1. Introduction
The effects of global change on human health have attracted increasing attention in recent years, with anthropogenic influences thought to have significant influences on the Earth’s climate (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [IPCC], 2007). Climate change is thought likely to have important effects on human, animal and plant life. In addition to indirect effects on human behaviour such as shifting migration patterns, direct effects of climate change on human health are potentially severe. Together with implications through changing air quality, increased exposure to UV radiation, changes in food production, increasing water shortages and contamination, and economic instability, climate change is widely expected to also significantly affect the global spread, intensity and distribution of infectious diseases (Hunter, 2003; McMichael et al., 2006).
In this chapter, we review current knowledge on the impacts of global change on infectious diseases (Section 1), highlighting how combining global and regional climate models with mathematical (and statistical) models of disease transmission (Section 2) provides valuable tools for better understanding future disease scenarios as environmental conditions change. Such models may be used to address important questions on the current and projected impacts of climate change on disease transmission and we illustrate these issues (and the extent to which they have been addressed in modelling work to date) in Section 3. It should be remembered, however, that despite the power of weather, climate and disease models, considerable uncertainties remain. Identifying the origin of these uncertainties, highlighting where improved data may improve model accuracy, realism and confidence, together with translating uncertainties in model inputs into uncertainties in model outputs, are important benefits of modelling. Highlighting where key uncertainties lie is discussed in Section 4, illustrating where future research priorities may be directed to further our understanding of this emerging field.
1.1. Key climatic variables
Although many climatic variables may affect transmission, changes in four main variables are thought to most significantly affect diseases with strong environmental components, namely temperature, precipitation, relative humidity (RH) and wind. Here, we briefly review the impacts of these components on transmission, as well as outlining expected future trends in these variables. It should be noted, however, that climatic variables rarely act in isolation and combinations of variables tend to be associated with climatological niches for optimum transmission of different diseases, e.g. the preferred environmental conditions for optimum proliferation of
1.1.1. Temperature
The cold-blooded nature of most vectors (e.g. mosquitoes, fleas, ticks and flies) results in a strong dependence of disease incidence on ambient temperatures through changes in vector and parasite survival and development (Martens, 1998). Other influences of temperature on vectors include those on biting rates, resting and mating behaviours, dispersal and the duration of gonotrophic cycles (Martens et al. 1995), while effects on humans include changing migration and movement patterns and increasing susceptibility due to immunocompromisation at temperature extremes. The net effect is a non-linear dependence of pathogen vectorial capacity and basic reproduction number on temperature (e.g. Parham & Michael, 2010).
Global mean surface air temperatures are predicted to increase by several degrees over the next century and while predicted increases over the coming decades are typically consistent between climate models, there is considerable prediction variability from multi-model ensembles over longer timescales for different emissions scenarios and geographic regions. Changes in the occurrence of extreme temperature events are also likely, with predicted increases in more intense, frequent and longer duration episodes (heat waves), along with fewer colder episodes (IPCC, 2007).
Understanding the effect of temperature extremes on disease dynamics has received little attention to date, although strong influences on vectors and parasites at very high and very low temperatures are likely. The survival of malaria-transmitting
1.1.2. Precipitation
Precipitation has direct and indirect effects on disease incidence. Direct effects include increased likelihood of water-borne and soil-borne parasitic, bacterial and viral diseases following severe rainfall events, as well as creating new (and modifying existing) breeding sites for transmitters of VBDs. Indirect effects include increasing susceptibility through unsafe drinking water, food contamination or enteric diseases.
Rainfall extremes, including floods and storms, will also play an important role. The impact of high rainfall levels and flooding on increasing disease risk is likely to be strongly dependent on country wealth and overall development state, as well as other social and environmental influences. While the population dynamics of vectors will suffer some negative effects of such events (e.g. breeding site destruction from high intensity and volume rainfall increasing immature mortality (e.g. Paaijmans et al. (2007) for malaria)), the net effect is almost always increased vector abundance through breeding site creation. Thus, rainfall has been used as a predictor of VBD incidence for diseases including plague (Parmenter et al., 1999), Rift Valley fever (Linthicum et al., 1999) and malaria (Bi et al., 2003; Thomson et al., 2005). Delays between severe rainfall and vectors identifying new habitats for oviposition, plus other effects such as delays in water temperature reaching suitable levels for immature survival, often result in lags between rainfall events and sharp increases in disease prevalence (Briet et al., 2008; Kristan et al., 2008).
Drought and desiccation are also thought to play important roles. As well as indirect effects such as increasing human susceptibility due to changing immune status from water and food scarcity, the absence of water and soil moisture for prolonged periods decreases vector abundance due to the absence of suitable breeding sites.
Global mean precipitation is predicted to increase under future climatic conditions, together with increases in the intensity (but decreases in the frequency) of extreme rainfall events. Increases in precipitation appear almost independent of the emissions scenario over the coming decades, but display considerable variability thereafter (IPCC, 2007). Indeed, changes in rainfall patterns may have more influence on health risks from climate change than global warming (Allen & Ingram, 2002). However, in contrast to temperature trends, variability in rainfall predictions between models is considerably greater, particularly at lower latitudes. Increases in the intensity of rainfall extremes are projected to be even greater than increases in mean precipitation changes, with associated increased disease risks from flooding and droughts. Despite projected regional changes in seasonal and decadal rainfall patterns differing between climate models, ensemble model predictions highlight significant spatial heterogeneity in expected precipitation pattern changes. Decreasing seasonal rainfall across South African regions, for example, contrasts markedly with projected increases across East Africa (IPCC, 2007).
Despite uncertainty and variability in global rainfall predictions across different models, rainfall increases in East Africa, particularly during the winter months, show greatest robustness in predictions of all African regions. Together with associated temperature increases of around 3°C for all seasons, this has attracted increasing attention in the context of malaria dynamics, with research focussing on questions such as whether recent prevalence changes indicate that climate change effects are already underway in this region (Hay et al. 2002 a, 2002b , 2005; Pascual et al., 2006, 2008; Zhou et al., 2004).
1.1.3. Relative Humidity (RH)
Changes in RH are most likely to affect the dynamics of VBDs and while effects on parasite development within vectors are unlikely (although uncertain), considerable influences on human health and vector population dynamics (and behaviour) are evident. Extremes in RH have been shown to adversely affect human health (Baughman & Arens, 1996), worsening chronic diseases such as asthma (and other lung and respiratory diseases) and potentially increasing susceptibility to infectious diseases. The effects of changes in RH, however, are likely to most significantly affect vectors, notably on adult survival and activity.
For
Globally averaged RH is thought to remain approximately constant under climate change and this appears to be a feature of current general circulation models (GCMs) (Allen & Ingram, 2002). Recent work on creating and analysing the first global humidity dataset has shown that RH is almost constant on large spatiotemporal scales, but considerable regional structure and temporal variability remains (e.g. diurnal RH variability may be around 25%) (Willett et al., 2008). Global trends over land are typically negative, but not significant (Willett et al., 2008), and conditions of constant RH serve as further evidence of global warming (Willett et al., 2007). Comparisons between recent RH land means and global maps of malaria prevalence (e.g. Hay et al., 2009) are consistent with the notion of optimum RH for high prevalence, although given the lower density of weather stations contributing to the humidity dataset in the tropics (Willett et al., 2008), further research is required to better understand RH trends and anomalies in areas most severely affected by malaria.
