Biological activities of some isolated actinobacteria.
Abstract
Plant growth enhancement using plant beneficial bacteria has been viewed in the sustainable agriculture as an alternative to chemical fertilizers. Actinobacteria, among the group of important plant-associated bacteria, have been widely studied for its plant growth promotion activities. Actinobacteria are considered as a limelight among agriculturists for their beneficial aspects toward plants. They are naturally occurring spore-forming bacteria inhabiting the soil and known for their plant growth-promoting and biocontrol properties. The mechanisms behind these activities include nitrogen fixation, phosphate solubilization, siderophore production, and other attributes such as antifungal production of metabolites, phytohormones, and volatile organic compound. All these activities not only enhance the plant growth but also provide resistance in plants to withstand unfavorable conditions of the environment. Hence, this chapter emphasizes on the plant growth traits of actinobacteria and how far it was studied for enhanced growth and bio-fortification.
Keywords
- actinobacteria
- rhizosphere
- PGPR
- growth promotion
1. Introduction
Plant growth-promoting (PGP) microbes (epiphytic, endophytic, and rhizospheric) are likely to enhance the growth and productivity of crop by increasing the nutrient content. These plant microbiomes have been sorted out from diverse sources belonging to all three domains: archaea, bacteria, and fungi. The microbes associated with the plant rhizosphere are termed as rhizospheric microbes, and among them, actinobacteria are most dominant in nature [1]. As many researches stated actinobacteria as major microbial population present in the soil. The actinobacteria are known to have high G-C (57–75%) contents and comprise a broad group of filamentous, spore-forming, gram-positive, and aerobic bacteria that form branching filaments or hyphae and play a fundamental function in ecology along with soil nutrient cycle. Actinobacteria resemble to unicellular bacteria, they are different by not having distinct cell wall; instead they produce mycelium, a nonseptate and more slender [2]. Actinobacteria are widely dispersed in both terrestrial ecosystem, as present in soil, and aquatic ecosystems as in fresh and marine water. The terrestrial actinobacteria contribute in recycling process and are essential to the decomposition of many complex mixtures of polymers and organic material, located in dead plants, animals, and fungal materials. The phylum actinobacteria is currently recognized as the largest taxonomic units within the bacterial domain and recognized for its economic importance because it produces various biological active substances like vitamins, antibiotics, and enzymes. It is estimated that almost 23,000 bioactive secondary metabolites are produced by many microorganisms and almost 45% (10,000 out of 23,000) of these bioactive microbial metabolites are produced by actinomycetes. Among these actinomycetes,
Actinobacteria | Host plant | Target pathogen | References |
---|---|---|---|
[5] | |||
[6] | |||
Medicinal plants | [7] | ||
[8] | |||
[9] | |||
[10] | |||
[11] | |||
[12] | |||
Leguminous plants | [13] | ||
[14] | |||
[15] | |||
[16] | |||
[17] |
2. Actinobacteria’s role in PGPR activity
Plant growth and development of important organs in plant are facilitated by plant hormones called plant growth regulators (PGR). These PGR can influence plant growth even at very low concentration. Actinobacteria act as PGPR, and its impact is determined by considering the effectiveness and ability to influence PGR in root system. Different mechanisms used for promoting PGR by actinobacteria are classified into direct and indirect method (Figure 1).
The direct method exhibits various activities including solubilization of phosphorus, nitrogen fixation, iron acquisition, and production of different phytohormones, for instance, indole acetic acid (IAA), cytokinins, and gibberellins. In indirect method, actinobacteria promote plant growth in many ways such as synthesizing extracellular enzymes for fungal cell wall degradation producing antibiotics, volatile compounds (VOCs), inducting systemic resistance, as well as competition for nutrients [18].
2.1 Direct method for plant growth promoter by actinobacteria
Actinobacteria promote the growth of plants by involving in various direct activities as shown in Table 2.
