Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Recent Developments in a Radio-labeling of Brassinosteroids

Written By

Aleš Marek

Submitted: 16 November 2016 Reviewed: 15 March 2017 Published: 16 August 2017

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.68584

From the Edited Volume

Phytohormones - Signaling Mechanisms and Crosstalk in Plant Development and Stress Responses

Edited by Mohamed El-Esawi

Chapter metrics overview

1,994 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

The chapter provides a comprehensive overview on methodologies used for radio-labeling of brassinosteroids as one of the newest class of phytohormones. Discussed labeling strategies are lined up in terms of reached specific activities (SA) of brassinosteroids (BRs) as a key parameter for further utilization of such labeled drugs. The chapter is focused on two key natural radio-isotopes (tritium and carbon-14) used for drug tracing in pharmaceutical research.

Keywords

  • brassinosteroids
  • radio-isotope labeling
  • tritium
  • carbon-14

1. Introduction

1.1. Radio-labeling

Radioactive labels used for tracing of studied ligands have long been a part of the biological laboratory repertoire. Radioactivity gives a clear, unmistakable signal, and its use is fairly straightforward. Because of smooth traceability, visualization in organ tissues, quantification (liquid scintillation counting [LSC]), and unsurpassed sensitivity of radio-labeled molecules the radio-labeling is a powerful and practical tool to closely follow accurate mass balance and monitor the fate of a molecule on the molecular level and its biochemically transformed derivatives. Pharmacokinetic studies have traditionally used radio-labeled target compounds as a means for evaluating body absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME) [1, 2]. The use of radioligands is essential tool in binding assays aimed at ligand–receptor structure–activity relationship studies, which however requires high-specific activity (SA—a qualitative parameter) of studied ligands (because of, in general, very low concentration of receptors in tissues). Weak β-emitters such as tritium (3H, T) and carbon-14 (14C) are by far the most versatile and convenient natural labels available [3]. These two isotopes preserve molecular structure (no added tags or pendant groups that alter or change the structure). The advantages of 3H compared to 14C are much higher specific activity, significantly lower cost of starting material, and environment friendly radioactive waste management (shorter half time, Table 1 ). Also, an introduction of radio-isotope in a later stage of synthetic sequence (often in the last step) is a critical benefit in terms of synthetic yield, safety handling, and waste disposal. In general, all above-mentioned issues come out in favor of tritium over carbon-14. On the other hand, a relevant advantage of carbon-14 is lower potential of label loss. Label selection is usually at the discretion of the investigator and studies can be reported using either 3H or 14C label. For instance, tritium label could be applied to earlier stage development studies and then switched to a 14C label for the later stage development studies, for example, an advanced human ADME [4]. Each compound radio-labeled at the non-exchangeable and metabolically stable position need to possess radiochemical purity (RCP) basically over 97%. Instability of all radioligands caused by self-radiolysis requires a need to check a radiochemical purity of studied radio-labeled material before a particular experiment is carried out. Such instability can be significantly suppressed by appropriate storage of labeled material. In general, samples stored at −196°C (Cryoflex-sealed vial immersed in liquid nitrogen) in alcohol-reached medium last over 1–2 years in acceptable quality. Radiochemical purity (RCP) is then usually still over 95%. Samples in such conditions can be often used immediately for biological experiments and no further purification is needed. On the contrary, radio-labeled drugs stored in a refrigerator (+4°C) over 1 year rarely show better than 90% RCP. Foremost advantage of using radio-labeled drugs is that the radioactivity is easily detected and quantified using liquid scintillation techniques in a very low limit of detection (technically <1 Bq/L) [5, 6].

Tritium Carbon-14
Radioactive half-life 12.33 years 5730 years
Specific activity–labeled drugs (1 atom per molecule) 1.066 TBq/mmol 2.309 GBq/mmol
29.1 Ci/mmol 0.0624 Ci/mmol
Specific activity—element 3.56 × 1014 Bq/g 1.66 × 1011 Bq/g
2.57 Ci/mL
Type of radiation (emission probability, %) β (100%) β (100%)
Energy Emax = 18.6 keV
Eavg = 5.7 keV
Emax = 156 keV
Eavg = 49 keV
Maximum penetration air/water(tissue)/glass 6 mm/6 µm/2 µm 24 cm/0.250 um/170 µm
Decay product 3He+ (stable) 14N+ (stable)
Detection and measurement LSC (undetectable by portable survey meters) LSC Geiger-Mueller [10% efficiency]
Shielding None required—not an external radiation hazard None required—mCi quantities not an external radiation hazard

Table 1.

Nuclear characteristics of discussed radio-isotopes.

1.2. Brassinosteroids: a newest class of phytohormones

The entire evolutionary process in plants is regulated by the changes of hormonal concentration, tissue sensitivity, and their interaction during the entire life cycle of plants. One of the most recent groups of phytohormones represents brassinosteroids. They occur at low levels distributed throughout the plant kingdom [7]. The ability of plants to biosynthesize a large variety of such steroids were discovered in 1970 by Mitchell et al. who first from 40 kg of bee-collected rape pollen of Brassica napus L. isolated and characterized a steroidal lactone named brassinolide [8]. Few years later, castasterone was found in insect galls of Castanea crenata spp. Up to date, more than 70 structurally and functionally related polyhydroxylated sterol derivatives are known and this group of compounds has been identified as the natural brassinosteroids (BRs) [9]. All BRs have a 5α-cholestane skeleton, with functional variations due to differences in orientations of oxygenated functions on the skeleton [10, 11].

