Open access peer-reviewed chapter

DNA Methylation in the Pathogenesis of Head and Neck Cancer

Written By

Zvonko Magić, Gordana Supić, Mirjana Branković-Magić and Nebojša Jovic

Submitted: March 14th, 2012 Reviewed: June 29th, 2012 Published: November 28th, 2012

DOI: 10.5772/51169

Chapter metrics overview

2,806 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

1. Introduction

Head and neck cancer is the sixth most common cancer worldwide and one of the most aggressive malignancies in human population. The most common histologic type among the head and neck tumors are the squamous cell carcinomas (SCC). Despite the significant efforts committed during the last decades in its early detection, prevention and treatment, head and neck cancer prognosis remains very poor with the rising incidence in developed countries and younger population. Carcinogenesis of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC) is a multistep process, which arises through an accumulation of genetic and epigenetic alterations. Although the impact of genetic changes in oral carcinogenesis is well-known, over the last decade it has been demonstrated that epigenetic changes, especially aberrant DNA methylation, play a significant role in HNSCC.

1.1. Head and neck cancer – Etiology and risk factors

Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma is the sixth most common cancer in males and tenth in females worldwide [1]. Despite the fact that significant results have been achieved during the last decades in its early detection, prevention and treatment, the survival rate has remained less than 40%, and HNSCCremains one of the most aggressive malignancies. Furthermore, the incidence of this carcinoma is rising in developed countries and younger population, particularly young women [2, 3]. Early stages of the disease are associated with minimal symptoms, thus small percentage of HNSCChas been diagnosed at an early clinical stage. Advanced stages respond poorly to current cancer therapies, with high incidence of local and regional relapse and lymph node metastasis [2, 4, 5].

Head and neck cancers include malignancies arising from different anatomical sites within the upper aero-digestive tract. Head and neck cancers are characterized by heterogeneous histology. The majority carcinomas that arise from squamous cell epithelia are head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC), while other cancer types that can occur in the head and neck include thyroid cancer, malignant salivary gland tumors, lymphomas and sarcomas. HNSCCinclude cancers of the oral cavity, larynx, pharynx (oropharynx, hypopharynx, nasopharynx), and esophagus, [4, 5], Figure 1.

1.2. Risk factors for HNSCC

Both environmental and genetic factors play an important role in the etiology of head and neck cancers but the causal relationship between environmental factors, lifestyle and tumor development is not yet fully elucidated. The mucosa of the upper aerodigestive tract is exposed to number of carcinogens attributed to cause genetic and epigenetic changes that ultimately lead to head and neck cancer development. HNSCCincidence is influenced by age, genetic factors, geographic region and different lifestyle factors, including alcohol, smoking, betel quid use, oral hygiene, and Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) infection [5]. Emerging evidences are indicating that environmental factors, such as smoking, alcohol and diet could directly or indirectly affect epigenetic mechanisms of gene expression regulation and DNA methylation in HNSCC.

1.3. Tobacco and alcohol use in HNSCC

Smoking and alcohol consumption are the major risk factors for head and neck cancers [6, 7]. In addition, the combination of both alcohol and tobacco use synergically increases the risk for HNSCCdevelopment more than 10 times [8]. Cigarette smoking is the major cause of lung cancer and is associated with head and neck, esophagus, bladder, breast and kidney cancer [9]. Increased risk with smoking may be due to the direct effect of tobacco carcinogens or due to genetic polymorphisms in enzymes that activate or detoxify carcinogens.

Several carcinogens present in cigarette smoke are inactivated by a family of enzymes cytochrome P-450 (CYP), which convert carcinogens into reactivated intermediates. These intermediates form DNA adducts that need to be detoxified by a number of enzymes, including glutathione S-transferase [GST) [10]. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in these genes could be an alternative mechanism that modulates the effects of cigarette smoke. Even though alcohol and smoking are known risk factors, only a fraction of smokers and alcohol consumers develop HNSCC,suggesting that genetic susceptibility and interactions between genetic, epigenetic and environmental factors could play an important role in the etiology of HNSCC[11, 12].

Alcohol consumption has been associated with an increased risk of the head and neck, esophagus, liver, colorectal, and breast cancer [13]. Possible mechanisms by which alcohol exerts its harmful effect includes the genotoxic effect of ethanol metabolite acetaldehyde, production of reactive oxygen- and nitrogen species, changes in folate metabolism, generation of DNA adducts and inhibition of DNA repair. Also, alcohol could exert its damaging effect directly, either acting as a solvent of carcinogens from tobacco smoke or damaging the oral mucosa, that enhances the penetration of carcinogens from tobacco smoke [7]. Genetic polymorphisms of ethanol-metabolizing enzymes, including alcohol dehydrogenases (ADH) (which metabolizes alcohol into acetaldehyde), with a different ability to generate carcinogen acetaldehyde, may determine individual susceptibility to head and neck cancer. Acetaldehyde can form adducts with DNA, interfering with DNA synthesis and repair [7, 13]. “Fast-metabolizing” ADHs genotype was associated with the increase of OSCCand HNSCCrisk [14, 15, 16]. By the contrast, in other studies “fast-metabolizing” ADHs genotype was found to be associated with decreased risk of HNSCC[11, 17, 18]. Therefore, the mechanism by which smoking and alcohol causes increased risk for HNSCCand the role of alcohol and tobacco-related polymorphisms have not been fully elucidated.

Figure 1.

Diverse anatomical localization of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinomas. Although head and neck cancers are characterized by heterogeneous histology, the majority carcinomas arise from squamous cell epithelia of the oral cavity (tongue, buccal mucosa, floor of the mouth), oropharynx (soft palate, base of tongue, tonsils), hypopharynx, nasopharynx, larynx (supraglotis, glottis, subglotis) and esophagus.

1.4. HPV infection in HNSCC

In addition to alcohol and tobacco exposure, human papilloma virus (HPV) infection has also a significant part in the etiology of head and neck cancer. HPV cancers predominantly arise from tongue and palatine tonsils within the oropharynx [5, 19]. Acting in synergy with tobacco use and heavy alcohol consumption, HPV infection with high-risk types is considered as an etiological factor in the development of HSCCand OSCC[5]. Reported incidence of high-risk HPVs in oral carcinoma patients varied from 0% to 100% [20], depending on the methods used for HPV detection, tumor-host characteristics of the examined group of patients, varying numbers of included tissue samples, but it is also affected with different distribution of oncogenic HPVs in different world regions. The DNA of oncogenic HPVs is present in 20% of all HNSSCsand in nearly 60% of tonsillar cancers [5, 8]. There is increasing evidence that HPV-associated HNSCCcarcinomas are distinct clinical and pathological tumor entity from alcohol and smoking-associated HNSCCs with regards to risk factors, tumor biology and progression [5]. Infection with oncogenic HPV types, predominantly HPV16 and HPV18 is associated with increased risk of HNSSC[5, 19].

HPV infection causes deregulation of cell cycle and apoptosis by inactivation of Rband p53tumor suppressor gene protein products, involved in the maintenance of genome stability. E6 protein of high risk HPVs affects the p53protein function by ubiquitin-dependent degradation. Although p53tumor suppressor gene is the most often mutated gene in human oncology, in tumors with HPV etiology is not clear in which extent the mechanism of p53mutation is included in p53inactivation. It can be assumed that p53mutations occur most frequently in HPV negative than in the HPV positive head and neck cancers, but it is questionable if the presence of p53mutation in HPV infected tumors additionally influences prognosis of the patients. Numerous studies with conflicting results deal with the influence of oncogenic HPV types and prognosis of HSCC. The majority of them reported that HSCCpatients with HPV infection have better prognosis than the patients who are HPV negative [5, 21, 22]. On the contrary, our previous results concerning OSCCpatients in stage III of the disease showed worse overall and disease-free survival for patients infected with high-risk HPV types (HPV 16, 18 and 31) [23], indicating the presence of more aggressive disease in these patients. Our study comparing disease-free interval (DFI) and overall survival (OS) between patients with HPV infection only and the patients with HPV infection and p53mutation showed significantly shorter disease-free interval as well as overall survival in patients with both HPV infection and p53mutation. Presence of p53mutations in HPV infected tumors confer a higher risk of recurrence in this disease. In addition, since all patients were treated with postoperative radiotherapy, shorter DFI indicate that the response to radiotherapy may be influenced by p53status [24]. However, it has been recently reported that it is unlikely that HPV infection plays significant role in mobile tongue carcinogenesis in young OSCCpatients [25].

The role of HPV infection in the etiology, as well as in prognosis of head and neck cancers varies and it depends on head and neck cancer subtypes and different anatomic site of tumors. From that point of view, it is clear that HPV typing, together with other molecular markers may help in defining a particular group of tumors in regard to prognosis and response to anti cancer therapies.

1.5. Diet and HNSCC

Recent studies provide growing evidence that some dietary components, might affect the process of carcinogenesis. There is a growing body of evidence that bioactive food components, such as isothiocyanates from cruciferous vegetables (cauliflower, cabbage, and broccoli), diallyl sulfide (an organosulphur compound from garlic), green tea flavonoids, folate, and selenium, effect on cancer might be mediated through epigenetic mechanisms. Several recent studies indicate that dietary habits and fruit and vegetable intake could be associated with cancer risk [26, 27]. Increased fruit and vegetable consumption was recently associated with reduced occurrence of HNSCC[28]. However, the findings of association of diet and cancer risk are still confounding.

Figure 2.

Schematic presentation of synergistic effect of different genetic alterations in transformation of normal to malignant cell. Gene mutations can be inherited (BRCA1, BRCA2, RET, VHL, APC) and associated with a predisposition to certain cancer or cancer syndromes. Also, mutations can be acquired leading to the strong predisposition to malignant transformation of cells (K-ras, p53, HER2,bcr-abl, bcl-2, Rb). The human genome is characterized with enormous number of genetic polymorphisms that sometimes results with impaired function of the gene product, especially when cells are exposed to environmental or host risk factors. Hypermethylation of gene promoter sequences causes gene silencing that is of great importance for tumor suppressor genes. All these genetic alterations can impair function of other genes and further contribute to increased risk of malignant transformation.


