Open access

Characteristics of Low-Molecular Weight Carboxylic Acids in PM2.5 and PM10 Ambient Aerosols From Tanzania

Written By

Stelyus L. Mkoma, Gisele O. da Rocha, José D.S. da Silva and Jailson B. de Andrade

Submitted: November 7th, 2011 Published: September 12th, 2012

DOI: 10.5772/48138

Chapter metrics overview

2,478 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

1. Introduction

Carboxylic acids together with water-soluble inorganic ions are an important group of water-soluble organic compounds in the atmospheric aerosols (Jacobson et al., 2000, Bourotte et al., 2007). They are highlighted because they account for substantial portion of atmospheric aerosols, and potentially control chemical and physical properties of the particles. Consequently, they may have direct and indirect effects on the earth’s radiation balance by scattering incoming solar radiation, which counteracts the global warming (IPCC, 2007). More attention has been paid to carboxylic acids due to their potential to modify the hygroscopic properties of atmospheric particles, including cloud condensation nuclei activity and hence to change global radiation balance (Kerminen, 2001; Peng et al., 2001). Major water-soluble inorganic ions are associated with atmospheric visibility degradation, adverse human health effects, and acidity of precipitation (Dockery & Pope, 1996; IPCC, 2007).

Among the organic acids, low molecular weight carboxylic acids such as acetic, oxalic and malonic are generally most abundant in the atmospheric aerosols. Carboxylic acids in variable concentrations have been reported in various environments including rural and urban atmosphere (Kawamura &Sakaguchi, 1999; Kerminen et al., 2000; Nicolas et al., 2009) and have different source origin, including biomass burning, fossil fuel combustion (Kawamura 1987; Narukawa et al., 1999), sea spray, traffic and industrial emissions and photochemical oxidation of precursors from anthropogenic and biogenic origin (Kawamura &Sakaguchi, 1999; Limbeck&Puxbaum, 1999; Kumar et al., 2001; Chakraborty& Gupta, 2010). Other sources for carboxylic acids in the marine atmosphere include in-cloud and heterogeneous formations (Warneck, 2003).

Chemical composition of PM2.5 and even that of PM10 aerosols is important to gain insights into sources and of their toxicity and to evaluate effectiveness of abatement strategies for relevant emission sectors. Particulate matter (PM) with aerodynamic diameter less than 2.5 µm (PM2.5) exhibited stronger relation with health than those with aerodynamic diameter less than 10 µm (PM10), but other studies have reported a strong potential of PM10 to human health (Salma et al., 2002; Kappos et al., 2004). Most studies on low molecular weight carboxylic acids and their related compounds (Limbeck et al., 2001; Limon-Sanchez et al., 2002; Kawamura &Yasui, 2005) and major ions (Harrison et al., 2004; Karthikeyan&Balasubramanian, 2006; Mariani et al., 2007; Kundu et al., 2010; Mkoma et al., 2010) have extensively been reported.

In Africa similar aerosols measurements especially of organic components are missing. Therefore, a full scenario of air quality is far from being revealed because some pollutants including carboxylic acids have not been measured. The knowledge of elucidating chemical composition, levels, and source profiles of aerosols in the Tanzania atmosphere remains a challenge and is needed for both scientific and policy reasons. The continuous changes in socioeconomic and political environments in Tanzania result in changes in development, particularly in transport, industry, energy, and construction sectors. This chapter reports for the first time in Tanzania, composition of low molecular weight carboxylic acids in PM2.5 and PM10 aerosol samples collected from a rural background atmosphere in Morogoro. An insight of characteristics of water-soluble inorganic ions is also discussed in this chapter.


2. Experimental

2.1. Aerosol sampling site

Aerosol samples were collected at a rural site in Morogoro (300,000 inhabitants) between 26 April and 10 May 2011. This site is located at about 200 km west of the Indian Ocean and the city of Dar es Salaam, a business capital in Tanzania(Fig. 1). The samples were collected at Solomon Mahlangu Campus of Sokoine University of Agriculture (06°47'41"S, 37°37'44"E, altitude 504ma.s.l.). This site is located about 5 km from Morogoro central area and major road systems and possible aerosol sources include biomass burning, agriculture, livestock and soil dust. Approximately 70% of this area is covered by vegetation and about 15% with pasture field. Conversely, tropical savannah is the most important land cover in large part of the sampling site.

2.2. Aerosol collection

Two samplers were used in parallel to collect aerosol particles: a “Gent” PM2.5 and PM10 filter holder each with two quartz fibre filters (Whatman QM-A) in series. Quartz fibre filters can adsorb volatile organic compounds (VOCs) causing positive artifacts when measuring PM and particulate OC. On the other hand, semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) in aerosols may partially evaporate during sampling resulting in negative artifacts (Turpin et al., 2000; Mader et al., 2003; Hitzenberger et al., 2004). The quartz fibre filters were pre-fired at 550 °C during 24 h before use. Samplers operated at a flow rate of 17 L/min and were mounted on grass survey at SMC synoptic station approximately 2.7 m above ground level. The sampling was carried out approximately in 24 h intervals and exchange of filters during sampling periods was done at 7:30 am. A total of 11 sets of actual filed samples and 2 blanks were collected for each sampler and used in this chapter. After sampling the exposed filters were folded in half face to face, placed in polyethylene plastic bags and kept frozen at -4 °C during storage and transported cool to the laboratory of research and development in chemistry (LPQ) at the Institute of chemistry, Federal University of Bahia (UFBA). The samples were stored in a freezer at −20°C prior to analysis. All the procedures were strictly quality-controlled to avoid any possible contamination of the samples.

