Quality criteria’s samples for multiplex immunofluorescence.
Abstract
During the last years, multiplex immunofluorescence (mIF) has emerged as a very powerful tool in multiple epitope detection to study tumor tissues. This revolutionary technology is providing an important visual technique for tumor examination in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded specimens for a better understanding of tumor microenvironment, new treatment discoveries, cancer prevention, as well as translational studies. The aim of this chapter is to highlight the use of tyramide signal amplification methodology in mIF and image analysis to identify several proteins at the same time in one single tissue and their spatial distribution in different tumor specimens including whole sections, core needle biopsies, and tissue microarrays. This type of methodology associated with image analysis can perform high-quality throughput assay in translational research studies to be applied in cancer prevention and treatments.
Keywords
- tyramide signal amplification
- conventional IHC protocol
- immunoprofiling
- cancer tissues
- image analysis
- spatial analysis
1. Introduction
In the last years, novel and effective immunotherapies for patients with different tumor types are becoming clinically important, because of the remarkable clinical efficacy observed with several immune checkpoint inhibitors such as cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) and the programed death receptor 1 (PD-1) or its ligand (PD-L1) [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12]. Whereas anti-CTLA-4 antibodies (ipilimumab and tremelimumab), anti-PD-1 antibodies (nivolumab and pembrolizumab), and anti-PD-L1 antibodies (atezolizumab, avelumab, and durvalumab) have produced remarkable results, increasing the survival prognosis in many cancer types, it is still unknown why some tumors do not respond to or relapse after this type of treatment. In this way, increased observations suggest that tumors rich in tumor-associated immune cells (TAICs) may respond to therapies targeting immune system inhibitory or stimulatory mechanisms, and tumors with non-TAICs may require additional interventions aimed at promoting optimal inflammation and innate immune activation in the tumor microenvironment [13, 14, 15]. Indeed, characterization of different immune checkpoints as well as tumor microenvironment in patients with cancer has become a fundamental step in providing evidence for the presence of distinct immunologic phenotypes, based on the presence or absence of various immune cells [1, 16, 17] that can predict the response to the therapy. In this way, the study of immune checkpoints and TAICs and their interaction prompt the need for multiplexed analyses of tumor tissues. To address this need, in the last years, multiplex imaging platforms have emerged as an important tool to provide critical information about cancer microenvironment, prognosis, therapy, and relapse [18, 19, 20, 21, 22]. Different components in the tumor microenvironment can be examined simultaneously using multiplex methodologies, providing insight into biological cross-talk present at the tumor-host interface and from subcellular levels to entered cell populations. In addition, the precision of these new techniques can be used to evaluate the special distribution of multiple biomarkers detected simultaneously, and their coexpressions or interactions between cells are becoming a essential tool to study tumor tissues [22] and to ultimately enhance disease diagnosis and better inform timely patient care [23].
Multiplex technologies are being used to identify the presence of multiple biological markers as immune checkpoint and TAICs on a single tissue sample [24]. The multiplex imagining techniques provide unique biological information that in many cases cannot be obtained by other imaging methods or by single immunohistochemistry (IHC) techniques. As mentioned, individual cells can be accessed with extraordinary fidelity equal to that achievable in the bulk population, such that even rare cell populations can be studied to understand their important role in translational research, and this knowledge can be applied in cancer prevention and treatment. In this chapter, we will discuss one of the most reliable and a very well-known methodology to identify simultaneous biomarkers in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) specimens as well as its imaging analysis platform as an important tool for potential application in future cancer immunotherapy biomarker discoveries.
