Open access

Balloon Vaginoplasty: A Revolutionary Approach for Treating Vaginal Aplasia

Written By

Atef M.M. Darwish

Submitted: December 22nd, 2010 Published: August 23rd, 2011

DOI: 10.5772/25120

Chapter metrics overview

3,874 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

1. Introduction

Vaginal aplasia is a rare anomaly that carries psychologic, physical and sexual problems to the female and her partner. Whereas a number of vaginoplasty methods have been developed, refined, and modified, no state-of-the-art surgical approach has been established. This is due to a number of factors including regional differences, surgeon experience and preference for a method, and patient choice. The goal of vaginoplasty is to develop a space between the bladder and the rectum suitable for satisfactory intercourse for both partners.

This review will discuss in details the common available procedures of vaginoplasty with stress on the evident pros and cons of each technique. Thereafter, it will discuss the new era of balloon vaginoplasty whether done laparoscopically or via the retropubic space. Every procedure will be discussed meticulously with excellent illustrations. Some tables to compare different techniques will be provided. In short, a step by step educational approach will be delivered to the readers to start practicing such simplified procedures in their own hospitals.


2. Background

Vaginal aplasia (figures 1-3) is a rare anomaly occurring in approximately 15,000 to 10,000 births [1]. It carries an emotional, sexual, and social embarrassing effect on those women [2, 3].

Previously, those cases are neglected by the general gynecologists and sent to be treated by very limited specialized centers all over the word. Thanks to continuous refinement and innovation of reconstructive surgical techniques, some of those women could be able to conceive [46]. Even if this anomaly is associated with uterine aplasia, there is a hope for uterine transplantation within the coming few years [7, 8] because of successful animal transplantation [9, 10] and competent organ cryopreservation [11]. These modern achievements pushed interested centers to refine their procedures and offer those cases the best available care.

Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome (MRKHS) is a subtype of vaginal agenesis comprising congenital absence of vagina and a variety of Mullerian duct anomalies, with aplasia of the uterus being the most common feature. In general, these patients have normally functioning ovaries, which are often located at the pelvic brim (figure 3). Anomalies of the urinary tract and the skeleton are frequently associated with MRKHS [12].

Figure 1.

Clinical appearance of vaginal aplasia.

Figure 2.

Laparoscopic appearance of vaginal aplasia

Figure 3.

Abnormal localization of the ovaries in MRKH syndrome.


3. Therapeutic options of vaginoplasty

Numerous surgical and nonsurgical procedures with varying degrees of success have been described for correction of the condition, but none have proved to be universally accepted. As this chapter is planned to focus on balloon vaginoplasty, I just quote some references on the common techniques of vaginoplasty [13-29]. A lot of the published work on vaginoplasty demonstrates the feasibility of a particular procedure, highlights its possible advantages, and expresses the skills of the surgeons. The question now is not whether the procedure is feasible, but whether the approach is superior and beneficial to a particular patient, cost effective for the community at large, and more importantly easily performed by the general gynecologists without sophisticated instrumentation. The following algorism (figure 4) summarizes broadly the different methods of vaginoplasty.

Figure 4.

Classification of vaginoplasty techniques.

3.1. Conventional surgery

Gynecologic surgeons or gynecologic endoscopists of average experience would find most of the published surgical techniques of vaginoplasty sophisticated and difficult to perform, and both cost and effectiveness must be considered conjointly when evaluating new surgical procedures. Given the rarity of the condition and the number of available methods, outcome data can be difficult to obtain [30]. The traditional operative techniques [31] have major disadvantages, including prolonged recovery time and significant scarring [32]. These techniques require lengthy, often embarrassing self-catheterization, which can be painful, and they may yield a vagina of only limited length [33]. Many centers prefer Vecchietti’s neovaginoplasty because of its low perioperative morbidity and quicker recovery period [34]. These conventional surgical procedures are tedious, time consuming, and require a higher level of surgical expertise.

3.2. Laparoscopic approach

As described by Cooper et al. [35], laparoscopic neovagina can be created by drawing an olive into the vaginal grove and applying continuous tension via sutures passed at laparoscopy to a tensioning device on the anterior abdominal wall [35] using different instrument sets [36].

Figure 5.

Laparoscopic Vecchietti procedure

However, there are risks inherent in the most difficult step, passing the thread-bearing cutting needle from the abdominal wall to the retrohymenal fossa, through the vesicorectal space [37]. It is important to ensure bladder and rectal integrity [38]. Ultrasonographic control may increase safety [39].

3.3. Disadvantages of the Vecchietti procedure:

It requires specialized teams utilizing sophisticated instrumentation, however, and it is tedious to perform. It has the drawbacks of requiring daily traction for 8 to 10 days. Moreover, it lifts the posterior urethrovesical angle, making it more obtuse, with the possible consequence of causingstress incontinence later on (the posterior traction on the urethral supports also placing the patient at higher risk for stress incontinence). Furthermore, a change in the pelvic floor balance has been suspected [40]. Another problem with the Vecchietti vaginoplasty is the use of a special abdominal traction device for a few days [41].

Other laparoscopic procedures are more complicated and tedious, such as the Davydov procedure [32] or sigmoid colpoplasty [42,43]. Soong [44] described a laparoscopically assisted neovaginoplasty in which laparoscopic dissection of the rectovesical space is followed by traction of the pelvic peritoneum by a vaginal clamp and insertion of a vaginal stent for 1 week [45]. The latter is not a pure laparoscopic approach and appears to be time consuming, although Soong did not comment on the operative time.

