68-69]. There is neither splitting of the second peak nor pre-peak at the lower wave vector as seen in the reduced density function curve of the BMGs [68, 70-71]. These results confirm that the multicomponent BMGs has a homogeneously mixed atomic configuration corresponding to a high dense randomly packing. One of the most important topological short range structures developed among glasses and supercooled liquids are the local icosahedral clusters, which are revealed by many simulation studies [72-76]. An icosahedron is the central atom which forms a fivefold symmetry arrangements with each of its 12 neighbors. In contrast is a regular fragment of an FCC order, and the same pair will become an HCP order if the bottom close-packed plane is shifted as the same as the top plane. This fivefold symmetry and icosahedral clusters is also detected from the experiments of liquids and metallic glasses [77-78], even though in an immiscible binary system with positive heat of mixing [74-76]. The binding energy of an icosahedral cluster of 13 Lennard-Jones (LJ) atoms is 8. 4% lower than an FCC or HCP arrangement [79]. The critical size for a transition from icosahedral cluster to icosahedral phase is about 8 nm [25]. Icosahedral packing is a basic structural unit in extended amorphous systems, and the existence of icosahedral clusters offer seeds for the precipitation of the icosahedral phase. The icosahedral quasicrystalline phase will precipitate in the primary crystallization process and then transforms to stable crystalline phases when the amorphous alloys is annealing at higher temperatures [80-82].
In recent years, an order effect, called the medium range order, existing over length scale larger than the short range order but not extends to the long range order as crystalline state, has been detected in the some amorphous alloys [83-85]. Although the icosahedral type model gives a sound description on the structure in the short range order of metallic glasses but fails beyond the nearest-neighbor shell. For instance, how can the medium range order be defined with the local structural unit, and how would the local structural units be connected to full three-dimensional space? Miracle [86] suggested a compelling structural model for metallic glasses based on the dense packing of atomic clusters. An FCC packing of overlapping clusters is taken as the building scheme for medium range order in metallic glasses. Figure 1 illustrate his promoted model of medium range order. A reality check for these previous structural concepts was proposed by Sheng
A new insight, imperfect ordered packing, which is closely related to the cooling rate, is exposed on the medium range order embedded in the disordered atomic matrix by selected simulation of high-resolution electron microscopy image [87]. It points out that the packing character of medium range ordering structures can be of two types, i. e. icosahedron-like and lattice-like, and indicates that the solidification from melts or crystallization of metallic glasses is controlled by preferential growth of the most stable imperfect ordered packing. On the other hand, Fan
5. Deformation mechanisms
Unlike the dislocation mechanisms for plastic deformation in crystalline alloys, the amorphous alloys only allow limited atomic displacements to resist deformation as a result of the glassy structure with a high degree of dense randomly packed atomic configurations, when the applied stress is on the amorphous alloys [25,95]. The BMGs have higher tensile fracture strength □
In the conceptual framework of free volume, the mechanical coupling is weak to the surrounding of free volumes, and hence the inelastic relaxation becomes possible by local atom rearrangement, without affecting the surroundings significantly [105]. Thus, free volume regions could be the preferred sites where easy caused the glass structure destabilization by either temperature or applied stresses. The concept of free volume is most frequently used in explaining the deformation behaviors and atomic relaxations in the MGs due to its convenient for a measurement (density or enthalpy change), and easy understanding, that is, a necessary open space allowed for a shear process to operate. For instance, a simple relationship
6. The model of shear transformation zones
