Open access

Cryopreservation of Embryos and Oocytes of South American Fish Species

Written By

Danilo Pedro Streit Jr., Leandro Cesar de Godoy, Ricardo Pereira Ribeiro, Darci Carlos Fornari, Melanie Digmayer and Tiantian Zhang

Submitted: 12 September 2013 Published: 25 July 2014

DOI: 10.5772/58703

From the Edited Volume

Recent Advances in Cryopreservation

Edited by Hideaki Yamashiro

Chapter metrics overview

2,725 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

1. Introduction

The importance of animal genetic resources for wildlife maintenance as well as farming production has become more and more evident in recent years. Fish stocks are globally threatened mainly due to overfishing and environmental pollution. Cryopreservation of aquatic germplasm brings the possibility of preserving the genome of endangered species, increasing the representation of genetically valuable animals for farming purposes and avoiding genetic losses through diseases and catastrophes.

In fish, successful cryopreservation of semen from many species has been well documented and cryopreserved semen has been used for reproduction of many wild and farmed species. Attempts to cryopreserve fish embryos have been conducted over the past three decades, nevertheless successful cryopreservation protocol for long-term storage still remains elusive.

In this chapter we cover the cryobiology applications on assisted reproduction for fish farming, focused on embryo and oocyte cryopreservation. Our research group has been working in this area for more than 10 years and the chapter shows the main results that we have achieved from researches on embryos cryopreservation. The barriers that have been identified as a hamper for successful cryopreservation and the sensitiveness of tropical fish embryos to low temperature exposure are also detailed here.

Recently, researches have reported that the use of oocytes may offer some advantages when compared to fish embryos, improving the chances of a successful cryopreservation. On this point, the chapter presents the most recent achievements in oocytes cryopreservation from South American fish, new trends and future works on this area.

Advertisement

2. Brazilian aquaculture growth and researches in cryobiology area

The history of Brazilian aquaculture dates back to 1930's when the first scientific studies related to fish farming were carried out by Rodolpho von Ihering [1], however, the farming activities had bit higher impulses only from the 1970's by creation of research center facilities like CEPTA (Center for Research and Training in Aquaculture) and the insertion of academic activities related to aquaculture at universities. From the mid 90's the entry of some private companies boosted the sector, and from the 2000's aquaculture started to represent an important activity of the Brazilian agribusiness.

Fish farming is the sector of the Brazilian animal production industry which has displayed the highest growth in recent years, reaching 544,490 t in 2011, representing an increase of 38.1% compared to its production in 2010 [2]. From the total fish farmed in 2011, about 46% (250,046 t) of the production was from South American species [2].

The growth in fish production has called attention of numerous companies on planning the fish farming development, and biotechnology area has contributed decisively to this. Germplasm cryopreservation brings the possibility of preserving specific species or strains of particular interests, increasing the representation of genetically valuable animals, extending the reproductive life of a particular animal, and avoiding genetic losses through disease, catastrophe, or transfer between locations [3]. In fish farming, the successful cryopreservation of gametes, eggs, and embryos would offer new commercial possibilities, allowing the unlimited production of fry and potentially more robust fish as required by the market [4]. Germplasm cryopreservation also provides a secure method for preserving the genomes of endangered species, having an important role in conservation and preservation of genetic biodiversity of aquatic resources [5].

Research on cryopreservation of gametes and embryos from South American species focused initially on those fish with commercial interest, and more recently has also focused on species which have environmental importance. The first record published in the literature regarding semen cryopreservation from South American species was in 1984 [6] using Prochilodus scrofa=Prochilodus lineatus and Salminus maxillosus. Afterwards, papers started to be published involving other species such as: Rhamdia hilarii [7]; Leporinus silvestrii [8]; Piaractus mesopotamicus [9, 10]. In the 2000's studies on semen from South American species took different lines of research, not only investigating other species such as Leporinus macrocephalus [11], Brycon cephalus [12], Brycon orbygnianus [13], Brycon nattereri [14], but also testing different protocols for semen cryopreservation [15, 16], and assessing fertilizing capability after thawing [17, 18].