3.4. Advantages of laparoscopic approach

Apart from the common well established advantages of laparoscopic surgery over the conventional surgery, laparoscopy permits identification of the pelvic peritoneum as well as the proper site for the summit of the neovagina using the most mobile portion to form the vaginal fornix. Laparoscopy significantly facilitates this procedure, reduces operating time and risks, and makes the operation available to a wide range of surgeons skilled in laparoscopy [46].

3.5. Missing data in the previous studies:

The question is not whether the procedure is feasible, but whether the approach is superior and beneficial to a particular patient, cost effective for the community at large, and more importantly easily performed by the general gynecologists without sophisticated instrumentation. These guidelines constructed the frame of our institutional research on neovaginoplasty in recent years.

Examples and
Vaginoplasties with graftsVaginoplasties without grafts
Free skin graft (the McIndoe method)
- Sigmoid vaginostomy
- Amnion graft
- Pedunculated skin graft
- Pelvic peritoneum graft
- Free UB graft
- Grafts from the buccal mucosa
The Vecchietti operation [7], which can be
Laparoscopic balloon vaginoplasty

Nonanatomic access to the vaginal dimple
The posterior urethrovesical angle is lifted, which makes it more obtuse
A change in the balance of the pelvic floor has been suggested

Table 1.



4. Balloon vaginoplasty innovation

This concept is developed at Assiut University (Egypt) by our team in 2007. Its main goal is to introduce a simplified approach that can be done by many gynecologists all over the world. As any innovation, it quickly passed through sequential steps of modifications to get the best available safe as well as effective approach.

4.1. Advantages of native balloon vaginoplasty over foreign tissue vaginoplasty

Cancer of the neovaginacreated by exogenous tissue, for example, bowel, skin graft,vulvar skin flaps, rectus abdominis (myocutaneous) flaps,or inverted penile skin, has been documented at youngerages than cancer of the native vagina [47]. Tissue dysplasiacan be expected because the tissue is suddenly subjected tonew contacts or stresses [47]. Therefore, recent interest hasfocused on dilatation as a treatment of choice [48,49].Most of the international centers promote the use of vaginaldilators [50]. The success rate is reported to be up to 81% after vaginal dilatation [51]. This can be attributed tothe inherent nature of the vagina in the form of a high capabilityof elasticity and dispensability. Vaginal maximal tissueelongation is proved to be higher than that of normal skin [49]. It seems logical that dilatation or other surgical proceduresbased on proper understanding of the nature of this organwould be preferred over techniques based on the idea ofreplacement of the vagina by skin, amniotic membrane, sigmoid,or otherwise. Moreover, replacement techniques wouldlead to scar formation. The prevalence of dyspareunia increasesafter transvaginal reconstructive pelvic surgeries [52]. This concept stands behind the increased popularityof the conventional or laparoscopic Vecchietti operation asit is devoid of vaginal scars.Of peculiar advantages of balloon vaginoplasty particularly retropubic balloon vaginoplasty is the possibility of surgical intervention for recurrent or failed cases done by other procedures.Herein, I’ll summarize the different techniques of balloon vaginoplasty.

Laparoscopic balloon vaginoplasty after dissection of the rectovesical pouch [53]:

Under general endotracheal anesthesia, a standard laparoscopy evaluation is performed with two auxiliary 5-mm suprapubic portals. Dissection of the peritoneum covering the vesicorectal pouch is performed. A piece of gauze is inserted inside the rectum and is gently manipulated by a nurse in different directions, as directed by the surgeon. A metal catheter is inserted into the bladder, which is moved according to the directions of the surgeon. Gentle, sharp dissection of the vesicorectal space is done until a free area in between is achieved. Dissection then should be progressed until near the vaginal skin. The left 5-mm suprapubic trocar is extracted, followedby advancement of a blunt-ended grasper to make a gentle dissection of the peritoneum until reaching the dissectedarea. A 18F silicone Foley catheter is advanced extraperitoneally to replace the left-side blunt-ended grasper up to the dissected area. From the right side, blunt-ended grasping forcepsare pushed into the rectovesical space. Vaginally,a snip is made on top of it, followed by advancement of another grasper to pick up the tip of the catheter vaginally. The balloon is inflated with 6 cm3 saline while the catheter is advanced upward; tension is maintained by applying two disposable umbilical cord clamps on the stretched catheter. To avoid skin ischemia or pain at the site of traction, a steriledressing is insinuated beneath the clamps. To be fitted,a small hole is made at the center of the dressing beforeits application below the clamps. Maximal tension isachieved by continuous traction before applying the clamps(Fig. 6).The integrity

Figure 6.

Lateral view of the extrapeeritoneal catheter

of the bladder is easily checked by gentle testing using the blunt tip of a metal catheter. All laparoscopic instruments are extracted without any suturing. A Foley catheter is inserted into the urethra.


Despite being extraperitoneal, nevertheless,this procedure requires a considerable experience of laparoscopicsurgery to dissect rectum from the bladder safely.

Figure 7.

Dissection of rectovesical space.

Figure 8.

Extraction of the catheter via the vaginal dimple.

