Open access

Introductory Chapter: Zeolites - From Discovery to New Applications on the Global Market

Written By

Karmen Margeta and Anamarija Farkaš

Submitted: 27 January 2020 Published: 22 July 2020

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.92907

From the Edited Volume

Zeolites - New Challenges

Edited by Karmen Margeta and Anamarija Farkaš

Chapter metrics overview

1,265 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

1. Introduction

From the discovery of zeolites until today, the interest in scientific research and use of this amazing, interesting, and useful material has continuously grown.

Natural zeolites are hydrated aluminosilicate materials. Primary building units (PBUs) are tetrahedra of Si and Al oxides which are interconnected by oxygen ions into two-dimensional and three-dimensional secondary units (secondary building units [SBUs]). The zeolite network consists of channels and cavities filled with hydrated alkali and alkaline earth metal ions. With the presence of these metal ions in the structure of zeolites, a balance between positive electric charge of metal ions and negative charge of zeolite network is achieved.

The hydrating and dehydrating properties of zeolites were crucial in discovering their physical and chemical properties and their wider use, and that is why this mineral was named “boiling stone” (ζέω (zéō) meaning “to boil” and λίθος (líthos) meaning “stone”) [1].

Unlike natural zeolites which are formed as crystals in cavities of basalt rocks or as volcanic tuff in different geological environments at relatively low temperatures, synthetic zeolites are created by hydrothermal synthesis in laboratory conditions. During hydrothermal synthesis in the presence of certain chemical compounds (“template” or structure directing agent (SDA)), which act on the organization of SBUs and consequential formation of tertiary or composite building units (TBUs), a final crystal zeolite is created in the form of a polyhedron which contains Si-O-Al bonds. Control of kinetic processes during zeolite synthesis is especially important since most of the zeolites created via this process are metastable phases [2].

Advertisement

2. Zeolite’s history

Zeolite materials were discovered in the eighteenth century when a Swedish chemist, founder of modern mineralogy, Baron Axel Fredrik Cronstedt, discovered that during the heating of mineral “stilbite,” moisture appears on its surface [3]. His discovery began the research of chemical, physical, and mineralogical characteristics of natural zeolites.

In spite of the limited capabilities of structural research of zeolites at the time of their discovery (unlike today’s modern methods), researchers set the foundations for today’s application of natural and synthetic zeolites (Figure 1). Based on Cronstedt’s observations and research, in the middle of the nineteenth century according to the available literature, the first synthetic zeolite-levinite [5] was synthesized, while in the first half of the twentieth century (after the first structural analysis of zeolite materials), a synthetic analog zeolite-mordenite [6] was synthesized. Intensive research on the synthesis as well as physical and chemical properties of zeolites (absorption, ion exchange, dehydration) enabled the industrial application of zeolites. Significant discoveries and research of zeolites, as well as the beginning of modern zeolite science (parallel with the development of new instrumental techniques), are shown in Figure 2.

Figure 1.

The mineral stilbite (left) and the crystal structure (framework) of the stilbite group (right) [4].

Figure 2.

Early discoveries of zeolite materials and their characteristics, the beginning of the modern zeolite science, and their industrial applications [7, 8].

Figure 3.

Zeolite market segmented by continents.

Figure 4.

Global zeolite market share (by products).

Advertisement

3. Scientific research and industrial applications of zeolites

Almost three centuries have passed since the discovery of zeolites, and the interest in research of natural zeolite materials has not diminished. Equally, obtaining the optimal properties of synthetic zeolite for their technological application is a priority in scientific research.

In 2007 the sixth edition of “The Atlas of Zeolites” was published, in which the data for each of the 176 unique zeolite framework types are presented [9]. Of the total natural zeolites discovered (more then 60), only six occur in large quantities in the natural deposits worldwide: analcime (ANA), chabazite (CHA), clinoptilolite (HEU), erionite (ERI), mordenite (MOR), and phillipsite (PHI). Ferrierite (FER) occurs in a few large deposits.

