Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Silica Gel–Supported P-, Ge-, and Sb-Porphyrins for Visible Light Inactivation of Bacteria

Written By

Masahide Yasuda and Jin Matsumoto

Submitted: 03 April 2017 Reviewed: 05 June 2017 Published: 20 December 2017

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.70004

From the Edited Volume

Visible-Light Photocatalysis of Carbon-Based Materials

Edited by Yunjin Yao

Chapter metrics overview

1,061 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

This chapter describes the photocatalysis action of (dihydroxo)tetraphenyl¬porphyrinato complexes of high valent P (V), Ge (IV), and Sb (V) (P(tpp), Ge(tpp), and Sb(tpp)). These chromophores were fixed onto silica gel (SiO2) through Coulombic forces and hydrogen bonding between axial hydroxo ligands and silanol groups to produce M(tpp)/SiO2 (M = P, Ge, and Sb) composites. M(tpp)/SiO2 were applied to the photo-inactivation of Escherichia coli and Legionella pneumophila. Moreover, M(tpp)/SiO2 was subjected to practical experiments for the photoinactivation of L. pneumophila naturally occurring in a cooling tower and a public fountain. It is noteworthy that 80 g of Sb(tpp)/SiO2 catalyst, containing 40 mg of Sb(tpp) maintained a concentration of Legionella species below 100 CFU/100 mL for 120 days in 13 m3 of water in a fountain under sunlight exposure. The photoinactivation proceeded through the liberation of M(tpp) from SiO2, adsorption of M(tpp) inside bacteria, and generation of reactive oxygen species, such as singlet oxygen, under visible light irradiation, thus resulting in bacteria apoptosis. Based on these results, we developed water-soluble porphyrins by modification of P and Sb porphyrin axial ligands to alkyloxo, alkylethylenedioxy, and alkylpyridinium groups. These water-soluble porphyrins were applied to the photodynamic inactivation of E. coli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Keywords

  • high valent metal
  • P(V)-porphyrin
  • Ge(IV)-porphyrin
  • Sb(V)-porphyrin
  • Escherichia coli
  • Legionella pneumophila
  • Saccharomyces cerevisiae

1. Introduction

Photocatalysis has received much attention as an environmentally friendly process for degrading organic compounds and bacteria in contaminated water. It is well known that UV-light irradiation of TiO2 generates a hydroxyl radical, which works as a strong oxidizing reagent for various microorganisms in aqueous solutions [1]. In 1985, Matsunaga et al. reported that Pt-loaded TiO2, under irradiation of >380 nm light, was capable of photoinactivation of various microorganisms, such as Lactobacillus acidophilus, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Escherichia coli, and Chlorella vulgaris [2]. However, the UV light used for activation of TiO2 is harmful to humans and only low amounts of the correct wavelengths are found in sunlight. Therefore, a photocatalyst that operates under irradiation from visible light emitted from the sun or a fluorescent lamp has been earnestly desired. Many researchers have focused much attention on porphyrins and metalloporphyrins, which can absorb visible light with high-absorption coefficients. Among the various metalloporphyrin chromophores, we selected axially dihydroxo-substituted tetraphenylporphyrin complexes (M(tpp)) of high valent metals, such as P(V), Ge(IV), and Sb(V) (Figure 1). To support M(tpp) on a carrier, we used silica gel (SiO2), which has a high transparency to visible light and a strong binding force to porphyrins. Thus, M(tpp)/SiO2 composites were prepared by adsorption of M(tpp) on SiO2 and the composites operated as photocatalysts under visible light irradiation. Moreover, the porphyrins were subjected to water solubilization for medical field applications.

Figure 1.

P(tpp), Ge(tpp), and Sb(tpp).

In this chapter, we will cover M(tpp)/SiO2 and water-soluble porphyrins that were applied to the photosensitized inactivation of E. coli and S. cerevisiae in a reaction vessel and Legionella pneumophila in naturally occurring environments such as cooling tower and public fountains.

Advertisement

2. Preparation of the photocatalysts

2.1. Porphyrin chromophores

The porphyrin chromophores studied were (dihydroxo) tetraphenylporphyrinatophosphorus chloride (P(tpp)), (dihydroxo)tetraphenylporphyrinatogermanium (Ge(tpp)), and (dihydroxo)tetraphenylporphyrinatoantimony bromide (Sb(tpp)). Axial hydroxo ligands were bonded to the metals through stable covalent bonds. P(tpp) and Sb(tpp) are cationic complexes, whereas Ge(tpp) is a neutral complex. Table 1 lists the physicochemical properties of the M(tpp)s, such as oxidation potentials (E1/2ox vs. Ag/AgNO3), reduction potentials (E1/2red), absorption maxima (λmax), and molar absorption coefficients (ε). Since M(tpp) has absorptions at the Soret band around 420 nm and Q-bands at 550 nm with high ε, they can capture even weak light emitted from a fluorescent lamp and the sun. The fluorescence maxima (λF), quantum yields (ΦF), and lifetimes (τF) were obtained from fluorescence spectra. Since ΦF values were low, it was suggested that the efficiency of triplet state formation was relatively high. High efficiency of triplet state formation is advantageous for energy transfer to 3O2. The E1/2red values of M(tpp)s were −0.74 to −0.93 V vs. Ag/AgNO3, which were relatively positive compared with the divalent metal tetraphenylporphyrin complexes of Zn(II) (−1.31 V), Ni(II) (−1.18 V), and Pb(II) (−1.10 V) [8]. This fact shows that M(tpp)s (M = P, Ge, Sb) have powerful oxidation abilities under light irradiation. Moreover, the toxicity of M(tpp) is low. The lethal dose 50 (LD50) of Sb(tpp) [9] and P(tpp) [10] was more than 2000 mg/kg. Therefore, M(tpp) can be safely used in living environmental fields.