The highest concentration of BRs in plants is detected in the reproductive organs (pollen and seeds; 1–100 ng/g). They were also detected in other plant organs from roots to leaves. They are involved in various kinds of regulatory actions on growth and development, that is, stimulation of cell expansion, cell division, stress tolerance, accretion of biomass, yield and quality of seeds, and plant adaptability [9]. The metabolism of nucleic acids and proteins and the gene expression is changed by BRs at the molecular level.

The extremely high activity of brassinosteroids has attracted the attention of many specialists in the field of analytical and synthetic chemistry, biochemistry, plant physiology, and agriculture. Recently, it has been reported that some natural BRs have (besides early reported, e.g., antibacterial, antiviral, antifungal, and neuroprotective) potent cell growth inhibitory activities in animal and human cancer cell lines without affecting the normal cell growth (BJ fibroblasts) [12, 13]. The presence of a lactone or ketone moiety in ring B and diol functions (2α, 3α- and 22R, 23R-) turned out to be an essential factor for high biological activity of such BRs ( Figure 1 ).

Figure 1.

24-epiBL (1) is the 24-(R)-epimer of the first isolated brassinosteroid, 24-epiCS (2), 28-homoCS (3).

This chapter is engaged in the recent developments in the synthesis of 3H- and 14C-radio-labeled analogs of the brassinolide.

Advertisement

2. Synthesis of tritium-labeled BRs

2.1. BRs with very high SA of tritium (~99 Ci/mmol)

For binding assays, study aimed at ligand-receptor-activity relationship is a high specific activity (SA), a bottom line requirement. The SA of such radio-labeled drugs need to be in scale of tenths of Ci/mmol. This critical precondition used to be an obstacle in the way of BR’s studies for decades. The state-of-art strategy for such a labeling was reported by Marek et al. [14]. The methodology yields tritium-labeled BRs bearing a very high SA of 99.4 and 98 Ci/mmol (approx. 3.4 tritium enrichment per molecule), respectively. Convenient, a six-step synthetic sequence starting with the brassinosteroid to be labeled provides the desired tritium-multi-labeled product in sufficient yield (up to 40 mCi) with satisfactory radiochemical purity (>97%). The work is focused on the 24-[3H]epibrassinolide [3H]-1 and 24-[3H]epicastasterone [3H]-2, both labeled in the side chain of BR skeleton on positions of carbon C-24, -25, -26, and -27 ( Figure 2 ). The labeling strategy is designed to employ a radio-labeling step at the later stage of the synthetic sequence.

Figure 2.

The successful approach for the synthesis of 24-[3H]epiCS and 24-[3H]epiBL with a high SA.

In 1998, Seto et al. described a fairly elegant strategy for the deuterium-multi-labeling of brassinolide in its side-chain [15]. The five-step reaction sequence was started by full protection of hydroxyl groups on the BR. The C-25 carbon was oxidized by freshly generated trifluoromethyldioxirane (TFD) that yielded appropriate hydroxy derivative. Its consecutive dehydration led to a mixture of Δ25(26) and Δ24(25) regiomers in the 65:35 ratio that was possible to separate after deprotection. The deuteration of Δ25(26) regioisomer by deuterium gas catalyzed by Pd/C (1 atm, 25°C, 1 h) yielded [24, 25, 26, 27-2H]brassinolide with 60% deuterium enrichment calculated from MS data. The ratio of the individual multi-deuterated species in the cluster was 2H2:2H3:2H4:2H6:2H7 = 3:8:14:15:60. The basic idea of this methodology for usage at labeling with radioactive isotope tritium was waiting almost for two decades—then 24-[3H]epiBL (1) and 24-[3H]epiCS (2) was synthesized [14].

The protocol of Seto et al. paved the way for the synthesis of an unsaturated precursor for the intended synthesis of 3H-labeled 24-epiCS [15, 16]. First, the 2,3-22,23-bisisopropylidene derivative 4 was prepared in a 96% yield by a reaction of 24-epiCS (2) with 2,2-dimethoxypropane catalyzed by p-toluenesulfonic acid [14]. Having 2,3,22,23-diisopropylidene-24-epicastasterone 4 available, the TFD hydroxylation of C-25 carbon with this particular derivative was studied. Unfortunately, the desired hydroxylation was accompanied by oxidation of alcohol C-3 affording appropriate hydroxyketone. Hence, more resistant 2,3,22,23-tetra-O-acetyl-24-epiCS was prepared. However, its C-25 hydroxylation did not proceed at all under the conditions used for the hydroxylation of 4. Finally, 2,3-di-O-acetyl-22,23-isopropylidene-24-epicastasterone (6) was prepared which upon TFD hydroxylation at low temperature gave 2,3-di-O-acetyl-22,23-isopropylidene-25-hydroxy-24-epiCS (7) in 58% yield ( Figure 2 ). The dehydration of 7 using thionyl chloride in pyridine at 0°C for 30 min afforded a mixture of prevailing (22R,23R,24R)-2α,3α-diacetoxy-22,23-isopropylidenedioxy-24-methyl-5α-cholestan-25-ene-6-one (8) accompanied by its 24-ene regioisomer 9. The separation of unsaturated regioisomers 8 and 9 from each other turned out to be infeasible using various conditions on high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Importantly, it was possible to separate unsaturated derivatives 8 and 9 from 24-epicastasterone derivative 6 by HPLC. This fact eventually enabled the isolation of 261 mCi of (22R,23R,24R)-2α,3α-diacetoxy-22,23-isopropylidenedioxy-24-[24, 25, 26, 27-3H]epicastasterone (10) after the catalytic tritiation of the mixture of the unsaturated derivatives 8 and 9 over Pd/C (10%) in ethyl acetate under carrier-free tritium gas (998 mbar) for 2 h. In one-pot synthesis, derivative 10 was deisopropylinated and deacetylated provided by HPLC purification, 40 mCi of 24-[24, 25, 26, 27-3H]epicastasterone ([3H]-2) with RCP >97% and SAMS = 99.4 Ci/mmol [14].

