Open access

The Dynamic Process Mesozoic-cenozoic Igneous in Tibetan Plateau, China

Written By

Su Zhou, Ruizhao Qiu, Sun Kai and Zhang Linlin

Submitted: January 5th, 2011 Published: July 27th, 2011

DOI: 10.5772/25236

Chapter metrics overview

3,130 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

1. Introduction

Tibetan Plateau, China has intensive magmatic activity with widely magmatic rocks distribution, in the exposed area of about 300,000 km2. Isotopic dating method has been the most important means in the determination of rock formation age, the inversion of history and mechanism of Tibetan Plateau and the establishment of patterns of magma there. Whereas the most outstanding natural laboratory on the Earth for studying continental collision orogensis (Allegrè et al.,1984; Molnar et al.,1993), investigations on Tibetan plateau have been conducting. The Chinese and foreign geologists had long-term research on geochronology of igneous rocks in Tibet since 1964 when the first K-Ar isotopic age data on Tibet has been published by Prof. Li, who worked in a scientific expedition of Tibet Academy Sciences. Study areas have spanned the various district of the plateau and the means of geochronology are constantly updated with the progress of isotopic dating techniques. However, owing to over 4500 m altitude and poor traffic system, a few areas have are studed, remaining 1,520,000 km2 to do geological servey before 1999. After 2005, China Geological Survey has conducted the one hundred and one 1/250,000 scale region mapping on the western and the northern Tibet. Consequently, numerous radiometric age data of its magmatisms have been accumulated, including the most acive long half-life period radioisotope dating method, such as the K-Ar, fast neutron activation of 40Ar-39Ar, Rb-Sr, zircon and monazite U-Pb and SHRIMP. It is both important scientific and practical significance to make full use of these valuable data collested from nature condition scurviness areas, clean up and dig out some useful information among them.

It has been shown that the climax and valley of magmatic activity just corresponds to that of tectonic activity and vice versa. Furthermore, the tectonic - magmatic process is often accompanied by relevant metamorphism, mineralization and uplift cooling of geological body or belt. Therefore, the statistical isotopic age data of igneous rocks is the concentrated expression of the geological process, which reflects the regional characteristics of major geological events recorde better than the application of a single age of geological body in some way (Bi et al.,, 1999). The increased isotope age data about its magmatism enable us to identifie the formation and distribution of the main magmatism in Tibetan Plateau and fine a new approach to trace the geology process of Tibetan Plateau.

To this end, the chapter collects the Mesozoic and Cenozoic isotopic age of all kinds of igneous rocks in the Tibetan Plateau from the literature and the latest region geological survey reports, including 1875 radiometric age data, filtrats them by geological facts and geochronological characteristics, collated and summarized statistically them in regional and by lithofacies. Synthesis the distribution and the frequency of their radiometric age data enable much useful information to be obtained about time and space frames of Tibetan Plateau magmatism, enriching and improving the regional geodynamic process of Tibetan plateau. Therefore, it, conjuncting with some results we got leads us to identify the characteristics of the region distribution of igneous rock of Cenozoic- Mesozoic, and a migration order of Cenozioc volcanic rocks and a sequence of mgmatic-tectonic events in Mesozoic –Cenozoic of Gangese in statistical perspective.


2. Clustering and screening of the previous radioactive ages

Acquisition and application of a large number of Isotope geochronology data provide an important foundation for the division of Tibetan Plateau magmatic stages and comparisons, playing a positive role for broaden the study of Tibetan Plateau from the local to the region associated with global change and even. However, the data obtained from different testing times and researchers, and in different laboratories, by various dating methods are most of the scattered in various Chinese and foreign literature, to serve the limited purpose of the study and areas, and sometimes there are a few contradictions in the data itself. In order to access reliably the Mesozoic and Cenozoic radioactive ages of Tibetan Plateau, we conduct such work as following.

To begin with collection of data from now to previous, we trace the original isotope data as far as possible to determine the characteristics, location, original number of rocks samples and the method used. We eliminate duplication of reporting data, and then review and sort them by these following criteria.

Firstly, we screen the data by geological methods. For example, Luma bridge intrusion at the western part of Gangdise, the existing isotopic age are: K-Ar age of 159 Ma and 72 Ma and U-Pb age of 67 Ma for granodiorite, while 60 Ma K-Ar ages for biotite granite. We don’t credit the age of 159 Ma since it intruded into the Lower Cretaceous rocks of limestone and sandstone. We remove 307.5 Ma of zircon U - Pb of tonalite rocks 76-110 from eastern Shiquanhe mass and 289.6 Ma of zircon U-Pb age of Jiangpa granodiorite complex body when statistics since these dating and the surrounding geological age discrepancies.

Secondly, the locations of sampling show that there is a big imbalance in the Tibetan Plateau geochronological study. In the overall point of view, there are more geological dating data along the highway, others are less; and there are more data in middle and eastern Tibetan Plateau, while in western and northern Plateau less, except for some focal research ares, which have significantly more data, such as in the north Hoh Xil, the Ulugh Muztagh, Jingyu lake, the western Ritu pluton and so on. To some extent, it limits the representativeness of the data and the reasonableness of their weight in the statistical calculation. In order to obtain relatively objective results, for the same rock mass, we take any one or two results, if it has the same lithology with multiple measurements and the similar ages. For the large mass, such as the Quxu pluton and so on, five data will be taken. However, a bulky database is still likely to be retained for some large mass since intrusive, especially batholith at Tibetan Plateau general has numerous lithology and are multi-stage intrusion (Regional Geology of Tibet Autonomous Region, 1993).

Thirdly, we generally prefer more recent data that measured to older one in the same geological body regarding the considerable progress in testing technology of isotopic age. On the same geological bodies with different isotopic age data obtained the screening methods are: U-Pb method of credibility, followed by 40Ar-39Ar method, Sm-Nd method and, finally, Rb-Sr method and K -Ar method. For the K-Ar analys, the dilution method is more accuracy than the volume; and, the results of mineral separates are more reasonable than whole-rock in the same test methods determine. On the other hand, some abnormal data in preliminary study are not optional if the same author does not mention in his later literature.

Fourthly, all data are reserved if there is no reasonableness cause to remove them, such as we reserve the two data of Nyingchi granodiorite rock, which are of 17.7 Ma by K-Ar age and of 154 Ma by U-Pb method. Some of the data are much early-stage work, involving many types of rock, scattered data points (such as the Long County rock), can not take care, so that we keep majority.

Figure 1.

A comparison of the data of isotopic ages of Quxu granites between pre-and post-discrimination

Figure 2.

A comparison of the existing data of isotopic ages of intrusive rocks in the Tibetan Plateau between pre-and post-discrimination

Fifthly, we screening dataset as same volcanic rocks as intrusive rocks. However, since their severe natural environment at Tibetan Plateau, most volcanic cycle and intermittent of the volcanic eruption here are generally unclear. Therefore, the exact location of samples and horizon are difficult to determine at patch distribution volcanic rocks area, resulting in hard to determine more fully the reasons for taking care of data. In general, we retain any of the similar results at the same region; and reserved all of them if they are in different stage of volcanism, such as: results in Zhonglugu sites at the Southeast Coqing, rhyolites and basaltic volcanic rocks of the determination results were 39.97 Ma and 56.25 Ma, the two are reserved (Xie, et al, 2002).

Consequently, more intrusive rocks data have been removed, but the overall distribution of the data have not formed a big change (Figure 1, 2); when most data of the volcanic rocks and mafic, ultramafic rocks are reserved owing to the absent of adequate causes, leaving no major change in the number of samples (Figure 3).

Figure 3.

A comparison of the existing data of isotopic ages of volcanic rocks in the Tibetan Plateau between pre-and post-discrimination


3. Analyses on statistics results

3.1. Overview

Adopted the above criteria, we collected 1916 isotopic age data, inclding the K-Ar method, fast neutron activation 40Ar-39Ar method, Rb-Sr method, zircon and monazite U-Pb method, Zircon ion microprobe mass spectrometry, among which K-Ar method of accounting for 65%, 40Ar-39Ar method of accounting for 17%, U-Pb method of accounting for 11%, Rb-Sr method of accounting for 7%, plus a small amount of Sm-Nd, Neutron activation, fission track law and the data does not indicate the method used in literature (Figure 4a). Among them, the the K-Ar and 40Ar-39Ar dating method are most used (93% for volcanic rocks and 74% for intrusive rocks respectively, Figure 4b, c). However, the results using U-Pb zircon dating method in intrusive rocks significantly increased compared with the results using in volcanic rocks (Figure 4c), which is compatible with the dating methods in different application field. Furthermoer, some of the early determination of the isotopic age data quality is reliable, and the recently completed test results can be compared the age (Figure 5). So that we think previous method of dating is the right choice, which can be used for statistical analysis.

Figure 4.

A sketch map showing various methods of isotopic dating used for igneous rocks in the Tibetan Plateau. a. General drawing; b. volcanic rocks; c. intrusive rock

Figure 5.

Results of isotopic dating of the Neogene volcanic rocks in Majiang area, Tibet

3.2. The frequency histogram of intrusion and volcanic rocks

The frequency histogram of the isotopic age after filtering shows that magmatism in Tibet Plateau occures all stage duing Cenozoic and Mesozoic; and it is uneven in different geological periods and various rock types. Overall, however, their value of the intermediate-acidic intrusion and intermediate-acidic volcanic rocks decrease with age, infering the trend of magmatism abviousely intensified from Mesozoic to Cenozoic (Figure 6); Specifically, the frequency value of the isotopic age of the intermediate-acidic intrusive and extrusive volcanic rocks can be divided into two phases, that is 250 - 140 Ma and 140 - 10 Ma; and the former is serrated, without any outstanding peaks and troughs; the latter has a frequency distribution upward oscillation curve towards present and much higher values of total average frequency and maximum. Compare to volcanic rocks, intrusive rocks has longer active period, from 260 - 10 Ma, and can be divided into three stages: 260 - 140 Ma, 140 - 50 Ma, 50 - 0 Ma, with the progressiving frequency value, segment by segment. At 240 Ma, 140 Ma, 60 Ma, and 20 Ma, the frequency of isotopic age of intrusive rock were sudden jump in, with the maximum frequency of the peak ages of intrusive rocks in 50-30 Ma and then, after 10 Ma, the intrusion greatly reduced, turning to silence.