M(tpp)E1/2ox/VaE1/2red/Vbλmax/nmc (ε /104 M−1 cm−1)dFluorescenceRef.
Soret bandQ-bandλmax/(E0–0/eV)eΦF (τF/ns)f
P(tpp)1.20g−0.93g424 (31.2)554 (1.82)607 (2.04)0.0416 (5.4)[3]
Ge(tpp)0.95−0.83420 (77.6)554 (2.19)596 (2.08)0.1500 (4.7)[4, 5]
Sb(tpp)1.17−0.74419 (41.6)552 (3.09)596 (2.08)0.0518 (1.6)[6, 7]

Table 1.

Properties of M(tpp).

Half peak of oxidation potential vs Ag/AgNO3.


Half peak of reduction potential vs Ag/AgNO3.


Absorption maxima of M(tpp).


Molar absorption coefficients (ε) of M(tpp) in MeCN. The ε of P(tpp) was measured in MeOH.


Fluorescence maxima. The values in parenthesis are excitation energy in eV.


Fluorescence quantum yield (ΦF) under excitation at the Q-band and fluorescence lifetimes (τF).


Unpublished results.


2.2. Preparation of porphyrins/silica gel composites

To perform the photoreaction in an aqueous solution, less water-soluble M(tpp) was fixed onto porous SiO2 to form M(tpp)/SiO2 [11]. Silica gel powder (300 mesh, 40 μmφ, BW300 Fuji Silysia, Japan) and silica gel beads (0.85–1.70 mmφ, 306 m2 g−1, CARIACT Q–10, Fuji Silysia) were used. M(tpp) was fixed on SiO2 through Coulombic forces and hydrogen bonding between axial hydroxo ligands and silanol groups. The general procedure for M(tpp)/SiO2 preparation is described for the case of Sb(tpp)/SiO2 as follows. SiO2 (70 g) was added to a MeOH−toluene solution (1:4 v/v, 500 mL) containing Sb(tpp) (60 mg) and the mixture was allowed to stand for 18 h. MeOH was evaporated from the solution at 40°C under reduced pressure (Figure 2). The treated silica gel was isolated by filtration and then dried under reduced pressure at 40°C to give Sb(tpp)/SiO2. The content of Sb(tpp) was 0.087 wt%.

Figure 2.

Silica gel-supported M(tpp) catalyst (M(tpp)/SiO2).

2.3. Photocatalytic oxidation of organic compounds using M(tpp)/SiO2 (M = Ge, Sb)

Since M(tpp)/SiO2 (M = Ge, Sb) have high oxidation abilities, M(tpp)/SiO2 was applied to the oxidation of cycloalkenes [12] and acetone [4] and the dechlorination of 4-chlorophenol [13]. The photocatalytic reactions were performed using the setup depicted in Figure 3, where the reactant was supplied by a continuous flow system. In a spiral-type apparatus (Figure 3A), the reactant solution is fed continuously from a holder to a spiral glass tube packed with the photocatalyst. Sample irradiation was performed using a fluorescent lamp (22 W). The oval mirror-type apparatus (Figure 3B) consisted of a fluorescent lamp (18 W), an oval mirror, and a reactor (20 mmφ × 500 mm; 150 mL) packed with the photocatalyst. The fluorescent lamp was set on one focus of the oval mirror, and the reactor was set at another focus. The visible light emitted from the fluorescent lamp was concentrated onto the reactor. The reactant solution was fed continuously from reservoirs into the reactors.

Figure 3.

Setups for photocatalytic reactions: spiral type (A) and oval mirror type (B).

The photocatalytic oxidations of cycloalkenes using oxygen were performed in a spiral type reactor (Figure 3A). Irradiation was directed onto a spiral glass tube (4 mmΦ × 2.5 m) containing photocatalyst (6.0 g) to which CH2Cl2 solutions (150 mL) of cycloalkenes (0.1 M) were fed continuously from the reservoir [12]. To reduce silanol group effects, Sb(tpp)/SiO2 was modified by capping with (Me3Si)2NH to give Sb(tpp)/SiO2TMS. The photocatalytic oxidation of cyclohexene on Sb(tpp)/SiO2TMS in CH2Cl2 produced cis-1,2-epoxycyclohexane (28%), 1,2-cyclohexanediol (27%), and 2-cyclohexen-1-ol (38%) along with a small amount of 2-cyclohexene-1-one (7%) at 99.8% conversion after irradiation for 56 h (Figure 4). Similarly, the photocatalytic oxidation was applied to cyclooctene and 1-methyl-cyclohexene, which mainly resulted in diol formation.