2. Molecular changes In HNSCC

Second half of 20th century and beginning of 21st century are marked with almost revolutionary breakthrough in our understanding of human gene structure and functions. The rapid development of biotechniques led to the sequencing of complete human genome and later of genome and transcriptome of many human tumors [29, 30]. Even before these achievements, it was well accepted that malignant tumors, on the molecular level, are disease of genes. This knowledge led to enormous number of worldwide research projects and publications concerning association of gene alterations in tumor cells with cancerogenesis and early diagnosis, tumor progression, tumor staging and response to therapy. In spite of many practical/clinical results of these studies [Her-2/neu, BRCA-1and BRCA-2in Breast Cancer; K-rasand EGFRin Colon Cancer; bcr-ablin Chronic Myeloid Leukemia; B-RAFand c-KITin Melanoma; detection of dominant clone of B- and T-lymphocytes in tracking minimal residual disease in lymphomas and leukemia’s [29-33], still much more questions concerning significance of gene alterations for tumor development and treatment remains unanswered. In the last 10-15 years significant efforts are done to fulfill these gaps in our understanding of molecular pathogenesis of cancer by studying epigenetic changes of tumor tissues.

These alterations are of special interest because epigenetic changes are tumor/tissue specific, although inheritable epigenetic alterations are under strong influence of environmental risk factors and patient behavior and they are potentially reversible. Intensive research of epigenetic alterations in human tumors and their association with environmental risk factors and patient behavior put an attention to another group of gene alterations, i.e. on inherited gene polymorphisms. These researches tried to elucidate connection of certain gene polymorphisms with environmental and host risk factors and epigenetic alterations in different human tumors and in HNSCC[12, 16, 34-36], Figure 2.

Carcinogenesis of HNSCCis a multistep process, which arises through an accumulation of genetic and epigenetic alterations. These genetic alterations result in inactivation of multiple tumor suppressor genes and activation of proto-oncogenes by deletions, point mutations, promoter methylation, and gene amplification [3], Table 1.

Genetic changesLocus / geneCancer typeFrequencyRef.
LOH9p21-22/ p16INK4a/p14ARFHNSCC
70–80%37, 38,39, 40
30–70%37, 39, 40, 47
Mutation9p21-22/ p16OSCC70%41
Amplification11q13/(PRAD-1/Cyclin D1/hst-1/int-2)HNSCC30–50%46, 47
7p12/EGFROSCC30%53, 54

Table 1.

Frequent genetic abnormalities in head and neck cancer.

Genetic instability in regions leads to loss of chromosomal region that contains tumor suppressor genes. A high incidence of Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) observed at 9p, 8p, 3p, 9q, and 11q regions were associated with tumor stage, and poor histological differentiation in HNSCC[37]. Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of 9p21 appears is an early and frequent event in head and neck carcinogenesis [37, 38-40]. The CDKN2A gene locus found in 9p21 region encodes two different transcripts, p16and p14ARF, which are responsible for G1 cell cycle regulation and MDM2 mediated degradation of p53. P16and p14are often inactivated in HNSCCthrough homozygous deletion, by promoter methylation, and by point mutations [41-44].

Loss of chromosome region 3p is a common early genetic event in HNSCC[2, 40, 45]. Genetic alterations at 3p that are common in HNSCCand OSCCcontains tumor suppressor genes Fragile histidine triad (FHIT) gene mapped at 3p14, Ras association family (RASSF1A) gene, mapped at 3p21, and Retinoic acid receptor B2 gene (RARB2), mapped to chromosome region 3p24 [37, 40]. Amplification of 11q13 leads to overexpression of cyclin D1 [46], detected in 30–60% of HNSCCand 40% of cases of oral squamous dysplasia [47].

There has been much research on the tumor suppressor gene p53and its role in HNSCCand OSCCcarcinogenesis. The p53protein blocks cell division at the G1 to S boundary, stimulates DNA repair after DNA damage, and induces apoptosis. P53has been shown to be functionally inactivated in oral and head and neck tumors [48]. LOH of 17p13, which contains p53and point mutations of the p53are seen in more than 50% of HNSCCcases [39, 49]. Cigarette smoking has been associated with the mutation of p53in head and neck cancers [14]. Investigations about the prognostic value of p53status in head and neck cancer subtypes hardly can get a clear result due to the presence of large heterogeneity in regard to patients characteristics, and methods for p53detection. Meta-analysis of Tandon et al [50] pointed out that evidence about the prognostic value of p53in head and neck cancer squamous cell carcinomas has been inconclusive. However, determination of p53status of HNSCCmay be of particular interests due to its possible role in prediction of the response to cisplatin based chemotherapy. Cisplatin chemotherapy is widely used chemotherapeutical approach in the treatment of head and neck cancers and data that patients with p53mutations respond better to cisplatin chemotherapy need further confirmation [51]. Chemotherapy responses in HNSCCpatients is also influenced by polymorphism at codon 72 of p53gene. In patients with wild type p53, arginine at codon 72 is associated with better response to chemotherapy. On the contrary, if p53is mutated, proline at position 72 is better option [52]. Better understanding of cellular processes and their actors such as p53network and their relation to clinical settings will help in appropriate biomarker characterization. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is overexpressed in 90% of HNSCC[53], often due to amplification [54]. Thus, frequent molecular abnormalities in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma include alterations in tumor suppressor genes p16INK4A, p53, p14ARF, FHIT, RASSF1A, Rb, cyclin D1, and activation of oncogenes, such as members of the rasgene family, c-myc, and EGFR[2-4], Table 1.

A large number of previous studies have also suggested the correlation between polymorphisms of genes involved in cell cycle control, angiogenesis and metabolism of alcohol and carcinogens and susceptibility to head and neck cancer [10, 16, 34-36].

Although the impact of genetic changes in oral carcinogenesis is well-known, over the last decade it has been demonstrated that epigenetic changes, especially aberrant DNA methylation, play a significant role in HNSCC[55]. Epigenetic modifications are heritable changes in gene expression that are not coded in the DNA sequence [56]. These changes are mitoticaly (clonally) heritable and potentially reversible, which provides large possibilities of epigenetic therapy. Additionally, epigenetic changes could be modulated by the nutrition, environmental and genetic factors and/or gene-by-environment interactions. Main mechanisms of epigenetic control in mammals include DNA methylation, histone modifications and RNA interference (RNA silencing).


3. DNA methylation

DNA methylation of cytosine in a CpG dinucleotide is the key epigenetic modification in mammals. The covalent addition of a methyl group to the 5-carbon (C5) position of cytosine that are located 5' to a guanosine base in a CpG dinucleotide are catalyzed by a family of enzymes DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs). CpG dinucleotides are asymmetrically distributed in the genome. Throughout the genome rare solitary CpGs are heavily methylated. In contrast, CpG clustered in small stretches of DNA (0.5-4kb regions), with greater than 50% GC content, are termed ‘CpG islands’. Of approximately 50% the genes in the genome CpG islands are associated with promoter regions. In normal cells, most CpG sites outside of CpG islands are methylated, whereas CpG islands in gene promoters are usually unmethylated, independently of the gene transcription status [56]. During the process of cancerogenesis paradoxical changes in DNA methylation patterns occurs, with simultaneous global hypomethylation and regional hypermethylation changes. Global DNA hypomethylation may activate, ‘unlock’ repetitive elements that could affect genome stability or could lead to transcriptional activation of latent viruses or oncogenes. Simultaneously, regional hypermethylation leads to transcriptional silencing of tumor suppressor genes. Cytosine methylation of CpG islands in the promoters of tumor suppressor genes causes their inactivation, transcriptional silencing and consequently malignant transformation. Investigations showed that the number of cancer-related genes that are inactivated by epigenetic modifications equals or even exceeds the number of genes inactivated by mutation. Furthermore, genetic and epigenetic changes have almost identical biological effect and pattern of gene expression [56]. Pattern of tumor suppressor genes hypermethylation shows tumor-type specificity.

While DNMT3Aand DNMT3Bare mostly involved in de novomethylation, DNMT1is involved in the maintenance of DNA methylation after replication [56]. Several studies have shown DNMToverexpression (mainly DNMT1and DNMT3B) in cancer, including HNSCC[57]. The analysis of DNMTknockout cells revealed that individual enzymes also interact between each other, and interact with other chromatin modifying enzymes, histone deacetylases (HDAC) and methyl-CpG binding proteins (MBPs). Methylation of cytosine within CpG islands is associated with binding of MBPs, which recruit HDACto methylated DNA in regions of transcriptional silencing. Histone deacetylation, catalyzed by HDACs, leads to the chromatin condensation and suppression of DNA transcription. Thus, DNA methylation and histone modifications are not isolated events, but highly coordinated [56].

3.1. DNA methylation in HNSCC

Frequent hypermethylation of tumor-related genes were observed in cancer tissue of OSCCand HNSCC, in the normal adjacent mucous in the OSCC[58], dysplastic tissue [59], and leukoplakia [60]. Promoter hypermethylation can also be detected in buccal swabs samples of tobacco and alcohol users [58], Thus, DNA methylation has been considered as an early event in head and neck carcinogenesis.

The list of genes that are found to be inactivated by DNA methylation events in HNSCCis growing rapidly and includes genes involved in the cell cycle control (p14, p15, p16and p53), DNA damage repair (MGMT, hMLH1, and ATM), apoptosis (DAPK, RASSF1A, and RARβ), Wntsignalling (APC, RUNX3, WIF1, E-cadand DCC) SFRPfamily genes, TCF21, etc. [42, 44, 55, 58-62], Table 2.

