Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Antioxidants from Nigerian Medicinal Plants: What Are the Evidence?

Written By

Abubakar Babando Aliyu, Jonathan Ilemona Achika, Joseph Adesina Adewuyi, Patience Gangas, Hamisu Ibrahim and Adebayo Ojo Oyewale

Submitted: 09 September 2018 Reviewed: 16 January 2019 Published: 08 July 2019

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.84454

From the Edited Volume

Lipid Peroxidation Research

Edited by Mahmoud Ahmed Mansour

Chapter metrics overview

1,660 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

The search for natural antioxidants from plants would continue to be a dominant research interest for many years. This is because of the increasing understanding on the role of oxidative stress in damaging cell structures such as DNA, due to over production of free radicals and reactive oxygen species (ROS) in human systems, which are linked to inflammation, cancer and diabetes. However, phenolic compounds especially from phytochemicals or vegetable foods play important roles in reducing the risk of these diseases and reinforces the importance of natural antioxidants in human health. These antioxidant molecules neutralize or quench the ROS by either hydrogen atom transfer or single electron transfer mechanisms. Thus, the capacity to scavenge ROS and free radicals or inhibits lipid peroxidation is measured quantitatively as the strength of antioxidant activity. Several chemical and biochemical protocols have been used in the evaluation of plant extracts as antioxidants. Overwhelming literature reports have indicated varying degrees of antioxidant efficacies of extracts from Nigerian medicinal plants in comparison to synthetic antioxidants. These efficacies were analyzed to provide insight into the strength of antioxidant activity. This chapter reviewed 250 Nigerian medicinal plants in search of evidence for effective antioxidants.

Keywords

  • Nigerian medicinal plants
  • antioxidants
  • DPPH
  • ROS
  • free radicals

1. Introduction

Since the discovery of enzyme superoxide dismutase (SOD) and the evidence that emerged in support of the role of free radicals in biological systems, human understanding of free radical biochemistry in health and disease continue to advance [1]. This provided the basis for continuous search on natural antioxidants from foods and phytomedicines. Overwhelming reports on Google search engine has indicated 92,800 hits for “antioxidant activity” of medicinal plants in the last 10 years (2008–2018). This is due to growing interest on the antioxidant properties of medicinal plants. Several chemical and biochemical protocols have been used in the evaluation of antioxidant activity including the oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC), total radical-trapping antioxidant potential (TRAP), total oxidant scavenging capacity (TOSC), chemiluminescence (CL), croton bleaching, low density lipoprotein (LDL) oxidation, ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP), copper reduction assay (CUPRAC), 2,2′ azinobis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid (ABTS) assay, 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), nitric oxide (NO), hydroxyl radical (OH) hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and total phenolic assay among others [2]. Biochemical protocols are based on animal models for in vivo evaluations of oxidative stress biomarkers. However, this study is focused on in vitro evaluations of antioxidants from plants based on hydrogen atom transfer or single electron transfer mechanisms [2]. The strength of antioxidant activity measured from a combination of different methodologies was used to evaluating antioxidant effectiveness [3]. This review provides fundamental background on free radical and ROS in human health and disease with a view to understand the roles of natural antioxidants. We reviewed 250 Nigerian medicinal plants evaluated for antioxidant activity in search of evidence for effective antioxidants.

Advertisement

2. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) in human health and disease

Human system uses oxidation for normal metabolic activities in the transformation of nutrients into energy. During oxidation, reactive oxygen species (ROS) are also produced at low levels in normal physiological conditions, which are necessary for maintaining normal cell functions such as signaling immunity and homeostasis [4]. These activities are maintained by endogenous antioxidant (enzymatic) defense systems produced by the body for protection against harmful effects. These include superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px), glutathione reductase (GSH-Rx) and catalase [5]. Excessive production of ROS beyond the body defense mechanisms can be extremely harmful to cellular functions by damaging nucleic acids, oxidizing proteins, and causing lipid peroxidation [6]. The resultant cell damage by free radicals and ROS appeared as major contributor to aging and degenerative diseases of aging such as cancer, cardiovascular disease, immune system decline, liver diseases, diabetes mellitus, inflammation and brain dysfunction among others [7, 8]. These ROS and reactive nitrogen species (RNS) including superoxide anion O2−*, hydroxide ion OH−*, hydroxyl radical OH*, peroxyl radical ROO* and nitric oxide NO* as well as H2O2, lipid peroxides ROOH, and singlet O2 are very reactive and can initiates free radical reactions or lipid peroxidation in living cells.

ROS can be produced either by external sources (e.g., tobacco smoke, stress, etc.), as by-products during the mitochondrial electron transport of aerobic respiration or by oxidoreductase enzymes and metal catalyzed oxidation [9]. But the biological effects of ROS depend on the types of cell or tissue in relation to enzyme production, signal transduction and DNA repair [10]. ROS are harmful when excessive productions are not balanced by body antioxidant mechanism. This imbalance between ROS production and enzymatic antioxidant defense systems is called oxidative stress [11]. Antioxidants counteract oxidative stress by neutralizing free radicals because they are reducing agents that react with and buffer ROS as a form of defense against oxidative stress [12].

Advertisement

3. Phytochemicals as sources of natural antioxidants

Antioxidants are molecules that prevent oxidation or inactivates the reactive oxygen species and thus prevent oxidative damage to the cells and body tissues [13]. Antioxidants can also inhibit, quench or scavenge free radicals converting them into new and stable chemical compounds [14]. Broadly, antioxidants are classified as enzymatic and non-enzymatic with each class providing complementary role of protection against free radicals in human systems. Previous work has concisely discussed on antioxidants classification [3] as summarily reproduced in Figure 1. But our focus is the non-enzymatic antioxidant involving flavonoids, phenolic acids, vitamins, carotenoids, minerals and cofactors. They are exogenous sources of protection through diet. Plants foods contain a variety of nutrients and non-nutrients chemicals which are good antioxidant agents. These sources of natural antioxidants including Vitamin A (retinol) obtained from β-carotene, vitamin C (ascorbic acid), Vitamin E (α-tocopherol), lycopene and carotenoids occur naturally in fruits, vegetables, legumes and grains which are commonly consumed and play important role in the defense against free radicals [3, 15]. Medicinal plants are rich source of phenolic compounds such as flavonoids, phenolic acids and coumarins [16, 17]. Flavonoids are antioxidants compounds composed of anthocyanins, flavanones, flavonols, flavones, isoflavonoids and flavanones, while hydroxycinnamic and hydroxybenzoic acids such as gallic acid are components of phenolic acids widely distributed secondary metabolites in plants with antioxidant and antiradical properties [18]. They are important as chelators and free radical scavengers of hydroxyl and peroxyl radicals, superoxide anions and peroxynitrites [19]. Carotenoids natural pigments are important phytochemical antioxidants obtained from plants. They are structurally grouped into carotenes and xanthophyll based on the degree of oxygenation of carotenoid hydrocarbons and exert antioxidant effect by singlet oxygen quenching ability [3]. Several studies on the antioxidant activities of various herbal plants have indicated their enormous medicinal values as inhibitors of free radical and ROS [20].

Figure 1.

Board classification of antioxidants adapted from Carocho and Ferreira [3].

Advertisement

4. Antioxidants from Nigerian medicinal plants

Nigeria is a west African country with an area of 923,769 km2 having a population of 198 million with 250 ethnic groups [21]. The country shares border with republic of Cameroun to the east, Niger and Chad republics to the north, Benin republic to the west and Gulf of Guinea to the south. Nigeria has favorable climate conditions with enormous diversity of plant species, which are distributed across geographical contrast of the mangrove swamps in South-South (SS), to the tropical rain forests covering South-West (SW) and South-East (SE) and to the grassland vegetation of North-Central (NC) up to the Sahel savannah of semi-arid North-East (NE) (Figure 2). Many of these plants are used as medicines for treatment of illness or management of human and animal health among rural and urban dwellers.

Figure 2.

Map of Nigeria showing the six geopolitical zones.

The application of herbal recipes especially in the management of human metabolic diseases such as diabetes and cancer is common knowledge among Nigerians. This prompted research interest in academia on the potentials of phytomedicines as complimentary or alternative treatment agents, and consequent research efforts to validate their pharmacological properties. The number of Nigerian medicinal plants reported for antioxidants is enormous. However, 250 medicinal plants evaluated for antioxidant activity were studied in addition to the 28 compounds isolated from 44 plants. But antioxidant evaluations on crude extracts rather than on pure compounds largely dominated the literature. Thus, effective activity based on concentrations required to inhibit 50% free radicals (IC50) for selected extracts are presented (Table 1) together with concentrations of various standard antioxidants used.