Figure 4.

Photo-oxidation of cycloalkenes using Sb(tpp)/SiO2TMS.

Photo-oxidation of MeOH to HCHO was performed by Ge(tpp)/SiO2 at room temperature using a spiral type reactor (Figure 3A). Irradiation with a fluorescent light was performed on a spiral glass tube (4 mmφ × 2.5 m) packed with Ge(tpp)/SiO2 (12 g). The reactant was fed continuously into the spiral glass tube from the reservoir that contained an aerated aqueous solution of MeOH (50 mM in 200 mL) [4]. HCHO (30.6 μM) was formed after 180 h with a turnover number (TON) of 3.0 (Figure 5). The isotope effect for the photo-oxidation of methanol was found to be 2.1 from the ratios of slopes in the time-conversion plots for CH3OH and CD3OH. Therefore, it was suggested that the oxidation occurs through hydrogen abstraction. The generation of a Ge-O• species was generated by excitation of Ge(tpp). Here, Ge(tpp) acts as an O-radical generator. The photo-oxidation by Ge(tpp)/SiO2 was applied to toluene and ethylbenzene to produce alcohols and aldehydes/ketones. In the cases of cumene, methylcyclopentane, and methylcyclohexane, the corresponding alcohols were produced.

Figure 5.

Photo-oxidation of methanol using Ge(tpp)/SiO2.

Dechlorination of 4-chlorophenol (4-CP) using Sb(tpp)/SiO2 was performed using the oval mirror-type apparatus (Figure 3B) [13]. Here, Fe(NO3)3 was used instead of O2 as the electron acceptor for the dechlorination of 4-CP, since the oxidation potential of 4-CP was relatively high. Sb(tpp)/SiO2 (0.087 wt% Sb(tpp)) was loaded into the oval mirror reactor. Before irradiation, the aqueous solution of 4-CP (initial concentration was 493 μM) was fed for 3 h under dark conditions, and the initial concentration of 4-CP decreased to 400 mM, probably due to the adsorption of 4-CP on the SiO2. Upon irradiation with the fluorescent lamp for 72 h, the concentration of 4-CP decreased from 400 to 6 μM along with the formation of Cl (233 μM) and 1,4-benzoquinone (205 μM). Fe2+ (811 μM) was produced as a consequence of the reduction of Fe3+ (Figure 6). Electron transfer from the excited triplet state of Sb(tpp)/SiO2 to Fe3+ was responsible for the photodechlorination initiation, since Rehm-Weller equation calculated that the free energy change (ΔG) for the electron transfer from the excited triplet state of Sb(tpp) (E0−0 = 1.63 eV) to Fe3+ ion (E1/2red = −0.31 V vs Ag/AgNO3) would be −0.15 V: ΔG = E1/2ox − E1/2red − E0–0, where E1/2ox (Sb(tpp)) = 1.17 V vs Ag/AgNO3. The resulting reactive dicationic Sb(tpp)/SiO2 undergoes the hole transfer to 4-CP adsorbed on SiO2 and solved in the aqueous solution. The resulting 4-CP cation radical allows for the nucleophilic addition of H2O. The substitution of Cl with OH via the hydroxy adduct followed by the oxidation by Fe3+ gives 1,4-benzoquinone.

Figure 6.

Dechlorination of 4-chlorophenol (4-CP) using Sb(tpp)/SiO2 under irradiation from a fluorescent lamp.

Advertisement

3. Photoinactivation of E. coli by M(tpp)/SiO2 (M = P, Sb)

Our first experiment for photoinactivation using Sb(tpp)/SiO2 was reported in 2003 against E. coli [10]. Photoinactivation of E. coli was enacted as follows: E. coli k-12 (IFO3335) was cultured aerobically at 30°C for 8 h in a basal medium (pH 6.5) consisting of 1% bactotriptone, 0.5% yeast extract, and 1% NaCl. After centrifugation of the cultured broth at 8500 g for 10 min, the harvested cells were washed with physiological saline and then resuspended in the saline. Phosphate buffer (9.0 mL, 100 mM, pH 7.0), the cell suspension of E. coli (1.0 mL, ca. 104 cells mL−1), and Sb(tpp)/SiO2 (10 mg) were introduced into an L-type glass tube (length 180 mm, diameter 15 mm) that was set on a reciprocal shaker in the apparatus shown in Figure 7. The glass tube was shaken at 160 rpm and irradiated for 2 h using a fluorescent lamp (Panasonic FL-15ECW, Japan, λ = 400–723 nm, maximum intensity at 545 nm, 10.5 W cm−2) set above a reciprocal shaker. Aliquots (0.1 mL) were taken from the reaction mixture at 20 min intervals and plated on agar plates in triplicate. The colonies that appeared after incubation for 24 h at 30°C were counted. The amount of living cells (B in cell mL−1) was defined as the average number of the colonies of E. coli in the triplicate plates.

Figure 7.

Apparatus used for photoinactivation of bacteria experiments.

