Open access

Design and Application of Piezoelectric Stacks in Level Sensors

Written By

Andrzej Buchacz and Andrzej Wróbel

Submitted: 12 June 2012 Published: 27 February 2013

DOI: 10.5772/54580

From the Edited Volume

Piezoelectric Materials and Devices - Practice and Applications

Edited by Farzad Ebrahimi

Chapter metrics overview

2,263 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

1. Introduction

In recent years there is growing interest of materials, called smart materials. They have one or more properties that can be significantly changed. Smartness describes abilities of shape, size and state of aggregation changes. The main groups of smart materials are:

  • piezoelectric plates,

  • magneto-rheostatic materials,

  • electro-rheostatic materials,

  • shape memory alloys.

Those materials are widely used in technology and their numbers of applications still growing. Piezoelectric effect was discovered by French physicists Peter and Paul Curie in the 1880s. They described generation of electric charge on the surface with various shape during its deformation in different directions.

In their research, first of all, they focused on tourmaline crystal, salt and quartz. In 1881s Gabriel Lippman suggested the existence of the reverse piezoelectric phenomenon, which was confirmed experimentally by the Curie brothers. As a solution of research such two, unique properties of piezoelectric materials were assigned:

  • showing of simple piezoelectric effect, which rely on generating of voltage after deformation of material,

  • reverse piezoelectric effect, which rely on changing of sizes (by around 4%) after applying a voltage to piezoelectric facing.

Designing of technological systems, which contains piezoelectric elements should not be framed only to mechanical system analysis, but should be taken under consideration also electrical part. The entity should be considered as complex system, which contains independent subsystem.

Problem with mechanical-physical systems synthesis, first of all electrical and mechanical ones, is well known and frequently published (Arczewski, 1988; Bellert 1981; Białas, 2012; Buchacz & Płaczek, 2012). In articles concerned theory and designing of filters not much space was devoted to mechanical systems with parameters distributed in continuous way. Determination tests of mechatronic systems characteristics, applications of graphs and structural numbers were carried out at Silesian Center repeatedly (Buchacz, 2004; Sękala & Świder, 2005; Wróbel, 2012). Those studies gave assumption to analysis of piezoelectric work. In many publications and papers, mechanical systems investigations on example of vibration beams and rods, were introduced. Moreover, rules of modellinig by non-classical method and attempts of analysis by using hypergraph skeletons (Buchacz & Świder, 2000), graphs with signal flow and matrix methods (Bishop et at.,1972) were shown in these works.

Nowadays, numerous piezoelectric advantages caused its multi-application in mechanics and in many replaced field of science (Shin et al.,2005; Ha, 2002). Many times beams configurations, with respect to different boundary conditions and during piezoelectric application in damping of vibrations, were analyzed. In the paper (Sherrit, 1999) capability of piezoelectric systems modelling using equivalent Manson models were presented. Analysis of longitudinal vibrations were made taking into consideration dielectric and piezoelement layer. Mason in (Mason, 1948) introduced one-dimensional, equivalent system parameters widely used in modelling systems both free, and loaded. The main disadvantage of such approach is the equivalent of the mechanical system by discreet model. In article (Shin et at.,2005) author presents 4-port equivalent system of piezoelectric plate, used to identification of system response on mechanical force. A matrix, size 5x5, input-output dependences, with different conditions of support, was also determined. Another type of piezoelectric transducer, which was based on Masons alternative systems of higher number of piezoelectric layer, were presented in many articles. Simulation was carried out in frequency domain, furthermore result was compared with values obtained by experimental method. Bellert in his volumes of chosen works (Bellert 1981) many times wrote about modelling of replacing systems, examined as 4-ports. In work (Bolkowski, 1986) author provide chain method of connection electric 4-ports. However, both: (Bolkowski, 1986) and (Bellert 1981) concerned primarily electric systems. In research work number N502 071 31/3719 attempts of active, mechanical systems, with damping in scope of graphs and structural numbers methods, were analyzed. In such, rich publications from field of vibration analysis, solution of piezoelectric plate itself with respect to dynamic characteristic was not undertaken, with the exceptions (Kacprzyk, 1995).

