Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Epidemiology of Myocardial Infarction

Written By

Joshua Chadwick Jayaraj, Karapet Davatyan, S.S. Subramanian and Jemmi Priya

Submitted: 26 September 2017 Reviewed: 01 February 2018 Published: 05 November 2018

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.74768

From the Edited Volume

Myocardial Infarction

Edited by Burak Pamukçu

Chapter metrics overview

5,550 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Coronary heart disease (CHD) is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality throughout the world. The most common form of CHD is the myocardial infarction. It is responsible for over 15% of mortality each year, among the vast majority of people suffering from non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) than ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The prevalence of myocardial infarction (MI) is higher in men in all age-specific groups than women. Although the incidence of MI is decreased in the industrialized nations partly because of improved health systems and implementation of effective public health strategies, nevertheless the rates are surging in the developing countries such as South Asia, parts of Latin America, and Eastern Europe. The modifiable risk factors represent over 90% of the risk for acute MI. The risk factors such as dyslipidemia, smoking, psychosocial stressors, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, obesity, alcohol consumption, physical inactivity, and a diet low in fruits and vegetables were strongly associated with acute MI.

Keywords

  • myocardial infarction
  • epidemiology
  • prevalence
  • incidence
  • risk factors

1. Introduction

The widely accepted definition of epidemiology is “the study of the distribution and determinants of health-related states or events in specified populations, and the application of this study to the control of health problems” [1]. The overarching aim of epidemiology is to improve the control of disease through both prevention and treatment that will decrease morbidity and mortality due to the disease and will increase the quality of life of those who have a severe illness like coronary artery diseases, e.g., myocardial infarction.

1.1. Coronary heart disease

The most common cause of coronary heart disease (CHD) is atherosclerosis of coronary arteries [2]. Atherosclerosis causes an inadequate supply of oxygen for a given a myocardial demand leading to myocardial hypoxia.

1.2. Atherosclerosis

The sequence of endothelial dysfunction, plaque formation consisting of lipids and smooth muscles, and associated inflammation causes atherosclerotic plaque [3]. Over these plaques rupture and thrombosis causing further narrowing of arteries and occlusion of blood flow can occur.

Although beyond the scope of this chapter, atherosclerosis implies disturbances in the coronary circulation as well as the microcirculation dysfunction.

1.3. Burden of coronary heart disease

Globally, cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are the number one cause of mortality. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), it is estimated that 7.4 million deaths were due to coronary heart disease in 2015. Eighty-two percent of deaths in low- and middle-income countries are accountable for CVD. Figure 1 shows the age-standardized estimate of mortality by cardiovascular diseases and diabetes per 100,000 people. It is estimated that 23.6 million people will die from CVDs by 2030. These are projected to remain the leading cause of mortality.

Figure 1.

Cardiovascular diseases and diabetes, deaths per 100,000 people. Source: Global Health Observatory data repository and World Health Organization [4].

1.4. Geographic variations in coronary heart disease

Worldwide the prevalence of CHD is increasing albeit there are regional variations due to the influence of economies, industrialization, and advancement in healthcare systems [5]. Data from the USA suggest about 25% of deaths in the USA are associated with heart disease each year [6]. An American dies due to myocardial infarction (MI) every 60 seconds [6]. The incidence of CHD in the western world is decreasing even though the risk factors for CHD such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and obesity are increasing. The decline is due to strengthening healthcare systems due to relative advancement in therapeutic and invasive interventions. As a result, CHD costs the USA about $200 billion each year [7]. The total cost includes not only the cost of healthcare services or medications, but it also includes the loss of productivity [7].

As Asia comprises over one-third of the world population, its experience on the prevalence of CHD is significant. In India, CHD may not be explained due to the traditional risk factors [8], whereas in China, CHD remains the second most cause of the deaths. Chinese cardiovascular medicine focusses centrally on prevention by shifting its focus from symptom-based therapy to lifestyle-guided improvement [9]. Trends in mortality from CHD were favorable in European Union countries, whereas in Eastern European countries, mortality from CHD remains exceptionally high [10]. CVD death rates have been significantly decreasing in most of the countries of Latin America despite the disparities in current trends [11].

The WHO has identified very cost-effective interventions that are feasible to be implemented even in low resource settings for averting the global epidemic of CVDs.

Advertisement

2. Myocardial infarction

2.1. Defining myocardial infarction

The most common form of CHD is the myocardial infarction (MI) [12]. MI occurs when a coronary artery is occluded or almost occluded, which creates a severe reduction in the blood flow, causing some of the heart muscle being supplied by that artery to become infarcted [13]. There are two clinical settings of MI—ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). STEMI is recognized by characteristic changes on the electrocardiography (ECG) [14]. One of those ECG changes is the typical elevation in the “ST segment” which is called as STEMI. On the contrary the absence of ST-segment elevation and the presence of positive cardiac biomarker such as troponin are called NSTEMI [15].

