Open Access is an initiative that aims to make scientific research freely available to all. To date our community has made over 100 million downloads. It’s based on principles of collaboration, unobstructed discovery, and, most importantly, scientific progression. As PhD students, we found it difficult to access the research we needed, so we decided to create a new Open Access publisher that levels the playing field for scientists across the world. How? By making research easy to access, and puts the academic needs of the researchers before the business interests of publishers.
We are a community of more than 103,000 authors and editors from 3,291 institutions spanning 160 countries, including Nobel Prize winners and some of the world’s most-cited researchers. Publishing on IntechOpen allows authors to earn citations and find new collaborators, meaning more people see your work not only from your own field of study, but from other related fields too.
To purchase hard copies of this book, please contact the representative in India:
CBS Publishers & Distributors Pvt. Ltd.
www.cbspd.com
|
customercare@cbspd.com
Palynological examination of 17 honey samples procured from 8 localities in Paderu forest division in Visakhapatnam district, Andhra Pradesh, India, produced assemblage of pollen in terms of quantity and diversity. According to melissopalynological assessment of the honey samples, 6 were unifloral, i.e., 3 from Ageratum conyzoides and 1 each from Schleichera oleosa, Psidium guajava, and Mimosa pudica, and 11 were multifloral. The dominant taxa include Mimosa pudica, Syzygium cumini, and Centipeda minima. The taxa such as Terminalia arjuna, Dendrophthoe falcata, Lamiaceae, Asteraceae, and Phyllanthus emblica were minor sources of nectar and bee forage, as indicated by low frequencies of their pollen. The numerous pollen types and their diversity show that bees travel considerable distance to collect the nectar for honey production.
Department of Botany, University College of Science, Saifabad Osmania University, India
Hari Ramakrisha
Department of Botany, University College of Science, Osmania University, India
Sonte Niranjan
Department of Botany, University College of Science, Osmania University, India
*Address all correspondence to: hrkpaleobot@gmail.com
1. Introduction
Melissopalynology is a branch of plant sciences that studies pollen found in honey. Precision in interpreting pollen data recovered from the honey has always been a primary goal of those who study pollen and honey. We are using pollen count to determine the nectar source of a honey sample and recognize the types and percentage of recovered pollen in the honey. This study is the fact that honey bees utilize certain natural raw materials which are identifiable in honey. These natural raw materials include pollen and nectar [1]. The growth and development of honey bees depend on nectar as the source of carbohydrates and pollen as the source of proteins [2, 3]. Palynological analyses of honey and pollen loads are used to know about honey bee foraging ecology, habitat and vegetation [4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11]. Pollen of honey samples provides reliable information on floral resources of honeys along with the relative preferences of bees among the diverse assemblages of plant species flowering synchronously [12, 13].
The significant melissopalynological works have been reported from different sectors of this state, dealing with pollen analysis of honey [14, 15, 16]. Similar melissopalynological research work has been worked out in Karnataka [17, 18, 19], Bihar [20], Madhya Pradesh [21], Maharashtra [22], Uttarakhand [23, 24, 25, 26], Uttar Pradesh [27, 28], and West Bengal [29, 30, 31, 32], but the information is still rather sketchy. Qualitative and quantitative melissopalynological analyses in the east coast regions of India demonstrate that these regions are rich in bee plants with potential for producing adequate unifloral honeys, have an extended honey flow period, and thus can be utilized commercially for a moderate- to large-scale apiculture enterprises [33].
The study area includes the Paderu forest division of Visakhapatnam district, Andhra Pradesh. This division is the higher altitude zone in the hilly tracts of Eastern Ghats of Andhra Pradesh. It has the second highest tribal population in Andhra Pradesh. Paderu forest division (Figure 1) lies in between latitudes of 17°-51″ and 18°-35″ north and longitude of 82°-17″ and 83°-1″ east with a total geographical area of 3,24,965 ha, out of which the forest area under the control of the division is 104811.91 ha. The division comprises of a series of hills with an average annual rainfall of 2800 mm and a rich diversity of plant wealth.
