Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Intermetallics Formation and Their Effect on Mechanical Properties of Al-Si-X Alloys

By Williams S. Ebhota and Tien-Chien Jen

Submitted: May 22nd 2017Reviewed: December 18th 2017Published: May 30th 2018

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.73188

Downloaded: 428

Abstract

This study focuses on primary impurities, called intermetallics, in the microstructure of Al-Si-X alloys, their formation, effects and treatments to eliminate or ameliorate their deleterious effects. Intermetallic compounds are usually formed when alloying elements, such as Fe, Cu, Mn, Mg and Sr. are added to Al-Si based alloys. These elements are depicted by X in the alloys formation expression. The chapter noted that the most common intermetallics are iron (Fe) based, and several of these Fe-phases, including the most harmful Fe-phase, β-Al5SiFe, are listed and discussed. Fe-phase intermetallics are deleterious to the mechanical properties of Al-alloys; however, addition of <0.7% Fe helps prevent soldering in die casting mould. The effects of Fe-phase and other intermetallics formed by Cu, Mg and Mn were examined. Further, some techniques of eliminating or mitigating the negative influences of intermetallics were discussed.

Keywords

  • Al-Si alloys
  • Fe intermetallics
  • aluminium alloys intermetallics
  • impurities in aluminium alloys
  • alloying elements

1. Introduction

Eutectic and near-eutectic alloys of Al-Si-X (ternary systems) have many areas of applications, particularly in the automotive, airspace and marine industries, due to their exceptional properties. X in Al-Si-X formation represents one or more alloying elements, such as copper (Cu), magnesium (Mg), nickel (Ni), iron (Fe), etc. Large quantities of aluminium (Al) alloys (Al-Si-X) are required in engineering applications, especially in automotive and airspace industries [1, 2, 3, 4]. The mean aluminium consumption in automobiles in Europe is shown in Figure 1. The increasing demand and studies on these alloys seem to be proportionate, as several studies have been reported on Al-Si-X alloys’ microstructure, mechanical properties and their modifications [5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11]. The high demand is due to the excellent high strength-to-weight ratio, abrasion and corrosion resistance and low coefficient of thermal expansion possess by aluminium alloys. Besides these properties, aluminium alloys application is limited by certain mechanical property drawbacks, such as partially inherited as-cast microstructure, existence of unavoidable metastable intermetallics and intra-dendritic zones of microstructure [12, 13]. Eutectic and near-eutectic Al–Si-X alloys depend on chemical composition, morphology of dendritic α-Al, and intermetallics that are present in the microstructure for mechanical properties. Coupled with the size and morphology of eutectic Si and the precipitation hardening phases during heat treatment, describing the myriad variables responsible for mechanical properties is quite complex.

Figure 1.

The mean aluminium consumption in automobiles in Europe [15].

These alloys are usually produced from secondary alloys and recycling processes. Many of their based alloys contain impurities, while the levels of impurities in the recycled ones are multiplied during recycling process. Alloying elements, such as Mg, Cu and silicon (Si) are deliberately added to Al alloys to enhance their mechanical properties. Apart from the intentionally added elements, impurities such as Fe, Cu, Cr, Manganese (Mn), and transition metals are usually present [14]. Although these impurities are at trace levels in the alloys, they form new phase components called intermetallics that significantly influence the properties of the microstructures. Quite often, these impurities are strong sites for crack initiation that serve as weak points for decohesion failure. However, intermetallics of Al or Si show resistance to corrosion and oxidation due to their adherent surface oxides; intermetallics of light elements are applied in light weight areas due to their attractive low density, which gives rise to highly specific properties.

The total amount of intermetallics in as-cast alloys is below 5% volume. Despite a few intermetallics in the cast microstructure, the detrimental effects on the ductility and service performance of alloys are huge. Controlling and manipulating the development of the metastable intermetallics during non-equilibrium solidification are of technological interests. This chapter, therefore, centres on the understanding of intermetallics in Al-Si-X alloys, their formation, nature, their effects on mechanical properties and methods of mitigating their adverse influences. There are several published studies on the type of intermetallics in Al-Si-X alloys and their effects as presented in Table 1.