Each of the seven natural zeolites has been synthesized, but only mordenite and ferrierite are synthesized in large quantities (synthetic mordenite has large pores while natural mordenite has small pores) [10].

Commercial natural zeolite deposits are primarily found in the USA (volcanic tuffs in saline, alkaline lake deposits, and open hydrologic systems). If both natural and synthetic zeolites are equally available in commercial quantity, synthetic zeolite will be more acceptable because the process of removing impurities from natural zeolite is significantly more expensive.

Even though there is a large number of scientific research which describes properties, structures, characteristics, physical and chemical processes of absorption, and ionic exchange of zeolites with the use of modern techniques, still some of the properties and processes are not completely understood, especially the ones related to natural zeolites. Still there is room for further research and application of these incredible microporous materials in areas which are still unexplored.

Zeolites have found application in almost all areas of agriculture and animal husbandry, biotechnology, medicine, chemical industry, construction industry, oil and natural gas industry, water processing, etc., as well as new technologies which contribute to sustainable development. Due to their specific properties, high thermal and hydrothermal stability, as well as environmental acceptability, zeolites are an alternative to similar materials that are not economically and environmentally acceptable [11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34].

Since the first industrial applications (during the beginning of the twentieth century) until today, demand for zeolites has permanently grown, whether they are used individually or in combination with other micro- and nanoporous materials. New scientific research of synthetic zeolites contributes to the further development of highly active and selective synthetic zeolites used as catalysts, adsorbents, and ion exchangers with high capacity and selectivity.

The increasing number of national and world technological innovation (patents) allows the new industrial applications of zeolite materials, which positively affect economic growth and development with the emphasis on zeolite materials that do not pollute the environment [35, 36].

3.1 Global zeolite market

Zeolite markets (natural and synthetic products) are developed on all continents, shown in Figure 3. The largest market of zeolites is in the USA, followed by the Asia-Pacific area, China, India, Europe, and other markets.

Global zeolite market share (by products) shows that the synthetic zeolites have a bigger share than the natural zeolites (Figure 4).

In 2016 the zeolite global market was estimated at 29.08 billion USD with an expected growth of 2.5% in the period from 2016 to 2022. Therefore, zeolite global market could achieve a value of 33.8 USD until 2022 [37].

Market research companies have published reports in which the following are presented: zeolite market size, share, and trends analysis report by product, by application, and by region, for the specific estimated period. Some of their data are shown in Table 1. The value of compounded annual rate of growth (CAGR) is referring to the valuation before the COVID-19 pandemic.

Natural and synthetic zeolite/application Zeolite market size Forecast period CAGR Ref. (*MRC)
High-quality transportation fuels and chemical products 4.15 billion USD 2019–2024 5.3% [39]
Membrane **NA 2017–2025 3.7% [40]
Paints and coating industry 53.4 million USD 2016–2024 3.2% [41]
Detergents 1.4 billion USD 2018–2028 2.6% [42]
Adsorbents, ion exchange, catalyst **NA 2019–2026 2.73% [43]
Cement, animal feed industry, wastewater treatment 6.6 billion USD 2019–2026 4.9% [44]
Synthetic zeolite market 19.81 billion USD 2017–2025 4.6% [45]

Table 1.

Estimation of global zeolite markets growth (data were taken from market research company reports).

MRC, market research company.


NA, not available.


Estimations of market research companies are that the market of natural zeolites will have slower growth until the year 2030, considering limitations such as the high price of raw materials, high costs of transportation of raw materials, and availability of alternative materials in specific areas of industrial application (such as enzymes, metals, and other chemical compounds in catalysis processes). However, natural zeolites hold an advantage over other materials because they are nontoxic and ecologically acceptable and as such materials can meet the demands which are set by environment protection laws.

Unlike natural zeolites, the demand for synthetic zeolites until the year 2030 is estimated to grow in areas of industrial application [38].

