Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Biodiversity and Environmental Integrity of Some Rivers in Derived Savannah Belt in Edo-North, Southern Nigeria

By Abdul-Rahman Dirisu and John Ovie Olomukoro

Submitted: November 7th 2019Reviewed: July 15th 2020Published: February 10th 2021

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.93394

Downloaded: 28


Investigative study on macroinvertebrates and pollution tolerance index of four rivers in the derived savannah belt of Edo-North in Southern Nigeria was carried out from January to December, 2010. The study involved monthly field sampling and laboratory analysis of macrofauna. The objectives of the study were to evaluate the biodiversity status and importantly, the environmental integrity of the four selected rivers. Two dominant macroinvertebrate families were recorded; Baetidae and Chironomidae while, 53 macroinvertebrate taxa were identified across the rivers. The highest number of species (12) was recorded for Diptera, while, Hirudinea, Nematoda and Arachnida each had 1 species in the population. General diversity indices ranged from 2.02 to 2.78 with the least and highest recorded in Edion and Etuno Rivers, respectively. The fauna evenness index indicated that the water bodies had values less than 1.0. Meanwhile, Pollution tolerance index revealed spatial and seasonal variations in water quality conditions but only Edion River exhibited poor water quality in all the months of study.


  • macroinvertebrate taxa
  • water quality
  • species richness
  • pollution sensitive

1. Introduction

Over the years, degradation of water quality has remained a major issue in most parts of the world, including the Niger Delta region of Nigeria. This has continued to pose a threat to health and economic development in Nigeria and other countries alike [1], with about 60% of the rural and urban populace depending on ponds, streams and shallow wells for domestic water supply in some developing countries [2, 3]. The increasing concern for the level of pollutants in surface and groundwater makes water monitoring very essential [3, 4, 5].

Macroinvertebrates are highly useful bioindicators in understanding the ecological health of aquatic ecosystems, which could be more accurate than chemical and microbiological data, which exhibit short-term fluctuations [6, 7, 8]. Benthic macroinvertebrates include all bottom-dwelling plants and animals in water bodies and are found either crawling, burrowing or attached to various kinds of objects such as wood, stone, and organic matter [9]. These organisms play a vital role in the circulation and recirculation of nutrients in aquatic ecosystems.

Macroinvertebrates sampling is one technique used to determine the health of a stream, as they are subjected to day to day and longer term changes in pollution, oxygen and acidity levels. They can be used to monitor stream quality conditions over a broad area or they can be used to determine the effects of point source discharges, such as sewage treatment plants and factories, on a site-specific basis [3]. The advantages of this is that, unlike fish, benthos cannot move around as much, so they are less able to escape the effects of sediment and other pollutants that diminish water quality. Therefore, macroinvertebrates can give reliable information on stream, river and lake water quality. Their long life cycles allow studies conducted by aquatic ecologist to determine any decline in environment quality.

A Pollution Tolerance Index (PTI) is a method that is used to rate stream quality based on macroinvertebrate communities [10]. The three major tolerance categories of macroinvertebrate used in assessing the rivers water quality conditions are sensitive, facultative (or somewhat pollution tolerance) and pollution tolerant groups [11]. The aim of this study was to determine the quality of surface waters in Edo-North of Edo State in Southern Nigeria (using macrofauna as bioindicators), where anthropogenic factors and other human activities including uncontrolled waste disposal practices have placed immense stress on the quality of the water resources. The study determined the composition, abundance and the distribution of benthic macrofauna in the rivers; investigated the full biodiversity value of macrofauna as indices of pollution; and determined the Pollution Tolerance Index of the rivers, using macroinvertebrates.