Laparoscopic balloon vaginoplasty without dissection of the rectovesical pouch [54,55]

A silicon coated balloon catheter is manipulated by a specially designed inserter, which is passed transperitoneally and through the pelvic floor where the balloon is positioned at the vaginal dimple. An upward, gradual (1-2cm/day) traction is applied on the catheter stem from the abdominal side for one week. A concomitant increase in balloon capacity (5ml every other day) to increase the width of the neovagina is also done. Sexual relationsare recommended as early as one week after surgery.


Despite being an easy procedure, it is a blind and intraperitoneal approach. Practically, an extraperitoneal approach is proved to be effective and carries no risk of coiling of some loops of intestine or peritoneal irritation.

Figure 9.

Insertion of a specialty designed inserter.

Figure 10.

Postoperative view.

Modified laparoscopically assisted BV [56,57]:

The procedure starts with diagnostic laparoscopy (video). After full evaluation of intraabdominal and intrapelvicstructures, the telescope is directed toward the pelvic floor. A suction irrigation cannula is introduced through theancillary abdominal puncture and pushed firmly against the pelvic floor in the region of the pouch of Douglas (Figure 11). Simultaneously, using palpation,the tip of the cannula is introduced transperineallythrough the vaginal dimple, positioning it so that it presses at a centralpoint of the dimple. The surgeon’sright hand held the cannula from the abdominalside, and the left hand guidesthe pressed tip of the cannula from theperineal side.Next, a conventional surgical needle,its curve attenuated, is threaded witha long, double-stranded silk suture(DSSS) and passed through the vaginaldimple at the point where the cannula tipis positioned. The needle perforates the pelvic floor, and as it appears at the pouch of Douglas, the cannula is removed and a laparoscopic grasper/needle-holder is inserted so that the needle could be extracted through the ancillary abdominal puncture (Figure 12). Then, the needle is removed from the DSSS, and the suture is threaded into the opening of an 18-gauge silicon coatedFoley’s catheter. Traction is exertedon the DSSS from the perineal sideuntil the catheter is pulled backthrough the abdominal port to the pelvic floor and through the pelvic floor to the dimple (Figure 13). This step is greatlyfacilitated by exerting counter traction on the catheter, stretching it to decrease its caliber especially while it ismoved through the pelvic floor, since the channel created by the needle is very narrow. After the balloon-bearing end of the catheter appears at the dimple, it is inflated with 15 mL of saline. Traction is exerted from the abdominal side until the balloon moved up, carrying the stretched dimple above the introitus. Catheter placement in past procedures relied on a unique catheter inserter, but the catheter can be manipulated into position using a suction irrigation cannula and a surgical needle. Traction on the catheter is maintained without the supporting plate that had been expressly made for that purpose. Traction on the catheter should be maintained using a supportive plate. It may be made of stainless steel and sterilized by autoclave, closely resembles a DVD disk. In the first method, a thick, multilayered dressing is tightly wrapped around the catheter, until a cylinder, at least 5 cm high and 10 cm wide, is formed perpendicular to the abdomen. The outermost layer of the dressing is encircled with

Figure 11.

Modified laparoscopic intraperitoneal balloon vaginoplasty.

adhesive tape to guard against unraveling (Figure 11). In addition,the cord clamp would be well supportedaway from the abdominal wall,thus preventing pressure necrosis. An alternative supporting plate made of 3 DVDsjoined together with silicon and sterilizedwith ethylene oxide can be used. It is placed around thecatheter and over a dressing so that it distributedthe force from traction over awide surface area, preventing pressuresloughing of the abdominal skin. Postoperativecare is the same as that previouslydescribed for BV and includedcontrolled traction and distension, preventionof infection, continued psychosocialsupport, and emphasis on early resumptionof sexual activity; patientsare instructed to use a condom andgentamicin cream during the first 10 days after discharge.


It seems to be non applicable by the general gynecologists as it is an intraperitoneal approach with a risk of subsequent intestinal coiling, risky as they reported a case of rectal injury out of three cases (33.3%) added to the risks of laparoscopy particularly if the patient has a scar of correctiob of other malformations or pelvic surgery.


5. Space of Retzius (figure 12)

In 1858, Retzius described the eponymous space, situated anterior and lateral to the urinary bladder (prevesical space) [58]. It is the space between the symphysis, the bladder, and the anterior abdominal wall. It is bordered anteriorly by the pelvic bone; posteriorly by the endopelvic fascia (the urogenital, pubocervical, and pelvic fascia, which cover the bladder and the urethra); and laterally by the obturator muscle. It contains loose connective tissue and fat and affords the surgeon access to the bladder without opening the peritoneal cavity. It is an optimal extraperitoneal approach well addressed in the field of urogynecology. Access though it wouldeliminate laparoscopy and its complications. Moreover, because of its proximity, it seems logical to access the vaginal dimple through it rather than through the auxiliary laparoscopic portals.

Figure 12.

