InTechOpen uses cookies to offer you the best online experience. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Medicine » Oncology » "Molecular Targets of CNS Tumors", book edited by Miklos Garami, ISBN 978-953-307-736-9, Published: September 22, 2011 under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 license. © The Author(s).

Chapter 30

The Role of HGF/c-Met Pathway Signaling in Human Medulloblastoma

By Claudia Faria, Christian Smith and James Rutka
DOI: 10.5772/23296

Article top


HGF and Met structures
Figure 1. HGF and Met structures
The HGF/c-Met signaling pathway
Figure 2. The HGF/c-Met signaling pathway
Mechanisms of Met signaling regulation
Figure 3. Mechanisms of Met signaling regulation
Summary of HGF/c-Met inhibitors. (VEGFR, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor; Ret, rearranged during transfection; Kit, stem cell factor receptor; Flt-3, FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3; Tie-2, angiopoietin receptor 2; PDGFR, platelet-derived growth factor receptor; Ron, recepteur d’origine nantais)
Table 1. Summary of HGF/c-Met inhibitors. (VEGFR, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor; Ret, rearranged during transfection; Kit, stem cell factor receptor; Flt-3, FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3; Tie-2, angiopoietin receptor 2; PDGFR, platelet-derived growth factor receptor; Ron, recepteur d’origine nantais)

The Role of HGF/c-Met Pathway Signaling in Human Medulloblastoma

Claudia Faria1, Christian Smith1 and James Rutka1

1. Introduction

Medulloblastoma is the most common malignant brain tumor in childhood and represents around 10% of all pediatric cancer deaths.It arises in the cerebellum and originates from aberrant proliferation of neural progenitor cells during development. It has a high tendency to disseminate throughout the central nervous system with as many as 30% of children with metastatic spread at the time of diagnosis. Dissemination is the most important factor associated with poor survival and the leading cause of treatment failure. The current therapies include surgery, radiation and chemotherapy with 5-year survival rates ranging between 50 and 80%. Among long-term survivors, a major concern is the sequelae induced by treatment including endocrinologic, neurocognitive and behavioral dysfunction.

The genetic heterogeneity of medulloblastoma appears to be the basis for differential response to treatment, which leads to the conclusion that current tumor classification systems based solely on histological or clinical criteria are clearly insufficient and limited. Recent studies have identified distinct molecular variants of medulloblastoma that correspond with different clinical presentations, transcriptional profiles, genetic abnormalities and clinical outcomes(Eberhart, 2011; Ellison et al., 2011; Northcott et al., 2010; Pfister et al., 2010). Thus, a better understanding of the molecular biology of this tumor will have significant diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic value.

Medulloblastoma is associated with dysregulation of the pathways that normally lead to cerebellum development. Over the past few years, different signaling pathways have been shown to play a critical role in medulloblastoma formation and progression. The hepatocyte growth factor (HGF)/c-Met signaling pathway has been implicated in different processes including development and tumorigenesis but only recently has it been demonstrated in medulloblastoma pathogenesis. The receptor tyrosine kinase c-Met is normally activated following engagement with HGF ligand, secreted as a precursor that is proteolytically cleaved in an active form by the serine protease hepatocyte growth factor activator. HGF is a member of the plasminogen-related growth factor family and was originally identified as a growth factor for hepatocytes and as a fibroblast-derived cell motility or scatter factor. The interplay between c-Met and its ligand mediate downstream events that, in the central nervous system, play a critical role in cerebellar granule cell precursors proliferation and survival.Dysregulation of this pathway can promote tumorigenesis through cell migration, invasion and metastasis, angiogenesis and prevention ofapoptosis. Met has been found to be overexpressed in a variety of malignancies where its activation can occur by HGF ligation or through ligand independent mechanisms, including mutations and amplifications.

It was shown that medulloblastomatumor cell lines and surgical tumor samples express HGF and c-Met. Furthermore, overexpression of c-Met is associated with poor clinical outcome. Treatment of medulloblastoma cell lines with HGF induced tumor cell proliferation, anchorage-independent growth and reduced apoptosis in response to chemotherapy. Recently, Serine protease inhibitor kunitz-type 2 (SPINT2), a tumorsupressor gene silenced by promoter methylation in medulloblastoma, was identified by our group as a key regulator of HGF/c-Met pathway (Kongkham et al., 2008). Several therapeutic strategies aiming to target and limit the signaling cascade of HGF/c-Met were examined with the c-Met inhibitors being the most promising. Targeting the HGF/c-Met pathway, alone or in combination with standard therapies is likely to improve present treatments in Met-dependent malignancies such as medulloblastoma.

In this chapter we examine the role of the HGF/c-Met pathway in normal cerebellar development and in medulloblastoma formation and progression. We also highlight the most recent advances in targeted therapies to the HGF/c-Met axis in cancer.

2. HGF/c-Met pathway signaling

The HGF/c-Met pathway has been associated with normal development, organ regeneration and cancer. Met is a high affinity tyrosine kinase receptor for hepatocyte growth factor (also known as scatter factor, capable of inducing dissociation and motility). Met is generally expressed in epithelial cells and is activated by HGF produced in surrounding mesenchymal cells or released into the circulation.

During embryogenesis HGF/c-Met signaling is necessary for the development of the placenta, liver, kidney and neuronal tissue but also for the directional migration of skeletal muscle cells (Birchmeier Gherardi, 1998). In adult tissues, this pathway has been implicated in regeneration and wound healing (Chmielowiec et al., 2007; Huh et al., 2004). Therefore, the HGF/c-Met axis is a key player in cell proliferation, survival and migration and, when dysregulated, can give origin to a variety of cancers.

2.1. Structure of HGF and Met

HGF is a multidomain protein similar to plasminogen, a circulating proenzyme that promotes the lysis of fibrin blood clots in its active form as plasmin. HGF is synthesized as a single-chain inactive precursor and it is converted by serine proteases into an active form with two chains ( and chain) linked by a disulfide bond. HGF consists of six domains: an amino-terminal hairpin loop domain (HL), four kringle domains (K1-K4) and a serine protease homology (SPH) domain which lacks enzymatic activity (Figure 1).

Met, the HGF receptor, is a disulfide-linked heterodimer which results from cleavage of a precursor into an extracellular chain and a transmembrane chain. The extracellular region of Met is composed of three domains: the Sema domain (homologous to the Sema domain of the semaphorins and plexins) that includes the entire chain and part of the chain; the PSI domain (also present in the plexins, semaphorins and integrins); and four IPT domains (immunoglobulin-like also found in plexins and transcriptional factors). The intracellular region of Met consists of three portions: a juxtamembrane sequence that has the role to downregulate kinase activity upon phosphorylation of Ser975; a catalytic region that activates kinase activity following phosphorylation of Tyr1234 and Tyr1235; and a carboxy-terminal multifunctional docking site that contains two docking tyrosines (Tyr1349 and Tyr1356) essential for downstream signaling(Trusolino et al., 2010).


Figure 1.