Previous presented solutions were conducted mainly in field of time and concerned single plate. Present paper is continuation of mentioned publications with stack of piezoelectric plates. This work is an author’s idea of calculations of complex systems with many elements. The base of calculation is matrix method and application of aggregation of graphs to determination characteristic parameters of bimorphic systems, as well as to drawing its characteristics.

Advertisement

2. Vibrating level sensor as a practical example of the application of piezoelectric stacks

An important characteristic of the designed and analyzed piezoelectric systems is the possibility of their practical application. This chapter presents options for further research related to the piezoelectric phenomenon of complex systems. Both a single piezoelectric plate, as well as complex systems, are often used in pressure, level, force and displacement sensors. As part of future research is proposed execution of laboratory stand for tests of piezoelectric plates used in vibration sensors. These sensors were used for level detection of loose materials in open or pressurized tanks. Output signal is a binary signal, transmitted to the automation systems via a relay. In Fig. 1 and Fig. 2 the level of vibration sensors manufactured by the “Nivomer” company from Gliwice were shown.

Figure 1.

Angular vibrational sensor

Figure 2.

Approximate dimensions [documentation of the ”Nivomer”company]

The application of stack tiles for intensification of the output signal. The sensors consist of two pairs of receiving plates and two or three supplying plates, connected in a bimorphic system (Fig. 3, Fig. 4). Variable voltage, which feeds the supply plates results in a change in their thickness proportionally to the value of applied voltage.

Figure 3.

Stack of plates in the level sensor

Figure 4.

Computer model of the tiles stack

Changes in the plate thickness causing mechanical vibrations of the element, so called “fork”. When the “forks” are not covered by material, full deformation of supplying plates are transferred to the receiving ones. As a result of elongation of receiving plates, on its facing, there is a difference of potentials, proportional to the force. The value of this voltage is transformed by an electronic system (Fig. 5). In case of covered ”forks”, the receiving plates are no longer crushed and stretched. At the same time the potential is not generated on the facing of the plates.

Figure 5.

View of the sensor with control

Figure 6.

Construction of the level sensor by “Nivomer” company

Described sensor of "Nivomer" company is made of the body, ended with membrane which intensify a signal, to which are welded two identical vibrating rods (Fig. 6). In the presented sensor piezoelectric plates in the form of discs were used but there is a possibility of replacing the plates with shapes analyzed in previous chapters. Effect of plates stacks analysis in sensors designing The proposed analysis of the piezoelectric phenomenon of bimorphic systems allows at the design stage to determine the optimal parameters of piezoelectric plates. Well-chosen plate size and their number is crucial in the performance of other mechanical parts.

After the preliminary analysis of the construction of sensors with the company "Nivomer" from Gliwice found that by introducing a variable number of plates in the system is possible to choose the frequency of the generator and the maximum deflection of the fork carrying vibrations. The proposed methods and algorithms of work concern complex systems, can be used to design a stack of piezoelectric plates in the presented sensor level. In future work, it is proposed to conduct vibration test level sensors and a comparison of the algebraic method with the experimental method.

Advertisement

3. Object model under examination

Under consideration is vibrating piezoelectric plate with parameters distributed in a continuous way. The model has a section A, a thickness d and is made of a uniform material with a density ρ. Example of such system was shown in Fig. 7. Mechanical displacements are caused by the forces and voltage, while the current is generated by the difference of potentials on the plates of piezoelectric.

Figure 7.

Continuous and limited piezoelectric model

In the analyzed example calculations are based on constitutive equations that include the assumed boundary conditions. In the study assumed that the test object is vibrating piezoelectric plate treated as a one-dimensional system. Piezoelectric plate constitutive equations are as follows (Soluch, 1980):

{σ=EuxεEp,D=εSEp+εux,E1

where:

E - the modulus of longitudinal elasticity,

EP - the intensity value of electric field,

ε - deformation,

εS - the electric permeability,

D - the electric induction.

