Open Access is an initiative that aims to make scientific research freely available to all. To date our community has made over 100 million downloads. It’s based on principles of collaboration, unobstructed discovery, and, most importantly, scientific progression. As PhD students, we found it difficult to access the research we needed, so we decided to create a new Open Access publisher that levels the playing field for scientists across the world. How? By making research easy to access, and puts the academic needs of the researchers before the business interests of publishers.
We are a community of more than 103,000 authors and editors from 3,291 institutions spanning 160 countries, including Nobel Prize winners and some of the world’s most-cited researchers. Publishing on IntechOpen allows authors to earn citations and find new collaborators, meaning more people see your work not only from your own field of study, but from other related fields too.
Plastics were first invented in 1860, but have only been widely used in the last 30 years. Plastics are light, durable, modifiable and hygienic. Plastics are made up of long chain of molecules called polymers. Polymers are made when naturally occurring substances such as crude oil or petroleum are transformed into other substances with completely different properties. These polymers can then be made into granules, powders and liquids, becoming raw materials for plastic products. Worldwide plastics production increases 80 million tons every year. Global production and consumption of plastics have increased, from less than 5 million tons in the year 1950 to 260 million tons in the year 2007. Of those over one third is being used for packaging, while rest is used for other sectors. Plastic production has increased by more than 500% over the past 30 years. Per capita consumption of plastics will increase by more than 50% during the next decades. In the Western Europe total annual household waste generation is approximately 500 kg per capita and 750 kg per capita in the United States; 12% of this total waste is plastics. The global total waste plastic generation is estimated to be over 210 million tons per year. US alone generate 48 million tons per year (Stat data from EPA). The growth in plastics use is due to their beneficial characteristics; 21st century Economic growth making them even more suitable for a wide variety of applications, such as: food and product packaging, car manufacturing, agricultural use, housing products and etc. Because of good safety and hygiene properties for food packaging, excellent thermal and electrical insulation properties, plastics are more desirable among consumers. Low production cost, lower energy consumption and CO2 emissions during production of plastics are relatively lower than making alternative materials, such as glass, metals and etc. Yet for all their advantages, plastics have a considerable downside in terms of their environmental impact. Plastic production requires large amounts of resources, primarily fossil fuels and 8% of the world’s annual oil production is used in the production of plastics. Potentially harmful chemicals are added as stabilizers or colorants. Many of these have not undergone environmental risk assessment and their impact on human health and environment is currently uncertain. Worldwide municipal sites like shops or malls had the largest proportion of plastic rubbish items. Ocean soup swirling the debris of plastics trash in the Pacific Ocean has now grown to a size that is twice as large as the continental US. In 2006, 11.5 million of tons of plastics were wasted in the landfill. These types of disposal of the waste plastics release toxic gas; which has negative impact on environment. Most plastics are non-biodegradable and they take long time to break down in landfill, estimated to be more than a century. Plastic waste also has a detrimental impact on wild life; plastic waste in the oceans is estimated to cause the death of more than a million seabirds and more than 100,000 marine mammals every year (UN Environmental Program Estimate). Along with this hundreds of thousands of sea turtles, whales and other marine mammals die every year eating discarded waste plastic bags mistaken for food. Setting up intermediate treatment plants for waste plastic, such as: plastic incineration, recycle, or obtaining the landfill for reclamation is difficult. The types of the waste plastics are LDPE, HDPE, PP, PS, PVC, PETE, PLA and etc. The problems of waste plastics can’t be solved by landfilling or incineration, because the safety deposits are expensive and incineration stimulates the growing emission of harmful green house gases, e.g COx, NOx, SOx and etc. By using NSR’s new technology we can convert all types of waste plastics into liquid hydrocarbon fuel by setting temperature profile 370° C to 420° C, we can resolve all waste plastic problems including land, ocean, river and green house effects. Many of researcher and experts have done a lot of research and work on waste plastics; some of the thesis’s are on thermal degradation process [1-10], pyrolysis process [11-20] and catalytic conversion process [21-30]. Producing fuels can be alternative of heating oil, gasoline, naphtha, aviation, diesel and fuel oil. We also produce light gaseous (natural gas) hydrocarbon compound (C1-C4), such as: methane, ethane, propane and butane. This process is profitable because it requires less production cost per gallon. We can produce individual plastic to fuel, mixed waste plastic to fuel and that produced fuel can make different category fuels by using further fractional distillation process. This NSR technology will not only reduce the production cost of fuel, but it will also reduce 9% of foreign oil dependency, create more electricity and new jobs all over the world. To mitigate the present world market demand, we can substitute this method as a potential source of new renewable energy.
A plastic has physical and chemical properties. Different types of plastics displayed distinguishable characteristics and properties. Many kinds of plastics are appeared like LDPE, HDPE, PP, PS, PVC &PETE etc. Several individual plastics properties are elaborated in shortly, that’s given below in Table-1, Table-2, Table-3and Table-4.
Quantity
Value
Units
Thermal expansion
110 - 130
e-6/K
Thermal conductivity
0.46 - 0.52
W/m.K
Specific heat
1800 - 2700
J/kg.K
Melting temperature
108 - 134
°C
Glass temperature
-110 - -110
°C
Service temperature
-30 - 85
°C
Density
940 - 965
kg/m3
Resistivity
5e+17 - 1e+21
Ohm.mm2/m
Shrinkage
2 - 4
%
Water absorption
0.01 - 0.01
%
Table 1.
HDPE-2 Plastic Properties
Quantity
Value
Units
Thermal expansion
150 - 200
e-6/K
Thermal conductivity
0.3 - 0.335
W/m.K
Specific heat
1800 - 3400
J/kg.K
Melting temperature
125 - 136
°C
Glass temperature
-110 - -110
°C
Service temperature
-30 - 70
°C
Density
910 - 928
kg/m3
Resistivity
5e+17 - 1e+21
Ohm.mm2/m
Breakdown potential
17.7 - 39.4
kV/mm
Shrinkage
1.5 - 3
%
Water absorption
0.005 - 0.015
%
Table 2.
LDPE-4 Plastic Properties
Quantity
Value
Units
Thermal expansion
180 - 180
e-6/K
Thermal conductivity
0.22 - 0.22
W/m.K
Melting temperature
160 - 165
°C
Glass temperature
-10 - -10
°C
Service temperature
-10 - 110
°C
Density
902 - 907
kg/m3
Resistivity
5e+21 - 1e+22
Ohm.mm2/m
Breakdown potential
55 - 90
kV/mm
Shrinkage
0.8 - 2
%
Table 3.