HGF and Met structures

2.2. Met signal transduction

To activate the Met receptor, the single chain HGF precursor is cleaved into a heterodimeric active form by a protease called HGF activator (HGFA) (Miyazawa et al., 1993). This process is regulated by a protein family of serine protease inhibitors called SPINT1 and SPINT2 (Kawaguchi et al., 1997; Shimomura et al., 1997). Inhibiting the activation of HGF by HGFA, SPINT1 and -2 limitsignaling through the HGF/c-Met pathway.

Following HGF binding, the kinase activity of Met is switched on. This process starts with receptor dimerization and trans-phosphorylation of two tyrosine residues in the catalytic region (Tyr1234 and Tyr1235) and is followed by phosphorylation of two additional tyrosines in the carboxy-terminal tail (Tyr1349 and Tyr1356). These tyrosines create docking sites for a variety of adaptor proteins and direct kinase substrates including the growth factor receptor-bound protein 2 (Grb2), Grb2-associated adaptor protein (Gab1), son of sevenless (SOS), SRC homology protein tyrosine phosphatase 3 (Shp2), phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K) and signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3). This leads to the activation of downstream signaling pathways that include the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), PI3K/AKT and STAT pathways, which mediate Met-dependent cell proliferation, survival, migration and invasion (Figure 2).


Figure 2.

The HGF/c-Met signaling pathway

The activation of MAPK cascade will sequentially activate different protein kinases whose terminal effectors include extracellular signal-regulated kinases (Erk1 and Erk2), Jun amino-terminal kinases (JNK1, JNK2 and JNK3) and p38. These downstream elements will activate cell cycle regulators leading to cell proliferation and will promote alterations in cytoskeletal functions that control cell migration and invasion. PI3K/AKT activation mediates cell survival and resistance to apoptosis through inactivation of the pro-apoptotic protein BCL-2 antagonist of cell death (BAD) and degradation of the pro-apoptotic protein p53 (Birchmeier et al., 2003). Upon activation of STAT3 by the Met receptor at the plasma membrane, it translocates to the nucleus to operate as a transcription factor regulating the expression of genes implicated in cell proliferation and differentiation (Y. W. Zhang et al., 2002).

Other molecules that interact with the Met receptor include the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), the 64 integrin, the semaphoring receptors of the plexin B family and the variant of the hyaluronan receptor CD44 (that links the extracellular matrix and the intracellular cytoskeleton) (Bertotti et al., 2006; Guo et al., 2008; Orian-Rousseau et al., 2002). This crosstalk of Met with different surface proteins highlights the dynamic environment at the plasma membrane and contributes to Met associated biological responses (Lai et al., 2009).

2.3. Regulation of Met signaling

It has been shown that the signaling network around the tyrosine kinase receptor Met is more complex than the known process of recruiting signaling effectors at the plasma membrane and subsequently stimulating intermediates in the cytosol. In fact, this view has been expanded by the finding that Met signals can also originate from endosomal compartments and by a series of other events.

Upon HGF binding, Met is internalized by clathrin-mediated endocytosis and recruited into peripheral early endosomes. This process is mediated by protein kinase C (PKC) that promotes the transfer of active Erk to focal adhesions and, subsequently, the HGF-induced cell migration. From the peripheral endosomes, Met travels along the microtubule network to late perinuclear compartments in a process mediated by PKC. This juxtanuclear accumulation of Met is a determinant step for activation and nuclear translocation of STAT3 (Kermorgant Parker, 2005, 2008).

Downregulation of Met signaling involves trafficking and degradation of ligand-activated receptors in the lysosomes. This process is initiated by the association of Met with casitas B-lineage lymphoma (CBL) and endocytic adaptors. Following endocytosis, Met accumulates in multivesicular bodies that later fuse with lysosomes and leads to protein degradation. Met can also undergo sequential proteolytic cleavage at two juxtamembrane sites. The first cleavage occurs in the extracellular domain and is mediated by a disintegrinand metalloprotease (ADAM) originating a ‘decoy’ fragment that sequesters the ligand and interferes with the receptor’s activity. The second cleavage is performed in the intracellular domain, by a -secretase and yields a fragment that is destroyed in the proteasome (Hammond et al., 2001)(Figure 3).

3. HGF, Met and cancer

The dysregulation of HGF/c-Met signaling has emerged as a key player in several human malignancies, particularly in invasion and metastasis. Human cell lines overexpressing either HGF and/or Met become tumorigenic and metastatic when implanted into nude mice (Rong et al., 1994). Moreover, transgenic mice expressing the receptor or the ligand develop metastatic tumors(Takayama et al., 1997). On the contrary, downregulation of HGF or Met expression in human tumorxenografts decreases tumor growth (Abounader et al., 2002).


Figure 3.

Mechanisms of Met signaling regulation

There are three biological mechanisms underlying the tumorigenicity of Met: a) the establishment of HGF/c-Met autocrine loops; b) the overexpression of HGF or Met; and c) the presence of activating mutations in the Met receptor (Benvenuti Comoglio, 2007).

An autocrine mechanism of Met activation is found in some human tumors. For example, osteosarcomas and rabdomyosarcomas are derived from mesenchymal cells which physiologically produce HGF. Glioblastomas and breast carcinomas are derived from ectodermal tissues that normally express Met but not HGF. Experimental models of HGF/c-Met autocrine loops were also able to generate invasive tumorsin vitro and in transgenic mice (Boccaccio Comoglio, 2006).

The most frequent mechanism of Met dysregulation found in human tumors is the overexpression of the receptor or its ligand. A large number of studies showed that HGF and Met are expressed in a wide variety of human tumors and in their metastasis. These include carcinomas of the breast, colon, lung, ovary, liver, kidney, upper gastrointestinal tract, pancreas and prostate but also sarcomas, haematopoietic malignancies, melanomas and glioblastomas(Birchmeier et al., 2003).

It has also been shown that high expression levels of Met and its ligand correlate with increased aggressiveness of tumors and patients poor prognosis (Birchmeier et al., 2003). For example, in colorectal cancer patients Met is a powerful prognostic factor for early stage invasion and metastasis (Kammula et al., 2007). Moreover, in a study including 74 clinical samples of low-grade and high-grade gliomas the authors described a correlation of HGF and Met expression levels with tumor grade (Abounader Laterra, 2005).

The compelling evidence that links Met with human cancer liesin the MET-activating mutations found in hereditary renal papillary carcinoma. These mutations were also found in sporadic tumors such as renal carcinoma, gastric cancer, childhood hepatocellular carcinoma and in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (Boccaccio Comoglio, 2006; Lai et al., 2009).

The association between cancer and blood coagulation disorders has been known for many years. In fact, approximately 50% of all patients with malignant tumors and up to 90% of those with metastasis have coagulopathies (Wojtukiewicz et al., 2001). Interestingly, Boccaccio et al. showed in a mouse model that activation of the oncogene Met induced cancer and a thrombohemorrhagicsyndrome through transcriptional upregulation of the procoagulation factors plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 (PAI-1) and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2). Upon a first phase characterized by a hypercoagulation state due to Metsignaling activation, the mice developed a hemorrhagic diathesis due to exhaustion of the hyperactivatedhemostatic system (Boccaccio et al., 2005). At the early step of this process, hypoxia induces transcription of Met that, subsequently, activates the transcription of genes involved in hemostasis, such as PAI-1 and COX-2. The activation of the coagulation cascade will lead to fibrin deposition around cells forming an extracellular matrix that will promote angiogenesis and cell migration (Boccaccio Comoglio, 2005).