To get [24, 25, 26, 27-3H]epibrassinolide ([3H]-1), the Baeyer-Villiger oxidation on fully protected 24-[24, 25, 26, 27-3H]epicastasterone 11 was carried out by freshly prepared chloroform solution of trifluoroperoxyacetic acid [30% H2O2 (20 ml), trifluoroacetic acid (100 ml), CHCl3 (1 mL)] cooled to 0°C by an ice bath [14] . The de-isopropylidation of the (22R,23R,24R)-2α,3α-diacetoxy-22,23-isopropylidenedioxy-24-[24, 25, 26, 27-3H]epiBL (11) was carried out by wet FeCl3, afterwards full deacetylation was accomplished by methanol solution of CH3ONa. This conditions was made possible to obtain 3.5 mCi of pure 24-[24, 25, 26, 27-3H]-epiBL ([3H]-1) with RCP > 97% and SAMS = 98 Ci/mmol. The 3H NMR spectra of both [3H]-1 and [3H]-2 show tritium signals in C-25, C-26, and -27, and is in accordance with the determined SA, indicating 3.4 tritium atoms per molecule.

2.1.1. Stability of BRs possessing very high SA

The free BRs with a high SA are extremely sensitive to radiolysis if stored improperly. Authors reported one representative example—when a sample was evaporated to dryness and used for the NMR analysis (DMSO-d 6 ), the signals in 3H NMR spectrum were difficult to assign [14]. Hence, the particular NMR sample was re-checked for purity by radio-HPLC, and indeed, only 12% of activity of desired 24-[24, 25, 26, 27-3H]epiCS ([3H]-2) was left whereas 88% of radioactivity was found in a broaden peak with higher retention on the column ( Figures 3 and 4 ). Nevertheless, authors reported secure procedure to remove chromatographic solvents and formulate the high-SA BRs for application in biochemical experiments. Combined HPLC fractions (each about 2 mL) were first enriched with glycerol (300 mL) (acts as an antioxidant and also prevents risk of getting dryness of labeled samples) and 10 mg of (±)-6-hydroxy-2,5,7,8-tetramethylchroman-2-carboxylic acid (Trolox) (acts as additional antioxidant with no harm in eventual biological experiments) [14]. When methanol and water evaporated on CentriVap, the residual glycerol solution was further diluted with water (2 mL), the radioactivity was determined and the concentration of 24-[24, 25, 26, 27-3H]epiCS ([3H]-2) was afterwards adjusted to 1 mCi/mL with a glycerol/water (1:1) mixture. The concentration of Trolox in the final formulation needed to be adjusted to 0.5%. For maximal stability of prepared samples, storage of 1 mCi aliquots in liquid nitrogen is recommended.

Figure 3.

HPLC radiodetector chromatogram of [3H]-2 after purification.

Figure 4.

HPLC radiodetector chromatogram; fast decomposition of [3H]-2 when handled improperly - after its simple evaporation to dryness and storage in DMSO-d 6 overnight.

2.2. BRs with reasonable high SA of tritium

2.2.1. Reductive tritium-dehalogenation of generated chlorocarbonates (6 Ci/mmol)

To get polyhydroxylated steroid regio- and enantio-specifically labeled on the un-exchangeable position of C-3, a general procedure can be effectively used ( Figure 5 ) [17]. A suitable precursor for the introduction of tritium, 3β-chloro-2,3-carbonate derivative, is synthetically affordable by a short-reaction sequence from a 2α,3α-dihydroxy steroid to be labeled ( Figure 6 ) [18]. Chlorocarbonate undergoes reductive tritium dechlorination catalyzed by the [Pd0]/Et3N system, providing 28-[3β-3H]homoCS, 24-[3β-3H]epiCS, and 24-[3β-3H]epiBL, respectively, in good yield and with high SA (5.8 Ci/mmol; 0.2 tritium per molecule) ( Figure 5 ) [19]. A crucial aspect in the reductive dehalogenation of the chloro derivative is the choice of a solvent that would provide a reasonable yield [17]. The optimized reaction conditions turned out to be PdO/CaCO3 (5%)/Et3N/chlorocarbonate (2:6:1) dissolved in dry EtOAc for all investigated steroids. The successful 3H-labeling experiments have proven the stereo selectivity of the reductive dehalogenation and afforded a product with high specific activity (5.8 Ci/mmol).

