Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Infection by Human Papillomavirus (HPV), Chlamydia trachomatis and Ureaplasma urealyticum, in Relation with Reproductive Failure

Written By

Adriana Ancer‐Arellano, Jesus Ancer‐Rodríguez, David Hardisson, Alberto Niderhauser-Garcia, Jose Sanchez‐Hernández, Alvarez‐ Cuevas Salomón and Guadalupe Gallegos‐Avila

Reviewed: 21 March 2017 Published: 06 September 2017

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.68696

From the Edited Volume

Fundamentals of Sexually Transmitted Infections

Edited by Server Serdaroglu and Zekayi Kutlubay

Chapter metrics overview

1,577 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Recent studies suggest that besides oncogenic capacity, HPV could have etiological role on infertility, but more evidence is necessary to confirm these results. We present in this chapter the microbiological and clinical outcome of 104 infertile women aleatory selected, from northeast of Mexico: 84.6%, with genital infection (GI) by multiple germs: Chlamydia trachomatis (Ct) [86.5%], HPV [49%], Ureaplasma urealyticum (Uu) [47.11%] and Mycoplasma hominis [35.57%]. Significant association (P ≤ 0, 05) was observed between the HPV presence and Uu diagnosis, assisted‐reproduction unsuccessful like previous treatment, cervical cytology with inflammatory process, multiple sexual partners, white‐dense‐mucous, secretion into the vagina, and HPV diagnosed in early years. The more frequent genotypes of HPV present in the infertile women studied were 6/18/16/58/11 and 68. In 60% of them, more than two genotypes were founded. The most frequent associations of high‐risk HPV (HPVhr) were 16/18, 16/58, 16/33, 16/52 and 18/58. Considering the isolate or combined presentation of HPVhr, 79.5% of these women would have a potential to develop cervix carcinoma. GI by HPV/Uu/Ct affects the fertility. Infertile women with GI that include these microorganisms with probed (HPV/Ct) or suspicious carcinogenic effect (Uu) would be considered a group of high risk for cervical cancer.

Keywords

  • genital infection
  • HPV
  • Chlamydia trachomatis
  • Ureaplasma urealyticum
  • Infertility
  • risk for cervical cancer

1. Introduction

At present, reproductive failure affects to a great population. Human infertility is defined by World Health Organization, like the absent of conception and outcome of healthy baby borne, after 1 year of unprotected intercourse. Infertility is a health complex problem with low quality life for the couples. Estimations on 2010 referred 1.9 and 10.5% of primary and secondary infertility, respectively, on women at reproductive age (20–40 years old). A high prevalence of fertility health is documented in South of Asia, Medium East, Central Europe, East Europe, and Central Asia [1].

Genitourinary unspecific infection is associated with unexplained infertility, subfertility, obstetric and gynecologic complications that not have known clear etiology for several decades like recurrent abortion, premature delivery, placenta dysfunction and preeclampsia [2, 3]. As well, assisted reproduction treatment for infertility had been associated with genital infection [47]. Specific treatment for genital infection is recommended to improve the successful of in vitro fertilization an embryo implantation [8, 9]. The low age of sexual activity initiation and with multiple sexual partners is a recognized risk factor for sexually transmitted genitourinary infection, but the absent or subtle clinical manifestations prevent the opportune treatment and persisting infection for long time and thus may exert detriment on the reproductive function [10].

Besides the still controversial participation of HPV on fertility and obstetric complications, the major bacteria implicated for a long time are C. trachomatis, and other atypical bacteria treated in next section: U. urealyticum, M. hominis, that were considered for a long time an improbable cause of female internal genital infection, were isolated from endometrial tissue and material obtained by hysteroscopy and laparoscopy procedures, in women with tubary obstruction, hidrosalpinx, and adherence syndrome [1115]. In recent years, another species of Mycoplasmataceae, M. genitalium, has been considered an emerging sexually transmitted infection that exerts damage in female genital tract and is implicated in fertility problems [1618].

Advertisement

2. Human papillomavirus

2.1. Classification

HPV belongs to Papoviridae family microorganism and comprises a group of approximately 200 small DNA viruses. According to its tissue tropism, HPV has been classified like Alpha HPV that affects epithelial mucosae and is subclassified into high risk and low risk of carcinogenic potential Beta, gamma, nu and mu. HPV has more potential to affect cutaneous epithelia and more associated with papilloma and external warts and had been associated with no melanocytic skin carcinoma [19, 20].

2.2. Epidemiology

The HPV infection has an epidemiologic importance. Registered prevalence is influenced by diagnostic test applied, the number and age of individuals of studied population, the geographic region studied [21]. Nevertheless, actually are considered the most common sexually transmitted viral infection worldwide, present in 11–12% of population and are 14 million people infected by first time each year. The incidence of HPV infection in the United States is one of higher, as 44.8%, and is present principally in women 20–24 years old [22]. In Mexico from 2005 to 2010, urogenital candidiasis and HPV infection present an incidence of 12.3/100,000 habitant between 15 and 24 years old and were higher between 20 and 24 years old. In this country had been estimated that toward 2050, there are not a clear tendency to diminish of the HPV infection. This situation is very worrying due to the potential malignancy of the lesions [23]. On the records of National Institute of Statistic and Geography of Mexico, were informed that 4417 women died by cervical cancer, in 2013 [24].

2.3. Biomedical importance

HPV infect principally undifferentiated keratinocytes into de basal level of stratified squamous epithelia, from mucous genital and oropharyngeal epithelia cutaneous and, as well as glandular cells of endocérvix [2527]. HPV had been recognized as definitive anogenital carcinogen for male and female, mainly in uterine cervix cancer [28], alone or in combination with other germs [29]. Some estimations show that the presence of HPV represents 12 more opportunities to develop cervical cancer than general population [30] and the HPV infection the most important between the factor risk for cervical cancer [21]. Recently, HPV was associated, lung cancer [3134] to larynx and pharynx carcinoma that their incidence are increasing in the last years [35, 36]. The global incidence of head and neck squamous cells and cervical cancer is similar; infection at both sites is strongly associated with sexual behavior: similarities in chromosomal aberrations, gene expression, and methylation and micro RNA profiles between Positive HPV head and neck squamous cells and cervical cancer. All of these observations were referred as argue to carry out comparative epidemiologic study of HPV infection and associated with carcinoma of head and neck and cervical cancer [37].

2.4. Their role in reproductive failure

Although is well known than many authors are interested to search carcinogenic roll of HPV, there are only a few studies about the effect of HPV infection on human reproduction [3841]. There is evidence showing the adherence of HPV to the equatorial segment of sperm cell [42]. Epidemiologic data about the infection by HPV in infertile men associated high levels of seminal leukocytes, with altered movement and morphology of head sperm, with the HPV infection [4345]. Previously, experimental studies had been demonstrated chromosomic damage in HPV infected sperm, depending of genotypes 16 and 3 [46, 47]. An association has been found between cervical HPV of high risk and premature membrane rupture and preterm new borne [4850]. The genital infection by more than one genotype of HPV was higher in recurrent early lost pregnancy, and HPV was identified in placenta tissue of preterm delivery by preeclampsia [41]. The frequency of cervical HPV infection and high‐grade lesion was higher in women that have indicated assisted reproduction than general population [6] and successful of assisted reproduction were affected by the presence of HPV [5, 7]. The HPV transmission from mother to child in utero was informed in several investigations [5154]. These authors remark the risk to appear papillary lesions in oropharynx and larynx of new born from mothers infected by HPV.

Advertisement

3. Chlamydia trachomatis

3.1. Biology and classification

The family Chlamydiaceae consists of two clinically important genera, Chlamydia and Chlamydophila, with three species responsible for human disease: Chlamydia trachomatis, Chlamydophila psittaci, and Chlamydophila pneumoniae [55]. C. trachomatis, as all the members of the family Chlamydiaceae, is an obligate intracellular parasite whose developmental cycle occurs within a eukaryotic host. Infection of eukaryotic host cells is initiated by the metabolically inactive and the infectious elementary bodies (EBs). Through largely unknown mechanisms, EBs attach to and induce their internalization by host cells. Within the first few hours post infection, EBs differentiate to the larger and more pleomorphic reticulate bodies (RBs), which are metabolically active, noninfectious, and replicative. At the end of a successful developmental cycle, the cell lyses, releasing the EBs [56, 57].

