Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Effectiveness and Safety of Topical Phototherapy in the Treatment of Dermatological Diseases

By Giorgio Delrosso and Paola Savoia

Submitted: March 31st 2016Reviewed: September 9th 2016Published: May 17th 2017

DOI: 10.5772/65712

Downloaded: 566


Phototherapy consists in the use of ultraviolet (UV) radiation from artificial sources for therapeutic purposes. Despite the introduction of new and powerful drugs (including biological and target therapies), phototherapy remains an established, lower cost, and effective option for the treatment of many common skin diseases.


  • phototherapy
  • dermatological diseases
  • bath-PUVA
  • gel-PUVA
  • psoralen

1. Introduction

Phototherapy consists in the use of ultraviolet (UV) radiation from artificial sources for therapeutic purposes and remains an established, lower cost, and effective option for the treatment of many common skin inflammatory and immune-related diseases [15]. Table 1 displays the major dermatological diseases and skin conditions in which phototherapy has been proven to be an effective therapeutic strategy. In the systemic photochemotherapy (PUVA), UVA radiation occurs after the oral administration of photosensitizing agents of the family of Psoralens.

Inflammatory dermatosesAtopic dermatitis
Actinic prurigo
Contact dermatitis
Hydroa vacciniforme
Lichen ruber planus
Physical and chronic urticaria
Seasonal and polymorphic light eruption
Premalignant and malignant skin diseasesActinic reticulosis
Lymphomatoid papulomatosis
Mycosis fungoides (Stage 1A–IIB)
Patch or plaque parapsoriasis
OthersAlopecia areata
Erytropoietic protoporphyria

Table 1.

Indication to UVA and PUVA therapy.

2. Psoralens

Psoralen (also called psoralene) is the progenitor of a family of natural organic compounds known as linear furanocoumarin, that is, derivatives of coumarin by the addition of a furan ring. Its methoxylated derivatives are commonly used in phototherapy and comprise the 5-methoxypsoralen (5-MOP) and the 8-methoxypsoralen (8-MOP). 5-MOP (or 4-methoxyfuro[3,2-g]benzopyrane-7-one, Bergaptene) is generally extracted from bergamot and many other citrus essential oils, including those from lemon, sweet orange, bitter orange, and mandarin, whereas the 8-MOP (or 9-methoxyfuro[3,2-g][1]benzopyran-7-one, ammoidin, methoxsalen, and xanthotoxin) is extracted from Ammi majus, a plant of the Ammi Umbelliferae family [6]. The absorption spectrum of psoralens ranges between 320 and 360 nm, in vitro; in vivo, due to the interaction with biological structures, the spectrum extends toward a longer wavelength, around 400 nm. Using artificial sources with a conventional emission spectrum (such as Philips TL/09 lamps), the peak of sensitivity for 8-MOP is between 335 and 355 nm.

Photosensitization determined by psoralen occurs by means of two mechanisms [7, 8]:

  1. Photoaddition reactions: In the dark, psoralens intercalate between base pairs of the DNA double helix. Upon UVA excitation, intercalated psoralens get photoactivated; as a result of this reaction, they form [2 + 2]-cycloadducts, primarily with adjacent thymine bases, involving either their furan or pyrone moiety; more precisely, the [2 + 2]-type photoconjugation occurs between the 3,4-pyrone and/or 4',5'-furan double bond of the intercalated psoralen and the pyrimidine 5,6 double bond. The furan adduct is then capable of absorbing another UVA photon, resulting in interstrand cross-links [9]. DNA interstrand cross-links are among the most cytotoxic types of DNA damage; their repair is extraordinarily difficult for the cell since it requires the coordination of proteins from several pathways, including nucleotide excision repair, base excision repair, mismatch repair, homologous recombination, translation synthesis, and proteins involved in Fanconi anemia [10]. Monoadducts and cross-links inhibit DNA-readout processes, thus leading to necrosis or apoptosis of the photodamaged cells [11]. Psoralens are highly soluble in body fluids, and therefore they can form photoadducts with a variety of other molecules besides DNA, including RNAs, proteins, and polyunsaturated fatty acids; actually, most of the administered 8-MOP have been found to be conjugated to proteins rather than to nucleic acids or lipids [12]. Psoralen photoadducts to those molecules result in disruption and silencing of a variety of metabolic and signaling pathways, thus exerting a broad range of phototoxicity.

