Open access peer-reviewed chapter

The Interplay between Cytoskeleton and Calcium Dynamics

Written By

Francisco Javier Martin-Romero, Aida M. Lopez-Guerrero, Carlos Pascual-Caro and Eulalia Pozo-Guisado

Submitted: 16 March 2016 Reviewed: 11 November 2016 Published: 17 May 2017

DOI: 10.5772/66862

From the Edited Volume

Cytoskeleton - Structure, Dynamics, Function and Disease

Edited by Jose C. Jimenez-Lopez

Chapter metrics overview

1,749 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Cell motility is a complex cellular event that involves reorganization of cytoskeleton. This reorganization encompasses the transient polarization of the cell to facilitate the plasma membrane ruffling, a rearrangement of cortical actin cytoskeleton required for the development of cellular protrusions. It is known that extracellular Ca2+ influx is essential for cell migration and for the positive-feedback cycle that maintains leading-edge structures and ruffling activity. The aim of this review is to summarize our knowledge regarding the Ca2+-dependent signaling pathways, Ca2+ transporters and sensors involved in cell migration. Also, we show here reported evidences that support for a crosstalk between Ca2+ transport and the reorganization of the cytoskeleton required for cell migration. In this regard, we will analyze the role of store-operated Ca2+ entry (SOCE) as a modulator of cytoskeleton and cell migration, but also the modulation of this Ca2+ entry pathway by microtubules and the actin cytoskeleton. As a main conclusion, this review will show that data reported in the last years support a role for SOCE in shaping cytoskeleton, but at the same time, SOCE is strongly dependent on cytoskeletal proteins, in an interesting interplay between cytoskeleton and Ca2+ dynamics.

Keywords

  • calcium
  • microtubules
  • actin
  • STIM1
  • ORAI1
  • cell migration
  • cortical cytoskeleton

1. Introduction

Calcium ions (Ca2+) are essential intracellular transducers for cell signaling because of their role to bind Ca2+-sensitive proteins that mediate key activities in signaling pathways. Upon cell stimulation through a variety of receptors and other types of physicochemical stimulations such as depolarization of plasma membrane, changes in osmolarity, physical distortion of cell surface, temperature, etc., a number of intracellular “second messengers” transmit the initial stimulation into the cell to trigger a proper response to these stimuli. The response is attained in some cases by transiently altering ion transport through plasma membrane as well as intracellular membranes, posttranslational modifications of proteins, changes in gene expression, or reshaping the cytoskeleton in a second-messenger-dependent manner.

To properly act as a second messenger the concentration of free cytosolic Ca2+ ([Ca2+]i) is substantially different across plasma membrane. While the physiological extracellular medium contains 1–3 mM Ca2+, the level of the cytosolic milieu is within a narrow range, 80–120 nM [1, 2]. Considering this large chemical gradient of free Ca2+ concentration, cells can trigger a rapid and transient increase of [Ca2+]i by increasing Ca2+ transport through plasma membrane. This transient Ca2+ increase triggers the action of a wide range of Ca2+-dependent mediators that modify signaling pathways. Because Ca2+ is involved in numerous signaling pathways, differential features of Ca2+ increase are required to respond to diverse initial stimuli. This is achieved by the spatiotemporal control of the Ca2+ increase, i.e., the localization of the cytosolic Ca2+ spike within the cell, as well as the rate of the increase, the extent of the transient increase and the kinetics of the final decrease to basal levels [3].

This Ca2+ transport is therefore tightly regulated by specific channels, which are sensitive to hormones, cytokines, small molecules and other extracellular stimuli. The features of the transporters shape the characteristics of Ca2+ current (Ca2+influx), modeling the kinetics of Ca2+ entry. Because a specific distribution of Ca2+ channels and transducers is required the cytoskeleton has been involved in the spatial regulation of Ca2+ entry. Interestingly, Ca2+ signaling strongly influences cytoskeleton dynamics, in an interesting interplay that is currently under study. In order to assess the crosstalk between Ca2+ signaling and cytoskeleton we will review here the recent literature regarding this topic, with special focus on the role of store-operated Ca2+ entry (SOCE) in cell migration, focal adhesion turnover and actin filaments reorganization. In addition, we will review the role of the microtubule cytoskeleton in the normal function of SOCE. A major regulator of SOCE is the protein STIM1, an endoplasmic reticulum resident protein that serves as intraluminal Ca2+ sensor and plasma membrane Ca2+ channel modulator. STIM1 is known to be a plus-end microtubule binding protein (+TIP). As a +TIP, STIM1 is transported throughout the cell while bound to microtubules, but it is released upon activation. The molecular basis of this regulation and the role of posttranslational modifications in STIM1 that are known to underlie this regulation, will be also described.

Advertisement

2. Ca2+ transporters and Ca2+ influx pathways

In eukaryotic cells plasma membrane (PM) contains different Ca2+ transport systems to control Ca2+ influx as well as Ca2+ extrusion. Because the temporal control of Ca2+ signaling is also strictly controlled, transporters are highly coordinated to let the Ca2+ spikes/waves last for a precise time, but this time ranges from microseconds (as in exocytosis) to hours, as observed during mammalian oocyte fertilization. To understand this control, we summarize here the most important Ca2+ transporters in eukaryotic cells. Ca2+ entry channels are divided into the following:

Voltage-operated channels (VOCs) are regulated by the net electric charge across the plasma membrane in the way that they open upon depolarization. This family consists of three different groups of channels, Cav1 (L-type channels), Cav2 (N-, P/Q and R-types) and Cav3 (T-type channels) [4].

Receptor-operated channels (ROCs), which are gated upon binding to agonists such as ATP, glutamate, or acetylcholine [5]. Within this group we should highlight the transient receptor potential (TRP) ion channel family, a large family of channels involved in sensory perception, smooth muscle contraction-relaxation cycles and cell proliferation [6]. Members of the TRPC (transient receptor potential canonical) family are also involved in the organization of heteromeric Ca2+ channels that respond to intracellular Ca2+ store depletion [7]. This is the case for TRPC1 that has been described to be part of complexes together with members of the ORAI family [8]. Other important members of this family are P2X receptors, which are Ca2+ channels gated by extracellular ATP [9] and glutamate receptors, all of them reviewed in Ref. [10].

