Open access

Pyrethroids and Their Effects on Ion Channels

Written By

Erin N. Wakeling, April P. Neal and William D. Atchison

Submitted: December 12th, 2011 Published: July 25th, 2012

DOI: 10.5772/50330

Chapter metrics overview

5,828 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

1. Introduction

Ion channels are integral membrane proteins that are critical for neuronal function. They form pores in the plasma membrane that allow certain ions to travel with their concentration gradient across the membrane. Those that open in response to a change in membrane potential are called voltage-gated ion channels. Channels that open in response to binding by a chemical signal or molecule are ligand-gated ion channels. In neurons, ion channels are essential for chemical communication between cells, or synaptic transmission. Ion channels also function to maintain membrane potential and initiate and propagate electrical impulses.

Due to their importance in neurons, ion channels are often the molecular targets of neurotoxins. Pyrethrin compounds first identified in the pyrethrum extract of Chrysanthemum cinerariaefolium are neurotoxins that disrupt the normal function of voltage-gated sodium channels (VGSCs). Pyrethrum extract is a very effective natural insecticide [1], however, it rapidly degrades upon exposure to light, making it unsuitable for commercial agriculture use. Beginning in the mid 20th century, synthetic analogs of pyrethrins, pyrethroid insecticides, were developed by modifying the structures of pyrethrins to increase photostability and insecticidal activity. Pyrethroid insecticides target VGSCs, but also affect the function of voltage-gated calcium and voltage-gated chloride channels. This chapter provides an overview of pyrethroid structure and toxicological properties in insects and mammals concentrating on the effects of pyrethroid on various ion channels.


2. Pyrethroid structure and toxicity

Initially isolated in 1924, two pyrethrin compounds were determined to be responsible for the insecticidal action of pyrethrum. They were designated pyrethrin I and II; pyrethrin I had a monocarboxylic acid moiety (chrysanthemic acid) while pyrethrin II had a dicarboxylic acid (pyrethric acid) [2, 3]. The other main chemical moiety of interest in the pyrethrins was an alcohol, a substituted cyclopentenolone. Of the two compounds, pyrethrin I was more potent in insecticidal assays with Aphis rumincis L. (Aphids) [4, 5], which concurred with earlier work on cockroaches. Together the early insecticidal assays of the two compounds indicated that the insecticidal action was likely driven by pyrethrin I. However, subsequent studies conflicted regarding the potency of pyrethrin I and II: some studies indicated that pyrethrin I was more potent whereas others indicated pyrethrin II was more potent [3, 5, 6]. These discrepancies were ascribed to the difficulties encountered by early researchers in isolating pure pyrethrin I and II, photodegredation of stored fractions, and differences in test species selection. Eventually it was determined that pyrethrin I was more effective for killing insects while pyrethrin II was more effective for knockdown [1]. This combination of knockdown and lethal effects was largely responsible for the effectiveness of pyrethrum extracts against biting insects and prompted investigations designed to improve insecticidal potency by modifying the chemical moieties of the pyrethrin compounds.

In the first generation of the synthetic pyrethroids, which included allethrin (Allyl analog), tetramethrin (tetrahydrophthalimidomethyl analog), and resmethrin (discovered at Rothamsted Experimental Station), the acid moiety was based on the chrysanthemic acid present in pyrethrin I. This acid has a cyclopropane ring which is not present in more recent synthetic pyrethroids, such as fenvalerate (phenylisovalerate pyrethroid). In terms of insecticidal potency, the major breakthrough was the introduction of a cyano (CN) residue at the α carbon of the 3-phenoxybenzyl-alcohol moiety. Addition of this CN group enhanced insecticidal activity roughly 3-6 fold compared to non-cyano pyrethroids.

This cyano group in synthetic pyrethroids allowed for the classification of pyrethroids into two distinct subclasses. Type II compounds have the cyano group while type I agents do not. For example, permethrin is a common type I pyrethroid while cypermethrin (named for the addition of the cyano group) is a type II (Figure 1). Pyrethroids are highly flexible with many theoretically attainable geometries; most have several potentially stereogenic carbons [7, 8]. Due to this complex geometry, pyrethroids can be present as mixtures of isomers; for example, allethrin can be used as a mixture of four isomers (4RS) or as a single isomer (S-bioallethrin). In contrast the synthetic pathway used to generate deltamethrin and esfenvalerate results in the enrichment of a single isomer [7]. In general R esters of type I pyrethroids and S esters of type II pyrethroids exhibit the highest insecticidal potency [1, 9-11]. The presence of the stereo-inactive isomers can attenuate the effects of the active isomers [12].

Although the potency increased, first and second generation pyrethroids were still highly photolabile [13]. The photodegredation of pyrethroids generally results in decomposition of the parent compound to less toxic products. The first photostable pyrethroids developed was permethrin in 1973 [14], and permethrin is still one of the most heavily used pyrethroids in agricultural settings. Permethrin and other halogen-containing pyrethroids such as decamethrin and fenvalerate can persist on plant cuticles and have prolonged insecticidal action compared to the more photolabile chemicals [1].

Compared to later generation chemicals, first generation pyrethroids have limited outdoor uses due to their photolability. However, they are still used prominently in household insecticide sprays for flying and crawling insects [15]. Indoor pyrethroids are also used in topical creams, sprays, and shampoos for controlling biting insects and head lice in both humans and their domestic pets. Recent studies have shown that sensitive populations such as children and pregnant women are exposed to pyrethroids via these indoor applications [16, 17]. The outdoor pyrethroids are used in agricultural settings and disease vector control. The two most commonly used pyrethkdrroids in agriculture are cypermethrin and permethrin, which together account for an annual usage of 3 million pounds [18, 19]. Several pyrethroids are registered for use in the United States for control of the malaria-bearing mosquito species Anopheles [20], and pyrethroid-treated bed nets are used in tropical regions worldwide to prevent malaria. Pyrethroid use in agriculture and vector control has increased in recent years due to the reduced use of chlorinated, carbamate, and organophosphate pesticides [15], resulting in increased human exposure [21].

Figure 1.

Pyrethrins, prototypes for the synthetic pyrethroids, were derived from the pyrethrum extract of Chysanthemum species. Introduction of an α-cyano group determines whether pyrethroids are classified as type I (cyano lacking) or type II (cyano-containing).

Pyrethroid exposure in insects is predominately through the insect cuticle. Rapid absorption, particularly with the halogen-containing pyrethroids, causes disruption of insect neurotransmission causing knockdown and possibly death within seconds to minutes. In contrast to insects, human dermal absorption of pyrethroids is low relative to absorption via lung or gut [15, 22]. Humans absorb approximately 1% of pyrethroid exposure through skin but up to 36% through ingestion [22]. However, sprays combining pyrethroid formulations with N,N-diethyl-m-toluamide (DEET) can increase dermal absorption of pyrethroids. After absorption, pyrethroids are distributed throughout the body and can cross the blood-brain barrier to access the nervous system. In occupational settings such as agriculture, inhalation of aerosolized pyrethroid formulations can result in toxicity, necessitating the use of personal protective equipment to prevent intoxication. Due to relatively low mammalian toxicity and the adequacy of personal protective gear in occupational settings of high exposure, there have been relatively few cases of human poisoning. The most commonly encountered human symptom of pyrethroids toxicity is paresthesia, which can be treated by decontamination of the exposed skin followed by bathing with oil [22]. Systemic poisonings in humans can be hard to control; central and peripheral nervous system effects in humans must be treated by a multisystem approach due to the numerous targets of pyrethroids in mammals [22].

Studies on pyrethrin I and II and first generation synthetic pyrethroids showed low mammalian toxicity. A large proportion of the administered dose was excreted in an unmetabolized form. Furthermore, the bioavailable dose is metabolized easily in mammals through cleavage by esterases and cytochrome P450 mixed function oxidases in liver or plasma [23-25]. The (+)-trans form of some pyrethroids, such as bioresmethrin, is much more toxic to mammals than the (+)-cis isomer. Mammalian systems metabolize the (+)-trans isomers much faster than the (+)-cis form, effectively removing the most toxic species [26]. Consequently, pyrethroids do not appear to accumulate in mammalian tissues. Clearance from plasma is relatively fast as pyrethroids are distributed throughout the body [27], with plasma half lives (t½) of the pyrethroid class ranging from 9-15 hours (hrs) [28]. In animal models pyrethroids exhibit peak concentration in the brain within 2-3 hrs after oral administration and decrease rapidly [27, 29]. Brain pyrethroid levels are relatively low (0.1-0.3% of body burden), even at the time of peak symptom expression [28]. Clearance rates of pyrethroids from the brain can vary; for example in a study comparing clearance rates of several pyrethroids from the brain, deltamethrin was cleared quickest, followed by fenvalerate, cypermethrin, and permethrin [30]. Although the majority of the administered pyrethroid dose is metabolized quickly in plasma and liver, the unmetabolized fraction can partition into fat where pyrethroid metabolism and clearance is much slower [27, 30].

Although efficient metabolism in mammals reduces the likelihood of acute toxicity, high exposures can result in intoxication. Type I and type II pyrethroids produce different toxicological symptoms in mammals, likely due to differences in the effects of the classes on mammalian neurons (Table 1) [31, 32]. Mammalian intoxication by type I pyrethroids causes symptoms characterized by tremor (T-class), exaggerated startle response, and hyperexcitability [7, 11, 33]. Intoxication by type II pyrethroids results in burrowing and pawing behavior, followed by salivation and coarse tremor, which evolves into choreoathetosis (involuntary movement and writhing) [34]. This second type of poisoning is referred to as CS-class. Some pyrethroids, such as fenpropathrin and cyphenothrin can result in symptoms from both T and CS-class [9. 31], and have been designated by some to belong to a third class (TS: tremor and salivation) [35]. One hypothesis for the difference in toxicity symptoms is that the cyano group in the type II pyrethroids results in a prolonged effect on neurons, causing a different spectrum of toxicological symptoms [7, 11].