2. Materials and methods

2.1 Study area

The sampled locations which are located within Edo State of Nigeria (Figure 1) were carefully chosen to monitor the water quality and pollution tolerance index of selected fresh water bodies in Edo-North. There are two distinct tropical seasons in this area, viz.; the rainy season, which occurs usually between April and October with its peak between July and August and dry the season, which occurs between November and March. The rainy season period is usually characterised by high relative humidity and low atmospheric temperatures. The four selected fresh water ecosystems locations are in the derived savannah zone. The spread was such that all ecological niches and areas of human activities were covered (Table 1).The GPS readings of the sampled sites were determined using GPS 12 Garmin model (serial number 36209488). Etuno River runs through Igarra community and takes its source from Kukuruku hill in Akoko-Edo area. There are cesspools in this catchment during the dry season, but the flood velocity increases in the wet season, ranging from 0.97 to 5.6 m2 s−1. On the other hand, Orli, Omodo and Edion Rivers flow through Agbede communities. The first two rivers are murky brown in colour particularly during the wet season. There are variations in their flow velocity throughout the year, which ranged from 0.1 to 14.71 m2 s−1. Two sampling points each (from upstream and downstream) were chosen along the stretch of the four rivers.

Figure 1.

Map of Edo state indicating the sampled locations.

Station IDStation/riverTownCoordinatesLand use pattern
1EtunoIgharraN 7° 16E 6° 7Agricultural/ human settlements, stone crushing activities
2OrlieAgbedeN 6° 58E 6° 16Agricultural/human settlements
3EdionAgbedeN 6° 55E 6° 16Agricultural/ human settlements
4OmodoAgbedeN 6° 52N 6° 17Agricultural/ human settlements

Table 1.

GPS coordinates and land use pattern of sampled locations.

2.2 Sampling for macroinvertebrates

The substrates at the bottom of the selected stations were sampled for macrofauna which consists of invertebrates in the sediment and the roots of floating macrophytes. The modified grab [12] and kicking sampling techniques [13] were used to collect sediment cores. The kicking method caused vigorous disturbance and movement of substratum and emergent vegetation from upstream. The animals disturbed from the stream bed were washed by the current and collected by a hand-net held down-stream. Each “kicking activity” lasted for 10 minutes and collected samples were preserved using 10% formaldehyde. All samples were sorted in the laboratory using the American binocular dissecting microscope, and organisms were preserved in 4% formaldehyde in specimen bottles. Identifications of organisms were made using relevant key manuals and literature [14, 15].

2.3 Analysis of data

Using the Paleontological Statistics tool (PAST 1.99 version), basic diversity indices such as relative abundance, taxa richness and species diversity were computed to describe the macrofauna community structure [16]. These indices provide a convenient means of comparing differences within ecological communities and also for monitoring temporal changes. Pollution tolerance of macroinvertebrate organisms to pollutants was assessed using the Pollution Tolerance Index (PTI) model. Specimens were taken and examined for the presence and abundance of the different types of organisms. Their values were inputted in an equation, which gave an overall value to the stream. Tolerance values were assigned to the sensitive, facultative and pollution tolerant macroinvertebrate groups as adopted from Klemm et al. [17] and Olomukro and Dirisu [18].

3. Results

3.1 Macroinvertebrates and community structure

Fifty three macroinvertebrates taxa were identified during the study (Table 2). Ephemeroptera and Diptera were represented by four families each in the studied water bodies. The former was dominated by the family Baetidae and the latter group by the family Chironomidae. These two groups comprised over 70% of the macroinvertebrate communities in each water body.

Nematoda (Aquatic Worms)Decapoda (Freshwater shrimp)Ephemeroptera (Mayfly)OdonataHemiptera (True Bug)Coleoptera (Beetles)Trichoptera (Caddis flies)DipteraMollusca (Water snails)
Rhabdolaimus spp.Caridina africanaAdenophlebriodes spp.Anisoptera (Dragon Fly)Lethocerus spp.Acilius sulcatusLeptocerid spp.Chironomidae (Midge fly)Ancycastrum spp.
Other nematodesCaridina gaboneusisBaetis spp.Libellula spp.Nepa spp.Dytiscus spp.Limnophilus spp.Chironomus fractilobusHydrobia spp.
OLIGOCHAETA (Aquatic Worms)Desmocaris trispinosaCentroptilum spp.Aphylla spp.Dytiscus marginalisPolycentropus spp.Chironomus travaalensisHydrobia guyenoti
Nais spp.Macrobrachium spp.Cloeon spp.Plathemis spp.Chironomus sp.Hydrobia lineate
Potamalpheops monodiCloeon cyclindroculumZygoptera (Damsel Fly)Pseudochironomus spp.Potanorbis crista
Gammarus spp.Dicerconyzon spp.Coenagrion spp.Tanypus spp.Pitar tumeus
LarvaEphemerella ignitaEnallagma spp.Tanytarsus spp.Tympanotonus radula
Cardiosoma spp. (crab)Habrophlebia spp.Hesperangrion heterodoxumChinotanypus spp.
Unidentified (crab)Psuedocloeon spp.Lestes spp.Cricotopus spp.
Pentaneura spp.
Culex spp.
Insect larva

Table 2.