HGF/c-Met signalingalso has a role in angiogenesis either by direct influence of c-Met activation in vascular endothelial cells, or by regulation of the expression levels of other angiogenic factors in tumor cells. It was previously shown that the HGF/c-Met interaction stimulates proliferation and migration of endothelial cells in vitro and induces blood vessel formation in vivo (Bussolino et al., 1992). Zhang et al. described the “angiogenic switch” in tumor cells upon HGF stimulation by simultaneous upregulation of the proangiogenic vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and downregulation of thrombospondin 1 (TSP-1), an angiogenesis inhibitor (Y. W. Zhang et al., 2003). This process has distinct mediators: while VEGF is modulated by MAPK, PI3K and STAT3, TSP-1 is targeted only by MAPK. An interesting example of this regulation was found in human glioma cells where stimulation with HGF increased the expression levels of VEGF and tumor-associated angiogenesis. The use of HGF and Met inhibitors in experimental tumor models significantly reduced tumor growth and tumor vessel formation (Abounader Laterra, 2005).

Recently, a new key player of the HGF/c-Met pathway was described. Metastasis-associated in colon cancer-1 (MACC1) was identified by genome-wide expression analysis in primary and metastatic colon carcinomas. Its expression in human tumor samples was found to be an independent prognostic factor for metastasis formation and metastasis-free survival. The experimental studies showed that MACC1 promotes proliferation, invasion and HGF-induced scattering in vitro and tumor growth and metastasis in xenograft models (Stein et al., 2009). The authors proposed a positive feedback mechanism where MACC1 acts as a transcriptional regulator of the Met gene. The stimulation of the Met receptor with HGF causes the translocation of MACC1 from the cytoplasm into the nucleus. There, MACC1 activates the transcription of the Met gene by binding to its promoter (Arlt Stein, 2009). The increased amounts of Met receptor will be able to bind more HGF molecules thereby enhancing the pathway signaling and promoting cell proliferation, migration and metastasis.

4. HGF/c-Met signaling in medulloblastoma

4.1. Medulloblastoma overview

Medulloblastoma is the most common malignant childhood brain tumor, comprising 20% of all primary brain tumors in the pediatric population (Crawford et al., 2007). It is an embryonaltumor that arises in the cerebellum from primitive pluripotent precursor cells of the ventricular zone and the external granular layer (Hatten Roussel, 2011).

The 2007 World Health Organization (WHO) classified medulloblastoma in five variants: classic, desmoplastic, anaplastic, large cell and medulloblastoma with extensive nodularity. Clinical data suggests a favorable prognosis for desmoplasticmedulloblastoma and a significant worst outcome for the anaplastic subtype (Gilbertson Ellison, 2008).

Medulloblastoma formation is strongly associated with dysregulation of the pathways involved in the normal development of the cerebellum. The best characterized pathways in medulloblastomatumorigenesis are the Sonic hedgehog (Shh), Wingless (Wnt) and Notch pathways (Hatten Roussel, 2011).

Traditionally, patients are stratified into standard risk and high-risk groups according to age, residual tumor and metastatic disease at diagnosis. High-risk patients include those younger than 3 years of age or having a residual tumor or disseminated disease at diagnosis (Packer et al., 2003). In fact, one third of the patients will have metastasis at the time of diagnosis and two thirds will have leptomeningeal spread by the time of relapse (MacDonald, 2008). Moreover, dissemination is the leading cause of treatment failure and the most powerful factor associated with poor survival (Zeltzer et al., 1999).

Recently, Northcott and co-workers described four molecular subtypes of medulloblastoma using gene expression profiling and some genomic features (Northcott et al., 2010). These medulloblastoma subtypes are distinct with respect to the underlying signaling pathway that is dysregulated and the clinical outcome. The Wnt subgroup includes classic medulloblastomas and has a better prognosis. Most tumors in the Shh subgroup are desmoplasticmedulloblastomas and also have good prognosis. The other two subgroups, group C and D, are non-Shh/Wnt, and demonstrate Myc overexpression as the main feature of group C, and isochromosome 17q as the main feature of group D. Interestingly, group C patients showed a significantly reduced survival, regardless of their metastatic status.

The treatment for standard risk patients includes surgery, craniospinal irradiation and chemotherapy with reported 5-year overall survival of 80%. For patients with metastatic disease the intensified treatment regimens, including high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem-cell transplantation and non-conventional radiotherapy, have improved prognosis, with 5-year overall survival rates between 50 and 70% (Gajjar et al., 2006; Sanders et al., 2008). Among survivors, a major concern is the long-term sequelae induced by treatments which include endocrinological, neurocognitive, behavioral, motor and sensitive deficits (Armstrong et al., 2009). Therefore, there is a critical need to identify new molecular targets that improve tumor growth suppression while minimizing the side effects of therapy.

4.2. HGF/c-Met pathway in cerebellar development

During embryonic development, the progenitor cells localized in the ventricular zone of the cerebellum (also called primary germinal zone), along the IVth ventricle, migrate radially to give rise to Purkinje cells, neurons of the cerebellar nuclei and different types of cerebellar interneurons. Simultaneously, the progenitor cells in the rombic lip migrate dorsally to originate the external granule layer (EGL or secondary germinal zone). The peak of proliferation of these cells occurs between postnatal day (P) P5 and P8 in the mouse. Through a tightly regulated mechanism, the progenitor cells in the EGL become postmitotic, differentiate and migrate inwards to give origin to the internal granule layer (IGL), a process that is completeby P20 in the mouse (Marino, 2005).

During the early postnatal period, multiple mitogenic pathways, such as Shh, Wnt and Notch, promote the rapid expansion of progenitor cells in the EGL. It is believed that this vast population of cells includes subgroups of progenitors with distinct genetic properties, that give origin to the different medulloblastoma subtypes (Hatten Roussel, 2011).

The HGF/c-Met pathway also plays a critical role in cerebellar development. The knockout mice for HGF, Met and SPINT2 are all embryonic lethal (Bladt et al., 1995; Mitchell et al., 2001; Uehara et al., 1995). Comparing the regional expression of HGF and Met in both developing and adult rat brains, Achim and co-workers found expression of HGF in the parietal cortex, striatum and cerebellar deep gray matter in developing but not in adult brain. Abundant expression of Met was also detected in the newborn cortex, thalamus and brainstem (Achim et al., 1997). The analysis of HGF and Met expression in the central nervous system of different mammalian species showed that their neuronal expression is highly conserved during evolution, a sign that they mediate important functions (Jung et al., 1994).

Leraciet al. described the expression of Met in the proliferating cells of the external granule layer of the cerebellum and increased proliferation after stimulation of primary cultures of granule cells with HGF. In addition, transgenic mice with partial loss of Met function had a smaller cerebellum with abnormal foliation and balance impairment (Ieraci et al., 2002).