According to Argon’s shear transformation zone (STZ) model [112], shear deformation takes place by spontaneous and cooperative reorganization of a small cluster of randomly close-packed atoms [113]. An STZ can supply a small increment of shear strain under the action of an applied shear stress [114], and thus creates a localized distortion of the surroundings to accomplish the shear-band formation. The size of STZ is predicted among the order of 100 atoms from energetic considerations [115-116] and is consistent with the model of molecular dynamics simulation in the investigation of Cu-Ti system [117]. Liu’s [118] schematic view on formation of the first STZs in the year of 2012 suggests that a metallic glass system is assumed to be sheared under a constant strain rate. Considering the intrinsic heterogeneity and preexisting flaws resulted from casting, the first STZ generates easily under the action of a stress smaller than macro yielding stress. Since the first STZ alters the initial strain field, the surrounding material is subjected to a self-generated dynamic and thermal noise. With the aid of the heterogeneous strain field and thermal noise, the secondary STZ emerges subsequently in the neighborhood of the first STZ. As a consequence, a shear band nucleus or an embryo of avalanche forms, which induces the yielding of the macroscopic material. STZs have equal chances to propagate forward or backward along the shear plane. For simplicity, here, we only report the case that the STZ starts at one edge and propagates in one direction. Compared with abstract free-volume concept, the STZ mechanism is easy to be studied in the atomic models. A number of MD simulation studies by Falk and Langer summarized the crucial features of STZ mechanisms as follows [111, 119]: (a) once a STZ has transformed and relieved a certain amount of shear stress, it cannot transform again in the same direction. Thus, the system saturates and becomes jammed. (b) STZs can be created and destroyed at rates proportional to the rate of irreversible plastic deformation, and plastic flow can take place only when new zones are being created as fast as existing zones are being transformed. (c) The attempt frequency of the transition is tied to the noise in the system, which is driven by the strain rate. The stochastic nature of these fluctuations is assumed to arise from random motions associated with the disorder in the system. (d) The transition rates between jammed and flowing are strongly sensitive to the applied stress. Recently, they also proposed a criterion (effective temperature) that determines which materials exhibit shear bands based on the initial conditions alone, based on their STZ theory [120-122]. The behavior of the effective temperature as a function of time for a system that localizes and a system that does not localize [120]. Their numerical works show that perturbations to the effective temperature grow due to instability in the transient dynamics, but unstable systems do not always develop shear bands. Nonlinear energy dissipation processes interact with perturbation growth to determine whether a material exhibits strain localization [120]. Argon considered the shear deformation of shear-transformation zones (STZs) as a disk of two-layer atoms around a free-volume site, which had a shear strain of γ0 ≈ 1 [112]. With a shear stress,
7. Theory of shear banding and shear band model
According to the experimental observations, the width of a shear band is about 100 nm, which is the same as its offset shear displacement [125-126], and propagation time of shear bands is about 10-5 second [127]. Because shear bands are thin, move fast, and are short-lived, to observe the dynamic evolution of the shear bands in the metallic glasses is highly difficult. Building the atomic scale model of shear band such as the development of a shear band inside a binary bulk metallic glass model is very beneficial for studying the shear band mechanism [110]. A simple conceptual quantity excess volume,
8. Conclusions
In summery, the fabrication techniques of the bulk metallic glasses are reviewed chronically. The fundamental concepts of the unique microstructures of the bulk metallic glasses according to different manufacturing are introduced. Moreover, the proposed, but still under debate, various deformation mechanisms are discussed. We wish to draw more attentions from the readers to explore the exciting potential and underneath mechanisms of the bulk metallic glasses.
Acknowledgement
EWH appreciates the support from National Science Council Programs 100-2221-E-008-041 and 99-3113-Y-042-001. JWQ would like to acknowledge the financial support of National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51101110).
References
- 1.
Hansen, N., New discoveries in deformed metals. Physical Metallurgy and Materials Science,2001 2917 2935 - 2.
Wang W. H. Roles of. minor additions. in formation. properties of. bulk metallic. glasses 2007 540 596 - 3.
Gramt P. S. Prog Mater. Sci 1995 497 - 4.
Li B. Nordstrom N. Lavernia E. J. Mater Sci. Eng A. 1997 207 - 5.
J. Non-Cryst. Solids,Afonso C. R. M. et al. Amorphous phase. formation during. spray forming. of Al. Ni Y. Zr C. O. alloy 2001 134 138 - 6.
Applied Physics Letters,Koch C. C. et al. Preparation of. Amorphous Ni60nb. by Mechanical. Alloying 1983 1017 1019 - 7.
