Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Agricultural Impact of Porcine Cyisticercosis in Africa: A Review

By Helena A. Ngowi, Samson Mukaratirwa, Faustin P. Lekule, Ndichu Maingi, Charles Waiswa, Chummy Sikasunge, Sonia Afonso, Julienne Sumbu, Sylvia Ramiandrasoa, Mary Louise Penrith and Arve Lee Willingham

Submitted: February 22nd 2012Reviewed: June 30th 2012Published: January 30th 2013

DOI: 10.5772/51196

Downloaded: 2305

1. Introduction

This chapter reviews the status of pig production and porcine cysticercosis caused by Taenia solium in Africa. First, it provides background information regarding pig production and porcine cysticercosis in the region. The chapter then reviews in some more details the current status of porcine cysticercosis in each of the countries based on available scientific literature. Furthermore, this chapter analyses extensively the economic impact of porcine cysticercosis, especially to the agricultural sector in Africa. Finally, the chapter provides conclusions and recommendations to guide future work in relation to porcine cysticercosis in the African continent. To simplify the reporting, the African continent has been divided into five regions based on the United Nations classification system. The regions are northern Africa, southern Africa, western Africa, central Africa, and eastern Africa.

2. Background

Porcine cysticercosis refers to as an infection of pigs with the larval form of Taenia species. Taenia solium, T. saginata asiatica, and T. hydatigena are the Taenia species that can infect pigs. While T. saginata asiatica is currently known to be limited to Asia, T. solium and T. hydatigena have a worldwide distribution. On the African continent, however, T. solium ('pork tapeworm') is the most important species of Taenia economically and for public health. The larval form of this parasite is capable of infecting humans leading to life-threatening neurological disorders, including epilepsy. In addition, T. solium cysticercosis in humans and pigs causes serious economic losses in affected countries because of condemnation of infected pigs and disability in neurocysticercotic patients. The human is the only natural definitive host of T. solium. An adult tapeworm is harboured in the small intestine of humans, a condition referred to as taeniasis. Taenia solium taeniasis is acquired through ingestion of infective larvae of the parasite from infected meat. Raw or inadequately cooked pork provides the route for taeniasis transmission. On the other hand, the larval form of T. solium, cysticercosis, can infect both humans and pigs if the hosts ingest infective eggs of the parasite. The life cycle of T. solium is presented in Figure 1. Water and foodstuffs contaminated with faecal material from a human carrier of the adult tapeworm are the major sources of cysticercosis transmission. Several factors have been found to facilitate the occurrence of cysticercosis. These include open defaecation, poor personal hygiene, free ranging pigs, and lack of safe drinking water. These factors facilitate both human and animal host access to human faecal materials, which at times may contain T. solium eggs.

Although a number of animal species including dogs [1] can be infected with T. solium cysticercosis, domesticated pigs play the major role in the transmission cycle of the parasite because of their close proximity to humans, especially in rural areas, and the increasing popularity of pig keeping and pork consumption in many developing countries [2]. Therefore, most of the literature on T. solium has focused on the human-pig transmission cycle. This is also the focus in this chapter.

Figure 1.

The life cycle of Taenia solium.

Taenia solium is prevalent in several countries of Africa, Asia and Latin America, providing the full life cycle of the parasite. Poverty has facilitated the parasite’s endemicity by inhibiting adequate sanitation and good pig husbandry, which are primary in the control of T. solium transmission. The currently emergence and re-emergence of cysticercosis in some industrialised countries of the USA and Europe resulting from international migration have been limited to human-human transmission leading to human cysticercosis (including neurocysticercosis). However, because of improved sanitation and intensive pig rearing, porcine cysticercosis can rarely be (re)introduced in these countries, and hence, a full cycle of the parasite is virtually impossible. In such countries, the major impact of the parasite is related to human morbidity and associated economic losses.