Figure 6.

Histogram of isotopic ages of igneous rocks in the Tibetan Plateau

Regarding volcanic activity, it began later than intrusion one, with a small amount of intermittent appeared since 230 Ma. Ever since 130 Ma, the curve of frequency distribution of isotopic ages of volcanic rocks is slowly rising, and acceleratedly increasing at 70 Ma, forming a summit at 40 - 30 Ma, which the value of frequency of isotopic age is higher than that of intrusive rocks. After that, the value of frequency of isotopic age of volcanic rocks sudden drops into a valley in the 30-20 Ma, and increase again after from 20 Ma to 10Ma, and then slightly decreased and continued to the present. The distribution pattern in statistics diagram that the volcanic activity began later than the intrusive rocks and has so far remained well above the value of the frequency distribution of intrusive rocks may show volcanic lag in response to tectonic events. The frequency of isotopic age of volcanic and intrusive rocks occurred cogradient peak in 50-40 Ma and 20-10 Ma, indicating two strong magmatic activities at the time in the Tibetan Plateau. Mearnwhile there is a significant trough between 30 Ma to 20 Ma in the frequency values of isotopic age of both intrusive rocks and volcanic, reflecting the tendency to ebb and flow synchronously of the strength of both volcanic and intrusive activities Tibetan after 70 Ma-60 Ma at the Tibetan Plateau.

3.3. The frequency histogram of basic-ultrabasic rocks

The change of the frequency distribution of isotopic age of basic-ultrabasic rock is not significant in Figure 6, owing to the total number of samples considerably less than the intermediate-acidic intrusive and volcanic rocks on the total number of samples. We map them separately (Figure 7), and can learn that frequency of the isotopic age of basic - ultrabasic rock of Tibetan plateau distributs generally in two groups, that is 260 Ma - 40Ma and 10 Ma - 0 Ma. In the diagrame, basalt aged from 10 Ma –0 Ma are all restricted to Tengchong, eastern Tibetan and the ages between 50 Ma and 40 Ma of them confined in south of Yarlung Zangpo and North of Longmuco-Shuanggou-Lancangjiang suture while other ages of basic-ultrabasic rock distributes in diversity regions of Tibetan plateau. In 220 Ma, 180 Ma, 140 Ma and 90 Ma, respectively, the values of the frequency distribution of isotopic age in the second sector of basic-ultrabasic rock activities appear comparatively high, demonstrating that the periods of basic-ultrabasic upsurge. On the whole, they wear off with time and reach to zero, infering that the collage of terranes developed and has ceased since 60Ma.

Figure 7.

Histogram of isotopic ages of basic-ultrabasic rocks in the Tibetan Plateau


4. Analyses on statistics results

4.1. Regional geological

Figure 8.

Outline map to show the main crustal blocks, suture zones and faults in the area of the Tibetan Plateau simpled from the 1:250,000 scale geologic map (Pan et al., 2004)

Despite the appearance of the plateau as a single geological entity now, the Tibetan plateau represents a collage of terranes, each reflecting its own distinct geological history (Wang and Mo, 1995). There is a close relationship between the formation of igneous rocks and the tectonic events caused by plate movement, such as the multi-period ocean crust subduction, continent – island arc and continent – continent collision and the intra – continental convergence (Figure 8). Therafore, We review and analyze our collected isotope dating data by intermediate-acidic intrusive rocks, intermediate-acidic volcanic rocks and basic - ultrabasic rocks from north to south of Tibetan Plateau, that is the west Kunlun, Northern Tibetan, Gangdise and Himalayan belt (including the Transhimalayan and highe Himalayan), and eastern Tibetan Plateau in order to find a possible link between the formation time of igneous rocks in different regions and these tectonic feature and ophiolite zone.

4.2. Intrusive rocks

The frequency distribution in the isotopic values of Mesozoic-Cenozoic intrusive rocks in the Tibetan Plateau is shown in Figure 9. It demonstrates that the intrusive activities of entirely plateau have two period with an apparent lull between 150 -140 Ma. The frequency values of 260 – 150 Ma are lower than that of 140 – 10 Ma. Among of them, the intrusive activitise of eastern Platean and west Kunlun was more intensive than other areas during Jurassic-Triassic period while the most activity area changed to Gangdese during Cretaceous and Cenozoic. The highest values of frequency of isotopic ages appear in Triassic instrusive rocks of eastern Platean and in Cenozoic instrusive rocks of Gangdese, reflecting the diversity central related geologic associations. Regard as Cenozoic intrusive rocks in the eastern Tibetan Plateau, isotopic age frequency is higher than Mesozoic ones and has a isolated peak of 40 Ma-30 Ma. Soon afterwards, the intrusion of magma of eastern Tibetan Plateau tumble rapidly down and almost complete ceases after 10 Ma, infering a shor-lived and large-scale intrusive activity.

Figure 9.

Histogram of isotopic ages of intermediate-acidic intrusive rocks in the Tibetan Plateau

During the 240-150 Ma, in Gangdise belt, the frequency of isotopic age values of intrusive rocks are distributed and low in value, without too much significant change except for slighly rising tendency; Since then, the frequency of intrusion ages of Gangdese upsurges and evolves toward a “climactic” caldera-forming atage until 10 Ma. Then, it drops as low as the value as 130 Ma ago; During this section, the frequency of isotopic age of intrusive rocks at Gangdese apperas four peak periods of 20 - 10 Ma, 60 - 40 Ma, 80 - 70 Ma, 130 - 90 Ma, with gradully growing numbers and summist at interval 60 - 40 Ma and 20 –10 Ma, corresponding to the subduction of India plate and the collision of India-Asia (about 65 Ma).

Figure 10.

Histogram of the frequency of over 65 Ma intermediate-acidic intrusive rocks in the Tibetan Plateau

Figure 11.

Histogram of the frequency of less 65 Ma intermediate-acidic intrusive rocks in the Tibetan Plateau

Mesozoic-Cenozoic intrusive rocks wildly spread in the notthern Tibetan and west Kunlun with totally lower frequency of isotopic age, inferring smaller intensity. However, contract to the notthern Tibetan, the frequency of isotopic age in the west Kunlun attenuates from Mesozoic to Cenozoic. We conjecture that an influence of the India-Asia collision weaken from south to north. Apart from a data of Kangmar gneissic dome, the isotopic ages of Himalayan intrusive rocks appear only after 50 Ma, concertrated between 20 Ma and 10 Ma, which imply a post-collsion tectonic activity.

We rescale the frequency of isotope dating of intrusive rocks and get two histograms in order to facilitate a comparison in diverse pool. It shows that the active area of intrusive activities turning from the west Kunlun and eastern Tibetan Plateau to Gangdese since 135 Ma. During Crateous, the numbers of eastern Tibetan remains higher while the one of west Kunlun becomes smaller (Figure 10). The frequency histogram of isotope dating of Cenozoic intrusive rocks reveals that there are three distinguished intrusive activities during, there are 40 - 30 Ma for eastern Tibetan, 20 -10 Ma for Gangdese and Himalaya (Figure 11). Therefore, we infer that Cenozoic intrusive activities of Tibetan Plateau migrated from Gangdese to northern and eastern Tibetan, and then returned to Gangdese and to Himalaya. The transition period appears between 30 – 25 Ma, revealling another turning time of the statues of Tibetan lithosphere.

4.3. Volcanic rocks

The hisgram of frequency of isotopic age of Mesozoic-Cenozoic volcanic rocks (Figure 12) seems clearly distribut of small number 150 Ma ago, indicating an inferior volcanism at Plateau then. However, volcanic activity increased since 130 Ma in Gangdese, and started a steadily upward stage, with a large peak at 60-30 Ma iinterval; After 60 Ma, the frequency of isotopic age of volcanic rocks in Northern Tibetan elevated and went up to a higher numbers, with the curve being asymmetric Normal distribution and the peak at 20-10 Ma.Additional, The frequency distribution of isotopic ages of volcanic rocks in the eastern Tibetan Plateau and in west Kunlun also forrm a big independent summit in 40 –30 Ma and 10 Ma to presant respectively. In general, Cenozoic volcanic activity has much more intensty than Mesozoic one. Consequently, we depict divide the data in two kinds of scales in order to review them separately.

Figure 12.

Histogram of isotopic ages of intermediate-acidic eruptive rocks from various regions in the Tibetan Plateau

Volcanic activies occurs in differ part of Tibetan except for Gangdese and Himalaya during Triassic, with higer numbers of isotope age in west Kunlun and northern Tibetan. Meanwhile, the frequency of isotopic ages of volcanic rocks of west Kunlun between 230 – 220 Ma forms the highest peak of Mensozoic volcanism in the Plateau. Besides Himalaya, Jurassic volcanic rocks scatter intermittently in Tibetan Plateau in low numbers of isotope age with summit of 150 – 140 Ma in northern Tibetan. Since Cratecous, the frequency of isotopic ages of volcanic rocks of Gangdese has much high numbers than others, implying the consequence of subduction of Indan plate. Meanwhile, the frequency of isotopic ages records the widespread presence of volcanic activites in East Tibetau, and separated in west Kunlun and Northen Tibetan; both are in low low numbers (Figure 13).

