Safe service time of the material of the test primary steam pipeline elbow and circumferential welded joint made of 13 HMF steel after approx. 200,000 h service under creep conditions for the operating parameters of further service.
This article describes the method for determination of residual life and disposable residual life based on long- and short-term creep tests for different temperature levels above the operating one and stress level equal to the operating one. The method for determination of the share of disposable life in total life and the time of safe service beyond the design service time was proposed. These characteristics of the steel are used for the evaluation of the structural changes and mechanical properties of the material after long-term operation. The result of this study is the database of material characteristics representing the mechanical properties related to the structure analysis, and it can be used for diagnosis of the components of pressure part of power boilers.
- mechanical properties
- short creep test
- residual life
- welded joint
The extension in the service time of power units which have exceeded the design service life of 100,000 h is made using the calculation method based on the creep strength data for 200,000 h service and the positive results of comprehensive diagnostic tests, with particular consideration given to those of the critical pressure components of boilers and turbines. Out of them, the components working at above the limit temperature, that is, under creep conditions, are of particular importance. In the assessment of these components, it is important and necessary to assess the condition of their materials [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7]. Such an assessment is carried out based on non-destructive materials testing, and its result is referred to the available characteristics of materials after service [8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15]. The results of these tests provide good estimation of the condition of material and its exhaustion degree and allow for determination of the time of further safe service until the next inspection [16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28].
However, to reach the level of 200,000 h service for the material of components, not only good estimation of residual life but also its determination based on the destructive testing on a representative test specimen is required in a number of cases.
Yet, it is not always possible in practice. It can be made to assess the condition of the material of the main steam pipeline or transfer pipeline as well as for certain chambers and desuperheaters. However, it must be preceded by a cost-effectiveness calculation for such a procedure.
The problem related to the assessment of creep resistance in case of materials operated for a long time under creep conditions is the time required to carry out the creep tests to assess the residual life and the remaining safe time of service. This paper shows how to use long-term creep tests at the temperature and stress parameters corresponding to the actual operating ones, which allow for determination of the actual residual life, to make such an assessment. The method for using short-term creep tests for such an assessment where test duration is reduced by increasing one of the parameters in relation to the actual ones is also presented.
2. Creep tests
2.1 Long-term creep tests
In the assessment of residual life and disposable residual life, the main source of information is still creep tests in spite of the fact that their disadvantage is a long time until the test results are obtained. Creep tests are usually carried out under uniaxial tension and at strain rates from 10 to 9 to 10–12 s−1 (corresponding to the actual service conditions) on test specimens taken directly from the material of component after long-term service at a temperature exceeding the limit one tg (te > tg).
Long-term creep tests can be divided into:
Creep rupture tests without measurement of elongation during test
Creep test with measurement of elongation during test
Based on the results of creep rupture tests without measurement of elongation during test, the residual life can be determined using one of the two procedures:
Lifetime fracture rule
Extrapolation of creep rupture test results
The lifetime fracture rule relies on the assumption that changes in temperature T or stress
Thus, the lifetime fracture rule concept by Robinson assumes that
where T is the time of stress
For each of these degrees, the creep rate in steady state (secondary creep) or the time to rupture tri based on the experimental data measured under preset stress and temperature is determined. The total creep strain is assumed to be the sum of strains corresponding to the consecutive degrees, that is, .
For the materials after service, the lifetime fracture rule can be presented as
where ts is the time of previous service of the material, trs is the time to rupture under service conditions (σe, Te), tt is the time to rupture of the test specimen determined under the accelerated creep test conditions for the material after service (σt > σe and/or Tt > Te), and trt is the time to rupture of the material in the as-received condition under the accelerated test conditions (σe = σt, T = Tt).
Assuming that the further operating conditions will not differ from the previous ones, the time equal to the residual life can be determined from
The need to know the time to rupture of the material in the as-received condition trt restricts the use of this method.
In the event when the test specimens for destructive testing are taken from the operated material after two different times of service ts1 and ts2 and the creep tests are carried out for both conditions of one material, the time to rupture of the material in the as-received condition trt can be eliminated. Then, the knowledge of the properties of material in the as-received condition is not required.
The use of this method is particularly useful in the modernisation of boilers when some critical boiler components operating under creep conditions are replaced and the basic operating parameters are recorded and controlled on-line.
The residual life can also be determined by extrapolating the results of creep rupture tests carried out on material after service at a temperature equal to or different from the design service temperature (Tr) and stress values equal to, but usually higher than, those characteristic of the service conditions (
where H (
This method for determination of residual life is shown graphically in Figure 1. Knowing the operating temperature Tr and the operating stress
The duration of the tests allowing for determination of the residual life tre can be reduced by carrying out the creep tests with measurement of elongation during test in order to determine the creep rate in steady state for the properly selected creep parameters (
where εc acpt is the acceptable total strain (adopted based on the operating experience and creep test results)—creep rate for parameters of further service (εe, Te) provided that the relation εe ≤ εc acpt is met.