Global markets depend on a series of factors such as political and economic situations as well as other factors that cannot be influenced or predicted. One such factor is the COVID-19 pandemic which (according to first forecasts) caused a change in market conditions and slowed down technological progress and the start of new production, as well as made launching new products on the market based on zeolite materials harder.

Advertisement

4. New challenges in research and application of zeolites

Today, the humankind is faced with many threats such as (i) drought and lack of freshwater caused by climate change, (ii) political and economic instabilities, and (iii) dangerous pandemics such as the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, which caused slowing down of scientific research, economic growth, and development and even brought into question the survival of mankind.

With current use of zeolites in agriculture, animal husbandry, water processing, numerous industries (chemical, oil, construction, etc.) biotechnology, medicine, etc., the future of zeolite application opens up new possibilities for research, development, and technological application in still undiscovered areas such as medication and antimicrobial application [46], which would allow new global markets for zeolites.

Furthermore, the application of zeolites in technologies that can contribute to the reduction of CO2 emissions (one of the greenhouse gases which contributes to climate change) could have a significant role in their future use [47, 48, 49].

Advertisement

5. Conclusions

Scientific research of natural zeolites poses a challenge in zeolite science because there are still many unexplored properties of this fascinating, ecologically friendly, and truly useful microporous material. Further research on natural zeolite and production of new synthetic zeolites open up possibilities of their application in still unexplored areas in the near future because their application requires low technical complexity and initial infrastructure investment.