Severe fine tremorCoarse tremor
Marked reflex hyperexcitabilityModerate reflex hyperexcitability
Sympathetic activationSympathetic activation
Parethesia (dermal exposure)Parethesia (dermal exposure)
Clonic seizuresTonic seizures
Uncoordinated twitchesIncreased extensor tone
Aggressive sparringProfuse watery salivation
Sinuous writhing
Rolling gait
Chewing; nosing; pawing; burrowing

Table 1.

Pyrethroid toxicity syndromes in mammals. Species-specific effects are indicated †= mouse, ‡= rat. Modified from [21, 34].

The T-, CS-, and TS-syndromes are dose-dependent, acute responses to overt pyrethroid toxicity. They exhibit a fast onset, occurring from within a few minutes to over 1 hr but take about 2-8 hrs to peak [28]. Recovery is generally complete within 24-48 hours after cessation of exposure. The appearance of neurobehavioral symptoms follows this time course; symptoms begin around 1 hr, peak around 4-8 hrs and are resolved 12-48 hrs after oral exposure [34].

The safety of the pyrethrins and early generation pyrethroids is largely due to their instability. By producing more stable pyrethroids, the potential for mammalian toxicity increased. The halogen-containing pyrethroids lack many of the characteristics that originally deemed the earlier pyrethroids and pyrethrins as safe. For example, the halogen-containing pyrethroids are much more photostable. This allows them to persist on the surface of plants much longer than the earlier pyrethroids. They are also highly lipophilic, which promotes higher bioavailability in mammals [1]. In fact, fluorinated pyrethroids induce toxicity symptoms with a much faster onset than non-halogenated compounds [35] and halogenation coupled with the cyano group increases toxic potency in mammals by an order of magnitude [34].

Despite low incidence of acute poisoning in humans, there is substantial interest in the effect of chronic exposure to pyrethroids. The early studies on pyrethroid toxicity focused on their effects on neuronal targets in acute paradigms [35]. However, the identification of other endpoints of concern suggests that there are prolonged effects of pyrethroid exposure, perhaps mediated by active metabolites in addition to the parent compound [7]. Several laboratories have independently identified that chronic pyrethroid exposure causes alterations to the dopaminergic system in rodents [36-40]. This is particularly interesting in the context of motor activity changes during the acute toxicity syndromes [34]. Induction of apoptosis by deltamethrin in dopaminergic neurons was demonstrated in vitro [41] and others have shown that sub-chronic exposure to permethrin in rats resulted in neuronal loss in the hippocampus and motor cortex [42]. Repeated exposure to pyrethroids resulted in altered dopamine transporter function, changes in the number of dopaminergic binding sites in rat brain [36], and possibly increased dopamine turnover resulting in decreased dopaminergic function [38, 49]. Decreased dopamine levels were also observed during chronic exposure to the type II pyrethroid cypermethrin, an effect accompanied by dopaminergic neurodegeneration [40]. The underlying mechanism for dopaminergic sensitivity to pyrethroids is unknown, but the effects observed across laboratories illustrate a consistent picture of pyrethroid effects in the dopamine neurotransmitter system.

The effects of cypermethrin on dopaminergic neurons listed above only occurred in animals exposed to the pyrethroid during both developmental and adult exposure and did not occur in animals exposed only during adulthood [40]. This may indicate that developmental exposure predisposes adult animals to pyrethroid sensitivity. Several studies have suggested that neonatal mammals are more sensitive to pyrethroids than adult animals. Brain levels of pyrethroids in neonatal rats are higher than for adult animals [43]. Further, neonatal rats have less capacity to metabolize pyrethroids than adults, leading to 4-17 fold increased sensitivity to pyrethroids [44, 45]. An additional factor in the susceptibility of developing animals to pyrethroids is the differential expression of pyrethroid targets during development. For example, some developmentally expressed isoforms of the sodium (Na+) channel are much more sensitive to pyrethroids than isoforms expressed in the adult brain [33, 46]. The differences in sensitivity between neonates and adults are greatest with the type II pyrethroids; type I pyrethroids in neonates produce LD50

LD50: The median lethal dose, or the dose required to kill 50 percent of the exposed animals.

values roughly 2-3 fold lower than in adults, but type II pyrethroids had 16-24 fold lower LD50s in pups. Besides acute lethality, rats exposed to pyrethroids during postnatal days 10-16 exhibited increased motor activity and lack of habituation. These effects were accompanied by changes in neurotransmitter receptor levels [47], which persisted for up to 5 months after cessation of exposure. Together, results from these studies suggest that neonatal mammals are more sensitive than adult animals, due to a combination of differential expression of pyrethroid targets, reduced metabolic capacity, and increased pyrethroid levels in neuronal tissues.


3. Pyrethroid effects on nerve impulses

Action potentials are the electrical impulses that travel along the axons of neurons and result from the movement of Na+ and potassium (K+) ions across the membrane [48] (Figure 2). Binding of excitatory neurotransmitters to their receptors opens cation-permeable ion channels causing the membrane to depolarize or become more positive. This depolarization activates (opens) VGSCs allowing Na+ to enter the neuron further depolarizing the membrane. This increase in membrane permeability to Na+ is responsible for the rising phase of the action potential, eventually causing the membrane polarity to reverse (overshoot phase). The falling phase of the action potential is caused by the inactivation of the VGSCs and the opening of voltage-gated potassium channels allowing K+ to leave the cell. The efflux of K+ ions results in hyperpolarization (undershoot phase) of the membrane. Ultimately the voltage-gated K+ channels close and the membrane potential returns to its resting state.

In microelectrode recordings

Microelectrodes are typically made of a glass pipette pulled to a very fine tip and filled with an electrical conductor, such as a high salt solution. When the electrode is connected to a voltmeter and inserted into a cell it can detect changes in transmembrane voltage.

of action potentials in cockroaches, treatment with pyrethrum extract resulted in repetitive discharges followed by a block in nerve conduction [49, 50]. Allethrin, the first synthetic pyrethroid, also caused repetitive discharges and a subsequent conduction block. This effect was concentration and temperature-dependent [51-53]. Higher concentrations of pyrethrum and allethrin induced conduction block more rapidly and exposure at lower temperatures resulted in greater insecticidal activity. Allethrin treatment also slowed the rising and falling phases of the action potential and resulted in a more positive resting membrane potential. Increasing or decreasing the extracellular K+ concentration did not alter the effects of allethrin, indicating that pyrethroids alter Na+ conductance through action on VGSCs. Electrophysiological experiments in frog, squid and crayfish confirmed that type I pyrethroids cause repetitive discharges upon a single stimulus similar to allethrin and pyrethrins, whereas type II pyrethroids cause stimulus-dependent membrane depolarization and conduction block [54-57, 32].

Figure 2.

Phases of an action potential. Orange- normal action potential. Blue- action potential in the presence of allethrin. Modified from Motifolio Biomedical PowerPoint Toolkit Suite.


4. Pyrethroid effects on insect voltage-gated sodium channels

VGSCs consist of a pore forming subunit (α subunit) and an auxiliary subunit [58]. The α subunit contains four domains (I-IV) each with 6 transmembrane segments (Figure 3A). The amino and carboxy termini of the protein are intracellular. The fifth and sixth transmembrane segments (S5 and S6) and the loop between them form the channel pore and confer selectivity for Na+. Positively charged amino acids in S4 serve as the voltage sensor initiating a conformation change that opens the channel upon membrane depolarization. The cytoplasmic linker between domains III and IV serves as the inactivation gate. VGSCs can exist in 4 states controlled by the opening and closing of two distinct “gates,” known as the activation and inactivation gate, respectively (Figure 3B) [48]. At the resting membrane potential the channel is closed and the inactivation gate is open. Upon membrane depolarization, the channel opens allowing Na+ to enter the cell. During inactivation, the inactivation gate closes occluding the pore. Finally the channel closes during a state called deactivation. Removal of deactivation is needed to restore the “closed” state of the channel and prepare it for another activation (opening).

Figure 3.

The α subunit of the voltage-gated sodium channel. A. Schematic of VGSC α subunit indicating the four domains (I-IV) and their six transmembrane segments (1-6). The transmembrane segments and loop that form the channel pore are shown in green. The 4th transmembrane segment, shown in purple, acts as the voltage sensor. B. Four states of the VGSC. At resting membrane potentials the channel is closed. During the rising phase of an action potential the channel activates or opens. Channel inactivation contributes to the falling phase. During the undershoot phase the channel deactivates prior to returning to the closed phase once resting membrane resting potential has been restored. Modified from Motifolio Biomedical PowerPoint Toolkit Suite.

In insects, a single gene encodes the VGSC α subunit. In Drosophila melanogaster this gene is called para [48]. Messenger RNA transcripts from this gene are alternatively spliced resulting in mature transcripts containing different combinations of exons. The transcripts also undergo RNA editing in which some nucleotides are converted from one base to another often changing the amino acid that is encoded. The combination of alternative splicing and RNA editing results in VGSCs with distinct gating properties. The auxiliary subunit, TipE in D. melanogaster, increases cell surface expression of Para, enhances the peak Na+ current and alters the kinetics of channel inactivation.

Advancements in electrophysiological techniques, particularly the development of the voltage and patch-clamp techniques

The voltage-clamp technique typically uses two microelectrodes, allowing the experimenter to control the membrane potential and record transmembrane currents that result from ion channels opening and closing. Patch-clamp is a highly sensitive version of the voltage-clamp technique in which currents flowing through a single ion channel can be measured. A single electrode serves both to measure voltage and pass current.