The method for determination of creep rate for the parameters of further service is shown graphically in Figure 2.
The creep rupture tests with measurement of elongation during test are also used to determine:
The time to end of secondary creep tII and the corresponding elongation εII
The time to rupture tr and the corresponding elongation εc
The share υ of the time of secondary creep tII in the overall time to rupture tr
The tests are carried out at a constant test temperature Tb, which is similar to the operating one, and at stress σb values higher than those corresponding to the operating one. As a result of each of the tests, the creep curves ε = f (t) at σb = const are obtained (Figure 3a). The test results are plotted on the diagram in the coordinate system υ = f(σ)εc = f(σ)εII = f (σ) at Tb ≈ Te = const (Figure 3b). The characteristics obtained in this way allow for determination of the disposable residual life, which is the time of further safe service for the adopted operating parameters.
2.2 Short-term creep tests
The disadvantage of the method for determination of residual life using long-term creep tests is the time of waiting for test results, which takes at least 2–3 years. To reduce the duration of these tests and the assessment of residual life, the so-called short-term creep tests with a duration from a few dozen to max 3000–10,000 h are used in the engineering practice. This opens up the possibility for obtaining test results within a maximum of several months and providing good estimation of residual life.
The acceleration of the creep process and the reduction in the duration of tests is obtained in creep tests carried out under uniaxial tension on test specimens taken from the material of a power system component and:
Under constant test stress equal to the operating stress and at different test temperature levels much higher than the operating temperature
At constant test temperature equal to the operating temperature and under different test stress levels much higher than the operating stress
The manner of presenting results of short-term creep tests conducted under constant stress equal to the operating one (
Based on at least 40 years’ experience of the Creep Test Laboratory of the Institute for Ferrous Metallurgy in comparing results of short-term creep tests and extrapolating them with results of long-term tests of even up to 100,000 h, they were found to be useful for and applicable to the estimation of life and residual life. The determination of residual life for the material after service does not require knowledge of its history and previous operating conditions, and the only requirement is to define the operating parameters of its further service (σrp, Trp). Strong convergence of the results obtained in short- and long-term creep tests allows the method of short-term creep tests conducted under constant stress equal to the operating one to be used in practice. A disadvantage of this method is the restriction with regard to the applied test temperature levels arising from precipitation processes that occur in the material. The temperature levels must therefore be selected individually for each grade of material being tested.
Therefore, in the diagnostic practice, only short-term creep tests under constant stress and at different levels of temperature significantly higher than the operating one should be used to determine the residual life of the materials of components operating under creep conditions (pipelines, steam superheater coils). Such tests are recommended for use after exceeding the design service time, which is most often equal to 100,000 h. When the design time is exceeded by 50% (1.5 of to), these tests are obligatory.
The reliability of the obtained results of short-term creep tests depends on the requirements for compliance with constant level of preset test temperature Tb over the measurement length of the test specimen throughout the duration of the test. The determination of residual life with an error of no more than 20% in relation to the time determined based on long-term creep tests ensures that short-term creep tests are carried out at the test temperature Tb (much higher than the operating one) with an accuracy equal to or higher than ±0.5°C over the measurement length of the test specimen, regardless of what the test temperature level is.
3. Method for determination of the time of safe service for material after long-term service under creep conditions beyond the design service time
The main step in the proposed method for determination of the time of further safe service is to determine the residual life. Its determination is based on creep test results. These tests have been so far the only known method for determination of service life for actual operating parameters of the materials in use. In creep tests, the decisive factor for their duration is the time to rupture. It cannot be reduced in the development of material characteristics. However, such a possibility exists for the assessment of specific material both in the as-received condition and after service. Nevertheless, the research methods used for this purpose have to be verified with results of long-term creep tests .
The proposed procedure for determination of residual life and disposable residual life, which is the time of safe service beyond the design time, is presented as the algorithm presented in Figure 6. This algorithm consists of six consecutive steps.
3.1 Selection of the representative areas for destructive testing and of the test material (step 1)
The selection of the representative areas for destructive testing is made after review of the previous service, results of measurements and diagnostic tests carried out on the object, verification calculations and determination of the temperature, and strain and stress distributions by the finite element method for the most strenuous areas [17, 18, 19].
The test materials selected in this way, with provision of the appropriate access to components for cutting them out and the possibility for repair/replacement, were an elbow and a straight section of the main primary steam pipeline made of 13 HMF steel after approx. 200,000 h service.
