Changes to the composition of the overall population of bacteria and yeast present in the broth prior to fermentation (day 0) as well as on day 1 and day 7.
Abstract
The following herbal teas were fermented with the Kombucha “tea fungus” for 7 days: Acacia arabica, Aegle marmelos root bark, Aerva lanata, Asteracantha longifolia, Cassia auriculata, Hemidesmus indicus, Hordeum vulgare, Phyllanthus emblica, Tinospora cordifolia. Microbial enumerations of the bacteria and fungi present in the broth and the tea fungal mats were carried out. At the end of the period of fermentation, the pH values ranged from 4.0 to 6.0, while the titratable acidity (TA) ranging from 2.5 to 5.0 g/mL. The TA was within the acceptable limits of consumption for all beverages. The Oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC) assay indicated 5 of the fermented beverages to have statistically significant increases (P < 0.05) by the end of the period of fermentation. By day 7, the IC50 values of the α-amylase inhibitory activities ranged from 52.5 to 67.2 μg/mL, while the α-glucosidase inhibitory activity values ranged from 95.2 to 196.1 μg/mL by this time point. Overall, an enhancement of the antioxidant and starch hydrolase inhibitory potential of the seven herbal teas was observed as a result of the fermentation by addition of the tea fungus. Thus, this fermentation process could be highlighted as a novel and versatile methodology to obtain functional beverages.
Keywords
- antioxidant activity
- ORAC
- Kombucha
- starch hydrolase inhibitory activity
- total phenolic content
1. Introduction
Kombucha or “tea fungus” is a fermented beverage which is believed to have its origins in northeast China, and has recently gained rapid popularity among the rest of the world [1]. The beverage is produced through the symbiotic growth of bacteria and osmophilic yeast strains in a thick jelly-like membrane which is cultured in sugared black tea (Figure 1) [2]. While the term “Kombucha” is the most commonly used name for the beverage on a commercial basis, it is also known by other names such as Chainii grib, Chainii kvass Champignon de longue vie, Ling zhi, kocha kinoko and red tea fungus [3]. For the production of the beverage, the substrate is incubated with the tea fungal mat statically under aerobic conditions, usually for a minimum of 7 days at 20–28
There are several types of fermentation processes which take place in the production of the beverage and obtained by-products depending on the various metabolic pathways followed by the microorganisms [6]. Kombucha fermentation is a combination of three such pathways: Alcoholic, lactic, and acetic acid production [6]. These pathways take place primarily because of the presence of several yeasts and bacteria coexisting in the medium, where the fermentation is initiated by osmotolerant microorganisms and ultimately dominated by acid-tolerant species [6].
There are many yeast genus and species in the Kombucha culture, where a broad spectrum has been reported by many researchers including
Some studies have been able to successfully demonstrate the preparation of fermented beverages through the addition of the tea fungus to various types of plant-based products which are essentially not of
In this study, the following plant-based herbal teas were fermented by addition of a locally available tea fungal mat:
The selection of herbs was also based with the intention of widening the application of the tea fungus to other types of herbal teas which maybe more readily available depending on the vegetation of various regions and countries. Jayawardena et al. [16] has investigated the antioxidant and starch hydrolase inhibitory potential of these herbs, further justifying their selection as a fermentation medium for preparation of the novel beverages. Identification of the dominant bacteria and yeast species were carried out as well as the changes to the overall population of bacteria and yeast in the broth and pellicle. Other than pH and TA, the enhancement of the antioxidant potential was evaluated. Another aspect of this study was the investigation of the starch hydrolase inhibitory activities, namely α-amylase and α-glucosidase enzyme activities, of the fermented beverages. Starch hydrolase inhibitors retard the absorption of glucose by curbing the action of α-amylase and α-glucosidase [17]. Compounds which are able to impede these enzymes and thereby, delay starch digestion, resulting in a reduction in the rate of glucose absorption, which in turn blunts the postprandial plasma glucose increase in diabetic patients. The enhancement of the starch hydrolase inhibitory potential of the herbal teas through addition of the tea fungal mat was also investigated in this study.
