Open Access is an initiative that aims to make scientific research freely available to all. To date our community has made over 100 million downloads. It’s based on principles of collaboration, unobstructed discovery, and, most importantly, scientific progression. As PhD students, we found it difficult to access the research we needed, so we decided to create a new Open Access publisher that levels the playing field for scientists across the world. How? By making research easy to access, and puts the academic needs of the researchers before the business interests of publishers.
We are a community of more than 103,000 authors and editors from 3,291 institutions spanning 160 countries, including Nobel Prize winners and some of the world’s most-cited researchers. Publishing on IntechOpen allows authors to earn citations and find new collaborators, meaning more people see your work not only from your own field of study, but from other related fields too.
Today, most electrical energy is generated by burning huge fossil fuels and special weather conditions such as acid rain and snow, climate change, urban smog, regional haze, several tornados, etc., have happened around the whole world. It is now clear that the installation of a number of wind turbine generators can effectively reduce environmental pollution, fossil fuel consumption, and the costs of overall electricity generation. Although wind is only an intermittent source of energy, it represents a reliable energy resource from a long-term energy policy viewpoint. Among various renewable energy resources, wind power energy is one of the most popular and promising energy resources in the whole world today. At a specific wind farm, the available electricity generated by a wind power generation system depends on mean wind speed (MWS), standard deviation of wind speed, and the location of installation. Since year-to-year variation on annual MWS is hard to predict, wind speed variations during a year can be well characterized in terms of a probability distribution function (pdf). This paper also addresses the relations among MWS, its standard deviation, and two important parameters of Weibull distribution.
The wind resource varies with of the day and the season of the year and even some extent from year to year. Wind energy has inherent variances and hence it has been expressed by distribution functions. In this paper, we present some methods for estimating Weibull parameters, namely, shape parameter ( k ) and scale parameter ( c ). The Weibul distribution is an important distribution especially for reliability and maintainability analysis. The suitable values for both shape parameter and scale parameters of Weibull distribution are important for selecting locations of installing wind turbine generators. The scale parameter of Weibull distribution also important to determine whether a wind farm is good or not. The presented method is the analytical methods and computational experiments on the presented methods are reported.
2. Weibull distribution
The Weibull distribution is characterized by two parameters, one is the shape parameter k (dimensionless) and the other is the scale parameter c (m/s).
And puty=1+2k, then the following equation can be obtained
∫0∞v2f(v)dv=c2Γ(1+2k)E9
Hence we get
σ=[c2Γ(1+2k)−c2Γ2(1+1k)]12=cΓ(1+2k)−Γ2(1+1k)E10
2.1. Linear Least Square Method (LLSM)
Least square method is used to calculate the parameter(s) in a formula when modeling an experiment of a phenomenon and it can give an estimation of the parameters. When using least square method, the sum of the squares of the deviations S which is defined as below, should be minimized.
S=∑i=1nwi2[yi−g(xi)]2E11
In the equation, xi is the wind speed, yi is the probability of the wind speed rank, so (xi, yi) mean the data plot, wi is a weight value of the plot and n is a number of the data plot. The estimation technique we shall discuss is known as the Linear Least Square Method (LLSM), which is a computational approach to fitting a mathematical or statistical model to data. It is so commonly applied in engineering and mathematics problem that is often not thought of as an estimation problem. The linear least square method (LLSM) is a special case for the least square method with a formula which consists of some linear functions and it is easy to use. And in the more special case that the formula is line, the linear least square method is much easier. The Weibull distribution function is a non-linear function, which is
F(v)=1−exp[−(vc)k]E12
i.e.
11−F(v)=exp[(vc)k]E13
i.e.
ln{11−F(v)}=[(vc)k]E14
But the cumulative Weibull distribution function is transformed to a linear function like below:
Letx1,x2,........................xnbe a random sample of size n drawn from a probability density functionf(x,θ)where θ is an unknown parameter. The likelihood function of this random sample is the joint density of the n random variables and is a function of the unknown parameter. Thus
L=∏i=1nfXi(xi,θ)E18
is the Likelihood function. The Maximum Likelihood Estimator (MLE) of θ, sayθ¯, is the value of θ, that maximizes L or, equivalently, the logarithm of L. Often, but not always, the MLE of q is a solution of
dLogLdθ=0E19
Now, we apply the MLE to estimate the Weibull parameters, namely the shape parameter and the scale parameters. Consider the Weibull probability density function (pdf) given in (2), then likelihood function will be
L(x1,x2,..,xn,k,c)=∏i=1n(kc)(xic)k−1e−(xic)kE20
On taking the logarithms of (20), differentiating with respect to k and c in turn and equating to zero, we obtain the estimating equations
∂lnL∂k=nk+∑i=1nlnxi−1c∑i=1nxiklnxi=0E21
∂lnL∂c=−nc+1c2∑i=1nxik=0E22
On eliminating c between these two above equations and simplifying, we get
∑i=1nxiklnxi∑i=1nxik−1k−1n∑i=1nlnxi=0E23
which may be solved to get the estimate of k. This can be accomplished by Newton-Raphson method. Which can be written in the form
Once k is determined, c can be estimated using equation (22) as
c=∑i=1nxiknE27
2.3. Some results
When a location has c=6 the pdf under various values of k are shown in Fig. 1. A higher value of k such as 2.5 or 4 indicates that the variation of Mean Wind speed is small. A lower value of k such as 1.5 or 2 indicates a greater deviation away from Mean Wind speed.