Second-messenger-operated channels (SMOCs) are members of an important family of channels gated by intracellular second messengers, such as arachidonic acid-regulated Ca2+ (ARC) channel or TRPC6, a member of the TRPC which is sensitive to diacylglycerol (DAG) [11].

Store-operated channels (SOCs) are channels that are regulated by the filling state of intracellular Ca2+ stores, mainly the sarco(endo)plasmic reticulum (ER). Their activity is actually the result of an initial Ca2+ release from the ER, mainly through the activation of the phosphoinositide pathway. A wide range of stimuli triggers the breakdown of phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) into diacylglycerol (DAG) and inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3), which activates IP3 receptors (IP3R) at the ER, leading to the transient release of Ca2+. Most of this Ca2+ is taken back to the ER by the sarco(endo)plasmic Ca2+ reticulum ATPase (SERCA), the Ca2+ pump in the ER membrane. However, some of this Ca2+ is extruded out of the cell by plasma membrane Ca2+ ATPases (PMCA), leading to the partial depletion of Ca2+ within the ER when the stimulation is repetitive. Thus, a system is required to replenish this Ca2+ and this action is mediated by SOCs that activate the Ca2+ influx pathway known as the store-operated Ca2+ entry (SOCE), described for the first time in the late 1980s by James W. Putney [12].

As stated above, there are some transporters considered as OFF systems, i.e., they are designed to decrease [Ca2+]i to basal levels (to approximately 100 nM) and therefore to shut down Ca2+ signaling. These are mainly Ca2+ pumps, ATP-consuming transporters that pump Ca2+ ions against the Ca2+ gradient concentration [13]. PMCAs and SERCAs extrude Ca2+ from the cytosol to extracellular milieu and into the ER vesicles. In addition to these systems, the plasma membrane Na+/Ca2+ exchanger contributes to Ca2+ extrusion in a Na+-gradient-dependent manner and it is particularly important in cardiac cells and neuronal tissues [14]. Finally, a mitochondrial Ca2+ uniporter (MCU) and the secretory-pathway Ca2+-ATPase (SPCA) are additional and widespread systems that restore cytosolic Ca2+ levels [15].

In summary, the combination of the activities of channels and pumps, either at the plasma membrane or at subcellular organelles and the particular expression profile of those transporters in different cells and tissues, makes possible for a cell-specific response to a wide range of stimuli.

Advertisement

3. Store-operated Ca2+ entry

As stated above, store-operated Ca2+ entry (SOCE) is a Ca2+ influx transport system that maintains the permanence of the Ca2+-dependent signaling, because it preserves the intraluminal Ca2+ levels in the ER in the high micromolar range. For this extraordinary role, SOCE is a ubiquitous mechanism and is one of the most important pathways for Ca2+ entry in both excitable and nonexcitable cells [16]. However, the molecular nature of the members that control this Ca2+ influx pathway remained elusive until the description of two proteins, STIM1 and ORAI1, 10 years ago [1722]. The mechanism that links luminal Ca2+ levels with plasma membrane Ca2+ entry is mediated by STIM1, a transmembrane protein located at the ER that acts as a Ca2+ sensor. STIM1 contains a Ca2+-sensitive EF-hand domain at the intraluminal domain and activates plasma membrane Ca2+ channels (SOCs) upon Ca2+ depletion within the intracellular stores. This depletion triggers the oligomerization of STIM1 and the relocalization in ER-PM juxtapositions required for the binding and activation of plasma membrane SOCs.

One of the most important SOCs is ORAI1 (also known as CRACM1), although the ORAI family contains two additional members, ORAI2 and ORAI3. In addition to ORAI1, some of the transient receptor potential canonical (TRPC) channels can function in a STIM1-dependent mode. STIM1 directly activates TRPC1, TRPC4 and TRPC5 channels that can therefore act as SOCs [23]. TRPC1 also binds to ORAI1 and the TRPC1-ORAI1-STIM1 ternary complexes can be therefore considered SOCs [24]. STIM1 also activates TRPC3 and TRPC6, not by direct interaction, but mediating the heteromultimerization of TRPC3 with TRPC1 and TRPC6 with TRPC4 [23].

The mode of STIM1-dependent gating for ORAIs and TRPCs is also different. STIM1 gates ORAI1 by direct binding through the STIM1-ORAI1-activating region, or SOAR, also called CRAC-activating domain or CAD. In contrast, the C-terminal polybasic domain of STIM1 activates TRPC1 by an electrostatic gating mechanism that results in SOC channel activation [25, 26].

STIM1 can bind other types of Ca2+ channels, such as Cav1.2 channels, but this binding leads to the suppression of the activation of these channels [27, 28]. Interestingly, this inhibitory action is mediated by the domain of STIM1 that activates ORAI1 (SOAR or CAD) and this direct binding to Cav1.2 causes also the internalization of the channel, which explains the coordinated regulation of Ca2+ entry through VOCCS and SOCs. Thus, the combination of different Ca2+ channels provides a diversity of Ca2+ conductances in response to a wide variety of stimuli. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying the expected differential localization of STIM1 within cells are not clear. In this regard, the cytoskeleton seems to be a requirement for STIM1 function and binding to ORAI1 and therefore for the activation of SOCE. It was early observed that SOCE is sensitive to drugs that modify cytoskeletal components, such as cytochalasin D or nocodazole in NIH 3T3 cells [29], or vascular endothelial cells [30] and later confirmed in RBL-2H3 cells, bone marrow-derived mast cells [31], HEK293 cells [32] and platelets [3335].