Figure 1.

Location of the sampling site in Morogoro, Tanzania

During the sampling period meteorological data were collected from the site. The daily winds were predominantly south-easterly with an average speed of 6.8 m/s. Average temperature was 26.8 oC and average relative humidity was 73%. The recorded maximum temperature and relative humidity were 29.8 °C and 79.5%, while minimum values were 23.7 °C and 63.5%, respectively. During the campaigns 5 days hand rainfall of a total 19.9 mm.

2.3. Aerosol analyses

For particulate mass measurements, the filter samples were weighed before and after sampling with an analytical microbalance balance Mettler Toledo MX5 (reading precision 1 μg). Before weighing, the filters were conditioned in a chamber equipped with hydro-thermometer clock at a temperature of 20 °C and relative humidity of 40% for 48 h and the weightings were done under these conditions.

For determination of carboxylic acids and water-soluble ions one-half of 12.88 cm2 portions punched from of each PTFE filter was extracted using 5 ml Milli-Q ultrapure water (resistivity of 18.2 MΩcm, Barnstead International, USA) in a shaker tubes Model AT56 (Fanem Ltd, Sao Paulo, Brazil) for 5 minutes, followed by filtering through Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) filter (0.45 μm pore size, Sartorius Stedim, Germany). The concentrations of aqueous extracts were determined by Dionex ion chromatography ICS 1100 and ICS 2100 for acids/anions and cations respectively which was equipped with an auto sampler (Dionex ICS Series AS-DV). An analytical column AS16 (3 x 50 mm) with AG16 guard column (3 x 50 mm) and CSRS-300 I (2 mm) suppressor in ion-exchange mode was used to determine carboxylates (monocarboxylates: formateand acetate; dicarboxylates: oxalate, malonate, succinate, and maleate; ketocarboxylate: pyruvate) and water-soluble anions (chloride Cl, nitrate NO3 and sulphate SO42−). The eluent gradient programme was sweeping from 6.0 to 8.0 mmol/L KOH in 35 minutes under flow rate of 0.38 µL/min, except for acetic acid which was determined in another run, reducing injection time to avoid overlap of peaks. For determination of water-soluble cations (NH4+, Na+, K+, Mg2+ and Ca2+) an analytical column CS16 and Guard column CG16 (both 3 x 50 mm) and CSRS-I (2 mm) suppressor in a chemical mode were used. An eluent of 17.5 mmol/L H2SO4 was used at flow rate of 0.35 µL/min. The injection volume was 25 µL for all detection. Peak identification was confirmed based on a match of ion chromatograph retention times and standard samples. Limit of detection determined as mean equal to 3 times standard deviation of the field blank value corresponded to a range of 0.008 to 0.017 ng/L for carboxylates, 0.008 to 0.023 ng/L for anions and 0.021 to 0.083 ng/L for cations. Limits of quantification were between 0.026 and 0.058 ng/L for carboxylates, 0.028 and 0.078 ng/L for anions and 0.063 and 0.252 ng/L for cations.


3. Results and discussion

3.1. Concentrations of PM mass

Mean PM mass concentrations and associated standard deviations and ranges as derived from the two low-volume samplers are shown in Table 1. The results showed that mean mass concentration of PM2.5 and PM10 aerosols during the campaign were 13±3.5 µg/m3 and 16±2.3 µg/m3, respectively. The percentages of PM2.5 mass in PM10 size fraction (Fig. 2) found to range from 44–99% with a mean of 83±29%. These results indicate that most of PM mass was in PM2.5 size fraction. High PM2.5/PM10 ratios for PM mass indicate that there is small contribution from soil dust, which is known to be mostly associated with PM10 aerosols. Currently in Tanzania, the ambient air quality standard limit values for inhalable particulate matter are 60 to 90 μg/m3 for PM10 (TBS, 2006). The mean concentrations for PM10 mass at our site in Morogoro were below these average limit values. In addition, the current data sets were in line with levels reported in our previous studies (Mkoma et al., 2009a,b; Mkoma et al., 2010). Nevertheless, when compared PM mass data from our rural site in Tanzania are in line with few available other data sets for rural sites in Southern Africa (Nyanganyura et al., 2007). They are also comparable to or lower to other sites in Europe and Asia (Van Dingenen et al., 2004; Gu et al., 2010; Maenhaut et al., 2011; Ram &Sarin, 2011).