RefAl-AlloyIntermetallicsEffects on mechanical properties
[16, 17]Al-Fe-Fe is highly soluble in molten Al but low in solid Al (max 0.05 wt.%, 0.025 atm.%)Al3FeIt cracks and reduces formability and fatigue resistance but Improves wear resistance
Al6FeThe effect of Al6Fe fibres on fatigue properties of Al-Fe alloys is not very clear yet, though is said to be finely dispersed.
[18, 19, 20, 21, 22]Fe combines with other elements to form intermetallic phase particles of various types
Al-Si-Feβ-Al5FeSi;Deleterious; stress raiser
α-Al8Fe2SiLess harmful
δ-Al4FeSiMetastable
Al-Si-Mg-Feπ-Al8Mg3FeSi6It has negative impact on ductile properties; lower strength and ductility
Al9FeMg3Si5improved significantly after the T6 heat treatment
Mg2SiDetrimental to the alloys’ ductility
[23]Al-Mn-FeAl6(Fe,Mn)Significantly deteriorate the mechanical properties of alloy
Al-Si-Mn-Fe
(Excess Mn + Al5FeSi)
α-Al15(FeMn)3Si2
(China script)
Not very harmful but reduces the machinability
[24, 25]Al-Cu
(Cu 1–4%)
θ-Al2CuImprove mechanical properties-they decrease the grain size and increase the fatigue life
Al-Si-Cu-Mg
(Cu 1–4%)
(Q) AI5Cu2Mg8Si6

Table 1.

Studies on the types of intermetallics in al-Si-X alloys and their effects on mechanical properties.

2. Formation processes of intermetallic compounds and their identification

The equilibrium and non-equilibrium reactions that occur during the casting of Al alloy account for intermetallic phases. Coarse intermetallic particles are formed in the interdendritic regions during solidification or at a relatively high temperature in the solid state during solution treatment, homogenisation, or recrystallization [14]. Most metals, except for Mg and Cu, exhibit a low solid solubility in Al. When the amount of solute element exceeds the limit of solid solubility, an intermediate phase, also called second phase, is developed. The composition of the intermediate phase is in between two pure metals (primary components) and has a varied crystal structure from the primary components. The intermediate phase, with unchanging composition, is called an intermetallic compound. Therefore, intermetallics are products of incomplete solid solubility by alloy systems. Intermetallic compounds identification in Al alloys is critical to complex structure examination. Microstructural examination is one of the primary ways of evaluating the evolution of phases in materials. This evaluation promotes the understanding of the effects of composition, production technique, heat treatments and deformation process on alloys’ mechanical behaviours. Also, it is used to investigate the influences of new fabrication processes and to analyse failure mechanisms and causes.

2.1. Identification of intermetallics

2.1.1. Fe-Intermetallics

The known intermetallic compounds in aluminium and its alloys are categorised into two systems: binary (Al-Fe and Fe-Si) and ternary systems. The following phases have been reported to exist in Al-Fe binary systems: Al5Fe2, Al3Fe, Al2Fe Al13Fe4 and Al8Fe5 [26, 27, 28]. In the case of a Fe-Si system, the following stable compounds were found: FeSi, Fe2Si, FeSi2, and Fe5Si3 [2930]. Phase equilibria of the binary systems are generally well known. The ternary system is characterised by a large number phases, both metastable and stable. Several review papers on Al-Fe-Si ternary phases have been published [23, 24, 25]. Gosh appraised over 150 research papers on ternary phases that covered unto 1986 [30, 31]. More updates have been provided by other authors [30] and in 2008, Du et al. presented about 24 Al-Si-Fe ternary compounds [32]. A summary of all the significant phases of both binary and ternary systems are presented in Table 2.

Binary systemsDenary systems (Al-Si-Fe)
Al-FeAl-SiFe-SiAl2Fe3Si3Al4.5FeSi
AlFe (α2)HT-FeSi2 (Fe2Si5)FeSiAl3FeSiAl3Fe2Si3
AlFe31)LT-FeSi2FeSi2Al21.5-45Fe36.5–37.5Si8.5–41.5aAl64.5–67.5Fe15.5–16.5Si17-19a
Al2FeFe2SiFe2SiAl2FeSiAl2Fe3Si4
Al5Fe2Fe5Si3Fe5Si3Al53.9–65.3Fe19.5–20.5Si15.2–25.6aAl39.2–48.7Fe23.5–24.5Si27.8–36.3a
Al13Fe4FeSiAl3FeSi2Al24.1–28.6Fe31.9–32.9Si39.5-43a
Al8Fe5 (e)Al53-56Fe23.5–24.5Si20.5–22.5aAl57-59Fe24-25Si17-18a
Al7.4Fe2SiAl4Fe1.7Si
Al45.5-54Fe15.5–16.5Si30.5-38aAl64–66.5Fe24-25Si9.5–11a
Al68-72Fe18–19.5Si10–12.5a

Table 2.

A summary of both binary and ternary systems.