2. Materials and methods
2.1 Preparation of the fermented beverages and determination of pH, TA and overall population of bacteria and yeast in the broth and pellicle
One gram each of the plant powders were added to 100 mL of boiling water and infused for 5 min followed by filtration through a sterile sieve. Sucrose (10%) was dissolved in each beverage and the preparation was left to cool to room temperature at 24 ± 3°C. The cooled teas were aseptically inoculated with 10 mL of the freshly grown tea fungal broth which was originated from black tea for 7 days at 24 ± 3°C. Sampling was performed on a daily basis in order to avoid contamination. Broths of the fermented beverages were centrifuged at 7240 g for 10 min prior to the assays to remove any particulate matter present as a result of microbial action and coalescence of proteins, which might interfere with the measurements. An electronic pH meter (Orion model 290A) was used to measure the pH of the broths, while the TA was measured according to the method by Chen and Liu [12] using acid-based titration. Fermented broth (10 mL) was titrated with 0.1 M NaOH and the end-point was determined by measuring the pH using the electronic pH meter (Orion model 290A), where pH = 7.0 was taken as the end-point. The final TA of the fermented broths was expressed in g/mL.
Changes to the overall population of bacteria and yeast in the fermented broth and pellicle was determined according to the method by Chen and Liu [12]. Glucose-yeast extract-calcium carbonate agar (GYCA) and potato dextrose agar (PDA) media, were used for the growth of bacteria and yeast, respectively. As per the method by Chen and Liu [12], the GYCA medium was composed of 30 g of glucose, 5 g of yeast extract, 3 g of peptone, 10 g of calcium carbonate, 30 mL of 95% ethanol, 20 g of agar, and distilled water added to make a final volume of 1 L. Aliquots of 1 mL were taken from both the broth and the tea fungal mat, while the upper pellicle portion was filtered with a sterile cheesecloth before sampling to remove the cellulose fibers. Both bacterial and yeast counts were expressed as colony-forming units per mL (cfu/mL).
2.2 Determination of the total phenolic content (TPC) and antioxidant activity
The method by Huang et al. [18] was used for determining the TPC. The results were expressed as milligrams of gallic acid equivalents (GAE) per milliliters (mg GAE/mL), using a gallic acid standard curve. The assay was carried out in 96-well format where the following constituent volumes were added in this particular order to a single well to add up to a total volume of 200 μL per well: Sample / blank (deionized water) / gallic acid standard—20 μL, Folin-Ciocalteu reagent—100 μL, Na2CO3 (30 g/L)—80 μL. The microplate was incubated at room temperature for 15 min following which the absorbance was read at 540 nm using a Thermo Scientific Multiskan GO Microplate Reader. The TPC value was back-calculated using the gallic acid standard curve.
The Oxygen Radical Absorbance Capacity (ORAC) assay was carried out according to the methodology by Prior et al. [19]. The final values for this assay were expressed as micromoles of trolox equivalents (TE) per milliliters (μmol TE/mL) using a trolox standard curve. Trolox is a vitamin E analogue and is ideal for the calculation of the ORAC value. This assay was carried out in 96-well format as well [19]. The following components were added to a single well in this particular order, adding up to a total volume of 200 μL per well: (1) Blank (phosphate buffered saline)/trolox standard/sample—20 μL, (2) fluorescein working solution—160 μL, (3) 2,2′-azobis(2-amidinopropane) dihydrochloride (AAPH)—20 μL. AAPH was added in last since it is a radical initiator and for the reaction kinetics to occur in all wells at the same time point. The reaction kinetics were monitored for two hours as a fluorecence decay [485 nm (ex)/525 nm (em)], following which the area under the curve was used to calculate the ORAC value compared with those of the trolox standards.
As for the di(phenyl)-(2,4,6-trinitrophenyl)iminoazanium (DPPH) radical scavenging activity assay, 100 μL of each of the broths of the fermented beverages were mixed with 1 mL of 0.1 mM DPPH in ethanol along with 450 L of 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer at pH 7.4. The solution was incubated at room temperature for 30 min and reduction of DPPH radicals was measured by reading the absorbance of the resulting solution at 517 nm. The antioxidant activity was calculated as % DPPH radical scavenging activity. Scavenging ability of superoxide radical (O2−) was assessed by the method described by Lee et al. [20], and was carried out in 96-well format using the Thermo Scientific Multiskan GO Microplate Reader similar to the TPC and ORAC assays.