Figure 1.
Study area of Paderu forest division in Visakhapatnam district, Andhra Pradesh.
The materials for the present study are 17 honey samples (50 ml each) that were procured from 8 different blocks of Paderu forest division during 2011–2013, i.e., 3 samples from Ananthagiri (Af-13, Af-34, and Af-57), 4 from Paderu (Af-10, Af-40, Af-44, and Af-64), 2 from Munchingiputtu (Af-14 and Af-54), 2 from G.Madugula (Af-3 and Af-48), 3 from Peddabayalu (Af-11, Af-53, and Af-65), and one each from Araku Valley (Af-37), Dumbriguda (Af-9), and Hukumpeta (Af-51). For palynological assessment, the honey samples were chemically processed using the acetolysis method, i.e., 1 ml of honey sample was dissolved in 10 ml of distilled water and centrifuged. The supernatant liquid was drawn out. The resultant sediment was treated with 5 ml of glacial acetic acid and centrifuged. After decanting acetic acid, the sediment was treated with acetolysis mixture (5 ml). It was prepared by nine parts of acetic anhydride and one part of con. sulfuric acid and then heated under water bath until the liquid turned chestnut-brown color. After cooling it was again centrifuged and the supernatant liquid was decanted. The sediment then treated with glacial acetic acid, later centrifuged, and the supernatant liquid was decanted off. And the sediment was washed with distilled water, and 50% aqueous glycerin (5 ml) was added and centrifuged for 10 min. The supernatant liquid was decanted off, and the tubes were inverted upside down on a filter paper for a few minutes [34].
The pollen sediment was taken on a pellet of glycerin jelly and transferred to the center of the slide. After being warmed slightly, the melted jelly with pollen sediment was covered by cover slip. Cover glass was later sealed with paraffin wax and labeled with their respective codes. Three slides were prepared for each sample and studied critically for their pollen contents.
Identification of pollen recovered from honey samples were carried out through the consultation of reference pollen slides available in Paleobotany and Palynology lab, UCS, Saifabad, OU. Quantitative pollen analysis was based on the method recommended by the International Commission for Bee Botany [6]. Pollen contents were taken at random, covering the maximum mounted area to avoid repletion. Once identified and counted, the pollen grains were placed into one of following pollen frequency classes-predominant pollen types (>45%), secondary pollen types (16–45%), important minor pollen types (3–15%), and minor pollen types (<3%). Honey samples containing more than 45% of a single type of pollen were considered as unifloral honey. The pollen types were placed into arboreal and non-arboreal taxa for making honey pollen spectra (Figure 2). A detailed list which included sample number, locality, nature and type of honey, collection season, and frequency of pollen types recovered is given in Table 1.
Figure 2.
Pollen spectra showing frequency of non-arboreal and arboreal taxa from different honeys of Paderu forest division.
G.Madugula (V-P-GM-Bp-AF-3, spring collection): the sample proved to be multifloral with secondary pollen taxa including Carum copticum (21.74%), followed by important minor pollen types, Urticaceae type (15.02%), Eucalyptus globulus (13.22%), Syzygium cumini (12.78%), Psidium guajava (9.40%), Tridax procumbens (6.05%), Blumea oxyodonta (4.70%), Bombax ceiba (4.03%), Brassica nigra (3.81%), and Vernonia cinerea (3.65%).
Dumbriguda (V-P-DG-Vb-AF-9, spring collection): the sample procured is productive and proved to be multifloral with secondary pollen taxa Mimosa pudica (28.62%). Crotalaria juncea (13.01%), Tridax procumbens (8.57%), Psidium guajava (8.55%), Andrographis echioides (8.17%), Terminalia arjuna (7.94%), Schleichera oleosa (7.06%), Commelina suffruticosa (5.57%), and Ageratum conyzoides (5.20%) are recorded as important minor pollen types.