In response to the WHO’s effort to estimate the global burden of neurocysticercosis, four comprehensive studies have reported estimates of burdens of T. solium cysticercosis [4-7]. While three of the studies estimated the economic burden of cysticercosis, each focusing on a specific country [4,5,7], a global extensive systematic review of literature found that the frequency of neurocysticercosis in people with epilepsy was consistent across endemic countries. The pooled estimate was 29.0% (95%CI: 22.9%–35.5%) [6]. Knowledge on the proportion of epilepsy caused by neurocysticercosis is primary to enable estimation of the economic impact of neurocysticercosis in endemic countries. For the studies that have estimated the economic burden of cysticercosis in both human and pigs, the infected pigs have been found to contribute 4.7-26.9% of the overall costs of the infections [4,5]. The cost estimates in the pig industry have been entirely based on the prevalence of porcine cysticercosis and the economic loss of the pig’s value due to the infection. Thus the observed variation between countries has been primarily due to the differences in porcine cysticercosis prevalence and reduced values of the infected pigs in the different country settings. A study in the Eastern Cape Province of South Africa also reported different values due to different data analytical methods [4]. Generally, the price of a finished pig was estimated to be reduced by 20-60% because of infection with cysticercosis [4,5].

While T. solium is progressively being recognized as an important parasite at the global level, to date scientists in several developing countries endemic for the parasite are struggling to bring the disease to the national attention. Failure of T. solium endemic countries to recognize the importance of the parasite is attributed partly to lack of knowledge by stakeholders on the presence, magnitude and impacts of the parasite. While understanding both the human health and agricultural impacts of the parasite is necessary in order to establish the overall societal burden of the parasite to countries, for endemic diseases such as cysticercosis, political decisions in most developing countries are often based on economic impacts of the diseases. This is because most long-term, persisting endemic diseases are difficult to quickly appreciate their impact, especially to non-professional policy makers. This is different from epidemic diseases, which draw significant attention when they occur, and hence, favourable measures are usually taken urgently to control such diseases. Political will is important for countries to allocate necessary resources to solve community related problems such as diseases. Specific knowledge on the contribution of the various sectors in the overall societal burden of T. solium is of particular importance to promote inter-sectoral collaboration towards control of the parasite [8].

In Africa, pig keeping is popular in many countries. However, there has been no study that has clearly described the pattern of pig production and the overall status of porcine cysticercosis on the continent. This is important in order to understand the importance of the pig enterprise in the region as well as the potential for porcine cysticercosis to constrain the industry. Africa is one of the regions where the full cycle of T. solium is occurring because of the favourable environmental conditions and poverty, which inhibit application of effective control measures for the parasite. Thus Africa provides a suitable ecology for T. solium endemicity. While information on human taeniasis and cysticercosis status in Africa is still scant, inhibiting a full appraisal of the parasite’s burden to the affected countries, a number of scientific publications are presumed to be available with regard to the magnitude and impact of porcine cysticercosis to the agricultural sector in the affected African countries. The emergence of T. solium cysticercosis in eastern and southern Africa as a serious agricultural problem and public health risk was described earlier by the Cysticercosis Working Group in Eastern and Southern Africa (CWGESA) [2]. Other authors have described the taeniasis-cysticercosis complex in West and Central Africa [9]. These provide some of the evidence on the importance of cysticercosis caused by T. solium in Africa. Synthesizing the information on the burden of porcine cysticercosis to the agricultural sector in Africa would inform on the regional status and guide future efforts towards control and ultimately elimination of the parasite

3. Scope

In this chapter, we review the pig production and agricultural impact of porcine cysticercosis on the African continent based on available literature. Data on the pig population in Africa is based on the most current global pig population estimates [10]. For the prevalence of porcine cysticercosis, the most recent information is included, with a priority for prevalence estimated using antigen ELISA, where available, in order to reflect active infections. However, prevalence based on a less accurate diagnostic method is used if that is the only information available. Note that, the purpose of the review is to describe the current status of porcine cysticercosis in the African region rather than presenting all that has been done in the region with regard to porcine cysticercosis. For simplicity, the African continent is divided into five major regions as classified by the United Nations. That is northern Africa, southern Africa, western Africa, central Africa, and eastern Africa [Figure 2]. Only the 54 countries fully recognised by the United Nations are included. These consists of seven, five, 16, nine and 17 countries of the northern, southern, western, central and eastern Africa, respectively.