, enabled researchers to study the effect of pyrethroids on Na+ current. Pyrethroids slowed VGSC activation leading to a decrease in peak Na+ current [53, 55, 59-61]. Pyrethroids slowed VGSC inactivation and deactivation leading to a prolonged VGSC open time. Type II pyrethroids prolonged channel open time more than type I pyrethroids. The longer channel open time results in more Na+ entering the cell leading to hyperexcitability with type I pyrethroids, membrane depolarization and conduction block with type II pyrethroids. Even though not every VGSC is altered by pyrethroids, modification of a small percentage of VGSCs can increase Na+ current substantially [91, 95].

In addition to the electrophysiology data, there is genetic evidence that pyrethroids target the VGSC. Pyrethroid resistant, or knockdown-resistant (kdr), houseflies were first reported in the 1950s [62, 63]. Genetic mapping of the kdr and super-kdr trait in houseflies revealed that pyrethroid resistance was tightly linked to the housefly VGSC gene, Vssc1 [64]. Similar genetic mapping experiments in tobacco budworms, German cockroaches and mosquitoes also linked kdr and super-kdr traits in those species with their respective VGSC genes [65-67]. Comparative sequence analysis of kdr and super-kdr housefly Vssc1 with the wild-type gene identified two point mutations in domain II [68]. The first mutation, a leucine to phenylalanine change in transmembrane segment 6, was found in two kdr and six super-kdr housefly strains. The second mutation, a methionine to threonine change in the intracellular loop between transmembrane segments 4 and 5, was only found in super-kdr strains. Sequencing of the VGSC genes from other species with kdr resistance identified several other mutations (Table 2) [58, 69-73].

The most common kdr mutation is a leucine (L) to phenylalanine (F), histidine (H), or serine (S) change in domain II segment 6 (DIIS6). As this mutation does not alter expression or localization of the VGSC, it was suspected to alter the affinity of the channel for pyrethroids [74]. Expression of this L to F mutant channel in Xenopus laevis oocytes resulted in VGSCs that were 10 fold less sensitive to cismethirin as assessed using voltage-clamp experiments [75]. The L to F mutation is found in combination with a methionine (M) to threonine (T) change in highly resistant houseflies. When expressed in X. laevis oocytes, the double mutant channels were 200x more resistant to deltamethrin and almost insensitive to permethrin [76]. Several other kdr mutations have been assayed in X. laevis oocytes and in general mutant channels required much higher concentrations of pyrethroid to produce Na+ currents that were similar to those produced by pyrethroid treated wild-type channels [77-80].

The clustering of kdr and six super-kdr mutations in DIIS4-S5 linker, DIIS5 and DIIS6 suggest that these regions are part of the pyrethroid-binding site. This is supported by computer modeling in which fenvalerate is predicted to interact with amino acids in DIIS4-S5 linker, the DIIS5 and the cytoplasmic end of DIIS6 [81]. The computer model is supported by competitive binding assays using active and inactive permethrin [82]. The L to F mutation in DIIS6 was found to reduce binding of the inactive pyrethroid by 16 fold. Alternatively, the kdr and six super-kdr mutations could alter VGSC gating properties in a way that counteracts pyrethroid action. In support of this second hypothesis, the L to F mutation in DIIS6 and the M to T mutation in DIIS4-S5 linker enhanced inactivation by shifting the voltage-dependence of inactivation to more negative membrane potentials and by increasing the rate of inactivation [76]. Further study of naturally occurring kdr mutations and splicing isoforms of VGSCs will provide a greater understanding of the molecular interactions between pyrethroids and VGSCs.

MutationLocation in VGSCSpecies
Leucine to PhenylalanineDIIS6Musca domestica, Blattella germanica, Plutella xylostella, Myzus persicae, Anopheles gambiae, Culex pipiens, Culex quinquefasciatus, Haematobia irritans, Leptinotarsa decemlineata, Frankliniella occidentalis, Cydia pomonella, Ctenocephalides felis
Leucine to SerineDIIS6Culex pipiens, Anopheles gambiae
Leucine to HistidineDIIS6Heliothis virescens
Methionine to ThreonineDIIS4-S5 linkerMusca domestica, Haematobia irritans, Heliothis virescens
Aspartate to GlycineAmino terminusBlattella germanica
Glutamate to LysineDI and DII linkerBlattella germanica
Cysteine to ArginineDI and DII linkerBlattella germanica
Proline to LeucineCarboxy terminusBlattella germanica
Valine to MethionineDIS6Heliothis virescens
Methionine to IsoleucineDIIS1-S2 linkerPediculus capitis
Leucine to PhenylalanineDIIS5Pediculus capitis
Threonine to IsoleucineDIIS5Plutella xylostella, Pediculus capitis
Threonine to CytosineDIIS5Frankliniella occidentalis
Threonine to ValineDIIS5Ctenocephalides felis
Phenylalanine to IsoleucineDIIIS6Boophilus microplus
Leucine to ProlineDIII-DIV linkerVarroa destructor

Table 2.

List of some of the species with kdr mutations. Mutations in red occur at the same leucine residue. Mutations in blue occur at the same threonine residue.


5. Pyrethroid effects on mammalian voltage-gated sodium channels

The α subunit of VGSCs in mammals is very similar both in structure and amino acid sequence to the insect VGSC [83]. In contrast to insects, mammals have nine VGSC genes (Nav1.1-1.9) that differ in channel properties and tissue expression patterns (Table 3). Transcripts produced from these genes also undergo alternative splicing to produce more functionally diverse channels. The auxiliary subunit in mammals, or β subunit, is required for proper localization of the α subunit to the plasma membrane. Interaction of the β subunit with the α subunits also modifies the voltage-dependence and kinetics of gating. Mammals have four β subunit genes (β1-β4); all four β subunits are expressed in the central nervous system and heart, but skeletal muscle only expresses β1.

Similar to insects, exposure to pyrethroids increases excitability in mammalian neurons by slowing the action potential falling phase [84-87]. Type I and type II pyrethroids delay mammalian VGSC inactivation resulting in a prolonged Na+ current [88, 89]. The length of channel open time is dependent on the pyrethroid type, with type II pyrethroids holding VGSCs open much longer than type I. For example, tetramethrin increased the open time of mouse neuroblastoma

Mouse neuroblastoma cells are an immortal cell-line derived from a spontaneous tumor of neural crest origin.

VGSCs ten-fold, whereas deltamethrin increased the open time 200-fold [89, 89]. The ability of pyrethroid to delay mammalian VGSC inactivation was also temperature-dependent, with lower temperatures resulting in slower Na+ current decay [89-91]. Electrophysiology studies demonstrating mammalian VGSC sensitivity to pyrethroids were also supported by in vitro assays. Pyrethroids enhanced 22Na+ uptake by toxin activated VGSCs in cultured mouse neuroblastoma cells and rat brain synaptosomes

In this model, neurons are harvested from rat brains and processed via subcellular fractionation to isolate the nerve terminals.

[84, 92]. Binding studies a using radioactive pyrethroid demonstrated specific binding of the pyrethroid to rat brain VGSC α subunits [93].

Channel NameFormer NamesExpression Pattern
Nav 1.1brain ICentral and peripheral nervous system
Nav 1.2brain II/IIaCentral nervous system
Nav1.3brain IIIEmbryonic/neonatal nervous system
Nav1.4μ1/SkM1Skeletal muscle
Nav1.5H1/SkM2Cardiac muscle
Nav1.6NaCh6/PN4Central and peripheral nervous system
Nav1.7PN1Central and peripheral nervous system
Nav1.8SNS/PN3Peripheral nervous system
Nav1.9NaNPeripheral nervous system

Table 3.

Mammalian sodium channels and tissue expression pattern. Channels in boldface are resistant to TTX, a voltage-gated sodium channel blocker, but are more sensitive to pyrethroids.

Although, mammalian VGSCs are less sensitive to pyrethroids that insect VGSCs, there is variability in pyrethroid sensitivity among the channel isoforms. Dorsal root ganglion cells are sensory neurons that express two classes of VGSCs, tetrodotoxin (TTX)-sensitive and TTX resistant channels. TTX is a potent VGSC inhibitor that prevents action potential generation. Nav1.8 and Nav1.9, which are resistant to TTX, are highly sensitive to pyrethroids [94-98]. Allethrin (at 10 μM) was found to have significant effect on TTX-resistant channels but no effect on TTX-sensitive channels. Similar results were obtained with tetramethrin and deltamethrin. Expression and voltage clamp studies in X. laevis oocytes demonstrated that Nav1.2 was less susceptible to pyrethroid modification than other sub-types [99-101]. Rat Nav1.3, which is expressed in the developing central nervous system, is more sensitive to type II pyrethroids than Nav1.2 [46,100]. The high pyrethroid sensitivity of Nav1.3, may underlie the increased neurotoxicity of pyrethroid to developing mammals. Nav1.6, which is highly expressed in the adult brain, is fifteen times more sensitive to tefluthrin and deltamethrin than Nav1.2 [101]. VGSCs are also critical for normal cardiac function. Tefluthrin, fenpropathrin and cypermethrin prolonged Na+ current in rat cardiomyocytes and increased the intervals between heartbeats in perfused hearts [102, 103]. Further investigation into structural differences between mammalian VGSC isoforms and how those differences affect pyrethroid sensitivity will be required to understand the molecular basis of pyrethroid toxicity in mammals. Such studies will be essential to the development of new pyrethroid insecticides with lower mammalian toxicity.


6. Pyrethroid effects on mammalian voltage-gated calcium channels

Voltage gated calcium channels (VGCCs) play essential roles in diverse cellular functions. They mediate Ca2+ influx into the cell from the extracellular environment following membrane depolarization. This can alter cell signaling, neurotransmission, and gene expression. VGCCs contain one transmembrane pore-forming and voltage-sensing subunit designated α1. The association of the transmembrane segments with a water-filled cavity forms the pore, through which Ca2+ traverses. A ring of glutamate residues, which line the pore, imparts Ca2+ selectivity. Changes in membrane potential cause a conformational shift resulting in the movement of a voltage-sensing domain to open the ionic pore. VGCCs are classified in three groups (CaV1-3)

The nomenclature of VGCCs genes is complex since the original naming system, based on the type of Ca2+ current observed during electrophysiological recording, was in place before the more systematic HUGO Human Gene Nomenclature was adopted. We will use the nomenclature developed by ion channel researchers throughout this review but refer the reader to (Ertel et al., 2000) for further discussion of VGCC naming conventions.