HGF has also been proposed to mediate neurotrophic functions during neurogenesis both in the central and peripheral nervous systems. In fact, it was shown that HGF is a chemoattractant and promotes survival of motor neurons in the embryo. Furthermore, stimulation of sensory and sympathetic neurons with HGF enhances survival, differentiation and axonal growth (Maina Klein, 1999). Exploring the neuroprotective role of HGF, different groups showed that HGF treatment of primary cerebellar granule neurons prevents apoptotic cell death through activation of the PI3K/AKT pathway signaling(Honda et al., 1995; Hossain et al., 2002; L. Zhang et al., 2000).

To further investigate the influence of aberrant HGF/c-Met pathway signaling on cerebellar development and medulloblastoma initiation and progression, our group genetically engineered a transgenic mouse that expresses a constitutively active mutant of human Met, specifically within the cerebellum. We are in the process of characterizing the cerebellar development in the transgenic line as compared to the wild type, and determine the effects of constitutive Met activation in medulloblastoma pathogenesis.

4.3. HGF/c-Met pathway in medulloblastoma formation

HGF/c-Met signaling has an important role in tumorigenesis and metastatic behavior in several human malignancies but its role in medulloblastoma pathogenesis was only recently described.

Studying a series of 14 human medulloblastoma samples by comparative genomic hybridization Tong et al. found amplification of the Met oncogene on chromosome 7q in 38.5% of cases (Tong et al., 2004). A separate group showed a correlation between the expression of HGF and Met in human medulloblastoma samples and patient clinical outcome (Li et al., 2005). When they stimulated medulloblastoma cells with HGF there was an activation of downstream effectors, evidenced by Met, MAPK and AKT phosphorylation. Up-regulation of the pathway was also able to induce cell proliferation, cell cycle progression, anchorage-independent growth and resistance to chemotherapy-induced apoptosis in medulloblastoma cell lines. In vivo models overexpressing HGF also had increased tumor growth and invasion (Li et al., 2005). More recently, the same group identified an association between HGF/c-Met signaling and c-Myc in medulloblastoma. They found that HGF induced c-Myc expression both at transcriptional and post-transcriptional levels, leading to cell cycle progression, cell proliferation and increased apoptosis (Li et al., 2008b).

Although the anti-apoptotic functions of HGF/c-Met pathway seem to be predominant, Li et al. described enhanced cell death in Daoy cell lines after Met activation. Apoptotic cell death can be induced by two different pathways: the intrinsic mitochondrial pathway and the extrinsic death receptor pathway. In malignant tissues, the tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis–inducing ligand (TRAIL) has the potential to activate the death receptor pathway upon binding of death receptors DR4 and DR5, which leads to downstream caspase activation and apoptosis (Suliman et al., 2001). Li and co-workers found that increased apoptosis of medulloblastoma cell lines after stimulation with HGF was induced by TRAIL and mediated by DR5 overexpression (Li et al., 2008a). Moreover, the treatment of those cells with a specific c-Met inhibitor (PHA665752) reduced apoptosis indicating that it requires activation of the canonical receptor tyrosine kinase (Li et al., 2008a).

Using an epigenome-wide screening our group identified an inhibitor of HGF/c-Met signaling. SPINT2, a tumor suppressor gene, was downregulated in 73.2% of primary medulloblastoma samples while Met was upregulated in 45% of cases. SPINT2 was silenced by promoter hypermethylation in 34.4% of primary tumor samples (Kongkham et al., 2008). A single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array analysis identified hemizygous deletions in the SPINT2 locus on chromosome 19q13.2 and gains in the HGF and MET loci on chromosome 7q. The experimental studies using medulloblastoma cells transfected with SPINT2 showed decreased proliferation, migration and anchorage-independent growth in vitro and increased survival times in mouse xenografts(Kongkham et al., 2008). Although SPINT2downregulation has already been implicated in other human cancers (Dong et al., 2010; Morris et al., 2005; Parr et al., 2004) this was the first report to establish its role in medulloblastoma pathogenesis.

Binning et al. showed that HGF and Shh cooperate to transform cerebellar neural progenitors in transgenic mice, leading to medulloblastoma initiation and growth (Binning et al., 2008). Furthermore, the treatment of mice bearing Shh+HGF induced tumors with a monoclonal antibody against HGF (L2G7) prolonged survival by increasing apoptosis (Binning et al., 2008). Previous studies had already shown that systemic administration of L2G7 to mouse xenografts of human HGF+/c-Met+ glioblastomas improved survival and reduced tumor growth (Kim et al., 2006).

Knowing that a procoagulant state is often the first manifestation of a malignancy and that it is due to the expression of specific proteins such as tissue factor (TF), Provencal and colleagues analyzed the expression of this protein in human medulloblastoma samples and observed a strong correlation between Met and TF expression levels. Furthermore, the stimulation of Daoy cells with HGF increased the expression of TF and the treatment of those cells with physiological amounts of TF activator (factor VIIa) increased their migratory potential (Provencal et al., 2009). It was hypothesized that the acquisition of a procoagulant phenotype by medulloblastomafavors its dissemination because the enrichment of the tumor environment with fibrin protects the cancer cells from the immune system and forms a matrix for cell migration (Provencal et al., 2009). The same group found that upregulation of TF upon Met pathway activation was associated with increased resistance to the chemotherapeutic drug etoposide(Provencal et al., 2010). This observation suggested that the combination of anticoagulant drugs and chemotherapy could improve the efficacy of chemotherapeutic agents. In fact, this regimen was already tested in metastatic breast cancer with encouraging results (Falanga et al., 1998).

These findings show the importance of the HGF/c-Met pathway signaling in medulloblastoma malignancy. Furthermore, they also provide validation of this pathway as a target for new and promising therapies using small molecular inhibitors and antibodies, some of them already in clinical trials for other cancers.

5. Inhibitors of HGF/c-Met pathway in cancer therapy

The evidence that the HGF/c-Met pathway is involved in the progression and dissemination of several malignancies has generated considerable interest in HGF and Met as major targets in cancer therapy and drug development. Different strategies are being explored and some of them are already being tested in clinical trials. We can consider three main groups of drugs: a) HGF and Met antagonists or competitors; b) Monoclonal antibodies directed against HGF and Met; and c) Small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

The use of molecular targeted therapies against HGF and Met in medulloblastoma was only recently reported. Our group demonstrated the efficacy of a highly specific small molecular inhibitor (PHA665752) in the treatment of medulloblastoma cell lines by reducing cell proliferation, migration and anchorage-independent growth (Kongkham et al. 2010). Another group used an orally available small molecule inhibitor of Met (SGX523) in medulloblastoma cells and human glioblastomaxenografts. They reported decreased cell proliferation, migration and invasion in the in vitro studies and significant reduction of in vivotumor growth (Guessous et al., 2010). The HGF-neutralizing monoclonal antibody, L2G7, was also tested in monotherapy and in combination therapy in genetically engineered mice with medulloblastomas induced by Shh and HGF. The authors reported tumor growth inhibition and increased survival with L2G7 monotherapy(Coon et al., 2010).

