1. Introduction
Cancer of the skin is the most common form of malignancy in humans and is divided into two categories – non-malignant skin cancer and cutaneous melanoma. Non-melanoma skin cancer (basal cell and small cell carcinoma) make up a vast majority of skin cancers. According to data from National Cancer Institute (NCI) in 2012, more than 2 million new cases of non-melanomas will be identified with less than a 1000 deaths. Despite according for only 4% of all cases, melanoma is the deadliest of skin cancers resulting in over 79% of skin cancer deaths [1]. In the United States, melanoma is the fifth most common cancer in men and the sixth most common in women. In 2011, 70,230 new melanoma cases were identified with 8,790 deaths. The median age of diagnosis is between 45-55; although 25% of melanomas occur in individuals over 40 years.
2. Types of skin cancer
Basal Cell Carcinoma (BCC): This is the most common form of skin cancer and accounts for more than 90% of all skin cancers in the United States. BCC causes damage by growing and invading the surrounding tissue and usually does not metastasize to other parts of the body. Intermittent sun exposure (especially early in life), age and light colored skin are important factors in the development of BCC. Approximately a fifth of BCCs, develop in regions that are not sun-exposed such as chest, arms, neck, back and scalp [2]. Weakening of the immune system on account of the disease or immune-suppressive drugs is known to promote the risk of developing BCCs. Usually BCC begins as a small, dome-shaped bump and is covered by small superficial blood vessels called telangiectases and its texture is often shiny and translucent. Hereditary predisposition to BCC [3,4] occurs among individuals with albinism and Xeroderma Pigmentosum. These disorders can be linked to either instability of the skin or diminished pigmentation.
Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC): This cancer begins in the squamous cells that form the surface of the skin, lining of hollow organs of the respiratory and digestive tracts. The earliest form of SCC is called as actinic keratosis (AK) [2] that appear as rough, red bumps on the scalp, face, ears and back of the hands. The rate at which the bumps (keratosis) invade deeper in the skin to become fully developed squamous cell carcinoma is estimated to be 10-20% over a 10 year period. Actinic keratinosis that becomes thicker and more tender could increase the possibility of getting transformed to an invasive squamous cell carcinoma phenotype. The most important risk factor is sun exposure. Lesions appear after years of sun damage in the forehead, cheeks as well as the backs of hands. Other minor factors like exposure to hydrocarbons, arsenic, heat or X-rays could predispose to SCCs. Unlike BCC, SCCs can metastasize to other parts but are easy to treat.
Melanoma: This is the cancer of the melanocytes, the “skin-color producing cells” of the body. An estimated 132,000 new cases of melanoma occur worldwide every year [5,6,7] with approximately 65,161 deaths according to estimates from the World Health Organization (WHO). The high mortality rate of melanoma is remarkably high considering the fact that melanoma is nearly always curable in its early stages; the high mortality rate can be attributed to late diagnosis in which the cancer spreads to other parts of the body [5]. Melanoma incidence has increased more rapidly than that of any other cancer, yet our ability to treat disseminated disease has been lagging [8,9,10]. The predicted 1 year survival for Stage IV melanoma ranges between 41% to 59% [11]. At a very early point in the progression of melanoma, the cancer gains metastatic potential.
3. Risk factors
There are multiple risk factors that contribute to escalating incidence of melanomas in humans (Table 1). Ultraviolet (UV) radiation especially UVA (315-400 nm) and UVB (280-315 nm) from sunlight is an important contributing factor for melanoma progression. A study by Glanz et al [5,12] revealed that 90% of all melanomas are attributed to exposure to ultraviolet radiation.
The damaging effects of UV radiation (UVR) is on account of direct cellular damage and alterations in immunologic functions. UVR causes DNA damage (by formation of pyrimidine dimers), gene mutations, oxidative stress, immunosuppressive and inflammatory responses. All these effects play an important role in photoaging of the skin and predispose to skin cancer [13]. UVR creates mutations in p53, a key tumor suppressor gene that plays an important role in DNA repair and apoptosis. Thus if p53 is mutated, the cells lose the DNA repair process leading to the deregulation of apoptosis, expression of mutated keratinocytes and initiation of skin cancer [13,14]. Darker skinned individuals have lower incidence of cutaneous melanoma primarily as a result of increased epidermal melanin. Studies indicate that epidermal melanin in African-American individuals filters twice as much UVB radiation than in Caucasians. This is on account of the larger, more melanized melanosomes located in the epidermis of dark skin individuals that absorb and scatter more light energy than the smaller, less melanized melanosomes of white skin. The incidence rate of skin cancer (both melanoma and non-melanoma) has increased significantly in the last decade [15]; particularly among young women. For most individuals, exposure to UVR from the sun is the main source of skin cancer. Nonetheless, some individuals are exposed to high UV doses through artificial sources – sunbeds and sunlamps used for tanning purposes. Indoor tanning is widespread in most developed countries in Northern Europe, Australia and the United States [16]. Intense early sunburns and blistering sunburns are closely associated with melanoma development [17,18,19]. Statistics indicate that one severe childhood sunburn is associated with a two-fold increase in melanoma risk [20]. Chronic UV exposure results in increased skin aging, wrinkles, uneven skin pigmentation, loss of elasticity and a distribution in the skin barrier function [21]. Chronic UVR exposure is an important risk factor in the development of actinic keratosis (precursor of SCCs).
UVA UVB |
Xeroderma pigmentosum Oculocutaneous albinism Basal cell nevus syndrome |
X-rays |
Artificial UV radiation (tanning) Smoking Color of skin (having fair skin, especially with blue or hazel eyes) History of precursor lesions Chronically injured or non-healing wounds Working outdoors Increasing age |
|
|
|
|
|
Pten | 10q | Primary & metastatic | [135,136,137] | |
|
p16Ink4a/p14Arf | 9p | Primary & metastatic | [135,136] |
|
Beta-3-endonexin | 1p31 | Uveal | [138] |
Braf | 7q21.3 | Cutaneous | [135] | |
|
cyclinD1 | 11q13 | Acral | [136] |
|
cdk4 | 12q14 | Acral & mucosal | [136] |
|
N-cadherin | 18q | Uveal & metastatic | [137,139] |
|
c-myc | 8q23 | Ocular, primary & metastatic | [135,137,140,141] |
|
Mitf | 3p14 | Cutaneous, metastatic | [142,143] |
4. Roadway to melanoma
Malignant melanomas arise from epidermal melanocytes or the melanocyte precursor cell which are derived from the neural crest and migrate to the skin and hair follicles [22]. Melanoma initiation and progression is accompanied by a series of histological changes. The five distinct changes are: 1) nevus – benign lesion characterized by an increased number of nested melanocytes; 2) dysplastic nevus – which is characterized by random, discontinuous and atypical melanocytes; 3) radial-growth phase (RGP) melanoma where the cells acquire the ability to proliferate intraepidermally; 4) vertical growth phase (VGP) melanoma – characterized by melanoma cells acquiring the ability to penetrate through the basement membrane (BM) into underlying dermis and subcutaneous tissue; and 5) metastatic melanoma – characterized by the spread of melanoma cells to other areas of the skin and other organs. The most critical event in melanoma progression is the RGP-VGP transition which involves the escape from keratinocyte mediated growth control. This is consistent with tumor thickness being a strong predictor of metastatic disease and adverse clinical outcome [23].
