Link to this chapter Copy to clipboard
Cite this chapter Copy to clipboard
Embed this chapter on your site Copy to clipboard
Embed this code snippet in the HTML of your website to show this chapter
Open access peer-reviewed chapter
By Mark D. Holmes
Submitted: October 20th 2010Reviewed: May 27th 2011Published: September 15th 2011
Electroencephalographic (EEG) signals derive from the action of neuronal activity in the cerebral cortex, through the action of synchronously occurring post-synaptic potentials of neuronal masses (De Munck et al., 1992). Forming reciprocal combinations of interacting excitatory and inhibitory populations, these neuronal masses are believed to be the sources of the macroscopic EEG signal recorded on the scalp (Freeman, 1975; Wilson & Cowan, 1973; Lopes da Silva & van Leeuwen, 1978). In individuals with epilepsy, seizures emerge from ongoing cortical activity through incompletely understood mechanisms, but are likely related to a wide variety of biochemical, anatomic, physiologic, or genetic aberrations (Avanzini & Franceschetti, 2003; Bragin et al., 2002; D’Ambrosio et al., 2004; D’Ambrosio et al., 2005; Nemani & Binder, 2005; Noebels, 2003; Shah et al., 2004; Stables et al., 2002; White 2002).
For over 50 years the paroxysmal EEG signals (“spikes” or “sharp waves”) recorded on the scalp, reflecting the abnormal behavior of cortical neuronal populations, have remained the most important laboratory findings in the clinical evaluation of patients with epilepsy (Niedermeyer, 1999). However, despite the indispensable role of the EEG, the standard assessment has significant limitations. Typically, 16-21 electrodes are placed over the upper portions of the cranium, and under these circumstances distances between individual electrodes are several cm, resulting in inadequate spatial resolution, and an even poorer assessment of cortical activity in basal brain regions. Research on the spatial frequency spectrum suggests that to maximize spatial information of the human EEG (“spatial Nyquist”), interelectrode distances on the cortical surface must be within 1.25 mm (Freeman et al, 2000), and on the scalp, less than 10 mm (Freeman, 2003). As a consequence, analysis of standard EEG recordings yields poor spatial resolution, often results in failure to detect significant pathology, and provides only limited insight into the extent of the involved cortical network and patterns of discharge propagation. It is anticipated that when detailed knowledge of the specific cortical regions activated during epileptiform discharges becomes readily available, that such information will prove to be critical in understanding the nature of an individual subject’s seizures and in improving therapy (Spencer, 2002).
Major technological advances are becoming available and will likely change the role and utility of scalp-recorded EEG. One of these advances is the capability for rapid application of a dense array of electrodes, a technique that may also now be employed in the context of continuous longterm EEG video monitoring (LTM) (Thompson et al, 2008). Recording systems with up to 256 electrodes can provide coverage that includes face and neck, with the goal of “sampling” basal brain regions (e.g. inferior frontal and basal temporal areas), as well the convexity of the cerebrum. By increasing spatial sampling and decreasing the distance between electrodes, dense array EEG (dEEG) results in markedly improved spatial resolution from scalp EEG data (Lantz et al., 2003). Another important technological advance is in the development of physical models of head tissues that allow estimation of neural sources of the EEG (Michel et al., 2001). The combination of superior spatial resolution and sophisticated methods of source analysis, with results registered on realistic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) models, results in more precise information on electrographic pathology that may be extracted from the scalp EEG (Phillips et al, 2002; Michel et al., 2004).
With this background in perspective, the purpose of this paper is to describe our research in dense array EEG as it applies to epilepsy. The review will include a discussion of the insight that this research has provided in understanding the nature of epileptic circuits, the potential role of dEEG in evaluating difficult seizures, and the direction of future technological developments.