2. Tyramide signal amplification for multiplex staining in FFPE tissues
Tyramide signal amplification (TSA) was described in the 1990s by Bobrow and colleagues [25, 26]. It is an enzyme-linked signal amplification method that is used to detect and localize low copy number of proteins present in tissues by conventional IHC protocol, using, most commonly, alkaline phosphatase or horseradish peroxidase (HRP) enzymatic reaction to catalyze the deposition of tyramide-labeled molecules at the site of probe or epitope detection. Tyramides are conjugated to biotin or fluorescent labels and revealed by streptavidin-HRP system [27, 28]. The HRP catalyzes the formation of tyramide into highly reactive tyramide radicals that covalently bind to electron-rich tyrosine moieties close to the epitope of interest on FFPE tissue. Tissue surfaces with anchored biotinylated tyramide must be further treated with fluorescent- or enzyme-tagged proteins that have a high affinity for biotin, such as streptavidin, before microscopic visualization [27, 28]. The detection of the proteins is increased more than ten times compared to standard biotin-based staining methods [29].
Perkin Elmer developed the Opal™ workflow (Figure 1), which allows simultaneous staining of multiple biomarkers within a single paraffin tissue section. Multiplex immunofluorescence (mIF) allows researchers to use antibodies raised in the same species, and different panels combined with different targets can be created using this technology [21, 27]. The approach, in the manual protocol, involves detection with fluorescent TSA reagents, followed by microwave treatment that removes the primary and secondary antibodies between cycles and any nonspecific staining that reduces tissue autofluorescence for each antibody cycle. The correct ordering of the different antibodies in a panel is still challenging and is only solved by trial and error to obtain a perfect staining. In the automated protocol using Leica Bond RX or another autostainer, the time of staining is reduced drastically when compared with manual staining. The possibilities for mIF are expanding our knowledge of tumor immune contexture
Specimen type | Size (cm) | Viable tumor cells (N) | Necrosis (%) | Fat/cartilage/bone (%) | Adequacy for mIF staining* |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whole section | >1.0 × 1.0 | >100 | 0 or <10 | 0 or <10 of any component | 100% in our series |
Whole section | >1.0 × 1.0 | >100 | 0 or >10 | >50 of any component | 80% in our series |
Small biopsies | >1.0 × 0.2 | >100 | 0 or <10 | 0 or <5 of any component | 100% in our series |
Small biopsies | <1.0 × 0.2 | >100 | <10 | <50 of any component | 70% in our series |
Small biopsies | <1.0× 0.2 | <100 | >10 | >50 of any component | 50% in our series |
TMA (by core) | >0.1 | >100 | 0 or <5 | 0 or <5 of any component | 100% in our series |
3. Image approaches and data analysis
Although the methodology of TSA is available for FFPE material and can enable multiparametric readouts from a single tissue section, they sometimes have limited scalability and throughput, related to limited number of markers allowed per panel compared with other multiplex methodologies like imaging mass cytometry and multiplexed ion beam imaging [35, 36]. The scanner system (Figure 2) Vectra® [27] from PerkinElmer provides high quality of scanning with high-resolution and multiband filter cubes that provide greater flexibility associated with the multispectral camera, to match with the sample. The new generation of scanner Polaris™ (PerkinElmer) scan system supports multiple filters using tunable LED excitation, similar to confocal microscope, and the captured signals are assembled in a composite image [37]. After acquiring the panoramic low-magnification images at ×4 or ×10, the specimens can be sampled using different ROI sizes by the phenochart (PerkinElmer) software viewer to scan high-resolution images at ×20 or ×40. Although, the scanner system Vectra®-Polaris™ can capture different regions of interest (ROIs) using the filters and the multispectral camera at high quality resolution [36], it is still impossible to accelerate the process of scanning or scan the whole tissue section as a unique image for the analysis. The time for scanning the sample is variable and depends on the number of markers used in the panel, number of ROIs captured per sample, and size of the ROI and can take from minutes to several hours according these parameters [38] (Table 2). According our experience, the TSA staining system for mIF when combined with multispectral image analysis software, such as InForm (PerkinElmer), can provide a powerful tool for analysis of multiple markers in one single slide [21, 39]. However, there are many available software in the market that can be used for the analysis of mIF images generated by the InForm software from the Vectra®-Polaris™ scanner systems, and it is important to know that the InForm software is essential to generate the individual unmixed tyramide fluorochrome with a positive signal without noise or aberrant background staining and with high resolution performance across the different ROIs from the scanning systems [40]. For the analysis, image analysis software need to be accessible (Table 3), with easy automated capabilities of detection, including tissue segmentation, compartmentalization of the staining (e.g., nuclear, membranous, or cytoplasmic) (Figure 2), and spatial colocalization of cell distribution, critically important to study different markers included in different panels (Figure 3). In the same way, comprehensive evaluation using this different image analysis software is needed not only for clear antigen demarcation and good staining procedures but also for good interpretation of the results. Pathologists are very important and need to standardize the possible interobserved variation [41, 42] when using different image analysis platforms during the colocalization of proteins.