2.3 Determination of the α-amylase and α-glucosidase inhibitory activities
The α-amylase inhibitory activity was evaluated according to the method by Liu et al., where acarbose was used as the positive control [17]. The reduction of turbidity at 660 nm was monitored over time using the Thermo Scientific Multiskan GO Microplate Reader, and the area under the curve was used to calculate the overall inhibitory activity. The α-glucosidase inhibitory activity was carried out according to the method by Koh et al., and the same positive control was used in this instance as well [21]. A reaction substrate consisting of 4-nitrophenyl R-D-glucopyranoside (PNPG), (30 mM) and α-glucosidase (16.65 mg/mL) were prepared in phosphate buffer saline (PBS). A volume of 340 μL of inhibitor solutions of different concentrations was pipetted into separate reaction vials. Then, 20 μL of the α-glucosidase solution was added into each vial, and incubated at 37°C for 10 min. The PNPG solution (40 μL) was added to initiate the digestion. After 15 min, 200 μL of 1 M Na2CO3 solution was added to terminate the reaction. Aliquots of 300 μL from the reacted solutions were withdrawn and added each well of a 96-well microplate. Absorbance at 400 nm was read using the Thermo Scientific Multiskan GO Microplate Reader.
For both assays, experiments were performed in triplicate, and a curve of percentage inhibition against inhibitor concentration was plotted with the averaged values to back-calculate to the enzyme inhibitory values in the samples. Although for both assays, acarbose equivalence could also be used to express the final enzyme inhibitory data, in this instance, for ease of reference and comparison, the results were expressed as IC50 (mg/mL).
2.4 Statistical analysis
For the statistical evaluations, IBM SPSS Statistics version 21.0 released in 2012 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) for Windows was used. Three or more independent analyses were utilized to calculate and express the results as mean ± standard error mean (SEM).
3. Results and discussion
As per Figure 2, all the beverages had a statistically significant decrease (P < 0.05) in the pH values by the end of the fermentation process on day 7. Out of the nine fermented beverages, HI and TC had statistically significant decreases (P < 0.05) in the pH from day 1 itself, whereas changes took place slightly later in the rest of the beverages. The decrease in pH of all the Kombucha samples as a whole would have been due to the increased concentration of organic acids (typically in the form of acetic acid) produced during the fermentation process. As per Figure 1, all unfermented teas had an initial pH value of between 6.0 and 8.0 prior to fermentation, while the pH values were between 4.0 and 6.0 on day 7 at the end of the fermentation period.
As per Figure 2, the TA of all the unfermented beverages had initial values ranging from 0.1 to 0.5 g/mL. Once the fermentation was complete by day 7, the TA values ranged between 2.5 and 5.0 g/mL, where all beverages had statistically significant increases in this particular parameter (P < 0.05). Given that the optimum consumable acidity level is 4.0–4.5 g/L for Kombucha beverages, only AA and HI did not have TA levels falling within this range by the end of the period of fermentation. Nevertheless, on a comparative basis, according to the TA reference levels as indicated by Reiss [5], it may be assumed that all of the Kombucha beverages were acceptable for consumption in terms of acidity.
The TPC and ORAC values are shown in Figure 3. AM-RB had the highest TPC prior to fermentation with HV being the lowest. By day 7, statistically significant increases (P < 0.05) in the TPC were observed in AM-RB, CA, HI and TC. Correlating with the TPC values, AM-RB had the highest ORAC values with HV being the lowest. The DPPH EC50 values appear to have complemented the ORAC values with the exceptions of AM-RB, TC, AA and ALa, where their values were observed to have statistically significant increases (P < 0.05) by day 7 (Figure 3).
As for the antioxidant assay of superoxide scavenging activity, the trends of increase or decrease whether it be statistically significant or not, were not as clear as the ORAC and DPPH EC50 values (Figure 4). A better correlation between the TPC and the ORAC values rather than the DPPH EC50 and superoxide scavenging values of all beverages on all days of analysis (R2 = 0.985 for ORAC versus R2 = 0.745 DPPH EC50 and R2 = 0.632 for superoxide scavenging potential). This showed that the phenolic compounds present in the fermented beverages were better scavengers of the peroxyl radical which is generated through the AAPH.
