Chemical compositions of work materials
In order to improve efficiency of cutting process in production industry, development of new steel which has good machinablity is desired. The work material which has good surface roughness, easy breakable chip and small tool wear as the good machinablity is expected. And the free-machining steel was developed owning to adding elements which could make the machinablity better. Of all others, leaded free-machining steel and sulfurized free-machining steel are famous. The leaded free-machining steel and sulfurized free-machining steel are well used in the production industry. However the use of the leaded free-machining steel is limited from an environmental problem. In order to develop new environmental friendly free-machining steel, it is necessary to find out the behavior of the inclusion in the work material for the improvement of the machining performance.
There are a lot of studies about the behavior of the inclusion in the free-machining steel (Narutaki et al., 1987), (Yaguchi, 1991), (Usui et al., 1980). There are some papers about the role of the lead and the manganese sulfide which are the representative inclusions. The Pb inclusion acts as lubricant and reduces cutting resistance (Akazawa, 1997). As the MnS is harder than steel, the MnS acts as an internal stress concentration source when the work material reforms into a chip at the cutting edge. And the MnS produced the micro-cracks at shear deformation zone. This is the cause that the shear area became small and reduces the cutting stress (Yamamoto, 1971). Although these results are almost reasonable, we must think over the role of the inclusion again in order to produce new free-machining steel. The experiment was carried out to find out the mechanism of the sulfurized inclusion on the machinablity, using some kinds of steels which have different size of the inclusion. The observation of the deformation behavior near the cutting edge was carried out to investigate the effect of the inclusion in detail.
2. Experimental method
In this experiment, two kinds of the sulfurized free-machining steels (Steel A and Steel B) which have different size of the inclusion were used. Figure 1 show optical microphotographs of microstructure and size distribution of MnS in the Steel A and Steel B, respectively. The area fraction of equivalent circle diameter of the inclusions was also shown in these figures. The steel A contains larger inclusions than the steel B. These sulfurized free-machining steels contain 0.42% S, and chemical compositions of these materials are almost the same as shown in Table 1. The inclusions tend to be slender parallel to rolling direction.
In an orthogonal cutting at low speed, the cutting forces were measured. The cutting width of the work material was 2 mm. The surface of work materials was polished to observe deformation of the inclusions. An orthogonal cutting was performed using table feeding system of a horizontal milling machine as shown in Fig. 2. Table 2 shows cutting conditions in the orthogonal cutting. The cutting speed was 16mm/min and the depth of cut was 0.1mm. The tool material was high speed steel and its rake angle was 10 degree.
|Cutting speed||0.016 m/min|
|Depth of cut||0.1 mm|
3. Experimental results and discussions
3.1. Orthogonal cutting
The Cutting forces were measured in the orthogonal cutting. These results are shown in Fig. 3. On the whole, the cutting force in the Steel A was bigger than that in the Steel B. The cutting force in the Steel A was more stable than that in the Steel B. This fact led smooth surface roughness.
In order to investigate the flow state of around the shear zone, a quick stop test was carried out during the orthogonal cutting. Figure 4 shows the enlarged photographs around the shear zone. In case of theSteel A, the large crack parallel to the shear plane was found. In case of Steel B, the chip is thin, and there are small cracks near the rake face.
3.2. Micro-cutting in SEM
A small orthogonal cutting equipment as shown in Fig. 5 was mounted into the Scanning Electrical Microscope (SEM) (Iwata 1977). The deformation behavior around the shear zone was observed in detail with the SEM. An example of the micro-cutting in SEM is also shown in this figure. The cutting speed was 0.27 mm/s and the depth of cut was 20-50 μm. Table 3 shows the cutting conditions. The work material was cut from the test piece as shown in Fig.6.
|Cutting speed||0.27 mm/s|
|Depth of cut||20～50 μm|
Figure7 shows the sequential photographs during cutting of the Steel A. As the Steel A has the spindle shaped inclusions, the inclusion MnS which was extended perpendicular to the cutting direction can be found. This inclusion turned in counterclockwise and broke to several pieces around the shear zone. These pieces create voids around them, and flowed to the chip in the direction parallel to the shear plane. As shown in this figure, the void was formed at the upper of the inclusion and the micro-crack was formed along the primary shear plane.
Figure8 shows the sequential photographs during cutting of the Steel B. The inclusion of higher aspect ratio than that in the Steel A can be found. As the Steel B had long slender inclusions, this inclusion broke into smaller pieces than that in the Steel A. These pieces create very small voids between them. The inclusions in the Steel B are well dispersed, so these very small voids are created at various places in the work material. It causes the reduction of the cutting force.
3.3. Image analysis for stress distribution
It is very important to know strain and stress distribution in shearing zone. The sequential images could be taken during micro-cutting in SEM. Using with image processing, the strain increase and stress distribution around MnS can be calculated. That is to say, as comparison with two sequential SEM images after micro movement of the tool, the displacement within observed zone could be measured by tracing a same point. Moreover the strain increase and stress distribution could be calculated from the displacement.