Figure 13.

Histogram of the frequency of over 65 Ma intermediate-acidic extrusive rocks in the Tibetan Plateau

Figure 14.

Histogram of the frequency of less 65 Ma intermediate-acidic extrusive rocks in the Tibetan Plateau

Tibeatn Plateau has fairly violent volcanism in Cenozoic period, with diversity centers in the process of time. Since 65 Ma, volcanic activity in Gangdise proceeded with higher intensity until 30 Ma. The frequency of isotopic ages of volcanic rocks in Northern gradual enhances and attains a higher numbers. At the moment of 45 Ma, frequency far outnumbers the one of Gangdese, indecting that a transfer of the center of volcanic activity. Volcanism of eastern Tibetan oncentrated between 40 Ma and 30 Ma, while was very feeble in other times with only intermittent and a small number of frequency, demonstrating volcanicbeing short-lived and high intensity characteristics there. Analogous pattern appears in the frequency of isotope dating in west Kunlun. Its large-scale, short-lived and high-intensity volcanic activity emerged in 5 - 0 Ma with intermittent distribution at any other time of Cenozoic. The histogram of the frequency of isotope ages reveals that the upsurge of volcanism of eastern Tibetan correspondece to the trough of Gangdese and Northern Tibetan, while the upsurge of volcanism of West Kunlun steps at the period of the trough of another regions. It is seems there is a complement intensity.Turning point in the two stages of volcanic activities is between 35 - 30 Ma and 5 – 0 Ma (Figure 14).

4.4. Migration sequence of the Cenozoic volcanism in the Tibetan Plateau

We suppose that Cenozoic volcanic activities of Tibetan Plateau migrated from different regions according to the frequency distribution of isotopic ages. Therefore, we divided northern Tibetan into Qiangtang and Hoh Xil and add the data of Lixian, Gansu province to show the overall volcanical perspective of Plateau. Isotopic ages of volcanic rocks in the Himalayan belt were collected to six, and five of the six are young than 50 Ma, mostly are 20-10 Ma, accordancing with the pattern of intrusive rocks. The isotopic ages of four samples from Lixan, Gansu province are between 20-10 Ma. The histogram of the statistical data of Cenozoic isotopic age data from Tibetan plateau shows that volcanic activity among the Tibetan plateau has progressively intensified since 70Ma and reached the climax in the interval 40-35Ma, after which it continued with reduced intensity from 35Ma and reached the lower level during 25-20Ma. Since then, the volcanism reactivitied and came to the sub-peak during 10-15Ma. From then, the intensity of volcanism declined and maintained at a mild level. It seems that there are two peak stages on Cenozoic volcanism of Tibetan plateau which may infer the transformation of dynamics of Tibeatan plateau.

The diagram shows a migrating order in Cenozoic volcanic activity of Tibetan Plateau is Gangdese → Qiangtang→Eastern Tibet →Himalaya, Hoh Xil and Lixian, Gansu province and Gangdese → West Kunlun (Figure 15). Therefore, the Cenozoic volcanic activity in Tibetan plateau is of the characteristics from the center (that is Gangdise) relocating to the edge of the plateau; after 10 Ma, it has completely transferred from the center of the Tibetan Plateau; and the migration of the volcanic activity occurred in 30-20 Ma and the reduction of volcanism in Gangdese may suggest the existence of some stress, resulting the areas with intensed volcanism changing in the plateau.

In early paleogene Cenozoic volcanic activity in Gangdese of Tibetan Plateau continused and increased, forming suumit of 50 -45 Ma. Then, the center of volcanism transferred to Qiangtang. 35 Ma, it changed to east Tibetan with two big frequency of isotope dating. Lately, volcanical activity returned to Qiangtang and migrated toward north at Hoh Xil and Lixan, Gansu province 10 Ma later. Meanwhile, volcanical activity migrated toward south at Gangdese and Himalaya. Volcanism remained in 5 – 0 Ma in the margin of Tibetan, there are the west Kunlun, Hoh Xil and eastern Tibetan, while volcanic activity in other parts of Tibetan Plateau significant reducted or turned to quiet.

Figure 15.

Migration sequence of the Cenozoic volcanism in the Tibetan Plateau

4.5. Ophiolite and basic – ultrabasic rocks

Ophiolite belts are complexity and research limitation (Qiu et al., 2005); among them, Bangong-Nujiang and Yarlung Zangpo with large-scale are the most important borderlines for the tectonic units divided in Tibetan (Figure 8). Qiangtang and Gangdese terras are comparted from by the former. The collision suture between the Indian plate and Asia continent is well shown by the latter. There is always a small-scale ophiolite belt exposed on the southern side of each belt respectively. Most of the data points of isotope dating of ultramafic rock in the Tibetan Plateau distribute along the Yarlungzangbu ophiolite and Bangong- Nujiang ophiolite belt. Yet a few data of have been accumulated, forming a limited database with unconspicuous statistical laws. To facilitate the analysis, statistical data is divided into the southern and northern Gangdise largely on Coqen - Xainza fault, corresponding respectively to the formation and activities of Yarlungzangbu and Bangong- Nujiang suture (Figure16).

Figure 16.

Histogram of isotopic ages of basic-ultrabasic rocks from various regions in the Tibetan Plateau

The figure shows that the frequency of isotopic age of the southern Gangdese peak in 220 - 210 Ma, 130 - 120 Ma and 90 - 80 Ma, with gradually descend number, inferring various intensity of the basic-ultrabasic activities in Mesozoic and Cesozic. It is very interisting the the isotopic age of older than 200 Ma confined in eastern Yarlung Zangpo ophiolite belt so that we take 130 - 120 Ma as the peak time of it since it is more than 1500 km long. Constract to the northern Gangdese, the data of isotopic age of basic-ultrabasic rocks distribut continuously and maintain in higher frequency between the ages of 180-120 Ma, indicating that this period is the active for the basic - ultramafic magma of the Yarlung Zangpo ophiolite belt.

The highest frequency value of isotopic age in northern Gangdese is in 170-160 Ma, maybe representing a stronger period of mantle activity. Howeve, the frequency value of isotopic age is also high between 200 Ma and 160 Ma, infering that the activities of mafic – ultramafic commence earlier than south. There is a few mafic – ultramafic rocks in southen Gangdise after 70 Ma, which may relate to its location of southern margin of India-Asia colision. Since 40 Ma, basic and ultrabasic magmatic activity stopped completely. We synthesize the subducting of oceanic crust commenced about 180Ma in Bangong-Nujiang suture towards south and about 130Ma in Yarlung Zangpo suture towards North by the frequency and distribution of the magmatism of North Gangdese and South Gangdese.


5. Process of the Tethy in Tibetan Plateau

Figure 17.

Diagram showing the dynamic process of the Evolution of the Tethy in Tibetanan Plateau

Tibetanan Tethyan Oceans were developed in Mesozoic period, which represented by Bangong-Nujiang and Yarlung Zangpo: (1) gabbro age of 191—195Ma in Bangong-Nujiang suture, and violent gabbro magmatism about 180Ma in Yarlung Zangpo, and Jurassic Radiolarian fossils found in the abysmal cherts indicate both oceans might be opened at the same times in early Jurassic. (2) boninite and boninite series recognized in the volcanic rocks of 140—170Ma in Bangong-Nujiang suture and 110—170Ma in Yarlung Zangpo suture, indicate the initial subduction episode happening, and the O-type adakite recognized in intrusive rocks of ≥95—139Ma in Bangong-Nujiang suture and ≥65—110Ma in Yarlung Zangpo suture indicate the subduction continuing. (3) Bangong-Nujiang oceanic basin closed by the end K1, and Yarlung Zangpo oceanic basin closed in K2/E (≈65Ma). (4) after the collision of India-Asia plates at about 65Ma, large-scale magmatic activities of 65—40Ma was caused on the south Gangdeze. (5) With the continuous subduction of India plate toward North, the occurrence of C-type akakite of 45—35Ma in Qiangtang and 25—8Ma indicate the orogenic lithosphere de-rooting episode happening in Qiangtang first, then in Gangdese.

We depict a dynamic process of the Evolution of the Tethy in Tibetanan Plateau based on the the statistical and analytical data (Figure 17).



This research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (40572048, 40830317 and 40873023 ) and the National key Project for Basic Research on Tibetan Plateau (Projects 2011CB403100 and 2009CB421000). and Ministry of Science and Technology of the People´s Republic of China(No.2003009).


