InTechOpen uses cookies to offer you the best online experience. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Medicine » "Success in Artificial Insemination - Quality of Semen and Diagnostics Employed", book edited by Alemayehu Lemma, ISBN 978-953-51-0920-4, Published: January 9, 2013 under CC BY 3.0 license. © The Author(s).

Chapter 8

The Role of Trans-Rectal Ultrasonography in Artificial Insemination Program

By Alemayehu Lemma
DOI: 10.5772/52721

Article top


Several medium sized follicles observed in mare. Ultrasonogram taken with 5MHz curvilinear array scanner (Hitachi 405, Germany). Source: Lemma et al, 2006
Figure 1. Several medium sized follicles observed in mare. Ultrasonogram taken with 5MHz curvilinear array scanner (Hitachi 405, Germany). Source: Lemma et al, 2006
Bovine embryo scanned on Day 26 of pregnancy using B-mode real time ultrasound with 5MHz linear array transducer
Figure 2. Bovine embryo scanned on Day 26 of pregnancy using B-mode real time ultrasound with 5MHz linear array transducer

The Role of Trans-Rectal Ultrasonography in Artificial Insemination Program

Alemayehu Lemma1

1. Introduction

The ultrasound technology has been used for various functions particularly as a tool in beef and dairy research for many years. It has become more available to the commercial livestock agriculture recently. Application of transrectal real-time ultrasonography in the study of bovine reproduction represents a technological breakthrough that has revolutionized the knowledge of reproductive biology [Boyd and Omran, 1991]. New research results derived from ultrasonic imaging has clarified the complex nature of reproductive processes such as ovarian follicular dynamics, corpus luteum function, and foetal development in farm animals. Extensive adoption and use of ultrasonography for routine reproductive examinations of dairy cattle is its highest contribution to the dairy industry.

Practical applications of ultrasound in bovine reproduction include imaging of the ovary as a diagnostic aid, examination and confirmation of ovarian cysts, early pregnancy detection, identification of twins and foetal sexing [Fortune et al, 1988; Garcia et al, 1999; Noble et al, 2000 Lamb, 2001; Stroud, 2006]. Although rectal palpation is the established method for conducting reproductive examinations, the information-gathering capabilities of ultrasonic imaging far exceed those of rectal palpation. Assessment of pregnancy status and foetal viability early post breeding can significantly improve reproductive efficiency. Such methods can play a key role in reproductive management to rapidly return open animals to the breeding program. Early pregnancy detection is only useful when techniques have a high level of accuracy for detection of both pregnant and non-pregnant animals.

Early ultrasonic identification of twinning or male calves in dairy cows allows for implementation of differential management strategies such as termination of the unwanted pregnancy or to mitigate the negative effects of twinning during the periparturient period. Ultrasound can accurately determine the presence of a viable embryo as early as 21 days after AI. The accuracy of detecting foetal viability may approach 100% [Lamb, 2001]. A technician with a trained eye has the capability of accurately assessing the age of the foetus based on foetal size [Curran, 1986]. At 60 to 85 days of pregnancy the trained user can even determine foetal sex by the absence and/or presence of the foetal genitalia with over 95% accuracy. These two features alone provide many options for the use of ultrasound in reproductive management practices [Palmer and Drinacourt, 1980; Muller and Wittkowski, 1986; Kastelic et al, 1989; Romano and Masgee, 2001]. Development of integrated reproductive management systems that combines ultrasound with new and existing reproductive technologies will further enhance the practical applications of ultrasonography. In summary, current and future applications of ultrasonography hold tremendous potential to enhance reproductive management and improve reproductive efficiency in bovine.

The incorporation of ultrasound in reproductive research has also led to greater understanding of ovarian physiology. Ultrasound has been used extensively in the development of controlled breeding programs involving both oestrus and ovulation synchronization for effective timed AI. Sequential monitoring of dynamic changes in a follicular population during the oestrous cycle has been made possible by ultrasonography [Driancort et al, 1991; Garcia et al, 1999; Ginther 1993]. This capability has helped unlock some of the mysteries of folliculogenesis. During anoestrous, inactive ovaries are readily differentiated from functional ovaries with ultrasonography.

