Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Assessment of Human Sperm Cells Morphological Parameters

By Kristina Lasiene

Submitted: March 3rd 2017Reviewed: October 3rd 2017Published: December 20th 2017

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.71413

Downloaded: 252

Abstract

The quality of spermatozoa has a direct influence on the fertilization and developmental competence of embryos. The aim of this work was to review the methods of spermatozoa morphology assessment, features of the normal spermatozoa and the reasons of their several abnormalities. Three methods can be used for the evaluation of spermatozoa morphology in the in vitro fertilization (IVF) laboratory: (1) light microscopy of stained spermatozoa, (2) motile sperm organelle morphology examination (MSOME) and (3) polarized light microscopy. The analysis of spermatozoa morphology includes the assessment of head, neck, midpiece and tail. Morphologically abnormal spermatozoa are categorized into subgroups according to the defects of the head, neck, midpiece and/or tail. Before IVF and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), the quality of spermatozoa must be estimated exactly, because this has the high influence on embryo development. Therefore the analysis of the morphological parameters of spermatozoa using the light microscopy, MSOME, in combination with precise head birefringence detection using the polarized microscopy, could give the best fertilization rate and embryo quality after IVF and ICSI.

Keywords

  • abnormalities
  • human
  • morphology
  • normal
  • spermatozoa

1. Introduction

The development of in vitro produced human embryos is directly dependent on the quality of the oocytes and spermatozoa which are used for in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). The examination of oocyte and spermatozoa morphology is currently considered to be a tool devoted to the fertility prognosis. Morphology of spermatozoa has been recognized as the best predictor of outcome for natural fertilization, intrauterine insemination and IVF. The spermatozoa morphology also plays a significant role in ICSI outcome [1].

The aim of this work was to review the methods of spermatozoa morphology assessment, features of the normal spermatozoa and the reasons of their various abnormalities.

2. Semen collection and analysis

The sample of semen should be collected after 2–7 days of sexual abstinence. The first ejaculate gives a correct conclusion in at least 85% of cases. It is helpful to examine two or three samples to obtain more precise data [2, 3].

Semen analysis includes:

  • Spermatozoa analysis (number, vitality, motility, morphology),

  • Immunological analysis (anti-spermatozoa antibodies detection),

  • Seminal fluid analysis (biochemical markers of accessory glands secretions) [3].

2.1. Evaluation of the spermatozoa morphology

2.1.1. Light microscopy of stained spermatozoa

The light microscopy of stained spermatozoa is the fundamental and commonly used method for evaluation of spermatozoa morphology. Two techniques can be used for this evaluation: (1) the microscopic analysis of stained samples as visual observations of spermatozoa (manual method) and (2) computerized analysis. Primarily for both methods, the stained smears of semen must be prepared. The droplet of the semen sample are smeared on a glass slide, dried in the air and fixed. The smears must be stained for providing sharp contrast for defining the spermatozoa outline and cell details. There are a lot of methods for the staining of human and animal spermatozoa. World Health Organization recommends three routine staining methods for the evaluation of morphology of human spermatozoa: Papanicolaou, Shorr or Diff-Quik (Rapidiff) [3, 4]. Some laboratories use a new stain SpermBlue® successfully [5, 6].

The stained smears are analyzed by the magnification 1000× with oil immersion. Using a manual method, the laboratory technician examines 200 spermatozoa and categorizes each spermatozoon as normal or abnormal. Subsequently, the anomalies are classified using strictly defined criteria. The measurement of spermatozoa can be performed using the ocular micrometer. By computerized analysis method, various computer analyzing programs, systems and modules categorize and measure automatically different morphological features of each selected spermatozoon [5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11].

A few classifications of human spermatozoa morphology have been originated and used worldwide: MacLeod’s [12], David’s [13, 14], Dusseldorf [15, 16], Strict (Tygerberg’s) criteria [17, 18] and others. The World Health Organization (WHO) confirmed the Strict (Tygerberg’s) criteria as conventional standard for spermatozoa morphology [4].