The equation of motion of a given element is as follows:

σx=ρu..,E2

where:

σ - tension,

ρ - density of piezoelectric plate.

It was assumed that Poisson equation is:

Dx=0.E3

Rearranging equation (1) due to Ep :

Ep=DεSεεSux.E4

Substituting expression (4) into equation (1), strain is given:

σ=cuxεεSD,E5

where:

c=E+ε2/εS is the stiffened elastic constant.

From equation (3) result that D=const.Therefore, the equation of motion (2), that takes into account (5), is a one-dimensional wave equation:

c2ux2=ρu..,E6

or assuming that the volume wave equation in piezoelement is equal to:

V=cρ,E7

equation of motion (6) was presented in the form:

2ux21V2u...E8

Assuming the expansion of the plate, mainly in the perpendicular plane to the axis, the following boundary conditions were defined:

{u=u1,whenx=x1,u=u2,whenx=x2,σ=σ1,whenx=x1,σ=σ2,whenx=x2.E9

Replaced mechanical stress by force, using the formula F=Aσ, where A is the surface of piezoelectric plate and σ is the stress of piezoelectric plate. Determined forces in this case are:

{F=F1,whenx=x1,F=F2,whenx=x2.E10

The solution of equation (8) is harmonical displacement:

u=a1ej(ωtkx)+a1ej(ωt+kx),E11

or assuming, that

A1=a1ejωt,A2=a2ejωt,A2=a2ejωt.E12

written as:

u=A1ejkx+A2ejkx.E13

Taking into account the boundary conditions included in the model (9) was obtained:

{u1=A1ejkx1+A2ejx1,u2=A1ejkx2+A2ejx2.E14

In order to determine the coefficients A1 and A2, presented in equation (12) the determinants method was used. The determinant of the set of equations (14) takes the form:

W=|ejkx1ejkx1ejkx2ejkx2|,E15
|W|=ejkx1ejkx2ejkx1ejkx2,E16
|W|=ejkx1+jkx2ejkx2+jkx1.E17

Using the dependences between the trigonometric and exponential functions:

sinx=12j(ejxejx),E18
cosx=12(ejx+ejx),E19

equation (17) was written as:

|W|=2jsin(k(x2x1)),E20

and assuming that the thickness of the plate d=x2x1, the equation was determined:

|W|=2jsinkd.E21

Determinant WA1 results from equation (2.14) and is:

WA1=|u1ejkx1u2ejkx2|,E22

so:

|WA1|=u1ejkx2u2ejkx1.E23

Using the record:

A1=|WA||W|,E24

and substituting the expression (21), (23) into equation (24), A1 was obtained:

A1=u1ejkx2u2ejkx12jsinkd.E25

Furthermore, the determinant WA2 was calculated:

WA2=|ejkx1ejkx2u1u2|,E26

so:

|WA2|=u2ejkx1u1ejkx2,E27

Analogously to (25) A2 was determined:

A2=u2ejkx1u1ejkx22jsinkd.E28

Substituting (11) into equation (5) was written:

σ=c(jkA1ejkx+jkA2ejkx)εεSD.E29

Using (10), the force was defined F1:

F1=Ack(jA1ejkx1jA2ejkx1)εεSD,E30

substituting determined A1, A2 to the equation (30), was obtained:

F1=Ack[j(u1ejkx2u2ejkx12jsinkd)ejkx1j(u2ejkx1u1ejkx22jsinkd)ejku1]εεSD.E31

Carrying out the multiplication of expressions in brackets (31):

F1=Ack[(u1ejk(x2x1)u2ejk(x1x1)2sinkd)(u2ejk(x1jx1)u1ejk(x2x1)2sinkd)]εεSD,E32

and excluding the displacement u1 and u2 before the bracket:

F1=Ack[u1(ejk(x2x1)+ejk(x2x1))u2(ejk(x1x1)+ejk(x1x1))2sinkd]εεSDE33

And taking into account the dependence:

coskd=(ejk(x2x1)+ejk(x2x1))2,E34

was obtained:

