Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Research Progress on Synergistic Effect between Insulation Gas Mixtures

By Su Zhao and Dengming Xiao

Submitted: June 11th 2019Reviewed: November 29th 2019Published: January 2nd 2020

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.90705

Downloaded: 69

Abstract

Synergetic effect is a special gas discharge phenomenon among insulating gas mixtures, which has important reference value for gas selection of future gas-insulated power equipment. The research progress and investigation methods of synergistic effect and insulation characteristics of different gas mixtures at home and abroad are reviewed in this chapter. The synergistic effect between different kinds of gas mixtures including SF6 gas mixtures and some new insulation gases such as c-C4F8, CF3I, and C4F7N is presented. Combined with the results of multiple studies, it can be seen that the synergistic effect of the gas mixture has a certain relationship with the electronic transport parameters and discharge patterns. Besides, the synergistic effect of the same gas mixture may change with the change of external conditions such as gas pressure, voltage type, and electrode distance.

Keywords

  • gas discharge
  • synergistic effect
  • gas mixture
  • insulation
  • environmental friendly gas

1. Introduction

With the continuous development of power industry, gas-insulated power equipment has been used more and more widely in electrical transmission system. Gas-insulated power equipment mainly includes gas-insulated transformer (GIT), gas-insulated transmission line (GIL), and gas-insulated switchgear (GIS). These gas-insulated equipment are noncombustible, nonexplosive, safe, and stable and have long maintenance period [1]. At present, SF6 gas is the most widely used gas in power equipment, which has excellent insulation performance and arc extinguishing ability. As early as the 1940s, SF6 gas has been used as insulation gas in power equipment [2]. Since the 1970s, researchers have studied the use of gas mixture including SF6 and some buffer gases such as N2, CO2, Ar, He, air, etc. to replace pure SF6 as the insulation medium [3, 4, 5]. With further study, researchers found that the insulation characteristics of gas mixtures containing SF6 gas did not increase linearly according to the mixing ratio of SF6, and the electrical strength of the mixture was higher than the weighted average of the electrical strength of the two gas components. In 1980, Wootton and Chantry first used synergism to describe this phenomenon [6]. In the study of synergistic effect, scholars have found that there are also super synergistic effect and negative synergistic effect, which are shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Types of synergistic effect.

Suppose that the composition of gas mixture is gas 1 and gas 2, the breakdown voltage of gas 1 is U1, the breakdown voltage of gas 2 is U2, and U1 > U2, the breakdown voltage of gas mixture is Um, and K is the mixing ratio of gas 1 in the gas mixture. For super synergistic effect, Um > U1 and Um > U2 exist in some mixing ratios, as shown in curve a; for synergistic effect, Um > U1 + U2, as shown in curve b; for linear relationship, Um = U1 + U2, as shown in curve c; for negative synergistic effect, Um < U1 + U2, as shown in curve d in Figure 1.

At first, researchers studied the synergistic effect of SF6 gas mixture in order to solve the problems of high liquefaction temperature, sensitivity to electric field, and the high price of SF6 gas [7]. However, with the deepening understanding of SF6, scholars have found that SF6 is a strong greenhouse gas. It is estimated that the global annual production of SF6 gas is more than 20,000 tons and 80% of SF6 gas produced globally each year is used in the power industry. Although SF6 has many advantages, its greenhouse effect on the earth cannot be ignored. The global warming potential (GWP) value of SF6 gas is 23,900; it means that the emission of 1 kg SF6 is equivalent to the emission of 23,900 kg of CO2. What is more serious is that SF6 has a very stable chemical property, which is difficult to decompose after it spreads to the outside environment, and can exist for up to 3200 years. The environmental impact and greenhouse effect generated by SF6 will continue to accumulate [8, 9, 10].