From the information given above, one can conclude that cytoskeleton is not only a critical modulator of SOCE, but also one can hypothesize that cytoskeleton might underlie the differential preference of STIM1 for different Ca2+ transporters.

Advertisement

4. Cytoskeletal components involved in the control of SOCE

After the molecular description of STIM1 and ORAI1 as the two major elements controlling SOCE, it was earlier found that the microtubule cytoskeleton was involved in the regulation of this Ca2+ entry pathway. The group of James W. Putney described that STIM1 tagged with fluorescent proteins colocalized with endogenous tubulin and that the treatment with nocodazole, which induces tubulin depolymerization, triggered the loss of this colocalization in HEK293 cells. Moreover, nocodazole had an inhibitory effect on SOCE that could be reverted by the overexpression of YFP (yellow fluorescent protein)-STIM1 [32], suggesting that the microtubule cytoskeleton has an important role in the activation of SOCE by facilitating the appropriate localization of STIM1 to activate SOCs. Similar findings were reported in COS-7 cells, where the treatment with nocodazole triggered the retraction of tubulin filaments from cell periphery leading to the progressive loss of SOCE, similarly to what is found in mitosis. On the contrary, placlitaxel, which stabilizes microtubules, enhanced SOCE [36], supporting for a role of microtubules in the normal function of SOCE.

It was later demonstrated that STIM1 directly binds to EB1, a microtubule plus-end binding (or tracking) protein (+TIP) and that STIM1 is transported through the surface of the ER network by this microtubule-dependent mechanism [37]. In addition, it was observed that the overexpression of ectopic STIM1 led to the stimulation of the ER extension, an effect that was explained by the direct attachment of the ER to the growing ends of microtubules, which was stimulated by the accumulation of STIM1. Therefore, this observation also revealed that STIM1 concentration could regulate ER extension and remodeling. In addition, Luis Vaca group reported that STIM1 binds to EB1 when traveling through the ER under resting conditions and that there is a dissociation of this STIM1-EB1 complex upon Ca2+ depletion of the ER, an event that facilitates the clustering of STIM1 in the periphery of the cell [38].

STIM1-EB1 binding was studied further and it was found that the sequence Thr-Arg-Ile-Pro (TRIP) in the C-terminus of STIM1 is responsible for the direct binding to EB1 [39]. This sequence belongs to a short polypeptide motif, S/TxIP, found in several +TIPs. For those +TIPs with an S/TxIP motif, a phospho-regulation of the binding with microtubules has been reported. The +TIPs, APC [40, 41], MCAK [42] and CLASP2 [43, 44] are phosphorylated in the vicinity of the S/TxIP sequence, negatively regulating their interaction with microtubules. In these +TIPs we find a high number of proline, serine and basic residues that give a positive charge to the surroundings of the EB1 binding domain. This is why the negative charge of the phosphorylation of residues in the surroundings of the S/TxIP motif explains the blocking of the binding to microtubule ends. In this regard, our group reported that, as it was reported for those +TIPs, the binding of STIM1 to the tip of microtubules growing ends is regulated by phosphorylation. Near the S/TxIP sequence, which in human STIM1 is found in residues 642–645 (Thr-Arg-Ile-Pro), our group have described three phosphorylatable residues, Ser575, Ser608 and Ser621, which are target for ERK1/2 activity in vitro and in vivo [44, 45]. Using overexpressed STIM1 mutated at ERK1/2 target residues, we reported that dephosphorylated STIM1 (i.e., with Ser-to-Ala substitution mutations) remained bound to EB1, whereas constitutive phosphorylated STIM1 (mimicked by Ser-to-Glu mutations et ERK1/2 target sites) detached from EB1 [46, 47]. By means of the generation of phospho-specific antibodies directed against the three individual residues, we reported that there is a dynamic phosphorylation of STIM1 during its activation. Thus, activation of SOCE by thapsigargin or 2,5-di-ter-butyl-1,4-benzohydroquinone, two SERCA inhibitors that trigger ER emptying, is accompanied by the increase of phosphorylation at the ERK1/2 target Ser residues (575, 608 and 621). Moreover, the washout of the inhibitor with a Ca2+-containing medium, in order to let the refilling of the ER, carried out in parallel to STIM1 dephosphorylation [46]. In addition, Ser/Ala mutation inhibited SOCE and impaired the binding STIM1-ORAI1. In contrast, Ser/Glu mutations enhanced SOCE, whereas facilitated the clustering of STIM1 in response to store depletion, as well as the binding to ORAI1. Later, we reported that IGF-1 [48] and EGF [49] also trigger Ca2+ release from the ER and phosphorylation of STIM1, an effect that has been proven to be essential for the dissociation from EB1 and finally for the activation of SOCE (see Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Involvement of SOCE in cell migration. The binding of ligands to some plasma membrane receptors activates the phosphoinositide pathway, releasing IP3 and activating Ca2+ release from the ER. In parallel, receptor tyrosine kinases trigger the activation of the MAPK pathway, via activation of Ras-Raf-MEK-ERK. Ca2+ mobilization from the ER and phosphorylation of STIM1 are two essential events for the activation of STIM1. Phospho-STIM1 releases from microtubules facilitating STIM1 clustering and translocation to PM-ER junctions to activate ORAI1. This activation increases [Ca2+]i locally, an event required for the phosphorylation of Src, PYK2 and FAK kinases, as well as MLC2, which are well-known modulators of invadopodia formation, focal adhesion turnover and actomyosin contractility.

Taken together, those results support a mechanism that explains the reversible interaction of STIM1 and EB1 [46, 50]. This mechanism predicts that those stimuli that induce store depletion and ERK1/2 activation lead to phosphorylation of STIM1 at Ser575, Ser608 and Ser621, an event that promotes the dissociation of STIM1 from EB1. This dissociation enables STIM1 clustering and the binding to SOCs, in order to activate STIM1-dependent Ca2+ entry (SOCE). In addition, the activation of Ca2+ entry and the subsequent refilling of Ca2+ stores induce STIM1 dephosphorylation, promoting the association of STIM1 with EB1 and microtubules.