2.1.2. Motile sperm organelle morphology examination (MSOME)

This method is used for evaluating the morphology of the live (non-fixed, non-stained) spermatozoa before the ICSI. Using the high magnification (6000× and more) by the inverted computerized microscope, it is possible to observe the morphological abnormalities in spermatozoa, which are not visible with magnification 400× (Figure 1). The neck, tail, midpiece, mitochondria, acrosome and post-acrosomal lamina and the nucleus of spermatozoon are morphologically examined in live motile spermatozoa [19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25].

Figure 1.

Spermatozoa morphology using MSOME ([19], open access). (A) Normal spermatozoa observed at high magnification (8400×); (B) spermatozoa with large nuclear vacuoles observed at high magnification (8400×).

2.1.3. Polarized light microscopy

An estimation of head birefringence by polarized light using polarized microscope method is used for analysis of live spermatozoa morphological quality. This birefringence is associated with sub-acrosomal protein filaments and nucleoprotein filaments (Figure 2). The presence of birefringence in the head indicates the good morphology of a spermatozoon [26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31].

Figure 2.

The birefringence of human spermatozoa ([26], with permission).

3. Morphology of the normal spermatozoon

The analysis of spermatozoa morphology includes the assessment of head, neck, midpiece and tail. The analysis of the head includes the assessment of head shape and size, nucleus shape and size, acrosomal area (acrosomal index) and acrosomal vacuoles. The shape, size and cytoplasmic droplets are analyzed in the midpiece, principal and terminal pieces of tail (Table 1).

FeaturesReferences
HeadShapeOval[4]
SizeLength 4–5 μm, width 2.5–3.5 μm, length-width ratio 1.5–1.75
Acrosomal size40–70% of total head area
Nucleus shapeSmooth, symmetric and oval[1, 32, 33]
Nucleus sizeLength 4.75 ± 0.28 μm, width 3.28 ± 0.20 μm
Nuclear insideNo regional nuclear disorders, ≤ 1vacuole that occupies less than 4% of the nuclear area
NeckNo abaxial implantation[18]
Midpiece of tailShapeSlender[1, 32, 33, 34]
SizeLength 7–8 μm, width < 1 μm
AttachmentAxially attached to the head
Cytoplasmic dropletsNo cytoplasmic droplets and/or disorders or less than half size of normal head
MitochondriaNot fragmented or damaged
Principal and terminal pieces of tailShapeStraight, uniform, and thinner than the midpiece, uncoiled[34, 35, 36]
SizeLength 45–50 μm, tail/head length ratio 10.3 ± 0.2

Table 1.

Features of morphologically normal spermatozoon.

The acrosomal vacuoles are concentrated between the inner and outer acrosomal membranes. They present the migration of acrosin to the spermatozoon surface and may be the earliest event characterizing the beginning of the acrosome reaction. The presence of these vacuoles is considered as a significant marker of successful fertilization of oocytes in vitro [37, 38].

Normal human spermatozoa carry the X or the Y chromosome. Measuring the spermatozoa sorted by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) sexing, Cui [39] estimated that the X chromosome-bearing spermatozoa have significantly greater head length, neck and tail length, head perimeter and head area than Y chromosome-bearing spermatozoa. The neck and tail were also significantly longer in X chromosome-bearing spermatozoa. A difference of volume of X- and Y-bearing spermatozoa heads is associated with the difference of DNA content (3.5–4%) [40].

Therefore, the morphometric parameters of normal spermatozoon can differ according to staining method of sperm smear [11, 41]. Maree with co-authors [42] maintained that fixatives and stains can change the size of spermatozoa. They reported that morphometric parameters of SpermBlue® stained spermatozoa head differed least from parameters of fresh non-stained spermatozoa (Table 2). Also the results can differ according the technician [17].

