Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Radiation Response of Silicon Carbide Diodes and Transistors

By Takeshi Ohshima, Shinobu Onoda, Naoya Iwamoto, Takahiro Makino, Manabu Arai and Yasunori Tanaka

Submitted: March 28th 2012Reviewed: July 6th 2012Published: October 16th 2012

DOI: 10.5772/51371

Downloaded: 2357

1. Introduction

Silicon Carbide (SiC) is regarded as a promising candidate for electronic devices used in harsh radiation environments (Rad-hard devices) such as in space, accelerator facilities and nuclear power plants [1-5]. In order to apply SiC to such rad-hard devices, we have to know the radiation response of the characteristics of SiC devices, because semiconductor devices show destructive and non-destructive malfunctions and/or degradation their characteristics due to irradiation. For radiation effects on semiconductor devices, three major effects, Single Event Effects (SEEs), Total Ionizing Dose (TID) effect, and Displacement Damage Dose (DDD) effects are known.

When charged particles such as heavy ions are irradiated into semiconductors, dense charge (electron-hole pairs) is generated in semiconductors along to the ion track. The malfunctions of electronic devices such as LSIs and power devices caused by charge generated by charged particles are called SEEs. The SEEs occur even by only one particle incidence, and there are both nondestructive (soft errors) and destructive (hard errors) SEE failures [6-8]. The soft errors arise if the amount of charge collected by devices is large enough to reverse or flip the data state of a memory cell, register, latch, or flip-flop. Since the soft errors are not destructive, the function of semiconductor devices can be recovered by writing new data to the bit and/or resetting of devices. For example, the Single Event Upset (SEU) and the Multiple Bit Upset (MBU) in a Static Random Access Memory (SRAM) and a Dynamic Random Access Memory (DRAM), the Single Event Functional Interrupt (SEFI) in Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA) or DRAM control circuitry are known as the soft errors. Recently, the Single Event Transient (SET) arises as a serious issue for analog electronics and digital logic cells. In general, the SETs in analog electronics are referred to as ASETs, and those in digital combinatorial logic are referred to as DSETs. In contrast, the Single Event Latch-up (SEL), the Single Event Burnout (SEB), and the Single Event Gate Rupture (SEGR) in power electronic devices are known as the hard errors.

Electron-hole pairs are induced in insulator layers of Metal-Insulator-Semiconductor (MIS) structure devices, such as Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor (MOS) devices by irradiation, and as a result, charge trapped in insulator (oxide) and/or traps near the interface between oxide and semiconductor (interface traps) are generated. Since such charge trapped in insulator and interface traps act give harmful influence to transport properties of semiconductors, the electrical characteristics of MIS devices are degraded by their generation [9, 10]. For example, the shift of threshold voltage (V T) and the decrease in the channel mobility (μch) are observed in MOS field effect transistors (FETs). This radiation effect is called the TID effect, and in general, the value of the TID effects gradually increases with increasing dose of radiations because the amount of radiation-induced charge in insulator and interface traps increases with increasing dose.

When energetic particles are irradiated into semiconductor crystals, atoms at lattice sites are scattered into non-lattice sites (knock-on effects). As a result, vacancies and interstitials are created in semiconductor crystals. This is the origin of the DDD effect. However, in reality, the structure of residual defects is not so simple and a wide variety of defects such as divacancies, vacancy clusters, and vacancy-impurity complexes exists in crystals because generated vacancies and interstitials thermally diffuse and finally they become stable defects. In general, such defects act as scattering/recombination centers to free carriers, and as a result, the electrical characteristics of semiconductors devices are degraded. In the case of the DDD effect, similar to the TID effect, the degradation of the characteristics of semiconductor devices becomes larger with increasing fluence of radiation. The degradation of the electrical performance of solar cells installed in space satellites is known as one of the examples of the DDD effect [11-14].

In this chapter, the effects of radiation on the electrical characteristics of SiC devices are described from the point of view of the TID effect and the SEEs.

2. Gamma-ray irradiation effects on SiC MOSFETs

Figure 1 shows the change in the subthreshold region of drain current (ID) – gate voltage (VG) curves (subthreshold curves) for n-channel 6H-SiC MOSFETs by gamma-ray irradiation. The bias of 12 V was applied to drain (VD) during measurements. The gate oxide of the MOSFETs was formed using pyrogenic oxidation (H2:O2 = 1:1) at 1100°C. The mark „+“ on the each line indicates the value of VT. As shown in the figure, the value of VT shifts to the negative voltage side, and also the ID-VG curves stretches after irradiation. This suggests that charge in oxide and interface traps are generated by gamma-ray irradiation.

Figure 1.

Change in the subthreshold region of ID –VG curves (subthreshold curves) for n-channel 6H-SiC MOSFETs by gamma-ray irradiation. The bias of 12 V was applied to drain during measurements. The „+“ mark on the each line indicates the value of VT.