The starch hydrolase inhibitory activities of α-amylase and α-glucosidase enzymes are shown in Figure 5. On the first day of fermentation, only CE, HI, PE and AA had statistically significant increases (P < 0.05) in the α-amylase inhibitory activities. However, by day 7 at the end of the fermentation period, all the beverages had statistically significant increases (P < 0.05) as compared with day 0. As for the α-glucosidase inhibitory activities, AM-RB, CA, HI, PE, AA, ALa and HV had statistically significant increases (P < 0.05) during both day 1 and 7 as compared with day 0. The fermentation process was able to enhance the α-amylase inhibitory activity better than the α-glucosidase inhibitory activity. This is an important aspect, given that α-amylase is required for the subsequent reactions of α-glucosidase, and therefore, curbing the reactivity of α-amylase is important from the perspective of reducing the release of simple sugars into physiological system [22].
Changes to the composition of the overall population of bacteria and yeast present in the broth and pellicle on days 1 and 7 are shown in Tables 1 and 2, respectively. As per the measurements from day 0, the inoculum of 10 mL which was added to initiate the fermentation process contained various numbers of bacteria and yeast. However, overall, an increase in the bacteria and yeast population in all of the fermented beverages was observed by the end of the period of fermentation. The increase in these numbers was indicative of the microbes’ viability and successful livelihood in the beverages, thus, confirming their ability of thrive in the environments in similar fashion to black tea. An aspect which remains to be investigated concerning this parameter is whether some of the microbes have entered a viable but nonculturable (VBNC) state. Since the origins of the bacteria and yeast are from black tea itself, it is possible that some of the microbes have entered a state of low metabolic activity, and thus were not accounted for during the measurement of this parameter.
Herb | Microbes | Days | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
0 (cfu/mL) | 1 (cfu/mL) | 7 (cfu/mL) | ||
AA | Bacteria | 2.9 ± 0.1 × 106 | 8.6 ± 0.2 × 106 | 3.9 ± 0.3 × 109 |
Yeast | 1.5 ± 0.2 × 106 | 8.9 ± 0.1 × 106 | 9.2 ± 0.1 × 109 | |
AM-RB | Bacteria | 3.9 ± 0.1 × 106 | 6.5 ± 0.3 × 106 | 9.1 ± 0.1 × 1010 |
Yeast | 6.9 ± 0.2 × 106 | 6.6 ± 0.2 × 107 | 9.5 ± 0.1 × 1010 | |
ALa | Bacteria | 3.5 ± 0.1 × 106 | 6.6 ± 0.2 × 107 | 7.5 ± 0.2 × 109 |
Yeast | 5.3 ± 0.1 × 106 | 9.3 ± 0.2 × 105 | 9.6 ± 0.1 × 1010 | |
ALo | Bacteria | 3.4 ± 0.2 × 106 | 6.6 ± 0.2 × 106 | 9.8 ± 0.1 × 1010 |
Yeast | 5.1 ± 0.2 × 106 | 5.5 ± 0.1 × 107 | 1.8 ± 0.1 × 1010 | |
CA | Bacteria | 1.9 ± 0.2 × 106 | 2.5 ± 0.1 × 106 | 3.6 ± 0.1 × 1010 |
Yeast | 1.2 ± 0.2 × 106 | 8.8 ± 0.2 × 106 | 9.2 ± 0.1 × 1010 | |
HI | Bacteria | 3.6 ± 0.2 × 106 | 5.9 ± 0.1 × 106 | 3.9 ± 0.1 × 1010 |
Yeast | 5.3 ± 0.1 × 106 | 6.5 ± 0.2 × 107 | 9.0 ± 0.1 × 1010 | |
HV | Bacteria | 4.1 ± 0.1 × 106 | 3.5 ± 0.3 × 106 | 4.8 ± 0.1 × 1010 |
Yeast | 2.5 ± 0.1 × 106 | 4.4 ± 0.3 × 105 | 8.0 ± 0.2 × 1010 | |
PE | Bacteria | 1.2 ± 0.2 × 106 | 3.9 ± 0.2 × 106 | 7.1 ± 0.1 × 109 |
Yeast | 3.2 ± 0.1 × 106 | 5.0 ± 0.1 × 107 | 8.0 ± 0.2 × 109 | |
TC | Bacteria | 1.9 ± 0.2 × 106 | 3.2 ± 0.1 × 106 | 2.3 ± 0.2 × 109 |
Yeast | 4.1 ± 0.1 × 106 | 8.3 ± 0.2 × 106 | 1.9 ± 0.1 × 1010 |
Herb | Microbes | Days | |
---|---|---|---|
1 (cfu/mL) | 7 (cfu/mL) | ||
AA | Bacteria | 3.7 ± 0.2 × 106 | 2.2 ± 0.1 × 108 |
Yeast | 1.1 ± 0.2 × 105 | 1.6 ± 0.2 × 107 | |
