Relative proportion of OTUs belonged to representative genus in feces samples determined by 16S metagenomics sequencing.
Abstract
Understanding the transboundary movement of microorganisms is a significant public health issue. It is possible that large amounts of various bacteria existing on the earth’s surface are spreading across borders through migratory birds, but their identities and rates of migration have yet to be elucidated. Although modern bacteriology has advanced based on culture technology, many environmental bacteria may be in a “viable but nonculturable” state. To date, various novel culture-independent detection methods have been developed, including next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology that enables high-throughput sequencing and in-depth gene analysis independent of culture. By using NGS to comprehensively analyze the intestinal microbiota of migratory birds, research on bacterial and viral communities traveling over long distances has entered a new era, providing a new insight for the analysis of the livestock industry, agriculture, and human health risks. Here, we describe the current state and future outcomes of studying intestinal microbiota associated with migratory birds.
Keywords
- migratory bird
- avian
- wild bird
- gut microbiota
- intestinal microbiota
1. Introduction
Understanding the transboundary movement of microorganisms is a significant issue regarding health, sanitation, and ecological conservation. Birds are susceptible to many microbial diseases that are common to humans and domestic animals [1]. The unprecedented spread of West Nile virus in North America in 1999 has raised concerns over the transport of pathogenic viruses by migratory birds [2]. Recent sporadic outbreaks of avian influenza have caused masses of avian deaths, and it is strongly suspected that the source of infection in East Asia is the feces of migratory birds. In 2014, studies revealed that the influenza virus of the Antarctic penguin had spread to migratory birds via the fecal-oral route and was highly likely to have infected horses on continents more than a few thousand kilometers away [3].
Waterfowls such as ducks, geese, coots, and cormorants can play a role in the environmental dissemination of
Organized and periodic surveillance methods of bacterial pathogens are not as efficient as those for the highly pathogenic avian influenza. Avian cholera, caused by
Attempts have been made to clarify the microbiota contained within migratory birds’ feces using new culture-independent genetic-based methods such as next-generation sequencing (NGS). Research on the spreading of bacterial populations over the vast distances has led to the elucidation of the roles of migratory birds regarding human health risks. Further studies of the spatial and temporal distribution of pathogenic bacteria in wild birds will enhance the assessment of their roles, thereby enabling the prediction of potential outbreaks based on migratory patterns. NGS is useful for the understanding of bacterial diversity and the discovery of novel bacteria [9]. This review considers the potential role of wild birds in the transmission of intestinal microbiota and our current knowledge of microbiota associated with migratory birds using NGS technologies.
2. Intestinal microbiota in wild birds
The majority of information regarding enteropathogens in wild birds has been ascertained by applying traditional microbiological techniques [10, 11, 12]. Research on the fecal flora of wild birds in a few well-studied species has focused on the prevalence of enteropathogenic bacteria that are most likely zoonotic. Representative species that are often found in diseased wild birds include
Many classical methods such as microscopy, culture, or serology have been used to detect and isolate pathogenic protozoa or fungi from excreta of migratory birds.
Representative virus species that often cause fecal-oral disease transmission in wild birds include
As vectors of enteropathogens, wild birds have been associated with global outbreaks of water-borne and food-borne diseases. For example, outbreaks of infectious diseases have been attributed to fecal water supply contamination by wild birds [14]. Birds were strongly suspected as a source of enteropathogens for livestock when infected birds were found foraging on the livestock feed, and domestic cats have been known to contract enteropathogens by feeding on infected dead birds [15]. The incidence of infectious diseases in humans has also been linked to the handling of dead wild birds [16].
3. Methodology
Traditionally, studies on microbial community composition have been based on culture-dependent methods [17]. When classifying and identifying bacteria, a combination of simple methods has helped to distinguish bacteria based on morphology, dyeability, and biochemical properties. Since automated devices have been developed, it is possible to assure the quality of microbial-based data in pharmaceutical fields and diagnostics fields as standards. When in need of more specific classification, sequence decoding for a specific gene or DNA fingerprinting is carried out. When determining bacterial species, it is a standard practice to analyze the 16S rRNA gene.