  1. 1. ArnaudN. al. 1992 The high K2O volcanism of northwestern Tibet: geochemistry and tectonic implications[J], Earth Planet Sci. Lett., 1992, 111:351-67
  2. 2. BaiZ. D.XuD. B.ChenM. J.SunL. X. 2009 Characteristics and zircon SHRIMP U-Pb dating of the Amduo trachyte, Tibet, China. Geological Bulletin of China. 2009, 28(9): 1229-1235. (in Chinese with English abstract)
  3. 3. BiH.WanZ. G.WangY. al. 1999 History of tectono-magmatic evolution in the Western Kunlun Orogen,1999, Science in China,1999,42(6):604-619
  4. 4. BirdP. 1978 Initiation of intracontinental subduction in the Hi Malaya[J], J.Geophys, 1978, 83:4975-4987
  5. 5. BlisniukP. M.HackerB. al. 2001 Nor Mal faulting in central Tibet since at least 13.5 Myr ago[J], Nature, 2001, 412:628-32
  6. 6. BouchezJ. L.PecgerA. 1981 The Hi Malayan Main Central Nepal[J], Tectonophysics, 1981, 78: 23-50
  7. 7. Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources of Xizang Autonomous Region, People’s Republic of China, Ministry of Geology and Mineral Resources Geological Memoirs: Regional Geology of Xi-zang (Tibet) (in Chinese with English abstract), Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 1993 1993 237463 .
  8. 8. CaiZ. Y.QiuR. Z.XiongX. L. 2004 Geochemical characteristics and geological significance of the adakites from west Tibet, 19HKT workshop special issue, Himalayan Journal of Science, 2(4), 291.
  9. 9. ChangC.F.ZhengS.L. 1973 Tectonic featureres pf the Mount Jolmo Lungma Region in southern Tibet,China. Scientia Geologica Sinica. 1:1-12, (in Chinese, with English abstract)
  10. 10. ChenJ. L.XuJ. F.KangZ. Q.WangB. D. 2006 Origin of the Miocene Bugasi Group volcanic rocks in the Cuoqin County, Weatern Tibetan Plateau. Acta Petrologica Sinica. 2006, 22(3): 585-594. (in Chinese, with English abstract)
  11. 11. C. H. E. N. W.MAC.Q.B. I. A. N. Q.J.H. U. Y.Q.L. O. N. G. T.C.Y. U. S.L.C. H. E. N. D.M.T. U. J.H. 2009 Evidences from Geochemistry and Zircon U-Pb Gechronology of Volcanic Rocks of Yeba Formation in Demingding Area, the East of Middle Gangdise, Tibet. Geological Science and Technology Information. 2009, 28(03): 31-40. (in Chinese, with English abstract)
  12. 12. ChungS.L.ChuM.F.ZhangY.XieY.LoC.H.LeeT.Y.LanC.Y.LiX.ZhangY. Q.WangY. 2005 Tibetan tectonic evolution inferred from spatial and temporal variations in post-collisional magmatism. Earth Science Reviews 68 173196 .
  13. 13. ChungS.-L.LoC.-H.LeeT.-Y.ZhangY.XieY.LiX.WangK.-L.WangP.-L. 1998 Diachronous uplift of the Tibetan Plateau starting 40 Myr ago. Nature 394 769773 .
  14. 14. ColemanM. E.HodgesK. 1995 Evidence for Tibet plateau uplift before 14 Myr ago from a new minimum age for east-west extension[J], Nature, 1995, 374:49-52
  15. 15. ColemanM. E. 1998 U-Pb Constraints on Oligocene-Miocene defor Mation and anatexis within the central Hi Malaya, Marsyandi Valley, Nepal[J], American Journal of Science, 1998, Summer:553571
  16. 16. CopelandP.HarrisonT. M. 1990 Episodic rapid uplift of Higher Hi Malayas by 40Ar/39Ar analysis of detrital K-feldspar and muscovite, begal fan[J], Geology,1990,18:354-357
  17. 17. CopelandP.HarrisonT. al. 1995 Ther Mal evolution of the Gangdese batholith, southern Tibet: A history of episodic unroofing[J], Tectonics, 1995, 14(2):223-236
  18. 18. CostaS.CabyR. 2001 Evolution of the Ligurian Tethys in the Western Alps: Sm/ Nd and U/ Pb geochronology and rare-earth element geochemistry of the Montgenevre Ophiolite (France) [J], Chemical Geology, 2001, 175 (3-4) :449-466.
  19. 19. al. 1986 ,Mesozoic and Cenozoic volcanics rocks from central and southern Tibet 39Ar-40Ar dating, petrogical characteristics and geodynamical significance[J], Earth and Planetary Science Letter, 1986, 79:281-302
  20. 20. DebonF.SonetJ.LiuG. al. 1982 Caracteres Chimico-mineral logiques et Datations Par Rb-Sr des Trois Ceintures Plutoniques du Tibet Meridonal[J], C. R. Acad. Sci.Paris. 1982,295 213218
  21. 21. DengW. 1989 Cenozoic volcanic rocks in the northern Ngari district of the Tibet: a discussion on the intracontinental subduction. Acta Petrologica Sinica 3, 1-11 (in Chinese with English abstract).
  22. 22. DengW. 1991 Geology, geochemistry and ages of the shoshonitic lavas in the central Kunlun orogenic belt. Scientia Geologica Sinica 3, 201-213 (in Chinese with English abstract).
  23. 23. DingL.kappP.ZhongD. al. 2003 Cenozoic Volcanism in Tibet: Evidence for a Transition from Oceanic to Continental Subduction[J], Journal of Petrology, 2003,44:1833-1865
  24. 24. DingL.YueY.CaiF.XuX.ZhangQ.LaiQ. 2006 40Ar/39Ar geochronology, geochemical and Sr-Nd-O isotopic characteristics of the high-Mg ultrapotassic rocks in Lhasa block of Tibet: implications in the onset time and depth of NSstriking rift system. Acta Geologica Sinica 80, 1252-1261 (in Chinese, with English abstract).
  25. 25. DongY. H.WangQ.XuJ. F.ZiF. Dongyue Lake adakitic volcanic rocks with high Mg# in north Qiangtang block: Petrogenesis and its tectonic implication. Acta Petrologica Sinica. 2008 24(2): 292-302.
  26. 26. DongY. H.XuJ. F.ZengQ. G.WangQ.MaoG. Z.LiJ. Is There a Neo-Tethys’ Subduction Record Earlier than arc volcanic rocks in the Sangri Group? Acta Petrologica Sinica. 2006 22(3): 661-668. (in Chinese, with English abstract)
  27. 27. EnglandP.HouseMan. G. 1989 Extension during continental convergence, with application to the Tibetan Plateau[J], J. Geophys Res., 1989, 175:61~69
  28. 28. FuX. G.WangJ.TanF. W.ChenM.WangJ. J.DuB. W.ChenW. B. 2009 Zircon SHRIMP U-Pb age of volcanic rocks in E’erlongba Formation, eastern part of the Qiangtang basin, Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, China and its geological significance. Geological Bulletin of China. 2009, 28(5): 561-567. (in Chinese, with English abstract)
  29. 29. FuX.WangJ.WangZ.ChenW. 2008 U-Pb Zircon Age and Geochemical Characteristics of Volcanic Rocks from the Juhua Mountain Area in the northern Qiangtang Basin, northern Xizang(Tibet). GEOLOGICAL REVIEW. 2008, 54(2): 232-242. (in Chinese, with English abstract)
  30. 30. GariepyC.AllegreC. J.XuR. H. 1985 The Pb-isotope geochemistry of granitoids from the Hi Malaya-Tibet collision zone: implication for crustal evolution[J], Earth and Planetary Sci. Letters, 1985,74:220214
  31. 31. GarzioneC. N.DettMan. D. al. 2000 High times on the Tibetan Plateau: Paleoelevation of the Thakkola graben, Nepal[J], Geology,2000, 28: 339~42
  32. 32. GengQ.PanG.ZhengL. 2001 Gangdese island-arc granite belt in Yarlung Tsangpo Grand Gorge. Sedimentary and Tethyan Geology, 21 2 1622 . (in Chinese with English abstract).
  33. 33. G. E. N. G. Q.R.P. A. N. G.T.W. A. N. G. L.Q.Z. H. U. D.C.L. I. A. O. Z.L. 2006 Isotopic geochronology of the volcanic rocks from the Yeba Formation in the Gangdise zone, Xizang. Sedimentary Geology and Tethyan Geology. 2006, 26(1): 1-7. (in Chinese, with English abstract)
  34. 34. Geologic Map of the Lhasa Region at a Scale of 1:200000, Xizang Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources, Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 1990 1990 22148
  35. 35. Geologic Map of the Qushui Region at a Scale of 1:200000, Xizang Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources (in Chinese), Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 1993 1993 1960 .
  36. 36. al. 1985 Xainxa ultra Mafic rocks, central Tibet, China: tectonic environment and geodynamic significance[J], Geology, 1985, 13:330~333.
  37. 37. GöpelC.AllegreC. J.XuR. H. 1984 Lead isotope study of the Xigaze ophiolits(Tibet): the problem of the relationship between Mag Matites(gabbros, dolerites, lavas and tectonites (harzbergites) [J], Earth Planet Sci. lett., 1984, 69: 301-310
