Open access

Growth of Germanium Nanowires on a Flexible Organic Substrate

Written By

Lauren Klein, Daniel Mastrogiovanni, Alan Wan and Eric Garfunkel

Submitted: February 10th, 2011 Published: July 19th, 2011

DOI: 10.5772/18887

Chapter metrics overview

2,828 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

1. Introduction

Germanium nanowires (GeNWs) have received extensive attention due to their potential use in electronic, optoelectronic, sensor and other applications. (Heath 2000; Wu and Yang 2000; Hanrath and Korgel 2002; Hanrath and Korgel 2004) (Greytak 2004) The small size, high aspect ratio, and high surface/volume ratio of Ge and other semiconducting nanowires also make them of great fundamental scientific interest. (Jing, Ni et al. 2006; Allen 2007) GeNWs grown via a vapor-liquid-solid (VLS) mechanism in a modified chemical vapor deposition (CVD) process are crystalline. (Dailey 2004) They can be patterned, functionalized, and/or made components of heterostructures for device applications. (Yun 2003; Hanrath and Korgel 2004; Dai 2005; Wang, Chang et al. 2005; Adhikari, Marshall et al. 2006; Pasquier, Mastrogiovanni et al. 2007) Germanium possesses a higher carrier mobility than silicon, as well as a lower nanowire growth temperature when grown using the VLS method (Adhikari, Marshall et al. 2007).

There would be a large market for flexible electronic and photonic devices if functionality and performance could approach that of conventional solid state devices at a reasonable cost. (Bradley, Gabriel et al. 2003; Bitetti, Marchetti et al. 2007) Polymer films hold great promise as a cost-efficient substrate for potential applications such as those of photovoltaics or display technologies, due in large part to their ease of manufacturing, low cost, and extensive past development.

Other complex materials combinations are being explored including integrating inorganic nanoparticles or small molecule organics with polymers. Two classes of methods for integrating semiconductor nanowires with flexible materials are:

  1. transferring wires from a sacrificial growth substrate to a new material via contact printing or solution deposition (Bradley, Gabriel et al. 2003; McAlpine, Friedman et al. 2003; Saran, Parikh et al. 2004; Fan, Ho et al. 2008), and

  2. direct integration via solution growth or very low temperature VSS growth.

(Gibson 2005; Lin 2005; Kang 2008) In the former method nanowires must first be grown on some other substrate and then harvested. However, for many large-scale applications direct growth would be highly preferable. Growing nanowires on the polymer substrates simplifies the processing of any devices through reduction of the number of necessary steps, and thus becomes more cost-effective. Direct growth saves time, reduces the risk of damage to the nanowires during harvesting, and also securely fastens the wires to the substrate. The wires grown in this study were anchored to the polymer with sufficient integrity to withstand extensive flexing of the substrate, and were manufactured at standard VLS growth temperatures.

The relatively low decomposition temperatures of most polymers cannot survive the growth temperature used in most VLS nanowire processing. However, the growth temperatures of GeNWs, 300-400 °C, does allow for direct growth on thermally stable polymers. Polyimides such as Kapton, are one class of polymers that offer promise. Recent advances in the thermal stability of polymers (to over 600 °C) offer hope that flexible, and in some cases transparent, substrates can be manufactured to enable the extension of our methods to other nanowire/nanotube growth systems such as silicon nanowires or carbon nanotubes. (Ree, Kim et al. 1997; Maya, Lozano et al. 2005; Li, Liu et al. 2006; Choi, Chung et al.; Chung and Hsiao 2008; Wang, Yi et al. 2008)


2. Growth and processing methods

2.1. Polymer processing

In the near future, it is expected that an increasing amount of these materials will be made commercially available, though not many are on the market today. For the studies contained herein, Kapton (Dupont) and poly[(4,4’-hexafluoroisopropylidene) diphthalic anhydride-alt-3,6-diaminoacridine hemisulfate] (Sigma-Aldrich) are used. It is the relatively low growth temperature of germanium nanowires which makes growth on any polymer, even those listed above, possible. Both materials possess a glass-transition temperature just above the required growth range for germanium nanowires.

To prepare the fluorinated polyimide samples, poly[(4,4’-hexafluoroisopropylidene) diphthalic anhydride-alt-3,6-diaminoacridine hemisulfate] is dissolved in DMSO at a concentration of 10 mg/mL. The solution is subsequently drop cast onto a glass slide while simultaneously heating at 50 °C to expedite solvent removal. It should be noted that by this preparation method, the fluorinated polyimide samples are not flexible, but if bulk material were available, flexible substrates of fluorinated polyimide could easily be treated in the same manner as Kapton.