However, traditional culture methods underestimate bacterial populations because many environmental bacteria cannot yet to be cultivated by conventional laboratory techniques [18, 19]. Traditional microbiological methods of detection, enumeration, and identification using culture methods are often time-consuming and labor-intensive. These practical considerations often limit the extent to which microbiological tests are routinely applied to community analysis.
Various approaches have been developed to identify microorganisms in natural samples without the requirement for laboratory cultivation [20, 21, 22, 23]. Since the latter half of the 1990s, direct sequencing approaches for 16S ribosomal RNA gene amplicon have been popularized. In these methodologies, DNA is extracted directly from the sample without culturing the bacteria. Target DNA is amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using a universal primer set targeting a conserved region of the 16S rRNA gene or a genus-specific primer, and then sequencing follows to identify the bacterial community members. Because the amplicons are mixed molecules derived from numerous complex bacterial species, PCR products should be separated using denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis or a clone library method in combination [24, 25]. With these methods, the number of bacterial clones that can be screened at one time is limited from several tens to thousands and proves to be labor-intensive.
In this decade, a comprehensive analysis of gene sequences using next-generation sequencing (NGS) has spread rapidly [26, 27]. The NGS is a powerful technology capable of concurrently determining nucleotide sequences for tens of millions to hundreds of millions of fragmented DNA strands. Originally, NGS was used for high-throughput sequencing of a single biological genome, but now it is possible to perform high-speed processing, allowing multiple samples to be sequenced simultaneously. Therefore, a wide variety of applications have been proposed for NGS. The price of NGS contract analysis service also has declined greatly in the past few years, making it easier to use so that it is now more useful for research on genetic diseases, clinical diagnoses, relationships between human intestinal flora and diseases, analyses of environmental bacterial community composition and succession in both time and space, and searches for useful microorganisms in various environments. Metagenomic methods provided by NGS technology have facilitated a remarkable expansion of our knowledge regarding uncultured bacteria [28].
A more recent detection method, quantitative real-time PCR, is known for its excellent accuracy and sensitivity when detecting known zoonotic pathogens [29]. On the other hand, it is difficult to identify target pathogens that are not previously known with this method, and often too many samples must be handled simultaneously for it to be convenient. A comprehensive analysis by NGS enables us to comprehend a whole picture of the bacterial community contained in a sample, so it is possible to carry out further analysis with specific pathogenic bacteria based on the taxonomic information obtained by NGS.
4. Variable region of the 16S rRNA gene
The 16S rRNA gene sequence was first used in 1985 for phylogenetic analysis [30]. Because it contains both highly conserved regions for primer design and hypervariable regions to identify phylogenetic characteristics of microorganisms, the 16S rRNA gene sequence became the most widely used marker gene for profiling bacterial communities [31]. Full-length 16S rRNA gene sequences consist of nine hypervariable regions that are separated by nine highly conserved regions [32]. Limited by sequencing technology, the 16S rRNA gene sequences used in most studies are partial sequences. Therefore, the selection of proper primers is critical for studying bacterial phylogeny in various environments [32].
Recent studies utilizing high-throughput technology also have demonstrated that the use of suboptimal primer pairs results in the uneven amplification of certain species, causing either an under- or overestimation of some species in a microbial community [32, 33]. Integrated bioinformatics tools were used to evaluate the phylogenetic sensitivity of the hypervariable regions compared with the corresponding full-length sequences. Results showed that using a combination of V4–V6 regions represented the optimal subregions for bacterial phylogenetic studies of new phyla [34].