S. No Plant name Family Part used IC50 sample IC50 standard Ref.
1 Abrus precatorius Leguminosae Seed 1.92*
2.10*
AA = 1.83
AA = 1.20
[37]
2 Acalypha ornata Euphorbiaceae Leaf 20.50* TC = 15.4 [68]
3 Acalypha wilkesiana Euphorbiaceae Leaf 15.25* AA = 7.26 [26]
4 Acanthospermum hispidum Asteraceae Aerial 28.9* AA = 1.41 [39]
5 Aframomum melegueta Zingiberaceae Fruit
Leaf
0.04**
0.07**
AA = 0.03 [69]
6 Ageratum conyzoides Asteraceae Leaf 31.25* AA = 7.26 [26]
7 Allamanda cathartica Apocynaceae Leaf 0.46** VE = 0.25 [70]
8 Allanblackia floribunda Guttiferae Leaf 0.02**
0.1**
VE = 0.01 [71]
9 Alstonia boonei Apocynaceae Stem 0.12** AA = 0.06 [72]
10 Alstonia congensis Apocynaceae Root 19.7* AA = 4.9 [73]
11 Alternanthera dentata Amaranthaceae Leaf 35* AA = 125 [46]
12 Amaranth caudatus Amaranthaceae Leaf
Stem
15.81** TC = 13.2 [27]
13 Anacardium occidentale Anacardiaceae Bark
Leaf
5.66*
7.77*
AA = 4.57 [74]
14 Annona senegalensis Annonaceae Leaf 45.72*
49.0*
GA = 48.77
TX = 72.9
[35]
15 Aspilia africana Asteraceae Leaf 160* AA = 120 [75]
16 Asystasia gangetica Acanthaceae Leaf 100* AA = 150 [75]
17 Bauhinia galpinii Caesalpiniaceae Leaf 20.52* AA = 19.8 [76]
18 Bauhinia monandra Caesalpiniaceae Leaf 5.56* AA = 30.0 [45]
19 Bixa orellana Bixaceae Leaf 0.45* VE = 0.25 [70]
20 Borreria ocymoides Rubiaceae Aerial 1.85** AA = 0.05 [77]
21 Borreria verticillata Rubiaceae Leaf 2.98* AA = 1.05 [78]
22 Bridelia ferruginea Euphorbiaceae Leaf 12.5* AA = 7.26 [26]
23 Bridelia micrantha Euphorbiaceae Leaf 0.1 μM AA = 2.0 μM [38]
24 Bryophyllum pinnatum Crassulaceae Leaf 0.41** VC = 0.067 [79]
25 Calliandra surinamensis Mimosaeae Flower 28** VE = 38 [80]
26 Calyptrochilum christyanum Orchidaceae Whole 50.6* AA = 1.41 [39]
27 Canthium subcordatum Rubiaceae Leaf 23.9* AA = 4.9 [74]
28 Capsicum annuum Solanaceae Fruit 1.15** BHA = 0.96 [25]
29 Capsicum frutescens Solanaceae Fruit 0.67** BHA = 0.96 [25]
30 Carica papaya Caricaceae Seed 0.227** AA = 0.109 [67]
31 Cassia sieberiana Leguminosae Leaf 24.1*
46.6*
AA = 4.9
TC = 38.9
[73]
32 Cassia singuaena Leguminosae Leaf 1.20* AA = 2.56 [48]
33 Celosia trigyna Amaranthaceae Leaf 120* AA = 120 [75]
34 Cissampelos owariensis Menispermaceae Leaf 2.77* AA = 0.067 [25]
35 Citrus aurantifolia Rutaceae Peel 12.1** VC = 0.067 [25]
36 Commiphora kerstingii Burseraceae Leaf 0.33**
0.54**
AA = 0.49 [23]
37 Corchorus olitorius Malvaceae Leaf 11.8**
27.52*
TC = 13.2
AA = 188.3
[27]
[33]
38 Crassocephalum rubens Asteraceae Leaf 2.91**
1.73**
VC = 1.18
VC = 0.56
[62]
39 Cucumis sativus Cucurbitaceae Leaf 1.68**
71.1**
BHA = 0.96
TC = 13.2
[27]
[25]
40 Cucurbita moschata Cucurbitaceae Leaf 150* AA = 120
TC = 50
[75]
41 Cymbopogon citratus Poaceae Leaf 1.35* VE = 0.25 [70]
42 Daniellia oliveri Leguminosae Leaf 15.5* TC = 0.25 [50]
43 Daucus carota Apiaceae Aerial 4.61** BHA = 0.96 [25]
44 Ehretia cymosa Boraginaceae Leaf 0.47** GA = 2.09 [53]
45 Emilia coccinea Asteraceae Leaf 120* AA = 120 [75]
46 Eugenia caryophyllata Myrtaceae Leaf
Bud
0.03*
0.02*
AA = 0.03 [47]
47 Eupatorium adenophorum Asteraceae Root 22.4*
53.7*
AA = 4.9
RT = 3.3
[73]
48 Eupatorium odoratum Asteraceae Leaf 0.07** AA = 0.06 [72]
49 Euphorbia hirta Euphorbiaceae Leaf 2.5** VC = 4.5 [81]
50 Feretia apodanthera Rubiaceae Root 0.053** VC = 0.048 [43]
51 Ficus exasperata Moraceae Leaf 0.86* VE = 0.25 [70]
52 Ficus gnaphalocarpa Moraceae Leaf 45.3*
44.6*
GA = 48.8
TX = 72.9
[34]
53 Ficus sycomorus Moraceae Stem 42.0* VC = 25.0 [82]
54 Globimetula oreophila Loranthaceae Leaf 0.38** VC = 0.06 [79]
55 Gongronema latifolia Asclepiadaceae Leaf 70.0* VC = 50 [83]
56 Grewia carpinifolia Tiliaceae Leaf
Stem
0.32**
0.39**
AA = 0.31
AA = 0.18
[32]
57 Harungana madagascariensis Hypericaceae Stem 37.5* BHT = 16.2 [36]
58 Heliotropium indicum Boraginaceae Aerial 48.4* AA = 1.41 [39]
59 Hibiscus sabdariffa Malvaceae Leaf 0.14* AA = 0.02 [84]
60 Holarrhena floribunda Apocynaceae Leaf 7.2* QT = 2.95 [85]
61 Ipomoea asarifolia Convulvulaceae Leaf 24.3* AA = 1.41 [39]
62 Irvingia gabonensis Irvingiaceae Root
Stem
12.4*
25.5*
AA = 4.9
TC = 38.9
[73]
63 Justicia secunda Acanthaceae Leaf 1.58 μM AA = 2.52 [86]
64 Kalanchoe pinnata Crassulaceae Leaf 180* AA = 120 [75]
65 Lactuca sativa Asteraceae Whole 0.26** QT = 0.83 [25]
66 Landolphia owariensis Apocynaceae Root 8.8*
49.1*
AA = 4.9
TC = 38.9
[73]
67 Laportea ovalifolia Urticaceae Leaf 100* AA = 150 [75]
68 Lasianthera africana Icacinaceae Leaf
Root
0.30**
0.27**
RT = 0.26 [28]
69 Launaea taraxacifolia Asteraceae Shoot
Leaf
1.94**
1.59**
VC = 1.18
VC = 0.56
[62]
70 Lawsonia inermis Lythraceae Leaf 3.80* AA = 7.26 [26]
71 Leptadenia hastata Asclepiadaceae Leaf 42.3* GA = 48.8 [35]
72 Lycopersicon esculentum Solanaceae Fruit 1.16**
1.47**
QT = 0.83 [25]
73 Massularia acuminata Rubiaceae Leaf 70.0* VC = 7.59 [87]
74 Mondia whitei Apocynaceae Leaf 6.1* AA = 3.4 [66]
75 Moringa oleifera Moringaceae Leaf 0.16* AA = 0.02 [84]
76 Murraya koenigii Rutaceae Leaf 7.35* TC = 13.2 [27]
77 Nauclea diderrichii Rubiaceae Stem 18.12* AA = 1.41 [39]
78 Nauclea latifolia Rubiaceae Leaf 12.9* AA = 4.9 [73]
79 Ocimum basilicum Lamiaceae Leaf 1.0* AA = 9.0 [55]
80 Ocimum gratissimum Lamiaceae Leaf
Stem
0.14*
8.67*
AA = 0.02
BHA = 3.36
[33]
[27]
81 Parinari curatellifolia Chrysobalanaceae Leaf 13.5* VC = 1.98 [88]
82 Parkia biglobosa Leguminosae Stem 15.65* AA = 7.26 [26]
83 Phragmanthera capitata Loranthaceae Leaf 1.9*
1.0*
BHT = 4.6
VC = 10
[41]
84 Piliostigma reticulatum Fabaceae Leaf 10.3* AA = 3.9 [22]
85 Piliostigma thonningii Fabaceae Leaf 14.7* AA = 3.9 [22]
86 Piper guineense Piperaceae Seed 74* AA = 31.7 [89]
87 Psidium guajava Myrtaceae Leaf 0.04** BHA = 0.05 [24]
88 Sapium ellipticum Euphorbiaceae Stem 0.19** BHT = 0.11 [90]
89 Senna alata Fabaceae Leaf 0.59** VC = 0.067 [79]
90 Simarouba glauca Simaroubaceae Stem 4.7* BHT = 5.0 [42]
91 Solanum macrocarpon Solanaceae Leaf 6.21** TC = 13.2 [27]
92 Spinacia oleracea Amaranthaceae Leaf 12.6* TC = 13.2 [27]
93 Spondias purpurea Anacardiaceae Stem 8.3* AA = 11.5 [52]
94 Stachytarpheta jamaicensis Verbenaceae Leaf 5.0* AA = 9.0 [51]
95 Strophanthus hispidus Apocynaceae Root 1.18** VC = 0.067 [79]
96 Telfairia occidentalis Cucurbitaceae Leaf 0.16** AA = 0.02 [84]
97 Trichilia catigua Meliaceae Stem 30.28* AA = 20.72 [64]
98 Vernonia amygdalina Asteraceae Leaf 31.25* AA = 7.26 [26]
99 Vernonia calvoana Asteraceae Leaf 1.90 μM AA = 2.0 μM [49]
100 Vernonia cinerea Asteraceae Leaf 6.50*
8.0*
GA = 0.62 [30]
101 Vernonia migeodii Asteraceae Leaf 20.0* AA = 18.0 [91]
102 Vitex doniana Verbenaceae Leaf 53.23* GA = 48.8 [34]
103 Xylopia aethiopica Annonaceae Fruit 1.04** VC = 0.067 [79]
104 Zingiber officinale Zingiberaceae Rhizome 47.0* AA = 36.4 [92]