Figure 5.

Tritium Pd-catalyzed reductive dehalogenation; (i) T2/PdO/CaCO3/Et3N; (ii) Fe(III), CH2Cl2; (iii) NaOH, 1,4-dioxane; (iv) H2O2/TFA, 0°C, 30 min, r.t., 4 h, CHCl3.

Figure 6.

Reaction sequence of the synthesis of 24-[3H]epiCS; [3H]-2.

The synthetic procedure starts with transformation of the vicinal 2α,3α-diols of appropriate BR to α-hydroxy ketone by oxidation with a freshly generated dimethyldioxirane (DMD). Such α-hydroxy ketone moiety proved to be an excellent substrate for high-yield enantiospecific formation of 3β-chloro-2,3-carbonate by a reaction with easy-to-handle triphosgene. The key substrate for reductive dechlorination—3β-chloro-2,3-carbonate—was synthesized by a three-step reaction sequence in an overall yield of 46–55% ( Figure 6 ; representative synthesis of 24-[3H]epiCS). To improve the solubility of the starting steroid (to be labeled) in a non-polar solvent, 2,3- and 22,23-vicinal diols were protected. The isopropylidation of both vicinal diol groups by 2,2-dimethoxypropane (10 eqv.) catalyzed by p-toluenesulphonic acid in dry CH2Cl2 turned out to be an elegant protecting strategy. Full conversion was reached in 30 h and the pure product 4 was isolated. Acetonide 4 was further oxidized at the position of C(3)-OH by freshly synthesized dimethyldioxirane (DMD) [20]. The reaction carried out in CH2Cl2 overnight at 4°C in dark afforded the desired α-hydroxy ketone 13 accompanied by its regioisomer 3-hydroxy ketone, in a ratio of 10:1 in favor of isomer 13. In general, α-hydroxy ketone 13 is supposed to be isolated in a higher yield when the oxidation of 2,3-unprotected diols takes place; a selective deprotection of acetonide by Ce(NH4)2(NO3)6 in borate buffer followed by the DMD oxidation of the vicinal 2,3-diol group used to provide a higher overall yield of about 5% [21]. However, in the case of the 28-HCS derivative, a partial deprotection-oxidation reaction sequence afforded a drop of an isolated yield of about 15% compared to direct oxidation of the protected derivative. The 3β-chloro-2,3-carbonate 14 was synthesized by a stereospecific reaction of 13 with triphosgene in dry benzene providing a quantitative yield in 3 h ( Figure 7 ).

Figure 7.

Mechanism of enantiospecific formation of 3β-chloro-2,3-carbonate derivatives of BR.

The catalytic reductive dehalogenation of BR–chlorocarbonates was studied with deuterium in the system of 2H2/Pd[0]/Et3N providing appropriate 3β-deutero-2,3-carbonates with 70–80% deuterium enrichment (based on 1H NMR) at the C-3 position and with an isolated yield of up to 65% (initially on a cheap pregnane analog available in multi-game scale). The best results for deuterium dehalogenation were achieved with the molar ratio of PdO/CaCO3(5%)/Et3N/chlorocarbonate being 2:6:1 for every BR derivative at a short period of time (6 h). When the amount of the base was too high, it diminished the yield of [2H]-labeled ethylene carbonate. Various catalysts such as Pd/C (either 5 or 30%), PdO/BaSO4 (10%) used for reduction yielded lower yield of desired carbonate (15–19%). Authors disclosed very significant solvent effect with an impact on the isolated yield as well as the by-products formation. Briefly, the best results provided EtOAc (dry), giving up to a 65% yield of labeled carbonate with 80% 2H-enrichment. Other solvents used for reduction provided both low conversion and isolated yield of carbonate (0–19%). Androstane chlorocarbonate employed for reductive dehalogenation under similar condition as for pregnane analog provided analogous results (58% yield, 75% 2H-enrichment at C-3). Surprisingly, in addition to desired labeled carbonate two by-products were detected, isolated, and afterwards characterized in that experiment—the multi-labeled ketone and the multi-labeled alcohol, both in the yield of 15%. The reaction course toward formation of both by-products was further accelerated while protic solvent (MeOH) was used in the reaction [43% (ketone) and 40% (alcohol)]. The reaction conditions used for the labeling of 24-epiCS were the same as described above for the other two steroids. A full conversion of appropriate chlorocarbonate was obtained after a 6-h reaction [PdO/CaCO3 (5%)/Et3N/substrate 2:6:1] in dry EtOAc. The isolated yield of labeled carbonate was determined to be 31% [D/H at C-3 = 70:30]. Both the by-products, ketone (20%) and alcohol (13%), were isolated too. The use of DMF as solvent reduced the conversion of chlorocarbonate to 45%, the yield of labeled carbonate down to 19% and the formation of by-products to 11 and 10%, respectively.