In the 2000's researches on cryopreservation of fish embryos began in Brazil, with the first tow thesis performed on the subject in the country [19, 20] and having the first papers published in 2007 (Piaractus mesopotamicus) [21] and in 2008 (Prochilodus lineatus) [22]. Currently, three research groups have been working on fish embryo cryopreservation research: Aquam Group (Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul-UFRGS), PeixeGen Group (Maringá State University-UEM) and the Cryopreservation of Gametes and Embryos of Neotropical Fish Group (Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho-UNESP). However, other groups have started activities in this research area, as NAQUA Group (Federal University of Lavras) and certainly new scientific papers related to this area will begin to be published in the next years.

Advertisement

3. Main difficulties in cryopreserving fish embryos

Fish, reptiles, birds and amphibian embryos contain a considerable amount of yolk and represent a complex multicompartmentalized biological class, whose cryopreservation has constantly failed [22]. Rall [23] pointed out five features that would hinder the cryopreservation of embryos from teleosteans:

  • Cells of great size and a large final size of the embryos: In general, fish embryos are much larger than most mammalian embryos. Compared to a human zygote, which has about 100 µm in diameter, a fish zygote (> 1 mm in diameter) comes to be a thousand times larger. This large size of fish embryos results in a low surface/volume ratio and lower membrane permeability to water and cryoprotectant solutions;

  • Distinct osmotic properties for each compartment of the embryo: the complex membrane structures hamper considerably the transport between each other;

  • Chorion: the low permeability of this membrane envelope makes it almost impassable;

  • High sensitivity at low temperatures: fish embryos are too sensitive to sub-zero temperatures exposure.

Within this context, several studies have been carried out in order to overcome the pointed difficulties: Microinjection of cryoprotectants directly into the cytoplasm [24], use of negative pressure to increase permeability of the cryoprotectant agents (CPAs) [25], chorion removal [26] and microinjection of anti-freeze proteins (AFPs) [27]. AFPs are a class of polypeptides produced by certain vertebrates, plants, fungi and bacteria that permit their survival in subzero environments. AFPs bind to small ice crystals to limit the growth to manageable sizes. Application of hydrostatic pressure [25, 28-31] was also tested. Nevertheless, all these attempts have failed. Some researchers state that precise knowledge of embryo-permeability would be one of the keys for designing and achieving a successful cryopreservation protocol.

Advertisement

4. Results achieved according to the cryopreservation technique employed

The initial focus of the earlier studies on cryopreservation of South American fish embryos was to assess the embryo sensitivity to different CPAs and exposure times, as well as the best stage of embryonic development to be used. As there was no reference to undergo cryogenic experiments with embryos of South American fish species, the initial studies were based on researches using Cyprinus carpio [29] and Danio rerio [28].

In early tests it was identified that for embryos of South American species, the intermediate stages of development, post-morula 8 hours post fertilization (hpf) were less susceptible to injuries caused by CPAs [20]. Methanol, dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and ethylene glycol as permeating and sucrose as non-permeating CPAs led to better results, then started to be used to compose protocols of further researches [19, 20].

4.1. Chilling

To the South American species, designing a practical and efficient chilling protocol was the main objective attempted by the research teams. Unlike freezing technique where specific cooling rates can be achieved by using liquid nitrogen (LN), and once frozen in liquid nitrogen samples can be stored for extended periods of time; the chilling technique consists of exposing cryoprotected fish embryos to subzero temperatures (normally using a refrigerator) followed by short storage periods [32, 33]. This method can be very useful for hatchery management since it allows synchronizing the development of embryos collected from different spawning events and may optimize the use of hatchery facilities, especially in remote areas where facilities are very limited.

We chilled Piaractus mesopotamicus embryos using a chilling solution composed by 0.5 M (17.1%) sucrose and 2.81 M (9%) methanol for six hours at-8 °C, which resulted in a hatching rate of 69.2% [21]. The same protocol was used for other South American fish embryos, achieving good results as for Brycon orbygnianus with hatching rate above 62% [34], Rhinelepis aspera upper 50% [35] (Figure 1), for Salminus brasiliensis with hatching rate of 67.06 % [36], and for Colossoma macropomum achieving a hatching rate of 77.6% [36].

Figure 1.