Affected by climate change, more and more international cooperation has been carried out to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, so as to curb global climate change and maintain the sustainable development of the environment. In the Kyoto protocol of the United Nations framework convention on climate change signed in Kyoto, Japan, in 1997, SF6 has been clearly regulated as one of the six greenhouse gases and requires developed countries to freeze and reduce the total greenhouse gas emissions [11]. It means that the use of SF6 in the industrial field will be increasingly restricted and pressured. Therefore, it is an urgent task to study a new gas insulation scheme to replace SF6.

Although at present there have been many studies about alternative SF6 gas, no gas can thoroughly replace SF6 gas in the form of a single gas; they all have to be mixed with buffer gas for industrial application. The reasonable use of synergistic effect can effectively improve dielectric strength of gas mixtures and reduce the use of insulation gas, so in this paper, the research progress and methods of synergistic effect with gas mixtures are introduced; the prospect and the difficulties in the field were also discussed. This paper is expected to provide help and reference for future research on synergistic effect.

2. Synergistic effect in SF6 gas mixtures

In view of the synergistic effect and insulation strength of SF6 mixture, scholars studied and analyzed it through theoretical calculation and experimental research. Figure 2a is a simple and intuitive calculation method proposed by Wieland et al. for the insulation strength of SF6 gas mixture, and Figure 2b is the comparison of the calculation results with the actual values and weighted values [12].

Figure 2.

Experimental results of SF6 gas mixtures. (a) Wieland calculation method, (b) Results comparison of different methods.

Christophorou et al. thought that the preferred gas mixture should include effective electron-attaching gas and/or electron-slowing down gas [13]. The attachment cross section of electron-attaching components should be as wide as possible, or the attachment cross section of different gases is in different energy interval, so the attachment cross section of gas mixtures is also wide. The effect of electron-slowing down gas is to slow down the free electrons, making them easier to attach and reducing secondary ionization. Based on this theory, they believed that when an electronegative gas and a gas with a large dipole moment are mixed, the synergistic effect and insulation strength of the gas mixture will be better. Figure 3 shows the experimental results of SF6 gas mixtures with CF4, CHF3, and 1,1,1-CH3CF3 gas, and the electric dipole moments of these three gases are 0, 1.65D, and 2.32D, respectively.

Figure 3.

Experimental results of SF6 gas mixtures. (a) SF6-CF4, (b) SF6-CHF3, (c) SF6-1,1,1-CH3CF3.

From the figure, it can be seen that the breakdown voltage curve of SF6-CF4 gas mixtures shows almost a linear trend, and the electric dipole moments of CF4 is 0. When it comes to SF6-CHF3 gas mixture, as the content of SF6 gas increases, the breakdown voltage of the gas mixtures does not increase in a straight line, and there is synergistic effect that occurs. The electric dipole moments of 1,1,1-CH3CF3 gas is 2.32D, which is the one with the largest electric dipole moment among the three gases; from Figure 3c it can be seen that the synergistic effect of this gas mixture is the most pronounced.

Okubo et al. investigated the partial discharge (PD) and breakdown characteristics of SF6-N2 gas mixtures in order to analyze the relationship between electronegativity, additive gases, and the insulation strength [14]. They believed that the synergistic effect of gas mixture is related to the change of discharge form. Figure 4 shows the impulse PD of SF6-N2 gas mixture at different pressure. The needle-plate electrode was used in the experiment, and the content of SF6 was 10% and N2 was 90%.

Figure 4.

Impulse PD in SF6-N2 gas mixture. (a) 0.1MPa, (b) 0.2MPa, (c) 0.3MPa.

It can be seen that with the change of gas pressure, the development of impulse PD has changed. When the gas pressure is 0.1 MPa, as shown in Figure 5a, the brushlike partial discharge occurred around the needle electrode, and it can be thought of as streamer discharge. When the pressure increases to 0.2 MPa, it can be seen from Figure 5b that the development of discharge process becomes longer; streamer discharge turns into leader discharge. As the pressure continues to increase, when the pressure is 0.3 MPa, the PD type of the gas mixture is still the leader discharge, and the path of discharge development becomes shorter with the increase of the pressure.

