Open access

Stem Cell Transplantation for the Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Disease

Written By

Nikolaos Papanas

Submitted: November 7th, 2010 Published: August 23rd, 2011

DOI: 10.5772/20138

Chapter metrics overview

2,632 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

1. Introduction

Peripheral Arterial Disease (PAD) is a chronic occlusion of lower-extremity arteries distal to the aortic bifurcation [1, 2]. It affects 3%-12% in the general population and its frequency increases with age [1-3]. In the vast majority of patients, PAD is ascribable to atherosclerosis [1,2 ]. It is a progressive disease leading to severe haemodynamic compromise of the affected extremity and may be even limb threatening in the event of critical ischaemia [1-3]. Not only does PAD have a considerable unfavourable impact on the quality of life, but it also poses a tremendous economic burden on society [1-3] and is an ominous harbinger of high morbidity and mortality due to concomitant coronary artery disease and cerebrovascular disease [4-6].

Management of PAD may be divided into medical and surgical. The former includes risk factor modification and medical treatment [3, 5, 7, 8], while the latter comprises surgical revascularisation (bypass surgery, intraluminal angioplasty, endovascular surgery) [9-11]. Revascularisation may be divided into percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and by-pass surgery [9, 10, 12, 13]. The former can restore adequate blood flow, while recurrence is infrequent and amputation rates are rare [9-11]. This technique yields favourable results in patients with critical limb ischaemia as well [9, 10]. By-pass graft surgery has also been extensively practised [12, 13]. Depending on the location of affected arteries, it may be performed to the femoral, popliteal or even distal arteries, such as the dorsalis pedis artery [12, 13].

However, vascular atherosclerotic lesions may diffusely affect several anatomical regions. This holds especially true for elderly and diabetic patients, who may, therefore, be poor candidates for surgical intervention [1, 14]. Regrettably, it may also apply to patients with critical limb ischaemia or those who have had prior revascularisation [1, 15]. Hence, there is an undeniable need to develop alternative therapeutic modalities to restore limb blood flow [1, 5, 15, 16]. This chapter reviews the progress achieved with autologous stem cell transplantation, an important innovation involving intramuscular and/or intra-arterial stem cell administration into the affected lower extremity [15-17].


2. Stem cell therapy: Principles and cell types

Stem cell therapy is based on administration of autologous stem cells, taken either from the bone marrow, from the peripheral blood or, more rarely, from adipose tissue [17-23]. Human bone marrow contains stem cells with the potential for differentiation into a variety of tissues, including endothelium, liver, muscle, bone and skin [15-17, 22, 23]. Consequently, bone marrow-derived cells may differentiate into endothelial cells and also provide progenitor and/or stem cells to wounds during healing [15-17, 22, 23]. Importantly, the newly derived endothelial cells promote angiogenesis, i.e. new vessel formation (also called neovascularisation), by two mechanisms [15, 17, 24-26]. First, they get connected to each other and are organised into capillary tubes, thus forming the primary capillary plexus, which is further refined by remodelling [25, 26]. Secondly, they release growth factors promoting angiogenesis (also called angiogenic growth factors), mainly Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF), Fibroblast Growth Factor (FGF), Hypoxia inducible factor-1a (HIF-1 a), Hepatocyte Growth Factor (HGF), Placental Growth Factor (PlGF), angiopoietin, Nerve Growth Factor (NGF), Developmental endothelial locus-1 (Del-1) and others [15, 24]. Similar efficacy appears to be also accomplished with peripheral blood stem cells and adipose tissue-derived stem cells [18-21, 23].

Bone marrow-derived cells include autologous bone marrow-derived bone marrow stem cells (BMCs), bone marrow mononuclear cells (BMMNCs) and endothel progenitor cells (EPCs) [16, 18-20, 22, 23]. Peripheral blood-derived cells include mononuclear cells (PBMNCs), polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNCs), erythroid colony-forming cells (ECFCs), circulating blood-derived progenitor cells (CPCs) and EPC, while other cells mainly include mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and adipose tissue-derived cells (ADSCs) [16, 18-23].


3. Pre-clinical studies

Preclinical studies have evaluated a variety of stem cells from bone marrow, peripheral blood or other sources, using the ischaemic hindlimb model in the mouse, rat or rabbit. Experimental hindlimb ischaemia is achieved by surgical ligation of the superficial femoral and/or external iliac artery [15]. This unilateral hindlimb ischaemia has been widely used as a model of PAD, although it virtually equates to acute ischaemia, not entirely representative of chronic PAD [15]. Major studies are briefly described in this section.

3.1. Bone marrow-derived stem cells

In the mouse ischaemic hindlimb, Ziegelhoeffer et al. [27] investigated whether BMCs act by incorporation into vessels. They found a threefold increase of such cells around growing collateral arteries in the ischaemic vs. control limb. The authors concluded that BMCs do not promote vascular growth by incorporating into vessel walls but may function as supporting cells [27]. In another study, intravenous BMC administration was successful in improving blood flow as well as increasing capillary density and expression of the proliferation-associated protein Ki-67 in mouse ischaemic hindlimbs [28]. Importantly, this beneficial effect was enhanced by concomitant metabolic vascular protection (1.0% vitamin E added to the chow and 0.05% vitamin C and 6% L-arginine added to the drinking water), suggesting an additive effect, attribitable in part to NO activation and reduced systemic oxidative stress [28].

A further study provided evidence for increased neovascularisation with bone marrow-derived cells. Takagi et al. [29] examined whether granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) can enhance neovascularisation and collateral vessel formation induced by BMNC transplantation in the hindlimb ischaemia model. Administration of G-CSF significantly increased blood perfusion on Laser Doppler imaging (LDI), number of angiographically detectable collateral vessels, and capillary density [29]. Similarly, neovascularisation was significantly increased in rats receiving BMNCs, as evidenced by angiographical findings and capillary density. The combination of G-CSF and BMNCs augmented neovascularisation in comparison to BMNCs alone, as manifested by angiographical findings and capillary density [29]. It was concluded that G-CSF and BMNCs combination could emerge as a helpful therapeutic approach to restore blood flow [29].

Sica et al. [30] explored the effect of intravenous BMC administration and concurrent metabolic vascular protection (1.0% vitamin E, 0.05% vitamin C, and 6% L-arginine) in the ischaemic hindlimb of diabetic and non-diabetic mice. In both mice, BMC treatment increased blood flow and capillary density and decreased interstitial fibrosis [30]. This effect was amplified by metabolic vasculoprotective treatment. The latter had by itself no effect on capillary density, but could reduce interstitial fibrosis in non-diabetic mice [30].

One year later, Jeon et al. [31] examined whether the angiogenic efficacy of a combination of two angiogenic strategies (EPC mobilization with G-CSF and BMMNC transplantation) is superior to either strategy alone in the mouse ischaemic hindlimb. Both treatments were efficacious in increasing microvessel density and expression of bFGF and VEGF [31]. Combination therapy accomplished more extensive expression of bFGF and VEGF than either form of single therapy [31].

More recently, a study randomised ApoE knockout mice to receive either phosphate buffered saline (PBS) or intra-arterial BMCs [32]. Efficacy was assesed by LDI of the ischaemic limbs. It was demonstrated that BMCs significantly (p<0.05) increased blood flow recovery in ischaemic limbs, in comparison to saline (61.8±15% vs. 41.9±13.9%, respectively) [32]. Of note, it was revealed that BMCs differentiated not only into small blood vessels, but also into skeletal myofibres and supporting membranes [32]. The latter changes were associated with increased serum levels of VEGF, FGF-2, transforming growth factor beta (TGFbeta), interleukin 4 (IL-4), and tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha). These workers proposed that the benefit of new skeletal muscle formation might be added to that of angiogenesis in long-standing lower extremity ischaemia [32].