Paderu (V-P-P-Sa-AF-10, spring collection): the sample proved as unifloral with one predominant pollen taxon, Ageratum conyzoides (68.25%), followed by Schleichera oleosa (7.93%), Parkinsonia aculeata (6.03%), and Citrullus lanatus (3.17%) as important minor pollen taxa.
Peddabayalu (V-P-PB-PB-AF-11, autumn collection): the sample procured is multifloral with pollen of Coriandrum sativum (15.90%), Mimosa pudica (15.19%), Syzygium cumini (12.36%), Ageratum conyzoides (11.30%), Ocimum sanctum (6.00%), Schleichera oleosa (5.30%), Eucalyptus globulus (4.94%), Polygonum barbatum (3.53%), Blumea oxyodonta (3.53%), and Casuarina equisetifolia (3.18%) as important minor pollen taxa.
Ananthagiri (V-P-AG-Ch-AF-13, autumn collection): the sample procured is productive and proved as unifloral as evidenced by the predominant pollen taxon Schleichera oleosa (55.00%), followed by the recovery of Mimosa pudica (13.07%), Eucalyptus globulus (8.65%), Phyllanthus emblica (6.92%), Dendrophthoe falcata (3.07%), and Leucas aspera (3.69%) as important minor pollen types.
Munchingiputtu (V-P-MUN-L-AF-14, autumn collection): the sample proved as multifloral with pollen of Eucalyptus globulus (13.46%), Tridax procumbens (8.77%), Centipeda minima (8.32%), Ageratum conyzoides (7.41%), Terminalia arjuna (6.80%), Psidium guajava (6.80%), Crotalaria juncea (6.95%), Syzygium cumini (6.95%), Commelina suffruticosa (6.95%), Sapindus emarginatus (4.84%), Erythrina variegata (3.02%), and Leucas aspera (3.78%) as important minor pollen types.
Ananthagiri (V-P-AG-Gb-AF-34, spring collection): the sample procured is unifloral as palynologically evidenced by a single predominant pollen taxon, Ageratum conyzoides (81.03%), followed by Phyllanthus emblica (12.06%) and Madhuca indica (5.86%) as important minor pollen types.
Araku Valley (V-P-AR-Me-AF-37, spring collection): the sample procured is productive and proved to be unifloral with predominant pollen taxon Psidium guajava (55.03%), followed by secondary pollen taxon Mimosa pudica (24.59%), Terminalia arjuna (10.53%), and Delonix regia (5.85%) pollen as important minor pollen types.
Paderu (V-P-P-Sp-AF-40, spring collection): the sample procured is productive like the AF-34 samples which is unifloral with predominant pollen taxon, Ageratum conyzoides (92.83%) followed by important minor pollen taxon, Dendrophthoe falcata (4.98%).
Paderu (V-P-P-Vm-AF-44, spring collection): the samples is palynologically productive and proved to be unifloral with single predominant pollen taxon, Mimosa pudica (69.57%), followed by the important minor pollen types like Hyptis suaveolens (14.56%) and Conyza stricta (13.59%).
G. madugula (V-P-GM-Ak-AF-48, spring collection): the samples proved as multifloral as evidenced by secondary pollen types like Mimosa pudica (32.91%), Conyza stricta (28.30%), and Tridax procumbens (17.81%). The remaining taxa are represented as important minor pollen types like Pedalium murex (5.24%), Hyptis suaveolens (3.56%), Saccharum officinarum (3.18%), Sida acuta (3.14%), and Ageratum conyzoides (3.14%).
Hukumpeta (V-P-HP-R-AF-51, spring collection): the sample is palynologically proved to be multifloral as evidenced by secondary pollen types, Eucalyptus globulus (35.48%) and Mimosa pudica (17.41%), followed by important minor pollen types, Hygrophila auriculata (14.83%), Cocos nucifera (11.61%), Borassus flabellifer (10.96%), and Cucumis sativus (9.71%).