Eckert J. Mater Sci. Eng A. 1997 364 - 8.
Sherif M. Eskandarany E. Inoue A. Metall Mater. Trans A. 2002 135 - 9.
Physical Metallurgy and Materials Science,Xing Z. P. Kang S. B. Kim H. W. Microstructural evolution. mechanical properties. of the. A. A80 alloy during. the accumulative. roll-bonding process. 2002 1521 1530 - 10.
Applied Physics Letters,Yeh X. L. Samwer K. Johnson W. L. Formation of. an Amorphous. Metallic Hydride. by Reaction. of Hydrogen. with Crystalline. Intermetallic-a Compounds. New Method. of Synthesizing. Metallic Glasses. 1983 242 244 - 11.
Saito, Y., et al., Ultra-fine grained bulk aluminum produced by accumulative roll-bonding (ARB) process. 1998 1221 1227 - 12.
Schwarz R. B. Johnson W. L. Formation of. an Amorphous. Alloy by. Solid-State Reaction. of the. Pure Polycrystalline. Metals 1983 415 418 - 13.
Haussler, P., et al., Experimental-Evidence for a Structure-Induced Minimum of the Density of States at the Fermi Energy in Amorphous-Alloys. Physical Review Letters,1983 714 717 - 14.
Qiao J. W. et al. Tensile deformation. micromechanisms for. bulk metallic. glass matrix. composites From. work-hardening to. softening 2011 4126 4137 - 15.
Nature,Klement W. Willens R. H. Duwez P. Non-crystalline Structure. on Solidified. Gold-silicon Alloys. 1960 869 870 - 16.
Chen H. S. Turnbull D. Formation stability. structure of. palladium-silicon based. alloy glasses. 1969 1021 1031 - 17.
Chen H. S. Thermodynamic Considerations. on Formation. Stability of. Metallic Glasses. 1974 1505 1511 - 18.
Journal of Chemical Physics,Turnbull D. Fisher J. C. Rate of. Nucleation in. Condensed Systems. 1949 71 73 - 19.
Lu Z. P. Liu C. T. new A. glass-forming ability. criterion for. bulk metallic. glasses 2002 3501 3512 - 20.
Xia, L., et al., Thermodynamic modeling of glass formation in metallic glasses. 2006 3 - 21.
Applied Physics Letters,Drehman A. J. Greer A. L. Turnbull D. Bulk Formation. of a. Metallic-Glass-Pd- Ni-4 P-2 1982 716 717 - 22.
Applied Physics Letters,Kui H. W. Greer A. L. Turnbull D. Formation of. Bulk-Glass Metallic. by Fluxing. 1984 615 616 - 23.
Johnson W. L. Thermodynamic Kinetic Aspects. of the. Crystal to. Glass Transformation. in Metallic. Materials 1986 81 134 - 24.
Materials Transactions, JIM,Inoue A. Zhang T. Masumoto T. Al-Ni-Alloys La Amorphous. with a. Wide Supercooled. Liquid Region. 1989 965 972 - 25.
Inoue, A., Stabilization of metallic supercooled liquid and bulk amorphous alloys. 2000 279 306 - 26.
Inoue, A., et al., Mg-Cu-Y Amorphous-Alloys with High Mechanical Strengths Produced by a Metallic Mold Casting Method. Materials Transactions, JIM,1991 609 616 - 27.
JIM,Zhang T. Inoue A. Masumoto T. Amorphous-Al-Tm Zr. Tm . Co =. Ni Cu. Alloys with. Significant Supercooled. Liquid Region. of over. 10 K. 1991 1005 1010 - 28.
Inoue, A., et al., Preparation of 16 Mm Diameter Rod of Amorphous Zr65al7. ni10cu17. 5 Alloy. Materials Transactions, JIM,1993 1234 1237 - 29.
Inoue, A., High-Strength Bulk Amorphous-Alloys with Low Critical Cooling Rates. JIM,1995 866 875 - 30.