Figure 5.

PD characteristics in SF6-N2 gas mixture.

Yamada et al. studied the insulation properties of a kind of gas mixture containing ultra-dilute SF6 gas [15]. It has been found that trace SF6 has a significant effect on the streamer discharge of the gas mixture. As the SF6 content increases, the number of the discharge channels decreased significantly, and the number of channels that can reach the plane electrode also reduced, as shown in Figure 4. Except for the effect on discharge characteristics, the results show that the breakdown voltage and the PD voltage of SF6/N2 gas mixture have a significant synergistic effect. Yamada T thought that the addition of trace SF6 inhibits the development of streamer discharge process, which leads to synergistic effect.

Osmokrovic et al. conducted an in-depth study on the synergistic effect of SF6/N2 under impulse voltage. The experimental results show that the synergistic effect of SF6/N2 gas mixture related to the rising rate of the impulse voltage. As the impulse voltage rise rate increases, the synergistic effect is gradually weakened. The synergistic effect of SF6 gas mixture is very weak and almost completely disappears under some impulse voltage with very high rise rate [16]. The insulation characteristics of SF6 and SF6/N2 gas mixture under impulse voltage with different rise rate are shown in Figure 5. The rise rates of shock voltage in Figure 6a–c are 1, 50 and 800 kv/ms, respectively.

Figure 6.

Insulation characteristics of SF6 and SF6/N2 gas mixture under different rising rate impulse voltages. (a) 1kV/ms, (b) 50kv/ms, (C) 800kV/ms.

Based on the above phenomenon, Osmokrovic proposed that after adding N2 to the SF6 gas, electrons can make N2 vibration and rotation dynamics excited or dissociated, this process will make electrons lose energy, and the effective temperature decreases, to realize the modulation of electron energy spectrum and increase the probability that the electrons are captured. The rise rate of impulse voltage has influence on the modulation of the electron energy spectrum, which in turn affects the synergistic effect of SF6 gas mixture.

Hayakawa et al. studied the generation and development of PD characteristics of SF6/N2 gas mixture under positive lightning impulse [17]. PD and breakdown characteristics with different SF6 content are shown in Figure 7. Hayakawa proved through the film of the streak camera and ICCD that the discharge process in SF6/N2 gas mixture did change with the increase of gas pressure. Streamer discharge and leader discharge are the two types of PD process in SF6/N2 gas mixture, which all have relationship with gas pressure and SF6 content. With the increase of gas pressure and the content of SF6 gas, the leader discharge process gradually takes the leading position, and the streamer discharge process of gradually weakens.

Figure 7.

PD and breakdown characteristics with different SF6 content. (BDV50, breakdown voltage; PDIV50, 50% probability PD inception voltage; LOV, leader discharge onset voltage). (a) SF65–N295%, (b) SF610–N290%, (c) SF620–N280%, (d) pure SF6.

Chen studied the discharge characteristics of SF6/N2 gas mixture under DC voltage and lightning impulse in extremely uneven electric field. The experimental results show that there was a significant decrease of breakdown voltage with the increase of gas pressure under DC voltage and the abnormal discharge characteristics pressure range of SF6/N2 gas mixture is larger than SF6 gas. This phenomenon leads to the breakdown voltage of SF6/N2 gas mixture is higher than that of SF6 gas. So under this abnormal range, positive synergistic effect occurs. However, under lighting impulse voltage, no abnormal discharge phenomenon was found, but positive synergistic effect still existed, as shown in Figure 8 [18].

Figure 8.

Abnormal discharge phenomenon in SF6/N2 and SF6.