(A) Rhinelepis aspera embryos at blastoporous closing stage (75% epiboly movement) 9 h post-fertilization and (B): newly hatched larva of Rhinelepis aspera after exposure to a short-term cooling protocol carried out by Fornari et al. [35]. Digital images (7.2 megapixels) obtained by using a stereomicroscope. A: ×30 magnification. B: ×10 magnification.

Increasing the exposure time of embryos to chilling was a study carried out by Digmayer [37] with Piaractus mesopotamicus. In this study the author increased the sucrose concentration from 0.5 to 0.73 M and methanol concentration was also increased from 2.81 to 3.12 M. There was reported some hatching rate within 24 hours exposure, but not after 36 hours.

Lopes et al. [38] using the protocol set by Digmayer [37] assessed the chilling of Piaractus mesopotamicus embryos at four stages of development and confirmed to be the post-morula stage (8 hpf) as the best one in terms of hatching rate.

The exposure time (3, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 hours) was also tested to embryos of another South American species, Prochilodus lineatus, using the standard chilling protocol (0.5 M sucrose and 2.81 M methanol) employed by Streit Jr. et al. [21]. In this study, it was possible to estimate that at every hour under chilling the hatching rate decreased by 6.58% and after 12 hours none larvae hatched.

The embryos of Piaractus mesopotamicus were exposed by Fornari et al. [33] to-8 °C for 6, 12, and 24 hours, using a fixed methanol concentration of 2.81 M combined with different sucrose concentrations (0.25, 0.50, 0.75 and 1 M). There was no influence among the cryoprotectant combinations on the hatching rate up to 12 hours chilling, except for the treatment combining 2.81 M methanol with 0.99 M sucrose, in which no larvae hatched after this exposure time.

The combination of permeating and non-permeating cryoprotectants can be a research line that may produce good results. Working with Brycon orbignyanus Paes [39] exposed the post-morula stage embryos to a chilling solution composed by 0.5 M sucrose and methanol (2.81, 1.40 and 0.94 M), ethylene glycol (1.45, 0.72 and 0.48 M), and DMSO (1.15, 0.57 and 0.38 M) at tow controlled temperatures (0.0 and 8.0 °C) for 6, 10, 24, 72 and 168 hours. According to the author, the best result was observed when combining 1.4 M methanol and 0.57 M DMSO associated with 0.5 M sucrose, independent of the tested temperature. According to Milliorini [39] Brycon orbignyanus embryos are less sensitive to chilling than Salminus brasiliensis embryos. This is another important aspect, the range of sensitivity from some South American fish species when exposed to low temperatures.

Results obtained from these researches on embryos cryopreservation by chilling have great importance and can help in developing a successful freezing protocol which would allow preserving embryos for longer periods.

4.2. Freezing

The knowledge on developmental stage which South American fish embryos are less sensitive to cryoprotectants and low temperature exposure was the starting point to initiate the studies on embryos freezing in Brazil. The choice by intermediate stages of development, morula and post-morula (8hpf) was based on information reported by Gwo et al. [41], when working with red drum (Sciaenopus ocellatus) found that embryos at morula stage showed higher resistance to chilling than the eight-cell stage (embryos at earlier stages) and gastrula (embryos at later stages). Ninhaus-Silveira et al. [22] reported that Prochilodus lineatus embryos at morula stage were more resistant than those which had between 4 and 6 somites. This information corroborated the observation made by Streit Jr. [20] pointing 8hpf as the embryonic stage that best survived to exposure to different cryoprotectants.

Pre-cooling in cell cryopreservation is essential for the success of the process. When the cooling is sufficiently slow, cells are able to lose water rapidly by osmosis, tolerating dehydration and maintaining the equilibrium of the water chemical potential of the intracellular and extracellular solutions [42]. However, the author shows that even then the exposure of cells to cryoprotectant solution causes an osmotic stress, which depending on the concentration, time and temperature of exposure to the solution can lead the cell to collapse. On the other hand, if cooling is too fast, the chemical potential of water and extracellular solution decreases faster than the intracellular water, resulting in remaining intracellular water that eventually will form intracellular ice crystals, which are often lethal to cells [3].

