A cyber-physical system (CPS) is a system which combines and coordinates the physical system and informatics or computational entities (including computation and communication) into a tight mode. Nowadays we can see the applications of cyber-physical system in the fields of aerospace, automotive, chemical processes, civil infrastructure, energy, healthcare, manufacturing, transportation, entertainment, and consumer appliances.
First, the typical feature of a cyber-physical system is the
A Radio-frequency Identification (RFID) system is a typical cyber-physical system because of its mainly functional and physical components: (1) The computational element: although a passive RFID tag normally only contains the storage function, but the whole RFID system (mainly in a RFID tag reader) and the post-processing system have the computing and data-processing functions; (2) The controlling element: usually a RFID system is under the control of an inner micro- control-unit (MCU); (3) The communication element: in a RFID system, nearly all the information is exchanged via the wave of radio frequency (RF), the data and controlling flows are established via a 2-way RF communication. During the work process, the traditional RFID uses the electronic tags which are placed on the items to track their locations or descriptions. The RFID tags are tiny microchips that can, in some cases, be fabricated smaller than a pinhead or a grain of sand. The chip is attached to a tiny antenna which allows it to communicate and transmit information. Figure 2 is a blown up view of a simple RFID tag .
Mostly the regular RFID systems for the civil use are classified into three types – the passive, the semi-passive, and the active RFID. A passive tagisdormant until it is triggered by asignal from a RFID reader. A passive tag does not have a built-in power supply, so it needs the radio frequency energy (electromagnetic wave) from the RFID reader. These tags are particularly popular in use because they can draw the power wirelessly, such thatthe size and price can be reduced much. Furthermore, these tags can be applied on almost everything because of the wide use of the wireless power supply. A semi-passive tag contains a small battery to function an inner timer or random access memory. However, the power supply does not actively communicate with a reader until it is requested. When it is requested, it uses the radio wave power to transmit the information to the reader, which is the same as that of a passive one. An active tag has a more powerful small power source (a battery or other changeable DC source) built-in. Unlike the semi-passive tags, it can actively communicate with the readers without the need of radio wave power.
The most common type of RFID tags used on the market isthe passive type and the tags rely on the readers for the energy. A RFID reader usually has a Radio Frequency (RF) module that allows it to transmit and receive messages. It is also manufactured with additional interfaces (e.g. RS 232 or RS485) to allow the connection with the PC’s, etc. Figure 3 shows a simple diagram of the communication between a RFID reader and a tag (or transponder). The “application” shown in the diagram is an enterprise network infrastructure.
In this chapter, we willstudy the mixture of a cyber-physical system using the RFID technology. As mentioned above, in a traditional embedded system with a built-in power supplier, using the passive RFID tags is subject to losing the processing ability without the RFID tag readers. To meet the requirements of CPS key application, it is necessary for the RFID tags to contain the batteries and operate the inner MCU and microchips. In the following sections, we will discuss the design on the key applications of the RFID system with the active mode .
2. Active RFID system
As discussed in the previous section, usually a passive tag holds a unique identification code or a number of 8 bytes in length, along with other small pieces of information. The active and passive tags are different based on the types of information they store. A common passive tagonly stores the object identification information, whereas an active tag stores the object description and its transportation history, in addition to the identification information. A real active RFID tagis shown in Figures 4 and 5 [http://www.scienceprog.com/how-does-rfid-tag-technology-works/, http://tronweb.super-nova.co.jp/tronnews05-4.html].
To meet the requirements of the key application of cyber-physical system, we should analyze the applicability of a passive RFID system with details. Usually, the microchip in a passive RFID tagissealed with a plastic cover statically and cannot be altered from its manufacture or configuration. But the information on the tags is able to be rewritten. There are three different core devices which are able to re-write the data into the RFID tags :①EEPROMs (electrically erasable programmable read-only memory) are most commonly used among these three. Usually an EEPROM memory capacity ranges from 16 bytes to 8 kilobytes. The disadvantage of using this device for the writing process is the high power consumption.②FRAMs (ferromagnetic random access memory)’sreading power consumption is lower than that in the EEPROM. Butthemanufacturing problems in the past cause an impact on its market acceptance.The FRAMshave a similar limit in the memory capacity. ③SRAMs (static random access memory) are used especially in the microwave systems and have very high writing cycles. In order to retain the data, it needsanuninterrupted power supply, such an auxiliary battery or some other power sourcesshould be equipped for the tags. This obviously limits its usefulness. The SRAMs memory capacity ranges from 256 bytes to 64 kilobytes. From the manufactory experience, a RFID tag can be read and written up to 10 billion times before its performance drops, so the future of this tag is optimistic.