A 256-channel Geodesic Sensor Net (EGI, Inc, Eugene OR, USA) is applied to each person during the recordings, requiring 10-30 min for application and adjustment (Fig. 1). The net is constructed to include electrode coverage over the face and neck. For an average adult head, interelectrode distances are approximately 20-25 mm. The EEG-amplifier used in our research includes a bandpass of 0.1 to 400 Hz, sampling rate up to 1000 Hz, 16-bit analog-digital conversion, and noise levels engineered typically to 0.6 microvolts root-mean-square. Impedances are maintained at less than 50,000 ohms, consistent with the high input impedance amplifiers employed (Ferree et al., 2001). Continuous longterm EEG-video monitoring (LTM) with dEEG is also now feasible, and we have employed this technique to capture seizures in over 50 patients with medically refractory localization-related seizures, with continuous recordings up to 24-96 hours (Thompson et al., 2008). In our investigations on subjects with refractory generalized seizures, recordings are performed on an outpatient basis, with recording times of sufficient duration to record discharges (60-90 minutes) and with no reduction in subjects’ antiseizure medications; these recordings include waking and, and in most cases, drowsy or sleep states.
The 256 channel dEEG is recorded with a common vertex reference, and re-referenced digitally to various montages for inspection, including the average reference. Because of the improved coverage of the inferior head surface, the average reference allows the potential at each index electrode to be examined with reference to an estimate of the zero potential of the head (Bertrand et al., 1985; Dien, 1998; Junghofer et al., 1999). The average-referenced EEG waveforms are examined with topographic waveform plots, a technique that allows inspection of geometric distribution of the potential fields. In addition, topographic maps are created with spherical spline interpolation (Perrin et al., 1987). Dynamic scalp topography of epileptiform discharges with animations can be created at variable time intervals (Tucker at al., 1994).
The principal goal of our research efforts in dEEG is to noninvasively localize brain regions that are involved in the onset and distribution of epileptiform discharges. In other words, our efforts are aimed at solving the “inverse problem”, which in this case is to determine the location of electrical signals originating from the cerebral cortex from recordings obtained on the closed surface of the head. Since there is no unique solution to the inverse problem, achieving viable answers begins with the construction of a brain and head model (“forward model”), based on biologically realistic assumptions, such as the geometry and the electrical properties of head tissues and assuming the cortical origin of scalp-recorded brain signals (Nunez & Srinivasan, 2006). In brief, the method of solving the inverse problem involves use of an appropriate forward model used in conjunction with an inverse algorithm for source analysis. It is important to emphasize that, regardless of the sophistication of the source analysis, the final results may be misleading if the scalp data lacks adequate spatial resolution, or if the researcher fails to recognize or account for non-cerebral artifacts (such as eye movements and muscle potentials) that often contaminate scalp EEG.
As first step in this analysis, one technique of constructing the forward model is specification of an ellipsoidal head with four homogeneous shells: brain, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), skull, and scalp. Conductivity ratios that may be used include 1.0 (CSF),.3300 (brain),.0042 (skull), and.3300 (scalp); tissue thicknesses may be specified as 1.0 mm (CSF), 7.0 mm (skull), and 6.0 mm (scalp), with head radius set to 92.5 mm (Berg & Scherg, 1994 ). An improvement in the forward model may be accomplished by inclusion of a realistic model of head conductivity with finite difference computations (Salman et al., 2005). To provide solutions that are consistent with source analysis techniques regional sources are selected (with dipole moments in three orthogonal directions of space) that are most adequate to describe the discharge complex. Dipole locations are visualized in relation to a standard brain MRI model, with electrodes positioned in relation to skull landmarks in accordance with the international (10-20) EEG system (nasion, periaurcular points), and co-registered with the head conductivity model. The positions of the electrodes, with respect to the standard MRI model, are determined by fitting actual 256-channel locations used in the source localization software. These locations are the average cartesian coordinates of the digitized locations from five normal adult subjects.
Several independent methods have been employed in research in regard to the inverse algorithm component to identify electrographic sources, including linear inverse techniques (Pasqual-Marqui et al., 2002; Grave de Peralta Menendez et al., 2004) and equivalent dipole methods (Scherg & Ebersole, 1994; Scherg et al., 2002). Most of our research has utilized the linear inverse method of local autoregressive average (LAURA), which weights the solution distribution so that sources are continuous with nearby activity (Grave de Peralta Menendez et al., 2004). Because the vector fields of electrical sources fall off with the cube of distance (and the potential fields with the square of distance), the LAURA method constrains the solution with a weighting function that assumes the result will have a spatial smoothness with this physical property. The LAURA inverse solutions are implemented within the GeoSource software package used in our research (
One method to test the validity of dEEG is with direct comparison with intracranial EEG recordings performed in the same patients (Holmes et al., 2008; Holmes et al., 2010a). In order to accomplish this, seizures must be captured using dEEG LTM. We have studied 10 consecutive patients with medically refractory localization-related epilepsy, all surgical candidates, who underwent noninvasive evaluation with dEEG LTM studies prior to intracranial EEG recordings. At least twelve months of postoperative clinical outcome for each patient is available.