Germanium nanowires grow via a catalyzed mechanism, and the polymer substrates must first be coated with gold a thin gold film or gold particles. Gold deposition is achieved by one of two methods, either through sputter coating thin films on the surface, or through wet chemical treatment. Kapton sheets were sputter-coated with Au films roughly 2, 5, 10, and 50 nm thick. Exact thicknesses were determined using Rutherford Backscattering Spectroscopy (RBS). Polymer substrates cleaned with methanol to remove organic contaminants were exposed to a 0.1M solution of 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane (APTES) in methanol for 24 hours. The sheets were removed, rinsed clean, and then blown dry with purified N2. The functionalized films were then submerged in commercial gold nanoparticle solutions (Ted Pella, Inc) with nanoparticle diameters ranging between 10 and 50 nm.

2.2. Germanium nanowire growth

The functionalized plastic substrates were confined to a specially designed stainless steel holder to prevent deformation of the polymer as higher temperatures were attained. For growth on Kapton a stainless steel holder was required to keep the thin plastic sheets from deforming during growth. The stainless steel holder we used to secure the Kapton is shown in figure 1, below. As our growth temperatures approach the glass transition temperature of Kapton, if the film was not restrained, significant curling of the film would take place, undesirable for subsequent processing and studies. The holder measures 10cm x 1.8cm x 0.6cm.

Figure 1.

Stainless steel holder designed to accommodate Kapton samples

All processed substrates were placed in a hot-wall CVD reactor. Germane (GeH4) gas (5% in He, Voltaix) was flowed through the system at a rate of 20 sccm at partial pressures ranging from 1-3 Torr. Growth timing was varied between 5 and 30 minutes. Growth temperature was held at 360° . Proccessing temperatures in this range lead to conical wires, due to radial non-catalyzed CVD growth. A diagram of this procedure is shown in figure 2.

Figure 2.

Diagram of germanium nanowire growth scheme.

2.3. Post growth processing

Nanowire samples were placed in a 0.1M solution of 1-octanethiol for 24 hours immediately upon removal from the reactor. Alkanethiol solutions have been shown to form self-assembled monolayers on germanium substrates and are attractive chemicals to begin passivation studies with as they can be terminated with large number of functional groups which can be subsequently reacted to more fully functionalize a surface. (Hanrath and Korgel 2004; Wang, Chang et al. 2004; Wang, Chang et al. 2005) (Sang 2001)


3. Results

3.1. Growth on polymer substrates

Germanium nanowires grown on Kapton and fluorinated polyimide samples produce a high yield of nanowires with good mechanical and chemical robustness. Wires produced in these growths are slightly tapered, due to uncatalyzed CVD deposition on the sides of the wire as growth proceeds.

A satisfactory mechanical robustness was observed when wires were anchored to a flexible material; the systems underwent considerable bending and flexing consistent with being handled in the lab and no detachment or damage to the wires was evident. Figure 3, below, represents one such system, imaged while the Kapton substrate was restricted in a bent position.

Figure 3.

Germanium nanowires grown on Kapton. Inset image shows wires from the height of the Kapton fold.

Figure 4 shows a side-view scanning electron micrograph of GeNWs on Kapton. These wires were grown at 360° for 15 minutes from 10nm Au colloid particles. Remaining catalysts can be observed at the tips of the wires. Tapering is clearly evident, most likely stemming from non-catalyzed radial CVD growth.

In Figure 5, a top-view image is shown of GeNWs grown on poly[(4,4’-hexafluoroisopropylidene) diphthalic anhydride-alt-3,6-diaminoacridine hemisulfate]. These wires were grown at 360° for 15 minutes from 10nm Au colloid particles. Excellent uniformity of the length and diameters of the wires is noted.

Figure 4.

Side view scanning electron micrograph images of GeNWs on Kapton.

Figure 5.

Top view scanning electron micrograph image of GeNWs grown on poly[(4,4’-hexafluoroisopropylidene) diphthalic anhydride-alt-3,6-diaminoacridine hemisulfate].