In addition to EB1, other members of the cytoskeleton have been involved in SOCE regulation. For instance, it has been reported that the microtubule-binding protein adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) is required for STIM1 puncta near ER-PM junctions, because reduced STIM1 was observed at these junctions in APC-depleted cells and this effect correlated well with the inhibition of SOCE [51]. The APC-binding domain was found in the C-terminus of STIM1 (residues 650–685), similarly to what it has been reported for STIM1-EB1. Thus, it can be assumed that upon depletion of the ER, STIM1 dissociates from EB1 and associates to APC to form puncta near ER-PM junctions and to activate ORAI1 and SOCE.

A downstream effector of SOCE is the transcription factor NFAT (nuclear factor of activated T-cells). Once Ca2+entry becomes activated, the increase of [Ca2+]i activates the Ca2+-dependent phosphatase calcineurin (or protein phosphatase 2B), which dephosphorylates NFAT, promoting the nuclear translocation of NFAT that can be easily monitored using GFP-tagged NFAT. By means of this well-established feature of SOCE, Sharma et al. [52] designed a genome-wide RNA interference screen for NFAT activation in HeLa cells and they identified septin proteins as key regulators of SOCE. Knockdown of SEPT4 gene expression reduced SOCE without affecting ER-Ca2+ release and without inhibiting SERCA or PMCAs. This knockdown also decreased Ca2+-induced NFAT translocation by >95%. Septins were found to be required for proper organization of ORAI1 in the plasma membrane even before depletion of ER-Ca2+ stores. Septins also promoted the targeting of STIM1 to ER-PM junctions and the formation of stable ORAI1 clusters after store depletion. Because septins are considered scaffold proteins that recruit other proteins, preventing diffusion, septins should be considered promoters of the stable recruitment of STIM1-ORAI1 at ER-PM junctions. More recently it was found that Septin 7 inhibits the activation of Orai channels in Drosophila neurons (dOrai) and that the depletion of Septin 7 levels results in higher dOrai-mediated Ca2+ entry, independently of the filling state of the ER. In fact, overexpression of Septin 7 reduced Ca2+ entry, suggesting that, in Drosophila neurons, Septin 7 is a negative regulator of dOrai channel function [53]. These authors stated that hetero-hexamers septin filaments closely associate with the PM and near the ER in resting neurons and that the reduction of SEPT7 results in breaks in the linear septin filaments present in wild-type cells, leading to the formation of shorter septin filaments. ER-Ca2+ store depletion reorganizes these filaments, moving STIM1 to the peripheral ER, promoting the coupling of STIM/dOrai and the activation of Ca2+ entry through dOrai (SOCE). Shorter septin filaments due to SEPT7 knockdown leads to STIM1 recruitment to the peripheral ER in resting neurons and the activation of dOrai, resulting in a store-independent activation of dOrai [53].

Homer1 is another scaffolding protein that binds to TRPC channels through a PPPF sequence of the Ca2+ channel. However, this sequence is close to the STIM1 binding sequence, thus suggesting that Homer1 and STIM1 could be competitors for binding to TRPC. Yuan et al. [54] proposed that Homer couples TRPC channels to IP3 receptors (IP3R) to keep these channels closed, but dissociation of the TRPC-Homer-IP3R complexes gives STIM1 access to TRPC binding to gate these channels. A similar proposal was later reported for STIM1 and Cav1.2 channels in HEK293 cells [55], where the treatment with thapsigargin induces coimmunoprecipitation of Homer1 with STIM1 and the Cav1.2 α1 subunit. Impairment of Homer1 function with the peptide PPKKFR or by siRNA specific for Homer1 reduced the association of STIM1 to Cav1.2 α1, adding a new scaffolding protein to the list of regulators of Ca2+ entry.

In summary, the increasing number of members of the cytoskeleton involved in the specific interaction of STIM1 with different plasma membrane Ca2+ channels leads to the conclusion that the cytoskeleton strongly modulates SOCE, as well as the activation and inhibition of others Ca2+ transport systems.

Advertisement

5. How SOCE modulates cytoskeleton dynamics and cell migration

Because the localization and function of STIM1 and ORAI1 are strongly dependent on components of the actin and tubulin cytoskeleton, the question of how SOCE and Ca2+ dynamics influence cytoskeleton-dependent events, such as cell adhesion and migration, was rapidly considered by many groups.

Focal adhesions are complexes of macromolecules that serve as mechanical links between the extracellular substrate and the cytoskeleton. These molecular assemblies are highly dynamic. However, the molecular mechanism by which Ca2+ regulates focal adhesion turnover is still unclear. A few proteins that regulate focal adhesion assembly or disassembly are sensitive to changes in the intracellular free Ca2+ concentration. For instance, the Ca2+-dependent protease calpain [56], which could cleave talin at focal adhesion sites, leads to an increase of focal adhesion disassembly rates. Indeed, disassembly of other focal adhesion components, like paxillin, vinculin and zyxin, has been shown to be dependent on the cleavage of talin by calpain, suggesting a role for the Ca2+-dependent talin proteolysis in the regulation of focal adhesion turnover [57]. In this regard, it has been found that the reduction of STIM1 or ORAI1 gene expression, by RNA interference, dramatically affected the rate of focal adhesion turnover, slowing down cell migration in vitro and inhibiting metastasis of MDA-MB-231 cancer cells in nude mice [58]. The treatment of cells with SKF96365, a SOC inhibitor, also induced large focal adhesions in vitro, due to defective focal adhesion turnover. In addition, this blocking agent also inhibited tumor progression in mice [58].