3.2. Medical relevance

Chlamydia trachomatis is the most prevalent sexually transmitted bacterial infection, recognized worldwide, which causes a wide spectrum of diseases, including salpingitis, endometritis, and uterine, cervical lesions with scarring process, which often causes infertility in women [58]. Serotypes D‐K of C. trachomatis has an etiologic relation to pelvic inflammatory disease; it has been isolated from superior genital tract in a quarter of women with pelvic inflammation and is possible that chronic process would be in relation to ovarian cancer [59]. The role of C. trachomatis with regard to inducing male factor infertility is a matter of debate. Chlamydial infection could potentially exert a strong influence on male infertility, as it is the main cause of urethritis and accessory gland inflammation in men. Sequelae of ascending infections might be occlusions in the canaliculi system of the genital tract, damage of the epithelial cells involved in spermatogenesis, and immunoreaction with the production of anti‐sperm antibodies [60, 11]. Also, the relationship of C. trachomatis infection with semen quality and sperm morphology is still controversial [61, 62]. In men, are documented that Chlamydia trachomatis is responsible of epididymitis, orchitis, prostatitis and urethritis [6366]. Then more, there are many evidence of that this infection cause sperm damage with low motility, altered morphology, and diminish of sperm concentration, with detriment of male fertility [6771]. Sexually transmitted infections are hypothesized to play a role in the development of prostate cancer, perhaps due to inflammation‐induced oncogenesis [71]. Eventually, more evidence supports this affirmation. An investigation to evaluate the possible role of Chlamydia trachomatis in the pathogenesis of prostate cancer assessed the presence of this bacterium in prostate biopsies of patients with prostate cancer, patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and control subjects. Tissue sections were analyzed using a direct fluorescent‐antibody (DFA) assay. When proliferative areas were compared, C. trachomatis was most frequently detected in prostate cancer group that in BPH patients (p = 0.006). In inflammation areas, C. trachomatis was most frequently detected in prostate cancer patients that in control subjects (p = 0.008). These data suggest an association between the presence of C. trachomatis and prostate cancer [72].

Advertisement

4. Mycoplasmataceae Genus

4.1. Biology and classification

Mycoplasma are microorganisms derived from Gram‐positive bacteria characterized by: streamlined and very small genome, the absence of a cell wall, requiring cholesterol for membrane function and growth, and displaying genetic economy that determine a strict dependence of the host for nutrients and refuge [73, 74]. They have a parasitic lifestyle, invading target cells and existing and replicating for extended periods intracellularly [75]. From 200 species established into class Mollicutes, six of them: Ureaplasma urealyticum, Mycoplasma hominis, Mycoplasma genitalium, Mycoplasma primatum, Mycoplasma spermatophilum and Mycoplasma penetrans have like their main site of colonization, the genital tract [76]. These microorganisms can be commensal in low genitourinary tract of sexually active men and women and can live in close relationship to mammalian cells. Nevertheless, they may cause disorders and pathologies associated with infertility: non‐gonococcal and non‐chlamydial, epididymitis, urolitiasis, as well with reproductive problems and infertility [7784].

4.2. Medical relevance

Gnarpe and Friberg in early seventies informed for the first time a high percentage (85%) of infertile patients with Ureaplasma urealyticum isolated from semen by specific culture, compared to low percentage (22%) in fertile men. Then, these authors showed by scanning electron microscopy, Mycoplasma adhered to sperm tail [85]. Similar observation was done in the following years by different authors [8690]. The use of PCR techniques confirmed the presence of Ureaplasma urealyticum in seminal samples of subfertile men with sperm alterations [62, 91, 92]. Since two before decade, had been affirm that Mycoplasma have carcinogenic potential due to the long latency an infection chronicity that may induce malignant cellular transformation [93]. Recently, experimental studies demonstrated induction of genic expression altered in prostatic and cervical cells and progression to malignant transformation [94, 95]. Mycoplasma hominis and Mycoplasma hyorhinis, a mycoplasma frequently present in patients with AIDS, induce malignant transformation with increased karyotypic entropy, chromosomal aberrations and polysomy, in BPH‐1 cells, after 9 months that were infected with these germs [96]. These observation had been supported a relationship between prostatitis and cancer, in etiologic association referred in 2002 [97].

Advertisement

5. Mechanism of genital coinfection by HPV, chlamydia trachomatis and mycoplasmas

The cervical overlaying columnar epithelia can be invaded by Ureaplasma urealyticum and Chlamydia trachomatis that produce severe inflammatory response, with discharge of exudative secretions and clinical signs and symptoms [98, 99]. Nevertheless, usually the appropriated diagnostic test will not be applied, and the treatment generally is unspecific. The presence of inflammatory cells in the genital ducts enhances the adherence of virus [100, 101], and Chlamydia trachomatis has been considered an enhancer to the entry of human immunodeficiency virus and HPV, the only one germ directly associated with the etiology of cervical cancer [101104]. Several studies have demonstrated an association between Chlamydia trachomatis and a high risk HPV persistence [105, 106]. A study realized by Paba et al., (2008), in patients with intraepithelial neoplasia or cervical cancer, confirmed the association of Chlamydia trachomatis and multiple high risk HPV persistence, and like a consequence of viral integration, inhibition of cell apoptosis, overexpression of E6/E7 oncogenes and cellular transformation [107].

Advertisement

6. Our experience

6.1. Studies on male infectious factor of infertility

Our group has reported different studies in couples with infertility of unknown etiology, from northeast Mexico. In that patients with spontaneous and recurrent abortion and failure in assisted reproduction treatments, was frequently detected the presence in seminal fluid, urethral swab and cervix and vagina secretions, of Chlamydia trachomatis and Ureaplasma urealyticum, and Mycoplasma hominis. The diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis was made by direct immunofluorescence, the gold standard for this microorganism for a long of time. For detection of Ureaplasma urealyticum and Mycoplasma sp., we practiced specific media culture, considered too, the gold standard. In morphologic seminal analysis, we described the presence of elementary bodies and inclusion vacuoles of Chlamydia and bacterial particles similar to Mycoplasmas, inside the cytoplasm, adhered to the principal piece and into the middle piece of the sperm [108].

A pattern of structural sperm alteration and inflammatory reaction with sperm phagocytosis, by leucocytes and macrophages, were described by semi thin section at light microscopy and thin section by transmission electron microscopy [109113]. Beside this the infectious process result a diminish motility, vitality, linear movement and sperm concentration. These seminal parameters were associated with high levels of sperm chromatin fragmentation (SCD test), and high levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) detected by NBT test. The antibiotic, antioxidant and drugs against the inflammation treatment determine the reduction of bacteriospermia, increase percentage of normal sperm, especially from acrosome damage, middle piece flagellum and nuclear defects. After 6 weeks of treatment, the probability of outcome of pregnancy with healthy newborn increased, and seminal parameters of predictive value were chromatin fragmentation, bacteriospermia and head sperm anomalies [114117].