In the following sections, prevalence and incidence of myocardial infarction are elaborated. Prevalence is defined as the number of diseased individuals present in the population at a specific time. The incidence rate is determined as the number of new cases of a disease that occur during a specific time. The estimates are reported from various data sources such as general practice registries and self-reported by the patient through the national survey. The reliability of the data is based on the data source.

2.2. Prevalence of myocardial infarction

According to 2014, based on the self-reported national survey of the UK, the prevalence of MI was reported as 640,000 in men and 275,000 in women; this represents about 915,000 people that have suffered an MI in the UK. In 2013, the prevalence of MI in men was about three times higher than for women in the UK [16]. As shown in Figure 2, the prevalence of age-specific MI extends from 0.06% of men <45 years of age to 2.46% of those ≥75 years old.

Figure 2.

Age-specific prevalence of MI in the UK, 2014 [17]. Adapted from Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD), 2014. Evaluations are based on records from a sample of general practices in each of the constituent nations of the UK.

In contrast to these developed countries, South Asian countries (India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, and Nepal) have the highest prevalence of MI seen in younger than 45 years of age compared to those older than 60 years.

2.3. Incidence of myocardial infarction

Prevalence reflects first (acute) MI and MI in patients who had a previous MI. The incidence of MI only reflects the former. The incidence of MI has been declining in developed countries, including the USA and the UK.

The recent estimates of the incidence of MI in the USA are about 525,000 based on AHA data [18]. The Mozaffarian Study reported data comparing and contrasting the incidence of myocardial infarction in white men and women versus and black men and women. The study concludes that the incidence of myocardial infarction was more significant among black men (12.9/100,000 males) who are in the age group 75–84 years of age than whites for both men (9.1/100,000 males) and women (7.8/100,000 females). Similar trends exist in other age groups and their counterparts (Figure 3) [19]. It is essential to assess the effectiveness of public health strategies to fight MI.

Figure 3.

Incidence of myocardial infarction by age, sex, and race in the USA, 2015 [19]. Adapted from Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2015 update: A report from the American Heart Association.

Regarding the clinical type of MI, it has been estimated that incidence rates (per 100,000) of STEMI decreased appreciably (121 to 77), whereas those incidence rates of NSTEMI declined slightly (126 to 132) [20]. In a landmark study, no variation was seen in all-cause mortality for both STEMI and NSTEMI between 6 months and 4 years of follow-up. But, STEMI patients have a worse long-term prognosis matched to NSTEMI patients [21]. Other studies have shown a worse 7-year mortality rate for NSTEMI patients than STEMI patients [22].

2.4. Risk factors

The INTERHEART study evaluated the prevalence of nine potentially modifiable risk factors in more than 15,000 cases with the first acute MI and matched with about 15,000 asymptomatic age- and sex-matched controls [23]. Nine risk factors were strongly associated with acute MI in the 52 countries included in the trial. The modifiable risk factors represent over 90% of the risk for acute MI. Diabetes mellitus is a significant predictor of adverse cardiac outcomes, especially in women. It is considered to be a coronary heart disease equivalent (Tables 14) [24, 25].

CHD risk equivalents
  • Noncoronary atherosclerotic disease (e.g., carotid, peripheral, abdominal aortic aneurysm)

  • Diabetes mellitus

  • Chronic kidney disease

CHD-established risk factors
  • Dyslipidemia, smoking, psychosocial stressors, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, obesity, alcohol consumption, physical inactivity, and diet low in fruits and vegetables

  • Age (especially >50 in men and postmenopausal women)

  • Family history of CHD in first-degree relative age < 50 (men) and age < 60 (women)

Table 1.

Risk factors for coronary heart disease (CHD).

Involved myocardiumOccluded vesselECG leads involved
Anterior MILADSome or all of leads V1–V6
Inferior MIRCA or LCXST elevation in leads II, III, and aVF
Right ventricular MI
(occurs in ½ of inferior MI)
RCAST elevation in leads V4–V6R
Posterior MILCX or RCAST depression in leads V1–V3
ST elevation in leads I and aVL (LCX)
ST depression in leads I and aVL (RCA)
Lateral MILCX, diagonalST elevation in leads I, aVL, V5, and V6
ST depression in leads II, III, and aVF

Table 2.

Myocardial infarction location based on coronary artery involvement.