Standard methods in these 10 subjects, which included, as appropriate in each case, high resolution MRI examinations, standard scalp EEG LTM, single photon emission tomography (SPECT) imaging, positron emission tomography (PET) imaging, neuropsychological testing, and detailed neurological examination, failed to provide adequate ictal localization. For this reason, all individuals required invasive EEG studies to define ictal onsets. Patients with skull defects or previous brain surgery were not offered dEEG studies, since these would affect source analysis methods. The subjects included 7 males and 3 females, with age range 12-49 years
Prior to intracranial monitoring, the subjects were hospitalized and underwent continuous video-EEG recording long enough to capture one or more habitual seizure, using the 256 channel EEG system, with the exception of one subject, who was studied with 128 channels. The hospital stay was generally shorter (24-96 hours), compared to standard LTM.
The first steps in evaluating the data include screening for artifacts, and removing or digitally interpolating channels degraded by artifact or poor contact (Perrin et al., 1987); from zero to 10 channels were interpolated in the typical 256 dEEG LTM recording in this series. The next phase of analysis typically includes the following: 1) Before actual EEG review, the video recordings are analyzed to determine ictal semiology and time of onset of clinical seizures. 2) The initial electrographic analysis consists of review of the continuous EEG data. Montages using the traditional clinical 10-20 electrode array (30 mm/sec) are first inspected for the purposes of orienting to the head topography and to obtain a general estimate when the ictal onset most likely occurs. 3) EEG characteristics that signify the onset of the seizure are then isolated. This part of the evaluation is complex and subjective because there are often multiple clues to the onset of the seizure, as with any clinical EEG evaluation. Such clues may take place across a considerable amount of time, ranging from milliseconds to seconds, to even minutes. It is not possible simply to select one sample for source localization and consistent findings across multiple seizures increase confidence in the results. The clinical neurophysiologist’s interpretation is required to separate the electrographic signs of seizure onset from other EEG features, many of which may be pathological but not indicative of the seizure. For example, in some patients recurring spikes are observed prior to the fully developed seizure; often these early spikes are important for localizing the potential onset of the seizure. In other patients, the EEG may appear relatively “quiescent” prior to the onset of the seizure and more subtle clues are sought, such as slow oscillations (0.5-7 Hz), or focal rhythmic or arrhythmic slowing proximal to the fully developed seizure. 4) Review of the topographic EEG display (topographic waveform plot) of all 256 channels further aids in spatially isolating distinct epileptiform patterns that occur prior to and during the onset of the seizure. With an accurate average reference formed from 256 surface potential channels (approximating the zero sum of all cortical dipoles), the topographic waveform plot illustrates the phase reversals and thus approximate neural sources of epileptiform events. In many cases, ictal patterns emerge when all 256 channels are displayed that are not obvious using only subsampled, standard 10-20 chart views (Fig. 2). 5) Topographic mapping examinations of the electrical potentials at the surfaces of the brain are often aided by two-dimensional Laplacian (the spatial second derivative) computations, using the potentials with spherical splines, in order to estimate radial scalp current density (Tucker et al., 1994).
The invasive EEG recordings obtained in all 10 cases were necessitated by the fact that the initial standard noninvasive evaluation failed to reveal adequate information upon which surgical therapy could be planned. The indications, type of electrodes (subdural grid or strip electrodes), location of electrode placement, and duration of recordings were based on standard clinical criteria. The neurosurgeon was aware of the dense array recordings prior to placement of subdural arrays. However, interpretations of the invasive recordings were made without reference to the dense array predictions of seizure onset, and brain resections were based solely on the analysis of ictal onsets obtained from the invasive EEG recordings. Of the nine subjects who underwent surgery, eight underwent resections, while one underwent multiple subpial transections (MST), since her seizures originated, in part, within hand motor cortex (Morrell et al., 1989). One subject, who had bitemporal epilepsy, was judged not to be a candidate for resective surgery.
