Physical properties and photocatalytic activities of the well-defined morphological BiVO4 photocatalysts.
Organic compounds, such as organic dyes and phenols, are the main pollutants in wastewater. In the past years, a large number of studies on the fabrication and photocatalytic organics degradation of BiVO4 and its related materials have been reported in the literature. In this chapter, we shall focus on the advancements in the synthesis and photocatalytic applications of several kinds of BiVO4-based photocatalysts: (i) well-defined morphological BiVO4 photocatalysts, (ii) porous BiVO4 photocatalysts, (iii) heteroatom-doped BiVO4 photocatalysts, (iv) BiVO4-based heterojunction photocatalysts, and (v) supported BiVO4 photocatalysts. We shall discuss the structure–photocatalytic performance relationship of the materials and the involved photocatalytic degradation mechanisms. In addition, we also propose the research trends and technologies for practical applications of the BiVO4-based photocatalytic materials.
- well-defined morphology
- porous BiVO4 photocatalyst
- heteroatom-doped BiVO4
- BiVO4-based heterojunction
- supported BiVO4
With the unceasingly expanding industrial development, environmental pollution caused by industrial effluents has nowadays become the most urgent issue to be solved . In particular, various industrial processes and human activities contaminate the global water supply, which is a serious problem for living beings. During the past decades, great efforts have been made on the degradation of organic wastewater pollutants. The visible-light-driven photocatalysis attracts much attention, since such a photocatalytic process can directly convert organic pollutants (e.g., methylene blue (MB), methyl orange (MO), rhodamine B (RhB), phenol, and etc.) to harmless products (CO2 and H2O) under sunlight irradiation.
The organic dye models (MB, MO, and RhB) in textile and other industrial effluents have become one series of the major environmental contaminants, which have serious implications on the environment and human health . Meanwhile, phenol is a widely used chemical and present in a great variety of emitted waste effluents. Organic dyes and phenol degrade slowly in the environment and are extremely toxic, carcinogenic, teratogenic, and refractory in nature . Therefore, tremendous efforts have been made to fabricate high-efficiency photocatalysts for the control of wastewater pollution.
As one of the earliest studied
Semiconductor is a kind of materials with electrical conductivity between conductor (such as metals) and insulator (such as ceramics). The unique electronic property of a semiconductor is characterized by its valence band (VB) and conduction band (CB). The VB of a semiconductor is formed by the interaction of the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO), while the CB is formed by the interaction of the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO). There is no electron state between the top of the VB and the bottom of CB. The energy range between CB and VB is called forbidden bandgap (also called bandgap energy), which is usually denoted as
As shown in reaction 1, the photocatalytic reaction initiates from the generation of electron−hole pairs upon light irradiation. When a semiconductor photocatalyst absorbs photons with energy equal to or greater than its
These photogenerated electron−hole pairs may further be involved in the following three possible processes : (i) successfully migrating to the surface of semiconductor, (ii) being captured by the defect sites in bulk and/or on the surface region of semiconductor, and (iii) recombining and releasing the energy in the form of heat or photon. The last two processes are generally viewed as deactivation processes because the photogenerated electrons and holes do not contribute to the photocatalytic reactions. Only the photogenerated charges that reach to the surface of semiconductor can be available for photocatalytic reactions. The defect sites in the bulk and on the surface of semiconductor may serve as the recombination centers for the photogenerated electrons and holes, which would decrease the efficiency of the photocatalytic reaction.
It is well known that the photocatalytic activity of a semiconductor depends strongly upon three factors: adsorption behavior, photoresponsive region, and separation efficiency of electron–hole pairs . The adsorption behavior can usually be enhanced by improving the surface areas of catalysts. In this aspect, how to extend the photoresponsive region and improve the separation efficiency of electron–hole pairs are important factors on the photocatalytic performance of a semiconductor . The way to extend the photoresponsive region of a semiconductor photocatalyst is mainly the doping of nonmetals or transition metals, which can also improve the separation efficiency of electron–hole pairs and increase the oxidation power of photogenerated carriers [12, 13]. In general, noble metals (e.g., Ag, Pt, Au, and Pd) have been used as electron acceptors to separate the photoinduced hole–electron pairs and promote the interfacial charge transfer processes .
Generally speaking, physicochemical properties of a material may be quite different depending on its crystal phase structure. The phase structure of BiVO4 is one of the important factors determining its photocatalytic performance . BiVO4 has mainly three polymorphs in nature, including zircon–tetragonal, scheelite–tetragonal, and scheelite–monoclinic. The zircon–tetragonal phase can be formed via a low-temperature (100°C) synthesis route, whereas the scheelite-monoclinic phase can be generated using a high-temperature (400–600°C) synthesis method . Moreover, the phase transformation between the scheelite monoclinic and the scheelite tetragonal can occur reversibly at 255°C . It has been confirmed that the sheelite monoclinic structure of BiVO4 is the most photocatalytically active under visible-light irradiation. The greater reactivity can be associated with the energy band structure since monoclinic and tetragonal BiVO4 have bandgap energies of 2.4 and 2.9 eV, respectively. [8, 18, 19] Though BiVO4 has better photocatalytic performance, various strategies have been proposed to further improve its activity. In addition to the crystal structure, the photocatalytic property also strongly depends upon the morphology of BiVO4 . Different morphological semiconductor photocatalysts have been prepared by many researchers. Efficient charge separation is the most important factor that determines the photocatalytic performance . Furthermore, creation of heterjunction  and porous structure  as well as doping of element(s)  and using of support  are also effective strategies for improving charge separation efficiency.
2. Well-defined morphological BiVO4 photocatalysts
As one of new photocatalysts, monoclinic BiVO4 (
|Photocatalyst||Crystal structure||Surface area (m2/g)||Reaction condition||Degradation efficiency and light illumination time||References|
|Sphere-like BiVO4||Monoclinic||1.75||−||Visible light, 80 mL RhB (0.01 mmol/L), 0.1 g sample||100% and 20 min|||
|Monoclinic||−||−||UV light, RhB||84.1% and 2.5 h|||
|Monoclinic||8.4||2.45||Visible light, 200 mL MO (0.01 mmol/L), 0.1 g sample||84% and 2 h|||
|Monoclinic||10||2.37||Sunlight, 50 mL phenol (25 mg/L), 0.3 mL H2O2, 0.1 g sample||100% and 1.5 h|||
|Monoclinic||2.62||2.48||Visible light, 100 mL RhB (0.01 mmol/L), 0.08 g sample||97.7% and 6 h|||
|Monoclinic||−||2.5||Visible light, 100 mL RhB, 0.01 g sample||80% and 50 min|||
|Tetragonal||−||2.81||Sunlight, 100 mL MB (5 mg/L), 0.1 g sample||90% and 5 h|||
|Monoclinic||24.4||2.50||Blue light, 50 mL MB (0.01 mmol/L), 0.005 g sample||100% and 5 h|||
|Monoclinic||85.4||2.38||Visible light, 20 mL MB (20 mg/L), 0.02 g sample||63% and 2 h|||
|Monoclinic||0.7||2.42||Visible light, 100 mL MB (0.01 mmol/L), 0.01 g sample||90% and 3 h|||
|Flower-like BiVO4||Monoclinic||0.9||2.3||Visible light, MB (10 mg/L), 1 g/L sample||60% and 2 h|||
|Monoclinic||61.6||2.14||Visible light, 20 mL MB (20 mg/L), 0.02 g sample||75% and 2 h|||
|Monoclinic||−||2.46||Sunlight, 100 mL MO (10 mg/L), 0.5 g sample||58% and 4 h|||
|Monoclinic||1.6||2.45||Sunlight, 200 mL RhB (5 mg/L), 0.1 g sample||62% and 10 h|||
|Monoclinic||2.1||2.52||Visible light, 100 mL MO (0.01 mmol/L), 0.1 g sample||60% and 4 h|||
|Rod-like BiVO4||Monoclinic||3.5||2.46||Sunlight, 200 mL RhB (10 mg/L), 0.2 g sample||98.3% and 8 h|||
|Monoclinic||4.3||2.26||Visible light, 100 mL MB (0.01 mmol/L), 0.01 g sample||90% and 2 h|||
|Monoclinic||3.8||2.47||Visible light, 100 mL MO (0.01 mmol/L), 0.1 g sample||87% and 4 h|||