Strategies using combined regimens targeting multiple receptor tyrosine kinases are currently under study. This can be achieved in two different ways either by a combination of highly selective agents or by using a single agent that targets multiple specific members of the Met pathway. The use of broad-spectrum agents may have the advantage of reducing drug interactions, but it may also affect other unintended kinases. Stommelet al., studying glioma cell lines, xenografts and human primary glioblastomas, showed simultaneous activation of multiple receptor tyrosine kinases and better responses to combined treatment when compared to monotherapy(Stommel et al., 2007).

We provide a brief summary of the latest advances in HGF/c-Met targeted therapy (Table 1).

5.1. HGF and Met antagonists

HGF and Met antagonists or decoys are molecules that bind to the receptor with high affinity without activation of downstream signaling. The activation of Met by HGF involves


Table 1.

Summary of HGF/c-Met inhibitors. (VEGFR, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor; Ret, rearranged during transfection; Kit, stem cell factor receptor; Flt-3, FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3; Tie-2, angiopoietin receptor 2; PDGFR, platelet-derived growth factor receptor; Ron, recepteur d’origine nantais)

the dimerization of the receptor upon binding of the two chains of the ligand. HGF has a high affinity site located in the –chain and a low affinity site in the –chain, which only becomes accessible after pro-HGF activation (Comoglio et al., 2008). This means that the inactive form of HGF or HGF fragments can interact with Met by binding to the high affinity site but they cannot induce Met signaling because they are unable to promote receptor dimerization.

Examples of HGF competitors are NK2, NK4 and uncleavable HGF. NK2 is a naturally occurring HGF fragment and NK4 is a synthetic truncated form of HGF that contains only the –chain. This is by far the best studied HGF antagonist and it was shown that it inhibits cell invasion and angiogenesis in vitro and in xenografts(Kuba et al., 2000). Uncleavable pro-HGF is an unprocessable form of HGF that competes with active HGF for Met binding and with pro-HGF proteases for HGF proteolytic activation.

Decoy Met is an enzymatically inactive molecule that corresponds to the extracellular domain of the receptor. It interacts with HGF and full-length Met, sequestering the ligand and interfering with the receptor dimerization.

5.2. Monoclonal antibodies directed against HGF and Met

The use of monoclonal antibodies has the following advantages: Specificity against HGF and Met; a relatively longer half-life when compared to other inhibitors; and the potential to induce a host immune response against the tumor cells (Eder et al., 2009).

AMG102 is a fully human IgG2 antibody against HGF that was found to enhance the effects of temozolomide and docetaxelin vitro and in xenograft models of gliomas(Jun et al., 2007). A Phase I study used a combination of AMG102 and the antiangiogenic drugs bevacizumab and motesanib in the treatment of patients with advanced solid tumors, showing a stable disease in most patients (Rosen et al., 2008). This molecule has also been tested in Phase II clinical trials for advanced glioblastomas and renal cell carcinomas and a preliminary analysis in glioma patients suggested that AMG102 has limited efficacy as monotherapy(Reardon et al., 2008). Therefore, the most recent clinical trials will use AMG102 in combination therapy ( L2G7 is another anti-HGF antibody that proved to be effective reducing subcutaneous and intracranial gliomaxenografts and to increase survival (Kim et al., 2006).

The initial efforts to develop antibodies against Met were unsuccessful because they tended to behave as agonists rather than antagonists, due to its bivalent structure that acts as a natural dimerizing agent. To circumvent this problem a ‘one-armed’ antibody (OA-5D5; MetMAb), consisting of a monovalent Fab fragment, was developed. It binds to Met with high affinity preventing HGF interaction and subsequent downstream signaling. Martens et al. infused MetMAbintratumorally, reporting almost complete inhibition of tumor growth in a glioblastoma mouse model (Martens et al., 2006). Phase II clinical trials using MetMAb in combination with bevacizumav and paclitaxel for metastatic breast cancer and with erlotinib for advanced non-small cell lung cancer have been initiated (

5.3. Small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors

Small molecule inhibitors target the ATP-binding site of the Met receptor, blocking its transphosphorylation. These molecules can also be classified according to their specificity for Met. Highly selective drugs may not be desirable as inhibition of multiple kinases may be more efficient and reduce the development of resistance. On the other hand, off-target inhibition of essential kinases may also be deleterious. With the recent advances in research and the ongoing clinical trials the small molecule inhibitors have emerged as promising drugs (Naran et al., 2009).

PHA665752 is a Met selective inhibitor that was found to be effective in tumor cell lines and xenografts, particularly in a subset of cancers with amplification of the Met gene (Kongkham et al., 2010; Smolen et al., 2006). Due to its low oral bioavailability another drug (PF2341066) with identical structure but more favorable pharmacokinetic properties was designed. PF2341066 selectively targets Met and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) and was shown to have antitumor cytoreductive activity and antiangiogenic activity in several cancer models (Christensen et al., 2007; Zillhardt et al., 2010; Zou et al., 2007). A Phase II study in non-small-cell lung cancer reported encouraging results with a disease control rate of 87% (Mayor, 2011). The drug is now in Phase III trials. Interestingly, PF2341066 is also being tested in Phase I/II studies in children with recurrent solid tumors, primary central nervous system tumors and anaplastic large cell lymphoma (

ARQ197 is a highly selective, non-ATP competitive drug with reported clinical activity in several types of solid tumors. A Phase II trial in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer reported improved survival in patients treated with ARQ197 and erlotinib when compared to erlotinibmonotherapy(Mayor, 2011).

SGX523 is an orally available ATP-competitive molecule with high selectivity for Met. Although the initial results with in vitro and in vivo models of medulloblastomas and gliomas looked promising because of its efficacy in reducing tumor growth, the drug was discontinued from a Phase I trial due to renal toxicity (Diamond et al., 2010).

XL184 and XL880 are orally available, non-selective inhibitors, with high binding affinity to both Met and VEGFR and to a lesser extent to other receptor tyrosine kinases such as PDGFR, Ret, Kit, Flt-3 and Tie-2 (Liu et al., 2010). XL184 is being evaluated in a Phase III study in patients with advanced medullary thyroid cancer and in Phase II studies in patients with glioblastomamultiforme and non-small-cell lung cancer that has progressed after previous benefit with erlotinib. XL880 has been tested in Phase II clinical trials in metastatic gastric cancer, papillary renal cell carcinoma and head and neck squamous cell cancer (

MP470 is a multi-kinase inhibitor, orally available, that was reported to radiosensitizeglioblastoma cell lines, through the suppression of RAD51, a DNA repair related protein (Welsh et al., 2009). Additional Phase I clinical studies, currently underway, useMP470 in monotherapy or in combination with standard chemotherapies in patients with metastatic solid tumors and lymphoma (

6. Conclusion and future directions

The HGF/c-Met signaling pathway plays a significant role in cancer and has emerged recently as a promising target in the treatment of several malignancies. It was shown that HGF and Met are key players in cerebellum development and that their dysregulation is involved in medulloblastoma formation and progression.