According to Mcwhorter and Winokur [9], the density of charge trapped in gate oxide (ΔNOX) and interface traps (ΔNIT) generated by irradiation can be estimated from the shift of subthreshold curves using a following analysis. Since charge trapped in gate oxide does not respond to bias applied to gate, the entire subthreshold curve is simply shifted by the generation of charge trapped in gate oxide. On the other hand, since the charge state of interface traps depends on Fermi level (thus, the value of the bias applied to gate oxide), the subthereshold curve is stretched by the generation of interface traps. This behavior can be expressed as

ΔVT=ΔVOX+ΔVITE1

where ΔVT, ΔVOX and ΔVIT are the shift of the threshold voltage by irradiation, the voltage shifts due to the generation of oxide-trapped charge and interface traps, respectively. Also, since the charge state of interface traps is assumed to be neutral at midgap state, at which Fermi level corresponds to the intrinsic Fermi level, the shift of the midgap voltage (ΔVMID) due to irradiation is caused by oxide-trapped charge. Thus,

ΔVMID=ΔVOXE2

Since the subthreshold curve between VMID and VT is stretched by the generation of interface traps, ΔVIT is determined as

ΔVIT= (VTVMID)post (VTVMID)preE3

where „post“ and „pre“ mean after and before irradiation, respectively.

In order to obtain the value of VMID, firstly, the drain current corresponding to the midgap condition (IMID) is estimated. In the subthreshold region, ID is expressed as the formula [15]

ID= 21/2μ(W/L)(qNALB/β)(ni/NA)2exp(βϕs)(βϕs)1/2E4

where NA, ni, ϕs and LB are the acceptor (or donor) concentration in the channel region of a MOSFET, the intrinsic carrier concentration, band bending at the surface and the Debye length given by LB = (εs /(βqNA))1/2, respectively. Here, β is equal to q/kBT, where q and kB are the electron charge and the Boltzmann constant, respectively. At the midgap condition, ϕs is equal to (kBT/q)ln(NA/ni). Thus, IMID can be estimated from eq. (4) using ϕs for (kBT/q)ln(NA/ni). Then, the value of VMID can be obtained from the value of VG at IMID on subthreshold curves. It should be mentioned that for the determination of VMID for SiC, it is necessary to linearly extrapolate the lower position of the subthreshold curve down to the lower part of the curve, since the value of IMID is of the order of 10-30 A.

The value of ΔNOX and ΔNIT is estimated from

ΔNOX=ΔVOXCOX/qE5
ΔNIT=ΔVITCOX/qE6

where COX is equal to εOX/tOX, and εOX and tOX are the relative dielectric constant of SiO2 and the thickness of gate oxide, respectively.

Figure 2 (a) shows the ΔVT as a function of absorbed dose for n-channel 6H-SiC MOSFETs. The triangles, circles and squares represent results obtained from MOSFETs of which gate oxide was fabricated by dry (Dry) and pyrogenic (Pyro) oxidations at 1100°C and pryogenic oxidation followed by hydrogen annealing at 700°C for 30 min at a pressure of 20 Torr (H2), respectively. For the details of the fabrication process of those MOSFETs, please see Ref. [16, 17]. For the Dry SiC MOSFETs, the ΔVT slightly shifts to the positive voltage side above 50 kGy although the value does not change below 30 kGy. For the Pyro SiC MOSFETs, the value of ΔVT shifts to the negative voltage side, and the negative shift become smaller above 30 kGy. For the H2 SiC MOSFETs, the ΔVT shows the negative shift around 20 kGy, however, the voltage shift terns to the positive above 30 kGy. Since the value of ΔVT is affected by the generation of charge trapped in gate oxide and interface traps, for understanding the behavior of ΔVT, it is necessary to know the information on ΔVOX and ΔVIT. Therefore, the value of ΔVOX and ΔVIT is derived from the subthreshold curves using Eqs. (1) – (4). The absorbed dose dependence of ΔVOX and ΔVIT is shown in Figs. 3 (a) and (b), respectively. The values of ΔVOX for the Dry and the Pyro SiC MOSFETs show the negative voltage shift and the shift becomes large with absorbed dose. These results indicate that for the Dry and the Pyro SiC MOSFETs, the positive charge is trapped in gate oxide by gamma-ray irradiation and the trapped charge increases with increasing absorbed dose. Since the shift of ΔVOX for the Pyro SiC MOSFETs is larger than that for the Dry SiC MOSFETs, the value of trapped charge for the Pyro SiC MOSFETs is larger than that for the Dry SiC MOSFETs. On the other hand, ΔVOX for the H2 SiC MOSFETs shows complicated behaviors although the shift is very slight even after 530 kGy irradiation. Thus, firstly the ΔVOX shifts to the negative voltage side at doses below 40 kGy. However, the value shows a positive voltage shift around 60 kGy although a negative shift appears at 180 kGy. Then, finally, the shift becomes positive again after irradiation at 530 kGy.

Figure 2.

ΔV T as a function of absorbed dose for n-channel 6H-SiC MOSFETs. The triangles, circles and squares represent results obtained from MOSFETs of which gate oxide was fabricated by dry (Dry) and pyrogenic (Pyro) oxidations at 1100°C and pryogenic oxidation followed by hydrogen annealing at 700°C for 30 min at a pressure of 20 Torr (H2), respectively.