In order to measure the displacement from the sequential SEM images, P IV (Particle Image Velocimetry) method was used (Raffel etal., 2007). The moving distance was calculated from gray level pattern between SEM image A at t in time and SEM image B at t+△t in time as shown in Fig.9.
The strain and stress distribution was calculated from the displacement increase measured with the PIV method using with FEM as shown in Fig.10 (Usui et al., 1990). In the calculation, the mechanical properties as shown in Table 4 were used.
|Steel A||Steel B|
|Yield strength MPa||522||560|
|Tensile strength MPa||525||563|
|Reduction ofarea %||52.1||48.0|
The strain increase distribution was calculated from the two sequential SEM Images as shown in Fig. 7. Figure 11 shows the strain increase distribution in micro-cutting of the Steel A. The moving distance of two images was 1.8 m. As shown in Fig 11 (d), the shear strain increase was large in shear zone but another large strain increase was found around MnS.
The stress distribution was calculated from the strain increase distribution. Figure 12 shows the stress distribution in micro-cutting of the Steel A. It shows that the stress was big at the upper of the MnS because of the stress concentration.
The strain increase distribution was calculated from the two sequential SEM Images as shown in Fig. 8. Figure 13 shows the strain increase distribution in micro-cutting of the Steel B. The moving distance of two images was 4.3 m. As shown in Fig 13 (d), the strain increase along shear zone was large in and no large strain increase was found around MnS.
The stress distribution was calculated from the strain increase distribution. Figure 14 shows the stress distribution in micro-cutting of the Steel B. As the Steel B had long slender inclusions, the inclusion MnS broke into small pieces and the stress distributed along the shear plane. There is little stress concentration around the MnS.
Consequently, in the Steel A which has large spindle type MnS, the micro-crack is easily formed. As this micro-crack affects the breakage of a build-up edge (BUE) and chip, the BUE could not become big and the good finish surface roughness was gained in the Steel A. As shown in Fig. 15, large micro-crack affected the separation between the chip and the BUE.
3.4. Quick stop test during turning.
A quick stop experiment during turning was carried out with the quick stop system which was attached to a conventional lathe. Figure 16 shows the equipment of the quick stop test. The tool was rotated down at the moment when pulling a pin which fixed the tool and the cutting state was stopped quickly. The deformation behavior around the shear zone was observed from the workpiece with a chip. The cutting speed was 62 m/min and the depth of cut was 0.2 mm. Table 5 shows the cutting conditions.
|Cutting speed||62 m/min|
|Depth of cut||0.2 mm|
|Tool||Cemented carbide P10|
In quick stop test, the chips in the vicinity of the tool face and machined surface was observed as shown in Fig. 17. In case of the Steel A which contains large spindle shaped inclusions, the BUE could not be found. And machined surface had good surface roughness. In case of the Steel B which contains small slender inclusions, the BUE could be found on the rake face of the chip. There were many tears on the machined surface. The BUE partially separated and they leave on the machined surface. As a result, the surface roughness became bad. In this experiment, it was clear that the larger inclusions could reduce the formation of the BUE.
The main results obtained are as follows.
In machining of sulfurized free-machining, some inclusions creates voids around them, some break to several pieces depending on their conditions around the shear zone.
The larger inclusions can reduce the formation of the BUE.
Akazawa T. 1997“ Free cutting steels contributing to industry”, , 46 5May), 6 10.
Araki T. Yamamoto S. 1971“ Machinability of Steel and Metallugical Factors”, , 57 13Nov.), 1912 1932.
Iwata K. Ueda K. Shibasaka 1977, “ Study on Micro-machining Mechanics Based on Direct-SEM Observation”, , 43 3) 311 317.
Katayama S. Toda M. Hashimura M. 1996“ Growing Model of Build-up Edge in Relation to Inhomogeneities of Steel Microstructure”, , 62 9 1345 1349.
Maekawa K. Kubo A. Kitagawa T. 1991“ MachinabilityAnalysis of Free-machining Steel”, , 57 12 2193 2198.
Narutaki N. Yamane Y. Usuki H. Yan B. Kuwana T. 1987“ Machinability of Resulfurized Steels under High Cutting Speed”, , 53 3March), 455 466.
Raffel M. Willert C. E. Kompenhaus J. 2000 Particle Image Velocimetry, , 3-54063-683-8York.
Usui E. 1990(1st), Kyouritsu Shuppan, 4-32008-054-8
Usui E. Obikawa T. Shirakashi T. 1980“ Embrittle Action of Free-machining Additives”, , 46 7July), 849 855.
Yaguchi H. 1986“ Effect of MnS Inclusion Size on Machinability of Low-Carbon Leaded Resulfurized Free-Maching Steel”, 4 3 214 220.
Yaguchi H. 1988“ Effect of soft assitives (Pb, Bi) on formation of Build-up edge”, , 4 926 932.
Yaguchi H. 1991“ The Role of Liquid Metal Embrittlement on the Chip Disposability of Steel”, , 77 5May), 683 690.