3.2. Stem cells from peripheral blood

Asahara et al. [33] showed increased capillary density and augmented blood flow recovery following administration of heterologous, homologous and autologous EPCs in the mouse ischaemic hindlimb. Athymic nude rats with unilateral hindlimb ischaemia, were randomly assigned to intramuscular administration of PBMNCs plus platelets or PBMNCs plus platelets plus PMNs [34]. Blood perfusion, as evaluated by LDI, improved significantly (p<0.001) by 44% in rats receiving PBMNC plus platelets. There was a further significant (p<0.01) increase with the addition of PMNs. Density of newly formed capillaries was increased by PBMNCs plus platelets (3.5-fold increase) or platelets alone (2.4-fold increase), with a significant between-group difference (p<0.001), whereas PMNs exerted a significant (p<0.05) inhibitory role (32% inhibition) [34].

Yoon et al. [35] utilised the synergistic effect of EPCs and outgrowth endothelial cells (OECs), both cultured from the peripheral blood. Each cell type alone succeeded in a significant (p<0.05) increase of new vessel formation in the mouse experimental model [35]. In vitro, there was a synergistic effect by mutual interaction through cytokines and matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs). In vivo, injection of both cell types resulted in significantly (p<0.05) more pronounced neovascularisation than either cell type alone [35].

In another study, rats were randomly allocated to MSCs, MNCs, or vehicle infusion (control group) [36]. Significant improvement of hindlimb ischemia was observed both in rats receiving MNCs and in those treated with MSCs, as compared to the control group. LDI perfusion index was highest in the MSC group (0.81±0.08), followed by the MNC (0.69±0.1) and control group (0.57±0.06) [36]. Capillary density was significantly (p<0.01) increased with both treatments compared to controls. MSC treatment was significantly (p<0.01) more efficacious in increasing capillary density than MNC treatment [36]. The number of transplanted cell-derived endothelial cells was also highest in MSC rats. Finally, MSCs were significantly (p<0.05) more tolerant to apoptotic stimuli (serum starvation and hypoxia) in vitro than MNCs [36].

Two further works confirmed the beneficial effect of EPCs from peripheral blood in hindlimb ischaemia of the mouse [37] and rat [38]. In the first study, EPCs improved histologically confirmed muscle healing, blood flow and vessel density [37]. These changes were associated with modulation of proangiogenic pathways: increased VEGF-A levels and sensitivity to VEGF family ligands, increased levels of monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1) [37]. In the second work, EPC treatment was combined with targeted extracorporeal shock wave application to facilitate their tissue recruitment [38]. Combined treatment achieved a significant (p<0.01) increase in the number of histologically confirmed vascular endothelial growth factor-positive endothelial cells per myocyte, as well as a significant (p<0.05) enhancement in EPC recruitment and homing [38]. Moreover, there was a significant (p<0.05) increase in relative blood flow recovery assessed by LDI [38].

Using an immunodeficient hindlimb ischemia model and LDI, Sasaki et al. [39] evaluated limb salvage rate and blood perfusion after intramuscular implantation of ECFCs, as compared to PBS treatment in the controls. Salvage rate and blood perfusion were increased by 38% (p<0.05) and 82.8% (p<0.01), respectively [39]. Vascular smooth muscle cell recruitment was also increased and the capillary density was 1.6-fold higher (p<0.05) than in the control group [39]. Finally, ECFCs were confirmed to supply angiogenic cytokines (VEGF and FGF-2), suggesting a possible novel strategy for therapeutic angiogenesis [39].

3.3. Other stem cells

A variety of other cells have also been investigated. Niagara et al. [40] studied the effect of rabbit autologous primary skeletal myoblasts on angiographically confirmed new vessel formation. Treatment induced a significant increase in neovascularisation (p<0.05) and capillary density (p<0.01) [40].

Scientists from the Cardiovascular Research Institute in the Washington Hospital Center have experimented with MSCs in the mouse [41, 42]. They showed that these cells effectively increased VEGF and b-FGF levels, collateral blood flow and limb function [41, 42]. At the same time, auto-amputation and muscle atrophy were reduced. Their data indicated the great importance of paracrine signaling and, additionally, showed that cell incorporation into vessels was not a prerequisite for their effects [41, 42].

ADSCs represent another alternative. Cultured ADSCs from C57Bl/6 mouse inguinal adipose tissue were transplanted into the ischaemic mouse hindlimb and improved blood flow assessed by LDI and capillary density assessed by anti-CD31 immunostaining antibody [43]. The therapeutic effect appeared to be mainly achieved by their ability to secrete angiogenic growth factors: relatively high expression of HGF, VEGF, placental growth factor (PGF), and transforming growth factor beta (TGF)-β, as well as moderate expression of FGF-2 and angiopoietin 1 were noted [43]. Moon et al. [21] have also shown that hADSC can improve blood flow (evidenced by LDI), even when transplanted relatively late, i.e. 7 days post induction of ischaemia in mice. The therapeutic effect was related to the number of transplanted cells. Conditioned media from these cells increased proliferation of human aortic endothelial cells [21].

More recently, Kim and collagues [44] have compared human adipose stromal cells (hADSC) with human bone marrow stromal cells (hBMSC) in a nude mice model of hindlimb ischaemia. The former showed superior recovery of blood flow and higher expression of matrix metalloproteinases (MMP3 and MMP9) than the latter, prompting further exploration of this therapeutic alternative [44].


4. Clinical studies

Clinical studies have evaluated stem cells taken from bone marrow, peripheral blood or other sources. These works differ substantially in number of patients recruited and endpoints used. Major studies are briefly described in this section (Tables 1, 2).

4.1. Bone marrow-derived stem cells

4.1.1. BMCs

Esato et al. [45] administered BMCs in 8 selected patients with chronic lower extremity ischaemia (4 patients with PAD, 4 patients with thromboangiitis obliterans [TAO, Bürger’s disease]), in whom prior treatment had failed. Symptoms improved in 7/8 patients. Moreover, complete ulcer healing was achieved in 2/3 patients, and partial healing in the 3rd patient [45]. Temperature increase was documented in 2 patients and new collateral formation in 2 out of 3 patients who underwent angiography.

Nizankowski et al. [46] delivered BMCs intramuscularly by repeated injections into the pedal and tibial regions in 10 patients suffering from chronic leg ischaemia staged Fontaine IV. Efficacy was assessed by LDI, transcutaneous oxygen pressure (TcPO2), ankle-brachial index (ABI), visual analogue pain scale, analgesic therapy requirement, ulceration area, angiography and scintigraphy. Improved blood flow was documented by LDI and elevation in TcPO2 [46]. Painful symptoms were relieved in the majority of patients, and only 3 amputations were finally needed at 12-month follow-up. Treatment efficacy did not depend on the number of cells injected [46].

Another centre recruited 22 patients, who were divided into those with severe and those with moderate ischaemia [47]. Both patient groups received BMCs, the number of which was higher in those with severe ischaemia. Evaluation included improvement of pain, cold sensation and numbness, ABI, TcPO2, angiography, amputation rate, and foot ulcer healing. At 4 weeks, pain was alleviated in 90.0% in patients with severe and 16.7% with moderate ischaemia (p<0.01) [47]. The corresponding rates of relief in cold sensation were 90.5% and 5.3% (p<0.01), while those in improved numbness were 62.5% and 9.1% (p<0.01) [47]. ABI was increased by 31.8% in subjects with severe ischaemia, but not in those with moderate ischaemia (p<0.01). The corresponding increments in TcPO2 were 94.4% and 11.1% (p<0.01) [47]. Angiography demonstrated new collateral vessel network in 100% of subjects with severe ischaemia but not in the presence of moderate ischaemia (p<0.01) [47]. Subjects with severe ischaemia exhibited 4.5% amputation rates and 75% rates improved ulcer healing. The corresponding rates in those with moderate ischaemia were 27.3% and 0% (p<0.05). Thus, it was concluded that efficacy was significantly superior with higher number of implanted cells [47].

In a small series of 5 patients with advanced PAD and foot ulcers, intramuscular (gastrocnemius muscle) BMC transplantation achieved substantial improvement in pain intensity and pain-free walking distance in all of them after 12 months [48]. Complete ulcer healing was achieved in 3 and partial healing in one patient [48]. There was a progressive improvement of ABI and TcPO2 over 12 months: at the end of this period, the average ABI rose from 0.41 to 0.83 (p<0.05) and the average TcPO2 from 18.8 to 37.5 mmHg [48]. Duplex ultrasonography showed improvement in one patient, while angiography detected new collaterals in 3 patients [48].