F1=Ack[u1coskdsinkdu2sinkd]εεSD.E35

Finally, introducing trigonometric functions, equation (35) was written as:

F1=Ack[u1tankdu2sinkd]+εεSD,E36

In (36) the ralationship of force F1, acting on the beginning of the system (Fig. 2), on the displacements u1 and u2 and its influence on the piezoelectric effect εεSD were shown. Force F2, determined from the equation (30) is equal to:

F2=Ack(jA1ejkx2jA2ejkx2)εεSD,E37

and substituting the determinants A1 (25), A2 (28) to the equation (30), was obtained:

F2=Ack[j(u1ejkx2u2ejkx12jsinkd)ejkx2j(u2ejkx1u1ejkx22jsinkd)ejku2]εεSD.E38

Carrying out the multiplication of expressions in brackets:

F2=Ack[(u1ejk(x2x2)u2ejk(x2x1)2sinkd)(u2ejk(x2jx1)u1ejk(x2x2)2sinkd)]εεSD,E39

and excluding displacements u1 I u2 before brackets:

F2=Ack[u1(ejk(x2x2)+ejk(x2x2))u2(ejk(x2x1)+ejk(x2x1))2sinkd]εεSD,E40

and using dependences (18, 19) written:

F2=Ack[u1sinkdu2coskdsinkd]εεSD.E41

Finally, taking into account the trigonometric functions,

F2=Ack[u1sinkdu2tankd]+εεSDE42

was calculated.

Dependences of the forces and displacements acting on the system under consideration, taking into account the piezoelectric effect, are taking the following form:

{F1=ρVA(u1tankdu2sinkd)+εεSD,F2=ρVA(u1sinkdu2tankd)+εεSD.E43

Analyzing the effects occurring in the piezoelectric plate, also the electrical parameters such as voltage on the plates of piezoelectric and current value were took into account. Voltage U is therefore expressed as a function of electric field:

U=u1u2Epdu,E44

where:

U - value of generated voltage on the linings of piezoelectric,

Ep - electric field intensity.

Integrating (44):

U=Ddεsεεs(u2u1),E45

where:

D- electric induction module, defined as:

D=iωA,E46

finally the voltage in a function of current was shown as:

U=hω(u2u1)+1ωC0i,E47

where:

h=εεs.E48

Capacitance, depends directly on the dimensions of the plates, aswell as physicochemical properties, written in the form:

C0=εsAd.E49

Introducing (46) into equations (36), (42), (46), dependences of replacement set of piezoelectric plate were received, plate characterized by three equations:

F1=Ack[u1tankdu2sinkd]+εεSiωA,E50
F2=Ack[u1tankdu2sinkd]+εεSiωA,E51
U=hω(u2u1)+1ωC0i.E52

Assuming signs :

k=ωV,E53

and

Z=ρVA,E54

obtained the relations between the electrical and mechanical values of piezoelectric plates:

F1=Z[u1tankdu2sinkd]+hiω,E55
F2=Z[u1tankdu2sinkd]+hiω,E56
U=hω(u2u1)+1ωC0iE57

which are also written in a matrix form:

[F1UF2]=[ZtankdhωZsinkdhω1ωC0hωZsinkdhωZtankd][u1iu2].E58
Advertisement

4. Mapping matrix into graph

The values of susceptibility, admittance and characteristics were determined from the formula:

Y=1detZ((ZM)D)T,E59

The matrix (58) was written as respond of system for operating extortion. The individual elements of matrix, presented as a flexibility, admittance and characteristics were recorded as follows: determined dependences of force from displacement are given in Table 1.

Table 1.

Dependences of force from displacement

The dependences between mechanical and electrical parameters were shown in Table 2.

Table 2.

Dependences between mechanical and electrical parameters

In table 3 electrical dependences: voltage and current, so called admittance of piezoelectric system, were listed.

Table 3.