3.2. Concentrations of carboxylates ions

Table 1 present mean total concentrations and range of carboxylates (TCAs) which were 23.7±6.5 ng/m3 (range: 13.3-36.5 ng/m3) in PM2.5 and 36.4±12 ng/m3 (range: 10.7-58.2 ng/m3) in PM10 aerosols. Oxalate and malonate were most abundant carboxylates in PM2.5 accounting for 32.5% and 31.85% of total carboxylates, respectively, whereas in PM10 acetate was most abundant accounted for 62.5% of total carboxylates followed by oxalate which accounted for 32.6% of total carboxylates. Other studies have also reported oxalates to be most abundant carboxylate in aerosol samples (Mochida et al., 2003; Warneck, 2003). Pyruvate was also found in substantial amount and formate the least abundant counting on average 3% of total carboxylates in each of the aerosol fractions. Succinate and malonate were below detection limit in PM2.5 and PM10 aerosols, respectively. The total carboxylates accounted for 0.18% to total PM2.5 mass and 0.22% to PM10 mass. In comparison with other studies, the mean concentrations of all measured carboxylates in Tanzania were lower to those reported in urban and rural sites around the world (Souza et al., 1999; Kerminen et al., 2000; Yao et al., 2003; Kawamura &Yasui, 2005).

3.3. Water-soluble inorganic ions and ratios

Chemical characteristics of water-soluble inorganic ions and their relative abundances in PM2.5 and PM10 aerosols are also shown in Table 1. In both aerosol fractions, water-soluble Mg2+ was the most important cation and SO42–the main anionic species. On average Mg2+ accounted for 44.4% of total water-soluble ions in PM2.5 and 24.7% in PM10 whereas SO42–accounted for 22.8% and 35.2% of total ions in PM2.5 and PM10, respectively. High levels of crustal element Mg2+ together with Ca2+ are essentially attributable to soil/mineral dust dispersal. As to reasonable NH4+ levels (8% of total ions) in PM2.5, this may be due to presence of ammonia gas from biomass burning especially during smoldering combustion (Andreae&Merlet, 2001) and from agricultural activities in particular cattle raising (Street et al., 2003; Stone et al., 2010). Water-soluble K+, a good indicator for biomass burning, was second most abundant cation in PM2.5 accounted for 10.6% of total water-soluble ions.

For SO42– the higher levels could be attributed to its efficient formation by in-cloud processing of SO2 (Yao et al., 2003) and from secondary formation processes (Allen et al., 2004). As to low NO3 levels, this is likely due to the fact that the site is rural with little or no traffic and undoubtedly there are less anthropogenic emissions of precursor gas NOx. Also as to low concentrations of Na+ whichis mainly derived from sea-salt, this is presumably due to long distance (about 200 km) from the Indian Oceanto our sampling site. The observed levels for water-soluble ions are comparable with those reported in our previous work in Morogoro (Mkoma et al., 2009a; Mkoma et al., 2010). It appears that the levels of SO42−, NO3, and NH4+ in PM10 fractions are substantially lower in Tanzania than at European rural sites (Putaud et al., 2004) and Asia (Aggarwal& Kawamura, 2009;Pavuluri et al., 2011).

MeanSDMin.Max.Rel. Ab.MeanSDMin.Max.Rel. Ab.
PM mass (µg/m3)
Carboxylates ions (ng/m3)
Formate, FA0.710.300.381.
Acetate, Ac5.
Oxalate, Oxa7.72.74.713.132.511.87.24.531.032.6
Malonate, Mal7.53.94.818.331.8-----
Succinate, Suc-----
Pyruvate, Pyr2.
Total carboxylate23.76.513.336.5-36.412.010.758.2-
Water-soluble ions (ng/m3)
Total ions44888348585-6462142561108-

Table 1.

Mean concentrations, ranges and relative abundances (%) of carboxylates and water-soluble inorganic ions in PM2.5 and PM10 aerosols from Morogoro.

To determine the impact of marine sources on chemical composition of aerosol particles in PM2.5 and PM10 fractions, sea-salt ratios were calculated for each inorganic ion using Na as a reference element, assuming all Na to be of marine origin. The ratios for Cl/Na+, SO42–/Na+, K+/Na+, Mg2+/Na+ and Ca2+/Na+ in PM2.5 were 0.15 (0.25), 6.48 (1.81), 2.95 (0.04), 12.97 (0.04), 2.44 (0.12), respectively. The corresponding values in PM10 were 0.10 (0.25), 2.51 (1.81), 0.43 (0.04), 1.68 (0.04), 0.75 (0.12), respectively. Values in brackets represent average ratios for each ion in sea-water (Brewer, 1975). Larger ratios of ions indicate incorporation of non-marine constituents in aerosols. As to low mean Cl/Na+ ratios than sea-water ratio indicates that a minor fraction of Na+ may be contributed from other sources such as mineral dust. But also low ratio could be due to modifications of sea-salt fraction by non-marine constituents. Chloride loss may be explained by heterogeneous reaction of airborne sea-salt with acidic gases and aerosol species (Millero, 2006).

3.4. Time series of PM mass and selected aerosol species

Time series of PM mass, selected acids and ions species in PM2.5 and PM10 fractions as a function of sampling time are shown in Figs. 2 and 3. Nss-SO42– in Fig. 2 was hereby obtained by subtracting sea-salt contribution from measured SO42– data. Sea-salt contribution of SO42– was obtained as 0.252Na+, whereby Na+ is the measured concentration of Na+ and 0.252 is SO42–/Na+ ratio in the bulk seawater composition given by Riley and Chester (1971). As can be observed in Fig. 2, selected species in both size fractions showed no clear trends that can be noted but showed slightly variation during sampling period especially for PM10 aerosols. The observed behaviour of the species could be resulted from variations in sources strengths and meteorological conditions, such as mixing height. Additionally, high relative humidity (mean: 73%) during the campaign could serve as removal mechanisms hence lead to a daily variation in carboxylates levels.