Peddabayalu (V-P-PB-L-AF-53, spring collection): the sample procured is productive and proved as multifloral with pollen of Syzygium cumini (41.82%), Centipeda minima (18.87%) recorded as secondary pollen types, followed by the pollen of Mimosa pudica (14.59%), Vernonia cinerea (11.08%), and Urticaceae type (6.80%) as important minor pollen types.
Munchingiputtu (V-P-MUN-Sk-AF-54, autumn collection): the sample proved as multifloral with evidenced of pollen of Syzygium cumini (37.63%), Centipeda minima (18.70%), and Mimosa pudica (18.27%) represented as secondary pollen types. The remaining taxa are represented as important minor pollen types like Urticaceae type (11.82%), Vernonia cinerea (7.74%), and Tridax procumbens (5.84%).
Ananthagiri (V-P-AG-Mt-AF-57, autumn collection): the sample procured is productive and proved as multifloral with pollen of Syzygium cumini (26.97%) represented as secondary pollen taxon, followed by the pollen of Spilanthes calva (13.40%), Mimosa pudica (13.24%), Centipeda minima (12.43%), Cyathocline purpurea (12.76%), Leucaena leucocephala (10.10%), Tridax procumbens (5.71%), and Vernonia cinerea (5.39%) as important minor pollen types.
Paderu (V-P-P-Rb-AF-64, autumn collection): the sample proved to be multifloral with evidenced by secondary pollen types like Tridax procumbens (27.95%), Schleichera oleosa (19.88%), and Erythrina variegata (16.42%). The remaining taxa are Eucalyptus globules (12.96%), Leucaena leucocephala (6.34%), Urticaceae type (5.47%), Cocos nucifera (4.32%), Amaranthus spinosus (3.45%), and Dendrophthoe falcata (3.21%) recollected as important minor pollen types.
Peddabayalu (V-P-PB-L-AF-65, autumn collection): the sample procured is productive and proved as multifloral with pollen of Mimosa pudica (41.0%), Schleichera oleosa (26.61%), and Dendrophthoe falcata (19.42%) identified as secondary pollen types, followed by single-pollen taxon Hakea laurina (12.97%) as important minor pollen taxon.
The present Melissopalynological study provides new insights into the pollen composition of honey samples from Paderu forest division in Visakhapatnam district of Andhra Pradesh. A total of 69 pollen morphotypes from 17 honeys produced by Apis florea were identified. Six honeys were considered unifloral honeys because they contained a predominant pollen type (>45%). The dominant of unifloral honeys, without any toxic pollen grains and with scarce fungal elements, suggests that most of the honeys are of good quality and suitable for human consumption.
The results coincide with the melissopalynological investigation in the peninsular part of India where unifloral honeys are dominant [35]. The diverse flora of India is due to varied climatic conditions in different parts of India. The multifloral source of honeys may be generated by the absence of major ingredients of forest and invasion of secondary forest elements [36]. The Palynological analysis of Paderu forest division honeys reflects that the native flora may be used as a source of good quality honey. In our studied honey-pollen exploration, it is easy to perceive that the honey bee preferred mainly non-arboreal in spring honeys, with the exception of Af-37 as arboreal dominant; Ageratum conyzoides is a predominant pollen taxon in three spring samples, Mimosa pudica, Tridax procumbens, and Conyza stricta as secondary pollen taxa. In autumn season also, bees preferred mainly non-arboreal exception of Af-13 and -64 samples, in Af-13 sample as unifloral with Schleichera oleosa as predominant pollen taxa.