Advances in understanding the molecular mechanisms and genetic profiles underlying the different subtypes of medulloblastoma created an urgent need for new and less toxic targeted therapies. HGF/c-Met inhibitors used in the treatment of gliomasin vitro and in vivo showed efficient reduction in tumor growth and are, therefore, being evaluated in clinical trials. Our preliminary data using a Met selective inhibitor in medulloblastoma cell lines showed that the HGF/c-Met pathway is a novel and promising therapeutic target in this disease.

In the future we will test a panel of available HGF and Met inhibitors using orthotopicxenograft models and our transgenic medulloblastoma mouse model. We hope that the results of our pre-clinical studies will provide the basis for future clinical trials where the HGF and Met inhibitors could synergize with current therapies to increase survival and improve the quality of life of children with brain tumors.


This work was supported by a grant from the Canadian Cancer Society (grant 2011-700751), and through support from B.r.a.i.n.child, the Wiley Fund and the Laurie Berman Fund for Brain Tumor Research.CF is a PhD candidate from The Programme for Advanced Medical Education, supported by FundaçãoGulbenkian, Fundação Champalimaud, Ministério da Saúde e Fundaçãopara a Ciência e Tecnologia, Portugal.


1 - R. Abounader, J. Laterra, 2005Scatter factor/hepatocyte growth factor in brain tumor growth and angiogenesis’, Neuro Oncol, 7 (4), 436-51.
2 - R. Abounader, et al.2002In vivo targeting of SF/HGF and c-met expression via U1snRNA/ribozymes inhibits glioma growth and angiogenesis and promotes apoptosis’, FASEB J, 16 (1), 108-10.
3 - C. L. Achim, et al.1997Expression of HGF and cMet in the developing and adult brain’, Brain Res Dev Brain Res, 102 (2), 299-303.
4 - F. Arlt, U. Stein, 2009Colon cancer metastasis: MACC1 and Met as metastatic pacemakers’, Int J Biochem Cell Biol, 41 (12), 2356-9.
5 - G. T. Armstrong, et al.2009Long-term outcomes among adult survivors of childhood central nervous system malignancies in the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study’, J Natl Cancer Inst, 101 (13), 946-58.
6 - R. Bagai, W. Fan, Ma P. C. , 2010ARQ-197, an oral small-molecule inhibitor of c-Met for the treatment of solid tumors’, IDrugs, 13 (6), 404-14.
7 - S. Benvenuti, P. M. Comoglio, 2007The MET receptor tyrosine kinase in invasion and metastasis’, J Cell Physiol, 213 (2), 316-25.
8 - A. Bertotti, P. M. Comoglio, L. Trusolino, 2006Beta4 integrin activates a Shp2Src signaling pathway that sustains HGF-induced anchorage-independent growth’, J Cell Biol, 175 (6), 993-1003.
9 - M. J. Binning, et al.2008Hepatocyte growth factor and sonic Hedgehog expression in cerebellar neural progenitor cells costimulate medulloblastoma initiation and growth’, Cancer Res, 68 (19), 7838-45.
10 - C. Birchmeier, E. Gherardi, 1998Developmental roles of HGF/SF and its receptor, the c-Met tyrosine kinase’, Trends Cell Biol, 8 (10), 404-10.
11 - C. Birchmeier, et al.2003Met, metastasis, motility and more’, Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 4 (12), 915-25.
12 - F. Bladt, et al.1995Essential role for the c-met receptor in the migration of myogenic precursor cells into the limb bud’, Nature, 376 (6543), 768-71.
13 - C. Boccaccio, P. M. Comoglio, 2005A functional role for hemostasis in early cancer development’, Cancer Res, 65 (19), 8579-82.
14 - C. Boccaccio, P. M. Comoglio, 2006Invasive growth: a MET-driven genetic programme for cancer and stem cells’, Nat Rev Cancer, 6 (8), 637-45.
15 - C. Boccaccio, et al.2005The MET oncogene drives a genetic programme linking cancer to haemostasis’, Nature, 434 (7031), 396-400.
16 - T. Burgess, et al.2006Fully human monoclonal antibodies to hepatocyte growth factor with therapeutic potential against hepatocyte growth factor/c-Met-dependent human tumors’, Cancer Res, 66 (3), 1721-9.
17 - F. Bussolino, et al.1992Hepatocyte growth factor is a potent angiogenic factor which stimulates endothelial cell motility and growth’, J Cell Biol, 119 (3), 629-41.
18 - J. Chmielowiec, et al.2007c-Met is essential for wound healing in the skin’, J Cell Biol, 177 (1), 151-62.
19 - J. G. Christensen, et al.2007Cytoreductive antitumor activity of PF-2341066, a novel inhibitor of anaplastic lymphoma kinase and c-Met, in experimental models of anaplastic large-cell lymphoma’, Mol Cancer Ther, 6 (12 Pt 1), 3314-22.
20 - P. M. Comoglio, S. Giordano, L. Trusolino, 2008Drug development of MET inhibitors: targeting oncogene addiction and expedience’, Nat Rev Drug Discov, 7 (6), 504-16.
21 - V. Coon, et al.2010Molecular therapy targeting Sonic hedgehog and hepatocyte growth factor signaling in a mouse model of medulloblastoma’, Mol Cancer Ther, 9 (9), 2627-36.
22 - J. R. Crawford, Donald. T. J. Mac, R. J. Packer, 2007Medulloblastoma in childhood: new biological advances’, Lancet Neurol, 6 (12), 1073-85.
23 - S. Diamond, et al.2010Species-specific metabolism of SGX523 by aldehyde oxidase and the toxicological implications’, Drug Metab Dispos, 38 (8), 1277-85.
24 - W. Dong, et al.2010Epigenetic inactivation and tumor suppressor activity of HAI-2/SPINT2 in gastric cancer’, Int J Cancer, 127 (7), 1526-34.
25 - C. G. Eberhart, 2011Molecular diagnostics in embryonal brain tumors’, Brain Pathol, 21 (1), 96-104.
26 - J. P. Eder, et al.2009Novel therapeutic inhibitors of the c-Met signaling pathway in cancer’, Clin Cancer Res, 15 (7), 2207-14.
27 - D. W. Ellison, et al.2011Definition of disease-risk stratification groups in childhood medulloblastoma using combined clinical, pathologic, and molecular variables’, J Clin Oncol, 29 (11), 1400-7.
28 - A. Falanga, et al.1998The effect of very-low-dose warfarin on markers of hypercoagulation in metastatic breast cancer: results from a randomized trial’, Thromb Haemost, 79 (1), 23-7.
29 - A. Gajjar, et al.2006Risk-adapted craniospinal radiotherapy followed by high-dose chemotherapy and stem-cell rescue in children with newly diagnosed medulloblastoma (St Jude Medulloblastoma-96): long-term results from a prospective, multicentre trial’, Lancet Oncol, 7 (10), 813-20.
30 - R. J. Gilbertson, D. W. Ellison, 2008The origins of medulloblastoma subtypes’, Annu Rev Pathol, 334165