  38. 38. G.DongX.MoZ.Zhaoet al. 2005 Geochronologic Constraints by SHRIMP II Zircon U-Pb Dating on Magma Underplating in the Gangdise Belt Following India-Eurasia Collision, Acta geologica Sinica 2005, 79 6 787794 . (in Chinese, with English abstract)
  39. 39. GuiXuntang.ChengZhongli.WangJunwen. 1982 Studies on Rb-Sr isotope of intermediate- acidic rocks in The Gangdese magmatic belt, Tibet. Geochimia, 3: 217-225 (in Chinese with
  40. 40. HarrisonT. M.CopelandP.KiddW. S. al. 1995 activation of the Nyainqentanghla Shear Zone: Implications for uplift of the southern Tibetan Plateau [J], Tectonics, 1995,14:658-76
  41. 41. HeZ. H.YangD. M.WangT. W. 2006 Age, geochemistry and its tectonic significance of Kaimeng ophiolites in Jiali fault belt, Tibet. Acta Petrologica Sinica. 2006, 22(2): 653-660.
  42. 42. al. Mag Matism and metamorphism in the Ladakh Hi Malaya(The Indus-Tsangpo suture zone) [J], Earth Planet. Sci. Letters, 1982 60:178-194
  43. 43. HouZ. Q.GaoY. F.QuX. al. 2004 Origin of adakitic intrusives generated during mid-Miocene east-west extension in southern Tibet, Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 220 139155 .
  44. 44. HouZ. Q.ZhaoZ. D.GaoY. F.YangZ. M.JiangW. 2006 Tearing and diachronous subduction of the Indian continental slab: evidence from Cenozoic Gangdese volcano-magmatic rocks in southern Tibet. Acta Geologica Sinica 22, 761-774 (in Chinese, with English Abstract).
  45. 45. Ying-congH. U. A. N. G.De-mingY. A. N. G.Chang-qingZ. H. E. N. G.Zhong-huaH. E.Lin-naD. A. I.Jian-guoL. I.Yao-yuZ. H. A. N. G. 2005 The Geochemical Characteristics of the Pana Volcanic Rock of the Linzizong Group in the Zhaxue Area, Linzhou County, Tibet and Its Geological Implication. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition). 2005, 35(5): 576-580. (in Chinese, with English abstract)
  46. 46. JiW. H.ChenS. J.ZhaoZ. M.LiR. S.HeS. P.WangC. Discovery of the Cambiran volcanic rocks in the Xainza area, Gangdese orogenic belt, Tibet, China and its significance. Geological Bulletin of China. 2009 28(9): 1350-1354. (in Chinese, with English abstract)
  47. 47. JianPing.LiuDunyi.SunXiaomeng. 2003 SHRIMP dating for the Carboniferous ophiolite in Jinshajiang belt, western geochronology on the evolution of paleo-tethyan oceanic crust. Acta Geologica Sinica (Chinese edtion), 77(2):1-13 (in Chinese with English abstract).
  48. 48. JiangWan. 1996 On the Intermediate-Acidic Plutonic Magmatism in Middle Gangdese Belt and Uplifting Mechanism of Qinghai-Xizang(Tibet) Plateau. Ph. D. Dissertation, China University of Geosciences, Beijing,
  49. 49. JinChengwei.XuRonghua. 1982 Granitoids in Himalayas and middle Gangdese. Petrological Research, 1: 81-95 (in Chinese with English abstract).
  50. 50. JinChengwei.ZhouYunsheng. 1978 Magmatic belt in the Himalaya and Gangdese arc range and its genetic model. Scientia Geologica Sinica, 4: 297-312 (in Chinese with English abstract).
  51. 51. JinChengwei. 1986 Enclaves in Qüxü granite batholith, Lhasa, Tibet. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2 (2): 23-32 (in Chinese with English abstract).
  52. 52. Zhi-qiangK. A. N. G.Ji-fengX. U.Bao-diW. A. N. G.Yan-huiD. O. N. G.Shu-qingW. A. N. G.Jian-linC. H. E. N. 2009 Geochemistry of Cretaceous Volcanic Rocks of Duoni Formation in Northern Lhasa Block: Discussion of Tectonic Setting. Earth Science-Journal of China University of Geosciences. 2009, 34(1): 89-104. (in Chinese, with English abstract)
  53. 53. KangZ. Q.XuJ. F.DongY. H.WangB. Q. Cretaceous volcanic rocks of Zenong Group in north-middle Lhasa block: products of southward subducting of the Slainajap ocean? Acta Petrologica Sinica. 2008 24(2): 303-314. (in Chinese, with English abstract)
  54. 54. Kohn, M.J., Parkinson C.D., Petrologic case for Eocene slab breakoff during the Indo-Asian collision[J], Geology, 2002 30: 591~94
  55. 55. LaiS. C. 2003 Identification of the Cenozoic adakitic rock association from Tibetan plateau and its tectonic significance. Earth Science Frontiers, 10(4), 407-415. (in Chinese with English abstract).
  56. 56. LeeH. Y.ChungS. L.WangY. B.ZhuD. C.YangJ. H.SongB.LiuD. Y.WuF. Y. 2007 Age, petrogenesis and geological significance of the Linzizong volcanic succession in the Linzhou basin, southern Tibet: Evidence from zircon U-Pb dates and Hf isotopes. Acta Petrologica Sinica. 2007, 23(2): 493-500. (in Chinese, with English abstract)
  57. 57. LengChengbiao.ZhangXingchun.ZhouWeide. 2010 A primary study of the geological characteristics and the zircon U-Pb age of the Gangjiang porphy copper-molybdenum deposit in Nimu, Tibet. Earth Science Frontiers. 2010, 17(2): 185-197. (in Chinese, with English abstract)
  58. 58. Bao-huaL. I.Hai-shengY. I. N.Jin-huiL. I. N.Ji-junH. U. A. N. G.BingZ. H. A. O. 2004 A Preliminary Study of Ar-Ar Ages for Volcanic Rocks from the Mt. Zurhen Ul, Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Acta Geologica Sichuan. 2004, 24(02): 73-76. (in Chinese, with English abstract)
  59. 59. LiC.DongY. S.ZhaiQ. G.WangL. Q.YanQ. R.WuY. W.HeT. T. Discovery of Eopaleozoic ophiolite in the Qiangtang of Tibet Plateau: Evidence from SHRIMP U-Pb dating and its tectonic implications. Acta Petrologica Sinica. 2008 24(1): 31-36.
  60. 60. LiC.HuangX. P.MouS. Y.ChiX. G. Age dating of the Zougouyouchacuo volcanic rocks and age determination of the Kangtog Formation in southern Qiangtang, northern Tibet, China. Geological Bulletin of China. 2006 25(1-2): 226-228. (in Chinese, with English abstract)
  61. 61. CaiL. I.Zhong-huaH. E.Hui-minL. I. 2004 U-Pb and Sm-Nd dating of mafic dike swarms in southren Qiangtang, Qinghai-Tibet Pleatau and its tectonic significance. GEOLOGY IN CHINA. 2004, 31(04): 384-389. (in Chinese with English abstract)
  62. 62. LiD. P.ZhaoY.HuJ. M.LiH. K.LiX. L.ZhouX. K.DuS. X. Characteristics of late Miocene A-type granite on the northwestern margin of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau and its significance. Geological Bulletin of China. 2007 26(12): 1671-1677. (in Chinese with English abstract)
  63. 63. LiJ. F.XiaB.LiuL. W.XuL. F.HeG. S.WangH.ZhangY. Q.YangZ. Q.-PbS. H. R. I. M. P. U.zircondating.ofdiabase.inthe.La’ngaCo.ophioliteBurang.TibetChina.itsgeological.significance Geological Bulletin of China. 2008 27(10): 1739-1743. (in Chinese with English abstract)
  64. 64. JianfengL. I.BinX. I. A.LiwenL. I. U.LifengX. U.GuanshengH. E.HongW. A. N. G.YuquanZ. H. A. N. G.ZhiqingY. A. N. G. 2009 SHRIMP U-Pb dating for the Gabbro in Qunrang Ophiolite, Tibet: The Geochronology Constraint for the Development of Eastern Tethys Basin. Geotectonica et Metallogenia. 2009, 33(2): 294-298. (in Chinese with English abstract)
  65. 65. JindongL. I.DaoyuanB. A. I.XianhuiW. A. N. G. 2004 Ages of volcanic rocks and planation surface in the Canmei Mountain area, northern Tibet. GEOLOGICAL BULLETIN OF CHINA. 2004, 23(7): 670-675. (in Chinese with English abstract)
  66. 66. LiJ. X.LiG. M.QinK. Z.XiaoB. Geochemistry of porphyries and volcanic rocks and ore-forming geochronology of Duobuza gold-rich porphyry copper deposit in Bangonghu belt, Tibet: Constraints on metallogenic tectonic settings. Acta Petrologica Sinica. 2008 24(3):531-543. (in Chinese with English abstract)
  67. 67. LiJ. X.QinK. Z.LiG. M.YangL. K. 2007 K-Ar and 40Ar/39Ar age dating of Nimu porphyry copper orefield in Central Gangdese: Constrains on magmatic-hydrothermal evolution and metallogenetic tectonic setting. Acta Petrologica Sinica. 2007,23(5): 953-966. (in Chinese with English abstract)
  68. 68. Zai-huiL. I.Lai-linZ. H. E. N. G.Jun-minL. I.Xiang-biaoX. I. A. 2009 40Ar-39Ar Dating of Linzizong Volcanic rocks in the Central Gangdise Area and Its Geological Implication. Bulletin of Mineralogy, Petrology and Geochemistry. 2009, 28(3): 223-227. (in Chinese, with English abstract)