|Monoclinic/tetragonal||−||2.46||Visible light, 100 mL RhB (10 mg/L), 0.04 g sample||39.5% and 2.5 h|||
|Monoclinic||−||2.45||Visible light, 100 mL RhB (0.01 mmol/L), 0.2 g sample||96% and 50 min|||
|Peanut-like BiVO4||Monoclinic||10.3||2.4||Sunlight, 200 mL RhB (5 mg/L), 0.1 g sample||61% and 10 h|||
|Monoclinic||0.54||2.4||Solar light, 100 mL crystalviolet (0.02 mmol/L), 0.05 g sample||98% and 1 h|||
|Monoclinic||33.9||2.44||Visible light, 100 mL MB (10 mg/L), 0.1 g sample||95% and 225 min|||
|Monoclinic||5.4||2.35||UV–Vis light, 100 mL MB (10 ppm), 1 g/L sample||40% and 2 h|||
|Monoclinic||0.9||2.34||Visible light, 100 mL MB (0.01 mmol/L), 0.01 g sample||90% and 2 h|||
|Monoclinic||3.97||2.25||Visible light, 50 mL RhB (0.015 mmol/L), 0.1 g sample||60% and 10 h|||
|Monoclinic||−||2.35||Visible light, 30 mL MB (5 mg/L), 0.1 g sample||81.6% and 160 min|||
|Monoclinic||0.4||2.35||Visible light, alachlor (50 mg/L), 1 g/L sample||97% and 6 h|||
|Olive-like BiVO4||Monoclinic||0.91||2.40||Sunlight, 50 mL MB (10 mg/L), 0.1 g sample||18% and 3.5 h|||
|Monoclinic||4.6||2.40||Sunlight, 200 mL RhB (5 mg/L), 0.1 g sample||97% and 10 h|||
|Monoclinic||−||2.50||Visible light, 100 mL RhB (10 mg/L), 0.04 g sample||50.5% and 2.5 h|||
|Monoclinic||−||2.45||Visible light, 100 mL MB (10 mg/L), 0.1 g sample||67% and 225 min|||
|Microtube-like BiVO4||Monoclinic||6.6||2.33||Visible light, 100 mL MB (0.01 mmol/L), 0.01 g sample||90% and 3 h|||
|Monoclinic||−||2.36||Visible light, 100 mL RhB (0.01 mmol/L), 0.5 mmol sample||96% and 3 h|||
|Monoclinic||0.3||2.36||Visible light, MO (20 mg/L), 0.01 g sample||95% and 3 h|||
|Monoclinic||3.46||2.48||Visible light, 100 mL RhB (0.01 mmol/L), 0.2 g sample||100% and 5 h|||
|Dumbbell-like BiVO4||Monoclinic||4.6||2.43||Visible light, 200 mL RhB (5 mg/L), 0.1 g sample||89% and 10 h|||
|Monoclinic||−||2.51||Visible light, 600 mL RhB (0.01 mmol/L), 0.3 g sample||90% and 4.5 h|||
|Monoclinic||9.87||2.25||Sunlight, 100 mL ofloxacin (20 mg/L), 0.1 g sample||80.8% and 1 h|||
|Monoclinic||53.6||2.42||Visible light, 100 mL RhB (0.01 mmol/L), 0.1 g sample||100% and 1 h|||
|Needle-like BiVO4||Monoclinic||−||−||Sunlight, 200 mL RhB (5 mg/L), 0.1 g sample||40% and 10 h|||
|Monoclinic||2.0||2.41||UV–Vis light, MB (10 ppm), 1 g/L sample||60% and 2 h|||
|Monoclinic||17.63||2.42||Visible light, 100 mL MB (10 mg/L), 0.005 g sample||81% and 200 min|||
|Monoclinic||1.6||2.38||UV–Vis light, MB (10 ppm), 1 g/L sample||66% and 3 h|||
|Dendrite-like BiVO4||Monoclinic/tetragonal||1.88||2.52||Visible light, 100 mL MB (20 mg/L), 0.1 g sample||95% and 3 h|||
|Butterfly-like BiVO4||Monoclinic||1.22||2.34||Sunlight, 50 mL MB (10 mg/L), 0.1 g sample||74.8% and 3.5 h|||
|Nanosheet-like BiVO4||Monoclinic||−||3.3||Visible light, 100 mL RhB, 0.01 g sample||50% and 50 min|||
|Leaf-like BiVO4||Monoclinic||3.0||2.34||Visible light, 100 mL MB (0.01 mmol/L), 0.01 g sample||100% and 3 h|||
|Cuboid-like BiVO4||Monoclinic||−||2.39||Sunlight, 100 mL MO (10 mg/L), 0.5 g sample||36% and 4 h|||
|Star-like BiVO4||Monoclinic||−||2.44||Visible light, 100 mL MB (10 mg/L), 0.1 g sample||76% and 225 min|||
|Bone-like BiVO4||Monoclinic||10.32||2.36||Visible light, 100 mL MB (0.01 mmol/L), 0.005 g sample||61% and 200 min|||
2.1. Sphere-like BiVO4
Among different morphologies of BiVO4, microspherical or nanospherical BiVO4 particles are mostly reported. For example, Kunduz et al.  reported the preparation of monoclinic bismuth vanadate catalysts by hydrothermal method at different pH values and the removal of phenol from wastewater under natural sunlight illumination. Homogenous and spherical BiVO4 (particle size = 40–90 nm) was formed at pH = 2 (Figure 1d), the bandgap energy of the BiVO4 sample calculated from the absorption edge was 2.37 eV. This BiVO4 sample showed a high phenol conversion (100%) within 90 min of natural sunlight illumination, which was related to the morphology of BiVO4 (surface area = 10 m2/g).
An one-pot template-free hydrothermal method was developed for the fabrication of BiVO4 microspheres with a tetragonal–monoclinic heterophasic structure . The average diameter, bandgap energy, and BET surface area of the as-prepared BiVO4 microspheres were 4–6 μm, 2.48 eV, and 2.62 m2/g, respectively. The BiVO4 microspheres exhibited the highest photocatalytic activity with ca. Ninety-eight percentage degradation of RhB, remarkably superior to the pure monoclinic–scheelite BiVO4 and tetragonal–zircon BiVO4. The enhanced photocatalytic performance was attributed to the more effective separation of photogenerated carriers generated in the heterophasic BiVO4. Based on free radical scavenging and N2/O2-purging experiments, the degradation of RhB was believed to be driven mainly by the participation of •O2− and a lesser extent by the participation of holes and •OH.
Sun et al.  prepared monoclinic scheelite BiVO4 hollow spheres (diameter = 3000–4000 nm) using a simple hydrothermal method with urea as guiding surfactant. It is observed that the RhB removal efficiency of BiVO4 hollow spheres was more than 80% after 50 min of visible-light irradiation without adding any H2O2. The superior activity of the
Monoclinic BiVO4 crystals with a particle size of 400–700 nm and a surface area of 1.75 m2/g were synthesized with the assistance of cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) . The given RhB solution (100 mL, 10−5 M) was completely degraded within 20 min of visible-light irradiation, which was due to the addition of CTAB during the catalyst fabrication process.
Many other researchers also reported various kinds of spherical BiVO4 crystallites (Table 1). For example, Ma et al.  prepared BiVO4 microspheres by a hydrothermal method in the presence of ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA) for the removal of MB under sunlight illumination. Jiang et al.  reported porous spherical BiVO4 using urea as pH adjustor and polyvinyl pyrrolidone (PVP) as surfactant for MO degradation. Castillo et al.  studied flame-assisted synthesis of nanoscale spherical BiVO4 for the degradation of MB under visible-light illumination. These spherical BiVO4 samples exhibited good photocatalytic activities for the degradation of organic dyes under visible-light irradiation.
2.2. Flower-like BiVO4
A flower-like morphology is usually composed of nanorods or nanosheets. Flower-like particles not only look beautiful, but also show good photocatalytic performance. Fan et al.  prepared monoclinic BiVO4 with a flower-like morphology via a simple hydrothermal route by adjusting the amount of surfactant (PVP K30). The photocatalytic efficiency for the decolorization of MB aqueous solution could reach 75% in 2 h of visible-light irradiation. The UV-visible diffuse reflectance absorption spectra reveal that this BiVO4 sample showed excellent absorption of visible light in the region of up to 600 nm, and the
2.3. Rod-like BiVO4
Figure 3 shows the scanning electron microscopic (SEM) images of the rod-like BiVO4 samples. Hu et al.  reported the controlled fabrication of monoclinic BiVO4 with a rod-like structure and investigated the effect of calcination temperature on the sunlight-driven photocatalytic degradation of RhB. It is found that the sample calcined at 300°C exhibited a superior photocatalytic activity: RhB at an initial concentration of RhB lower than 10 mg/L could be completely decolorized after 6 h of sunlight irradiation. The bandgap energy and BET surface area of the rod-like BiVO4 photocatalyst were 2.46 eV and 3.5 m2/g, respectively. It can be observed from the SEM images (Figure 3) that the sample obtained after calcination at 300°C was composed of dispersive and short rod-like nanocrystals, thus displaying higher BET surface area, which would enhance the adsorption ability and hence improve the photocatalytic performance. Dai and coworkers  prepared monoclinic BiVO4 single crystallites with different morphologies using the triblock copolymer P123-assisted hydrothermal strategy with bismuth nitrate and ammonium metavanadate as metal source and various bases as pH adjustor. The rod-like BiVO4 sample was obtained at pH = 6 using NH3–H2O as pH adjustor. This sample displayed a higher surface area (3.2 m2/g) and a lower bandgap energy (2.26 eV). The rod-like BiVO4 sample showed excellent visible-light-driven photocatalytic activity for MB degradation in an aqueous solution under visible light irradiation: 90% degradation was achieved within 2 h of reaction. The unusually high visible-light-driven catalytic performance of monoclinically crystallized rod-like BiVO4 single crystallite was associated with its higher surface area and surface oxygen defect concentrations as well as the unique particle morphology.