JIM,Inoue A. Nishiyama N. Kimura H. Preparation thermal stability. of bulk. amorphous Pd. Cu Ni P. alloy cylinder. of . mm in diameter. 1997 179 183 - 31.
Wang W. H. Dong C. Shek C. H. Bulk metallic. glasses Materials. Science Engineering-Reports R. 2004 45 89 - 32.
Mrs Bulletin,Johnson W. L. Bulk glass-forming. metallic alloys. Science technology 1999 42 56 - 33.
Inoue, A., Bulk amorphous and nanocrystalline alloys with high functional properties. Materials Science and Engineering A2001 1 10 - 34.
Leonhardt M. Loser W. Lindenkreuz H. G. Solidification kinetics. phase formation. of undercooled. eutectic-Nb Ni. melts 1999 2961 2968 - 35.
Guo F. Q. Poon S. J. Shiflet G. J. Ca Al-based bulk. metallic glasses. with high. thermal stability. 2004 37 39 - 36.
Applied Physics Letters,Meng W. J. et al. Solid-State Interdiffusion. Reactions in. Ni Ti. Ni Zr. Multilayered-Films Thin. 1987 661 663 - 37.
at. %) and mechanical properties of bulk Cu64Zr36 glass. Acta Materialia,Xu D. H. et al. Bulk metallic. glass formation. in binary. Cu-rich alloy. series-Cu100-x Zrx. (x=3 . 3. 2004 2621 2624 - 38.
Hattori, T., et al., Does bulk metallic glass of elemental Zr and Ti exist? Physical Review Letters, 2006 4 - 39.
Greer A. L. Metallic Glasses. Science 1995 1947 1953 - 40.
Doye J. P. K. Wales D. J. The structure. stability of. atomic liquids. From clusters. to bulk. 1996 484 487 - 41.
Spaepen, F., Condensed-matter science- Five-fold symmetry in liquids. Nature,2000 781 782 - 42.
Sheng H. W. et al. Atomic packing. short-to-medium-range order. in metallic. glasses 2006 419 425 - 43.
Tanaka, H., Two-order-parameter model of the liquid-glass transition. III. Universal patterns of relaxations in glass-forming liquids.2005 3396 3413 - 44.
Nat Mater,Hufnagel T. C. Amorphous materials. Finding order. in disorder. 2004 666 667 - 45.
Fan, C., et al., Structural model for bulk amorphous alloys. 2006 - 46.
Fan, C., et al., Atomic migration and bonding characteristics during a glass transition investigated using as-cast Zr-Cu-Al. B,2011 195207 - 47.
Fan, C., et al., Quenched-in quasicrystal medium-range order and pair distribution function study on Zr55Cu35Al10 bulk metallic. 2006 888 892 - 48.
Golovin Y. I. et al. Serrated plastic. flow during. nanoindentation of. a. bulk metallic. glass 2001 947 952 - 49.
Acta Materialia,Murah P. Ramamurty U. Embrittlement of. a. bulk metallic. glass due. to-T-g sub. annealing 2005 1467 1478 - 50.
Ramamurty, U., et al., Hardness and plastic deformation in a bulk metallic glass. 2005 705 717 - 51.
Zhang G. P. et al. On rate-dependent. serrated flow. behavior in. amorphous metals. during nanoindentation. 2005 1147 1151 - 52.
Liu Y. H. et al. Super plastic. bulk metallic. glasses at. room temperature. 2007 1385 1388 - 53.
Zhang Y. Greer A. L. Thickness of. shear bands. in metallic. glasses 2006 - 54.
Morris J. R. et al. Simulating the. Effect of. Poisson Ratio. on Metallic. Glass Properties. 2009 1229 1234 - 55.
Nordlund K. Averback R. S. Atomic displacement. processes in. irradiated amorphous. crystalline silicon. 1997 3101 3103 - 56.
Robach J. S. et al. Dynamic observations. atomistic simulations. of dislocation-defect. interactions in. rapidly quenched. copper gold 2006 1679 1690 - 57.