Eighteen patients with advanced PAD (staged Fontaine III/IV) were recruited in another long-term study with 18-month follow-up. The control group included 18 matched patients taking maximal drug therapy [49]. In the treatment arm, patients received BMCs in two intra-arterial doses and, concurrently, daily antioxidants and L-arginine. Among BMC-treated patients, mean walking distance started to increase at 3 months and exhibited further improvement at 18 months (p<0.05) [49]. Significant (p<0.05) improvement in ABI was seen in 10/18 patients at 3 months and in 12/18 patients at 18 months [49]. Ischaemic ulcers improved in 13/18 patients after 6-12 months. Amputation rates were 13.3% (2/18) in BMC-treated patients and 55.6% (10/18) in controls (p=0.014) [49].

A total of 37 patients suffering from PAD staged Fontaine IV with an ulcerated limb (including diabetic foot) receiving BMCs intramuscularly were recruited in a further trial [50]. Efficacy parameters included toe pressure, toe-pressure index (TBI), ABI, TcPO2, LDI, skin perfusion pressure, wound healing and amputation rates. Limb salvage was achieved in 30 patients (81%) and amputation rate was 19% (7 patients) [50]. In the limb salvage group, significant (p<0.05) improvements in toe pressure, TBI, LDI and TcPO2 were noted [50]. Significant (p<0.05) improvement in pain-free walking distance at treadmill testing was also shown in a study of 42 subjects with chronic PAD involving the femoropopliteal-tibial segment by intramuscular BMC administration [51].

To evaluate the long-term efficacy of BMC transplantation in subjects with PAD without option for revascularisation or with unsuccessful revascularisation, the BONe Marrow Outcome Trial in Critical Limb Ischemia (BONMOT-CLI) was designed [52]. This is a double-blinded, 1:1 randomised, placebo-controlled multi-centre study enrolling patients from 4 German centres. Patients will be randomised to autologous BMCs (expected 45 patients) injected at 40 sites into the ischaemic limb or sham bone marrow aspiration and 40 saline injections [52]. The composite primary endpoint of major amputation or persisting critical limb ischaemia will be evaluated at 3 months. Subjects will be then followed up for up to two years. Secondary endpoints will include death, changes in perfusion, quality of life, pain-free walking distance, minor amputations, wound healing, collateral density and cancer incidence [52].

4.1.2. BMMNCs

In 2002, the Therapeutic Angiogenesis using Cell Transplantation (TACT) Study Investigators recruited 25 patients with unilateral leg ischaemia (group A), who received BMMNCs into the gastrocnemius muscle and saline into the less ischaemic limb, as well as 22 patients with bilateral leg ischaemia (group B), who randomly received BMMNCs in one leg and peripheral blood-mononuclear cells in the other as a control [53]. Efficacy parameters included ABI, TcPO2 and rest pain. In group B, the BMMNC-treated limb exhibited significant increases in ABI, as compared to the contralateral limb, by 0.09 (CI 0.06-0.11, p<0.0001), in TcPO2 by 13 mmHg (CI 9-17, p<0.0001) and in pain-free walking time by 1.2 min (CI 0.7-1.7, p=0.0001) [53]. Pain intensity was also reduced by -0.85 (-1.6 to -0.12, p=0.025) in comparison to the contralateral limb [53]. Similar improvements were seen in the BMMNC-treated vs. saline-treated extremity in group A. The new therapy was well tolerated. Two patients in group A died after myocardial infarction, but this was unrelated to treatment [53].

Kirana et al. [54] described a 60-year old type 2 diabetic patient with infected gangrenous ulcers of the 3rd and 4th left toes. The patient has severe stenosis of anterior tibial, posterior tibial and dorsalis pedis arteries, leading to critical ischaemia. After amputation of the affected toes, he received intramuscular BMMNC transplantation. After 20 weeks, the stump had completely healed, and there were improvements in ABI, Laser Doppler reactive hyperaemia and TcPO2 [54].

Higashi et al. [55] studied the effect of BMMNCs in 7 patients with PAD. Treatment improved ABI (from 0.33±0.21 to 0.39±0.17, p=0.06), TcPO2 (from 28.4±11.5 to 36.6±5.2 mm Hg, p=0.03), and pain-free walking time (from 0.8±0.6 to 2.9±2.2 minutes, p=0.02) [55]. Moreover, it improved endothelial function, evaluated by blood flow in response to acetylcholine (from 19.3±6.8 to 29.6±7.1 mL/min per 100 mL, p=0.002) [55]. In the same year, two other small studies the efficacy of BMMNCs. The first work showed that these cells improved blood flow in 12 patients with PAD staged Fontaine IV [56]. Specifically, there was an increase in pain-free walking time (from 140±53 s to 451±74 s, p=0.034), ABI (from 0.65±0.08 to 0.73±0.07, p=0.055) and perfusion index (proximal area from 1.32±0.10 to 1.56±0.11, p=0.007) [56]. Perfusion scintigraphy could identify new collaterals after BMMNC transplantation [56]. The second work showed increased ABI (from 0.54±0.47 to 0.61±0.50, p<0.05) and TcPO2 (28.4±15.4 mmHg to 37.1±24.4 mmHg) following BMNNC transplantation in 8 patients with PAD [57].

A group from the Heinrich Heine University of Düsseldorf, Germany has performed a series of small studies enquiring into the efficacy of BMMNCs. A 62-year old man with PAD staged Fontaine IIb received combined intra-arterial and intramuscular transplantation of BMMNCs [58]. After 10 weeks, there was a 7-fold improvement of walking distance, a greater than 50% increase of tissue oxygen saturation and a 24% increment of ABI on exercise [58]. Then, 10 patients received intra-arterial (into the common femoral artery) and intramuscular (into the muscles of the thigh and the lower leg) BMMNC transplantation [59]. After 2 months, pain-free walking distance increased significantly (p<0.05) in all patients. Moreover, significant (p<0.05) improvement of ABI, capillary-venous oxygen saturation and parameters of venous occlusion plethysmography were observed [59]. A 63-year-old type 2 diabetic patient with severe intermittent claudication and a recalcitrant ulcer in the right hallux was treated with intra-arterial and intramuscular BMMNC transplantation [60]. At 8 weeks, the ulcer had healed completely. Six months later, there were significant (p<0.05) increments in the claudication-free walking distance by >100% and in resting blood flow on venous occlusion plethysmography by 23% [60]. The next study in 8 patients with PAD staged Fontaine II or III demonstrated a significant (p<0.05) 3.7-fold increment in pain-free walking distance [61]. ABI on exercise (from 0.62±0.17 to 0.77±0.15, p=0.018), capillary-venous oxygen saturation (from 50±15 to 62±6%, p=0.027) and venous occlusion plethysmography (from 4.6±1.7 to 6.5±1.7 ml/100 ml tissue/min, p<0.05) exhibited significant improvements as well [61]. Finally, 13 subjects with chronic PAD staged Fontaine IIb received combined intra-arterial and intramuscular BMMNC transplantation [62]. After 2 months, the pain-free walking distance increased significantly by more than 300% (from 147±90 to 500±614 m, p=0.001). ABI rose, both at rest (from 0.66±0.18 to 0.80±0.15, p=0.003) and on exercise (from 0.64±0.19 to 0.76±0.16, p=0.006) [62]. The authors also found significant improvements in capillary-venous oxygen saturation (from 56±14 to 63±5, p=0.021) and venous occlusion plethysmography (from 2.1±0.7 to 2.5±0.7, p=0.009). Importantly, beneficial effects were sustained at 13 months [62].