In this study, oxalate concentrations were high to a factor of 10 than those of formate during the sampling period and in both PM2.5 and PM10 aerosol particles. These results indicate that formate was mainly from photochemical oxidation, while oxalates might have other sources besides photochemical oxidation. On the other hand, the concentrations of acetate were high than those of oxalate. Acetic acid in the atmosphere has been reported to be produced by oxidations of longer-chain dicarboxylic acids (Kawamura et al., 1996). Therefore, the observed acetate levels suggest that longer-chain dicarboxylic acids were possibly available at our site. Unfortunately, no data for high molecular weight dicarboxylic acids measured for the campaign.

Figure 2.

Time series of PM mass, carboxylates and nss-SO42− in PM2.5fraction at Morogoro

Figure 3.

Time series of PM mass, carboxylates and Na+ and Cl in PM10fraction at Morogoro

3.5. PM2.5 to PM10 ratios

The average PM2.5 (fine) to PM10 (coarse) percentage ratios and associated standard deviations for PM mass, carboxylates and various water-soluble inorganic ions are shown in Fig. 4. The ratios were calculated on the basis of data for PM2.5 and PM10 samples taken in parallel and then averaged over all samples from the sampling period. The mean fine to coarse ratios for all species with exception of those for acetate, Na+, Ca2+, NO3 and Cl were predominantly associated with fine fraction (for more than 55%). High fine/coarse ratio for PM mass may be due to a less contribution from soil dust, which is known to be mostly associated with coarse particles. For carboxylates, high ratios (even larger than 70%) are considered to be attributed from secondary organic aerosols (SOA), biomass burning activities andhigh temperature (average: 26.8 °C during sampling period). Concentrations of oxalate in PM2.5 showed strong correlations (r2 = 0.70) with those in PM10 aerosols. The slope of linear regression equations (PM2.5 = 2.48 x PM10) indicated that oxalate was mainly present in fine fraction during sampling period. On the other hand, different size distributions between oxalate and acetate could be related to their different physical characteristics. Acetate in PM2.5 fraction could easily volatilize (more volatile than oxalate) to gas phase, part of which could be absorbed on PM10 particles.

For water-soluble inorganic ions, as expected, sea-salt elements (Na, Cl) and indicator element for crustal matter (Ca) were predominantly (for more than 62%) associated with PM10 aerosols. NH4+ and nss-SO42– were mainly present in the fine aerosols suggesting that these species originated from high temperature sources and/or gas-to-particle conversion. The nss-SO42– is due to oxidation of SO2, which is predominantly from anthropogenic origin (e.g. biomass burning). A well-known indicator for biomass burning, K was associated with the fine particles (about 100%) suggesting vegetative emissions and crustal source could be an important source for K+ aerosols at this site with small impact from biomass burning activities.

Figure 4.

Mean contribution (%) of PM2.5 aerosolsmassand selected aerosol species in PM10 fractionduring the campaignin Morogoro.

3.6. Sources of carboxylates and water-soluble ions in aerosols

3.6.1. Correlation analysis

Correlation coefficients of PM mass, carboxylates and source indicators, shown in Table 2 were performed in order to understand their possible sources and formation mechanisms. The selected source indicators include K+ for biomass burning and vegetation emissions, Na+ and Clfor sea spray or waste burning, and SO42−for secondary formation of different mechanisms. Temperature and wind speed have been used as additional parameters to illustrate the atmospheric behaviours of carboxylic acids. In this study K+ had good correlation with formate (r2=53) and moderate to poorly correlations with other carboxylates in PM10. This indicates that formate could be originated from biomass and/or waste burning emissions but other carboxylates are considered to have other important sources than biomass burning. It can also be observed from Table 2 that there were possible similar sources for formate and other carboxylates (oxalate, Succinate and pyruvate) as verified by good correlation between them in PM2.5 and PM10 aerosols. Pyruvate shows good correlation with acetate (r2 = 54) and succinate (r2=51) in PM10 aerosols. These indicate a feature of photochemical decomposition of succinic acid (Yao et al., 2002).

Sea-salt derived aerosols have been reported to have particle with aerodynamic diameter between 1 and 5 µm (Kerminen et al., 2000). In this study, we found Na+ has pronounced amount in PM10 aerosol and to slightly extent Cl, suggesting sea spray could be one of the contributing sources of the aerosol components at the site. But even though Na+ correlate well (r2=73) with Cl, the calculated Cl to Na+ mass ratio to sea-salt component in aerosol particles had mean value between 0.15 (PM2.5) and 0.10 (PM10). This suggest that continental contributions was most important than marine contribution since Cl/Na+ ratio in marine aerosols varies between 1.0 and 1.7 (Chesselet et al., 1972).