PP-5 Plastic Properties
Quantity
Value
Units
Thermal expansion
60 - 80
e-6/K
Thermal conductivity
0.14 - 0.16
W/m.K
Specific heat
1300 - 1300
J/kg.K
Glass temperature
80 - 98
°C
Service temperature
-10 - 90
°C
Density
1040 - 1050
kg/m3
Resistivity
1e+22 - 1e+22
Ohm.mm2/m
Breakdown potential
100 - 160
kV/mm
Shrinkage
0.3 - 0.7
%
Table 4.
PS-6 Plastic Properties
2.2. Pre analysis of Gas Chromatography & Mass Spectrometer (GC/MS) analysis
Before starting the fuel production experiment, we have analyzed each of the individual raw waste plastics. Types of analyzed raw waste plastics are following, HDPE-2 (High Density Polyethylene), LDPE-4 (Low Density Polyethylene), PP-5 (Polypropylene) and PS-6 (Polystyrene)
Figure 1.
GC/MS Chromatogram of HDPE-2 Raw Waste Plastic
Retention Time
Compound Name
Formula
Retention Time
Compound Name
Formula
2.14
Propane
C3H8
22.62
Tetradecane
C14H30
2.23
3-Butyn-1-ol
C4H6O
24.57
1,13-Tetradecadiene
C14H26
17.61
Dodecane
C12H26
40.94
1,19-Eicosadiene
C20H38
19.78
1,13-Tetradecadiene
C14H26
41.02
1-Docosene
C22H44
20.00
1-Tridecene
C13H26
42.48
1-Docosene
C22H44
20.19
Tridecane
C13H28
43.89
1-Tetracosanol
C24H50O
22.24
1,13-Tetradecadiene
C14H26
45.28
9-Tricosene, (Z)-
C23H46
22.45
Cyclotetradecane
C14H28
46.76
17-Pentatriacontene
C35H70
Table 4.
GC/MS Compound List of HDPE-2 Waste Plastic
Figure 2.
GC/MS Chromatogram of LDPE-4 Raw Waste Plastic
Retention Time (Minutes)
Compound Name
Formula
Retention Time (Minutes)
Compound Name
Formula
2.11
Propane
C3H8
17.13
1,11-Dodecadiene
C12H22
2.19
Cyclopropyl carbinol
C4H8O
17.37
Cyclododecane
C12H24
11.44
1,9-Decadiene
C10H18
33.62
1-Nonadecene
C19H38
11.73
Cyclodecane
C10H20
11.95
Decane
C10H22
35.87
1,19-Eicosadiene
C20H38
14.35
1,10-Undecadiene
C11H20
36.08
1-Heneicosyl formate
C22H44O2
14.61
1-Undecene
C11H22
42.76
1-Docosanol
C22H46O
14.84
Undecane
C11H24
47.91
9-Tricosene, (Z)-
C23H46
Table 5.
GC/MS Chromatogram Compound list of LDPE-4 Raw Waste Plastic
Figure 3.
GC/MS Chromatogram of PP-5 Raw Waste Plastic
Retention Time (Minutes)
Compound Name
Formula
Retention Time (Minutes)
Compound Name
Formula
2.13
Cyclopropane
C3H6
12.29
Decane, 4-methyl-
C11H24
2.26
1-Butyne
C4H6
14.18
2-Dodecene, (E)-
C12H24
9.36
1,6-Octadiene, 2,5-dimethyl-, (E)-
C10H18
26.35
1-Hexadecanol, 3,7,11,15-tetramethyl-
C20H42O
11.71
Nonane, 2-methyl-3-methylene-
C11H22
31.52
1-Heneicosyl formate
C22H44O2
11.78
1-Ethyl-2,2,6-trimethylcyclohexane
C11H22
32.51
1-Nonadecanol
C19H40O
12.17
Nonane, 2,6-dimethyl-
C11H24
33.98
1,22-Docosanediol
C22H46O2
Table 6.
GC/MS Chromatogram Compound List of PP-5 Raw Waste Plastic
GC/MS Chromatogram of PS-6 Raw Waste Plastic Compound List
Individual raw waste plastics of GCMS pre-analysis in accordance with their numerous retention times many compound are found, some of them are mentioned shortly. In HDPE-2 raw waste plastics on retention time 2.14, compound is Propane (C3H8), on retention time 22.45, compound is Cyclotetradecane and finally on retention time 46.76 obtained compound is Pentatriacotene (C35H70) [Shown above Fig.1 and Table-4]. In LDPE-4 raw waste plastics on retention time 2.11, compound is Propane (C3H8), on retention time 14.84, compound is Undecane (C11H24) and finally on retention time 47.91 obtained compound is 9-Tricosene (Z)-(C23H46) [Shown above Fig.2 and Table-5]. In PP-5 initially on retention time 2.13 compound is Cyclopropane (C3H6) and finally on retention time 33.98 obtained compound is 1, 22-Docosanediol (C22H46O2) [Shown above Fig.3 and Table-6]. Accordingly in PS-6 on retention time 2.17 found compound is Cyclopropane and eventually on retention time 40.13 obtained compound is Benzene, 1,1',1'',1'''-(1,2,3,4-butanetetryl)tetrakis[Shown above Fig.4 and Table-7].
2.3. Sample preparation
We take municipal mixed waste plastics or any other source of mixed waste plastics; we initially sort out the foreign particles, clean the waste plastics and clean wash them with detergent. After clean up all waste plastics spread in the open air for air dry. When dried out we shred them by scissors, now shredded plastics are grinded by grinding machine. Grinded samples structure are granular form small particles and that easy to put into the reactor. In our laboratory facility we can utilize 400g to 3kg of grinding sample for any experimental purposes.
3.1. Individual plastic to fuel production process
The process has been conducted in small scales with individual plastics in laboratory, on various waste plastics types; High-density polyethylene (HDPE, code 2), low-density polyethylene (LDPE, code 4), polypropylene (PP, code 5) and polystyrene (PS, code 6). These plastic types were investigated singly. For small-scale laboratory process the weight of input waste plastics ranges from 400 grams to 3kg. These waste plastics are collected, optionally sorted, cleaned of contaminants, and shredded into small pieces prior to the thermal liquefaction process. The process of converting the waste plastic to alternative energy begins with heating the solid plastic with or without the presence of cracking catalyst to form liquid slurry (thermal liquefaction in the range of 370-420 ºC), condensing the vapor with standard condensing column to form liquid hydrocarbon fuel termed “NSR fuel”. Preliminary tests on the produced NSR fuel have shown that it is a mixture of various hydrocarbons range. The produced fuel density varies based on individual plastic types. In equivalent to obtaining the liquid hydrocarbon fuel we also receive light gaseous hydrocarbon compounds (C1-C4) which resembles natural gas. Further fractional distillation based on different temperature is producing different category fuels; such as heating oil, gasoline, Naphtha (chemical), Aviation, Diesel and Fuel Oil. Experiment diagram given below in Fig.5.