Magnification | Scanner | ROI (Vectra®)/(PolarisTM) (seven markers) | |
---|---|---|---|
Vectra® (Time/minutes) | PolarisTM (Time/minutes) | ||
4×* | ~9 | – | Panoramic view |
10×* | ~18 | ~13 | Panoramic view |
20× | ~6 | ~5 | 1×1 (669×500 μm)/(931×698 μm) |
20× | ~12 | ~14 | 2×2 (1338×1000 μm)/(1862×1396 μm) |
20× | ~22 | ~35 | 3×3 (2007×1500 μm)/(2793×2094 μm) |
40× | ~4 | ~8 | 1×1 (334×250 μm)/(465×249 μm) |
40× | ~10 | ~20 | 2×2 (669×500 μm)/(931×698 μm) |
40× | ~19 | ~36 | 3×3 (1004×750 μm)/(1396×1047 μm) |
Vendor | Program name | Method | Availability |
---|---|---|---|
PerkinElmer | InForm | Color-based colocalization, tissue, cell segmentation | Licensed |
Definiens | Tissue Studio | Imaging segmentation, marker intensity measurement, and statistical analysis | Licensed |
Indica Labs | HALO | Membrane, colocalization, immune cell proximity, spatial analysis | Licensed |
Visiopharm | Visimoph Tissuemorph | Signal intensity, area, counting objects, statistical analysis | Licensed |
Spot Imagine | Spot advanced | Color-based colocalization | Licensed |
FARSIGHT | Nucleus Editor | Multichannel-based object identification/toolkit | Free |
NIH | Image J | Color-based, user interactive segmentation | Free |
HistoRx | AQUAnalysis | Signal intensity per unit area and per layer | Licensed |
CompuCyte | iCyte | Nucleus segmentation or phantom contouring, measuring associated signals | Licensed |
4. Multiplex immunofluorescence staining from translational research
Despite the evolution in the last years, in different levels of cancer research, concerning prevention, diagnosis, therapeutic options, and follow-up methods, cancer diseases are still the major public health problem worldwide [43]. Profiling immune cells is currently a powerful metric for tumor subclassification and predicting clinical outcomes. A great variety of cancer research screening tools is applied to diagnose tumors and has been established for different tumors. Simultaneous quantification of more than one biomarker at the same time has become more and more interesting in cancer research using different multiplex technologies. Multiplex TSA can allow different biomarkers in one single slide, targeting different systemic processes, such as inflammation, immunocheckpoints, angiogenesis, or cell death using tumor markers (Figure 3), to improve cancer prevention, diagnostic accuracy, and treatment. We demonstrated that this method can offer important advantages, such as high-throughput performance, low material requirement, wide range of applications, and cost- and time-effective multiplex for several parameters in different panels [23, 44, 45]. Several biomarkers can be cancer-specific since malignant cells of different histologic types can produce different patterns of proangiogenic factors, growth factors, and immune cells that are tumor related. The study of biomarker panels (Figure 3) and its spatial distribution (Figure 4) can be used for early diagnosis and assessment of therapy response [46]. This methodology can represent an ideal method to realize personalized therapies using efficient mIF panels and help to understand much better the cancer microenvironment, highlighting the benefit for exploring immune evasion mechanisms and finding potential biomarkers that allow researchers to assess the mechanism of action and predict and track response [47].