Table 1.

Antioxidant activities of selected Nigerian plants.

IC50 = μgmL−1.


IC50 = mgmL−1.


AA, ascorbic acid; QT, quercetin; RT, rutin; GA, gallic acid; VC, vitamin C; VE, vitamin E; TX, trolox; BHT, butylated hydroxy toluene ; BHA, butylated hydroxy anisole; TC, tocopherol.

Advertisement

5. Antioxidant activities of crude extracts

The antioxidant efficacies of Nigerian plants were largely evaluated using protocols involving DPPH, ABTS, FRAP, TAC, NO, OH and or H2O2 targets. The DPPH radical scavenging assay is one of the commonly used techniques for quick evaluation of antioxidant capacity. Plant extracts tested for DPPH inhibition have demonstrated interesting efficacies for instance, crude extracts of P. reticulatum (40.10 μgmL−1) and P. thoninngii (50.94 μgmL−1) showed comparable activity with Ginkgo biloba (EC50 40.72 μgmL−1) [22]. Nigerian plants evaluated for antioxidants activity between 2008 and 2012 were reported in 40 publications representing over 166 extracts from 119 plants. These studies showed 29 extracts with effective activity on various free radical targets. However, 15 extracts have comparable antioxidant efficacies to standard antioxidants, while 14 have higher percent (%) inhibition or lower IC50 values than the standards used. These include stem methanol extract of C. kerstingii (IC50 26.27 μgmL−1, ascorbic acid 33.59 μgmL−1) [23] and leaf methanol extract of P. guajava (IC50 0.037 mgmL−1, BHA 0.049 mgmL−1) [24]. But DPPH inhibition studies on selected vegetable plants showed better effective activity for L. sativa (IC50 0.26 mgmL−1), Z. officinale (IC50 0.29 mgmL−1) and C. frutescens (IC50 0.67 mgmL−1) respectively compared to BHA (IC50 0.96 mgmL−1) and quercetin (IC50 0.83 mgmL−1) [25]. The activity of L. inermis was most profound of the 36 medicinal plants surveyed in Southwestern Nigeria, with lower IC50 of 3.80 μgmL−1 than ascorbic acid (7.26 μgmL−1) [26]. Similar evaluations of DPPH inhibition on 15 medicinal plants showed S. oleracea extract with lower IC50 of 12.6 mgmL−1. But S. macrocarpon extract was most effective with IC50 6.21 mgmL−1 lower than α-tocopherol (13.20 mgmL−1) [27].

The analysis of antioxidant efficacies on medicinal plants reported from 2013 to 2017 in 55 publications, involving 211 extracts from 144 plants was carried out. We observed that 70 extracts from 50 plants have exhibited good antioxidant efficacies on various free radical targets with 51 extracts from 53 plants having comparable efficacies to standard antioxidants. However, lower IC50 or higher percent (%) inhibitions compared to standards were observed with 20 extracts from 17 medicinal plants. The NO inhibition on root extract of L. africana (IC50 0.27 mgmL−1) compared very well with rutin (IC50 0.28 mgmL−1) [28]. The DPPH inhibition on P. guajava (IC50 1.564 μgmL−1) extract also indicated effective activity compared to ascorbic acid (IC50 5.950 μgmL−1) [29]. Other plant extracts including V. cinerea (IC50 6.50 μgmL−1) compared to gallic acid (IC50 0.62 μgmL−1) [30] and K. senegalensis stem bark (IC50 95.76 μgmL−1) with ascorbic acid (223.35 μgmL−1) indicated effective activity [31]. The inhibition of lipid peroxidation using thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) assay on leaf extract of G. carpinifolia was very effective with IC50 of 0.24 mgmL−1 compared to ascorbic acid (IC50 0.38 mgmL−1). Moreover, the ABTS assay indicated 100% inhibitions for both extracts and ascorbic acid [32]. The antioxidant evaluations on two of the most locally utilized vegetable plants such as V. amygdalina and O. gratissimum showed effective inhibitions compared to the standard ascorbic acid [33].

Furthermore, DPPH inhibitions on S. occidentalis (IC50 42.80 μgmL−1) compared to gallic acid (48.77 μgmL−1) was effective, but ABTS assay on F. gnaphalocarpa (44.63 μgmL−1) was more effective than Trolox (72.92 μgmL−1) [34]. Similarly, L. hastata (IC50 42.32 μgmL−1) when compared to gallic acid (48.77 μgmL−1) and ABTS on A. senegalensis (IC50 48.98 μgmL−1) with Trolox (72.92 μgmL−1) have interesting lower IC50values [35]. But H. madagascariensis exhibited moderate activity [36] while A. precatorius [37] and B. micrantha [38] have demonstrated effective inhibitions (Table 1). The analyses of Nigerian plants in 2018 showed interesting activities with 15 plant extracts from 32 published reports. Plants with moderate DPPH inhibition include A. hispidum, A. laxiflora, C. christyanum, H. indicum and I. asarifolia [39]. However, effective inhibitions were observed on root extracts of D. tripetala (IC50 0.631 μgmL−1) and M. excelsa (IC50 0.194 μgmL−1) compared to 4.60 μgmL−1 ascorbic acid [40]. Similarly, P. capitata (27.4 μgmL−1) was effective than BHT (56.0 μgmL−1) [41], and the evaluation of S. glauca stem bark on FRAP (4.70 μgmL−1) and NO (11.90 μgmL−1) were effective than 5.0 μgmL−1 and 18.0 μgmL−1 of BHT respectively [42]. Lastly, plant crude extracts have demonstrated varying but strong efficacies on different free radical targets which in many cases surpassed standard antioxidants. The report on DPPH inhibition of F. apodanthera root bark ethanol extract represents effective activity with IC50 of 0.053 μgmL−1 in comparison to vitamin C (0.048 μgmL−1) standard [43].

Advertisement

6. Chemical composition and antioxidant activity

6.1 GC-MS analysis of extracts and evaluation of antioxidant activity

The antioxidant evaluations of Nigerian medicinal plants with determination of chemical composition using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) have become routine studies. The GC-MS is intended to give insight on the probable chemical entities of volatile components present in the sample extract. Several plants constituents have been analyzed using GC–MS by comparison of compounds’ retention times with library of standard chemical entities provided by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) database imbedded in the instrument. The chemical constituents with low molecular weights such as terpenoids, long chain alkanes, phenolics and fatty acid methyl esters (FAME) are separated and detected by GC-MS. This is perhaps one reason that FAME are prevalent from among plant extracts, but sharp contrast between lipophilic and hydrophilic components are determined by solvent polarity or method of extraction [44].