  2. Photodynamic reactions: Photoactivation of psoralens in the presence of oxygen results in the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), including singlet oxygen and superoxide radical anions. Thus, psoralens activate both type 1 photodynamic mechanisms (i.e., the production of superoxide, hydrogen peroxide, and hydroxyl radical (HO•) by electron transfer) and type 2 mechanisms (i.e., the production of singlet oxygen (1O2) by energy transfer) [13]. Reactive oxygen species are extremely unstable and react with other molecules, causing a variety of cell damages, including lipid peroxidation, DNA breaks, and DNA-protein cross-links (PMID: 24721421). To counteract oxidative damage/stress, cells rely on a number of antioxidative defense systems, including natural radical scavengers (e.g., tocopherol and vitamin A) and different enzymes (e.g., superoxide dismutase, glutathione peroxidase, and catalase).

Adducted DNA by psoralens is also implicated in melanogenesis: modified nucleotides, in particular oligonucleotides composed by two thymidine residues, stimulate cells to express tyrosinase, a known key enzyme in melanin production, with variable effects in patients with vitiligo vulgaris [1417]. The demonstrated ability of furocoumarines to bind proteins, including those of the lens, can induce cataract in long-term therapy. Finally, it has to be noticed that PUVA has also the ability to induce apoptosis of Langerhans cells, activated T-lymphocytes, neutrophils, macrophages, NK cells, fibroblasts, endothelial cells, and mast cells, thus exerting a beneficial effect for the most common dermatoses [18].

2.1. Dosage

Pharmacokinetic studies have shown that psoralens absorption is subject to individual variations, in terms of both mean plasma concentration and timing for reaching the maximum peak. In addition, in the same individual, plasma concentration varies during the day, although the maximum peak represents a constant [1921].

Recommended doses are the following:

  1. 8-MOP: 0.6 mg/kg (or 25 mg/m2, for subjects weighing less than 60 kg) 2 h before exposure if in a micronized form or 1 h before if in liquid or gelatinous form. The dosage should then be adjusted according to the response.

  2. 5-MOP: 1.2 mg/kg, 3.5 h before the treatment.

8-MOP administration results in a photosensitization which reaches its maximum, 2–4 h after the intake and disappears in 6–8 h. Psoralens are transported in the blood by serum proteins (mainly albumin), and are predominantly catabolized in the liver by cytochrome P450 (CYP450)-triggered oxidation. CYP450s make a large superfamily of heme-containing monooxygenases, which take care of the detoxification of many drugs [22]. Recent studies have shown that CYP3A11 is the major target cytochrome for psoralens metabolism in mice [23]. Another key cytochrome for detoxification or activation of many toxicologically important substrates is CYP2B1 [24]. Psoralens are oxidized by CYP3A11 at the furan ring to form a furan epoxide that binds to CYP 2B1 with a high stoichiometry [25]; after biding, CYP 2B1 produces dihydrodiols, which are the final catabolic products of linear fucocoumarins [25]. In addition, 8-MOP up-regulates CYP1A1 expression, and can be a substrate for this CYP450 [26]. CYP450s are encoded by highly polymorphic genes [27] and their expression varies among individuals, in relation with alcohol intake and drug use; both these facts provide an easy explanation for individual variations in response to psoralen-related therapies. About 75% of furanocoumarins catabolic products produced by the liver are excreted in the urine as inactive hydroxylated- or glucurono-conjugates derivatives within 12 h; key proteins for this excretory function are the solute carrier (SLC) 22A family organic cation/carnitine transporters (OCTs/OCTNs) and the organic anion transporters (OATs). More specifically, the administration of furocoumarins up-regulates renal OCT1, OCT2, OCTN2, and OAT3 protein levels, as a result of increased gene expression in mice; in addition, oxidized linear furocoumarins induce high expression of mURAT1, mMRP4, and mGLUT9, which may also play important roles in renal transportation, and accumulation of psoralen metabolites as well as in related kidney injury. Notably, 8-MOP clearance in the lens is rather slow, it being detectable in this organ for 18 h after oral intake [28].