|
|
|
|
|
ATM kinase | Cell cycle control, DNA damage response | Melanocytic infiltration | [135,136,137] | |
|
N-cadherin | Cell-cell adhesion | Melanoma invasiveness | [144,145] |
|
Metallo proteinases -1, 2 | Degradation of ECM | Tumor progression | [146] |
|
Osteopontin | Inductor of MMP | Risk of metastasis | [144,147] |
|
Osteonectin | Angiogenesis | Tumor progression | [144] |
|
Wnt5a | Cell signaling | Melanoma invasiveness | [125,148] |
|
Cdc28/cdk1 protein kinase subunit 2 | Cell cycle control | Poor prognosis | [147] |
|
EIF2γ | DNA translation | Tumor progression | [149] |
|
PCNA | Cofactor DNA polymerase | Genome destabilization | [150] |
E-cadherin | Cell-cell adhesion | Tumor progression | [144,145,147] | |
|
P-cadherin | Cell-cell adhesion | Tumor progression | [145,151] |
|
Cadherin-10 | Cell-cell adhesion | High risk of metastasis | [144] |
|
Desmocollin-1 | Desmosomal component | Loss of cell adhesion | [137,139,179] |
Acquisition of somatic mutations in key regulatory genes is the driving force behind the initiation and progression of melanoma development. For the past few decades numerous research teams around the world have researched on melanoma genetics leading to an overwhelming body of information.
5. Susceptibility genes
Approximately 8-12% of all melanomas are familial – occurring in individuals with a history of familial melanoma [24]. Two genes have been found to be associated with high penetrance susceptibility – CDKN2A and CDK4. Using linkage analysis of families with high melanoma incidences, the first melanoma incidence susceptibility gene, CDK2N2A was identified at chromosome 9p21 [25,26]. The gene CDKN2A encodes two unrelated proteins – p16Ink4A and p14Arf. These proteins are tumor suppressors involved in cell cycle regulation. Numerous studies indicate that p16Ink4A inhibits G1 cyclin dependent kinase (cdk4/cdkb) mediated phosphorylation of retinoblastoma protein (pRB) resulting in cell cycle progression arrest through G1-S; while p14 favors apoptosis and blocks oncogenic transformation by stabilizing p53 levels through the inhibition of Mdm2-mediated p53 ubiquitination [27,28,29,30]. Loss of p16 promotes hyper-phosphorylation of pRb resulting in its inactivation while the loss of p14 inactivates p53 — leading to unrestricted cell cycle progression. Germline mutations in CDKN2A have been found in 40% of families with 3 or more family members affected by melanoma [31]. Not all individuals carrying germline CDKN2A mutations develop mutations. Individuals with large numbers of pigment lesions or nevi have familial atypical mole-melanoma syndrome (FAMS) are associated with increased risk to developing melanoma [32,33].
The other melanoma susceptibility gene, CDK4 is located at chromosome 12q14 [34,35,36]. Mutations in CDK4 abrogate binding of cdk4 to p16 have been associated with melanoma pathogenesis [32]. This is evidence that links the entire p16Ink4A-cdk4/cdk6-pRb pathway to melanoma indicating that hereditary retinoblastoma patients with germline inactivation of retinoblastoma (Rb1) are predisposed to melanoma [37,38].
6. Acquired genetic alterations in melanoma
Understanding the regulating pathways involved in melanoma development and progression has advanced significantly in recent years. The discovery of genetic alterations that aids in the formation of various cancers has aided in the development of numerous molecularly targeted therapies for individuals with metastatic disease [39,40,41]. These genes are known to be key molecular driver in melanoma; >70% cases harbor activating mutations in these genes. The molecule that is most commonly found to be mutated in melanomas is BRAF (~50% of all cancers) followed by NRAS (20%) and c-kit (1%) [42,43,44]. Melanoma is the result of complex changes in multiple signaling pathways affecting growth, cell mobility, metabolism and the ability to escape cell death progression. The Ras-Raf-Mek-Erk pathway followed by PI3K/Akt pathway is constitutively activated in a significant number of melanoma tumors.
7. The Ras-Raf-Mek-Erk
In 2002, a breakthrough study found that Braf to be mutated in a large percentage of melanomas – triggering new studies that focus on MAPK (mitogen activated protein kinase) signaling in melanomas. Braf is mutated in upto 82% of cutaneous nevi [45,46], 66% of primary melanomas [44] and 40-68% of metastatic melanomas [47,48]. A specific mutation substitution of valine with glutamic acid at residue 600 (BRAF V600E), account for 90%+ BRAF mutation. Raf, a downstream effector of RAS is a serine-threonine specific protein kinase that activates Mek, which inturn activates Erk. Humans have 3 Raf genes: A-raf, B-raf and C-raf. The occurrence of mutation in Nras or Braf is 80-90% of all melanomas suggests that constitutive activation of extracellular signal regulated protein kinase (Ras-Raf-Mek-Erk). Most Ras mutations are present in codon 61 of N-Ras with K-Ras and H-Ras mutations being relatively rare [49,50]. Constitutive activation of Ras-Raf-Mek-Erk cascade has been shown to contribute to tumorigenesis by inhibiting apoptosis and increasing cell proliferation, tumor invasion and metastasis. Activated Erk plays a pivotal role in cell proliferation by controlling the G1- to S-phase transition by negative regulation of p27 inhibition and upregulation of c-myc activity [51,52]. Inhibition of Erk activity is associated with G1 cell cycle arrest by upregulation of p21 and reduced phosphorylation [52]. Activated Erk is also known to stimulate cell proliferation by increasing the transcription and stability of c-Jun which is mediated by CREB (cyclic adenosine monophosphate responsive element-binding) and Gsk-3β (glycogen synthase kinase-3beta) respectively [53]. Erk is also believed to increase proliferation by inhibiting differentiation. Constitutively active Erk limits differentiation in melanoma by targeting MITF (microphthalmia-associated transcription factor) for degradation [54,55,56]. The activated Erk pathway enhances melanoma specific survival by differentially regulating RSK-mediated phosphorylation and inactivation of the pro-apoptotic protein Bad [57] and inhibiting Jak-Stat pathway [58].
Erk signaling also contributes towards tumor invasion and metastasis by regulating the expression of integrin and matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs). Activated Ras-Mek-Erk pathway drives the production of MMP1 [59,60,61].
8. The PI3K/Akt pathway
The PI3K/Akt pathway is activated in various cancers, mostly on accont of mutations in tumor suppressor PTEN (phosphatase and tensin homolog) [62]. In melanoma, los of PTEN on chromosome 10q 23-24 was first reported by Parmiter et al [63]. The PTEN gene encodes a phosphatase that degrades products of PI3K by dephosphorylating phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-triphosphate and phosphatidylinositol 3,4-biphosphate at 3 positions [64]. Loss of PTEN increases AKT phosphorylation and activity leading to increased mitogenic signaling and decreased apoptosis [65]. Various studies suggest that 30-40% of melanoma cell lines and 5-15% of uncultured melanoma specimens carry inactivating mutations or homozygous deletions of Pten [63,66,67].