Focal adhesion kinase (FAK) and proline-rich tyrosine kinase 2 beta (PTK2B or PYK2) are two well-known kinases involved in focal adhesion assembly [59]. Because focal adhesion targeting of PYK2 is required for the turnover and the Tyr402 autophosphorylation is required for PYK2 targeting, Chen et al. studied the correlation between EGF stimulation, PYK2 phosphorylation and STIM1 levels in SiHa cells [60]. EGF activates PYK2 phosphorylation at Tyr402, but this phosphorylation has been shown to be inhibited by the silencing of STIM1 [60]. In addition, STIM1 knockdown induced large focal adhesions, independently of the stimulation with EGF, further confirming the role of Ca2+ entry in facilitating the turnover of focal adhesions. Similarly, EGF triggered the phosphorylation of FAK at Tyr397, which is required for focal adhesion turnover and it was demonstrated that this phosphorylation is inhibited by STIM1 knockdown [60].

In this regard, it is known that EGF activates the phosphoinositide pathway, generating IP3 and activating Ca2+ release from the ER. EGF also activates de MAPK (mitogen-activated protein kinases) pathway. As a consequence STIM1 becomes phosphorylated at ERK1/2 target sites (Ser575, Ser608 and Ser621) upon EGF stimulation, leading to the dissociation from microtubules (i.e., EB1) and activating SOCE [49]. Casas-Rua et al. demonstrated that nonphosphorylatable mutants of STIM1, such as STIM1-S575A/S308A/S621A, blocked EGF signaling pathway, inhibiting cell migration in the endometrial adenocarcinoma Ishikawa cell line [49]. The impact of STIM1 was observed also at the genomic response level, because ectopic overexpression of STIM1-S575A/S608A/S621A blocked the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) of Ishikawa cells treated with EGF. The stimulation of cells with EGF induced a significant switch in E-cadherin localization from subplasma membrane region to a diffuse localization throughout the cytosol, as described for other epithelial cells [61]. EGF also triggered an increase of vimentin expression in well-defined cytoskeletal localization, as for other cells upon EGF stimulation [61, 62]. However, Ishikawa cells overexpressing STIM1-S575A/S608A/S621A-mCherry did not show significant increase in vimentin expression, nor E-cadherin relocalization [49], supporting for a role for phospho-STIM1 in the regulation of cell migration and cell transformation into a mesenchymal phenotype.

Cytosolic Ca2+ levels also regulate actomyosin, the macromolecular complex of actin and myosin that drives the mechanical forces for cell contractility during migration. Nonmuscle cell contractility is controlled by nonmuscle myosin II, through the phosphorylation of its regulatory light chains (MLC2) at Ser19 in a Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent manner [63]. The contractile force that moves the cell body is then transmitted to focal adhesions by phospho-myosin II-based actomyosin contraction. This phosphorylation was abolished by the Ca2+ channel inhibitor SKF96365, or by knocking-down STIM1 expression [64], indicating that STIM1-dependent Ca2+ entry has a significant role in MLC2 activation and in the reorganization of the actin-myosin cytoskeleton in migrating cells.

In addition to focal adhesions, podosomes and invadopodia are also adhesion structures regulated by Ca2+ signaling. Sun et al. reported that melanoma invasion is promoted by STIM1- and ORAI1-mediated Ca2+ oscillations, which promote invadopodia formation and extracellular matrix (ECM) degradation [65]. These authors found that Ca2+ signaling mediated by STIM1 and ORAI1 is essential for invadopodia formation over a collagen matrix and that addition of SKF96365, or chelation of extracellular Ca2+ with EGTA, blocked invadopodia assembly. More interestingly, ectopic expression of STIM1 or STIM1+ORAI1 increased phosphorylation levels of Tyr416 in Src kinase, without affecting phospho-FAK. This effect was revealed for MCF-7 cells (human breast cancer cells), NMuMG (mouse mammary epithelial cell line) and WM793 melanoma cells and the activation of Ca2+ entry with thapsigargin or ionophore A23187 led to the same result, i.e., a rapid increase of pY416 Src levels. These data, together with the fact that STIM1 shRNA, chelation of extracellular Ca2+, or the inhibition of SOCE with 2-APB, reduced pY416 Src levels, strongly suggesting a direct role of STIM1-ORAI1-mediated Ca2+ influx in the preservation of Src activity and invadopodia formation [65].

From the information given above it is now widely accepted that one of the major targets for SOCE is the cytoskeleton and that the dynamics of the focal adhesion assembly as well as the dynamics of actin and tubulin cytoskeleton are strongly influenced by the kinetics of Ca2+ entry through store-operated Ca2+ channels.

Advertisement

6. Localization and polarization of SOCE in migrating cells

From the given information arises the question about the spatial control of STIM1-ORAI1 localization. The polarization of Ca2+ entry pathways has been described in several cell types, especially in exocrine gland cells. In pancreatic acinar cells under stimulation of Ca2+ mobilizing receptors, the ER Ca2+ release is detected in the apical region of the cell and the [Ca2+]i increase remains restricted at this region [66], although the signal propagates to basolateral regions at high concentration of agonists. In salivary gland acinar cells, [Ca2+]i increase is also detected in the apical region and then propagates to the basal region [67]. Indeed, several studies have demonstrated that agonist-stimulated Ca2+ signaling in exocrine gland cells is highly polarized. TRPC1 is a key factor for SOCE in salivary gland acinar cells and pancreatic acinar cells. In addition, TRPC3 contributes to SOCE and contributes to the receptor-stimulated Ca2+ influx in exocrine pancreatic acinar cells [68]. In addition, SOCE is the major contributor to Ca2+ influx in salivary gland and pancreatic acinar cells, so it is expected an asymmetric distribution of STIM1, ORAI1 and TRPC1-3, some of the most widely studied members involved in the control of SOCE.

As expected, a polarized localization has been shown for all Ca2+ signaling proteins in exocrine acinar cells: IP3Rs, SERCAs and PMCA pumps, GPCRs, TRPC channels, ORAI1 channels and STIM1 [66, 69, 70], an asymmetric distribution required for the directed secretion carried out by these cells. However, little is known about the mechanisms involved in the targeting of Ca2+-signaling complexes to these regions.