Actinobacteria | PGP traits | Host plant | Reference |
---|---|---|---|
Siderophore production | Rice ( | [19] | |
IAA production Phosphate solubilization | Wheat | [20] | |
Nitrogen fixation | Soybean ( | [21] | |
IAA production | Mandarin ( | [22] | |
IAA production | Sorghum Rice | [23] | |
ACC deaminase activity | Pepper ( | [24] | |
Phosphate solubilization | Carrot ( | [25] | |
Nutrient uptake | Clover | [26] | |
Gibberellic acid, IAA, | Marine environments | [27] | |
Auxin, gibberellin, and cytokinin synthesis | Wheat | [28] | |
Nitrogen fixation IAA production ACC deaminase activity | Canola | [29] | |
Phosphate solubilization | — | [30] | |
Actinobacteria | Phosphate solubilization, Nitrogen fixation | Soya bean | [31] |
2.1.1 Nitrogen fixation
Nitrogen is a well-known and key element of nucleic acids and proteins, and it is also an indispensable nutrient for plant growth. Nitrogen gas is abundantly found in the air, constituting 78% of the atmosphere, but it is not directly available to plants for uptake unless it is converted into its soluble form [32]. Biological nitrogen fixer (BNF) used nitrogenase enzyme system which converts the atmospheric nitrogen required by plants into ammonium and nitrates [33]. Additionally, synthetic nitrogen fertilizers are also supplied to balance the limited availability of nitrogen provided by biological nitrogen fixer. But these fertilizers might be harmful to health and agricultural sustainability. Therefore, actinobacteria are good choice to be utilized as BNF to improve the plant growth for sustainable agriculture.
2.1.2 Phosphorus solubilization
After nitrogen, the second major element, for plant growth, is phosphorus [36]. Phosphorus exists in soil as both inorganic and organic forms [37], but 0.1% phosphorus is available as soluble form to be absorbed by plants. An immediate need of phosphorus is fulfilled by chemical fertilizers, like nitrogen, but the majority of these applied chemical fertilizers are not only expensive but also wasted because it retains in soil as an insoluble form just after the application [37]. In the past decades, many microbes have been described which can solubilize the insoluble phosphorus, and since then, numerous studies by many researchers have been carried out to investigate the phosphate-solubilizing potential of different microbes such as bacteria, fungi, and actinobacteria [38]. Different in vitro and in vivo studies have been executed, which highlight capability to solubilize soil phosphorus by PGP actinobacteria, for instance,
2.1.3 Siderophore production by actinobacteria
Iron is an essential nutrient element for all organisms, which acts as a necessary co-factor for several enzymatic reactions. Many beneficial actinobacteria including
2.1.4 Production of hormone
Several rhizospheric and endophytic actinobacteria have been noticed to yield several phytohormones, namely, indole acetic acid (IAA), cytokinins, and gibberellins. These phytohormones show a significant role in the plant growth [47]. The most important phytohormone is indole-3-acetic acid, a principal form of auxin that shows the useful impact on plants by various cellular processes like cell division, elongation, and differentiation. Recently, endophytic actinobacteria are getting more attention because of their role in the production of phytohormones. It has been reported that
2.2 Indirect plant growth mechanism of actinobacteria
In indirect plant growth mechanism, actinobacteria also enhance the growth of plants like direct mechanism which is mentioned in Figure 3.