5. Conclusion
The detection of multiple markers in the same tissue section can provide important and efficient means to apply this technology in disease diagnosis, prevention, and translational research. Multiplex immunoflourescence platforms have emerged more and more from translational research labs toward the clinic, increasing the opportunity to study and understand much better the tumor-immune interactions. This methodology and different image analysis strategies can give important information about immune cells’ coexpression and their spatial-pattern distribution in the tumor microenvironment. Development of multiplex immunoflourescence based-TSA system requires a very well-trained multidisciplinary team including pathologists, oncologists, and immunologists. In addition, this methodology requires automation to provide efficient and fast information as well as easy analysis methodologies for research pathologists that currently use this method.
Acknowledgments
The author would like to acknowledge the people that work in the laboratory of multiplex immunofluorescence, Mei Jang, Tong Li, Aerole Tanhemon, and Barbara Mino; the pathology team that work in the multiplex image analysis; as well as the chair of the Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, Dr. Ignacio Wistuba.
References
- 1.
Topalian SL, Hodi FS, Brahmer JR, Gettinger SN, Smith DC, McDermott DF, et al. Safety, activity, and immune correlates of anti-PD-1 antibody in cancer. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2012; 366 (26):2443-2454 - 2.
Hamid O, Robert C, Daud A, Hodi FS, Hwu WJ, Kefford R, et al. Safety and tumor responses with lambrolizumab (anti-PD-1) in melanoma. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2013; 369 (2):134-144 - 3.
Wolchok JD, Kluger H, Callahan MK, Postow MA, Rizvi NA, Lesokhin AM, et al. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab in advanced melanoma. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2013; 369 (2):122-133 - 4.
Ansell SM, Lesokhin AM, Borrello I, Halwani A, Scott EC, Gutierrez M, et al. PD-1 blockade with nivolumab in relapsed or refractory Hodgkin’s lymphoma. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2015; 372 (4):311-319 - 5.
Brahmer JR, Hammers H, Lipson EJ. Nivolumab: targeting PD-1 to bolster antitumor immunity. Future Oncology. 2015; 11 (9):1307-1326 - 6.
Herbst RS, Soria JC, Kowanetz M, Fine GD, Hamid O, Gordon MS, et al. Predictive correlates of response to the anti-PD-L1 antibody MPDL3280A in cancer patients. Nature. 2014; 515 (7528):563-567 - 7.
Gettinger S, Herbst RS. B7-H1/PD-1 blockade therapy in non-small cell lung cancer: Current status and future direction. Cancer Journal. 2014; 20 (4):281-289 - 8.
Robert C, Long GV, Brady B, Dutriaux C, Maio M, Mortier L, et al. Nivolumab in previously untreated melanoma without BRAF mutation. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2015; 372 (4):320-330 - 9.
Sunshine J, Taube JM. PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Current Opinion in Pharmacology. 2015; 23 :32-38 - 10.
Gettinger SN, Horn L, Gandhi L, Spigel DR, Antonia SJ, Rizvi NA, et al. Overall survival and long-term safety of nivolumab (anti-programmed death 1 antibody, BMS-936558, ONO-4538) in patients with previously treated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2015; 33 (18):2004-2012 - 11.
Dong H, Strome SE, Salomao DR, Tamura H, Hirano F, Flies DB, et al. Tumor-associated B7-H1 promotes T-cell apoptosis: A potential mechanism of immune evasion. Nature Medicine. 2002; 8 (8):793-800 - 12.
Ishida Y, Agata Y, Shibahara K, Honjo T. Induced expression of PD-1, a novel member of the immunoglobulin gene superfamily, upon programmed cell death. The EMBO Journal. 1992; 11 (11):3887-3895 - 13.
Kershaw MH, Westwood JA, Darcy PK. Gene-engineered T cells for cancer therapy. Nature Reviews Cancer. 2013; 13 (8):525-541 - 14.