3.2. Colloidal gold vs. sputtered gold films

The starting gold catalyst is critical to the nanowire formation. As described in the methods section above, both sputter-coated Au films and wet chemical deposition of colloidal gold particles were utilized as sources of gold. For most applications in nanotechnology it is uniformity in size and spatial distribution which is sought in these wires; variations in length and diameter lead to variations in electrical physical properties and physical. Thus, the ideal growth will produce wires as similar in length and diameter as possible.

To ensure uniformity of nanowire diameter across a single sample during growth, colloidal catalysts are preferred over sputter-coated films. As the eventual nanowire diameter is determined by the prepared colloid diameter, wires can be grown over large areas with precise control over their size. We used predominantly 10nm and 20nm colloids in these studies. The colloids, as purchased, have a rough concentration of about 1011 nanoparticles/mL and will generally coat the substrates in a uniform manner when prepared as described above. Less dense areas can be prepared by diluting colloid solutions with distilled, deionized water.

In Figure 6, shown below, the wires were grown from 20 nm colloids under standard growth conditions as described above. One will note the general consistency among wire diameters. Prior to heating, the colloids are certified by Ted Pella to be within 18 and 22 nm in diameter. It is observed, however, that wires often differ from this initial diameter range by 10-20 nanometers. There are two reasons for this discrepancy. First, once exposed to air, wires typically grow a 5nm coating of native oxide, GeOx, making them appear fatter in scanning electron micrographs.

Figure 6.

Germanium nanowires grown from colloidal gold particles attached to the surface through the previously described wet chemical method. Wires are largely consistent in size and length.

Second, once heated, the gold becomes mobile on the substrate surface and can aggregate. Organic linker molecules used to hold the nanoparticles in place vaporize as soon as the temperature reaches 213 °C. Heating of the substrate must continue, however, until the bulk gold-germanium eutectic temperature is reached. During this period of time, the wires grown from 20 nm colloid particles may end up being closer to 40 nm in diameter, due to the combination of several original particles. There are, however, no such rules or generalizations which can be made for sputter-coated films.

Figure 7.

Scanning electron micrograph of germanium nanowires grown on Kapton from 6.7 nm gold film. Note the non-uniform distribution of diameters present. Wires were grown under standard conditions.

Figure 7 is a characteristic image consistent with nanowire growth from a sputter-deposited gold film. The wires differ drastically in diameter, with fatter wires reaching several hundred nanometers in diameter and thinner wires maintaining diameters of 50 nm or smaller. As can be seen from a comparison of Figures 6 and 7, the nanowires grown from colloids are significantly more uniform than those that were grown from the sputter-coated films.

The growth on sputter-deposited films results from the diffusion and nucleation of the gold on the substrate surface. A discrete island or particle of gold is required to begin nucleation of the germanium nanowire. It is well known that when heated, thin gold films become mobile resulting in the balling up of the metal on the surface. It is this mechanism which makes it possible to grow wires from an initially contiguous film over the surface of a substrate. There are, however, specific limitations as to the deposited thickness of this film. Of the sputter-coated films, reasonable nanowire growth was observed for approximately 5-20 nm thick gold films, area averaged.

If insufficient gold is present, very poor growth is observed, resulting in few, if any, actual wires, as can be seen in Figure 8. For this exceptionally thin coating, it appears there is not enough gold to form the necessary nucleating islands. Wire-like masses are observed, but they exist in the plane of the surface and are not free standing, resembling more amorphous germanium masses capped with gold than any useful nanowire structure.

Figure 8.

Poor growth results from 2.8 nm gold film. “Wires” were grown under standard conditions.

If too much gold is present, an equally significant problem is encountered. Eventually, with the increase of thickness, one approaches a film which acts more closely to a bulk layer of gold. Balling-up and mobility across the surface is hindered, and catalyst islands do not form, making it impossible for nanowire nucleation to begin. As can be seen in Figure 9, no growth is observed under these conditions. If sputter coating is the only available method of functionalizing the substrate surface with the gold catalysts, it is preferable that the thickness of the deposited gold film is tightly controlled to approximately 10 nm.

Figure 9.

Poor growth results from a 77 nm gold film.

The thicknesses of these films were confirmed through analysis by Rutherford Backscattering Spectroscopy (RBS) as shown in Figure 10.

Figure 10.