2.2.1 Cell wall-degrading enzymes
Actinobacteria synthesize many different extracellular enzymes that help to decompose material in soil. Some of these enzymes include xylanases, chitinases, hemicellulose, nucleases, amylases, lipases, glucanases, pectinase, proteinases, cellulases, ligninases, and keratinase. Mainly soil-living actinobacteria are saprophytic and play a central role in decomposition. Actinobacteria use this mixture of enzymes for decomposition against a variety of phytopathogens and majorly contribute to biocontrol potential by damaging cell wall of these pathogens. Cell wall of many bacteria and fungi is made up of polymers like glycan, cellulose, chitin, protein, and lipids [49]. Actinobacteria are regarded as the dominant organisms that decompose chitin in soil and also considered as promising antagonistic agents for biocontrol because of the hydrolytic reaction on mycelium of the fungi. Acctinobacteria are also observed to produced chitinase enzyme that inhibit fungal growth by cell wall chitin hydrolysis. Many species of
Enzymes | Actinobacteria | References |
---|---|---|
Chitinase | [52] | |
Chitinase, glucanase | [53] | |
Cellulose | [54] | |
Ligase | [25] | |
Amylases, lipases, β-1-3-glucanase | [55] | |
Chitinase, glucanase and protease | [56] |
2.2.2 Actinobacteria’s role as nutrient promoter
As PGP, actinobacteria also act to raise the soil fertility by exhibiting various activities; hence, it is acknowledged as a main natural nutrient enhancer. Besides siderophore producer and phosphate solubilizer, actinobacteria also produce many kinds of enzymes like lipase, amylase, peroxidase, xylanase, chitinase, keratinase, pectinase, cellulase, and protease. This cocktail of enzymes helps to convert nutrients into simple mineral forms, and due to this nutrient cycling ability of actinobacteria, it is considered as an optimal candidate for natural fertilizers [38]. These actinobacteria also promote the soil metal-mobilizing ability like Fe, Zn, and Se, which ultimately increase the germination of seeds and plant growth. Current research has exposed that the root colonization of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi increases growth of crop and zinc and iron content of chickpea grains [57]. Under greenhouse and field conditions, two PGPR, namely,
2.2.3 Actinobacteria in bioremediation of metals
Anthropogenic activities are the main cause of metal pollution of agricultural lands which led to a decrease in the fruitful agricultural cropland. As reported by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), nearly more than 40,000 contaminated sites are present in the United States. Furthermore, due to heavy metal contamination, 50,000 hectare of forest, 55,000 hectare of pasture, and 100,000 hectare of cropland have vanished, and these need retrieval process [60]. PGP like actinobacteria stay in metal-contaminated soil and increase the bioremediation process by extracting and solubilizing mineral. Different reactions like oxidation, metal reduction, and biosorption as well as several substances like organic acids, siderophores, polymeric substances, glycoprotein, and bio-surfactants are released by the microbes which aid in the metal-mobilizing property of these microbes. Many studies have been performed by researchers which demonstrated the metal-mobilizing mechanism [61].
2.2.4 Reduction of plant-pathogen stress by actinobacteria
Primarily, plants use beneficial microorganisms and plant integrated defense mechanism to protect themselves from phytopathogens [62]. Beneficial microorganisms (pathogen antagonistic) alleviate the pathogen stress in plants through different mechanisms like secretion of anti-pathogenic metabolites, competition for space, and nutrients [8]. Actinobacteria also play vital role in plant protection against plant pathogens utilizing nutrients, required by pathogens for growth. Meanwhile, actinobacteria produce different volatile compounds, antibiotics and cell wall degrading enzymes against phytopathogens [63]. Actinobacteria have been reported to produce various antifungal volatile organic compounds against fungal disease [64].