In a study, the effects of Cu, Fe, Mg, Mn, and Sr. additions on the type of intermetallic compounds formed in Al-Si eutectic alloys were investigated and reported [33]. Many eutectic alloys (SP0, SP1 SP2, SP3, SP4, and SP5) were developed by adding elements Cu, Fe, Mn, Mg and Sr. to A413.1. The chemical compositions of the various alloys produced for the experiment are presented in Table 3.

Phase typeAlloy codeAlSiCuFeCrMnMgSr/ppm*Suggested composition
α-FeSp060.309.930.4818.431.838.99120Al12.7(Fe,Mn,Cr,Cu)3Si2
Sp060.329.930.4919.171.678.4100Al12.7(Fe,Mn,Cr,Cu)3Si2
Sp059.819.580.9821.100.967.5700Al13.6(Fe,Mn,Cr,Cu)3.3Si2
Sp066.369.900.8814.721.426.7100Al14(Fe,Mn,Cr,Cu)2.3Si2
Sp065.149.520.5816.071.487.19180Al12.6(Fe,Mn,Cr,Cu)3Si2
Sp061.0910.100.3919.051.879.1142Al12.1(Fe,Mn,Cr,Cu)2.9Si2
Sp060.1010.130.4018.281.908.78110Al12.3(Fe,Mn,Cr,Cu)2.8Si2
Sp459.910.51.2914.71.7912.80.01132Al11.7(Fe,Mn,Cr,Cu)2.9Si2
Sp560.5910.40.7917.02.3210.3000109Al12.2(Fe,Mn,Cr,Cu)3Si2
Sp570.518.921.4412.880.634.940.08000Al16.5(Fe,Mn,Cr,Cu)2.2Si2
Sp561.839.630.6720.101.298.79000452Al13.4(Fe,Mn,Cr,Cu)3.3Si2
Sp561.89.430.6020.621.268.30000000Al13.7(Fe,Mn,Cr,Cu)3.3Si2
Sp561.0910.40.9019.041.588.77000000Al12.3(Fe,Mn,Cr,Cu)2.9Si2
Sp561.4610.11.1020.771.028.030.01236Al12.7(Fe,Mn,Cr,Cu)3.1Si2
Range59.8–70.68.9–10.50.4–1.4414.7–21.10.63–2.34.9–12.8Al11.7–16.5(Fe,Mn,Cr,Cu)2.2–3.3Si2
Average62.29.90.7918.01.58.5Al13(Fe,Mn,Cr,Cu)2.9Si2
β-FeSp166.25180.2114.10.114.6800Al7.1(Fe,Mn,Cr,Cu)Si1.8
Sp171.29.660.3313.560.114.23241Al8.0(Fe,Mn,Cr,Cu)Si
Sp156.717.680.0522.80.033.800Al4.4(Fe,Mn,Cr,Cu)Si1.3
Sp168.517.30.2516.50.053.5500Al7.0(Fe,Mn,Cr,Cu)Si1.7
Sp272.314.80.1310.70.072.72352Al10.7(Fe,Mn,Cr,Cu)Si2.1
Sp260.917.90.0520.00.054.500Al5.0(Fe,Mn,Cr,Cu)Si1.4
Sp455.717.90.1022.20.053.880.11129Al4.39(Fe,Mn,Cr,Cu)Si1.36
Sp454.718.40.1521.30.063.721.69000Al4.47(Fe,Mn,Cr,Cu)Si1.59
Sp455.617.90.1022.10.033.610.44000Al4.43(Fe,Mn,Cr,Cu)Si1.41
Sp456.418.10.0623.00.033.790.02000Al4.33(Fe,Mn,Cr,Cu)Si1.34
Range54.4–72.39.6–18.40.05–0.3310.7–230.03–0.112.72–4.68Al4.3–10.7(Fe,Mn,Cr,Cu)Si1–2.21
Average61.816.70.1418.60.063.8Al6(Fe,Mn,Cr,Cu)Si1.5
Mg2S Pi phaseSp30.3337.362.400Mg1.9Si
Sp349.326.50.138.160.101.6614.7600Al10.3(Fe,Mn,Cr,Cu)Si5.3Mg3.4
Sp352.325.80.197.890.051.2313.2700Al11.8(Fe,Mn,Cr,Cu)Si5.6Mg3.3
Sp348.626.10.089.190.010.9615.0300Al9.9(Fe,Mn,Cr,Cu)Si5.1Mg3.4
Sp251.025.40.118.110.081.4413.8700Al11.0(Fe,Mn,Cr,Cu)Si5.3Mg3.3
Sp249.626.50.208.77000.6314.2200Al10.9(Fe,Mn,Cr,Cu)Si5.6Mg3.5
Sp248.026.80.129.30000.7914.97127Al9.9(Fe,Mn,Cr,Cu)Si5.3Mg3.4
Sp446.727.40.187.910.041.9115.9000Al9.6(Fe,Mn,Cr,Cu)Si5.4Mg3.6
Sp447.527.40.278.500.021.2615.9000Al9.9(Fe,Mn,Cr,Cu)Si5.5Mg3.7
Sp448.426.70.469.580.132.4415.1000Al8.1(Fe,Mn,Cr,Cu)Si4.3Mg2.8
Sp446.927.40.158.150.031.9815.9000Al9.4(Fe,Mn,Cr,Cu)Si5.2Mg3.5
Range46.7–52.325.4–27.40.08–0.467.9–9.60–0.130.6–2.4413.3–15.9Al8.1–11.8(Fe,Mn,Cr,Cu)Si4.3–5.6Mg2.8–3.7
Average48.926.60.198.60.041.4314.9Al9(Fe,Mn,Cr,Cu)Si5.3Mg3.4
Q phasesSp316.5631.619.230.100.010.0134.67000Al4Mg9.4Cu2Si7.4
Sp317.5631.620.360.0400000036.51117Al4Mg9.4Cu2Si7
Sp318.6231.419.510.120000.0136.29000Al4.5Mg9.7Cu2Si7.3
Sp320.8826.617.250.02000038.01000Al4.4Mg8.4Cu2Si7
Sp422.5128.518.90.140.010.0139.28000Al4.6Mg8Cu2Si6.8
Sp421.730.218.40.100.0200037.89Al4.1Mg7.8Cu2Si7.7
Range16.6–22.526.6–31.617.2–20.30.02–0.1428–36.5Al4–4.4Mg7.8–9.7Cu2Si6.8–7.7
Average23.63018.90.832.8Al4Mg8.8Cu2Si7.2