Space of Retzius


6. Retropubic fine needle vaginoplasty (59)

Patients are prepared as usual for any simple gynecologic operation. Under IV propophol anesthesia, the bladder is evacuated followed by insertion of a rigid catheter guide (bladder stylet) loaded inside a urethral catheter. It aims to mobilize the bladder neck away from the tip of the needle when it passes into the retropubic space. A 7 mm suprapubic incision is made just lateral to the midline in the suprapubic area 2 cm above the symphysis pubis in the same manner as tension free traction (TVT) operation for treating genuine stress incontinence [60]. A fine single lumen egg retrieval needle with its stainless handle tightly fitted to a cut distal end of a Foley catheter is used. We prefer Swemed Sense needle (Virtolife Sweden AB, Kungsbacka, Sweden) which has a reduced distal end of 0.9 mm OD while the rest of the needle has 1.4 mm OD (Figure 13). An additional advantage of this needle is good malleability that allows bending of the needle during insertion to adapt the curve of space of Retzius (Figure12). The bended needle is inserted through the suprapubic incision directed towards the space of Retzus with simultaneous mobilization of the bladder inwards and laterally into the ipsilateral side with the bladder stylet. To help the needle reach the correct place in the center of the vaginal dimple, a small incision in the vaginal dimple is made which is used to allow the introduction of the operator's contraletral index finger to guide the tip of the fine needle. Once the tip of the needle appears, the bladder catheter is removed followed by cystoscopic examination. If the bladder is intact, the needle is advanced with some force to allow the fitted catheter to bypass the anterior abdominal wall layers. Once the balloon is seen from the vaginal side, it is disconnected from the needle, inflated with 6-8 cc of saline, and pulled upwards (figure 13). Traction is maintained by applying two alternating umbilical cord plastic clamps on its part adjacent to the anterior abdominal wall. To avoid skin ischemia, an intervening layer of sterile gauze is placed underneath a stainless steel fenestrated plate (Figure 14). To avoid retention effect of the balloon, a urethral catheter is inserted and fixed. After a short postoperative interval, before discharge, the patient isinstructed to maintain antibiotic coverage and to take a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugwhenever required. She is taught how to evacuate andcare for the urine collection bag, make frequent proper vaginaldouches using bovidone iodine 10%, and apply sterilevulvar dressings to guard against ascending infection.Three days later, she has to come to the office for more traction on the catheter which is maintained using a third umbilical clamp. The abdominal and the uretheral catheters are removedon day 8.

Figure 13.

Instrumentation and a diagram of fine needle vaginoplasty


Despite being simple, it is a relatively unsafe as the needle is passed blindly towards the vaginal dimple sometimes after several trials. There is a risk of needle puncture of the surgeon’s fingers. Moreover, the needle is malleable and unstable during its perforation of the retropubic space. Lastly, the vaginoabdominal approach is more comfortable than abdominovaginal approach used during the fine needle procedure.

Figure 14.

Stainless steel fenestrated plate


7. Transretropubic traction vaginoplasty (TRT) [60]

Using an olive rather than balloon but goes along the road of balloon vaginoplasty that’s why I preferred to include it here.

Idea: In the course of a few days, a plastic olive placed on the vaginal dimple is lifted by a meshtape inserted through the space of Retzius and anchored to the anterior abdominal wall. The upward traction exerted on the vaginal dimple is sufficient to create a neovagina.


The patients are prepared for the TRT vaginoplasty as for any simple gynecologic surgical procedure. Under general anesthesia, bladder evacuation is followed by the insertion of a urethralcatheter, through which a rigid guide (or bladder stylet) is then passed. This step is taken to mobilize the bladder neck away from the tip of the needle when it passed into the retropubic space. A 7-mm incision is then made on both sides in the suprapubic area, 2 cm from the midline and 2 cm above the symphysis pubis, as if to install tension-free vaginal tape to treat stress urinary incontinence [61]. A sharp, curved needle especially designed with a wide eye attached to a plastic handle (Fig. 15) is used to perforate the vaginal dimple bilaterally, just 1 cm below the bladder neck. A strip of mesh composed of a knitted polypropylene monofilament (Pro Mesh (Ethicon, Somerville, NJ, USA), 1 cm in width and 30 cm in length, is stretched and passed through the eye of the needle. A 2 x 3 cm, fenestrated plastic olive is threaded like a bead on the tape. The needle is inserted through the vaginal dimple skin without prior incision, directed upwards and slightly laterally toward the space of Retzius, with simultaneous mobilization of the bladder inwards and laterally on the same side with the bladder stylet. After which, the needle isdirected slightly medially toward the suprapubic incision on the same side. Once the tape is seen through the incision, the needle is withdrawn while the tape is clamped with a forceps. The bladder catheter is then removed and a cystoscopic examination performed. If the bladder is intact, the same steps are repeated on the other side. Traction on the tape is maintained by placing a plastic umbilical cord clamp on each end of the mesh tape. A layer of sterile gauze isplaced underneath a fenestrated plate of stainless steel to avoid skin ischemia. A urethral catheter is inserted to prevent urinary retention from the pressure applied by the plastic olive.

After a short postoperative interval, before discharge, the patient is instructed to take an antibiotic medication for 1 week and a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) whenever required. She is also taught how to void her bowels, care for her urine collection bag, frequently cleanse her vagina with a 10% povidone iodine solution, and apply sterile vulvar dressings to guard against ascending infection. She returned to the office 3 days later to increase the traction to the tape, and the new traction is maintained using an additional umbilical clamp on each side. If the patient is afraid of experiencing pain from the traction, she is given an intravenous injection of an NSAID 15 minutes before the procedure. The tape, plastic olive, and uretheral catheter are removed on the eighth day after the procedure. During an examination, a medium-sized speculum is inserted into the vagina and the vaginal length is measured and recorded. The patient is encouraged to start sexual intercourse on that day. She presented to the office every 2 weeks for the next 2 months for evaluations. Each spouse is privately asked about dyspareunia and sexual satisfaction at each visit. The husbands are also asked about penetration. A score of 100 is used for satisfaction and penetration. It is a simple scoring chart designed at our institution after the visual analog scale for pelvic pain. After the 2-month follow-up, the couple presented to the clinic only when they had operation-related complaints.