Endophytic actinobacteria | Host plant | Metabolite | Target pathogen(s) | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|
Munumbicins A, B, C and D | [70] | |||
Potato | Geldanamycin | [71] | ||
Rice | 2,3-Dihydroxybenzoic acid, phenylacetic acid, cervinomycin A1 and A2 | [72] | ||
Wheat | Malayamycin | [73] | ||
Pepper | 2-Furancarboxaldehyde | [74] | ||
Saadamycin/5,7-Dimethoxy-4-pmethoxylphenyl coumarin | [75] | |||
Coronamycin | [76] | |||
Coumarin | [77] | |||
Ketoconazole, fluconazole, miconazole | [78] | |||
100% | Tomato | Filipin III (purified antibiotic) | [79] | |
Banana | [80] | |||
Rice | Bonactin | [81] | ||
Benzaldehyde, butanoic acid | [53] |
2.2.5 Actinobacteria’s role against stress
Several abiotic stress factors including flooding, extreme temperatures, salinity, nutrient stress, drought, and metal stress impose a harmful impact on yields of the crop, as well as it also severally damaged the soil. As described by the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), if precautionary steps are not implemented, in the next 25 years 30% land degradation will happen due to abiotic stress factors, and this will rise to 50% in 2050 [16]. Strains of actinobacteria have better tolerance against abiotic stress factors like temperature, salinity, and metal stress, and inoculation of tolerant actinobacteria strain was noticed to encourage the plant growth. Useful effects of PGP
3. Conclusion
Production of food to fulfill the need of an increasing population and mimic the reliance on nonrenewable resources and also environmental effect is the greatest challenge of this century. To complete this challenge, the use of plant growth microbes such as actinobacteria is a good choice as an alternative tool for sustainable agriculture. Various studies highlight the abilities of actinobacteria as a plant growth promoter and their additive impact on plant growth and protection. Actinobacteria isolates have shown the multidimensional way to be effective on plant growth. They promote plant growth by involving various activities like production of phytohormones, siderophore production, solubilization of phosphate, fixation of nitrogen, complementing mycorrhizal fungi, and also balancing the ecology of the soil system. Additionally, many studies also have proven the potential of actinobacteria as a biocontrol agent. These characteristics of the actinobacteria group have proved them as inevitable tools for increasing productivity and quality in agriculture. Keeping in mind all these aspects, it is a need of time that we focus on the use of actinobacteria as an alternative tool and reduce the use of harmful chemicals. The studies referred in this chapter also support the belief that the use of eco-friendly microorganisms and designing new formulations with cooperative microbe might contribute to plant growth improvement.
References
- 1.
Lata RK, Divjot K, Nath YA. Endophytic microbiomes: Biodiversity, ecological significance and biotechnological applications. Research Journal of Biotechnology. 2019; 14 :10 - 2.
Chander J. Textbook of Medical Mycology. Chandigarh, India: JP Medical Ltd; 2017 - 3.
Binda E et al. Specificity of induction of glycopeptide antibiotic resistance in the producing actinomycetes. Antibiotics. 2018; 7 (2):36 - 4.
Stamenov D et al. The use of Streptomyces isolate with plant growth promoting traits in the production of English ryegrass. Romanian Agricultural Research. 2016;33 :299-306 - 5.
Cao L et al. Isolation and characterization of endophytic Streptomyces strains from surface-sterilized tomato(Lycopersicon esculentum) roots. Letters in Applied Microbiology. 2004;39 (5):425-430 - 6.
El-Tarabily KA, Hardy GESJ, Sivasithamparam K. Performance of three endophytic actinomycetes in relation to plant growth promotion and biological control of Pythium aphanidermatum , a pathogen of cucumber under commercial field production conditions in the United Arab Emirates. European Journal of Plant Pathology. 2010;128 (4):527-539 - 7.
Singh S, Gaur R. Evaluation of antagonistic and plant growth promoting activities of chitinolytic endophytic actinomycetes associated with medicinal plants against Sclerotium rolfsii in chickpea. Journal of Applied Microbiology. 2016;121 (2):506-518 - 8.
Passari AK et al. Detection of biosynthetic gene and phytohormone production by endophytic actinobacteria associated with Solanum lycopersicum and their plant-growth-promoting effect. Research in Microbiology. 2016;167 (8):692-705 - 9.
Passari AK et al. In vitro and in vivo plant growth promoting activities and DNA fingerprinting of antagonistic endophytic actinomycetes associates with medicinal plants. PLoS One. 2015; 10 (9):e0139468 - 10.
Goodman AA. Endophytic Actinomycetes as Potential Agents to Control Common Scab of Potatoes. Nothern Michigan University: NMU Master’s Theses; 2014 - 11.