Because migrating cells are polarized cells, with polarized distribution of receptor tyrosine kinases, the study of Ca2+ entry in migrating cells is a task of particular importance. In this regard, Tsai et al. reported recently that STIM1 is enriched at the leading edge of migrating cells, measured with YFP-STIM1 and CFP-tagged ER marker [71]. The authors concluded that the polarization of STIM1 is microtubule-plus-end dependent, because STIM1-I644N/P645N, a mutant STIM1 that does not bind to EB1, failed to polarize in migrating cells. Because of the enrichment of receptor tyrosine kinases at the front of migrating cells, local Ca2+ pulses were observed with higher frequency at the leading edge, accompanied by a lower level of luminal ER Ca2+ and increased levels of PMCA activity at the front. In this report the authors also described that a DAG gradient is the result of the asymmetric activity of phospholipase C (PLC) at the leading edge of migrating cells, leading to the recruitment and activation of PKCbeta, a kinase involved in migration [72] by phosphorylating myosin [73], or other substrates of the cytoskeleton, such as GAP43, adducin, or fascin [74]. However, the precise mechanism that assembles de STIM1-ORAI1 and/or TRPC1 in a polarized distribution in cells is still unclear and it is expected that additional members of the cytoskeleton will solve this open question.

Advertisement

7. Conclusions

In conclusion, cytosolic-free Ca2+ concentration regulates the reorganization of cytoskeleton, focal adhesion turnover, invadopodia formation, actomyosin contractility and it is critical to trigger the development of lamellipodia as the leading structure during migration. But this dependence is reciprocal and Ca2+ influx through store-operated Ca2+channels at the plasma membrane is fully dependent on the formation of endoplasmic reticulum-plasma membrane juxtapositions that are shaped by the reorganization of the cytoskeleton. In the last few years valuable knowledge has been gained regarding the activation of STIM1 by Ca2+ store depletion and how STIM1 relocalizes and activates ORAI1 at the PM-ER junctions. Here we have shown that both STIM1 and ORAI1 are involved in many aspects of cell migration and that gene silencing and specific inhibitors point out these two proteins in the regulation of Ca2+ influx pathways involved in supporting efficient cell adhesion and migration. However, a major lack of knowledge regarding the polarization of the signaling profile persists. Recent advances in genome editing will be valuable tools to knockout and knockin STIM and ORAI genes, as well as genes coding for cytoskeletal proteins involved in the reorganization of SOCE. With this coming era we will be able to monitor and study the behavior of tagged proteins at endogenous levels, as well as to study the loss of function of certain genes in any cell type, in an attempt to solve this open question in cell biology and signaling.