It is possible that porcine cysticercosis poses more economic losses than those only related to condemnation or reduced value of infected pigs. For example, studies have established possible reduced fertility of pigs naturally infected with cysticercosis, which would reduce the productive performance of the pigs [12]. Similar findings have been reported in human infected with neurocysticercosis [13]. In both the pig and human studies, cysticercosis was found to significantly reduce serum level of testosterone while increasing significantly the level of follicle stimulating hormones in males [12,13]. On the other hand, cysticercosis significantly reduced the level of progesterone in females [13]. These endocrinological changes are thought to exert significant inhibitory action in the reproduction function of the infected individuals. However, it has been observed that the effect is more intense in male than female hosts. Although the study of pigs included males only, there is strong evidence from laboratory trials, which suggests that the effect of the parasite in female pigs will most likely resemble that observed in female humans [12,13].

Figure 2.

Regions of Africa based on the United Nations system of classification.

Disability in persons infected with neurocysticercosis is another potential factor that is likely to contribute to further economic losses in the agricultural sector through reduced manpower, some of which would be used in pig production in the countries. This can be supported by studies in Eastern Cape Province of South Africa and Cameroon, which show that the majority of people in Africa are not employed in salaried jobs [4,5]. This significant proportion of the population is likely to engage in small-scale businesses, including pig farming. Those suffering from neurocysticercosis in this category of the population are likely to contribute significantly to agricultural losses in the pig industry.

Because of the current lack of information on the actual reduction of pigs’ reproductivity as a result of cysticercosis and specific contribution of unemployed populations to pig production in endemic countries, the analysis of the agricultural impact of T. solium in this study is mostly based on the costs related to the partial or total condemnation of infected pigs. However, we observe possible gross underestimation of the impact.

4. Methodology

4.1. Study area and duration

This study was carried out between April and June, 2012 and included the 54 African countries that were fully recognised by the United Nations as of 2012 [14]

Collection of data on country pig populations and status of porcine cysticercosis

Pig population data for each of the 54 countries were downloaded from the FAO statistical database [10]. The most recent pig population estimates (those of 2010) were used. Thereafter, several Google searches were performed for each country name and key English phrases and words such as “porcine cysticercosis”, “Taenia solium”, “T. solium”, and “cysticercosis” to gather scientific publications related to porcine cysticercosis in each country. When a relevant article was encountered, necessary information such as disease magnitude, sample size and diagnostic method was recorded as available. If more than one article was found to be relevant, a range of values was given and authors for all the articles used were cited. The most current literature was preferred.

Estimation of agricultural impact of porcine cysticercosis

This was the main focus of the study. Therefore, more attention was given to this aspect. A total of 200 articles were retrieved following several Google searches using the following four phrases in that order: (i) Burden-of Taenia-solium cysticercosis, (ii) Impact-of Taenia-solium, (iii) Economic-impact Taenia-solium, and (iv) Financial-impact Taenia-solium. For each search phrase, 50 first articles we retrieved from which the relevant ones were downloaded from their publishers for further analysis. This first screening was based on a quick assessment of information given in the abstracts. Following the first screening, a total of 18 articles were considered relevant and different from each other, and hence, were included. Out of the 18 articles, 10 were obtained from the first search, seven new articles from the second search, one form the third, and none new from the fourth search phrase. In the second screening, only those articles that included information for Africa were sub-selected from the 18 articles. Five were obtained at this sub-sampling stage. Finally, only those articles that included information on the economic burden of porcine cysticercosis in Africa were selected. Four articles met this criterion and were included for further analysis. The four articles were all peer-reviewed journal papers [4,5,16,17]. A flow diagram to illustrate the sampling procedure described above is given in Figure 3.

The information collected was recorded as reported by the author(s) of the article. If there was different information regarding the cost of porcine cysticercosis in a country, a range of values was given and data sources cited.

Figure 3.

The flow diagram of the literature sampling procedure to analyse the economic impact of porcine cysticercosis in Africa.