RBS spectra confirming an area averaged Au thickness on Kapton. A) 77 nm B) 2.8 nm

3.3. AFM studies of Kapton

At a germanium nanowire growth temperature of 360 °C (as used in part of this work), the growth temperature approaches the glass transition temperature of Kapton. It was necessary to determine if this would have any effect on the gold catalyst particles deposited on the surface during the pre-treatment, particularly if the gold could become embedded within the polymer during the initial heating. In order to examine the location and morphology of the gold nanoparticle catalysts under growth conditions, atomic force microscopy (AFM) was employed. AFM images were obtained using a Digital Instruments MultiMode AFM with a Nanoscope IV controller operating in TappingMode. VISTAprobes non-contact mode Si cantilevers with a spring constant of 0.40 N/m, resonant frequency of 300 kHz, and nominal tip radii of 10 nm were used.

Figure 11.

AFM height (left) and phase (right) images of colloidal Au particles on a Kapton film (a) and plain Kapton film (b) after heating samples under conditions simulating nanowire growth. All images are 1 μm2.

Scans were performed on Kapton films treated with 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane (APTES) and colloidal gold particles of 50nm in diameter, as described in the methods section, and an untreated Kapton film as a control. Both samples were imaged before and after heating in N2 (360 °C, 15 min.) to mimic the conditions present during nanowire growth. Figure 11 reveals that gold remains in colloidal form on the surface of the polymer and does not appear to migrate into the bulk of the polymer.

Upon heating, the colloids do appear to aggregate and form particles roughly twice their initial diameter. As can be seen from Figure 11a, the colloids appear to be roughly 100 nm in diameter post-heating. Aggregation of the colloids is expected due to the increasing mobility of gold on surfaces at higher temperatures. This, in turn, is consistent with the typical observation of nanowires possessing diameters larger than the initial catalyst size.

3.4. Treatment to remove nanowire oxide

Due to the poor electrical properties of the native oxide of germanium it is a significant problem which must be addressed with in order to utilize germanium nanowires to their full potential in electrical devices. The oxide must be prevented from growing or removed after it has developed. Under ambient conditions, germanium surfaces undergo rapid oxidation to GeO followed by conversion to the thermodynamically more stable GeO2. This oxide can be removed through traditional processing methods such as treatment with a dilute aqueous HF solution. (Adhikari 2005) Our studies show that the germanium oxides are readily removed in a 2% HF solution for 1 minute with minimal damage to the GeNWs or the polymer substrate.

Figure 12.

Nanowires grown on a Kapton substrate retain their integrity after an HF dip.

The chemical robustness of the polymer substrate is key element if the eventual goal for such a system is printable electronics. Flexible polymer sheets and any deposited components must be able to withstand wet chemical processing to be of use. As can be seen in Figure 12, nanowires exposed to the HF treatment described above retain their structure and attachment to the Kapton surface.

3.5. Passivation

One method to passivate germanium involves capping the surface with organic thiols. Germanium nanowire samples grown on polymers were placed in a 0.1M solution of 1-octanethiol for 24 hours immediately upon removal from the reactor. To confirm the level of oxide on the surface, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy was used. For the following spectra, data were collected using Al Kα anode source with a cylindrical mirror analyzer. The FWHM of the C 1s peak (2.4 eV) was used as the FWHM for the deconvolution of the Ge 2p peaks. The C 1s is a single Gaussian and represents the energy resolution of the instrument at the pass energy utilized. Within the deconvolution of the Ge 2p 1/2, the peak with the lowest binding energy was assigned to that of bulk Ge. All spectra were shifted to ensure that this peak was centered at 1217.0 eV.

A comparison of passivated and non-passivated samples reveals a substantial decrease in the surface oxidation for samples that had been thiol passivated. Non-passivated samples possess a substantial oxide layer consisting primarily of GeO2, with a smaller contribution from GeO, as can be seen in Figure 13a. The passivated species also exhibit a small higher binding energy shoulder consisting of a single peak attributed primarily to GeO, as can be seen in figure 13b. However, the contribution relative to the bulk germanium peak is greatly reduced from that of the non-passivated sample. The presence of GeO suggests that even the brief exposure of the sample to atmosphere while transferring from the growth chamber to the thiol solution is enough to partially oxidize the germanium. However, as previously mentioned, the stability of the polymer substrate is sufficient to remove this oxide coating prior to passivation, thus greatly reducing the presence of oxide.

Figure 13.

XPS spectra of Ge 2p3/2 and 2p1/2 for non-passivated (a) and passivated (b) GeNWs

Passivation between processing steps, and passivation/packaging at the end of processing, are key in realizing device applications. The growth, processing, and passivation methods detailed in this work are all found to lead to a flexible and well-integrated GeNW-polymer hybrid film, of potential importance for a range of flexible applications such as batteries, solar cells, sensors, and transistors.