Table 3.

Analysis of chemical composition of intermetallic phases [33].

Microstructural examination shows the presence of α-Fe Chinese script phases in alloys SP0, SP4 and SP5, with a reasonable amount of Mn, as shown in Figure 2. The morphology of Chinese script of the α-Fe phase arises during solidification of eutectic alongside α-Al. The appearance of α-Fe phase could be polyhedrons if it solidifies before the eutectic reaction occurs [34].

Figure 2.

Refs. [33, 34] shows (a) non-modified PS0 alloy; (b) shows compact SEM image of phase; (c) structure of over modified PS4 alloy –note the presences of Al4SrSi2 particles on top of a-Fe morphology.

2.1.2. α- and β-Fe phases

The platelet β-AlFeSi particles are found in the Sp1, Sp2 and Sp4 alloys. The β phase is known to be a primary phase, with a three-dimensional form of a platelet that looks like needles in a two-dimensional optical micrograph, as shown in Figure 3. The β-Fe phase chemical composition observed vary within Al9Fe2Si2, Al9FeSi, Al13.6Fe3 Si3.05, Al13.3Fe3Si3.3 and Al13.6Fe3Si3.4 [35]. The phases are generally represented by the chemical formula Al5FeSi, despite the non-inclusion of alloying elements such as Cu, Mn, etc. The α-phase is the second type of the script-like; it has a lower amount of Fe which is between 23.88 and 26.79 wt.%, with Si in the range of 6.87 and 8.38 wt.%. The chemical formula of the phase is Al10.42–11.67Fe2Si1.08–1.25. The second type of the script-like a phase has a lower iron content, between 23.88 and 26.79 wt.%, a silicon content lying between 6.87 and 8.38 wt.%, and a chemical formula of Al10.42–11.67Fe2Si1.08–1.25.

Figure 3.

Optical micrograph of (a) β-Fe phase (needles) in alloy Sp1 and (b) SEM image showing 3-D platelet morphology of β-Fe phase [33].

2.1.3. δ- and pi-phase α- and β-Fe phases

Apart from α- and β-AlFeSi phases commonly found in Fe intermetallic compounds, there are other phases that are occasionally found [33]. These phases include δ-Al4FeSi2 and pi-Al8Mg3FeSi6 compounds, shown in the micrographs in Figure 4. The formation of the δ-Al4FeSi2 phase is favoured by high amount of Si in Al-Si eutectic alloys. This phase is considered to be the richest in Si of the Al-Fe-Si phases, and looks like platelet morphology and shows grey level under optical microscope like β-phase [21, 36]. The disparity in the Fe/Si atomic ratio in the examined β-phase particles is most likely the outcome of the partial conversion of the δ-phase to the β-phase via the peritectic decomposition as in the expression [37]:

Figure 4.