2.4. Peanut-like BiVO4
Chen et al.  synthesized
2.5. Polyhedron-like BiVO4
The physical properties and photocatalytic activities of the related polyhedral BiVO4 samples are summarized in Table 1. For example, Han et al.  reported the synthesis of monodispersed octahedral
2.6. Olive-like BiVO4
The physical properties and photocatalytic activities of several kinds of olive-like BiVO4 samples are listed in Table 1. Adopting the facile pH-dictated solvothermal route with the aid of either NH3–H2O or NaOH, Dong et al.  controllably synthesized the uniform monoclinic scheelite BiVO4 with hierarchical structures. As the pH value was adjusted to 6.26 using NaOH as the pH controller, the olive-like BiVO4 crystallites (bandgap energy = 2.40 eV) was generated. The olive-like BiVO4 sample showed a RhB degradation efficiency of 97% after 10 h of sunlight irradiation. It should be noted that this sample did not have a high surface area (4.6 m2/g) in comparison with other samples (surface area = 6.3–11.1 m2/g) obtained at different pH values. Apparently, the enhanced photocatalytic performance was not related to the surface area and aspect ratios of the fabricated photocatalysts, but to the unique morphological configurations. Lei et al.  synthesized olive-like BiVO4 using a hydrothermal strategy at pH = 3.0. As seen from the SEM images (Figure 6c), the sizes of the BiVO4 particles were predominantly 1.8–2.9 μm in length and 1.1–1.8 μm in diameter. The olive-like BiVO4 photocatalyst with a bandgap energy of 2.5 eV showed the highest photocatalytic activity, which could photocatalytically degrade 50.5% RhB after 150 min of visible-light illumination. The synergic effect of monoclinic phase and particle size contributed to the high photocatalytic efficiency of the olive-like BiVO4 photocatalyst.
Dai and coworkers  fabricated the BiVO4 samples with a monoclinic scheelite-type structure and various morphologies via an alcoho-hydrothermal route with Bi(NO3)3 and NH4VO3 as precursor and sodium hdroxide as pH adjustor in the absence or presence of triblock copolymer P123. It is realized that the pH of the precursor solution and the surfactant greatly affected the particle shape and architecture of BiVO4. Porous BiVO4 particles with spherical, flower-like, and sheet-like shapes were obtained in the presence of P123 at a reaction temperature of 180°C and a pH of 2, 7, or 10, respectively. A rod-like BiVO4 was generated at reaction temperature = 180°C and pH = 2. The four BiVO4 samples possessed a surface area of 1.4–3.8 m2/g and a bandgap energy of 2.47–2.54 eV. The difference in morphology of the BiVO4 particles gave rise to discrepancies in surface area, surface oxygen deficiency density, and (040) crystal face exposure. The rod-like BiVO4 sample that possessed the largest surface area, the highest surface oxygen deficiency density, the highest (040) crystal face exposure, and the lowest bandgap energy performed the best for MO degradation under visible-light irradiation. It is concluded that the particle morphology could influence the photocatalytic activity of BiVO4 and the rod-like shape was favorable for the improvement in photocatalytic activity.
2.7. Microtube-like BiVO4
The physical properties and photocatalytic activities of tubular BiVO4 samples reported in the literature are summarized in Table 1. Single-crystalline monoclinic BiVO4 microtubes with a side length of 800 nm and a wall thickness of 100 nm (Figure 7b) were synthesized by a facile reflux method at 80°C . The results of optical absorption experiments reveal that in addition to the UV light region, the BiVO4 microtubes also had a strong absorption in the visible-light region and the bandgap energy was estimated to be 2.36 eV. The RhB photodegradation over the BiVO4 microtubes was up to 96% after 3 h of visible-light irradiation, which could be associated with its distinctive morphology.
2.8. Dumbbell-like BiVO4
Lu et al.  reported the controllable synthesis of dumbbell-like BiVO4 with a hierarchical nanostructure (Figure 8b) and a bandgap energy of 2.51 eV by employing a simple hydrothermal process. The photocatalytic degradation of RhB over the dumbbell-like BiVO4 sample was up to 90% within 4.5 h of visible-light irradiation, which was much higher than the P25 sample under the same reaction conditions. The good visible-light-driven photocatalytic efficiency was related to the exposed crystal planes, which could not only provide more active sites for the photocatalytic reaction but also effectively promote the separation efficiency of the electron–hole pairs. The physical properties and photocatalytic activities of several kinds of dumbbell-like BiVO4 samples reported in the literature are summarized in Table 1.
2.9. Needle-like BiVO4
The physical properties and photocatalytic activities of the typical needle-like BiVO4 samples are summarized in Table 1. For example, Obregón et al.  prepared monoclinic BiVO4 with different morphologies by a surfactant-free hydrothermal method through adjusting the pH value, precipitating agent type, hydrothermal temperature, and treatment time. The needle-like particles (Figure 9b) obtained with hydrothermal treatment at 100°C and NH4OH as pH controlling agent showed the best efficiency (50–60% after 2 h of UV-visible-light irradiation) for MB photodegradation. The surface areas of the samples obtained with hydrothermal treatment time of 2, 8, and 20 h were 30.2, 2.7, and 1.6 m2/g, respectively. It should be noted that the slight diminution in surface area had no clear effect on the photocatalytic performance of the sample. Therefore, the best performance was not associated with the surface area, but strongly affected by the crystallite size and morphology.
3. Porous BiVO4 photocatalysts
Most of the monoclinic BiVO4 samples obtained using the above methods are bulk materials and are low in surface area (<4 m2/g) [55, 56], which is unfavorable for photocatalytic applications. The reasons are as follows: (i) the amount of surface active sites is intimately related to the surface area [57, 58] and (ii) a porous architecture can increase the ability to capture incident light and the transfer of reactant and product molecules . Therefore, it is of significance to controllably prepare BiVO4 photocatalysts that are porous in structure and high in surface area. The physical properties and photocatalytic activities of typical porous BiVO4 samples are summarized in Table 2.