FUNCTIONGeneGene nameLocusGene ActionHNSCC methylationRef.
Cell Cycle Controlp16Cyclin-dependent
kinase inhibitor
9p21Regulation of
the Rbpathway
10-70%42, 96
kinase inhibitor 2B
9p21TGF beta-mediated
cell cycle arrest
Apoptosisp14Alternative open
reading frame (ARF)
of INK4a locus
9p21Pro-apoptosis18-46%75-77, 96
protein kinase 1
18-77%42, 44, 61, 68, 72, 78
Wnt signaling pathwayAPCAdenomatous
polyposis coli
and adhesion
20-68%44, 92-95
CDH1E-cadherin16q22Cell–cell adhesion2-66%44, 72, 81-88
SFRPSoluble frizzled
receptor protein
genes family
10q24Antagonists of
the Wnt pathway
WIF1Wnt inhibitory
factor 1
12q14Secreted Wnt
25-90%62, 97, 102
transcription factor 3
inhibitor, TGF-β-induced
tumor suppression
18-36%62, 99-101
DNA damage repairhMLH1human mutL homolog 13p21DNA mismatch repair8-76%96, 106, 107
DNA methyltransferase
10q26DNA repair
for alkylated guanine
10-57%59, 44, 72, 103-105
Tumor suppressorFHITFragile Histidine Triad3p14Control of cell cycle33-84%96, 110
RASSF1ARas association
domain family
member 1A
3p21RAS pathway
regulation and
tumor suppression
10-76%45, 72, 78, 79, 96
DCCDeleted in
Colorectal Cancer
18q21Cell–cell adhesion17-75%108, 109
RARβRetinoic acid
receptor beta
3p24Regulatory protein
and apoptosis
53-88%59, 78

Table 2.

Genes commonly methylated in HNSCC.

3.2. DNA methylation association with progression and prognosis in HNSCC

A number of tumor suppressor genes hypermethylation has been associated with worse outcome in various cancer types. Hypermethylation of the p16and WIF1genes [63] and RASSF1Aand RUNX3methylation status [64] were found to be independent prognostic factors non-small cell lung cancers. DAPKpromoter hypermethylation has been associated with tumor aggressiveness and poor prognosis in lung cancer [65]. E-cadherin promoter hypermethylation was found to be the prognostic factor of worse prognosis in diffuse gastric cancer [66], and in non-small cell lung carcinoma [67]. Epigenetic inactivation of several genes by DNA methylation has been found to associate with HNSCCprogression [44, 58, 61, 68].

p16INK4ais cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor which regulates the Rbpathway, leading to inhibition of cell cycle progression. An alternate spliced product of the same INK4a locus is another tumor suppressor gene p14ARF(Alternative open reading frame). Loss of p16in head and neck and oral tumors has been frequently reported [69, 70]. p16methylation was correlated with malignant transformation of oral epithelial dysplasia and is a potential biomarker for prediction of prognosis of mild or moderate oral epithelial dysplasia, with the overall sensitivity and specificity of >60% [71]. Previously, p16methylation status has been correlated with tumor stage, lymph node metastasis and tumor size in HNSCC[72], and poorly differentiated HNSCC[73]. p16hypermethylation has been associated with poor prognosis in HNSCC[55, 74] and OSCC[75]. Interestingly, p16INK4Aand p14ARFgenes, transcribed from the same locus INK4A by alternate splicing, could have a diametrically opposite clinical effect in oral cancer patients when methylated. Promoter methylation of p16was associated with increased disease recurrences and worse prognosis, whereas p14methylation was strongly associated with lower disease recurrence and was found to be a good prognostic predictor for oral carcinoma [75]. However, other studies associated p14methylation with tumor stage and lymph node involvement of OSCC[76] and poor prognosis [77]. These findings indicate that DNA methylation status of INK4A/ARFlocus could be used as a prognostic biomarker for assessing the aggressiveness of disease in oral and head and neck carcinoma patients.

Death associated protein-kinase (DAPK), plays a critical role in apoptosis regulation in tumor development, and commonly is hypermethylated in HNSCC[42] and OSCC[68]. DAPKpromoter methylation showed the positive correlation with lymph node involvement [42, 72, 78] and advanced disease stage in HNSCC[42, 72]. The presence of DAPKpromoter hypermethylation detected in surgical margins was associated with the decreased overall survival and was shown to be an independent prognostic factor for overall survival in OSCCpatients [61].

RASSF1ARas association (RalGDS/AF-6) domain family member 1A, involved in RAS pathway regulation and tumor suppression, is frequently inactivated by promoter hypermethylation in HNSCC[45, 72]. RASSF1Amethylation correlates with head and neck tumor stage [72], poor disease-free survival of OSCC[79] and lymph node metastasis in nasophageal carcinomas [78].

E-cadherin(E-cad) has a dual role in a mammalian cell, as a Ca+2-dependent cell adhesion molecule, and as a part of the complex signaling Wnt pathway interacting with β- and α-catenine [80]. Hypermethylation of E-cadis a common event in HNSCC[44, 72, 81, 82]. Reduced E-cadexpression as a consequence of promoter hypermethylation leads to the development of the invasive phenotype in the OSCC[83], and is associated with lymph node metastasis in the OSCC[84] and HNSCC[85]. Hypermethylation of E-cadhas previously been associated with tumor stage of HNSCC[72] and nasopharyngeal carcinomas [86] and lymph node metastasis of oral [82] and nasopharyngeal carcinomas [87]. Down-regulation of CDH1 due to hypermethylation contributed to the progression of esophageal cancer [88], led to poor differentiation and the development of the invasive phenotype in the OSCC[83], and salivary gland carcinomas [89]. Furthermore, E-cadhypermethylation was associated with poor survival in the OSCC[84] and HNSCC[85]. Recently published investigations showed that E-cadgene hypermethylation was associated with the decreased survival in HNSCCpatients [90]. In addition, advanced OSCCpatients with E-cadpromoter methylation had significantly worse 3- and 5-year survival rates [44], and E-cadhypermethylation was found to be an independent prognostic factor in oral tongue carcinoma [81]. However, HNSCCpatients with E-cadpromoter methylation had lower rates of local recurrences and better disease-specific survival and outcome [91], which indicates that the role of E-cadgene methylation in head and neck carcinomas has not been fully elucidated.

APCgene plays an integral role in the Wntsignaling pathway in binding and degrading of β-catenine. Hypermethylation of the APCgene promoter is frequent in HNSCC[92-94], and OSCC[44]. APCmethylation status has previously been associated with worse prognosis of esophageal carcinoma [95]. However, in another study on esophageal cancer, hypermethylation of the APCgene was related to a lower number of metastatic lymph nodes and better recurrence rates [96].

SFRP(soluble frizzled receptor protein) family genes are involved in the inhibition of Wntsignaling. Promoters of SFRP-2, SFRP-4, SFRP-5 genes showed methylation in OSCC, whereas SFRP-1 was demethylated in oral cancer [97]. SFRP-1 has been associated with tumor grade in OSCC[98]. Hypermethylation of SFRP-1 was associated with an increased risk of esophageal cancer recurrence [99].

RUNX3Runt-related transcription factor 3 gene plays a role in the transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β) -induced tumor suppression pathway. RUNX3may have an oncogenic role in HNSCCand its expression may predict malignant behavior [100]. In contrast to HNSCC, in OSCCthe RUNX3gene is downregulated due to promoter hypermethylation [101] and associated with lymph node involvement and tumor stage in tongue carcinomas [62]. Hypermethylation of RUNX3detected in the plasma of esophageal cancer patients was significantly associated with an increased risk of cancer recurrence [99].

WIF1Wnt inhibitory factor 1, gene involved in the inhibition of Wntsignaling, is commonly methylated in the HNSCC[102] and OSCC[62, 97]. Its methylation status was correlated with lymph node metastasis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma [102].

MGMTO(6)-methylguanine-DNAmethyltransferase a DNA repair gene that removes mutagenic O6-guanine adducts from DNA, is inactivated by hypermethylation in HNSCC[59] and OSCC[44]. MGMTpromoter hypermethylation was associated with tumor stage of HNSCC[72] and with lymph node involvement in laryngeal carcinomas [103]. In addition, the methylation of MGMTwas associated with poor survival and reduced disease-free survival in OSCC[104] and increased recurrences rate and poor prognosis of HNSCC[105].

hMLH1mutL homolog 1 is involved in the DNA repair process. The hMLH1promoter methylation occurred in high frequency of the majority of the early stage OSCCand in about half of the late stage carcinomas [106], indicating its potential role in the tumor progression. Promoter methylation of hMLH1gene is also a common event in HNSCC, and was correlated with poor survival in HNSCC[107].

RARßRetinoic acid receptor beta is commonly methylated in HNSCC[59] and associated with highly differentiated tumors, advanced tumor stage and the presence of lymph node metastasis of nasopharyngeal carcinomas [78].

TIMP3Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases 3 gene is involved in the inhibition of angiogenesis and tumor growth. Promoter methylation of TIMP3 predicts better outcome in HNSCCtreated by radiotherapy [91].

DCCDeleted in colorectal cancer, tumor suppressor gene highly methylated in HNSCC[108] was correlated with mandibular invasion and poor survival in oral cancer [109].

FHITFragile Histidine Triad gene is associated highly methylated in HNSCC[96], and associated with poor prognosis in early stage esophageal squamous cell carcinoma [110].

MINT1and MINT 31,are the members of Methylated in tumor gene family, which methylation was previously associated with invasiveness and poor survival in the OSCC[109].

A number of recent data suggests that promoter hypermethylation of specific genes does not occur independently or randomly, but concurrently, which indicate that during the tumor progression progressive accumulation of epigenetic alterations could occur. High degree of methylation of multiple genes CpG island regions, associated with microsatellite instability and hMLH1gene hypermethylation, has been defined as a CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) in colorectal cancer, and is characterized by a poor outcome [111]. It has been suggested that a form of the CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) exists in other solid tumors, including HNSCC[112]. As opposed of CIMP positive colorectal cancers In oral cancer CIMP is characterized by less aggressive tumor biology [113],. The panel of tumor-related genes used to classify multiple methylation and CIMP differs substantially between studies [12, 112, 113], which could likely affect the results of association with clinical parameters and prognosis. Future extensive investigations are needed to establish a reliable set of reference cancer-related genes whose methylation status should be examined in the specific types of tumors. Further investigations are needed to better characterize the etiology of this methylation phenotype as well as to determine if this phenotype has important prognostic or clinical use.

3.3. DNA methylation in early detection of HNSCC

The detection of aberrant DNA hypermethylation emerged as a potential biomarker strategy for early detection of various carcinomas. Since DNA methylation is an early event in tumorigenesis of HNSCC, identification of methylation markers could provide great promise for early detection and treatment in HNSCC[68]. As opposed to advanced HNSCCdiagnosis, early HNSCCdetection increases survival to 80%. Therefore, early detection markers may potentially serve as a predictive tool for diagnosis and recurrence of HNSCC. However, even though such markers provide great promise for early detection, epigenetic biomarkers have not yet been clinically implemented [114, 115].