As mentioned in section 1, the application of CPS inclines to “more computation power”, the RFID system using passive tags shows several disadvantages when examined with the requirements of CPS applications.
The processing ability of RFID tags is extremelybased on the reader or the connected computers. The tag has a very weak computing ability, so a passive RFID tag is barelyas an electrical ID container.
A passive RFID tag is not able to take any kind of sensor to carry the environment data because of the lack of the driving circuits.
Even in an active region of a passive RFID reader, the energy supply from the radio coupling of the electromagnetic coil is not sufficient for a more complex computation tofunction the RFID card’s MCU.
The two-way complex communication is subject tosuffering more electromagnetic interference (EMI) during the communications between the card and the reader, plus the radio coupling interaction.
Apparently, an active RFID system can be described highly the likeness of wireless sensor, which has shown to be a successful and mature system. The largest deployment of the active RFID is done byUS Department of Defense (DoD), the DoD usesthe Savi active tags on each of its over a million shipping containers that travel outside of US.
However, different from a pure wireless sensor system, an active RFID system network is a kind of Ad-hoc network, that is, a heterogeneous network. From the communication protocol point of view, an active RFID reader and its corresponding tags can work with a one-to-many model (and vice versa): one tag can be coupled with many readers (the reader can be defined as a base station in the Ad-hoc model). So when designing the active RFID system protocols,we should consider the difference between the peer-to-peer model and one-to-many model (or many-to-one).
From the network topological structure point of view,a heterogeneous network is wirelessbased. It is a good carrier for the two-way wireless communication. Here, we define the RFID system used in a CPS system as the followings:
In the next section we will study a typical RFID application in CPS system.
3. A typical RFID application in CPS: acase study
This case study is about the use of an active RFID system which includes a few readers (as the base station) and many active tags (as the sensors) to build an active wireless positioning network, which is a pre-research one of our project .
The positioning based services for the geographic information are important in the civil applications, such as the travelling, geographic measurement, harbour operation, driving or logistics; as well as in the military, such as an emergency support or emergency logistics. Today, the global positioning system (GPS) is the most widelyused and most well developed positioning system. A GPS receiver usesa high-precision referenced time from a low-orbit satellite toconduct the distance measurement, and it calculates the position byusing the geometry methods. The GPS system provides a highpositioning accuracy, an excellent timeliness and a stronganti-interference ability.The GPS has many advantages, but with a fatal weakness, that is, its positioning ability and performance are affected distinctly when the receiver is out of the region of the GPS satellite’s signal. For example, in an application of the military emergency logistics, when the military vehicle is running in a tunnel or the soldiers are in a thick forest or in a construction, the GPS can not provide the robust positioning service. Especially in a situation such as the need for a rapid response, the loss of GPS performance may cause the possession lost or more casualties. To avoid this problem, the in-door positioning based service is needed for both the military and the civil applications. We study a kind of GPS-independent active positioning system, based on an active RFID system and the TOA (time of arrival) technology and related algorithms .
Based on the theory, the distributed node location service uses the referenced base stations (i.e. an active RFID reader, they have the absolute orrelative positions ofRFID tags) in a distributed network. The node locationservice is a highly potential core service in the location-basedservice when applied in a distributed scenario. It shows a great potential,especially when it is used for the positioning in the complicated or blocked indoor/outdoor environment, emergent logistics management, anddisaster-relief emergent positioning, etc.
Currently, based on the positioned objects, the distributed nodelocation service's algorithms and the systems can be categorized intoa self-node positioning and a target-node positioning. Here we only focus on the self-node positioning. In the positioningtechnology, a node in the network is recognized as a beacon node oran unknown node based on whether the node is assigned or notassigned with the location information (relative location orabsolute location via the GPS or other devices). As the unknownnodes gaining more relative information during the process,therefore, in order to reduce the overall networking loads and thecommunication cost, the number of the beacon nodes should belimited.
We consider the unknown nodes in the network as the sensors withsome special functions (e.g. a function of measuring the distance)and the beacon nodes as the base stations, such that the networkwith a specific topological structure is a heterogeneouswireless sensor network(WSN). Generally, a well-designed WSN mainly contains the followingunits:
Transmission units (including the distance sensors and A/D modules);
Processing units (including the MCU and embedded software system);
Communication units (including the radio frequency modules).