Figure 8A shows the time courses of survival ratio (100 B/B0) of E. coli, where B0 is the initial amount of E. coli. Upon irradiation for 60 min, the concentration of E. coli decreased from the initial concentration (6.4 × 103 cells mL−1) to about 40 cells mL−1. Its survival ratio was 0.6%. Thus, Sb(tpp)/SiO2 demonstrated bactericidal activity under visible light irradiation. Control experiments, irradiation in the absence of the photocatalyst and photocatalyst without irradiation, were also performed. Each control run maintained the B0 of E. coli, showing that the Sb(tpp)/SiO2 has bactericidal activity only with light activation. Incident light was absorbed exclusively by Sb(tpp)/SiO2. However, the excited singlet state of Sb(tpp)/SiO2 was too short-lived to contact directly with the bacteria. Therefore, it was suggested that the excited triplet state of Sb(tpp)/SiO2 (triplet energy = 1.63 eV) underwent energy transfer to molecular oxygen (triplet energy = 0.98 eV) to generate singlet oxygen (1O2). Thus, we found that Sb(tpp)/SiO2 could generate 1O2 in aqueous solutions to sterilize E. coli cells using visible light irradiation.

Figure 8.

Photoinactivation of E. coli by Sb(tpp)/SiO2 (A) and P(tpp)/SiO2 (B) and L. pneumophila by Sb(tpp)/SiO2 (C) under visible light irradiation in the presence of M(tpp)/SiO2 (), dark conditions in the presence of M(tpp)/SiO2 (▲), visible light irradiation in the absence of M(tpp)/SiO2 (○), and dark in the absence of M(tpp)/SiO2 (△). Reaction conditions: initial concentration of bacteria = 1.0 × 104 cell mL–1 for E. coli and 6.4 × 103 cells mL−1 for L. pneumophila, M(tpp)/SiO2 = 10 mg in phosphate buffer solution (10 mL) for E. coli and water (10 mL) for L. pneumophila under irradiation of fluorescent lamps (light intensity = 21 W cm–2).

Similar photoinactivation studies of E. coli were performed using P(tpp)/SiO2 (10 mg) in phosphate buffer (10 mL) containing E. coli (104 cells) [10]. The survival plots are shown in Figure 8B. Under a nitrogen atmosphere, photoinactivation using P(tpp)/SiO2 did not occur. We postulated that photoinactivation obeyed a Michaelis-Menten type mechanism, which involves an interaction between bacteria and P(tpp)/SiO2 in the ground state. Plots of B0Bvalues against irradiation time gave a linear correlation. From the slopes of the plots, the rate for photoinactivation was determined to be proportional to the amounts of P(tpp)/SiO2 and light intensity. Thus, adsorption of E. coli on P(tpp)/SiO2 was important for efficient photoinactivation using P(tpp)/SiO2 under visible light irradiation.

Advertisement

4. Photoinactivation of Legionella species in naturally occurring environments

L. pneumophila has become one of the most aggressive pathogens since the first outbreak of Legionnaires’ disease in Philadelphia in 1976 [14]. The natural habitats for L. pneumophila include a wide range of aquatic bodies, such as lakes, streams, and artificially constructed aquatic reservoirs (hot springs, fountains, and cooling towers). Large outbreaks of Legionnaires’ disease have been reported in Portugal, the Netherlands, and Spain [15, 16, 17]. On the other hand, photocatalytic treatments have received much attention as an environmentally friendly process to inactivate bacteria in contaminated water. In 2002-2003, our group carried out the photoinactivation of Legionella species occurring in bacteria’s natural habitats, such as in cooling towers and public fountains using a use of Sb(tpp)/SiO2 [18].

4.1. Photoinactivation of L. pneumophila

Initially, the photoinactivation of L. pneumophila was examined with Sb(tpp)/SiO2 using L-type glass tubes in the apparatus shown in Figure 7 in a similar manner to the method described for E. coli [10]. A phosphate buffer (0.1 M, pH 7.0, 10 mL) containing a cell suspension of L. pneumophila (6.4 × 105 CFU/100 mL), and Sb(tpp)/SiO2 (10 mg) was introduced into the L-type glass tube (length 18 cm, diameter 1.5 cm) and irradiated with a fluorescent lamp [18]. Aliquots (0.1 mL) of the reaction mixture were directly plated on a selective medium for Legionella species, i.e., WYOα agar medium (Eiken Chemicals Co., Ltd, Japan) consisting of glycine (3 g), vancomycin (5 mg), polymixin B (106 IU), and amphotericin B (80 mg). The colonies of L. pneumophila appeared after incubation for 7 days at 36°C. Wet, smooth, and bluish-white colonies were counted on triplicate plates. The cell concentration of L. pneumophila was represented in colony formation units in 100 mL of the aqueous solution (CFU/100 mL).

Figure 8C shows the time courses for Legionella species survival. Upon irradiation for 60 min in the presence of the Sb(tpp)/SiO2, the concentration of Legionella species apparently decreased from the initial concentration (6.4 × 105 CFU) to 4 × 103 CFU. Its survival ratio was 0.6%. In the control experiments, irradiation in the absence of Sb(tpp)/SiO2, in the presence of Sb(tpp)/SiO2 without irradiation, and in the absence of Sb(tpp)/SiO2 and irradiation, each runs maintained the initial concentration of Legionella species. Thus, Sb(tpp)/SiO2 was confirmed to have the photocatalytic activity that could sterilize Legionella species.

