Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Gastric Microbiota and Resistance to Antibiotics

By Agnes Tving Stauning, Rie Louise Møller Nordestgaard, Tove Havnhøj Frandsen and Leif Percival Andersen

Submitted: March 9th 2018Reviewed: August 1st 2018Published: November 5th 2018

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.80662

Downloaded: 529


Studies on gastric microbiota find several bacterial families and species in the stomach using molecular-based techniques. When biopsies are cultured, there may be growth of bacteria, pure culture of Helicobacter pylori, or no growth. When looking at the histological sections of corresponding biopsies no bacteria may be seen, except curved rods (H. pylori) adherent to the gastric epithelial cells. In a number of biopsies, several different bacteria are cultured with or without H. pylori. The non–H. pylori bacteria cultured are like the normal oral flora and may be contamination of the samples during endoscopy. In histological sections, these bacteria are seen above the mucin layer and not adherent to the epithelial cells confirming that it is contamination of the samples and can thus not be regarded as gastric microbiota. Therefore, the susceptibility of H. pylori to antibiotics is independent of coexisting bacterial flora. A review of H. pylori susceptibility to antibiotics in untreated and previous treated patients will be given including meta-analyses of H. pylori susceptibility to metronidazole (MTZ), clarithromycin, and levofloxacin. These data indicate that these antibiotics become more doubtful to use for primary therapy and should be banned for secondary therapy without susceptibility testing.


  • gastric microbiota
  • H. pylori
  • histology
  • susceptibility testing
  • resistant rates

1. Introduction

Microbiota and microbiome are not always clearly defined or distinguished. The human microbiota comprises the population of microbial species that live on or in the human body. This is the resident flora of the body and does not include the transient flora (sampling contamination, etc.). The microbiome is constituted by all the genes inside these microbial cells and is thus restricted to detection by molecular methods (sequencing, polymerase chain reactions [PCR]) [1].

By molecular methods, bacteria are usually identified to family and genera level [2]. Bacterial families and genera may include species and types of bacteria that may have completely opposite actions in the human body [3]. It is, therefore, doubtful if molecular methods alone are sensitive enough to predict the effect of the composition of microbiota. The limited original literature on gastric microbiota has mainly focused on gastric cancer and contains conflicting results [4, 5, 6, 7]. There are many difficulties in investigating the gastric microbiota. One thing many authors are not aware of is the difficulty of getting samples without contaminating bacterial flora (Figure 1) [8]. In animal models, the whole stomach can be removed, and contamination of the stomach can be avoided, but in most animal species, physiology, acidity, etc. of the stomach are very different from the human stomach. Samples from the human stomach are usually taken as biopsies during gastroscopy. Even though the endoscope and the forceps are sterilized or decontaminated, it will be contaminated with oral bacterial flora during gastroscopy and thereby will the samples be contaminated by oral flora mainly of the phyla Firmicutes[8, 9].

Figure 1.

Schematic illustration of the gastric mucosa with the main cell types of oxyntic and pyloric glands in the gastric epithelium. Gastric stem cells reside in the isthmus zone of the gland and differentiate into precursors of the different cell lineages, which migrate either apically toward the gastric lumen or downwards to the base. The superficial epithelium and the gastric glands are covered by a viscous mucus layer mainly composed of MUC5AC, secreted by the SMCs, and MUC6, secreted mainly by MNCs and antral gland cells. The mucus layer consists of an inner layer, which is firmly attached to the epithelium, and an outer loose layer. The gastric pathogenHelicobacter pylorihas been shown to use the transmucus pH gradient between the acidic gastric lumen and the near‐neutral epithelial surface for spatial orientation to reach its niche at the juxtamucosal epithelium. The precise location of non–H. pylorimicrobiota is still hypothetical. [8].