Shimizu M et al. Identification of endophytic Streptomyces sp. R-5 and analysis of its antimicrobial metabolites. Journal of General Plant Pathology. 2004;70 (1):66-68 - 12.
Shimizu M, Yazawa S, Ushijima Y. A promising strain of endophytic Streptomyces sp. for biological control of cucumber anthracnose. Journal of General Plant Pathology. 2009;75 (1):27-36 - 13.
Shivlata L, Satyanarayana T. Actinobacteria in agricultural and environmental sustainability. In: Agro-Environmental Sustainability. New Delhi, India: Springer; 2017. pp. 173-218 - 14.
Purushotham N et al. Community structure of endophytic actinobacteria in a New Zealand native medicinal plant Pseudowintera colorata (Horopito) and their influence on plant growth. Microbial Ecology. 2018;76 (3):729-740 - 15.
Ting ASY, Hermanto A, Peh KL. Indigenous actinomycetes from empty fruit bunch compost of oil palm: Evaluation on enzymatic and antagonistic properties. Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology. 2014; 3 (4):310-315 - 16.
Verma V, Singh S, Prakash S. Bio-control and plant growth promotion potential of siderophore producing endophytic Streptomyces fromAzadirachta indica A. Juss . Journal of Basic Microbiology. 2011;51 (5):550-556 - 17.
Goudjal Y et al. Biocontrol of Rhizoctonia solani damping-off and promotion of tomato plant growth by endophytic actinomycetes isolated from native plants ofAlgerian Sahara . Microbiological Research. 2014;169 (1):59-65 - 18.
Majeed A et al. Isolation and characterization of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria from wheat rhizosphere and their effect on plant growth promotion. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2015; 6 :198 - 19.
Rungin S et al. Plant growth enhancing effects by a siderophore-producing endophytic streptomycete isolated from a Thai jasmine rice plant ( Oryza sativa L. cv. KDML105). Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2012;102 (3):463-472 - 20.
Aly MM, El Sayed H, Jastaniah SD. Synergistic effect between Azotobacter vinelandii andStreptomyces sp. isolated from saline soil on seed germination and growth of wheat plant. Journal of American Science. 2012;8 (5):667-676 - 21.
Soe KM, Yamakawa T. Low-density co-inoculation of Myanmar Bradyrhizobium yuanmingense MAS34 andStreptomyces griseoflavus P4 to enhance symbiosis and seed yield in soybean varieties. American Journal of Plant Sciences. 2013;4 (09):1879 - 22.
Shutsrirung A et al. Diversity of endophytic actinomycetes in mandarin grown in northern Thailand, their phytohormone production potential and plant growth promoting activity. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition. 2013; 59 (3):322-330 - 23.
Gopalakrishnan S et al. Plant growth-promoting activities of Streptomyces spp. in sorghum and rice. Springerplus. 2013;2 (1):574 - 24.
Sziderics A et al. Bacterial endophytes contribute to abiotic stress adaptation in pepper plants ( Capsicum annuum L.). Canadian Journal of Microbiology. 2007;53 (11):1195-1202 - 25.
El-Tarabily KA, Nassar AH, Sivasithamparam K. Promotion of growth of bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in a calcareous soil by a phosphate-solubilizing, rhizosphere-competent isolate ofMicromonospora endolithica . Applied Soil Ecology. 2008;39 (2):161-171 - 26.
Franco-Correa M et al. Evaluation of actinomycete strains for key traits related with plant growth promotion and mycorrhiza helping activities. Applied Soil Ecology. 2010; 45 (3):209-217 - 27.
Rashad FM et al. Isolation and characterization of multifunctional Streptomyces species with antimicrobial, nematicidal and phytohormone activities from marine environments in Egypt. Microbiological Research. 2015;175 :34-47 - 28.
Aldesuquy H, Mansour F, Abo-Hamed S. Effect of the culture filtrates of Streptomyces on growth and productivity of wheat plants. Folia Microbiologica. 1998;43 (5):465-470 - 29.