Pten encodes a negative regulator of extracellular growth signals that are transcended via PI3K-Akt pathway. Akt/protein kinase B (PKB), a serine-threonine kinase, is a core component of the PI3K signaling cascade and is activated through the phosphorylation of Ser 473/474 and Thr 308/309 [68,69]. Activated Akt regulates a network of factors that control cell proliferation and survival and this pathway is hyperactive in most metastatic melanomas [70,71,72]. Akt activates the transcription of a wide variety of genes involved in a wide range of cellular activities – those involved in immune activation, cell proliferation, apoptosis and cell survival [69]. Several studies have documented Akt activation in melanoma. Dai et al undertook a 292 sample study of pAkt levels using tissue microarray & immunohistochemistry strategies and identified strong pAkt expression in 17%, 43%, 49% and 77% of the biopsies in normal nevi, dysplastic nevi, primary melanoma and melanoma metastasis respectively. An important cell adhesion protein MelCAM that plays critical roles in melanoma development was increased upon active Akt expression [73,74]. PI3K and Akt is known to increase the expression of MMP2 and MMP9 by a mechanism involving Akt activation of NF-kappaB binding to the MMP promoter [75,76]. Akt overexpression led to upregulation of VEGF, increased production of superoxide ROS. Akt can suppress apoptosis by phosphorylating and inactivating many proapoptotic proteins like caspase 9 and Bad [77,78]. PI3K pathway emerges as the central axis that is deregulated in melanoma and along with constitutively active MAPK pathway makes an important role in melanoma development progression. Thus targeting PI3K is expected to be an important therapeutic target modality for melanoma treatment.
9. Wnt/β-catenin pathway
Βeta-catenin (β-catenin) is a key component of the Wnt signaling pathway. Signaling through this pathway controls a wide range of cellular functions and aberrant Wnt/β-catenin signaling can lead to cancer development and progression [79]. Wnts are glycoproteins that act as ligands to stimulate receptor-mediated signal transduction pathways involved in cell survival, proliferation, behavior and fate. Wnt proteins are known to activate 3 different extracellular pathways – Wnt/β-catenin, Wnt/planar-polarity and Wnt/Ca2+ pathways [80]. The Wnt/β-catenin also known as the canonical Wnt pathway plays an important role in melanoma development. In the absence of Wnt ligands, free β-catenin binds to the destructive complex of Axin, adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) and glycogen synthase kinase-3β (GSK-3β). GSK-3β mediates the phosphorylation of β-catenin at specific regulatory sites on the N-terminal side marking β-catenin for ubiquitination and subsequent proteosomal degradation. Upon the binding of Wnt ligand, GSK--catenin for ubiquitination and subsequent proteosomal degradation. Upon the binding of Wnt ligand, GSK-3β activity is inhibited resulting in accumulation of β-catenin in the cytoplasm and shuttles into the nucleus where it serves as an essential co-activator of the Tcf/Lef (T-cell factor / lymphoid enhancer factor) family [81]. Numerous genes implicated in the tumorigenic process like c-myc and cyclinD1 have been identified as targets of the canonical Wnt signaling.
Increased nuclear localization of β-catenin – an important indication of activated Wnt signaling pathway is observed in over a third of melanoma specimens [82,83,84]. Mutations in β-catenin have been observed in about 23% of melanoma cancer cell lines and these mutations affect phosphorylation sites at Ser33, Ser37, Thr41 and Ser45 [85] at the N-terminal domain. These mutations render β-catenin resistant to phosphorylation and subsequent degradation. Low rates of β-catenin mutation have been observed in primary melanomas and metastasis indicating that activating mutations is a rare event in melanoma tumorigenesis [82,83,84,86,87,88]. Mutations in APC were observed sporadically in primary melanomas [82,85,88]. While APC promoter 1A hypermethylation was observed in 17% of melanoma biopsies and 13% of melanoma cell lines. Wnt signaling pathways is activated in tumors through aberration in other genes. ICAT (inhibition of β-catenin & T-cell factor), a gene that negatively regulates the association of β-catenin with TCF4 thus repressing the transactivation of β-catenin-Tcf4 target genes [89]. A study by Reifenberger J et al suggests that loss of ICAT expression may contribute to the progression of melanoma [86]. ICAT mRNA expression analysis in two-third melanoma specimens revealed a 20% or less decrease in ICAT transcription [86]. However the mechanism behind the reduced ICAT mRNA level in melanoma is unclear.
Identification of Wnt target genes is also important towards the study of melanoma progression. Brn1, the POU domain transcription factor is directly controlled by Wnt signaling in transgenic mouse models and melanoma cell lines [90]. Studies indicate that overexpression of Brn2 is associated with increased melanoma progression and tumorigenicity [90,91].MITF (microphthalmia-associated transcription factor), a Wnt target gene, is essential for the development of the melanocyte lineage and has an important role in the control of cell proliferation, survival and differentiation [54,92,93]. The regulation of MITF expression by β-catenin significantly influences the growth and survival behavior of treatment resistant melanoma [94]. A study by Schepsky A et al demonstrated that MITF can directly interact with β-catenin and redirect transcriptional activity away from canonical Wnt signaling-regulated target gene specific for MITF [95]. Induction of Wnt signaling can be blocked by 5 different proteins – Dkk, Wise, sFrp (secreted Frizzled related protein), Wif (wnt inhibitory factor), and Cerebrus that compete for the Wnt ligand or the Lrz-Frp receptor [96]. Interestingly, Dkk1 (Dickkopf 1) expression is negligible in melanomas [97]. Studies by Kuphal et al have demonstrated a downregulated or loss of Dkk-1, -2 and-3 in all melanoma cell lines and most of the melanoma tumor samples that were analyzed [98]. In xenograft mouse model, overexpression of Dkk-1 and Wif-1inhibited melanoma tissue growth [99,100].
10. The JNK/c-Jun pathway
Activation of Jnks is usually in response to diverse stresses. These kinases play an important role in the regulation of cell proliferation, cell survival, cell death, DNA repair and metabolism. A variety of extracellular stimuli by cytokines, growth factors, hormones, UV radiation and tumor promoters are known to activate Jnks [101]. Sequential protein phorphorylation through a MAP-kinase module (MAP3K-MAP2K-MAPK) is responsible for Jnk activation [102]. Depending upon the cellular context, Jnk has been shown to elicit both positive and negative effects on tumor development [103]. Activation of Jnk is required for Ras-mediated transformation and mediate proliferation and tumor growth [104,105]. These observations are consistent with the findings of constitutively active Jnk in tumor samples and cell lines [103,106]. Jnk mediated the phosphorylation at serine 63 & 73 residues enhancing the ability of transcription factor c-Jun, a component of the AP-1 transcription complex [107]. The activation of Jnk leas to the induction of AP-1 dependent target genes that play important roles in cell proliferation, cell death and inflammation. Other members of the AP-1 transcription complex include c-Jun, Jun B, Jun D, c-Fos, Fra1 and Fra 2. The role of Jnk in oncogenesis is emerging; however c-Jun is a well defined oncogene in cancer. c-Jun is amplified and overexpressed in undifferentiated and aggressive sarcomas [108], breast and lung cancer [109,110]. Since the 1990s, the role of Jnk pathway in melanomas was recognized [111,112]. c-Jun, Jun B, c-fos genes play a role in the transformation of melanocytes into malignant melanomas [111].
The possible role Jnk pathway has led research teams to study the clinical relevance of interfering with this pathway. siRNA or chemical inhibitors of Jnk signaling inhibited proliferation in breast and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) [106,113] and also induced apoptosis in prostate cancer cells [114]. A study by Gurzov E et al demonstrated that knockdown of c-Jun and Jun B in B16F10 melanoma cells by siRNA resulted in increased cell cycle arrest and apoptosis also resulting in extended survival of mice inoculated with these modified melanoma cells[115], suggesting that inactivation of c-Jun and Jun B could provide a valuable strategy for antitumor intervention [115].