Advantages: TRT vaginoplasty seems to be superior as it does not depend on endoscopy, does not require dissecting the rectovesical space or the vaginal dimple, and is performed relatively quickly. Moreover, the risk of stress incontinence is still present in patients undergoing balloon vaginoplasty because of the posterior traction exerted on the vaginaldimple [62].

Figure 15.

TRT vaginoplasty

Disadvantages: a bit sophisticated and these instrumentations are not available in all operating rooms. Moreover, we reported exaggerated patient discomfort and repeated complaints particularly during traction on day 3. In the following table, I’ll summarize the differences between some vaginoplasty techniques.

Transretropubic (TRT) vaginoplastyLaparoscopic Veccheitti vaginoplastyLaparoscopic balloon vaginoplasty [53]
AdmissionNo needIn-patient for 8 daysNo need
Increased postoperative painExaggerated once on day 3Mild daily stretching of the threadsMild once on day 3
Slipping of traction deviceNonereportedNone
General anesthesiaOnceTwiceOnce
laparoscopic expertiseUsually not neededNearly level IIINearly level II
InstrumentationLess sophisticated and reproducibleSophisticatedLess sophisticated and reproducible
LaparoscopyUsually not neededneededneeded
Relation to peritoneumExtraperitonealIntraperitoneal or extraperitonealExtraperitoneal
Postoperative stress incontinenceNot possible as it improves posterior vesicourethral anglePossible and reported [61]Possible but not reported

Table 2.

Differences between some vaginoplasty techniques


8. Transretropubic balloon vaginoplasty approach [63]

The patients are prepared for the operation as for any simplegynecologic surgical procedure. Under spinal anesthesia, bladder evacuation isfollowed by the insertion of a urethral catheter, through which a rigid guide (orbladder stylet, figure 1) is then passed. This step is taken to mobilize the bladderneck away from the tip of the needle when it passed into the retropubic space. A 5-mm incision is then made on the midline in the suprapubic area, 2 cm above thesymphysis pubis. A especially designed sharp, curved needle with a wide eye attachedto a plastic handle (Fig. 16) is used to perforate the vaginal dimple centrally, just 1cm below the bladder neck. The needle is inserted through the vaginal dimple skinwithout prior incision, directed cephalicallyupwards and slightly laterally toward the space ofRetzius, with simultaneous mobilization of the bladder inwards and laterally on thesame side utilizing the bladder stylet. In all cases, the perforation is controlled byperioperative ultrasonographic examination of the space of Retzius. Thereafter, the needle is directed slightly medially toward the suprapubic incision in the midline. Once the fenstrum of the needle is seen through the incision, the distal end of asilicone Foley catheter is fixed to it by a double strengthened Vicryl 2 sutures.Thereafter, the needle is withdrawn downwards and the Vicryl suture is cutleaving the distal end of the Foley catheter outside the vaginal dimple which isimmediately filled with 4-6 cc of saline to avoid excessive pain. The bladder catheter is then removed and acystoscopic examination is performed. Upward traction on the catheter is maintainedby placing a plastic umbilical cord clamp on its abdominal side. A layer of sterilegauze is placed underneath a fenestrated plate of stainless steel to avoid skinischemia (Fig. 16). A urethral catheter is inserted to prevent urinary retention fromupward traction the inflated balloon. Operative time is recorded for all case. After ashort postoperative interval of few hours, before discharge, the patient is instructedto take an antibiotic medication for 1 week and a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug(NSAID) whenever required. She is also taught how to void her bowels, care for herurine collection bag, frequently cleanse her vagina with a 10% povidone iodinesolution, and apply sterile vulvar dressings to guard against ascending infection. Shereturned to the office 3 days later to increase the upward traction and the size to theballoon by reinflation with extra 3-4 cc of saline and the new traction is maintained using a new umbilical clamp.The suprapubic and uretheral catheters are removed on the 8th day after theprocedure.

Figure 16.

Transretropubic balloon vaginoplasty: instrumentation and a diagram.


9. Modified retropubic vaginoplasty[64-66]

Through a small supra pubic puncture, the catheter inserter is passed from above into the retropubic space just behind the pubic bone and guided to the center of the vaginal dimple. Then, a cystoscopic examination is performed to ensure bladder and uretheral integrity. This is followed by gradual controlled distention of the balloon and traction on the catheter stem as described in laparoscopic balloon vaginoplasty.

Drawbacks: this is a relatively unsafe procedure as the inserter is about 5 mm in caliber and there is no safety issue to protect the urethra from injury during perforation. Non usage of a bladder stylet is another disadvantage as it is used for contralateral displacement of the urethra away from the perforation site. Again, they used perforation from the abdominal site which is considered difficult and unguided if compared with perforation from the vaginal side. Another technical problem of their procedure is the absence of a fenestrum to easily carry threads to the vaginal side.