Siddikee MA et al. Isolation, characterization, and use for plant growth promotion under salt stress, of ACC deaminase-producing halotolerant bacteria derived from coastal soil. Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2010; 20 (11):1577-1584 - 30.
Nafis A et al. Actinobacteria from extreme niches in Morocco and their plant growth-promoting potentials. Diversity. 2019; 11 (8):139 - 31.
Amule F et al. Effect of actinobacterial, rhizobium and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria consortium inoculation on rhizosphere soil properties in soybean in Jabalpur district of Madhya Pradesh. International Journal of Consumer Studies. 2018; 6 (1):583-586 - 32.
Santi C, Bogusz D, Franche C. Biological nitrogen fixation in non-legume plants. Annals of Botany. 2013; 111 (5):743-767 - 33.
Kim J, Rees DC. Nitrogenase and biological nitrogen fixation. Biochemistry. 1994; 33 (2):389-397 - 34.
Benson DR, Silvester W. Biology of Frankia strains, actinomycete symbionts of actinorhizal plants. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews. 1993;57 (2):293-319 - 35.
Sellstedt A, Richau KH. Aspects of nitrogen-fixing Actinobacteria , in particular free-living and symbioticFrankia . FEMS Microbiology Letters. 2013;342 (2):179-186 - 36.
Razaq M, Zhang P, Shen H-L. Influence of nitrogen and phosphorous on the growth and root morphology of Acer mono. PLoS One. 2017; 12 (2):e0171321 - 37.
Bouain N et al. Phosphate and zinc transport and signalling in plants: Toward a better understanding of their homeostasis interaction. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2014; 65 (20):5725-5741 - 38.
Jog R, Nareshkumar G, Rajkumar S. Enhancing soil health and plant growth promotion by actinomycetes. In: Plant Growth Promoting Actinobacteria. Singapore: Springer; 2016. pp. 33-45 - 39.
Hamdali H et al. Rock phosphate-solubilizing Actinomycetes: Screening for plant growth-promoting activities. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2008; 24 (11):2565-2575 - 40.
El-Tarabily KA. Promotion of tomato ( Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. ) plant growth by rhizosphere competent 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid deaminase-producing streptomycete actinomycetes. Plant and Soil. 2008;308 (1-2):161-174 - 41.
Crowley DE. Microbial siderophores in the plant rhizosphere. In: Iron Nutrition in Plants and Rhizospheric Microorganisms. Riverside, CA, USA: Springer, University of California; 2006. pp. 169-198 - 42.
Wang W et al. Siderophore production by actinobacteria. Biometals. 2014; 27 (4):623-631 - 43.
Challis GL, Ravel J. Coelichelin, a new peptide siderophore encoded by the Streptomyces coelicolor genome: Structure prediction from the sequence of its non-ribosomal peptide synthetase. FEMS Microbiology Letters. 2000; 187 (2):111-114 - 44.
Lee J et al. Siderophore production by actinomycetes isolates from two soil sites in Western Australia. Biometals. 2012; 25 (2):285-296 - 45.
Rashid S, Charles TC, Glick BR. Isolation and characterization of new plant growth-promoting bacterial endophytes. Applied Soil Ecology. 2012; 61 :217-224 - 46.
Gopalakrishnan S et al. Biocontrol of charcoal-rot of sorghum by actinomycetes isolated from herbal vermicompost. African Journal of Biotechnology. 2011; 10 (79):18142-18152 - 47.
Gopalakrishnan S, Sathya A, Vijayabharathi R. A Book Entitled “Plant Growth-Promoting Actinobacteria: A New Avenue for Enhancing the Productivity & Soil Fertility of Grain Legumes”. Singapore: Springer; 2016 - 48.
Abd-Alla MH, El-Sayed E-SA, Rasmey A-HM. Indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) production by Streptomyces atrovirens isolated from rhizospheric soil in Egypt. Journal of Biology and Earth Sciences. 2013; 3 (2):182-193 - 49.