AM-RB | Bacteria | 1.1 ± 0.1 × 106 | 1.5 ± 0.1 × 108 |
Yeast | 1.5 ± 0.2 × 105 | 5.5 ± 0.2 × 107 | |
ALa | Bacteria | 6.6 ± 0.2 × 106 | 7.5 ± 0.1 × 108 |
Yeast | 1.5 ± 0.1 × 105 | 9.2 ± 0.1 × 107 | |
ALo | Bacteria | 2.1 ± 0.2 × 106 | 9.5 ± 0.1 × 108 |
Yeast | 1.6 ± 0.2 × 105 | 1.9 ± 0.1 × 107 | |
CA | Bacteria | 2.8 ± 0.1 × 106 | 2.8 ± 0.1 × 108 |
Yeast | 5.5 ± 0.1 × 105 | 4.8 ± 0.2 × 107 | |
HI | Bacteria | 3.9 ± 0.1 × 106 | 3.9 ± 0.1 × 108 |
Yeast | 4.9 ± 0.1 × 105 | 5.9 ± 0.3 × 107 | |
HV | Bacteria | 4.4 ± 0.2 × 106 | 7.5 ± 0.1 × 108 |
Yeast | 4.7 ± 0.1 × 105 | 5.5 ± 0.1 × 107 | |
PE | Bacteria | 3.5 ± 0.1 × 106 | 6.6 ± 0.2 × 108 |
Yeast | 2.2 ± 0.1 × 105 | 2.9 ± 0.1 × 107 | |
TC | Bacteria | 3.1 ± 0.1 × 106 | 2.5 ± 0.1 × 108 |
Yeast | 6.6 ± 0.1 × 105 | 1.9 ± 0.2 × 107 |
The hypothesis for the increase in the TPC was explained by Blanc [23], where phytases liberated by bacteria and yeast in the tea fungus consortium were identified as capable of liberating polyphenol compounds from the cellulosic backbone of the fermentation medium. This metabolic reaction would have resulted in an increase in the polyphenols in the soluble fraction of the fermented beverages produced in this study. Phytases liberated by bacteria and yeast during Kombucha fermentation are also able of causing degradation of complex polyphenols to smaller molecules which would also result in the increase of TPC. The therapeutic effect of the Kombucha fermentation process has been associated with the increased presence of polyphenols, compounds produced during the fermentation period, and synergistic action between different compounds which are liberated at various stages of the fermentation process [24, 25, 26].
The opportunities and challenges for the food and beverage industry in the area of evidence-based functional foods with a low glycemic index which are able to curb the starch digestion rates are on the rise, given the increasing incidence of diabetes throughout the world [27]. Given the noteworthy starch hydrolase inhibitory activities of the fermented herbal beverages generated in this study, their importance in support of preventing metabolic diseases such as diabetes could be highlighted in this aspect. Recently, there have been many warnings on the side effects of anti-diabetic drugs such as Rosiglitazone and Pioglitazone which highlight the urgent need of alternative and safer means of blood glucose control—a prospect which could be ideally achieved through functional foods which contain bioactive ingredients with the ability to regulate blood glucose concentration toward the normal range [28].
Last but not least, the selection of a particular fermentation period for this study requires justification. The beverages and their analytical parameters were monitored for 7 days. This was the minimum duration by which the fermented beverages could be consumed without the presence of metabolic artifacts resulting from prolonged fermentation according to literature [25, 29, 30]. In particular, according to the study by Amarasinghe et al. [30] where the study was conducted for monitoring the fermentation for a period of 8 weeks, the Kombucha samples displayed a decrease in the antioxidant activity during the 2 months of fermentation. This was suggestive that suggestive the functional properties of the beverage had decreased. It was also implied in this study that it is possible through prolonged fermentation to result in the accumulation of organic acids, which might reach harmful levels for direct consumption [30].