The GC-MS analyses and evaluation of antioxidants on B. monandra hexane extract showed 4-hydroxy-5-methyl-3-propyl-2-hexanone (42.7%) and oleic acid (20%) as major compounds. The DPPH inhibition (IC50 5.56 μgmL−1) with ascorbic acid (IC50 30.0 μgmL−1) showed interesting efficacy, but ethyl acetate extract containing largely oleic acid (40.76%) and hexadecanoic acid (21.75%) was more effective (IC50 0.01 μgmL−1) [45]. The evaluation on A. dentata methanol extract containing hexadecanoic acid (31.6%), phytol (24.6%) and octadecanoic acid (10.56%) was found to be poor. However, the FRAP inhibition showed optimum activity (0.65 μmolL−1) compared to ascorbic acid (2.00 μmolL−1) [46]. The DPPH screening on buds, leaf, root and stem of commonly used spice, E. caryophyllata was reported. The various ethanol extracts showed effective activities IC50 of 0.02, 0.03, 3.66 and 0.99 μgmL−1 respectively, compared to ascorbic acid (IC50 0.03 μgmL−1) and gallic acid (IC50 0.05 μgmL−1) standards. This indicated an important response to the DPPH scavenging capacity which have been largely attributed to aromatic phenols, caryophyllene, aromatic esters and ethers [47]. Similar comprehensive study on the leaf, stem bark and root of C. singueana was reported. The DPPH, OH and NO showed IC50 of 1.20, 2.58 and 35.99 μgmL−1 for DPPH inhibition of stem bark ethanol, root aqueous and leaf ethanol extracts respectively. But the response on OH showed IC50 of 1.58, 2.05 and 6.47 μgmL−1 respectively, for stem bark ethyl acetate, root aqueous and leaf ethanol extracts. The NO results however, was interesting on leaf aqueous extract (IC50 2.81 μgmL−1) better than the ascorbic acid (IC50 26.28 μgmL−1) and Trolox (IC50 599.21 μgmL−1) standards used. The chemical components such as resorcinol (54%) and phytol (23.7%) were largely detected from ethanol extracts of stem bark and leaf respectively [48].

The leaf ethyl acetate extract of V. calvoana harvested from the South–South Nigeria contains largely aromatic compounds such as ethyl benzene (22%) and 1,2,3-trimethyl benzene (12.5%). FRAP inhibitions on extract (1.98 μM) and ascorbic acid (2.0 μM) were more effective than on DPPH [49]. Although the inhibition on DPPH by plant extracts have been promising but chloroform extract of D. oliveri exudate showed rather poor (IC50 of 15.5 μgmL−1) when compared to α-Tocopherol (0.25 μgmL−1) [50]. But S. jamaicensis methanol extract (IC50 5.0 μgmL−1) was more effective than ascorbic acid (IC50 9.0 μgmL−1). Compounds such as 3,5-dihydroxy-6-methyl-2,3-dihydro-4H-pyran-4-one (13.7%) and D-arabinitol (13.5%) have been largely identified [51]. It was interesting to note that S. purpurea hexane extract showed effective DPPH inhibition (IC50 8.3 μgmL−1) than ascorbic acid (IC50 11.5 μgmL−1) [52]. The evaluation of E. cymosa leaf extracts on ethyl acetate (IC50 0.56 mgmL−1) and methanol (IC50 0.60 mgmL−1) extracts justifies effective activity compared to gallic acid (IC50 0.47 mgmL−1). The 2-hexadecycloxirane (34.2%) and methyl linoleate (28.9%) were detected as major components of methanol extract [53]. Lastly, the GC-MS analyses of various plant extracts and antioxidant evaluation have revealed similar pattern of contents and composition in addition to contrasting influences of solvent polarity to radical inhibition efficacies. Nevertheless, interesting antioxidant efficacies were observed.

6.2 GC-MS analysis of essential oils and evaluation of antioxidant activity

The essential oils (EO) from Nigerian medicinal plants have been analyzed using the GC–MS and evaluated for antioxidants activity. Because they are mixtures of several constituents containing largely low molecular weights compounds, EO are rapidly analyzed using GC–MS to ascertain their chemical composition. The essential oils (EO) from P. guajava showed that 3, 6-dioxa-2,4,5,7-tetraoctane-2,2,4,4,5,5,7,7-octamethyl (11.7%) and cyclononane (10.7%) are largely identified. DPPH inhibition showed 71.83% comparable to 68.7% of ascorbic acid [54]. The antioxidant efficacy of O. basilicum EO was also interesting (IC50 of 1.0 μgmL−1) probably due to phenolic constituents such as methyl eugenol (15.5%), o-nitrocumene (14.0%) and 2-phenyl-1-hexanol (14.0%) [55]. The EO of common spices such as A. melegueta leaf, C. crepidioides stem bark, O. gratissimum leaf and M. myristica stem bark showed various chemical constituents with interesting antioxidant activity. The EO components largely identified from the four plants are myrtenyl acetate (29.1%), thymol (44%), γ-terpinene (53%) and γ-cardinene (31.1%) respectively. The highest antioxidant activity was found from EO of O. gratissimum (96.4%) which compared to BHA (96.7%). However, other EOs have demonstrated radical scavenging of >50% inhibition [56]. The leaf EO of C. portoricensis was found to contain thymol (9.64%) and β-caryophyllene (9.15%) as main compounds which might have resulted to 75% DPPH inhibition compared to BHT (95%) [57]. Similarly, analysis on M. alternifolius EO that yielded largely tricosane (19.45%) and z-14-nonanosene (13.4%) with interesting efficacy (97.95%) compared to ascorbic acid (97.88%) [58]. This trend of activity demonstrated by the EO was observed in E. maculata which contained α-pinene (8.0%), β-trans-ocimene (8.0%), 1S-α-pinene (7.0%) and cyclofenchene (7.0%) as main components, with the DPPH (IC50 8.0 μgmL−1) and FRAP (10.0 μgmL−1) inhibition efficacies in comparison to 9.0 and 20.0 μgmL−1 ascorbic acid respectively [59]. Lastly, GC-MS analyses of EO from Nigerian plants have revealed interesting but similar chemical compounds with some degree of antioxidant efficacies. EO composition containing phenolics moieties and terpenoids have indicated evidence of effective radical inhibitions.

6.3 HPLC analysis of extracts and evaluation of antioxidant activity

The high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) has been reported in the analysis of major chemical constituents of plant extracts alongside with the antioxidant activity. The HPLC technique uses reverse phase chromatography because of simplicity, versatility and sensitivity towards separation, purification, quantification and identification of diverse natural products such as plant phenolics, steroids, alkaloids and flavonoids [60]. Hence, the combination of HPLC methods with antioxidants evaluations may provide the needed understanding of antioxidant efficacies of plant extracts. Previous HPLC profiling of ethanol extract of Z. zanthoxyloide showed quercetin, kaempferol and caffeic acid largely quantified. DPPH inhibition (IC50 38.58 μgmL−1) in comparison to ascorbic acid (6.63 μgmL−1) was poor [61]. Similarly, aqueous extracts of L. taraxacifolia (IC50 6.59 μgmL−1) and C. rubens (IC50 6.21 μgmL−1) were less effective than Trolox (IC50 0.51 μgmL−1). Although methanol extracts of both plants contain gallic acid, caffeic acid, quercetin, rutin, isoquercetin and kaempferol as the main compounds identified, yet the activity was not interesting. But the OH inhibition on aqueous extracts showed rather interesting results with IC50 1.94 and 1.09 μgmL−1 in comparison to IC50 1.18 μgmL−1 of vitamin C [62].

Although antioxidant activities of plant extracts using DPPH have been established to correlate with phenolics and flavonoids contents [63]. However, many of the plants evaluated for antioxidants activity have no correlation with the number and amounts of phenolics and flavonoids quantified by HPLC. The report on T. catigua ethanol, ethyl acetate, dichloromethane and butanol extracts showed DPPH inhibition with IC50 of 9.17, 30.28, 42.42 and 76.35 μgmL−1 respectively. These, in comparison to ascorbic acid (20.72 μgmL−1) indicated poor activity except the ethanol extract with lower IC50 than the standard. The extract was quantified to be rich in gallic acid, chlorogenic acid rutin and quercetin [64]. Similarly, S. dulcificum contains phenolic acids and flavonoids but demonstrated poor efficacies on DPPH (IC50 139.45 μgmL−1), ABTS (IC50 135.83 μgmL−1), NO (IC50 119.17 μgmL−1) and OH (IC50 147.65 μgmL−1) [65]. However, M. whitei contains largely caffeic acid with interesting efficacies on NO (IC50 6.1 μgmL−1) and FRAP (IC50 5.7 μgmL−1) compared to ascorbic acid (3.4 and 7.0 μgmL−1) respectively [66]. Similarly, C. papaya seeds protein analyzed using the LC-ESI-DAD-MS with largely ferulic acid in addition to flavonoid sugars, justifies the antioxidant efficacies on DPPH (IC50 0.227 mgmL−1) and Fe2+ chelating (IC50 0.157 mgmL−1) in comparison to ascorbic acid (IC50 0.109 mgmL−1) and EDTA (IC50 0.091 mgmL−1) respectively [67]. The HPLC quantification of plant extracts have shown similar classes of compounds such as chlorogenic acid, ellagic acid, caffeic acid, gallic acid, p-coumaric acid, apigenin, quercetin, rutin and kaempferol which have been repeatedly found in Nigerian plants. But the antioxidant efficacies observed were not reflective of HPLC quantification. This may indicate that phenolic compounds are quantified at miniature level which can only serve as evidence of qualitative presence in plant extracts.