Routine oral visual screening could significantly reduce oral cavity mortality [116]. However, oral cavity screening will not identify cancers deep in the pharynx or larynx which requires special instrumentation and examination. In addition, screening of HNSCCshould involve noninvasive detection of OSCCand HNSCC, such as detection in saliva and oral rinses, or minimally invasive detection, such as blood and serum analysis. Saliva presents an ideal means for HNSCCbiomarker detection because of its proximity to the primary tumor site, availability of exfoliated cancer cells, and ease of sampling [117, 118].

Soluble CD44 promoter gene hypermethylation detected in saliva samples has been indicated as an early detection marker in HNSCCscreening [119]. Recently, NID2and HOXA9promoter hypermethylation have been identified as biomarkers for prevention and early detection in oral carcinoma tissues and saliva [120]. Hypermethylation of multiple tumor-related genes (RAR-β, DAPK, CDH1, p16and RASSF1A) analyzed in combination could serve as a biomarker for early diagnosis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma [57]. Moreover, these multiple tumor-related gene hypermethylation were associated with the increase of DNMT3bexpression in early stages of esophageal cancer [57].

The development methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR) techniques has resulted in the identification of methylated genes specific to HNSCCdetected in tumor samples [68], including DAPK[42], and RASSF1A[72].

Saliva and oral rinses could be ideal diagnostic and predictive biofluids for head and neck cancer since they samples cells from the entire lesion and the entire oral cavity. The detection of hypermethylated marker genes from oral rinse and saliva samples has a great potential for the noninvasive detection of OSCCand HNSCC[118, 68, 121, 122, 123, 124]. DNA hypermethylation of p16, MGMT, and DAPKin saliva showed aberrant methylation in 56% of samples from HNSCCpatients, and only in one of the 30 control subjects [68]. The aberrant methylation of a combination of marker genes E-cadherin, transmembrane protein with epidermal growth factor-like and 2 follistatin-like domains 2 (TMEFF2), and MGMT, present in oral rinses was used to detect OSCCwith >90% sensitivity and specificity [124].

Using the approach of gene selection according to previous studies on promoter methylation in HNSCCCarvalho et al. analyzed both saliva and serum in 211 HNSCCpatients and 527 normal controls, and showed high specificity of promoter hypermethylation in HNSCCpatients compared with normal subjects (>90%); however, the sensitivity of this panel was 31.4% [118]. In another study with different approaches, genome-wide methylation array analysis of 807 cancer-associated genes, was conducted on the matched preoperative saliva, postoperative saliva, and oral cancer tissue, and compared to saliva of normal subjects. Multiple potential diagnostic gene panels that consisted of 4 to 7 genes ranged in their sensitivity from 62% to 77% and in their specificity from 83% to 100% [123], significantly higher than previous studies of aberrant methylation detected in saliva in head and neck cancer patients [121, 122, 118]. Using this approach, new genes could be discovered that can be used as a reliable biomarker for the early detection of oral and head and neck cancer.

The KIF1A(Kinesin family member 1A) gene, that encodes a microtubule-dependent molecular motor protein involved in organelle transport and cell division, has recently been associated with aberrant DNA methylation in HNSCC[125]. EDNRB(Endothelin receptor type B) is a G protein coupled receptor, which activates a phosphatidylinositol calcium second messenger system, has previously been associated with nasopharyngeal carcinomas [126] and HNSCC[125]. Promoter hypermethylation of KIF1Aand EDNRBis a frequent event in primary HNSCC, and these genes are preferentially methylated in salivary rinses from HNSCCpatients. KIF1A(97.8% specificity and 36.6% sensitivity) and EDNRB(93.2% specificity and 67.6% sensitivity) are highly sensitive markers that could potentially be used as biomarkers for HNSCCdetection. In addition, combining the markers improves sensitivity while maintains good specificity (93.1% specificity and 77.4% sensitivity) [125].

3.4. Predictive significance of DNA methylation

Epigenetic alterations such as DNA methylation could be a marker of response to radio and/or chemotherapy in the treatment of cancer. DNA methylation could play an important role in the regulation of gene expression for genes involved in cell cycle and apoptosis, thus affecting the chemosensitivity of cancers. Treatment of cancer cells with demethylating agent could lead to re-expression of gene involved in the activation of the apoptotic process and restore the sensitivity to the chemotherapy. Targeting the epigenetic mechanisms of apoptosis related genes inactivation may increase the efficacy of chemotherapy in various cancer types. Studies in vitro and in model systems certainly suggest that treatment with epipgenetic agents can reverse drug resistance.

The best known example of DNA promoter hypermethylation and response to chemotherapy is MGMTpromoter methylation in glioma patients treated with alkylating agents [127]. The expression of DNA repair gene MGMT, which removes alkyl groups added to guanine in DNA, is controlled by its promoter methylation. A cell that expresses a low amount of MGMTis known to be more sensitive to the antiproliferative effects of alkylating agents. It has been shown that hypermethylation of MGMTis the predictor of good response to temozolomide therapy in gliomas [128], to carmustine therapy in gliomas [127], and to cyclophosphamide therapy in diffuse B cell lymphoma [129]. Acquired hypermethylation of DNA mismatch repair gene hMLH1(detectable in peripheral blood) during carboplatinum/taxane therapy of ovarian cancer predicts poorer outcome [130]. In addition, WRNgene promoter hypermethylation was associated with hypersensitivity to topoisomerase inhibitor irinotecan in primary colon cancer [131].

It has been shown that DNA methylation could have the predictive significance in OSCCand HNSCC. Hypermethylation of MGMTwas the predictor of good response to temozolomide therapy in oral squamous cell carcinoma [105]. GPx3 promoter hypermethylation was associated with tumorigenesis and chemotherapy response in HNSCC[132]. A correlation between methylation of mitotic checkpoint gene CHFR (checkpoint with ring finger) and sensitivity to microtubule inhibitors (docetaxel or paclitaxel) was observed in OSCCcells [133]. Downregulation of SMG-1(suppressor with morphogenetic effect on genitalia) due to promoter hypermethylation in HPV-Positive HNSCCresulted in increased radiation sensitivity and correlated with improved survival, whereas SMG-1overexpression protected HPV-positive tumor cells from irradiation [134]. DNA methylation could be a regulatory mechanism for chemosensitivity to 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin by zebularine, a novel DNA methyltransferase inhibitor, in oral squamous cell carcinomas [135]. It has been shown that zebularine suppresses the apoptotic potential of 5-fluorouracil via cAMP/PKA/CREB pathway in human oral carcinoma cells [136].

Radiotherapy is the standard adjuvant treatment for OSCCand the Ras/PI3K/AKT pathway plays an important role in OSCCradioresistance. A combination of RASSF1A, RASSF2A, and HIN-1methylation was found to be significantly associated with poor disease-free survival in patients treated with radiotherapy after surgery but not in patients treated with surgery alone [79].

TGF-βsignaling has been found to be disrupted in HNSCCprogression [137], thus this pathway has been targeted for therapy [138]. Downregulation of disabled homolog 2 (DAB2) gene expression via promoter DNA methylation frequently occurs in HNSCCand acts as an independent predictor of metastasis and poor prognosis [139]. Epigenetic downregulation of DAB2switches TGF-βfrom a tumor suppressor to a tumor promoter, suggest a way to stratify patients with advanced SCC who may benefit from anti-TGF-β therapies [139].

Although methylation of certain genes appears to influence the sensitivity to chemotherapeutic drugs, the majority of studies were performed on cell line models, or a small number of subjects. In addition, combination therapies of epigenetic agents and standard chemotherapy/radiotherapy have to be carefully investigated due to potential harmful effects in the clinical application of DNMTinhibitors. Epigenetic profile in predicting the chemosensitivity of individual cancers would contribute to personalized therapy [140]. Studies of pharmacoepigenomics will require large-scale analyses and genome-wide methylation analyses using microarrays and next-generation sequencers, necessary to confirm the usage of epigenetic changes in predicting responses to chemotherapeutic drugs.

3.5. Epigenetic therapy of HNSCC

Unlike mutations, epigenetic changes are reversible, which provides large possibilities of epigenetic therapy [141]. Demethylating agents that inhibit DNA methyltransferases DNMTs, could have a utility to effectively activate expression of previously epigenetically silenced genes. 5-azanucleosides, nucleoside analogs that inhibit DNMTs, with consequent hypomethylation of DNA, have long been known to have DNA demethylating activities, but are too toxic for clinical use [141]. However, recent studies have shown that therapeutic efficacy could be achieved at low drug doses [142 -4]. 5-Azacytidine, a cytosine analog treatment has been tested in multiple cancer cell lines and are shown to reexpress methylated genes in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) [142, 143]. Low doses were used in a large trial in patients with MDS, and showed an increase in the time of conversion of MDS to leukemia, and increased overall survival [144].

5-Azacytidine application resulted in partial demethylation of the MGMTand RASSF1Atumor suppressor genes and reduced proliferation of the tumor cells suggesting further investigation of 5-azacytidine for HNSCCtreatment [145]. Methylation status and expression of HIC1, a potential tumor suppressor gene, was restored after demethylation treatment of HNSCCcell lines with 5-azacytidine [146].

Epigenetic therapy in monotherapy could reactivate tumor suppressor genes or in combination therapy may enhance the anti-proliferative effect of standard chemotherapy, such as cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, etc. The low dose of a novel DNA methyltransferase inhibitor, zebularine may sensitize oral cancer cells to cisplatin, an important characteristic of solid cancer treatment. DNA methylation could be a regulatory mechanism for dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), known to be a principal factor in 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) resistance and that DPD activated by zebularine in OSCCcould be an inhibiting factor in the response to apoptosis induced by 5-FU [135].