We could see clearly that these requirements can be well met based on the active RFID system. In this section we address some key issues on the range basedpositioning service and study a novel model of the node-locationservice based on the aforementioned CPS model. The theoretical analysis shows that thismodel can provide a good and stable positioning accuracy and astrong robustness for the scenes where the network topologystructure or the node's surrounding environment varies. Inaddition, it also benefits the re-organizing of the network and thecorresponding the active RFID tags’ surviving time.
When we combine the node-location service with the proposed model, a newpositioning service mode is formulated, that is the wireless sensornetwork positioning technology. Compared with the traditionalwireless positioning technology, it provides new features below:
Low hardware resource requirement;
Non-centralized Ad-hoc network;
Low energy cost;
High positioning accuracy;
Dynamic positioning supported;
Communication and positioning;
The accuracy of the range-free positioning service and itsconvergence rate highly depends on the estimated accuracy on thenetwork's average jumping distance. When the anisotropy or thetopological structure of this RFID system’s organizedWSN becomes complicate, the performanceof the algorithm will be significantly weaken. Therefore, comparedwith the range-free positioning algorithm, the range-basedpositioning algorithm has such advantages as a better accuracy and ashorter response time. However, on the other hand, it also holdssome disadvantages, such as a higher requirement for the hardwareand the more power cost. To balance the advantages and the prices,we choose a TOA(Time-of-Arrival)-based distance measurement technology under the WSNas the prototype model.
According to the discussion above, we realize that the in thepursuit of the highly realizable accuracy of the positioningsacrifices the fast response rate and narrow bandwidth with lesspower cost. An optimization should be reached. We propose a methodto simulate and calculate (or optimize) this point by using astatistical model. A lower bound of the positioning accuracy basedon the TOA and WSN methods is also discussed in this section.
The algorithm of the TOA costs less hardware resource in theapplications, it is helpful to enhance the reliability androbustness of the model.Using the TOA distance estimation, we can apply the trilaterationmethod for the positioning, which is shown in Figure 6.
Considering the mixture of cyber-system and physical system;the aforementioned theory can be designed as algorithms and be coded in MCU of the active RFID tags.
Figure 7 shows the experimental results of the proposed method. The detailed experimental platform is described below.
We physicallyimplemented the specified positioning equipment using the proposed model. Theequipment includesan IEEE 802.15.4a chirp spread spectrum (CSS)system, its time-domain and frequency-domain characteristics areshown in the Fig 8. The receiving sensitivity of beacon nodesand unknown nodes is greater than -97dBm. They work in a duplex mode,cooperating with a gain antenna and a related operating system,and the experiment shows a good signal-to-noise ratio(SNR). The average loaded RF power is only 1mW, whichcould significantly ensure the surviving time of the unknown nodes.
The model system has a strong ability of the anti-multi-path-interference andanti-human-interference. In the modulation, the pulseresolution is adjustable in order to be adapted in differentapplication environments. The networking protocol is uncomplicated andreliable; it can be also added with a 128-bit hardware encryption,which can effectively prevent the interference from outside and the disclosure ofthe location information.
Based on our prototype of the design, we have made the experimental product. Figure 9 shows the experiment platform which realizesthe algorithm and the active RFID system.
We improved this product with a compactsize and low-power consumption. The key parameters of the tag arelisted in Table 2.
In conclusion, the active RFID system has shown the gain of a great potential for building a highly-mixed system of information and the physical devices. In this chapter, we compare the RFID system with a traditional wireless sensor network system and discuss the applicability of the type of RFID systems. We propose and study the design idea, methodology, product and experimental results of an active RFID based relative positioning system.
Sztipanovits J. Stankovic J. Corman D. 2009Industry- Academy Collaboration in Cyber Physical System (CPS) Research White Paper 1Georage Mason University, May 19, 2009
,Proc. Reserach Seminar on Telecommunications Bussiness II, Luukkainen S. Eds., April, Jalasto M. 2005
Yamada I. Shiotsu S. Itasaki A. et al. 2005Secure active RFID tag system, Ubicomp2005 Workshop
Rhodes J. 2007RFID System Protocols and Standards Overview, Research Report CPET 384Wide Area Networks, 2007
Lai X. Li J. . Li X. Wu N. 2010A novel model of node location service based on wireless sensor networks and statistical method, Proc. SPIE Wireless Sensing, Localization, and Processing, V, Sohail A. Dianat; Michael D. Zoltowski Eds., 2010