We found ictal localization, estimated from dense array EEG studies, convergent (within approximately 3 cm) in 8 of 10 patients with the intracranial data (Fig. 3). In the two cases where we found divergence of ictal localization, lateralization was the same using both modalities. In two subjects, we found more than one ictal focus with intracranial studies; one of the two foci for each of these two cases was found with dense array recordings. In all instances, the recording times for intracranial LTM (range 7-20 days) exceeded that of dense array LTM. More seizures were recorded during invasive studies compared to dense array recordings, as a result of the longer recording time for intracranial recordings, in nine of the 10 patients.
All patients in the series have been followed at least twelve months after surgery (range 12-40 months). Recorded outcomes are based on both an approximate percentage of seizure reduction and the corresponding Engel classification of postsurgical outcome (Engel et al., 1993). The nine patients who underwent resections or MST were either seizure-free (two patients) or had a clinically significant improvement in seizure frequency or severity at the time of most recent postoperative clinic visit (Engel class 1, 2, or 3). Nonspecific gliosis proved to be the most commonly observed pathological finding.
A detailed study of one case report in this series is illustrative (Holmes et al., 2008). A 13 y/o girl presented with medically refractory, daily complex partial seizures since age 5. Her attacks, each lasting 30-60 sec, consist of the onset of confusion with orofacial and upper extremity automatisms. Standard EEG studies disclosed left occipital and left parietal spikes. Ictal onsets from standard LTM were found to be of probable left posterior quadrant onset, but were poorly localized. MRI was normal. DEEG LTM studies captured one of her typical seizures and disclosed that the seizure originated from left posterior inferior occipital lobe. Within one sec, ictal propagation to right posterior temporal-occipital cortex, and then back to left parietal cortex was found. The patient subsequently underwent invasive LTM, with intracranial subdural grid electrodes placed over left posterior quadrant, and subdural strip electrodes placed bilaterally over posterior quadrants and basal temporal regions. Both ictal onsets and propagation patterns recorded from the invasive EEG studies corresponded closely to that found on the dEEG studies. Surgery was carried out, based on the results of the invasive studies, and the patient has been seizure-free 35 months after resection.
Interictal dense array EEG studies may be conducted on a short-term, outpatient basis (Phillips et al., 2002; Holmes et al., 2005; Michel et al., 2004) to capture interictal epileptiform discharges. In a study (Holmes et al., 2005) of eight subjects, all surgical candidates, spikes were detected with Reveal software (
The conventional classification of epileptic seizures is based on the International League Against Epilepsy dichotomy that epileptic seizures are either “partial” (localization-related) or “generalized” (Commission on Classification and Terminology of the International League Against Epilepsy, 1989). This scheme implies that partial seizures have discrete focal origins, while generalized seizures are assumed to occur without lateralizing or localizing features that include bilateral, global cortical activation at ictal onset (Panayiotopoulos, 2002). Experimental evidence that implicates thalamic and thalmocortical mechanisms in the pathophysiology of generalized seizures has been offered as an explanation for the apparently “generalized” nature of these seizures (Gloor, 1978; McCormick, 2002; Slaght et al., 2002).
The absence seizure is often considered the prototypic idiopathic generalized seizure. Although the concept of generalized seizures persists in clinical practice, traditional EEG visual analysis emphasized a frontal preponderance of the spike-wave complexes in absence (Niedermeyer, 1999) and early studies in source analysis suggested that, although bilateral at onset, the ictal patterns in absence localized to frontal cortex (Rodin et al., 1994). Research using dense array EEG provides further evidence that the traditional concept of “generalized” epilepsy may not be accurate. Recent studies of absence in five patients using 256 channel dEEG recordings showed that both at onset and during propagation, the discharges in absence are associated with activation of only discrete regions of mainly medial frontal and orbital frontal cortex (Holmes et al., 2004). Detailed studies of the ictal discharges in absence, the onsets of which develop rapidly, suggest that the waveforms may best be described as “wave-spike”, rather than “spike-wave”. Though individual variability between subjects may exist, typically the intial slow wave follows oscillations localized to medial frontal regions, then exhibits anterior propagation and abrupt transition over the frontal pole as a positive spike displaces the diffuse anterior negative slow wave, with the discharge then sweeping posteriorly along the orbital frontal cortex.