6.2. Studies on female infectious factor of infertility

After confirming that a very high percentage of couples in northern Mexico with incapacity to procreate, have Chlamydia trachomatis and Ureaplasma urealyticum infections in the ducts and organs of the seminal tract, associated with detrimental damage of fertilization capacity of the sperm, we studied the endometrium histopathology and endometrialis bacteria. Although endometritis is included into the internal genital infection, present in a high percentage of infertile couples, the study of endometrial biopsy is out of the diagnostic routine evaluation of infertility female factor. Microscopic analysis was performed on paraffin embedded and H&E stained tissue sections, observed at 1000X. In all the cases, it was possible to recognize, the presence of bacterial particles, identified according to their morphology, such as Chlamydia or Ureaplasma, which were previously diagnosed in genital secretions. The most frequent histopathologic findings at the endometrial tissue were interstitial edema (93%), lymphocytic and polymorphonuclear subepithelial infiltrate (72%) and in 48%, plasmocytic subepithelial infiltrate. The cell denudation of the lining epithelia was observed in 69% of biopsies, and in 62% of them, intracytoplasmic vacuole of epithelial cells, known as spongiosis, was observed. In a low percentage of cases, intraepithelial inflammatory cells (lymphocytes and polymorphonuclears) were found at the endometrium, both lining and glandular epithelia. Germinal center of inflammatory cells in the connective stroma also was observed. The concluding results of this study showed the invading endometrium with Chlamydia trachomatis and Ureaplasma urealyticum that were present too, into the mucus of uterine cavity and cervical duct. In view of glandular and stromal changes, inflammatory reaction and presence of bacteria into the stromal tissue and glandular and lining epithelia, endometritis due to Chlamydia trachomatis and Ureaplasma urealyticum, should be considered like an adverse condition to the female fertility as well implantation and normal embryo development. The clinician must consider the study of endometrial biopsy in all patients that need evaluation for infertility, even more if signs and symptoms of internal genital infection or chronic inflammatory process are present. Early diagnosis of genital infection and laboratory test performance looking for Chlamydia trachomatis and Ureaplasma urealyticum and its corresponding treatment could be prevent reproductive failure and scarring injuries and maybe can improve the results of reproduction treatments [118, 119]. While male genital infection by Chlamydia trachomatis and Ureaplasma urealyticum is generally asymptomatic, the women have a variable signs and symptoms of the sick, and clinical improvement is easier to appreciate; in male, their low and subtle clinical signs of infection and the treatment results can be see only by the study of seminal parameters in relation to the infection. For some years, we have focused on the investigation of the clinical and pathogenic aspects of the internal genital infections as well as the integral therapeutic management of male and female reproductive pathologies named as treatment of “binomials gineco‐andrologic” of the infectious factor of Infertility [120, 121].

6.3. Study of HPV in infertile couples

In addition of sexually transmission of Chlamydia trachomatis and Ureaplasma urealyticum, along the clinical evaluation, is necessary to be in alert to another sexually transmitted germ. This chapter focuses on the results of the first work that we carried out about the importance of the presence of HPV in the population with infectious factor of infertility. The aim of this analysis was to establish the HPV and genotype prevalence, the relationship of HPV presence with other microorganism, and to describe clinical findings of the studied group of patients.

6.3.1. Patients, material and methods

6.3.1.1. Study population

For the present analysis, samples of mucous secretion from cervix and vagina and endocervical scrapes of 104 women randomly selected women, from patients attended at private clinic in Monterrey, México, for infertility and genitourinary infection since 2003–2014. Patients were recruited by verbal invitation at the time of consultation. They gave voluntary authorization, by Informed consent, to use the clinical data and results of the laboratory test for statistical analysis. Ethical issues were in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration and endorsed by the Ethics Committee of our institution (PA15‐001). All selected patients had polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test for HPV in genital secretions and were tested by direct specimen test Kit for Chlamydia trachomatis detection (MicroTrak; Trinity Biotech, Wicklow, Ireland); the isolation of Ureaplasma urealyticum and Mycoplasma hominis was done using the Mycoplasma IST kit (BioMerieux, Marcy L’ Etoile, France). For any other microorganism, we applied general culture.

6.3.1.2. Clinical assessment

An infertility medical history was taken and recorded on a standardized form by a single experienced clinician, who also performed external genital, vaginal exploration, pelvic examinations and realized the sampling of genital secretions. The data obtained from medical file were: demographic parameters, history of fertility and infertility, gestational losses and obstetric complications, treatment of infertility problems, history of cervical lesions, and surgical procedures, result of previous cervical‐vaginal cytology Pap smears, signs and symptoms of genitourinary infections and pathological data of the cervix and vagina examination. At subjective appreciation, the clinical parameters were considered for semiquantitative record: low, medium, and high or abundant.

6.3.1.3. HPV DNA extraction and genotyping

For the extraction and purification of DNA from cervical samples, 100 μL of the cell suspension previously prepared was used. Silica extraction columns (Nucleospin® Blood, Machery‐Nagel GmBH & Co., Germany) were used under the manufacturer’s instructions. During the 12 years covered by this study, the technology for HPV diagnosis was changing. For this reason, different techniques were applied depending on the time when the patient arrives for medical treatment. In 34 patients, molecular detection of HPV‐AND was carried out by PCR‐Multiplex that detect 4–12 genotypes; for 36 patients, secretions from the cervix and vagina were tested for HPV capillary electrophoresis using “Applied Biosystems 3130 series genetic analyzer systems” and the software GeneMapper, which diagnostic 14–19 genotypes high and low risk. Molecular detection of ADN from HPV was done in the 36 patients by Dual Priming Oligonucleotide, more specific and that detect 14–19 genotypes of HPV and in the 34 last patients in situ Hybridization with oligo specific probes to identified 20–28 HPV genotypes.

6.3.1.4. Statistical analysis

Absolute frequency of qualitative parameters is expressed in percentages. For quantitative variable was calculated media and, or median as well standard deviation. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were calculated using (2 × 2) contingency tables. The association between clinical results and HPV and the association between other microorganisms present were calculated with Fisher’s exact test. For all tests, the significance level was P ≤ 0.05 and power of (1‐β) = 80% for two‐tail. The statistical software used was SPSS version 17 for Windows (SPSS Inc.)

6.3.2. Results

From 690 infertile couples attended from 2003 to 2012, the aleatory selected sample of 104 female partners was representative, according to medium probability ponderation of 48% for the different genotypess, that was estimated based in some reports [122]. A total of 104 female partners from couples with genitourinary infection were included in this study. Primary infertility was present in 65 couples and secondary infertility in 13 couples. The median age of the patients was 34 years (range, 22–55 years). The microorganisms identified on the group studied are C. trachomatis (86.5%), HPV (49%), U. urealyticum (47.11%), M. Hominis (35.57%), E. coli (20.2%), C. Albicans (17.3%) and S. faecalis (10.6%). In a high proportion of the vaginal samples, microbiota vaginal was reduced or absent in a (76.9%) and 86% have more than one pathogen germs. C albicans was present like solitary microorganism in 17.3% as well HPV was the only identified germ in one patient. Statistical analysis established positive correlation between HPV and U. urealyticum (p = 0.05) and decreased microbiota (p = 0.001).

The distribution of C. trachomatis was similar in the positive and negative to HPV group (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Microorganism identified into the cervix and vagina secretions of 104 female partners from couples with genitourinary infection. The most frequent bacteria in the genital sample of infertile women studied were Chlamydia trachomatis. However, if we considered that Ureaplasma urealyticum and Mycoplasma hominis belong to the same genus: Mycoplasmataceae, the presence of these bacteria, result of major importance in this group.

Between the clinical parameters taken into account for this investigation, some of them presented statistics correlation to the presence of HPV: the presence of more than one sexual partner (p = 0.05), genitourinary infection symptoms (p = 0.01), white mucous vaginal secretion fluxing from the uterine duct (p = 0.05), failure in assisted reproduction previously carried out (p ≤ 0.0001), and previous HPV infection diagnosed by suspicious lesion or cytological exam (p ≤ 0.0001) was in association to HPV (Table 1). For Microbiota vaginalis, the relationship to the presence of HPV was proportionally inversed.

Total of casesHPV positiveHPV negativeP
N%N%N%
HPV previous diagnosis4644.23364.71324.50.0001
Pap. report: inflammation low/moderate3332.02141.21223.10.05
Active genitourinary infection6764.43976.52852.80.01
Only one partner6764.42854.93973.60.05
≥2 sexual partner3735.62345.11426.40.05
Unsuccessfully FIV/ICSI151001173.3426.70.002
White, dense mucus secretion7885.74285.73669.20.05
Ureaplasma urealyticum in vaginal secretion4947.12956.92037.70.05
Absence of vaginal microbiota5552.92447.13158.50.03
Diminished vaginal microbiota2524.01733.3815.10.03

Table 1.

Microbiological and clinical data associated with HPV.