A4 mixed series of 35 patients (30 with ischaemic diabetic foot, 2 with PAD and 3 with TAO) received BMMNC transplantation after bone marrow mobilisation with GcSF [63]. Pain was entirely relieved in 94.7% and improved in 97.1% of patients [63]. Numbness was alleviated in 93.3% of patients. Claudication-free walking distance was prolonged in all subjects, while 47.9% exhibited a significant (p<0.05) increase in ABI and 92.3% a significant (p<0.05) increase in TcPO2 [63]. Ulcer healing was accomplished in 9.1% and ulcer area reduction in 27.3% [63]. Amputation rate was 6.3%. New collateral vessels were identified by angiography in 91.2%. Complications included transient fever and mild fatigue in one patient and acute myocardial infarction in one patient. The latter occurred 7 days following transplantation and easily recovered with treatment [63].

These authors then compared intramuscular (group A, n=16) with intra-arterial (group B, n=16) BMMNC injection [64]. Efficacy parameters included rest pain, coldness, ABI, intermittent claudication, TcPO2 and angiography. Treatment was equally efficacious in both groups [64]. Rest pain was improved in 76.5% of group A and in 93.3% of group B patients. Coldness improved in 100% of patients from both groups. ABI increased in 44.4% of group A and in 41.2% of group B patients [64]. Limb salvage was achieved in 83.3% of group A and in 94.1% of group B patients [64]. TcPO2 increased to ≥20 mmHg in 20 limbs, while a rich new collateral network was identified in 9/15 limbs which underwent angiography. There were 2 deaths from heart failure [64].

Longer data from this group have recently become available [65]. A total of 65 patients with PAD have received BMMNCs: 12 patients were transplanted 2-4 times and 53 patients only once [65]. Mean follow-up was 21.5 months (range 8-56) [65]. In both treatment groups, coldness improved in all patients, while there were significant (p<0.05) increments in ABI and TcPO2. Overall efficacy was 70.8% and the recurrence rate was 10.7%. Response duration was over 12 months in 91.3% of patients, over 24 months in 52.2% and over 37 months in 26.1%. Efficacy was significantly (p<0.001) higher in subjects transplanted 2-4 times (100%) than in those transplanted once (64.2%) [65]. Mortality rate was 12.3%: 5 patients died of myocardial infarction and heart failure, and 3 died of cerebral infarction [65].

Twelve patients received BMMNC transplantation by two different techniques (either sorted on a blood cell separator or isolated by density gradient on Ficoll-Hypaque) [66]. Both modalities were equally effective in improving ABI at rest, oxygen saturation, pain-free walking time and rest pain intensity. Improvement was sustained at 24 weeks and limb salvage rate was 41.67% [66]. In another small series, 7 patients (3 with TAO and 4 with PAD undergoing haemodialysis) received mononuclear cell transplantation (BMMNC in 6, PBMNC in 1) into the gastrocnemius and quadriceps femoris muscles [67]. Patients with TAO exhibited improvements in painful symptoms, ABI, TcPO2 and thermography, while patients with PAD did not respond [67]. It was concluded that transplantation was more effective in TAO than in PAD, but this must be interpreted with caution, given the very small number of patients [67].

Van Tongeren et al. [68] compared combined intra-arterial plus intramuscular (n=12) to exclusive intramuscular (n=15) BMMNC transplantation. Efficacy was assessed at 1, 6 and 12 months by means of limb salvage, pain-free walking distance, ABI and pain scores [68]. Both modalities were equally effective. Pain-free walking distance improved from 81±56 m to 257±126 m at 6 months (p=0.0002). Mean ABI increased by 23% after 6 months (p=0.01) and pain score was reduced up to 50% (p=0.001). Two patients in the combined treatment group vs. 7 patients in the intramuscular group (p=0.17) required amputation [68].

In the same year, the 3-year outcomes of the TACT (Therapeutic Angiogenesis using Cell Transplantation) follow-up study were published [69]. Primary endpoints comprised mortality and amputation-free interval. Median follow-up was 25.3 months (range 0.8-69.0 months) and 3-year survival rates were 80% (CI 68-91) in PAD (n=74) and 100% in TAO (n=41). Amputation-free rates were 60% (CI 46-74) and 91% (CI 82-100), respectively [69]. At 2 years, ABI and TcPO2 had not changed significantly, but there was a sustainable significant improvement in pain scale, ulcer size and pain-free walking distance [69].

Ten patients with end-stage PAD underwent 2 BMMNC transplantations, while 10 matched patients served as controls [70]. In the treatment arm, there was a significant (p<0.05) improvement in ABI, claudication-free walking distance and capillary density, which were maintained at 12 months [70]. Eight patients with critical limb ischaemia (CLI) and no alternative treatment option received BMMNC transplantation into the gastrocnemius muscle [71]. Pain, angiography and non-invasive vascular workup were evaluated. At 4 months, pain was reduced in 5 patients. At 8 months, 5 patients could be evaluated and showed stability or insignificant improvement [71].

Twenty-four patients with CLI received intra-arterial BMMNC transplantation [72]. After 12 months, all patients survived and only 2 of them had undergone amputation. Ulcer healing rate was 78% and median Fontaine stage had improved from 3.5 to 2 (p<0.0001) [72]. Collateral vessel formation had improved by 1.13 and 1.3 points on a four-point semiquantitative scale in calf and foot, respectively (p<0.0001) [72]. Impressively, significant improvements were reported in all items of the SF-36 quality of life questionnaire [72].

De Vriese et al. [73] included 16 very old patients (mean age 78±2 years) with CLI and substantial comorbidities (hypertension, smoking, diabetes, hypercholesterolaemia and uraemia), who underwent intramuscular BMMNC transplantation. TcPO2 improved from 0.51±0.11 to 0.86±0.03 mm Hg (p<0.001) after 12 weeks, whereas ABI showed no significant change (0.42±0.15 vs. 0.59±0.1, p=0.23) [73]. On digital subtraction angiography, the number of collateral vessels increased by 0.89±0.86 (p=0.33), but capillary surface area on gastrocnemius muscle biopsy increased from 0.61±0.07% to 2.38±0.73% (p<0.05) [73]. Two patients died of gangrene, 3 patients were amputated and one patient required by-pass surgery. Two further patients died of unrelated causes [73]. Of note, symptomatic relief was mainly achieved in patients with less severe ischaemia [73]. Thus, despite some objective improvement in vascular parameters, BMMNC administration was only associated with very modest overall improvement in these high-risk patients.

More recently, 51 patients with limb-threatening CLI facing risk of major amputation received BMMNCs intramuscularly [74]. This treatment was offered after unsuccessful or impossible revascularisation procedure and optimal medical therapy. Limb salvage was 59% at 6 months and 53% at the end of the study (mean follow-up 411±261 days) [74]. At 6 months, ABI increased from 0.33±0.18 to 0.46±0.15 (p=0.005) and TcPO2 increased from 12±12 to 25±15 mmHg (p=0.001) in patients with limb salvage, but not in those ultimately amputated [74]. The former were also downstaged from a mean Rutherford category of 4.9 to 3.3 (p=0.0001). Wound area was reduced from 11.6±20 to 4.4±11 cm2. Median walking distance improved from 0 to 40 m, but only in those escaping amputation. Finally, analgesic requirement dropped by 62% [74].

A further work looked at the short-term results of dual intramuscular and intra-arterial autologous BMMNC transplantation in 9 patients facing the risk of lower-extremity amputation [75]. Eight patients had rest pain, 7 had diabetes mellitus and 8 recalcitrant ulcers. Efficacy parameters comprised ABI, rest pain, ulcer healing and amputation. The primary composite endpoint was defined as improved ABI, relief of rest pain, ulcer healing and absence of major amputations [75]. Overall success rate was 33.3% (3 patients), while success in at least one of the 4 components of the primary endpoint was noted in 5 additional patients (55.6%) [75]. ABI exhibited a non-significant improvement by 0.12 (dorsalis pedis artery) and 0.08 (posterior tibial artery). Three patients (33.3%) sustained major amputations. Those remaining free from amputations showed improvement in patient severity and could be downstaged by at least one level in Rutherford and Fontaine classifications at a mean follow-up of 7.8 months [75]. Complete ulcer healing was accomplished at 3 months in all ulcerated patients not needing amputation. These short-term findings favoured BMMNC transplantation for limb salvage in patients with severe PAD, but it must be borne in mind that patient numbers were small [75].