Electrical dependences: voltage and current

In order to determine graph, representing modeled system of piezoelectric plates, as the symbols in the matrix were used. The elements of matrix (58) assigned to the edges of graph are presented as:

Y11=(x1,F1)=1detZ{ρVAωC0tgkdh2ω2}E60
Y12=(x1,U)=1detZ{ρVAsinkdhωhωρVAsinkd}E61
Y13=(x1,F2)=1detZ{h2ω21ωC0ρVAsinkd}E62
Y21=(i,F1)=1detZ{hωρVAtgkd+ρVAsinkdhω}E63
Y22=(i,U)=1detZ{(ρVAtgkd)2+(ρVAsinkd)2}E64
Y23=(i,F2)=1detZ{ρVAωC0tgkdh2ω2}E65
Y31=(x2,F1)=1detZ{h2ω2+ρVAωC0sinkd}E66
Y32=(x2,U)=1detZ{hωρVAtgkdρVAsinkdhω}E67
Y33=(x2,F2)=1detZ{h2ω2ρVAtgkdρVAωC0tgkd}E68

The graphical representation of mapping is shown as:

Figure 8.

Mapping Yij

The symbol Yij is the mechanical flexibility, electrical admittance or characteristics of the system. In mapping of the parameters into the graph, mark Yij means the relationship between the vertex of graph, directed from the apex i to apex j, with the symbol i=j, then the following relationship were true:

Y11=Y10,

Y22=Y20,E69

Y33=Y30.

Dependences according to the index j=0 maps a connection of the vertex with the base vertex. Following this systematic, assignment by an edge of following relations was made:

Figure 9.

Mapping Y10

where f(Y11) is the mechanical flexibility;

Figure 10.

Mapping Y20

where f(Y22) is admittance of electrical system;

Figure 11.

Mapping Y30

where f(Y33) is mechanical flexibility;

Figure 12.

Mapping Y12

where f(Y12) is system characteristic;

Figure 13.

Mapping Y21

where f(Y21) is system characteristic;

Figure 14.

Mapping Y23

where f(Y23) is system characteristic;

Figure 15.

Mapping Y32

where f(Y32) is mechanical flexibility;

Figure 16.

Mapping Y13

where f(Y13) is mechanical flexibility;

Figure 17.

Mapping Y31

where f(Y31) is mechanical flexibility.

A set of drawings of the relation (fig. 9.) – (fig.17.), represents 4-vertex graph, were created and presented in Fig. 18.

2X={Y11,Y22,Y33,Y12,Y21,Y31,Y13,Y23,Y32}E70

Figure 18.

Geometric representation of mapping in the graph

In the rest of the work earlier created 4-vertex graph was replaced by structural number method to the 3-vertex graph.

Advertisement

5. Construction of the replacement graph

Furthermore, the use of an extended 4-vertex graph may prove to complicated calculations. In such case, a modelling of system using the replaced graph was performed. In order to maintain clearness of mapping, characteristics determined in paragraph 4 are indicated by Arabic numerals in parentheses, in accordance with (Bellert, 1981). As a consequence of introduction of the replaced graph, a graph presented in Fig. 19 was obtained. It is the basis for further network analysis methods.

Figure 19.

Construction of the replacement graph

As a result of insertion of replaced graph, replaced flexibility of the system was calculated by structural number method:

Yb=Y3'=detZ(A1'A2')detZA1'2'=Y4(Y2+Y5)+Y5(Y1+Y3)Y1+Y2+Y4.E71
Ya=Y1'=detZ(A2'A3')detZA2'3'=Y1(Y3+Y4)+Y3(Y2+Y4)Y1+Y2+Y4.E72
Advertisement

6. Chain equation of simple and complex system plate

On the figure 14 a piezoelectric plate with parameters distributed in the continuous way, the left and right end is free, was presented. The model of a single plate was marked by (i). Currently considered a model system is reduced system in the previous graph from 4-vertex to 3-vertex graph, as shown in Fig. 20.

Figure 20.