(a) β-Al5FeSi transforming into pi-phase in Sp4 alloy; (b) presence of pi-phase and phases of Mg2Si Chinese script in SP3 alloy [33].

Liq. + δ-Al4FeSi2 → β-Al5FeSi + Si.

The pi-Al8Mg3FeSi6 phase is usually present in the precipitates of an alloy containing relatively high Mg, such as Sp3 and Sp4 in Table 3.

2.2. Mg2Si phase

The precipitate, Mg2Si, is usually observed to in all Al–Si–Mg alloys, at the edge of pi phase particles. It appears in the form of black Chinese script particles, as shown in Figure 4. The precipitate can also be found at the edge of primary Si and the average chemical analysis of the Mg2Si provided in Table 3.

2.3. Al2Cu and Q-phases

Copper concentration increases with the solid fraction and segregates to the liquid during solidification. Al–Al2Cu is formed to the end of solidification. A study has suggested that addition of alloying elements, such as Mg and Sr phase, does not alter the stability of the Al2Cu [33]. During final solidification, the Q-phase, Q-Al5Mg8Si6Cu2, grows out from Al2Cu particles. The EDX spectrum in Figure 5, shown that Q-phase has a reflection of elements, such as Al, Cu, Si and Mg, in the alloy.

Figure 5.

(a) Q-phase growing out of Al2Cu phase; (b) energy dispersive spectroscopy corresponding to Q phase in (a) [33].

Secondary alloys were prepared from recycling of cast Al alloys scrap of AlSi9Cu3, AlSi12Cu1Fe and AlSi8Zn10Mg were investigated for intermetallic compounds [38]. The chemical compositions of the recycled alloys are presented in Table 4.

Materials elementsAlSi9Cu3AlSi12Cu1FeAlSi8Zn10Mg
Si9.412.58.64
Cu2.40.850.005
Mn0.240.2450.181
Mg0.280.3470.452
Zn10.429.6
Ni0.050.0390.0022
Fe0.90.6920.1143
Pb0.090.055
Ti0.040.0260.0622
Cr0.040.0230.0014
Sn0.030.01
Hg0.0006
Ca0.0010.0002
Cd0.0001
Bi0.0003
P0.0001
Sb0.0007
AlRemainderRemainderRemainder

Table 4.

Chemical composition of the recycled of cast al alloys scrap (wt.%).

The intermetallics found in recycled cast alloys, AlSi12Cu1Fe, AlSi8Zn10Mg and AlSi9Cu3, are presented Figures 6 and 7.

Figure 6.

Intermetallic phases in the microstructures of recycled al-Si-X cast alloys [38] (a–c) intermetallics in AlSi8Zn10Mg cast alloy; (e–h) intermetallics in AlSi12Cu1Fe cast alloy; (d & i) microstructures of secondary AlSi8Zn10Mg and AlSi12Cu1Fe alloys respectively.

Figure 7.

Intermetallic compounds in recycled AlSi9Cu3 cast alloy.

3. Effect of intermetallic on mechanical and physical properties of al-Si alloys

The presence of intermetallic compounds in Al alloys is of a great concern to materials engineers due to their harmful effects on mechanical properties. Mechanical properties of Al-Si-X alloys are greatly affected by the structures of the intermetallic. Intermetallics compounds appear more in recycled Al-Si based alloys, however, cycling which is a secondary production process of Al and its alloys is cheaper than primary production process. Therefore, producing Al alloys devoid of deleterious intermetallic phases will positively affect Al and its alloys recycle market and decrease the use of primary method that requires high fabrication power consumption.

The β-phase platelets are usually potential sites for crack initiation, where eventual breakup failure occurs. Iron-based intermetallics dominate Al-Si-X alloys’ intermetallics studies. Commercially available alloys contain Fe impurities in the form of Al and Si and other elements phases. In conductive liquids, the presence of certain Fe-phases, Al3Fe and α-AlFeSi, on the surface stimulates pitting attacks on the surface because α-AlFeSi is cathodic in the Al matrix. The greatest disadvantage of intermetallics is their low ductility, especially at low and transitional temperatures. This has been attributed to several factors, such as [39]:

  1. A restricted number of simple deformation modes to suit the von Mises criterion,

  2. Dislocations operation with large slip vectors

  3. Restricted cross-slip

  4. Transmitting slip across grain boundaries complexity

  5. Inherent grain boundary weakness

  6. Isolation of harmful solutes to grain boundaries

  7. High Peierls-Nabarro stress and covalent bonding

  8. Environmental vulnerability.

3.1. Fe intermetallics

The presence of the dispersed brittle intermetallic ß-Al5FeSi phase in the structure is one of the primary barriers that impede the bendability of Al-Si based alloy sheet and consequently, poor mechanical formability. During sheet bending and forming processes, these particles create damage and premature failure. Intermetallic, ß-Al5FeSi, forms thin brittle platelets that cause weak bond strengths within the matrix of α-Al, thus initiating crack sites around the structure. This deleterious behaviour is especially severe in sheets produced by strip casting, a cost-effective fabrication method, which should be economically suitable for automotive Al alloys production [40]. In Al-Si based casting, Fe is the most common deleterious impurity element and forms the intermetallic compound ß-Al5FeSi when levels of Fe in an alloy exceed critical percentage. Solid solubility of Fe in Al is very low and consequently combines with other impurities or alloying elements to form intermetallic compounds. The type of compound formed depends on the other available impurities. An optical micrograph of the Al-Si-1.8Fe-0.8Mn microstructure is shown in Figure 8.

Figure 8.

Optical micrograph of al-Si-1.8Fe-0.8Mn microstructure [41].

However, Fe is required in pressure die casting to prevent liquid metal from soldering to the die [42, 43]. For optimal thermal performance, Fe is desirable for Al-Si alloys to maintain stable mechanical properties at high temperatures. The Al alloys formed by Cu and Mg addition, are known for high strength due to precipitation hardening. These alloys, however, lose their strength at elevated temperatures because of unstable precipitates formed by Cu and Mg. Addition of Fe to alloys makes them stable at high temperatures compared to alloys with Cu and Mg addition. Transition elements such as Fe, upon addition to Al alloys, yield thermally stable intermetallics. The composition of eutectic Al-Si-Fe alloy is about 0.8 wt.% Fe. The liquid metal does not show affinity of dissolution with the steel mould, once the iron content is at approximately this level. The desirable Fe content in alloys in most Al pressure die casters is in the range of 0.8–1.1 wt.% Fe.

The class of wrought Al alloys, 6xxx series, is known for good corrosion resistance and high strength to density ratio. These alloys are good substitutes for steel in the manufacturing of automobile body panels. Apart from their principal compositional elements, Al, Mg, and Si, 6xxx alloys also possess Fe, Cu, Mn, and Cr, which sometimes are not deliberately added. The presence of these elements, especially Fe, promotes the development of different brittle iron-containing intermetallic compounds [44]. These Fe intermetallics cause poor formability and consequently, stimulate premature failure and damage during bending and forming operations. This drawback limits the application of 6xxx alloys in both automotive and aerospace industries [40, 45, 46].

3.2. Other Fe-phases

Other phases that have a detrimental influence on the alloy properties are Al3Fe and α-AlFeSi, which is cathodic to the α-Al matrix. Their presence on the surface accelerates pitting attacks in conductive liquids. Subsequently, these affect the mechanical property of the alloy by decreasing its ductility and resulting in de-cohesion failure. Equally, the platelets and needles of β-phase intermetallic, may adversely affect the alloy’s castability, fluidity, and dendrites channel feeding, which results in cast defects. The different intermetallic phases in Al-Si eutectic alloys depend on the composition of the alloys. However, the phases in the microstructure with Cu and Mg, β-Al–Fe–Si–X and Sr, which are usually called Chinese script phases, are most studied. Virtually in all the alloys microstructures, α-AlFeSiCuMg phases with the Chinese script morphology are the dominant Fe intermetallic phases [47]. The composition of the alloy affects the morphology and location of intermetallic phases in α-Al or in the interdendritic regions.

3.3. Manganese, Mn

Often, Mn is found in secondary metal made from recycled wrought product and is usually not deliberately added to virgin cast alloys. Manganese can transform iron-rich (Al5FeSi) phases morphology of Al-Si-X alloy from platelets to a more cubic or globules (Al15(MnFe)3Si2) and this improves the alloy’s ductility and tensile strength. Figure 9 shows micrographs of Al-Si-X structure with (a) iron-rich Al5FeSi phase; and (b) Cubic Al15(MnFe)3Si2 form.

Figure 9.

(a) Formation of a thick polyhedral α-Al15(Fe,Mn)3Si2 phase in the microstructure of the Al9Si0.8Fe alloy containing 0.7 wt.% of Mn; (b) micrograph of the Al9Si0.8Fe alloy containing 0.7 wt.% of Mn showing the presence of the β-Al5FeSi particles [2].

It is recommended that Mn should be over 50% of Fe when the amount of Fe exceeds 0.45 wt.%. Manganese (Mn) is more influential in causing gravity segregation than Fe. Application of Mn concentration that exceeds 0.6 wt.% causes segregation whether the Fe content is 0.8 or 2.3 wt.% [48]. Further, Mondolfo [21] reported that Mn marginally improves strength at the expense of ductility, while Kashyap et al. [49] indicate that presence of Mn weakens the strength of Al-7Si-Mg alloy.