5. Flyway
Bird migration is the regular seasonal journey undertaken by many species of birds. Bird movements occur as a response to changes in food availability, habitat, or weather. Approximately 1800 of the world’s 10,000 bird species are long-distance migrants [35]. The bar-tailed godwit,
Many species migrate along broadly similar, well-established routes, known as flyways. Recent research has identified nine such pathways: the East Atlantic, the Mediterranean/Black Sea, the West Asia/East Africa, the Central Asia, the East Asia/Australasia, and four flyways in the Americas [37]. The most common pattern involves flying north in the spring to breed in the temperate or Arctic summer and then returning south in the fall to warmer wintering grounds. Migration is often annual and is linked closely with the cyclic pattern of the seasons. Migration is most evident among birds, which have a highly efficient means for traveling swiftly over long distances.
The East Asia/Australasia flyway extends from Siberia and North America to the southern limits of Australia and New Zealand. It encompasses large parts of East Asia, all of Southeast Asia, and includes eastern India and the Andaman and Nicobar Islands. The scale of avian movements along the flyway is awesome, with over 50 million migratory birds using the route annually [38]. Bacterial community compositions in migratory birds from the East Asia/Australasia flyway are described in the section below.
6. Bacterial community composition in migratory birds
A comprehensive analysis of the bacterial community structure in migratory birds using culture-independent methods is introduced below.
6.1. Confirmation of avian host
For field samples, it is important to confirm that the specimens are derived from the desired avian host. Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) sequences from avian hosts are ideal for this purpose because they provide phylogenetic information and a high copy number in host cells. Kenzaka et al. [39] amplified avian host DNAs by PCR with primers L5216 (5´-ACTCTTRTTTAAGGCTTTGAAGGC-3′) and H6313 (5´-GGCCCATACCCCGRAAATG-3′) targeting the NADH dehydrogenase subunit 2 (ND2) gene and determined the sequences to confirm the avian host feces [40]. The mtDNA sequences from a variety of avian species are available in DNA database (e.g., GenBank).
6.2. Eurasian wigeon
The Eurasian wigeon (
Kenzaka et al. collected fresh feces from the Eurasian wigeon that had fallen on plant surfaces along the southern coast of Lake Biwa (Japan) [39]. From this research, most fecal sample bacterial communities were dominated by the phyla
Detected genera that have been reported in association with human pathogenicity are shown in Table 1. The genera
Genus | Relative proportion (%)a | |
---|---|---|
Eurasian wigeon | Barn swallow | |
33.2 | <0.1 | |
21.1 | <0.1 | |
16.5 | <0.1 | |
6.1 | 17.7 | |
5.7 | <0.1 | |
3.1 | 13.4 | |
0.4 | <0.1 | |
0.1 | 0.2 | |
<0.1 | 11.2 | |
<0.1 | 9.9 | |
<0.1 | 9.2 | |
<0.1 | 7.2 | |
<0.1 | 4.8 | |
<0.1 | 0.8 |
6.3. Barn swallow
The barn swallow (
In Osaka Prefecture (Japan), Kenzaka et al. collected specimens of fresh swallow feces from under a mating pair’s nest, made at the edge of a private house or artificial building [45]. Figure 2c shows the results of the bacterial community composition analysis (at the phylum level) found in swallow feces. Most fecal samples were dominated by
Table 1 shows the major genera with high abundance, namely,
6.4. Bar-headed goose
Wang et al. examined metagenomic profiling of gut microbial communities in both wild and artificially reared bar-headed geese in China [48]. The bar-headed goose (
The authors found that
At the genus level, the sequences from the wild samples represented 106 genera. Four major genera (
They also reported on functional profiling and found that artificially reared bar-headed geese had more genes related to carbohydrate transport and metabolism, energy metabolism and coenzyme transport, and metabolism, in general.
6.5. Shorebirds
Ryu et al. examined intestinal microbiota of migrating shorebirds in Delaware Bay (Delaware, United States) on Atlantic flyway using a 16S rRNA clone library [50]. The authors collected the pellets from ruddy turnstones, red knots, and semipalmated sandpipers, which use the Atlantic flyway. The flyway route generally follows the Atlantic Coast of North America and the Appalachian Mountains.