Bacterial resistance to antibiotics can occur either if the bacteria obtain plasmids containing resistance genes from other bacteria in the microbiota (conjugation); they can take up free DNA with resistance genes from the environment (transcription) or DNA can be transferred by bacteriophages (transduction). Furthermore, mutations can occur in the bacterial genome which may result in resistance if the mutation occurs in the part of the genome that codes for a structure on which the antibiotics act; this action may be interfered, and the bacteria becomes resistant to the antibiotic [10, 11, 12]. The conjugation of plasmids increases with the number of different bacteria in the microbiota and depends on a close contact between the bacteria. Uptake of free DNA does not demand a direct contact with other bacteria, but bacteria should probably be present in the close environment [3]. Mutations occur in all bacteria with a certain time because of natural replication errors [12]. Some bacteria mutate more often than others; but because of the short generation time for bacteria, each bacterial clone will have several mutations. If the mutation occurs in a part of the genome, which is target for the antibiotics, resistance to the antibiotic may occur.


2. Study on gastric microbiota

In a previous unpublished study that included 411 biopsies from patients undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopy were investigated both by microaerobic culture and by histology (Table 1). From 249 (60%) biopsies other bacteria than H. pyloriwere cultured. These bacteria were oral flora, that is, Streptococcusspp., Staphylococcusspp., Corynebacteriumspp., Neisseriaspp., etc., which may indicate contamination of both the endoscope and the biopsies during the procedure. In histological sections, very few bacteria except H. pyloriwere seen in 20 (5%) of the biopsies. In all cases, the bacteria were located superficial to the mucus layer and not in relation to the epithelial cells and H. pylori, which confirm that it is contamination from the oral cavity. The discrepancy in the number of biopsies with other bacteria than H. pyloribetween culture and histology may be because very few bacteria (less than 5 colonies) are cultured and the preparation of histological sections may remove much of the mucin and the contaminating bacteria. H. pyloriwas found alone without contamination in 60 biopsies by culture and in 83 biopsies by histology which indicate that H. pyloriis a true gastric microbiota (Figure 2).

No. of biopsiesCultureHistology
H. pyloriOther bacteriaH. pyloriOther bacteria

Table 1.

Comparison of culture and histological finding of H. pyloriand other bacteria (oral flora) in gastric biopsies.

Figure 2.

Imprint cytology showing the presence ofH. pylori(Giemsa stain, ×400) Rahbar [84].

All known mechanisms for H. pyloriresistance to all antibiotics are point mutations located on the chromosome (Table 2), indicating no uptake of plasmids or free DNA, which support that H. pyloriis the only bacteria in the true gastric microbiota and everything else is transient contaminating flora [13].

Resistance toMutation
RifampicinRNA polymerase subunit beta/beta

Table 2.

Examples of mutations in H. pyloricausing resistance to antibiotics.

3. Diagnosis of H. pylori

The detection of H. pylorican be done by invasive and noninvasive methods. The invasive methods require a biopsy, whereas the noninvasive methods are gentler for the patient.

Culture of H. pylorimay be difficult and the sensitivity may be rather low (50–85%) [14]. The sensitivity of the culture depends on transport time to the lab and the culture method used [15]. Different agar plates or incubation time can also give different results on the same biopsy. Two biopsies from the antrum and two biopsies from the fundus are preferred when making a culture as H. pyloriis unevenly distributed in the stomach. Culture is the only method by which it is possible to make a full susceptibility test.

Histology is an invasive method which requires a least one antral biopsy and preferably two antral and two corpus biopsies. The biopsy is stained with hematoxylin and eosin, Giemsa, or silver staining. H. pyloriis identified by the color, shape, and close relation to the mucosa and can be confirmed by immunohistochemistry using H. pylori–specific antibodies. The histology has shown to have a sensitivity at the same level as culture but is influenced by the size of the biopsy [14]. The number of biopsies and the location in the stomach also modify the sensitivity. The specificity of histology is lower than the specificity of the culture as histology cannot distinguish H. pylorifrom non–pylori Helicobacterspecies. The detection rates in cultures and histology varies with varying expertise of examiners. If the patient is taking proton pump inhibitor (PPI), bismuth, or antibiotics prior to gastroscopy, it might change the shape of H. pylorifrom curved rod to a coccoid form. This form is undetectable in the routine microscopy technique and requires fluorescent in situhybridization, immunohistochemistry with specific antibodies to H. pylori,or confirmation by the 16s rRNA and 23rRAN sequencing, which are irrespective of the shape of the bacteria [16].