References

  1. 1. Berridge, M.J., M.D. Bootman and H.L. Roderick, Calcium signalling: dynamics, homeostasis and remodelling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 2003. 4(7): pp. 517–29.
  2. 2. Berridge, M.J., P. Lipp and M.D. Bootman, The versatility and universality of calcium signalling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 2000. 1(1): pp. 11–21.
  3. 3. Berridge, M.J. (2014) Cell Signalling Biology. DOI: 10.1042/csb0001012
  4. 4. Catterall, W.A. and N. Zheng, Deciphering voltage-gated Na+and Ca2+channels by studying prokaryotic ancestors. Trends Biochem Sci, 2015. 40(9): pp. 526–34.
  5. 5. Frings, S., Cyclic nucleotide-gated channels and calcium: an intimate relation. Adv Second Messenger Phosphoprotein Res, 1997. 31: pp. 75–82.
  6. 6. Taberner, F.J., et al., TRP channels interaction with lipids and its implications in disease. Biochim Biophys Acta, 2015. 1848(9): pp. 1818–27.
  7. 7. Ambudkar, I.S. and H.L. Ong, Organization and function of TRPC channelosomes. Pflugers Arch, 2007. 455(2): pp. 187–200.
  8. 8. Ambudkar, I.S., et al., TRPC1: the link between functionally distinct store-operated calcium channels. Cell Calcium, 2007. 42(2): pp. 213–23.
  9. 9. Vial, C., J.A. Roberts and R.J. Evans, Molecular properties of ATP-gated P2X receptor ion channels. Trends Pharmacol Sci, 2004. 25(9): pp. 487–93.
  10. 10. Madden, D.R., The structure and function of glutamate receptor ion channels. Nat Rev Neurosci, 2002. 3(2): pp. 91–101.
  11. 11. Gudermann, T., et al., Activation, subunit composition and physiological relevance of DAG-sensitive TRPC proteins. Novartis Found Symp, 2004. 258: pp. 103–18; discussion 118–22, 155–9, 263–6.
  12. 12. Putney, J.W., Jr., A model for receptor-regulated calcium entry. Cell Calcium, 1986. 7(1): pp. 1–12.
  13. 13. MacLennan, D.H. and N.M. Green, Structural biology. Pumping ions. Nature, 2000. 405(6787): pp. 633–4.
  14. 14. DiPolo, R. and L. Beauge, Sodium/calcium exchanger: influence of metabolic regulation on ion carrier interactions. Physiol Rev, 2006. 86(1): pp. 155–203.
  15. 15. Babcock, D.F., et al., Mitochondrial participation in the intracellular Ca2+network. J Cell Biol, 1997. 136(4): pp. 833–44.
  16. 16. Smyth, J.T., et al., Activation and regulation of store-operated calcium entry. J Cell Mol Med, 2010. 14(10): pp. 2337–49.
  17. 17. Liou, J., et al., STIM is a Ca2+sensor essential for Ca2+-store-depletion-triggered Ca2+influx. Curr Biol, 2005. 15(13): pp. 1235–41.
  18. 18. Roos, J., et al., STIM1, an essential and conserved component of store-operated Ca2+channel function. J Cell Biol, 2005. 169(3): p. 435–45.
  19. 19. Zhang, S.L., et al., STIM1 is a Ca2+sensor that activates CRAC channels and migrates from the Ca2+store to the plasma membrane. Nature, 2005. 437(7060): pp. 902–5.
  20. 20. Feske, S., et al., A mutation in Orai1 causes immune deficiency by abrogating CRAC channel function. Nature, 2006. 441(7090): pp. 179–85.
  21. 21. Luik, R.M., et al., The elementary unit of store-operated Ca2+entry: local activation of CRAC channels by STIM1 at ER-plasma membrane junctions. J Cell Biol, 2006. 174(6): pp. 815–25.
  22. 22. Prakriya, M., et al., Orai1 is an essential pore subunit of the CRAC channel. Nature, 2006. 443(7108): pp. 230–3.
  23. 23. Yuan, J.P., et al., STIM1 heteromultimerizes TRPC channels to determine their function as store-operated channels. Nat Cell Biol, 2007. 9(6): pp. 636–45.
  24. 24. Ong, H.L., et al., Dynamic assembly of TRPC1-STIM1-Orai1 ternary complex is involved in store-operated calcium influx. Evidence for similarities in store-operated and calcium release-activated calcium channel components. J Biol Chem, 2007. 282(12): pp. 9105–16.
  25. 25. Yuan, J.P., et al., SOAR and the polybasic STIM1 domains gate and regulate Orai channels. Nat Cell Biol, 2009. 11(3): pp. 337–43.
  26. 26. Park, C.Y., et al., STIM1 clusters and activates CRAC channels via direct binding of a cytosolic domain to Orai1. Cell, 2009. 136(5): pp. 876–90.
  27. 27. Park, C.Y., A. Shcheglovitov and R. Dolmetsch, The CRAC channel activator STIM1 binds and inhibits L-type voltage-gated calcium channels. Science, 2010. 330(6000): pp. 101–5.
  28. 28. Wang, Y., et al., The calcium store sensor, STIM1, reciprocally controls Orai and CaV1.2 channels. Science, 2010. 330(6000): pp. 105–9.
  29. 29. Ribeiro, C.M., J. Reece and J.W. Putney, Jr., Role of the cytoskeleton in calcium signaling in NIH 3T3 cells. An intact cytoskeleton is required for agonist-induced [Ca2+]i signaling, but not for capacitative calcium entry. J Biol Chem, 1997. 272(42): pp. 26555–561.
  30. 30. Holda, J.R. and L.A. Blatter, Capacitative calcium entry is inhibited in vascular endothelial cells by disruption of cytoskeletal microfilaments. FEBS Lett, 1997. 403(2): pp. 191–6.
  31. 31. Oka, T., M. Hori and H. Ozaki, Microtubule disruption suppresses allergic response through the inhibition of calcium influx in the mast cell degranulation pathway. J Immunol, 2005. 174(8): pp. 4584–89.
  32. 32. Smyth, J.T., et al., Role of the microtubule cytoskeleton in the function of the store-operated Ca2+channel activator STIM1. J Cell Sci, 2007. 120(Pt 21): pp. 3762–71.
  33. 33. Redondo, P.C., et al., Dual role of tubulin-cytoskeleton in store-operated calcium entry in human platelets. Cell Signal, 2007. 19(10): pp. 2147–54.
  34. 34. Rosado, J.A., S. Jenner and S.O. Sage, A role for the actin cytoskeleton in the initiation and maintenance of store-mediated calcium entry in human platelets. Evidence for conformational coupling. J Biol Chem, 2000. 275(11): pp. 7527–33.
  35. 35. Rosado, J.A. and S.O. Sage, Farnesylcysteine analogues inhibit store-regulated Ca2+entry in human platelets: evidence for involvement of small GTP-binding proteins and actin cytoskeleton. Biochem J, 2000. 347 Pt 1: pp. 183–92.
  36. 36. Russa, A.D., et al., Microtubule remodeling mediates the inhibition of store-operated calcium entry (SOCE) during mitosis in COS-7 cells. Arch Histol Cytol, 2008. 71(4): pp. 249–63.
  37. 37. Grigoriev, I., et al., STIM1 is a MT-plus-end-tracking protein involved in remodeling of the ER. Curr Biol, 2008. 18(3): pp. 177–82.
  38. 38. Sampieri, A., et al., Visualizing the store-operated channel complex assembly in real time: identification of SERCA2 as a new member. Cell Calcium, 2009. 45(5): pp. 439–46.