Sathya A, Vijayabharathi R, Gopalakrishnan S. Plant growth-promoting actinobacteria: A new strategy for enhancing sustainable production and protection of grain legumes. Biotech. 2017; 7 (2):102 - 50.
Karthik N, Binod P, Pandey A. Purification and characterisation of an acidic and antifungal chitinase produced by a Streptomyces sp. Bioresource Technology. 2015;188 :195-201 - 51.
Yandigeri MS et al. Chitinolytic Streptomyces vinaceusdrappus S5MW2 isolated from Chilika lake, India enhances plant growth and biocontrol efficacy through chitin supplementation againstRhizoctonia solani . World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2015;31 (8):1217-1225 - 52.
Liotti RG, da Silva Figueiredo MI, Soares MA. Streptomyces griseocarneus R132 controls phytopathogens and promotes growth of pepper(Capsicum annuum) . Biological Control. 2019;138 :104065 - 53.
Wonglom P et al. Streptomyces angustmyceticus NR8-2 as a potential microorganism for the biological control of leaf spots of Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis caused by Colletotrichum sp. andCurvularia lunata . Biological Control. 2019;138 :104046 - 54.
Saito A, Fujii T, Miyashita K. Distribution and evolution of chitinase genes in Streptomyces species: Involvement of gene-duplication and domain-deletion. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2003;84 (1):7 - 55.
Khamna S, Yokota A, Peberdy JF, Lumyong S. Indole-3-acetic acid production by Streptomyces sp. isolated from some Thai medicinal plant rhizosphere soils. EurAsian Journal of BioSciences. 2010;4 (1):23-32 - 56.
Marsh P, Wellington EMH. Molecular ecology of filamentous actinomycetes in soil. Molecular Ecology of Rhizosphere Microorganisms. Wellington, New Zealand: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH; 2007. pp. 133-149 - 57.
Pellegrino E, Bedini S. Enhancing ecosystem services in sustainable agriculture: Biofertilization and biofortification of chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L.) by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 2014;68 :429-439 - 58.
Kaur N, Sharma P. Screening and characterization of native Pseudomonas sp. as plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) rhizosphere. African Journal of Microbiology Research. 2013;7 (16):1465-1474 - 59.
Sathya A et al. Plant growth-promoting actinobacteria on chickpea seed mineral density: An upcoming complementary tool for sustainable biofortification strategy. Biotech. 2016; 6 (2):138 - 60.
Mahmood T. Phytoextraction of heavy metals-the process and scope for remediation of contaminated soils. Soil and Environment. 2010; 29 (2):91-109 - 61.
Sessitsch A et al. The role of plant-associated bacteria in the mobilization and phytoextraction of trace elements in contaminated soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 2013; 60 :182-194 - 62.
Dangl JL, Jones JD. Plant pathogens and integrated defence responses to infection. Nature. 2001; 411 (6839):826 - 63.
de Jesus Sousa JA, Olivares FL. Plant growth promotion by streptomycetes: Ecophysiology, mechanisms and applications. Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture. 2016; 3 (1):24 - 64.
Wang Z et al. Fumigant activity of volatiles from Streptomyces alboflavus TD-1 against Fusarium moniliforme Sheldon. Journal of Microbiology. 2013;51 (4):477-483 - 65.
Wan M et al. Effect of volatile substances of Streptomyces platensis F-1 on control of plant fungal diseases. Biological Control. 2008; 46 (3):552-559 - 66.
Pal KK, Gardener BM. Biological Control of Plant Pathogens. Gujarat, India: The Plant Health Instructor; 2006 - 67.
Conn V, Walker A, Franco C. Endophytic actinobacteria induce defense pathways in Arabidopsis thaliana . Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions. 2008;21 (2):208-218 - 68.