Lopes et al. [43] using the protocol set by Digmayer [37] tested three cooling curves for Piaractus mesopotamicus embryos at post-morula stage (8hpf) at-8 °C and concluded that 1 °C/s is better than 0.5 °C/s and 35 °C/s. This result corroborates the observations made by Zhang et al. [30] with embryos of the model species Danio rerio and testing the effect of slow (1 °C/min), intermediate (30 °C/min) and fast (300 °C/min) cooling curves, using methanol as cryoprotectant.

Likewise studies with other fish species, successful results for long-term storage of South American fish embryos is still remains elusive. However, researches have been focused on trying to understand the extent of injuries in embryonic tissue during the freezing process. In the freezing protocol tested for Prochilodus lineatus by Ninhaus-Silveira et al. [22], it was possible to observe some evidences of the problems caused by freezing. Although authors have found intact blastoderm, after scanning microscopy analysis they verified nuclei with disorganized chromatin and cracks in the plasma membrane, which compromised the microvilli, causing embryo death.

Piaractus mesopotamicus embryos were exposed by Neves et al. [44] to six freezing protocols: 0.1 M sucrose plus ethylene glycol (1.20, 1.61 and 2.09 M) or methanol (2.18, 3.12 and 4.06 M). After thawing the chorion was observed to be broken and missing blastoderm in all treatments, which was crucial to the embryos death.

4.3. Vitrification

Vitrification was first developed by Rall and Fahy [45] to overcome the problems of intracellular ice formation and has the advantage of minimize the procedure time and eliminate the need for a programmed freezing machine. Vitrification is the solidification of a liquid brought about not by crystallization but by an extreme elevation in viscosity during ultra-rapid cooling rates [4].

Figure 2.

Scanning electron micrograph of Colossoma macropomum embryo after exposure to a vitrification protocol carried out by Fornari [46]. (A): embryo displaying intact chorion; (B): embryo with manually removed chorion, displaying damaged blastoderm; (C): embryo at blastoporous closing stage displaying cell injuries.

Vitrification of Colossoma macropomum embryos (8hpf) was carried out by Fornari [46] using methanol, DMSO, ethylene glycol and glycerol at concentrations of 10, 20 and 30%. Although hatching did not happen, when using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (Figure 2), it was noted that the embryos exposed to methanol treatments had the chorion and some cellular structures preserved.

Advertisement

5. Cryopreservation of fish oocytes

Sensitivity of fish oocytes and embryos to low temperatures exposure is specific for each species and for each cell types [30, 31]. The assessment of damages caused by cryopreservation is of great importance as it can be used to characterize the intensity of cell damage, which can incapacitate the cells to overcome such injuries and eventually lose their viability [47].

The difficulties in cryopreserving fish embryos, previously reported in this chapter seem to be reduced when dealing with oocytes due to its smaller size and less sensitivity to low temperature and CPAs exposure, besides the absence of fully formed chorion, which makes them more permeable to water and solutes. Fish oocytes have some advantages over other species, especially at early stages of development [4, 48, 49].

Recently, Digmayer [50] assessed the sensitivity of Colossoma macropomum oocytes by exposing to cryo-solutions containing 1.6 M methanol and two concentrations (0.25 and 0.50 M) of non-permeating cryoprotectants (glucose, sucrose, trehalose and fructose) using a slow cooling protocol (1 °C/min until seeding), following storage in liquid nitrogen. After thawing, in the protocol consisting of 1.6 M methanol and 0.25 M sucrose it could be observed oocytes with intact zona radiata (Figure 3); however a displacement of this structure from the oocyte membrane was also observed. None fertilization success was achieved.

Figure 3.

Morphological structure of Colossoma macropomum oocytes after exposure to a slow cooling protocol carried out by Digmayer [50]. (A and B): yolk (y) and yolk granules (ygr) heterogeneous in size; (C): zona radiata (zr) displacement. Oocytes were stained with hematoxylin and floxin.

Digmayer [50] also worked with Piaractus brachypomus oocytes at room temperature (28.4 ºC) combining methanol (1.6 and 3.1 M) and DMSO (0.7 and 1.3 M) with 0.25 M sucrose diluted in 50% L-15 medium or Hanks' solution. In this study, the least toxic combination of CPAs was 1.6 M methanol with 0.25 M sucrose diluted in Hanks' solution, which allowed that 17.3% of those oocytes after being fertilized developed into a health larva.