|Photocatalyst||Crystal structure||Crystallite size (nm)||Surface area (m2/g)||Reaction condition||Degradation efficiency and light illumination time||References|
|3DOM BiVO4||Monoclinic||185||23.6||2.50||Visible light, 200 mL phenol (0.1 mmol/L), 0.2 g sample||94% and 3 h|||
|Mesoporous BiVO4||Monoclinic||−||8.4||2.45||Visible light, 200 mL MO (0.01 mmol/L), 0.1 g sample||84% and 2 h|||
|Ordered mesoporous BiVO4||Monoclinic||3.5||59||2.20||Visible light, 80 mL MB (10 ppm), 0.08 g sample||85% and 3h|||
|Mesoporous BiVO4||Monoclinic||−||11.8||2.38||Visible light, 200 mL phenol (0.2 mmol/L), 0.2 g sample||91% and 4 h|||
|Mesoporous BiVO4||Monoclinic||2.2||7.2||2.38||Sunlight, 200 mL RhB (0.02 mmol/L), 0.2 g sample||100% and 1 h|||
|3DOM InVO4||Monoclinic||130−140||52.3||2.50||Visible light, 100 mL MB (10 mg/L), 0.1 g sample||98% and 1 h|||
|15 wt% CrO||Monoclinic||155−165||45||2.10||Visible light, 100 mL RhB (15 mg/L), 0.1 g sample||99% and 200 min|||
|0.08 wt% Au/3DOM InVO4–BiVO4||Monoclinic||22.3||25.1||2.54||Visible light, 100 mL RhB (15 mg/L), 0.1 g sample||100% and 50 min|||
|0.08 wt% Au/3DOM InVO4–BiVO4||Monoclinic||22.3||25.1||2.54||Visible light, 100 mL MB (20 mg/L), 0.1 g sample||100% and 90 min|||
|0.08 wt% Au/3DOM InVO4–BiVO4||Monoclinic||22.3||25.1||2.54||Visible light, 100 mL RhB (15 mg/L) + MB (20 mg/L), 0.1 g sample||100% and 120 min|||
|0.17 wt% Pd/10 wt% AgBr/BiVO4||Monoclinic||29.8||12.9||2.49||Visible light, 100 mL 4-chlorophenol (15 mg/L), 0.05 g sample||100% and 2.5 h|||
By adopting an alcoho-hydrothermal method with Bi(NO3)3 and NH4VO3 as precursor, sodium hydroxide as pH adjustor, ethanol and ethylene glycol as solvent, and dodecylamine, oleylamine, or oleic acid as surfactant, Dai and coworkers  prepared the BiVO4 materials with various shapes and/or mesoporous architectures. Photocatalytic activities of the as-derived samples were measured for phenol degradation in the presence of H2O2 under visible-light illumination, and effect of phenol concentration on photocatalytic performance was also probed. The authors pointed out that the surfactant and pH exerted a significant impact on particle morphology and crystal phase structure of BiVO4. Monoclinic BiVO4 samples with a porous olive-like shape could be fabricated with dodecylamine, oleylamine, or oleic acid as surfactant at a pH of 1.5 or 3.0 and a reaction temperature of 100°C. Short-rod-like monoclinic BiVO4 and porous sheet-layered spherical orthorhombic Bi4V2O11 were generated with dodecylamine as surfactant at reaction temperature = 100°C and pH = 7.0 and 11.0, respectively. Among all of the as-prepared BiVO4 samples, the porous sample with an olive-like morphology and a surface area of 12.7 m2/g (derived with dodecylamine and at pH = 1.5) exhibited the best visible-light-driven photocatalytic performance for phenol degradation (96% phenol was removed within 4 h of visible-light illumination).
Jiang et al.  prepared monoclinic BiVO4 single crystallites with a porous octapod-like morphology using the P123-assisted hydrothermal method with bismuth nitrate and ammonium metavanadate as metal source and various bases as pH adjustor. The BiVO4 with a surface area of 11.8 m2/g and a bandgap energy of 2.38 eV showed excellent photocatalytic activities for the degradation of MB and phenol. Near 100 and 91% degradation of MB and phenol were achieved within 2 and 4 h of visible-light irradiation, respectively. The authors concluded that the high visible-light-driven catalytic performance of the porous octapod-like BiVO4 single crystallites was associated with the higher surface area, porous structure, and lower bandgap energy.
Peanut-shaped porous monoclinic BiVO4 with high yield was prepared using a simple template-free solvothermal method . The pore size of the sample was 2.2 nm. Compared to the BiVO4 sample obtained hydrothermally, the porous BiVO4 sample exhibited a higher photocatalytic activity for the degradation of RhB and maintained high catalytic efficiency in the repeated recycles of the H2O2-containing system. Nearly, complete degradation of RhB was observed after 1 h of sunlight irradiation. It is noteworthy that the bandgap energy (2.38 eV) of the porous BiVO4 sample was higher than that (2.28 eV) of the nonporous BiVO4 sample, but the surface area (7.3 m2/g) of the former was considerably higher than that (2.1 m2/g) of the latter.
Li et al.  prepared ordered mesoporous monoclinic BiVO4 using mesoporous silica (KIT-6) as template. The mesoporous BiVO4 sample had a surface area of 59 m2/g and a pore size of 3.5 nm. The mesoporous BiVO4 exhibited a superior visible-light-driven photocatalytic activity for the degradation of MB. The degradation rate over the mesoporous BiVO4 sample was twice as active as the conventional BiVO4 sample, and 85% MB could be degraded after 3 h of visible-light illumination. The mesoporous BiVO4 sample possessed a large surface area, an ordered structure, and a small crystal size, thus resulting in excellent visible-light photocatalytic activity. The most attractive feature of the mesoporous BiVO4 semiconductor with a bandgap energy of 2.20 eV was its excellent visible-light response ability.
Liu et al.  prepared three-dimensionally ordered macroporous (3DOM) bismuth vanadates with a monoclinic crystal structure and high surface areas (18–24 m2/g) using ascorbic acid-assisted poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA)-templating strategy. The average macropore size and wall thicknesses of the BiVO4 samples were in the ranges of 160–185 and 24–70 nm, respectively. The photocatalytic performance of the porous BiVO4 samples was evaluated for the degradation of phenol in the presence of a small amount of H2O2 under visible-light illumination. The results showed that the conversion of phenol could reach 94% at an initial phenol concentration of 0.1 mmol/L after 3 h of visible-light irradiation. However, only 51% phenol was degraded over the bulk BiVO4 sample. The authors concluded that the excellent photocatalytic activity of 3DOM BiVO4 was associated with the high-quality 3DOM-structured BiVO4 that has a high surface area and a surface oxygen vacancy density.
Wang et al.  reported the 3DOM-structured monoclinic InVO4 with high surface areas (35–52 m2/g) using the citric acid-, tartaric acid-, or ascorbic acid-assisted PMMA-templating strategy. From the SEM images, among the as-obtained samples, the InVO4 sample derived with PMMA in the presence of ascorbic acid showed the best quality in 3DOM architecture and a bandgap energy of 2.50 eV, with the macropore and nanovoid (on the skeletons) sizes being in the ranges of 130–160 and of 2–10 nm, respectively. Ninety-eight percentage MB was removed over the ascorbic acid-derived sample within 1 h of visible-light illumination. It is concluded that the excellent photocatalytic activity of this sample was related to its higher surface area and surface oxygen vacancy density and lower bandgap energy as well as the better quality of 3DOM structure.
Dai and coworker  loaded certain amounts of chromia on the surface of 3DOM InVO4 to obtain the
Ji et al.  prepared the 3DOM InVO4–BiVO4 (InBi-3D) and its supported noble metal (
Dai and coworkers  prepared 3DOM BiVO4 (3D-BiV), AgBr/3D-BiV, and
4. Heteroatom-doped BiVO4 photocatalysts
Up to now, many investigations have been made to improve the photocatalytic performance of visible-light-responsive BiVO4 by doping heteroatoms that can efficiently avoid the charge recombination via trapping both electrons and holes. The co-doping with both cations and anions can also extend the visible-light absorption spectrum of BiVO4.
4.1. Doping with anions
Yin et al.  reported the one-step fabrication of high-performance C-doped BiVO4 photocatalyst with hierarchical structures under visible-light irradiation. The sample calcined at 400°C with a carbon content of 1.5 wt% showed the best photocatalytic MB degradation efficiency (100% degradation after 1 h of visible-light irradiation), which was 6.3 times higher than that over the pure BiVO4 sample (18% degradation after 1 h of visible-light irradiation). The XRD result showed that 1.5 wt% C-BiVO4 had a smaller crystalline size (18.7 nm) in comparison with pure BiVO4 (28.5 nm). Moreover, the bandgap energy of 1.5 wt% C-BiVO4 was about 2.39 eV, which was smaller than that (2.46 eV) of pure BiVO4. The photocatalytic performance was enhanced by C-doping because it improved the efficient separation and transfer of the photogenerated electrons and holes, as evidenced by the results of electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) measurements.
Tan et al.  fabricated a N-doped monoclinic BiVO4 photocatalyst via a facile microwave hydrothermal route using NaN3 as nitrogen source. The photocatalytic performance of the samples was evaluated by the decolorization of RhB under the simulated sunlight irradiation. After 4 h of the simulated sunlight irradiation, the degradation efficiencies over the pure BiVO4 and N-doped BiVO4 samples were 48 and 97%, respectively, indicating that N-doped BiVO4 was twice as active as pure BiVO4. The bandgap energy (2.0 eV) of N-doped BiVO4 was narrower than that (2.2 eV) of pure BiVO4, whereas the surface area (1.34 m2/g) of the former was close to that (0.21 m2/g) of the latter. The enhancement in photocatalytic activity could be attributable to the small particle size, narrow bandgap, and most importantly, the existence of multi-atomic BiVO4 centers and surface oxygen vacancies, which improved the mobility of charge carriers and inhibited the recombination of charge carriers.