Separately, Tucker et al (Tucker et al., 2007) analyzed the same data collected for the Holmes et al., 2004 study, using the LAURA inverse, and an improved high resolution finite difference head conductivity model, that showed a “flatmap” display of the cortical surface using GeoSource software. Overall, the results were convergent with the earlier report. For each seizure in each patient the slow wave of the wave-spike cycle engaged networks of mainly medial frontal, and occasionally temporal, cortical networks. Invariably, this was followed by primary current source distribution in ventromedial frontal cortex during the abrupt wave-spike transition. Although differences were found between individual patients, particularly during in the slow wave and the oscillatory EEG changes in the second or so prior to ictal onset, each seizure rapidly progressed to a stereotyped pattern with major spike discharges localized to midline frontal networks.
We also evaluated epileptiform discharges in 10 patients with the idiopathic generalized epilepsy syndrome of juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME) (Holmes et al, 2010b). In this syndrome, seizures begin typically in adolescence, do not remit, and may be characterized by absence, myoclonic, or generalized tonic-clonic attacks. The neurological examination and magnetic resonance imaging studies are normal, and discharges (based on standard EEG) is classically shown to exhibit generalized 4-6 Hz spike or multiple spike-slow wave complexes. In this study, each subject underwent 1-2 hours of outpatient recording using a 256 channel dEEG system and epileptiform discharges were captured in all cases. Analysis of epileptiform patterns disclosed that in many cases the results were, not surprisingly, similar to absence, with activation of mesial frontal and orbital frontal regions found in all cases (Figs 4, 5). Involvement of other midline regions (anterior or posterior cingulum) was observed in 4/10 subjects. Importantly, in 6/10 (60%) of the patients, the epileptiform circuit included mesial temporal lobe. The common denominator in all cases of JME is engagement of orbitofrontal and medial frontal cortical regions. Independent research findings from other investigators who have examined JME and absence epilepsy with other modalities, including MRI volumetric analysis (Tae et al., 2008), diffuse tensor imaging (Deppe et al., 2006), magnetic resonance spectroscopy (Lin et al., 2009), and functional MRI (Bai et al, 2010) have all implicated focal cortical involvement in ”generalized epilepsies”, particularly discrete regions of frontal and temporal lobe
Epileptic seizures may involve only specific cortical networks. Analysis of ictal patterns in both generalized and localization-related seizures with dense array EEG leads to an interpretation that all seizures, including those classified as “generalized”, involve only specific cortical networks. The standard classification of epileptic seizures is a reflection of the inadequacy of conventional EEG analysis, where spatial resolution is at best limited. Furthermore, consideration of the regions of cortical involvement at the onset and during propagation may also lead to the hypothesis that epileptic seizures may be considered as fundamentally corticothalamic or corticolimbic in nature. Discharges in absence seizures and in JME invariably involve discrete regions of orbital and medial frontal cortex, and by inference that is based on mammalian research, the thalamic reticular nucleus (TRN), with sparing of limbic circuits (Futatsugi & Riviello, 1998; Steriade, 2003). Absence may be the prototype of the corticothalamic (“generalized”) seizure in which corticothalmic mechanisms interact with TRN networks and therefore influence thalamocortical projections and widespread cortical regions (Zikopoulos & Barbas, 2006). In contrast, the temporal lobe seizure may be the prototype of the corticolimbic (“localization-related” or “partial” seizure. However, some frontal lobe seizures may also show spread to ventomedial frontal cortex, in a manner similar to absence, and thus may also be considered as “corticothalamic” seizures. On the other hand, some extratemporal seizures show propagation to temporal lobe structures. Seizures classically considered to be localization-related may therefore exhibit patterns consistent with primary involvement of either corticothalamic or corticolimbic circuits. The detailed study of the specific networks involved in the major types of epileptic seizures may have broader implications as well. Close examination of how consciousness breaks down in epileptic seizures most certainly offers clues to the underlying mechanisms that bind consciousness within the large-scale networks of the cerebral cortex (Tucker & Holmes, 2011).