4.2. Practical experiments in a cooling tower

The bactericidal experiment was performed in a cooling tower (Figure 9A) that was located in a building in Miyazaki city [18]. A cylindrical apparatus (200 mmφ × 500 mm, Figure 9B) that consisted of seven fluorescent lamps (18 W, 43 mmφ × 50 cm) and the Sb(tpp)/SiO2 catalyst (4.0 kg, 0.05 wt% Sb(tpp)) was used. Water in the holder (800 L) of the cooling tower was pumped into a cylindrical vessel at a rate of 28 L min−1, and then, the treated water was returned to the holder. The average retention time was calculated to be 26 s. In the cylindrical vessel, the Sb(tpp)/SiO2 catalyst was irradiated by visible light emitted from the fluorescent lamps at ambient temperature. Sampling of the water was carried out at outlet at 3–7 day intervals. At the same time, the atmospheric temperatures were recorded as the average value of the highest temperature of Miyazaki city during the sampling day and 2 days prior. The sample water (1.0 L) was filtrated through a membrane filter (0.45 μm, HA, Millipore) under reduced pressure into the vessel (100 mL) containing the microbes adhering to the membrane filter, an aqueous solution (5 mL) was added, and the vessel was shaken vigorously. Saturated aqueous KCl (5 mL, pH 2.2) containing 0.2 M HCl was added, and the vessel was shaken vigorously. After standing for exactly 20 min at room temperature, the prepared solution was ready for plating as described in Section 4.1. The amounts of Legionella species were determined by the colony counting method.

Figure 9.

Practical experiment in a cooling tower: the cylindrical apparatus (B) setup in the cooling tower (A).

Under the conditions without any bactericidal treatments, Legionella species occurred in a range from 20 to 139 CFU in the holder of the cooling tower, as shown in Figure 10. After the bactericidal apparatus was active, the concentrations of Legionella species decreased to levels below the detection limit. This was maintained until the irradiation treatment ceased. Seven days after the irradiation ceased, detectable amounts of Legionella species reappeared. Thus, the bactericidal effects of Sb(tpp)/SiO2 were practically confirmed in this cooling tower experiment.

Figure 10.

Time-course plots of the amounts of Legionella species () in the cooling tower along with the atmospheric temperature (○). The cylindrical photo-bactericidal apparatus was operated from October 1 to October 21, 2002. Conditions: catalyst, Sb(tpp)/SiO2 (4 kg); water, ca. 800 L; flow rate, 28 L min−1; and average retention time, 26 s.

4.3. Practical experiments in water fountain

Practical experiments were performed in a public fountain of Miyazaki city (Figure 11A) that was filled with 13 m3 of water [18]. Photoinactivation of the fountain was examined using a leaf-type of photoinactivation apparatus (200 mmφ × 50 mm, Figure 11B) containing the Sb(tpp)/SiO2 catalyst (80 g, 0.05 wt% Sb(tpp)), which operated under sunlight irradiation. The determination of viable cell numbers of Legionella species was carried out in the manner described in Section 4.2. After the leaf-type apparatus had been installed into the fountain, the concentrations of Legionella species in the fountain were continuously kept below 30 CFU under sunlight irradiation (Figure 12). After the leaf-type apparatus was removed, the concentrations of Legionella species gradually increased to reach 100 CFU, which is the environmental quality standard, within 42 days after the removal.

Figure 11.

Practical experiments in a public fountain: The leaf-type apparatus (B) was set in the fountain (A). (C) Picture indicates the leaf-type apparatus set in the pool of the fountain.

Figure 12.

Time-conversion plots of the amount of Legionella species () in public fountain photoinactivation. The experiment was performed using a leaf-type photo-bactericidal apparatus containing Sb(tpp)/SiO2 (80 g) in a fountain that contained 13 m3 of water between April 9 to October 29, 2003. The leaf-type apparatus was installed into the fountain on May 28, 2003 and was removed from the fountain on August 22, 2003. Atmospheric temperature (○) was recorded as the average of the highest temperature of Miyazaki city for three days before the sampling day.

As a result of the practical experiments, it is noteworthy that 80 g of Sb(tpp)/SiO2 catalyst, which contained 40 mg of Sb(tpp), could maintain the concentration of Legionella species in 13 m3 of water below 100 CFU for 120 days.