3.2. Mixed waste plastic to fuel production process
Mixed waste plastics to fuel production process performed in the laboratory on various waste plastics types; High-density polyethylene (HDPE, code 2), low-density polyethylene
Figure 5.
Individual & Waste Plastic to Fuel Production Process Diagram
(LDPE, code 4), polypropylene (PP, code 5) and polystyrene (PS, code 6). These processes were investigated with mixture of several plastics such as HDPE-2, LDPE-4, and PP-5 &PS-6. These waste plastics are collected, optionally sorted, cleaned of contaminants, and shredded into small pieces prior to the thermal degradation process. The experiment could be randomly mixture of waste plastics or proportional ratio mixture of waste plastics. For small-scale laboratory process the weight of input waste plastics ranges from 300 grams to 3kg. In the laboratory processes our present reactor chamber capacity is 2-3 kg. We put 2 kg of grinding sample into the reactor chamber to expedite the experiment process. At the starting point of experiment reactor temperature set up at 350 ºC for quick melting, after melted temperature maintained manually from “reactor temperature profile menu option” by increasing and decreasing depending to the rate of reaction. The optimum temperature (steady & more fuel production state) is 305 ºC. From 2kg of waste plastics obtained fuel amount is 2 liter 600 ml (2600 ml), fuel density is 0.76 g/ml. We defined the fuel as heating oil named “NSR fuel”. The experiment additionally produced light gases Methane, Ethane, Propane and Butane as well as few amount of carbon ashes as a remaining residue. These light gases would be the alternative source of natural gases. Mixed waste plastic to produced fuel preliminary test indicated that the hydrocarbon compound rage from C3 to C27.
3.3. Fractional distillation process
Fractional distillation process has been conducted according to the laboratory scale. We measured 700 ml of NSR fuel called heating fuel and took the weight of 1000 ml boiling flask (Glass Reactor). Subsequently fuel poured into the boiling flask, after that we put filled boiling flask in 1000 ml heat mantle as well as connected variac meter with heat mantle. Attached distillation adapter, clump joint, condenser and collection flask with high temperature apiezon grease and insulated by aluminum foil paper. Initially we ran the experiment at 40 ºC to collect gasoline grade, after gasoline collection subsequently we raised the temperature to 110 ºC for naphtha (Chemical), 180 ºC for aviation fuel, 260 º C for diesel fuel and eventually at 340 ºC we found fuel oil. At the end of the experiment remaining residual fuel was less, approximately amount 10-15 ml. Out of 700 ml NSR fuel we collected 125 ml of gasoline; density is 0.72 g/ml, 150 ml of naphtha; density is 0.73, 200 ml of aviation fuel; density is 0.74, 150 ml of diesel fuel; density is 0.80 g/ml and 50-60 ml of fuel oil; density is 0.84.
After all experiment done on behalf of each experiment we calculated the yield percentages of fuel production, light gases and residue. In addition described the physical properties of each fuel such as fuel density, specific gravity, fuel color and fuel appearance respectively. Similarly, individual fuel production yield percentages & properties are given below in Table 8 (a) & 9 (a) and Mixed Waste Plastics to fuel Yield percentages & properties are also given below in Table 8(b) & 9 (b).
Waste Plastic Name
Fuel Yield %
Light Gas %
Residue %
HDPE-2
89.354
5.345
5.299
LDPE-4
87.972
5.806
6.221
PP-5
91.981
2.073
5.944
PS-6
85.331
4.995
9.674
Table 8a.
Individual Fuel Production Yield Percentage
Sample Name
Fuel Yield %
Light Gas %
Residue %
HDPE,LDPE,PP&PS
90
5
5
Table 8b.
Mixed Waste Plastic to Fuel Yield Percentage
Name of Waste Plastic Fuel
Fuel Density gm/ml
Specific Gravity
Fuel Color
Fuel Appearance
LDPE-4
0.771
0.7702
Yellow, light transparent
Little bit wax and ash content
HDPE-2
0.782
0.7812
Yellow, no transparent
Wax, cloudy and little bit ash content
PP-5
0.759
0.7582
Light brown, light transparent
Little bit wax and ash content
PS-6
0.916
0.9150
Light yellow, not transparent
Wax, cloudy and little bit ash content
Table 9a.
Individual Plastic to Fuel Properties
Name of Fuel
Density g/ml
Specific Gravity
Fuel Color
Fuel
Mixed Plastic to Fuel
0.775
0.7742
Yellow light transparent
Ash contain present
Table 9b.
Mixed Waste Plastic to Fuel Properties
4.1 Fuel analysis and result discussion
4.2. Gas Chromatography and Mass Spectrometer (GC/MS) analysis
Analysis of Individual waste plastics (HDPE-2, LDPE-4, PP-5, and PS-6) to individual fuel:
Figure 6.
GC/MS Chromatogram of HDPE-2 Waste Plastic to Fuel
Retention Time (Minutes)
Compound Name
Formula
Retention Time (Minutes)
Compound Name
Formula
1.56
Propane
C3H8
12.18
Cyclopentane, hexyl-
C11H22
1.66
2-Butene, (E)-
C4H8
12.92
1-Dodecene
C12H24
1.68
Butane
C4H10
13.05
Dodecane
C12H26
1.96
Cyclopropane, 1,2-dimethyl-, cis-
C5H10
13.76
Cyclododecane
C12H24
9.65
1-Decene
C10H20
27.98
1-Docosene
C22H44
9.80
Decane
C10H22
28.09
Tetracosane
C24H50
11.35
1-Undecene
C11H22
30.24
1-Docosene
C22H44
11.49
Undecane
C11H24
30.38
Octacosane
C28H58
Table 10.
GC/MS Chromatogram Compound List of HDPE-2 Waste Plastic to Fuel
Figure 7.
GC/MS Chromatogram of LDPE-4 Waste Plastic to Fuel
Retention Time ( Minutes)
Compound Name
Compound Formula
Retention Time ( Minutes)
Compound Name
Compound Formula
1.55
Cyclopropane
C3H6
12.92
1-Dodecene
C12H24
1.68
Butane
C4H10
13.06
Dodecane
C12H26
1.96
2-Pentene, (E)-
C5H10
13.76
Cyclododecane
C12H24
1.99
Pentane
C5H12
14.40
1-Tridecene
C13H26
10.48
Cyclodecane
C10H20
24.88
Heneicosane
C21H44
10.89
Cyclohexene, 3-(2-methylpropyl)-
C10H18
26.31
Heneicosane
C21H44
11.35
1-Undecene
C11H22
28.09
Tetracosane
C24H50
11.49
Undecane
C11H24
33.21
Octacosane
C28H58
Table 11.