10. Which balloon vaginoplasty should I use?

After this detailed discussion of the published studies on balloon vaginoplasty, I would recommend retropubic balloon vaginoplasty [63] due to the following causes:

Transretropubic balloon vaginoplasty is a simple, fast, safe and available extraperitoneal procedure. It can be easily done by any gynecologist having basic knowledge of the anatomy of the retropubic space. Not only does it save time for the gynecologists, but it also saves a lot of money for the patient and the community as well.

A recent study on laparoscopic balloon vaginoplasty by ElSaman et al reported a case of rectal injury out of three cases (33.3%). This possibility is remote if the retropubic approach is utilized. Being an extraperitoneal approach makes retropubic balloon vaginoplasty very suitable for cases with extensive intraperitoneal adhesions or with history of intestinal surgery. Moreover, due to its proximity, it seems logic to access the vaginal dimple through it rather than the laparoscopic portals. Retropubic balloon vaginoplasty disturbs neither the urethral support nor the urethrovesical angle. It may even add support to the bladder neck, although for a short period. This technical point is considered as an additional advantage of the retropubic approach over transabdominal conventional or even laparoscopic vaginoplasty. Retropubic balloon vaginoplasty is a good example of minimally-invasive surgery for vaginal aplasia, an anomaly currently corrected with very sophisticated techniques utilizing foreign tissues such as peritoneum, skin, sigmoid, or amnion grafts. Selection of the retropubic space and performing the procedure in the same way as tension-free tape (TVT) for treating stress incontinence is assuring regarding safety and is confirmed by absence of complications in our pilot study. It seems that this transretropubic balloon vaginoplasty is superior to transretropubic vaginoplasty using a tape and an olive in terms of shorter mean operative time (8.5 vs. 26.5min) due to single perforation of the space of Retzius, elimination of the exaggerated intolerable pain on traction on the tape that required analgesics in all cases of the previous study, and utilization of the silicone balloon with easier traction due to elastic recoil character and changeable balloon size. Clearly, this procedure is much cheaper than transretropubic vaginoplasty.

A modified retropubic vaginoplasty has been recently published by ElSaman et al. The authors used an inserter carrying threads at its distal end and passed from the suprapubic side towards the vaginal dimple. This instrument is short and straight unlike the long curved needle used in this study. Moreover, their procedure is blind and completely unsafe as this instrument has a wide caliber with a high possibility of urethral injury. Out of three cases, they reported one case of urethral damage (33.3%) that required catheterization for 8 days. Another technical problem of their procedure is the absence of a fenestrum to easily carry threads to the vaginal side.