F-doped BiVO4 particles were synthesized through a simple two-step hydrothermal process . The XRD results demonstrated that the presence of F− ions did not change the phase structure of monoclinic BiVO4. F-doped BiVO4 was consisted of relatively uniform spheres with a diameter of 2–4 μm, and the bandgap energy was 2.39 eV. When the BiVO4/NaF molar ratio was 1: 0.9, the derived F-doped BiVO4 sample exhibited the highest photocatalytic MB degradation activity (99% MB was degraded after 3 h of visible-light irradiation). The appropriate amount of F– ions introduced into the BiVO4 crystal lattice might effectively restrain the recombination of photogenerated electron–hole pairs, thus facilitating the improvement in photocatalytic activity.
Jiang et al.  prepared fluoride-doped BiVO4 with the different F/Bi molar ratios using the hydrothermal strategy with the hydrothermally derived BiVO4 as precursor and NH4F as fluoride source. All of the samples were of single-phase monoclinic scheelite structure. The doping of fluorine did not induce any alteration in crystal structure but changed the morphology of the sample particles. Compared to the undoped BiVO4 sample, the fluoride-doped BiVO4 samples showed higher oxygen adspecies concentration. When the F/Bi molar ratio was 0.29, the BiVO4 sample with a surface area of 14.6 m2/g and a bandgap energy of 2.42 eV performed the best for the degradation of phenol, giving a 97% phenol degradation efficiency within 2 h of visible-light irradiation. The authors concluded that the excellent photocatalytic performance of fluoride-doped BiVO4 was associated with its higher surface area and adsorbed oxygen species concentration, stronger optical absorbance performance, and lower bandgap energy.
Other anions (e.g., S and B) were also doped into the BiVO4 lattice (Table 3). For example, Guo et al.  found that S-doped BiVO4 was superior to pure BiVO4 in photocatalyzing the degradation of MB under visible-light irradiation, since an appropriate amount of S2− ions could improve the separation efficiency of photogenerated electron–hole pairs and hinder their recombination.
|Photocatalyst||Crystal structure||Crystallite size (nm)||Surface area (m2/g)||Reaction condition||Degradation efficiency and light illumination time||References|
|0.5 wt% C–BiVO4||Monoclinic||35.7||1.18||−||Visible light, 200 mL phenol (5 mg/L), 0.2 g sample||88.7% and 5 h|||
|4 mol% B–BiVO4||Monoclinic||23.0||4.17||2.34||Visible light, 50 mL MO (15 mg/L), 0.01 g sample||96% and 50 min|||
|F–BiVO4 (F/Bi molar ratio = 0.29)||Monoclinic||−||14.6||2.42||Visible light, 200 mL phenol (0.2 mmol/L), 0.2 g sample||97% and 2 h|||
|0.17 wt% S–BiVO4||Monoclinic||29.01||3.18||2.44||Visible light, 100 mL MB (10 mg/L), 0.1 g sample||100% and 25 min|||
|0.08 wt% S–BiVO4||Monoclinic||−||9.9||2.40||Visible light, 100 mL MB (0.005 mmol/L), 0.01 g sample||95% and 2 h|||
|1.40 wt% FeO||Monoclinic||−||5.1||2.39||Visible light, 100 mL MB (0.01 mmol/L), 0.01 g sample||100% and 90 min|||
|N–BiVO4 (N : Bi molar ratio = 0.2)||Monoclinic||49.8||3.03||2.23||Visible light, 50 mL MO (10 mg/L), 0.01 g sample||85% and 50 min|||
|1% wt% Cu-BiVO4||Monoclinic||39.78||15.37||1.90||UV light, 90 mL MB (50 mg/L), 0.15 g sample||96% and 2 h|||
|2 mol% Mo-BiVO4||Monoclinic||−||0.1||2.39||Visible light, MB (16 ppm), 0.1 g sample||100% and 1.5 h|||
|1.08 wt% Er-BiVO4||Monoclinic||−||4.39||2.11||Visible light, 100 mL MO (10 mg/L), 0.2 g sample||99.4% and 3 h|||
|8 mol% Yb-BiVO4||Tetragonal||−||11.02||2.9||Sunlight, 50 mL RhB (5 mg/L), 0.05 g sample||98% and 2 h|||
|3 mol% Yb/0.75 mol% Er-BiVO4||Monoclinic/tetragonal||−||4||2.35/2.68||UV–vis–NIR light, 150 mL MB (10 ppm), 1 g/L sample||100% and 1 h|||
|0.8 wt% Eu/4 wt% B-BiVO4||Monoclinic||44.89||4.61||2.28||Visible light, 50 mL MO (15 mg/L), 0.015 g sample||90% and 50 min|||
Employing a dodecylamine-assisted alcohol-hydrothermal method in the absence and presence of thiourea or Na2S, Zhao et al.  synthesized the sulfur-doped BiVO4 samples. The S-doped samples possessed a monoclinic scheelite structure and a surface area of 8.4–9.9 m2/g, and the bandgap energies of the S-doped BiVO4 samples were narrower than that of pure BiVO4. The S-doped BiVO4 sample with a S content of 0.78 wt% showed the best photocatalytic performance for the degradation of MB and formaldehyde. The photodegradation efficiency of MB was 92% within 2.5 h of visible-light illumination, but only 45% MB was degraded over pure BiVO4 under the same conditions. It is believed that a higher adsorbed oxygen species concentration and a lower bandgap energy were responsible for the excellent photocatalytic activity of the 0.78 wt% S-BiVO4 sample. These authors also investigated the porous olive-like morphological S-doped bismuth vanadate-supported iron oxide (
4.2. Doping with cations
Cation doping is another approach to enhance the photocatalytic degradation efficiency of BiVO4, including transition metal doping and rare-earth doping (Table 3). For example, Li et al.  prepared Cu-doped monoclinic BiVO4 by a facile hydrothermal method and used the degradation of RhB to evaluate their photocatalytic activities. 1 wt% Cu-BiVO4 showed the best degradation performance: 95% of RhB was degraded within 80 min of visible-light irradiation, whereas pure BiVO4 can only degrade 60% of RhB within the same time. The bandgap energy of 1 wt% Cu-BiVO4 was 2.55 eV, resulting in the photoabsorption ability of the 1 wt% Cu-BiVO4 sample slightly stronger than undoped BiVO4 (bandgap energy = 2.57 eV). The amount of oxygen vacancies increased in the copper-doped samples. Possible factors that significantly enhance photocatalytic performance could be as follows: (i) Cu2+ substituted partial V5+ ions with lower oxidation state, generating a certain amount of oxygen vacancies; (ii) the generated oxygen vacancies can capture the electrons to suppress recombination of the photoinduced carriers; and (iii) the photoinduced carriers freely diffuse to the active sites on the surface of the photocatalyst where oxidation of organic species takes place.
Zhou et al.  prepared a series of visible-light-sensitive monoclinic Co-BiVO4 photocatalysts by the heteronuclear complexing method with diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (DTPA) as chelating agent. The bandgap was narrowed by doping cobalt. The bandgap energies of the Co-doped BiVO4 samples at cobalt molar content of 0 and 1–10 wt% were 2.44 and 2.39–2.43 eV, respectively. The photocatalytic activity of Co-BiVO4 was studied by the decolorization of MB. The 5 wt% Co-BiVO4 sample exhibited the highest photocatalytic activity with a 85% of MB removal (65% of MB removal by pure BiVO4) within 5 h of visible-light irradiation. There was no significant loss of photocatalytic activity in three successive runs (each lasted for 6 h). Therefore, Co-BiVO4 was photocatalytically stable and resistant to photocorrosion during the photocatalytic degradation of organic dyes.
Obregón et al.  synthesized Er-BiVO4 by means of a microwave-assisted hydrothermal method and examined the photodegradation of MB under sunlike excitation. The Er-doped BiVO4 sample showed a mixed phase of monoclinic and tetragonal structures. The optimal MB conversion was achieved over the sample with 0.75 atom% of erbium, over which the complete MB degradation was reached after 40 min of light illumination. The reaction rate obtained over this photocatalyst was 20 times higher than that over the undoped BiVO4 sample. Two clear absorption edges in the diffuse reflectance spectra of the sample appeared, and the corresponding bandgap energies were ca. 2.4 and 2.8 eV, which were associated with the monoclinic and tetragonal phases, respectively. In order to understand the role of erbium doping in the luminescent properties of the sample, the photoluminescence spectra upon 523 and 655 nm excitations were studied. Upon 655 nm excitation, the up-converted emission of the 0.75 atom% Er-BiVO4 sample was almost suppressed in the 400–600 nm range. Therefore, the dramatic improvement in photocatalytic activity induced by Er3+ doping could correlate to a co-operative process involving the electronic and luminescence mechanism. This sensitization mechanism could improve the photon efficiency of the photocatalytic process, and the formation of a monoclinic–tetragonal heterostructure could also be responsible for a more effective charge separation.