These behaviors indicate that both positively and negatively charges are generated in gate oxide for the H2 SiC MOSFETs by gamma-ray irradiation. It was reported from the change in capacitance – voltage characteristics of 6H-SiC MOS capacitors due to gamma-ray irradiation that negative and positive trapped charges were generated near SiO2/SiC interface and in oxide at 40 nm from the interface, respectively [18]. Although the mechanism of H2-anneling effect on the gate oxide and the interface between oxide and SiC has not yet been clarified, since the initial value of VT decreased by H2 annealing [19], the large shift of ΔVT to the positive voltage side and the unique behavior of ΔVOX might occurs due to the reduction of H2-annealing effects by gamma-ray irradiation. Also, it should be noticed that a part of interface traps might be detected as oxide-trapped-charge in this analysis since interface traps in the middle region of the band gap of 6H–SiC have extremely long charge release times at RT, and they act just as charge trapped in oxide [20]. In contrast to ΔVOX, the values of ΔVIT for all SiC MOSFETs show the positive voltage side and their shifts become larger with increasing absorbed dose although the absolute values depend on the fabrication process of gate oxide, as shown in Fig. 3 (c).

Figure 3.

(a) ΔVOX and (b) ΔVIT as a function of absorbed dose for n-channel 6H-SiC MOSFETs. The triangles, circles and squares represent results obtained from MOSFETs of which gate oxide was fabricated by dry (Dry) and pyrogenic (Pyro) oxidations at 1100°C and pryogenic oxidation followed by hydrogen annealing at 700°C for 30 min at a pressure of 20 Torr (H2), respectively.

The values of ΔNOX and ΔNIT are estimated from Figs. 3 (b) and (c), respectively, using Eq. (5)/(6). Figures 4 (a) and (b) show ΔNOX and ΔNIT, respectively, for the Dry (triangles), the Pyro (circles) and the H2 (squares) SiC MOSFETs as a function of absorbed dose. For comparison, the reported results of Si MOSFETs are also plotted in the figures (upside-down triangles) [9]. The value of ΔNOX for the Dry SiC MOSFETs is slightly smaller than that of the Pyro SiC MOSFETs and both values increase with increasing absorbed dose with an exponent of 2/3. It is also found that Si MOSFETs show the 2/3 power-low dependence, although the value of ΔNOX for the Si MOSFETs is larger than that for the SiC MOSFETs [9]. On the other hand, the change in ΔNOX for the H2 MOSFETs due to irradiation show a different behavior from others, and the value is in order of 1011 /cm2 even after irradiation at 530 kGy. These results indicate that the characteristics of gate oxide fabricated by H2-annealing differ from those by non-annealing. However, it should be noticed that ΔNOX estimated in this analysis is a value subtracting a positive component from a negative component. Thus, if both positive and negative components are almost the same value, the net number of ΔNOX is small. Therefore, from this result, we cannot simply conclude that the quality of gate oxide fabricated by H2-annealing is higher than that of gate oxide fabricated by non-annealing or not.

For ΔNIT, the H2 SiC MOSFETs have lower values than the other MOSFETs at absorbed doses above 30 kGy. The characteristics of SiC MOS devices were reported to be degraded by carbon related compounds remaining around the interface between SiO2 and SiC [21]. Since such compounds might also act as precursors of radiation-induced interface traps, it is assumed that H2 annealing to gate oxide of SiC MOSFETs reduces residual compounds near the interface. For the absorbed dose dependence of ΔNIT, the H2 and the Dry SiC MOSFETs have the 2/3 power-low dependence although ΔNIT for the Pyro SiC MOSFETs increases with increasing the absorbed dose with an exponent of approximately 3/2. The 2/3 power-law dependence is also reported in Si of which gate oxide was formed using dry oxidation [9]. The power-law dependence comes from the generation mechanism of interface traps, and the structural and/or electrical properties of the interface between SiO2 and SiC for the H2 and the Dry SiC MOSFETs are different from those for the Pyro SiC MOSFETs. Therefore, it is suggests that the characteristics of the interface between SiO2 and SiC formed by pyrogenic oxidation followed by H2-annealing are similar to those formed by dry oxidation.

Figure 4.

a) ΔNOX and (b) ΔNIT for Dry (triangles), Pyro (circles) and H2 (squares) SiC MOSFETs as a function of absorbed dose. For comparison, the reported results of Si MOSFETs are also plotted in the figures (upside-down triangles) [9].