2.2. Cautions

In view of the prolonged photosensitivity induced by 8-MOP [29], it is mandatory to avoid exposition to the sunlight after the treatment; to this purpose, eyes and lips should be protected with glasses and sunscreen.

During treatment with psoralens, regular evaluation of liver function is needed and drug should be reduced or discontinued if there is any sign of liver damage. The most frequent pharmacological interactions are with other topical or systemic photoactive drugs (e.g., phenothiazine, chlorothiazide and derivatives, sulfonylureas, sulfonamides, neomycin, and bergamot essence). Diet with low (or free) coumarins should also be recommended, which are mainly contained in fig, cedar, lime, parsley, mustard, carrots and celery, and parsnips.

The most frequently observed side effects related to 8-MOP administration include severe burns, gastric distress, nausea, nervousness, insomnia, and depression.

Major contraindications to PUVA therapy are summarized in Table 2.

Autoimmune diseasesAge >10 yearsAge >16 years
Basal cell carcinoma syndromeActinic keratosisBullous skin diseases
Dysplastic nevus syndromePersonal history of nonmelanoma skin cancerCataract
Personal history of melanomaPrevious exposure to UVA >1500 J/cm2Photosensitization
PorphyryPrevious exposure to X-ray or arsenicPhoto type I*
Pregnancy and lactationSystemic immunosuppressive therapyPoor compliance
Severe heart failureRenal and/or hepatic failure
Systemic lupus erythematosus; Dermatomyositis
Xeroderma pigmentosum and other congenital defects of DNA repair mechanisms

Table 2.

Contraindications to PUVA therapy.

Photo type I is characterized by pale white skin, blue or hazel eyes, and blond or red hair; patients with photo-type I always have burns, does not tan.

3. UV irradiation

The most frequently used lamps for phototherapy are fluorescent, low-pressure mercury vapor tubes (e.g., Philips TL/09, Philips CLEO-UVA or Sylvania F 85 tubes) with an emission spectrum ranging from 320 to 450 nm, and an emission peak at 352 nm. PUVA units are either whole-body cabins or small-panel irradiators for the treatments of hands and feet or other restricted areas of the body. To provide consistency and repeatability of treatment doses, it is fundamental to measure the emission by calibrated radiometers-photometers, sensitive to the spectrum emitted by the lamps. Treatment times are automatically calculated on the basis of variables such as (i) total or daily usage time of the lamps, (ii) environmental and patient’s conditions (temperature, humidity, dust, and distribution of adipose tissue), and (iii) presence of other UV sources. When devices devoid of dosimeters are used, the dosage should be calculated according to the formula: Dose (mJ/cm2) = irradiance (mW/cm2) × time (seconds); special tables are then used to calculate the appropriate dosage, according to patient’s phototype. In any case, it is recommended a semiannual or annual assessment of the UVA cabin or panel with external radiometer-photometer calibrated to the National Physics Laboratory, which will provide an adjustment for timing and doses [5, 6].

3.1. Dose assessment

Dose assessment, according to the different published protocols, is based on (i) evaluation of the Fitzpatrick phototype, (ii) calculation of the minimal phototoxic dose (MPD), that is, the lowest UVA dose that produces a perceptible erythema after psoralen administration, and (iii) assessment of an attack dosage equal to 50% of MPD.

The sessions are initially carried out three to four times a week and then reduced to two times a week after a clinical improvement has been obtained. The possibility of performing one session every 7–10 days as maintenance therapy can be considered. Side effects are resumed as shown in Table 3.

Side effects
Gastric intoleranceAnti-DNA and antinucleus antibodies (low title)
Hypertrichosis or alopeciaCarcinogenesis (actinic keratosis, NMSCs, melanomas)
Neomelanogenesis and stratum corneum thickeningCataract
PainDisorder of pigmentation
Photo-inducted dermatitisIdiopathic guttate hypomelanosis
Phototoxic exanthemaMelanocytes dystrophies
Skin dryness and pruritus

Table 3.