Sulphate has been used as reference to investigate major formation routes of carboxylic acids (Yu et al., 2005). As shown in Table 2, formate and pyruvate showed good correlation with SO42−in PM2.5, suggesting that in-cloud and heterogeneous formations play an important role in the formation of carboxylates. On the other hand, poor correlation of malonic with SO42− in PM2.5 suggests that possibly the acid is volatile at ambient temperatures (Peng et al., 2001). Acetate and oxalateshowed poor correlations with SO42− in both aerosol fractions, indicating that they mainly originated from primary emissions sources and/or the atmospheric processes different from those of SO42−. This is contrary to what have been observed in other studies that in-cloud and heterogeneous formations can yield a good correlation between oxalate and SO42− (Yu et al., 2005).

Wind speed poorly correlated with most carboxylates except with acetate (r2=51) inPM10 aerosols. This indicates that in addition to secondary formation carboxylateswere mainly generated from local sources, while acetatemight be related to long range aerosols transport to the sampling site. It should also be noted that primary emissions are major sources of precursors for most carboxylic acids (Kawamura &Yasui, 2005).

Species FAAcOxaMalSucPyrSO42−NO3ClNa+K+Ca2+WS

Table 2.

Correlation coefficients for PM mass, carboxylates, selected ions and wind speed in PM2.5 (upper diagonal triangle) and PM10 fractions (lower diagonal triangle) inMorogoro. Correlation coefficients that are larger than 0.50 are indicated in bold.

3.6.2. Concentrations ratios

The ratio of acetic to formic acid has been used as good indicator of contributions of primary (high ratio) and secondary sources (low ratio) to carboxylic acids (Talbot et al., 1988, 1990; Grosjean, 1992). As can be seen in Table 3, low acetate/formate ratios for both PM2.5 and PM10 aerosols particles indicate that secondary formation was an important contributing source of carboxylates at our site. This suggestion is supported by the fact that high mean average temperature during sampling period (mean: 26.8 oC) might be controlling factor in determining the contribution of primary and secondary sources to these carboxylates. However, there are various types of the atmospheric reactions forming carboxylic acids (e.g. formic, acetic, and oxalic) in urban and near urban atmospheres, which include oxidation of unsaturated fatty acids originating from cooking activities, ozone oxidation of olefins emitted from vehicular exhausts (Scheff&Wadden, 1993) and oxidation of aromatic hydrocarbons (Kawamura &Ikushima, 1993).

The ratio of oxalic acid to total dicarboxylic acid (for this study oxalic, malonic, succinic acids) can be used to evaluate aging process of organic aerosols (Kawamura &Sakaguchi, 1999), because diacid such as oxalic acid can be produced by oxidations of longer-chain dicarboxylic acids (Kawamura et al., 1996). In this study oxalate to total dicarboxylates ratios show low values in both aerosol fractions, indicating that aerosols emitted from various sources and transported to this site were less and equally aged. Since there relative humidity was high during the campaign (up to 73% on average), it is supposed that oxalate was also produced in aqueous phase. Aqueous phase chemistry in aerosol and/or cloud droplets is important in production of oxalic acid (Warneck, 2003). On the other hand, mean ratio of oxalate to K+ in PM2.5 aerosols was 0.19±0.08, somewhat closeto or higher than those reported range (0.03−0.1) for flaming and smoldering phases in burning plumes (Yamasoe et al., 2000). This suggests that carboxylates might be originated from biogenic sources with contribution from biomass burning emissions.

Oxalate/Total dicarboxylates0.33±0.080.23−0.490.33±0.170.15−0.83

Table 3.

Mean ratios and ranges for carboxylates and K+ in PM2.5 and PM10 aerosols inMorogoro.


4. Conclusion

PM2.5 and PM10 aerosols samples were collected from a rural site Morogoro, Tanzania and analysed for low molecular weight carboxylates and water-soluble inorganic ions. Oxalate and malonate were dominant species in PM2.5while acetate was most prominent species in PM10 aerosols followed by oxalate. Of the ionic components, SO42−, K+, and Mg2+ in PM2.5 and SO42−, Na+, and Mg2+ in PM10 made lager contribution to total water-soluble inorganic aerosol mass. Various ratios and correlations between carboxylates and ions used for possible source identification suggest that primary emissions, secondary formation, and to a slightly extent sea spray and biomass burning could be the sources for the aerosols at this site.The ratio of acetate to formate was used to distinguish primary and secondary sources of these carboxylates and was found to be close to reported value for secondary reactions, indicating dominance of secondary sources.Substantial concentration of carboxylates and water-soluble ions observed in the Morogoro atmosphere suggest that it was urgent to study the characteristics and sources of these species to better understand their roles in the Tanzania environment. However, more work is needed to determine longer-chain (high) molecular weight carboxylic acids and related organic compounds and their seasonal variations in other urban and rural sites in Tanzania.



The authors are grateful to funding from Directorate of Research and Postgraduate Studies, Sokoine University of Agriculture (SUA)-Tanzania; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)-Brazil; and Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia, de Energia e Ambiente (INCT-E&A), Instituto de Química, Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA)-Brazil. We also wish to acknowledge Mr. Filbert T. Sogomba (SUA) for help in logistics and collection of aerosol samples and Cibele Cristina de AraújoSoares (UFBA) for PM mass measurements.