11. The NFκB (NF-kappaB) pathway
The NFκB family in mammals contains 5 members – p105/p50 (NFκB1), p100/p52 (NFκB2), RelA (p65), RelB and c-Rel (J-206, 207). The canonical activation of NFκB pathway involves TNFα stimulation resulting in the subsequent phosphorylation/activation of IKK (IκB kinase). In turn, IKK-mediated phosphorylation of IκB leading to ubiquitination of IκB and its proteosomal degradation, releasing the NFκB complex which activates a host of target genes [116,117]. The type of genes that get trans-activated depends on the composition of activated NFκB complex. For instance, complexes containing c-Rel activates pro-apoptotic genes (Dr4/Dr5, Bcl-x) and inhibits anti-apoptotic genes (cellular inhibitor of apoptosis (cIAP1, cIAP2), survivin). Complexes containing RelA inhibits the expression of DR4/DR5 and upregulates caspase 8, cIAP1 and cIAP2 [118].
NFκB is activated in various tumors including melanomas and distinct mechanisms have been proposed for the elevated levels of NFκB activity in melanomas. Activation of NFκB in melanomas is also linked to the loss of E-cadherin, a frequent event in melanoma transformation [119]. NIK (NFκB interacting kinase), an activator of IKK is overexpressed in melanoma cells while compared to normal cells. The major contribution of NFκB in melanoma development and progression relates to its function as an important regulator of survival and apoptosis. A study by Meyskens at al demonstrated that in metastatic melanoma cells, an increase in DNA binding activity of NFκB is associated with an increased expression of p50 and RelA resulting in increased expression of anti-apoptotic regulators. Also the expression of c-Rel, the transcriptional activator of pro-apoptotic genes is markedly in melanoma cells compared with normal melanocytes [120]. Strong p50 nuclear staining also correlated with poor prognosis in melanoma patients [121]. Besides eliciting anti-apoptotic activities NFκB mediates the transcription of MMP2 and MMP9 [121,122]. Overexpression of MMPs is associated with tumor invasion, metastasis and angiogenesis.
12. Melanoma stem cells
Stem cells are cells that can self-renew and the ability to differentiate into various cell lineages. These cells are located in the restrictive niche (environment). The interaction between stem cells and their microenvironment is important for the self renewal process. These cells are highly clonogenic and slow cycling (quiescent) in response to proliferation and survival stimuli. Stem cells divide asymmetrically giving rise to a daughter cell that remains a stem cell (capable of self renewal) and another daughter cell that can rapidly divide and differentiate. Melanocytes that are found in the skin and in the choroid layer of the eye is derived from the neural crest (NC). Neural crest cells undergo EMT to migrate along the definite pathways in the embryo. NC cells give rise to a large array of differentiated cells – melanocytes, peripheral neurons & glia, endocrine and cartilage cells [123]. Melanoblasts which are melanocytic precursors – unpigmented cells with the potential to produce melanin, invade the skin areas and differentiate into melanocytes.
The cancer stem theory suggests that cancer originates from a small subpopulation of neoplastic stem cells that have the potential to self renew and are primarily responsible for sustaining the tumor and giving rise to progressively differentiating cells that proliferate rapidly and contribute to the cellular heterogeneity of the tumor (F-194). Cancer stem cells arise either from undifferentiated stem cells or from cells that possess stem cell like characteristics. Evidence suggests that aggressive melanoma cells acquire characteristics of embryonic stem cells having a multipotent plastic phenotype [124]. Studies by Bittner MP et al demonstrated that melanoma cells express genes associated with different cell types like endothelial, epithelial, fibroblastic, neuronal, hematopoietic and progenitor cells [125]. Strangely genes specific for melanocytes are downregulated in metastatic melanomas. Tyrosinase & MLANA (melan A), genes associated with pigmentation are greatly downregulated in aggressive melanomas [124]. Aggressive melanoma cells express endothelial-associated genes and form extravascular fluid-conducting networks which allow melanomas to greatly adapt to the hypoxic microenvironment of rapidly proliferating tumors, a phenomenon called as “vascular mimicry” [124,126]. From different melanoma cell lines, cells with stem cell-like features which have the ability to grow as non-adherent cell aggregates known as spheroids/spheres have been isolated (F-196). These cells have the ability to differentiate into various lineages – adipogenic, osteogenic, chondrogenic and melanogenic. A study by Bittner M et al demonstrated a subset of these spheroid cells express the cell surface marker CD20, a unique molecular signature of aggressive melanomas [125]. For the treatment of non-Hodkin’s lymphoma, CD20 is a standard therapeutic target which raises the possibility that CD20 could be used as a potential target for melanoma treatment [127].
Several studies have demonstrated that aggressive melanoma cells share characteristics with embryonic progenitors. Evidence suggests a major role for stromal components in all stages of tumorigenesis (initiation, progression and metastasis) [128]. Noted scientist Stephen Paget had coined the term “seed & soil” hypothesis predicting that metastatic cells only colonize soils (organs) that are permissive to their growth[129,130]. Studies show embryonic microenvironment has the capacity to reverse the metastatic phenotype of cancer cells. The microenvironment of human embryonic stem cells reprograms aggressive melanoma cells towards a less aggressive phenotype [124]. Nodal, an embryonic morphogen of the TGFβ family is important for sustaining melanoma aggressiveness and plasticity. Nodal is regained in highly aggressive melanoma cell lines, invasive VGP (vertical growth phase)-stage melanoma and metastatic melanoma [131], implicating Nodal as a novel diagnostic marker in melanoma progression and could be a therapeutic target for metastatic melanoma treatment [124].
13. Conclusion
Our understanding of melanoma development and progression has evolved tremendously over the past three decades. Unfortunately our understanding of the molecular biology of melanoma is still far from complete despite extensive research and knowledge gained in chromosomal alterations, mutations in important melanoma-associated genes, epigenetic modifications and melanoma microenvironment. Even to this day, the best prognostic significance of primary melanoma is the thickness of the tumor (i.e. RGP → VGP transition) and the presence/absence of ulcerations. Melanoma still remains as a tumor that is refractory to current chemotherapeutic treatments. A further study of the interaction between various signaling pathways will help researchers decipher the complexity of the genetic and epigenetic changes which eventually would lead to better therapeutic modalities for the treatment of primary and metastatic melanomas.
Glossary
AK - actinic keratosis
BCC - basal cell carcinoma
Cdks - cyclin-dependent kinases
CREB - cyclic adenosine monophosphate responsive element-binding
FAMS - familial atypical mole-melanoma syndrome
GSK3β - glycogen synthase kinase-3beta
IKK - Inhibitor of IκB kinase
MAPK - mitogen activated protein kinase
MITF - microphthalmia-associated transcription factor
MMP - matrix metalloproteinase
NF-κB - nuclear factor kappa-B
NIK - NFκB-interacting kinase
Pten - phosphatase and tensin homolog
Rb - retinoblastoma
RGP - radial growth phase
SCC - Squamous cell carcinoma
Tcf4 - T-cell factor-4
UVR - ultraviolet radiation
VGP - vertical growth phase
WIF1 - Wnt-inhibitory factor 1
References
- 1.
Jemal A Bray F Center M. M Ferlay J Ward E et al 2011 Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin61 69 90 - 2.
Marghoob A. A 2011 Skin cancers and their etiologies. Semin Cutan Med Surg 30: S1 5 - 3.
Eichberger T Regl G Ikram M. S Neill G. W Philpott M. P et al 2004 FOXE1, a new transcriptional target of GLI2 is expressed in human epidermis and basal cell carcinoma. J Invest Dermatol122 1180 1187 - 4.