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) has been extensively investigated and validated as a therapeutic target in lung, colorectal, pancreatic, and head and neck cancers. However, patients with wild type EGFRobtain little sustained benefit from anti-EGFRmonotherapy Broad restoration of tumor suppressor function by demethylation could enhance the anti-proliferative and pro-apoptotic effect of EGFRblockade in solid malignancy. Re-expression of p15, p21, or p27, cell cycle inhibitors downstream of EGFR, or PTEN, a PI3K/Akt inhibitory protein, may have particular synergy with anti-EGFRtherapy. Recent phase I study evaluated the combination of anti-EGFRerlotinib and 5-azacytidine in solid carcinomas showed the beneficial clinical effect in lung and head and neck cancers [147]. Efficacy of erlotinib could be enhanced by concurrent hypomethylating therapy with 5-azacytidine, secondary to re-expression of tumor suppressors interacting with the EGFRsignaling cascade. In recent study of resistance to anti-EGFRtherapy agents, promoter methylation of commonly methylated genes was investigated in two parental non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and HNSCCcell lines and their resistant derivatives to either erlotinib or cetuximab [148]. It was found that DAPKgene promoter was hypermethylated in drug-resistant derivatives generated from both parental cell lines. Restoration of DAPKinto the resistant NSCLCcells by stable transfection re-sensitized the cells to both erlotinib and cetuximab [148], thus indicating that DAPKpromoter methylation could be a potential biomarker of drug response.

These results demonstrate that DNA methylation could play an important role in both chemotherapy and radiotherapy resistance, and that gene silencing through promoter methylation is one of the key mechanisms of developed resistance to anti-EGFRtherapeutic agents. Epigenetic therapy could be a novel treatment to overcome chemo- and/or radiotherapy resistance and to improve the benefits of current therapies.

3.6. DNA methylation in HNSCCand etiological factors

Epidemiological studies have reported the association of DNA methylation status in HNSCCwith exposure to environmental factors, including tobacco smoke, alcohol intake, genotoxic betel quid consumption, HPV infection, diet and environmental pollutants.

Recent studies have shown a correlation between tobacco and/or alcohol use and hypermethylation of tumor related genes. DNA global hypomethylation was associated with alcohol consumption [149]. p16methylation has been correlated with alcohol use and smoking [72]. Promoter methylation of p16was previously correlated with alcohol intake [150], while RASSF1Amethylation was associated with tobacco use in HNSCC[72]. Smoking and drinking was associated with p15promoter methylation in the upper aerodigestive tract of healthy individuals and HNSCCpatients [151]. Promoter methylation of SFRP1occurred more often in both heavy and light drinkers compared to nondrinkers in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma [152]. Significant association of tumor-associated genes hypermethylation with alcohol use was observed in HNSCC[153].

Recent studies are indicating that increased fruit and vegetable consumption are associated with reduced head and neck cancer risk [28]. There is a growing body of evidence that bioactive food components, such as isothiocyanates from cruciferous vegetables (cauliflower, cabbage, and broccoli), diallyl sulfide, an organosulphur compound from garlic, isoflavone, phytosterole, folate, selenium, vitamin E, flavonoids might reduce cancer risk through epigenetic mechanisms. The chemoprevention of cancer by natural compounds could be a promising approach with less side effects and toxicity. Main polyphenols with the properties of DNMTinhibition are tea polyphenols, soy isoflavones, organosulphur compounds from garlic, and isothiocyanates from cruciferous vegetables. Dietary folate intake was associated with p16promoter methylation in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma [154]. Epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG), the major polyphenol in green tea, is believed to be a key active ingredient with anti-cancer properties. EGCGis methylated by catechol-O-methyltransferase and inhibits DNA methyltransferase (DNMT), thus reversing the hypermethylation and inducing the re-expression of the silenced genes [141].

EGCGhas been reported to reverse hypermethylation and reactivate several tumor suppressor genes in human esophageal squamous cell carcinoma cell lines [155]. The reversion-inducing cysteine-rich protein with Kazal motifs (RECK), a novel matrix metalloproteinases (MMP) inhibitor, is involved in the inhibition of tumor angiogenesis, invasion, and metastasis. EGCGtreatment enhanced RECKexpression by reversal of hypermethylation of RECKpromoter and inhibiting MMPactivities and invasion in OSCCcell lines [156]. Genistein, soy dietary isoflavone, reversed DNA hypermethylation and reactivated RARβ, p16, and MGMTin esophageal cancer cells [157]. However, the findings of association of diet and epigenetic modifications in the head and cancer and other carcinomas are still confounding.


4. Conclusions

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is one of the most common and highly aggressive malignancies worldwide, despite the significant efforts committed in the last decades in its detection, prevention and treatment. Therefore, early detection and better disease prediction via genetic and epigenetic biomarkers is crucial. However, very few reliable markers are currently known. Recent studies provide strong evidence that DNA methylation could have an important role in head and neck cancer. The detection of promoter methylation status may be a useful molecular marker for early detection of HNSCCfrom tissue, saliva, and serum samples and in real time analysis of margins during surgery. In addition, the creation of methylation gene panels could be useful for HNSCCscreening in the timely inclusion of treatment and thorough surveillance during follow-up period. Unlike genetic changes, epigenetic modifications are heritable and potentially reversible, thus providing the potential for therapy. Frequent DNA methylation detected in HNSCCand association with tumor progression and survival indicates that DNA methylation plays an important role in head and neck carcinogenesis and may be a useful diagnostic marker and a potential therapeutic target for HNSCC.