The most frequent bacteria in the genital sample of infertile women studied were Chlamydia trachomatis. However, if we considered that Ureaplasma urealyticum and Mycoplasma hominis belong to the same genus: Mycoplasmataceae, the presence of these bacteria, result of major importance in this group.

Prevalent genotypes of HPV detected in the infertile patients studied group were; HPVar 6 (19.2%), HPVhr 18 (12.5%), HPVhr 16 (11.6%), HPVhr 58 (11.1%), HPVhr 52 (7.1%), HPVlr 11 (6.7%) and HPVhr 68 (7.5%). Thirteen different genotypes of PVH were detected in low frequency. These data are concentrated on Table 2. To consider the percentage of this frequency, it is necessary to remember that the results depend on the number of HPV search in each one of the three different tests applied that was not equal for all patients.

HPV genotype identifiedRisk for cancerPatients studied for genotypePositive result
N%N%
6Low1041002019.2
16Alto103991211.6
18High1041001312.5
58High7269.2811.1
52High9894.277.1
11Low10410076.7
31High8783.755.7
33High7269.256.9
68High6764.457.5
66High6764.434.5
51High9894.233.1
42Low6663.523
39High6966.334.3
59High6966.311.4
45High7369.211.4
35High7369.211.4
71Low7067.311.4
61Low6966.311.4
55Low6360.611.6
81Low111

Table 2.

Prevalent genotypes of HPV detected by PCR in secretions of cervix and vagina of infertile women studied group.

Combinations of more than one HPV genotypes were detected in 60% on the studied samples. From them 46.3% were the following associations between high risk for cancer HPV: 16/18, 18/58, 16/33, 16/52 and 18/52. In a similar percentage (44.8%) of women, low risk for cancer, principally HPV 6, was detected in combination with high risk HPV: 18, 52, 16 and 39. As well, we observed that three to five different HPV genotypes were present in 23.5% of the positive group infertile patients (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

HPV genotyping results: Combinations of HPV. The number inside the square represents the patients with at least two different genotypes HPV detected in cervical and vaginal secretions of the women studied. Inside the square is the number of cases identified with the combined presence in the sample of cervical secretion of different Genotype HPV. For example: 4 cases have a combination of 16 and 18 genotypes of HPVhr; another 4 cases have simultaneously HPVhr 16 and 58.

According to the results of this study, a total of 79.5% of positive HPV group of patients, presented one or more high‐risk genotypes, and considering the statistical association between the positivity to HPV and the clinical history of previous HPV infections, this condition may represent a persistent infection or a reinfection. Consequently, we consider convenient a recommendation to take in account women with reproductive failure, like a group of risk of cervical cancer. There was statistical association between the positivity to HPV to clinical history of previous HPV infections. Would be very important, the simultaneously presence with Ureaplasma urealyticum, and Chlamydia trachomatis, sexually transmitted germs with suspicious carcinogenic potential, in a population in reproductive age, as we observed in this study.

With the results obtained from this study, it was not possible to establish an association between the abortions presented in 28 of the studied women, and the positivity to HPV. Nevertheless for future studies that include a high number of patients, is may be important to observe that low risk to cancer genotypes 6 and 11, were present in a high prevalence in this investigation, and their importance on the results of inseminations, in vitro fertilization and gestational loss, and are not defined now a days. Finally, our data confirm the recommendation to investigate HPV before to carry out in vitro fertilization, in view of the high frequency of failure of this treatment of infertility, when HPV is present.

The following description will give an illustration of some of cases included in this study resume of microbiologic and gineco obstetric data are included at the Figures 35.

Figure 3.

Infertile women with chronic genitourinary infection, and failure in assisted reproduction. Case 1. The patient was treated by hysterectomy due to persistent infection, after several fruitless treatment of assisted reproduction for primary infertility. The images illustrate clinical, histopathological and HPV test in vaginal secretions. (A) Abnormal colposcopy; (B) koilocyte was found in the cervix biopsy; (C) arrow shows lesion on vaginal fundus; (D) results of PCR and HPV genotyping of vaginal secretions. Multiple HPV were present, except the 74 of unknown significance, all correspond a high risk for cancer genotype.

Figure 4.

HPV genotypes combinations associated with genitourinary infection by multiple microorganisms.

Figure 5.

HPV genotypes combinations associated with genitourinary infection by multiple microorganisms in infertile patients.

Case 2. Women 34 years, previously treated with five intrauterine inseminations and three in vitro fertilization (IVF) with intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). This patient had been treated repeatedly too, for genitourinary infection, unsuccessfully. After abnormal findings in a colposcopy, and histopathologic diagnosis of koilocyte in a cervix biopsy the clinician decide to practice hysterectomy, principally to solve the recurrent infections. One year later, these women required medical assistance due to severe signs and symptoms of genitourinary infection. In the vaginal sample were presented HPV 18, 35, 39, 51, 56, 66 y 74 (Figure 3). Case 3. Woman of 29 years old attended by primary infertility of unknown etiology and had been treated two times by assisted reproduction, with negative results. At the time of her arrive to the specially clinic, she referred previous result of ASCUS in PAP and signs and symptoms of genitourinary infection: dysuria, pelvic pain, abnormal menstrual bleeding, and a fluxing of white secretion from the vagina. At genital exploration, hypertrophy and erythema of cervix and papillary lesion at vaginal wall were found. The secretion of cervix and vagina was positive to C. trachomatis, U. urealyticum and C. albicans. PCR detected genotypes 16, 31, 33, 52, and 54 (Figure 4).

Case 3. Female 31 years, with two pregnancy loss of the first trimester, in both were diagnosed by ultrasound a chorionic vesicle without embryo. This patient did not have any fertility treatment previously. She had some PAP inform with inflammation but in one of them was diagnosed metaplastic changes. Genital infection was clinically diagnosed, and multi‐microbial infection was detected in samples of secretions. (Figure 4). Case 4. A 37‐year‐old woman, who had a child without fertility treatment and did not have a second pregnancy, despite having no contraceptive treatment. This patient required medical assistance for chronic infection that was resistant to many treatments implemented previously. In this case were found HPV 44 and HPV 52 in association to C. trachomatis, U. urealyticum that eventually may be an etiologic association to secondary infertility of this case. Then more, S. faecalis and E.coli were present as part of the microorganism found in genital secretions. Lactobacillus acidophilus was absent (Figure 5). Case 5. Another patient that not received infertility treatment, but do not have a baby, even to be active sexually and do not have protection contraceptive. This woman suffers urinary symptoms since 2 years ago, and clinical signs and symptoms of vaginal recurrent infection, resistant to previous treatments. The diagnostic test applied to vaginal and cervical fluids was positive to one of the most common HPV associations: 16 and 18, but HPV 39, C. trachomatis, U. urealyticum and C. albicans were part of the multiple germs infection (Figure 5).

Advertisement

7. Concluding remarks

This is a study carried out by aleatory selection of 104 infertile women attended by reproductive failure and genital infection; the main objective was to establish the relationship of HPV presence, with other microorganism and the genotype of HPV detected in this group of infertile women. All patients authorized the use of clinic and laboratory analysis data from her cervical and vaginal samples, to realize statistical analysis and sign an informed consent. The clinical parameters considered were: signs and symptoms of infection disease, results of previous assisted reproduction treatments, and the presence of previous abortions. These data were compared to genotype HPV present, and the diagnosis of others germs by laboratory test included direct investigation with immunofluorescence monoclonal antibodies to Chlamydia trachomatis, and bacterial cultures, included selective media to U. urealyticum, M. hominis. The microorganisms identified on the group studied are C. trachomatis (86.5%), HPV (49%), U. urealyticum (47.11%), M. Hominis (35.57%), E. coli (20.2%), C. Albicans (17.3%) and S. faecalis (10.6%). In a high proportion of the vaginal samples, microbiota vaginal was reduced or absent in a (76.9%) and 86% have more than one pathogen germs. C albicans was present like solitary microorganism in 17.3% as well HPV was the only identified germ in one patient. Statistical analysis established positive correlation between HPV and U. urealyticum (p = 0.05), and decreased microbiota (p = 0.001). The distribution of C. trachomatis was similar in the positive and negative to HPV group.