Advertisement

7. Antioxidant activities of isolated compounds

The antioxidant evaluations on isolated compounds from Nigerian medicinal plants are rarely reported. This is probably due to funding problems associated to plant chemistry research in Nigeria, coupled with dysfunctional analytical instruments such as the NMR spectrometer. Most of the published research on isolation and characterization of compounds were carried out abroad. Of the 250 plants analyzed for antioxidant evaluations, only 28 compounds were isolated from 44 plants together with full spectral characterization. The antioxidant activities of quercetin and quercetin-3-O-rutinoside from B. monandra were probably the first report on pure compounds [93]. Since then several isolated compounds were evaluated for antioxidant efficacies and in most cases compared with standard antioxidants. Thus, compounds’ efficacy only with IC50 values of standards are presented in Table 2. The analysis of isolated compounds showed that flavonoids and flavonoids glycosides constitute major classes of antioxidants reported. Catechin isolated from A. senegalensis had effective DPPH inhibition (IC50 0.03 mgmL−1) and Fe2+ chelating activity (1.29 mgmL−1) when compared to ascorbic acid (0.01 mgmL−1) and EDTA (IC50 0.05 mgmL−1) respectively [94]. The evaluation on H2O2 inhibition by (−)-epicatechin isolated from A. floribunda showed effective activity with equal strength as standard ascorbic acid (IC50 8.0 μgmL−1) [95]. Similarly, the ABTS inhibition by quercetin isolated from C. sieberiana has resulted to effective activity of equal strength to Tocopherol (0.81 mM) [96]. The DPPH inhibition by caffeic acid (IC50 3.03 μgmL−1) from S. monostachys is another effective activity comparable to quercetin standard (IC50 2.32 μgmL−1) [97]. However, the most outstanding DPPH inhibition was recorded on quercetin-3-O-rutinoside/rhamnoside isolated from A. occidentalis. The 1:1 mixture of flavonoid glycoside exhibited IC50 0.96 μgmL−1 less than ascorbic acid (IC50 4.57 μgmL−1). [74]. But generally, the antioxidant efficacies of isolated compounds from Nigerian plants are not interesting. Out of the 28 compounds isolated from 44 plants only 7 compounds from 6 plants exhibited the efficacies with strength of standard antioxidants.

S. No Chemical name Plant Model Compd. (IC50) Stand. (IC50) Ref.
1 Quercetin Bauhinia monandra DPPH 10.64^ AA = 12.52 [93]
2 Quercetin-3-O-rutinoside Bauhinia monandra DPPH 16.11^ AA = 12.52 [93]
3 Isovitexin Croton zambesicus DPPH 189.1^ QT = 5.31 [98]
4 Trans-ethyl-3-(3, 4-dihydroxyphenyl acrylate Aspilia africana DPPH 14.49^ AA = 13.18 [99]
5 p-hydroxy benzaldehyde Aspilia africana DPPH 73.50* VC = 37.5 [102]
6 Tiliroside Croton gratissimus DPPH 360.1* AA = 70.12 [100]
7 Isovitexin Croton gratissimus DPPH 211.6* AA = 70.12 [100]
8 Helichrysoside-3′-methyl ether Croton zambesicus DPPH 183.4* AA = 70.12 [100]
9 Betulin Parinari curatellifolia DPPH >100* VC = 1.98 [88]
10 β-sitosterol Parinari curatellifolia DPPH >50* VC = 1.98 [88]
11 Betulinic acid Parinari curatellifolia DPPH >100* VC = 1.98 [88]
12 4-(3′,3-dihydroxyl-1-mercaptopropyl) phenyl-glucosylpyranoside Massularia acuminata DPPH 75* VC = 7.59 [87]
13 Agathisflavone Anacardium occidentale DPPH 366.4* AA = 4.57 [74]
14 Quercetin-3-O-rutinoside/rhamnoside Anacardium occidentale DPPH 0.96* AA = 4.57 [74]
15 Rosmarinic acid Solenostemon monostachyus DPPH 4.99* QT = 2.32 [97]
16 Methyl rosmarinate Solenostemon monostachyus DPPH 5.97* QT = 2.32 [97]
17 Caffeic acid Solenostemon monostachyus DPPH 3.03* QT = 2.32 [97]
18 Methyl caffeate Solenostemon monostachyus DPPH 13.41* QT = 2.32 [97]
19 Apigenin Solenostemon monostachyus DPPH 26.67* QT = 2.32 [97]
20 Luteolin Solenostemon monostachyus DPPH 5.35* QT = 2.32 [97]
21 Apigenin glucuronide Solenostemon monostachyus DPPH 185.89* QT = 2.32 [97]
22 Epicatechin Chrysophyllum albidum DPPH 19.02^ GA = 12.82 [101]
23 Epigallocatechin Chrysophyllum albidum DPPH 15.88^ GA = 12.82 [101]
24 Procyanidin B5 Chrysophyllum albidum DPPH 8.80^ GA = 12.82 [101]
25 Kaempferol-3-O-rutinoside Holarrhena floribunda FRAP 394.8* QT = 2.95 [85]
26 Quercetin-3-O-glucoside Holarrhena floribunda LPI
FRAP
10.4*
1649.4*
QT = 2.95 [85]
27 Kaempferol-3-O-glucoside Holarrhena floribunda FRAP 337.5* QT = 2.95 [85]
28 Quercetin-3-O-glucoside/galactoside mixture (1: 1) Holarrhena floribunda LPI
FRAP
9.8*
1589.9*
QT = 2.95 [85]
29 Quercetin Cassia sieberiana DPPH
ABTS
1.58#
0.81#
AA = 2.44
TX = 0.81
[96]
30 Kaempferol Cassia sieberiana DPPH 7.75# AA = 2.44 [96]
31 Dihydrokaempferol Cassia sieberiana DPPH 82.93# AA = 2.44 [96]
32 Piceatannol Cassia sieberiana DPPH 3.96# AA = 2.44 [96]
33 (−)-Catechin Alchornea floribunda DPPH
H2O2
88*
13*
AA = 6
AA = 8
[95]
34 (+)-epicatechin Alchornea floribunda DPPH
H2O2
40*
10*
AA = 6
AA = 8
[95]
35 (−)-epicatechin Alchornea floribunda DPPH
H2O2
10*
8*
AA = 6
AA = 8
[95]
36 (2R,3R)-dihydroquercetin Alchornea floribunda DPPH
H2O2
46*
18*
AA = 6
AA = 8
[95]
37 Catechin Annona senegalensis DPPH
Fe(II)
0.03**
1.29**
AA = 0.01
EDTA = 0.05
[15]

Table 2.

Antioxidant activity of isolated compounds of Nigerian plants.

IC50 = μM.


IC50 = mM.


IC50 = μgmL−1.


IC50 = mgmL−1.


DPPH, 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl radical; ABTS, 2,2’-azinobis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid; FRAP, ferric reducing antioxidant power; TAC, total antioxidant capacity; LPI, lipid peroxidation inhibition; NO, nitric oxide assay; H2O2, hydrogen peroxide assay; AA, ascorbic acid; QT, quercetin; RT, rutin; GA, gallic acid; VC, vitamin C; VE, vitamin E; TX, trolox; EDTA: ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid.