AuthorsNumber of PatientsType of CellsClinical outcomes
Nizankowski et al. [46]10BMCsImprovement of symptoms, increased blood flow (LDI, TcPO2)
Gu et al. [47]22BMCsImprovement of symptoms (pain, cold sensation), increase in ABI and TcPO2, new collateral vessels
Napoli et al. [49]18BMCsIncrease in ABI and walking distance, ulcer healing, reduction of amputation rates
Procházka et al. [50]37BMCsImprovement in toe pressure, TBI, LDI and TcPO2
Korymasov et al. [51]42BMCsImprovement in pain-free walking distance
Tateishi-Yuyama et al. [53]25BMMNCs vs. PBMNCsIncrease in ABI, TcPO2 and walking distance
Higashi et al. [55]7BMMNCsIncrease in ABI, TcPO2, endothelial function and walking distance
Miyamoto et al. [56]12BMMNCsIncrease in ABI, perfusion index and walking distance
Bartsch et al. [62]13BMMNCsLong-term improvement in walking distance, ABI and oxygen saturation
Gu et al. [63]35 (30 ischaemic diabetic foot, 2 PAD, 3 TAO)BMMNCsImprovement in pain, numbness and walking distance, increase in ABI and TcPO2, ulcer healing, new collateral vessels
Gu et al. [64]32BMMNCsImprovement in symptoms, ABI and TcPO2, limb salvage, new collateral vessels
Gu et al. [65]65BMMNCsLong-term improvement in coldness, ABI and TcPO2, new collateral vessels
Van Tongeren et al. [68]27BMMNCsImprovement in walking distance and ABI, reduced amputation rates
Matoba et al. [69]115 (74 PAD, 41 TAO)BMMNCsLong-term improvement in pain scale, ulcer size and walking distance, reduced amputation rates
Chochola et al. [72]24BMMNCsUlcer healing, new collateral vessels, Fontaine downstaging, improved quality of life
De Vriese et al. [73]16BMMNCsIncreased capillary surface area on muscle biopsy, increase in TcPO2, insignificant increase in ABI and number of collateral vessels
Amann et al. [74]51BMMNCsLimb salvage, increase in ABI and TcPO2,

Table 1.

Major clinical studies with bone marrow-derived stem cell therapy

Finally, in a phase I clinical trial, 10 patients with advanced PAD (Fontaine stages IIb to IV) received a cell product consisting of autologous BMMNCs and MSCs [76]. ABI improved significantly (from 0.34±0.19 to 0.69±0.18, p<0.002) at 2 months. Claudication-free walking time increased significantly (p<0.05) by 3.48±1.72 folds at 6 months [76]. Significant (p<0.05) improvements were also seen in 99mTc-TF perfusion scintigraphy scores and in quality of life scores at 6 months [76]. TcPO2 rose insignificantly (p=0.067) from 33±6 mm Hg to 46±10 mm Hg at 6 months, but angiographic score increased from 0.90± 0.30 to 1.89±0.78 (p=0.002) [76].

4.2. Stem cells from peripheral blood

4.2.1. PBMNCs

The main cell population used is PBMNCs, with or without GcSF mobilisation. Inaba et al. [77] included 7 patients with PAD, who received GcSF subcutaneously for 5 days and then intramuscular PBMNC transplantation. Pain was relieved as early as at 3 days [77]. Maximum pain-free walking distance was increased by day 7. The heel ulcer completely healed in one patient. These improvements were sustained at 12 months. Improvements in ABI and angiographic findings were minor [77].

Ishida et al. [78] examined the feasibility and safety of PBMNC administration after GcSF mobilisation in 6 patients (1 with PAD, 5 with TAO). A slight increase in ABI and ulcer area were seen in 4 and 3 patients, respectively [78]. Mean walking distance significantly increased from 203 m to 559 m (p=0.031) at 4 weeks and was sustainable for 24 weeks. There was also a significant improvement in physiological functioning, as evaluated by the SF-36 questionnaire on quality of life [78]. No serious adverse events were noted.

In 92 patients with CLI, intramuscular PBMNC administration after GcSF mobilisation was most effective for non-diabetic non-dialysis subjects in terms of averting amputations [79]. In those with diabetes and/or undergoing haemodialysis, treatment was efficacious for milder ischaemia (up to Fontaine stage III), but not for advanced disease (staged Fontaine IV) [79]. Indeed, most amputations (n=37) were carried out in Fontaine staged IV diabetic or dialysis patients. Characteristically, amputation rate was as high as 71% in Fontaine staged IV diabetic patients on haemodialysis [79]. Interestingly, serum VEGF levels increased in all patients (mean increase 176%), regardless of clinical outcome.

In 15 patients with CLI, intramuscular PBMNC administration after GcSF mobilisation induced significant (p<0.05) increases in mean ABI (from 0.3 to 0.46), mean pain-free walking distance (from 0.15 to 0.72 km) and mean maximal walking distance (from 0.96 to 2.13 km) at 12 months [80]. Moreover, 5/6 foot ulcers healed completely.

Two studies compared PBMNC to BMMNC transplantation. Gu et al. [19] carried out this comparison in 42 patients with unilateral lower extremity ischaemia (28 with ischaemic diabetic foot, 8 with TAO and 6 patients with PAD). Each therapy was administered to 21 patients. No difference was seen between the two groups [19]. All but one ulcers healed. At 4 weeks, pain was relieved in 88.2% of patients in the BMMNc and in 89.5% of patients in the PBMNC group [19]. Cold sensation was relieved in 94.4% of BMMNC and 94.7% of PBMNC patients. Numbness was improved in 69.2% of BMMNC and 66.7% of PBMNC patients. ABI increased in 38.1% of BMMNC and 33.3% of PBMNC patients. TcPO2 increased in 85.7% of BMMNC and 90.5% of PBMNC patients. New collateral vessels were identified in 83.3% of BMMNC and 77.8% of PBMNC patients. Wound healing was noted in 60.0% of BMMNC and 66.7% of PBMNC patients, and amputation rate was 9.1% in each group. Follow-up was extended to a mean of 8 months (range 3-15) in 40 patients [19]. At the end of follow-up, painful symptoms improved in 75.0% of BMMNC and 70.0% of PBMNC patients, ABI increased in 60.0% of BMMNC and 65.0% of PBMNC patients. TcPO2 increased in 80.0% of BMMNC and 75.0% of PBMNC patients. Finally, new collateral vessels were detected in 90.0% of BMMNC and 84.6% of PBMNC patients [19].

Similarly, 150 patients with PAD were randomised to PBMNC (n=76) or BMMNC (n=74) and followed for 12 weeks [20]. In the PBMNC group, improvements in ABI (p<0.0001), skin temperature (p=0.028), and rest pain (p<0.0001) were significantly more pronounced in comparison to the BMNC group [20]. However, no between-group difference was found in terms of pain-free walking distance, TcPO2, ulcers, and amputation rates. Thus, while both treatment options were effective, PBMNC administration yielded higher overall efficacy [20].

Finally, Zhang et al. [23] studied 15 patients (10 with PAD, 5 with TAO) suffering from severe ischaemia affecting the popliteal and distal arterial segment who could not be surgically revascularised. Four patients were Fontaine stage II, five patients were stage III, and six patients were stage IV. Three patients had diabetes mellitus and one had chronic renal failure [23]. All patients received PBMNCs intramuscularly. After two and 12 months, ABI, TcPO2, claudication-free walking distance and pain intensity improved significantly (p<0.005) [23]. A significant increase in new vessel formation was also evidenced by angiography at 24 weeks. No adverse vents were noted.