  1. 1. AggarwalS. G.KawamuraK.2009Carbonaceous and inorganic composition in long-range transported aerosols over northern Japan: Implication for aging of water-soluble organic fractionAtmospheric Environment4316May 2009), 253225401352-2310
  2. 2. AllenA. G.CardosoA. A.daRocha. G. O.2004Influence of sugar cane burning on aerosol soluble ion composition in Southeastern BrazilAtmospheric Environment3830September 2004), 502550381352-2310
  3. 3. AndreaeM. O.MerletP.2001Emission of trace gases and aerosols from biomass burningGlobal Biogeochemical Cycles154December 2001), 9559661944-9224
  4. 4. BourotteC.Curi-AmaranteA.P.FortiM.C.LuizA.PereiraA..BragaA. L.LotufoP. A.2007Association between ionic composition of fine and coarse aerosol soluble fraction and peak expiratory flow of asthmatic patients in São Paulo city (Brazil)Atmospheric Environment4110March 2007), 203620481352-2310
  5. 5. BrewerP. G.1975Minor elements in sea water, In: Chemical Oceanography, 1nd edition, J.P Riley and G. Skirrow (Ed.): 415-496, Academic Press, 0-12588-601-2UK
  6. 6. ChakrabortyA.GuptaT.2010Chemical Characterization and Source Apportionment of Submicron (PM1) Aerosols in Kanpur Region, India. Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 104December 2010), 4334452071-1409
  7. 7. ChesseletR.MorelliM.Buat-MenardP.1972Some aspects of the geochemistry of marine aerosols. In: Dyrssen, D., Jagner, D. (Eds.), The Changing Chemistry of the Oceans, Proceedings of Nobel Symposium 20, Wiley-Interscience, New York, 92
  8. 8. DockeryD.PopeA.1996Epidemiology of acute health effects: Summary of time-series studies. In: Particles in Our Air: Concentration and Health Effects, J.D. Spengler, and R. Wilson, (Eds.): 123147Harvard University Press, 0-67424-077-4MA
  9. 9. GrosjeanD.1992Formic and acetic acids: emissions, atmospheric formation and dry deposition at two southern California locations.Atmospheric Environment26A18December 1992), 327932861352-2310
  10. 10. GuJ.BaiZ.LiuA.WuL.XieY.LiW.DongH.ZhangX.2010Characterization of Atmospheric Organic Carbon and Element Carbon of PM2.5 and PM10 at Tianjin, China. Aerosol Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 102April), 1671762071-1409
  11. 11. HarrisonR. M.JonesA. M.LawrenceR. G.2004Major component composition of PM10 and PM2.5 from roadside and urban background sites. Atmospheric Environment, 3827September 2004), 45311352-2310
  12. 12. HitzenbergerR.BernerA.GalambosZ.MaenhautW.CafmeyerJ.SchwarzJ.MiillerK.SpindlerG.WieprechtW.AckerK.HillamoR. .MakelaT.2004Intercomparison of methods to measure the mass concentration of the atmospheric aerosol during INTERCOMP2000-influence of instrumentation and size cuts. Atmospheric Environment, 3838December 2004), 646764761352-2310
  13. 13. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC),2007IPCC fourth assessment report (2007), Contribution of working group I. Cambridge University Press, London, 996
  14. 14. JacobsonM. C.HansonH. C.NooneK. J. .CharlsonR. J.2000Organic atmospheric aerosols: review and state of the science. Reviews of Geophysics, 382May 2000), 2672941944-9208
  15. 15. KapposA. D.BruckmannP.EikmannT.EnglertN.HeinrichU.HöppeP.KochE.KrauseG. H. M.KreylingW. G.RauchfussK.RomboutP.KlempV. S.ThielW. R. .WichmannH. E.2004Health effects of particles in ambient air. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health, 2074August 2004), 3994071438-4639
  16. 16. KarthikeyanS. .BalasubramanianR.2006Determination of water-soluble inorganic and organic species in atmospheric fine particulate matter. Microchemical Journal, 821January 2006), 49550002-6265X
  17. 17. KawamuraK. .IkushimaK.1993Seasonal changes in the distribution of dicarboxylic acids in the urban atmosphere. Environmental Science and Technology, 2710September 1993), 222722331520-5851
  18. 18. KawamuraK.KasukabeH.BarrieL.1996Source and reaction pathways of dicarboxylic acids, ketoacids and dicarbonyls in Arctic aerosols: one year of observations. Atmospheric Environment, 3010-11May 1996), 170917221352-2310
  19. 19. KawamuraK. .SakaguchiF.1999Molecular distribution of water soluble carboxylic acids in marine aerosols over the Pacific Ocean including tropics. Journal of Geophysical Research, 104D3February 1999), 350135092156-2202
  20. 20. KerminenV.M.2001Relative roles of secondary sulfate and organics in atmospheric cloud condensation nuclei production. Journal of Geophysical Research, 106D15August 1999), 17321173332156-2202