The ruddy turnstone (
Of about 4000 16S rRNA clone sequences analyzed from these shorebirds, the bacterial community was mostly composed of
6.6. Bacterial community composition in migratory and nonmigratory birds
Application of NGS for analyzing the intestinal flora of various animals, including humans, is rapidly increasing. In studies on nonmigratory birds, such as chickens, turkeys, ducks, and penguins,
In the case of the Eurasian wigeon, it was characteristic that the proportions of
Figure 3 shows the relative proportions of bacterial phylotypes in intestinal microbial communities of the Eurasian wigeon, the barn swallow, other birds, and mammals registered in DNA database GenBank. Figure 4 shows the results of principal component analysis comparing the similarities between the intestinal microbial communities of the migratory birds with other birds and mammals registered. It is highly likely that migratory birds may eat different foods from individual to individual, so differences across individuals are large compared to poultry; however, compared with other organisms (□, ■ in Figure 4), individual intestinal microbiota from the Eurasian wigeon (▼) and the swallow (○) were relatively similar. In particular, intestinal bacterial composition was found to be greatly different from mammals, such as swine, beef cattle, and dairy cattle (■). It seems that each intestinal bacterial community is formed by the food consumed, whether it is an insect meal, an herbivorous meal, an omnivorous meal, a carnivorous meal, and so on.
7. Protozoa and fungi in migratory birds
For comprehensive analysis by NGS of eukaryotic parasite, 18S rRNA gene, 28S rRNA gene, or cytochrome c oxidase I (COX1) gene on mitochondrial DNA has been used. The universal primers can amplify species across a broad variety of taxa, making them a time- and cost-effective alternative to group-specific primers. Using multiple markers may provide a broader taxonomic resolution of biological communities including diet. The diversity of sequences that can be detected by universal primers is often compromised by high concentrations of DNA templates of some groups. Moreover, up to 90% of the sequences obtained from NGS can be less-degraded host DNA [56]. If the DNA within the sample contains a small number of interesting sequences in relatively high concentrations of non-interesting sequences, less sequences are often not amplified. In this case, the use of annealing inhibiting primers which overlap with the 3′ end of one of the universal primers is effective [57]. The inclusion of primers to block host DNA amplification can increase the number of nonhost sequences significantly.
As fungi contained in the intestinal tract of seabirds,
8. Conclusion and future perspectives
The use of culture-independent methods for studying bird-associated microbial communities could prove invaluable in the expansion of our current knowledge. NGS targeting the 16S rRNA gene allows comprehensive clarification of the sampled bacterial communities and their associated movement with migratory birds. This methodology also is clarifying the details of bacterial communities, which are moving long distances with migratory birds. Since the 16S rRNA gene differs from 1 to 16 in the number of copies per cell depending on genus [60], the relative proportion obtained by NGS does not necessarily agree with the ratio of actual community composition, but the dominant populations can be ascertained. Applications of NGS will lead to a better understanding of the whole picture of the bacterial communities in migratory birds. Narrowing down the target bacteria using NGS will enable us to identify unknown pathogens or reveal the potential migration status of known pathogens that have not been noticed thus far due to methodological constraints.
The dynamics of individual pathogenic bacteria and drug-resistant bacteria need to be examined in detail in the future. By conducting community composition investigations in parallel with functional investigations (e.g., drug resistance), these methods will lead to an understanding of the mechanisms by which multidrug-resistant bacteria spread around the world.
Addressing the current implications of birds as potential vectors of pathogenic bacteria is of great interest. Analysis of the indigenous bacterial flora of migratory birds may highlight the importance of human hygiene and the environmental significance of microbial transfer associated with natural avian migratory patterns. When wild birds are vectors of disease, it is important to identify the true source of the infectious organisms. NGS, being a culture-independent method, will facilitate further understanding of the complexities and interactions of the genera inherently present in the avian gut and of those acquired from the environment.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the JSPS Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) (15K00571) and Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas (15H05946). We thank Takashi Fujimitsu, Kenji Kataoka, and Yuina Ishimoto for technical assistance during this work.