4.2.2. Other stem cells

Seven patients with CLI (Rutherford stages 4 or 5) were treated with an intra-arterial infusion of autologous CPCs isolated from peripheral blood following GcSF mobilisation [81]. After 12 weeks, a 30-fold increase in pain-free walking distance from 6.4±12.5 to 195±196 m (p=0.016) was evident. At the same time, pain intensity was significantly reduced (from 8±1 to 2±2; p=0.001). There were also significant increments in ABI (from 0.48±0.09 to 0.64±0.11 p=0.001) and TcPO2 (from 15±10 to 35±9 mmHg, p=0.001) [81]. Moreover, a 5-fold increase in flow-dependent vasodilation (from 0.9±0.3 to 5.0±1.4% p=0.016) and a 140% increase in adenosine-dependent flow reserve (from 3.6±1.3 to 4.9±1.7, p=0.004) in the superficial femoral artery were documented. Local or systemic adverse events were not seen [81].

In 6 patients with CLI due to PAD involving the infrapopliteal segment, intramuscular injections of non-mobilised peripheral blood angiogenic cell precursors (NMPB-ACPs) were carried out [82]. Five patients showed significant improvement in blood flow (ABI, TcPO2) and 4 had complete healing of ulcers or amputation stumps. However, major amputation could finally not be avoided in 2 patients [82]. Obviously, more experience with this treatment is needed.


5. Safety issues

The vast majority of studies suggests that stem cell therapy for PAD is very safe. Local, injection-related side effects are, indeed, extremely rare. As regards systemic toxicity, there have been concerns with the use of GcSF, given that this growth factor has been reported to occasionally cause coronary ischaemia [83] or acute arterial thrombosis [84]. However, safety profiles of studies using GcSF have not been worse than those without GcSF.

In some studies, deaths have been reported. These were mostly due to acute myocardial infarction [53, 65, 69] congestive heart failure [64, 65, 69] and stroke [65, 69], while perforation peritonitis [69], sepsis [69] and suicide [69] have been reported as exceptionally

AuthorsNumber of PatientsType of CellsClinical outcomes
Inaba et al. [77]7PBMNCs, with or without GcSFIncreased walking distance, minor improvements in ABI and angiographic findings
Ishida et al. [78]6 (1 PAD, 5 TAO)PBMNCs with GcSFIncrease in walking distance, slight improvement in ABI and ulcer area
Kawamura et al. [79]92PBMNCs with GcSFReduced amputations, mostly in non-diabetic non-dialysis patients
Zhang et al. [80]15PBMNCsIncreased walking distance and ABI, ulcer healing
Gu et al. [19]42 (28 ischaemic diabetic foot, 8 TAO, 6 PAD)PBMNCs vs. BMMNCsEqual efficacy: ulcer healing, improvement of symptoms, increase in ABI and TcPO2, new collateral vessels
Huang et al. [20]150PBMNCs vs. BMMNCsPBMNC administration: higher overall efficacy. Improvement in ABI, skin temperature, rest pain, walking distance, TcPO2, ulcers, and amputation rates (both treatments)
Zhang et al. [23]15 (10 PAD, 5 TAO)PBMNCsLong-term improvement in ABI, TcPO2, walking distance and pain, new collateral vessels
Lenk et al. [81]7CPCs with GcSFReduced pain, increase in walking distance, ABI, TcPO2, flow-dependent vasodilation and adenosine-dependent flow reserve

Table 2.

Major clinical studies with peripheral blood-derived stem cell therapy

rare causes. However, death events were never clearly related to stem cell therapy. Conversely, some of them could be characterised as clearly unrelated [53, 65]. Indeed, patients recruited in stem cell studies had severe or even limb-threatening vascular disease with considerable comorbidity. Such patients are generally a priori anticipated to suffer further vascular events, mainly in the coronary or cerebral arteries [1, 2, 4, 5]. Of note, in the study with the longest follow-up and most information on safety [69], mortality rate was 14.9% in PAD and 0% in TAO. Thus, caution is needed before attributing this mortality to stem cell treatment, and more information is required.

Serious adverse events have included acute myocardial infarction, stroke, post-surgery restenosis of coronary arteries, sepsis and peritonitis, while mild adverse events have included transient fever and myalgia [69]. Matoba et al. [69] have provided the most detailed and long-term data. Again, these adverse events were only observed in PAD and not in TAO, casting doubt on their relation to treatment. Regrettably, there was no control group to compare event rates.

In summary, stem cell transplantation appears to be generally safe. Deaths and adverse events have never been unambiguously linked to treatment. Nonetheless, it should not escape our notice that patient series have been very small, some studies only presenting case series of up to 10 subjects [45, 46, 48, 54, 58-62, 75-78, 82]. Follow-up has also been relatively short, in most studies less than 1 year. More importantly, event rates could not be compared to a control group. Hence, additional data is eagerly awaited to confirm or refute this safety profile.


6. Clinical implications

Available evidence suggests that stem cell therapy should be considered for those patients with severe PAD who are poor candidates for revascularisation. The question then to ask would be: bone marrow-derived or peripheral blood-derived stem cells? Not to be underestimated, the latter is easier to perform and, theoretically, offers the incremental advantage that it might be repeated. Moreover, it does not appear to be inferior in efficacy, but more comparative data is required. At least as regards mononuclear cells, PBMNCs show comparable [19] or even superior [20] efficacy in comparison to BMMNCs. If comparable efficacy is generalised for all bone marrow-derived vs. peripheral blood-derived stem cells, then the individual decision may rest with the treating physician, depending on previous experience and availability issues.

BMCs, BMMNCs and PBMNCs are the main cell types used [19, 20, 23, 29, 47, 50, 55, 56, 63-65, 68, 69, 73, 74, 77, 78, 80, 81], and there is no clear superiority of one cell type over the others. Administration has been intramuscular into the ischaemic extremity in the vast majority of trials. Combined intra-arterial and intramuscular administration has also been used [58-60, 62]. Combined intra-arterial and intramuscular BMMNC transplantation has been shown to be equally effective to intramuscular transplantation [68]. Gu et al. [64] showed equal treatment efficacy for intra-arterial vs. intramuscular BMMNC transplantation. Arguably, intramuscular administration may, for the time being, constitute the route of choice, since it has been more extensively studied.

The beneficial effect of stem cell therapy has been evaluated by diverse outcomes. These include alleviation of pain [19, 23, 46, 47, 51, 63, 69], increased walking distance [19, 20, 23, 47, 51, 53, 55, 56, 63, 68, 69, 77, 78, 80], improved ABI and TcPO2 [19, 20, 23, 47, 53, 55, 56, 50, 63, 68, 69, 73, 74, 77, 78, 80, 81], but also hard endpoints, notably ulcer healing [19, 20, 47, 49, 63, 69, 74, 78, 80], quality of life [72] and limb salvage [20, 49, 68, 69, 79]. Moreover, new collateral vessels have been identified on angiography [19, 23, 47, 63, 65, 72, 73]. Thus, despite the variety of efficacy parameters in the individual works, it is true that studies converge to suggest an objectively demonstrable and clinically meaningful benefit.

Importantly, however, long-term efficacy needs to be better studied as well. Indeed, follow-up in most studies has been up to one year and few works have provided long-term data [23, 62, 65, 69]. Based on the latter, treatment-induced improvements in painful symptoms, walking distance and blood flow parameters (ABI, TcPO2) appear to be, at least in part, sustainable at 2-3 years [23, 62, 65, 69]. If long-term efficacy becomes finally established, the argument in favour of stem cell therapy for severe inoperable PAD will be strongly enhanced.

Two further issues deserve careful consideration. First, safety profile appears, as already discussed, very good, but more information is needed. Ideally, we need a robust analysis balancing improvement in clinical outcomes to adverse event rates. In this context, it is extremely important to define the number needed to treat (NNT) and the number needed to harm (NNH) before attempting more widespread use of this treatment option. NNT and NNH could even vary, according to the type of patient population (e.g. PAD, CLI, TAO, acute CLI, elderly patients with substantial comorbidity and so on) [69]. However, this information is vital for clinical decisions outside randomised clinical trials. Secondly, stem cell therapy is an expensive treatment and its cost-effectiveness has not been determined. Thus, a detailed cost-benefit analysis is desirable.