As was already mentioned, traces of water (partly synthesized by the reduction of PdO with D2 gas) play a crucial role in the suggested mechanism of by-product formation ( Figure 8 ) [17]. The initial oxidative addition of in situ generated Pd[0] into the chlorocarbonate C(3)-Cl bond forms an organopalladium compound 16. Such palladium could be partly substituted by traces of water to form appropriate hydroxyl carbonate 17, which afterwards undergoes ring opening, leading to ketone 18. Unsaturated ketone 19 is formed by an elimination of carbonic acid from ketone 18 (Pathway A), which could be in situ reduced by a system of D2/Pd[0] providing 1,2-deuterium-labeled ketone 20 and 21, respectively. The other discussed pathway (B) involves an elimination of carbon dioxide, affording α-hydroxyketone, and the subsequent elimination of H2O leading to 19. Authors declare a statement that theoretical pathway B was not supported by any analytical findings. First, the α-hydroxyketone was not detected in the reaction mixture. Moreover, the single experiment using synthesized α-hydroxyketone and reaction conditions simulating conditions used for reductive deuterium dehalogenation, yielded ultimately 2α,3β-dihydroxy-3α[2H] derivative in an isolated 85% yield and no other product was identified in the reaction mixture. In advance, the absolute configuration at C-2 and C-3 of 2α,3β-dihydroxy derivative was confirmed by was confirmed by X-ray analysis affording ORTEP diagram. A regular ESI-MS analysis of 20 and 21 measured in CH3OH has confirmed the structure of multi-labeled ketones with the distribution of deuterium 1D/2D being 70:30. The second by-product, multi-labeled alcohols 22 and 23, are most likely formed by a Pd-catalyzed reduction of the ketones 20 and 21 by D2. The structure of 22 and 23 was confirmed by 1H NMR as well as ESI-MS with a deuterium distribution 1D/2D/3D being 10:50:40.

Figure 8.

Mechanism of multi-labeled by-products formation.

In view of the favorable results of deuterium experiments, this protocol was followed using tritium gas. Tritium dehalogenation experiment was designed following the optimized reaction conditions [PdO/CaCO3 (5%)/Et3N/substrate 2:6:1, dry EtOAc]. 3H-labeled 24-epiCS and 24-epiBL, was synthesized when the appropriate 3β-chloro-2,3-carbonate 14 was used for a reaction with carrier-free tritium gas (600 mbar), PdO/CaCO3 (5%), and in presence of base Et3N. The reaction proceeded at 25°C for 17 h ( Figure 6 ). The reduction yielded 5.9 mCi of the desired 3H-labeled carbonate 15, and two further unidentified by-products (21.3 and 12.4 mCi) were detected. By 1H NMR was determined a specific activity of 15 at 5.8 Ci/mmol (which accounts for 0.2 tritium atom per molecule). Compared to previous deuterium comprehensive study, the obtained tritium enrichment was lower than expected. Authors speculate that the significant drop in SA was caused by the reduced pressure of tritium gas (600 mbar 3H2) compared to deuterium gas (950 mbar of 2H2) used for the reduction. The only signal in the 3H NMR spectrum (the singlet at δ 4.8 ppm) explicitly determined the regio- and stereo-specificity of the reduction. The deprotection of the isopropylidene group in the side chain was carried out by wet FeCl3 in CH2Cl2. The last step—hydrolysis of 3H-labeled carbonate 15—was accomplished by NaOH (0.5 M) in 1,4-dioxane (1:1). Desired [3H]-2 (3.8 mCi, 5.8 Ci/mmol) was purified by preparative radio-HPLC. Aliquot of [3H]-2 was further employed for Baeyer-Villiger oxidation leading to [3H]-1 (0.3 mCi, SA 5.8 Ci/mmol).

The SA of isolated [3H]-2 was about four times lower than was predicted based on the previous comprehensive deuterium-using study. To further investigate the influence of a metal catalyst on the SA and the yield of the labeled product, it was considered the use of the Pd[0] catalyst instead of the Pd[II]O catalyst, where the generation of Pd[0] is accompanied by the formation of tritiated water. The suggested mechanism of the by-products formation explained how the traces of water significantly reduce the yield of the labeled product desired ( Figure 8 ). Hence, to suppress synthesis of multi-labeled by-products Pd on charcoal was employed at synthesis of 28-[3β-3H]homocastasterone [19]. The catalyst/base/substrate ratio for the tritium experiment was kept identical to the previous experiment of the tritium labeling of 24-epiCS—2:6:1. Carrier-free tritium released over the reaction mixture (738 mbar, 11.5 Ci, 180 μmol) was left to react for 24 h at room temperature. Then, the analytical radio-HPLC proved the formation of the desired 3H-labeled carbonate (13.3 mCi) and two other by-products (42.8 and 24.7 mCi) were detected. The SA of 3H-carbonate was determined by 1H NMR as 5.8 Ci/mmol (based on the decrease of the corresponding 1H signal intensity in the labeled position). The deprotection of the 22,23-isopropylidene group by treatment with wet FeCl3 in CH2Cl2 was completed within 10 min. The crude 3β-tritio-2,3-carbonate was directly hydrolyzed by 0.5 M aqueous NaOH in 1,4-dioxane. The crude product was purified on the semi-prep radio-HPLC, affording 5.3 mCi of [3H]-(3) of SA 5.8 Ci/mmol with radiochemical purity (RCP) >97%. Both by-products were isolated, and 3H and 1H NMR measured. The structure of multi-labeled by-products is believed to be similar to those that were recently described ( Figure 9 ) for androstane and 24-epiCS (i.e., labeled 24-epityphasterol and 3-dehydro-24-epiteasteron, respectively) derivatives. In this case, these by-products are supposed to be 22,23-isopropylidene-protected multi-labeled [1, 2, 3-3H]-28-homotyphasterol and [1, 2-3H]-3-dehydro-28-homoteasterone derivatives ( Figure 9 ).