The μch for Si MOSFETs is known to decrease with increasing absorbed dose [10]. In order to confirm this for SiC MOSFETs, μch for the H2 SiC MOSFETs were plotted as a function of absorbed dose (Fig. 5). For comparison, the result reported for Si MOSFETs are also plotted in the figure [9]. The μch for the H2 SiC MOSFETs does not change up to 20 kGy and the value decreases with increasing absorbed dose above 60 kGy. Then, the value of μch reduces to be 50 % of the initial value at 530 kGy. On the other hand, μch for the Si MOSFETs decreases with increasing absorbed dose and becomes 50 % of the initial value by irradiation at 10 kGy. Although the initial value of μch for Si MOSFETs (600 cm2/Vs) is much higher than the initial value of μch for the H2 SiC MOSFET (~ 50 cm2/Vs), the value for Si MOSFETs is assumed to be almost zero after irradiation at 100 kGy whereas the H2 SiC MOSFETs still keep 25 cm2/Vs of μch even after irradiation at 530 kGy. In addition, it is mentioned that the stability of their electrical performance against irradiation is also important for Rad-hard devices. Therefore, it can be concluded that SiC MOSFETs are quite tolerant against radiation in comparison with Si MOSFETs. For the degradation mechanism of μch, Ohshima et al. reported [17] that the relationship between the decrease of μch and ΔNIT for SiC MOSFETs was described by the same relationship reported for Si MOSFETs (μch = μ0 /(1 + αΔNIT)) [10], where μ0 and α are the initial value of the channel mobility and a constant (= 7.0±1.3×10-13), respectively. This suggests that μch for SiC MOSFETs as well as Si MOSFETs can be explained in term of carrier scattering in the channel region by interface traps generated by gamma-ray irradiation. Since interface traps located in the middle of the band gap behave just like charge trapped oxide for SiC, ΔNIT obtained in this analysis means the net density of interface traps which act as carrier scattering centers. It was reported that the channel mobility of 6H–SiC MOSFETs is affected by acceptor-like traps existing near the conduction band edge [22]. Although the relationship between interface traps induced by irradiation and intrinsic interface traps has not yet been clarified in the case of SiC MOS devices, it is assumed that the radiation resistance of SiC MOSFETs might be improved by the reduction of initial interface traps generated near the conduction band edge.

Figure 5.

μch for H2 SiC MOSFETs as a function of absorbed dose. For comparison, the result reported for Si MOSFETs are also plotted in the figure [9]. The value of the channel mobility is normalized by the initial value.

Next, the effects of the surface morphology on μch of SiC MOSFETs irradiated with gamma-rays will be discussed. In this study, MOSFETs were fabricated on n-type 6H-SiC epitaxial layers using the same fabrication process except the procedures of high temperature annealing after implantation [23]. Thus, although all samples were annealed at 1650°C for 3 min in an Ar atmosphere, the surface of one series of samples was covered with carbon films (C-coating) during the annealing to avoid the degradation of the surface morphology [24], and the other series of samples were annealed without the carbon coating (non-coating). After the annealing, the carbon films were removed by the oxidation at 800°C for 30 min in O2 gas. Gate oxide of both series of the MOSFETs were formed by pyrogenic oxidation (H2:O2 = 1:1) at 1100°C for 30 min. For the details of the fabrication process, please see Ref. [23]. The initial values of μch for C-coating and non-coating SiC MOSFETs are 41 and 44 cm2/Vs, respectively. For the surface morphology, the values of root mean square (RMS) for the C-coating and non-coating SiC are obtained to be 0.67 and 1.36 nm, respectively, from AFM measurements, whereas the RMS was 0.25 nm before annealing.

Figures 6 (a) and (b) show μch and ΔNIT, respectively, for C-coating (squares) and non-coating (circles) SiC MOSFETs as a function of absorbed dose. As shown in the figure, no significant decrease or slight increase in μch is observed for the C-coating SiC MOSFETs. The value of ΔNIT for the C-coating SiC MOSFETs is estimated to be less than 4x1011 /cm2, and no significant increase in ΔNIT is observed up to 3 MGy. In contrast, μch for the non-coating SiC MOSFETs decreases with increasing absorbed dose above 2 MGy. In the absorbed region that μch decreases, ΔNIT increases with increasing absorbed dose, and the value becomes of the order of 1012 /cm2 by irradiation above 2 MGy. As above-mentioned, μch is degraded by the generation of interface traps. Therefore, the decrease in μch for the non-coating SiC MOSFETs can be interpreted in terms of the generation of interface traps. Also, it was reported by Kimoto [24] the channel mobility can be affected by the surface roughness. So, the higher radiation resistance obtained for the C-coating SiC MOSFETs compared to non-coating ones is caused by the less surface roughness.

Figure 6.

a) μch and (b) ΔNIT for C-coating (squares) and non-coating (circles) SiC MOSFETs as a function of absorbed dose.