Iwasaki J. K Srivastava D Moy R. L Lin H. J Kouba D. J 2012 The molecular genetics underlying basal cell carcinoma pathogenesis and links to targeted therapeutics. J Am Acad Dermatol 66: e167 178 - 5.
Narayanan D. L Saladi R. N Fox J. L 2010 Ultraviolet radiation and skin cancer. Int J Dermatol49 978 986 - 6.
Foster P. J Dunn E. A Karl K. E Snir J. A Nycz C. M et al 2008 Cellular magnetic resonance imaging: in vivo imaging of melanoma cells in lymph nodes of mice. Neoplasia10 207 216 - 7.
Marugame T Zhang M. J 2010 Comparison of time trends in melanoma of skin cancer mortality (1990-2006) between countries based on the WHO mortality database. Jpn J Clin Oncol 40: 710. - 8.
Ko J. M Velez N. F Tsao H 2010 Pathways to melanoma. Semin Cutan Med Surg29 210 217 - 9.
Jemal A Thun M. J Ries L. A Howe H. L Weir H. K et al 2008 Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2005, featuring trends in lung cancer, tobacco use, and tobacco control. J Natl Cancer Inst100 1672 1694 - 10.
Linos E Swetter S. M Cockburn M. G Colditz G. A Clarke C. A 2009 Increasing burden of melanoma in the United States. J Invest Dermatol129 1666 1674 - 11.
Wargo J. A Tanabe K 2009 Surgical management of melanoma. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am23 565 581 x. - 12.
Glanz K Buller D. B Saraiya M 2007 Reducing ultraviolet radiation exposure among outdoor workers: state of the evidence and recommendations. Environ Health 6: 22. - 13.
Meeran S. M Punathil T Katiyar S. K 2008 IL-12 deficiency exacerbates inflammatory responses in UV-irradiated skin and skin tumors. J Invest Dermatol128 2716 2727 - 14.
Benjamin C. L Ananthaswamy H. N 2007 53 and the pathogenesis of skin cancer. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 224: 241-248. - 15.
Garbe C Leiter U 2009 Melanoma epidemiology and trends. Clin Dermatol27 3 9 - 16.
Gandini S Autier P Boniol M 2011 Reviews on sun exposure and artificial light and melanoma. Prog Biophys Mol Biol107 362 366 - 17.
Preston D. S Stern R. S 1992 Nonmelanoma cancers of the skin. N Engl J Med327 1649 1662 - 18.
Gilchrest B. A Eller M. S Geller A. C Yaar M 1999 The pathogenesis of melanoma induced by ultraviolet radiation. N Engl J Med340 1341 1348 - 19.
Jr., Neal K (Gloster H. M 2006 Skin cancer in skin of color. J Am Acad Dermatol55 741 760 quiz 761-744. - 20.
Ma F Collado-mesa F Hu S Kirsner R. S 2007 Skin cancer awareness and sun protection behaviors in white Hispanic and white non-Hispanic high school students in Miami, Florida. Arch Dermatol143 983 988 - 21.
Schroeder P Haendeler J Krutmann J 2008 The role of near infrared radiation in photoaging of the skin. Exp Gerontol43 629 632 - 22.
Bennett D. C 1993 Genetics, development, and malignancy of melanocytes. Int Rev Cytol146 191 260 - 23.
Tsao H Atkins M. B Sober A. J 2004 Management of cutaneous melanoma. N Engl J Med351 998 1012 - 24.
Lomas J Martin-duque P Pons M Quintanilla M 2008 The genetics of malignant melanoma. Front Biosci13 5071 5093 - 25.
Hussussian C. J Struewing J. P Goldstein A. M Higgins P. A Ally D. S et al 1994 Germline16 mutations in familial melanoma. Nat Genet 8: 15-21. - 26.
Kamb A Shattuck-eidens D Eeles R Liu Q Gruis N. A et al 1994 Analysis of the16 gene (CDKN2) as a candidate for the chromosome 9p melanoma susceptibility locus. Nat Genet 8: 23-26. - 27.
Pomerantz J Schreiber-agus N Liegeois N. J Silverman A Alland L et al 1998 The Ink4a tumor suppressor gene product,19Arf interacts with MDM2 and neutralizes MDM2’s inhibition of p53. Cell 92: 713-723. - 28.
Zhang Y Xiong Y Yarbrough W. G 1998 ARF promotes MDM2 degradation and stabilizes53 ARF-INK4a locus deletion impairs both the Rb and p53 tumor suppression pathways. Cell 92: 725-734. - 29.
Kamijo T Weber J. D Zambetti G Zindy F Roussel M. F et al 1998 Functional and physical interactions of the ARF tumor suppressor with53 and Mdm2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95: 8292-8297. - 30.
Stott F. J Bates S James M. C Mcconnell B. B Starborg M et al 1998 The alternative product from the human CDKN2A locus,14 ARF), participates in a regulatory feedback loop with p53 and MDM2. EMBO J 17: 5001-5014. - 31.
Chin L Garraway L. A Fisher D. E 2006 Malignant melanoma: genetics and therapeutics in the genomic era. Genes Dev20 2149 2182 - 32.
Gandini S Sera F Cattaruzza M. S Pasquini P Abeni D et al 2005 Meta-analysis of risk factors for cutaneous melanoma: I. Common and atypical naevi. Eur J Cancer41 28 44 - 33.
Gandini S Sera F Cattaruzza M. S Pasquini P Picconi O et al 2005 Meta-analysis of risk factors for cutaneous melanoma: II. Sun exposure. Eur J Cancer41 45 60 - 34.
Zuo L Weger J Yang Q Goldstein A. M Tucker M. A et al 1996 Germline mutations in the16INK4a binding domain of CDK4 in familial melanoma. Nat Genet 12: 97-99. - 35.
Soufir N Avril M. F Chompret A Demenais F Bombled J et al 1998 Prevalence of16 and CDK4 germline mutations in 48 melanoma-prone families in France. The French Familial Melanoma Study Group. Hum Mol Genet 7: 209-216. - 36.
Wolfel T Hauer M Schneider J Serrano M Wolfel C et al 1995 A16INK4a CDK4 mutant targeted by cytolytic T lymphocytes in a human melanoma. Science 269: 1281-1284. - 37.
Eng C Li F. P Abramson D. H Ellsworth R. M Wong F. L et al 1993 Mortality from second tumors among long-term survivors of retinoblastoma. J Natl Cancer Inst85 1121 1128 - 38.
Fletcher O Easton D Anderson K Gilham C Jay M et al 2004 Lifetime risks of common cancers among retinoblastoma survivors. J Natl Cancer Inst96 357 363 - 39.
Druker B. J Talpaz M Resta D. J Peng B Buchdunger E et al 2001 Efficacy and safety of a specific inhibitor of the BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase in chronic myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med344 1031 1037 - 40.
Van den Abbeele AD, Eisenberg B, et al. (Demetri G. D Von Mehren M Blanke C. D 2002 Efficacy and safety of imatinib mesylate in advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors. N Engl J Med347 472 480 - 41.
Lynch T. J Bell D. W Sordella R Gurubhagavatula S Okimoto R. A et al 2004 Activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor underlying responsiveness of non-small-cell lung cancer to gefitinib. N Engl J Med350 2129 2139 - 42.
Curtin J. A Busam K Pinkel D Bastian B. C 2006 Somatic activation of KIT in distinct subtypes of melanoma. J Clin Oncol24 4340 4346 - 43.
Le Strange R, Oliff AI, Furth ME, Old LJ (Albino A. P 1984 Transforming ras genes from human melanoma: a manifestation of tumour heterogeneity? Nature308 69 72 - 44.