1.1.4. Wind
Global and local changes in wind patterns have three principle effects on infectious diseases, namely (a) affecting the dispersal ability and behaviour of disease vectors (or direct wind-borne pathogen spread), (b) changing hydrological processes such as evaporation that affect vector abundance and (c) affecting human susceptibility due to extreme weather events such as storms and tropical cyclones. Little research has examined the potential impact of changes in wind patterns on diseases, although some work has examined the effect on animal diseases (e.g. Kedmi et al. (2010) on epizootic hemorrhagic disease virus in dairy cattle and Sellers et al. (1985) on bluetongue in sheep). Peak wind and near-storm precipitation intensities are predicted to increase in future tropical cyclones (IPCC, 2007).
1.2. Current knowledge on the potential impact of climate change
We focus here on providing an overview of the main infectious diseases thought to be strongly affected by climate change, primarily focusing on VBDs, although we also consider the potential impacts on water-borne and other diseases. We focus solely on human diseases, but note that the effects of climate change have also been considered on non-human diseases such as bluetongue, Eastern and Western equine encephalitis, Western Venezuelan equine encephalitis and African horse sickness (Githeko et al., 2000; Summers, 2009). In the case of bluetongue, for example, incidence has been shown to increase most where temperature increases have been greatest and where minimum climatic conditions are met for transmission (Purse et al., 2005).
1.2.1. VBDs
The sensitive nature of arthropod species to changes in climatic variables suggests that of all the infectious diseases potentially susceptible to climate change, VBDs are the most sensitive and we may see shifts in VBD distribution over the coming decades and centuries (WHO, 1999). While there is much speculation on future incidence trends with climate change, few empirical studies have emerged to determine whether impacts are already underway and considerable debate has arisen from those that have (McMichael et al., 2006). This is nowhere better illustrated than the recent (and ongoing) debate about the relationship between malaria and meteorological trends in the East African highlands (Hay et al. 2002 a, 2002b , 2005; Pascual et al., 2006, 2008; Zhou et al., 2004).
The link between vector survival and lifecycle processes and climatic variables indicates only that VBDs can be affected by climate change; the magnitude and extent of the change given the many factors affecting incidence is perhaps the most important question for the field. The global distribution of malaria, for example, is thought to almost certainly change with climate (e.g. Cook, 1992; Sutherst, 2004), although the magnitude of this change may be relatively small (Rogers & Randolph, 2000), yet VBD transmission is dependent on a multitude of epidemiological, environmental, social, economic and demographic factors (Martens et al., 1995; McMichael et al., 2006). Indeed, mitigating climate change may result in only a very small reduction in the population at risk of malaria by 2080 (Goklany, 2004). Local infrastructure and wealth may also influence the risk of disease emergence in new regions (and the treatment of individuals should outbreaks arise), although the risk of imported infections should not be dismissed (Hunter, 2003; Isaacson, 1989).
Temperature, rainfall and RH thresholds critically affect the geographic regions conducive to malaria transmission, with the majority of cases contained within latitudes of 30°N to 30°S (Hales & Woodward, 2005; Hay et al., 2009), although the possibility of European outbreaks has also been considered (WHO, 1999). However, within regions where climatic sufficiency conditions exist for transmission (and where rainfall sufficiency is usually thought to be more crucial than temperature (e.g. Mabaso et al., 2006)), considerable research is required into the role of climatic influences compared to other factors driving disease dynamics. These include land use changes (including deforestation), changes in transportation infrastructure, changes in immunity, drug and insecticide resistance, urbanisation and the impact of control measures (Afrane et al., 2007; Hay et al., 2002; Lindblade et al., 2000). Local landscape also plays an important role (Ernst et al., 2006) and altitudinal effects on incidence have been considered (Lindsay & Martens, 1998; Reiter, 2008), along with changes in human behaviour (Martens & Hall, 2000; Tatem
Severe climatic events such as ENSO may have disproportionately large effects on disease trends (Kovats et al., 2003), with sudden increases in temperature, rainfall and RH shown to have caused sharp increases in malaria incidence in Punjab and Sri Lanka (Githeko et al., 2000) and Columbia (Bouma et al., 1997; Mantilla et al., 2009). Such climatic anomalies have been used to drive seasonal malaria forecasts (Thomson et al., 2005, 2006). Changes on shorter timescales (e.g. diurnal cycles) have been shown to have important implications for transmission (Paaijmans et al., 2010), since non-linear relationships between temperature and components of transmission mean that small changes in the former may have large effects on the latter, particularly in the most vulnerable regions (Sutherst, 2004).
Alongside malaria, dengue and schistosomiasis are also thought to be significantly affected by climatic changes (Martens, 1998), yet these diseases combined represent less than 7% of the global mortality due to malaria (WHO, 2008), which has therefore attracted most attention to date. However, despite the low mortality rate, the global burden of dengue remains high and it is thought to annually infect around 50-100 million people worldwide, remaining endemic in more than 100 countries (Whitehorn & Farrar, 2010). Dengue transmission demonstrates a similar global distribution to malaria, being primarily concentrated in the tropics and subtropics (Hopp & Foley, 2003; López-Vélez & Moreno, 2005), although this is likely to be affected by climate change (Cook, 1992) and shifts in altitudinal range are also possible (Chan et al., 1999). Transmission occurs via
Climatic changes are also likely to affect the global distribution of schistosomiasis (Cook, 1992; Martens, 1998; Mas-Coma et al., 2009), with transmission potential thought to be particularly sensitive to climate change around the edges of current endemic areas (Sutherst, 2004). Indeed, decreases in snail abundance due to increased mortality with global warming may reduce the epidemic potential of schistosomiasis in these regions (Epstein, 2001), although other areas (e.g. China) may experience an increase in areas suitable for transmission (Yang et al., 2005). Importation of cases into areas previously endemic is also a concern in several areas (e.g. Casimiro et al., 2006).
Other VBDs have also attracted recent attention in the context of climate change. The effects of global warming may cause shifts in the geographic distribution of vectors (through changing migration patterns) and changes to the duration of transmission seasons, with implications for diseases such as tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) and Lyme disease (Epstein, 2001; WHO, 1999). Increasing incidence of the latter has been found in several European countries (Semenza & Menne, 2009), with re-emergence under climate change also considered (Casimiro et al., 2006).
For TBE, milder winters and drier summers are thought to decrease and increase tick activity respectively (Githeko et al., 2000), with implications for tick abundance at higher altitudes and latitudes (Gray et al., 2009). Indeed, given that several parameters appearing in an expression for the basic reproduction number
Mosquito-borne diseases, more generally, are likely to experience important changes in transmission potential given the sensitivity of vector and pathogen survival, development and replication to changes in mean climatic drivers and temporal fluctuations about the means (Khasnis & Nettleman, 2005; Reiter, 2001), although factors such as changes in population growth or density may also play a strong role (Tol & Dowlatabadi, 2001). Through changes in vector abundance, distribution and seasonal activity, climatic changes may affect the incidence of other diseases such as leishmaniasis, Yellow Fever, Japanese encephalitis, arboviral diseases, African trypanosomiasis, lymphatic filariasis, onchocerciasis and dracunculiasis (Cook, 1992; Githeko et al., 2000; Gubler et al., 2001; Michael, 2009; Reiter, 2001; Sutherst, 2004). Changes in the patterns of Ross River virus, West Nile virus, Rift Valley fever, American trypanosomiasis and St. Louis encephalitis with climatic variables have also been reported (Epstein, 2001; Casimiro et al., 2006; Gubler et al., 2001; Michael, 2009; Semenza & Menne, 2009).