Model of single piezoelectric plate after reduction

Longitudinal vibrations of piezoelectric plate were considered, in the literature described also as thickness. The parameters specifying the system, in accordance with the previously accepted assumptions, were the sizes of input s11,s21 and output s12,s22 values, which were presented as:

1S(i)=YS2(i)E73

where:

Y is a value characterized input-output dependences.

The relations between displacements of plate, and the forces acting on them, written in matrix form:

[1s1(i)1s2(i)]=[Ya(i)Yc(i)Yd(i)Yb(i)][2s2(i)2s2(i)]E74

Transforming the matrix (26) to the chain form expects to receive in the form of matrices:

[2s1(i)1s1(i)]=[A11(i)A12(i)A21(i)A22(i)][2s2(i)1s2(i)]E75

where:

{A11(i)=Yb(i)Yc(i),A12(i)=1Yc(i),A21(i)=Yc(i)Yd(i)Ya(i)Yb(i)Yd(i),A22(i)=Ya(i)Yd(i).E76

In Fig. 21 the free system, consisting of two plates was presented. Superscript indicates the subsequent number of subsystem.

Figure 21.

Diagram of a connection between the two cells and the relation between them

B=[2s1(i)1s1(i)]=[A11(i)A12(i)A21(i)A22(i)][A11(i+1)A12(i+1)A21(i+1)A22(i+1)][2s2(i+1)1s2(i+1)]E77

Finally, chain equation was written in general form:

A(k)=A(i)A(i+1).E78

After the operations carried out according to (79) it was found, that the chain matrix with cascade structure is the ratio of chain matrix of individual cells of the complex system. Obtained transition matrix is presented as:

B=[2s1(i)1s1(i)]=[A11(i+1)A11(i)+A12(i)A21(i+1)A11(i)A12(i+1)+A12(i)A22(i+1)A21(i)A11(i+1)+A22(i)A21(i+1)A21(i)A12(i)+A22(i)A22(i+1)][2s2(i+1)1s2(i+1)]E79

Calculated coefficients (80) were substituted and the final form of the transition matrix was received:

B=[B11(k)B12(k)B21(k)B22(k)]E80
{B11(k)=Yb(i)Yb(i+1)Yd(i)Yd(i+1)+Ya(i+1)Yb(i+1)+Yc(i+1)Yd(i+1)Yd(i)Yd(i+1),B12(k)=Yb(i)Yd(i)Yd(i+1)+Ya(i+1)Yc(i)Yd(i+1),B21(k)=(Ya(i)Yb(i)+Yc(i)Yd(i))Yb(i+1)Yd(i)Yd(i+1)+Ya(i)(Ya(i+1)Yb(i+1)+Yc(i+1)Yd(i+1))Yd(i)Yd(i+1),B22(k)=Ya(i)Yb(i)+Yc(i)Yd(i)Yd(i)Yd(i+1)+Ya(i)Ya(i+1)Yd(i)Yd(i+1),E81

In order to obtain the flexibility of the complex system, calculated coefficients of chain equation (79), was transformed to the basic form:

{Ya(k)=B22(k)B12(k),Yc(k)=B11(k)B22(k)B12(k)B21(k),Yd(k)=1B12(k),Yb(k)=B11(k)B12(k).E82

Equation (83) is the components of the complex characteristics of the matrix taking into account obtained chain parameters of complex system.

Advertisement

7. Charts of simple and bimorph system

In this paragraph, graphical charts of characteristics of piezoelectric plates were shown. The parameters adopted for graphs plotting was presented in table 4.

No. Symbol Value Unit
1 ρ 7.5 [gcm3]
2 E=c33 150 [GPa]
3 A 3.1 [cm2]
4 d 1 [mm]

Table 4.

The parameters adopted for graphs plotting

Figure 22.

Characteristics of a single piezoelectric plate in the frequency domain, depending on the thickness of the plate

Figure 23.

Characteristics of the combined plates of thickness 2and 3[mm] in frequency domain

Figure 24.

Characteristics of a single piezoelectric plate in the frequency domain, depending on the plate surface area

Figure 25.