Advertisement

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1. Breck DW. Zeolite Molecular Sieves: Structure, Chemistry, and Use. New York: Wiley; 1973
  2. 2. Berenguer MÁ. Ordered porous nanomaterials: The merit of small. International Scholarly Research Notices. 2013:1-29. DOI: 10.1155/2013/257047
  3. 3. Cronstedt AF. Natural zeolite and minerals. Svenska Vetenskaps Akademiens Handlingar Stockholm. 1756;17:120-123
  4. 4. IZA Commission on Natural Zeolite. 2005. Available from: http://www.iza-online.org/natural/Datasheets/Stilbite/stilbite.htm
  5. 5. Annales des mines. 1999. Available from: http://annales.ensmp.fr/numeros/ANN_1865_S06_08/ANN_1865_S06_08.pdf
  6. 6. Pramod K, Bajpai M, Rao S, Gokhale KVGK. Synthesis of mordenite type zeolites. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Product Research and Development. 1978;17(3):223-227. DOI: 10.1021/i360067a009
  7. 7. Heaney PJ, Prewitt CT, Gibbs GV, editors. Silica: Physical behavior, geochemistry, and materials applications. Reviews in Mineralogy. Mineralogical Society of America. 1994;29(1):1-40
  8. 8. Jacobs PA, Flanigen EM, Jansen JC, Bekkum H, editors. Introduction to Zeolite Science and Practice. 2nd Completely Revised and Expanded Edition. Amsterdam, New York: Elsevier; 2001. p. 1078
  9. 9. Baerlocher C, McCusker LB, Olsen DH. Atlas of Zeolite Framework Types. 6th ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2007. p. 398
  10. 10. John D, Sherman JD. Synthetic zeolites and other microporous oxide molecular sieves. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the USA. 1999;96(7):3471-3478. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.96.7.3471. Washington. Available from: https://www.pnas.org/content/pnas/96/7/3471.full.pdf
  11. 11. Zimmermann NER, Haranczyk M. History and utility of zeolite framework-type discovery from aData-science perspective. Crystal Growth & Design. 2016;16:3043-3048. DOI: 10.1021/acs.cgd.6b00272
  12. 12. Bacakova L, Vandrovcova M, Kopovaaand I, Jirka I. Applications of zeolites in biotechnology and medicine–a review. Biomaterials Science. 2018;6(5):974-989. DOI: 10.1039/c8bm00028j
  13. 13. Montalvo S, Huiliñir C, Borja R, Sánchez E, Herrmann C. Application of zeolites for biological treatment processes of solid wastes and wastewaters—A review. Bioresource Technology. 2020;301. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.122808
  14. 14. Derakhshankhah H, Jafari S, Sarvari S, Barzegari E, Moakedi F, Ghorbani M, et al. Biomedical applications of Zeolitic nanoparticles, with an emphasis on medical interventions. International Journal of Nanomedicine. 2020;15:363-386. DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S234573
  15. 15. Li Y, Li L, Yu J. Applications of zeolites in sustainable chemistry (a review). Chem. 2017;3(6):928-949. DOI: 10.1016/j.chempr.2017.10.009
  16. 16. Moshoeshoe M, Nadiye-Tabbiruka MS, Obuseng V. A review of the chemistry, structure, properties and applications of zeolites American. Journal of Materials Science. 2017;7(5):196-221
  17. 17. Kraljević Pavelić S, Simović Medica J, Gumbarević D, Filošević A, Pržulj N, Pavelić K. Critical review on zeolite clinoptilolite safety and medical applications in vivo. Frontiers in Pharmacology. 2018;9:1350. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2018.01350
  18. 18. Gläser R, Weitkamp J. The application of zeolites in catalysis. Basic principles in applied catalysis. In: Baerns M, editor. Springer Series in Chemical Physics. Vol. 75. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2004. p. 211. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-05981-4_5
  19. 19. Nakhli SAA, Delkash M, Bakhshayesh BE, et al. Application of zeolites for sustainable agriculture: A review on water and nutrient retention. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution. 2017;228:464. DOI: 10.1007/s11270-017-3649-1
  20. 20. Woszuk A, Franus W. A review of the application of zeolite materials in warm mix asphalt technologies. Applied Sciences. 2017;7(3):293. DOI: 10.3390/app7030293
  21. 21. Wang S, Peng Y. Natural zeolites as effective adsorbents in water and wastewater treatment. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2010;156:11-24
  22. 22. Margeta K, Zabukovec Logar N, Šiljeg M, Farkaš A. Natural zeolites in water treatment—How effective is their use. In: Elshorbagy W, Rezaul Kabir Chowdhury RK, editors. Water Treatment. Rijeka, London: InTechOpen; 2013. pp. 82-112. DOI: 10.5772/50738
  23. 23. Dyer A, Keir D. Nuclear waste treatment by zeolites. Zeolites. 1984;4(3):215-217. DOI: 10.1016/0144-2449(84)90026-5
  24. 24. Lee HY, Kim HS, Jeong H-K, Park M, Chung D-Y, Lee K-Y, et al. Selective removal of radioactive cesium from nuclear waste by zeolites: On the origin of cesium selectivity revealed by systematic crystallographic studies. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C. 2017;121(19):10594-10608. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b02432