  21. 21. KerminenV.M.OjanenC.PakkanenT.HillamoR.AurelaM. .MerilaienJ.2000Low-molecular-weight dicarboxylic acids in an urban and rural atmosphere. Journal of Aerosol Science, 313March 2000), 3493620021-8502
  22. 22. KawamuraK. .YasuiO.2005Diurnal changes in the distribution of dicarboxylicacids,ketocarboxylic acids and dicarbonyls in the urban Tokyo atmosphere. Atmospheric Environment, 3910March 2005), 194519601352-2310
  23. 23. KumarA. V.PatilR. S. .NambiK. S. V.2001Source Apportionment of Ambient Particulate Matter at Two Traffic Junctions in Mumbai, India. Atmospheric Environment, 3525September 2001), 424542511352-2310
  24. 24. KunduS.KawamuraK.AndreaeT. W.HofferA. .AndreaeM. O.2010Diurnal variation in the water-soluble inorganic ions, organic carbon and isotopic compositions of total carbon and nitrogen in biomass burning aerosols from the LBA-SMOCC campaign in Rondônia, Brazil. Journal of Aerosol Science, 411January 2010), 1181330021-8502
  25. 25. LimbeckA. .PuxbaumH.1999Organic acids in continental background aerosols. Atmospheric Environment, 3312June 1999), 184718521352-2310
  26. 26. LimbeckA.PuxbaumH.OtterL.ScholesM. C.2001Semi-volatile behavior of dicarboxylic acids and other polar organic species at a rural background site (Nylsvley, RSA). Atmospheric Environment, 3510April 2001), 185318621352-2310
  27. 27. Limon-SanchezM. T.Arriaga-ColinaJ. L.Escalona-SeguraS.Ruíz-SuárezL. G.2002Observations of formic and acetic acids at three sites of Mexico City. Science of the Total Environment, 2873March 2002), 2032120048-9697
  28. 28. MaderB. T.SchauerJ. J.SeinfeldJ. H.FlaganR. C.YuJ. Z.YangH.LimH. J.TurpinB. J.DeminterJ. T.HeidemannG.BaeM. S.QuinnP.BatesT.EatoughD. J.HuebertB. J.BertramT.HowellS.2003Sampling methods used for the collection of particle-phase organic and elemental carbon during ACE-Asia. Atmospheric Environment, 3711April 2003), 143514491352-2310
  29. 29. MaenhautW.NavaS.LucarelliF.WangW.ChiX. .KulmalaM.2011Chemical composition, impact from biomass burning, and mass closure for PM2.5 and PM10 aerosols at Hyytiälä, Finland, in summer 2007. X-Ray Spectrometry, 403May/June 2011), 1681711097-4539
  30. 30. MarianiR. MelloW. Z.2007PM2.5-10, PM2.5 and associated water-soluble inorganic species at a coastal urban site in the metropolitan region of Rio de Janeiro. Atmospheric Environment, 4113April 2007), 288728921352-2310
  31. 31. MilleroF. J.2006Chemical Oceanography (3rd ed.): 496, Taylor and Francis, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 0-84932-280-4
  32. 32. MkomaS. L.WangW.MaenhautW. .TungarazaC. T.2010Seasonal Variation of Atmospheric Composition of Water-Soluble Inorganic Species at Rural Background Site in Tanzania, East Africa. Ethiopian Journal of Environmental Studies and Management, 32June 2010), 27381998-0507
  33. 33. MkomaS. L.MaenhautW.ChiX.WangW. .RaesN.2009bChemical composition and mass closure for PM10 aerosols during the 2005 dry season at a rural site in Morogoro, Tanzania. X-Ray Spectrometry, 384July/August 2009), 2933001097-4539
  34. 34. MkomaS. L.ChiX.MaenhautW.WangW. .RaesN.2009aCharacterisation of PM10 Atmospheric Aerosols for the Wet Season 2005 at Two Sites in East Africa. Atmospheric Environment, 433January 2009), 6316391352-2310
  35. 35. MochidaM.KawabataA.KawamuraK.HatsushikaH.YamazakiK.2003Seasonal variation and origins of dicarboxylic acids in the marine atmosphere over the western North Pacific. Journal of Geophysical Research, 108D6March 2003), 419342032156-2202
  36. 36. NarukawaM.KawamuraK.TakeuchiN.NakajimaT.1999Distribution of dicarboxylic acids and carbon isopotic compositions in aerosols from 1997 Indonesian forest fires. Geophysical Research Letters, 2620October 1999) 310131041944-8007
  37. 37. NicolasJ. F.GalindoN.YuberoE.PastorC.EsclapezR. .CrespoJ.2009Aerosol Inorganic Ions in a Semiarid Region on the Southeastern Spanish Mediterranean Coast. Water, Air and Soil Pollution, 2011-4July 2009), 1491591573-2932
  38. 38. NyanganyuraD.MaenhautW.MathuthuM.MakarauA. .MeixnerF. X.2007The chemical composition of tropospheric aerosols and their contributing sources to a continental background site in northern Zimbabwe from 1994 to 2000. Atmospheric Environment, 4112April 2007), 264426591352-2310
  39. 39. PavuluriC. M.KawamuraK.AggarwalS. G. .SwaminathanT.2011Characteristics, seasonality and sources of carbonaceous and ionic components in the tropical aerosols from Indian region. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 1115August 2011), 821582301680-7316