3. Radiation hardness of SiC devices

In this section, the change in the electrical characteristics of SiC transistors such as Static Induction Transistors (SITs), Metal-Semiconductor (MES) FETs and MOSFETs due to gamma-ray irradiation will be compared to Si MOS FETs from the point of view of the radiation hardness. Figure 7 shows ΔVT for SiC SITs [25], SiC MESFETs [26], C-coating+Dry SiC MOSFETs and C-coating+Pyro SiC MOSFETs as a function of absorbed dose. All transistors were irradiated with gamma-rays at RT. During gamma-ray irradiation, no bias was applied to any electrodes of the transistors. For comparison, the results reported for Si MOSFETs are also plotted in the figure [9]. No significant change in ΔVT for All SiC transistors is observed up to 105 Gy whereas the Si MOSFETs show obvious degradation in ΔVT. This indicates that those SiC transistors have extremely high radiation resistance compared to the Si MOSFETs. The value of ΔVT for both the SiC MOSFETs shifts to the negative voltage side in high dose regions, and the shift for the C-coating+Dry ones is larger than that for the C-coating+Pyro ones. Thus, the C-coating+Pyro MOSFETs have higher radiation resistance than the C-coating+Dry MOSFETs. For the SiC MESFETs, the shift of ΔVT to the negative voltage side increases with increasing in absorbed doses regions between 4×105 and 2×106 Gy, and the maximum shift of -0.75 V is observed at 2×106 Gy. However, the negative shift becomes smaller with increasing absorbed dose above 3×106 Gy and the value of ΔVT becomes -0.27 V after irradiation at 107 Gy. For the SiC SITs, although the positive shift is observed for ΔVT above 106 Gy, the value is relatively small (0.45V at 7×106 Gy) compared to other SiC transistors. Thus, it can be concluded that the radiation hardness of the SiC SITs and the MESFETs is higher than that of the SiC MOSFETs. Since SITs and MESFETs do not have gate oxide, such high radiation resistance to gamma-rays can be observed. However, it should be noticed that the characteristics of SiC SITs and MESFETs are also affected by TID effects since the SiC SITs and the MESFETs is covered with a insulator (oxide) for the surface termination, and charge is trapped in such insulator. In addition, in such a high absorbed dose region, the displacement damage effect by Compton electrons also occurs and the characteristics of devices are degraded.

Next, the change in the electrical characteristics of the SiC SITs by gamma-ray irradiation is expressed. The SiC SITs have an on-resistance of 0.15 Ω and a blocking voltage of 900 V at VG of -10 V before irradiation [27, 28]. Since the SiC SITs were developed as power devices, two Si power devices with similar current and voltage ratings, Si MOSFET (17N80C3) and Si IGBT (5J301), were also irradiated with gamma-rays for comparison. The SiC SITs mounted in TO220 packages were irradiated with gamma-rays at absorbed dose rate of 8.8 kGy/h at RT. During irradiation, no bias was applied to electrodes. The shift of the breakdown voltage for the SiC SITs (squares), the Si MOSFETs (triangles) and the Si IGBT (upside-down triangles) as a function of absorbed dose is shown in Fig. 8. The blocking characteristics for the SiC SITs and the Si ones (IGBTs and MOSFETs) were measured under VG at 10 V and 0V, respectively. No significant change in the breakdown voltage for the SiC SITs and the Si IGBT is observed up to 107 Gy. For the Si MOSFETs, the shift of the breakdown voltage increases with absorbed dose above 4×105 Gy, and the large shift of -500 V is observed at 107 Gy. It was also reported [25] that no significant increase in the leakage current for the SiC SITs (of the order of 10-6 A) was observed where the leakage current for the Si MOSFETs increased to 10-4 A level after irradiation 107 Gy.

Figure 7.

Change in ΔVT for SiC SITs (squares), SiC MESFETs (diamonds), C-coating+Dry SiC MOSFETs (triangles) and C-coating+Pyro SiC MOSFETs (circles) as a function of absorbed dose. All transistors were irradiated with gamma-rays at RT. During gamma-ray irradiation, no bias was applied to any electrodes of the transistors. For comparison, the results reported for Si MOSFETs (upside-down triangles) are also plotted in the figure [9].

Figure 8.

Shift of the breakdown voltage from the initial value for SiC SITs (squares), Si MOSFETs (triangles) and Si IGBT (upside-down triangles) as a function of absorbed dose. The blocking characteristics for SiC SITs and Si ones (IGBTs and MOSFETs) were measured under V G at 10 V and 0V, respectively.

The on-state characteristics were measured under VG at +2.5 V for the SiC SITs and at +15 V for the Si transistors (IGBTs and MOSFETs). Then, the on-voltage was defined as the value of VD at ID of 10 A. Figure 9 shows the shift of the on-voltage for the SiC SITs (squares), the Si MOSFETs (triangles) and the Si IGBT (upside-down triangles) as a function of absorbed dose. The shift of on-voltage for the SiC SITs and the Si MOSFETs due to gamma-ray irradiation shows a very stable behavior up to 107 Gy, whereas the on-voltage for the Si IGBTs remarkably increases after irradiation at 8×105 Gy (from 2.3 to more than 20 V). It was reported [29] that the displacement damage effect induced by Compton electrons degrades the gain for Si bipolar transistors. So, the result obtained from the Si IGBT is interpreted in terms of the majority carrier removal in the drift region (low doping region) due to the displacement damage effect. For the SiC SITs and the Si MOSFETs, since the doping concentration in the drift region is not low, the displacement damage effect might not be observed and as a result, on-voltage shows almost constant values up to 107 Gy. Although the stable on-voltage behavior is obtained for the SiC MOSFETs, the large fluctuation of VT was reported due to the TID effect. Considering gamma-ray irradiation effects on the breakdown voltage, the on-voltage, and VT, the characteristics of only the SiC SITs show the stable behaviors up to 107 MGy. Thus, we can conclude that the SiC SITs have extremely high radiation resistance, they have an enough potential for electronic devices used in harsh radiation environments such as nuclear power plants, space, and so on.

Figure 9.

