## 1. Introduction

Graphenes have attracted many physicists and/or chemists because of the beautiful structure and tunable electronic states. One of the remarkable properties is the high carrier mobility due to the famous Dirac point, in which the effective mass is theoretically zero (Novoselov, et al., 2004, 2005). The motion of electrons is described by pseudo relativistic effect, and new aspects on physics and chemistry of two-dimensional systems have been developed as nano-scale technology. Nowadays, there has been increasing interest of modified graphenes toward thin films, nano particles, adsorbance agents, and so on, as well as possible micro-electronic devises.

On the other hand, magnetism of graphenes is another interesting theme, related to the early studies on so-called graphene ribbons. That is, some graphene derivatives are promising candidates for organic ferromagnets. The magnetic properties depend on topological conditions such as edges, pores, and defects. Toward a new type of ferromagnets, chemical modification of graphene is a highly challenging theme. Paramagnetism of graphitic polymers itself has been theoretically predicted, relating to the edge states, pores, and defects. However, it was not until band structures of modified graphenes revealed the existence of flat bands at the frontier levels that robust ferromagnetism has been highly expected from graphene-based skeletons. The edges, pores, and defects in these systems should be ordered so as to cause completely flat bands in the Hückel level. Hückel analysis on modified graphenes gives a good perspective toward the flat-band ferromagnetism. In this chapter, graphene-based ferromagnetism is analyzed by crystal orbital method. Recent advances in magnetic graphenes are reviewed in view of their electronic states.

## 2. Methylene-edged graphenes

It is well known that graphene ribbons with peculiar type of edges have polyradical character, of which flat bands cause ferromagnetic interactions. Fig. 1 shows three types of graphene ribbons. Fig. 1a is the famous graphene ribbons with two-sided acene (zigzag) edges. The magnetic ordering has been predicted based on the band structures. The HOCO (highest occupied crystal orbital) and LUCO (lowest unoccupied crystal orbital) contact and become flat at the wavenumber region |* k*|>2

*/3 (Fujita et al., 1996). Thus, at least within the same edge, ferromagnetic interactions are expected. However, total magnetism in the acene-edged graphene ribbons is probably small, because spin moments at both sides tend to cancel each other. This is intuitively deduced from the conventional Heisenberg model. To avoid the spin-cancellation, hydrogen, oxygen and fluorine passivations have been suggested (Kusakabe & Maruyama, 2003; Maruyama & Kusakabe, 2004).*π

Instead, Klein suggested methylene-edged graphene ribbons shown in Fig. 1b (Klein, 1994; Klein & Bytautas, 1999). Nowadays, these are called Klein edges. At least within the same edge, the Klein-edged graphenes are also expected to show ferromagnetic interactions due to the flatness of frontier bands at |* k*|<2

*/3 (not |*π

*|>2*k

*/3). In this case, however, spin cancellation is also expected due to spin alternation in the bipartite lattice. While two-sided Klein edges cause spin cancellation, one-sided Klein edges shown in Fig. 1c are expected to show robust ferromagnetic interactions, because ferrimagnetic spin-polarized structures can be drawn by classical valence-bond theory. Although some studies predicted the antiferromagnetic states of the one-sided Klein edges with twisted or partially substituted methylene groups (Maruyama & Kusakabe, 2004), conservation of the planarity probably makes them ferromagnetic non-Kekulé polymers, and the electronic states are described by Wannier functions rather than conventional Bloch functions (Hatanaka, 2010a). Then, there appears one non-bonding band at the frontier level. The non-bonding band is completely flat within the Hückel approximation. Each Wannner function spans common atoms between the adjacent cells. This is necessary and sufficient condition for ferromagnetic interactions in conjugated*π

*systems, similar to triplet biradicals. Non-cancelled spin alignment and itinerant ferromagnetism are expected due to the flat band.*π

For simplicity, we first consider a small non-Kekulé polymer shown in Fig. 2. There are non-bonding crystal orbitals (NBCOs) at the frontier level. They are completely degenerate under Hückel approximation. Each NBCO can be transformed into Wannier functions localized around each cell, as formulated below.