In this study, more than one sexual partner (p = 0.05), genitourinary infection symptoms (p = 0.01), white mucous vaginal secretion fluxing from the uterine duct (p = 0.05), failure in assisted reproduction before carry out, and previous HPV infection diagnosed by suspicious lesion or cytological exam (p ≤ 0.0001) were in association to HPV. Prevalent genotypes of HPV detected in the infertile patients studied group were HPV six (19.2%), HPV 18 (12.5%), HPV 16 (11.5%), HPV 58 (7.2%), HPV 52 (6.7%), HPV 11 (6.7%) and HPV 68 (7.5%). Combinations of more than one HPV genotypes were detected in 60% on the studied samples. From them, 46.3% were the following associations between high risk for cancer HPV: 16/18, 18/58, 16/33, 16/52 and 18/52. In a similar percentage (44.8%) of women, low risk for cancer, principally HPV 6, was detected in combination with high risk HPV: 18, 52, 16 and 39. As well, we observed that three to five different HPV genotypes were present in 23.5% of the positive group infertile patients. According to the results of this study, a total of 79.5% of positive HPV group of patients, presented one or more high risk genotypes, and considering the statistical association between the positivity to HPV and the clinical history of previous HPV infections, this condition may represent a persistent infection or a reinfection. Consequently, we consider convenient a recommendation to take in account women with reproductive failure, like a group of risk of cervical cancer. With the results obtained from this study, was not possible to establish an association between the abortions presented on 28 of the studied women, and the positivity to HPV. Nevertheless for future studies that include a high number of patients, is may be important to observe that low risk to cancer genotypes 6 and 11, were present in a high prevalence in this investigation, and their importance on the results of inseminations, in vitro fertilization and gestational loss, still not defined now a days.

Advertisement

Acknowledgments

Authors acknowledge to”Center for Research and Development in Health Sciences (CIDICS) of Autonomous University of Nuevo León”, for their assessment in molecular test for HPV, C. trachomatis and U. urealyticum, and for the financial support to this publication.