4.4. Mechanism for photoinactivation using M(tpp)/SiO2

Elemental analyses of the catalysts before and after use in the fountain were performed with ICP. Before use, the Sb content in Sb(tpp)/SiO2 was measured to be 80 ppm, which was in good agreement with the Sb content (72 ppm) calculated for the 0.05 wt% of Sb(tpp) content in the catalyst. After 3 months of use in the fountain, the Sb content decreased from 80 to 17 ppm. On the other hand, Na, Mg, Al, and Ca largely increased, resulting in ion-absorption on SiO2. Moreover, Sb(tpp)/SiO2 catalyst used in the fountain was analyzed by a confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). It was found that the fluorescence coming from the surface of the catalyst keep the similar shapes to the original catalyst, but the intensity was weaker compared with the original spectra of Sb(tpp)/SiO2. On the other hand, the fluorescence from the inside of the catalyst maintained the original intensity. Therefore, it is suggested that Sb(tpp) was eliminated from the surface of the catalyst. Irradiation of fluorescent light on the Sb(tpp)/SiO2 catalyst in deionized water did not sufficiently account for the spectral change and decrease in total Sb. Therefore, that the cationic Sb(tpp) chromophore was exchanged with alkali metal ions in the bulk water on the surface of the catalyst under irradiation is strongly suggested. A similar phenomena were observed in the case of P(tpp)/SiO2 [10]. Moreover, when Sb(tpp) was tightly fixed on SiO2 through covalent bonds, no photoinactivation occurred [19].

Therefore, the liberation of the Sb(tpp) chromophore from SiO2 is necessary for photoinactivation, as shown in Figure 13. Sb(tpp) can dissolve slightly in water (the water solubility (CW) of Sb(tpp) is low (0.08 mM)). The liberated Sb(tpp) might be adsorbed by the bacteria and induce apoptosis under visible light irradiation. After the photoinactivation, Sb(tpp) might separate from the SiO2 and move to the pool of the fountain. This may explain the loss of Sb(tpp) from Sb(tpp)/SiO2.

Figure 13.

Possible mechanism for photoinactivation of bacteria by M(tpp)/SiO2.

Advertisement

5. Photosensitized inactivation using water-soluble porphyrins

As mentioned in the previous section, it was found that Sb(tpp) dissolved in water was responsible for the photoinactivation of bacteria. Therefore, in our next study, we intended to inactivate bacteria using water-soluble porphyrins. Water-soluble porphyrins have received much attention in connection with photoinactivation [20] and photodynamic therapy (PDT) [21, 22, 23, 24] ever since the first report on photoinactivation of E. coli by water-soluble meso-substituted cationic porphyrins appeared in 1996 [25]. For the biological application of porphyrins, water solubility is an important characteristic in the handling of porphyrins in an aqueous solution. We modified the axial ligands of P and Sb porphyrins by installing alkyloxo (1) [26], alkylethylenedioxy (2) [27, 28], and alkylpyridinium groups (3) [20, 29] (Figure 14). The water solubility (CW in mM) is shown in Table 2. The quantum yields for the formation of 1O2 were determined to be 0.65 for 1b, 0.53 for 1d [26], 0.62 for 2b, 0.69 for 2c, 0.73 for 2d [27], 0.88 for 3g, and 0.87 for 3c [29].

Figure 14.

Water-soluble porphyrins (13).

EntrynmCW/mMS. cerevisiaebE. coli
[P]/nMT1/2/min[P]/nMT1/2/min
1a00.1050380
1b10.1350192
1c61.095014
1d102.104022
1e122.215017
1f142.405021
2a1317.450023
2b1213.930081
2c2213.020031
2d425.385055
2e622.07564
2f611.11569
3a2>120*50*32250c32c
3b4112*50*36250c53c
3c663.65044250c120c
3d13.355020200066
3e46.10*30*85200027
3f53.8050029
3g65.84*20*7250031
3h76.0040024
3i83.8050063

Table 2.

Photoinactivation of S. cerevisiae and E. coli by water-soluble porphyrins (1, 2, and 3).

Water solubility of porphyrins in mM.


Experiment with * was performed in the presence of human serum albumin (HSA, 400 nM).


Unpublished results.


We show the results of photoinactivation of S. cerevisiae and E. coli using water-soluble P and Sb porphyrins (13). Photoinactivation was enacted using the apparatus shown in Figure 7. The porphyrin solution, a bacteria suspension, and buffer solution (or water) were introduced into L-type glass tubes, resulting in a solution (10 mL) containing bacteria cells (ca. 1 × 104 cell mL−1) and compounds 13 (5–2000 nM). The solution was irradiated using a fluorescent lamp (λmax = 545 nm) under aerobic conditions on a reciprocal shaker. The amounts of bacteria (cell mL−1) at every irradiation time were determined by the colony counting method. Under dark conditions, the bacterial counts were maintained at the initial levels. Thus, it was confirmed that all porphyrins (13) have no bactericidal activity under dark conditions at all.

From the plots of the survival ratios against irradiation time, the bactericidal activity of porphyrins was evaluated by the half life (T1/2 in min), which was the time required for the initial bacteria concentration to be halved. Moreover, the minimum concentrations ([P]) of porphyrins were adjusted until T1/2 was found in the range of 0–120 min. The [P] values and T1/2 are shown in Table 2. As [P] values and T1/2 are smaller, the bactericidal activity of porphyrins is higher. The most active sensitizer for S. cerevisiae was 2e and 2f, whose [P] value was 5.0 nM. However, 2e and 2f were ineffective for E. coli. Tricationic complexes 3a3c were effective for E. coli. The bioaffinity of the porphyrins can be related to the structure of the bacterial cell wall. In the case of S. cerevisiae, whose cell wall consisted of hydrophobic peptidoglycan, water-soluble porphyrins (2e2f) having hydrophobic character had the highest bioaffinity. On the other hand, polycationic porphyrins (3) had the highest bioaffinity toward gram-negative E. coli, whose cell wall consisted of phospholipids, lipopolysaccharides, lipoteichoic acids, and lipoproteins [30]. Moreover, it was found that 3 interacted strongly with human serum albumin (HSA) [31], and the addition of HSA was effective for inducing photoinactivation of S. cerevisiae using 3 [29]. Recently, reviews on photoinactivation by water-soluble porphyrins have been published by Almeida at al. [20] and our group [32].