The macrofauna found in four Rivers in Edo-north, Edo state, southern Nigeria.

The density of occurrence of Decapoda was highest in Omodo compared to the other rivers while, Atyidae was observed to be most dominant in the group. Other groups such as Odonata, Coleoptera, Trichoptera, Hemiptera and Mollusca were subdominant, common or rare in the various water bodies (Table 2).

3.2 Etuno river

Diptera was the dominant group in this river, while Ephemeroptera, Odonata (dragon fly), Coleoptera and Mollusca were the subdominant. Dipterans represented 61.8% of the total number of individuals (Table 3). Species richness index ranged from 0 to 2.84, with Dipterans having the highest richness among the groups.

Etuno riverOrlie river
GroupIndividuals/No%CompositionDiversity index (D)Individuals/No%CompositionDiversity index (D)
Oligochaeta2 (1)1.801(1)10
Ephemeroptera10 (2)9.10.434371 (4)710.7038
Odonata9 (3)8.20.9102413 (6)130.9494
Hemiptera3 (2)2.70.91024
Coleoptera8 (2)7.30.48092 (1)20
Tricheotera2 (1)2.701(1)10
Diptera68 (13)61.82.84396 (5)62.2324
Mollusca7 (1)6.406 (1)60
Edion riverOmodo river
Oligochaeta6 (1)4.40
Decapoda38 (3)19.30.549858 (5)42.60.9851
Ephemeroptera128 (4)650.618317 (4)12.51.0587
Odonata1(1)0.507 (3)5.11.0278
Tricheotera2 (2)1.01.4427
Diptera27 (5)13.71.213748 (8)35.31.8082

Table 3.

The number of individuals and diversity of the major taxonomic groups in the sampled locations (number of taxa in parenthesis).

3.3 Orlie river

Ephemeroptera (with 4 taxa) which is the dominant group in this station comprised Baetidae as the only family found, with 71% population density (Table 3). Species richness ranged between 0 and 2.23 indexes, with Diptera also having the highest species richness while Oligochaeta, Coleoptera, Trichoptera and Mollusca had the least diversity.

3.4 Edion river

A total of sixteen taxa were recorded for the macrofauna. The dominant and most frequently encountered was the Ephemeropterans which accounted for about 65% of the population followed by Decapoda (19.3%) and Diptera (13.7%). Species richness ranged between 0 and 1.44, with Trichoptera having the highest species richness and the least were Odonatans and Molluscans.

3.5 Omodo river

A total of 21 taxa were identified and categorised into five major groups as shown in Table 3. The dominant groups comprised Decapoda (42.6%) and Diptera (35.3%), and the subdominant were the Ephemeropterans with 12.5% density. Species richness ranged from 0 to 1.808 indexes, with Dipterans having the highest species richness and Oligochaetans the least.

3.6 Macroinvertebrate biodiversity

Biodiversity is the number and the distribution of species of living organisms. Change in biodiversity over time is the measure that can be used to assess the health of an ecosystem [10]. As biodiversity is lost, it is believed that the health and viability of an ecosystem declines. The highest biomass was reported in Edion River (219 individuals m−2) while, Orlie and Omodo rivers had <105 individuals m−2 (Table 4). Shannon-Wiener diversity indices showed that values ranged from 2.02 to 2.78 with the highest in Etuno River at Igarra, while the least diversity index was in Edion River. The macrofauna evenness index indicated that most of the water bodies had values less than 1.00, the highest being for Etuno (0.67) while the least was recorded in Edion (0.472).

Water bodyNo. of speciesAbundanceMagalef (D)Shannon_HEvennessDominance

Table 4.