4. Conclusions
Given the ease of preparation of the beverages which were investigated in this study, as well as the economic viability, the products could be promoted as functional beverages which could be consumed as means of supportive therapy. In particular, they could be used for the prevention and containment of disease conditions in association with their demonstrated antioxidant and starch hydrolase inhibitory properties. Although the therapeutic mechanisms of action of these beverages in the human physiology is yet to be elucidated. However, this study serves as a platform for the identification and promotion of some novel beverages as functional food which can be easily prepared in households using edible plants. Nevertheless, having mentioned as such, during the selection of plant material for fermentation with the Kombucha tea fungal mats, care needs to be taken to identify plant-based material which carry similar sensory perceptions as black tea, thus, reducing the chances of the fermented products possessing adverse sensory perceptions.
During this study, the sensory evaluations of the novel fermented beverages was not carried out. This is one aspect which needs to be explored in future studies. It is only hypothesized in this instance that the organoleptic properties would be acceptable, since the teas are similar in physical properties to
The microbial interactions taking place during the fermentation needs to be investigated further as well. For instance, as mentioned previously, whether the microbes undergo a state of VBNC needs to be elucidated. Additionally, whether microorganisms which have probiotic effects such as
Acknowledgments
Dr. Waisundara would like to express her gratitude to Miss Mindani I. Watawana and Miss Nilakshi Jayawardena—former Research Assistants at the National Institute of Fundamental Studies and Miss Candy Choo of Temasek School of Applied Sciences, Temasek Polytechnic, Singapore, for their assistance rendered toward the experimental work.
Conflict of interest
The author has no conflicts of interest to declare, financial or otherwise.
References
- 1.
Jayabalan R, Malbaša RV, Lončar ES, Vitas JS, Sathishkumar M. A review on Kombucha tea—Microbiology, composition, fermentation, beneficial effects, toxicity, and tea fungus. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety. 2014; 13 :538-550. DOI: 10.1111/1541-4337.12073 - 2.
Jayabalan R, Malini K, Muthuswamy S, Swaminathan K, Yun SE. Biochemical characteristics of tea fungus produced during Kombucha fermentation. Food Science and Biotechnology. 2010; 19 :843-847 - 3.
Malbaša RV, Lončar ES, Vitas JS, Čanadanović-Brunet JM. Influence of starter cultures on the antioxidant activity of kombucha beverage. Food Chemistry. 2011; 127 :1727-1731 - 4.
Jayabalan R, Marimuthu S, Swaminathan K. Changes in content of organic acids and tea polyphenols during kombucha tea fermentation. Food Chemistry. 2007; 102 :392-398 - 5.
Reiss J. Influence of different sugars on the metabolism of the tea fungus. Zeitschrift fur Lebensmittel-Untersuchung und-For-schung. 1994; 198 :258-261 - 6.
Villarreal-Soto VA, Beaufort S, Bouajila J, Souchard JP, Taillandier P. Understanding Kombucha tea fermentation: A review. Journal of Food Science. 2018; 83 (3):580-588.DOI: 10.1111/1750-3841.14068 - 7.
Chakravorty S, Bhattacharya S, Chatzinotas A, Chakraborty W, Bhattacharya D, Gachhui R. Kombucha tea fermentation: Microbial and biochemical dynamics. International Journal of Food Microbiology. 2016; 220 :63-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2015.12.015 - 8.
Coton M, Pawtowski A, Taminiau B, Burgaud G, Deniel F, Coulloumme-Labarthe L, et al. Unraveling microbial ecology of industrial-scale Kombucha fermentations by metabarcoding and culture-based methods. FEMS Microbiology Ecology. 2017; 93 (5):1-16. DOI: 10.1093/femsec/fix048 - 9.
Marsh AJ, Hill C, Ross RP, Cotter PD. Fermented beverages with healthpromoting potential: Past and future perspectives. Trends in Food Science and Technology. 2014; 38 (2):113-124. DOI: 10.1016/j.tifs.2014.05.002 - 10.
Marsh AJ, O’Sullivan O, Hill C, Ross RP, Cotter PD. Sequence-based analysis of the bacterial and fungal compositions of multiple Kombucha (tea fungus) samples. Food Microbiology. 2014; 38 :171-178. DOI: 10.1016/j.fm.2013.09.003 - 11.
Sreeramulu G, Zhu Y, Knol W. Kombucha fermentation and its antimicrobial activity. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2000; 48 :2589-2594 - 12.
Chen C, Liu BY. Changes in major components of tea fungus metabolites during prolonged fermentation. Journal of Applied Microbiology. 2000; 89 :834-839 - 13.