H. pyloriurease breaks down urea to ammonia and carbon dioxide. This feature is used in the diagnostic methods “rapid urease test” (RUT) and “urea breath test” (UBT). RUT is an invasive method that preferably needs two biopsies. If the biopsy contains H. pylori,the release of ammonia increases the pH of the test medium, which is seen by a color change due to a pH indicator. The result of the test is fast and takes approximately ½ hour. UBT is a noninvasive method where the patient ingests 13C-labeled urea. If the patient is infected with H. pylori,orally ingested 13C-urea is broken down to 13C-labeled carbon dioxide, which is then exhaled. The sensitivity of the two tests is 75–85% for RUT and >95% for UBT. Likewise, the UBT has a higher specificity (<95%) when compared to RUT (85–95%). For both RUT and UBT, PPI and antibiotics can give false negative results. Furthermore, coccoid forms of H. pyloriwould not produce urease and would therefore give a false negative result [17].

Stool antigen test is another noninvasive method. It was first successfully described in 1997 using polyclonal antibodies [18]. Today monoclonal antibodies are used, and the sensitivity and the specificity are at the same levels as for UBT, but are preferred in special patients like children and patients with bleeding ulcers. This test can be done within ½ hour and is good for screening a patient for an infection with H. pylori. Despite this, antigen excretion may vary over time, and antigens may degrade while passing through the intestines, which may lead to false negative results.

The humoral antibody response to H. pylorican be measured by either serum IgG antibodies to H. pylori, which shows an ongoing or a previous infection, or by serum IgM antibodies, which shows an ongoing acute infection. H. pyloriIgG antibodies can be detected in sputum or urine but have a much lover sensitivity and specificity than serum antibodies. Antibodies to H. pyloriin serum can be tested by ELISA or “near patient test (NPT).” NPT uses immune-chromatography or passive agglutination. A 2013 study compared the NPT and the ELISA test. The study showed that the NPT never reach 90% in sensitivity, and the frequency of false negatives and false positives were high [19]. Several tested ELISA kits showed a high specificity and sensitivity above 90%. However, the serological kits may differ considerably depending on the antigens that are included in the kit as antibodies to low-molecular-weight antigens (outer membrane antigens) decline significantly within 3 months, whereas antibodies to high-molecular-weight antigens (CagA, VacA, etc.) may stay potent for years [20]. CagA antibodies remain stable for a long period of time and can probably be useful for the detection of H. pyloriinfections in patients with gastric cancer when other tests are negative [21]. Due to local strain distribution of H. pylori,the serology kits should be made by using local H. pyloristrains, and the kits should be locally validated [21].

Gastrin and pepsinogen are compounds produced in the stomach that depend on the changes in the gastric mucosa, and the serum levels of pepsinogens are a marker of atrophic gastritis [22]. This can be combined with the H. pyloriantibody test to predict the risk of developing gastric cancer.

Molecular methods have been of increasing interest in the field of microbiology and for detection of H. pylori. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) seems to be more sensitive than any other method to detect H. pylori[23]. The main problem is that the method does not distinguish between live bacteria and DNA from dead bacteria. Real-time PCR (RT-PCR), which is a fast and quantitative PCR, seems to be more sensitive than classical PCR [24]. By sequencing the 16S RNA or 23S RNA region, it is possible to detect Helicobacterspecies and susceptibility to clarithromycin and tetracycline [25, 26, 27]. However, it is a more expensive and time-consuming method. A commercial kit has combined detection of H. pyloriand susceptibility to clarithromycin in a classical PCR. However, culture is still needed for a full susceptibility testing. There are so many point mutations causing resistance to antibiotics in H. pylorithat a full susceptibility analysis can only be detected by whole genome sequencing [28].