Shift of the on-voltage from the initial value for SiC SITs (squares), Si MOSFETs (triangles) and Si IGBT (upside-down triangles) as a function of absorbed dose.

4. Charge induced in SiC diodes by Ion irradiation

Since destructive or/and non-destructive malfunctions called SEEs occurs in electronic devices by charge (electron-hole pairs) generated by charged particle incidence, especially heavy ions. The SEEs on semiconductor devices are one of the most major issues for space applications. On the other hand, for high energy physics using accelerators with high luminosity, such as J-PARC and Super-LHC, Rad-hard particle detectors are expected to be developed. For the development of Rad-hard particle detectors as well as Rad-hard devices for space applications, it is important to clarify the behavior of charge generated in devices by charged particle incidence. In a previous study [30], Nava et al. reported that the Charge Collection Efficiency (CCE) obtained from 4H-SiC Schottky diodes by alpha particle incidence was estimated to be 100 %. It was also reported that 4H-SiC Schottky diodes could detect X-rays from radio isotopes [31,32]. Besides, the neutron detection by SiC diodes was investigated previously [33, 34]. As for light ions and X-rays irradiation into SiC, relatively large number of studies has been already reported. On the other hand, from the point of view of SEEs, study of ion irradiation on electronic devices using heavy ions is important. In this section, charge induced in SiC diodes by heavy ion incidence is reviewed on the basis of our previous studies [35-40].

Figure 10.

Schematic set-up of the TIBIC system installed at JAEA Takasaki and photo of the TIBIC system.

In order to obtain the information on charge induced in electronic devices, Ion Beam Induced Charge (IBIC) measurements is thought to be one of the useful methods. However, the decrease in collected charge during IBIC measurements should be considered for the accurate evaluation of charge induced by ion beams, since the device characteristics are degraded by radiation damage created in samples by ion incidence [41]. Therefore, single-ion hit Transient Ion Beam Induced Current (TIBIC) was developed at JAERI Takasaki in order to realize the evaluation of ion-induced current with minimizing the influence of damage [42]. Figure 10 shows the schematic set-up of the TIBIC system installed at JAEA Takasaki and the photo of the TIBIC system. The TIBIC collection system connects with a heavy ion microbeam line from the 3MV Tandem accelerator, and consists of a single event triggering system and a fast switch beam shutter system. The transient current signals induced by ions can be detected using a digital sampling oscilloscope (Tektronix 3 GHz TDS694C or 15 GHz TDS6154C). The details of the single ion hit TIBIC collection system are described in Ref. [43]. Since the TIBIC system connects with a beam scanning system, spatial images of transient current signals can be obtained.

Figure 11 shows TIBIC signals obtained from 6H-SiC n+p diodes with applied bias of 30, 90 or 150 V. Si ions with 12 MeV were used as probe beams. In this study, the 6H-SiC n+p diodes with 100 - 300 μm diameters were fabricated on p-type substrates with p-type epitaxial layers (Al doping concentration between 8x1014 and 3.5x1015 /cm3). The n+ region was formed by three-fold implantation (60, 90, 140 keV) of phosphorus (P) ions at 800°C and subsequent annealing at 1650°C for 3 min in argon (Ar) atmosphere. The thickness and a mean P concentration of the implanted layer are ~100 nm and 5x1019 /cm3, respectively. During the annealing, the sample surface was covered with a carbon film to avoid the degradation of the surface morphology [24]. The details of the diode fabrication process are described elsewhere [40]. The peak height of the TIBIC signals increases with increasing applied bias, and the value becomes to 0.50 from 0.19 mA when applied bias increases to 150 from 30 V. The fall-time, which is defined as the time from 90 % to 10 % of the current transient, shorten with increasing applied reverse bias, and the value decreases to 0.48 from 0.98 ns when applied bias increases to 150 from 30 V. These results can be interpreted in terms of an increase of the electric field in the depletion layer due to increasing applied bias. It is also mentioned the leakage currents of the diodes were in order of 10-11 A at an applied reverse bias of 150 V, and no significant differences in I -V characteristics between before and after TIBIC measurements were observed.

Figure 11.

TIBIC signals obtained from 6H-SiC n+p diodes with applied bias of 30, 90 or 150 V. Si ions with 12 MeV were used as probe beams.

By the integration of a TIBIC signal, charge collected by a diode can be estimated. Charge collected by the 6H-SiC n+p diodes as a function of applied bias is shown in Fig. 12. In this study, Si ions with different energies were applied as probe beams, and the value of energy of Si ions are described in the figure. Charge collected by the diodes increases with increasing applied bias, and the value of collected charge saturates in a higher bias region. For example, the saturation is observed above 40 and 60 V for 15 and 18 MeV, respectively. Charge generated in the depletion region of a diode can be collected by its electric field (Drift component). On the other hand, charge generated in deeper than the depletion region diffuses, and only charge reaching the repletion region can be collected by a diode (Diffusion component) whereas some generated carriers recombine during diffusion. Thus, if the depletion region is shorter than the projection range of ions, the decrease in collected charge is observed due to the recombination of generated carriers during diffusion. Since ions with higher energy have a longer projection range, the results obtained in Fig. 12 can be qualitatively interpreted in terms of the drift and the diffusion components. However, in reality, since an extended drift region is temporarily created in a deeper region than the depletion region, the saturation of collected charge occurs even in the case that the depletion region is shorter than the ion projection range [44].