5. Results

5.1. General results

The study area consisted of 54 countries. The total population of pigs estimated in the study area in 2010 amounted 29,606,438. This was approximately 3.1% of the world pig population estimate (N = 965,855,414) of 2010. Out of the Africa regional pig population, approximately 0.2% was reared in the northern countries, while 6.1%, 43.3%, 16,4%, and 34.0% were reared in the southern, western, central, and eastern Africa, respectively. Overall, 19 (35.2%) of the 54 study countries reported prevalence of cysticercosis in pigs. While no data were available in the northern region, the remaining regions provided prevalence data, with more reporting frequency observed in the eastern followed by central Africa.

Porcine cysticercosis in northern Africa

Countries of northern Africa comprise Algeria, Egypt, Libya, Morocco, Sudan, Southern Sudan, and Tunisia. Pig rearing in this region is minimal (Table 1). While there were no pigs reported for Libya, Sudan, and Southern Sudan, indicating possibly absence of or insignificant pig rearing in the countries, pig populations in the remaining four countries ranged from 5,700-38,000 in 2010, making an overall regional pig population of 58,200 pigs. The small number of pigs reared in the northern Africa region is likely to be due to drought and the fact that most of the inhabitants in the region are Muslims. Generally, there was no report available with regard to porcine cysticercosis in the northern Africa. While there is an indication of Egypt providing the most ancient known case of T. solium infection in humans, there was currently no information regarding prevalence of cysticercosis in pigs in that country. Pigs in Egypt are known to be kept mainly by Coptic Christians. Before, the 2009 suspected swine flu pandemic, which nevertheless did not prove true, pigs in the country have been very valuable in cleaning the city garbage by being fed on garbage traditionally collected from cities and urban centres [15]. Although this practice might have been reduced after the 2009 suspect swine flu pandemic, generally pigs in Egypt are at a greater risk of acquiring T. solium cysticercosis because of feeding on the garbage. The lack of reports on porcine cysticercosis in the country can be due to lack of research, which could also be enhanced by religious conflicts towards pig keeping in that country.

CountryPig population 2010Prevalence of PCC
Algeria5,700ND
Egypt38,000ND
Libya-ND
Morocco8,500ND
Sudan-ND
Southern Sudan
Tunisia
-
6,000
ND
Total58,200

Table 1.

Pig population estimates of North African countries in 2010 and the current status of porcine cysticercosis (PCC) caused by Taenia solium. ND indicates no data

Porcine cysticercosis in southern Africa

Table 2 presents the pig population estimates and status of porcine cysticercosis in southern Africa. South Africa is the only country in the region, which has reported prevalence of porcine cysticercosis. A number of studies have been conducted in several parts of the country for various periods of time. It is apparent that porcine cysticercosis is hyperendemic in some parts of the country. The possibility of the other countries in the region being free from porcine cysticercosis is yet to be scientifically proven. Such studies would be very valuable in guiding potential control measures for T. solium infections in South Africa by providing information on potential factors that may be encouraging the endemicity of the parasite in South Africa but not in the other countries if they prove to be free from the infections.

CountryPig population 2010Prevalence of PCCDiagnostic methodReference
Botswana12,950ND
Lesotho83,976ND
Namibia65,000ND
South Africa1,594,49054.8 – 57Ag-ELISA[18]
Swaziland50,000ND
Total1,806,416

Table 2.

Pig population estimates of southern African countries in 2010 and the current status of porcine cysticercosis (PCC) caused by Taenia solium. ND indicates no data

Porcine cysticercosis in western Africa

Western Africa has the largest pig population in the region (Table 3). Six of the 16 countries of the region have reported presence of porcine cysticercosis. Burkina Faso seems to have high prevalence of porcine cysticercosis in some region, probably because of variations in pig management practices. Apart from Burkina Faso, Gambia and Senegal, data from the other countries are rather old. This suggests that research on porcine cysticercosis in these countries has been inactive for quite some time.