. Cav1 consists of the L-type high-voltage-activated VGCCs, Cav2 consists of P/Q-, N-, and R-type high-voltage activated VGCCs, and Cav3 consists of T-type low-voltage activated VGCCs. The terms “high-voltage activated” and “low-voltage activated” derived from the characteristics associated with the voltage-dependence of the two classes. “High-voltage activated” channels require strong levels of depolarization from the resting membrane potential to open, whereas “low-voltage activated” channels need only minimal depolarization from the resting potential to become activated. The α1 subunit forms the major structural and functional unit of the channel, but VGCC activity can be modulated by accessory subunits α2, β, δ, and γ. The α2 and δ subunits are the product of a single gene and are covalently linked by a disulfide bond. The four VGCC β subunits (β1-4) are cytoplasmic and play an instrumental role in cellular trafficking, intracellular signaling, and channel activity modulation. The γ subunit (eight isoforms: Cavγ1- γ8) is only expressed in skeletal muscle and may also play a role in cell trafficking [104]. The ratio of subunits exists in a 1:1:1:1 α1α2δβγ ratio, but diversity among subunit isoforms allows for isoform-specific effects.

L-type VGCCs (Cav1) are essential to somatodendritic Ca2+ influx in mammalian central neurons. They mediate influx in response to back-propagating action potentials, synaptic plasticity, and excitatory activity-dependent modulation of gene transcription. The Cav2 family members are all expressed in central neurons, where they are localized to axons, soma, and dendrites. In peripheral neurons, they are expressed differentially. Their localization was determined using specific pharmacological inhibition of isoform-specific currents (Table 4). Cav2.1 (P/Q-type) and Cav2.2 (N-type) are the predominate VGCCs involved in presynaptic voltage-dependent Ca2+ influx which triggers vesicular release of neurotransmitters. However, at some synapses either or both L-type and R-type channels also participate in this essential function. The final family member, Cav3, consists of T-type VGCCs that activate at sub-threshold membrane potentials and are critical for regulation of plasma membrane Ca2+ permeability near resting membrane potentials and during action potentials. Depending on the brain region, T-type VGCCs are localized to soma, dendrites, or intracellular targets.

The primary target of pyrethroids is widely accepted as the VGSC [105]; however, pyrethroids can interact with other targets. The ciliate protozoa Paramecium tetraurelia do not express VGSCs and yet exhibit high sensitivity to type II pyrethroids, via a mechanism involving disrupted Ca2+ homeostasis [106]. Though unique in subunit structure, there are fundamental similarities between VGCCs and VGSCs. Both contain a pore-forming α subunit, intracellular β subunits, and similar gating mechanisms, although the VGCC has additional α2δ and γ subunits [107]. Several studies have noted effects of pyrethroids on mammalian neuronal VGCCs in the same concentration range as their effects on neuronal VGSCs [11, 98, 108, 109].

Neurons in culture develop spontaneous networks of interconnected neurons that exhibit electrical activity in response to neuronal signaling. This activity can be measured as either excitatory or inhibitory post-synaptic currents (EPSC or IPSC, respectively) using electrophysiological methods. EPSCs can be either action potential-dependent or action potential-independent; in the presence of TTX, EPSCs are present as miniature events and are termed miniature EPSCs (mEPSCs). In contrast, in the absence of TTX, EPSCs have a much larger magnitude. Both type I and type II pyrethroids inhibit spontaneous activity in neurons [110, 111]. Permethrin (type I) and deltamethrin (type II) both decreased the number of EPSCs in hippocampal neuron networks in a concentration-dependent manner; deltamethrin was more potent. In contrast, only the type I permethrin increased the frequency of mEPSCs in hippocampal neurons [112].

The stimulatory effect of permethrin on mEPSCs was dependent on the presence of extracellular Ca2+[112], showing that the effects observed on EPSCs by type I pyrethroids are downstream of Ca2+ entry through VGCCs. Effects of type I pyrethroids on VGCCs have been described in several electrophysiological studies. The type I pyrethroid allethrin potently blocked recombinant rat L-, P/Q-, and T-type VGCCs with IC50 in the low micromolar range in human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 cells [108], which is lower than or in the same magnitude of allethrin concentrations that affect insect VGSCs [61, 98]. However, another study found allethrin differentially modulated endogenous VGCC subtypes in rat pheochromocytoma (PC12) cells, with marked differences in sensitivity, stimulating L-type and inhibiting N-type VGCCs. L-type VGCCs exhibited an EC50

Half maximal effective concentration (EC50) refers to the concentration at which 50% of the maximum response is observed during a stimulatory effect.

in the mid-pM range while N-type VGCCs exhibited an IC50 in the low μM range [109].

SubtypeCalcium Currentα subunitExpression PatternPharmacological Inhibitors
Cav1.1L-typeα1SSkeletal muscleDihydropyridines (DHPs)
Cav1.2L-typeα1CHeart, smooth muscle, brain, pituitary, adrenal glandDHPs
Cav1.3L-typeα1DBrain, pancreas, kidney, ovary, cochleaDHPs
Cav2.1P/Q-typeα1ACentral and peripheral nervous systemω-agatoxin-IVA/IIIA,
ω-grammotoxin SIVA,
ω-conotoxin MVIIC
Cav2.2N- typeα1BCentral and peripheral nervous systemω-conotoxin MVIIC/GVIA/CVID,
ω-grammotoxin SIVA, farnesol, petidylamines
Cav2.3R-typeα1EBrain, cochlea, pituitary, retina, heartTarantula toxin derived peptide SNX-482
Cav3.1T-typeα1GCentral and peripheral nervous systemKurtoxin, ethosuximide, nickel
Cav3.2T-typeα1HBrain, heart, kidney, liverKurtoxin, ethosuximide, nickel
Cav3.3T-typeα1IBrain Kurtoxin, nickel

Table 4.

Naming system, tissue localization, and pharmacological agents of VGCC subtypes.

The VGCC subtype-specific effects seen in PC12 cells [109] but not in recombinant assays [108] may be due to differences in VGCC subunit expression. A combination of rat α1A(P/Q), α1C(L) or α1G(T) with the β1b and α2δ subunits was expressed in HEK293 cells [108]. While the α subunit composition would remain the same, PC12 cells express β1, β2, and β3 mRNA, and different β subunits associate in the native N-type channel [113]. Additionally, the β subunit can undergo extensive post-translational modification, resulting in numerous splice variants [114]. The β subunit in VGCCs has direct effects on VGCC inactivation, with VGCCs containing the β2a subunit exhibiting slower inactivation than those containing the β1b or β3 subunit [114-116]. Furthermore, the identity of the β subunit can shift the voltage dependence of VGCC currents, P/Q-type VGCCs containing β4 exhibit peak current at more hyperpolarized potentials than β1b, β2a, or β3, [116]. Effects of pyrethroids on VGSCs can be modulated by the identity of the VGSC β subunit [46], so perhaps pyrethroid effects on VGCCs may also be modulated by auxiliary subunit composition.

VGCC sensitivity to pyrethroids may also be modulated by the channel phosphorylation state. N-type VGCCs in particular are heavily influenced by phosphorylation by protein kinase C (PKC). PKC phosphorylates several sites in the N-type VGCC; phosphorylation at threonine-422 (T422) is stimulatory while at serine-425 (S425) it is inhibitory [117, 118]. Effects of PKC phosphorylation are dependent on β subunit expression [119]. In recombinant systems, application of phorbol-12-myristate, 13-acetate (PMA) potentiates current through N-type VGCC [120]. Inhibition of the PKC isoforms βII and ε block this potentiation. Deltamethrin differentially modulated recombinant N-type VGCCs based on channel phosphorylation status at the T422 residue [121]. Deltamethrin exposure of a mutant N-type VGCC that mimics phosphorylation at residue T422 resulted in channel activation. Wild-type channels and mutant channels incapable of phosphorylation are inhibited by deltamethrin. Although effects of type I pyrethroids on this mutant channel have not yet been investigated, this study raises the interesting possibility that VGCCs exhibit phosphorylation-specific sensitivity to pyrethroids

In addition to direct measurement of the effects of pyrethroids on Ca2+ current and VGCC properties, there have been many studies on pyrethroids effects on Ca2+ influx and neurotransmitter release. These endpoints serve as measures of functional outcomes of pyrethroid modulation of VGCCs. Alternatively, as pyrethroids are lipophilic and may independently partition into cells, results from these assays could indicate pyrethroid action on intracellular Ca2+ channels. Several studies were performed using rat synaptosomal preparations. Deltamethrin caused a significant increase in Ca2+ influx in rat synaptosomes in a stereospecific manner, with 1R-deltamethrin causing a roughly 1.7 fold increase in Ca2+ influx and 1S-deltamethrin having no effect on influx [122]. TTX had no effect on the stimulation of Ca2+ influx by deltamethrin, indicating that the influx was independent of VGSCs. However, incubation with ω-conotoxin MVIIC abolished the stimulatory effect of deltamethrin on Ca2+ influx, suggesting that the Ca2+ influx was via N- or P/Q- type VGCCs. In a follow up study, the deltamethrin-stimulated influx was reduced by 63% in the presence of ω-conotoxin GVIA, suggesting that more than half of the deltamethrin-stimulated influx was via N-type VGCCs.