References

  1. 1. Mascarenhas MN, Flaxman SR, Boerma T, Vanderpoel S, Stevens GA. National, regional, and global trends in infertility prevalence since 1990: a systematic analysis of 277 health surveys. PLoS Medicine. 2012;9:1001356
  2. 2. Viniker DA. Hypothesis on the role of sub‐clinical bacteria of the endometrium (bacteria endometrialis) in gynaecological and obstetric enigmas. Human Reproduction Update. 1999;5:373-385
  3. 3. Bachir BG, Jarvi K. Infectious, inflammatory, and immunologic conditions resulting in male infertility. Urologic Clinics of North America. 2014;41:67-81
  4. 4. Licciardi F, Grifo JA, Rosenwaks Z, Witkin SS. Relation between antibodies to Chlamydia trachomatis and spontaneous abortion following in vitro fertilization. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics. 1992;9:207-310
  5. 5. Spandorfer SD, Bongiovanni AM, Fasioulotis S, Rosenwaks Z, Ledger WJ, Witkin SS. Prevalence of cervical human papillomavirus in women undergoing in vitro fertilization and association with outcome. Fertility and Sterility. 2006;86:765-767
  6. 6. Van Hamont D, Nissen LH, Siebers AG, Hendriks JC, Melchers WJ, Kremer JA, Massuger LF. Abnormal cervical cytology in women eligible for IVF. Human Reproduction. 2006;21:2359-2363
  7. 7. Perino A, Giovannelli L, Schillaci R, Ruvolo G, Fiorentino FP, Alimondi P, Cefalù E, Ammatuna P. Human papillomavirus infection in couples undergoing in vitro fertilization procedures: Impact on reproductive out‐comes. Fertility and Sterility. 2011;95:1845-1848
  8. 8. Sharara FI, Queenan JT. Elevated serum Chlamydia trachomatis IgG antibodies. Association with decreased implantation rates in GIFT. The Journal of Reproductive Medicine. 1999;44:581-586
  9. 9. Wang Y, Wang C, Qiao J, Wang L, Liang S. Relationship of cytopathology and cervical infection to outcome of in‐vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics. 2008;101:21-26
  10. 10. Nuñez‐Troconis JT. Mycoplasma hominis and Ureaplasma urealyticum in different gynecologic diseases. Investigación Clínica. 1999;40:9-24
  11. 11. Paavonen J, Eggert‐Kruse W. Chlamydia trachomatis: Impact on human reproduction. Human Reproduction Update. 1999;5:433-447
  12. 12. Taylor‐Robinson D. T‐mycoplasmas and infertiliy. Nature. 1974;248:267
  13. 13. Brunham RC, Maclean IW, Binns B, Peeling RW. Chlamydia trachomatis: Its role in tubal infertility. The Journal of Infectious Diseases. 1985;152:1275-1282
  14. 14. Cohen CR, Manhart LE, Bukusi EA, Astete S, Brunham RC, Holmes KK, et al. Association between Mycoplasma genitalium and acute endometritis. Lancet. 2002;359:765-766
  15. 15. Anagrius C, Loré B, Jensen JS. Mycoplasma genitalium: Prevalence, clinical significance, and transmission. Sexually Transmitted Infections. 2005;81:458-462
  16. 16. Ross JD, Jensen JS. Mycoplasma genitalium as a sexually transmitted infection: Implications for screening, testing, and treatment. Sexually Transmitted Infections. 2006;82:269-271
  17. 17. Baczynska A, Funch P, Fedder J, Knudsen HJ, Birkelund S, Christiansen G. Morphology of human fallopian tubes after infection with Mycoplasma genitalium and Mycoplasma hominis in vitro—Organ culture study. Human Reproduction. 2007;22:968-979
  18. 18. Manhart LE, Holmes KK, Hughes JP, Houston LS, Totten PA. Mycoplasma genitalium among young adults in the United States: An emerging sexually transmitted infection. American Journal of Public Health. 2007;97:1118-1125
  19. 19. Haedicke J, Iftner T. Human papillomaviruses and cancer. Radiotherapy and Oncology. 2013;108:397-402
  20. 20. Ghittoni R, Accardi R, Chiocca S, Tommasino M. Role of human papillomaviruses in carcinogenesis. Ecancer Medical Science. 2015;9:526
  21. 21. Forman D, de Martel C, Lacey CJ, Soerjomataram I, Lortet‐Tieulent J, Bruni L, et al. Global burden of human papillomavirus and related diseases. Vaccine. 2012;30 (Suppl 5):F12‐F23
  22. 22. Steben M, Duarte‐Franco E. Human papillomavirus infection: Epidemiology and pathophysiology. Gynecologic Oncology. 2007;107 (Suppl 1):S2–S5
  23. 23. Secretaría de Salubridad y Asistencia (SSA‐México). CENEVACE. Anuarios de Morbilidad 1984-2010; CONAPO. Proyecciones de población en México 2005-2050
  24. 24. National Institute of Statistic and Geography of Mexico (Consulte of 2 June, 2015 http://www.inegi.org.mx)
  25. 25. Longworth M, Laimins L. Pathogenesis of human papillomaviruses in differentiating epithelia. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews. 2004;68:362-372
  26. 26. Handisurya A, Day PM, Thompson CD, Buck CB, Kwak K, Roden RB, Lowy DR, Schiller JT. Murine skin and vaginal mucosa are similarly susceptible to infection by pseudovirions of different papillomavirus classifications and species. Virology. 2012;433:385-394
  27. 27. Dunne EF, Park IU. HPV and HPV‐associated diseases. Infectious Disease Clinics of North America. 2013;27:765-778
  28. 28. zur‐Hausen H. Papillomaviruses and cancer: From basic studies to clinical application. Nature Reviews Cancer. 2002;2:342-350
  29. 29. Bhatla N, Puri K, Joseph E, Kriplani A, Iyer VK, Sreenivas V. Association of Chlamydia trachomatis infection with Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia—A pilot study. Indian Journal of Medical Research. 2013;137:533-539
  30. 30. Serman F. Cáncer cervicouterino: epidemio‐logía, historia natural y rol del virus del papiloma humano, perspectivas en prevencion y tratamiento. Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol. 2002;67:318-323
  31. 31. Syrjänen K. 2013: Detection of human papillomavirus in lung cancer: Systematic review and meta‐analysis. Anticancer Research. 2012;32:3235-3250
  32. 32. Badillo‐Almaraz I, Zapata‐Benavides P, Saavedra‐Alonso S, Zamora‐Davila D, Rezendez‐Pérez D, Tamez‐Guerra R, Herrera‐Esparza R, Rodríguez‐Padila, C. Human Papillomavirus16/18 infections in lung cancer patients in Mexico. Intervirology, DOI: 10.11590003510752013
  33. 33. zurHauasen H : Papillomavirus in the causation of human cancers.Virology.2009;384: 260-265
  34. 34. Fei Y, Yang J, Hsieh WC, Wu JY, Wu T, Goan YG, Lee H, Cheng YW.: Different Human papillomavirus 16/18 in Chinese non‐small cell lung cancer patients living in Wuhan, China. Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2006;36: 22274-22279
  35. 35. Chatuverdi AK, Engels EA, Pfeiffer RM, Hernandez BY, Xiao W, Kim E, Jiang B, Goodman MT, Sibug‐Saber M, Cozen W, et al.: Human Papilloma Virus and rising oropharyngeal cancer incidence in the United States. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2011;29: 4294-4301
  36. 36. Ang KK, Harris J, Wheeler R, Weber R, Rosenthal DI, Nguyen‐Tan PF, Westra WH, Chung CH, Jordan RC and LU C. Human Papilloma Virus and survival of patients with oropharyngeal cancer. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2010;363: 24-35
  37. 37. Gillison ML, Castellsagué X, Chaturvedi A, Goodman MT, Snijders P, Tommasino M, Arbyn M, Franceschi S. Eurogin Roadmap: Comparative epidemiology of HPV infection and associated cancers of the head and neck and cervix. International Journal of Cancer. 2014;134: 497-507
  38. 38. Souho T, Benlemlih M, Bennani B.: Human papillomavirus infection and fertility alteration: A systematic review. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0126936
  39. 39. Guizzo S, Ferrari B, Noventa M, Ferrari E, Patrelli TS, Gangemi M, Nardelli GB.: Male and couple fertility impairment due to HPV‐DNA sperm infection: Update on molecular mechanism and clinical impact–Systematic review. BioMed Research International. 2014;230263: 1-12
  40. 40. Schillaci R, Capra G, Bellavia C, Ruvolo G, Scazzone C, Venezia R, Perino A.: Detection of oncogenic human papillomavirus genotypes on spermatozoa from male partners of in‐fertile couples. Fertility and Sterility. 2013;100: 1236-1240
  41. 41. Conde‐Ferráez L, Chan‐May Ade A, Carrillo‐Martínez JR, Ayora‐Talavera G, González‐Losa MR.: Human papillomavirus infection and spontaneous abortion: A case–control study performed in Mexico. European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2013;170: 468-473
  42. 42. Pérez‐Andino J, Buck CB, Ribbeck K.: Adsorption of human papillomavirus 16 to live human sperm. PLoS One. 2009;4: e5847
  43. 43. Foresta C, Garolla A, Zuccarello D, Pizzol D, Moretti A, Barzon L, Palù G.: Human papillomavirus found in sperm head of young adult males affects the progressive motility. Fertility and Sterility. 2010;93: 802-806
  44. 44. Garolla A, Pizzol D, Bertoldo A, De Toni L, Barzon L, Foresta C.: Association, prevalence, and clearance of human papillomavirus and antisperm antibodies in infected semen samples from infertile patients. Fertility and Sterility. 2013;99: 125-131
  45. 45. Yang Y, Jia CW, Ma YM, Zhou LY, Wang SY.: Correlation between HPV sperm infection and male infertility. Asian Journal of Andrology. 2013;15: 529-532
  46. 46. Connelly DA, Chan PJ, Patton WC, King A.: Human sperm deoxyribonucleic acid fragmentation by specific types of papilloma‐virus. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2001;184: 1068-1070