Kalbasi A, June CH, Haas N, Vapiwala N. Radiation and immunotherapy: A synergistic combination. The Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2013; 123 (7):2756-2763 - 15.
Gajewski TF, Schreiber H, Fu YX. Innate and adaptive immune cells in the tumor microenvironment. Nature Immunology. 2013; 14 (10):1014-1022 - 16.
Teng MW, Ngiow SF, Ribas A, Smyth MJ. Classifying cancers based on T-cell infiltration and PD-L1. Cancer Research. 2015; 75 (11):2139-2145 - 17.
Tumeh PC, Harview CL, Yearley JH, Shintaku IP, Taylor EJ, Robert L, et al. PD-1 blockade induces responses by inhibiting adaptive immune resistance. Nature. 2014; 515 (7528):568-571 - 18.
Steiner C, Ducret A, Tille JC, Thomas M, McKee TA, Rubbia-Brandt L, et al. Applications of mass spectrometry for quantitative protein analysis in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues. Proteomics. 2014; 14 (4-5):441-451 - 19.
Stauber J, MacAleese L, Franck J, Claude E, Snel M, Kaletas BK, et al. On-tissue protein identification and imaging by MALDI-ion mobility mass spectrometry. Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry. 2010; 21 (3):338-347 - 20.
Sood A, Miller AM, Brogi E, Sui Y, Armenia J, McDonough E, et al. Multiplexed immunofluorescence delineates proteomic cancer cell states associated with metabolism. JCI Insight. 2016; 1 (6):1-14 - 21.
Gorris MAJ, Halilovic A, Rabold K, van Duffelen A, Wickramasinghe IN, Verweij D, et al. Eight-color multiplex immunohistochemistry for simultaneous detection of multiple immune checkpoint molecules within the tumor microenvironment. Journal of Immunology. 2018; 200 (1):347-354 - 22.
Rost S, Giltnane J, Bordeaux JM, Hitzman C, Koeppen H, Liu SD. Multiplexed ion beam imaging analysis for quantitation of protein expresssion in cancer tissue sections. Laboratory Investigation. 2017; 97 (8):992-1003 - 23.
Parra ER. Novel platforms of multiplexed immunofluorescence for study of paraffin tumor tissues. Journal of Cancer Treatment & Diagnosis. 2018; 2 (1):43-53 - 24.
Dixon AR, Bathany C, Tsuei M, White J, Barald KF, Takayama S. Recent developments in multiplexing techniques for immunohistochemistry. Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics. 2015; 15 (9):1171-1186 - 25.
Bobrow MN, Harris TD, Shaughnessy KJ, Litt GJ. Catalyzed reporter deposition, a novel method of signal amplification. Application to immunoassays. Journal of Immunological Methods. 1989; 125 (1-2):279-285 - 26.
Bobrow MN, Shaughnessy KJ, Litt GJ. Catalyzed reporter deposition, a novel method of signal amplification. II. Application to membrane immunoassays. Journal of Immunological Methods. 1991; 137 (1):103-112 - 27.
Parra ER, Uraoka N, Jiang M, Cook P, Gibbons D, Forget MA, et al. Validation of multiplex immunofluorescence panels using multispectral microscopy for immune-profiling of formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded human tumor tissues. Scientific Reports. 2017; 7 (1):13380 - 28.
Stack EC, Wang C, Roman KA, Hoyt CC. Multiplexed immunohistochemistry, imaging, and quantitation: A review, with an assessment of tyramide signal amplification, multispectral imaging and multiplex analysis. Methods. 2014; 70 (1):46-58 - 29.
Faget L, Hnasko TS. Tyramide signal amplification for immunofluorescent enhancement. Methods in Molecular Biology. 2015; 1318 :161-172 - 30.
Ju X, Shen R, Huang P, Zhai J, Qian X, Wang Q , et al. Predictive relevance of PD-L1 expression with pre-existing TILs in gastric cancer. Oncotarget. 2017; 8 (59):99372-99381 - 31.