Cismethrin had a lesser stimulatory effect on Ca2+ influx than deltamethrin but only with high (>20 mM) levels of potassium-induced depolarization [121, 123]. The cismethrin-mediated influx was unaffected by ω-conotoxin GVIA but was reduced by 50% with TTX [123]. In the presence of nimodipine, cismethrin increased Ca2+ influx [121]. A similar stimulatory effect on Ca2+ influx by cismethrin was observed in the presence of ω-conotoxin GVIA [121]. The results with cismethrin suggested that the pyrethroid is primarily increasing Ca2+ via a TTX-sensitive mechanism whereas the mechanism with deltamethrin is likely TTX-insensitive. This may suggest that the Ca2+ influx observed with cismethrin is a result of increased Na+ influx through VGSCs followed by replacement of Na+ with Ca2+ via the Na+/Ca2+ exchanger [121].

Deltamethrin caused a modest, yet significant, increase in glutamate release from rat synaptosomes in a stereospecific manner, with 1R-deltamethrin stimulating glutamate release and 1S-deltamethrin having no effect [122]. TTX had no effect on the stimulation of glutamate release by deltamethrin, indicating that the effect was independent of VGSCs. However, incubation with ω-conotoxin MVIIC abolished the stimulatory effect, suggesting that the release was mediated by activation of N- or P/Q- type VGCCs. In a subsequent study, ω-conotoxin GVIA reduced this deltamethrin-mediated increase in glutamate release by 70%, but nimodipine (L-type VGCC blocker) had no effect, suggesting that the enhanced glutamate release was predominately through stimulation of N-type VGCCs. Two other pyrethroids, cismethrin and bioresmethrin, had no effect on glutamate release in this model system [121, 122].

The studies described above suggested that while both type I and type II pyrethroids stimulate Ca2+ influx, type II pyrethroids are more potent modulators of glutamate release. However, as only a limited number of chemicals were tested, further studies are needed to determine if there were inter-class differences in these effects. A study of 11 pyrethroids, showed that they could be separated into 3 groups based on a cluster analysis of their behavior in Ca2+ influx and glutamate release assays. Group 1 consisted of cismethrin (type I) and bifenthrin (type I); group 2 consisted of bioallethrin (type I), tefluthrin (type I), and fenpropathrin (type II); and group 3 consisted of permethrin (type I), cyhalothrin (type II), cyfluthrin (type II), deltamethrin (type II), cypermethrin (type II), and esfenvalerate (type II). Thus, Group 1 and 2 were largely composed of type I pyrethroids while Group 3 consisted of mainly type II pyrethroids. Only Groups 1 and 3 elicited a concentration-dependent effect on Ca2+ influx into rat synaptosomes, while all three groups elicited a concentration-dependent effect on glutamate release, with the highest potency observed with Group 3 [124]. Thus, in this study the group with the most type II pyrethroids exhibited the highest potency in Ca2+ influx and neurotransmitter release assays. These findings were confirmed in another study on 11 pyrethroids. A cluster of 6 pyrethroids (λ-cyhalothrin, cypermethrin, permethrin, deltamethrin, cyfluthrin, and esfenvalerate) had the highest potency in both the Ca2+ influx and glutamate release assays. These 6 pyrethroids overlap with the pyrethroids in Group 3 of [124]. Another cluster of pyrethroids (tefluthrin, bio-allethrin, and fenpropathrin) affect glutamate release but not Ca2+ influx. These pyrethroids are identical to those in Group 2 of [124] and performed similarly in the Ca2+ influx and glutamate release assays in both studies. Finally, bifenthrin and cismethrin had modest effects on Ca2+ influx only at the highest concentrations tested and had no effect on glutamate release. These pyrethroids were in Group 1 [124], and while neither study observed pronounced effects of these pyrethroids on Ca2+ influx, [124] did observe effects of these pyrethroids on glutamate release. Thus, there is good agreement between two independent studies that type II pyrethroids generally are more potent against Ca2+ influx and glutamate release than are type I agents.

Most pyrethroid formulations used by humans consist of mixtures of various pyrethroids. Thus, an active area of investigation is the way pyrethroid mixtures interact with the pyrethroid targets. Binary mixtures of deltamethrin with the type II pyrethroids λ-cyhalothrin, cypermethrin, and esfenvalerate increased intracellular Ca2+ levels in an additive manner [125]. The type I pyrethroids permethrin and cismethrin also produced additive effects on Ca2+ influx when combined with deltamethrin in binary combinations. In contrast, S-bioallethrin and tefluthrin (type I) and fenpropathrin (type II) in binary mixtures with deltamethrin caused less-than-additive effects on Ca2+ influx [125]. These studies suggested that pyrethroids which cause increased Ca2+ influx work together in mixtures to stimulate Ca2+ influx in an additive manner. However, those pyrethroids with weak stimulatory activity or inhibitory activity on influx do not synergistically modulate Ca2+ influx. The additive effects on Ca2+ influx did not predict the effects of the binary combinations of pyrethroids on glutamate release. A more-than-additive effect on glutamate release was observed when a subset of type I or type II pyrethroids was combined with deltamethrin, but none of these mixtures had produced more-than additive effects on Ca2+ influx [125].


7. Pyrethroid effects on GABAA receptors

GABA (γ -aminobutyric acid) is a small molecule inhibitory neurotransmitter utilized by nearly 1/3 of the mammalian brain’s synapses. In contrast to excitatory neurotransmitters, inhibitory neurotransmitters prevent a neuron from firing an action potential [48]. There are three types of GABA receptors, A, B and C. GABA type A (GABAA) and GABA type C (GABAC) receptors are ligand-gated chloride ion (Cl-) channels. They exist as pentamers containing various combinations of α, β, γ, δ, ρ, π, and ε subunits (Figure 4). The subunit composition of the GABA receptors determines the pharmacological and electrophysiological properties of the receptors [126]. Thus far 6 α3, β, 3 γ, 1δ, 1Π, 1Ε, and 3 p subunits have been identified in the mammalian brain. They have distinct regional and cellular distributions, resulting in a diverse array of GABA receptors. However, the majority of GABAA receptors have 2 α, 2 β and 1 γ subunit. GABA binds GABAA receptors at the interface of the α and β subunits stimulating an influx of Cl- that holds the neuron’s membrane potential more negative than the threshold required to initiate an action potential.

In the1980s, GABAA receptors were postulated to play a role in type II pyrethroid poisoning signs. Diazepam, a benzodiazepine drug, delayed type II poisoning signs and reduced mortality in mice and cockroaches injected with deltamethrin or fenvalerate [127]. Benzodiazepines bind to GABAA receptors and enhance the inhibitory effects of GABA-induced activation of the receptor. Diazepam offered no protection from treatment with the type I pyrethroids, allethrin and permethrin. Type II, but not Type I pyrethroids also inhibit binding of picrotoxin and t-butylbicyclophosphorothionate (TBPS) to rat brain membranes in vitro [128, 129]. Picrotoxin and its derivative TBPS antagonize

Antagonists are chemicals that bind a receptor and blocks action of the receptor. Agonists are chemicals that bind the receptor triggering a response.

GABA-induced Cl- flux by blocking the GABAA ion channel. Picrotoxin and TBPS binding were effectively inhibited with 5 μM deltamethrin, cypermethrin and fenvalerate, whereas 50 μM of the type I pyrethroids cismethrin and permethrin had no effect. Pyrethroids had no effect on the binding of benzodiazepines or muscimol (binds at the GABA site), suggesting that type II pyrethroids bind the GABAA receptor at the same site as picrotoxin/TBPS.

Figure 4.

The GABAA receptor. This schematic depicts the most common GABAA receptor subunit composition and the binding sites of its ligand, GABA, and various drugs that influence the receptor’s function. Modified from Motifolio Biomedical PowerPoint Toolkit Suite.

Functional evidence of type II pyrethroid inhibition of GABAA receptors arose from electrophysiology experiments using crayfish claw opener muscles [130]. Bathing crayfish claw opener muscles in a GABA bath causes a decrease in input resistance, indicating an activation of GABA receptors. GABAA receptor antagonists, such as picrotoxin, increase input resistance by blocking the ion pore. Several type II pyrethroids increased the input resistance of the claw opener muscle in a manner similar to picrotoxin. Furthermore, cypermethrin inhibited GABA-stimulated influx of radioactive 36Cl- into rat brain synaptosomes [131]. However, none of these experiments were conducted in the presence of TTX to block the action of pyrethroids on VGSCs. In the presence of TTX, the GABA induced inward Cl- current of cultured rat sensory neurons was not affected by deltamethrin [132]. Antagonism of GABAA receptors should decrease inhibition in the brain. However, cismethrin, fenvalerate or deltamethrin increased function of inhibitory neurons in the rat hippocampus [133]. Further evidence against a direct effect of pyrethroids on GABAA receptors came from trout brain synaptosome 36Cl- influx assays [134]. Deltamethrin, cypermethrin and permethrin caused a concentration-dependent decrease in GABA-dependent 36Cl- influx. This effect was completely inhibited by TTX, indicating that previously observed effects of type II pyrethroids on GABAA receptors are indirect and downstream of the effects on VGSCs.


8. Pyrethroid effects on voltage-gated Cl- channels

Cl- is the most abundant extracellular anion and its movement across cell membranes is involved in cell volume regulation, and acidification of intracellular compartments such as lysosomes [135-137]. In excitable cells, voltage-gated Cl- channels (ClCs) act to maintain resting membrane potential. Comparatively little is known about the ClCs, but the channels are thought to function as dimers with two identical ion pores. In [134] an increase in basal uptake (GABA independent) of 36Cl- occurred upon pyrethroid administration. This pyrethroid-enhanced uptake was completely sensitive to TTX but only partially inhibited by a GABAA channel blocker, providing the first evidence that ClCs may be involved on pyrethroid action.