PapanicolaouRapidiff®SpermBlue®Fresh
Length (μm)4.28 ± 0.27a5.17 ± 0.27b4.73 ± 0.27c4.79 ± 0.26
Width (μm)2.65 ± 0.19a3.12 ± 0.21b2.75 ± 0.24a2.82 ± 0.23
Area (μm2)9.26 ± 0.99a12.87 ± 1.19b10.47 ± 1.21c
Perimeter (μm)11.83 ± 0.69a14.33 ± 0.75b12.99 ± 0.80c
Ellipticity1.63 ± 0.111.68 ± 0.101.75 ± 0.131.73 ± 0.12
Width/length ratio0.62 ± 0.040.60 ± 0.040.58 ± 0.040.59 ± 0.04
Elongation0.23 ± 0.030.25 ± 0.030.27 ± 0.030.26 ± 0.03
Roughness0.83 ± 0.020.79 ± 0.020.78 ± 0.03
Regularity0.96 ± 0.010.98 ± 0.010.97 ± 0.02
Acrosome coverage (%)32.76 ± 7.4323.73 ± 7.9746.29 ± 8.63

Table 2.

The comparison of sperm head morphometry for the three staining techniques and spermatozoa of fresh semen (mean ± SD) [42].

The live morphologically normal spermatozoa can be selected by sperm head birefringence for ICSI. Two types of head birefringence are ascertained on the basis of acrosome integrity: (1) partial head birefringence in acrosome-reacted spermatozoa and (2) total head birefringence in acrosome-non-reacted spermatozoa. Using acrosome-reacted spermatozoa shows better ICSI results [28, 29, 30]. Spermatozoa with partial head birefringence can present lower ratio of DNA fragmentation and higher ratio of normal nucleus [29]. In other hand, spermatozoa with nuclear vacuoles and DNA fragmentation can show the normal head birefringence. And otherwise, some spermatozoa with normal MSOME morphology and without DNA fragmentation can show no birefringence. Therefore the scientists recommend combining MSOME with evaluation of the head birefringence. It was determined that the lowest amount of DNA fragmentation occurs in sperm selected by MSOME and birefringence, compared to sperm selected via just one of the two methods alone [43].

4. Morphological abnormalities of spermatozoa

The abnormalities in morphology of spermatozoa have a negative effect on the outcome of IVF and ICSI. Morphologically abnormal spermatozoa analyzed by light microscopy or MSOME are categorized into subgroups according to the defects of the head, neck, midpiece and/or tail.

4.1. Abnormalities of the head

Spermatozoa, with head size and shape abnormalities (large, small, tapered, pyriform, round and amorphous heads), vacuolated heads, heads with small acrosomal area (<40% of head area), with double or multiple heads and without head are often found in the semen samples (Figure 3).

Figure 3.

Spermatozoa with abnormal head morphology. (a) Round head; (b) amorphous head; (c) large head and bent neck; (d) small tapered head and bent neck; (e) elongated head; (f) two-headed; (g) multiple-headed and (h) acephalic spermatozoon (arrow). Bar = 10 μm.

The cause of acephalic spermatozoa can be biallelic SUN5 mutations or homozygous deletion of SUN5 or mutation of BRDT and other genes [44, 45, 46].

Large-headed (macrocephalous) spermatozoa are defined as those with a length > 4.7 μm and a width > 3.2 μm. Large head can indicate insufficient shrinking of the nucleus, abnormally condensed chromatin, diploidy and aneuploidy of spermatozoa. Detailed genetic analysis shows that large-headed spermatozoa of some patients can have the homozygous mutation (c.144delC) in the Aurora kinase C (AURKC) gene. These spermatozoa of AURKC-deficient patients cannot complete meiosis in the absence of functional AURKC. Therefore they can be tetraploid [47, 48, 49, 50].

Small-headed (microcephalous) spermatozoa are defined as those with a length < 3.5 μm and a width < 2.5 μm. These spermatozoa can have the excessive shrunk nucleus and abnormally condensed chromatin and fragmented DNA. They may also present with very small, abnormally formed acrosomes [51, 52].