  69. 69. Zhong-xiongL. I.Zhi-liangC. H. E. N.Xiu-zhongL. I.C.GizbertB. C.Burchfiel 2004 K-Ar Ages of Cenozoic Volcanic Rocks from Gongjue Basin in Eastern Tibet. Earth Science-Journal of China University of Geosciences. 2004, 29(3): 278-282. (in Chinese, with English abstract)
  70. 70. LiJ. Z.ZhangY. Y.LuoH. Y. 1992 A research on petrological characters and genesis of the Cenozoic volcanic rocks in the Yangying village Geothermal field, Dangxiong, Tibet, China. Geoscience 6 (1), 96-109 (in Chinese with English abstract).
  71. 71. LiegeoisJ. P. 1998 Some words on the post-collisional Mag Matism[J], Lithos., 1998, 45 xv- xvii
  72. 72. Jin-huiL. I. N.Hai-shengY. I.BinZ. H. A. O.Bao-huaL. I.Zhi-qiangS. H. I.Ju-junH. U. A. N. G. 2003 40Ar-39Ar ISOTOPIC DATING AND ITS IMPLICATION OF CENOZOIC VOLCANIC ROCKS FROM ZUERKENGWULA MOUNTAIN AREA, NORTHERN TIBETAN. JMINERAL PETROL. 2003, 23(3): 31-34. (in Chinese, with English abstract)
  73. 73. Hong-yingL. I. U.BinX. I. A.Wan-mingD. E. N. G.Yu-quanZ. H. A. N. G. 2004 STUDY OF 40Ar-39Ar AND K-Ar DATING ON THE HIGH-K VOLCANIC ROCK FROM BAMAOQIONGZONG TO QIANGBAQIAN IN THE NORTHERN TIBET. JMINERAL PETROL. 2004, 24(1): 71-75. (in Chinese with English abstract)
  74. 74. LiuW.LiF. Q.YuanS. H.ZhouJ. W.ZhangW. P.LiangT. 2010 Zircon LA-ICP-MS U-Pb age of ignimbrite from Zenong Group in Coqen area of the central Gangdese belt, Tibet, China. Geological Bulletin of China. 2010, 29(7): 1009-1016. (in Chinese with English abstract).
  75. 75. Wen-canL. I. U.YuW. A. N. G.Xiang-xinZ. H. A. N. G.Hui-minL. I.Zhi-guangZ. H. O. U.Xing-guoZ. H. A. O. 2004 The rock types and isotope dating of the Kangmar gneissic dome in southern Tibet. Earth Science Frontiers (China University of Geoscineces, Beijing). 2004, 11(4):491-501. (in Chinese with English abstract)
  76. 76. LiuD. Z.MaR. Z.TaoX. F.HuX. W.ShiH.ZhuL. D.HuX. W. 2004 New results and major progress in regional geology survey of the Coqen County sheet. Geological bulletin of China 23 (5-6), 506-511 (in Chinese with English abstract).
  77. 77. LiuJ. 1989 Comment on ‘ages and distributions of the volcanic rocks in Pulu, Xinjing, China’. Acta Petrologica Sinica 2, 95-97 (in Chinese with English abstract).
  78. 78. LiuJ. 1999 Volcanoes in China. Science Press, Beijing (219 in Chinese with English abstract).
  79. 79. LuoZ. H.MoX. X.WanY. S.LiL.WeiY. Geological implications of the youngest SHRIMP U-Pb age of the alkaline basalt in the Tibetan Plateau. Acta Petrologica Sinica. 2006 22(3): 578-584. (in Chinese, with English abstract)
  80. 80. Mahé al. 2002 A slab breakoff model for the Neogene ther Mal evolution of south Karakorum and south Tibet[J], Earth Planet Sci. Lett., 2002, 195: 45~58
  81. 81. MaluskiH.ProustF.XiaoX. C. 1982 39Ar/40Ar dating of the trans-Himalayan calc-alkaline Mag Matism of southern Tibet[J], Nature, 1982, 298: 152-156
  82. 82. Mc CafferyR.NabelekJ. 1998 Role of oblique convergence in the active defor Mation of the Hi Malaya and southern Tibet plateau[J], Geology, 1998, 26: 691~94
  83. 83. al. Post-collisional potassic and ultrapotassic Mag Matism in SW Tibet: Geochemical and Sr-Nd-Pb-O isotopic constraints for Mantle source characteristics and petrogenesis[J], J. Petrol, 1999 40(9): 1399~1424
  84. 84. JihaiM. O.HuayingL. I. A. N. G.HengxiangY. U.YingwenX. I. E.YuquanZ. H. A. N. G. 2006 COMPARISON OF LA-ICP-MS AND SHRIMP U-PB ZIRCON AGES OF THE CHONGJIANG AND QULONG ORE-BEATING PORPHYRIES IN THE GANGDESE PORPHYRY COPPER BELT. Geotectonica et Metallogenia. 2006, 30(4):504-509.
  85. 85. MoXuanxue.ZhaoZhidan.DengJinfu.DongGuochen.ZhouSu.GuoTieying.ZhangShuangquan.WangLiangliang. 2003 Response of volcanism to the India-Asia collision. Earth Science Frontiers, 10:135-148 (in Chinese with English abstract).
  86. 86. MoX.DongG.ZhaoZ.GuoT.WangL.ChenT. 2005 Timing of magma mixing in the Gangdise magmatic belt during the India-Asia collision: zircon SHRIMP U-Pb dating. Acta Geologica Sinica 79 6676 .
  87. 87. MoX.ZhaoZ.DengJ.FlowerM.YuX.LuoZ.LiY.ZhouS.DongG.ZhuD.WangL. 2006a Petrology and geochemistry of postcollisional volcanic rocks from the Tibetan plateau: implications for lithosphere heterogeneity and collision-induced asthenospheric mantle flow. In: Dilek, Y., Pavlides, S. (Eds.), Postcollisional Tectonics and Magmatism in the Mediterranean Region and Asia. Geological Society of America Special Paper, 409 507530 . doi:10.1130/2006.2409(24).
  88. 88. MolnarP.TapponnierP. 1978 Active tectonics of Tibet[J], J. Geophys Res, 1978, 85: 5361~5375
  89. 89. NomadeS.RenneP. al. 2004 Miocene potassic and ultrapotassic volcanism in the Lhasa block: spatial trends and geodynamic implications [J], Earth Planet Sci. Lett., 2004, 221:227-243
  90. 90. PanG. T.DingJ.YaoD. S. 2004 Geological Map of Qinghai-Xizang (Tibet) Plateau and djacent Areas (with a Guidebook) (1:2500,000), Chengdu, Chengdu Cartographic (in Chinese with English abstract).
  91. 91. QiX. X.ZengL. S.MengX. J.XuZ. Q.LiT. F. 2008 Zircon SHRIMP U-Pb dating of Dala granite in the Tethyan Himalaya and its geological implication. Acta Petrologica Sinica. 2008, 24(7): 1501-1508.
  92. 92. QiangbaZ. X.XieY. W.WuY. W.XieC. M.LiQ. L.QiuJ. Q. 2009 Zircon SIMS U-Pb dating and its significance of cumulate gabbro from Dengqen ophiolite, eastern Tibet, China. Geological Bulletin of China. 2009, 28(9): 1253-1258. (in Chinese with English abstract)
  93. 93. QiuR. Z.CaiZ. Y.LiJ. F. 2004 Boninite of Ophiolite Belts in Western Qinghai-Tibet Plateau and its Geological Implication, Geoscience, 18(3), 305-308. (in Chinese with English abstract)
  94. 94. Rui-zhaoQ. I. U.SuZ. H. O. U.Jin-fuD. E. N. G.Jin-faL. I.Qing-huiX. I. A. O.Zhi-yongC. A. I. 2004 Dating of garbbro in the Shemalagou ophiolite in the western segment of the Bangong Co-Nujiang ophiolite belt, Tibet-with a discussion of the age of the Bangong Co-Nujiang ophiolite belt. GEOLOGY IN CHINA. 2004, 31(3): 262-268. (in Chinese with English abstract)
  95. 95. Xiao-mingQ. U.Rui-jiangW. A. N. G.Hong-boX. I. N.Yuan-yiZ. H. A. O.Xing-taoF. A. N. 2009 Geochronology and geochemistry of igneous rocks related to the subduction of the Tethys oceanic plate along the Bangong Lake arc zone, the western Tibetan Plateau. GEOCHIMICA. 2009, 38(6): 523-535. (in Chinese with English abstract)
  96. 96. QuXiaoming.XinHongbo.ZhaoYuanyi.WangRuijiang.FanXingtao. 2010 Opening time of Bangong Lake Middle Tethys oceanic basin of the Tibet Plateau: Constraints from petro-geochemistry and zircon U-Pb LAICPMS dating of mafic ophiolites. Earth Science Frontier. 2010, 17(3): 053-063. (in Chinese with English abstract)
  97. 97. Scharer. U.XuR. H.AllegereC. J. 1984 U-Pb geochronology of Gangdese (Transhi Malaya) Plutonism in the Lhasa-Xigaze region, Tibet[J], Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 1984, 69:311~320
  98. 98. HongS. H. E.QuanJinL. I.WenMADongFang.GuangL. I.MingDe QuanZ. H. A. N. G.ChengF. E. N. G.YouWenQ. U.JunGuiP. A. N.Tang 2009 Molybdenite Re-Os and SHRIMP zircon U-Pb dating of Duobuza porphyry copper deposit in Tibet and its geological implications. MINERAL DEPOSITS. 2009, 28(6): 737-746. (in Chinese with English abstract)
  99. 99. RenS. H. I.Deng 2007 SHRIMP dating of the Bangong Lake SSZ-type ophiolite: Constraints on the closure time of ocean in the Bangong Lake-Nujiang River, northwestern Tibet. Chinese Science Bulletin. 2007, 52(7): 936-941.
  100. 100. SongQuanyou.QinYong. 2002 Petro-geochemical characteristics and petrogenetic analysis for intrusions in Coqin Basin in Gangdese tectonic belt. Northwest Geology, 35 (3):99-105 (in Chinese with English abstract).