  1. 1. JemalA.SiegelR.WardE.MurrayT.XuJ.ThunM. J.2007Cancer statistics.CA Cancer J Clin.571
  2. 2. Perez-OrdonezB.BeaucheminM.JordanR.2006Molecular biology of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neckJ. Clin Pathol57445453
  3. 3. WilliamsH.K.2000Molecular pathogenesis of oral squamous carcinoma.Mol Pathol.53416572
  4. 4. ForastiereA.KochW.TrottiA.SidranskyD.2001Head and neck cancer.N Engl J Med.345261890900
  5. 5. RaginC. C.TaioliE.2007Survival of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck in relation to human papillomavirus infection: review and meta-analysis.Int J Cancer.12118131820
  6. 6. al.2003Folate intake and risk of oral and pharyngeal cancer.Ann Oncol.1416771681
  7. 7. PöschlG.SeitzH. K.2004Alcohol and cancer.Alcohol Alcohol.39315565
  8. 8. GillisonM. L.KochW. M.CaponeR. B.SpaffordM.WestraW. al.2000Evidence for a causal association between human papillomavirus and a subset of head and neck cancers.J Natl Cancer Inst.92709720
  9. 9. DollR.1998Uncovering the risks of smoking: historical perspective.Stat. Meth. Med Res.78711
  10. 10. ZhangZ. J.HaoK.ShiR.ZhaoG.JiangG. X.SongY.XuX.MaJ.2011Glutathione S-transferase M1 (GSTM1) and glutathione S-transferase T1 (GSTT1) null polymorphisms, smoking, and their interaction in oral cancer: a HuGE review and meta-analysis.Am J Epidemiol.173884757
  11. 11. SolomonP.SelvamG.ShanmugamG.2008Polymorphism in ADH and MTHFR genes in oral squamous cell carcinoma of Indians.Oral Diseases.14633639
  12. 12. SupicG.JovicN.KozomaraR.ZeljicK.MagicZ.2011Interaction between the MTHFR C677T polymorphism and alcohol--impact on oral cancer risk and multiple DNA methylation of tumor-related genes.J Dent Res.906570
  13. 13. SeitzH. K.StickelF.2007Molecular mechanisms of alcohol-mediated carcinogenesis.Nat Rev Cancer78599612
  14. 14. BrennanA.BoyleJ. O.KochW. M.1995Association between cigarette smoking and mutation of the 53 gene in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.N Engl J Med.33271217
  15. 15. VisapaaJ. al.2004Increased cancer risk in heavy drinkers with the alcohol dehydrogenase 1C*1 allele, possibly due to salivary acetaldehyde.Gut.538716
  16. 16. BrocicM.SupicG.ZeljicK.JovicN.KozomaraR.ZagoracS.ZlatkovicM.MagicZ.2011Genetic polymorphisms of ADH1C and CYP2E1 and risk of oral squamous cell carcinoma.Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg.145458693
  17. 17. SchwartzS.DoodyD.FitzgibbonsE.RicksS.PorterP.ChenC.2001Oral squamous cell cancer risk in relation to alcohol consumption and alcohol dehydrogenase-3 genotypes.Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev.10113744
  18. 18. PetersE.Mc CleanM.LiuM.EisenE.MuellerN.KelseyK. T.2005The ADH1C polymorphism modifies the risk of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck associated with alcohol and tobacco use.Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev.1447682
  19. 19. KlussmannJ. P.WeissenbornS.FuchsP. G.2001Human papillomavirus infection as a risk factor for squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck.N Engl J Med.34537681
  20. 20. TermineN.PanzarellaV.FalaschiniS.RussoA.MatrangaD.LoMuzio. I.CampisiG.2008HPV in oral squamous cell carcinoma vs Head and Neck squamous cell carcinoma biopsies: a meta-analysis (1998-2007).Ann Oncol.1916811690
  21. 21. DahlgrenL.DahlstrandH. M.LinquistD.HogmoA.BjornestalL.LindholmJ.LundbergB.DalianisT.Munck-WiklandE.2004Human papillomavirus is more common in base of tongue than in mobile tongue and is a favorable prognostic factor in base of tongue cancer patients.Int J Cancer.11210151019
  22. 22. MellinH.FrieslandS.LewensohnR.DalianisT.Munck WiklandE.2000Human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA in tonsillar cancer: clinical correlates, risk of relapse, and survival.Int J Cancer.89300304
  23. 23. KozomaraR.JovicN.MagicZ.Brankovic-MagicM.MinicV.2005Mutations and human papillomavirus infection in oral squamous cell carcinomas: correlation with overall survival.J Cranio-Maxillofacial Surg.33342348.
  24. 24. KozomaraR. J.Brankovic-MagicM. V.JovicN. R.StosicS. M.MagicZ. M.2007Prognostic significance of TP53 mutations in oral squamous cell carcinoma with human papilloma infection.Int J Biol Markers.22252257
  25. 25. KabeyaM.FurutaR.KawabataK.TakahashiS.IshikawaY.2012Prevalence of human papillomavirus in mobile tongue cancer with particular reference to young patients.Cancer Sci.103161168
  26. 26. BekkeringT.BeynonR.DaveySmith. G.DaviesA.HarbordR.SterneJ.ThomasS.WoodL.2006A systematic review of RCTs investigating the effect of dietal and physical activity interventions on cancer survival, updated report.World Cancer Research Fund. 15 January 2012)
  27. 27. DjuricZ.2011The Mediterranean diet: Effects on proteins that mediate fatty acid metabolism in the colon.Nutr Rev.6912730744
  28. 28. al.2008Fruit and vegetable intake and head and neck cancer risk in a large United States prospective cohort study.Int J Cancer.12223306
  29. 29. MagićZ.1999Apoptosis and cancer. Ed. In: Antypas G, editor. 2nd Balkan Congress of Oncology.Kushadasi October 1998, Turkey. Bologna: Monduzzi Ed.343348
  30. 30. MagicZ.RadulovicS.Brankovic MagicM.2007cDNA microarrays: identification of gene signatures and their application in clinical practice.J BUON. 12(Suppl 1)S39S44
  31. 31. Kandolf-SekulovićL.CikotaB.JovićM.SkiljevićD.StojadinovićO.MedenicaLj.MagićZ.2009The role of apoptosis and cell-proliferation regulating genes in mycosis fungoides.J Dermatol Sci.555356
  32. 32. CikotaB.TukićLj.TarabarO.MagićZ.2007p53 and ras gene mutations and quantification of residual disease in patients with B-cell non-hodgkin’s lymphoma.J Exp Clin Cancer Res264515522
  33. 33. Branković-MagićM.JankovićR.DobričićJ.BorojevićN.MagićZ.RadulovićS.2008TP53 mutations in breast cancer: association with ductal histology and early relapse of disease.Int J Biol Markers.23147153
  34. 34. HiyamaT.YoshiharaM.TanakaS.ChayamaK.2008Genetic polymorphisms and head and neck cancer risk (Review).Int J Oncol.3294573
  35. 35. ZeljicK.SupicG.StamenkovicRadak. M.JovicN.KozomaraR.MagicZ.2012Vitamin D receptor, CYP27B1 and CYP24A1 genes polymorphisms association with oral cancer risk and survival.J Oral Pathol Med.doi: j.16000714x.
  36. 36. SupicG.JovicN.ZeljicK.KozomaraR.MagicZ.2012Association of VEGF-A Genetic Polymorphisms with Cancer Risk and Survival in Advanced-Stage Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients.Oral Onc.
  37. 37. El -NaggerA. K.HurrK.BatsakisJ. al.1995Sequential loss of heterozygosity at microsatellite motifs in preinvasive and invasive head and neck squamous carcinoma.Cancer Res.5526569
  38. 38. CalifanoJ.van derR. P.WestraW.NawrozH.ClaymanG.PiantadosiS.CorioR.LeeD.GreenbergB.KochW.SidranskyD.1996Genetic progression model for head and neck cancer: implications for field cancerization.Cancer Res.5624882492
  39. 39. al.2006Genome-wide loss of heterozygosity and copy number alteration in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma using the Affymetrix GeneChip Mapping 10 K array.BMC Genomics7299
  40. 40. al.1999Location of candidate tumour suppressor gene loci at chromosomes 38p and 9p for oral squamous carcinomas.Int J Cancer8431825
  41. 41. al.1999Role of 16 MTS1, cyclin D1 and RB in primary oral cancer and oral cancer cell lines.Br. J Cancer807986
  42. 42. Sanchez-CespedesM.EstellerM.WuL.Nawroz-DanishH.YooG. H.KochW. M.JenJ.HermanJ. G.SidranskyD.2000Gene promoter hypermethylation in tumors and serum of head and neck cancer patients.Cancer Res.60892895
  43. 43. HaP. K.CalifanoJ. A.2006Promoter methylation and inactivation of tumour-suppressor genes in oral squamous-cell carcinoma.Lancet Oncol.77782
  44. 44. SupicG.KozomaraR.Brankovic-MagicM.JovicN.MagicZ.2009Gene hypermethylation in tumor tissue of advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma patients.Oral Oncol.4510517
  45. 45. HoggR. al.2002Frequent 3p allele loss and epigenetic inactivation of the RASSF1A tumour suppressor gene from region 321 in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.Eur J Cancer38158592
  46. 46. AmbatipudiS.GerstungM.GowdaR.PaiP.BorgesA. al.2011Genomic Profiling of Advanced-Stage Oral Cancers Reveals Chromosome 11q Alterations as Markers of Poor Clinical Outcome.PLoS ONE62e17250
  47. 47. KimM. M.CalifanoJ. A.2004Molecular pathology of head-and neck cancer.Int J Cancer112545553
  48. 48. LangdonJ. D.PartidgeM.1992Expression of the tumour suppressor gene 53 in oral cancer.Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg.3021420
  49. 49. BrachmanD. al.1992Occurrence of 53 gene deletions and human papilloma virus infection in human head and neck cancer.Cancer Res.5248324836
  50. 50. TandonS.Tudur-SmithC.RileyR. D.BoydM. T.JonesT. M.2010A systematic review of 53 as a prognostic factor of survival in squamous cell carcinoma of the four main anatomical subsites of the head and neck.Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev.19574587
  51. 51. al.2010TP53 mutations and pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant cisplatin and fluorouracil chemotherapy in resected oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma.J Clin Oncol.28761766
  52. 52. MrozE. A.RoccoJ. W.2010Functional 53 status as a biomarker for chemotherapy response in oral-cavity cancer.J Clin Oncol.28715717
  53. 53. GrandisJ. R.TweardyD. J.1993Elevated levels of transforming growth factor alpha and epidermal growth factor receptor messenger R.N.A. are early markers of carcinogenesis in head and neck cancer.Cancer Res.5335793584
  54. 54. ScullyC.1993Oncogenes, tumor suppressors and viruses in oral squamous carcinoma.J Oral Pathol Med.22337347
  55. 55. ShawR.2006The epigenetics of oral cancer.Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg.35101108
  56. 56. HermanJ. G.BaylinS. B.2003Gene silencing in cancer in association with promoter hypermethylation.N Eng. J Med.34920422054
  57. 57. LiB.WangB.NiuL. J.JiangL.QiuC. C.Hypermethylation of multiple tumor-related genes associated with D.N.M.T.3b up-regulation served as a biomarker for early diagnosis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.2011Epigenetics6330716
  58. 58. KulkarniV.SaranathD.2004Concurrent hypermethylation of multiple regulatory genes in chewing tobacco associated oral squamous cell carcinomas and adjacent normal tissues.Oral Oncol.40145153
  59. 59. al.2004Differential methylation status of tumor-associated genes in head and neck squamous carcinoma: incidence and potential implications.Clin Cancer Res.1038253830