3.2 Short-term creep tests (step 2)
The short-term creep tests were carried out for six levels of test temperature Tb = 600, 620, 640, 650, 660, and 680°C under the constant level of test stress σb with three different values of σb = 50, 80, and 100 MPa.
The obtained results of tests on the primary steam pipeline elbow made of 14MoV6–3 steel in the form of logtr = f(Tb) under σb = const, where tr is the time to rupture in creep test, for three levels of stress σb1 = 50 MPa, σb2 = 80 MPa, and σb3 = 100 MPa are shown in Figure 7.
3.3 Temporary creep strength curves at a constant temperature (step 3)
The extrapolation of the obtained relationships of log tr = f(tb) under σb = const towards a lower temperature allowed for determination of residual life tre for temperature equal to the extrapolation one.
The results of this extrapolation for one level of temperature Tb = const and three levels of stress σb1 = 50, σb2 = 80, and σb3 = 100 MPa allowed the creep strength curves to be plotted in the form of log σb = f (logtre) for Tb1 = 530, Tb2 = 540, Tb3 = 560, and Tb4 = 580°C, which is presented graphically in Figure 8.
3.4 Parameter residual creep strength curve (step 4)
Based on the constant-temperature residual creep strength curves in the form of log σb = f(logtre), the residual creep strength tre was determined, and on its basis, the Larson-Miller parameter curve was determined in the form of σb = f(L-M). Where: L-M = Tb (C + log tre); Tb, test temperature; C, material constant, tre, residual creep strength (Figure 9).
3.5 Safe time of service beyond the design time (step 5)
In contrast to the actual lifetime equal to the time to rupture of the material subject to creep, which is the residual life tre, the disposable residual life tbe is of practical importance. The disposable life is the time until which a structural component can be safely operated under the assumed temperature and stress conditions.
The disposable residual life is part of the residual life. To determine its share in the residual life, defined as the time to the end of the secondary creep tIIe in relation to the time to rupture tre, the rupture creep tests with measurement of elongation during test at a constant temperature Tb = 500°C similar to the operating one were carried out.
The results of the creep tests shown as creep curves ε = f(t) at Tb = const and the ratio of the disposable residual life tbe to the residual life tre depending on the test stress σb allowed to determine the tbe/tre ratio for the stress level equal to the operating stress σb = σep = 50–60 MPa, which is written as tbe = 0.55tre (Figure 3).
By knowing the residual life, the disposable residual life can be determined as the time of safe service for the adopted operating parameters. For the material of elbow, the relationships between the disposable residual life tbe and the operating temperature of further service Tep for the adopted constant level of operating stress σep at the selected levels of operating temperature Tep = 540 and 550°C and under stress σb = σep = 60 and 70 MPa are shown in Figure 10a and for the circumferential welded joint at Tep = 530 and 540°C and operating stress σep = 50 MPa in Figure 6, whereas the safe service time of the material of test primary steam pipeline elbow and circumferential welded joint made of 13 HMF steel after approx. 200,000 h service under creep conditions for the operating parameters of further service, which was determined based on the above-mentioned relationships, is summarised in Table 1.
3.6 Estimation of exhaustion degree caused by creep (step 6)
The exhaustion degree for materials working under creep conditions was defined in Chapter 3 of the study as the time of service until the time to rupture of this material under the temperature and stress operating conditions (te/tr).
For the reviewed case, the residual life tre (Table 2, column 9) was determined based on the developed relationship of log σ = f(tre) for the operating temperature of service Te. It was determined for the level of operating stress σe of the test components as shown in Figure 11.
To determine the operating stress level using the formula
where σe is the operating stress, g
Their designation and values for the test material of elbow and circumferential welded joint are summarised in Table 2, columns 2–7. The table also presents the operating stress σr values calculated for the test materials after service (column 8).
The life tr is defined as the total time of the previous service te and residual life tre for the parameters of the previous service (σe, Te), that is, tr = te + tre. Since the exhaustion degree based on the above-mentioned definition can be written as te/tr and tr = te + tre, then, in practice, te/tr = te/(te + tre). Using this relationship, the exhaustion degree (Table 2, column 10) was determined based on the residual life tre determined and knowledge of the previous time of service.