1.2.2. Other infectious diseases
Around 23% of global deaths due to infectious and parasitic diseases are due to diarrhoeal diseases, with almost half of these occurring in Africa (WHO, 2008). Higher temperatures are shown to frequently accompany increased incidence (McMichael et al., 2006); developing countries, for example, are predicted to show a 5% increase in incidence per 1°C temperature increase (Campbell-Lendrum et al., 2003). Changing environmental conditions may therefore strongly affect the intensity and distribution of water-borne diseases through changes in water quality and availability (Hunter, 2003), e.g. sharp increases in leptospirosis after strong rainfall events and flooding (Githeko et al., 2000; Gubler et al., 2001).
Temperature changes are known to affect the population dynamics of phytoplankton and zooplankton, which in turn affect the abundance of bacteria causing cholera (Lipp et al., 2002), the geographic range and dynamics of which may alter with climate change (Koelle et al., 2005; Pascual et al., 2002). The correlation between ENSO events and cholera has also been considered (e.g. Pascual et al., 2000).
Other impacts include those on food-borne diseases due to higher temperatures increasing bacterial survival and proliferation (Hall et al., 2002). Indeed, correlations have been observed between short-term increases in temperature and both food poisoning (McMichael et al., 2006) and increases in diseases such as salmonellosis and botulism (Semenza & Menne, 2009; WHO, 1999). The link between climatic variables and the incidence of rodent-borne diseases has been reported for diseases such as plague (Githeko et al., 2000; Gubler et al., 2001), as well as influences on soil-borne diseases such as melioidosis (Inglis & Sousa, 2009).
2. The use of models to understand disease transmission
The first application of mathematical modelling to infectious diseases is often attributed to work on smallpox eradication by Daniel Bernoulli in the 18th century (Bernoulli 1760), yet many of the methods currently applied to address public health questions have been developed over the last few decades (e.g. Anderson & May, 1991; Daley & Gani, 1999; Keeling and Rohani, 2007), and application of these methods to model specific pathogens or outbreaks have increased considerably since the mid-1980s.
2.1. Types of disease modelling framework
A range of mathematical frameworks are applicable for the development of environmentally-driven disease models and these may be categorised as taking one characteristic from each of the following classifications.
2.1.1. Population and Individual-Based Models (IBMs)
The primary population models for describing infectious disease transmission are typically compartmental in nature, aggregating individuals according to their disease status and tracking how the number of individuals in each class changes over time. In IBMs, each member of the population is modelled, taking into account individual characteristics or risk factors, and tracking the influence of demographic, social, climatic, environmental or epidemiological processes over time. Population models may take any of the mathematical forms below, while IBMs are typically stochastic as individuals undergo epidemiological processes with a certain probability. The introduction of
2.1.2. Continuous and discrete-state models
Models of the former type are described by continuous
2.1.3. Deterministic and stochastic models
In deterministic models, specifying parameter values, the initial values of state variables and a set of equations describing how initial states evolve over time results in model outputs that do not change from one simulation to the next. Mathematical descriptions of deterministic models are generally ordinary differential equations (ODEs), delay-differential equations (DDEs), partial differential equations (PDEs) or integro-PDEs (in continuous-time) or difference equations (in discrete-time). Stochastic models are formulated in terms of random variables, so that even for a fixed set of initial conditions, parameters and rules for evolving state variables, repeated runs of the same model produce different outputs. Stochastic effects are important when population sizes become small and may be used to capture uncertainty, variability and/or noise in disease or climate processes.
2.1.4. Continuous and discrete-time models
In the former, time evolves smoothly over an interval, so that model parameters reflect the rate at which events occur, and such models are often described by a set of differential equations. In the latter, the values of state variables are tracked only at certain time points, typically of fixed separation, and such models are usually described by difference, delay-difference or integro-difference equations.
2.1.5. Non-spatial and spatial models
Non-spatial models assume spatially homogeneous and isotropic transmission, so that each individual is assumed to be infected by all other members of the population with equal likelihood, irrespective of the distance between them. Most pathogens, however, have a spatially local component to transmission, where this spatial element may be in geographic space (i.e. Euclidean distance) or social space (e.g. in terms of human contact networks). Spatial models may be further classified as continuous or discrete-space models and reviews of spatial modelling (and model types) have appeared elsewhere (e.g. Keeling, 1999).
2.1.6. Homogeneous and heterogeneous mixing models
Models assuming homogeneous mixing assume no preferential contact between any two individuals in the population, so that if all individuals have the same contact rate and infection is passed on with a fixed probability per contact, then the model assumes a fixed force of infection across all contact pairs. For pathogen transmission where transmission risk is heterogeneous and varies across pairs of susceptible and infectious individuals according to
2.1.7. Models embedded within static or dynamically-varying environments
Here, the environment refers to all processes or influences on disease dynamics external to an individual and these include mixing patterns, contact structure, population demographics, drug resistance, intervention measures and climatic conditions. Disease dynamics of models assuming static environments arise solely from the interaction between intrinsic model processes, while in models whose environments change over time, both intrinsic and external processes may drive dynamics. Mathematically, the latter class of models are frequently implemented through temporal changes in model parameters and this occurs in climate-driven models through, for example, daily temperature variability affecting processes such as vector survival or parasite development.
Given this variation in available approaches, the choice of disease modelling framework to better understand the effects of climate change depends on a range of factors, primarily data availability and the questions of interest. Certain model types will prove advantageous over others when investigating the effect of environmental variables depending on the issues under consideration, the timescale available for the investigation, knowledge on disease natural history, the degree of analytical versus numerical insight required into spatiotemporal dynamics as climatic conditions change, and data availability for model calibration and validation. Other considerations may include computational resources (e.g. IBMs and climate models are very computationally intensive) and known uncertainties (or variability) in disease and climate inputs.
2.2. The role of modelling
In the context of understanding how global change will affect infectious diseases, both statistical and mathematical models have important roles to play. Statistical models use descriptive correlations between explanatory and response variables (here, climate and disease respectively) to predict the future state of systems based on past behaviour. Such models offer no explanations as to underpinning biological mechanisms driving predicted changes, although inferences are normally derived from the results obtained (see Section 3.2). Mathematical models, on the other hand, adopt a process-based approach, combining known biological, epidemiological and/or environmental processes to formulate assumptions that characterise the model. Future states of the system are predicted given the initial state and by comparing model output with observations on incidence, mathematical models offer explanatory power. We focus here on the role of dynamic mathematical models.