Van Swygenhoven H. Derlet P. M. Froseth A. G. Nucleation propagation of. dislocations in. nanocrystalline fcc. metals 2006 1975 1983 - 58.
Van Swygenhoven H. Farkas D. Caro A. Grain-boundary structures. in polycrystalline. metals at. the nanoscale. 2000 831 838 - 59.
Wolf, D., et al., Deformation of nanocrystalline materials by molecular-dynamics simulation: relationship to experiments? Acta Materialia, 2005 1 40 - 60.
Zheng G. P. Wang Y. M. Li M. Atomistic simulation. studies on. deformation mechanism. of nanocrystalline. cobalt 2005 3893 3901 - 61.
Millett P. C. Selvam R. P. Saxena A. Molecular dynamics. simulations of. grain size. stabilization in. nanocrystalline materials. by addition. of dopants. 2006 297 303 - 62.
Lo Y. C. et al. Structural relaxation. self-repair behavior. in nano-scaled. Zr-Cu metallic. glass under. cyclic loading. Molecular dynamics. simulations 2010 954 960 - 63.
Ikeda, H., et al., Strain rate induced amorphization in metallic nanowires. 1999 2900 2903 - 64.
Schuh C. A. Lund A. C. Nieh T. G. New regime. of homogeneous. flow in. the deformation. map of. metallic glasses. elevated temperature. nanoindentation experiments. mechanistic modeling. 2004 5879 5891 - 65.
Bernal J. D. Nature 1959 141 - 66.
Cohen M. H. Turnbull D. Nature 1964 964 - 67.
Wang, R., Short-Range Structure for Amorphous Intertransition Metal-Alloys. 1979 700 704 - 68.
Inoue, A., et al., High packing density of Zr- and Pd-based bulk amorphous alloys. Materials Transactions Jim,1998 318 321 - 69.
Ni10Be22. 5 bulk metallic glass under high pressure.Wang W. H. et al. Microstructural transformation. in a. Zr Ti U1 C. Ni . 2000 11292 11295 - 70.
Ni10Be22. 5 bulk amorphous alloy by electron diffraction intensity analysis.Wang W. H. et al. Microstructure studies. of Zr. Ti Cu1 Ni . 1997 1053 1055 - 71.
Inoue A. Bulk Amorphous. Alloys 1998 Trans Tech Publications. - 72.
Journal of Physical Chemistry,Honeycutt J. D. Andersen H. C. Molecular-Dynamics Study. of Melting. Freezing of. Small-Jones Lennard. Clusters 1987 4950 4963 - 73.
Physical Review Letters,Jonsson H. Andersen H. C. Icosahedral Ordering. in the. Lennard-Jones Liquid. Glass 1988 2295 2298 - 74.
He J. H. Ma Nanoscale E. phase separation. local icosahedral. order in. amorphous alloys. of immiscible. elements 2001 12 - 75.
He J. H. et al. Amorphous structures. in the. immiscible-Ni Ag. system 2001 2826 2829 - 76.
Luo W. K. et al. Icosahedral short-range. order in. amorphous alloys. 2004 4 - 77.
Ni10Cu12. 5Pd5 metallic glass. Applied Physics Letters,Li C. F. et al. Precipitation of. icosahedral quasicrystalline. phase in. Hf Al Ni . 2000 528 530 - 78.
Reichert, H., et al., Observation of five-fold local symmetry in liquid lead. 2000 839 841 - 79.
Solid State Physics,Spaepen D. R. N. a. F. Polytetrahedral order. in condensed. matter 1989 1 - 80.
Saida J. Matsushita M. Inoue A. Direct observation. of icosahedral. cluster in. Zr Pd binary glassy. alloy 2001 412 414 - 81.
Ni10Be22. 5 bulk amorphous alloy upon crystallization.Wang W. H. et al. Phase transformation. in a. Zr Ti Cu1 Ni . 2002 5 - 82.
Waniuk T. Schroers J. Johnson W. L. Timescales of. crystallization viscous flow. of the. bulk glass-forming. Zr-Ti-Ni-Cu-Be alloys. 2003 9 - 83.