4. H. pylorisusceptibility to antibiotics

During the last decade, an increased number of H. pylorihave become resistant to antibiotics, especially to clarithromycin and levofloxacin [29]. The resistance rates to metronidazole have always been more than 15% worldwide, but the increasing resistance rates to clarithromycin and levofloxacin in some areas have become higher than 10–15%. Thus, these antibiotics are not recommended for first-line therapy of H. pyloriwithout prior susceptibility testing [21]. It is common to treat H. pyloriinfections without prior susceptibility testing, and different studies show a much lower resistance rate to clarithromycin in H. pylorifrom untreated patients than in H. pylorifrom previously treated patients [30, 31, 32]. It is therefore of the greatest importance to make susceptibility testing after the first treatment failure.

The susceptibility testing of H. pylorican be done by various methods. The most common are dilution methods, disk diffusion, and E-test.

The dilution method is regarded to be the golden standard for susceptibility testing. A two-fold dilution row of the test antibiotic is made. A standard number of bacteria (McFarland 3) are added to each tube with antibiotics. The bacterial growth is inhibited by high concentrations of antibiotics. The first tube with bacterial growth is called the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC). H. pylorishould be grown for 48–72 hours under microaerobic conditions. It may be difficult to find a suitable media in which H. pylorigrows fast enough, and the slightest contamination will grow faster than H. pyloriand thereby spoil the susceptibility testing.

The disk diffusion test requires a small tablet of an antibiotic. The tablet is placed on the agar plate and is incubated for 3 days. After 3 days, there will be a zone around the tablet with no growth of H. pylori. This is the inhibition zone, and the diameter of the zone can be translated to an MIC value, which shows whether or not the bacteria are resistant to the antibiotic. To make the susceptibility testing of H. pylori, a McFarland 3.0 dilution of H. pyloriand Mueller-Hinton agar plates with 10% blood or chocolate ager plates should be used and incubated in microaerobic conditions at 37°C.

The E-test is a stripe with a concentration gradient of an antibiotic. The stripe is placed on the agar plate and is incubated for 3 days. After 3 days, there will be a droplet shape around the stripe with no growth of H. pylori(Figure 3). That concentration where H. pylorigrows close to stripe is the MIC value [33].

Figure 3.

Reading guide for E tests. (A) Colonies of a metronidazole-resistant subpopulation in the ellipse minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) >32; (B) trailing of microcolonies at the end point MIC 0.5 μg/ml. Warburton-Timms and McNulty [85].

5. Treatment of H. pyloriinfection

H. pyloriinfections are usually treated with a combination of antibiotics and nonantibiotics (proton pump inhibitor [PPI] or bismuth salts). Usually, a combination of two or three antibiotics is used, as the effect of monotherapy has been found insufficient. The most commonly used antibiotics are amoxicillin, clarithromycin, metronidazole, fluoroquinolones, tetracycline, and rifampicin (Table 3).

Bismuth nitrate
Bismuth citrate
Bismuth subsalicylate
H2 blocker

Table 3.

Commonly used antibiotics and nonantibiotics for treatment of H. pyloriinfections.

H. pyloriis found in very different environments such as the gastric lumen with a relatively low pH, in between the epithelial cells and on the basement membrane with a neutral pH but protected as intracellular microorganisms. When choosing antibiotics, it is important to select antibiotic to which H. pyloriis sensitive and is active in all the environmental niches where H. pylorioccurs. It is also important to look at the duration of the efficacy of antibiotics to keep stable levels above the minimal inhibitory concentrations.