Tagashira et al. believe that synergistic effects can be divided into three categories: a-synergistic effect (SF6 + SiH4), η-synergistic effect (SF6 + c-C4F8), and γ-synergistic effect (N2 + CH4). The research found that the curves of SF6/SiH4, SF6/c-C4F8, SF6/C3F6 gas mixtures with SF6 gas content all decreased first and then increased, that is, the curve had a minimum point. For the curve of SF6/SiH4 gas mixture, the falling part of the curve is due to the decrease of ionization coefficient α, that is, α-synergistic effect, and for the curve of SF6/c-C4F8 gas mixture, the rising part is caused by the increase of attachment coefficient η and that is η-synergistic effect. In addition to these two synergistic effects, they also proposed a synergistic effect of γ on the secondary ionization coefficient of N2 + CH4 gas mixture [19].

Takuma et al. studied the synergistic effect of gas mixtures such as SF6/N2, CCl2F2/N2, etc. They assumed that the effective ionization coefficient of the gas mixture is equal to the sum of the coefficients of the two component gases multiplied by their respective partial pressure ratios, suggesting an empirical formula for breakdown voltage of SF6/N2 gas mixture under slight uneven electric field [20]:

Um=U2+kk+C1kU1U2E1

where U1 and U2 are the breakdown voltage of component gas 1 and gas 2, Um is the breakdown voltage of gas mixture (U1 > U2), k is the partial pressure ratio of component gas 1, and C is the synergistic effect coefficient, which is independent of the partial pressure ratio k. When Constant C = 0.08, the calculated and experimental values of the SF6/N2 gas mixture by this formula are shown in Figure 5. The breakdown voltage values are basically the same, which can reflect the synergistic effect of SF6 gas mixture.

According to formula (1), the formula for calculating the synergy coefficient proposed by Takuma is

C=kU1UM1kUMU2E2

As can be seen from Eq. (2), when C = 1, the breakdown voltage of the gas mixture is equal to the weighting value of breakdown voltage of the two components according to the mixing ratio. That is, the breakdown voltage of the gas mixture exhibits a linear relationship that increases as the mixing ratio of the component gas increases. When 0 < C < 1, the breakdown voltage of the gas mixture reflects synergistic effect phenomenon, and the smaller the value of C, the more significant the nonlinear increase of the breakdown voltage of the gas mixture, which means synergistic effect becomes more significant. When C = 0, the breakdown voltage of the gas mixture equals to the breakdown voltage of gas 1, which means UM = U1.

If all the situations of synergistic effect, i.e., positive synergistic effect, synergistic effect, and negative synergistic, are considered at the same time, then the above formula is no longer applicable. Assuming a positive synergistic effect of the gas mixture, it can be seen from the calculation that the coefficient C < 0 under positive synergistic. When the breakdown voltage of the gas mixture is lower than all the breakdown voltage of the component gas, that is, the phenomenon of “super negative synergistic effect” appears, then value of the coefficient C is still less than 0, so the various synergistic effects of the gas mixture cannot be clearly distinguished by formula (2).

Guo et al. introduced a normalization coefficient h to investigate the synergistic effect of SF6/N2 gas mixture under lightning impulse. The definition of coefficient h is as follows:

h=UmU2kU1U20.5U1+U20<k<1h=0k=0or1E3

where U1, U2, Um, and k in Eq. 3 have the same meaning as those in Eq. 2. When h > 0, it means that gas mixture has synergistic effect, and when h < 0, it represents that the gas mixture has negative synergistic effect. The relationship between the coefficient h of SF6/N2 and k under lightning impulse with different needle-plane electrodes is shown in Figure 9 [21].

Figure 9.

Coefficient h for SF6/N2 gas mixture under lightning impulse with different needle-plane electrode (R is radius curvatures of needle electrodes). (a) R = 2 mm, (b) R = 1 mm.