31 - M. S. Gordon, et al.2010Safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of AMG 102, a fully human hepatocyte growth factor-neutralizing monoclonal antibody, in a first-in-human study of patients with advanced solid tumors’, Clin Cancer Res, 16 (2), 699-710.
32 - F. Guessous, et al.2010An orally bioavailable c-Met kinase inhibitor potently inhibits brain tumor malignancy and growth’, Anticancer Agents Med Chem, 10 (1), 28-35.
33 - A. Guo, et al.2008Signaling networks assembled by oncogenic EGFR and c-Met’, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 105 (2), 692-7.
34 - D. E. Hammond, et al.2001Down-regulation of MET, the receptor for hepatocyte growth factor’, Oncogene, 20 (22), 2761-70.
35 - M. E. Hatten, M. F. Roussel, 2011Development and cancer of the cerebellum’, Trends Neurosci, 34 (3), 134-42.
36 - S. Honda, et al.1995Localization and functional coupling of HGF and c-Met/HGF receptor in rat brain: implication as neurotrophic factor’, Brain Res Mol Brain Res, 32 (2), 197-210.
37 - M. A. Hossain, et al.2002Neuroprotection by scatter factor/hepatocyte growth factor and FGF-1 in cerebellar granule neurons is phosphatidylinositol 3kinase/akt-dependent and MAPK/CREB-independent’, J Neurochem, 81 (2), 365-78.
38 - C. G. Huh, et al.2004Hepatocyte growth factor/c-met signaling pathway is required for efficient liver regeneration and repair’, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 101 (13), 4477-82.
39 - A. Ieraci, P. E. Forni, C. Ponzetto, 2002Viable hypomorphic signaling mutant of the Met receptor reveals a role for hepatocyte growth factor in postnatal cerebellar development’, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 99 (23), 15200-5.
40 - H. T. Jun, et al.2007AMG 102, a fully human anti-hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor neutralizing antibody, enhances the efficacy of temozolomide or docetaxel in U-87 MG cells and xenografts’, Clin Cancer Res, 13 (22 Pt 1), 6735-42.
41 - W. Jung, et al.1994Expression and functional interaction of hepatocyte growth factor-scatter factor and its receptor c-met in mammalian brain’, J Cell Biol, 126 (2), 485-94.
42 - U. S. Kammula, et al.2007Molecular co-expression of the c-Met oncogene and hepatocyte growth factor in primary colon cancer predicts tumor stage and clinical outcome’, Cancer Lett, 248 (2), 219-28.
43 - T. Kawaguchi, et al.1997Purification and cloning of hepatocyte growth factor activator inhibitor type 2, a Kunitz-type serine protease inhibitor’, J Biol Chem, 272 (44), 27558-64.
44 - S. Kermorgant, P. J. Parker, 2005c-Met signalling: spatio-temporal decisions’, Cell Cycle, 4 (3), 352-5.
45 - S. Kermorgant, P. J. Parker, 2008Receptor trafficking controls weak signal delivery: a strategy used by c-Met for STAT3 nuclear accumulation’, J Cell Biol, 182 (5), 855-63.
46 - K. J. Kim, et al.2006Systemic anti-hepatocyte growth factor monoclonal antibody therapy induces the regression of intracranial glioma xenografts’, Clin Cancer Res, 12 (4), 1292-8.
47 - P. N. Kongkham, et al.2010Inhibition of the MET Receptor Tyrosine Kinase as a Novel Therapeutic Strategy in Medulloblastoma’, Transl Oncol, 3 (6), 336-43.
48 - P. N. Kongkham, et al.2008An epigenetic genome-wide screen identifies SPINT2 as a novel tumor suppressor gene in pediatric medulloblastoma’, Cancer Res, 68 (23), 9945-53.
49 - K. Kuba, et al.2000HGF/NK4, a four-kringle antagonist of hepatocyte growth factor, is an angiogenesis inhibitor that suppresses tumor growth and metastasis in mice’, Cancer Res, 60 (23), 6737-43.
50 - A. Z. Lai, J. V. Abella, M. Park, 2009Crosstalk in Met receptor oncogenesis’, Trends Cell Biol, 19 (10), 542-51.
51 - Y. Li, et al.2005The scatter factor/hepatocyte growth factor: c-met pathway in human embryonal central nervous system tumor malignancy’, Cancer Res, 65 (20), 9355-62.
52 - Y. Li, et al.2008aHepatocyte growth factor enhances death receptor-induced apoptosis by up-regulating DR5’, BMC Cancer, 8, 325.
53 - Y. Li, et al.2008bFunctional and molecular interactions between the HGF/c-Met pathway and c-Myc in large-cell medulloblastoma’, Lab Invest, 88 (2), 98-111.
54 - Y. Li, et al.2009Interactions between PTEN and the c-Met pathway in glioblastoma and implications for therapy’, Mol Cancer Ther, 8 (2), 376-85.
55 - X. Liu, R. C. Newton, P. A. Scherle, 2010Developing c-MET pathway inhibitors for cancer therapy: progress and challenges’, Trends Mol Med, 16 (1), 37-45.
56 - Donald. T. J. Mac, 2008Aggressive infantile embryonal tumors’, J Child Neurol, 23 (10), 1195-204.
57 - D. Mahadevan, et al.2007A novel tyrosine kinase switch is a mechanism of imatinib resistance in gastrointestinal stromal tumors’, Oncogene, 26 (27), 3909-19.
58 - F. Maina, R. Klein, 1999Hepatocyte growth factor, a versatile signal for developing neurons’, Nat Neurosci, 2 (3), 213-7.
59 - S. Marino, 2005Medulloblastoma: developmental mechanisms out of control’, Trends Mol Med, 11 (1), 17-22.
60 - T. Martens, et al.2006A novel one-armed anti-c-Met antibody inhibits glioblastoma growth in vivo’, Clin Cancer Res, 12 (20 Pt 1), 6144-52.
61 - K. Matsumoto, T. Nakamura, 2008NK4 gene therapy targeting HGF-Met and angiogenesis’, Front Biosci, 13194351
62 - K. Matsumoto, T. Nakamura, K. Sakai, 2008Hepatocyte growth factor and Met in tumor biology and therapeutic approach with NK4’, Proteomics, 8 (16), 3360-70.
63 - S. Mayor, 2011MET inhibitors: translating from bench to bedside’, Lancet Oncol, 12 (1), 14.
64 - M. Mazzone, et al.2004An uncleavable form of pro-scatter factor suppresses tumor growth and dissemination in mice’, J Clin Invest, 114 (10), 1418-32.
65 - P. Michieli, et al.2004Targeting the tumor and its microenvironment by a dual-function decoy Met receptor’, Cancer Cell, 6 (1), 61-73.
66 - K. J. Mitchell, et al.2001Functional analysis of secreted and transmembrane proteins critical to mouse development’, Nat Genet, 28 (3), 241-9.
67 - K. Miyazawa, et al.1993Molecular cloning and sequence analysis of the cDNA for a human serine protease reponsible for activation of hepatocyte growth factor. Structural similarity of the protease precursor to blood coagulation factor XII’, J Biol Chem, 268 (14), 10024-8.
68 - R. Montesano, et al.1998Differential effects of hepatocyte growth factor isoforms on epithelial and endothelial tubulogenesis’, Cell Growth Differ, 9 (5), 355-65.
69 - M. R. Morris, et al.2005Tumor suppressor activity and epigenetic inactivation of hepatocyte growth factor activator inhibitor type 2/SPINT2 in papillary and clear cell renal cell carcinoma’, Cancer Res, 65 (11), 4598-606.