Deltamethrin decreased the probability of ClC opening in cultured mouse neuroblastoma cells in a concentration-dependent manner [138, 139]. This effect was initially thought to be type II specific as cypermethrin also decreased open channel probability. However, bioallethrin (type I) also decreased the probability of ClC opening, whereas esfenvalerate and cyhalothrin (type II) had no effect [140]. Therefore the ability of a pyrethroid to modify ClC is not solely determined by the presence of an α cyano group. The Cl- channel agonist, ivermectin, increased the probability of ClC opening in deltamethrin-treated cultured mouse neuroblastoma cells [141]. In vivo experiments demonstrated that ivermectin decreased salivation and muscle twitching. Thus, ClCs are biologically relevant sites of action for certain pyrethroids that contribute to some of the intoxication signs.


9. Conclusion

Pyrethroid insecticides are synthetic analogs of pyrethrin, the natural insecticides produced by Chrysanthemum species. Pyrethroid insecticides are divided into two groups based on the absence (type I) or presence (type II) of a cyano group. Both types disrupt action potentials in insects by prolonging the open time of VGSCs in a concentration and temperature dependent manner by delaying channel inactivation and deactivation. As the type II pyrethroids hold VGSCs open longer, they allow greater influx of Na+ resulting in neuron depolarization and conduction block. Pyrethroids similarly affect mammalian VGSCs and those effects are thought to underlie the signs associated with pyrethroid intoxication. Developing mammals are more sensitive to pyrethroids than adults, but the molecular mechanisms for this increased sensitivity is unknown. The developmental neurotoxicity of pyrethroids may be due to effects on VGSC isoforms that are only expressed during development. There is also evidence that pyrethroid insecticides target mammalian VGCCs and ClCs. Pyrethroid appear to cause VGCC sub-type specific effects, although there are conflicting data present in the literature. Some pyrethroids are capable of antagonizing ClCs, and this action appears to be partly responsible for the hypersalivation and motor dysfunction seen in pyrethroid intoxication. There is currently little understanding as to how or if pyrethroid modification of VGCCs and ClCs contribute to mammalian toxicity both in adult and developing animals. Furthermore, as most mammals are exposed continually to a mixture of pyrethroids it remains to be seen how the combined effects of different pyrethroids affect neuronal function long-term.