Models provide a useful bridge between individual-scale processes, behaviour and environmental conditions and population-level observations on disease spread. As such, key principles underlying relationships between climate and disease may be elucidated, interactions between components affecting transmission may be better understood and patterns of prevalence may be explainable in terms of underlying processes. Model calibration and validation may provide a means of reliably predicting short and long-term disease dynamics, both under the assumption of unchanging model processes and where extrapolation of current observations to future scenarios is required when factors driving transmission change. Such models offer a major advantage over statistical models in this respect, which rely on the relationship between response and explanatory variables remaining constant. Extrapolation is based on current background conditions and the strength of existing associations between explanatory and response variables, an assumption that is questionable over the timescales characteristic of climate change.
Mathematical models also allow us to better understand the dynamics of complex systems involving interactions and feedbacks between multiple non-linear processes. Climate models are frequently associated with extreme sensitivity to initial conditions, while chaotic behaviour has also been observed in disease models (e.g. Bolker & Grenfell, 1993), and models may be used to overcome difficulties in our intuition at understanding the behaviour of systems with complex, non-linear and chaotic phenomena. This is particularly relevant to climate-driven infectious disease systems because of the complex behaviour that external drivers of dynamics, which climate variables embody, can introduce into disease transmission such as cyclical or chaotic dynamics (see below). Well-validated models may be used for short and long-term prediction, testing hypotheses and potentially acting as early warning systems for disease outbreaks in response to climatic phenomena (e.g. ENSO). They may also provide the basis of sensitivity analyses, enabling a better understanding of the response of disease dynamics to changes in model parameters, either epidemiological or climatic, as well as enabling identification of areas where improved data is required.
Perhaps most importantly, mathematical models may be used in scenario analysis to better understand (a) the impact of climate change mitigation on transmission, (b) how the interaction between climate and vector-borne, water-borne and other infectious diseases may influence climate change adaptations and (c) the influence of climatic variables and other drivers of disease on intervention dynamics. Such analysis may be used in long-term planning of disease control programmes, as well as utilising models as a means of quantifying uncertainties in disease and climate knowledge (see Section 4) and how this translates into uncertainties in the effectiveness of proposed intervention strategies.
3. Disease models in the context of climate change: The need to incorporate complexity
3.1. Large-scale effects of climate on disease transmission
Climatic variables affect processes associated with transmission in numerous ways and these may be broadly categorised as:
Direct effects on physical and physiological processes (e.g. changes in vector survival and the rate of blood meal processing with changing temperatures).
Indirect or intermediate effects on physical processes (e.g. hydrological processes affecting the creation and modification of vectors breeding sites through changing rainfall patterns).
Changes in human geography (e.g. land use changes such as deforestation, urbanisation or migration affecting the distribution of regions susceptible to emerging outbreaks).
Changes in the intensity, frequency or geographic distribution of extreme weather events such as droughts, flooding, heat waves and cold waves.
Changes in human susceptibility to diseases through immunosuppression due to factors such as changes in chronic cardiorespiratory diseases, malnutrition or water shortages.
Changes in intermediate host population dynamics (e.g. regional changes in vector abundance or bacterial proliferation causing increased water-borne or food-borne diseases).
Such effects raise important questions that realistic models, both mathematical and statistical, should address and both types of models, when used in combination, may provide powerful causative and descriptive links between climate and disease changes. As well as changes in the mean values of climatic variables, temporal variability is also likely to play a significant role (e.g. Zhou et al., 2004), so assessing the effects of climate variability (and uncertainty) on transmission is vital. Temporal variability in disease models may arise from a number of sources (Grassly & Fraser, 2006), the basic mechanisms for which, in this context, arise from (a) changing contact patterns or behaviour over time (e.g. human behaviour in response to severe weather events or changing vector dispersal patterns), (b) temporal variability in environmental variables driving microscale processes (e.g. diurnal temperature fluctuations or longer-term land use changes), (c) fluctuations in intermediate host population dynamics (e.g. tick or snail abundance in response to changing environmental variables) or (d) changes in host immunity (Parham & Michael, 2011).
Models may also be used to address questions such as the appearance of disease thresholds in the context of system resilience and stability (Gambhir & Michael, 2008; Scheffer et al., 2001), assessing the impact of climate mitigation and disease intervention measures, integrating economic considerations to assess the scale, nature and timing of control strategies given limited resources, and better understanding dynamic interactions between diseases. More specific epidemiological concepts may also be investigated such as the effects of climatic drivers on the basic reproduction number
3.2. Examples of models to date
3.2.1. Statistical and semi-mechanistic-based approaches
Research to date developing integrated malaria models has included both statistical and biological (process-based) approaches. An early statistical model used fuzzy logic to quantify the suitability of different regions within sub-Saharan Africa for transmission given local temperature and rainfall conditions (Craig et al., 1999), while Rogers & Randolph (2000) used a statistical approach to show that that the global malaria distribution may not change considerably by 2050. Other work has used spatial models and risk maps to demonstrate that changing population densities may be a crucial factor determining future malaria risk in Africa (e.g. Moffett et al., 2007), while the impact of climatic drivers versus developmental variables (such as local infrastructure, income and land use changes) has been considered in India (Garg et al., 2009). A semi-mechanistic modelling approach has also been used to analyse the role of rainfall in driving long-term malaria dynamics in the highlands of Kenya (Pascual et al., 2008).
3.2.2. Mechanistic modelling approaches
The first mechanistic modelling to introduce climatic variables into integrated disease frameworks (and consider associated health impacts) was developed in the late 1990s (Lindsay & Birley, 1996; Lindsay & Martens, 1998; Martens, 1998; Martens et al., 1995). Changes to the regions at risk of malaria, dengue or schistosomiasis under different emissions scenarios were assessed using the concept of epidemic potential (EP), defined as the inverse of the critical number of vectors per human required to ensure
As well as illustrating the insufficiency of vector abundance and climatic conditions as sole indicators of disease transmission potential (since factors such as the impact of control measures and the characteristics of local human or vector populations should also be considered), this work illustrates the highest risk of disease invasion to regions bordering current endemic areas, as well as populations at higher altitudes (Martens et al., 1995), although this risk is sensitive to local temperature and rainfall conditions under different emissions scenarios (Lindsay & Martens, 1998). This research is generalised by Janssen & Martens (1997) to consider the role of evolutionary insecticide and antimalarial drug resistance on the effectiveness of intervention measures. Areas of low endemnicity may suffer less severe consequences of resistance (incidence typically reduces with control measures) compared to regions with high endemic malaria, which may suffer increased incidence as a result of resistance, although the contrast between these cases depends on the climate change scenario. Results are based on a dynamic ODE transmission model for a human population at quasi-equilibrium (but assuming an equilibrium vector population). Frameworks developed in the early modelling literature are combined with comparable qualitative studies and generalised into an integrated assessment framework for understanding the effects of climate change on diseases in Chan et al. (1999), identifying the need to assess possible impacts due to ecological, biological and socio-economic factors.