  47. 47. Lee CA, Huang CT, King A, Chan PJ.: Differential effects of human papillomavirus DNA types on p53 tumor‐suppressor gene apoptosis in sperm. Gynecologic Oncology. 2002;85: 511-516
  48. 48. Gomez LM, Ma Y, Ho C, McGrath CM, Nelson DB, Parry S.: Placental infection with human papillomavirus is associated with spontaneous preterm delivery. Human Reproduction. 2008;23: 709-715
  49. 49. Skoczyński M, Gozdzicka‐Józefiak A, Kwaśniewska A.: Prevalence of human papillomavirus in spontaneously aborted products of conception. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 2011;90: 1402-1045
  50. 50. Cho G, Min KJ, Hong HR, Kim S, Hong JH, Lee JK, Oh MJ, Kim H.: High‐risk human papillomavirus infection is associated with premature rupture of membranes. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13: 173
  51. 51. Rintala MA, Grénman SE, Puranen MH, Isolauri E, Ekblad U, Kero PO, Syrjänen SM. Transmission of high‐risk human papilloma‐virus (HPV) between parents and infant?: A prospective study of HPV in families in Finland. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2005;43:376-381
  52. 52. Castellsagué X, Drudis T, Cañadas MP, Goncé A, Ros R, Pérez JM, et al. Human Papillomavirus (HPV) infection in pregnant women and mother‐to‐child transmission of genital HPV genotypes: A prospective study in Spain. BMC Infectious Diseases. 2009;9: 74
  53. 53. Freitas A, Mariz F, Silva A, Jesus A. Human papillomavirus vertical transmission: Review of current data. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2013;56:1451-1456
  54. 54. Koskimaa HM, Paaso AE, Welters MJ, Grénman SE, Syrjänen KJ, van der Burg SH, Syrjänen SM. Human papillomavirus 16 E2‐, E6‐ and E7‐specific T‐cell responses in children and their mothers who developed incident cervical intraepithelial neoplasia during a 14‐year follow‐up of the Finnish Family HPV cohort. Journal of Translational Medicine. 2014;12:44
  55. 55. Murray PR, Rosenthal KS, Pfaller MA. Chlamydia and chlamydophila. Medical Microbiology. 6th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Mosby Elsevier; 2009. p. 441
  56. 56. Al‐Younes HM, Brinkmann V, Meyer TF. Interaction of Chlamydia trachomatis serovar L2 with the host autophagic pathway. Infection and Immunity. 2004;72:4751-4762
  57. 57. Moulder JW. Interaction of chlamydiae and host cells in vitro. Microbiology Reviews. 1991;55:143-190
  58. 58. Taylor‐Robinson D, Thomas BJ. The role of Chlamydia trachomatis genital tract and associated diseases. Journal of Clinical Pathology. 1980;33:205-233
  59. 59. Ness RB, Goodman MT, Shen C, Brunham RC. Serologic evidence of past infection with Chlamydia trachomatis, in relation to ovarian cancer. The Journal of Infectious Disease. 2003;187:1147-1152
  60. 60. Gonzales GF, Muñoz G, Sánchez R, Henkel R, Gallegos‐Avila G, Díaz‐Gutierrez O, Vigil P, Vásquez F, Kortebani G, Mazzolli A, Bustos‐Obregón E. Update on the impact of Chlamydia trachomatis infection on male fertility. Andrologia. 2004;36:1-23
  61. 61. Mazzoli S, Cai T, Addonisio P, Bechi A, Mondaini N, Bartoletti R.: Chlamydia trachomatis infection is related to poor semen quality in young prostatitis patients. European Urology. 2009;57:708-714
  62. 62. Gdoura R, Kchaou W, Ammar‐Keskes L, Chakroun N, Sellemi A, Znazen A, Rebai T, Hammami A. Assessment of Chlamydia trachomatis, Ureaplasma urealyticum, Ureaplasma parvum, Mycoplasma hominis, and Mycoplasma genitalium in semen and first void urine specimens of asymptomatic male partners of infertile couples. Journal of Andrology. 2008;29:198-206
  63. 63. Stamm WE, Norrby SR. Urinary tract infections: disease panorama and challenges. The Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2001;183(Suppl 1):S1–S4
  64. 64. Terán S, Walsh C, Irwin KL. Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women: Bad news, good news, and next steps in prevention. Journal of the American Medical Women’s Association. 2001;56:100-104
  65. 65. Marrazzo J. Syphilis and other sexually transmitted diseases in HIV infection. Topics in HIV Medicine. 2007;15(1):11-16
  66. 66. Cunningham KA & Beagley KW. Male genital tract chlamydia infection: Implications for pathology and infertility. Biology of Reproduction. 2008;79:180-189
  67. 67. Diquelou JY, Pastorini E, Feneux D, Gicquel JM. The role of Chlamydia trachomatis in producing abnormal movements by spermatozoa. Journal de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Biologie de la Reproduction (Paris). 1989;18:615-625
  68. 68. Gallegos‐Avila G. Infecciones por Chlamydia trachomatis y Mycoplasma sp. Su relación con la infertilidad masculina. Bol Col Mex Urol. 2003;18:106-112
  69. 69. Hosseinzadeh S, Eley A, Pacey AA. Semen quality of men with asymptomatic chlamydial infection. Journal of Andrology. 2004;25:104-109
  70. 70. Bezold G, Politch JA, Kiviat NB, Kuypers JM, Wolff H, Anderson DJ. Prevalence of sexually transmissible pathogens in semen from asymptomatic male infertility patients with and without leukocytospermia. Fertility and Sterility. 2007;87:1087-1097
  71. 71. De Marzo AM, Platz EA, Sutcliffe S, Xu J, Grönberg H, Drake CG, Nakai Y, Isaacs WB, Nelson WG. Inflammation in prostate carcinogenesis. Nature Reviews Cancer. 2007;7:256-269
  72. 72. Gallegos‐Avila G, Sánchez JJ, Chávez‐Briones ML, Ramos‐González B, Niderhauser‐García A, Ancer‐Rodríguez J, Ortega‐Martínez M, Jaramillo‐Rangel G. A role of Chlamydia trachomatis in prostate cancer: A prostate biopsies study. In: Berhardt LV, editor. Advances in Medicine and Biology. Vol. 37. NY, USA: Nova Science Publishers, Inc.; 2011. pp. 1-13. ISBN: 978‐1‐62100‐102‐7
  73. 73. Razin S. The genus Mycoplasma and related genera (class Mollicutes). In: Dworkin M, Falkow S, Rosenberg E, Schleifer KH, Stackebrandt E, editors. The Prokaryotes. A Handbook on the Biology of Bacteria. Volume 4: Bacteria: Firmicutes, Cyanobacteria. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Springer Science+Business Media, LLC; 2006. p. 836
  74. 74. Baseman JB, Tully JG. Mycoplasmas: Sophisticated, reemerging, and burdened by their notoriety. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 1997;3:21-32
  75. 75. Dallo SF, Baseman JB. Intracellular DNA replication and long‐term survival of pathogenic mycoplasmas. Microbial Pathogenesis. 2000;29:301-309
  76. 76. Uusküla A, Kohl PK. Genital mycoplasmas, including Mycoplasma genitalium, as sexually transmitted agents. International Journal of STD & AIDS. 2002;13:79-85
  77. 77. Kilic D, Basar MM, Kaygusuz S, Yilmaz E, Basar H, Batislam E. Prevalence and treatment of Chlamydia trachomatis, Ureaplasma urealyticum, and Mycoplasma hominis in patients with non‐gonococcal urethritis. Japanese Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2004;57:17-20
  78. 78. Jensen JS. Mycoplasma genitalium: The etiological agent of urethritis and other sexually transmitted diseases. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology. 2004;18:1-11
  79. 79. Yoon BH, Chang JW, Romero R. Isolation of Ureaplasma urealyticum from the amniotic cavity and adverse outcome in preterm labor. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 1998;92:77-82
  80. 80. Denks K, Spaeth EL, Jõers K, Randoja R, Talpsep T, Ustav M, Kurg R. Coinfection of Chlamydia trachomatis, Ureaplasma urea‐lyticum and human papillomavirus among patients attending STD clinics in Estonia. Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2007;39:714-718
  81. 81. Dieterle S. Urogenital infections in reproductive medicine. Andrologia. 2008;40:117-119
  82. 82. Zeighami H, Peerayeh SN, Yazdi RS, Sorouri R. Prevalence of Ureaplasma urealyticum and Ureaplasma parvum in semen of infertile and healthy men. International Journal of STD & AIDS. 2009;20:387-390
  83. 83. Volgmann T, Ohlinger R, Panzig B. Ureaplasma urealyticum‐harmless commensal or underestimated enemy of human reproduction? A review. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2005;273:133-139
  84. 84. Lukic A, Canzio C, Patella A, Giovagnoli MR, Cipriani P, Frega A, Moscarini M. Determination of cervicovaginal micro‐organisms in women with abnormal cervical cytology: The role of Ureaplasma urealyticum. Anticancer Research. 2006;26:4843-4849
  85. 85. Gnarpe H, Friberg J. T‐mycoplasmas as a possible cause for reproductive failure. Nature. 1973;242:120-121
  86. 86. Fowlkes DM, Dooher GB, Oleary WM. Evidence by scanning electron microscopy for an association between spermatozoa and T‐mycoplasmas in men of infertile marriage. Fertility and Sterility. 1975;26:1203-1211
  87. 87. Busolo F, Zanchetta R, Bertolini G.: Mycoplasmic localization patterns on spermatozoa from infertile men. Fertility and Sterility. 1984;42: 412-417
  88. 88. Grossgebauer K, Hennig A. Ureaplasma‐infected human sperm in infertile men. Archives of Andrology. 1984;12 Suppl:35-41
  89. 89. Xu C, Sun GF, Zhu YF, Wang YF. The correlation of Ureaplasma urealyticum infection with infertility. Andrologia. 1997;29:219-226