Advertisement

6. Conclusion and perspectives

Since aqueous solutions are more transparent for visible light than ultraviolet, visible light photocatalysts work best for the photocatalytic reactions in aqueous solution. Moreover, visible light photocatalysts take advantage of the photocatalytic reactions under sunlight irradiation, since sunlight consists of 52% visible, 42% infrared, 6% UV-A, and 0.5% UV-B light. We showed two methods to photoinactivate bacteria: one method is the dispersion of M(tpp)/SiO2 (M = P, Ge, and Sb) in water, which is applicable to open system in naturally occurring environments; the other method is the water solubilization of M-porphyrins (M = P and Sb), which can be used in a closed system. M(tpp) and M-porphyrins can interact with bacteria through adsorption onto cell walls and absorption into the cells. Under irradiation, reactive species, such as 1O2, is generated by energy transfer from the porphyrins to O2 molecules on the cell walls and inside the cells.

Thus, porphyrins are useful chromophores for catalysis and sensitization in a biological application. The application of water-soluble M-porphyrins to PDT is currently underway in our laboratories.

Advertisement

Acknowledgments

This work was partially supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) (16K05847) from Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS). Also, the authors would like to express grateful acknowledgment to many students belonged in our laboratory during 2003 to present when visible light inactivation has been investigated in our laboratory for their large contributions.