Elongated-headed spermatozoa are described as being a head length > 5 μm with a width < 3 μm or a length of <5 μm and a width of <2 μm. Pyriform heads are also included under elongation of spermatozoa. Elongation of head is generally recognized as a stress-induced sperm morphology aberration, and is prevalent especially in male accessory gland infections and in the presence of a varicocele. An abnormally elongated nucleus shape of these spermatozoa is related with defects in the nuclear membrane, an increased frequency of chromosomal aneuploidies and altered chromatin compaction. Also anomalies of the neck region, persistence of cytoplasmic residues can often exist in these spermatozoa [52, 53].

Globozoospermia (round-headed sperm syndrome) is genetically determined abnormalities of spermatozoa. This disorder is classified into two categories: (1) total and (2) partial globozoospermia. In the total globozoospermia, the spermatozoa are easily recognizable by their small, round head shape, high DNA fragmentation and the absence of the acrosome. Owing to the absence of acrosomes, the spermatozoa do not contain acrosomal enzymes. Therefore they are unable to bind and penetrate the zona pellucida and fuse with the oolemma of the oocyte. In the case of the partial globozoospermia, spermatozoa show the oval head shape with less condensed chromatin, a partially present or remnants of acrosome and a disorganized midpiece. Mitochondria are present not only in the midpiece, but in the spermatozoa head too [52, 54, 55, 56].

Amorphous-headed spermatozoa indicate the chromosome 18 disomy and sex chromosome aneuploidy. Also, the high incidence of amorphous heads is relative to other abnormal head forms [57].

Multiple-headed spermatozoa have two or more closed or dissociated heads with or without an acrosome or midpiece. Disorders of movement and fragmented DNA are appropriated for these spermatozoa [51].

Human spermatozoa heads often contain vacuoles. They are not visible on standard magnification and can be observed using MSOME method only. According to their size, vacuoles are divided into three types: (1) large (>50% of surface area), (2) medium (50–25% of surface area) and (3) small (<25% of surface area of total sperm head). Based on the location, they are classified as acrosomal, equatorial and post-acrosomal. Also according to the size and the number of vacuoles in the head of one spermatozoon, they can be classified into three categories: (1) one small vacuole, (2) multiple sporadic vacuoles of various sizes and (3) one large vacuole. Head vacuoles are non-acrosomal origin large nuclear indentations of various sizes and positions, packed with membranous material organized in membrane whorls. Vacuoles cannot be considered as degenerative structures but can be regarded as a normal feature of the sperm head and does not affect ICSI outcomes. Therefore, some vacuoles can include vacant or low density DNA or show DNA fragmentation or abnormal chromatin compaction. Large vacuoles in the nucleus can indicate aneuploidy, fragmented DNA and chromatin condensation defects in the cell [24, 55, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63].

4.2. Abnormalities of the tail

Spermatozoa without tail or with the neck and midpiece defects (bent neck, asymmetrical insertion of the midpiece into the head, thick or irregular midpiece and abnormally thin midpiece) and principal and terminal pieces of tail defects (short, multiple, hairpin, broken, coiled, bent tail and tails of irregular width) are often found in the semen samples (Figure 4). All abnormalities of spermatozoa neck and tail reduce their motility and therefore have the negative influence on fertilization of oocyte.

Figure 4.

Spermatozoa with abnormal neck and tail morphology. (a) Absent tail; (b) coiled tail; (c) bent neck and (d) two-tailed spermatozoon. Bar = 10 μm.

Bent necks are associated with DNA fragmentation. Abnormal tails (two-tailed, bent tails, irregular tails) are associated to chromosome 13 disomy, supernumerary chromosomal abnormalities and the cytoskeletal abnormalities (including centriolar defects) [57].

The absence of a tail, the short and broken tail may be related to axonemal abnormalities that are only visible with electron microscopy, and an unknown genetic origin of these abnormalities could be hypothesized [64, 65]. Coiled tails of spermatozoa can be associated with varicocele and epididymal dysfunction [66, 67].