  90. 90. Núñez‐Calonge R, Caballero P, Redondo C, Baquero F, Martinez‐Ferrer M, Meseguer MA. Ureaplasma urealyticum reduces motility and induces membrane alterations in human spermatozoa. Human Reproduction. 1998;13:2756-2761
  91. 91. Blanchard A, Hentchel J, Duffy L, Baldus K. Detection of Ureaplasma urealyticum by polymerase chain reaction in the urogenital tract of adults, in amniotic fluid, and in the respiratory tract on newborns. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 1993;17(Suppl.1):S148–S153
  92. 92. Teng K, Li M, Yu W, Li H, Shen D, Liu D. Comparison of PCR with culture for detection of Ureaplasma urealyticum in clinical samples from patients with urogenital infections. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 1994;32:2232-2234
  93. 93. Tsai S, Wear DJ, Shih JW, Lo SC. Mycoplasmas and oncogenesis: persistent infection and multistage malignant transformation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1995;92:10197-101201
  94. 94. Zhang S, Tsai S, Lo SC. Alteration of gene expression profiles during mycoplasma‐induced malignant cell transformation. BMC Cancer. 2006;6:116
  95. 95. Zhang S, Wear DJ, Lo S. Mycoplasmal infections alter gene expression in cultured human prostatic and cervical epithelial cells. FEMS Immunology and Medical Microbiology. 2000;27:43-50
  96. 96. Namiki K, Goodison S, Porvasnik S, Allan RW, Iczkowski KA, Urbanek C, Reyes L, Sakamoto N, Rosser CJ. Persistent exposure to Mycoplasma induces malignant transformation of human prostate cells. PLoS One. 2009;4:1-9
  97. 97. Dennis LK, Lynch CF, Turner JC. Epidemiologic association between prostatitis and prostate cancer. Urology. 2002;60:315-319
  98. 98. Smith JS, Muñoz N, Herrero R, Eluf‐Neto J, Ngelangel C, Franceschi S, et al. Evidence for Chlamydia trachomatis as a human papilloma‐virus cofactor in the etiology of invasive cervical cancer in Brazil and the Philippines. The Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2002;185:324-331
  99. 99. Agrawal T, Vats V, Salhan S, Mittal A. Determination of chlamydial load and immune parameters in asymptomatic, symptomatic and infertile women. FEMS Immunology and Medical Microbiology. 2009:55:250-257
  100. 100. de Lucena‐Oliveira M, de Amorim MM, de Souza AS, de Albuquerque LC, da Costa AA. Chlamydia infection in patients with and without cervical intraepithelial lesions. Revista Da Associacao Medica Brasileira. 2008;54:506-512
  101. 101. Fleming DT, Wasserheit JN. From epidemiological synergy to public health policy and practice: The contribution of other sexually transmitted diseases to sexual transmission of HIV infection. Journal Sexually Transmitted Infections. 1999;75:3-17
  102. 102. Luostarinen T, Lehtinen M, Bjørge T, Abeler V, Hakama M, Hallmans G, et al. Joint effects of different human papillomaviruses and Chlamydia trachomatis infections on risk of squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix uteri. European Journal of Cancer. 2004;40:1058-1065
  103. 103. de Luca G, Marin M, Schelover E, Chamorro E, Vicente L, Albhom M, Alonso JM. Infeccion por Chlamydia trachomatis y Papilomavirus en mujeres con alteraciones citohistologicas de cuello uterino. Medicina (B Aires). 2006;66:303-306
  104. 104. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Annual Epidemiological Report on Communicable Diseases in Europe. 2008. http://ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications/Publications/0812_SUR_Annual_Epidemiological_Report_2008.pdf
  105. 105. Samoff E, Koumans EH, Markowitz LE, Sternberg M, Sawyer MK, Swan D, Papp JR, Black CM, Unger ER. Association of Chlamydia trachomatis with persistence of high‐risk types of human papillomavirus in a cohort of female adolescents. American Journal of Epidemiology. 2005;162:668-675
  106. 106. Silins I, Ryd W, Strand A, Wadell G, Törnberg S, Hansson BG, et al. Chlamydia trachomatis infection and persistence of human papilloma‐virus. International Journal of Cancer. 2005;116:110-115
  107. 107. Paba P, Bonifacio D, Di Bonito L, Ombres D, Favalli C, Syrjänen K, Ciotti M. Co‐expression of HSV2 and Chlamydia trachomatis in HPV‐positive cervical cancer and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia lesions is associated with aberrations in key intracellular pathways. Intervirology. 2008;51:230-234
  108. 108. Gallegos‐Ávila G. Estudio citológico del semen de hombres infértiles con infección genital por Chlamydia y Mycoplasma. Observaciones en cortes semifinos y ultrafinos [thesis]. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid; 2005
  109. 109. Gallegos‐Avila G, Ancer‐Rodriguez J, Alvarez‐Cuevas S, Ramos‐González B, Sanchez‐Hernández J, Nistal M, Regadera J. Relevancy of semithin section on the analysis of seminal damage, due to infection by Chlamydia and Mycoplasma, in couples with unsuccessful assisted reproduction. In: Ballesca Lagarda JL, Oliva Virgili R, editors. Papers contributed to 9th International Congress of Andrology. MEDIMOND International Proceedings. Barcelona, Spain; 2009, pp. 123-128
  110. 110. Gallegos‐Avila G, Ortega‐Martínez M, Ramos‐González B, Tijerina‐Menchaca R, Ancer‐Rodríguez J, Jaramillo‐Rangel G. Ultrastructural findings in semen samples of infertile men infected with Chlamydia trachomatis and mycoplasmas. Fertility and Sterility. 2009;91:915-919
  111. 111. Gallegos‐Ávila G, Alvarez‐Cuevas S, Niderhauser‐García A, Ancer‐Rodríguez J, Jaramillo‐Rangel G, Ortega‐Martínez M. Phagocytosis of spermatozoa and leucocytes by epithelial cells of the genital tract in infertile men infected with Chlamydia trachomatis and mycoplasmas. Histopathology. 2009;55:232-234
  112. 112. Gallegos‐Ávila G, Ancer‐Rodríguez J, Ortega‐Martínez, Jaramillo‐Rangel G. Infection and phagocytosis: Analysis in semen with transmission electron microscopy. In: Méndez‐Vilas A, Díaz J, editors. Microscopy: Science, Technology, Applications and Education. No. 4. Vol. 1: Applications in Biology and Medicine Formatex, Microscopy series ed. Badajoz, Spain. 2010. pp. 85-92. ISBN‐13: 978‐84‐614‐6191‐2
  113. 113. Gallegos‐Ávila G, Marcos M, Alvarez‐Cuevas S, Niderhauser‐García, Ancer‐Rodríguez J. Citología seminal en infecciones del aparato genital masculino. In: Regadera J, Noguera R, Hardisson D, editors. Atlas de Histología y del desarrollo del aparato genital masculino. Cap. 29. International Marketing and Communication, Madrid, Spain. 2016. pp. 267-271. ISBN 978‐84‐7867‐490‐9
  114. 114. Gallegos G, Ramos B, Santiso R, Goyanes V, Gosalvez J, Fernandez JL. Sperm DNA fragmentation in infertile men with genito‐urinary infection by Chlamydia trachomatis and Mycoplasma. Fertility and Sterility. 2008;90:328-334
  115. 115. Gallegos G. Infertility due to C. trachomatis and Mycoplasma is a result of sperm damage fragmentation. Nature Clinical Practice Urology. Research Highlights. 2008;5(11):580
  116. 116. Gallegos Ávila MG, Ramos González B, Sánchez Hernández JJ, Niderhauser García A, Ancer Rodríguez J. Aplicación del NBT‐Test para evaluar la producción espermática de ROS en la infección seminal por C. trachomatis y su asociación con la fragmentación de la cromatina y el deterioro de la calidad espermática. International Review of Andrology. 2011;9:88
  117. 117. Ramos‐González B. Fragmentación del ADN espermático en hombres infértiles con infección por Chlamydia trachomatis y Mycoplasma sp. Efecto de la terapia antibiótica y antioxidante [thesis]. Madrid, Spain: Universidad Autónoma de Madrid; 2012
  118. 118. Chávez‐Briones ML. Endometritis por Chlamydia trachomatis y Ureaplasma urealyticum en mujeres con infertilidad y aborto [thesis]. Madrid, Spain: Universidad Autónoma de Madrid; 2012
  119. 119. Chávez‐Briones ML, Alvarez‐Cuevas S, Ramos‐González B, Casillas‐Vega N, Niderhauser‐García A, Ancer‐Rodríguez J, Hardisson‐Hernáez D, Gallegos‐Ávila MG. Endometritis por Chlamydia trachomatis y Ureaplasma urealyticum en mujeres con infertilidad y aborto. Medicina Universitaria. 2013;5(Suppl 1):1-124
  120. 120. Gallegos Ávila MG, Ramos González B, Sánchez Hernández JJ, Niderhauser García A, Ancer Rodríguez J. Disminución de la teratozoospermia secundaria a tratamiento antibiótico en pacientes infértiles con infección urogenital ocasionada por Chlamydia trachomatis y Mycoplasma sp. International Review of Andrology. 2011;9:90
  121. 121. Gallegos‐Ávila MG, Álvarez‐Cuevas S, Sánchez‐Hernández JJ, Niderhauser‐García A, Casillas‐Vega N, Ramos‐González B. Resultado del tratamiento del binomio Andro‐Ginecológico en la infertilidad conyugal por infección genital interna. Andrology. 2013;11:1-14
  122. 122. Alberts CJ, Schim van der Loeff MF, Papenfuss MR, da Silva RJ, Villa LL, et al. Association of Chlamydia trachomatis infection and herpes simplex virus type 2 serostatus with genital human papillomavirus infection in men: the HPV in men study. Sexually Transmitted Diseases. 2013;40:508-515

Written By

Adriana Ancer‐Arellano, Jesus Ancer‐Rodríguez, David Hardisson, Alberto Niderhauser-Garcia, Jose Sanchez‐Hernández, Alvarez‐ Cuevas Salomón and Guadalupe Gallegos‐Avila

Reviewed: 21 March 2017 Published: 06 September 2017