GC/MS Chromatogram Compound List of LDPE-4 Waste Plastic to Fuel
GC/MS Chromatogram Compound List of PP-5 Waste Plastic to Fuel
Figure 9.
GC/MS Chromatogram of PS-6 Waste Plastic to Fuel
Retention Time (Minute)
Compound Name
Formula
Retention Time (Minute)
Compound Name
Formula
3.65
1,5-Hexadiyne
C6H6
17.68
Benzene, 1,1’-(1,2-ethanediyl)bis-
C14H14
5.54
Toluene
C7H8
18.03
Benzene, 1,1’-(1-methyl-1,2-ethanediyl)bis-
C15H16
7.94
Styrene
C8H8
19.30
Benzene, 1,1’-(1,3-propanediyl)bis-
C15H16
11.00
Acetophenone
C8H8O
21.61
Naphthalene,1-phenyl-
C16H12
13.07
Naphthalene
C10 H8
21.81
o-Terphenyl
C18H14
15.84
Biphenyl
C12H10
22.83
2-Phenylnaphthalene
C16H12
16.51
Diphenylmethane
C13H12
24.14
9-Phenyl-5H-benzocycloheptene
C17H14
17.22
Benzene,1,1’-ethylidenebis-
C14H14
24.67
p-Terphenyl
C18H14
Table 13.
GC/MS Chromatogram Compound List of PS-6 Waste Plastic to Fuel
From GCMS analysis of Individual HDPE-2, LDPE-4, PP-5, and PS-6 fuel, in accordance with their numerous retention times many compounds are found, some of them are mentioned shortly. In HDPE-2 fuel at retention time 1.56, compound is Propane (C3H8), and finally at retention time 30.38 obtained compound is Octacosane (C28H58), [Shown above, Fig.6 & Table-10]. In LDPE-4 fuel at retention time 1.55, compound is Cyclopropane (C3H6), and finally at retention time 33.21 obtained compound is Octacosane (C28H58) [Shown above, Fig.7 & Table-11]. In PP-5 initially at retention time 1.55 compound is Cyclopropane (C3H6) and finally at retention time 28.95 obtained compound is Dodecane,-1-Cyclopentyl-4-(3-Cyclopentylpropyl) (C22H46O2 ) [Shown above, Fig.8 & Table-12]. Accordingly in PS-6 at retention time 3.65 found compound is 1, 5-Hexadiyne and eventually at retention time 24.67 obtained compound is p-Terphnyl (C18H14) [Shown above, Fig.9 & Table-13].
Analysis of Mixed Waste Plastics to Fuel (Heating Oil):
Figure 10.
GC/MS Chromatogram of Mixed Waste Plastic to Fuel (Heating Oil)
Compound Name
Formula
Compound Name
Formula
Cyclopropane
(C3H6)
Dodecane
(C12H26)
2-Butene, (E)-
(C4H8)
Decane, 2,3,5,8-tetramethyl-
(C14H30)
Pentane
(C5H12)
1-Tridecene
(C13H26)
Pentane, 2-methyl-
(C6H14)
Tridecane
(C13H28)
Cyclopropane, 1-heptyl-2-methyl-
(C11H22)
Heneicosane
(C21H44)
Undecane
(C11H24)
Nonadecane
(C19H40)
1-Dodecanol, 3,7,11-trimethyl-
(C15H32 O)
Benzene, hexadecyl-
(C22H38)
1-Dodecene
(C12H24)
Heptacosane
(C27H56)
Table 14.
GC/MS Chromatogram Compound List of Mixed Waste Plastic to Fuel (Heating Oil)
From GCMS analysis of NSR fuel (Called Heating Fuel) primarily we found long chain hydrocarbon of compound. In the GCMS data we have noticed that the obtained compounds are Cyclopropane (C3H6) to Heptacosane (C27H56) including long and short chain of hydrocarbon compound [Shown above, Fig.10 & Table-14].
GCMS Analysis of Mixed Waste Plastics to Fractional Distillation Fuel:
Figure 11.
GC/MS Chromatogram of Mixed Waste Plastic Fuel to 1st Fractional Fuel (Gasoline)
Compound Name
Formula
Compound Name
Formula
1-Propene,2-methyl-
(C4H8)
Heptane
(C7H16)
Butane
(C4H10)
1,4-hexadiene,4-methyl-
(C7H12)
2-Pentene
(C5H10)
1,4-Heptadiene
(C7H12)
2-Pentene,(E)
(C5H10)
Cyclohexane,methyl-
(C7H14)
Cyclohexane
(C6H12)
1-Nonane
(C9H18)
Hexane,3-methyl
(C7H16)
Styrene
(C8H8)
Cyclohexene
(C6H10)
Nonane
(C9H20)
1-Hexene,2-methyl-
(C7H14)
Benzene,(1-methylethyl)-
(C9H12)
1-Heptane
(C7H14)
Table 15.
GC/MS Chromatogram compound list of Mixed Waste Plastic Fuel to 1st Fractional Fuel (Gasoline)
Figure 12.
GC/MS Chromatogram of Mixed Waste Plastic Fuel to 2nd Fractional Fuel (Naphtha, Chemical)
Compound Name
Formula
Compound Name
Formula
1-Hexene
(C6H12)
Cyclopentane-butyl-
(C9H8)
Hexane
(C6H14)
Benzene,propyl
(C9H12)
1-Heptene
(C7H14)
a-methylsyrene
(C9H10)
Heptane
(C7H16)
1-Decene
(C10H20)
2,4-dimethyl-1-heptene
(C9H18)
Cyclopropane,1-heptyl-2-methyl-
(C11H22)
Ethylbenzene
(C8H10)
Undecane
(C11H24)
1-Nonene
(C9H18)
1-Dodecene
(C12H24)
Styrene
(C8H8)
Dodecane
(C12H26)
1,3,5,7-Cyclooctatetraene
(C8H8)
Tridecane
(C13H28)
Nonane
(C9H20)
Tetradecdane
(C14H30)
Table 16.
GC/MS Chromatogram Compound List of Mixed Waste Plastic Fuel to 2nd Fractional Fuel (Naphtha, Chemical)
Figure 13.
GC/MS Chromatogram of Mixed Waste Plastic Fuel to 3rd Fractional Fuel (Aviation)
Retention Time (Min.)
Compound Name
Formula
Retention Time (Min.)