In addition to suggesting new insights into anatomical mechanisms of epilepsy, dEEG may be useful in assisting in localizing the site of seizure onset. Ideally, this determination should be made noninvasively, but in, practice, at least 30-50% of surgical candidates will require some form of intracranial EEG evaluation, including the majority of individuals with difficult extratemporal epilepsy (Holmes, 2006). DEEG may hold the promise to assist in ictal localization, when standard EEG methods fail, and may reduce the need for invasive studies. However, the present evidence is preliminary, as presented earlier in this chapter, and further research and validation studies are needed to establish the precise role of this technique in the presurgical evaluation; such research is necessary since complete concordance of dEEG and intracranial EEG findings is not yet available. At the very least, however, it is likely that dEEG will eventually assist in guiding the placement of invasive electrodes in some cases. As a corollary, the method may also eventually assist in planning the intracranial placement of novel treatment devices (Motamedi & Lesser, 2006). Unique methods of analyzing interictal segments of dEEG may also prove useful in localizing the epileptogenic zone. A recent study that analyzed one-minute randon, interictal segments of seizure and spike-free dEEG found that the intracranially proven epileptogenic zone corresponded closely to regions of focal increases in scalp dEEG 20-50 Hz synchronization and simultaneous decreases in coupling of theta and gamma frequencies (Fig. 6) (Ramon et al., 2008)
In addition to the role that the method may play in assisting in defining the epileptogenic in the presurgical evaluation, dEEG may also prove useful in lateralizing, and even localizing, essential language regions and motor function. A recent study in surgical candidates that exmained covert naming revealed that focal increases in power of 3-7 Hz and 20-50 Hz frequencies on dEEG lateralized to the same language-dominant side as predicted by the Wada test (Ramon et al., 2009a). These patterns are not apparent on standard EEG, again emphasizing the importance of improved spatial resolution provided by dEEG. Another study that examined motor mapping of thumb and little finger using subject-specific head models and simultaneous dEEG and fMRI demonstrated convergence between the two modalities (Luu & Tucker, 2010).
Technological development in dense array EEG is anticipated in several areas with the aims of improving methodology and reliability. Firstly, the current forward model used in source analysis calculations, which utilizes a standard MRI or ellipsoidal multi-shell model, may be replaced by the individual patient’s own MRI. Research is currently underway to feasibly incorporate patient-specific MRIs into source analysis algorithms. Secondly, more than 256 electrodes may eventually be recorded simultaneously from the scalp. Given that the spatial Nyquist of the human scalp EEG necessitates intersensor distances less than 3-5 mm (Freeman et al, 2003), as many as 1500 electrodes, or more, may be required to reduce interelectrode distances to achieve the ideal dimension. Furthermore, recent studies also suggest that when optimal scalp EEG spatial resolution is obtained, examination of spatial frequency patterns even make possible the extraction of details of the cortical surface anatomy, including gyral and sulcul patterns (Ramon et al., 2009b). Other future developments are likely to include the incorporation of advances in the quantitative evaluation of the onset and propagation of ictal EEG patterns, including analysis of direct current (ultraslow) frequencies (Vanhatalo et al., 2003; Miller et al., 2007), high frequency EEG (Worrell et al., 2004), and coherence and spatial pattern analysis (Freeman et al., 2006). Finally, the utility of dense array EEG in source localization of cortical activity can be evaluated, and improved, through joint recordings with whole-head magnetoencephalography (Liu et al., 2002). Future research will establish the clinical utility and role of each of these newer methods in extending the information from scalp EEG recordings.
The author has received no financial support, consulting fees, or research funding for the work described in this manuscript. He has no conflict of interest, financial or otherwise, in regard to the research described in this report
1451total chapter downloads
Login to your personal dashboard for more detailed statistics on your publications.Access personal reporting
Edited by Mintaze Kerem Günel
By J. Pais-Ribeiro and R. F. Meneses
Edited by Raymond Chuen-Chung Chang
By Garth F. Hall
We are IntechOpen, the world's leading publisher of Open Access books. Built by scientists, for scientists. Our readership spans scientists, professors, researchers, librarians, and students, as well as business professionals. We share our knowledge and peer-reveiwed research papers with libraries, scientific and engineering societies, and also work with corporate R&D departments and government entities.More about us