  60. 60. LopezM.AguirreJ. M.CuevasN.AnzolaM.VidegainJ.AguirregaviriaJ.MartinezD. P.2003Gene promoter hypermethylation in oral rinses of leukoplakia patients-a diagnostic and/or prognostic tool?Eur J. Cancer3923062309
  61. 61. SupicG.KozomaraR.JovicN.ZeljicK.MagicZ.2011Prognostic significance of tumor-related genes hypermethylation detected in cancer-free surgical margins of oral squamous cell carcinomas.Oral Oncol.4787028
  62. 62. SupicG.KozomaraR.JovicN.ZeljicK.MagicZ.2011Hypermethylation of RUNX3 but not WIF1 gene and its association with stage and nodal status of tongue cancers.Oral Dis.178794800
  63. 63. YoshinoM.SuzukiM.TianL.MoriyaY.HoshinoH.OkamotoT.YoshidaS.ShibuyaK.YoshinoI.2009Promoter hypermethylation of the 16 and Wif-1 genes as an independent prognostic marker in stage IA non-small cell lung cancers.Int J Oncol.35512019
  64. 64. YanagawaN.TamuraG.OizumiH.KanauchiN.EndohM.SadahiroM.MotoyamaT.2007Promoter hypermethylation of RASSF1A and RUNX3 genes as an independent prognostic prediction marker in surgically resected non-small cell lung cancers.Lung Cancer.5811318
  65. 65. InbalB.CohenO.Polak-CharconS.KopolovicJ.VadaiE.EisenbachL.KimchiA.1997DAP kinase links the control of apoptosis to metastasis.Nature390180184
  66. 66. al.2004Prognostic analysis of E-cadherin gene promoter hypermethylation in patients with surgically resected, node-positive, diffuse gastric cancer.Clin Cancer Res.1027842789
  67. 67. NakataS.SugioK.UramotoH.OyamaT.HanagiriT.MoritaM.YasumotoK.2006The methylation status and protein expression of CDH1, p16 (INK4A), and fragile histidine triad in nonsmall cell lung carcinoma: epigenetic silencing, clinical features, and prognostic significance.Cancer10621902199
  68. 68. RosasS. L.KochW.CostaCarvalho. M. G.WuL.CalifanoJ.WestraW.JenJ.SidranskyD.2001Promoter hypermethylation patterns of p16 O-6-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase, and death-associated protein kinase in tumors and saliva of head and neck cancer patients.Cancer Res.61939942
  69. 69. AuerkariE.I.2006Methylation of tumor suppressor genes p16 (INK4a), p27(Kip1) and E-cadherin in carcinogenesis.Oral Oncol.42513
  70. 70. ReedA. al.1996High frequency of 16 (CDKN2/MTS-1/INK4A) inactivation in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.Cancer Res.5636303
  71. 71. CaoJ.ZhouJ.GaoY.GuL.MengH.LiuH.DengD.2009Methylation of 16 CpG Island Associated with Malignant Progression of Oral Epithelial Dysplasia: A Prospective Cohort Study.Clin Cancer Res.1516517883
  72. 72. HasegawaM.2002Nelson, H.H., Peters, E., Ringstrom, E., Posner, M., and Kelsey, K.T. Patterns of gene promoter methylation in squamous cell cancer of the head and neck.Oncogene2142314236
  73. 73. SteinmannK.SandnerA.SchagdarsurenginU.DammannR. H.2009Frequent promoter hypermethylation of tumor-related genes in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.Oncol Rep.226151926
  74. 74. KoscielnyS.DahseR.ErnstG.vonEggeling. F.2007The prognostic relevance of 16 inactivation in head and neck cancer.ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec.691306
  75. 75. SailasreeR.AbhilashA.SathyanK.NalinakumariK.ThomasS.KannanS.2008Differential Roles of p16 INK4Aand p14ARF Genes in Prognosis of Oral Carcinoma.Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev.17241420
  76. 76. IshidaE.NakamuraM.ShimadaK.HiguchiT.TakatsuK.YaneK.KonishiN.2007DNA hypermethylation status of multiple genes in papillary thyroid carcinomas.Pathobiology74634452
  77. 77. DominguezG.SilvaJ.GarciaJ. al.2003Prevalence of aberrant methylation of p14 ARFover p16INK4a in some human primary tumors.Mutat Res.530917
  78. 78. FendriA.MasmoudiA.KhabirA.Sellami-BoudawaraT.DaoudJ.FrikhaM.GhorbelA.GargouriA.Mokdad-GargouriR.2009Inactivation of RASSF1A, RARbeta2 and DAP-kinase by promoter methylation correlates with lymph node metastasis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.Cancer Biol Ther.8544451
  79. 79. HuangK. H.HuangS. F.ChenI. H.LiaoC. T.WangH. M.HsiehL. L.2009Methylation of RASSF1A, RASSF2A, and HIN-1 is associated with poor outcome after radiotherapy, but not surgery, in oral squamous cell carcinoma.Clin Cancer Res.1512417480
  80. 80. KudoY.KitajimaS.OgawaI.HiraokaM.SargolzaeiS.KeikhaeeM. al.2004Invasion and metastasis of oral cancer cells require methylation of E-cadherin and/or degradation of membranous beta-catenin.Clin Cancer Res.1054555463
  81. 81. ChangH. W.ChowV.LamK. Y.WeiW. I.YuenA.2002Loss of E-cadherin expression resulting from promoter hypermethylation in oral tongue carcinoma and its prognostic significance.Cancer94386392
  82. 82. De MoraesR. V.OliveiraD. al.2008E-cadherin Abnormalities Resulting From CpG Methylation Promoter In Metastatic And Nonmetastatic Oral Cancer.Head Neck308592
  83. 83. SaitoY.TakazawaH.UzawaK.TanzawaH.SatoK.1998Reduced expression of Ecadherin in oral squamous cell carcinoma: relationship with DNA methylation of 5’CpG island.Int J Oncol.12293298
  84. 84. FoschiniM. al.2008E-cadherin Loss and DNP73l expression in oral squamous cell carcinomas showing aggressive behavior.Head Neck.3014751482
  85. 85. KurtzK. A.HoffmanH. T.ZimmermanM. B.RobinsonR. A.2006Decreased E-cadherin but not beta-catenin expression is associated with vascular invasion and decreased survival in head and neck squamous carcinomas.Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg.134142146
  86. 86. NiemhomS.KitazawaS.KitazawaR.MaedaS.LeopairatJ.2008Hypermethylation of epithelial-cadherin gene promoter is associated with Epstein-Barr virus in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.Cancer Detect Prev.32212734
  87. 87. AyadiW.Karray-HakimH.KhabirA.FekiL.CharfiS.BoudawaraT.GhorbelA.DaoudJ.FrikhaM.BussonP.HammamiA.2008Aberrant methylation of p16 DLEC1, BLU and E-cadherin gene promoters in nasopharyngeal carcinoma biopsies from Tunisian patients.Anticancer Res.284B21617
  88. 88. LingZ. Q.LiP.GeM. H.ZhaoX.HuF. J.FangX. H.DongZ. M.MaoW. M.2011Hypermethylation-modulated down-regulation of CDH1 expression contributes to the progression of esophageal cancer.Int J Mol Med.27562535
  89. 89. ZhangC. Y.MaoL.LiL.TianZ.ZhouX. J.ZhangZ. Y.LiJ.2007Promoter methylation as a common mechanism for inactivating E-cadherin in human salivary gland adenoid cystic carcinoma.Cancer11018795
  90. 90. MarsitC. J.PosnerM. R.Mc CleanM. D.KelseyK. T.2008Hypermethylation of E-cadherin Is an Independent Predictor of Improved Survival in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Cancer113156671
  91. 91. De SchutterH.GeeraertsH.VerbekenE.NuytsS.2009Promoter methylation of TIMP3 and CDH1 predicts better outcome in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma treated by radiotherapy only.Oncol Rep.21507513
  92. 92. al.2000Analysis of Adenomatous Polyposis Coli Promoter Hypermethylation in Human.Cancer Canc Res.6043664371
  93. 93. ChenK.2007Sawhney, R., Khan, M., Benninger, M.S., Hou, Z., Sethi, S., et al. Methylation of multiple genes as diagnostic and therapeutic markers in primary head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg.13311311138
  94. 94. BrockM. V.GouM.AkiyamaY.MullerA.WuT. T.MontgomeryE.DeaselM.GermonpréP.RubinsonL.HeitmillerR. F.YangS. C.ForastiereA. A.BaylinS. B.HermanJ. G.2003Prognostic importance of promoter hypermethylation of multiple genes in esophageal adenocarcinoma.Clin Cancer Res.9829129
  95. 95. ZareM.JaziiF.AlivandM.NasseriN.MalekzadehR.YazdanbodM.2009Qualitative analysis of Adenomatous Polyposis Coli promoter: Hypermethylation, engagement and effects on survival of patients with esophageal cancer in a high risk region of the world, a potential molecular marker.BMC Cancer.92435
  96. 96. KimY. T.ParkJ. Y.JeonY. K.ParkS. J.SongJ. Y.KangC. H.SungS. W.KimJ. H.2009Aberrant promoter CpG island hypermethylation of the adenomatosis polyposis coli gene can serve as a good prognostic factor by affecting lymph node metastasis in squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus.Dis Esophagus.22214350
  97. 97. PannoneG.BufoP.SantoroA.FrancoR.AquinoG.LongoF.BottiG.SerpicoR.CafarelliB.AbbruzzeseA.CaragliaM.PapagerakisS.Lo MuzioL.2010WNT pathway in oral cancer: epigenetic inactivation of WNT-inhibitors.Oncol Rep.244103541
  98. 98. SogabeY.SuzukiH.ToyotaM.OgiK.ImaiT.NojimaM.SasakiY.HiratsukaH.TokinoT.2008Epigenetic inactivation of SFRP genes in oral squamous cell carcinoma.Int J Oncol.326125361
  99. 99. LiuJ. B.QiangF. L.DongJ.CaiJ.ZhouS. H.ShiM. X.ChenK. P.HuZ. B.2011Plasma DNA methylation of Wnt antagonists predicts recurrence of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.World J Gastroenterol.28; 1744491721
  100. 100. al.2009RUNX3 has an oncogenic role in head and neck cancer.PLoS ONE.4112
  101. 101. al.2009Frequent inactivation of RUNX3 by promoter hypermethylation and protein mislocalization in oral squamous cell carcinomas.J Cancer Res Clin Oncol.135739747
  102. 102. FendriA.KhabirA.Hadri-GuigaB.Sellami-BoudawaraT.DaoudJ.FrikhaM.GhorbelA.GargouriA.Mokdad-GargouriR.2010Epigenetic alteration of the Wnt inhibitory factor-1 promoter is common and occurs in advanced stage of Tunisian nasopharyngeal carcinoma.Cancer Invest.289896903
  103. 103. PaluszczakJ.MisiakP.WierzbickaM.WoźniakA.Baer-DubowskaW.2011Frequent hypermethylation of DAPK, RARbeta, MGMT, RASSF1A and FHIT in laryngeal squamous cell carcinomas and adjacent normal mucosa.Oral Oncol.4721047
  104. 104. TaioliE.RaginC.WangX. H.ChenJ.LangevinS. M.BrownA. R.GollinS. M.GarteS.SobolR. W.2009Recurrence in oral and pharyngeal cancer is associated with quantitative MGMT promoter methylation.BMC Cancer9354
  105. 105. ZuoC.AiL.RatliffP.SuenJ. Y.HannaE.BrentT. P.FanC. Y.2004O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase gene: epigenetic silencing and prognostic value in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev.13696775
  106. 106. González-RamírezI.Ramírez-AmadorV.Irigoyen-CamachoM. E.Sánchez-PérezY.Anaya-SaavedraG.Granados-GarcíaM.García-VázquezF.García-CuellarC. M.2011hMLH1 promoter methylation is an early event in oral cancer.Oral Oncol.471226
  107. 107. ZuoC.ZhangH.SpencerH. J.VuralE.SuenJ. Y.SchichmanS. A.SmollerB. R.KokoskaM. S.FanC. Y.2009Increased microsatellite instability and epigenetic inactivation of the hMLH1 gene in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg.141448490
  108. 108. CarvalhoA. L.ChuangA.JiangW. al.2006Deleted in colorectal cancer is a putative conditional tumor-suppressor gene inactivated by promoter hypermethylation in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.Cancer Res.661994017