Last, but not least, stem cell therapy has hitherto only been explored as a salvage therapy in severe lower extremity ischaemia not responding to standardised treatment. Such approach has precluded comparison with revascularisation. Still, given the promising results in clinical benefits achieved with stem cell transplantation, it may be worthwhile to consider this therapeutic option earlier in the course of PAD, instead of reserving it for patients with no other choice. Earlier utilisation of stem cell therapy might thus yield even better results. Moreover, it might be combined with revascularisation, if both are used in the appropriate time frame. These are important aspects for future investigation.


7. Conclusions

Stem cell therapy is emerging as a promising treatment option for patients with PAD who are poor candidates for established treatment, including revascularisation and best medical therapy. There are two options, bone marrow-derived and peripheral blood-derived stem cells. Theoretically, transplantation of peripheral blood-derived stem cells offers the additional advantage that it can be repeated, but this potential has not been utilised. In the vast majority of cases, stem cell administration has been intramuscular into the ischaemic limb, but intra-arterial administration appears to be equally efficacious. The number of cells that need to be transplanted merits more precise study. Finally, while the new treatment appears generally safe, more data from larger patient series and longer follow-up are awaited for confirmation.


  1. 1. Criqui MH. Peripheral vascular disease- epidemiological aspects. Vasc Med2001637
  2. 2. OurielK.Peripheralarterial.diseaseLancet.2001358125764
  3. 3. Aronow WS.Management of peripheral arterial disease. Cardiol Rev 2005
  4. 4. AronowW. S.AhnC.Prevalence of coexistence of coronary artery disease, peripheral arterial occlusive disease and atherothrombotic brain infarction in men and women ≥62 years of age. Am J Cardiol 1994746465
  5. 5. CimminielloC.Peripheral arterial disease as a global vascular risk factor. Haematologica 200186168
  6. 6. YusufS.ReddyS.OunpuuS.AnandS.Global burden of cardiovascular diseases: part I: general considerations, the epidemiologic transition, risk factors, and impact of urbanization. Circulation 2001104274653
  7. 7. BurnsP.LimaE.BradburyA. W.What constitutes best medical therapy for peripheral arterial disease? Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 200224612
  8. 8. Hiatt WR.Medical treatment of Peripheral Arterial Disease and Claudication. New Engl J Med 2001344160821
  9. 9. al.Extensive use of peripheral angioplasty, particularly infrapopliteal, in the treatment of ischaemic diabetic foot ulcers: clinical results of a multicentric study of 221 consecutive diabetic subjects. J Intern Med 200225222532
  10. 10. FagliaE.DallaPaola. al.Peripheral angioplasty as the first-choice revascularization procedure in diabetic patients with critical limb ischemia: prospective study of 993 consecutive patients hospitalized and followed between 1999 and 2003. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2005296207
  11. 11. LepantaloM.BiancariF.TukiainenE.Never amputate without consultation of a vascular surgeon. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2000Suppl 1: S27S32.
  12. 12. PomposelliF. B.KansalN.HamdanA. D.etal. A.decadeof.experiencewith.dorsalispedis.arterybypass.analysisof.outcomein.morethan.10casesJ Vasc Surg 20033730715
  13. 13. al.Outcome of infrainguinal revascularization for critical limb ischemia in diabetics with end stage renal disease. Vasa 2006351520
  14. 14. Faries PL, Teodorescu VJ, Morrissey NJ et al.The role of surgical revascularization in the management of diabetic foot wounds. Am J Surg 2004S-37S.
  15. 15. KalkaC.BaumgartnerI.Gene and stem cell therapy in peripheral arterial occlusive disease. Vasc Med 20081315772
  16. 16. RafiiS.LydenD.Therapeutic stem and progenitor cell transplantation for organ vascularization and regeneration. Nat Med 200397022
  17. 17. LachmannN.NikolS.Therapeutic angiogenesis for peripheral artery disease: stem cell therapy. Vasa 20073624151
  18. 18. CapiodJ. al.Characterization and comparison of bone marrow and peripheral blood mononuclear cells used for cellular therapy in critical leg ischaemia: towards a new cellular product. Vox Sang 20099625665
  19. 19. GuY.ZhangJ.QiL.Comparative study on autologous implantation between bone marrow stem cells and peripheral blood stem cells for treatment of lower limb ischemia. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi 2007216758
  20. 20. Huang PP, Yang XF, Li SZ et al.Randomised comparison of G-CSF-mobilized peripheral blood mononuclear cells versus bone marrow-mononuclear cells for the treatment of patients with lower limb arteriosclerosis obliterans. Thromb Haemost 200798133542
  21. 21. Moon MH, Kim SY, Kim YJ et al.Human adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells improve postnatal neovascularization in a mouse model of hindlimb ischemia. Cell Physiol Biochem 20061727990
  22. 22. Schannwell CM.Stem cell therapy for cardiovascular diseases. Experiences in Düsseldorf. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 2008Suppl 8: S274S279.
  23. 23. al.Therapeutic angiogenesis of bone marrow mononuclear cells (MNCs) and peripheral blood MNCs: transplantation for ischemic hindlimb. Ann Vasc Surg 20082223847
  24. 24. Felmeden DC, Blann AD, Lip GYH. Angiogenesis: basic pathophysiology and implications for disease.Eur Heart J 200324586603
  25. 25. FlammeI.RisauW.Induction of vasculogenesis and hematopoiesis in vitro. Development 19921164359
  26. 26. RisauW.Mechanismsof.angiogenesisNature.19973866714
  27. 27. al.Bone marrow-derived cells do not incorporate into the adult growing vasculature. Circ Res 2004942308
  28. 28. al.Beneficial effects of concurrent autologous bone marrow cell therapy and metabolic intervention in ischemia-induced angiogenesis in the mouse hindlimb. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005102172026
  29. 29. al.Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor augments neovascularization induced by bone marrow transplantation in rat hindlimb ischemia. J Pharmacol Sci 2005994551
  30. 30. al.Autologous bone marrow cell therapy and metabolic intervention in ischemia-induced angiogenesis in the diabetic mouse hindlimb. Cell Cycle 2006529038
  31. 31. JeonO.SongS. J.BhangS. al.Additive effect of endothelial progenitor cell mobilization and bone marrow mononuclear cell transplantation on angiogenesis in mouse ischemic limbs. J Biomed Sci 20071432330
  32. 32. al.Intra-arterial transplantation of adult bone marrow cells restores blood flow and regenerates skeletal muscle in ischemic limbs. Vasc Endovasc Surg 20094343343
  33. 33. al.Isolation of putative progenitor endothelial cells for angiogenesis. Science 19972759647
  34. 34. al.Angiogenesis by implantation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells and platelets into ischemic limbs. Circulation 2002106201925
  35. 35. YoonC. H.HurJ.ParkK. al.Synergistic neovascularization by mixed transplantation of early endothelial progenitor cells and late outgrowth endothelial cells: the role of angiogenic cytokines and matrix metalloproteinases. Circulation 2005112161827
  36. 36. al.Comparison of angiogenic potency between mesenchymal stem cells and mononuclear cells in a rat model of hindlimb ischemia. Cardiovasc Res 20056654351
  37. 37. AwadO.DedkovE. al.Differential healing activities of CD34+ and CD14+ endothelial cell progenitors. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 20062675864
  38. 38. al.Low-energy shock wave for enhancing recruitment of endothelial progenitor cells: a new modality to increase efficacy of cell therapy in chronic hind limb ischemia. Circulation 2006114282330
  39. 39. al.Therapeutic angiogenesis by ex vivo expanded erythroid progenitor cells. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2007H657H665
  40. 40. NiagaraM. I.HaiderH. al.Autologous skeletal myoblasts transduced with a new adenoviral bicistronic vector for treatment of hind limb ischemia. J Vasc Surg 20044077485
  41. 41. KinnairdT.StabileE.MSBurnettet.alMarrow-derived stromal cells express genes encoding a broad spectrum of arteriogenic cytokines and promote in vitro and in vivo arteriogenesis through paracrine mechanisms. Circ Res 20049467885