The analysis results show that under the action of negative lightning impulse voltage, the negative synergistic effect increases with the increase of gas pressure. The synergistic effect under the positive impact voltage decreases with the decrease of gas pressure. With the increase of the electric field inhomogeneity coefficient, the synergistic effect has a negative synergistic effect. The analysis of the development process of the flow discharge shows that there are three reasons for the negative synergistic effect: similar flow corona starting voltage, different space charge effects, and different N2 and SF6/N2 mixed gas discharge forms. The difference of breakdown voltage between N2 and SF6/N2 gas mixture is shown in Figure 10. rsp represents the range of space charge, ΔUSP is the influence of space charge on breakdown voltage, Ust is the streamer corona onset voltage, and Ub = Ust + ΔUSP.

Figure 10.

Breakdown voltage differences between N2 and SF6/N2.

3. Synergistic effect in SF6 alternative gas mixtures

3.1 c-C4F8

c-C4F8 is colorless, odorless, nonflammable, and nonexplosive; the GWP of c-C4F8 is about 8700, and the molecular structure of c-C4F8 is shown in Figure 11. The insulation performance of pure c-C4F8 gas is better than SF6, and the gas mixture of c-C4F8 gas has similar insulation characteristics to SF6, which can meet the requirements of practical application. The liquefaction temperature of c-C4F8 is about −6°C, higher than that of SF6, which is −63.8°C [22]. Therefore, c-C4F8 can only be mixed with the gas in a certain proportion to reduce the overall liquefaction temperature of the gas mixture for application.

Figure 11.

Molecular structure of c-C4F8.

While studying the synergistic effect of SF6 gas mixture, Christophorou et al. also conducted a comparative study on the synergistic effect of c-C4F8 gas mixtures. The insulation characteristics and synergistic effect of c-C4F8/CF4 and c-C4F8/CHF3 gas mixture are shown in Figure 12 [13].

Figure 12.

Breakdown voltage of c-C4F8 gas mixtures for various electrode gaps. (a) c-C4F8/CF4, (b) c-C4F8/CHF3, (c) c-C4F8/1,1,1-CH3CF3.

It can be seen from the figure that the addition of a small amount of c-C4F8 can greatly improve the insulation strength of gas mixture. Mixing 20% c-C4F8 in CHF3 can double the breakdown voltage. The insulation strength of c-C4F8/1,1,1-CH3CF3 gas with the same mixing ratio is the same as that of pure SF6 gas. By comparison, it can be seen that the synergistic effect phenomenon will also occur when c-C4F8 gas and the gas with large dipole moment are mixed.

Xing et al. discussed the feasibility of replacing SF6 gas with c-C4F8/N2 mixture for gas insulation equipment from the perspective of PD performance. The initial PD voltage of c-C4F8/N2 gas mixture was measured under different pressure, different mixing ratio, and different electrode distance. The influence of these three factors on the PD performance of the gas mixture was obtained and compared with the initial PD voltage of pure SF6 gas. The results show that the initial PD voltage of pure c-C4F8 gas is 1.3 times that of pure SF6 gas [23]. c-C4F8 and N2 have synergistic effect, and the synergistic coefficient calculated by Takuma’s equation under different electrode distance and gas pressure is shown in Table 1.

Electrode distance/mmGas pressure/MpaC
5% c-C4F810% c-C4F815% c-C4F820% c-C4F8
100.200.480.500.540.53
0.250.200.400.440.63
200.200.470.860.450.52
0.250.340.500.490.54
300.200.150.250.300.36
0.250.240.320.340.41

Table 1.

Synergistic coefficient for c-C4F8/N2.

Yamamoto et al. examined the insulation characteristics of c-C4F8 gas mixtures such as c-C4F8/N2, c-C4F8/air, and c-C4F8/CO2 under different electric field [24]. The experimental results show that c-C4F8/CO2 gas mixture has better synergistic effect than the other two mixtures, and improve gas pressure or gap distance can greatly enhance the synergistic effect of c-C4F8 gas mixture. The relationship of synergistic effect coefficient C with Pd is shown in Figure 13.

Figure 13.