Davies H Bignell G. R Cox C Stephens P Edkins S et al 2002 Mutations of the BRAF gene in human cancer. Nature417 949 954 - 45.
Lopez-bergami P Fitchman B Ronai Z 2008 Understanding signaling cascades in melanoma. Photochem Photobiol84 289 306 - 46.
Pollock P. M Harper U. L Hansen K. S Yudt L. M Stark M et al 2003 High frequency of BRAF mutations in nevi. Nat Genet33 19 20 - 47.
Gorden A Osman I Gai W He D Huang W et al 2003 Analysis of BRAF and N-RAS mutations in metastatic melanoma tissues. Cancer Res63 3955 3957 - 48.
Kumar R Angelini S Czene K Sauroja I Hahka-kemppinen M et al 2003 BRAF mutations in metastatic melanoma: a possible association with clinical outcome. Clin Cancer Res9 3362 3368 - 49.
Carr J Mackie R. M 1994 Point mutations in the N-ras oncogene in malignant melanoma and congenital naevi. Br J Dermatol131 72 77 - 50.
Van Elsas A Zerp S Van Der Flier S Kruse-wolters M Vacca A et al 1995 Analysis of N-ras mutations in human cutaneous melanoma: tumor heterogeneity detected by polymerase chain reaction/single-stranded conformation polymorphism analysis. Recent Results Cancer Res139 57 67 - 51.
MacKiewicz A, et al. (Kortylewski M Heinrich P. C Kauffmann M. E Bohm M 2001 Mitogen-activated protein kinases control27 Kip1 expression and growth of human melanoma cells. Biochem J 357: 297-303. - 52.
Lefevre G Calipel A Mouriaux F Hecquet C Malecaze F et al 2003 Opposite long-term regulation of c-Myc and27Kip1 through overactivation of Raf-1 and the MEK/ERK module in proliferating human choroidal melanoma cells. Oncogene 22: 8813-8822. - 53.
Lopez-bergami P Huang C Goydos J. S Yip D Bar-eli M et al 2007 Rewired ERK-JNK signaling pathways in melanoma. Cancer Cell11 447 460 - 54.
Goding C. R 2000 Mitf from neural crest to melanoma: signal transduction and transcription in the melanocyte lineage. Genes Dev14 1712 1728 - 55.
Wu M Hemesath T. J Takemoto C. M Horstmann M. A Wells A. G et al 2000 c-Kit triggers dual phosphorylations, which couple activation and degradation of the essential melanocyte factor Mi. Genes Dev14 301 312 - 56.
Kim D. S Hwang E. S Lee J. E Kim S. Y Kwon S. B et al 2003 Sphingosine-1-phosphate decreases melanin synthesis via sustained ERK activation and subsequent MITF degradation. J Cell Sci116 1699 1706 - 57.
Eisenmann K. M Vanbrocklin M. W Staffend N. A Kitchen S. M Koo H. M 2003 Mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway-dependent tumor-specific survival signaling in melanoma cells through inactivation of the proapoptotic protein bad. Cancer Res63 8330 8337 - 58.
Krasilnikov M Ivanov V. N Dong J Ronai Z 2003 Erkand P. I K negatively regulate STAT-transcriptional activities in human melanoma cells: implications towards sensitization to apoptosis. Oncogene22 4092 4101 - 59.
Tower G. B Coon C. C Benbow U Vincenti M. P Brinckerhoff C. E 2002 Erk 1/2 differentially regulates the expression from the 1G/2G single nucleotide polymorphism in the MMP-1 promoter in melanoma cells. Biochim Biophys Acta1586 265 274 - 60.
Ishii Y Ogura T Tatemichi M Fujisawa H Otsuka F et al 2003 Induction of matrix metalloproteinase gene transcription by nitric oxide and mechanisms of MMP-1 gene induction in human melanoma cell lines. Int J Cancer103 161 168 - 61.
Ramos M. C Steinbrenner H Stuhlmann D Sies H Brenneisen P 2004 Induction of MMP-10 and MMP-1 in a squamous cell carcinoma cell line by ultraviolet radiation. Biol Chem385 75 86 - 62.
Steelman L. S Bertrand F. E Mccubrey J. A 2004 The complexity of PTEN: mutation, marker and potential target for therapeutic intervention. Expert Opin Ther Targets8 537 550 - 63.
Jr., Nowell PC (Parmiter A. H Balaban G Clark W. H 1988 Possible involvement of the chromosome region 10q24----q26 in early stages of melanocytic neoplasia. Cancer Genet Cytogenet30 313 317 - 64.
Simpson L Parsons R 2001 PTEN: life as a tumor suppressor. Exp Cell Res264 29 41 - 65.
Wu H Goel V Haluska F. G 2003 PTEN signaling pathways in melanoma. Oncogene22 3113 3122 - 66.
Herbst R. A Weiss J Ehnis A Cavenee W. K Arden K. C 1994 Loss of heterozygosity for 10q22-10qter in malignant melanoma progression. Cancer Res54 3111 3114 - 67.
Healy E Rehman I Angus B Rees J. L 1995 Loss of heterozygosity in sporadic primary cutaneous melanoma. Genes Chromosomes Cancer12 152 156 - 68.
Harlan J. E Yoon H. S Hajduk P. J Fesik S. W 1995 Structural characterization of the interaction between a pleckstrin homology domain and phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate. Biochemistry34 9859 9864 - 69.
Nicholson K. M Anderson N. G 2002 The protein kinase B/Akt signalling pathway in human malignancy. Cell Signal14 381 395 - 70.
Stahl J. M Sharma A Cheung M Zimmerman M Cheng J. Q et al 2004 Deregulated Akt3 activity promotes development of malignant melanoma. Cancer Res64 7002 7010 - 71.
Robertson G. P 2005 Functional and therapeutic significance of Akt deregulation in malignant melanoma. Cancer Metastasis Rev24 273 285 - 72.
Dhawan P Singh A. B Ellis D. L Richmond A 2002 Constitutive activation of Akt/protein kinase B in melanoma leads to up-regulation of nuclear factor-kappaB and tumor progression. Cancer Res62 7335 7342 - 73.
Li G Kalabis J Xu X Meier F Oka M et al 2003 Reciprocal regulation of MelCAM and AKT in human melanoma. Oncogene22 6891 6899 - 74.
Johnson J. P 1999 Cell adhesion molecules in the development and progression of malignant melanoma. Cancer Metastasis Rev18 345 357 - 75.
Kim D Kim S Koh H Yoon S. O Chung A. S et al 2001 Akt/PKB promotes cancer cell invasion via increased motility and metalloproteinase production. FASEB J15 1953 1962 - 76.
Park B. K Zeng X Glazer R. I 2001 Akt1 induces extracellular matrix invasion and matrix metalloproteinase-2 activity in mouse mammary epithelial cells. Cancer Res61 7647 7653 - 77.
Cardone M. H Roy N Stennicke H. R Salvesen G. S Franke T. F et al 1998 Regulation of cell death protease caspase-9 by phosphorylation. Science282 1318 1321 - 78.
Datta S. R Dudek H Tao X Masters S Fu H et al 1997 Akt phosphorylation of BAD couples survival signals to the cell-intrinsic death machinery. Cell91 231 241 - 79.
Giles R. H Van Es J. H Clevers H 2003 Caught up in a Wnt storm: Wnt signaling in cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta1653 1 24 - 80.
Veeman M. T Axelrod J. D Moon R. T 2003 A second canon. Functions and mechanisms of beta-catenin-independent Wnt signaling. Dev Cell5 367 377 - 81.