Studies on cryopreservation of South American fish oocytes are too recent and several points should be further clarified in order to help in achieving a successful cryopreservation protocol in the future.

Advertisement

6. Germplasm banking and genetic improvement programs in fish farming

In Brazil the use of gene banks starts driving to a professionalism level and an example serves very well to illustrate this situation. The use of a germplasm bank was crucial to the operation of the first genetic improvement program for native fish species created in the country. The important increase of aquaculture led the Brazilian government to create a national program for research and development of aquaculture, named AQUABRASIL. Among the AQUABRASIL's research areas, the genetic improvement program (GIP) for two South American native species tambaqui (Colossoma macropomum) and cachara (Pseudoplatystoma reticulatum) has been considered as great importance. It is important to highlight that this genetic improvement program was developed based on a similar program carried out by the World Fish Center (Malaysia) and implemented for tilapia in Brazil in 2005.

In the first four years of the GIP, the genes supplier populations were identified and the families were formed, for later fingerlings production. The semen bank enabled the required mobility, since the distances between base populations were higher than 2000 km. Transporting breeders for a long distance would be costly and risky, requiring a logistics that would involve land and air transportation, beyond too time to get the program's deployment and also the possible loss of these specimens. It was much easier to transport cryopreserved semen in liquid nitrogen dewars.

The protocols used for semen freezing were: YEAR 1-Cryopreservation protocol suggested by Carolsfeld et al. [15] for Characidae: DMSO+glucose+egg yolk; and for Siluridae: powder milk+methanol. Egg yolk and powder milk were thereafter replaced by BTS™ (Beltsville Thawing Solution). YEAR 2 and 3-Cryopreservation protocol from studies carried out by Murgas et al. [51] using semen of South American species; YEAR 4-Cryopreservation protocol employed only to composition of C. macropomum families, replacing DMSO by dimethylformamide (DMF), based on studies performed by Varela Júnior et al. [52].

Currently the GIP is still being developed and germplasm bank acts as a reservoir of genetic material for an eventual replacement or change in focus of the desired genetic trait.

Advertisement

7. New trends and future works in the area

Future studies in the area should try to find solutions that allow the cryopreservation of fish embryos. The path for future researches with South American species unfailingly passes through a better understanding of the injuries caused to the cell when exposed to CPAs and sub-zero temperatures in different protocols (slow, rapid or ultra-rapid cryopreservation). Advances in devices development as well as biochemical and molecular techniques can help in elucidating some questions and allow being closer to a successful cryopreservation.

A new research line aims to cryopreserve fish ovarian tissue instead of oocyte or embryo and seems to generate encouraging results. Recently, Godoy et al. [4] using Danio rerio as a model observed that 60% of the membranes of stage III ovarian follicles in tissue fragments remained intact after vitrification. This research line is currently under investigation by our research group involving South American species.

Another point that we should pay greater attention is related to genetic and behavioral changes induced in the larvae, juveniles and even in adult life after being exposed to cryo-solutions. Studies on this subject may lead to changes in cryopreservation procedures, including to other animal species.

Advertisement

Acknowledgments

We thank Boa Esperança Fish Farm (Rondônia-Brazil), Buriti Fish Farm and the "Delicious Fish" Farm (Mato Grosso-Brazil) for the partnership in research. The studies currently under development have been financially supported by CAPES and CNPq via the Science without Borders Program-PVE-Project N° 105/2012.