The spermatozoa can often have cytoplasmic droplets and cytoplasmic residues. Cytoplasmic droplets are small, regular osmotically sensitive vesicles which are located at the neck as opposed to the end of the annulus (Figure 5). Cytoplasmic droplets of normal human spermatozoa are still present after ejaculation and have no negative influence on cell function. Cytoplasmic residues are large, irregular material along the midpiece and can indicate the abnormal spermiogenesis (Figure 6). They form as outcome of incomplete cytoplasmic extrusion during spermiogenesis in the causes of suppression of FSH and/or androgens, deficiency of cyclin-dependent kinase 16 (CDK16) and organophosphorus pesticide (OP) exposure. In comparison to the cytoplasmic droplet, cytoplasmic residues contain major quantity of cytoplasm enzymes, which produce pathological amounts of reactive oxygen species. These species can negatively affect spermatozoa function including peroxidative damage to the cell membrane, DNA damage, mitochondrial dysfunction, impaired interaction with the female reproductive tract and lead to male infertility [1, 32, 52, 68, 69].

Figure 5.

Cytoplasmic droplets and residual cytoplasm structure ([68], open access). (A) Spermatozoa with cytoplasmic droplets and (B) spermatozoa with residual cytoplasm.

Figure 6.

The residual cytoplasm on the spermatozoa tail. Bar = 10 μm.

Multiple morphological abnormalities in the same patient’s spermatozoa tail structure and ultrastructure which impair motility can show the mutation of some genes (DNAH1, DNAJB13, CFAP43 and CFAP44) [70, 71, 72, 73].

The morphologically abnormal spermatozoon can have multiple defects too (Figure 7). The most irregularly shaped, multi-tailed spermatozoa is associated with severe male infertility. The multiple gene mutations, high rates of polyploidy and aneuploidy and reduced motility of spermatozoa have been described in these cases [48, 49].

Figure 7.

Spermatozoon with multiple abnormalities. Round head, bent neck and duplicate tail. Bar = 10 μm.

5. Conclusion

The morphology of spermatozoa has a direct influence on the fertilization and developmental competence of embryos. A normal semen sample must have >30% of morphologically normal spermatozoa. Considering on the morphological study of patients spermatozoa, researchers, practicians and WHO have defined the prognosis of IVF treatment. Excellent prognosis is expected when >14% of normal spermatozoa were found in the semen sample. When 4–14% of normal spermatozoa were found, the IVF prognosis is good. When prognosis is poor (<4% of normal spermatozoa were found in the semen), the ICSI should be recommended for these patients [3, 18, 74, 75, 76].

Therefore the analysis of the morphological parameters of spermatozoa using the light microscopy, MSOME, in combination with precise head birefringence detection using the polarized microscopy, could give the best fertilization rate and embryo quality after IVF and ICSI.

© 2017 The Author(s). Licensee IntechOpen. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

How to cite and reference

Link to this chapter Copy to clipboard

Cite this chapter Copy to clipboard

Kristina Lasiene (December 20th 2017). Assessment of Human Sperm Cells Morphological Parameters, Spermatozoa - Facts and Perspectives, Rosaria Meccariello and Rosanna Chianese, IntechOpen, DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.71413. Available from:

chapter statistics

252total chapter downloads

More statistics for editors and authors

Login to your personal dashboard for more detailed statistics on your publications.

Access personal reporting

Related Content

This Book

Next chapter

Ultrastructure of Spermatozoa from Infertility Patients

By Elizaveta E. Bragina and Elena N. Bocharova

Related Book

First chapter

Introductory Chapter: Epigenetics in Summary

By Rosaria Meccariello

We are IntechOpen, the world's leading publisher of Open Access books. Built by scientists, for scientists. Our readership spans scientists, professors, researchers, librarians, and students, as well as business professionals. We share our knowledge and peer-reveiwed research papers with libraries, scientific and engineering societies, and also work with corporate R&D departments and government entities.

More About Us