Further, when choosing bulls, many producers are faced with difficult decisions regarding the contributions of both maternal and carcass traits. Not only do the attributes of multiple breeds vary, but variation within breed is also substantial. By combining ultrasound and AI, a producer can develop a breeding program that optimizes both maternal and carcass traits [Travene et al, 1985; Kahn, 1992]. Using ultrasound, producers may determine females that are pregnant with AI-sired heifer calves based on the age and sex of the foetus [Travene et al, 1985; Kahn, 1992]. In a typical commercial cow-calf production environment controlled breeding seasons range from 60 to 120 days. By using ultrasound as early as 30 days after the end of the breeding season in seasonally breeding animals, producers can divide their herd into cows that became pregnant early or late in the breeding season, and open cows which can subsequently be managed appropriately in accordance with their reproductive status to run the production at reasonable cost.

2. Evaluation of the ovaries during AI

Ultrasonic evaluation of the ovaries should be considered a routine part of the reproductive examination particularly in cattle. A 5MHz transducer has greater resolution and is more suitable for evaluation of the ovaries than a 3 or 3.5MHz transducer. Follicles, like other fluid structures, are non echogenic, and therefore, appear on the ultrasound image as black, circumscribed structures which are spherical to irregular in shape (Fig 1). The irregular shapes are attributable to compression by adjacent follicles and luteal structures of the ovarian stroma.


Figure 1.

Several medium sized follicles observed in mare. Ultrasonogram taken with 5MHz curvilinear array scanner (Hitachi 405, Germany). Source: Lemma et al, 2006

Follicles as small as 2 - 3 mm can be seen and the corpus luteum can usually be identified throughout its functional life [Lemma et al, 2006] Estimating the stage of oestrous cycle, assessing the status and number of preovulatory follicles, determining ovulation, monitoring the development and morphology of corpus luteum are among the potential applications of ultrasonographic examination of the ovaries [Fortune et al, 1988; Garcia et al, 1999; Noble et al, 2000; Evans et al, 2000; Evans, 2003]. The number and sizes of follicles on a given ovary will vary widely and are dependent on the time of year and the reproductive stage in different animals [Vandeplassche et al, 1981; Perry, 1991; Godoi et al, 2002]. Many small follicles are observed during early dieostrus and these follicles will grow larger at mid-cycle. The dominant or ovulatory follicle will develop at a rate of 1.5 to 2.5mm per day in cattle [Driancourt et al, 1988] few days before ovulation which are all easily monitored ultrasonically to determine the date of ovulation and hence subsequently fix the appropriate time for insemination. During oestrous cycles in cattle dominant follicles reach a maximum diameter of approximately 10 - 20 mm and the largest subordinate follicles reach maximum diameter of approximately 8 mm. Cows ovulate at about 12 hours after the end of the oestrus period. The time for insemination may therefore range between 6 and 24 hours prior to ovulation [Arthur, 2001; Ball and Peters, 2004]

The appearance of dominant follicles is often accompanied by an outward manifestation of behavioural oestrus. However, cows with dominant follicle that is about to ovulate do not always show overt oestrus and this is becoming one of the greatest hindrance to the success of AI. Whilst good oestrus detection does not necessarily guarantee good reproductive performance, poor oestrus detection makes poor performance hard to avoid [Arthur, 2001]. Poor oestrus manifestation and failure to detect oestrus further hinders insemination at the correct time which is an important cause of fertilization failure. Insemination very early in oestrus also causes reduced fertility; possibly due to reduced sperm survival rates before fertilization [Andrew et al., 2004].

Many developing countries commonly relay on small holder dairy production system where owners cannot afford to keep a breeding bull and have to depend on AI services. The use of AI as the main method of breeding to improve performance means that the responsibility for oestrus detection falls upon the dairy owners who manage the herd [Lemma and Kebede, 2011]. In a study conducted to compare reproductive performance between farms using AI and natural service, the NSC, CCI and DALC were significantly higher (p<0.05) for farms using AI (2.1; 187.0 days and 185.7 days, respectively), compared to farms using natural service (1.7; 159.1 days and 154.9 days), respectively [Lemma and Kebede, 2011]. In a different study [Hansar et al, 2011] conducted to evaluate the efficiency of oestrus detection by small holder dairy owners in the success of AI and identify the role of ultrasonic evaluation of ovarian follicles before AI in improving pregnancy rate showed that ultrasonography can solve many problems of oestrus detection. In the same study, visual oestrus detection by dairy owners was assessed for validity using ultrasonic evaluation of the ovaries before AI with the following results (Table 1).