  1. 1. Casida JE1980Pyrethrum flowers and pyrethroid insecticides. Environ. Health Perspect. 34189202
  2. 2. StaudingerH.RuzickaL.1924Substances for killing insects I. The isolation and constitution of effective parts of dalmatian insect powder. Helv. Chim. Acta 7177201
  3. 3. StaudingerH.RuzickaL.1924Substances for killing insects II. The constitution of chrysanthemum-monocarbonic acid and dicarbonic acid. Helv. Chim. Acta 7201211
  4. 4. TattersfieldF.HobsonR. P.1929Pyrethrin I and II. Their estimation in pyrethrum (Chrysanthemum cinerariaefolium). I. J. Agricultural Sci. 19433437
  5. 5. TattersfieldF.HobsonR. P.GiminghamC. T.1929Pyrethrin I and II. Their insecticidal value and estimation in pyrethrum (Chrysanthemum cinerariaefolium). I. J. Agricultural Sci. 19266296
  6. 6. SawickiR. M.ElliottM.1965Insecticidal activity of pyrethrum extract and its four insecticidal constituents against house flies. VI-Relative toxicity of pyrethrin I and pyrethrin II against four strains of house flies. J. Sci. Fd Agric. 168589
  7. 7. KuriharaN.MiyamotoJ.PaulsonG. al.1997Chirality in synthetic agrochemicals: Bioactivity and safety consideration. Pure Appl. Chem. 6913351349
  8. 8. MullaleyA.TaylorR.1994Conformational properties of pyrethroids. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 8135152
  9. 9. Ray DE and Fry JR2006A reassessment of the neurotoxicity of pyrethroid insecticides. Pharmacol. Ther. 111174193
  10. 10. Soderlund DM and Bloomquist JR2003Neurotoxic actions of pyrethroid insecticides. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 347796
  11. 11. VaisH.MSWilliamsonDevonshire. A. al.2001The molecular interactions of pyrethroid insecticides with insect and mammalian sodium channels. Pest. Manag. Sci. 57877888
  12. 12. NarahashiT.1986Toxins that modulate the sodium-channel gating mechanism. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 479133151
  13. 13. Chen YL and Casida JE1969Photodecomposition of pyrethrin i, allethrin, phthalthrin, and dimethrin: modifications in the acid moiety. J. Agr. Food Chem. 17208215
  14. 14. ElliottM.FarnhamA. W.JaneN. al.1973A photostable pyrethroid. Nature 246169170
  15. 15. ATSDR2003Toxicologial Profile for Pyrethrins and Pyrethroids. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. Atlanta, GA.
  16. 16. Barr DB, Olsson AO, Wong LY, et al.2010Urinary concentrations of metabolites of pyrethroid insecticides in the general US population: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999-2002. Environ. Health Perspect. 118742748
  17. 17. Ostrea EMJ, Bielawski DM, Posecion MCJ, et al.2009Combined analysis of prenatal (maternal hair and blood) and neonatal (infant hair, cord blood and meconium) matrices to detect fetal exposure to environmental pesticides. Environ. Res. 109116122
  18. 18. US EPA2006Permethrin Facts (Reregistration Eligibility Decision Fact Sheet). Available:
  19. 19. US EPA2006Reregistration Eligibility Decision for Cypermethrin. Available:
  20. 20. US EPA2002Permethrin, Resmethrin, Sumithrin: Synthetic Pyrethroids for Mosquito Control. Available:
  21. 21. Power LE and Sudakin DL2007Pyrethrin and pyrethroid exposures in the United States: A longitudinal analysis of incidents reported to poison centers. J. Med. Toxicol. 39499
  22. 22. Ray DE and Forshaw PJ2000Pyrethroid insecticides: poisoning syndromes, synergies, and therapy. J. Toxicol. Clin. Toxicol. 3895101
  23. 23. Anand SS, Bruckner JV, Haines WT, et al.2006Characterization of deltamethrin metabolism by rat plasma and liver microsomes. Toxicol Appl. Pharmacol. 212156166
  24. 24. ElliottM.JanesN. F.KimmelE. al.1972Metabolic fate of pyrethrin I, pyrethrin II, and allethrin administered orally to rats. J. Agric. Food Chem. 20300313
  25. 25. YamamotoI.ElliottM.CasidaJ. E.1971The metabolic fate of pyrethrin I, pyrethrin II, and allethrin. Bull. World Health Organ. 44347348
  26. 26. Abernathy CO and Casida JE1973Pyrethroid insecticides: esterase cleavage in relation to selective toxicity. Science 17912351236
  27. 27. Kim KB, Anand SS, Kim HJ, et al.2008Toxicokinetics and tissue distribution of deltamethrin in adult Sprague-Dawley rats. Toxicol. Sci. 101197205
  28. 28. US EPA,O.P.P.2011Pyrethroid Cumulative Risk Assessment. Docket ID: EPA-HQ-OPP-2011-0746-0003.
  29. 29. Godin SJ, DeVito MJ, Hughes MF, et al.2010Physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling of deltamethrin: development of a rat and human diffusion-limited model. Toxicol. Sci. 115330343
  30. 30. Marei AE, Ruzo LO, Casida JE1982Analysis and persistence of permethrin, cypermethrin, deltamethrin, and fenvalerate in the fat and brain of treated rats. J. Agric. Food Chem. 30558562
  31. 31. BreckenridgeC. al.2009Evidence for a separate mechanism of toxicity for the Type I and the Type II pyrethroid insecticides. Neurotoxicology 30: S17S31.
  32. 32. LundA. E.NarahashiT.1983Kinetics of sodium channel modification as the basis for the variation in the nerve membrane effects of pyrethroids and DDT analogs. Pest. Biochem. Physiol. 20203216
  33. 33. Shafer TJ, Meyer DA, Crofton KM2005Developmental neurotoxicity of pyrethroid insecticides: critical review and future research needs. Environ. Health Perspect. 113123136
  34. 34. Wolansky MJ and Harrill JA2008Neurobehavioral toxicology of pyrethroid insecticides in adult animals: a critical review. Neurotoxicol. Teratol. 305578
  35. 35. Verschoyle RD and Aldridge WN1980Structure-activity relationships of some pyrethroids in rats. Arch. Toxicol. 45325329
  36. 36. Elwan MA, Richardson JR, Guillot TS, et al.2006Pyrethroid pesticide-induced alterations in dopamine transporter function. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 211188197
  37. 37. MMHossainSuzuki. al.2006Differential effects of pyrethrid insecticides on extracellular dopamine in the striatum of freely moving rats. Tox. App. Pharmacol. 2172534
  38. 38. NasutiC.GabbianelliR.FalcioniM. al.2007Dopaminergic system modulation, behavioral changes, and oxidative stress after neonatal administration of pyrethroids. Toxicology 229194205
  39. 39. NasutiC.FalcioniM. L.NwankwoI. al.2008Effect of permethrin plus antioxidants on locomotor activity and striatum in adolescent rats. Toxicology 2514550
  40. 40. SinghA. K.TiwariM. N.UpadhyayG.etal..2012Long term exposure to cypermethrin induces nigrostriatal dopaminergic neurodegeneration in adult rats: postnatal exposure enhances the susceptibility during adulthood. Neurobiol. Aging 33404415
  41. 41. Hossain MM and Richardson JR2011Mechanism of pyrethroid pesticide-induced apoptosis: role of calpain and the ER stress pathway. Toxicol. Sci. 122512525
  42. 42. Abdel-RahmanA.ShettyA. K.Abou-DoniaM. B.2001Subchronic dermal application of N,N-diethyl m-toluamide (DEET) and permethrin to adult rats, alone or in combination, causes diffuse neuronal cell death and cytoskeletal abnormalities in the cerebral cortex and the hippocampus, and Purkinje neuron loss in the cerebellum. Exp. Neurol. 172153171
  43. 43. Sheets LP2000A consideration of age-dependent differences in susceptibility to organophosphorus and pyrethroid insecticides. Neurotoxicology 215763
  44. 44. CantalamessaF.1993Acute toxicity of two pyrethroids, permethrin, and cypermethrin in neonatal and adult rats. Arch. Toxicol. 67510513
  45. 45. Sheets LP, Doherty JD, Law MW, et al.1994Age-dependent differences in the susceptibility of rats to deltamethrin. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 126186190
  46. 46. Meacham CA, Brodfuehrer PD, Watkins JA, et al.2008Developmentally-regulated sodium channel subunits are differentially sensitive to α-cyano containing pyrethroids. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 231273281
  47. 47. TaltsU.FredrikssonA.ErikssonP.1998Changes in behavior and muscarinic receptor density after neonatal and adult exposure to bioallethrin. Neurobiol. Aging 19545552
  48. 48. PurvesD.AugustineG. al.eds2001Neuroscience, 2nd edition. Sunderlund: Sinauer Associates.
  49. 49. LowensteinO.1942A method of physiological assay of pyrethrum extracts. Nature 26760762
  50. 50. Walsh JH and Gordon HT1947The mode of action of certain insecticides on the arthropod nerve axon. J. Cell Physiol. 30147171
  51. 51. NarahashiT.1962Effect of the insecticide allethrin on membrane potentials of cockroach giant axons. J. Cell Comp. Physiol. 596165
  52. 52. NarahashiT.1962Nature of the negative after-potential increased by the insecticide allethrin in cockroach giant axons. J. Cell Comp. Physiol. 596776
  53. 53. NarahashiT.1971Mode of action of pyrethroids. Bull. World Health Organ. 4433745
  54. 54. NarahashiT.AndersonN. C.1967Mechanism of excitation block by the insecticide allethrin applied externally and internally to squid giant axons. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 10529547
  55. 55. MurayamaK.AbottN. J.NarahashiT.ShapiroB. I.1972Effects of allethrin and Condylactis toxin on the kinetics of sodium conductance of crayfish axon membranes. Comp. Gen. Pharmacol. 3391400
  56. 56. Clements AN and May TE1977The actions of pyrethroids upon the peripheral nervous system and associated organs in the locust. Pestic. Sci. 8661680
  57. 57. VijverbergH. P.Van denBercken. J.1982Annotation. Action of pyrethroid insecticides on the vertebrate nervous system. Neuropathol. Appl. Neurobiol. 8: 421.440.
  58. 58. DongK.2007Insect sodium channels and insecticide resistance. Invert. Neurosci. 71730
  59. 59. WangC. M.NarahashiT.ScukaM.1972Mechanism of negative temperature coefficient of nerve blocking action of allethrin. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 182442453
  60. 60. BrownL. D.NarahashiT.1992Modulation of nerve membrane sodium channel activation by deltamethrin. Brain Res. 5847176
  61. 61. AmarM.PichonY.InoueI.1992Patch-clamp analysis on the effects of the insecticide deltamethrin on insect neurons. J. Exp. Biol. 1636584
  62. 62. Busvine JR1951Mechanism of resistance to insecticide in houseflies. Nature 168193195
  63. 63. DaviesM.KeidingJ.VonHosten.1958Resistance to pyrethrins and to pyrethrins-piperonyl butoxide in a wild strain of Musca domestica L. in Sweden. Nature 18218161817
  64. 64. MSWilliamsonDenholm. I.CABellet.al1993Knockdown resistance (kdr) to DDT and pyrethroid insecticides maps to a sodium channel gene locus in the housefly (Musca domestica). Mol. Gen. Genet. 2401722
  65. 65. Taylor MF, Heckel DG, Brown TM et al.1993Linkage of pyrethroid insecticide resistance to a sodium channel locus in the tobacco budworm. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 23763775
  66. 66. DongK.ScottJ. G.1994Linkage of kdr-type resistance and the para-homologous sodium channel gene in German cockroaches (Blattella germanica). Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 24647654
  67. 67. SeversonD. W.AnthonyN. al.1997Molecular mapping of insecticide resistance genes in the yellow fever mosquito (Aedes aegypti). J. Hered. 88520524
  68. 68. al.1996Identification of mutations in the housefly para-type sodium channel gene associated with knockdown resistance (kdr) to pyrethroid insecticides. Mol. Gen. Genet. 2525160
  69. 69. Soderlund DM2008Pyrethroids, knockdown resistance and sodium channels. Pest. Manag. Sci. 64610616
  70. 70. MiyazakiM.OhyamaK.DunlapD. al.1996Cloning and sequencing of the para-type sodium channel gene from susceptible and kdr-resistant German cockroaches (Blattella germanica) and house fly (Musca domestica). Mol. Gen. Genet. 2526168
  71. 71. Ingles PJ, Adams PM, Knipple DC et al.1996Characterization of voltage-sensitive sodium channel gene coding sequences from insecticide-susceptible and knockdown-resistant house fly strains. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 26319326
  72. 72. DongK.1997A single amino acid change in the para sodium channel protein is associated with knockdown-resistance (kdr) to pyrethroid insecticides in German cockroach. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2793100
  73. 73. ParkY.TaylorM. F.FeyereisenR.1997A valine421 to methionine mutation in IS6 of the hscp voltage-gated sodium channel associated with pyrethroid resistance in Heliothis virescens F. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 239688691
  74. 74. CastellaC.Castells-BrookeN.BergeJ. al.1997Expression and distribution of voltage-sensitive sodium channels in pyrethroid-susceptible and pyrethroid-resistant Musca domestica. Invert. Neurosci. 34147
  75. 75. Smith TJ, Lee SH, Ingles PJ, et al.1997The L1014F point mutation in the house fly Vssc1 sodium channel confers knockdown resistance to pyrethroids. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 27807812
  76. 76. VaisH.AtkinsonS.Pluteanuet.al2003Mutations of the para sodium channel of Drosophila melanogaster indentify putative binding sites for pyrethroids. Mol. Pharmacol. 64914922
  77. 77. Usherwood PN, Davies TG, Mellor IR, et al.2007Mutations in DIIS5 and the DIIS4-S5 linker of Drosophila melanogaster sodium channel define binding domains for pyrethroids and DDT. FEBS Lett. 58154855492
  78. 78. SupyoonK.SymingtonS. B.HyeockLee. al.2008Three mutations identified in the voltage-sensitive sodium channel α-subunit gene of permethrin-resistant human head lice reduce the permethrin sensitivity of house fly Vssc1 sodium channels expressed in Xenopus oocytes. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 38296306
  79. 79. al.2009Molecular determinants of the insect sodium channel for the specific action of type II pyrethroid insecticides. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 234266272
  80. 80. Burton MJ, Mellor IR, Davies TGE, et al.2011Differential resistance of insect sodium channels with kdr mutations to deltamethrin, permethrin and DDT. Insect Biochem. Molec. Biol. 41723732
  81. 81. O’Reilly AO, Khambay BP, Williamson MS, et al.2006Modeling insecticide-binding sites in the voltage-gated sodium channel. Biochem. J. 396255263
  82. 82. al.2005Identification of amino acid residues in the insect sodium channel critical for pyrethroid binding. Mol. Pharmacol. 67513522
  83. 83. Catterall WA, Goldin AL, Waxman SG2005International Union of Pharmacology. XLVII. Nomenclature and structure-function relationships of voltage-gated sodium channels. Pharmacol. Rev. 57397409
  84. 84. JacquesY.RomeyG.CaveyM. al.1980Interaction of pyrethroids with the Na+ channel in mammalian neuronal cells in culture. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 600882897
  85. 85. Smith PR1980The effect of cismethrin on the rat dorsal root potentials. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 66125128
  86. 86. Parkin PJ and Le Quesne PM1982Effect of a synthetic pyrethroid deltamethrin on excitability changes following a nerve impulse. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 45337342
  87. 87. TakahashiM.Le QuesneP. M.1982The effects of the pyrethroids deltamethrin and cismethrin on nerve excitability in rats. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 4510051011
  88. 88. ChinnK.NarahashiT.1986Stabilization of sodium channel states by deltamethrin in mouse neuroblastoma cells. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 380191207
  89. 89. Ruigt GS, Neyt HC, Van der Zalm JM, et al.1987Increase of sodium current after pyrethroid insecticides in mouse neuroblastoma cells. Brain Res. 437309322
  90. 90. ChinnK.NarahashiT.1989Temperature-dependent subconducting states and kinetics of deltamethrin-modified sodium channels of neuroblastoma cells. Pflugers Arch. 413571579
  91. 91. SongJ. H.NarahashiT.1996Modulation of sodium channels of rat cerebellar Purkinje neurons by the pyrethroid deltamethrin. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 277445453
  92. 92. LombetA.MourreC.LazdunskiM.1988Interaction of insecticides of the pyrethroid family with specific binding sites on the voltage-dependent sodium channel from mammalian brain. Brain Res. 4594453
  93. 93. TrainerV. L.Mc PheeJ. al.1997High affinity binding of pyrethroids to the α subunit of brain sodium channels. Mol. Pharmacol. 51651657
  94. 94. GinsburgK. S.NarahashiT.1993Differential sensitivity of tetrodotoxin-sensitive and tetrodotoxin-resistant sodium channels to the insecticide allethrin in rat dorsal root ganglion neurons. Brain Res. 627239248
  95. 95. SongJ. H.NarahashiT.1996Differential effects of the pyrethroid tetramethrin on tetrodotoxin-sensitive and tetrodotoxin-resistant single sodium channels. Brain Res. 712258264
  96. 96. SongJ. al.1996Interactions of tetramethrin, fenvalarate and DDT at the sodium channel in rat dorsal root ganglion neurons. Brain Res. 7082937
  97. 97. TabareanI. V.NarahashiT.1998Potent modulation of tetrodotoxin-sensitive and tetrodotoxin-resistant sodium channels by the type II pyrethroid deltamethrin. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 284958965
  98. 98. GinsburgK. S.NarahashiT.1999Time course and temperature dependence of allethrin modulation of sodium channels in rat dorsal root ganglion cells. Brain Res. 8473849
  99. 99. al.2000A single amino acid change makes rat neuronal sodium channels highly sensitive to pyrethroid insecticides. FEBS Lett. 470135138
  100. 100. TanJ.SoderlundD. M.2009Human and rat Nav1.3 voltage-gated sodium channels differ in inactivation properties and sensitivity to the pyrethroid insecticide tefulthrin. Neurotoxicology 308189
  101. 101. TanJ.SoderlundD. M.2010Divergent actions of the pyrethroid insecticides S-bioallethrin, tefluthrin, and deltamethrin on rat Nav1.6 sodium channels. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 247229237
  102. 102. Spencer CI, Yuill KH, Borg JJ, et al.2001Actions of pyrethroid insecticides on sodium currents, action potentials, and contractile rhythm in isolated mammalian ventricular myocytes and perfused hearts. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 29810671082
  103. 103. Spencer CI and Sham JS2005Mechanisms underlying the effects of the pyrethroid tefluthrin on action potential duration in isolated rat ventricular myocytes. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 3151623
  104. 104. VacherH.MohapatraD. P.TrimmerJ. S.2008Localization and targeting of voltage-dependent ion channels in mammalian central neurons. Physiol. Rev. 8814071447
  105. 105. Gammon DW, Leggett MF, Clark JM2011Pyrethroid mode(s) of action in the context of Food Quality Protection Act (FQPA) regulation. J. Agric. Food Chem. 5927732785
  106. 106. SymingtonS. B.ZhangA. al.1999Characterization of pyrethroid action on ciliary calcium channels in Paramecium tetraurelia. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 65181193
  107. 107. CatterallW. al.2007Voltage-gated ion channels and gating modifier toxins. Toxicon. 49124141
  108. 108. Hildebrand ME, Mcrory JE, Snutch TP, et al.2004Mammalian voltage-gated calcium channels are potently blocked by the pyrethroid insecticide allethrin. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 308805813
  109. 109. NealA. P.YuanY.AtchisonW. D.2010Allethrin differentially modulates voltage-gated Ca2+ channel subtypes in rat PC12 cells. Toxicol. Sci. 116604613
  110. 110. Meyer DA, Carter JM, Johnstone AFM, et al.2008Pyrethroid modulation of spontaneous neuronal excitability and neurotransmission in hippocampal neurons in culture. Neurotoxicology 29213225
  111. 111. Shafer TJ, Rijal SO, Gross GW2008Complete inhibition of spontaneous activity in neuronal networks in vitro by deltamethrin and permethrin. Neurotoxicology 29203212
  112. 112. Meyer DA and Shafer TJ2006Permethrin, but not deltamethrin, increases spontaneous glutamate release from hippocampal neurons in culture. Neurotoxicology 27594603
  113. 113. LiuH.FelixR.CAGurneetet.al1996Expression and subunit interaction of voltage-dependentCa2+ channels in PC12 cells. J. Neurosci. 1675577567
  114. 114. TakahashiS. X.MittmanS.ColecraftH. M.2003Distinctive modulatory effects of five human auxiliary β(2) subunit splice variants on L-type calcium channel gating. Biophys. J. 8430073021
  115. 115. al.1994The amino-terminus of a calcium-channel β-subunit sets rates of channel inactivation independently of the subunits effect on activation. Neuron. 1314331438
  116. 116. SteaA.TomlinsonW. J.SoongT. al.1994Localization and functional-properties of a rat-brain-α1a calcium-channel reflect similarities to neuronal Q-type and P-type channels. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 911057610580
  117. 117. al.2006Inhibitory role of Ser-425 of the α1 2.2 subunit in the enhancement of Cav 2.2 currents by phorbol-12-myristate, 13-acetate. J. Biol. Chem. 2812001120017
  118. 118. ZamponiG. al.1997Crosstalk between G proteins and protein kinase C mediated by the calcium channel α(1) subunit. Nature 385442446
  119. 119. SteaA.SoongT. W.SnutchT. P.1995Determinants of PKC-dependent modulation of a family of neuronal calcium channels. Neuron 15929940
  120. 120. RajagopalS.FangH.OronceC. I. al.2009Site-specific regulation of Cav2.2 channels by protein kinase C isozymes βII ang E. Neuroscience 159618628
  121. 121. Symington SB, Frisbie RK, Kim HJ, et al.2007Mutation of threonine 422 to glutamic acid mimics the phosphorylation state and alters the action of deltamethrin on Cav2.2. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 88312320
  122. 122. Symington SB, Clark JM2005Action of deltamethrin on N-type (Cav2.2) voltage-sensitive calcium channels in rat brain. Pest. Biochem. Physiol. 82115
  123. 123. Clark JM and Symington SB2007Pyrethroid action on calcium channels: neurotoxicological implications. Invert. Neurosci. 7316
  124. 124. Clark JM and Symington SB2008Neurotoxic implications of the agonistic action of CS-syndrome pyrethroids on the N-type Cav2.2 calcium channel. Pest. Manag. Sci. 64628638
  125. 125. Symington SB, Hodgdon HE, Frisbie RK, et al.2011Binary mixtures of pyrethroids produce differential effects on Ca2+ influx and glutamate release at isolated presynaptic nerve terminals from rat brain. Pest. Biochem. Physiol. 99131139
  126. 126. SieghartW.2006Structure, pharmacology, and function of GABAA receptor subtypes. Adv. Pharmacol. 54231263
  127. 127. Gammon DW, Lawrence LJ, Casida JE1982Pyrethroid toxicology: protective effects of diazepam and phenobarbital in the mouse and the cockroach. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 66290296
  128. 128. Lawrence LJ and Casida JE1983Stereospecific action of pyrethroid insecticides on the g-aminobutyric acid receptor-ionophore complex. Science 22113991401
  129. 129. Crofton KM, Reiter LW and Mailman RM1987Pyrethroid insecticides and radioligand displacement from the GABA receptor chloride ionophore complex. Toxicol. Lett. 35183190
  130. 130. Gammon DW and Casida JE1983Pyrethroids of the most potent class antagonize GABA action at the crayfish neuromuscular junction. Neurosci. Lett. 40163168
  131. 131. Abalis IM, Eldefrawi ME and Eldefrawi AT1986Effects of insecticides on GABA-induced chloride influx into rat brain microsacs. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health 181323
  132. 132. OgataN.VogelS. M.NarahashiT.1988Lindane but not deltamethrin blocks a component of GABA-activated chloride channels. FASEB J. 228952900
  133. 133. Gilbert ME, Mack CM and Crofton KM1989Pyrethroids and enhanced inhibition in the hippocampus of the rat. Brain Res. 477314321
  134. 134. Eshelman AJ and Murray TF1991Pyrethroid insecticides indirectly inhibit GABA-dependent 36Cl- influx in synaptoneurosomes from the trout brain. Neuropharmacology 3013331341
  135. 135. FrancoliniF.PetrisA.1990Chloride channels of biological membranes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1031247259
  136. 136. DuranC.ThompsonC. al.2010Chloride channels: often enigmatic, rarely predictable. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 7295121
  137. 137. GeorgeA. L.BianchiL.LinkE. al.2001From stones to bones: the biology of ClC chloride channels. Curr. Biol. 11: R620R628.
  138. 138. ForshawP. J.ListerT.RayD. E.1993Inhibition of a neuronal voltage-dependent chloride channel by the type II pyrethroid, deltamethrin. Neuropharmacology 32105111
  139. 139. RayD. E.SutharsanS.ForshawP. J.1997Actions of pyrethroid insecticides on voltage-gated chloride channels in neuroblastoma cells. Neurotoxicology 18755760
  140. 140. Burr SA and Ray DE2004Structure-activity and interaction effects of 14 different pyrethroids on voltage-gated chloride ion channels. Toxicol. Sci. 77341360
  141. 141. Forshaw PJ and Ray DE2000The role of voltage-gated chloride channels in type II pyrethroid insecticide poisoning. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 16318