Relationship of synergistic effect coefficient C with Pd.

3.2 CF3I

CF3I gas is odorless, nonflammable, chemically stable, and material compatible. The molecular structure of CF3I is shown in Figure 14. CF3I is considered as one of the ideal alternatives to conventional Freon refrigerant. In terms of environmental characteristics, CF3I is an extremely environmental friendly gas, and its GWP value is about 1–5, much lower than SF6 gas. At the same time, the C-I chemical bond in the molecular structure of CF3I is easy to photolysis under solar radiation, resulting in the very short existence time of CF3I in the atmosphere, and the ozone destruction potential of the gas can also be ignored. The boiling point of CF3I at normal pressure is −22.5°C, which indicates that CF3I gas will transform from gaseous to liquid when the temperature is lower than −22.5°C [25]. Therefore, CF3I gas must be mixed with buffer gas before it can be used in power equipment.

Figure 14.

Molecular structure of CF3I.

Urquijo et al. experimentally measured the electron transport parameters of CF3I and CF3I/N2 gas mixture. They analyzed and studied several parameters including electron drift velocity, diffusion coefficient, electron ionization coefficient, and attachment coefficient by means of pulsed Townsend method. Experimental results show that the critical electric field intensity (E/N)lim of CF3I was 437Td, and the insulation strength of the gas is about 1.2 times that of SF6 gas. When the content of CF3I is 70%, the dielectric strength of CF3I/N2 gas mixture is basically the same with pure SF6 gas [26]. The insulation characteristic comparison of CF3I/N2 and SF6/N2 gas mixtures IS shown in Figure 15. From the figure it can be seen that CF3I/N2 and SF6/N2 gas mixture both have synergistic effect phenomenon, but the phenomenon of CF3I/N2 gas mixture is weak when compared with SF6/N2.

Figure 15.

Comparison of insulation strength between CF3I/N2 and SF6/N2.

In addition to CF3I/N2 mixture, there is also a synergistic effect of CF3I/CO2 mixture. Jiao et al. studied the gas mixture of CF3I/CO2 with low content of CF3I, and conducted breakdown test on CF3I/CO2 gas mixture with different mixing ratio, different gas pressure, and different discharge gap distance under extremely uneven electric field [27]. The experimental results show that the mixing of trace CF3I can significantly increase the breakdown voltage, and the breakdown voltage tends to be stable when the content of CF3I gas is over 6%. Although there is still a gap of the breakdown voltage between CF3I/CO2 and SF6, the trace amount of CF3I has a good synergistic relationship with CO2 mixture. The relationship between breakdown voltage and CF3I content under different electrode distances is shown in Figure 16, and the synergistic coefficient of CF3I/CO2 gas mixture calculated by Takuma’s equation is shown in Table 2. The author believes that the negative synergetic effect coefficient is caused by the saturation of the breakdown voltage and does not continue to analyze the reason. In fact, this phenomenon may be related to the abnormal breakdown of the gas mixture containing CO2.

Figure 16.

Relationship between breakdown voltage and CF3I content under different electrode distance. (a) 5 mm, (b) 10 mm, (c) 20 mm, (d) 30 mm.

Gap distance /mmPressure /MPaSynergetic coefficient
2%CF3I4%CF3I6%CF3I8%CF3I
50.100.110.140.350.72
0.150.020.520.220.60
0.200.060.160.080.99
0.300.170.10−0.14−0.09
100.100.060.150.130.68
0.150.060.240.580.27
0.200.130.120.120.04
0.300.050.150.020.20
200.100.060.150.220.36
0.150.210.400.180.31
0.200.150.160.100.04
0.30−0.07−0.20−0.82−1.32
300.100.080.220.15−0.05
0.150.120.110.190.06
0.200.040.010.010.38
0.30−0.05−0.05−0.37−0.32

Table 2.

Synergetic coefficients of CF3I/CO2 gas mixtures using Takuma’s equation.