Oestrus signs Overall (n=60) Pregnant After AI (n=18) Non-Pregnant After AI (n=42)
Bellowing [%]
Mounting others [%]66.777.864.2
Vaginal discharge [%]83.388.983.3
Mounting and vaginal discharge60.687.552.0
Diameter of dominant follicle [mm]12.9±3.414.7±3.312.1±3.37
Estrus to AI [hrs]13.3±9.310.5±6.915.10

Table 1.

Dairy cows and heifers that showed different types of oestrus signs prior to AI (n=60)

A significant difference (p<0.05) was observed in the mean diameter of largest follicle between the pregnant and non pregnant animals. Similarly, the duration from detection of estrus to AI was also significantly different (P<0.05) between successful and failed pregnancies. While none of the animals were waited until they exhibited standing estrus, the average duration to AI for animals that later became pregnant and showed both Vaginal discharge and mounting was 6.4hrs with 13.8mm average diameter of largest follicle. In contrast to this, those non pregnant animals showing both mounting and Vaginal discharge were brought to AI on average after 14.1hrs, and the average diameter of largest follicle was 9.7mm.

The mean (±SD) diameter of the largest follicle for animals showing both signs was 12.7±4.4 mm. Considering these estrus signs to be the best indicators of estrus as perceived by the dairy owners, 9, 5 and 6 animals were brought within 6 hrs, 7-14hrs and after 14hrs of heat manifestation, respectively. The mean size of the follicles for the same time group of animals was 13.5±3.2mm, 13.0±4.7mm and 11.1±5.8mm, respectively. Only 39.4% were found to be fit for insemination (showing most oestrus signs, follicular diameter ≥12mm and/or were brought for AI ≤12hrs of oestrus manifestation) during the ultrasonic evaluation. However, all animals were inseminated giving a pregnancy rate of only 30.0% compared to 61.5% for the fit animals alone. It was concluded that the low conception rate, delayed time of insemination, and the difference in the size of larger follicle indicate the incompatibility of visual heat detection and optimal time of insemination. This study clearly shows two important facts: cows showing oestrus do not necessarily carry mature follicles ready for ovulation, and ultrasonic evaluation of the ovaries right before AI can significantly improve pregnancy rate by avoiding insemination of animals that are not fit for service.

Furthermore, ultrasound has also great contribution to reproductive management through estrus synchronization. By early detection of pregnancy post AI in synchronization the pitfalls of different factors involved in reducing reproductive performance could be identified and accordingly mitigated. In a study [Hamid et al, 2012] conducted to evaluate the effects of artificial estrus induction and breed, both were known to have significant effect on pregnancy rate (Table 2). Pregnancy was determined at day 26 post AI using a B-mode real time ultrasound with a 5MHz linear array transducer (Mindray, Hong Kong). The negative effect of poor nutritional management appropriate for cross breed animals, and the positive influence of estrus induction on first service pregnancy rate were identified. This information was useful in the decision making process on those animals that failed to be pregnant.

Breed Non oestrus induced cows Oestrus induced cows
No of cows at first AI Pregnancy rate [%] p-value No of cows at first AI Pregnancy rate [%] p-value
Zebu7518 (24%)6230 (48.4%)
Cross106 (60%)0.018157 (46.7%)0.905
Total8524 (28.2%)7737 (48.1%)0.009

Table 2.