Compound Name
Formula
7.04
Styrene
C8H8
14.93
Tetradecane
C14H30
8.60
a-Methylstyrene
C9H10
16.12
Cyclopentadecane
C15H30
10.18
Cyclooctane,1,4-dimethyl-,cis-
C10H20
16.23
Pentadecane
C15H32
10.38
1-Undecene
C11H22
17.37
1-Hexadecene
C16H32
12.07
Dodecane
C12H26
19.80
E-15-Heptadecanal
C17H32O
13.42
1-Tridecene
C13H26
19.89
Octadecane
C18H38
13.56
Tridecane
C13H28
21.13
Nonadecane
C19H40
14.81
Cyclotetradecane
C14H28
22.45
Eicosane
C20H42
Table 17.
GC/MS Chromatogram Compound list of Mixed Waste Plastic Fuel to 3rd Fractional Fuel (Aviation)
Figure 14.
GC/MS Chromatogram of Mixed Waste Plastic Fuel to 4th Fractional Fuel (Diesel)
Compound Name
Formula
Compound Name
Formula
Pentane
(C5H12)
1-Pentadecene
(C15H30)
1-Pentene, 2-methyl-
(C6H12)
Pentadecane
(C15H32)
Heptane, 4-methyl-
(C8H18)
1-Nonadecanol
(C19H40 O)
Toluene
(C7H8)
1-Hexadecene
(C16H32)
E-14-Hexadecenal
(C16H30 O)
Eicosane
(C20H42)
4-Tetradecene, (E)-
(C14H28)
Heneicosane
(C21H44)
Tetradecane
(C14H30)
Octacosane
(C28H58)
Table 18.
GC/MS Chromatogram Compound List of Mixed Waste Plastic Fuel to 4th Fractional Fuel (Diesel)
Figure 15.
GC/MS Chromatogram of Mixed Waste Plastic Fuel to 5th Fractional Fuel (Fuel Oil)
Compound Name
Formula
Compound Name
Formula
1) 1-Propene, 2-methyl-
(C4H8)
16) Tridecane
(C13H28)
2) Pentane
(C5H12)
17) Tetradecane
(C14H30)
3)1-Pentene, 2-methyl-
(C6H12)
18) Pentadecane
(C15H32)
4) Hexane
(C6H14)
19) Hexadecane
(C16H34)
5) Heptane
(C7H16)
20) Benzene, 1,1'-(1,3-propanediyl)bis-
(C15H16)
6) à-Methylstyrene
(C9H10)
27) Heneicosane
(C21H44)
7) Decane
(C10H22)
28) Tetracosane
(C24H50)
8) Undecane
(C11H24)
29) Heptacosane
(C27H56)
Table 19.
GC/MS Chromatogram Compound list of Mixed Waste Plastic Fuel to 5th Fractional Fuel (Fuel Oil)
GC/MS analysis of fractional distillation fuel, a lot of compound is appeared in each individual fuel. Some of those compounds are mentioned, such as in Gasoline (1ST Fraction) we found Carbon range C4 to C9 and compound is 1-Propene-2-Methyl (C3H8) to Benzene, (1-methylethyl) - (C9H12) [Shown above, Fig.11 & Table-15]. In naphtha (2nd Fraction) Carbon range is C6 to C14 and compound is 1- Hexene (C6H12) to Tetradecane (C14H30) [Shown above, Fig.12 & Table-16]. In Aviation fuel (3rd Fraction) Carbon range is C8 to C20 and compound is Styrene (C8H8) to Eicosane (C20H42) [Shown above, Fig.13 & Table-17]. In Diesel (4th Fraction) Carbon range is C5 to C28 and compound is pentane (C5H12) to Octacosane (C20H58) [Shown above, Fig.14 & Table-18].Eventually in Fuel oil (5th Fraction) Carbon range is C4 to C27, and compound is 1-Propene-2-methyl (C4H8) to Heptacosane (C27H56) [Shown above, Fig.15 & Table-19].
4.3. FTIR (Spectrum-100) analysis
Analysis of Individual waste plastics (HDPE-2, LDPE-4, PP-5, and PS-6) to individual fuel:
Figure 16.
FTIR Spectra of HDPE-2 Plastic to Fuel
Band Peak Number
Wave Number (cm-1)
Compound Group Name
1
2956.38
C-CH3
2
2921.84
C-CH3
3
2853.19
CH2
4
1641.69
Non-Conjugated
5
1465.41
CH3
6
1377.92
CH3
7
991.76
-CH= CH2
8
965.02
-CH=CH-(Trans)
9
909.08
-CH= CH2
10
721.39
-CH=CH-(Cis)
11
667.88
-CH=CH-(Cis)
Table 20.
FTIR Spectra of HDPE-2 Plastic to Fuel Functional Group Name
Figure 17.
FTIR Spectra of LDPE-4 Plastic to Fuel
Band Peak Number
Wave Number (cm-1)
Functional Group Name
1
2956.72
C-CH3
2
2922.13
C-CH3
3
2853.50
CH2
4
1641.78
Non-Conjugated
5
1458.43
CH3
6
1377.96
CH3
7
964.96
-CH= CH2
8
909.10
-CH=CH-(Trans)
9
887.93
-CH= CH2
10
721.71
-CH=CH-(Cis)
11
667.91
-CH=CH-(Cis)
Table 21.
FTIR Spectra of LDPE-4 Plastic to Fuel Functional Group Name
Figure 18.
FTIR Spectra of PP-5 Plastic to Fue.
Band Peak Number
Wave Number (cm-1)
Compound Group Name
Band Peak Number
Wave Number (cm-1)
Compound Group Name
1
3074.99
H Bonded NH
8
1377.07
CH3
2
2955.87
C-CH3
9
1155.03
3
2912.71
C-CH3
10
965.06
-CH=CH-(Trans)
4
2871.87
C-CH3
11
887.02
C=CH2
5
2842.66
C-CH3
12
739.06
-CH=CH-(Cis)
6
1650.20
Amides
13
667.85
-CH=CH-(Cis)
7
1465.95
CH2
Table 22.
FTIR Spectra of PP-5 Plastic to Fuel Functional Group Name
Figure 19.
FTIR Spectra of PS-6 Plastic to Fuel
Band Peak Number
Wave Number (cm-1)
Compound Group Name
Band Peak Number
Wave Number (cm-1)
Compound Group Name
1
3083.59
=C-H
15
1414.28
CH2
2
3060.73
=C-H
16
1376.10
CH3
3
3027.21
=C-H
17
1317.86
4
2966.73
C-CH3
18
1288.55
5
2874.03
C-CH3
19
1202.23
6
2834.62
C-CH3
20
1178.59
7
1943.85
21
1082.33
8
1802.56
Non-Conjugated
22
1028.94
Acetates
9
1693.70
Conjugated
23
1020.83
Acetates
10
1630.02
Conjugated
24
990.91
-CH=CH2
11
1603.28
Conjugated
25
906.80
-CH=CH2
12
1575.74
26
775.16
13
1494.73
27
729.65
-CH=CH-(Cis)
14
1450.70
CH3
28
694.78
-CH=CH-(Cis)
Table 23.