Co-doping with two different elements can exhibit better photocatalytic activity than the doping of single element. Wang et al.  reported that photodegradation of MO over BiVO4 doped with B species showed a higher MO degradation rate than the pure BiVO4 sample under visible-light irradiation. With the doping of europium, the photocatalytic MO degradation rate over Eu–B co-doped BiVO4 increased with the rise in europium content, and then decreased when the amount of europium was high enough. Co-doping of two different elements can further increase the photocatalytic activity due to the synergistic effects of a number of factors (such as higher specific area, smaller
Obregón et al.  also reported a highly active monoclinic–tetragonal BiVO4 by doping with Yb3+ and Er3+, which can completely photodegrade MB within 1 h of sunlike excitation. According to the results of structural and morphological characterization, one can deduce that the presence of Yb3+ and Er3+ induced the stabilization of the tetragonal phase probably due to its partial incorporation into the BiVO4 lattice. The improved photocatalytic efficiency was ascribed to two reasons: (i) the doping of lanthanide ions favored the co-existence of a monoclinic-tetragonal heterostructure, and such a structural configuration could optimize the charge separation and (ii) Yb3+ and Er3+ luminescence tandem led to a supportive photoluminescence up-conversion process, which could render the energy transfer process from erbium ions to the monoclinic BiVO4 phase.
It should be noted that not all of the photocatalytic activity enhancement can be ascribed to the higher specific area, small crystallite sizes, smaller
5. BiVO4-based heterojunction photocatalysts
In comparison with single-component photocatalyst, the heterostructure photocatalyst usually exhibits a higher photocatalytic performance for the degradation of various organic contaminants since it can facilitate the effective separation of photoinduced carriers and suppress the recombination of the electron–hole pairs, leaving more charge carriers to form reactive species .
Absorption of photons by a semiconductor photocatalyst induces the photogenerated electrons and holes. The photogenerated charge carriers are separated or recombined on the way to the surface reaction sites. The charge separation is a crucial factor determining the light to conversion efficiency . Therefore, much attention has been paid on increasing the charge separation efficiency. Fabrication of a heterojunction structure has been recognized as a useful strategy to avoid charge recombination in a semiconductor catalyst.
5.1. Co3O4/BiVO4 heterojunction
Co3O4 is a
Long et al.  prepared the Co3O4/BiVO4 composite photocatalyst with a
Yu and coworkers  also investigated the BiVO4 decorated with Co3O4, which showed a much higher photocatalytic activity than pure BiVO4. The authors believed that the high crystallinity of BiVO4 and the formed
|Photocatalyst||Surface area (m2/g)||Reaction condition||Degradation efficiency and light illumination time||References|
|0.8 wt% Co3O4/BiVO4||1.38||−||Visible light, phenol (18 mg/L), 3 g/L sample||96% and 3 h|||
|3 wt% Co3O4/BiVO4||8.03||2.34||Visible light, 80 mL acid orange II (20 mg/L), 0.05 g sample||78% and 5 h|||
|9 wt% BiVO4/TiO2||107.7||−||Visible light, 80 mL RhB (0.01 mmol/L), 0.08 g sample||79% and 6 h|||
|8 mol% BiVO4/TiO2||17||2.4||Visible light, 50 mL RhB (1 mmol/L), 0.02 g sample||95% and 2 h|||
|40 mol% CeO2/BiVO4||−||2.40||Visible light, 100 mL RhB (5 mg/L), 0.15 g sample||73% and 4 h|||
|40 mol% CeO2/BiVO4||−||2.46||Visible light, 50 mL MB (0.02 mmol/L), 0.05 g sample||80% and 30 min|||
|30 mol% BiVO4/C3N4||4.52||2.45||Visible light, 50 mL RhB (0.01 mmol/L), 0.05 g sample||85% and 5 h|||
|16.7 mol% BiVO4/C3N4||12.99||2.25||Visible light, 100 mL MB (10 mg/L), 0.05 g sample||96% and 1 h|||
|1 wt% GR/BiVO4||10||2.38||Visible light, 100 mL RhB (10 mg/L), 0.02 g sample||94% and 140 min|||
|3 wt% GR/BiVO4||44.2||1.94||Visible light, 100 mL RhB (0.01 mmol/L), 0.6 mmol sample||100% and 10 min|||
|5 wt% RGO/BiVO4||15.73||2.41||Visible light, 50 mL RhB (10 mg/L), 0.1 g sample||89% and 3 h|||
|3 wt% RGO/BiVO4||4.84||2.32||Sunlight, 200 mL RhB (7.5 mg/L), 0.15 g sample||96.5% and 6 h|||
|50 mol% Bi2WO6/BiVO4||2.69||2.08||Visible light, 100 mL RhB (0.01 mmol/L), 0.1 g sample||100% and 0.5 h|||
|3 wt% Bi2WO6/BiVO4||−||2.50||Visible light, 50 mL phenol (10 mg/L), 0.15 g sample||81% and 6 h|||
|2.5 wt% Cu2O/BiVO4||−||2.4||Visible light, 50 mL MB (0.02 mmol/L), 0.05 g sample||100% and 75 min|||
|33 wt% Cu2O/BiVO4||−||2.45||Visible light, 100 mL phenol (100 mg/L), 0.2 g sample||41% and 6 h|||
|8 wt% CuO/BiVO4||−||2.12||Visible light, 30 mL MO (5 mg/L), 0.03 g sample||90.4% and 3 h|||
|1 wt% CuO/BiVO4||2||2.28||Visible light, 100 mL acid orange 7 (0.05 mmol/L), 0.05 g sample||95% and 3 h|||
|Bi2O3/BiVO4 (Bi/V molar ratio = 1.1)||2.3||2.40||Sunlight, 100 mL MB (0.02 mmol/L), 0.05 g sample||100% and 40 min|||
|Bi2O3/BiVO4||1.48||2.52||Visible light, 100 mL RhB (0.01 mmol/L), 0.1 g sample||88% and 4 h|||
|43 mol% BiOBr/BiVO4||−||2.38||Visible light, 50 mL MB (10 mg/L), 0.05 g sample||97.2% and 4 h|||
|13 mol% BiOCl/BiVO4||2.80||2.38||Visible light, 100 mL MO (0.0263 mmol/L), 0.1 g sample||85% and 11 h|||
|15 mol% BiIO4/BiVO4||−||2.40||Visible light, 50 mL RhB (0.01 mmol/L), 0.05 g sample||75% and 5 h|||
|MoS2/BiVO4||−||−||Visible light, 100 mL MB (40 mg/L), 0.1 g sample||95% and 2 h|||
|80 mol% InVO4/BiVO4||25.45||2.52||Visible light, 100 mL MB (0.02 mmol/L), 0.1 g sample||87% and 2 h|||
|16.7 wt% Ag2O/BiVO4||−||2.06||Visible light, 30 mL MO (5 mg/L), 0.03 g sample||91% and 160 min|||
|22.47 wt% AgBr/BiVO4||−||−||Visible light, 75 mL MB|
(10 mg/L), 0.075 g sample
|83.1% and 2.5 h|||
|10 mol% Ag3PO4/BiVO4||−||2.46||Visible light, 100 mL MB|
(10 mg/L), 0.05 g sample
|92% and 10 min|||
5.2. TiO2/BiVO4 heterojunction
As we know, TiO2 has been widely used in environmental purification, H2 production, photosynthesis, CO2 reduction, etc. TiO2 is cheap, stable, nontoxic, and environmentally friendly, and hence an ideal model for investigations of semiconductor photocatalysts . However, a major drawback of TiO2 is that only UV in the solar spectrum (about 3–5%) can be utilized to initiate the photocatalytic redox processes.
Table 4 summarizes the physical properties and photocatalytic activities of the TiO2/BiVO4 heterojunction samples reported in the literature. Xie et al.  prepared TiO2/BiVO4 nanocomposites with different molar ratios by impregnating BiVO4 particles into a TiO2 sol and after a thermal treatment at 450°C. The phenol degradation efficiency (74% after 1 h of visible-light illumination) over the TiO2/BiVO4 nanocomposites was as 4 times as that over pure BiVO4. The results of the transient-state surface photovoltage responses and atmosphere-controlled steady-state surface photovoltage spectra demonstrated that the lifetime of photogenerated charge carriers over the nanosized BiVO4 sample could be prolonged by approximately millisecond timescale after a proper molar ratio of nanocrystalline TiO2 was coupled. The promoted charge separation was responsible for the unexpected high photocatalytic activity for phenol degradation under visible-light irradiation.