  101. 101. SpicerR. A.HarrisN. B. al. 2003 Constant elevation of southern Tibet over the past 15 million years[J], Nature, 2003, 421: 622~624
  102. 102. SunC. G.ZhaoZ. D.MoX. X.ZhuD. C.DongG. C.ZhouS.ChenH. H.XieL. W.YangY. H.SunJ. F.YuF. Enriched mantle source and petrogenesis of Sailipu ultrapotassic rocks in southwestern Tibetan Plateau: constraints from zircon U-Pb geochronology and Hf isotopic compositions. Acta Petrologica Sinica. 2008 24(2): 249-264. (in Chinese, with English abstract)
  103. 103. SunC. G.ZhaoZ. D.MoX. X.ZhuD. C.DongG. C.ZhouS.ChenH. H.XieL. W.YangTan.FuwenLiuChaoji. 1992 Preliminary study on enclaves in Gangdese batholith. Journal of Mineralogy and Petgrology, 12 (2):21-27 (in Chinese with English abstract).
  104. 104. JuT. A. N. G.XingFengL. I.JiZhiL. I.JunLiZ. H. A. N. G.XiaoT. A. N. G.QianQiD. E. N. G.XingL. A. N. G.HaiYongH. U. A. N. G.XiaoY. A. O.FengYouW. A. N. G. 2010 Time limit for formation of main geological bodies in Xiongcun copper-gold deposit, Xietongmen County, Tibet: Evidence from zircon U-Pb ages and Re-Os age of molybdenite. MINERAL DEPOSITS. 2010, 29(3): 461-475. (in Chinese, with English abstract)
  105. 105. al. 2001 Oblique stepwise rise and growth of the Tibet plateau[J], Science, 2001, 294:1671~1677
  106. 106. TongJ. S.LiuJ.ZhongH. M.XiaJ.LuR. K.LiY. H. Zircon U-Pb dating and geochemistry of mafic dike swarms in the Lhozag area, southern Tibet, China, and their tectonic implications. Geological Bulletin of China. 2007 26(12): 1654-1664. (in Chinese with English abstract)
  107. 107. al. 1996 Post-collision, Shoshonitic Volcanism on the Tibetan Plateau: Implications for Convective Thinning of the Lithosphere and the Source of Ocean Island Basalts[J], Journal of petrology, 1996,37:45~71
  108. 108. TurnerS.HawksworthC. J.LinJ. al. 1993 Timing of Tibetan uplift constrained by analysis volcanic rocks[J], Nature, 1993, 364:50~53
  109. 109. WangH.MoX. 1995 An outline of tectonic evolution of China: Episodes, 18 1-2 , 616 .
  110. 110. Yu-shengW. A. N.Zhao-huaL. U. O.LiL. I. 2004 3.8 Ma: SHRIMP U-Pb zircon dating of the younger alkali basalt in the Qinghai-Xizang Plateau. GEOCHIMICA. 2004, 33(5): 442-446. (in Chinese, with English abstract)
  111. 111. WangB. D.XuJ. F.ZhangX. G.ChenJ. L.KangZ. Q.DongY. H. 2008 Petrogenesis of Miocene volcanic rocks in the Sailipu area, Western Tibetan Plateau: Geochemical and Sr-Nd isotopic constraints. Acta Petrologica Sinica. 2008, 24(2): 265-278. (in Chinese, with English abstract)
  112. 112. WangJ.WangZ. J.ChenW. X.FuX. G.ChenM. New evidences for the age assignment of the Nadi Kangri Formation in the North Qiangtang basin, northern Tibet, China. Geological Bulletin of China. 2007 26(4): 404-409. (in Chinese, with English abstract)
  113. 113. WangL. Q.PanG. T.LiC.DongY. S.ZhuD. C.YuanS. H.ZhuT. X. 2008 SHRIMP U-Pb zircon dating of Eopaleozoic cumulate in Guoganjianian Mt. from central Qiangtang area of northern Tibet-Considering the evolvement of Proto-and Paleo-Tethys. Geological Bulletion of China. 2008, 27(12): 2045-2056. (in Chinese with English abstract)
  114. 114. Li-quanW. A. N. G.Gui-tangP. A. N.Di-chengZ. H. U.Tong-xingZ. H. U.Shi-liangL. I. N.Zong-liangL. I. 2006 40Ar/39Ar ages of the metamorphic rocks and basalts in E’rou area of Shuanghu, northern Xizang and their significance. Earth Science Frontiers. 2006, 13(4): 221-232. (in Chinese, with English abstract)
  115. 115. YingchaoW. A. N. G.BinX. I. A.YuquanZ. H. A. N. G.YanbinW. A. N. G. 2005 U-PB SHRIMP ZIRCON AGES OF THE CUOGUONONGBA TOURMALINE TWO-MICA GRANITE IN PULAN, SOUTHWEST TIBET. Geotectonica et Metallogenia. 2005, 29(4): 517-521.
  116. 116. DongliangW. E. I.BinX. I. A.GuoqingZ. H. O. U.RanW. A. N. G.LifengZ. H. O. N. G.ShaokaiW. A. N. 2006 Sm-Nd Isochron Age of Zedang Ophiolite in Tibet and Its Significance. ACTA GEOSCIENTICA SINICA. 2006, 27(1): 31-34. (in Chinese, with English abstract)
  117. 117. DongliangW. E. I.BinX. I. A.GuoqingZ. H. O. U.RanW. A. N. G.LifengZ. H. O. N. G.ShaokaiW. A. N. 2006 Sm-Nd Isochron Age of Zedang Ophiolite in Tibet and Its Signigicance. ACTA GEOSCIENTICA SINICA. 2006, 27(1): 31-34.
  118. 118. Qi-rongW. E. I.De-weiL. I.Guo-canW. A. N. G.Jian-pingZ. H. E. N. G. 2007 ZIRCON SHRIMP U-Pb CHRONOLOGY AND GEOCHEMISTRY OF CENOZOIC ORTHOCLASE PORPHYRY IN GONGMAORIMA AREA, NORTHERM TIBET PLATEAU. JMINERAL PETROL. 2007, 27(4): 45-52. (in Chinese, with English abstract)
  119. 119. WeiQ. R.LiD. W.WangG. C.ZhengJ. P. 2007 Zircon SHRIMP U-Pb dating and geochemical characteristics of Chabaoma Formation volcanic rocks in northern Tibetan plateau and its petrogenesis. Acta Petrologica Sinica. 2007, 23(11): 2727-2736.
  120. 120. ZhenquanW. E. I.BinX. I. A.YuquanZ. H. A. N. G.RanW. A. N. G.ZhiqingY. A. N. G.DongliangW. E. I. 2006 SHRIMP ZIRCON DATING OF DIABASE IN THE XIUGUGABU OPHIOLITE IN TIBET AND ITS GEOLOGICAL MPLICATIONS. Geotectonica et Metallogenia. 2006, 30(1): 93-97. (in Chinese with English abstract)
  121. 121. WeinbergR. F.DunlapW. J.WhitehouseM. 2000 New field, structural and geochronological data from the Shyok and Nubra valleys, northern Ladakh; linking Kohistan to Tibet[J], Geological Society Special Publications, 2000,170:253~275
  122. 122. Chun-qiW. E. N.JiD. O. U.QuanW. E. N.Sheng-xiangZ. H. A. N. G.Xiao-pingF. A. N.LinX. U.YanH. U. O.Xiao-junL. U. O. 2004 40Ar-39Ar DATING OF BIOTITE IN ANDERNITE FROM MAYOUMU GOLD ORE AREA IN TIBET, CHINA. JMINERAL PETROL. 2004, 24(2): 53-56. (in Chinese, with English abstract)
  123. 123. WhiteheadJ.DunningG. R.SprayJ. G. 2000 U-Pb geochronology and origin of granitoid rocks in the Thetford Mines ophiolite, Canadian Appalachians[J], Geological Society of America Bulletin,2000,112(6):915~928
  124. 124. al. Age and composition of dikes in Southern Tibet: New constraints on timing of east-west extension and its relationship to postcollisional volcanism[J], Geology, 2001 29(4):339-342
  125. 125. Zhen-hanW. U.Pei-shengY. E.Dao-gongH. U.WeiZ. H. A. N. G.Chun-jingZ. H. O. U. 2007 U-Pb Isotopic Dating of Zircons from Porphyry Granite of the Fenghuoshan Mts, Northern Tibetan Plateau and Its Geological Significance. GEOSCIENCE. 2007, 21(3): 435-442. (in Chinese, with English abstract)
  126. 126. Zhen-hanW. U.Pei-shengY. E.Dao-gongH. U.WeiZ. H. A. N. G.Chun-jingZ. H. O. U. 2007 U-Pb Isotopic Dating of Zircons from Porphyry Granite of the Fenghuoshan Mts, Northern Tibetan Plateau and Its Geological Significance. GEOSCIENCE. 2007, 21(3): 435-442. (in Chinese with English abstract)
  127. 127. BinX. I. A.Jian-fengL. I.Li-wenL. I. U.Li-fengX. U.Guan-shengH. E.HongW. A. N. G.Yu-quanZ. H. A. N. G.Zhi-qingY. A. N. G. 2008 SHRIMP U-Pb dating for diabase in Sangsang ophiolite, Xizang, China: Geochronological constraint for development of eastern Tethys basin. GEOCHIMICA. 2008, 37(4): 399-403. (in Chinese with English abstract)
  128. 128. BinX. I. A.QingchaL. I. N.YuquanZ. H. A. N. G.WanmingD. E. N. G. 2006 The Type of Volcanic Rocks for the Bamaoqiongzong, Yongbocuo and Qiangbaqian in the Northern Tibet, the Dating of 40Ar-39Ar and Its Geological Implications. ACTA GEOLOGICA SINICA. 2006, 80(11): 1676-1682. (in Chinese, with English abstract)
  129. 129. BinX. I. A.QingchaL. I. N.YuquanZ. H. A. N. G.WanmingD. E. N. G. 2006 The Type of Volcanic Rocks for the Bamaoqiongzong, Yongbocuo and Qiangbaqian in the Northern Tibet, the Dating of 40Ar-39Ar and Its Geological Implications. ACTA GEOLOGICA SINICA. 2006, 80(11): 1676-1682.
  130. 130. BinX. I. A.LifengX. U.ZhenquanW. E. I.YuquanZ. H. A. N. G.RanW. A. N. G.JianfengL. I.YanbinW. A. N. G. 2008 SHRIMP Zircon Dating of Gabbro from the Donqiao Ophiolite in Tibet and Its Geological Implications. ACTA GEOLOGICA SINICA. 2008, 82(04): 528-531.