Advertisement

8. Conclusion

Analysis of antioxidant efficacies of Nigerian medicinal plants reported from 1998 to 2018 was carried out. The aim was to provide evidence for effective antioxidants. Our findings have shown the enormous potentials of Nigerian plants as sources of natural antioxidants. We have observed various crude extracts obtained mainly from polar solvents with antioxidant efficacies better than standard compounds. Such preponderance of evidence indicated by broad spectrum of free radical and non-free radical inhibitions has defined the comparable strength of plant extracts to standard antioxidants. Nigerian plants have the capacity to protect or inhibit damage induced by free radical species. This study attempts to provide insights on the strength of antioxidant efficacies of plant extracts comparable to standard antioxidants. However, it is recommended that comprehensive approach to plant bioactive research must be adopted in search of antioxidants to avoid replication of studies especially on certain species. There is need for collaboration among Nigerian scientist working in related areas to enhance on the scope of research questions and improve on the quality of research output.

Advertisement

Acknowledgments

Authors acknowledged the plant taxonomist, Umar Shehu Gallah of National Research Institute for Chemical Technology (NARICT) Zaria, for providing the local (Hausa) names of plants. We are grateful to Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria for providing some of the facilities used during the study.

References

  1. 1. McCord JM, Fridovich I. Superoxide dismutase an enzymic function for erythrocuprein Hemocuprein. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1969;244:6049-6055
  2. 2. Prior RL, Wu X, Schaich K. Standardized methods for the determination of antioxidant capacity and phenolics in foods and dietary supplements. Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry. 2005;53:4290-4302
  3. 3. Carocho M, Ferreira ICFR. A review on antioxidants, prooxidants and related controversy: Natural and synthetic compounds, screening and analysis methodologies and future perspectives. Food and Chemical Toxicology. 2013;51:15-25
  4. 4. West AP, Shadel GS, Ghosh S. Mitochondria in innate immune responses. Nature Reviews Immunology. 2011;11:389-402
  5. 5. Kurutas EB. The importance of antioxidants which play the role in cellular response against oxidative/nitrosative stress: Current state. Nutrition Journal. 2016;15:71
  6. 6. Sanchez C. Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant properties from mushrooms. Synthetic and Systems Biotechnology. 2016;2:13e22
  7. 7. Halliwell B. Free radicals, antioxidants, and human disease: Curiosity, cause, or consequence? Lancet. 1994;344:721e4
  8. 8. Kozarski M, Klaus A, Jakovljevic D, Todorovic N, Vunduk J, Petrovic P. Antioxidants of edible mushrooms. Molecules. 2015;20:19489e525
  9. 9. Cederbaum AI, Lu Y, Wu D. Role of oxidative stress in alcohol-induced liver injury. Archives of Toxicology. 2009;83(6):519e48
  10. 10. George S, Hamblin MR, Abrahamse H. Effect of red light and near infrared laser on the generation of reactive oxygen species in primary dermal fibroblasts. Journal of Photochemistry & Photobiology, B: Biology. 2018;188:60-68
  11. 11. Qian X, Nie X, Yao W, Klinghammer K, Sudhoff H, Kaufmann AM, et al. Reactive oxygen species in cancer stem cells of head and neck squamous Cancer. Seminars in Cancer Biology. 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2018.06.001
  12. 12. Sies H. Strategies of antioxidant defense. FEBS Journal. 1993;215:213-219
  13. 13. Halliwell B. Biochemistry of oxidative stress. Biochemical Society Transaction. 2007;35:1147-1150
  14. 14. Halliwell B. How to characterize a biological antioxidant. Free Radical Research Communication. 1990;9:1-32
  15. 15. Govindarajan R, Vijayakumar M, Pushpangadan P. Antioxidant approach to disease management and the role of ‘Rasayana’ herbs of Ayurveda. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 2005;99:165-178
  16. 16. Larson RA. The antioxidants of higher plants. Phytochemistry. 1988;27(4):969-978
  17. 17. Kahkonen MP, Hopia AI, Vuorela HJ, Rauha JP, Pihlaja K, Kujala TS, et al. Antioxidant activity of plant extracts containing phenolic compounds. Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry. 1999;47(10):3954-3962
  18. 18. Nakayoma J, Yamada M. Suppression of active oxygen-indeed cytotoxicity by flavonoids. Biochemical Pharmacology. 1995;45:265-267
  19. 19. Bhadoriya U, Sharma P, Solanki SS. In vitro free radical scavenging activity of gallic acid isolated from Caesalpinia decapetala wood. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Disease. 2012:S833-S836
  20. 20. Xu DP, Li Y, Meng X, Zhou T, Zhou Y, Zheng J, et al. Natural antioxidants in foods and medicinal plants: Extraction, assessment and resources. International Journal of Molecular Science. 2017;18:96
  21. 21. National Bureau of Statistics. Annual Abstract of Statistics. Abuja, Nigeria: Federal Republic of Nigeria; 2011. p. 3
  22. 22. Aderogba MA, Okoh EK, Adelawa TA, Obuotor EM. Antioxidant properties of the Nigerian Piliostigma species. Journal of Biological Sciences. 2004;4(4):501-503
  23. 23. Ibrahim T, Muluh GK, Alexander A. Phytochemical screening, antioxidant and antibacterial activities of Commiphora kerstingii. International Biological and Biomedical Journal. 2015;2(3):126-133
  24. 24. Ogunlana OE, Ogunlana OO. In vitro assessment of the free radical scavenging activity of Psidium guajava. Research Journal of Agriculture and Biological Sciences. 2008;4(6):666-671
  25. 25. Azeez L, Adeoye MD, Majolagbe TA, Lawal AT, Badiru R. Antioxidant activity and phytochemical contents of some selected Nigerian fruits and vegetables. American Journal of Chemistry. 2012;2(4):209-213
  26. 26. Adetutu A, Morgana WA, Corcoran O. Ethnopharmacological survey and in vitro evaluation of wound-healing plants used in South-Western Nigeria. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 2011;137:50-56
  27. 27. Olajire AA, Azeez L. Total antioxidant activity, phenolic, flavonoid and ascorbic acid contents of Nigerian vegetables. African Journal of Food Science and Technology. 2011;2(2):22-29
  28. 28. Atiko R, Onocha PA, Oyedemi SO. Phytochemical analysis and antioxidant properties of leaves, stems and roots extracts of Lasianthera africana. Research Journal of Chemical Sciences. 2016;6(9):19-26
  29. 29. Ekaluo UB, Ikpeme EV, Ekerette EE, Chukwu CI. In vitro antioxidant and free radical activity of some Nigerian medicinal plants: Bitter leaf (Vernonia amygdalina L.) and guava (Psidium guajava Del.). Research Journal of Medicinal Plant. 2015;9(5):215-226
  30. 30. Sonibare MA, Aremu OT, Okorie PN. Antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of solvent fractions of Vernonia cinerea (L.) leaf extract. African Health Sciences. 2016;16(2):629-639
  31. 31. Abalaka ME, Daniyan SY, Akpor OB, Inyinbor AA. Antimicrobial, in-vitro free radical scavenging, antioxidant properties of leaf, bark and root extracts from Khaya senegalensis. UMYU Journal of Microbiology Research. 2016;1(1):46-54
  32. 32. Adebiyi OE, Olayemi FO, Ning-Hua T, Guang-Zhi Z. In vitro antioxidant activity, total phenolic and flavonoid contents of ethanol extract of stem and leaf of Grewia carpinifolia. Beni-Suef University Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences. 2017;6:10-14
  33. 33. Adeosun AM, Ighodaro OM, Aminu AO, Ogunlana AI. The antioxidant and phenolic profiles of five green vegetables grown in southern Nigeria. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Technologia Alimentaria. 2016;15(4):391-397
  34. 34. Dluya T, Daniel D, Umar Y. In vitro antioxidant activity and phytochemical evaluation of five medicinal plant extracts. The Pharmaceutical and Chemical Journal. 2017;4(5):73-82
  35. 35. Dluya T, Daniel D, Samuel AB. Studies on in vitro antioxidant activities of methanol extract of five African traditional plants. International Journal of Research in Pharmacy and Biosciences. 2017;4(11):28-36