  • LD50: The median lethal dose, or the dose required to kill 50 percent of the exposed animals.
  • Microelectrodes are typically made of a glass pipette pulled to a very fine tip and filled with an electrical conductor, such as a high salt solution. When the electrode is connected to a voltmeter and inserted into a cell it can detect changes in transmembrane voltage.
  • The voltage-clamp technique typically uses two microelectrodes, allowing the experimenter to control the membrane potential and record transmembrane currents that result from ion channels opening and closing. Patch-clamp is a highly sensitive version of the voltage-clamp technique in which currents flowing through a single ion channel can be measured. A single electrode serves both to measure voltage and pass current.
  • Mouse neuroblastoma cells are an immortal cell-line derived from a spontaneous tumor of neural crest origin.
  • In this model, neurons are harvested from rat brains and processed via subcellular fractionation to isolate the nerve terminals.
  • The nomenclature of VGCCs genes is complex since the original naming system, based on the type of Ca2+ current observed during electrophysiological recording, was in place before the more systematic HUGO Human Gene Nomenclature was adopted. We will use the nomenclature developed by ion channel researchers throughout this review but refer the reader to (Ertel et al., 2000) for further discussion of VGCC naming conventions.
  • Half maximal effective concentration (EC50) refers to the concentration at which 50% of the maximum response is observed during a stimulatory effect.
  • Antagonists are chemicals that bind a receptor and blocks action of the receptor. Agonists are chemicals that bind the receptor triggering a response.

Written By

Erin N. Wakeling, April P. Neal and William D. Atchison

Submitted: December 12th, 2011 Published: July 25th, 2012