  42. 42. KinnairdT.StabileE.MSBurnettet.alLocal delivery of marrow-derived stromal cells augments collateral perfusion through paracrine mechanisms. Circulation 200410915439
  43. 43. al.Novel autologous cell therapy in ischemic limb disease through growth factor secretion by cultured adipose tissue-derived stromal cells. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 20052525427
  44. 44. al.Direct comparison of human mesenchymal stem cells derived from adipose tissues and bone marrow in mediating neovascularization in response to vascular ischemia. Cell Physiol Biochem 20072086776
  45. 45. EsatoK.HamanoK.LiT. al.Neovascularization induced by autologous bone marrow cell implantation in peripheral arterial disease. Cell Transplant 20021174752
  46. 46. NizankowskiR.PetriczekT.SkotnickiA.SzczeklikA.The treatment of advanced chronic lower limb ischaemia with marrow stem cell autotransplantation. Kardiol Polsk 20056335160
  47. 47. GuY.ZhangJ.QiL.Effective autologous bone marrow stem cell dosage for treatment of severe lower limb ischemia. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi 2006205046
  48. 48. al.Autologous bone marrow-derived stem cell therapy in patients with severe peripheral arterial disorder. Orv Hetil 200814953140
  49. 49. al.Beneficial effects of autologous bone marrow cell infusion and antioxidants/L-arginine in patients with chronic critical limb ischemia. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehab 20081570918
  50. 50. ProcházkaV.GumulecJ.Chmelová al.Autologous bone marrow stem cell transplantation in patients with end-stage chronical critical limb ischemia and diabetic foot. Vnitr Lék 2009551738
  51. 51. Korymasov EA, Tiumina OV, Aiupov AM et al.Use of autologous progenitor cells of the bone marrow in treatment of patients with lower-limb atherosclerosis obliterans. Angiol Sosud Khir 2009152831
  52. 52. AmannB.LüdemannC.Rü al.Design and rationale of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study for autologous bone marrow cell transplantation in critical limb ischemia: the BONe Marrow Outcomes Trial in Critical Limb Ischemia (BONMOT-CLI). Vasa 20083731925
  53. 53. al.Therapeutic angiogenesis for patients with limb ischaemia by autologous transplantation of bone-marrow cells: a pilot study and a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 200236042735
  54. 54. al.Wound therapy with autologous bone marrow stem cells in diabetic patients with ischaemia-induced tissue ulcers affecting the lower limbs. Int J Clin Pract 2007616902
  55. 55. al.Autologous bone-marrow mononuclear cell implantation improves endothelium-dependent vasodilation in patients with limb ischemia. Circulation 200410912158
  56. 56. al.Therapeutic angiogenesis by autologous bone marrow cell implantation for refractory chronic peripheral arterial disease using assessment of neovascularization by 99mTc-tetrofosmin (TF) perfusion scintigraphy. Cell Transplant 20041342937
  57. 57. al.Clinical application of bone marrow implantation in patients with arteriosclerosis obliterans, and the association between efficacy and the number of implanted bone marrow cells. Circ J 200468118993
  58. 58. al.Intra-arterial and intramuscular transplantation of adult, autologous bone marrow stem cells. Novel treatment for therapy-refractory peripheral arterial occlusive disease. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 20061317983
  59. 59. al.Transplantation of autologous adult bone marrow stem cells in patients with severe peripheral arterial occlusion disease. Med Klin (Munich) 20061011957
  60. 60. al.Rapid healing of a therapy-refractory diabetic foot after transplantation of autologous bone marrow stem cells. Med Klin (Munich), 200510067680
  61. 61. BartschT.BrehmM.ZeusT.StrauerB. E.Autologous mononuclear stem cell transplantation in patients with peripheral occlusive arterial disease. J Cardiovasc Nurs 2006214302
  62. 62. al.Transplantation of autologous mononuclear bone marrow stem cells in patients with peripheral arterial disease (the TAM-PAD study). Clin Res Cardiol 2007968919
  63. 63. GuY.ZhangJ.QiL. A.clinicalstudy.onimplantation.ofautologous.bonemarrow.mononuclearcells.afterbone.marrowstimulation.fortreatment.oflower.limbischemia.Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi 200620101720
  64. 64. GuY. Q.ZhangJ.GuoL. al.Transplantation of autologous bone marrow mononuclear cells for patients with lower limb ischemia. Chin Med J (Engl) 20081219637
  65. 65. al.Middle-term outcome of autologous bone marrow mononuclear cells transplantation for treatment of lower limb ischemia. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi 2009233414
  66. 66. Herná al.Autologous bone-marrow mononuclear cell implantation in patients with severe lower limb ischaemia: a comparison of using blood cell separator and Ficoll density gradient centrifugation. Atherosclerosis 2007e526
  67. 67. al.Safety and efficacy of autologous progenitor cell transplantation for therapeutic angiogenesis in patients with critical limb ischemia. Circ J 200771196201
  68. 68. Van Tongeren RB, Hamming JF, Fibbe WE et al.Intramuscular or combined intramuscular/intra-arterial administration of bone marrow mononuclear cells: a clinical trial in patients with advanced limb ischemia. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 200849518
  69. 69. al.Long-term clinical outcome after intramuscular implantation of bone marrow mononuclear cells (Therapeutic Angiogenesis by Cell Transplantation [TACT] trial) in patients with chronic limb ischemia. Am Heart J 200815610108
  70. 70. al.Long-term effects of repeated autologous transplantation of bone marrow cells in patients affected by peripheral arterial disease. Bone Marrow Transplant 20084266772
  71. 71. WesterT.JørgensenJ. al.Treatment with autologous bone marrow mononuclear cells in patients with critical lower limb ischaemia. A pilot study. Scand J Surg 2008975662
  72. 72. ChocholaM.Pytlí al.Autologous intra-arterial infusion of bone marrow mononuclear cells in patients with critical leg ischemia. Int Angiol 20082728190
  73. 73. ASDe VrieseBilliet. J.Van al.Autologous transplantation of bone marrow mononuclear cells for limb ischemia in a caucasian population with atherosclerosis obliterans. J Intern Med 2008263395403
  74. 74. AmannB.LuedemannC.RateiR.Schmidt-LuckeJ. A.Autologous bone marrow cell transplantation increases leg perfusion and reduces amputations in patients with advanced critical limb ischemia due to peripheral artery disease. Cell Transplant 20091837180
  75. 75. FranzR. W.ParksA.ShahK. al.Use of autologous bone marrow mononuclear cell implantation therapy as a limb salvage procedure in patients with severe peripheral arterial disease. J Vasc Surg 200950137890
  76. 76. Lasala GP, Silva JA, Gardner PA, Minguell JJ.Combination stem cell therapy for the treatment of severe limb ischemia: safety and efficacy analysis. Angiology 2010615516
  77. 77. InabaS.EgashiraK.KomoriK.Peripheral-blood or bone-marrow mononuclear cells for therapeutic angiogenesis? Lancet 2002
  78. 78. al.Autologous peripheral blood mononuclear cell implantation for patients with peripheral arterial disease improves limb ischemia. Circ J 20056912605
  79. 79. al.Clinical study of therapeutic angiogenesis by autologous peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) transplantation in 92 patients with critically ischemic limbs. Int J Artif Organs 2006922633
  80. 80. ZhangH. K.LiM.FengH.Autologous transplantation of peripheral blood stem cell intreatment of critical limb ischemia. Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban 2007363603
  81. 81. al.Therapeutical potential of blood-derived progenitor cells in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease and critical limb ischaemia. Eur Heart J 20052619039
  82. 82. al.Enhancing limb salvage by non-mobilized peripheral blood angiogenic cell precursors therapy in patients with critical limb ischemia. J Med Assoc Thai 2009923207
  83. 83. al.Angina pectoris occurring during granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-combined preparatory regimen for autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation in a patient with acute myelogenous leukaemia. Br J Haematol 1997976668
  84. 84. al.Acute arterial thrombosis due to platelet aggregation in a patient receiving granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. Br J Haematol 1996944136

Written By

Nikolaos Papanas

Submitted: November 7th, 2010 Published: August 23rd, 2011