PPI in standard doses do not have antibacterial effect on H. pylori, but 5–10 times higher doses have a direct effect on H. pylori. Bismuth salts binds to the surface of H. pyloribut have a relatively little antibacterial effect. However, bismuth salts affect the respiratory chain at the same points as metronidazole and thereby reverts metronidazole resistance in H. pyloriand thus becomes sensitive to metronidazole.


6. Prevalence of H. pyloriresistance to antibiotics

When analyzing different studies around the world, the primary resistance rate for H. pylorivaries. The highest rate of primary metronidazole (MTZ) resistance is found in Africa (52%) followed by South America (49%) and Asia (43%). The lowest resistance rate is found in Europe (35%). The highest primary resistance rates for clarithromycin and levofloxacin are found in South America (20 and 27%) while the lowest rates are found in Europe (12 and 10%) [30, 31, 32, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67]. There is a significantly (p < 0.001) higher risk of primary metronidazole and levofloxacin resistance in Asian when compared to Europe.

The high rate of metronidazole resistance seen in developing countries may be due to the high use of metronidazole for treatment of parasites and gynecological infections [62, 68]. It is therefore likely that the patients who are treated for H. pyloriwith metronidazole for the first time are resistant for this treatment. It is recommended to use bismuth therapy together with metronidazole in the first-line treatment in areas with high metronidazole resistance [21].

The high resistance rates for clarithromycin and levofloxacin in South America, Africa, and Asia can be due to the use of huge amounts of antibiotics in general [69]. Typically, the diagnostics are not precise, and the patients are treated with more a broad spectrum of antibiotics for a longer period. This can lead to a faster development of resistance in H. pylori[70].

A large multinational study tested H. pyloriresistance in 18 European countries [29]. All 18 countries used E-test for the susceptibility testing and only tested patients who had never been treated for H. pyloribefore. In total, 2204 people were included in the study, and the resistance rate for adults were 18% for clarithromycin, 14% for levofloxacin, and 35% for metronidazole. They found a significant association between the use of only long-acting macrolides and clarithromycin resistance. The levofloxacin resistance was significantly associated with the use of quinolone.

The prevalence of H. pyloriresistance to antibiotics was tested in Denmark in 1997, 1998–2004, and 2013 [71, 72, 73]. Throughout the years, the resistance for clarithromycin has increased from 0% in 1997 to 53% in 2013, and likewise, the resistance for metronidazole increased from 20 to 74% [12, 13, 14]. None of the studies mention whether or not the patients have had H. pylorieradication therapy prior to testing or not, which might explain the huge increase in resistance.

6.1. Effect of antibiotic treatment on H. pyloriresistance rates

International guidelines recommend first line of treatment of H. pyloriinfections with 10 days of triple therapy (PPI, clarithromycin, and metronidazole or amoxicillin). If this fails, a treatment with four types of medicine (PPI, bismuth subsalicylate, tetracycline, and metronidazole) for 2 weeks is recommended. After treatment failure for the second time, it is recommended to perform a gastroscopy and susceptibility testing for H. pylori[21].

The primary and secondary resistance rate for H. pylorihas only been described in eight studies [30, 32, 40, 43, 58, 65, 66, 74]. By using “Review Manager 5.3,” it is possible to compare the studies via Forest plots. The meta-analyses show that the secondary resistance is significantly higher (p < 0.001) than the primary.

The meta-analysis shows a high increasing resistance rate for all three antibiotics when the patient had been treated for H. pyloripreviously. The high and increasing resistance rates to metronidazole, clarithromycin, and levofloxacin make it uncertain that these antibiotics should be recommended as the first-line therapy of H. pyloriinfections without prior endoscopy and susceptibility testing (Figure 4A–C).

Figure 4.

Meta-analysis for MTZ (A), CLR (B), and LEV (C). For all three antibiotics, there is a higher odds ratio for resistance if the patient is previously treated for infection withH. pylori.