While early modelling work on malaria, dengue and schistosomiasis make valuable contributions to the field, considerable limitations are apparent. Most notable of these are (a) consideration of only static aspects of disease transmission (and human and vector population dynamics) to assess infection risk, (b) limited or poor parameterisation of interactions between hosts, vectors and pathogens in terms of climatic (and other environmental) variables and (c) limited development of realistic disease transmission models beyond low-dimensional ODE approaches. To overcome the assumption of equilibrium vector populations, Shaman et al. (2002) develop a detailed dynamic simulation model, coupled to land surface hydrology, to model the abundance of
Of relevance to malaria is the discrete-time stochastic IBM of Depinay et al. (2004) who consider the effects of abiotic (temperature and moisture) and biotic (nutrient competition, predation and dispersal) factors on
Integrating better-parameterised and more realistic dynamical population and transmission models represents the current state of the art, although considerable difficulties and uncertainties remain (see Section 4). Arguably the most recent and comprehensive research in this respect is that of Hoshen & Morse (2004) (and Hoshen & Morse (2005)), recently updated and improved in terms of model parameterisation, calibration and validation (Ermert et al., 2011a, 2011b), who use a discrete-time model (based on physiological age) to better understand the link between vector dynamics and malaria transmission under different environmental conditions. Such models may be used for better understanding static and dynamic aspects of transmission under future climate scenarios, particularly when combined with mapping work elsewhere (e.g. Hay et al. (2009)), and the use of multi-model ensembles to improve model confidence (Hoshen & Morse, 2004) represents an approach that has already been integrated in climate modelling (see Section 4). Few other integrated dynamical studies currently exist (although see the entomological model linked to climate in Ruiz et al. (2006)), but work focussing on static aspects of transmission have also made valuable recent contributions. These include the effect of diurnal temperature cycles on malaria risk under different mean climatic conditions (Paaijmans et al., 2010), the role of the Normalised Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) in driving seasonal transmission (Gaudart et al., 2009) and the influence of temperature on malaria invasion under different climatic regimes (Parham & Michael, 2010).
Fewer modelling studies on the influence of climate change on other VBDs have been carried out to date, although this represents an emerging modelling field. However, some work has been carried out to date on the impact on schistosomiasis and dengue (e.g. Cross & Hyams, 1996; Hales et al., 2002; Yang
4. Conclusion
Despite considerable progress in the last decade in our understanding of the link between climate change and the consequences for human infectious diseases (and other health risks) (McMichael et al., 2006), considerable work remains, particularly in better understanding the role of environmental drivers versus other epidemiological factors known to drive transmission. Current uncertainties may be categorised as those related solely to epidemiological aspects independent of climate, those related to uncertainties associated with climate models themselves and those related to the interaction between disease and climate. Understanding, quantifying and improving our knowledge in each of these areas is vital if we are to better understand the challenges that lie ahead.
Understanding vector population dynamics represents an important area requiring considerable further research. For
Intra-species and inter-species competition is often observed between vectors (Kirby & Lindsay, 2009; Paaijmans et al., 2009), with associated impacts on predators’ species preference in the presence of multiple prey (Bradshaw & Holzapfel, 1983). The limited quantitative data available on
Thus, detecting, measuring and modelling density-dependent effects is extremely challenging (e.g. Hassell, 1987; Solow & Steele, 1990), even if species-specific data is available, and understanding such effects in adult vectors is even more difficult, with few studies to date (e.g. Charlwood et al. (1995) for the limited research to date on effects in adult
In addition to biotic uncertainties with vector (and bacterial) population dynamics, understanding the influence of abiotic effects, such as those from climatic and other environmental variables, is key. In the case of VBDs, environmental factors are likely to affect each component of the disease triangle of hosts, vectors and pathogens, although the magnitude (and timescale) of the effects on each remain uncertain. Reliable parameterisation of the effects of temperature, rainfall, RH, wind patterns and other climatic variables on the range of possible disease vectors requires further experimental studies (e.g. Depinay et al., 2004; Ermert et al., 2011a, 2011b). Research to date has shown that these interactions may have important non-linear influences on vector and pathogen dynamics, which will strongly affect disease dynamics when incorporated within realistic disease transmission models.
Improved parameterisation of microscale interactions between climatic and epidemiological processes affecting the disease triangle thus represents a major source of uncertainty in current climate-driven disease models, although these have served to highlight where improved data is required. In addition, little research has considered the interaction between biotic and abiotic factors affecting transmission, but predation and other density-dependent effects, for example, may depend on climatic and other environmental variables (e.g. Sunahara & Mogi, 2002). Temperature effects on mosquito mortality, development and activity may affect the population dynamics of species in upper and lower trophic levels, changing the nature of predator-prey interactions (Service, 1977).
Considerable heterogeneities also exist across the disease triangle and these include variability in the nature of climate and disease relationships for VBDs, for example, by vector species (e.g. variability within the
As well as improving our understanding of the interactions between population, disease and environmental processes (and uncertainties therein), understanding the impact of climate change on infectious diseases also requires knowledge of the uncertainties in climate modelling. Uncertainties surrounding the development, reliability and performance of GCMs, downscaling to regional climate models (RCMs) and the use of climate model ensembles have been considered elsewhere (e.g. Knutti, 2008; Murphy et al., 2004; Slingo et al., 2009). Types of from uncertainties include structural (e.g. arising from the type of climate model used), process-based (e.g. assumptions regarding sub-grid and neglected processes), parameterisation issues (e.g. regional variability in model parameters), choice of initial conditions (and boundary conditions for RCMs) and variability between emissions scenarios, together with issues such as the choice and stability of numerical algorithms used to solve model equations.
Quantifying uncertainties in climate model predictions is vital if we are to translate these into the implications for global and regional disease risk using transmission models, themselves possessing uncertainties. Understanding the sensitivity of disease models to uncertainties in model inputs and how these propagate into uncertainties in model predictions represents an important area. Understanding the limitations of current climate-driven disease models given climatological unknowns (and limitations in computational power) is important if we are to improve the reliability of future models and the robustness of predictions under climate change. The use of multi-model ensembles in climate modelling has already become an established technique (e.g. Palmer et al., 2005; Tebaldi & Knutti, 2007) and although some disease modelling has incorporated ensemble climate model predictions (e.g. Morse
Acknowledgments
Paul E. Parham would like to thank the Grantham Institute for Climate Change at Imperial College London for funding this research.
References
- 1.
Afrane Y. A. Zhou G. Lawson B. W. Githeko A. K. Yan G. 2007 Life-table analysis of Anopheles arabiensis in western Kenya highlands: effects of land covers on larval and adult survivorship. ,77 4 660 666 0002-9637 - 2.
Ahumada J. A. Lapointe D. Samuel M. D. 2004 Modeling the Population Dynamics of Culex quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culicidae), along an Elevational Gradient in Hawaii. ,41 6 1157 1170 0022-2585 - 3.
Allen M. Ingram W. 2002 Constraints on future changes in climate and the hydrologic cycle. ,419 6903 224 232 0028-0836 - 4.
Baughman A. Arens E. 1996 Indoor humidity and human health.1. Literature review of health effects of humidity-influenced indoor pollutants, . Atlanta, GA, 96 - 5.
Bernoulli D. 1760 Essai d’une nouvelle analyse de la mortalité causée par la petite vérole et des advantages de l’inoculation pour la prevenir. ,1 45 - 6.
Bi P. Parton K. Tong S. 2005 El Nino-Southern Oscillation and vector-borne diseases in Anhui, China 5 2 Summer 2005),95 100 1530-3667 - 7.
Bi P. Tong S. Donald K. Parton K. Ni J. 2003 Climatic variables and transmission of malaria: a 12-year data analysis in Shuchen County, China. ,118 1 January-03),65 71 0033-3549 - 8.