4. Conclusion

In conclusion, we present results of GeNW VLS growth on flexible organic substrates. The nanowire attachment to the polymer substrates is robust and able to withstand flexing of the substrate. Post-growth processing to remove the oxide and to functionalize the nanowires (with or without the oxide present), can be applied without damaging the substrate. This work is of potential importance for a range of flexible applications such as batteries, solar cells, sensors and transistors. Direct growth of nanowires on flexible substrates simplifies processing and improves yield. We compare various methods of catalyst preparation from which nanowire growth can be initiated, and conclude that wet chemical methods to deposit colloidal gold particles on the substrate surface produces wires superior in uniformity than sputter coated gold films.



The authors thank the National Science Foundation for financial support for this work. They acknowledge Ozgur Celik, Leszek Wielunski, and Robert Lorber for their valuable time and advice.


  1. 1. Adhikari H. Marshall A. F. et al. 2006 Nano Lett. 6 2 318 323 .
  2. 2. Adhikari H. Marshall A. F. et al. 2007 ACS Nano 1 5 415 422 .
  3. 3. Adhikari H. Sun S. Mc Intyre P. Chidsey C. E. D. 2005 Applied Physics Letters 87.
  4. 4. Allen P. B. 2007 Nano Lett. 7 1 6 10 .
  5. 5. Bitetti G. Marchetti M. et al. 2007 Acta Astronautica 60 3 166 174 .
  6. 6. Bradley K. J. Gabriel C. P. et al. 2003 Nano Lett. 3 10 1353 1355 .
  7. 7. Choi H. Chung I. S. et al. 2008 Polymer.
  8. 8. Chung, C.-L. and S.-H. Hsiao 2008 Polymer 49 10 2476 2485 .
  9. 9. Dai H. 2005 Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 44 2 5 .
  10. 10. Dailey J. W. Taraci J. Clement T. Smith D. J. Picraux S. T. 2004 J. Appl. Phys 96.
  11. 11. Fan Z. Ho J. C. et al. 2008 Nano Lett. 8 1 20 25 .
  12. 12. Gibson J. Daghlian C. P. 2005 J. Appl. Phys 97.
  13. 13. Greytak A. B. Lauhoun L. J. Gudiksen M. S. Lieber C. M. 2004 Applied Physics Letters 84.
  14. 14. Hanrath T. Korgel B. A. 2002 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124 7 1424 1429 .
  15. 15. Hanrath T. Korgel B. A. 2004 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126 47 15466 15472 .
  16. 16. Heath J. 2000 J. Phys. Chem 104(11864-11870).
  17. 17. Jing M. Ni M. et al. 2006 J. Phys. Chem. B 110 37 18332 18337 .
  18. 18. Kang K. Lee H. Kim C. Yang J. Jo M. 2008 Advanced Materials 9999.
  19. 19. Li H. Liu J. et al. 2006 Polymer 47 4 1443 1450 .
  20. 20. Lin C. Liao H. Chen S. 2005 Applied Physics Letters(86).
  21. 21. Maya E. M. Lozano A. E. et al. 2005 Polymer 46 25 11247 11254 .
  22. 22. Mc Alpine M. C. Friedman R. S. et al. 2003 Nano Lett. 3 11 1531 1535 .
  23. 23. Pasquier A. D. Mastrogiovanni D. D. T. et al. 2007 Applied Physics Letters 91(18): 183501.
  24. 24. Ree M. Kim K. et al. 1997 Journal of Applied Physics 81 2 698 708 .
  25. 25. Sang W. Han M. Carraro C. Maboudian R. 2001 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 123.
  26. 26. Saran N. Parikh K. et al. 2004 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126 14 4462 4463 .
  27. 27. Wang D. Y. Chang L. et al. 2005 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127 33 11871 11875 .
  28. 28. Wang D. Y. Chang L. et al. 2004 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126 37 11602 11611 .
  29. 29. Wang L. Yi B. L. et al. 2008 J. Phys. Chem. B 112 14 4270 4275 .
  30. 30. Wu Y. Yang P. 2000 Chem. Mater. 12 3 605 607 .
  31. 31. Yun M. 2003 Nanofabrication Technologies 5220.

Written By

Lauren Klein, Daniel Mastrogiovanni, Alan Wan and Eric Garfunkel

Submitted: February 10th, 2011 Published: July 19th, 2011