Water bodies with their number of species, abundance and diversity indices.

4. Pollution tolerance index (PTI)

Pollution Tolerance Index (PTI) values were determined at monthly interval for each rivers using the available macroinvertebrate populations in the aquatic ecosystems. There was spatial and seasonal variation in water quality conditions in the water bodies. The sampled rivers revealed moderate water quality in March, July and December 2010 most importantly, while the other months of the year indicated poor water quality (Table 5, Figures 25).

RiverMarAprMayJunJulAugSeptOctNovDecOverallHealth status

Table 5.

Monthly variation and overall pollution tolerance index (PTI) of the sampled rivers.

Figure 2.

The spatial and seasonal variation in pollution tolerance index (PTI) of the Etuno river.

Figure 3.

The spatial and seasonal variation in pollution tolerance index (PTI) of the Orlie river.

Figure 4.

The spatial and seasonal variation in pollution tolerance index (PTI) of the Edion river.

Figure 5.

The spatial and seasonal variation in pollution tolerance index (PTI) of the Omodo river.

5. Discussion

A decrease in diversity and corresponding increase in abundance of a limited number of species is a common community response to environmental disturbance. The high diversity indices observed in the rivers indicated that many species had equal or near equal opportunity of co-existence. However, the macroinvertebrates were not evenly distributed across the sampled rivers, which is bound in most aquatic ecosystems [3, 19].

The abundance of Ephemeroptera group which is a clean water representative and is generally intolerant to contaminated aquatic ecosystems, clearly revealed that most of the rivers had moderate water quality with the exception of Etuno River. The water quality status was confirmed by the PTI estimation for the rivers. Monthly variations of PTI were observed in all the rivers. Unfortunately, there were no PTI values recorded for 5 months (August to December, 2010) in Etuno River as the various PTI groups were completely absent, a situation that could not be explained. Though, surface run offs and inundation do greatly affect and destabilise the colonisation patterns of substrates by macrofauna, this was not the case as rainfall had diminished in those months. However, the water quality status were generally moderate, an indication that the water bodies had not been seriously compromised.

6. Conclusion

The presence of a species is more valuable than its absence in aquatic ecosystems. Therefore, factors limiting diversity of macrofauna should be discouraged around water bodies. It is important that the different sources of pollutants, ranging from industrial through municipal to domestic activities be controlled during siting in the Edo-North with particular reference to the small factories located on the banks of Etuno River as contaminants are eroded and transported downstream with ease.


Thanks to Mr. Festus Arijode for all the assistance he rendered during the field work. We are thankful to the then management of the National Centre for Energy and Environment (NCEE), Energy Commission of Nigeria, University of Benin, for funding the study from which this paper has been drafted.

© 2020 The Author(s). Licensee IntechOpen. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

How to cite and reference

Link to this chapter Copy to clipboard

Cite this chapter Copy to clipboard

Abdul-Rahman Dirisu and John Ovie Olomukoro (February 10th 2021). Biodiversity and Environmental Integrity of Some Rivers in Derived Savannah Belt in Edo-North, Southern Nigeria, Inland Waters - Dynamics and Ecology, Adam Devlin, Jiayi Pan and Mohammad Manjur Shah, IntechOpen, DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.93394. Available from:

chapter statistics

28total chapter downloads

More statistics for editors and authors

Login to your personal dashboard for more detailed statistics on your publications.

Access personal reporting

Related Content

This Book

Next chapter

Freshwater Invertebrates of Southwestern South America: Diversity, Biogeography, and Threats

By Claudio Valdovinos Zarges, Pablo Fierro and Viviana Olmos

Related Book

First chapter

Climatic Change in a Large Shallow Tropical Lake Chapala, Mexico

By Filonov Anatoliy, Iryna Tereshchenko, Cesar Monzon, David Avalos-Cueva and Diego Pantoja-González

We are IntechOpen, the world's leading publisher of Open Access books. Built by scientists, for scientists. Our readership spans scientists, professors, researchers, librarians, and students, as well as business professionals. We share our knowledge and peer-reveiwed research papers with libraries, scientific and engineering societies, and also work with corporate R&D departments and government entities.

More About Us