6.2. Vaccine

Another way to overcome H. pyloriinfections is with a vaccine. In the past couple of years, many studies have investigated developing an effective and safe vaccine. The development of an effective vaccine is complicated by the noninvasive nature of H. pylori.It stays in the lumen of the stomach and does not cross the epithelium. Therefore, the vaccine should affect T helper memory cells, which are required to stay in the lumen during a H. pyloriinfection [75].

Appropriate bacterial antigens, safe and effective adjuvants, and a route of delivery are required for developing a vaccine. For the bacterial antigen, most studies use urease, but other antigens are investigated for example Cag L. The CagL is a protein essential for the pathogenesis of H. pylori. It binds to integrins in the mucosa and triggers the release of the carcinogen CagA to the host cells through the type IV secretin system. CagL also introduces an IL-8 response, which causes inflammation [76]. The use of CagL in a subunit vaccine was investigated by Choudhari et al. in 2013 [75]. The study showed that CagL was stable in pH 4–6 and that sucrose enhances the stability.

The use of heat shock proteins in a vaccine introduced protective immunity without requiring the addition of an adjuvant. The protection, however, is not optimal because sterilizing immunity is not obtained, which is shown in a study from 2014 [77].

A derivate of the cholera toxin (CTA1-DD) and safe nontoxic mutants of Escherichia coliheat labile toxin (dm2T) have also been tested as potential adjuvants. CTA1-DD enhances the Th1 and Th17 immunity and reduces the bacterial colonization by three- to eight-fold [78]. The use of dm2T was equally as effective as the gold standard H. pylorivaccine containing cholera toxin [79].

The routes of delivery that have been tested are sublingual, intranasal, respiratory, and oral [79]. A study on humans from China (2015) tested a vaccine based on a urease B subunit and heat-labile enterotoxin B subunit (gene derived from E. coliH44815) [80]. The vaccine was taken orally three times (day 0, 14, and 28). This study showed a vaccine efficacy of 71.8% in the first year, 55% in in the second year, and 55.8% in the third year after vaccinations. Even though these findings are excellent, a 100% effective vaccine is still not developed. More studies and longer time follow-ups are needed before a fully effective vaccine is on the market. If a fully effective vaccine is made, it would be the best heath measure against H. pyloriinfections and gastric cancer.

7. Discussion

The human gastric microbiota may be difficult to estimate since samples for microbiome investigations often are contaminated with oral bacterial flora during gastroscopy. And the studies in these fields do not make any attempt to remove the oral contamination prior to sequencing. Histological examination of biopsies reveals H. pylorias the only bacteria in close relation to the epithelial cells in the gastric mucosa. When H. pyloriis seen in stomach samples, there is always a strong humoral and cellular immune response to H. pyloriand it thereby fulfills the criteria for a true infection but also a colonization. This has not been shown for any other bacteria.

Thus, in noncancer patients, H. pyloriseems to be the gastric microbiota. In patients with gastric cancer, there may be a different situation as the mucosa is disintegrated and an overgrowth of intestinal bacteria is common. However, it remains to be shown that the intestinal bacteria adhere to the gastric mucosa and cause a local immune response. It is, therefore, believed that H. pyloriis still the most important gastric pathogen.

An increasing resistance to antibiotics in H. pylorihas been seen worldwide especially to metronidazole, clarithromycin, and levofloxacin. This is a worrying development as it may interfere with our recommendations for primary treatment of H. pyloriwithout susceptibility testing. It is a question how fast the resistance occurs. Should susceptibility testing be done after first treatment failure or can it wait until the second treatment failure as recommended? At least the resistance rates are much higher in previously treated patients than in untreated patients.