  1. 1. EvansP. N.PolandN. L.BovingR.L.Vaginal malformations. Am J. Obstet Gynecol1981141910920
  2. 2. Poland ML, Evans TN.Psychologic aspects of vaginal agenesis. J Reprod Med.19853043404
  3. 3. Morgan EM, Quint EH.Assessment of sexual functioning, mental health, and life goals in women with vaginal agenesis. Arch Sex Behav.200635560718
  4. 4. PrapasY.PapanicolaouA.PrapasN.GoutzioulisM.PapanicolaouN.Term pregnancy after vaginal transplantation in a case of vaginal agenesis with a functional uterus. Acta Europaea fertilitatis1993
  5. 5. PanielB.HaddadB.Utero-vaginal aplasia and pregnancy. Journal de Gynecologie Obstetrique et Biologie de la Reproduction1994
  6. 6. MouraM. D.NavarroP.NogueiraA.Pregnancy and term delivery after neovaginoplasty in a patient with vaginal agenesis. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics2000
  7. 7. Brannstrom M, Wranning CA. Uterus transplantation: How far away from human trials? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand.2008;87(11):1097-1100.
  8. 8. Gosden RG.Ovary and Uterus Transplantation. Reproduction.2008Aug 26, in press.
  9. 9. CAWranningAkhi. S. N.KurlbergG.BrannstromM.Uterus transplantation in the rat: Model development, surgical learning and morphological evaluation of healing. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand.2008871112391247
  10. 10. Dahm-KählerP.WranningC.LundmarkC.EnskogA.Mö al.Transplantation of the uterus in sheep: methodology and early reperfusion events. J Obstet Gynaecol Res.200834578493
  11. 11. DittrichR.BeckmannM. W.MuellerA.BinderH.HoffmannI.MaltarisT.UterusCryopreservation.Maintenanceof.UterineContractility.bythe.Useof.DifferentCryoprotocols.Reprod Domest Anim.2008Oct 13, in press.
  12. 12. UlrichU.SchrickelJ.DornC.RichterO.LewalterT.Lu°deritzB.RhiemK.Mayer-von Rokitansky-Ku°ster-Hauser syndrome in association with a hitherto undescribed variant of the Holt-Oram syndrome with an aorto-pulmonary window. Hum Reprod20041912013
  13. 13. Croak AJ, Gebhart JB, Klingele CJ, Lee RA, Rayburn WF.Therapeutic strategies for vaginal Mullerian agenesis. J Reprod Med200348395401
  14. 14. WierraniF.GrunbergerW.Vaginoplasty using deepithelialized vulvar transposition flaps: the Grunberger method. J Am Coll Surg2003196159162
  15. 15. NoguchiS.NakatsukaM.SugiyamaY.ChekirC.KamadaY.HiramatsuY.Use of artificial dermis and recombinant basic fibroblast growth factor for creating a neovagina in a patient with Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome. Hum Reprod20041916291632
  16. 16. MotoyamaS.Laoag-FernandezJ. B.MochizukiS.YamabeS.MaruoT.Vaginoplasty with Interceed absorbable adhesion barrier for complete squamous epithelialization in vaginal agenesis. Am J Obstet Gynecol200318812601264
  17. 17. Jackson ND, Rosenblatt PL.Use of Interceed Absorbable Adhesion Barrier for vaginoplasty. Obstet Gynecol19948410481050
  18. 18. Dietrich JE, Hertweck SP, Traynor MP, Reinstine JH.Laparoscopically assisted creation of a neovagina using the Louisville modification. Fertil Steril20078814311434
  19. 19. CaiB.ZhangJ. R.XiX. W.YanQ.WanX. P.Laparoscopically assisted sigmoid colon vaginoplasty in women with Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome: feasibility and short-term results. Bjog200711414861492
  20. 20. Bailez MM.Laparoscopy in uterovaginal anomalies. Semin Pediatr Surg200716278287
  21. 21. MichalaL.CutnerA.CreightonS. M.Surgical approaches to treating vaginal agenesis. Bjog200711414551459
  22. 22. Rock JA, Schlaff WD.The obstetric consequences of uterovaginal anomalies. Fertil Steril198543681692
  23. 23. Mc IA.The treatment of congenital absence and obliterative conditions of the vagina. Br J Plast Surg19502254267
  24. 24. Buttram VC, Jr., Gibbons WE. Mullerian anomalies: a proposed classification.An analysis of 144 cases). Fertil Steril1979324046
  25. 25. AndryjowiczE.QizilbashA. H.De PetrilloA. D.O’ConnellG. J.TaylorM. H.Adenocarcinoma in a cecal neovagina--complication of irradiation: report of a case and review of literature. Gynecol Oncol198521235239
  26. 26. RotmenschJ.RosensheinN.DillonM.MurphyA.JDWoodruffCarcinoma arising in the neovagina: case report and review of the literature. Obstet Gynecol198361534536
  27. 27. Williams EA.Congenital Absence of the Vagina: a Simple Operation for Its Relief. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw196471511512
  28. 28. FedeleL.BianchiS.FrontinoG.FontanaE.RestelliE.BruniV.The laparoscopic Vecchietti’s modified technique in Rokitansky syndrome: anatomic, functional, and sexual long-term results. Am J Obstet Gynecol2008e371376
  29. 29. FedeleL.BusaccaM.CandianiM.VignaliM.Laparoscopic creation of a neovagina in Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome by modification of Vecchietti’s operation. Am J Obstet Gynecol1994171268269
  30. 30. MiziaK.MJBennettDudley. J.MorriseyJ.Mu°lleriandysgenesis. a.reviewof.recentoutcomes.atRoyal.Hospitalfor.WomenAust NZJ Obstet Gynaecol2006462931
  31. 31. LaffargueF.GiacaloneP. L.BoulotP.VigourouxB.HedonB.BenosP. A.laparoscopicprocedure.forthe.treatmentof.vaginalaplasia.Br J Obstet Gynaecol19951025657
  32. 32. Ismail IS, Cutner AS, Creighton SM. Laparoscopic vaginoplasty: alternative techniques in vaginal reconstruction.BJOG20061133403
  33. 33. LotanG.MashiachR.HalevyA.Total endoscopic vaginal reconstruction in a case of Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A2005154358
  34. 34. CharvatM.HorejsiJ.TeslikL.Laparoscopic neovaginoplasty-a modification of the Vecchietti operation. Ceska Gynekol20016624751
  35. 35. MJCooperFleming. S.MurrayJ.Laparoscopic assisted Vecchietti procedure for the creation of a neovagina. J Obstet Gynaecol Res1996223858