CountryPig population 2010Prevalence of PCCDiagnostic methodReference
Benin354,000ND
Burkina Faso1,920,2000-39.6Ag-ELISA[16,19]
Cape Verde238,600ND
Cote d’Ivoire350,000ND
Gambia28,5004.8 (n = 371)Ag-ELISA[20]
Ghana536,00011.7[16]
Guinea95,180ND
Guinea Bissau418,900ND
Liberia265,300ND
Mali75,015ND
Mauritania-ND
Niger40,000ND
Nigeria7,471,73015.3[16]
Senegal346,6816.4-13.2 (n=1334)Ag-ELISA[20]
Sierra Leone45,211ND
Togo643,63017[16]
Total12,828,947

Table 3.

Pig population estimates of West African countries in 2010 and the current status of porcine cysticercosis (PCC) caused by Taenia solium. ND indicates no data

Porcine cysticercosis in central Africa

Four out of the ten countries of central Africa have reported prevalence of porcine cysticercosis. Extensive studies have been conducted in Cameroon, ranging from epidemiological, intervention trials and disease burden analysis. Porcine cysticercosis prevalence in Cameroon seems to resemble that in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Central Africa also indicates high infection rates of porcine cysticercosis.

CountryPig population 2010Prevalence of PCCDiagnostic methodReference
Angola791,0000-6.8Meat insp.[16]
Cameroon1,680,00011-39.8Ag-ELISA[21]
Central Afr Rep1,087,000ND
Chad30,4006.8-25.7Tongue/Meat[16]
Rep Congo70,000ND
DR Congo967,00041.2 (n=153)Ag-ELISA[22]
Eq. Guinea6,300ND
Gabon215,000ND
Sao Tomé & Pr2,620ND
Total4,849,320

Table 4.

Pig population estimates of Central African countries in 2010 and the current status of porcine cysticercosis (PCC) caused by Taenia solium. ND indicates no data

Porcine cysticercosis in eastern Africa

The eastern Africa region consists of 17 countries and approximately 10 million pigs were reared in the region in 2010 (Table 5). The region includes ten out of 13 countries that belong to the CWGESA, an international non-governmental scientific organisation that was founded in 2002 with the overall objective of combating taeniasis/cysticercosis on a regional effort, considering that the disease has no border. As shown in the table below, a number of countries have reported prevalence of porcine cysticercosis, also suggesting high infection pressure in some countries. In Tanzania, an incidence rate of 69 per 100 pig-yeas was estimated in sentinel pigs based on antigen ELISA [23].

Economic impact of porcine cysticercosis in Africa

Quite a good amount of information regarding the monetary burden of porcine cysticercosis has been reported in the southern, western, central, and eastern Africa regions. Extensive and most recent studies are those conducted in South Africa and Cameroon [4,5]. These studies were also able to establish the disease burden in humans. Overall, the available information provides enough evidence of the agricultural impact of porcine cysticercosis in Africa, especially most of sub-Saharan Africa. Table 6 summarises the information on the monetary burden of porcine cysticercosis in Africa.

CountryPig population 2010Prevalence of PCCDiagnostic methodReference
Tanzania495,00030.7-32 (n=600)Ag-ELISA[24]
Kenya347,4004.0Ag-ELISA[25]
Uganda2,300,0008.6 (n=480)Ag-ELISA[26]
Rwanda602,32420[16]
Burundi244,7912-39Meat insp.[16]
Djibouti-ND
Eritrea-ND
Ethiopia29,000ND
Somalia4,200ND
Mozambique1,350,00034.9 (n=661)Ag-ELISA[27]
Madagascar1,380,250ND
Malawi2,147,900ND
Zambia500,0008.2-23.3 (n=98-1691)Ag-ELISA[28, 29]
Zimbabwe635,0002.7-28.6Meat insp.[2]
Comoros-ND
Mauritius22,327ND
Seychelles5,363ND
Total10,063,555

Table 5.