Elcheva I Tarapore R. S Bhatia N Spiegelman V. S 2008 Overexpression of mRNA-binding protein CRD-BP in malignant melanomas. Oncogene27 5069 5074 - 82.
Rimm D. L Caca K Hu G Harrison F. B Fearon E. R 1999 Frequent nuclear/cytoplasmic localization of beta-catenin without exon 3 mutations in malignant melanoma. Am J Pathol154 325 329 - 83.
van den Oord JJ (Demunter A Libbrecht L Degreef H De Wolf-peeters C 2002 Loss of membranous expression of beta-catenin is associated with tumor progression in cutaneous melanoma and rarely caused by exon 3 mutations. Mod Pathol15 454 461 - 84.
Omholt K Platz A Ringborg U Hansson J 2001 Cytoplasmic and nuclear accumulation of beta-catenin is rarely caused by CTNNB1 exon 3 mutations in cutaneous malignant melanoma. Int J Cancer92 839 842 - 85.
Rubinfeld B El-Robbins P Gamil M Albert I Porfiri E et al 1997 Stabilization of beta-catenin by genetic defects in melanoma cell lines. Science275 1790 1792 - 86.
Reifenberger J Knobbe C. B Wolter M Blaschke B Schulte K. W et al 2002 Molecular genetic analysis of malignant melanomas for aberrations of the WNT signaling pathway genes CTNNB1, APC, ICAT and BTRC. Int J Cancer100 549 556 - 87.
Pollock P. M Hayward N 2002 Mutations in exon 3 of the beta-catenin gene are rare in melanoma cell lines. Melanoma Res12 183 186 - 88.
Worm J Christensen C Gronbaek K Tulchinsky E Guldberg P 2004 Genetic and epigenetic alterations of the APC gene in malignant melanoma. Oncogene23 5215 5226 - 89.
Tago K Nakamura T Nishita M Hyodo J Nagai S et al 2000 Inhibition of Wnt signaling by ICAT, a novel beta-catenin-interacting protein. Genes Dev14 1741 1749 - 90.
Goodall J Martinozzi S Dexter T. J Champeval D Carreira S et al 2004 Brn-2 expression controls melanoma proliferation and is directly regulated by beta-catenin. Mol Cell Biol24 2915 2922 - 91.
Thomson J. A Murphy K Baker E Sutherland G. R Parsons P. G et al 1995 The brn-2 gene regulates the melanocytic phenotype and tumorigenic potential of human melanoma cells. Oncogene11 691 700 - 92.
Hodgkinson C. A Moore K. J Nakayama A Steingrimsson E Copeland N. G et al 1993 Mutations at the mouse microphthalmia locus are associated with defects in a gene encoding a novel basic-helix-loop-helix-zipper protein. Cell74 395 404 - 93.
Hughes M. J Lingrel J. B Krakowsky J. M Anderson K. P 1993 A Helix-loop helix transcription factor-like gene is located at the mi locus. J Biol Chem268 20687 20690 - 94.
Widlund H. R Horstmann M. A Price E. R Cui J Lessnick S. L et al 2002 Beta-catenin-induced melanoma growth requires the downstream target Microphthalmia-associated transcription factor. J Cell Biol158 1079 1087 - 95.
Schepsky A Bruser K Gunnarsson G. J Goodall J Hallsson J. H et al 2006 The microphthalmia-associated transcription factor Mitf interacts with beta-catenin to determine target gene expression. Mol Cell Biol26 8914 8927 - 96.
Kawano Y Kypta R 2003 Secreted antagonists of the Wnt signalling pathway. J Cell Sci116 2627 2634 - 97.
Forget M. A Turcotte S Beauseigle D Godin-ethier J Pelletier S et al 2007 The Wnt pathway regulator DKK1 is preferentially expressed in hormone-resistant breast tumours and in some common cancer types. Br J Cancer96 646 653 - 98.
Kuphal S Lodermeyer S Bataille F Schuierer M Hoang B. H et al 2006 Expression of Dickkopf genes is strongly reduced in malignant melanoma. Oncogene25 5027 5036 - 99.
Mikheev A. M Mikheeva S. A Rostomily R Zarbl H 2007 Dickkopf-1 activates cell death in MDA-MB435 melanoma cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun352 675 680 - 100.
Lin Y. C You L Xu Z He B Yang C. T et al 2007 Wnt inhibitory factor-1 gene transfer inhibits melanoma cell growth. Hum Gene Ther18 379 386 - 101.
Weston C. R Davis R. J 2007 The JNK signal transduction pathway. Curr Opin Cell Biol19 142 149 - 102.
Karin M 1995 The regulation of AP-1 activity by mitogen-activated protein kinases. J Biol Chem270 16483 16486 - 103.
Kennedy N. J Davis R. J 2003 Role of JNK in tumor development. Cell Cycle2 199 201 - 104.
Yang Y. M Bost F Charbono W Dean N Mckay R et al 2003 C-Jun NH(2)-terminal kinase mediates proliferation and tumor growth of human prostate carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res9 391 401 - 105.
Cui J Han S. Y Wang C Su W Harshyne L et al 2006 c-Jun NH(2)-terminal kinase 2alpha2 promotes the tumorigenicity of human glioblastoma cells. Cancer Res66 10024 10031 - 106.
Khatlani T. S Wislez M Sun M Srinivas H Iwanaga K et al 2007 c-Jun N-terminal kinase is activated in non-small-cell lung cancer and promotes neoplastic transformation in human bronchial epithelial cells. Oncogene26 2658 2666 - 107.
Adler V Schaffer A Kim J Dolan L Ronai Z 1995 UV Irradiation and heat shock mediate JNK activation via alternate pathways. J Biol Chem270 26071 26077 - 108.
Mariani O Brennetot C Coindre J. M Gruel N Ganem C et al 2007 JUN oncogene amplification and overexpression block adipocytic differentiation in highly aggressive sarcomas. Cancer Cell11 361 374 - 109.
Vleugel M. M Greijer A. E Bos R Van Der Wall E Van Diest P. J 2006 c-Jun activation is associated with proliferation and angiogenesis in invasive breast cancer. Hum Pathol37 668 674 - 110.
Maeno K Masuda A Yanagisawa K Konishi H Osada H et al 2006 Altered regulation of c-jun and its involvement in anchorage-independent growth of human lung cancers. Oncogene25 271 277 - 111.
Jr. (Yamanishi D. T Buckmeier J. A Meyskens F. L 1991 Expression of c-jun, jun-B, and c-fos proto-oncogenes in human primary melanocytes and metastatic melanomas. J Invest Dermatol97 349 353 - 112.
Rutberg S. E Goldstein I. M Yang Y. M Stackpole C. W Ronai Z 1994 Expression and transcriptional activity of AP-1, CRE, and URE binding proteins in B16 mouse melanoma subclones. Mol Carcinog10 82 87 - 113.
Van Den Berg CL (Mingo-sion A. M Marietta P. M Koller E Wolf D. M 2004 Inhibition of JNK reduces G2/M transit independent of53 leading to endoreduplication, decreased proliferation, and apoptosis in breast cancer cells. Oncogene 23: 596-604. - 114.
Uzgare A. R Isaacs J. T 2004 Enhanced redundancy in Akt and mitogen-activated protein kinase-induced survival of malignant versus normal prostate epithelial cells. Cancer Res64 6190 6199 - 115.
Gurzov E. N Bakiri L Alfaro J. M Wagner E. F Izquierdo M 2008 Targeting c-Jun and JunB proteins as potential anticancer cell therapy. Oncogene27 641 652 - 116.