References
- 1.
Benskin CM, Wilson K, Jones K, Hartley IR. Bacterial pathogens in wild birds: A review of the frequency and effects of infection. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society. 2009; 84 (3):349-373. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2008.00076.x - 2.
Anderson JF, Andreadis TG, Vossbrinck CR, Tirrell S, Wakem EM, French RA, Garmendia AE, Van Kruiningen HJ. Isolation of West Nile virus from mosquitoes, crows, and a Cooper's hawk in Connecticut. Science. 1999; 286 (5448):2331-2333. DOI: 10.1126/science.286.5448.2331 - 3.
Hurt AC, Vijaykrishna D, Butler J, Baas C, Maurer-Stroh S, Silva-de-la-Fuente MC, Medina-Vogel G, Olsen B, Kelso A, Barr IG, González-Acuña D. Detection of evolutionarily distinct avian influenza a viruses in Antarctica. MBio. 2014; 5 (3):e01098-e010914. DOI: 10.1128/mBio.01098-14 - 4.
Plutzer J, Tomor B. The role of aquatic birds in the environmental dissemination of human pathogenic Giardia duodenalis cysts andCryptosporidium oocysts in Hungary. Parasitology International. 2009;58 (3):227-231. DOI: 10.1016/j.parint.2009.05.004 - 5.
Petersen KD, Christensen JP, Permin A, Bisgaard M. Virulence of Pasteurella multocida subsp. multocida isolated from outbreaks of fowl cholera in wild birds for domestic poultry and game birds. Avian Pathology. 2001;30 (1):27-31. DOI: 10.1080/03079450020023168 - 6.
Hubálek Z. An annotated checklist of pathogenic microorganisms associated with migratory birds. Journal of Wildlife Diseases. 2004; 40 (4):639-659. DOI: 10.7589/0090-3558-40.4.639 - 7.
Bonnedahl J, Järhult JD. Antibiotic resistance in wild birds. Upsala Journal of Medical Sciences. 2014; 119 (2):113-116. DOI: 10.3109/03009734.2014.905663 - 8.
Abulreesh HH, Goulder R, Scott GW. Wild birds and human pathogens in the context of ringing and migration. Ringing & Migration. 2007; 23 (4):193-200. DOI: 10.1080/03078698.2007.9674363 - 9.
Novais RC, Thorstenson YR. The evolution of pyrosequencing(R) for microbiology: From genes to genomes. Journal of Microbiological Methods. 2010; 86 (1):1-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2011.04.006 - 10.
Brittingham MC, Temple SA, Duncan RM. A survey of the prevalence of selected bacteria in wild birds. Journal of Wildlife Diseases. 1988; 24 (2):299-307. DOI: 10.7589/0090-3558-24.2.299 - 11.
Kapperud G, Rosef O. Avian wildlife reservoir of Campylobacter fetus subsp. jejuni,Yersinia spp., andSalmonella spp. in Norway. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 1983;45 (2):375-380 - 12.
Waldenström J, Broman T, Carlsson I, Hasselquist D, Achterberg RP, Wagenaar JA, Olsen B. Prevalence of Campylobacter jejuni ,Campylobacter lari , andCampylobacter coli in different ecological guilds and taxa of migrating birds. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2002;68 (12):5911-5917. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.68.12.5911-5917.2002 - 13.
Buck JD. Isolation of Candida albicans and halophilicVibrio spp. from aquatic birds in Connecticut and Florida. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 1990;56 (3):826-828 - 14.
Varslot M, Resell J, Fostad IG. Water-borne campylobacter infection--probably caused by pink-footed geese. Two outbreaks in Nord-Trøndelag, Stjørtdal in 1994 and Verdal in 1995. Tidsskrift for den Norske Lægeforening. 1996; 116 (28):3366-3369 - 15.