References

  1. 1. Petrere Júnior M. Setor pesqueiro: análise da situação atual e tendências do desenvolvimento da indústria da pesca. Manaus: IBAMA/PRÓVARZEA 2004; p97.
  2. 2. Ministério da Pesca e Aquicultura. MPA: Boletim Estatístico da pesca e Aquicultura: Brasil 2011. (Accessed 25 January 2014).
  3. 3. Zhang T, Rawson DM, Pekarsky I, Blais I, Lubzens E. Low-temperature preservation of fish gonad cells and oocytes. In: Badin PJ, Cerdà J, Lubzens E. (ed.) The fish oocytes: from basic studies to biotechnological applications. New York: Springer; 2007. p.411-436.
  4. 4. Godoy LC, Streit Jr DP, Zampolla T, Bos-Mikich A, Zhang T. A study on the vitrification of stage III stage zebrafish (Danio rerio) ovarian follicles. Cryobiology 2013; 67(3): 347-354.
  5. 5. Rana K. Preservation of gametes. In: Bromage N, Roberts R. (ed.) Broodstock management and egg and larval quality. Cambridge: Blackwell Science; 1995. p53-75.
  6. 6. Cóser AML, Godinho H, Ribeiro D. Cryogenic preservation of spermatozoa from Prochilodus scrofa and Salminus maxillosus. Aquaculture 1984; 37(4): 387-390.
  7. 7. Fogli Da Silveira W, Kavamoto ET, Narahara MY. Avaliação da qualidade e criopreservação em forma de "pellets" do sêmen de bagre Rhamdia hilarii (Valenciennes, 1840). Boletim do Instituto de Pesca 1985; 12(1): 7-11.
  8. 8. Cóser AML, Godinho HP, Torquato VC. Criopreservação de sêmen do peixe piau, Leporinus silvestrii (Boulonger, 1902). Arquivos Brasileiros de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia 1997; 39(1): 37-42.
  9. 9. Carolsfeld J, Harvey B, Fogli Da Silveira W, Kavamoto ET, Ramos SM, Silveira AN. Criopreservação do sêmen do pacu, Piaractus mesopotamicus (Holmberg, 1887). Boletim Técnico do CEPTA 1990; 3(1): 1-4.
  10. 10. Fogli Da Silveira W, Kavamoto ET, Cestarolli MA, Godinho HM, Ramos SM, Silveira AN. Avaliação espermática, preservação criogênica e fertilidade do sêmen do pacu, Piaractus mesopotâmicus (Holmberg, 1887), proveniente de reprodução induzida. Boletim do Instituto de Pesca 1990; 17(1): 1-13.
  11. 11. Ribeiro RIMA, Godinho HP. Criopreservação do sêmen testicular do teleósteo piau-açu, Leporinus macrocephalus. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia 2003; 55(1): 1-7.
  12. 12. Ninhaus-Silveira A, Foresti F, Silveira RV, Senhorini JA. Seminal analysis, cryogenic preservation, and fertility in matrinxã fish, Brycon cephalus (Günther, 1869). Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology 2006; 49(4) 651-659.
  13. 13. Maria AN, Viveiros ATM, Freitas RTF, Oliveira AV. Extenders and cryoprotectants for cooling and freezing of piracanjuba (Brycon orbignyanus) semen, an endangered Brazilian teleost fish. Aquaculture 2006; 260(1/4): 298-306.
  14. 14. Oliveira AV, Viveiros ATM, Maria AN, Freitas RTF, Isaú ZA. Sucesso do resfriamento e congelamento de sêmen em pirapitinga (Brycon nattereri). Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia 2007; 59(6): 1509-1515.
  15. 15. Carolsfeld J, Godinho HP, Zaniboni-Filho E, Harvey BJ. Cryopreservation of sperm in Brazilian migratory fish conservation. Journal of Fish Biology 2003; 63(2): 472-489.
  16. 16. Viveiros ATM, Oliveira AV, Maria AN, Orfão LH, Souza JC. Sensibilidade dos espermatozoides de dourado (Salminus maxillosus) a diferentes soluções crioprotetoras. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia 2009; 61(4): 883-889.
  17. 17. Orfão LH, Maria AN, Nascimento AF, Isaú ZA, Viveiros ATM. Sperm fertility of the subtropical freshwater streaked prochilod Prochilodus lineatus (Characiformes) improved after dilution and cold storage. Aquaculture Research 2010; 41(4): 241-247.