Based on the above study, bees are preferred mainly on non-arboreal to collect nectar and convert to honey due to the flowering time of the melliferous species; climatic condition and human activities (e.g., farming, reforestation, and forest fires) may be other factors to consider in understanding the presence or absence of some taxa in the pollen spectra of honeys. In recent years, many rural communities have taken up beekeeping as an alternative source of their livelihood strategies. Even the younger generation is showing interest because beekeeping is so easy and simple that anybody can take it as an enterprise. Thus, our melissopalynological investigation may contribute to and favor the possibilities of using rich flora of the studied area in order to develop beekeeping enterprises on a commercial basis, in which self-employment opportunities may be created for many rural communities and develop their livelihood strategies in this area.
The analysis of the pollen content of Paderu forest division in Visakhapatnam district of Andhra Pradesh honey samples indicates that the local flora may be used as a source of good quality honey. The overall preponderance of non-arboreal in most of the honeys reflects that the honey bees prefer to visits to collect nectar. The scarce appearance of pollen from nectar-less plants such as Amaranthaceae, Cyperaceae, and Poaceae indicates that they were trapped in the hive incidentally by wind or were inadvertently transported by honey bees. And apiculture may enhance honey production in floristically rich province of Paderu forest division in Visakhapatnam district of Andhra Pradesh and adjoining areas, when job opportunities may be created for many developing rural communities of this state.
The authors are thankful to the Principal, University College of Science, Saifabad, OU, and Head of the Department of Botany, Osmania University, for providing laboratory facilities and acknowledge to local beekeepers for sample collection.
References
1.Seedley TD. Honey Bee Ecology. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press; 1985
2.Turner V. Banksia pollen as a source of protein in the diet of two Australian marsupials Cercartetus nanus and Tarsipus rostratus. Oikos. 1984;43:53-61
3.Lin SH, Chang SY, Chen SH. Nectar and pollen sources for honeybee (Apis cerana Fabr.) in Qinglan mangrove area, Hainan Island, China. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology. 1993;48:1266-1273
4.Maurizio A. Pollen analysis of honey. Bee World. 1951;32:1-5
5.Maurizio A. Microscopy of honey. In: Crane E, editor. Honey: A Comprehensive Survey. New York: Crane, Russak and Co; 1975. pp. 240-257
6.Louveaux J, Mourizio A, Vorwohl G. Methods of melissopalynology. Bee World. 1978;59:139-157
7.Lieux MH. Acetolysis applied to microscopical honey analysis. Grana. 1980;19:57-61
8.Agwu COC, Aknabi TO. A palynological study of honey from four vegetation zones in Nigeria. Pollen et Spores. 1985;27:335-348
9.Moar NT. Pollen analysis of New Zealand honey. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research. 1985;28:39-70
10.Feller-Demalsy MJ, Parent J, Strachan A. Microscopic analysis of honeys from Manitoba, Canada. Journal of Apicultural Research. 1989;28:41-49
11.Terrab A, Pontes A, Heredia FJ, Diez MJ. Palynological and geographical characterization of avocado honeys in Spain. Grana. 2004;43:116-121
12.Deodikar GB. Some aspects of bee botany. Indian Bee Journal. 1961;23:60-61
13.Garg A. Bee Botany of Bhimtal in Western Himalayas: Melissopalynological Analysis. 1st ed. Dehradun: Bishen Singh & Mahendra Pal Singh; 2006