In addition to binary CF3I gas mixture, some scholars have studied ternary gas mixture containing CF3I gas. Xu et al. calculated the electron energy distribution function (EEDF) of CF3I ternary gas mixtures by solving the Boltzmann equation and propose a new equation to analyze synergistic effect. The results show that if buffer gases such as N2 or CO2 are concluded in the ternary mixture, the distribution of low-energy electrons in EEDF increases, leading to the synergistic effect, but there is no synergistic effect with CF4. The mixture of two strongly electronegative gases, CF3I/SF6, shows weak negative synergistic effect, while the addition of N2 or CO2 can reduce the negative synergistic effect [28]. The EEDF of CF3I ternary gas mixtures is shown in Figure 17.

Figure 17.

EEDF of CF3I ternary gas mixtures. (a) CF3I/SF6/N2, (b) CF3I/N2/CF4.

The computational formula of synergistic effect coefficient proposed by Xu is as follows:

ξ=E/Nlim,mixxiE/Nlim,i1E4

where (E/N)lim, mix is the critical reduced field intensity of gas mixture and (E/N)lim, i is the critical reduced field intensity of single gas. xi is the molar fraction of the gas component. Fix the buffer mole fraction of gas to 0, 10, and 30%, and change the mixing ratio of CF3I and SF6 gas; the (E/N)lim and synergistic effect coefficient of CF3I ternary gas mixtures are shown in Figure 18.

Figure 18.

The (E/N)lim and synergistic coefficient of CF3I gas mixtures. (a) CF3I/SF6/N2, (b) CF3I/SF6/CO2, (c) CF3I/CF4/N2.

3.3 C4F7N

C4F7N is an SF6 alternative gas jointly developed by Alstom of France and 3 M of the United States. The commodity name of this gas is Novec 4710, which is an organic compound containing four C atoms and seven F atoms. Its molecular structure is shown in Figure 19. The chemical characteristics of the gas are similar to those of fluoro organic gas, and the chemical characteristics are relatively stable, which can achieve good compatibility with other materials in electrical equipment. The relative molecular weight of C4F7N is 195.0, and it also has a high liquefaction temperature, which is −4.7°C [29]. Therefore, it also needs to be mixed with buffer gas.

Figure 19.

Molecular structure of C4F7N.

C4F7N gas mixture is a popular alternative to SF6. At present, most researches on SF6 alternative gases are concentrated on this gas. In order to obtain the optimal buffer gas type and mixing ratio in C4F7N gas mixture, Hu et al. studied the power frequency breakdown performance and synergistic characteristics of C4F7N/CO2 and C4F7N/N2 gas mixture with uniform electric field [30]. The gas pressure is 0.1–0.7 MPa, and the C4F7N content ratio in gas mixture is 5–20%. The experimental and calculation results show that the C4F7N/CO2 and C4F7N/N2 gas mixture both have synergistic effects, and the synergistic effect of C4F7N/CO2 is stronger than C4F7N/N2. The interaction between C4F7N and CO2 bimolecular is stronger than that of C4F7N and N2, and the research indicates that there is a certain correlation between the synergistic effect of C4F7N gas mixture and the intermolecular interaction. This result presents the theoretical calculation and analysis direction for the qualitative judgment of the synergistic effect of C4F7N gas mixture. The synergistic coefficient h of C4F7N/CO2 and C4F7N/N2 calculated by Guo Can’s equation is shown in Table 3.

Gas typePressure /MPaCoefficient h
5% C4F7N7% C4F7N9% C4F7N13% C4F7N
C4F7N/CO20.10.570.630.690.77
0.20.490.590.630.69
0.30.460.520.570.69
0.40.450.530.570.69
0.50.450.540.590.73
0.60.470.550.620.75
0.70.500.580.640.76
C4F7N/N20.10.400.460.530.62
0.20.440.510.570.63
0.30.340.410.480.56
0.40.350.420.480.56
0.50.370.430.480.56
0.60.390.460.500.64
0.70.440.520.580.64

Table 3.