Bolker B. M. Grenfell B. T. 1993 Chaos and biological complexity in measles dynamics. ,251 1330 75 81 0962-8452 - 9.
Bomblies A. Duchemin J. B. Eltahir E. A. 2009 A mechanistic approach for accurate simulation of village scale malaria transmission. ,8 223 1475-2875 - 10.
Bouma M. J. Poveda G. Rojas W. Chavasse D. Quinones M. Cox J. Patz J. 1997 Predicting high-risk years for malaria in Colombia using parameters of El Nino Southern Oscillation. ,2 12 1122 1127 1360-2276 - 11.
Bouma M. J. Sondorp H. E. van der Kaay H. J. 1994 Climate change and periodic epidemic malaria. ,343 8910 1440 0140-6736 - 12.
Bradshaw W. Holzapfel C. 1983 Predator-mediated, non-equilibrium coexistence of tree-hole mosquitos in southeastern North-America. 57 1-2 239 256 0029-8549 - 13.
Briët O. J. Vounatsou P. Gunawardena D. M. Galappaththy G. N. Amerasinghe P. H. 2008 Temporal correlation between malaria and rainfall in Sri Lanka. ,7 77 1475-2875 - 14.
Brownstein J. Holford T. Fish D. 2005 Effect of Climate Change on Lyme Disease Risk in North America. ,2 1 38 46 1612-9202 - 15.
Campbell-Lendrum D. Pruss-Ustun A. Corvalan C. 2003 How much disease could climate change cause, In : , McMichael, A.J., Campbell-Lendrum, D.H., Corvalán, C.F., Ebi, K.L., Githeko, A.K., Scheraga, J.D. & Woodward, A. (Eds),133 158 World Health Organisation,924156248 Geneva. - 16.
Casimiro E. Calheiros J. Santos F. D. Kovats S. 2006 National Assessment of Human Health Effects of Climate Change in Portugal: Approach and Key Findings. ,114 12 1950 1956 0091-6765 - 17.
Chan N. Y. Ebi K. L. Smith F. Wilson T. F. Smith A. E. 1999 An integrated assessment framework for climate change and infectious diseases. ,107 5 329 337 0091-6765 - 18.
Charlwood J. D. Smith T. Kihonda J. Heiz B. Billingsley P. F. Takken W. 1995 Density-Independent Feeding Success of Malaria Vectors (Diptera, Culicidae) in Tanzani a.85 1 29 35 0007-4853 - 19.
Coluzzi M. Sabatini A. Petrarca V. Di Deco M. A. 1979 Chromosomal differentiation and adaptation to human environments in the Anopheles gambiae complex. 73 5 483 497 0035-9203 - 20.
Cook G. C. 1992 Effect of global warming on the distribution of parasitic and other infectious diseases: a review. ,85 11 688 691 0141-0768 - 21.
Craig M. H. Snow R. W. le Sueur D. 1999 A climate-based distribution model of malaria transmission in sub-Saharan Africa. ,15 3 105 111 0169-4758 - 22.
Cross E. R. Hyams K. C. 1996 The potential effect of global warming on the geographic and seasonal distribution of Phlebotomus papatasi in southwest Asia. ,104 Jul 1996),724 727 0091-6765 - 23.
Depinay J. M. O. Mbogo C. M. Killeen G. Knols B. Beier J. Carlson J. Dushoff J. Billingsley P. Mwambi H. Githure J. Toure A. M. Ellis Mc Kenzie. F. 2004 A simulation model of African Anopheles ecology and population dynamics for the analysis of malaria transmission. ,3 29 1475-2875 - 24.
Dye C. 1984 Models for the population dynamics of the yellow fever mosquito, Aedes aegypti. Journal of Animal Ecology,53 1 247 268 - 25.
Epstein P. R. 2001 Climate change and emerging infectious diseases. ,3 9 747 754 1286-4579 - 26.
Ermert V. Fink A. Jones A. Morse A. 2011a Development of a new version of the Liverpool Malaria Model. I. Refining the parameter settings and mathematical formulation of basic processes based on a literature review. ,10 1 35 1475-2875 - 27.
Ermert V. Fink A. Jones A. Morse A. 2011b Development of a new version of the Liverpool Malaria Model. II. Calibration and validation for West Africa. ,10 62 1475-2875 - 28.
Ernst K. C. Adoka S. O. Kowuor D. O. Wilson M. L. John C. C. 2006 Malaria hotspot areas in a highland Kenya site are consistent in epidemic and non-epidemic years and are associated with ecological factors. ,5 78 1475-2875 - 29.
Fillinger U. Sonye G. Killeen G. F. Knols B. G. Becker N. 2004 The practical importance of permanent and semipermanent habitats for controlling aquatic stages of Anopheles gambiae sensu lato mosquitoes: operational observations from a rural town in western Kenya. Tropical Medicine and International Health,9 12 1274 1289 1360-2276 - 30.
Gagnon A. Bush A. Smoyer Tomic. K. 2001 Dengue epidemics and the El Nino Southern Oscillation. ,19 1 35 43 0093-6577 X - 31.
Gambhir M. Michael E. 2008 Complex ecological dynamics and eradicability of the vector borne macroparasitic disease, lymphatic filariasis. ,3 8 e2874 1932-6203 - 32.
Garg A. Dhiman R. C. Bhattacharya S. Shukla P. R. 2009 Development, malaria and adaptation to climate change: a case study from India. ,43 5 779 789 1432-1009 - 33.
Gaudart J. Touré O. Dessay N. Dicko A. Ranque S. Forest L. Demongeot J. Doumbo O. K. Knols B. G. 2009 Modelling malaria incidence with environmental dependency in a locality of Sudanese savannah area, Mali. ,8 61 1475-2875 - 34.
Githeko A. K. Lindsay S. W. Confalonieri U. E. Patz J. A. 2000 Climate change and vector-borne diseases: a regional analysis. ,78 9 1136 1147 0042-9686 - 35.
Goklany I. M. 2004 Climate change and malaria. ,306 5693 55 57 1095-9203 - 36.
Grassly N. Fraser C. 2006 Seasonal infectious disease epidemiology. ,273 1600 2541 2550 0962-8452 - 37.
Gray J. S. Dautel H. Estrada-Pea A. Kahl O. Lindgren E. 2009 Effects of climate change on ticks and tick-borne diseases in Europe. ,2009 593232 0168-7708 X - 38.
Gubler D. J. Reiter P. Ebi K. L. Yap W. Nasci R. Patz J. A. 2001 Climate variability and change in the United States: potential impacts on vector- and rodent-borne diseases. ,109 No. Suppl 2, (01),223 233 0091-6765 - 39.
Hales S. Woodward A. 2005 Global climate change and malaria. ,5 5 258 259 1473-3099 - 40.
Hales S. de Wet N. Maindonald J. Woodward A. 2002 Potential effect of population and climate changes on global distribution of dengue fever: an empirical model. ,360 9336 830 834 0140-6736 - 41.
Hales S. Weinstein P. Souares Y. Woodward A. 1999 El Niño and the dynamics of vectorborne disease transmission. ,107 2 99 102 0091-6765 - 42.
Hall G. D’Souza R. Kirk M. 2002 Foodborne disease in the new millennium: out of the frying pan and into the fire? ,177 11-12 614 618 0002-5729 X - 43.