14.Ramanujam CGK, Kalpana TP. Pollen analysis of Prosopis juliflora honeys from Ranga Reddy district, A.P. and its relevance to apiculture and social forestry. Journal of Palynology. 1991;27:345-368
15.Ramanujam CGK, Reddy PR, Kalpana TP. Pollen analysis of apiary honeys from east Godavari District, A.P. Journal of the Indian Institute of Science. 1992;72:289-299
16.Lakshmi K, Suryanarayana MC. Melittopalynological investigation of Apis dorsata honeys from forest areas of Cuddapha District, Andhra Pradesh. Journal of Palynology. 2004;40:189-198
17.Chauhan MS, Murthy S. Melittopalynological investigation of honeys from Chamaraj Nagar District, Southern Karnataka. Geophytology. 2010;39:41-47
18.Sivaram V, Roopa P, Shubharani R, Suwannapong G. Pollen analysis in honeys collected from Karnataka region of Nilgiri Biosphere, South India. Journal of Apiculture. 2012;27:223-231
19.Raghunandan KS, Basavarajappa S. Analysis of multifloral honey of the giant honey bee, Apis dorsata F., for pesticide residues in southern Karnataka, India. European Journal of Zoological Research. 2013;2:22-28
20.Suryanarayana MC, Rao GM, Singh TSMS. Studies on pollen sources for Apis cerana Fabr. and Apis mellifera L. bees at Muzaffarpur, Bihar, India. Apidologie. 1992;23:33-48
21.Chauhan MS, Quamar MF. Melissopalynological studies of honeys from Harda District, Madhya Pradesh. Phytomorphology. 2010;69:122-127
22.Deodikar GB, Thakar CV. A pollen study of honey yielding plants of Mahabaleshwar hills. Apicultural Lab Bulletin. 1953;1:1-6
23.Verma SK. Foraging behaviour of Apis cerana indica Fabr. in Jeolekote (Nainital), India. Indian Bee Journal. 1988;45:5-7
24.Gaur RD, Nanwani P. A melittopalynological analysis of apiary honeys from Pauri Garhwal, U.P., India. Indian Bee Journal. 1989;51:12-14
25.Tiwari JK, Gairola A, Tiwari P, Ballabha R. Pollen analysis of some honey samples from Kamad area of district Uttarkashi in Garhwal Himalaya, India. Asian Journal of Experimental Biological Sciences. 2012;3:778-784
26.Dixit S, Basumatary SK, Singh H, Bera SK. Melissopalynological studies of western part of Almora District, Uttarakhand. The Paleobotanist. 2013;62:39-46
27.Sharma M, Nair PKK. Pollen analysis of some honeys from Uttar Pradesh. Indian Journal of Horticulture. 1965;22:46-51
28.Chauhan MS, Trivedi A. Pollen analysis of honeys from Lucknow District, Uttar Pradesh. Journal of Applied Bioscience. 2011;37:48-51
29.Mondal M, Mitra K. Pollen analysis of honey from Sunderban (W. Bengal). Geophytology. 1980;10:137-139
30.Bhattacharya K, Chanda S, Gupta S, Ganguly P. Analysis of the pollen load from a honey sample from Salt Lake City, Clcutta. Science and Culture. 1983;49:222-224
31.Jana D, Bandyopadhyay A, Bera S. Pollen analysis of winter honey samples from Murshidabad District, West Bengal. Geophytology. 2000;30:91-97
32.Jana D, Bera S. Sonneratia apetala Buch Ham as major nectar source for honey bees during mid-summer days in Sunderbans, West Bengal, India. Phytomorphology. 2004;54:51-57
33.Upadayay D, Bhattacharya S, Ferguson DK, Bera S. Prospects of apicultural entrepreneurship in coastal district of Eastern India: A melissopalynological evaluation. PLoS One. 2014;9:1-15
34.Erdtman G. The acetolysis method—A revised description. Svensk Botanisk Tidskrift. 1960;54:561-564
35.Bhargav HR, Jyothi JVA, Bhushanam M, Surendra NS. Pollen analysis of Apis honey, Karnataka, India. Apiacta. 2009;44:14-19
36.Chauhan MS, Farooqui A, Trivedi A. Impact of urbanisation, deforestation and foraging pattern of honey bees. Botany. 2015;5:44-47
Written By
Ravula Devender, Hari Ramakrisha and Sonte Niranjan
Submitted: 06 May 2019Reviewed: 30 July 2019Published: 09 November 2019
Open access peer-reviewed chapter