Several literatures have indicated that Mn enhances yield strength and ultimate tensile strength of wrought Al-Si alloys [50, 51]. Formation of fine dispersoids of about 0.03–0.3 μm by the addition of Zr, Cr and Mn to commercial aluminium alloys was reported in these studies. Dispersoids significantly affect alloy’s fracture toughness, strength, grain structures and recrystallization characteristics. Investigation has revealed that commercial 6000, 7000 and 8000 series aluminium alloys are improved by the addition of manganese with it ductility retailed [52].

4. Processes to eliminate or ameliorate intermetallic deleterious effects

Many studies have reported various approaches and techniques in improving the mechanical properties of Fe-bearing intermetallics by the application of modification principle. Rapid solidification process increases the solubility fields and alters the morphology and size of microstructural elements but does not eliminate intermetallics. Das et al. demonstrated the effect of rapid cooling on alloy by processing Rheocast A380 alloy, using cooling slope (CS) technique to generate semisolid slurry from the superheated alloy melt [53]. The study observed finer, near spherical grains within the cooling slope fabricated slurry and in the solidified castings. This structure is different from the dendritic grains bounded by large eutectic phase within the conventionally cast A380 alloy. However, the most harmful intermetallic phase, β-Al5FeSi (monoclinic), was found to be present, accounting for the alloy’s low ductility and consequent poor mechanical formability [54].

The Al–Si–Cu ternary system alloy, A380, has minute fractions of Fe, Mg, Mn, Ni and Zn. These impurity elements interact to form intermetallic compounds near the grain boundary and occasionally in the parent matrix. The expected intermetallics phases in A380 alloy are α-phase, β-phase (Al5FeSi), and (Al15(Fe,Mn)3Si2). β-phase morphology is platelet-like (needle-like) appearance and serves as a stress-raiser in the matrix, while α-Phase morphology is like polyhedral crystals and sometimes like Chinese script. The detrimental effects of intermetallic need to be removed or reduced; some of the techniques that are exploited include thermal treatment, chemical solutions and microstructural control by co-injecting inoculated intermetallic particles [54, 55, 56].

Thermal treatment—Heat treatment is a normal alternative to be considered. However, the dissolved phase possibly precipitated by thermal homogenisation process during artificial or natural ageing. This is not very effective because thermodynamically, stable phases are not influenced by heat treatment.

Chemical solutions—Conventional metallurgical chemical processes are used to eliminate the deleterious effects of Fe in Al alloys by limiting the amount of Fe to prevent the formation of Al-Fe-Si compounds.

Microstructural control—Co-injecting inoculated intermetallic particles is used to manipulate the microstructure. The particles, which vaporised during spray-forming, act as a substrate for heterogeneous nucleation, promoting nucleation and grow into the cubic. This principle involves the alteration of the type, size, morphology and the dispersion of the intermetallics in these alloys. Hosseinifar and Malakhov reported that the addition of 0.2% wt lanthanum (La) decreased the fraction of deleterious plate-like β-AlFeSi phase and increased the amount of a lesser harmful, α-AlFeSi phase [57]. It was explained that La covers the surface of the Chinese script particles (α-AlFeSi), a behaviour inferred to be like that of Strontium (Sr) addition. SEM images of Chinese script-shaped intermetallic compounds and the morphology of the β-AlFeSi phase are shown in Figure 10.

Figure 10.

SEM images showing the (a) presence of the Chinese script-shaped intermetallic compounds [58]; (b) morphology of the b-AlFeSi phase [57].

The addition of a sufficient amount of Mn to Fe-rich intermetallics can defuse its brittleness and alter the platelet morphology to a less deleterious intermetallic compound [43, 59]. However, the addition of Mn to a melt containing Fe leads to another problem, as this increases the volume fraction of intermetallics and the mean diameter size of Fe solute. This development deteriorates the alloy’s mechanical properties [60]. Table 5 shows examples of intermetallics and their corresponding ductility improving alloying elements.

Intermetallicβ-AlFeSiNi3AlTiAlTi3Al
Alloying element for ductilityLanthanum (La)Boron (B)Manganese (Mn)Niobium (Nb)

Table 5.

Intermetallics with ductility improving alloying elements [39].