Comparison of first service pregnancy rate between oestrus induced and non induced cows (effect of heat induction); and between breeds (zebu and Holstein cross cows)

3. Application of ultrasonography in early PD

Reproductive ultrasonography has increased the knowledge of the changes during early pregnancy in different animals. With the use of a real-time, B-mode ultrasonography and 5 MHz transducer, pregnancy can be detected as early as 9 to 12 days post AI into gestation [Pierson and Ginther, 1984; Curran et al., 1986; Boyd et al., 1988]. A thorough understanding of the ultrasonic anatomy and dynamic changes in the uterus is essential for accurate pregnancy detection. The embryo initially appears as a short line (Day 20-22), later becomes C-shaped (Day 22-30), and finally, by Day 30-32 of gestation assumes an L- shape (Fig 2). Although the embryo can first be detected between Days 19 and 24 of gestation [Curran et al., 1986], it is most practical to scan females which are expected to have embryos that are >26 days of age. The bovine foetus can be visualized beginning at day 20 post breeding and continuing throughout gestation, however, because of its size in relation to the image field of view, the foetus cannot be fully imaged after 90 days using high frequency transducers.


Figure 2.

Bovine embryo scanned on Day 26 of pregnancy using B-mode real time ultrasound with 5MHz linear array transducer

Accuracy of diagnoses improves, however, by Day 18 (85%), Day 20 (100%) and Day 22 (100%) of pregnancy (Kastelic et al., 1989). Presence and vitality of the embryo can be confirmed by the detection of a heartbeat as early as 19 to 24 days of gestation. Early pregnancy detection has a greater economic significance particularly for the dairy industry. When an accuracy of over 99% is achieved, it enables to rapidly identify fertility problems. The rate of detection of early embryonic loss is thus also higher with 10 to 16% of cows diagnosed pregnant at 28 days post AI experience early embryonic loss by 56 days post AI. Cows diagnosed pregnant at 28 days post AI using ultrasound should, therefore, be scheduled for a subsequent examination around 60 days post AI, when the rate of embryonic loss per day decreases dramatically.

In situations where the exact dates of AI are known, ultrasonography is simply used as a confirmation of pregnancy or to validate that detection of a viable embryo within the first two weeks of pregnancy. In contrast, another study showed diagnosis of pregnancy in heifers on day 10 through day 16 of gestation resulted in a positive diagnosis for pregnant or non-pregnant cows in less than 50%. On from days 18 - 22 of gestation, accuracy of pregnancy diagnosis improved from 85% to 100% [Lamb and Fricke, 2005]. Although an embryonic vesicle is detectable by ultrasound as early as 9 days of gestation, accuracy of detection approaches 100% usually after day 25 of gestation. For practical purposes, the efficiency (speed and accuracy) of a correct diagnosis of pregnancy should be performed in cows expected to have embryos that are at least 26 days of age.

Ultrasound is a rapid method for pregnancy diagnosis, and experienced palpators adapt to ultrasound quickly. This is particularly important to lessen the effect of early scanning on embryonic survival. The time required to assess pregnancy in beef heifers at the end of a 108-day breeding season averaged 11.3 seconds using palpation per rectum versus 16.1 seconds required to assess pregnancy and foetal age using ultrasound (Galland et al., 1994). Two points must be considered when using ultrasound for routine early pregnancy diagnosis in a cow herd. First, when using ultrasound for early pregnancy diagnosis, emphasis must be given to identifying non-pregnant rather than pregnant cows. Second, a management strategy must be implemented to return the non-pregnant cows to service as quickly as possible after pregnancy diagnosis. Such strategies include administration of PGF2α to cows with a responsive CL, use of estrus detection aids, or a combination of both methods. Such strategies will significantly improve outcomes of AI in large herds.

The main advantages of the use of ultrasound for pregnancy diagnosis are the high accuracy of the results and the relatively early confirmation of pregnancy. Mistakes can be made, no matter proficient the operator might be. Therefore, it is suggested that a female not be considered non-pregnant until two negative scans have been obtained at a gestation age of at least 16 days. The main disadvantages of the use of ultrasonography are related to the cost and time involved. Ultrasound machines are relatively expensive. Pregnancy diagnosis with an ultrasound machine takes more time than rectal palpation. Also the training required for proper interpretation of the images is another disadvantage. Cows diagnosed pregnant at an early ultrasound exam have a greater risk of early embryonic loss and, therefore, must undergo subsequent pregnancy examinations to identify and rebreed cows that experience such loss. If left unidentified, cows experiencing embryonic loss after an early pregnancy diagnosis would actually reduce reproductive efficiency by extending their calving interval (Fricke, 2002).