Cowley J. M. Electron nanodiffraction. methods for. measuring medium-range. order 2002 197 206 - 84.
Mattern, N., et al., Short-range order of Zr62-xTixAl10Cu20Ni8 bulk metallic glasses. 2002 305 314 - 85.
Nature Materials,Hufnagel T. C. Amorphous-Finding materials. order in. disorder 2004 666 667 - 86.
Miracle D. B. structural A. model for. metallic glasses. 2004 697 702 - 87.
Chen G. L. et al. Molecular dynamic. simulations atomic structures. of amorphous. materials 2006 3 - 88.
Fan, C., et al., Structures and mechanical behaviors of Zr55Cu35Al10 bulk amorphous alloys at ambient and cryogenic temperatures. 2006 6 - 89.
Fan, C., et al., Structural model for bulk amorphous alloys. 2006 3 - 90.
Qiao J. W. et al. Resolving ensembled. microstructural information. of bulk-metallic-glass-matrix. composites using. synchrotron x-ray. diffraction 2010 - 91.
Ott R. T. et al. Micromechanics of. deformation of. metallic-glass-matrix composites. from in. situ synchrotron. strain measurements. finite element. modeling 2005 1883 1893 - 92.
Applied Physics Letters,Loffler J. F. et al. Crystallization of. bulk amorphous. Zr Ti Nb). Cu Ni Al 2000 525 527 - 93.
Wang X. L. et al. In situ. Synchrotron Study. of Phase. Transformation Behaviors. in Bulk. Metallic Glass. by Simultaneous. Diffraction Small Angle. Scattering 2003 265501 - 94.
Huang E. W. et al. Study of. nanoprecipitates in. a. nickel-based superalloy. using small-angle. neutron scattering. transmission electron. microscopy 2008 - 95.
Structural Materials Properties Microstructure and ProcessingTakeuchi A. Inoue A. Size dependence. of soft. to hard. magnetic transition. in . Nd Pr. Fe-Al bulk. amorphous alloys. 2004 1140 1144 - 96.
Flores K. M. Dauskardt R. H. Mean stress. effects on. flow localization. failure in. a. bulk metallic. glass 2001 2527 2537 - 97.
Flores K. M. Dauskardt R. H. Local heating. associated with. crack tip. plasticity in. Zr-Ti-Ni-Cu-Be bulk. amorphous metals. 1999 638 643 - 98.
Inoue A. Takeuchi A. Recent progress. in bulk. glassy alloys. 2002 1892 1906 - 99.
Jom-Journal of the Minerals Metals & Materials Society,Johnson W. L. Bulk amorphous. metal-An emerging. engineering material. Jom 2002 40 43 - 100.
Hays C. C. Kim C. P. Johnson W. L. Microstructure controlled. shear band. pattern formation. enhanced plasticity. of bulk. metallic glasses. containing in. situ formed. ductile phase. dendrite dispersions. 2000 2901 2904 - 101.
Schroers J. Johnson W. L. Ductile bulk. metallic glass. 2004 4 - 102.
Journal of Chemical Physics,Cohen M. H. Turnbull D. Molecular Transport. in Liquids. Glasses 1959 1164 1169 - 103.
Spaepen, F., Microscopic Mechanism for Steady-State Inhomogeneous Flow in Metallic Glasses. 1977 407 415 - 104.
Argon A. S. Plastic-Deformation in. Metallic Glasses. 1979 47 58 - 105. Michael Miller, P. L., Bulk Metallic Glasses: An Overview. Hardcover ed. 2007: Springer
- 106.
Vandenbeukel A. Sietsma J. The-Transition Glass. as Free-Volume a. Related Kinetic. Phenomenon 1990 383 389 - 107.
Yang, B., et al., Dynamic evolution of nanoscale shear bands in a bulk-metallic glass. 2005 141904 - 108.
Journal of Chemical Physics,Albano F. Falk M. L. Shear softening. structure in. a. simulated three-dimensional. binary glass. 2005 8 - 109.