Figure 9.

Multi-labeled by-products.

2.2.2. Catalytic reduction of 24-methylene BRs (SA = 2 Ci/mmol)

An elegant and fast strategy to get BRs labeled by tritium was briefly communicated by Yokota et al. [22]. [3H]-BRs synthesized on demand at Amersham International (Amersham, UK) were used for comparative analysis in stems and seeds by radioimmunoassay. The labeling strategy was based on platinum-catalyzed reduction of 24-methylene position of available BR (dolichosterone and dolicholide) in carrier-free tritium atmosphere ( Figure 10 ). Reduction of dolichosterone afforded two epimers 24-[24, 28-3H]castasterone (8.1 mCi, SA = 2.2 Ci/mmol) and 24-[24, 28-3H]epicastasterone [3H]-(2) (6.5 mCi, SA not determined), respectively, which were then separated on HPLC. Analogically, reduction of dolicholide provided 24-[24, 28-3H]brassinolide (10.6 mCi, SA = 2.3 Ci/mmol) and 24-[24, 28-3H]epibrassinolide [3H]-(1) (4.0 mCi, SA not determined). Authors stated unexpectedly low SA of gained products (theoretical SA was supposed to be over 40 Ci/mmol). Detailed synthetic procedure and analysis were not reported.

Figure 10.

Metal-catalyzed 24-methylene BR tritiation.

2.3. BRs with very low SA of tritium (10−3 Ci/mmol)

Tritium-labeled protected 24-epiCS and 24-epiBL [3H]-1 were for the first time prepared by Kolbe et al. [23]. By very simple procedure of base-catalyzed exchange reaction with tritiated water (SA = 20.10−3 Ci/mmol—accounts for 0.7 × 10−3 tritium atom per molecule HTO) to the enolizable alpha positions of C-6 ketone of tetracetate 24-epiCS 27 ( Figure 11 ). By this method, it is theoretically possible to exchange hydrogen on three distinctive positions (C-5α, C-7α, and C-7β). However, the obtained SA of BRs was very low (6.10−3 Ci/mmol), about 3-4 orders lower than that provided by methods described above. Because of low SA of such prepared material cannot be used in receptor studies at all. The other drawback of this procedure is chemical exchangeability of labels, which inevitably leads to loss of label in protic solvents (water) during biological experiments and disqualifies this approach from use in ADME studies. Three-step reaction sequence provided 24-[5, 7, 7-3H]epiBL with SA 6.10−3 Ci/mmol; labeling step leading to protected 24-[3H]epiCS 27, followed by a Baeyer-Villiger oxidation with CF3COOOH and sequence was accomplished by hydroxy group deprotection [20] . The same sequence was also performed with 2,3,22,23-bis-isopropylidenedioxy-24-epiCS 29 as starting compound. The advantage of the use of isopropylidene protecting groups over acetate group is the deprotection step. The lactone ring is stable under acidic hydrolysis conditions used for isopropylidene deprotection, which occurs simultaneously with Baeyer-Villiger oxidation. The basic hydrolysis needed for the acetate group cleavage leads to lactone hydrolysis and acid catalyzed re-lactonization is needed ( Figure 11 ).

Figure 11.

Low SA possessing 24-[3H]-epiBL.

A base-catalyzed exchange was used for labeling of biogenetic brassinosteroids precursors [24]. 24-[5, 7, 7-3H]epiteasterone (SA = 1.5 10−3 Ci/mmol), 6-oxo-24β-methyl-22-dehydro[5, 7, 7-3H]cholestenol (SA = not indicated), and 6-oxo-24-[5, 7, 7-3H]epicampestanol (SA = 3.5 10−3 Ci/mmol ), respectively, were partly labeled on positions of C-5 and C-7 by reaction in sealed ampoule with tritiated water (SA = 14.10−3 Ci/mmol—accounts for 0.5 × 10−3 tritium atom per molecule HTO) in presence of base Et3N ( Figure 12 ). As mentioned above this simple methodology affords poor SA (in order of 10−3 Ci/mmol) of BRs labeled on an exchangeable positions thus prone to loss of label later on. On the other hand, this approach provides high yield (>45%) of desired material.

Figure 12.

24-[3H]epiteasterone and 6-oxo-24-[3H]epicampestanol.