Due to the high resistant rates, it is necessary to perform a susceptibility test before starting the treatment. The advantages would be a better and maybe quicker eradication of the H. pyloriinfection. Disadvantages of early susceptibility testing are the cost and time of the analyses. Biopsies are an invasive method and may often be painful for the patient. Furthermore, it takes up to 14 days before a full susceptibility test is completed, so the real treatment starts approximately 2 weeks after the doctor confirms the presence of H. pylori. By this time, the patient could have been done with the first line of treatment. In the short perspective, a quick susceptibility test would be very time consuming, but in the long perspective, it might save the patient from several treatments and prevent the relapse of the H. pyloriinfection. But it also gives a better overview on how quickly H. pyloridevelops resistance to the recommended treatment.

When detecting H. pylori,the best would be a quick a method that was as quick as PCR but also made it possible to have a full susceptibility test incorporated. New primers for detecting antibiotic resistance are in progress, but the problem is that there are many different mutations leading to the same resistance profile. H. pylorionly develops antibiotic resistance by mutation in the genome. For MTZ, mutations in at least nine different genes are known to contribute to MTZ resistance [13]. If the detecting of MTZ resistance should be made by PCR, it would be necessary to perform the PCR with many different primers all looking for one specific mutation. In theory, this would be the most sensitive way to find MTZ resistance, but in practice, it would be almost impossible, take a lot of time, and would be expensive.

Due to the enormous amount of mutations leading to antibiotic resistant, the culture and susceptibility testing done by E-test is still the best and most economical way.

The increasing resistant rates to the most commonly used antibiotics raises the question of whether other antibiotics or combinations of antibiotic and nonantibiotic should be used for primary treatment of H. pyloriinfections without susceptibility testing. Bismuth compounds in standard doses, proton pump inhibitors, and acid suppressing compounds in high doses may convert the MTZ resistance [81]. This makes MTZ useful in combination with these compounds, especially the bismuth compounds, which have been shown in clinical studies [21]. Nonantibiotics such as neuroleptics and other compounds acting on the central nerves system have anti–H. pylorieffect in vitro[82] and compounds without effect on the central nervous system may be candidates for alternative treatment. Herbs like broccoli and green tee have some effect on H. pyloriand may in combination with antibiotics and nonantibiotics be candidates for treatment in the future [83].

8. Conclusion

H. pyloriis the most important gastric pathogen and may constitute the true gastric microbiota. It is, therefore, important to follow the development of resistance in H. pylorito antibiotics. With the increased resistance of H. pylorito metronidazole, clarithromycin, and levofloxacin, it may be doubtful if these antibiotics can be recommended as primary treatment without susceptibility testing.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interests.

© 2018 The Author(s). Licensee IntechOpen. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

How to cite and reference

Link to this chapter Copy to clipboard

Cite this chapter Copy to clipboard

Agnes Tving Stauning, Rie Louise Møller Nordestgaard, Tove Havnhøj Frandsen and Leif Percival Andersen (November 5th 2018). Gastric Microbiota and Resistance to Antibiotics, Helicobacter Pylori - New Approaches of an Old Human Microorganism, Bruna Maria Roesler, IntechOpen, DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.80662. Available from:

chapter statistics

529total chapter downloads

More statistics for editors and authors

Login to your personal dashboard for more detailed statistics on your publications.

Access personal reporting

Related Content

This Book

Next chapter

Nonantibiotic-Based Therapeutics Targeting Helicobacter pylori: From Nature to the Lab

By Paula Parreira, Catarina Leal Seabra, Daniela Lopes-de-Campos and Maria Cristina L. Martins

Related Book

First chapter

Persistence of Helicobacter pylori Infection: Genetic and Epigenetic Diversity

By Mohammed Benghezal, Jonathan C. Gauntlett, Aleksandra W. Debowski, Alma Fulurija, Hans-Olof Nilsson and Barry James Marshall

We are IntechOpen, the world's leading publisher of Open Access books. Built by scientists, for scientists. Our readership spans scientists, professors, researchers, librarians, and students, as well as business professionals. We share our knowledge and peer-reveiwed research papers with libraries, scientific and engineering societies, and also work with corporate R&D departments and government entities.

More About Us