Apart from the most commonly used TiO2 catalyst, cubic fluorite cerium dioxide (CeO2), a semiconductor with a bandgap energy similar to that of TiO2 , shows a promising photocatalytic activity for the degradation of various organic dye pollutants . CeO2 has been used in the splitting of water for H2 evolution and the degradation of phenol or chlorinated phenol under UV irradiation [91, 92]. However, the broad bandgap energy of CeO2 limits its applications in visible-light illumination . As we know, the heterojunction structure in composite photocatalysts can dominate photoinduced charges in the direction of transport, distance of separation, and rate of recombination, leading to the efficient separation of photogenerated charges and thus greatly improving the photocatalytic activity of the heterojunction-structured sample. If BiVO4 is coupled with CeO2 to form a heterojunction structure, it is possible to generate visible-light-driven catalysts that show excellent photocatalytic performance.
Wetchakun et al.  prepared the BiVO4/CeO2 nanocomposites by coupling a homogeneous precipitation method with a hydrothermal process. Photocatalytic activities of the as-prepared samples were examined for the degradation of MB, MO, and a mixture of MB and MO aqueous solutions under visible-light irradiation. The XRD patterns reveal that the BiVO4/CeO2 nanocomposite was composed of BiVO4 and CeO2, and BiVO4 in the composite sample was present in two crystalline phases. The sample with a BiVO4/CeO2 molar ratio of 0.6: 0.4 showed the highest photocatalytic activity (the highest MB degradation of 80% was achieved within 30 min of light irradiation). The absorption of BiVO4/CeO2 nanocomposites increased in the visible-light region (485–505 nm). Moreover, the low bandgap energy (2.46 eV) of BiVO4/CeO2 nanocomposites also influenced the dyes degradation.
The physical properties and photocatalytic activities of the CeO2/BiVO4 heterojunction samples reported in the literature are summarized in Table 4.
5.4. g-C3N4/BiVO4 heterojunction
As a promising photocatalyst candidate for organic pollutant removal, graphite-like carbon nitride (g-C3N4) exhibits a relatively high photocatalytic activity under visible-light illumination due to its rapid separation of photoinduced charge carriers [93, 94]. The very negative CB (−1.13 eV) of g-C3N4 enables a strong reduction power of electrons (e−) in the CB. Nevertheless, there are still some shortcomings (e.g., the limited visible-light absorption below 450 nm and the low surface area) for the utilization of g-C3N4 in photocatalysis [95, 96]. Recently, continuous efforts have been made to improve the photocatalytic performance of g-C3N4. Among these, combining g-C3N4 with other semiconductors to construct heterostructures can effectively promote the separation rate of photoexcitated charge carriers . BiVO4 and g-C3N4 are selected to construct heterojunction photocatalysts according to the following considerations: (i) both BiVO4 and g-C3N4 have been proved to be promising visible-light photocatalysts with desirable chemical stability and (ii) their suitable energy band alignments are beneficial for the separation of light-induced electron–hole pairs in the as-formed heterojunction photocatalysts. More importantly, the g-C3N4/BiVO4 heterojunction structures can be easily modified to achieve a controllable coverage of g-C3N4 on BiVO4 via a thermal annealing process, during which the g-C3N4 phase can be thermally etched by oxidation in air [7, 98].
Li et al.  prepared an efficient g-C3N4/BiVO4 heterojunction photocatalyst with BiVO4 networks decorated by discrete g-C3N4 nanoislands for highly efficient photocatalytic degradation of MB. There was the co-existence of BiVO4 and g-C3N4 phase in the composite samples. Among these heterojunction photocatalysts, the g-C3N4/BiVO4 heterojunction sample with a g-C3N4/BiVO4 ratio of 15: 3 performed the best photocatalytically in the degradation of MB. In this sample, the g-C3N4 phase displayed a discrete nanoisland morphology (5–10 nm in diameter), which was attached tightly to the surface of BiVO4. The as-synthesized g-C3N4/BiVO4 photocatalyst showed a superior visible-light photocatalytic activity, which was about 4.5 and 6.9 times as high as that over pure BiVO4 and g-C3N4, respectively. The enhanced photocatalytic activity can be ascribed to the increased charge separation efficiency, fully exposed reactive sites, and separated redox reaction sites as well as excellent visible-light response in the network composites. The physical properties and photocatalytic activities of the g-C3N4/BiVO4 heterojunction samples are summarized in Table 4.
5.5. rGO/BiVO4 heterojunction
Reduced graphene oxide (rGO) with excellent electrical conductivity and high carrier mobility has been proved to be an excellent media for electron transfer. The widely accepted mechanism for the enhancement in photocatalytic performance is that chemical bonding between rGO and semiconductor could accelerate the transfer of photogenerated electrons in semiconductor to rGO, thus effectively suppressing the recombination of photogenerated carriers . The rGO/BiVO4 composites have attracted much attention and significant research progress has been achieved.
Wang et al.  fabricated the rGO/BiVO4 nanocomposite photocatalysts with excellent visible-light photocatalytic activities through electrostatic self-assembly via a simple surface charge modification on amorphous BiVO4 powders with silane coupling agent. The surface areas of rGO/BiVO4 and BiVO4 were 23.57 and 2.62 m2/g, respectively, and their corresponding bandgap energies were 2.41 and 2.47 eV. The photocatalytic MB degradation efficiency over rGO/BiVO4 was 94.1%, whereas that over bare BiVO4 was just 24.1% after 30 min of visible-light irradiation. The smaller particle size with a high surface area and an increased interfacial interaction in rGO/BiVO4 gave rise to increased photocatalytic reaction sites, extended photoresponding range, and enhanced photogenerated charge separation and transportation efficiency.
The physical properties and photocatalytic activities of the rGO/BiVO4 heterojunction samples reported in the literature are summarized in Table 4.
5.6. Bi2WO6/BiVO4 heterojunction
As one of the typical Aurivillius oxides with a layered structure, Bi2WO6 has attracted increasing attention in many research fields due to its excellent intrinsic physicochemical properties , including ferroelectric piezoelectricity, pyroelectricity, catalytic activity, non-linear dielectric susceptibility, and luminescence. Besides, Bi2WO6 is a typical
5.7. Cu2O/BiVO4 heterojunction
Cu2O is a
Wang et al.  prepared the Cu2O/BiVO4 photocatalysts with a heterogeneous nanostructure and a
5.8. Bi2O3/BiVO4 heterojunction
Bi2O3 is an active
Guan et al.  synthesized the BiVO4 and BiVO4@Bi2O3 microspheres with a hollow olive-like morphology and a
5.9. BiOCl/ BiVO4 heterojunction
In recent years, much attention has been paid on the bismuth oxyhalides (BiOX, X = Cl, Br, I)  and their composites in heterogeneous photocatalysis because of their characteristic hierarchical structures and unique optical properties . Among them, BiOCl has drawn considerable attention as a novel photocatalyst due to their unique layered structure and high photocorrosion property . However, BiOCl is similar to TiO2, which is semiconductor with a wide bandgap
A visible-light-active BiOCl/BiVO4 photocatalyst with a
6. Supported BiVO4 photocatalyst
Due to fast recombination of photogenerated electrons and holes or lack of appropriate reaction sites, single semiconductor-based photocatalysts usually do not show high efficiency in photocatalysis . To improve the photocatalytic performance, it is necessary to fabricate composite photocatalysts by loading proper oxidation or reduction cocatalyst(s) on a semiconductor. In such a composite photocatalyst, the role of the cocatalyst(s) is as follows : (i) providing trapping sites for the photogenerated charges and promoting the charge separation, thus enhancing the quantum efficiency; (ii) improving the photostability of the catalyst by timely consuming the photogenerated electrons and holes; and (iii) catalyzing the reactions by lowering the activation energy. Various kinds of cocatalysts have been applied to BiVO4 to improve the photocatalytic removal of organics, including metal cocatalysts, metal oxide cocatalysts, and metal sulfide cocatalysts. As early in 2005, Kohtani et al.  prepared silver particles loaded on BiVO4 by an impregnation method for the degradation of 4-
Chen et al.  prepared the Ag/BiVO4 composites using a one-step method with ethylene glycol and water as solvent and L-lysine as surfactant. The photocatalytic performance of the composites was evaluated for the degradation of MB in an aqueous solution under visible-light irradiation. Based on the XRD and XPS results, only a small part of the Ag presented as metallic Ag (Ag0) dispersed on the surface of BiVO4, whereas most of Ag was present in oxidized Ag (Ag+). The Ag particles with a size of about 5 nm were in close contact with BiVO4. More than 98% of MB could be degraded over 6.5 wt% Ag/BiVO4 within 100 min of visible-light illumination. The 6.5 wt% Ag/BiVO4 sample had a surface area of 4.84 m2/g and a bandgap energy of 2.4 eV. The results demonstrate that a proper amount of Ag in the composite could promote the separation of photogenerated electrons and holes.