  18. 18. Nascimento AF, Maria AN, Pessoa NO, Carvalho MAM, Viveiros ATM. Out-of-season sperm cryopreserved in different media of the Amazonian freshwater fish pirapitinga (Piaractus brachypomus). Animal Reproduction Science 2010; 118(2): 324-329.
  19. 19. Ninhaus-Silveira A. Desenvolvimento Embrionário e Preservação Criogênica de embriões do curimbatá, Prochilodus lineatus (Steindachner, 1881) (Teleostei, Prochilodontidae). PhD Thesis. Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho” UNESP; 2004.
  20. 20. Streit Jr DP. Crioprotetores e resfriamento de embriões de pacu (Piaractus mesopotamicus). PhD Thesis. Universidade Estadual de Maringá; 2005.
  21. 21. Streit Jr DP, Digmayer M, Ribeiro RP, Sirol RN, Moraes GV, Galo JM. Embriões de pacu submetidos a diferentes protocolos de resfriamento. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 2007; 42(8): 1199-1202.
  22. 22. Ninhaus-Silveira A. Foresti F, Azevedo A, Agostinho CA, Silveira RV. Cryogenic preservation of embryos of Prochilodus lineatus (Valenciennes, 1836) (Characiforme; Prochilodontidae). Zygote 2008; 17(1): 45.
  23. 23. Rall WF. Recent advances in the cryopreservation of salmonid fishes. In: Cloud JG, Thorgaard GH. (ed.) Genetic conservation of salmonid fishes. New York: Plenum; 1993. p137-58.
  24. 24. Leung LKP, Jamieson BGM. Live preservation of gametes. In: Jamieson BGM. (ed.) Fish evolution and systematics: evidence from spermatozoa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1991. p245-263.
  25. 25. Hagedorn M, Kleinhans FW, Wildt DE, Rall WF. Chill sensitivity and cryoprotectant permeability of dechorionated zebrafish embryos (Brachidanio rerio). Cryobiology 1997; 34(3): 251-263.
  26. 26. Routray P, Suzuki T, Strüssmann CA, Takai R. Factors affecting the uptake of DMSO by the eggs and embryos of medaka (Oryzias latipes). Theriogenology 2002; 58(8): 1483-1496.
  27. 27. Robles V, Cabrita E, Anel L, Herráez MP. Micro injection of the antifreeze protein type III (AFPIII) in turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) embryos: toxicity and protein distribution. Aquaculture 2006; 261(4): 1299-1306.
  28. 28. Zhang T, Rawson DM. Studies on chilling sensitivity of zebrafish (Brachydanio rerio) embryos. Cryobiology 1995; 32(3): 239-246.
  29. 29. Dinnyés A, Urbányi B, Baranyai B, Magyary I. Chilling sensitivity of carp (Cyprinus carpio) embryos at different developmental stages in the presence or absence of cryoprotectants: work in progress. Theriogenology 1998; 50(1): 1-13.
  30. 30. Zhang T, Liu X, Rawson DM. Effects of methanol and developmental arrest on chilling injury in zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryos. Theriogenology 2003; 59(7): 1545-1556.
  31. 31. Valdez Jr MD, Miyamoto A, Hara T, Edashige K, Kasai M. Sensitivity to chilling of medaka (Orysias latipes) embryos at various developmental stages. Theriogenology 2005; 64(1): 112-122.
  32. 32. Ahammad MM, Bhattacharyya D, Jana BB. Hatching of common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) embryo stored at 4 and –2°C in different concentration of methanol and sucrose. Theriogenology 2003; 60(8): 1409-1422.
  33. 33. Fornari DC, Ribeiro RP, Streit Jr DP, Vargas L, Godoy LC, Oliveira CAL, Digmayer M, Galo JM, Neves PR. Increasing storage capability of pacu (Piaractus mesopotamicus) embryos by chilling: development of a useful methodology for hatcheries management. CryoLetters, Luton 2012; 33: 125-133.
  34. 34. Fornari DC, Ribeiro RP, Streit Jr DP, Povh JA, Sirol RN, Barrero NML, Osipi J, Santos AI, Oliveira D. Viabilidade de embriões de piracanjuba Brycon orbignyanus (Valenciennes, 1850) conservados sob baixa temperatura em diferentes soluções crioprotetora. In: Proceedings, Aquaciência 2008, 4th, Maringá: Paraná. Congresso de Aquaciência 2008, cd room. 2008.