  36. 36. Antia BS, Ita BN, Udo UE. Nutrient composition and in vitro antioxidant properties of Harungana madagascariensis stembark extracts. Journal of Medicinal Food. 2015;18(5):609-614
  37. 37. Okoh SO, Asekun OT, Familoni OB, Afolayan AJ. Antioxidant and free radical scavenging capacity of seed and shell essential oils extracted from Abrus precatorius (L). Antioxidants. 2014;3:278-287
  38. 38. Nwaehwujor OC, Ode JM, Akande OG. In vitro antioxidant activity of some herbal plants from Southern Nigeria. Journal of Medical Science. 2013;1(13):56-611
  39. 39. Sidiq LO, Segun PA, Ogbole OO. Total phenolic contents and antioxidant activity of nine medicinal plants used in nigerian traditional medicine. Tropical Journal of Natural Product Research. 2018;2(9):438-441
  40. 40. Ekere N, Okparanozie T, Agbo M. Effects of solvents on the in-vitro antioxidant activity of Dennettia tripetala G. Baker and Milicia excelsa (Welw.) C. Berg root extracts. Iranian Journal of Health Sciences. 2018;6(3):1-7
  41. 41. Ohikhena FU, Wintola OA, Afolayan AJ. Quantitative phytochemical constituents and antioxidant activities of the mistletoe, Phragmanthera capitata (Sprengel) Balle extracted with different solvents. Pharmacognosy Research. 2018;10:16-23
  42. 42. Osagie-Eweka SDE. Phytochemical analyses and comparative in vitro antioxidant studies of aqueous, methanol and ethanol stem bark extracts of Simarouba glauca DC. (Paradise tree). African Journal of Plant Science. 2018;12(1):7-16
  43. 43. Owolabi OO, James DB, Sani I, Andongma BT, Fasanya OO, Kure B. Phytochemical analysis, antioxidant and anti-inflammatory potential of Feretia apodanthera root bark extracts. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 2018;18:12. DOI: 10.1186/s12906-017-2070-z
  44. 44. Muhamad II, Hassan ND, Mamat SNH, Nawi NM, Rashid WA, Tan NA. Chapter 14: Extraction technologies and solvents of phytocompounds from plant materials: Physicochemical characterization and identification of ingredients and bioactive compounds from plant extract using various instrumentations. In: Ingredients Extraction by Physicochemical Methods in Food. Elsevier Inc.; 2017. pp. 523-560. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-811521-3.00014-4
  45. 45. Ajiboye AT, Musa MD, Otun KO, Jimoh AA, Bale AT, Lawal SO, et al. The studies of antioxidant and antimicrobial potentials of the leaf extract of Bauhinia monandra plant. Natural Products Chemistry and Research. 2015;3:180. DOI: 10.4172/2329-6836.1000180
  46. 46. Akachukwu D, Uchegbu R. GC-MS antimicrobial and in vitro antioxidant assay of the leaf extract of. Journal of Advances in Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2016;11(2):1-7
  47. 47. Mohammed A, Koorbanally NA, Islam S. Phytochemistry, antioxidative and antidiabetic effects of various parts of Eugenia caryophyllata thunb. in vitro. Acta Poloniae Pharmaceutica-Drug Research. 2015;72(6):1201-1215
  48. 48. Ibrahim MA, Koorbanally NA, Shahidul Islam MD. In vitro anti-oxidative activities and GC-MS analysis of various solvent extracts of Cassia singueana parts. Acta Poloniae Pharmaceutica-Drug Research. 2013;70(4):709-719
  49. 49. Iwara IA, Igile GO, Mboso OE, Mgbeje BIA, Ebong PE. Evaluation of phytochemical components from ethyl acetate fraction of Vernonia calvoana using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis and its antioxidants activities. African Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology. 2017;11(42):534-539
  50. 50. Atolani O, Olatunji GA. Chemical composition, antioxidant and cytotoxicity potential of Daniellia oliveri (Rolfe) Hutch. & Dalz. Turkish Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2016;13(1):41-46
  51. 51. Ololade ZS, Ogunmola OO, Kuyooro SE, Abiona OO. Stachytarpheta jamaicensis leaf extract: Chemical composition, antioxidant, anti-arthritic, anti-inflammatory and bactericidal potentials. Journal of Scientific and Innovative Research. 2017;6(4):119-125
  52. 52. Elufioye TO, Berida TI. GC-MS analysis and antioxidant activity of Spondias purpurea L (Anacardiaceae). Pharmacognosy Journal. 2018;10(5):941-945
  53. 53. Ogundajo A, Ashafa AT. Phytochemical compositions and In vitro assessments of antioxidant and antidiabetic potentials of fractions from Ehretia cymosa Thonn. Pharmacognosy Magazine. 2017;13(S3):470-480
  54. 54. Fasola TR, Oloyede GK, Aponjolosun SB. Chemical composition, toxicity and antioxidant activities of essential oils of stem bark of Nigerian species of guava (Psidium guajava Linn.). EXCLI Journal. 2011;10:34-43
  55. 55. Ololade ZS, Fakankun OA, Alao FO, Udi OU. Ocimum basilicum var. purpureum floral essential oil: phytochemicals, phenolic content, antioxidant, free radical scavenging and antimicrobial potentials. Global Journal of Science Frontier Research: B Chemistry. 2014;14(7):31-38
  56. 56. Owokotomo IA, Jabar JM, Abata EO. Radical scavenging activity of essential oils from some Nigerian medicinal plants and spices. Applied Tropical Agriculture. 2016;21(1):196-200
  57. 57. Okhale SE, Okoro IJ, Ezissi CC, Oladosu PO. GC-MS characterization, antimicrobial and antioxidant effects of the leaf essential oil of Calliandra portoricensis (Jacq.) Benth. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Research. 2018;3(1):38-43
  58. 58. Onocha A, Oloyede GK, Akintola JA. Chemical composition, free radical scavenging and antimicrobial activities of essential oil of Mariscus alternifolius Vahl Patricia. The Open Conference Proceedings Journal. 2016;7:160-167
  59. 59. Ololade ZS, Olawore NO, Oladosu IA. Phytochemistry and therapeutic potentials of the seed essential oil of Eucalyptus maculata Hook from Nigeria. Organic Chemistry Current Research. 2013;2:1
  60. 60. Boligon AA, Athayde ML. Importance of HPLC in analysis of plants extracts. Austin Chromatography. 2014;1(3):1-2
  61. 61. Adekunle AS, Kamdem JP, Rocha JBT. Antioxidant activity and HPLC analysis of Zanthozylum zanthoxyloide. Report and Opinion. 2012;4(3):6-13
  62. 62. Borokini FB, Labunmi L. In vitro investigation of antioxidant activities of Launea taraxacifolia and Crassocephalum rubens. International Journal of Food Studies. 2017;6:82-94
  63. 63. Piluzza G, Bullitta S. Correlations between phenolic content and antioxidant properties in twenty-four plant species of traditional ethnoveterinary use in the Mediterranean area. Pharmaceutical Biology. 2011;49(3):240-247
  64. 64. Kamdem JP, Stefanello ST, Boligon AA, Wagner C, Kade IJ, Pereira RP, et al. In vitro antioxidant activity of stem bark of Trichilia catigua Adr. Juss. Acta Pharmacetica. 2012;62:371-382
  65. 65. Obafemi TO, Akinmoladun AC, Olaleye MT, Onasanya A, Komolafe KC, Falode JA, et al. High performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) fingerprinting, mineral composition and in vitro antioxidant activity of methanol leaf extract of Synsepalum dulcificum (sapotaceae). Journal of Applied Pharmaceutical Science. 2017;7(11):110-118
  66. 66. Esievo KB, Fatokun OT, Adamu A, Egharevba HO. HPLC analysis, anti-oxidant and antiproliferative evaluation of methanol extracts of leaves and roots of Mondia whitei (Hook. f) Skeels. Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research. 2018;10(4):81-87
  67. 67. Kadiri O, Akanbi CT, Olawoye BT, Saka O, Gbadamosi SO. Characterization and antioxidant evaluation of phenolic compounds extracted from the protein concentrate and protein isolate produced from pawpaw (Carica papaya Linn.) seeds. International Journal of Food Properties. 2017;20(11):2423-2436
  68. 68. Onocha PA, Oloyede GK, Olasunkanmi GS. Chemical composition, brine shrimp toxicity and free-radical scavenging activity of leaf essential oil of Acalypha Ornata (Hochst). Advances in Environmental Biology. 2011;5(1):188-193
  69. 69. Mohammed A. Antioxidative and antidiabetic effects of some African medicinal plants [PhD Biochemistry]. School of Life Sciences, College of Agriculture, Engineering and Science, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa. 2016. pp. 1-250
  70. 70. Omonhinmin AC, Dike IP, Rotimi E. Phytochemical, cytotoxicity and antioxidant activities of five anti-malaria plants. Research Journal of Medicinal Plant. 2015. DOI: 10.3923/rjmp.2015.81.89