Hassell M. P. 1987 Detecting regulation in patchily distributed animal populations. Journal of Animal Ecology,56 705 713 - 44.
Hay S. I. Cox J. Rogers D. J. Randolph S. E. Stern D. I. Shanks G. D. Myers M. F. Snow R. W. 2002 Climate change and the resurgence of malaria in the East African highlands. ,415 6874 905 909 0028-0836 - 45.
Hay S. I. Rogers D. J. Randolph S. E. Stern D. I. Cox J. Shanks G. D. Snow R. W. 2002 Hot topic or hot air? Climate change and malaria resurgence in East African highlands. ,18 12 530 534 1471-4922 - 46.
Hay S. I. Shanks G. D. Stern D. I. Snow R. W. Randolph S. E. Rogers D. J. 2005 Climate variability and malaria epidemics in the highlands of East Africa. ,21 2 52 53 1471-4922 - 47.
Hay S. Guerra C. Gething P. Patil A. Tatem A. Noor A. Kabaria C. Manh B. Elyazar I. R. F. Brooker S. Smith D. Moyeed R. Snow R. 2009 A world malaria map: Plasmodium falciparum endemicity in 2007. ,6 3 e1000048 1549-1277 - 48.
Hay S. I. Myers M. F. Burke D. S. Vaughn D. W. Endy T. Ananda N. Shanks G. D. Snow R. W. Rogers D. J. 2000 Etiology of interepidemic periods of mosquito-borne disease. ,97 16 9335 9339 0027-8424 - 49.
Herrera-Martinez A. D. Rodríguez-Morales A. J. 2010 Potential influence of climate variability on dengue incidence registered in a western pediatric hospital of Venezuela. ,27 2 280 286 - 50.
Hochedez P. Jaureguiberry S. Debruyne M. Bossi P. Hausfater P. Brucker G. Bricaire F. Caumes E. 2006 Chikungunya infection in travelers. ,12 10 1565 1567 1080-6040 - 51.
Hopp M. Foley J. 2003 Worldwide fluctuations in dengue fever cases related to climate variability. ,25 1 Oct 2003),85 94 0093-6577 X - 52.
Hoshen M. B. Morse A. P. 2005 A model structure for estimating malaria risk, In: , Takken, W., Martens, P. & Bogers, R.J. (Eds.),41 50 Springer,978-1-40204-541-7 - 53.
Hoshen M. B. Morse A. P. 2004 A weather-driven model of malaria transmission. ,3 32 1475-2875 - 54.
Huang J. Walker E. D. Vulule J. Miller J. R. 2006 Daily temperature profiles in and around Western Kenyan larval habitats of Anopheles gambiae as related to egg mortality, ,5 87 1475-2875 - 55.
Hunter P. R. 2003 Climate change and waterborne and vector-borne disease. ,94 Suppl, (03),37S 46S 1364-5072 - 56.
Inglis T. J. J. Sousa A. 2009 The public health implications of melioidosis. ,13 1 Feb 2009),59 66 1413-8670 - 57.
IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). 2007 . IPCC,6-13009-317-9 - 58.
Isaäcson M. 1989 Airport malaria: a review. ,67 6 737 743 0042-9686 - 59.
Janssen M. A. Martens W. J. 1997 Modeling malaria as a complex adaptive system. ,3 3 Summer 1997),213 236 1064-5462 - 60.
Jawara M. Pinder M. Drakeley C. Nwakanma D. Jallow E. Bogh C. Lindsay S. Conway D. 2008 Dry season ecology of Anopheles gambiae complex mosquitoes in The Gambia. ,7 156 1475-2875 - 61.
Juliano S. A. 2007 Population Dynamics. ,23 2 Suppl,265 275 0875-6971 X - 62.
Kedmi M. Herziger Y. Galon N. Cohen R. Perel M. Batten C. Braverman Y. Gottlieb Y. Shpigel N. Klement E. 2010 The association of winds with the spread of EHDV in dairy cattle in Israel during an outbreak in 2006. .96 3-4 152 160 0167-5877 - 63.
Keeling M. J. 1999a Spatial models of interacting populations, In: , McGlade, J.M. (Ed.),64 99 Blackwell Science,0-86542-734-8 - 64.
Khasnis A. A. Nettleman M. D. 2005 Global warming and infectious disease. ,36 6 Nov-Dec 2005),689 696 0188-4409 - 65.
Kilian A. H. Langi P. Talisuna A. Kabagambe G. 1999 Rainfall pattern, El Nino and malaria in Uganda. ,93 1 January-99),22 23 0035-9203 - 66.
Kirby M. J. Lindsay S. W. 2004 Responses of adult mosquitoes of two sibling species, Anopheles arabiensis and A. gambiae s.s. (Diptera: Culicidae), to high temperatures. ,94 5 441 448 0007-4853 - 67.
Kirby M. J. Lindsay S. W. 2009 Effect of temperature and inter-specific competition on the development and survival of Anopheles gambiae s. s. and An. arabiensis larvae. ,109 2 Feb 2009),118 123 1873-6254 - 68.
Knutti R. 2008 Should we believe model predictions of future climate change? ,366 1885 4647 4664 0136-4503 X - 69.
Koelle K. Pascual M. Yunus M. 2005 Pathogen adaptation to seasonal forcing and climate change. ,272 1566 971 977 0962-8452 - 70.
Koenraadt C. J. M. Githeko A. K. Takken W. 2004 The effects of rainfall and evapotranspiration on the temporal dynamics of Anopheles gambiae s.s. and Anopheles arabiensis in a Kenyan village. ,90 2 141 153 0000-1706 X - 71.
Kovats R. S. Bouma M. Hajat S. Worrall E. Haines A. 2003 El Niño and health. ,362 9394 1481 1489 0140-6736 - 72.
Kristan M. Abeku T. Beard J. Okia M. Rapuoda B. Sang J. Cox J. 2008 Variations in entomological indices in relation to weather patterns and malaria incidence in East African highlands: implications for epidemic prevention and control. ,7 231 1475-2875 - 73.
Lane R. P. Crosskey R. W. . Eds. 1993 Medical insects and arachnids, Chapman & Hall, IBSN 0412400006, London - 74.
Lindblade K. A. Walker E. D. Onapa A. W. Katungu J. Wilson M. L. 1999 Highland malaria in Uganda: prospective analysis of an epidemic associated with El Niño. ,93 5 September-99),480 487 0035-9203 - 75.
Lindblade K. A. Walker E. D. Onapa A. W. Katungu J. Wilson M. L. 2000 Land use change alters malaria transmission parameters by modifying temperature in a highland area of Uganda. ,5 4 263 274 1360-2276 - 76.
Lindsay S. W. Birley M. H. 1996 Climate change and malaria transmission. Tropical Medicine and Parasitology,90 6 573 588 0003-4983 - 77.
Lindsay S. W. Martens W. J. 1998 Malaria in the African highlands: past, present and future. ,76 33 45 0042-9686 - 78.
Linthicum K. J. Anyamba A. Tucker C. J. Kelley P. W. Myers M. F. Peters C. J. 1999 Climate and satellite indicators to forecast Rift Valley fever epidemics in Kenya. ,285 5426 397 400 0036-8075 - 79.