The thixoforming process has been described as an effective technique to modify the morphology of the primary phases. Gencalp and Saklakoglu used this method to improve the formability property of A390 alloy with excess levels of Fe and Mn [58]. The intermetallic compounds observed in A380 fabricated by thixoforming are α-Al15Si2(Fe,Mn)3 with polyhedral morphology, different from the Chinese script morphology observed in the traditional gravity casting. Also, in A380 alloy by thixoforming, the very harmful β-Al5FeSi particle morphology was small-plate and θ-Al2Cu phase in the form of particle. These phases, Al5FeSi and θ-Al2Cu phase morphology are needle-like and thin plate respectively in gravity casting. SEM images of the varied intermetallics between thixoforming and gravity casting are shown in Figure 11. The A380 by thixoforming alloys had better mechanical properties compared to A380 by traditional gravity casting method.

Figure 11.

SEM images of (a) β-Al5FeSi needle-like intermetallics present in the gravity casting (b) particle small plate intermetallics, β-Al5FeSi found in thixoforming (c) α-Al15Si2(Fe,Mn)3 with polyhedral morphology found in thixoforming [58].

The solidification paths of 6xxx series Al alloys with and without La were established using careful calorimetric and microstructural investigations. Studies have shown that the addition of Sr. to Al-Si-Fe alloys prevents the formation β-phase intermetallic but promotes the production of a less harmful phase, α-AlFeSi, in as-cast alloys [48, 61]. Adding Sr to Al alloys under a fast cooling is an effective way of altering the amount, size and morphology of needle-like of Al5FeSi intermetallic compound. Chinese script or sludge are not formed in Al alloy without Mn. Addition of the combination of Fe and Mn at a high cooling rate was reported to be the most efficient technique of modifying intermetallic compounds [61]. SEM images in Figure 12 show the Sr. unmodified and modified microstructure of Al-6.5Si-3.5Cu-1.0Fe (in mass %) alloy.

Figure 12.

SEM images show the effect of adding Sr. on the microstructure of Al-6.5Si-3.5Cu-1.0Fe cast alloys (a) Sr. without; (b) with about 0.015% mass Sr [61].

Apart from Sr., the less expensive rare-earth metal, lanthanum (La), was found to decrease the fraction of plate-like β-AlFeSi particles and increase the fraction of α-AlFeSi particles with Chinese script morphology.

5. Conclusion

The influences of ternary alloying elements (Fe, Cu, Mn, and Mg) additions to Al-Si alloys (binary alloys) were discussed in this paper. The chapter observed that:

  1. The equilibrium and non-equilibrium reactions that occur during the casting of Al alloy account for intermetallic phases.

  2. Primary alloying elements are not completely soluble in the α-Al matrix and sometimes combine with impurities and matrix to form intermediate (intermetallics) phases.

  3. Intermetallics are products of incomplete solid solubility by alloy systems.

  4. Fe-based intermetallics are the most common. Fe-phases can be grouped into α- phase, β-phases, Pi-phase, and δ- phase, with α- and β-phases the most common. The most harmful intermetallics in Al-Si-Fe alloys is β-phase (β-Al5SiFe).

  5. Iron is deliberately added to the alloy to prevent soldering in die casting mould.

  6. Addition of Mn and Sr reduces the negative effect of β-phase of Fe intermetallics by improving the ductility. However, the addition of Mn weakens the strength of Al-7Si-Mg alloy.

  7. Microstructural examination is one of the primary ways of evaluating the evolution of phases in materials.

© 2018 The Author(s). Licensee IntechOpen. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

How to cite and reference

Link to this chapter Copy to clipboard

Cite this chapter Copy to clipboard

Williams S. Ebhota and Tien-Chien Jen (May 30th 2018). Intermetallics Formation and Their Effect on Mechanical Properties of Al-Si-X Alloys, Intermetallic Compounds - Formation and Applications, Mahmood Aliofkhazraei, IntechOpen, DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.73188. Available from:

chapter statistics

428total chapter downloads

More statistics for editors and authors

Login to your personal dashboard for more detailed statistics on your publications.

Access personal reporting

Related Content

This Book

Next chapter

Intermetallic Bonding for High-Temperature Microelectronics and Microsystems: Solid-Liquid Interdiffusion Bonding

By Knut E. Aasmundtveit, Thi-Thuy Luu, Hoang-Vu Nguyen, Andreas Larsson and Torleif A. Tollefsen

Related Book

First chapter

Nanostructure of Materials and Corrosion Resistance

By A. A. El-Meligi

We are IntechOpen, the world's leading publisher of Open Access books. Built by scientists, for scientists. Our readership spans scientists, professors, researchers, librarians, and students, as well as business professionals. We share our knowledge and peer-reveiwed research papers with libraries, scientific and engineering societies, and also work with corporate R&D departments and government entities.

More About Us