TestOnset of abnormalityDuration of abnormality
ECGImmediately at onset of chest painST elevation progresses to Q-waves over several days to weeks
Myoglobin1–4 hours1–2 days
CK-MB4–6 hours1–2 days
Troponin4–6 hours1–2 weeks

Table 3.

Diagnostic tests.

Mechanical complication of acute MICoronary artery typically involvedTime courseClinical findingsEchocardiography
RV failureRCAAcute
  • Hypotension and clear lungs

  • Kussmaul sign

  • Hypokinetic RV

Papillary muscle ruptureRCAAcute and within 3–5 days
  • Acute severe pulmonary edema

  • New holosystolic murmur

  • Severe mitral regurtitation with fail leaflet

Interventricular septal rupture/defectLAD: Apical septal rupture
RCA: Basal septal rupture
Acute and within 3–5 days
  • Shock and chest pain

  • New holosystolic murmur

  • Biventricular failure

  • Left-to-right shunt at the level of rupture

  • Step-up oxygen level between the right atrium and ventricle

Free wall ruptureLADWithin first 5 days to 2 weeks
  • Shock and chest pain

  • Jugular venous distention

  • Distant heart sounds

  • Pericardial effusion with tamponade

Table 4.

Evaluation of chest pain in the acute setting.

2.5. Summary

It is evident that MI is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. It is responsible for over 15% of mortality each year, among the vast majority of people suffering from NSTEMI than STEMI. The prevalence of MI is higher among men in all age-specific groups than women. Although the incidence of MI is decreased in the industrialized nations partly because of improved health systems and implementation of effective public health strategies, nevertheless the rates are surging in the developing countries such as South Asia, parts of Latin America, and Eastern Europe. The modifiable risk factors account for more than 90% of the risk for acute MI. Nine risk factors such as dyslipidemia, smoking, psychosocial stressors, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, obesity, alcohol consumption, physical inactivity, and a diet low in fruits and vegetables were strongly associated with acute MI in the 52 countries (Chart 1).

Chart 1

Evaluation of chest pain in the acute setting.

Advertisement

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank the following people for all their effort, motivation, and support during teaching: President of Haybusak University Dr. Anahit Harutyunian, Rector Dr. Suren Harutyunyan, Dean Dr. Yanina Marinosyan, Vice-Dean Dr. Narine Martirosyan, and Drs. Lusine Hovsepyan and Astghik Harutyunyan.