4. Early embryonic death (EED)

Prior to the development of ultrasound for pregnancy diagnosis in cattle, veterinarians were unable to accurately determine the viability or number of embryos or foetuses. Because the heartbeat of a foetus can be detected at approximately 22 days of age, one can accurately assess whether or not the pregnancy is viable. Studies in beef [Beal et al., 1992; Lamb et al., 1997] and dairy cattle [Smith and Stevenson, 1995; Vasconcelos et al., 1997; Szenci et al., 1998] have used ultrasound to assess the incidence of embryonic loss. The fertilization rate after AI in beef cows is about 90%, whereas embryonic survival rate is 93% by day 8 and only 56% by day 12 post AI [Diskin, and Sreenan, 1980]. The incidence of embryonic loss in beef cattle appears to be significantly less than in dairy cattle. Some reports [Beal et al., 1989; 1992; Lamb and Fricke, 2005] indicate a 6.5% incidence of embryonic loss in beef cows from day 25 to day 45 of gestation. In dairy cattle, pregnancy loss from 28 to 56 days after artificial insemination may reach 13.5%, or 0.5% per day. Ultrasonography hence becomes a useful tool in the study of early embryonic death (EED), and to monitor the success of a breeding program, by determining pregnancy rates and embryonic death.

Ultrasonography also provides a tool to accurately differentiate between the failure of a female to conceive and the incidence of embryonic mortality early after AI service [Beal et al., 1989]. At present, there is no practical way to reduce early embryonic loss in lactating dairy cows. However, recognizing the occurrence and magnitude of early embryonic loss may actually present management opportunities by taking advantage of new reproductive technologies that increase AI service rate in a dairy herd. If used routinely, transrectal ultrasonography has the potential to improve reproductive efficiency within a herd by reducing the period from AI to pregnancy diagnosis to 26 to 28 days with a high degree of diagnostic accuracy [Beghelli et al, 1986; Cheffaux et al, 1986; Baxter and Ward, 1997; Meyers, 2002].

5. Conclusion

Currently fresh, chilled and frozen-thawed semen are used extensively for AI in animal breeding and production throughout the world. Dairy herd size has increased with increasing pressure to maximize milk yield, whilst at the same time reducing production costs is necessary. Accurate oestrus detection crucial for timed and successful AI and early detection of the success or otherwise of insemination can meaningfully reduce the time delay before repeated insemination if this is necessary. For these reasons it is very important to have a reliable method to accurately detect the occurrence of oestrus. Errors in efficiency and accuracy of heat detection result in high semen cost and an increase in the interval from calving to conception, reducing cow production and net returns. The use of ultrasonography prior to AI for determining the ovarian status can significantly improve the success of AI.

Conversely, reproductive management is currently a major factor affecting profitability in the dairy industry. Early identification of non-pregnant dairy cows and heifers post AI can improve reproductive efficiency and pregnancy rate by decreasing the interval between AI services and increasing AI service rate. Thus, imaging technologies such as ultrasound to identify non-pregnant dairy cows and heifers early after AI may play a key role in management strategies to improve reproductive efficiency and increase profitability on commercial and small holder dairy farms. Early detection of non-pregnancy will lead to earlier intervention and decision that will shorten the calving interval, which has economic effect on the diary farm. Transrectal ultrasonography has also been used to determine foetus viability and hence can improve the outcome of AI by allowing knowledge based decision on problem cows.