70 - N. Munshi, et al.2010ARQ 197, a novel and selective inhibitor of the human c-Met receptor tyrosine kinase with antitumor activity’, Mol Cancer Ther, 9 (6), 1544-53.
71 - S. Naran, X. Zhang, S. J. Hughes, 2009Inhibition of HGF/MET as therapy for malignancy’, Expert Opin Ther Targets, 13 (5), 569-81.
72 - P. A. Northcott, et al.2010Medulloblastoma Comprises Four Distinct Molecular Variants’, J Clin Oncol.
73 - V. Orian-Rousseau, et al.2002CD44 is required for two consecutive steps in HGF/c-Met signaling’, Genes Dev, 16 (23), 3074-86.
74 - T. Otsuka, et al.2000Disassociation of met-mediated biological responses in vivo: the natural hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor splice variant NK2 antagonizes growth but facilitates metastasis’, Mol Cell Biol, 20 (6), 2055-65.
75 - R. J. Packer, B. R. Rood, Donald. T. J. Mac, 2003Medulloblastoma: present concepts of stratification into risk groups’, Pediatr Neurosurg, 39 (2), 60-7.
76 - C. Parr, et al.2004The hepatocyte growth factor regulatory factors in human breast cancer’, Clin Cancer Res, 10 (1 Pt 1), 202-11.
77 - S. M. Pfister, et al.2010Molecular diagnostics of CNS embryonal tumors’, Acta Neuropathol, 120 (5), 553-66.
78 - M. Provencal, et al.2010Tissue factor mediates the HGF/Met-induced anti-apoptotic pathway in DAOY medulloblastoma cells’, J Neurooncol, 97 (3), 365-72.
79 - M. Provencal, et al.2009c-Met activation in medulloblastoma induces tissue factor expression and activity: effects on cell migration’, Carcinogenesis, 30 (7), 1089-96.
80 - W. Qi, et al.2009MP470, a novel receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in combination with Erlotinib inhibits the HER family/PI3K/Akt pathway and tumor growth in prostate cancer’, BMC Cancer, 9, 142.
81 - F. Qian, et al.2009Inhibition of tumor cell growth, invasion, and metastasis by EXEL-2880 (XL880, GSK1363089), a novel inhibitor of HGF and VEGF receptor tyrosine kinases’, Cancer Res, 69 (20), 8009-16.
82 - D. A. Reardon, et al.2008Phase II study of AMG 102, a fully human neutralizing antibody against hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor, in patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme.’, J Clin Oncol, 26 (Abstr 2051).
83 - S. Rong, et al.1994Invasiveness and metastasis of NIH 3T3 cells induced by Met-hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor autocrine stimulation’, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 91 (11), 4731-5.
84 - P. J. Rosen, et al.2008AMG102, an HGF/SF antagonist, in combination with anti- angiogenesis targeted therapies in adult patients with advanced solid tumors’, J Clin Oncol, 26 (Abstr 3570).
85 - R. P. Sanders, et al.2008M1 Medulloblastoma: high risk at any age’, J Neurooncol, 90 (3), 351-5.
86 - T. Shimomura, et al.1997Hepatocyte growth factor activator inhibitor, a novel Kunitz-type serine protease inhibitor’, J Biol Chem, 272 (10), 6370-6.
87 - G. A. Smolen, et al.2006Amplification of MET may identify a subset of cancers with extreme sensitivity to the selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor PHA-665752’, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 103 (7), 2316-21.
88 - U. Stein, et al.2009MACC1, a newly identified key regulator of HGF-MET signaling, predicts colon cancer metastasis’, Nat Med, 15 (1), 59-67.
89 - J. M. Stommel, et al.2007Coactivation of receptor tyrosine kinases affects the response of tumor cells to targeted therapies’, Science, 318 (5848), 287-90.
90 - A. Suliman, et al.2001Intracellular mechanisms of TRAIL: apoptosis through mitochondrial-dependent and-independent pathways’, Oncogene, 20 (17), 2122-33.
91 - H. Takayama, et al.1997Diverse tumorigenesis associated with aberrant development in mice overexpressing hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor’, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 94 (2), 701-6.
92 - C. Y. Tong, et al.2004Detection of oncogene amplifications in medulloblastomas by comparative genomic hybridization and array-based comparative genomic hybridization’, J Neurosurg, 100 (2 Suppl Pediatrics), 18793
93 - L. Trusolino, A. Bertotti, P. M. Comoglio, 2010MET signalling: principles and functions in development, organ regeneration and cancer’, Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 11 (12), 834-48.
94 - Y. Uehara, et al.1995Placental defect and embryonic lethality in mice lacking hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor’, Nature, 373 (6516), 702-5.
95 - J. W. Welsh, et al.2009The c-Met receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor MP470 radiosensitizes glioblastoma cells’, Radiat Oncol, 4, 69.
96 - M. Z. Wojtukiewicz, et al.2001The hemostatic system and angiogenesis in malignancy’, Neoplasia, 3 (5), 371-84.
97 - P. M. Zeltzer, et al.1999Metastasis stage, adjuvant treatment, and residual tumor are prognostic factors for medulloblastoma in children: conclusions from the Children’s Cancer Group 921 randomized phase III study’, J Clin Oncol, 17 (3), 832-45.
98 - L. Zhang, et al.2000Hepatocyte growth factor protects cultured rat cerebellar granule neurons from apoptosis via the phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase/Akt pathway’, J Neurosci Res, 59 (4), 489-96.
99 - Y. W. Zhang, et al.2002Requirement of Stat3 signaling for HGF/SF-Met mediated tumorigenesis’, Oncogene, 21 (2), 217-26.
100 - Y. W. Zhang, et al.2003Hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor mediates angiogenesis through positive VEGF and negative thrombospondin 1 regulation’, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 100 (22), 12718-23.
101 - Y. W. Zhang, et al.2010MET kinase inhibitor SGX523 synergizes with epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor erlotinib in a hepatocyte growth factor-dependent fashion to suppress carcinoma growth’, Cancer Res, 70 (17), 6880-90.
102 - M. Zillhardt, J. G. Christensen, E. Lengyel, 2010An orally available small-molecule inhibitor of c-Met, PF-2341066, reduces tumor burden and metastasis in a preclinical model of ovarian cancer metastasis’, Neoplasia, 12 (1), 1-10.
103 - H. Y. Zou, et al.2007An orally available small-molecule inhibitor of c-Met, PF-2341066, exhibits cytoreductive antitumor efficacy through antiproliferative and antiangiogenic mechanisms’, Cancer Res, 67 (9), 4408-17.