2.4. BRs labeled by carbon-14 (SA = 56.8 × 10−3 Ci/mmol)

Till now, only one report on 14C-labeled brassinosteroids is available in the literature. In 1989, Seo et al. described the synthesis of [14C]-labeled (22R,23R)- and (22S,23S)-epiCS 50 and 51, and epiBL 52 and 53, respectively [25]. The obtained BRs possessed top SA (56.8 × 10−3 Ci/mmol) possible to reach while doing labeling by carbon-14. Because of multi-step synthetic sequence (>10 steps) needed, the reported overall yield of labeled products is 3.2 and 4.5%. The C-4 position in 24-epiBL 52 was selected for [14C]-labeling because of its stability to metabolic loss and easy way to do the preparation. According to the well-established method for 14C incorporation into the C-4 position of steroids, the enol lactone 41 was synthesized from the starting material brassicasterol 36 in five steps ( Figure 13 ). Bridged ketone 42 was prepared from lactone 41 after its treatment with [14C]methyl iodide. Alkaline treatment of 42 provided [4-14C]enone 43. Gentle acid catalyzed acetylation of enone 43 with isopropenyl acetate led to the enol acetate 44 that was afterwards reduced by NaBH4 to give [4-14C]brassicasterol 45. Simple mesylation of 45 afforded 46 which was treated with sodium carbonate providing the major product 3,5-cyclo-6-ol 47 isolated in 92% yield ( Figure 14 ). Jones oxidation of 47 then gave 3,5-cyclo-6-one 48. Rearrangement of 48 moderated by lithium bromide and camphor sulfonic acid in dimethyl acetamide afforded 2,22-diene-6-one 49 in quantitative yield. Oxidation of 49 with osmium tetroxide led to a stereo isomeric mixture of 2,3,22,23-tetraols–24-(22R,23R)-[14C]epiCS 50 and 24-(22S,23S)-[14C]epiCS 51 which were separated. The final Baeyer-Villiger oxidation of ketone C-6 with TFA in dichloromethane afforded the (22R,23R)-7-oxa-lactone 52 accompanied with its 6-oxa isomer 56 as a minor product. Analogically, (22S,23S)-tetraol provided the (22S,23S)-7-oxa-lactone 53 accompanied with its 6-oxa isomer 57. The ultimate products (22R,23R)-24-[14C]epiBL 52 and (22S,23S)-24-[14C]epiBL 53 were isolated in overall 3.20 and 4.46% radiochemical yield (toward Ba14CO3 used as an initial source or radio-label), respectively. SA of prepared BRs was 56.8 × 10−3 Ci/mmol.

Figure 13.

Synthetic pathway to 24-[14C]epiCS and 24-[14C]epiBL.

Figure 14.

Synthetic pathway to 24-[14C]epiCS and 24-[14C]epiBL.

Advertisement

3. Equipment of the radio-isotope laboratory (IOCB)

The author of this chapter is a member of the Radio-isotope laboratory, a service group of the IOCB CAS, working as a synthetic radiochemist in the production of radioactive molecular tracers. The laboratory is classified for handling of the open sources of ionizing radiation in quantities authorized for laboratories of II category according to Czech bylaw 307/2002 Sb for research and development and educational purposes. It is currently authorized to work with the main radioactive isotopes used in research, for example, 3H, 14C, 32P, 33P, 35S, 51Cr, 54Mn, 55Fe, 99Tc and 125I. The main purpose of the laboratory is to provide a series of highly specific facilities, equipment and services fully adapted to researchers’ needs and maintained in optimum conditions, always in line with applicable legislation to ensure that all personnel is fully protected and ensuring the physical safety of the materials used and the environment. The laboratory has an equipment, stuff, and knowledge to cooperate with other chemists and biologists to provide them with custom synthesis of radio-labeled compounds, especially commercially unavailable compounds. Following time-depending stability of synthesized radio-labeled compounds is one of our basic services provided to biologists.

The key instrument of the laboratory is a glove box with tritiation manifold from RC-TRITEC AG (Teufen, Switzerland) suitable for handling 100–1000 Ci of carrier-free tritium gas ( Figure 15 ). Tritiation manifold is based on U-Bed Technology to provide fresh, 3He-free tritium for tritiation by simply heating the UT3-bed, also allowing the recovery of surplus gas after completion of a reaction ( Figure 16 ). During the operation of the manifold, the internal atmosphere of the glove box is continually decontaminated by a scrubber equipped with catalytic oxidation of gaseous tritium to tritiated water, which is trapped on a molecular sieve. 3H NMR measurements were performed on a Bruker Avance II 300 MHz in the laboratory. Liquid scintillation analyser Tri-Carb 2900TR (Perkin Elmer) was used for detecting small amounts of α, β, and γ radioactivity. Mobile contamination monitor CoMo 170 (GRAETZ Strahlungsmeßtechnik GmbH) was used for the high-sensitive and nuclide referred measurement of surfaces with regard to α-, β-, and γ-contaminations when handling ionizing radiation. Analytical -preparative radio-HPLC (pump Waters 600, UV detector Waters 2487, radio chromatogram detector Ramona with analytical cell (LSC) and solid scintillator preparative cell (Raytest, Germany), data management software Empower 2 from Waters). Basic radiation protection equipment and waste disposal management.

Figure 15.

The equipment for safe handling of tritium gas; the tritium manifold (RC-TRITEC AG) placed in the glove box; a scrubber for decontamination placed behind the glove box.

Figure 16.

The equipment for safe handling of tritium gas; the tritium manifold (RC-TRITEC AG) placed in the glove box.

Advertisement

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Czech Academy of Sciences for the financial support within the program RVO: 61388963.