Pig population estimates of East African countries in 2010 and the current status of porcine cysticercosis (PCC) caused by Taenia solium. ND indicates no data

RegionCountryOverall annual monetary lossesLosses due to PCCAnnual DALYs lost due to NCCReference
Northern Africa-
Southern AfricaS. Africa 04US $18.6 - 34.2 MUS $5.0 MND[4]
Western AfricaB/ Faso€ 52,830[16]
Ghana€ 594,945[16]
Nigeria€ 17,442, 000[16]
Senegal€ 57,600[16]
Togo€ 2,167,500[16]
Central AfricaCameroon€ 10,255,202€ 478,844€ 45,838.4[5]
€ 2,062,125[16]
Angola€ 408,000[16]
Chad€ 56,063[16]
D R Congo€ 2,141,700[16]
Eastern AfricaBurundi€ 218,325[16]
Tanzania*[17]

Table 6.

Monetary and non-monetary costs of Taenia solium cysticercosis in Africa

6. Conclusion

This extensive literature survey has established the agricultural impact of porcine cysticercosis in Africa. The results indicate a high disease burden and its economic impact to affected countries due to monetary losses in the agricultural sector, human health related costs and reduced manpower as a result of disabilities in neurocysticercotic patients. Most of the previous studies have focused on financial losses due to reduced value of infected pigs. This can grossly underestimate the burden of T. solium to the agricultural sector since disabilities in neurocysticercotic patients (including attached stigma) and possible reduced reproductive performance of infected pigs could add further to the impact of the parasite to the agricultural sector. Only two studies in the region have in addition analysed the cost of the parasite as a result of neurocysticercotic persons. These studies found that monetary losses due to pig condemnations account only approximately 5% of the overall cost of the disease [4,5]. In addition, the studies established significant Disability Adjusted Life Years (DALYs) lost by patients suffering from neurocysticercosis. Such opportunity costs are likely to exert additional burden of the parasite to the agricultural sector as a good number of rural communities are mostly engaged in agricultural activities, including pig farming. This study recommends urgent measures to control T. solium in endemic countries now that adequate epidemiological data are available in several countries. In addition, studies are needed to determine the impact of porcine cysticercosis to the fertility and eventually fecundity of infected pigs.

Acknowledgement

Authors for the various studies and data sources used in the compilation of the information presented in this chapter are highly acknowledged.

© 2013 The Author(s). Licensee IntechOpen. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

How to cite and reference

Link to this chapter Copy to clipboard

Cite this chapter Copy to clipboard

Helena A. Ngowi, Samson Mukaratirwa, Faustin P. Lekule, Ndichu Maingi, Charles Waiswa, Chummy Sikasunge, Sonia Afonso, Julienne Sumbu, Sylvia Ramiandrasoa, Mary Louise Penrith and Arve Lee Willingham (January 30th 2013). Agricultural Impact of Porcine Cyisticercosis in Africa: A Review, Novel Aspects on Cysticercosis and Neurocysticercosis, Humberto Foyaca Sibat, IntechOpen, DOI: 10.5772/51196. Available from:

chapter statistics

2305total chapter downloads

1Crossref citations

More statistics for editors and authors

Login to your personal dashboard for more detailed statistics on your publications.

Access personal reporting

Related Content

This Book

Next chapter

Control of Taenia Solium Transmission of Taeniosis and Cysticercosis in Endemic Countries: The Roles of Continental Networks of Specialists and of Local Health Authorities

By Agnès Fleury, Edda Sciutto, Aline S. de Aluja, Carlos Larralde, Sonia Agudelo, Gisela Maria Garcia, Jaime Fandiño, Randy Guerra, Cáris Nunes, Samuel Carvalho de Aragão, Marcello Sato, Ronaldo Abraham, Arturo Carpio, Franklin Santillan, Maria Milagros Cortez A., Glenda Rojas, Elizabeth Ferrer, Cruz Manuel Aguilar, Juan Carlos Durán, Teresa Garate and R. Michael E. Parkhouse

Related Book

First chapter

Introductory Chapter: Cognitive Disorders and Its Historical Background

By Humberto Foyaca Sibat and Lourdes de Fátima Ibañez Valdés

We are IntechOpen, the world's leading publisher of Open Access books. Built by scientists, for scientists. Our readership spans scientists, professors, researchers, librarians, and students, as well as business professionals. We share our knowledge and peer-reveiwed research papers with libraries, scientific and engineering societies, and also work with corporate R&D departments and government entities.

More About Us