References

  1. 1. Fujishima A, Rao TN, Tryk DA. Titanium dioxide photocatalysis. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology C: Photochemistry Reviews. 2000;1:1-21
  2. 2. Matsunaga T, Tomoda R, Nakajima T, Wake H. Photoelectrochemical sterilization of microbial cells by semiconductor powders. FEMS Microbiology Letters. 1985;29:211-214
  3. 3. Fujitsuka M, Cho DW, Tojo S, Inoue A, Shiragami T, Yasuda M, Majima T. Electron transfer from axial ligand to S1- and S2-excited phosphorus tetraphenylporphyrin. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A. 2007;111:10574-10579
  4. 4. Shiragami T, Shiraki R, Makise R, Matsumoto J, Yasuda M. Di(hydroxo)porphyrin GeIV complex/silica gel composite as visible light-assisted radical generator. Chemistry Letters. 2010;39:874-875
  5. 5. Fujitsuka M, Shiragami T, Cho DW, Tojo S, Yasuda M, Majima T. Solvent dynamics regulated electron transfer in S2-excited Sb and Ge tetraphenylporphyrins with an electron donor substituent at the meso-position. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A. 2014;118:3926-3933
  6. 6. Tsunami SI, Tanaka K, Matsumoto J, Shiragami T, Yasuda M. Effects of an axial amino ligand on the spectroscopic and electrochemical properties of amino(methoxo)-(tetraphenylporphyrinato)antimony(V) complexes. Bulletin of the Chemical Society of Japan. 2008;81:583-589
  7. 7. Andou Y, Shiragami T, Shima K, Yasuda M. Synthesis and fluorescence study of a (2-naphthoxy)polyoxalkoxyantimony(V) tetraphenylporphyrin complex. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry. 2002;147:191-197
  8. 8. Felton RH, Linschitz H. Polarographic reduction of porphyrins and electron spin resonance of porphyrin anions. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 1966;88:1113-1116
  9. 9. Shiragami T, Matsumoto J, Inoue H, Yasuda M. Antimony porphyrin complexes as visible-light driven photocatalyst. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology C: Photochemistry Reviews. 2005;6:227-248
  10. 10. Fueda Y, Suzuki H, Komiya Y, Asakura Y, Shiragami T, Matsumoto J, Yokoi H, Yasuda M. Bactericidal effect of silica gel-supported porphyrinatophosphorus(V) catalysts on Escherichia coli under visible-light irradiation. Bulletin of the Chemical Society of Japan. 2006;79:1420-1425
  11. 11. Yokoi H, Shiragami T, Hirose J, Kawauchi T, Hinoue K, Fueda Y, Nobuhara K, Akazaki I, Yasuda M. Bactericidal effect of a silica gel-supported porphyrinatoantimony(V) complex under visible light irradiation. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2003;19:559-563
  12. 12. Shiragami T, Makise RI, Inokuchi Y, Matsumoto J, Inoue H, Yasuda M. Efficient photocatalytic oxidation of cycloalkenes by dihydroxo(tetraphenylporphyrunato) antimony supported on silica gel under visible light irradiation. Chemistry Letters. 2004;33:736-737
  13. 13. Shiragami T, Shimizu Y, Hinoue K, Fueta Y, Nobuhara K, Akazaki I, Yasuda M. Silica gel-supported porphyrinatoantimony(V) complex acting as visible-light driven photocatalyst for dechlorination of chlorophenols in aqueous solution. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry. 2003;156:115-119
  14. 14. Chang FY, Yu VL. Legionella infection. In: Fishman AP, Elias JA, Fishman JA, Grippi MA, Kaiser LR, and Senior R, editors. Fishman’s Pulmonary Diseases and Disorders. Vol. 2, 3rd ed. New York: McGraw Hill; 1996. pp. 945-949
  15. 15. Fernández JA, López P, Orozco D, Merino J. Clinical study of an outbreak of Legionnaire’s disease in Alcoy, southeastern Spain. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases. 2002;21:729-735
  16. 16. Lettinga KD, Verbon A, Weverling GJ, Schellekens JFP, Den Boer JW, Yzerman EPF, Prins J, Boersma WG, Van Ketel RJ, Prins JM, Speelman P. Legionnaires’ disease at a Dutch flower show: Prognostic factors and impact of therapy. Emerging Infectious Diseases Journal. 2002;8:1448-1454
  17. 17. Correia AM, Gonçalves G, Reis J, Cruz JM, Castro e Freitas JA. An outbreak of legionnaires’ disease in a municipality in northern Portugal. Euro Surveillance. 2001;6:121-124
  18. 18. Fueda Y, Hashimoto M, Nobuhara K, Yokoi H, Komiya Y, Shiragami T, Matsumoto J, Kawano K, Suzuki S, Yasuda M. Visible-light bactericidal effect of silica gel-supported porphyrinatoantimony(V) catalyst on Legionella species occurring in the living environmental fields. Biocontrol Science. 2005;10:55-60
  19. 19. Matsumoto J, Matsumoto T, Senda Y, Shiragami T, Yasuda M. Preparation and characterization of porphyrin chromophores immobilized on micro-silica gel beads. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry. 2008;197:101-109
  20. 20. Alves E, Faustino MAF, Neves MGPMS, Cunha T, Nadais H, Almeida A. Potential applications of porphyrins in photodynamic inactivation beyond the medical scope. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology C: Photochemistry Reviews. 2014;22:34-57
  21. 21. Josefsen LB, Boyle RW. Unique diagnostic and therapeutic roles of porphyrins and phthalocyanines in photodynamic therapy, imaging and theranostics. Theranostics. 2012;2:916-966
  22. 22. Kudinova NV, Berezov TT. Photodynamic therapy of cancer: Search for ideal photosensitizer. Biochemistry (Moscow) Supplement Series B Biomedical Chemistry. 2010;4:95-103
  23. 23. Nyman ES, Hynninen PH. Research advances in the use of tetrapyrrolic photosensitizers for photodynamic therapy. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology. 2004;73:1-28
  24. 24. Wainwright M. Photodynamic therapy: The development of new photosensitisers. Anti-Cancer Agents in Medicinal Chemistry. 2008;8:280-291
  25. 25. Merchat M, Spikes JD, Bertoloni G, Jori G. Studies on the mechanism of bacteria photosensitization by meso-substituted cationic porphyrins. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology. 1996;35:149-157
  26. 26. Yasuda M, Nakahara T, Matsumoto T, Shiragami T, Matsumoto J, Yokoi H, Hirano T, Hirakawa K. Visible light-assisted sterilization activity of water-soluble antimonyporphyrin toward Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry. 2009;205:210-214
  27. 27. Matsumoto J, Shinbara T, Tanimura SI, Matsumoto T, Shiragami T, Yokoi H, Nosaka Y, Okazaki S, Hirakawa K, Yasuda M. Water-soluble phosphorus porphyrins with high activity for visible light-assisted inactivation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry. 2011;218:178-184
  28. 28. Yasuda M, Shiragami T, Matsumoto J. Water-soluble Porphyrin and Process for Production Thereof. JP Patent JP20090233246; 2009
  29. 29. Matsumoto J, Kai Y, Yokoi H, Okazaki S, Yasuda M. Assistance of human serum albumin to photo-sensitized inactivation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae with axially pyridinio-bonded P-porphyrins. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology. 2016;161:279-283
  30. 30. Matsumoto J, Suemoto Y, Kanemaru H, Takemori K, Shigehara M, Miyamoto A, Yokoi H, Yasuda M. Alkyl substituent effect on photosensitized inactivation of Escherichia coli by pyridinium-bonded P-porphyrins. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology. 2017;168:124-131
  31. 31. Matsumoto J, Kubo T, Shinbara T, Matsuda N, Shiragami T, Fujitsuka M, Majima T, Yasuda M. Spectroscopic analysis of the interaction of human serum albumin with tricationic phosphorus porphyrins bearing axial pyridinio groups. Bulletin of the Chemical Society of Japan. 2013;86:1240-1247
  32. 32. Matsumoto J, Shiragami T, Hirakawa K, Yasuda M. Water-solubilization of P(V) and Sb(V) porphyrins and their photobiological application. International Journal of Photoenergy. 2015;2015:Article ID 148964

Written By

Masahide Yasuda and Jin Matsumoto

Submitted: 03 April 2017 Reviewed: 05 June 2017 Published: 20 December 2017