1 - A. H. Andrews, R. W. Blowey, H. Boyd, R. G. Eddy, 2004Bovine medicine diseases and husbandry of cattle.2nd ed. Blackwell Publishing Company, USA.
2 - G. H. Arthur, 2001Arthur’s Veterinary Reproduction and Obstetrics. Eighth Ed. 430767
3 - P. J. H. Ball, A. R. Peters, 2004Reproduction in Cattle.Fibiol311310.1002/9780470751091
4 - S. J. Baxter, W. R. Ward, 1997Incidence of foetal loss in dairy cattle after pregnancy diagnosis using an ultrasound scanner. Vet Rec.; 140287288
5 - W. E. Beal, R. C. Perry, L. R. Corah, 1992The use of ultrasound in monitoring reproductive physiology of beef cattle.J. Anim. Sci. 70924929
6 - W. E. Beal, R. B. Edwards, J. M. Kearnan, 1989Use of B-mode, linear array ultrasonography for evaluating the technique of bovine artificial insemination.J. Dairy Sci. 72 2198 EOF202 EOF
7 - V. Beghelli, C. Boiti, E. Parmigiani, S. Barbacini, 1986Pregnancy diagnosis and embryonic mortality in the cow. In: JM Sreenan and MG Diskin (Ed.) Embryonic Mortality in Farm Animals. Martinus Nijhoff, Boston, 159167
8 - J. S. Boyd, S. N. Omran, 1991Diagnostic ultrasonography of the bovine female reproductive tractIn practice13109118
9 - J. S. Boyd, S. N. Omran, T. R. Ayliffe, 1988Use of a high frequency transducer with real time B-mode ultrasound scanning to identify early pregnancy in cows.Vet. Rec. 123811
10 - S. Chaffaux, G. N. S. Reddy, F. Vaton, M. Thibier, 1986Transrectal real-time ultrasound scanning for diagnosing pregnancy and for monitoring embryonic mortality in dairy cattleAnim. Reprod. Sci., 10193200
11 - S. Curran, R. A. Pierson, O. J. Ginther, 1986Ultrasonographic appearance of the bovine conceptus from days 20 through 60.J. Amer. Vet. Med. Assoc.1891295 EOF302 EOF
12 - S. Curran, 1986Bovine foetal development. J Am. Vet Med. Assoc., 18912951302
13 - M. G. Diskin, J. M. Sreenan, 1980Fertilization and embryonic mortality rates in beef heifers after artificial insemination. J. Reprod. Fertil., 59463468
14 - M. A. Driancourt, P. Philipon, A. Locatelli, E. Jacques, R. Webb, 1988Are differences in gonadotrophin concentrations involved in the control of ovulation rate in Romanov and Uede-France ewes? J. Reprod. Fertil., 83 509
15 - M. A. Driancourt, W. W. Thatcher, M. Terqui, D. Andrieu, 1991Dynamics of ovarian follicular development in cattle during the oestrous cycle, early pregnancy and in response to PMSG. Domest. Anim. Endocrinol., 220921
16 - A. C. O. Evans, 2003Characteristics of ovarian follicle development in domestic animalsReprod. Domes. Anim. 38240246
17 - A. C. O. Evans, P. Duffy, N. Hynes, M. P. Boland, 2000Waves of follicle development during the oestrous cycle in sheep Theriogenology, 53699715
18 - J. E. Fortune, J. Sirois, S. M. Quirk, 1988The growth and differentiation of ovarian follicles during the bovine oestrous cycle. Theriogenology, 2995109
19 - P. M. Fricke, 2002Scanning the future-ultrasonography as a reproductive management tool for dairy cattle.J. Dairy Sci. 851918 EOF26 EOF
20 - J. C. Galland, L. A. Offenbach, M. F. Spire, 1994Measuring the time needed to confirm foetal age in beef heifers using ultrasonographic examination. Vet. Med. 89795804
21 - A. Garcia, G. C. van der Weijden, B. Colenbrander, M. M. Bevers, 1999Monitoring follicular development in cattle by real-time ultrasonography: a review.Vet. Rec., 14533440
22 - O. J. Ginther, 1993Major and minor follicular waves during the equine oestrus cycle. J Equine Vet Sci 131825
23 - D. B. Godoi, E. L. Gastal, M. O. Gastal, 2002A comparative study of follicular dynamics between lactating and non-lactating mares: effect of the body conditionTheriogenology58553556
24 - E. Hansar, A. Lemma, T. Yilma, 2011Confirmation of oestrus observed by dairy owners through gynaecological examination of animals presented for artificial insemination. As part of a DVM thesis, Addis Ababa University, School of Veterinary Medicine.