  131. 131. XieY. W.LiL. Q.QiangbaZ. X.WangM.JiangG. W. 2009 Geochemical, geochronological features and tectonic significance of volcanic rocks of Zhucun Formation in Baxoi area, eastern Tibet, China. Geological Bulletin of China. 2009, 28(9): 1244-1252. (in Chinese with English abstract)
  132. 132. De-mingX. U.Gui-chengH. U. A. N. G.Yi-junL. I. 2008 Sm-Nd ages and Nd-Sr-Pb isotope signatures of the Xuigugabu ophiolite, southwestern Tibet. GEOLOGY IN CHINA. 2008, 35(3): 429-435. (in Chinese with English abstract)
  133. 133. XuR. H.ScharerU.AllegeC. J. 1985 Mag Matism and metamorphism in the Lhasa block(Tibet): an U-Pb geochronological study[J], J. Geol., 1985, 93:41-57
  134. 134. XuRonghua. 1998 Abnormal 39Ar/40Ar age of granitoids from collisional orogenic belts in Tibet, Chinese Science Bulletin, 1998, 43 Supp.: 150.
  135. 135. XZBGMR (Xizang Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources), 1979 Regional geological survey reports of Lhasa (scale 1:1,000,000) (in Chinese with English abstract).
  136. 136. XZBGMR (Xizang Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources), 1996 Regional geological survey reports of Xietongmen and Namling (scale 1: 200,000) (inChinese with English abstract).
  137. 137. Y. H.SunJ. F.YuF. 2008 Enriched mantle source and petrogenesis of Sailipu ultrapotassic rocks in southwestern Tibetan Plateau: constraints from zircon U-Pb geochronology and Hf isotopic compositions. Acta Petrologica Sinica 24, 249-264 (in Chinese, with English abstract).
  138. 138. YangD. M.HuangY. C.DaiL. N.ZhaoL. 2005 SHRIMP zircon U-Pb age of garnet-bearing two-mica granite at Comai Township, Lhari County, Tibet, and its significance. Geological Bulletin of China. 2005, 24(3): 235-238. (in Chinese with English abstract)
  139. 139. YangJ. S.WuC. L.ShiR. D.LiH. B.XuZ. Q.MengF. C. 2002 Miocene and Pleistocene shoshonitic volcanic rocks in the Jingyuhu area, northern part of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Acta Petrologica Sinica 18 161176 .
  140. 140. YinA.HarrisonT. M. 2000 Geologic Evolution of the Hi Malayan-Tibet Orogen[J], Annu.Rev. Earth Planet Sci., 2000, 28:211-280
  141. 141. YinA.KappP. A.MurphyM. al. 1999 Significant late Neogene east-west extension in northern Tibet[J], Geology, 1999, 27: 787~90
  142. 142. YuX. 1994 Titanphlogopites from Cenozoic alkaline volcanic rock in western Qinling, Gansu province. Acta Petrologica et Mineralogica 13, 319-327 (in Chinese, with English abstract).
  143. 143. YueY. H.DingL. 2006 40Ar/39Ar Geochronolgy, geochemical characteristics and genesis of the Linzhou basic dikes, Tibet. Acta Petrologica Sinica. 2006, 22(4): 855-866. (in Chinese, with English abstract)
  144. 144. ZhaiQ. G.LiC.WangJ.ChenW. 2009 40Ar/39Ar dating for Cenozoic potassic volcanic rocks in northern Gemucuo from Qiangtang, northern Tibet, China. Geological Bulletin of China. 2009, 28(9): 1221-1228. (in Chinese, with English abstract)
  145. 145. ZhaiQ. G.WangJ.LiC.SuL. 2010 SHRIMP U-Pb dating and Hf isotopic analyses of Middle Ordovician meta-cumulate gabbro in central Qiangtang, northern Tibetan Plateau. Sci China Earth Sci. 2010, 40(05): 565-573.
  146. 146. ZhangChuanlin.ZhaoYu.GuoKunyi.DongYongguan.WangAiguo. 2003 GRENVILLE OROGENY IN NORTH OF THE QINGHAI-TIBET PLATEAU: FIRST EVIDENCE FROM ISOTOPIC DATING. CHINESE JOURNAL OF GEOLOGY. 2003, 38(4): 535-538. (in Chinese, with English abstract)
  147. 147. ZhangH. F.Xuw.c.GuoJ. Q.ZongK. Q.CaiH. M.YuanH. L. 2007 Zircon U-Pb and Hf isotopic composition of deformed granite in the southern margin of the Gangdese belt, Tibet: Evidence for early Jurassic subduction of Neo-Tehtyan oceanic slab. Acta Petrologica Sinica. 2007,23(6): 1347-1353.
  148. 148. ZhangQ.YangR. Y. 1985 The plutonite of High-Mg-andesite types in Dingqing ophiolite and its geological significance, Chinese Science Bulletin, 30(16), 1243-1245. (in Chinese with English abstract)
  149. 149. Wan-pingZ. H. A. N. G.Xuan-xueM. O.Di-chengZ. H. U.Si-huaY. U. A. N.Li-quanW. A. N. G. 2009 The genesis of the Xiongcun copper-gold deposit in southern Gangdise, Tibet: evidence from zircon U-Pb SHRIMP ages. ACTA PETROLOGICA ET MINERALOGICA. 2009, 28(3): 235-242. (in Chinese, with English abstract)
  150. 150. ZhangQ. 2003 Adakite from continental collision zones: melting of thickened lower crust beneath southern Tibet. Geology 31 10211024 .
  151. 151. ZhaoZ.ChiX. G.LiuJ. F.LiG. R.ZhaoY. D. Geochemical feature and its tectonic significance of Gemucuo Oligocene potassic volcanic rocks in the Qiangtang area, Tibet, China. Geological Bulletin of China. 2009 28(4): 463-473. (in Chinese, with English abstract)
  152. 152. ZhaoZ. D.M. O. X. X.Z. H. A. N. G. S. al. 2001 Post-collision Mag Matism in Wuyu basin, central hTibet: evidence for recycling of subducted Tethyan oceanic crust[J], Science in China (Series D),2001,44(supp.):2734
  153. 153. ZhaoZ. D.MoX. X.NomadeS.RenneP. R.ZhouS.DongG. C.WangL. L.ZhuD. C.LiaoZ. L. Post-colisional ultrapotassic rocks in Lhasa Block, Tibetan Plateau: Spatial and temporal distribution and its’ implications. Acta Petrologica Sinica. 2006 22(4): 787-794. (in Chinese, with English abstract)
  154. 154. ZhengY. Y.XuR. K.MaGaoG. T.ZhangS. B.MaG. Y. X. M.CiQ. Age of generation and subduction of Shiquan river ophiolite: Restriction from SHRIMP zircon dating. Acta Petrologica Sinica. 2006 22(4): 895-904.
  155. 155. ZhongHua.MingLiuJun.Jin-SongTongJun.XiaRu-kuiL. U. 2008 AGE AND SIGNIFICANCE FOR THE VOLCANIC ROCKS OF CANTOR FORMATION SONGXI REGION IN NORTHWEST OF QIANGTANG. Geology of Anhui. 2008, 18(2): 92-94. (in Chinese, with English abstract)
  156. 156. LifengZ. H. O. N. G.BinX. I. A.YuquanZ. H. A. N. G.RanW. A. N. G.DongliangW. E. I.ZhiqingY. A. N. G. 2006 SHRIMP Age Determination of the Diabase in Luobusa Ophiolite, Southern Xizang (Tibet). GEOLOGICAL REVIEW. 2006, 52(2): 224-229.
  157. 157. Z. H. O. U. S.M. O. X. X.MahoneyJ. al. 2002 Geochronology and Nd and Pb isotope characteristics of gabbro dikes in the Luobusha ophiolite, Tibet[J],Chinese Bulletin, 2002,47(2):143-145
  158. 158. ZhouS.MoX. X.DongG. al. 2004 40Ar-39Ar geochronology of Cenozoic Linzizong volcanic rocks from Linzhou Basin, Tibet, China, and their geological implications, Chinese Science Bulletin, 49(18), 1970-1979.
  159. 159. Z. H. O. U. S.QiuR. Z.M. O. X. X. 2010 40Ar/39Ar geochronology of post-collisional volcanism in the middle Gangdese Belt, southern Tibet. Journal of Asian Earth Science, 37 3 246258
  160. 160. ZhouS. 2002 Study on the geochronology of several key regions of Gangdese magmatic and Yarlung Zangpo ophiolite belts, Tibet. Ph.D. Dissertation, China University of Geosciences, Beijing (in Chinese with English abstract).
  161. 161. DichengZ. H. U.GuitangP. A. N.XuanxueM. O.LiquanW. A. N. G.ZhidanZ. H. A. O.ZhongliL. I. A. O.QuanruG. E. N. G.GuochenD. O. N. G. 2006 Identification for the Mesozoic OIB-type Basalts in Central Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau: Geochronology, Geochemistry and Their Tectonic Setting. ACTA GEOLOGICA SINICA. 2006, 80(9): 1312-1328. (in Chinese, with English abstract)
  162. 162. ZhuDicheng.PanGuitang.MoXuanxue.WangLiquan.ZhaoZhidan.LiaoZhongli.GengQuanru.DongGuochen. 2006 Identification for the Mesozoic OIB-type Basalts in Central Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau: Geochronology, Geochemistry and Their Tectonic Setting. ACTA GEOLOGICA SINICA. 2006, 80(9): 1312-1328.

Written By

Su Zhou, Ruizhao Qiu, Sun Kai and Zhang Linlin

Submitted: January 5th, 2011 Published: July 27th, 2011