  36. 36. FedeleL.BianchiS.BerlandaN.FontanaE.BulfoniA.BorrutoF.Laparoscopic creation of a neovagina with the laparoscopic Vecchietti operation: comparison of two instrument sets. Fertil Steril20068642932
  37. 37. FedeleL.BianchiS.DortaM.ZanconatoG.RaffaelliR.Laparoscopic creation of a neovagina in women with pelvic kidney. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc199963279
  38. 38. GiacaloneP. L.LaffargueF.FaureJ. M.DeschampsF.Ultrasound-assisted laparoscopic creation of a neovagina by modification of Vecchietti’s operation. Obstet Gynecol1999934468
  39. 39. GiacaloneP. L.LaffargueF.BousquetF.FaureJ. M.DeschampsF.Creation of a neovagina using ultrasonography-assisted laparoscopy (modified Vecchietti technique). J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod1998275146
  40. 40. BianchiM.SolaV.RicciP.PomesC.Late postoperative urinary stress incontinence after a laparoscopic-assisted Vecchietti procedure for neovagina creation in a patient with Rokitansky syndrome: successful treatment with the TVT-O technique. J Minim Invasive Gynecol20071411168
  41. 41. JansenF. W.KolkmanW.BakkumE. KroonC. D.Trimbos-KemperT. C.TrimbosJ. B.Complicationsof.laparoscopyan.inquiryabout.closed-versusopen-entry.techniqueAm J Obstet Gynecol200419036348
  42. 42. OhashiS.IkumaK.KoyasuY.TeiK.KannoH.AkashiA.HaqueS. M.Laparoscopic reconstruction of vagina using sigmoid autograft. Surg Endosc199610101921
  43. 43. Crouch NS, Creighton SM.Sigmoid colpoplasty for vaginal agenesis. Fertil Steril2004
  44. 44. SoongY. K.Laparoscopicallyassisted.neovaginoplastyIn.TulandiT.edAtlas of laparoscopic and hysteroscopic techniques for gynecologists. London: Saunders,1999Chapter 24.
  45. 45. Adamian LV, Zurabiani ZR, Kiselev SI, Khashukoeva AZ.Laparoscopy in surgical treatment of vaginal aplasia: laparoscopy-assisted colpopoiesis and perineal hysterectomy with colpopoiesis. Int J Fertil Menopausal Stud199641405
  46. 46. Adamian LV, Zurabiani ZR, Kiselev SI, Khashukoeva AZ.Laparoscopy in surgical treatment of vaginal aplasia: laparoscopy-assisted colpopoiesis and perineal hysterectomy with colpopoiesis. Int J Fertil Menopausal Stud199641405
  47. 47. Schober JM.Cancer of the neovagina. J Pediatr Urol2007316770
  48. 48. LiaoL.DoyleJ.CrouchN. S.CreightonS. M.Dilation as treatment for vaginal agenesis and hypoplasia: a pilot exploration of benefits and barriers as perceived by patients. J Obstet Gynaecol2006261448
  49. 49. Ismail-PrattI. S.BikooM.LiaoL. M.ConwayG. S.CreightonS. M.Normalization of the vagina by dilator treatment alone in Complete Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome and Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser Syndrome. Hum Reprod20072220204
  50. 50. Laufer MR.Congenital absence of the vagina: in search of the perfect solution. When, and by what technique, should a vagina be created? Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol2002144414
  51. 51. al.Biomechanical characterization of vaginal versus abdominal surgical wound healing in the rabbit. Am J Obstet Gynecol200319414727
  52. 52. al.Do alterations in vaginal dimensions after reconstructive pelvic surgeries affect the risk for dyspareunia? Am J Obstet Gynecol200519215737
  53. 53. Atef M.M. Darwish.A simplified novel laparoscopic formation of neovagina in cases of Mayer-von Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome Fertil Steril.2007;88(5):1427-30.
  54. 54. El Saman AM, Fathalla MM, Nasr AM, Youssef MA.Laparoscopically assisted balloon vaginoplasty for management of vaginal aplasia. Int J Gynecol Obstet2007981347
  55. 55. El Saman AM, Zakheraha MS, Nasra AM, Fathalla MM.Distension versus traction in laparoscopically assisted balloon vaginoplasty for management of vaginal aplasia. Int J Gynecol Obstet2007981347
  56. 56. El SamanA. M.MMFathallaZakherah.MSShaabanO. M.NasrA.Modifiedballoon.vaginoplastythe.fastestway.tocreate. a.naturalminor.changesin.techniqueeliminate.theneed.forcustomized.instrumentsAm J Obstet Gynecol.2009e15
  57. 57. El SamanA. M.IsmaelA. M.MSZakherahNasr. A.TawfikR. M.BedaiwyM. A.Enhancementballoon.vaginoplastyfor.treatmentof.blindvagina.dueto.androgeninsensitivity.syndromeFertil Steril.2011Feb;95277982
  58. 58. MirilasP.ColbornG. L.Mc CluskyD. A.3rd SkandalakisL. J.SkandalakisP. N.SkandalakisJ. E.The history of anatomy and surgery of the preperitoneal space. Arch Surg2005140904
  59. 59. Darwish AM. Fine needle vaginoplasty: a simplified novel approach for correction of vaginal aplasia.Fertil Steril.2010Jun;94130912
  60. 60. Darwish AM.Transretropubic traction vaginoplasty for correction of vaginal aplasia.Int J Gynaecol Obstet.2009Dec;10732625
  61. 61. Bent AE.Sling and bulking agent placement procedures. Rev Urol2004Suppl 5):S2646
  62. 62. BianchiM.SolaV.RicciP.PomesC.Late postoperative urinary stress incontinence after a laparoscopic-assisted Vecchietti procedure for neovagina creation in a patient with Rokitansky syndrome: successful treatment with the TVT-O technique. J Minim Invasive Gynecol20071411168
  63. 63. DarwishA. M.MohammadA. M. A.newera.fortreating.vaginalaplasia.usingtransretropubic.balloonvaginoplasty.approachFertil Steril.2011Mar 1;95311048
  64. 64. El Saman AM.Retropubic balloon vaginoplasty for management of Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome. Fertil Steril2009
  65. 65. El Saman AM.Combined retropubic balloon vaginoplasty and laparoscopic canalization: a novel blend of techniques provides a minimally invasive treatment for cervicovaginal aplasia. Am J Obstet Gynecol2009e331335
  66. 66. El Saman AM.Retropubic balloon vaginoplasty for management of Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome. Fertil Steril.2010Apr;93620169

Written By

Atef M.M. Darwish

Submitted: December 22nd, 2010 Published: August 23rd, 2011