Alley MR, Connolly JH, Fenwick SG, Mackereth GF, Leyland MJ, Rogers LE, Haycock M, Nicol C, Reed CE. An epidemic of salmonellosis caused by Salmonella Typhimurium DT160 in wild birds and humans in New Zealand. New Zealand Veterinary Journal. 2002;50 (5):170-176. DOI: 10.1080/00480169.2002.36306 - 16.
Thornley CN, Simmons GC, Callaghan ML, Nicol CM, Baker MG, Gilmore KS, Garrett NK. First incursion of Salmonella enterica serotype typhimurium DT160 into New Zealand. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 2003;9 (4):493-495. DOI: 10.3201/eid0904.020439 - 17.
HS X, Roberts N, Singleton FL, Attwell RW, Grimes DJ, Colwell RR. Survival and viability of nonculturable Escherichia coli andVibrio cholerae in the estuarine and marine environment. Microbial Ecology. 1982;8 (4):313-323. DOI: 10.1007/BF02010671 - 18.
Yamaguchi N, Kenzaka T, Nasu M. Rapid in situ enumeration of physiologically active bacteria in river waters using fluorescent probes. Microbes and Environments. 1997; 12 (1):1-8. DOI: 10.1264/jsme2.12.1 - 19.
Kenzaka T, Yamaguchi N, Utrarachkij F, Suthienkul O, Nasu M. Rapid identification and enumeration of antibiotic resistant bacteria in urban canals by microcolony-fluorescence in situ hybridization. Journal of Health Science. 2006; 52 (6):703-710. DOI: 10.1248/jhs.52.703 - 20.
Kenzaka T, Yamaguchi N, Tani K, Nasu M. rRNA-targeted fluorescent in situ hybridization analysis of bacterial community structure in river water. Microbiology. 1998; 144 (8):2085-2093. DOI: 10.1099/00221287-144-8-2085 - 21.
Kenzaka T, Utrarachkij F, Suthienkul O, Nasu M. Rapid monitoring of Escherichia coli in Southeast Asian urban canals by fluorescent-bacteriophage assay. Journal of Health Science. 2006;52 (6):666-671. DOI: 10.1248/jhs.52.666 - 22.
Kenzaka T, Ishidoshiro A, Yamaguchi N, Tani K, Nasu M. rRNA sequence-based scanning electron microscopic detection of bacteria. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2005; 71 (9):5523-5531. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.71.9.5523-5531.2005 - 23.
Kenzaka T, Tani K, Nasu M. High-frequency phage-mediated gene transfer in freshwater environments determined at single-cell level. The ISME Journal. 2010; 4 (5):648-659. DOI: 10.1038/ismej.2009.145 - 24.
Iwamoto T, Tani K, Nakamura K, Suzuki Y, Kitagawa M, Eguchi M, Nasu M. Monitoring impact of in situ biostimulation treatment on groundwater bacterial community by DGGE. FEMS Microbiology Ecology. 2000; 32 (2):129-141. DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2000.tb00707.x - 25.
Kawai M, Matsutera E, Kanda H, Yamaguchi N, Tani K, Nasu M. 16S ribosomal DNA-based analysis of bacterial diversity in purified water used in pharmaceutical manufacturing processes by PCR and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2002; 68 (2):699-704. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.68.2.699-704.2002 - 26.
Mardis E, Next-generation DNA. Sequencing method. Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics. 2008; 9 :387-402. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.genom.9.081307.16435 - 27.
Morozova O, Marra MA. Applications of next-generation sequencing technologies in functional genomics. Genomics. 2008; 92 (5):255-264. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2008.07.001 - 28.
Jovel J, Patterson J, Wang W, Hotte N, O'Keefe S, Mitchel T, Perry T, Kao D, Mason AL, Madsen KL, Wong GK. Characterization of the gut microbiome using 16S or shotgun metagenomics. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2016; 7 :459. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00459 - 29.
Pabinger S, Rödiger S, Kriegner A, Vierlinger K, Weinhäusel A. A survey of tools for the analysis of quantitative PCR (qPCR) data. Biomolecular Detection and Quantification. 2014; 1 (1):23-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.bdq.2014.08.002 - 30.