References

  1. 1. Marathe PH, Shyu WC, Humphreys WG. The use of radiolabeled compounds for ADME studies in discovery and exploratory development. Current Pharmaceutical Design. 2004;10(24):2991-3008
  2. 2. Penner N, Klunk LJ, Prakash C. Human radiolabeled mass balance studies: Objectives, utilities and limitations. Biopharmaceutics & Drug Disposition. 2009;30(4):185-203
  3. 3. Voges R, Heys JR, Moenius T. Preparation of The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, United Kingdom. Compounds Labeled with Tritium and Carbon-14. John Wiley & Sons; 2009. pp. 1-21
  4. 4. Krauser JA. A perspective on tritium versus carbon-14: Ensuring optimal label selection in pharmaceutical research and development. Journal of Labelled Compounds and Radiopharmaceuticals. 2013;56(9-10):441-446
  5. 5. Villa-Alfageme M, Manjon G. Low-level measurements of tritium in water. Applied Radiation and Isotopes. 2004;61(2-3):319-323
  6. 6. L’Annunziata MF. Handbook of Radioactivity Analysis. Academic Press; The Boulevard, Langford Lane, Kidlington, UK. 2012. pp. 424-622
  7. 7. Oklestkova J, Rarova L, Kvasnica M, Strnad M. Brassinosteroids: Synthesis and biological activities. Phytochemistry Reviews. 2015;14(6):1053-1072
  8. 8. Grove MD, Spencer GF, Rohwedder WK, Mandava N, Worley JF, Warthen JD, et al. Brassinolide, a plant growth-promoting steroid isolated from Brassica-Napus pollen. Nature. 1979;281(5728):216-217
  9. 9. Bajguz A. Brassinosteroids—Springer Science+Business Media B.V. Van Godewijckstraat Dordrecht Netherlands Occurence and chemical structures in plants. In: Hayat S, Ahmad A, editors. 2011. pp. 1-27.
  10. 10. Bajguz A, Tretyn A. The chemical characteristic and distribution of brassinosteroids in plants. Phytochemistry. 2003;62(7):1027-1046
  11. 11. Bajguz A. Metabolism of brassinosteroids in plants. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. 2007;45(2):95-107
  12. 12. Malikova J, Swaczynova J, Kolar Z, Strnad M. Anticancer and antiproliferative activity of natural brassino steroids. Phytochemistry. 2008;69(2):418-426
  13. 13. Steigerova J, Rarova L, Oklest’kova J, Krizova K, Levkova M, Svachova M, et al. Mechanisms of natural brassinosteroid-induced apoptosis of prostate cancer cells. Food and Chemical Toxicology. 2012;50(11):4068-4076
  14. 14. Marek A, Patil MR, Elbert T. The labeling of brassinosteroids by tritium. RSC Advances. 2015;5(80):65214-65220
  15. 15. Seto H, Fujioka S, Koshino H, Yoshida S, Watanabe T, Takatsuto S. A general approach to synthesis of labeled brassinosteroids: Preparation of 25,26,27-H-2(7) brassinolide with 60% isotopic purity from the parent brassinolide. Tetrahedron Letters. 1998;39(41):7525-7528
  16. 16. Seto H, Fujioka S, Koshino H, Yoshida S, Tsubuki M, Honda T. Synthesis and biological evaluation of extra-hydroxylated brassinolide analogs. Tetrahedron. 1999;55(28):8341-8352
  17. 17. Marek A, Klepetarova B, Elbert T. A facile method for steroid labeling by heavy isotopes of hydrogen. Tetrahedron. 2015;71(29):4874-4882
  18. 18. Marek A, Patil MR, Klepetarova B, Kohout L, Elbert T. A stereospecific pathway for the introduction of deuterium on the brassinosteroid skeleton by reductive dechlorination of chlorocarbonates. Tetrahedron Letters. 2012;53(16):2048-2050
  19. 19. Elbert T, Patil MR, Marek A. Enantiospecific tritium labeling of 28-homocastasterone. J Label Compd Radiopharm. 2017;60(3):176-82. DOI:10.1002/jlcr.3488
  20. 20. Marek A, Klepetarova B, Elbert T. The introduction of a double bond on the steroid skeleton—The preparation of enol silyl ether derivatives from vicinal diols. Collection of Czechoslovak Chemical Communications. 2011;76(5):443-456
  21. 21. Marek A, Klepetarova B, Elbert T. A study of the reactivity of polyhydroxylated sterol derivatives. Asian Journal of Organic Chemistry. 2015;4(8):808-817
  22. 22. Yokota T, Watanabe S, Ogino Y, Yamaguchi I, Takahashi N. Radioimmunoassay for brassinosteroids and its use for comparative analysis of brassinosteroids in stems and seeds of Phaseolus-Vulgaris. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation. 1990;9(3):151-159
  23. 23. Kolbe A, Marquardt V, Adam G. Synthesis of tritium labeled 24-epibrassinolide. Journal of Labelled Compounds and Radiopharmaceuticals. 1992;31(10):801-805
  24. 24. Kolbe A, Schneider B, Voigt B, Adam G. Labelling of biogenetic brassinosteroid precursors. Journal of Labelled Compounds and Radiopharmaceuticals. 1998;41(2):131-137
  25. 25. Seo S, Nagasaki T, Katsuyama Y, Matsubara F, Sakata T, Yoshioka M, et al. Synthesis of (22R,23R) and (22S,23S)-4-C-14-24-epibrassinolide. Journal of Labelled Compounds and Radiopharmaceuticals. 1989;27(12):1383-1393

Written By

Aleš Marek

Submitted: 16 November 2016 Reviewed: 15 March 2017 Published: 16 August 2017