At a bias of 150V, the depletion region is estimated to be 7 μm, and this is longer than the ion projection range of Si ions at 18 MeV which is estimated to be 4.8 μm by a Monte Carlo simulation code, SRIM [45]. Thus, at a bias of 150 V, all charge generated in the 6H-SiC diodes by Si ion incidence can be collected by the electric field in the depletion layer. The CCE for the 6H-SiC diodes is estimated from the value of charge collected at a bias of 150 V. Here, the value of CCE is defined as

(Qexp/Qideal) x 100E7

where Qexp and Qideal are the value of charge experimentally obtained at 150 V and the ideal value of charge generated in SiC, respectively. The value of Qideal is obtained by the equation

Qideal= (Eion/Eeh) xeE8

where Eion, Ee-h and e are the energy of incident ions, the generation energy of an electron-hole (e-h) pair and electron charge, respectively. In this study, the value of Ee-h in 6H-SiC is assumed to be 7.8 eV (= 2.8Eg) on the analogy of Ee-h in Si because the value of the energy for 6H-SiC has not been determined yet. It should be mentioned that the energy loss in the top Al electrode, the n+ region and by non-ionizing collisions and also the decay of signal in the measurement system are not considered in this estimation, and the reduction of the CCE due to those effects is estimated to be between 8 and 14 %. The value of the CCE for the SiC n+p diodes probed by Si ions at energies of 6, 12, 15 and 18 MeV is estimated to be 74, 83, 86 and 88 %, respectively. Since the effect of the energy loss in the Al electrode and the n+ region on the reduction of the CCE value decreases with increasing ion energy, the experimental result that higher CCE value is observed by higher energy ion incidence is reasonable. However, even after considering energy loss in those regions, the value of the CCE for 6MeV is not comparable to that for 12, 15 and 18 MeV. This suggests that the CCE is degraded by another effect in the case of 6 MeV-Si.

Figure 12.

Charge collected by 6H-SiC n+p diodes as a function of applied bias. Si ions with different energies were applied as probe beams, and the value of energy of Si ions are described in the figure.

In order to understand the degradation of the CCE due to not energy loss near the surface regions, the effect of ion species on the CCE was investigated. Figure 13 shows the relationship between ions species with the same energy (12 MeV) and the value of the CCE. The value of the CCE is obtained from the integration of TIBIC signals for the 6H-SiC n+p diodes at a bias of 150 V. The CCE for the diodes probed by O ions is estimated to be 90 %, and this value is the highest of all ion species in Fig. 13. With increasing atomic number, the value of the CCE decreases. The CCE of 42 % is observed by Au ion incidence. The degradation of the CCE for SiC diodes by Au ion incidence was also reported [36]. Zajic et al. suggested that high density of e-h pairs is generated by heavy ions, and generated e-h pairs are easy to recombine in such dense plasma [46].

Figure 13.

Relationship between ions species with the same energy (12 MeV) and the value of CCE. The value of CCE is obtained from the integration of TIBIC signals for 6H-SiC n+p diodes at a bias of 150 V.

The carrier density generated in SiC, and the distributions of e-h pairs are calculated on the basis of Kobetich and Katz (KK) theorem [47]. In this calculation, the KK model improved using empirical equations reported by Fageeha et al. [48] was applied since the KK model overestimates the density of e-h pairs at the core of the ion track. The calculated results of the density of e-h pairs generated in SiC by (Left) 12 MeV-O and (Right) -Au ion irradiation are shown in Fig. 14. In the case of 12 MeV-O ion incidence, the radius of the ion track at the sample surface and projection range of ions are estimated to be ≈ 40 nm and 5.2 μm, respectively. On the other hand, the ion track radius at the surface and the ion range for 12 MeV-Au ions are estimated to be ≈ 2 nm and 1.9 μm, respectively. Since the energy (12 MeV) is the same for both O and Au ions, the total number of e-h pairs generated in the ion track region is the same between O and Au ions. Thus, the density of e-h pairs in SiC irradiated with Au ions is much higher than that irradiated with O ions, and the estimated density of e-h pairs in SiC irradiated with 12 MeV-Au ions is a several orders of magnitude higher than that in SiC irradiated with 12 MeV-O ions. In such a high density of e-h pairs, the ambipolar effect occurs easily and the electric field temporarily weakens. As a result, the amount of the recombination between electrons and holes increases. For the dynamics of carriers generated in SiC by heavy ion incidence, please see Ref. [44]. The result obtained in this study indicates that it is important to consider the decrease in the CCE for SiC particle detectors when heavy ions are detected. From the point of view of SEEs in SiC, the decrease in collected charge is thought to be one of the advantages for the development of Rad-Hard devices. The similar charge collection behaviours have been also obtained for SiC p+n diodes, although only results obtained from SiC n+p diodes were introduced in this article [39].

Figure 14.