We consider Bloch functions corresponding to the NBCO band:

where the wavenumber * k* runs from –

*to*π

*,*π

*is the cell index,*μ

*is the number of cells, and*N

*is the index of atomic orbitals. Here we adopt the real part of*r

C

_{ r }(

*):*k

This procedure minimizes the exchange integral of the system. The Wannier function localized at the * ν*-th call is expressed by Equations (3) and (4):

where

Each Wannier coefficient is a function of the integer * τ*, which represents the difference from the

*-th cell. The Wannier functions should be normalized using a proper normalization factor, because the linear combinations of Bloch coefficients in Equation (2) are not always normalized to unity. Under Hückel approximation, the normalization factor is:*ν

Wannier functions in the original paper are not normalized (Hatanaka, M. & Shiba, R., 2007; Hatanaka, 2010a). In the present review, however, we adopt the renormalized Wannier functions, and the exchange integrals are recalculated. Since each Wannier function coefficient _{
r
}(* τ*) localizes at one or a few unit cells around the

*th cell,*ν-

a

_{ r }(

*) with |*τ

*|≥2 can be ignored. Then, the exchange integral*τ

K

_{ ij }between the

*-th and*i

*-th Wannier functions is nontrivial only when |i-j| = 1:*j

where (* rs*|

*) denotes the electron-repulsion integrals, and only one-centered integrals were taken into account in the approximation. The last expression results from Equation (2). From Equation (7), the exchange integrals of non-bonding extended systems are deduced from the amplitude pattern of their Wannier functions. The Bloch and Wannier functions can be calculated by usual secular equations and numerical integrals (Hatanaka, M. & Shiba, R., 2007).*tu

The * ν*-th Wannier function

ψ

_{ ν }is schematically shown in Fig. 2. In general, Wannier functions decay rapidly with increase in distance from the central cell. However, in this case, we see that the

*-th and (*ν

*+1)-th Wannier functions span common atoms between the adjacent region. Then, the two-electron wavefunction*ν

ψ

_{ ν }

ψ

_{ ν+1}contains so-called ionic terms, in which two electrons are accommodated to the same atomic orbitals. While simultaneous occupation of two electrons with antiparallel spins is allowed in the same atomic orbital, occupation of electrons with parallel spins is forbidden due to the Pauli principle. Thus, in this system, high-spin state is preferred rather than low-spin state due to reduction of Coulomb repulsion.

Klein-edged graphenes with * n* ladders are similarly analyzed as non-Kekulé polymers, as shown in Fig. 3. In these systems, amplitudes of the Wannier functions are mainly spread at upper and lower edges. When the number of ladders

*increases, the amplitudes inside the graphene plane become small, and highly localize at the edges. Nevertheless, even if the number of ladders becomes infinite, each Wannier function spans common atoms between the adjacent cells, and thus, the ferromagnetic interactions are always positive. This means that the high-spin stabilities are attributed to itinerant character of edge states, which is described by the Wannier functions. Nowadays, it has been theoretically shown that the Wannier functions in such degenerate systems should be symmetric with respective to the central cell, and minimize the exchange integral of the systems (Hatanaka, 2011). Then, the exchange integral is calculated from square of the amplitude pattern of the two-electron wavefunction*n

ψ

_{ ν }

ψ

_{ ν+1}, as schematically shown in Fig. 4. The exchange integral

*versus the number of ladders*K

*is shown in Fig. 5. The exchange integral is calculated from the Wannier coefficients, taking count of one-centered integrals. The exchange integral converges to a positive value, and thus, the system is expected to be ferromagnetic in the balk order. For chemical stability, carbonyl edges isoelectonic with methylene groups are promising.*n

## 3. Porous graphenes

Fig. 6 shows porous graphene. This compound was synthesized as a two-dimensional nanostructure (Bieri et al., 2009). They synthesized porous graphene by aryl-aryl coupling reactions on Ag (111) surface, and observed STM (scanning tunneling microscope) image of the honeycomb structures. In 2010, band structures of porous graphenes were investigated by several workers (Du et al., 2010; Hatanaka, 2010b; Li et al., 2010). The Hückel-level dispersion and DOS (density of states) are shown in Figs. 6 and 7 (Hatanaka, 2010b). The dispersion suggests semi-conductive band gaps, and the frontier bands are so flat as to be available for ferromagnetism. It is interesting that both HOCO and LUCO become flat at all the wavenumber region. Thus, this material is expected to show ferromagnetism when it is oxidized or reduced by proper dopants.

The flat bands result from nodal character of phenylene units. Fig. 8 shows amplitude patterns of selected Hückel molecular orbitals of cyclohexa-* m*-phenylene, which is considered as a unit group in the porous graphene. We see that the HOMO and LUMO have nodes at each phenylene unit. Orbital interactions between node-node linkages are zero within the Hückel approximation. Thus, both HOCO and LUCO in porous graphene become flat at the frontier levels. It is interesting that eigenvalues

*of HOMO (*ε

*+0.618*α

*) and LUMO (*β

*-0.618*α

*) in cyclohexa-*β

*-phenylene are identical to those of butadiene. Indeed,*m

apart from the normalization factors, amplitude patterns of butadiene’s HOMO and LUMO spread between each phenylene unit. Moreover, eigenvalues of HOMO-11 (* α*+1.618

*) and LUMO+11(*β

*-1.618*α

*) of cyclohexa-*β

*-phenylene are identical to those of the first and fourth orbitals in butadiene. These orbitals also cause flat bands in porous graphene at eigenvelues (*m

*±1.618*α

*). In porous graphene, additional flat bands coincidently appear at eigenvalues (*β

*±1.000*α

*). These bands come from nodal character of e*β

_{1g}orbitals in each benzene fragment.