25 - H. Jemal, A. Lemma, T. Yilma, 2012Study on factors affecting the success of artificial insemination program in cattle; Siltie zone. As part of MSc thesis, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Addis Ababa University
26 - W. Kähn, 1992Ultrasonography as a diagnostic tool in female animal reproduction. Anim Reprod Sci., 28110
27 - J. P. Kastelic, S. Curran, O. J. Ginther, 1989Accuracy of ultrasonography for pregnancy diagnosis on days 10 to 22 in heifers.Theriogenology813 EOF20 EOF
28 - G. C. Lamb, B. L. Miller, V. Traffas, L. R. Corah, 1997Oestrus detection, first service conception, and embryonic death in beef heifers synchronized with MGA and prostaglandin. Kansas AES report of progress 78397
29 - G. C. Lamb, 2001Reproductive Real-Time Ultrasound Technology: An Application for improving Calf Crop in Cattle Operations. In: Factors Affecting Calf Crop: Biotechnology of Reproduction. Ed. M.J. Fields. 231153
30 - G. C. Lamb, P. M. Fricke, 2005Ultrasound- early pregnancy diagnosis and foetal sexing. Proceedings, Applied Reproductive Strategies in Beef Cattle, Reno, Nevada
31 - A. Lemma, S. Kebede, 2011The effect of mating system and herd size on reproductive performance of dairy cows in market oriented urban dairy farms in and around Addis AbabaRevue Méd. Vét.,162526530
32 - P. J. Meyers, 2002Early embryonic mortality. Horse Health care- Reproduction and breeding. Meyers Equine Clinic Hillsburgh, Ontario, Canada.
33 - E. Müller, G. Wittkowski, 1986Visualization of male and female characteristics of bovine foetuses by real-time ultrasonics. Theriogenology25 571
34 - K. M. Noble, J. E. Tebble, D. Harvey, H. Dobson, 2000Ultrasonography and hormone profiles of persistent ovarian follicles (cysts) induced with low doses of progesterone in cattle.Journal of Reproduction and Fertility120361366
35 - E. Palmer, M. A. Driancourt, 1980Use of ultrasound echography in equine gynaecology. Theriogenology, 13203216
36 - T. C. Perry, 1991Reproduction in domestic animals4th ed., Los Angeles Academic Press. Los Angeles, 670
37 - R. A. Pierson, O. J. Ginther, 1984Ultrasonography for detection of pregnancy and study of embryonic development in heifers.Theriogenology225 EOF33 EOF
38 - J. E. Romano, D. Magee, 2001Applications of trans-rectal ultrasonography in cow/heifer reproduction. In: Annual Food Conference proceeding. Conception to Parturition: Fertility in Texas Beef cattle. College of Veterinary Medicine. June 2-3. Texas A & M University, 99104
39 - M. W. Smith, J. S. Stevenson, 1995Fate of the dominant follicle, embryonal survival, and pregnancy rates in dairy cattle treated with prostaglandin F2α and progestins in the absence or presence of a functional corpus luteum. J. Anim. Sci., 7337433751
40 - B. Stroud, 2006Bovine Foetal Sexing Using Ultrasound. Proceedings, Applied Reproductive Strategies in Beef Cattle, Stoney Creek Inn, St. Joseph, Missouri, USA.
41 - O. Szenci, J. F. Beckers, P. Humblot, J. Sulon, G. Sasser, M. A. M. Taverne, J. Varga, R. Baltusen, G. Shekk, 1998Comparison of ultrasonography, bovine pregnancy-specific protein B, and bovine pregnancy-associated glycoprotein 1 tests for pregnancy detection in dairy cows.Theriogenology507788
42 - M. A. M. Taverne, O. Szenci, J. Szetag, A. Piros, 1985Pregnancy diagnosis in cows with linear-array real-time ultrasound scanning: a preliminary note.Vet. Quarterly 7264270
43 - G. M. Vandeplassche, J. A. Wesson, O. J. Ginther, 1981Behavioural, follicular and gonadotropin changes during the oestrus cycle in donkeys. Theriogenol., 16239249
44 - J. L. M. Vasconcelos, R. W. Silcox, J. A. Lacerda, J. R. Pursley, M. C. Wiltbank, 1997Pregnancy rate, pregnancy loss, and response to heat stress after AI at 2 different times from ovulation in dairy cows. Biol. Reprod., 56140
45 - A. Lemma, H. J. Schwartz, M. Bekana, 2006 Application of ultrasonography in the study of the reproductive system of tropical Jennies (species Equus asinus) Trop. Anim. Health and Prod. 38267274