  39. 39. Honnappa, S., et al., An EB1-binding motif acts as a microtubule tip localization signal. Cell, 2009. 138(2): pp. 366–76.
  40. 40. Zumbrunn, J., et al., Binding of the adenomatous polyposis coli protein to microtubules increases microtubule stability and is regulated by GSK3 beta phosphorylation. Curr Biol, 2001. 11(1): pp. 44–9.
  41. 41. Nathke, I.S., The adenomatous polyposis coli protein: the Achilles heel of the gut epithelium. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol, 2004. 20: pp. 337–66.
  42. 42. Andrews, P.D., et al., Aurora B regulates MCAK at the mitotic centromere. Dev Cell, 2004. 6(2): pp. 253–68.
  43. 43. Kumar, P., et al., GSK3beta phosphorylation modulates CLASP-microtubule association and lamella microtubule attachment. J Cell Biol, 2009. 184(6): pp. 895–908.
  44. 44. Watanabe, T., et al., Phosphorylation of CLASP2 by GSK-3beta regulates its interaction with IQGAP1, EB1 and microtubules. J Cell Sci, 2009. 122(Pt 16): pp. 2969–79.
  45. 45. Pozo-Guisado, E., et al., Phosphorylation of STIM1 at ERK1/2 target sites modulates store-operated calcium entry. J Cell Sci, 2010. 123(Pt 18): pp. 3084–93.
  46. 46. Pozo-Guisado, E., et al., Phosphorylation of STIM1 at ERK1/2 target sites regulates interaction with the microtubule plus-end binding protein EB1. J Cell Sci, 2013. 126(Pt 14): pp. 3170–80.
  47. 47. Casas-Rua, V., et al., Inhibition of STIM1 phosphorylation underlies resveratrol-induced inhibition of store-operated calcium entry. Biochem Pharmacol, 2013. 86(11): pp. 1555–63.
  48. 48. Tomas-Martin, P., et al., Phospho-STIM1 is a downstream effector that mediates the signaling triggered by IGF-1 in HEK293 cells. Cell Signal, 2015. 27(3): pp. 545–54.
  49. 49. Casas-Rua, V., et al., STIM1 phosphorylation triggered by epidermal growth factor mediates cell migration. Biochim Biophys Acta, 2015. 1853(1): pp. 233–43.
  50. 50. Pozo-Guisado, E. and F.J. Martin-Romero, The regulation of STIM1 by phosphorylation. Commun Integr Biol, 2013. 6(6): p. e26283.
  51. 51. Asanov, A., et al., A relay mechanism between EB1 and APC facilitate STIM1 puncta assembly at endoplasmic reticulum-plasma membrane junctions. Cell Calcium, 2013. 54(3): pp. 246–56.
  52. 52. Sharma, S., et al., An siRNA screen for NFAT activation identifies septins as coordinators of store-operated Ca2+entry. Nature, 2013. 499(7457): pp. 238–42.
  53. 53. Deb, B. K., T. Pathak and G. Hasan, Store-independent modulation of Ca2+entry through Orai by Septin 7. Nat Commun, 2016. 7: 11751 doi: 10.1038/ncomms11751
  54. 54. Yuan, J.P., et al., The closing and opening of TRPC channels by Homer1 and STIM1. Acta Physiol (Oxf), 2012. 204(2): pp. 238–47.
  55. 55. Dionisio, N., et al., Homer proteins mediate the interaction between STIM1 and Cav1.2 channels. Biochim Biophys Acta, 2015. 1853(5): pp. 1145–53.
  56. 56. Huttenlocher, A., et al., Regulation of cell migration by the calcium-dependent protease calpain. J Biol Chem, 1997. 272(52): pp. 32719–22.
  57. 57. Franco, S.J., et al., Calpain-mediated proteolysis of talin regulates adhesion dynamics. Nat Cell Biol, 2004. 6(10): pp. 977–83.
  58. 58. Yang, S., J.J. Zhang and X.Y. Huang, Orai1 and STIM1 are critical for breast tumor cell migration and metastasis. Cancer Cell, 2009. 15(2): pp. 124–34.
  59. 59. Mitra, S.K., D.A. Hanson and D.D. Schlaepfer, Focal adhesion kinase: in command and control of cell motility. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 2005. 6(1): pp. 56–68.
  60. 60. Chen, Y.F., et al., Calcium store sensor stromal-interaction molecule 1-dependent signaling plays an important role in cervical cancer growth, migration and angiogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2011. 108(37): pp. 15225–30.
  61. 61. Larue, L. and A. Bellacosa, Epithelial-mesenchymal transition in development and cancer: role of phosphatidylinositol 3' kinase/AKT pathways. Oncogene, 2005. 24(50): pp. 7443–54.
  62. 62. Lee, J.M., et al., The epithelial-mesenchymal transition: new insights in signaling, development and disease. J Cell Biol, 2006. 172(7): pp. 973–81.
  63. 63. Vicente-Manzanares, M., et al., Non-muscle myosin II takes centre stage in cell adhesion and migration. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 2009. 10(11): pp. 778–90.
  64. 64. Chen, Y.T., et al., The ER Ca2+sensor STIM1 regulates actomyosin contractility of migratory cells. J Cell Sci, 2013. 126(Pt 5): pp. 1260–67.
  65. 65. Sun, J., et al., STIM1- and Orai1-mediated Ca2+oscillation orchestrates invadopodium formation and melanoma invasion. J Cell Biol, 2014. 207(4): pp. 535–48.
  66. 66. Yule, D.I., Subtype-specific regulation of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptors: controlling calcium signals in time and space. J Gen Physiol, 2001. 117(5): pp. 431–4.
  67. 67. Bruce, J.I., et al., Modulation of [Ca2+]i signaling dynamics and metabolism by perinuclear mitochondria in mouse parotid acinar cells. J Biol Chem, 2004. 279(13): pp. 12909–17.
  68. 68. Ambudkar, I.S., Polarization of calcium signaling and fluid secretion in salivary gland cells. Curr Med Chem, 2013. 19(34): pp. 5774–81.
  69. 69. Hong, J.H., et al., Polarized but differential localization and recruitment of STIM1, Orai1 and TRPC channels in secretory cells. Traffic, 2011. 12(2): pp. 232–45.
  70. 70. Bandyopadhyay, B.C., et al., Apical localization of a functional TRPC3/TRPC6-Ca2+-signaling complex in polarized epithelial cells. Role in apical Ca2+influx. J Biol Chem, 2005. 280(13): pp. 12908–16.
  71. 71. Tsai, F.C., et al., A polarized Ca2+, diacylglycerol and STIM1 signalling system regulates directed cell migration. Nat Cell Biol, 2014. 16(2): pp. 133–44.
  72. 72. Rosse, C., et al., PKC and the control of localized signal dynamics. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 2010. 11(2): pp. 103–12.
  73. 73. Ludowyke, R.I., et al., Phosphorylation of nonmuscle myosin heavy chain IIA on Ser1917 is mediated by protein kinase C beta II and coincides with the onset of stimulated degranulation of RBL-2H3 mast cells. J Immunol, 2006. 177(3): pp. 1492–9.
  74. 74. Larsson, C., Protein kinase C and the regulation of the actin cytoskeleton. Cell Signal, 2006. 18(3): pp. 276–84.

Written By

Francisco Javier Martin-Romero, Aida M. Lopez-Guerrero, Carlos Pascual-Caro and Eulalia Pozo-Guisado

Submitted: 16 March 2016 Reviewed: 11 November 2016 Published: 17 May 2017