  71. 71. Ayoola GA, Coker HAB, Adesegun SA, Adepoju-Bello AA, Obaweya K, Ezennia EC, et al. Phytochemical screening and antioxidant activities of some selected medicinal plants used for malaria therapy in Southwestern Nigeria. Tropical Journal of Pharmaceutical Research. 2008;7(3):1019-1024
  72. 72. Omoregie ES, Oriakhi K, Oikeh EI, Okugbo OT, Akpobire A. Comparative study of phenolic content and antioxidant activity of leaf extracts of Alstonia boonei and Eupatorium odoratum. Nigerian Journal of Basic and Applied Science. 2014;22(3&4):91-97
  73. 73. Awah FM, Uzoegwu PN, Ifeonu P, Oyugi JO, Rutherford J, Yao XJ, et al. Free radical scavenging activity, phenolic contents and cytotoxicity of selected Nigerian medicinal plants. Food Chemistry. 2012;131:1279-1286
  74. 74. Ajileye OO, Obuotor EM, Akinkunmi EO, Aderogba MA. Isolation and characterization of antioxidant and antimicrobial compounds from Anacardium occidentale L. (Anacardiaceae) leaf extract. Journal of King Saud University-Science. 2015;27:244-252
  75. 75. Uche FI. Evaluation of antioxidant activities of some Nigerian medicinal plants by the use of 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) free radical. MSc Pharmaceutical Sciences Degree in Pharmacognosy. Department of Pharmacognosy Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Nigeria, Nsukka. 2010. p. 80
  76. 76. Aderogba MA, McGraw LJ, Ogundaini AO, Eloff JN. Antioxidant activity and cytotoxicity study of the flavonol glycosides from Bauhinia galpinii. Natural Product Research. 2007;21(7):591-599
  77. 77. Adesegun SA, Orabueze CI, Coker HAB. Antimalarial and antioxidant potentials of extract and fractions of aerial part of Borreria ocymoides DC (Rubiaceae). Pharmacognosy Journal. 2017;9(4):534-540
  78. 78. Gero A, Ahmad HS, Zezi AU, Hussaini IM. Evaluation of antioxidant activity of leave extract of Borreria verticillta Linn (Rubiaceae). Journal of Natural Sciences Research. 2014;4(9):31-38
  79. 79. Faboro EO, Witchitnihad W, Fadere OA, Akinpelu DA, Obefemi CA. Antibcterial and antioxidant and phytochemical screening of aqueous methanol extract of eight Nigerian medicinal and aromatic plants. Journal of Pharmacy Research. 2016;10(7):523-532
  80. 80. Falodun A, Irabor EEI. Phytochemical, proximate, antioxidant and free radical scavenging evaluations of Calliandria surinamensis. Acta Poloniae Pharmaceutica-Drug Research. 2008;65(5):571-575
  81. 81. Famobuwa OE, Adekunbi EA, Akinnifesi TA, Hassan GF. In vitro antioxidant and anti-bacterial properties of a contraceptive herbal mixture of Zanthoxylum zanthoxyloides Lam (Rutaceae), Euphorbia hirta Linn (Euphorbiaceae) and Abrus precatorius L. (Leguminosae). Journal of Advances in Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2016;7(1):1-7
  82. 82. Atiku I, Pateh UU, Musa AM, Sule MI, Sani YM, Abdullahi SM, et al. Phytochemical and antioxidant activity studies of the ethanol leaf extract of Ficus sycomorus (Family: Moraceae). Nigerian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2016;15(2):8-14
  83. 83. Essien GE, Effiong GS. Evaluation of antioxidant potentials in methanol extract of Gongronema latifolium and Lasiathera africana leaf. European Journal of Pharmaceutical and Medical Research. 2017;4(9):841-846
  84. 84. Kambizi L, Bakare-Odunola MT, Oladiji AT, Kola-Mustapha AT, Amusa TO, Atolani O, et al. Proteinase inhibition, membrane stabilization, antioxidant and phytochemical evaluations of leaves, seeds and calyces of four selected edible medicinal plants. Cogent Chemistry. 2017;3:1314064
  85. 85. Badmus JA, Ekpo OE, Rautenbach F, Marnawick JL, Hussein AA, Hiss DC. Isolation and antioxidant activity of flavonoids from Holarrhena floribunda (G.don) leaves. Acta Biochemica Polonica. 2016;63(2):353-358
  86. 86. Onoja OS, Ezeja MI, Omeh YN, Onwukwe BC. Antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and antinociceptive activities of methanolic extract of Justicia secunda Vahl leaf. Alexandria Journal of Medicine. 2017;53:207-213
  87. 87. Oriola AO, Aladesanmi AJ, Idowu TO, Akinkunmi EO, Obuotor EM, Ogunsina MO. A new bioactive thiophenolic glycoside from the leaf of Massularia acuminata (g. don bullock) ex hoyle (Rubiaceae). African Journal of Traditional, Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 2014;11(2):319-323
  88. 88. Halilu ME, October N, Balogun M, Namrita L, Abubakar MS. Studies of in vitro antioxidant and cytotoxic activities of extracts and isolated compounds from Parinari curatellifolia (Chrysobalanaceae). Journal of Natural Sciences Research. 2013;3(13):149-154
  89. 89. Adesegun SA, Elechi NA, Coker HAB. Antioxidant activities of methanol extract of Sapium ellipticum. Pakistan Journal Biological Sciences. 2008;11(3):453-457
  90. 90. Ojo OA, Ojo AB, Ajiboye BO, Olaiya O, Okesola MA, Boligon AA, et al. HPLC-DAD fingerprinting analysis, antioxidant activities of Tithonia diversifolia (Hemsl.) A. Gray leaves and its inhibition of key enzymes linked to Alzheimer’s disease. Toxicology Reports. 2018;5:585-592
  91. 91. Halilu ME, Usman AO, Sani NA, Hassan LG, Ugwuah-Oguejiofor CJ, Bello SS. Evaluation of free radical scavenging activity of Vernonia migeodii (S. Moore) leave extracts. Nigerian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Research. 2016;1(1):8-13
  92. 92. Yusuf AA, Lawal B, Abubakar AN, Berinyuy EB, Omonije YO, Umar SI, et al. In-vitro antioxidants, antimicrobial and toxicological evaluation of Nigerian Zingiber officinale. Clinical Phytoscience. 2018;4:12
  93. 93. Aderogba MA, Ogundaini AO, Eloff JN. Isolation of two flavonoids from Bauhinia monandra (kurz) leaves and their antioxidative effects. African Journal of Traditional, Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 2006;3(4):59-65
  94. 94. Aladejare TT, Obuotor EM, Aderogba MA. Isolation and characterization of antioxidant compounds from Annona senegalensis leaf extracts. Nigerian Journal of Natural Products and Medicine. 2018;22:124-128
  95. 95. Ajaghaku DL, Obasi O, Umeokoli BO, Ogbuatu P, Nworu CS, Ilodigwe EE, et al. In vitro and in vivo antioxidant potentials of Alchornea floribunda leaf extract, fractions and isolated bioactive compounds. Avicenna Journal of Phytomedicine. 2017;7(1):80-92
  96. 96. Jibril S, Sirat HM, Basar N. Bioassay-guided isolation of antioxidants and α-glucosidase inhibitors from the root of Cassia sieberiana D.C. (Fabaceae). Records of Natural Product. 2017;11(4):406-410
  97. 97. Taiwo BJ, Obuotor EM, Onawunmi GO, Oguntuga AO. Radical scavenging compounds from the aerial parts of Solenostemon monostachys BRIQ (LAMIACEAE). African Journal of Traditional Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 2015;12(6):140-144
  98. 98. Aderogba MA, McGawc LJ, Bezabihb M, Abegazb BM. Isolation and characterization of novel antioxidant constituent of Croton zambesicus leaf extract. Natural Product Research. 2011;25(13):1224-1233
  99. 99. Jide FF, Abiodun OO. Evaluation of antioxidant and antimicrobial properties of two isolates from Aspilia africana. International Research Journal of Pharmacy. 2012;3(7):135-138
  100. 100. Ndhlala AR, Aderogba MA, Ncube B, van Staden J. Antioxidative and cholinesterase inhibitory effects of leaf extracts and their isolated compounds from two closely related Croton species. Molecules. 2013;18:1916-1932
  101. 101. Idowu TO, Ogundaini AO, Adesanya SA, Onawunmi GO, Osungunna MO, Obuotor EM, et al. Isolation and characterization of chemical constituents from Chrysophyllum albidum stem-bark extracts and their antioxidant and antibacterial properties. African Journal of Traditional Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 2016;13(5):182-189
  102. 102. Johnson EC, Etim EI, Archibong EO. Isolation and anti-oxidant potentials of para-hydroxybenzaldehyde from the methanol leaf extract of Aspilia africana (Pers.) C.D. Adams (Asteraceae). Nigerian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Applied Science Research. 2017;6(1):26-32

Written By

Abubakar Babando Aliyu, Jonathan Ilemona Achika, Joseph Adesina Adewuyi, Patience Gangas, Hamisu Ibrahim and Adebayo Ojo Oyewale

Submitted: 09 September 2018 Reviewed: 16 January 2019 Published: 08 July 2019