Calculated results of the e-h density generated in SiC by (Left) 12 MeV-O and (Right) -Au ion irradiation.

For the effects of ion incidence on MOS capacitors fabricated on SiC, it was reported that the peak amplitude of TIBIC signals decreased and the fall time increased with increasing number of incident ions [49-51]. Furthermore, the peak of TIBIC signals can be refreshed to its original value by applying a forward bias of + 1V to the gate electrode. From the measurement of the capacitance of SiC MOS capacitors during O ion irradiation, the value of capacitance was found to increase with increasing number of incident ions. This indicates that the depletion length of the MOS capacitors becomes shorten with increasing number of incident ions. Since large amounts of charge are induced by heavy ion incidence and some of them might flow to the interface between SiO2 and SiC, the degradation of TIBIC signals can be explained by a change in the net bias applied to the gate oxide due to the creation of the inversion region or/and charging up deep traps. The refreshment of TIBIC signals by applying a forward bias can be also interpreted in terms of releasing charge from the interface or/and deep traps. For the effects of heavy ion irradiation on 6H-SiC MOSFETs, Onoda et al. Reported from experimental results and their simulation using the Technology Computer Aided Design (TCAD) [52] that the charge collection behaviours were affected by drift, funnelling, diffusion, and recombination, and especially, the enhancement of transient currents was observed due to the parasitic bipolar action. It was also reported that the enhanced charge collection was observed for 4H-SiC MESFETs by heavy ion incidence [26]. According to device simulations using the TCAD, it was concluded that the enhanced charge collection effect can be interpreted in terms of not only the bipolar action but also the channel modulation effects. For the DDD effect in SiC devices, it was reported that the value of the CCE for SiC n+p diodes and the majority carrier concentration in them decreased with increasing gamma-rays, electrons or protons and the damage factor of the CCE and the carrier removal rate can be scaled by Non Ionizing Energy Loss (NIEL) [53-55].

5. Summary

In order to develop Rad-hard devices based on SiC, the radiation response of SiC devices have to be understood. In this chapter, effects of gamma-rays and swift heavy ions on SiC devices were reviewed. Firstly, the gamma-ray irradiation effects on SiC MOSFETs were introduced, and the degradation of their characteristics was discussed on the basis of charge generated in gate oxide and interface traps by irradiation. Then, the radiation resistance of SiC transistors, MOSFETs, MESFETs and SITs was compared to Si transistors. SiC transistors showed higher radiation resistance than Si transistors, and SiC SITs could be operated up to 10 MGy. This indicates that SiC SITs have extremely high radiation tolerance from the point of view of TID effects. Charge generated in 6H-SiC n+p diodes by heavy ion incidence was evaluated using TIBIC. The signal peak of the transient current increased, and the fall-time decreased with increasing applied reverse bias. The high CCE values were observed when ions with relatively light mass such as O and Si ions were applied as probe ions. However, the CCE decreased with increasing atomic number, and the value reduced to approximately 40 % when 12 MeV-Au ions were applied as probe ions. From the calculation based on the modified KK model, it was found that the density of e-h pairs in SiC irradiated with heavy ions, such as Ni and Au, is much higher than that in SiC irradiated with O and Si ions. Therefore, the decrease in the CCE by the irradiation of ions with heavy mass was interpreted in terms of the recombination of e-h pairs in plasma.

Acknowledgments

This study of gamma-ray irradiation effects on SiC SIT was supported by the Strategic Promotion Program for Basic Nuclear Research by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan. Also, the study of charge induced in SiC pn diodes and MOS capacitors by heavy ion incidence was partially supported by the Ministry and Education, Science, Sports and Culture, Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B), 2006, 18360458 and (B), 2009, 21360471, respectively.

© 2012 The Author(s). Licensee IntechOpen. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

How to cite and reference

Link to this chapter Copy to clipboard

Cite this chapter Copy to clipboard

Takeshi Ohshima, Shinobu Onoda, Naoya Iwamoto, Takahiro Makino, Manabu Arai and Yasunori Tanaka (October 16th 2012). Radiation Response of Silicon Carbide Diodes and Transistors, Physics and Technology of Silicon Carbide Devices, Yasuto Hijikata, IntechOpen, DOI: 10.5772/51371. Available from:

chapter statistics

2357total chapter downloads

2Crossref citations

More statistics for editors and authors

Login to your personal dashboard for more detailed statistics on your publications.

Access personal reporting

Related Content

This Book

Next chapter

Nondestructive and Contactless Characterization Method for Spatial Mapping of the Thickness and Electrical Properties in Homo-Epitaxially Grown SiC Epilayers Using Infrared Reflectance Spectroscopy

By Sadafumi Yoshida, Yasuto Hijikata and Hiroyuki Yaguchi

Related Book

First chapter

The Chinese Iron Ore Deposits and Ore Production

By Guangrong Li

We are IntechOpen, the world's leading publisher of Open Access books. Built by scientists, for scientists. Our readership spans scientists, professors, researchers, librarians, and students, as well as business professionals. We share our knowledge and peer-reveiwed research papers with libraries, scientific and engineering societies, and also work with corporate R&D departments and government entities.

More about us