Advertisement

Conflict of interest

No conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1. A Dictionary of Epidemiology. [cited 2017 Dec 14]; Available from: http://irea.ir/files/site1/pages/dictionary.pdf
  2. 2. Ambrose JA, Singh M. Pathophysiology of coronary artery disease leading to acute coronary syndromes. [cited 2017 Dec 14]; Available from: http://f1000.com/prime/reports/m/7/8
  3. 3. Badimon L, Padró T, Vilahur G. Atherosclerosis, platelets and thrombosis in acute ischaemic heart disease. European Heart Journal of Acute Cardiovascular care [Internet]. 2012 Apr [cited 2017 Dec 14];1(1):60-74. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24062891
  4. 4. WHO | Life expectancy. [cited 2015 Jul 15]; Available from: http://www.who.int/gho/mortality_burden_disease/life_tables/en/
  5. 5. Lopez AD, Mathers CD, Ezzati M, Jamison DT, Murray CJ. Global and regional burden of disease and risk factors, 2001: Systematic analysis of population health data. Lancet [Internet]. 2006 May 27 [cited 2017 Dec 14];367(9524):1747-1757. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16731270
  6. 6. Benjamin EJ, Blaha MJ, Chiuve SE, Cushman M, Das SR, Deo R, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2017 update: A report from the American Heart Association. Circulation [Internet]. 2017 Mar 7 [cited 2017 Dec 14];135(10):e146-e603. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28122885
  7. 7. Heron M. National Vital Statistics Reports Volume 65, Number 5 June 30, 2016 Deaths: Leading Causes for 2014. 2016 [cited 2017 Dec 14];65(5). Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr65/nvsr65_05.pdf
  8. 8. Goyal A, Yusuf S. The burden of cardiovascular disease in the Indian subcontinent. Indian Journal of Medical Research [Internet]. 2006 Sep [cited 2017 Dec 14];124(3):235-244. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17085827
  9. 9. Li H, Ge J. Cardiovascular diseases in China: Current status and future perspectives. IJC Heart and Vasculature [Internet]. 2015 Mar 1 [cited 2017 Dec 14];6:25-31. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352906714000694
  10. 10. Levi F, Lucchini F, Negri E, La Vecchia C. Trends in mortality from cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases in Europe and other areas of the world. Heart [Internet]. 2002 Aug [cited 2017 Dec 14];88(2):119-124. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12117828
  11. 11. de Fatima Marinho de Souza M, Gawryszewski VP, Orduñez P, Sanhueza A, Espinal MA. Cardiovascular disease mortality in the Americas: Current trends and disparities. Heart [Internet]. 2012 Aug 15 [cited 2017 Dec 14];98(16):1207-1212. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22826558
  12. 12. WHO | Global Status Report on Noncommunicable Diseases 2014. WHO. 2015
  13. 13. Goldstein JA, Demetriou D, Grines CL, Pica M, Shoukfeh M, O’Neill WW. Multiple complex coronary plaques in patients with acute myocardial infarction. New England Journal of Medicine [Internet]. 2000 Sep 28 [cited 2017 Oct 29];343(13):915-922. Available from: http://www.nejm.org/doi/abs/10.1056/NEJM200009283431303
  14. 14. O’Gara PT, Kushner FG, Ascheim DD, Casey DE, Chung MK, de Lemos J a, et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Journal of American College of Cardiology [Internet]. 2013 Jan 29 [cited 2014 Jul 10];61(4):e78-e140. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23256914
  15. 15. Amsterdam EA, Wenger NK, Brindis RG, Casey DE, Ganiats TG, Holmes DR, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: Executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation [Internet]. 2014 Dec 23 [cited 2017 Oct 29];130(25):2354-2594. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25249586
  16. 16. Bhatnagar P, Wickramasinghe K, Williams J, Rayner M, Townsend N. The epidemiology of cardiovascular disease in the UK 2014. Heart [Internet]. 2015 Aug 6 [cited 2017 Dec 17];101(15):1182-1189. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26041770
  17. 17. Herrett E, Gallagher AM, Bhaskaran K, Forbes H, Mathur R, van Staa T, et al. Data resource profile: Clinical practice research datalink (CPRD). International Journal of Epidemiology [Internet]. 2015 Jun [cited 2018 Jan 9];44(3):827-836. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26050254
  18. 18. Roger VL. Epidemiology of myocardial infarction. Medical Clinics of North America [Internet]. 2007 Jul [cited 2017 Dec 17];91(4):537-552; ix. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17640535
  19. 19. Mozaffarian D, Benjamin EJ, Go AS, Arnett DK, Blaha MJ, Cushman M, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2015 Update. Circulation [Internet]. 2015 Jan 27 [cited 2017 Dec 17];131(4):e29-e322. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25520374
  20. 20. McManus DD, Gore J, Yarzebski J, Spencer F, Lessard D, Goldberg RJ. Recent trends in the incidence, treatment, and outcomes of patients with STEMI and NSTEMI. American Journal of Medicine [Internet]. 2011 Jan [cited 2017 Dec 17];124(1):40-47. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21187184
  21. 21. Ren L, Ye H, Wang P, Cui Y, Cao S, Lv S. Comparison of long-term mortality of acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome patients after percutaneous coronary intervention. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2017 Dec 17];7(12):5588-5592. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25664077
  22. 22. García-García C, Subirana I, Sala J, Bruguera J, Sanz G, Valle V, et al. Long-term prognosis of first myocardial infarction according to the electrocardiographic pattern (st elevation myocardial infarction, non-st elevation myocardial infarction and non-classified myocardial infarction) and revascularization procedures. American Journal of Cardiology [Internet]. 2011 Oct 15 [cited 2017 Dec 17];108(8):1061-1067. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21791326
  23. 23. Yusuf S, Hawken S, Ôunpuu S, Dans T, Avezum A, Lanas F, et al. Effect of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with myocardial infarction in 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): Case-control study. Lancet [Internet]. 2004 Sep [cited 2017 Oct 29];364(9438):937-952. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15364185
  24. 24. Vaccaro O, Eberly LE, Neaton JD, Yang L, Riccardi G, Stamler J, et al. Impact of diabetes and previous myocardial infarction on long-term survival: 25-year mortality follow-up of primary screenees of the multiple risk factor intervention trial. Archives of Internal Medicine [Internet]. 2004 Jul 12 [cited 2017 Oct 29];164(13):1438. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15249353
  25. 25. Almdal T, Scharling H, Jensen JS, Vestergaard H. The independent effect of type 2 diabetes mellitus on ischemic heart disease, stroke, and death. Archives of Internal Medicine [Internet]. 2004 Jul 12 [cited 2017 Oct 29];164(13):1422. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15249351

Written By

Joshua Chadwick Jayaraj, Karapet Davatyan, S.S. Subramanian and Jemmi Priya

Submitted: 26 September 2017 Reviewed: 01 February 2018 Published: 05 November 2018