Lane DJ, Pace B, Olsen GJ, Stahl DA, Sogin ML, Pace NR. Rapid determination of 16S ribosomal RNA sequences for phylogenetic analyses. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1985; 82 (20):6955-6959. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.82.20.6955 - 31.
Tringe SG, Hugenholtz P. A renaissance for the pioneering 16S rRNA gene. Current Opinion in Microbiology. 2008; 11 (5):442-446. DOI: 10.1016/j.mib.2008.09.011 - 32.
Baker GC, Smith JJ, Cowan DA. Review and re-analysis of domain-specific 16S primers. Journal of Microbiological Methods. 2003; 55 (3):541-555. DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2003.08.009 - 33.
Wang Y, Qian PY. Conservative fragments in bacterial 16S rRNA genes and primer design for 16S ribosomal DNA amplicons in metagenomic studies. PLoS One. 2009; 4 (10):e7401. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0007401 - 34.
Yang B, Wang Y, Qian PY. Sensitivity and correlation of hypervariable regions in 16S rRNA genes in phylogenetic analysis. BMC Bioinformatics. 2016; 17 :135. DOI: 10.1186/s12859-016-0992-y - 35.
Sekercioglu CH. Conservation ecology: Area trumps mobility in fragment bird extinctions. Current Biology. 2007; 17 (8):R283-R286. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.02.019 - 36.
Hedenström A. Extreme endurance migration: What is the limit to non-stop flight? PLoS Biology. 2010; 8 (5):e1000362. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000362 - 37.
Kirby JS, Stattersfield AJ, Butchart SHM, Evans MI, Grimmett RFA, Jones VR, O'Sullivan J, Tucker GM, Newton I. Key conservation issues for migratory land- and waterbird species on the world's major flyways. Bird Conservation International. 2008; 18 (S1):S49-S73. DOI: 10.1017/S0959270908000439 - 38.
Yong DL, Liu Y, Low BW, Espanola CP, Choi CY, Kawakami K. Migratory songbirds in the East Asian-Australasian flyway: A review from a conservation perspective. Bird Conservation International. 2015; 25 (1):1-37. DOI: 10.1017/S0959270914000276 - 39.
Kenzaka T, Fujimitsu T, Kataoka K, Tani K. Intestinal microbiota in migrating Eurasian wigeon around Lake Biwa. Journal of Antibacterial and Antifungal Agents. 2018 (in press) - 40.
Sorenson MD, Ast JC, Dimcheff DE, Yuri T, Mindell DP. Primers for a PCR-based approach to mitochondrial genome sequencing in birds and other vertebrates. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 1999; 12 (2):105-114. DOI: 10.1006/mpev.1998.0602 - 41.
BirdLife International. Mareca penelope (amended version published in 2016) the IUCN red list of threatened species 2017: E.T22680157A111892532. 2017. DOI: 10.2305/IUCN.UK.2017-1.RLTS.T22680157A111892532.en - 42.
Keller JI, Shriver WG, Waldenström J, Griekspoor P, Olsen B. Prevalence of Campylobacter in wild birds of the mid-Atlantic region, USA. Journal of Wildlife Diseases. 2011;47 (3):750-754. DOI: 10.7589/0090-3558-47.3.750 - 43.
Hellström S, Kiviniemi K, Autio T, Korkeala H. Listeria monocytogenes is common in wild birds in Helsinki region and genotypes are frequently similar with those found along the food chain. Journal of Applied Microbiology. 2008;104 (3):883-888. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2007.03604.x - 44.
BirdLife International. Hirundo rustica . The IUCN red list of threatened species 2016: E.T22712252A87461332. 2016. DOI: 10.2305/IUCN.UK.2016-3.RLTS.T22712252A87461332.en - 45.
Kenzaka T, Kataoka K, Fujimitsu T, Tani K. Intestinal microbiota in migrating barn swallows around Osaka. Yakugaku Zasshi. 2018 in press - 46.