Dixit V Mak T. W 2002 NF-kappaB Signaling Many roads lead to madrid. Cell111 615 619 - 117.
Ghosh S Karin M 2002 Missing pieces in the NF-kappaB puzzle. Cell 109 Suppl: S81 96 - 118.
Chen X Kandasamy K Srivastava R. K 2003 Differential roles of RelA (65 and c-Rel subunits of nuclear factor kappa B in tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand signaling. Cancer Res 63: 1059-1066. - 119.
Poser I Dominguez D De Herreros A. G Varnai A Buettner R et al 2001 Loss of E-cadherin expression in melanoma cells involves up-regulation of the transcriptional repressor Snail. J Biol Chem276 24661 24666 - 120.
Jr., Buckmeier JA, McNulty SE, Tohidian NB (Meyskens F. L 1999 Activation of nuclear factor-kappa B in human metastatic melanomacells and the effect of oxidative stress. Clin Cancer Res5 1197 1202 - 121.
Boukerche H Su Z. Z Emdad L Sarkar D Fisher P. B 2007 mda-9/Syntenin regulates the metastatic phenotype in human melanoma cells by activating nuclear factor-kappaB. Cancer Res67 1812 1822 - 122.
Philip S Kundu G. C 2003 Osteopontin induces nuclear factor kappa B-mediated promatrix metalloproteinase-2 activation through I kappa B alpha /IKK signaling pathways, and curcumin (diferulolylmethane) down-regulates these pathways. J Biol Chem278 14487 14497 - 123.
Le Douarin NM (Dupin E 2003 Development of melanocyte precursors from the vertebrate neural crest. Oncogene22 3016 3023 - 124.
Hendrix M. J Seftor E. A Seftor R. E Kasemeier-kulesa J Kulesa P. M et al 2007 Reprogramming metastatic tumour cells with embryonic microenvironments. Nat Rev Cancer7 246 255 - 125.
Bittner M Meltzer P Chen Y Jiang Y Seftor E et al 2000 Molecular classification of cutaneous malignant melanoma by gene expression profiling. Nature406 536 540 - 126.
Hendrix M. J Seftor E. A Hess A. R Seftor R. E 2003 Molecular plasticity of human melanoma cells. Oncogene22 3070 3075 - 127.
Coiffier B Lepage E Briere J Herbrecht R Tilly H et al 2002 CHOP chemotherapy plus rituximab compared with CHOP alone in elderly patients with diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med346 235 242 - 128.
Lee J. T Herlyn M 2007 Microenvironmental influences in melanoma progression. J Cell Biochem101 862 872 - 129.
Paget S 1989 The distribution of secondary growths in cancer of the breast. 1889. Cancer Metastasis Rev8 98 101 - 130.
Fidler I. J 2003 The pathogenesis of cancer metastasis: the’seed and soil’ hypothesis revisited. Nat Rev Cancer3 453 458 - 131.
Topczewska J. M Postovit L. M Margaryan N. V Sam A Hess A. R et al 2006 Embryonic and tumorigenic pathways converge via Nodal signaling: role in melanoma aggressiveness. Nat Med12 925 932 - 132.
Miller S. A Hamilton S. L Wester U. G Cyr W. H 1998 An analysis of UVA emissions from sunlamps and the potential importance for melanoma. Photochem Photobiol68 63 70 - 133.
Lautenschlager S Wulf H. C Pittelkow M. R 2007 Photoprotection. Lancet370 528 537 - 134.
Brenner M Hearing V. J 2008 The protective role of melanin against UV damage in human skin. Photochem Photobiol84 539 549 - 135.
LeBoit PE, Hamm H, Brocker EB, Pinkel D (Bastian B. C 1998 Chromosomal gains and losses in primary cutaneous melanomas detected by comparative genomic hybridization. Cancer Res58 2170 2175 - 136.
Curtin J. A Fridlyand J Kageshita T Patel H. N Busam K. J et al 2005 Distinct sets of genetic alterations in melanoma. N Engl J Med353 2135 2147 - 137.
Balazs M Adam Z Treszl A Begany A Hunyadi J et al 2001 Chromosomal imbalances in primary and metastatic melanomas revealed by comparative genomic hybridization. Cytometry46 222 232 - 138.
Hausler T Stang A Anastassiou G Jockel K. H Mrzyk S et al 2005 Loss of heterozygosity of 1p in uveal melanomas with monosomy 3. Int J Cancer116 909 913 - 139.
White J. S Mclean I. W Becker R. L Director-myska A. E Nath J 2006 Correlation of comparative genomic hybridization results of 100 archival uveal melanomas with patient survival. Cancer Genet Cytogenet170 29 39 - 140.
du Manoir S, Jauch A, Horsthemke B, et al. (Speicher M. R Prescher G 1994 Chromosomal gains and losses in uveal melanomas detected by comparative genomic hybridization. Cancer Res54 3817 3823 - 141.
Vajdic C. M Hutchins A. M Kricker A Aitken J. F Armstrong B. K et al 2003 Chromosomal gains and losses in ocular melanoma detected by comparative genomic hybridization in an Australian population-based study. Cancer Genet Cytogenet144 12 17 - 142.
Garraway L. A Widlund H. R Rubin M. A Getz G Berger A. J et al 2005 Integrative genomic analyses identify MITF as a lineage survival oncogene amplified in malignant melanoma. Nature436 117 122 - 143.
Jonsson G Dahl C Staaf J Sandberg T Bendahl P. O et al 2007 Genomic profiling of malignant melanoma using tiling-resolution arrayCGH. Oncogene26 4738 4748 - 144.
Alonso S. R Tracey L Ortiz P Perez-gomez B Palacios J et al 2007 A high-throughput study in melanoma identifies epithelial-mesenchymal transition as a major determinant of metastasis. Cancer Res67 3450 3460 - 145.
Hoek K Rimm D. L Williams K. R Zhao H Ariyan S et al 2004 Expression profiling reveals novel pathways in the transformation of melanocytes to melanomas. Cancer Res64 5270 5282 - 146.
Seftor R. E Seftor E. A Koshikawa N Meltzer P. S Gardner L. M et al 2001 Cooperative interactions of laminin 5 gamma2 chain, matrix metalloproteinase-2, and membrane type-1-matrix/metalloproteinase are required for mimicry of embryonic vasculogenesis by aggressive melanoma. Cancer Res61 6322 6327 - 147.
Jaeger J Koczan D Thiesen H. J Ibrahim S. M Gross G et al 2007 Gene expression signatures for tumor progression, tumor subtype, and tumor thickness in laser-microdissected melanoma tissues. Clin Cancer Res13 806 815 - 148.
Weeraratna A. T Jiang Y Hostetter G Rosenblatt K Duray P et al 2002 Wnt5a signaling directly affects cell motility and invasion of metastatic melanoma. Cancer Cell1 279 288 - 149.
Becker B Roesch A Hafner C Stolz W Dugas M et al 2004 Discrimination of melanocytic tumors by cDNA array hybridization of tissues prepared by laser pressure catapulting. J Invest Dermatol122 361 368 - 150.
Winnepenninckx V Lazar V Michiels S Dessen P Stas M et al 2006 Gene expression profiling of primary cutaneous melanoma and clinical outcome. J Natl Cancer Inst98 472 482 - 151.
Haqq C Nosrati M Sudilovsky D Crothers J Khodabakhsh D et al 2005 The gene expression signatures of melanoma progression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A102 6092 6097