Senthilraja G. Induction of systemic resistance in crop plants against plant pathogens by plant growth-promoting actinomycetes. In: Plant Growth Promoting Actinobacteria. Singapore: Springer; 2016. pp. 193-202 - 69.
Zhao S, Du C-M, Tian C-Y. Suppression of Fusarium oxysporum and induced resistance of plants involved in the biocontrol ofCucumber Fusarium Wilt byStreptomyces bikiniensis HD-087. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2012;28 (9):2919-2927 - 70.
Castillo UF et al. Munumbicins E-4 and E-5: Novel broad-spectrum antibiotics from Streptomyces NRRL 3052. FEMS Microbiology Letters. 2006;255 (2):296-300 - 71.
Clermont N et al. Effect of biopolymers on geldanamycin production and biocontrol ability of Streptomyces melanosporofaciens strain EF-76. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology. 2010;32 (4):481-489 - 72.
Ismet A et al. Production and chemical characterization of antifungal metabolites from Micromonospora sp. M39 isolated from mangrove Rhizosphere soil. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2004;20 (5):523-528 - 73.
Li W et al. Malayamycin, a new streptomycete antifungal compound, specifically inhibits sporulation of Stagonospora nodorum (Berk) castell and Germano, the cause of wheat glume blotch disease. Pest Management Science. 2008;64 (12):1294-1302 - 74.
Park S et al. Determination of polyphenol levels variation in Capsicum annuum L. cv. Chelsea (yellow bell pepper) infected by anthracnose (Colletotrichum gloeosporioides ) using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Food Chemistry. 2012;130 (4):981-985 - 75.
Zhao K et al. The diversity and anti-microbial activity of endophytic actinomycetes isolated from medicinal plants in Panxi plateau , China. Current Microbiology. 2011;62 (1):182-190 - 76.
Ezra D et al. Coronamycins, peptide antibiotics produced by a verticillate Streptomyces sp.(MSU-2110) endophytic onMonstera sp. Microbiology. 2004;150 (4):785-793 - 77.
Liu Y et al. Endophytic bacteria associated with endangered plant Ferula sinkiangensis KM Shen in an arid land: Diversity and plant growth-promoting traits. Journal of Arid Land. 2017;9 (3):432-445 - 78.
Passari AK et al. Insights into the functionality of endophytic actinobacteria with a focus on their biosynthetic potential and secondary metabolites production. Scientific Reports. 2017; 7 (1):11809 - 79.
Kim JD et al. Identification and biocontrol efficacy of Streptomyces miharaensis producing filipin III againstFusarium wilt. Journal of Basic Microbiology. 2012;52 (2):150-159 - 80.
Getha K et al. Evaluation of Streptomyces sp. strain g10 for suppression ofFusarium wilt and rhizosphere colonization in pot-grown banana plantlets. Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2005;32 (1):24-32 - 81.
Buatong J et al. Antifungal metabolites from marine-derived Streptomyces sp. AMA49 againstPyricularia oryzae . Journal of Pure and Applied Microbiology. 2019;13 (2):653-665 - 82.
Sadeghi A et al. Plant growth promoting activity of an auxin and siderophore producing isolate of Streptomyces under saline soil conditions. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2012;28 (4):1503-1509 - 83.
Yandigeri MS et al. Drought-tolerant endophytic actinobacteria promote growth of wheat ( Triticum aestivum ) under water stress conditions. Plant Growth Regulation. 2012;68 (3):411-420 - 84.
Saraf M, Jha CK, Patel D. The role of ACC deaminase producing PGPR in sustainable agriculture. In: Plant Growth and Health Promoting Bacteria. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2010. pp. 365-385 - 85.
Etesami H et al. Bacterial biosynthesis of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC) deaminase and indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) as endophytic preferential selection traits by rice plant seedlings. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation. 2014; 33 (3):654-670 - 86.
Nascimento FX et al. New insights into 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC) deaminase phylogeny, evolution and ecological significance. PLoS One. 2014; 9 (6):e99168