  40. 40. PengC.ChanM. N.ChanC. K.2001The hygroscopic properties of dicarboxylic and multifunctional acids: measurements and UNIFAC predictions. Environmental Science and Technology, 3522November 2001), 449545011520-5851
  41. 41. PutaudJ.P.RaesF.Van DingenenR.BaltenspergerU.BrüggemannE.FacchiniM.C.DecesariS.FuzziS.GehrigR.HüglinC.LajP.LorbeerG.MaenhautW.MihalopoulosN.MüllerK.QuerolX.RodriguezS.SchneiderJ.SpindlerG.tenBrink. H.TørsethK. .WiedensohlerA.2004A European aerosol phenomenology-2: chemical characteristics of particulate matter at kerbside, urban, rural and background sites in Europe. Atmospheric Environment, 3816May 2004), 257925951352-2310
  42. 42. RamK.SarinM. M.2011Day and night variability of EC, OC, WSOC and inorganic ions in urban environment of Indo-Gangetic Plain: Implications to secondary aerosol formation. Atmospheric Environment, 452January 2011), 4604681352-2310
  43. 43. RileyJ. P.ChesterR.1971Introduction to Marine Chemistry: 465, Academic Press, 0-12588-750-7
  44. 44. SalmaI.BalashazyI.Winkler-HeilR.HofmannW. .ZarayG.2002Effect of particle mass size distribution on the deposition of aerosols in the human respiratory system. Journal of Aerosol Science, 331January 2002), 1191320021-8502
  45. 45. ScheffP. .WaddenR. A.1993Receptor modeling of volatile organic compounds: 1. Emission inventory and validation. Environmental Science and Technology, 274April 1993), 6176251520-5851
  46. 46. SouzaS. R.VasconcellosP. C.CarvalhoL. R. F.1999Low molecular weight carboxylic acids in an urban atmosphere: winter measurements in São Paulo City, Brazil. Atmospheric Environment, 3316July 1999), 256325741352-2310
  47. 47. StoneE. A.SchauerJ. J.PradhanB. B.DangolP. M.HabibG.VenkataramanC. .RamanathanV.2010Characterization of emissions from South Asian biofuels and application to source apportionment of carbonaceous aerosol in the Himalayas. Journal of Geophysical Research, 115D06301doi:10.1029/2009JD011881March 2010), 2156-2202
  48. 48. StreetsD. G.YarberK. F.WooJ.H.CarmichaelG. R.2003Biomass burning in Asia: Annual and seasonal estimates and atmospheric emissions. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 174October 2003), 109911181944-9224
  49. 49. TalbotR. W.AndreaeM. O.BerresheimH.JacobD. J.BeecherK. M.1990Sources and sinks of formic, acetic and pyruvic acids over central Amazonia: 2. Wet deposition. Journal of Geophysical Research, 95D10January 1990), 16799168112156-2202
  50. 50. Tanzania Bureau of Standards, TBS2006National Environmental Standards Compendium EMDC 6(1733). TZS 845: 2006 Air Quality Specification. 74
  51. 51. TurpinB. J.SaxenaP.AndrewsE.2000Measuring and simulating particulate organics in the atmosphere: problems and prospects. Atmospheric Environment, 3418July 2000), 298330131352-2310
  52. 52. Van DingenenR.RaesF.PutaudJ.P.BaltenspergerU.CharronA.FacchiniM.C.DecesariS.FuzziS.GehrigR.HanssonH.C.HarrisonR. M.HüglinC.JonesA. M.LajP.LorbeerG.MaenhautW.PalmgrenF.QuerolX.RodriguezS.SchneiderJ.tenBrink. H.TunvedP.TørsethK.WehnerB.WeingartnerE.WiedensohlerA. .WåhlinP.2004A European aerosol phenomenology-1: physical characteristics of particulate matter at kerbside, urban, rural and background sites in Europe. Atmospheric Environment, 3816May), 256125771352-2310
  53. 53. WarneckP.2003In-cloud chemistry opens pathway to the formation of oxalic acid in the marine atmosphere. Atmospheric Environment, 3717June 2003), 242324271352-2310
  54. 54. YamasoeM. A.ArtaxoP.MiguelA. H.AllenA. G.2000Chemical composition of aerosol particles from direct emissions of vegetation fires in the Amazon Basin: water-soluble species and trace elements. Atmospheric Environment, 3410July 2000), 164116531352-2310
  55. 55. YaoX.FangM.ChanC. K.2002Size distributions and formation of dicarboxylic acids in atmospheric particles. Atmospheric Environment, 3613May 2002), 209921071352-2310
  56. 56. YaoX.FangM.ChanC. K.HuM.2003Formation and size distribution characteristics of ionic species in atmospheric particulate matter in Beijing, China: (2) dicarboxylic acids. Atmospheric Environment, 3721July 2003), 300130071352-2310
  57. 57. YuJ.HuangX.XuJ.HuM.2005When aerosol sulfate goes up, so does oxalate: implication for the formation mechanisms of oxalate. Environmental Science and Technology, 391January 2005), 1281331520-5851

Written By

Stelyus L. Mkoma, Gisele O. da Rocha, José D.S. da Silva and Jailson B. de Andrade

Submitted: November 7th, 2011 Published: September 12th, 2012