Au/BiVO4 heterogeneous nanostructures were synthesized using a cysteine-linking strategy through the
Table 5 summarizes the physical properties and photocatalytic activities of BiVO4-supported reduction cocatalysts reported in the literature.
Li et al.  prepared the CuO/BiVO4 photocatalysts by an impregnation method. The highest MB photodegradation efficiency was obtained over the sample with a 5 atom% Cu content and after calcination at 300°C. MB could be completely degraded after 2 h of light irradiation. The bandgap energies of pure BiVO4 and 5 atom% CuO/BiVO4 were 2.40 and 2.34 eV, respectively. Moreover, the surface area (5.62 m2/g) of 5 atom% CuO/BiVO4 was higher than that (1.89 m2/g) of pure BiVO4. Therefore, the authors concluded that a proper Cu loading could effectively improve the photocatalytic activity.
|Photocatalyst||Crystal structure||Crystallite size (nm)||Surface area (m2/g)||Reaction condition||Degradation efficiency and light illumination time||References|
|6.5 wt% Ag/BiVO4||Monoclinic||5||4.83||2.40||Visible light, 100 mL MB (0.02 mmol/L), 0.05 g sample||98% and 100 min|||
|1.5 wt% Ag/BiVO4||Monoclinic||10−30||−||2.10||Visible light, MB (10 mg/L), 1 g/L sample||98% and 2 h|||
|3.5 wt% Au/BiVO4||Monoclinic||5||−||2.54||Visible light, 10 mL MO (5 mg/L), 0.01 g sample||100% and 50 min|||
|1 wt% Au/BiVO4||Monoclinic||8−10||−||2.0||Visible light, 50 mL phenol (10 mg/L), 3 g/L sample||99% and 2.5 h|||
|1 mol% CuO/BiVO4||Monoclinic||32.7||5.62||2.34||UV light, 200 mL MB (10 mg/L), 0.2 g sample||100% and 2 h|||
|5.0 mol% Fe2O3/BiVO4||Monoclinic||20.38||15.27||2.38||Visible light, 50 mL MB (0.05 mmol/L), 0.05 g sample||81% and 0.5 h|||
|0.1 wt% Pt/0.1 wt% MnO||Monoclinic||−||−||−||Visible light, 100 mL MO (10 mg/L), 0.05 g sample||100% and 1.5 h|||
|0.03 wt% Pt/0.01 wt% RuO2/BiVO4||Monoclinic||−||−||2.3||Visible light, 30 mL thiophene (600 ppm), 0.05 g sample||78% and 3 h|||
|1 mol% Ag2O/BiVO4||Monoclinic||100||2.70||2.31||Visible light, 50 mL ibuprofen (10 mg/L), 0.04 g sample||96% and 4 h|||
|1 wt% PdO/BiVO4||Monoclinic||−||−||1.63||Visible light, 30 mL MO (10 mg/L), 0.2 g sample||100% and 15 h|||
Chala et al.  prepared the pure BiVO4 and Fe-loaded BiVO4 samples by a hydrothermal method. Photocatalytic activities of the samples were examined using the degradation of MB under visible-light irradiation. The Fe/BiVO4 sample with an optimal iron loading of 5.0 mol% showed the best photodegradation performance (81%) within 30 min of visible-light illumination. The iron loading did not affect the crystal structure of BiVO4, and the iron oxides (mainly Fe2O3) might be loaded merely on the surface of BiVO4. The bandgap energies of BiVO4 and 5.0 mol% Fe/BiVO4 were 2.51 and 2.38 eV, respectively. Loading with Fe2O3 creates subband states in the bandgap of BiVO4 which could then be easily excited to produce more electron–hole pairs under visible-light irradiation, hence resulting in higher photocatalytic performance. Surface areas of the pure BiVO4 and 5.0 mol% Fe/BiVO4 samples were 6.44 and 15.27 m2/g, respectively, indicating that loading of BiVO4 with iron oxides led to an increase in surface area. The higher surface area could possibly provide more active sites on the catalyst surface, which gave rise to an enhancement in photocatalytic activity. The physical properties and photocatalytic activities of BiVO4-supported oxidation cocatalysts and dual cocatalysts reported in the literature are summarized in Table 5.
In comparison with single cocatalyst-loaded BiVO4 photocatalysts stated above, Li et al.  prepared two types of photocatalysts (
7. Photocatalytic degradation mechanism
7.1. Organic dyes photodegradation mechanisms
According to the literature, the main factors influencing the degradation rate of organic dyes are hydroxyl radicals (•OH), superoxide radical (•O2−), dissolved oxygen (O2), and holes (h+). The mechanisms for degradation of organic dyes (such as MB, MO, and RhB) are similar. Taking an example, the photocatalytic degradation mechanism over the BiVO4 quantum tubes–graphene composite sample for the degradation of RhB under visible-light illumination is illustrated in Figure 11.
It is well known that a complete photocatalytic process is generally divided into three stages: light harvesting, separation of photogenerated charges, and interfacial reactions . In the photocatalytic reaction of converting dyes to CO2 and H2O over the BiVO4–graphene composite material, the electrons (e−) are provided by photoexcitation of BiVO4 (CB electrons). In this regard, BiVO4 can absorb visible light to generate electron–hole pairs (reaction (1)). In fact, the photogenerated electrons instantly transfer from the CB of BiVO4 to the carbon atoms of graphene (reaction (2)). Simultaneously, these electrons on the surface of graphene can be captured by the adsorbed O2 molecules to produce •O2− (reaction (3)). Meanwhile, the holes on the surface of BiVO4 can be scavenged by the ubiquitous H2O molecules or OH− to yield •OH radicals (reaction (4)). In this case, the RhB molecules can be subsequently destroyed into CO2 and H2O (reaction (5)) by the generated •O2− and OH radicals due to their high activities .
It is noteworthy that holes (h+) can directly react with RhB molecules to generate CO2 and H2O (reaction (6)). Moreover, in order to improve the photocatalytic performance, H2O2 is often added to the dye solution as electronic sacrificial agent. It has been reported that a small amount of H2O2 in the initial dye solution was beneficial for trapping e− to form •OH radicals (reaction (7)) and also inhibiting the recombination of e−/h+ pairs.
7.2. Phenol and its derivatives photodegradation mechanisms
The difference of degradation of phenol and its derivatives from that of degradation of organic dyes is that the intermediate products are usually generated, which are difficult to be completely degraded to CO2 and H2O.
There are at least 20 intermediates (see Figure 12) of phenol photodegradation , the photodegradation process of phenol is hence very complicated. Furthermore, the routes of phenol photodegradation are different under different experimental conditions. Although the active species for phenol degradation are also the •OH, •O2−, O2, and h+, phenol is difficult to be completely destroyed to CO2 and H2O.
For example, Guo et al.  studied degradation of phenol (
Moreover, Devi and Rajashekhar  also proposed a possible phenol degradation mechanism over TiO2 under the conditions of UV light, catalyst dosage = 400 mg/L, phenol concentration = 20 mg/L, and ammonium persulfate (APS) = 100 mg/L), as shown in Figure 14.
Based on a plenty of literature, many possible phenol degradation mechanisms have been proposed. Unfortunately and inevitably, the by-products are always generated. It is noted that the toxicity of the by-products generated in phenol degradation processes may be stronger than phenol itself. Therefore, how to directly convert phenol into harmless products is still a big challenge.
8. Conclusive remarks and prospect
A large number of BiVO4 and its related materials with different morphologies and various structures, such as well-defined morphological BiVO4, porous BiVO4, heteroatom-doped BiVO4, BiVO4-based heterojunction, and supported BiVO4, have been successfully synthesized in the literature. Most of them show good or even excellent photocatalytic performance for the degradation of organic dyes, phenol or its derivatives under the illumination of visible light. The structure–photocatalytic performance relationship of these materials has been established, and the involved photocatalytic degradation mechanisms have been proposed.
Due to severe situations in water contamination, researchers have devoted themselves to resolve these problems. In particular, the photocatalytic technology has attracted more and more attention because of its unique advantages. However, it has still a long way to make photocatalytic technology widely practicable. Therefore, three strategies are suggested to further improve the photocatalytic performance: (i) It is greatly desired to design and fabricate novel and highly efficient photocatalytic materials; (ii) although photocatalytic reaction mechanisms have been studied for many years, it is still difficult to identify the elementary reaction steps, therefore