  35. 35. Fornari DC, Streit Jr DP, Ribeiro RP, Godoy LC, Neves PR, Oliveira D, Sirol RN. Effect of cryoprotectants on the survival of cascudo preto (Rhinelepis aspera) embryos stored at-8 C. Zygote 2011; 19(1): 1-6.
  36. 36. Fornari DC, Streit Jr DP, Galo JM, Oliveira D, Barrero NL, Povh JA, Ribeiro RP. Viability of embryos of Salminus brasilliensis (Cuvier) cooled in different cryoprotectors solutions. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 2013; 48(8): 1175-1178.
  37. 37. Digmayer M. Viabilidade de embriões de pacu, Piaractus mesopotamicus (Holmberg, 1887), submetidos a -8 °C e, diferentes concentrações de crioprotetores. Dissertation. Universidade Estadual de Maringá; 2010.
  38. 38. Lopes TS, Romagosa E, Streit Jr DP, Ribeiro RP, Digmayer M. Cooling of pacu (Piaractus mesopotamicus) embryos at various stages of development for 6 or 10 hours. Theriogenology 2011; 75(3): 570-576.
  39. 39. Paes MCF. Viabilidade de embriões de piracanjuba (Brycon orbignyanus) submetidos a diferentes protocolos de resfriamento. PhD Thesis. Universidade Estadual Paulista, Centro de Aquicultura; 2013.
  40. 40. Milliorini AB. Resfriamento e congelamento de embriões de dourado (Salminus brasiliensis), piracanjuba (Brycon orbignyanus) e piapara (Leporinus obtusidens). PhD Thesis. Universidade Federal de Lavras; 2012.
  41. 41. Gwo JC, Strawn K & Arnold CR. Changes in mechanical tolerance and chilling sensitivity of red drum (Sciaenopus ocellatus) embryos during development. Theriogenology 1995; 43(7): 1155-1161.
  42. 42. Meryman HT, Williams RT, Douglas MSJ. Freezing injury from “solution effect” and its prevention by natural or artificial cryoprotectant. Cryobiology 1977; 14(3): 287-302.
  43. 43. Lopes TS, Streit Jr DP, Fornari DC, Oliveira D, Ribeiro RP, Romagosa E. Chilling curves for Piaractus mesopotamicus (Holmberg, 1887) embryos stored at −8 C. Zygote 2012; 19(1): 1-6.
  44. 44. Neves PR, Ribeiro RP, Streit Jr DP, Natali MRM, Fornari DC, Santos AI, Godoy LC. Injuries in pacu embryos (Piaractus mesopotamicus) after freezing and thawing. Zygote 2012; 20(1): 1-7.
  45. 45. Rall WF, Fahy GM. Ice-free cryopreservation of mouse embryos at-196 °C by vitrification. Nature 1985; 24: 387-402.
  46. 46. Fornari DC. Criopreservação de embriões de tambaqui (Colossoma macropomum). PhD Thesis. Universidade Estadual de Maringá; 2012.
  47. 47. Carvalho AA, Faustino LR, Castro SV, Figueiredo JR, Rodrigues APR. Caracterização dos danos celulares em gametas femininos e embriões após criopreservação. Acta Scientiae Veterinariae 2012; 40(3): 1046.
  48. 48. Zhang T, Rawson DM. Cryo-conservation in fish: the potentials and challenges. Cryobiology 2007; 55(3): 354.
  49. 49. Tsai S, Lin C. Advantages and applications of cryopreservation in fisheries science. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology 2012; 55(3): 425-433.
  50. 50. Digmayer M. Influência da baixa temperatura e diferentes crioprotetores em oócitos e embriões de Colossoma macropomum e Piaractus brachypomus. PhD Thesis. Universidade Estadual de Maringá; 2013.
  51. 51. Murgas LDS, Miliorini AB, Silva MOB, Franciscatto RT, Maria AN. Viabilidade seminal de piapara (Leporinus obtusidens), empregando-se diferentes diluentes, no resfriamento do sêmen à 4º C. Revista Brasileira de Reprodução Animal 2002; 26(3): 211-213.
  52. 52. Varela Junior AS, Corcini CD, Gheller SMM, Jardim RD, Lucia T, Streit Jr DP, Figueiredo MRC. Use of amides as cryoprotectants in extenders for frozen sperm of tambaqui, Colossoma macropomum. Theriogenology 2012; 78(2): 244-251.

Written By

Danilo Pedro Streit Jr., Leandro Cesar de Godoy, Ricardo Pereira Ribeiro, Darci Carlos Fornari, Melanie Digmayer and Tiantian Zhang

Submitted: 12 September 2013 Published: 25 July 2014