Synergistic coefficient h of C4F7N/CO2 and C4F7N/N2 gas mixture.

Zheng et al. also studied the synergistic effect and insulation performance of C4F7N/CO2 gas mixture and found that the synergistic coefficient was related to avalanche parameters of pure gas. They proposed a graphical method based on the Wieland approximation to calculate the critical electric field of gas mixture. Based on the formula, the C4F7N content takes 9% in gas mixture tends to be the optimal mixing ratio [31]. Figure 20 shows the relationship of the critical electric field of gas mixture and C4F7N content.

Figure 20.

The relationship of the critical electric field of gas mixture and C4F7N content.

4. Conclusions

With the development of the power system, gas-insulated equipment such as GIS will be more and more widely used. At present, SF6 gas is still the most used insulating gas in power systems. However, due to the greenhouse effect of SF6 gas and the consensus of countries on the development of low-carbon clean energy systems, it is imperative to use new environmental friendly insulating gas in power equipment. Looking for SF6 replacement gas will also be a continuing research hotspot in the field of electrical engineering. According to the current research status, the replacement of SF6 by single gas and its application in gas insulation equipment is still in the laboratory research stage. The use of an electronegative gas mixed with a buffer gas is a well-feasible solution. This paper reviews the research status of the synergistic effect of insulating gas mixtures including SF6 gas. It has been found that some achievements have been made in the process and mechanism of synergistic effect, the types of synergistic effects under different conditions, and their influencing factors:

  1. SF6, c-C4F8, CF3I, and C4F7N gas all have synergistic effects when mixed with various buffer gases. SF6/N2 gas mixture will have negative synergistic effect under the lightning impulse. The synergistic effect of the gas mixture composed of c-C4F8, CF3I and C4F7N and CO2 is more significant than that after mixing with N2.

  2. The synergistic effect of gas mixture is affected by the type of gas and external conditions such as gas pressure, electric field type, voltage type, etc. The synergistic effect of the same gas mixture may change with the change of external conditions, such as from synergistic effect to negative synergistic or from negative synergistic to synergistic effect.

  3. The synergistic effect of the gas mixture has a certain relationship with the electronic transport parameters. However, since the assumptions of the parameter calculation differ greatly from the external conditions of the experimental measurements, the interpretation of the synergistic effect is not universal.

  4. The synergistic effect of gas mixture has a relationship with the discharge pattern. When synergistic effect occurs, the initial discharge voltage of the streamer discharge rises. When negative synergistic phenomenon occurs, the streamer discharge gradually changes to leader discharge, and the discharge starting voltage decreases.

© 2020 The Author(s). Licensee IntechOpen. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

How to cite and reference

Link to this chapter Copy to clipboard

Cite this chapter Copy to clipboard

Su Zhao and Dengming Xiao (January 2nd 2020). Research Progress on Synergistic Effect between Insulation Gas Mixtures, Modern Applications of Electrostatics and Dielectrics, Dengming Xiao and Krishnaswamy Sankaran, IntechOpen, DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.90705. Available from:

chapter statistics

69total chapter downloads

More statistics for editors and authors

Login to your personal dashboard for more detailed statistics on your publications.

Access personal reporting

Related Content

This Book

Next chapter

Introductory Chapter: Modern Applications of Electrostatics and Dielectrics

By Krishnaswamy Sankaran

Related Book

First chapter

Introductory Chapter: 4D Imaging

By Jinfeng Yang and Hidehiro Yasuda

We are IntechOpen, the world's leading publisher of Open Access books. Built by scientists, for scientists. Our readership spans scientists, professors, researchers, librarians, and students, as well as business professionals. We share our knowledge and peer-reveiwed research papers with libraries, scientific and engineering societies, and also work with corporate R&D departments and government entities.

More About Us