FTIR Spectra of PS-6 Plastic to Fuel Functional Group Name
In FTIR analysis of HDPE-2 fuel obtained functional groups are C-CH3, CH2, Non-Conjugated, CH3,-CH=CH2,-CH=CH- (Cis) and –CH=CH-(Trans) [Shown above, Fig.16& Table-20].In LDPE-4 analysis functional groups are C-CH3, CH2, Non-Conjugated, CH3,-CH=CH2,-CH=CH- (Cis) and –CH=CH-(Trans)[Shown above, Fig.17 &Table-21].In PP-5 analysis functional groups are CH3,C-CH2,-CH=CH- (Cis) and,-CH=CH- (Trans). [Shown above, Fig.18 & Table-22] Subsequently in PS-6 analysis obtained functional groups are CH2, CH3, Acetates,-CH=CH2 and –CH=CH-(Cis) etc. [Shown above, Fig.19 & Table-23].
FTIR Analysis of Mixed Waste Plastics to Fuel:
Figure 20.
FTIR Spectra of Mixed Waste Plastic to Fuel
Band Peak Number
Wave Number (cm-1)
Functional Group Name
Band Peak Number
Wave Number (cm-1)
Functional Group Name
1
3075.19
H Bonded NH
13
1377.71
CH3
2
2916.58
CH2
19
1029.84
Acetates
3
2728.78
C-CH3
20
990.95
Secondary Cyclic Alcohol
5
1938.53
Non-Conjugated
21
965.16
-CH=CH- (trans)
6
1818.59
Non-Conjugated
22
908.64
-CH=CH2
7
1781.20
Non-Conjugated
23
887.75
C=CH2
8
1720.59
Non-Conjugated
26
739.15
-CH=CH- (cis)
9
1649.79
Amides
27
727.92
-CH=CH- (cis)
10
1605.54
Non-Conjugated
28
696.66
-CH=CH- (cis)
12
1452.16
CH2
29
675.78
-CH=CH- (cis)
Table 24.
FTIR Spectra of Mixed Waste Plastic to Fuel Functional Group Name
In FTIR analysis of mixed waste plastics to NSR fuel obtained functional groups are: CH3, Acetates, Secondary Cyclic Alcohol,-CH=CH2, C=CH2,-CH=CH-(Cis) and -CH=CH-(Trans) etc. [Shown above, Fig. 20 & Table-24].
FTIR Analysis of Mixed Waste Plastics to Fractional Distillation Fuel:
Figure 21.
FTIR Spectra of Mixed Waste Plastic Fuel to 1st Fractional Fuel (Gasoline)
Band Peak Number
Wave Number (cm-1)
Functional Group Name
Band Peak Number
Wave Number (cm-1)
Functional Group Name
1
3078.07
H Bonded NH
13
1378.54
CH3
2
2921.04
C-CH3
19
1030.44
Acetates
3
2732.37
C-CH3
20
993.17
Secondary Cyclic Alcohol
4
2669.78
C-CH3
21
965.30
-CH=CH- (trans)
6
1853.61
Non-Conjugated
22
909.69
-CH=CH2
7
1821.24
Non-Conjugated
23
888.42
C=CH2
8
1720.48
Non-Conjugated
26
728.40
-CH=CH- (cis)
9
1642.16
Conjugated
27
694.80
-CH=CH- (cis)
10
1605.33
Conjugated
28
675.76
-CH=CH- (cis)
12
1456.00
CH3
29
628.70
-CH=CH- (cis)
Table 25.
Mixed Waste Plastic Fuel to 1st Fractional Fuel (Gasoline) FTIR Functional Group List
Figure 22.
FTIR Spectra of Mixed Waste Plastic Fuel to 2nd Fractional Fuel (Naphtha, Chemical)
Band Peak Number
Wave Number (cm-1)
Functional Group Name
Band Peak Number
Wave Number (cm-1)
Functional Group Name
2
3063.12
=C-H
16
1641.16
Non-Conjugated
3
2933.39
C-CH3
17
1631.00
Non-Conjugated
4
2730.96
C-CH3
21
1460.04
CH3
5
2669.39
C-CH3
22
1377.48
CH3
9
1940.47
Non-Conjugated
30
1029.53
Acetates
10
1871.71
Non-Conjugated
31
1020.91
Acetates
11
1816.96
Non-Conjugated
32
990.38
-CH=CH2
12
1799.27
Non-Conjugated
33
965.73
-CH=CH- (trans)
13
1743.30
Conjugated
34
907.57
-CH=CH2
14
1717.20
Non-Conjugated
37
728.99
-CH=CH- (cis)
15
1685.59
Conjugated
38
700.77
-CH=CH- (cis)
Table 26.
Mixed Waste Plastic Fuel to 2nd Fractional Fuel (Naphtha) FTIR Functional Group List
Figure 23.
FTIR Spectra of Mixed Waste Plastic Fuel to 3rd Fractional Fuel (Aviation)
Band Peak Number
Wave Number (cm-1)
Functional Group Name
Band Peak Number
Wave Number (cm-1)
Functional Group Name
3
2929.07
C-CH3
17
1467.90
CH3
4
2730.27
C-CH3
18
1377.65
CH3
5
2671.93
C-CH3
22
1029.94
Acetates
8
1938.55
Non-Conjugated
23
991.72
-CH=CH2
9
1868.05
Non-Conjugated
24
965.06
-CH=CH- (trans)
10
1820.48
Non-Conjugated
25
909.12
CH=CH2
11
1797.01
Non-Conjugated
26
888.50
C=CH2
12
1746.03
Non-Conjugated
29
721.81
-CH=CH- (cis)
13
1713.72
Non-Conjugated
30
698.09
-CH=CH- (cis)
14
1641.59
Non-Conjugated
Table 27.
Mixed Waste Plastic Fuel to 3rdt Fractional Fuel (Aviation) FTIR Functional Group List
Figure 24.