4. Method for determination of the minimum component wall thickness necessary to transfer the actual service loads of the material after long-term service under creep conditions with known creep strength characteristics
The most important element necessary to determine the minimum required component wall thickness goe, which will be able to transfer the required service load (σep, Tep), is to have the characteristics of residual creep strength for the material of test component after service in the form of log σ = f(tre) for the operating temperature Tep. This is the first step in the adopted procedure. Step 2 is to determine the residual creep strength RZe/Tep/tep for the adopted temperature of further service Te and the assumed time of further service te based on log σ = f(tre) at Tep = const. The value of RZe/Tep/tep obtained from the characteristics makes it possible to determine the acceptable stress k for the parameters of further service adopted in this way, which is step 3. To calculate the required minimum wall thickness goe for the adopted parameters of further service, the nominal outside diameter DOut of the component, the operating pressure pep, and the construction weakening coefficient z should be defined, which is step 4. Step 5 is the determination of the required minimum wall thickness goe of the component for the adopted parameters of further service.
And the last, sixth, step is to compare the obtained value of the calculated required minimum wall thickness goe to the measured minimum actual thickness gact min. If for the adopted time of further safe service tep:
goe < gact min, the component can be allowed for further service.
goe ≥ gact min, the component cannot be allowed to continue the operation at the required parameters of further service for the adopted time tep.
If goe ≥ gact min and the component cannot be allowed for further service, a shorter time of service should be adopted and the proposed procedure repeated. It may turn out that with a shorter time of further service tep, for the adopted parameters of further service, the condition of goe < gact min will be met. This will allow the test component to be operated for such a shorter time tep.
The proposed procedure in the form of an algorithm consisting of consecutive steps is shown in Figure 12. Its application is presented on the example of the primary steam pipeline elbow and circumferential welded joint made of 13 HMF steel after 200,000 h service.
4.1 Characteristics of residual creep strength
The temporary creep strength curve for the material of elbow after 200,000 h service under creep conditions plotted based on results of the tests discussed in Chapter 2 is shown in Figure 13 in the form of lg σ = f(tre) for the temperature of further service Tep = 540°C.
4.2 Determination of residual creep strength for the adopted time of further service
Based on the characteristics in point 2, the residual creep strength at 530 and 540°C for 10,000, 30,000, 50,000, and 100,000 h was determined for the materials of test primary steam pipeline components after 200,000 h service. The obtained results are presented in Table 3.
|Component||Designation of properties||Residual creep strength Rze, MPa at the test temperature Te = 540°C|
4.3 Determination of the acceptable stress
The value of acceptable stress k is equal to the value of acceptable lower scatter band −20% from the obtained mean value of residual creep strength for the adopted time tep and temperature Tep. It is calculated from the following formula:
The obtained values of acceptable stress k for the adopted levels of temperature Tep = 530, 540°C, and times te = 10,000, 30,000, 50,000, and 100,000 h of further service are provided in Table 4.
|Component||Adopted time of further service tep, h||Acceptable stress k, MPa for temperature of further service Tep = 540°C|
4.4 Definition of parameters of further service
The parameters of further service are defined to be the same as the previous ones. To calculate the required minimum wall thickness, in addition to pressure pep and temperature Tep of the component, it is also necessary to define its nominal outside diameter DOut, nominal wall thickness gn, design pressure po, operating pressure of further service pe, and construction weakening coefficient z. The required values are summarised in Table 5.
|1||Nominal outside diameter DOut||mm||324|
|2||Nominal wall thickness gn||mm||40|
|3||Minimum actual wall thickness gact min||mm||36.8|
|4||Time of further service tep||h||30,000|
|5||Temperature of further service Tep||°C||540|
|6||Design pressure po||MPa||14.2|
|7||Operating pressure of further service pep||MPa||13.8|
|8||Weakening coefficient z||—||1|
4.5 Calculation of the required minimum component wall thickness for the parameters of further service
The calculation of the minimum component wall thickness for the parameters of further service goe was made based on the following formula:
where goe is the minimum component wall thickness for the parameters of further service, pep is the operating pressure of further service, DOut is the nominal outside diameter, k is the acceptable stress, and z is the weakening coefficient.
The values obtained for pressure po and pep and for the adopted different times tep and temperature levels of further service Tep for the material of test primary steam pipeline elbow made of 13HMF steel are summarised in Table 6.
|Temperature of further service Tep = 540°C|
|Time of further service tep, h||30,000||50,000||100,000|
|Operating pressure of further service pep, MPa||Required minimum wall thickness goe, mm|
4.6 Comparison of the calculated required minimum wall thickness to the actual minimum thickness based on measurements taken on the component
The obtained results of calculations of the required minimum wall thickness for the parameters of further service (Table 6) were compared to the actual minimum thickness based on measurements taken on the component (Table 5, item 3) as shown graphically in Figure 14.
These results meet the condition of goe < gact min except for the adopted temperature of further service Tep = 540°C and the time of further service tep = 100,000 h for which this condition is not met and the component could not be allowed for further service of 100,000 h at 540°C for the other adopted operating parameters.