Carey CD, Gusenleitner D, Lipschitz M, Roemer MGM, Stack EC, Gjini E, et al. Topological analysis reveals a PD-L1-associated microenvironmental niche for Reed-Sternberg cells in Hodgkin lymphoma. Blood. 2017; 130 (22):2420-2430 - 32.
Edwards J, Wilmott JS, Madore J, Gide TN, Quek C, Tasker A, et al. CD103+ tumor-resident CD8+ T cells are associated with improved survival in immunotherapy naive melanoma patients and expand significantly during anti-PD1 treatment. Clinical Cancer Research. 2018; 24 (13):3036-3045 - 33.
Buisseret L, Pommey S, Allard B, Garaud S, Bergeron M, Cousineau I, et al. Clinical significance of CD73 in triple-negative breast cancer: Multiplex analysis of a phase III clinical trial. Annals of Oncology. 2018; 29 (4):1056-1062 - 34.
Parra ER, Villalobos P, Behrens C, Jiang M, Pataer A, Swisher SG, et al. Effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on the immune microenvironment in non-small cell lung carcinomas as determined by multiplex immunofluorescence and image analysis approaches. Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer . 2018; 6 (1):48 - 35.
Blom S, Paavolainen L, Bychkov D, Turkki R, Maki-Teeri P, Hemmes A, et al. Systems pathology by multiplexed immunohistochemistry and whole-slide digital image analysis. Scientific Reports. 2017; 7 (1):15580 - 36.
Isse K, Lesniak A, Grama K, Roysam B, Minervini MI, Demetris AJ. Digital transplantation pathology: Combining whole slide imaging, multiplex staining and automated image analysis. American Journal of Transplantation. 2012; 12 (1):27-37 - 37.
Sanderson MJ, Smith I, Parker I, Bootman MD. Fluorescence microscopy. Cold Spring Harbor Protocol. 2014; 2014 (10):pdb top071795 - 38.
Spindel S, Sapsford KE. Evaluation of optical detection platforms for multiplexed detection of proteins and the need for point-of-care biosensors for clinical use. Sensors (Basel). 2014; 14 (12):22313-22341 - 39.
Feng Z, Puri S, Moudgil T, Wood W, Hoyt CC, Wang C, et al. Multispectral imaging of formalin-fixed tissue predicts ability to generate tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes from melanoma. Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer. 2015; 3 :47 - 40.
Bobrow MN, Litt GJ, Shaughnessy KJ, Mayer PC, Conlon J. The use of catalyzed reporter deposition as a means of signal amplification in a variety of formats. Journal of Immunological Methods. 1992; 150 (1-2):145-149 - 41.
Huang W, Hennrick K, Drew S. A colorful future of quantitative pathology: Validation of Vectra technology using chromogenic multiplexed immunohistochemistry and prostate tissue microarrays. Human Pathology. 2013; 44 (1):29-38 - 42.
Nederlof M, Watanabe S, Burnip B, Taylor DL, Critchley-Thorne R. High-throughput profiling of tissue and tissue model microarrays: Combined transmitted light and 3-color fluorescence digital pathology. Journal of Pathology Informatics. 2011; 2 :50 - 43.
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2017. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2017; 67 (1):7-30 - 44.
Stack EC, Foukas PG, Lee PP. Multiplexed tissue biomarker imaging. Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer. 2016; 4 :9 - 45.
Bolognesi MM, Manzoni M, Scalia CR, Zannella S, Bosisio FM, Faretta M, et al. Multiplex staining by sequential immunostaining and antibody removal on routine tissue sections. The Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry. 2017; 65 (8):431-444 - 46.
Parra ER. Novel technology to assess programmed death-ligand 1 expression by multiplex immunofluorescence and image analysis. Applied Immunohistochemistry & Molecular Morphology. 2018; 26 (2):e22-ee4 - 47.
Barua S, Fang P, Sharma A, Fujimoto J, Wistuba I, Rao AUK, et al. Spatial interaction of tumor cells and regulatory T cells correlates with survival in non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2018; 117 :73-79