FTIR Spectra of Mixed Waste Plastic to Fuel (Diesel)
Band Peak Number
Wave Number (cm-1)
Functional Group Name
Band Peak Number
Wave Number (cm-1)
Functional Group Name
1
3063.15
=C-H
16
1452.15
CH2
2
3027.13
=C-H
17
1377.50
CH3
3
2917.31
CH2
22
1030.26
Acetates
4
2730.18
C-CH3
23
990.17
-CH=CH2
5
2674.43
C-CH3
24
965.09
-CH=CH- (trans)
8
1938.19
Non-Conjugated
25
908.18
-CH=CH2
9
1866.94
Non-Conjugated
26
889.16
C=CH2
10
1797.37
Non-Conjugated
29
742.29
-CH=CH- (cis)
11
1745.73
Non-Conjugated
30
721.52
-CH=CH- (cis)
12
1721.33
Non-Conjugated
31
697.70
-CH=CH- (cis)
13
1641.33
Non-Conjugated
Table 28.
Mixed Waste Plastic Fuel to 4th Fractional Fuel (Diesel) FTIR Functional Group List
Figure 25.
FTIR Spectra of Mixed Waste Plastic to Fuel (Fuel Oil)
Band Peak Number
Wave Number (cm-1)
Functional Group Name
Band Peak Number
Wave Number (cm-1)
Functional Group Name
1
2923.45
CH2
9
991.95
Secondary Cyclic Alcohol
2
2853.06
CH2
10
964.93
-CH=CH- (trans)
3
1746.10
Non-Conjugated
11
908.97
-CH=CH2
4
1641.30
Non-Conjugated
12
888.68
C=CH2
5
1602.35
Non-Conjugated
13
720.09
-CH=CH- (cis)
6
1464.70
CH2
14
698.20
-CH=CH- (cis)
7
1377.43
CH3
Table 29.
Mixed Waste Plastic Fuel to 5th Fractional Fuel (Fuel Oil) FTIR Functional Group List
In FTIR analysis of fractional distillation fuel such as in 1ST Fraction Fuel (Gasoline) obtained functional groups are CH3, Acetates, Secondary Cyclic Alcohol, -CH=CH2, C=CH2,nad -CH=CH- (Cis). [Shown above, Fig.21 & Table-25]. In 2nd Fraction Fuel (Naphtha) analysis functional groups are CH3, Non-Conjugated, Acetates,-CH=CH2,-CH=CH- (Cis) and –CH=CH-(Trans). [Shown above, Fig.22& Table-26]. In 3rd Fraction Fuel (Aviation) analysis functional groups are CH3, Acetates, C-CH2,-CH=CH- (Cis) and -CH=CH-(Trans) [Shown above, Fig.23& Table-27]. In 4th Fraction Fuel (Diesel) analysis functional groups are CH2, CH3, Acetates,-CH=CH2, C=CH2 and,-CH=CH- (Cis) [Shown above, Fig.24 & Table-28]. Subsequently in 5th Fraction Fuel (Fuel Oil) analysis obtained functional groups are Secondary Cyclic Alcohol,-CH=CH2, C=CH2, –CH=CH (Trans) and –CH=CH-(Cis) etc. [Shown above, Fig.25& Table-29].
Both NSR fractional fuels (NSR fractional 1st Fractional Fuel and NSR 4th Fractional Fuel) have been used to produce electricity by the help of conventional internal combustion generator. A flow diagram illustrating the process of energy production and consumption from NSR Fuel (Heating Oil) is shown below in Fig.26.
Figure 26.
Flow diagram of electricity generation consumption
NSR fractional 1st collection fuel was used in a gasoline generator with max 4.0 kW and volt output of 120. ~1 litter of fractional fuel was injected in the generator and with ~2900 watt constant demand; the generator ran a total of 42 minutes. A similar test was performed with commercial gasoline (87). ~1 litter of commercial gasoline (87) was injected and with the same ~ 2900 watt, constant demand the generator ran a total of 38 minutes. The difference in time occurs because NSR fraction 1st collection fuel has longer Carbon content than that of the commercial gasoline (87).
NSR fractional 4th collection fuel was used in a diesel generator with a max 4.0 kW and an output of 120 volt. ~1 litter of NSR fractional 2nd collection fuel was injected in the generator and with a constant demand of 3200 watt; the generator ran a total of 42 minutes. The same test was conducted with commercial diesel, and with the same demand the generator ran for 34 minutes.
A diagram [Fig.27] is provided below showing the produced electricity consumption of commercial gasoline (87) and NSR fractional fuel 1st collection.
Figure 27.
Electricity Consumption and run time monitored by EML 2020 logger system for 1st Fractional Fuel (Gasoline) and Commercial Gasoline87.
Figure 28.
Electricity Output Comparison Graph of Waste Plastic Fuel to 4th Fractional Fuel and Commercial Diesel Fuel
Fuel Name Generator Fuel Amount Duration kWh
4th Fractional Fuel (Diesel) AMCO 1 Liter 37 min 2.028
Table 30.
Comparison Table of 4th Fractional Fuel (Diesel) and Commercial Diesel
Comparison of NSR 4th fraction fuel and commercial diesel was conduced using an AMCO Diesel Generator. Above, Fig. 28 and Table 30 demonstrate the comparative results between the two fuels. The results indicate that the NSR-2 fuel provided a longer run time of the generator than the diesel. This is due to the NSR fuel having longer carbon chains than the diesel fuel.
Both NSR fractional 5th collection fuel and commercial gasoline (87) was used for a comparison automobile test. A 1984 Oldsmobile vehicle (V-8 powered engine) was used for the test-drive and one gallon of fuel was used for both cases after complete drainage of the pre-existing fuel in the fuel tank. The test-drive was done on a rural highway with an average speed of 55 mph.
Based on the preliminary automobile test-drive, the NSR fuel has offered a competitive advantage in mileage over the commercial gasoline-87. NSR fuel showed better mileage performance of 21 miles per gallon (mpg) compared to 18 mpg with commercial gasoline (87).
It is expected that NSR double condensed fuel will show even higher performance with more fuel-efficient car such as V-4 engine and hybrid vehicles. Additional test-driving is going to be conducted in the near future to verify the results.
The conversion of municipal waste plastics to liquid hydrocarbon fuel was carried out in thermal degradation process with/without catalyst. Individually we ran our experiment on waste plastics such as: HDPE-2, LDPE-4, PP-5 & PS-6. Each of those experiment procedures are maintained identically, every ten (10) minutes of interval experiment was monitored and found during the condensation time changes of individual waste plastics external behavior different because of their different physical and chemical properties. Similarly, we ran another experiment with 2kg of mixture of waste plastics in stainless steel reactor. Initial temperature is 350 ºC for quick melting and optimum temperature is 305 ºC. For glass reactor every experiment temperature was maintained by variac meter, when experiment started variac percent was 90% (Tem-405 ºC) for quick melting, after melted variac percent decreased to 70% (Tem- 315 ºC) due to smoke formation. Average (optimum) used variac percent in this experiment 75% (337.5 ºC).Gradually temperature range was maintained by variacmeter with proper monitoring. In fractional distillation process we separated different category of fuel such as gasoline, naphtha, jet fuel, diesel and fuel oil in accordance with their boiling point temperature profile.