Side effects related to PUVA therapy.

4. Topical photochemotherapy: bath-PUVA

Bath-PUVA therapy consists in the immersion of the whole body in a bath containing an 8-MOP alcoholic solution, at concentrations ranging from 1 to 3 mg/L, for a time varying from 15' to 20'. Then, the patient is exposed to increasing doses of UVA, which varies in relation to the phototype, with a minimal initial doses of 0.25–0.50 J/cm2 and progressive increments of 0.25 J/cm2 up to a maximum of 5–7 J/cm2 .

This modality of treatment minimizes short- and long-term side effects due to the systemic administration of the drug [19, 3033]. Three hours after treatment, photosensitivity is negligible, due to the low systemic absorption of 8-MOP; thus, patients can avoid the use of photoprotections, including sunglasses [34, 35]. Gas chromatography and mass spectrometry analyses have shown that plasmatic trixolaren concentrations range between 0.27 and 12.5 ng/ml after the ingestion of a 0.6 mg/kg dose and between 9 ng/ml and 25 pg/ml after bath-PUVA [20, 36].

In the skin, the drug absorption peak occurs within 15–35 min; the maximum concentration is reached in the stratum corneum and the removal of this cell layer (by “stripping”) significantly enhances the possibility of drug penetration to the underlying layers. The higher psoralen concentration in superficial layers of the epidermis justifies the increased effectiveness of this type of treatment in those diseases in which the epidermal involvement is massive [30, 36, 37]. The concentration measured by microanalytical techniques is instead of 1.7–6.6 ng/ml after oral intake and of 200–520 ng/ml after the bath.

Literature reports encourage results obtained with bath-PUVA in the treatment of several inflammatory [3847] and lymphoproliferative skin diseases [4852]. Figures 14 report same examples of results obtained with bath-PUVA at our center.

Figure 1.

Plaque psoriasis before (A, C, E, G) and after (B, D, F, H) bath-PUVA therapy.

Figure 2.

Ichthyosis-like atopic dermatitis before (A and C) and after (B and D) bath-PUVA therapy.

Figure 3.

Stage I mycosis fungoides before (A) and after (B) bath-PUVA therapy.

Figure 4.

Palmoplantar psoriasis before (A and C) and after (B and D) gel-PUVA therapy; eczematized psoriasis before (E and G) and after (F and H) gel-PUVA therapy.

4.1. Treatment

Before treatment, an accurate collection of clinical data is mandatory; patient should be informed about the treatment modality, its potential benefits and risks, and the need to avoid other potentially photosensitizing agents. Skin should be carefully examined and nevi should be covered with high-protection sunscreen, as well as the lips and genital areas; patient should also wear sunglasses during treatment and up to 3 h afterwards. At the end of treatment, we recommended also a shower, to remove residual traces of the drug from the skin, and the application of topical emollients [53, 54]. The treatment requires special attention and the protocol described above must necessarily be adapted to each patient, on the basis of the phototype and other clinical characteristics.

5. Topical photochemotherapy: gel-PUVA therapy

The gel-PUVA therapy is a variant of the cream-PUVA therapy and consists in the application of a 0.05% of 8-MOP gel on restricted skin areas, 20–30 min before the irradiation. The preparation of the 8-MOP gel is galenical; the psoralen is dissolved, in order to obtain a higher bioavailability and better cosmetic aspects and to avoid the “border effect.” The UVA radiation could be realized through cabin or panels according to the extent of the body areas affected by the disease, with an irradiation spectrum of 320–370 nm. Dose calculation is performed manually, because panels are not equipped with dosimeter; hence, every 6 months, their calibration is mandatory. Usually, an initial dose of 0.25–0.50 J/cm2 is used, with a progressive increase in 0.25–0.50J/cm2 for each session, up to a maximal dose of 9 J/cm2. Treatment sessions are performed three times/week for the first month of treatment and then reduced to two times/week in the second month and to one time/week in the third month. A weekly maintenance session could also be proposed.