Li Q. K. Li M. Atomic scale. characterization of. shear bands. in an. amorphous metal. 2006 3 - 110.
B,Li Q. K. Li M. Atomistic simulations. of correlations. between volumetric. change shear softening. in amorphous. metals 2007 5 - 111.
Chen M. W. Mechanical behavior. of metallic. glasses Microscopic. understanding of. strength ductility 2008 445 469 - 112.
Argon A. S. Plastic deformation. in metallic. glasses 1979 47 58 - 113.
Acta Materialia,Schuh C. A. Hufnagel T. C. Ramamurty U. Overview No. 14 Mechanical behavior. of amorphous. alloys 2007 4067 4109 - 114.
Schuh C. A. Lund A. C. Atomistic basis. for the. plastic yield. criterion of. metallic glass. 2003 449 452 - 115.
Debenedetti P. G. Stillinger F. H. Supercooled liquids. the glass. transition 2001 259 267 - 116.
Physical Review Letters,Johnson W. L. Samwer K. universal A. criterion for. plastic yielding. of metallic. glasses with. a. . T. T-g)(2/ temperature dependence. 2005 4 - 117.
Zink, M., et al., Plastic deformation of metallic glasses: Size of shear transformation zones from molecular dynamics simulations. 2006 3 - 118.
Liu W. D. Liu K. X. Notable internal. thermal effect. on the. yielding of. metallic glasses. 2012 141904 - 119.
E,Falk M. L. Langer J. S. Dynamics of. viscoplastic deformation. in amorphous. solids 1998 7192 7205 - 120.
E,Manning M. L. Langer J. S. Carlson J. M. Strain localization. in a. shear transformation. zone model. for amorphous. solids 2007 16 - 121.
Shi Y. F. et al. Evaluation of. the disorder. temperature free-volume formalisms. via simulations. of shear. banding in. amorphous solids. 2007 4 - 122.
E,Langer J. S. Shear-transformation-zone theory. of plastic. deformation near. the glass. transition 2008 021502 - 123.
Yang, B., et al., Localized heating and fracture criterion for bulk metallic glasses. 2006 915 922 - 124.
E,Manning M. L. et al. Rate-dependent shear. bands in. a. shear-transformation-zone model. of amorphous. solids 2009 17 - 125.
Pekarskaya E. Kim C. P. Johnson W. L. In situ. transmission electron. microscopy studies. of shear. bands in. a. bulk metallic. glass based. composite 2001 2513 2518 - 126.
Li J. Spaepen F. Hufnagel T. C. Nanometre-scale defects. in shear. bands in. a. metallic glass. 2002 2623 2630 - 127.
Hufnagel T. C. et al. Deformation failure of. Zr Ti C. U. Ni Al. bulk metallic. glass under. quasi-static dynamic compression. 2002 1441 1445 - 128.
Li Q. K. Li M. Effects of. surface imperfections. on deformation. failure of. amorphous metals. 2005 031910 - 129.
Li Q. K. Li M. Molecular dynamics. simulation of. intrinsic extrinsic mechanical. properties of. amorphous metals. 2006 1005 1010 - 130.
B,Bailey N. P. Schiotz J. Jacobsen K. W. Atomistic simulation. study of. the shear-band. deformation mechanism. in-Cu Mg. metallic glasses. 2006 12 - 131.
Shimizu F. Ogata S. Li J. Yield point. of metallic. glass 2006 4293 4298 - 132.
Shimizu F. Ogata S. Li J. Theory of. shear banding. in metallic. glasses molecular dynamics. calculations 2007 2923 2927 - 133.
Ogata, S., et al., Atomistic simulation of shear localization in Cu-Zr bulk metallic glass. 2006 1033 1037 - 134.
Lewandowski J. J. Greer A. L. Temperature rise. at shear. bands in. metallic glasses. 2006 15 18 - 135.
Spaepen, F., Metallic glasses: Must shear bands be hot? Nature Materials, 2006 7 8