The author acknowledges the support of Dr. Karin Kaufman, the founder and President of Natural State Research, Inc (NSR). The author also acknowledges the valuable contributions NSR laboratory team members during the preparation of this manuscript.
References
1.AguadoJ.SerranoD. P.VicenteG.Sa´nchezN.EnhancedProduction.of-Olefinsr. by Thermal. Degradation of. High-Density Polyethylene. . H. D. P. E. Decalin in Solvent Effect of the Reaction Time Temperature Ind Eng. Chem. Res. 20074634973504
2.AntonioMarcilla.ngelaA. Ä.Garcı´aN.Maria delRemedio.Herna´ndezThermal.Degradation-Vacuumof. L. D. P. E.GasOil.Mixturesfor.PlasticWastes.ValorizationEnergy.Fuels200721870880
3.AchyutK.PandaA.B.SinghR. K.2010 D.K. Mishra b,2, Thermolysis of waste plastics to liquid fuel A suitable method for plastic waste management and manufacture of value added products-A world prospective, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 14233248
5.MiguelMiranda.a,FilomenaPinto. a. I.Gulyurtlua. I.Cabritaa. C. A.Nogueiraa.ArlindoMatos. b.Responsesurface.methodologyoptimization.appliedto.rubbertyre.plasticwastes.thermalconversion.Fuel.2010 2217-2229
7.Karishma Gobin, George Manos*, Polymer degradation to fuels over microporous catalysts as a novel tertiary plastic recycling method, Polymer Degradation and Stability8320042004267279
10.Wei-Chiang Huang a,b,c, Mao-Suan Huang1 Chiung-Fang Huang a,b,c, Chien-Chung Chen c,e,*, Keng-Liang Ou c,e,f,**, Thermochemical conversion of polymer wastes into hydrocarbon fuels over various fluidizing cracking catalysts, Fuel 89201023052316
11.Valerio Cozzani, † Cristiano Nicolella,‡ Mauro Rovatti,‡ and Leonardo Tognotti*,†, Influence of Gas- Phase Reactions on the Product Yields Obtained in the Pyrolysis of Polyethylene, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1997199736342348
12.MarcillaA.Beltra´nM. I.NavarroR.Evolutionwith.theTemperature.ofthe.CompoundsObtained.inthe.CatalyticPyrolysis.ofPolyethylene.overH. U. S. Y.Ind Eng. Chem. Res. 200820084768966903
13.Madel RemedioHerna´ndez. A. Ä.ngelaN.Garcı´aAmparo.Go´mezJavier.Agullo´AntonioMarcilla.Effectof.ResidenceTime.onVolatile.ProductsObtained.inthe. H. D. P. E.Pyrolysisin.thePresence.Absenceof. H. Z. S.5 Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 20064587708778
15.BiswanathSaha†.AlokeK. Ghoshal*, Hybrid Genetic Algorithm and Model-Free Coupled Direct Search Methods for Pyrolysis Kinetics 5 ZSM-5 Catalyzed Decomposition of Waste Low-Density Polyethylene, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 20074654855492
16.WesterhoutR. W. J.WaandersJ.KuipersJ. A. M.van SwaaijW. P. M.Recyclingof.PolyethenePolypropenein. a.Novel-ScaleBench.RotatingCone.Reactorby.High-TemperaturePyrolysis.Ind Eng. Chem. Res. 199819983722932300
17.WesterhoutR. W. J.WaandersJ.KuipersJ. A. M.van SwaaijW. P. M.Developmentof. a.ContinuousRotating.ConeReactor.PilotPlant.forthe.Pyrolysisof.PolyethenePolypropeneInd. Eng. Chem. Res. 199819983723162322
18.WesterhoutR. W. J.BalkR. H. P.MeijerR.KuipersJ. A. M.van SwaaijW. P. M.ExaminationEvaluationof.theUse.ofScreen.Heatersfor.theMeasurement.ofthe.HighTemperature.PyrolysisKinetics.ofPolyethene.PolypropeneInd. Eng. Chem. Res. 199719973633603368
19.LanTang.HuangH.ZengliZhao. C. Z.WuChenY.Pyrolysisof.Polypropylenein. a.NitrogenPlasma.ReactorInd. Eng. Chem. Res. 200320034211451150
20.George Manos,*,† Arthur Garforth,‡ and John Dwyer§, Catalytic Degradation of High-Density Polyethylene on an Ultrastable-Y Zeolite. Nature of Initial Polymer Reactions, Pattern of Formation of Gas and Liquid Products, and Temperature Effects, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.2000 39, 1203-1208,
21.George Manos,*,† Arthur Garforth,‡ and John Dwyer§, Catalytic Degradation of High-Density Polyethylene over Different Zeolitic Structures, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 200020003911981202
22.Yoshio Uemichi,* Junko Nakamura, Toshihiro Itoh, and Masatoshi Sugioka, Conversion of Polyethylene into Gasoline-Range Fuels by Two-Stage Catalytic Degradation Using Silica-Alumin and5 Zeolite, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 199938385390
23.GeorgeManos,.Isman†.YusofY.Nikos‡.Papayannakos,§NicolasH. Gangas§, Catalytic Cracking of Polyethylene over Clay Catalysts. Comparison with an Ultrastable Y Zeolite,Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 200120014022202225
24.Jose´M. Arandes,*,† In˜ aki Abajo,† Danilo Lo´ pez-Valerio,§ Inmaculada Ferna´ ndez,† Miren J. Azkoiti,‡ Martı´n Olazar,† and Javier Bilbao†, Transformation of Several Plastic Wastes into Fuels by Catalytic Cracking, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 199719973645234529
25.Selhan Karago¨z,†,§ Jale Yanik,*,‡ Suat Ucüar,† and Chunshan Song§, Catalytic Coprocessing of Low-Density Polyethylene with VGO Using Metal Supported on Activated Carbon, Energy & Fuels200220021613011308
26.Toshiyuki Kanno, Masahiro Kimura, Na-oki Ikenaga, and Toshimitsu Suzuki*, Coliquefaction of Coal with Polyethylene Using Fe (CO)5 as Catalyst, Energy & Fuels 200014612617
27.MohammadNahid.Siddiquia,.HalimHamid.Redhwib.Catalyticcoprocessing.ofwaste.plasticspetroleumresidue.intoliquid.fueloils. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 8620092009141147