Best responses to gel-PUVA treatment are described for morphea, palmoplantar psoriasis, contact dermatitis, and vitiligo [43, 5557]. Inclusion and exclusion criteria are those described for systemic PUVA.

The amount of 8-MOP that is absorbed with this method is negligible [21, 58] and the only side effects that have been described are transitory erythema and pruritus, which can be easily managed with topical moisturizing creams. In a few cases, peripheral hyperpigmentation of the treated areas has also been reported [59].

In literature, also a topical psoralen-narrow-band UVB therapy has been described, based on the association of topical 8-MOP and narrow-band UVB irradiation [6062].

6. Conclusions

Phototherapy and especially topic phototherapy are efficient treatment methods for a variety of dermatological diseases, able to induce complete and durable responses in several inflammatory, immune-mediated, and neoplastic skin diseases. Relapses are rare, due to the absence of tachyphylaxis. Although the cost of phototherapy is low, the relative discomfort and the time required to reach the site of the treatment should be considered.

For the risk of carcinogenesis, a number of factors should be taken into account, including dose, age at the treatment, other potentially carcinogenic drugs, photodamaged skin areas, and the type of treatment (a lower carcinogenetic potential has been reported for bath-PUVA in respect to systemic PUVA). The analysis of 11 clinical trials, 10 of which were conducted on psoriatic patients (for a total of about 3400 patients), did not show an increased risk of melanoma [6366] or of nonmelanoma skin cancer after UVA phototherapy [60, 66, 67]. However, another study [63, 66] conducted on patients previously treated with PUVA therapy and subsequently exposed to a high amount of UVB (for more than 300 treatments) demonstrated a small but significant increased risk of both squamous (relative risk (RR): 1.37) and basal cell carcinomas (RR: 1.45). The risk was further increased for patients who received less than 100 PUVA but more than 300 UVB treatments (RR: 2.75 for SCC and 3.00 per BCC). An increased risk to develop malignant melanoma has also been reported, based on the phototype and on the number of treatments; melanoma could arise more than 20 years after the start of therapy, showing a greater aggressiveness than in the general population. An increased risk to develop other cancers (colon, lung, pancreas, and kidney) has not been documented. The putative carcinogenetic risk of narrow-band UVB is higher than for UVA, but its increased effectiveness requires lower cumulative doses, resulting in a reduced actual risk [60].

In summary, an accurate follow-up of patients is essential, in order to detect precancerous skin lesions, and identify suspicious melanocytic lesions, which must be excised. Accurate calculation of cumulative doses, number of treatments and their cumulative dosage, represents an absolute requirement for a correct planning of phototherapy. In addition, alternating PUVA therapy with other topical or systemic treatments can significantly reduce the carcinogenic potential of phototherapy.

© 2017 The Author(s). Licensee IntechOpen. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

How to cite and reference

Link to this chapter Copy to clipboard

Cite this chapter Copy to clipboard

Giorgio Delrosso and Paola Savoia (May 17th 2017). Effectiveness and Safety of Topical Phototherapy in the Treatment of Dermatological Diseases, Photomedicine - Advances in Clinical Practice, Yohei Tanaka, IntechOpen, DOI: 10.5772/65712. Available from:

chapter statistics

566total chapter downloads

More statistics for editors and authors

Login to your personal dashboard for more detailed statistics on your publications.

Access personal reporting

Related Content

This Book

Next chapter

The Use of Photomedicine in Musculoskeletal Pain

By Abdullah M. Al-Shenqiti

Related Book

First chapter

Reactive Oxygen Species in the Biology of Melanoma

By Irene L. Ibañez, Cintia Notcovich, Lucía L. Policastro and Hebe Durán

We are IntechOpen, the world's leading publisher of Open Access books. Built by scientists, for scientists. Our readership spans scientists, professors, researchers, librarians, and students, as well as business professionals. We share our knowledge and peer-reveiwed research papers with libraries, scientific and engineering societies, and also work with corporate R&D departments and government entities.

More about us