Figure 1.
Weibull Distribution Density versus wind speed under a constant value of c and different values of k.
When a location has k=3 the pdf under various valus of c are shown in Fig.2. A higher value of c such as 12 indicates a greater deviation away from Mean Wind speed.
Figure 2.
Weibull Distribution Density versus wind speed under a constant value of k=3 and different values of c.
Fig. 3 represents the characteristic curve ofΓ(1+1k).versus shape parameter k. The values ofΓ(1+1k).varies around.889 when k is between 1.9 to 2.6.
Fig.4 represents the characteristic curve ofcv¯versus shape parameter k.Normally the wind speed data collected at a specified location are used to calculate Mean Wind speed. A good estimate for parameter c can be obtained from Fig.4 asc=1.128v¯where k ranges from 1.6 to 4. If the parameter k is less than unity, the ratiocv¯decrease rapidly. Hence c is directly proportional to Mean Wind speed for1.6≤k≤4and Mean Wind speed is mainly affected by c. The most good wind farms have k in this specified range and estimation of c in terms ofv¯may have wide applications.
Figure 3.
Characteristic curve of Γ(1+1/k) versus Shape parameter k.
Figure 4.
Characteristic curve of c/ v ˜ versus shape parameter k.
March, 2009
Wind Speed (m/s)
March, 2009
Wind Speed (m/s)
1
0.56
17
0.28
2
0.28
18
0.83
3
0.56
19
1.39
4
0.56
20
1.11
5
1.11
21
1.11
6
0.83
22
0.83
7
1.11
23
0.56
8
1.94
24
0.83
9
1.11
25
1.67
10
0.83
26
1.94
11
1.11
27
1.39
12
1.39
28
0.83
13
0.28
29
2.22
14
0.56
30
1.67
15
0.28
31
2.22
16
0.28
Table 1.
Example: Consider the following example wherexirepresents the Average Monthly Wind Speed (m/s) at kolkata (from 1st March, 2009 to 31st March, 2009)
Also letF(xi)=in+1and using equations (16) and (17) we get k= 1.013658 and c=29.9931.
But if we apply maximum Likelihood Method we get k = 1.912128 and c=1.335916. There is a huge difference in value of c by the above two methods. This is due to the mean rank ofF(xi)and k value is tends to unity.
3. Conclusions
In this paper, we have presented two analytical methods for estimating the Weibull distribution parameters. The above results will help the scientists and the technocrats to select the location for Wind Turbine Generators.
4. Appendix
Those who are not familiar with the units or who have data given in units of other systems (For example wind speed in kmph), here is a short list with the conversion factors for the units that are most relevant for design of Wind Turbine Generators.
Length
1m = 3.28 ft
Area
1m2=10.76 ft2
Volume
1m3 = 35.31 ft3=264.2 gallons
Speed
1m/s=2.237mph 1knot=.5144 m/s=1.15 mph
Mass
1 kg=2.20 5lb
Force
1N=0.225 lbf=0.102 kgf
Torque
1Nm=.738 ft lbf
Energy
1J= 0.239 Calories= 0.27777*10-6 kWh= 1 Nm
Power
1 W=1Watt=1 J/s=0.738 ft lbf/s= 1Nm/s 1 hp = 0.7457 kW 1 pk = 0.7355 Kw
Paritosh Bhattacharya (September 22nd 2011). Weibull Distribution for Estimating the Parameters, Wind Energy Management, Paritosh Bhattacharya, IntechOpen, DOI: 10.5772/18151. Available from:
We are IntechOpen, the world's leading publisher of Open Access books. Built by scientists, for scientists. Our readership spans scientists, professors, researchers, librarians, and students, as well as business professionals. We share our knowledge and peer-reveiwed research papers with libraries, scientific and engineering societies, and also work with corporate R&D departments and government entities.