Watawana MI, Jayawardena N, Waisundara VY. Enhancement of the functional properties of coffee through fermentation by “tea fungus” (Kombucha). Journal of Food Processing and Preservation. 2015; 39 (6):2596-2603. DOI: 10.1111/jfpp.12509 - 14.
Watawana MI, Jayawardena N, Gunawardhana CB, Waisundara VY. Enhancement of the antioxidant and starch hydrolase inhibitory activities of king coconut water ( Cocos nucifera var.aurantiaca ) by fermentation with Kombucha “tea fungus”. International Journal of Food Science and Technology. 2016;51 (2):490-498. DOI: 10.1111/ijfs.13006 - 15.
Watawana MI, Jayawardena N, Ranasinghe SJ, Waisundara VY. Evaluation of the effect of different sweetening agents on the polyphenol contents and antioxidant and starch hydrolase inhibitory properties of Kombucha. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation. 2017;(1):41. DOI: 10.1111/jfpp.12752 - 16.
Jayawardena N, Watawana MI, Waisundara VY. Evaluation of the total antioxidant capacity, polyphenol contents and starch hydrolase inhibitory activity of ten edible plants in an in vitro model of digestion. Plant Foods for Human Nutrition. 2015;70 :71-76. DOI: 10.1007/s11130-014-0463-4 - 17.
Liu T, Song L, Wang H, Huang DJ. A high-throughput assay for quantification of starch hydrolase inhibition based on turbidity measurement. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2011; 59 :9756-9762 - 18.
Huang D, Ou BX, Hampsch-Woodill M, Flanagan JA, Deemer EK. Development and validation of oxygen radical absorbance capacity assay for lipophilic antioxidants using randomly methylated b-cyclodextrin as the solubility enhancer. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2002; 50 :1815-1821 - 19.
Prior RL, Hoang H, Gu LW, Wu XL, Bacchiocca M, Howard L, et al. Assays for hydrophilic and lipophilic antioxidant capacity [oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORACFL)] of plasma and other biological food samples. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2003; 51 :3273-3279 - 20.
Lee JC, Kim HR, Jim K, Jang YS. Antioxidant property of an ethanol extract of the stem of Opuntia ficus indica var. saboten. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2002;50 :6490-6496 - 21.
Koh LW, Wong LL, Loo YY, Kasapis S, Huang DJ. Evaluation of different teas against starch digestibility by mammalian glycosidases. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2009; 58 :148-154 - 22.
Waisundara VY. Assessment of bioaccessibility: A vital aspect for determining the efficacy of superfoods. In: Superfoods. Croatia: InTech Open; 2018. pp. 67-80. DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.73152 - 23.
Blanc PJ. Characterization of the tea fungus metabolites. Biotechnology Letters. 1996; 8 :139-142 - 24.
Jayabalan R, Marimuthu S, Thangaraj P, Sathishkumar M, Binupriya AR, Swaminathan K, et al. Preservation of Kombucha tea: Effect of temperature on tea components and free radical scavenging properties. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2008; 56 :9064-9071 - 25.
Jayabalan R, Subathradevi P, Marimuthu S, Sathishkumar M, Swaminathan K. Changes in free-radical scavenging ability of kombucha tea during fermentation. Food Chemistry. 2008; 109 :227-234 - 26.
Watawana MI, Jayawardena N, Gunawardhana CB, Waisundara VY. Health, wellness, and safety aspects of the consumption of Kombucha. Journal of Chemistry. 2015:1-11. DOI: 10.1155/2015/591869 - 27.
Stumvoll M, Goldstein BJ, van Haeften TW. Type 2 diabetes: Pathogenesis and treatment. Lancet. 2006; 371 :2153-2156 - 28.
Graham DJ, Ouellet-Hellstrom R, McCurdy TE, Ali F, Sholley C, Worrall C, et al. Risk of acute myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure and death in elderly medicare patients treated with rosiglitazone or pioglitazone. Journal of the American Medical Association. 2010; 304 :411-418 - 29.
Chu SC, Chen CH. Effects of origins and fermentation time on the antioxidant activities of kombucha. Food Chemistry. 2006; 98 :502-507 - 30.
Amarasinghe H, Weerakkody NS, Waisundara VY. Evaluation of physicochemical properties and antioxidant activities of kombucha “tea fungus” during extended periods of fermentation. Food Science & Nutrition. 2018; 6 :659-665. DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.605