Characteristics of a single piezoelectric plate in the frequency domain, depending on the piezoelectric density

Advertisement

8. Conclusions

The chapter concerns the analysis of simple and complex piezoelectric systems, in order to determine the impact of piezoelectric plates parameters on the characteristics of the system. For a long time in the machine building are used subassemblies, whose operation is based on the piezoelectric phenomenon. In a researches of machine elements, on their surface piezoelectric sensors are glued, whereas to monitor the state plates are used transducers made from piezoelectric foil. Piezoelectric are often used in machine building also as assemblies, subassemblies or executive elements. Implementation of the piezoelectric system, which acts as a sensor or actuator is based on the selection of geometric dimensions of the plate, and their basic material parameters. In systems composed of several layers is also important piezoelectric plate number. Moreover, there are new problems at the design stage for the designers working in the field of machine building, concerning the application of both: single and stack plates. This matter is extremely important in terms of practical applications. For this reason it is necessary to conduct research whose main objective is to understand the phenomena associated with vibrations of complex piezoelectric systems.

Work is a continuation and development of decades researches at the Gliwice Center, consist in making the analysis of both the classical methods and non-classical. Take advantage of non-classical methods is a more general proposes from modeling in classical meaning. Resolves simple and complex systems irrespective of the type and number of elements included in the test system.

Applied method of structural numbers method was presented and used previously in modeling mechanical systems.

References

  1. 1. ArczewskiK1988Structural Methods of the Complex Mechanical Systems Analysis, WPW, Warsaw
  2. 2. BehrensSFlemingA. JMoheimaniS. O. R2003Abroadband controller for shunt piezoelectric damping of structural vibration. Smart Materials and Structures, 121828
  3. 3. BellertS1981Chosen works, PWN, 8-30100-247-6
  4. 4. BialasK2012Mechanical and electrical elements in reduction of vibrations, Journal of vibroengineering, 1411231281392-8716
  5. 5. BishopR. E. DGladwellG. M. LMichaelsonS1972Matrix analysis of vibration. WNT, Warsaw
  6. 6. BolkowskiS1986Theoretical electrical engineering. WNT, Warsaw
  7. 7. BuchaczA2004Hypergrphs and their subgraphs in modelling and investigation of robots. Journal of materials processing technology. 157-158Complete, Elsevier, 3744
  8. 8. BuchaczAPlaczekM2012The analysis of a composite beam with piezoelectric actuator based on the approximate method, Journal of vibroengineering, 1411111161392-8716
  9. 9. BuchaczASwiderJ2000Skeletons hypergraph in modeling, examination and position robot’s manipulator and subassembly of machines. Silesian University of Technology Press, Gliwice.
  10. 10. HaS. K2002Analysis of a piezoelectric multimorph in extensional and flexular motions. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 253, 3, 10011014
  11. 11. KacprzykRMotylEGajewskiJ. BPasternakA1995Piezoelectric properties of nouniform electrets, Journal of Electrostatics 35, 161166
  12. 12. MasonW. P1948Electromechanical Transducers and Wale Filters. Van Nostrand
  13. 13. SekalaASwiderJ2005Hybrid Graphs in Modelling and Analysis of Discrete-Continuous Mechanical Systems. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 164-165Complete Elsevier 14361443
  14. 14. SherritSLearyS. PDolginB. P1999Comparison of the Mason and KLM equivalent circuits for piezoelectric resonators in thickness mode, Ultrasonics Symposium.
  15. 15. ShinHAhnHHanD. Y2005Modeling and analysis of multilayer piezoelectric transformer, Materials chemistry and physics 92616620
  16. 16. SoluchW1980The introduction to piezoelectronics, WKiŁ, 8-32060-041-3
  17. 17. WróbelA2012Model of piezoelectric including material damping, Proceedings of 16th International Conference ModTech 2012, 2069-673610611064

Written By

Andrzej Buchacz and Andrzej Wróbel

Submitted: 12 June 2012 Published: 27 February 2013