Porous graphene ribbons with various edges are also of interest, despite the coupling directions are not unique and some defects of the coupling reactions may cause diversity of molecular-weight distribution. Fortunately, it has been proved that the frontier non-bonding level of any porous oligomer is invariant with respect to molecular weight and/or coupling direction due to the zero-overlap interactions of the phenylene units. Thus, porous graphenes including porous ribbons are promising precursors toward organic ferromagnets.

Porous structures including boron and/or nitrogen are also interesting in that the hetero atoms serve as dopants, which increase or decrease the number of electrons in the frontier levels.

Fig. 9 shows porous graphene ribbons cut along the * x* axis. The systems are classified by the number of porous ladders

*, as denoted as X*n

_{1}-X

_{5}. The edges have bay areas consisting of seven carbon atoms, and resemble acene edges of conventional graphene. Fig. 10 shows dispersion of X

_{1}-X

_{5}. We see that the HOCOs and LUCOs are completely flat, similar to the two-dimensional porous graphene. Flat bands at (

*±1.618*α

*) are also conserved due to the nodal character of phenylene units. Interestingly, HOCOs and LUCOs in each system are*β

*-fold degenerate, respectively. That is, HOCO and LUCO in X*n

_{1}are single flat bands, and HOCO and LUCO in X

_{2}are doubly degenerate. Similarly, three-, four-, and five-fold degenerate HOCOs and LUCOs appear in X

_{3}, X

_{4}, X

_{5}, respectively. These degeneracies come from the systematic increase of the porous ladders. The resultant flat bands are also available for possible ferromagnetic interactions.

Fig. 11 shows porous graphene ribbons cut along the * y* axis. The systems are also classified by the number of porous ladders

*, as denoted as Y*n

_{1}-Y

_{5}. The edges have bay areas consisting of twelve carbon atoms, and resemble so-called phenanthrene edges of conventional graphene. Fig. 12 shows dispersion of Y

_{1}-Y

_{5}. The HOCOs and LUCOs are completely flat, similar to X

_{1}-X

_{5}. Flat bands at (

*±1.618*α

*) also appear. HOCOs and LUCOs in each system are also*β

*-fold degenerate, respectively.*n

Fig. 13 shows DOS of X_{5} and Y_{5}. There are main peaks corresponding to the flat bands. The largest peaks are due to the systematic degeneracies of HOCOs and LUCOs, and thus, photoelectron spectroscopy experiments will give a major peak at ca. 9.1 eV. Theoretical predictions on the magnetism of porous graphenes await experimental confirmations.

## 4. Defective graphenes

Recently, ferromagnetism of HOPG (highly oriented pyrolytic graphite) was found at room temperature (Červenka, et al., 2009; Esquinazi & Höhne, 2005; Mombrú et al., 2005). HOPGs often have defects, which form grain boundaries between the polycrystals. Laterally and longitudinally slipped defects in acene-edged HOPGs are particularly interesting in that the resultant defects are analyzable by graphene-based model (Hatanaka, 2010c). Fig. 14 shows definition of defects, in which the lateral and longitudinal displacements are represented by * Δx* and

*. Fig. 15 shows extended-Hückel dispersion of acene-edged graphenes with laterally and longitudinally slipped defects. The number of honeycomb ladders is fixed to be 19. The bold lines and dotted lines represent*Δz

*and*π

*bands, respectively. In laterally slipped defects (*σ

*> 0), flatness of the frontier bands is lost with increase in the displacements, and the resultant double occupation of electrons leads to antiferromagnetic ground state. On the other hand, in longitudinally slipped defects (*Δx

*> 0), flatness of the frontier bands is conserved even if the displacement becomes infinity, and the resultant electronic state resembles that of polycarbene, in which*Δz

*and*π

*spins coexist with ferromagnetic interactions.*σ

Here we consider simple models of defects by using graphene ribbons with 3 ladders. Fig. 16 shows change of orbital pattern for the laterally slipped graphenes. We note that the effective displacement of lateral slip is smaller than the lattice period * a*. Frontier Bloch functions (HOCO and LUCO at

*=*k

*/*π

*) of non-distorted graphene is localized at the edges (Fig. 16a), and contact at*a

*=*k

*/*π

*.*a

*-Frontier Bloch functions in laterally slipped graphene are doubly degenerate and also contact at*π

*=*k

*/*π

*under all the displacements (Fig. 16b). The amplitudes are localized inside the fault as well as at the acene edges. With increase in the lateral displacement, there appears a peculiar*a