  25. 25. Ghasemi Z, Sourinejad I, Kazemian H, Rohani S. Application of zeolites in aquaculture industry: A review. Reviews in Aquaculture. 2014;10(1):75-95. DOI: 10.1111/raq.12148
  26. 26. Williams CD. Application of zeolites to environmental remediation. In: Charlesworth SM, Booth CA, editors. Urban Pollution: Science and Management. New York: Wiley; 2018. DOI: 10.1002/9781119260493.ch19
  27. 27. Singh MP, Baghel GS, Titinchmi SJJ, Abbo HS. Zeolites: Smart materials for novel, efficient, and versatile catalysis. In: Ashutosh Tiwari A, Titinchi S, editors. Advanced Catalytic Materials. 2015. DOI: 10.1002/9781118998939.ch11
  28. 28. Mravec D, Hudec J, Janotka I. Some possibilities of catalytic and noncatalytic utilization of zeolites. Chemical Papers. 2005;59(1):62-69. DOI: 10.1002/chin.200534287
  29. 29. Ackley MW, Rege SU, Saxena H. Review-application of natural zeolites in the purification and separation of gases. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials. 2003;61:25-42
  30. 30. Bright KR, Sicairos-Ruelas EE, Gundy PM, Gerba CP. Assessment of the antiviral properties of zeolites containing metal ions. Food and Environmental Virology. 2009;1(1):37. DOI: 10.1007/s12560-008-9006-1
  31. 31. Derakhshankhah H, Jafari S, Sarvari S, Barzegari E, Moakedi F, Ghorbani M, et al. Biomedical applications of zeolitic nanoparticles, with an emphasis on medical interventions. International Journal of Nanomedicine. 2020;15:363-386. DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S234573
  32. 32. Park DH, Joe YH, Hwang J. Dry aerosol coating of anti-viral particles on commercial air filters using a high-volume flow atomizer. Aerosol and Air Quality Research. 2019;19:1636-1644 https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2019.04.0212
  33. 33. Ferreira L, Guedes JF, Almeida-Aguiar C, Fonseca AM, Neves IC. Microbial growth inhibition caused by Zn/Ag-Y zeolite materials with different amounts of silver. Colloids and Surfaces. B, Biointerfaces. 2016;142:141-147. DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2016.02.042
  34. 34. Savi GD, Cardoso WA, Furtado BG, Bortolotto T, Da Agostin LOV, Nones J, et al. New ion-exchanged zeolite derivatives: Antifungal and antimycotoxin properties against Aspergillus flavus and aflatoxin B1. Materials Research Express. 2017;4:8. Available from: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/2053-1591/aa84a5/meta
  35. 35. Margeta K, Vojnović B, Zabukovec Logar N. Development of natural zeolites for their use in water-treatment systems. Recent Patents of Nanotechnology. 2011;5(2):89-99. DOI: 10.2174/187221011795909170
  36. 36. Li B, Duan Y, Luebke D, Morreale B. Advances in CO2 capture technology: A patent review. Applied Energy. 2013;102:1439-1447
  37. 37. Grand View Research. 2018. Available from: https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/zeolites-market
  38. 38. Fact MR. 2020. Available from: https://www.factmr.com/report/3817/zeolites-market
  39. 39. Market research. 2019. Available from: https://www.marketresearch.com/IMARC-v3797/Zeolite-Global-Trends-Share-Size-12454492/
  40. 40. Credence Research. 2017. Available from: https://www.credenceresearch.com/press/global-zeolites-market
  41. 41. Transparency Market Research. 2016. Available from: https://www.transparencymarketresearch.com/zeolites-market.html
  42. 42. Future Market Insights. 2018. Available from: https://www.futuremarketinsights.com/reports/zeolite-for-detergents-market
  43. 43. Verified Market Research. 2018. Available from: https://www.verifiedmarketresearch.com/product/zeolite-powder-market/
  44. 44. Fortune Business Insights. 2018. Available from: https://www.fortunebusinessinsights.com/industry-reports/refinery-catalyst-market-101090
  45. 45. Global information. 2017. Available from: https://www.giiresearch.com/report/accu530047-global-synthetic-zeolites-market-analysis-trends.html
  46. 46. Nakamura S, Sato M, Sato Y, Ando N, Takayama T, Fujita M, et al. Synthesis and application of silver nanoparticles (Ag NPs) for the prevention of infection in healthcare workers. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2019;20(15):3620. DOI: 10.3390/ijms20153620
  47. 47. Chouikhi N, Cecilia JA, Vilarrasa-García E, Besghaier S, Chlendi M, Duro FIF, et al. CO2 adsorption of materials synthesized from clay minerals: A review. Minerals. 2019;9:514. DOI: 10.3390/min9090514
  48. 48. Oschatz M, Antonietti M. A search for selectivity to enable CO2 capture with porous adsorbents. Energy & Environmental Science. 2018;11:57. DOI: 10.1039/c7ee02110k
  49. 49. Younas M, Sohail M, Leong LK, Bashir MJK, Sumathi S. Feasibility of CO2 adsorption by solid adsorbents: a review on low-temperature systems. International journal of Environmental Science and Technology. 2016;13:1839-1860. DOI: 10.1007/s13762-016-1041-0

Written By

Karmen Margeta and Anamarija Farkaš

Submitted: 27 January 2020 Published: 22 July 2020