  109. 109. OgiK.ToyotaM.Ohe-ToyotaM.TanakaN.NoguchiM.SonodaT.KohamaG.TokinoT.2002Aberrant methylation of multiple genes and clinicopathological features in oral squamous cell carcinoma.Clin Cancer Res.831643171
  110. 110. LeeE. J.LeeB. B.KimJ. W.ShimY. M.HoseokI.HanJ.ChoE. Y.ParkJ.KimD. H.2006Aberrant methylation of Fragile Histidine Triad gene is associated with poor prognosis in early stage esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Eur J Cancer.42797280
  111. 111. IssaJ.P.2004CpG island methylator phenotype in cancer.Nat Rev Cancer.41298893
  112. 112. MarsitC. J.HousemanE. A.ChristensenB. al.2006Examination of a CpG island methylator phenotype and implications of methylation profiles in solid tumors.Cancer Res.66106219
  113. 113. ShawR. J.HallG. L.LoweD.BowersN. L.LiloglouT.FieldJ. K.WoolgarJ. A.RiskJ. M.2007CpG island methylation phenotype (CIMP) in oral cancer: associated with a marked inflammatory response and less aggressive tumour biology.Oral Oncol.43987886
  114. 114. FreedmanL.2007Quantitative science methods for biomarker validation in chemoprevention trials.Cancer Biomark313540
  115. 115. PapadimitrakopoulouV. A.HongW. K.2000Biomolecular markers as intermediate end points in chemoprevention trials of upper aerodigestive tract cancer.Int J Cancer.888525
  116. 116. al.2005Effect of screening on oral cancer mortality in Kerala, India: a cluster-randomised controlled trial.Lancet365192733
  117. 117. CalifanoJ. A.AhrendtS.MeiningerG.WestraW. H.KochW. M.SidranskyD.1996Detection of telomerase activity in oral rinses from head and neck squamous cell cancer patients.Cancer Res.5657205722
  118. 118. CarvalhoA. L.JeronimoC.KimM. M.HenriqueR.ZhangZ.HoqueM. O.ChangS.BraitM.NayakC. S.JiangW. al.2008Evaluation of promoter hypermethylation detection in body fluids as a screening/diagnosis tool for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.Clin Cancer Res.1497107
  119. 119. FranzmannE. J.ReateguiE. al.2007Soluble CD44 is a potential marker for the early detection of head and neck cancer.Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev.16134855
  120. 120. Guerrero-PrestonR.SoudryE.AceroJ.OreraM.Moreno-LópezL.Macía-Coló al.2011NID2 and HOXA9 promoter hypermethylation as biomarkers for prevention and early detection in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma tissues and saliva.Cancer Prev Res (Phila)47106172
  121. 121. RighiniC. FraipontF.TimsitJ. al.2007Tumor-specific methylation in saliva: a promising biomarker for early detection of head and neck cancer recurrence.Clin Cancer Res.13117985
  122. 122. VietC.JordanR. C. K.SchmidtB. L.2007DNA promoter hypermethylation in saliva for the early diagnosis of oral cancer.J Calif Dent Assoc.34844
  123. 123. VietC.SchmidtB.2008Methylation Array Analysis of Preoperative and Postoperative Saliva DNA in Oral Cancer Patients.Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Pre.1712360311
  124. 124. al.2012Aberrant DNA methylation of tumor-related genes in oral rinse a noninvasive method for detection of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma.CancerDOI: cncr.27417
  125. 125. al.2010KIF1A and EDNRB are differentially methylated in primary HNSCC and salivary rinses.Int. J. Cancer12723512359
  126. 126. LoK. W.TsangY. S.KwongJ.ToK. F.TeoP. M.HuangD. P.2002Promoter hypermethylation of the EDNRB gene in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.Int J Cancer986515
  127. 127. EstellerM.Garcia-FoncillasJ.AndionE.GoodmanS. N.HidalgoO. F.VanaclochaV.BaylinS. B.HermanJ. G.2000Inactivation of the DNA-repair gene MGMT and the clinical response of gliomas to alkylating agents.N Engl J Med.3431913504
  128. 128. HegiM. E.DiserensA. C.GorliaT.HamouM. TriboletN.WellerM.KrosJ. M.HainfellnerJ. A.MasonW.MarianiL.BrombergJ. E.HauP.MirimanoffR. O.CairncrossJ. G.JanzerR. C.StuppR.2005MGMT gene silencing and benefit from temozolomide in glioblastoma.N Engl J Med.352109971003
  129. 129. EstellerM.GaidanoG.GoodmanS. N.ZagonelV.CapelloD.BottoB.RossiD.GloghiniA.VitoloU.CarboneA.BaylinS. B.HermanJ. G.2002Hypermethylation of the DNA repair gene O(6)-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase and survival of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.J Natl Cancer Inst.9412632
  130. 130. GiffordG.PaulJ.VaseyP. A.KayeS. B.BrownR.2004The acquisition of hMLH1 methylation in plasma DNA after chemotherapy predicts poor survival for ovarian cancer patients.Clin Cancer Res.101344206
  131. 131. AgreloR.ChengW. H.SetienF.RoperoS.EspadaJ.FragaM. F.HerranzM.PazM. F.Sanchez-CespedesM.ArtigaM. J.GuerreroD.CastellsA.vonKobbe. C.BohrV. A.EstellerM.2006Epigenetic inactivation of the premature aging Werner syndrome gene in human cancer.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA.1032388227
  132. 132. ChenB.RaoX.HouseM. G.NephewK. P.CullenK. J.GuoZ.2011GPx3 promoter hypermethylation is a frequent event in human cancer and is associated with tumorigenesis and chemotherapy response.Cancer Lett.30913745
  133. 133. al.2005Small interfering RNA-induced CHFR silencing sensitizes oral squamous cell cancer cells to microtubule inhibitors.Cancer Biol Ther.4777380
  134. 134. GubanovaE.BrownB.IvanovS. V.HelledayT.MillsG. B.YarbroughW. al.2012Downregulation of SMG-1 in HPV-Positive Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Due to Promoter Hypermethylation Correlates with Improved Survival.Clin Cancer Res.18512571267
  135. 135. SuzukiM.ShinoharaF.EndoM.SugazakiM.EchigoS.RikiishiH.2009Zebularine suppresses the apoptotic potential of 5-fluorouracil via cAMP/PKA/CREB pathway against human oral squamous cell carcinoma cells.Cancer Chemother Pharmacol64222332
  136. 136. SuzukiM.ShinoharaF.NishimuraK.EchigoS.RikiishiH.2007Epigenetic regulation of chemosensitivity to 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin by zebularine in oral squamous cell carcinoma.Int J Oncol316144956
  137. 137. LogulloA. F.NonogakiS.MiguelR. E.KowalskiL. P.NishimotoI. N.PasiniF. S.FedericoM. H.BrentaniR. R.BrentaniM. M.2003Transforming growth factor beta1 (TGFbeta1) expression in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients as related to prognosis.J Oral Pathol Med.32313945
  138. 138. al.2002Tamoxifen inhibits the growth of head and neck cancer cells and sensitizes these cells to cisplatin induced-apoptosis: role of TGF-beta1.Carcinogenesis.23156975
  139. 139. HanniganA.SmithP.KalnaG.LoNigro. C.OrangeC.O.’BrienD. al.2010Epigenetic downregulation of human disabled homolog 2 switches TGF-beta from a tumor suppressor to a tumor promoter.J Clin Invest.1208284257
  140. 140. ToyotaM.SuzukiH.YamashitaT.HirataK.ImaiK.TokinoT.ShinomuraY.2009Cancer epigenomics: implications of DNA methylation in personalized cancer therapy.Cancer Sci.100578791
  141. 141. MagicZ.SupicG.Brankovic-MagicM.2009Towards targeted epigenetic therapy of cancer.Journal of Buon.14S79S88
  142. 142. SilvermanL. R.MuftiG. J.2005Methylation inhibitor therapy in the treatment of myelodysplastic syndrome.Nature Clin Pract Oncol.2S12S23
  143. 143. IssaJ. P.KantarjianH.2005AzacitidineNature Rev Drug Discov.5S6S7
  144. 144. al.2009Efficacy of azacitidine compared with that of conventional care regimens in the treatment of higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes: a randomised, open-label, phase III study.Lancet Oncol.10223232
  145. 145. KoutsimpelasD.PongsapichW.HeinrichU.MannS.MannW. J.BriegerJ.2012Promoter methylation of MGMT, MLH1 and RASSF1A tumor suppressor genes in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: pharmacological genome demethylation reduces proliferation of head and neck squamous carcinoma cells.Oncol Rep.274113541
  146. 146. BriegerJ.PongsapichW.MannS. A.HedrichJ.FruthK.PogozelskiB.MannW. J.2010Demethylation treatment restores hic1 expression and impairs aggressiveness of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.Oral Oncol.46967883
  147. 147. BaumanJ.VerschraegenC.BelinskyS.MullerC.RutledgeT.FekrazadM.RavindranathanM.LeeS. J.JonesD.2012A phase I study of 5-azacytidine and erlotinib in advanced solid tumor malignancies.Cancer Chemother Pharmacol.69254754
  148. 148. OgawaT.LiggettT. E.MelnikovA. A.MonittoC. al.2012Methylation of death-associated protein kinase is associated with cetuximab and erlotinib resistance.Cell Cycle.118165663
  149. 149. SmithI. M.MydlarzW. K.MithaniS. al.2007DNA global hypomethylation in squamous cell head and neck cancer associated with smoking, alcohol consumption and stage.Int J Cancer.121817248
  150. 150. PuriS. K.SiL.FanC. Y.HannaE.2005Aberrant promoter hypermethylation of multiple genes in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.Am J Otolaryngol.261127
  151. 151. ChangH. W.LingG. S.WeiW. I.YuenA. P.2004Smoking and drinking can induce p15 methylation in the upper aerodigestive tract of healthy individuals and patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.Cancer101112532
  152. 152. MarsitC.Mc CleanM.FurnissC.KelseyK.2006Epigenetic inactivation of the SFRP genes is associated with drinking, smoking and HPV in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.Int. J. Cancer11917611766
  153. 153. BennettK. L.LeeW.LamarreE.ZhangX.SethR.ScharpfJ.HuntJ.EngC.2010HPV status-independent association of alcohol and tobacco exposure or prior radiation therapy with promoter methylation of FUSSEL18, EBF3, IRX1, and SEPT9, but not SLC5A8, in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas.Genes Chromosomes Cancer4931926
  154. 154. KraunzK. S.HsiungD.Mc CleanM. D.LiuM.OsanyingbemiJ.NelsonH. H.KelseyK. T.2006Dietary folate is associated with p16 (INK4A) methylation in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.Int J Cancer.119715537
  155. 155. FangM. Z.WangY. W.AiN.HouZ.SunY.LuH.WelshW.YangC. S.2003Tea polyphenol (_)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate inhibits DNA methyltransferase and reactivates methylation-silenced genes in cancer cell lines.Cancer Res.6375637570
  156. 156. KatoK.LongN. K.MakitaH.ToidaM.YamashitaT.HatakeyamaD.HaraA.MoriH.ShibataT.2008Effects of green tea polyphenol on methylation status of RECK gene and cancer cell invasion in oral squamous cell carcinoma cells.Br J Cancer99464754
  157. 157. FangM. Z.ChenD.SunY.JinZ.ChristmanJ. K.YangC. S.2005Reversal of hypermethylation and reactivation of16INK4aRARbeta, and MGMT genes by genistein and other isoflavones from soy.Clin Cancer Res.1119 Pt 1703341

Written By

Zvonko Magić, Gordana Supić, Mirjana Branković-Magić and Nebojša Jovic

Submitted: March 14th, 2012 Reviewed: June 29th, 2012 Published: November 28th, 2012