*band, of which amplitude is shown in Fig. 16c. We see that this band consists of weak interacted dangling bonds in the slipped fault. The weak interaction causes crossing of frontier bands, as shown in the middle of Fig. 15, and thus, the magnetism due to acene-edged graphenes is considered to disappear.*σ

Fig. 17 shows * π*-frontier Bloch functions of longitudinally slipped graphene. Contrary to the laterally slipped graphene, amplitudes of the HOCO and LUCO always spread at the edges, and thus, their dispersions contact at

*=*k

*/*π

*(Fig. 17a). When the longitudinal displacement becomes large, carbene-type*a

*bands also appear at the frontier level (Fig. 17b). These orbitals accommodate magnetic electrons of the carbene sites, and thus, longitudinally displacement causes another type of magnetism within the fault. This is considered to be the reason why HOPGs often exhibit weak ferromagnetism. When the displacement is small, it has been shown that energy cost for longitudinal slip is smaller than that of lateral slip (Hatanaka, 2010c), and the energy cost is perhaps compensated by the high-spin stability.*σ

Thus, as rough estimation, we guess that ferromagnetism observed in HOPGs is attributed to longitudinally slipped defects, which form grain boundaries including multilayers of graphene planes. Indeed, topographies corresponding to the longitudinally slipped defects were recorded in HOPGs by AFM (atomic force microscope) and MFM (magnetic force microscope) techniques (Červenka et al., 2009).

## 5. Conclusion

Some graphene-based ferromagnets were analyzed in view of their electronic states. There appear flat bands at the frontier levels, in which the Wannier functions span common atoms between the adjacent cells. If geometry conditions such as edges, pores, and defects are well controlled by chemical modification, graphene-based ferromagnets will be realized through the flat bands. Amplitudes of the Wannier functions have non-bonding character, and the frontier electrons are itinerant around each central cell. The degeneracy of frontier flat bands and the positive exchange integrals play key roles for ferromagnetic interactions of graphene-based ferromagnets.

## Acknowledgments

Thanks are due to Elsevier B. V. for permission to use figures in the original papers (Hatanaka 2010a, 2010b, 2010c).

## References

- 1.
Bieri M. Treier M. Cai J. Aït-Mansour K. Ruffieux P. Gröning O. Gröning P. Kastler M. Rieger R. Feng X. Müllen K. Fasel R. 2009 Porous graphenes: two-dimensional polymer synthesis with atomic precision. - 2.
Červenka J. Katsnelson M. I. Flipse C. F. J. 2009 Room-temperature ferromagnetism in graphite driven by two-dimensional networks of point defects. - 3.
Du A. Zhu Z. Smith S. C. 2010 Multifunctional porous graphene for nanoelectronics and hydrogen storage: New properties revealed by first principle calculations. - 4.
Esquinazi P. Höhne R. 2005 Magnetism in carbon structures. - 5.
Fujita M. Wakabayashi K. Nakada K. Kusakabe K. 1996 Peculiar localized state at zigzag graphite edge. - 6.
Hatanaka M. 2010a Wannier analysis of magnetic graphenes. - 7.
Hatanaka M. 2010b Band structures of porous graphenes. - 8.
Hatanaka M. 2010c Band structures of defective graphenes. - 9.
Hatanaka M. 2011 Stability criterion for organic ferromagnetism. - 10.
Hatanaka M. Shiba R. 2007 Ferromagnetic interactions in non-Kekulé polymers. - 11.
Klein D. J. 1994 Graphitic polymer stripes with edge states. - 12.
Klein D. J. Bytautas L. 1999 Graphitic edges and unpaired π-electron spins. - 13.
Kusakabe K. Maruyama M. 2003 Magnetic nanographite. - 14.
Li Y. Zhou Z. Shen P. Chen Z. 2010 Two-dimensional polyphenylene: experimentally available porous graphene as a hydrogen purification membrane. - 15.
Maruyama M. Kusakabe K. 2004 Theoretical predication of synthesis methods to create magnetic nanographite. - 16.
Mombrú A. W. Pardo H. Faccio R. de Lima O. F. Leite E. R. Zanelatto G. Lanfredi A. J. C. Cardoso C. A. Araújo-Moreira F. M. 2005 Multilevel ferromagnetic behavior of room-temperature bulk magnetic graphite. - 17.
Novoselov K. S. Geim A. K. Morozov S. V. Jiang D. Zhang Y. Dubonos S. V. Grigorieva I. V. Firsov A. A. 2004 Electronic field effect in atomically thin carbon films. - 18.
Novoselov K. S. Geim A. K. Morozov S. V. Jiang D. Katsnelson M. I. Grigorieva I. V. Dubonos S. V. Firsov A. A. 2005 Two-dimensional gas of massless Dirac fermions in graphene.