Engels C, Ruscheweyh HJ, Beerenwinkel N, Lacroix C, Schwab C. The common gut microbe Eubacterium hallii also contributes to intestinal propionate formation. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2016;7 :713. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00713 - 47.
Gorvitovskaia A, Holmes SP, Huse SM. Interpreting Prevotella andBacteroides as biomarkers of diet and lifestyle. Microbiome. 2016;4 :15. DOI: 10.1186/s40168-016-0160-7 - 48.
Wang W, Zheng S, Sharshov K, Sun H, Yang F, Wang X, Li L, Xiao Z. Metagenomic profiling of gut microbial communities in both wild and artificially reared bar-headed goose ( Anser indicus ). Microbiology. 2017;6 (2):e00429. DOI: 10.1002/mbo3.429 - 49.
BirdLife International. Anser indicus . The IUCN red list of threatened species 2016: E.T22679893A92834171. 2016. DOI: 10.2305/IUCN.UK.2016-3.RLTS.T22679893A92834171.en - 50.
Ryu H, Grond K, Verheijen B, Elk M, Buehler DM, Santo Domingo JW. Intestinal microbiota and species diversity of Campylobacter andHelicobacter spp. in migrating shorebirds in Delaware Bay. Microbiome. 2014;80 (6):1838-1847. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.03793-13 - 51.
BirdLife International. Arenaria interpres . The IUCN red list of threatened species 2016: E.T22693336A86589171. 2016. DOI: 10.2305/IUCN.UK.2016-3.RLTS.T22693336A86589171.en - 52.
BirdLife International. Calidris canutus . (amended version published in 2016) the IUCN red list of threatened species 2017: E.T22693363A111379432. 2017. DOI: 10.2305/IUCN.UK.2017-1.RLTS.T22693363A111379432.en - 53.
Dewar ML, Arnould JP, Dann P, Trathan P, Groscolas R, Smith S. Interspecific variations in the gastrointestinal microbiota in penguins. Microbiology. 2013; 28 (1):195-204. DOI: 10.1002/mbo3.66 - 54.
Waite DW, Taylor MW. Exploring the avian gut microbiota: Current trends and future directions. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2015; 6 :673. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00673 - 55.
Barbosa A, Balagué V, Valera F, Martínez A, Benzal J, Motas M, Diaz JI, Mira A, Pedrós-Alió C. Age-related differences in the gastrointestinal microbiota of chinstrap penguins ( Pygoscelis antarctica ). PLoS One. 2016;11 (4):e0153215. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153215 - 56.
Shehzad W, Riaz T, Nawaz MA, Miquel C, Poillot C, Shah SA, Pompanon F, Coissac E, Taberlet P. Carnivore diet analysis based on next-generation sequencing: Application to the leopard cat ( Prionailurus bengalensis ) in Pakistan. Molecular Ecology. 2012;21 (8):1951-1965. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05424.x - 57.
Vestheim H, Jarman SN. Blocking primers to enhance PC amplification of rare sequences in mixed samples – A case study on prey DNA in Antarctic krill stomachs. Frontiers in Zoology. 2008; 5 :12. DOI: 10.1186/1742-9994-5-12 - 58.
McInnes JC, Alderman R, Deagle BE, Lea M-A, Raymond B, Jarman SN. Optimised scat collection protocols for dietary DNA metabarcoding in vertebrates. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 2017; 8 (2):192-202. DOI: 10.1111/2041-210X.12677 - 59.
Bowser AK, Diamond AW, Addison JA. From puffins to plankton: A DNA-based analysis of a seabird food chain in the northern gulf of Maine. PLoS One. 2013; 8 (12):e83152. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083152 - 60.
Stoddard SF, Smith BJ, Hein R, Roller BRK, Schmidt TM. rrnDB: Improved tools for interpreting rRNA gene abundance in bacteria and archaea and a new foundation for future development. Nucleic Acids Research. 2015; 43 :D593-D598. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gku1201