Lipp E. Huq A. Colwell R. 2002 Effects of global climate on infectious disease: the cholera model. ,15 4 October, 2002),757 770 0893-8512 - 80.
López-Vélez R. Molina Moreno. R. 2005 Cambio climático en España y riesgo de enfermedades infecciosas y parasitarias transmitidas por artrópodos y roedores. ,79 2 March-05),177 190 1135-5727 - 81.
Lundkvist E. Landin J. Jackson M. Svensson C. 2003 Diving beetles (Dytiscidae) as predators of mosquito larvae (Culicidae) in field experiments and in laboratory tests of prey preference. Bulletin of Entomological Research,93 3 219 226 0007-4853 - 82.
Mabaso M. L. Vounatsou P. Midzi S. Da Silva. J. Smith T. 2006 Spatio-temporal analysis of the role of climate in inter-annual variation of malaria incidence in Zimbabwe. ,5 20 0147-6072 X - 83.
Mantilla G. Oliveros H. Barnston A. G. 2009 The role of ENSO in understanding changes in Colombia’s annual malaria burden by region, 1960-2006. ,8 6 1475-2875 - 84.
Martens P. 1998 . Easrthscan,1-85383-522-6 - 85.
Martens P. Hall L. 2000 Malaria on the move: human population movement and malaria transmission. ,6 2 March-00),103 109 1080-6040 - 86.
Martens W. J. Niessen L. W. Rotmans J. Jetten T. H. Mc Michael A. J. 1995 Potential impact of global climate change on malaria risk. ,103 5 458 464 0091-6765 - 87.
Mas Coma. S. Valero M. Bargues M. 2009 Climate change effects on trematodiases, with emphasis on zoonotic fascioliasis and schistosomiasis. ,163 4 264 280 0304-4017 - 88.
Mattingly P. F. 1977 Names for the Anopheles gambiae complex. Mosquito Systematics,9 3 323 328 - 89.
Mc Michael A. Woodruff R. Hales S. 2006 Climate change and human health: present and future risks. ,367 9513 Sept 2006),859 869 01406736 - 90.
Metz J. A. J. Diekmann O. 1986 , Springer-Verlag,0-38716-786-2 - 91.
Michael E. 2010 Trypanosomes, leishmania and filarial infections, In: , Ayres, J.G., Harrison, R.M., Nichols G.L. & Maynard, R.L. (Eds),424 433 Hodder Arnold,978-0-34094-656-5 London - 92.
Moffett A. Shackelford N. Sarkar S. 2007 Malaria in Africa: Vector Species’ Niche Models and Relative Risk Maps. ,2 Sept 2007),1932-6203 - 93.
Mogi M. Miyagi I. Cabrera B. D. 1984 Development and survival of immature mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) in Philippine rice fields. Journal of Medical Entomology,21 3 283 291 0022-2585 - 94.
Molineaux L. Storey J. Cohen J. Thomas A. 1980 A longitudinal study of human malaria in the West African Savanna in the absence of control measures: relationships between different Plasmodium species, in particular P. falciparum and P. malariae. ,29 5 725 737 0002-9637 - 95.
Murphy J. Sexton D. Barnett D. Jones G. Webb M. Collins M. 2004 Quantification of modelling uncertainties in a large ensemble of climate change simulations. ,430 7001 768 772 0028-0836 - 96.
Ndiaye P. I. Bicout D. J. Mondet B. Sabatier P. 2006 Rainfall triggered dynamics of Aedes mosquito aggressiveness. ,243 2 222 229 0022-5193 - 97.
Paaijmans K. P. Wandago M. O. Githeko A. K. Takken W. 2007 Unexpected High Losses of Anopheles gambiae Larvae Due to Rainfall. ,2 11 1932-6203 - 98.
Paaijmans K. P. Huijben S. Githeko A. K. Takken W. 2009 Competitive interactions between larvae of the malaria mosquitoes Anopheles arabiensis and Anopheles gambiae under semi-field conditions in western Kenya. ,109 2 124 130 1873-6254 - 99.
Paaijmans K. Blanford S. Bell A. Blanford J. Read A. Thomas M. 2010 Influence of climate on malaria transmission depends on daily temperature variation.107 107 15135 15139 0027-8424 - 100.
Palmer T. Doblas Reyes. F. Hagedorn R. Weisheimer A. 2005 Probabilistic prediction of climate using multi-model ensembles: from basics to applications. ,360 1463 1991 1998 0962-8436 - 101.
Pampana E. J. 1969 (2nd edition), Oxford University Press, ISBN 019264212X, London - 102.
Parham P. E. Michael E. 2010 Modeling the Effects of Weather and Climate Change on Malaria Transmission. ,118 5 620 626 0091-6765 - 103.
Parham P. E. Michael E. 2011 Outbreak properties of epidemic models : The roles of temporal forcing and stochasticity on pathogen invasion dynamics. Journal of Theoretical Biology,271 1 1 9 0022-5193 - 104.
Parmenter R. R. Yadav E. P. Parmenter C. A. Ettestad P. Gage K. L. 1999 Incidence of plague associated with increased winter-spring precipitation in New Mexico. ,61 5 814 821 0002-9637 - 105.
Pascual M. Ahumada J. A. Chaves L. F. Rodo X. Bouma M. 2006 Malaria resurgence in the East African highlands: temperature trends revisited. ,103 15 5829 5834 0027-8424 - 106.
Pascual M. Bouma M. Dobson A. 2002 Cholera and climate: revisiting the quantitative evidence. ,4 Feb 2002),237 245 1286-4579 - 107.
Pascual M. Cazelles B. Bouma M. J. Chaves L. F. Koelle K. 2008 Shifting patterns: malaria dynamics and rainfall variability in an African highland.275 1631 Jan 2008),123 132 0962-8452 - 108.
Pascual M. Rod X. Ellner S. P. Colwell R. Bouma M. J. 2000 Cholera dynamics and El Niño-Southern Oscillation. ,289 5485 1766 1769 0036-8075 - 109.
Purse B. Mellor P. Rogers D. Samuel A. Mertens P. P. C. Baylis M. 2005 Climate change and the recent emergence of bluetongue in Europe. Nature Reviews Microbiology,3 2 171 181 1740-1526 - 110.
Randolph S. E. Rogers D. J. 2000 Fragile transmission cycles of tick-borne encephalitis virus may be disrupted by predicted climate change. ,267 1454 Sept 2000),1741 1744 0962-8452 - 111.
Randolph S. E. 1998 Ticks are not Insects: Consequences of Contrasting Vector Biology for Transmission Potential. ,14 5 186 192 0169-4758 - 112.
Randolph S. 2004 Evidence that climate change has caused ‘emergence’ of tick-borne diseases in Europe? ,293 No. Suppl 37, (04),5 15 1438-4221 - 113.
Reiter P. 2001 Climate change and mosquito-borne disease. ,109 No. Suppl 1, (01),141 161 0091-6765 - 114.
Reiter P. 2008 Global warming and malaria: knowing the horse before hitching the cart. ,7 No. Suppl 1, (08),S3 1475-2875 - 115.
Rogers D. J. Randolph S. E. 2000 The global spread of malaria in a future, warmer world. ,289 5485 1763 1766 0036-8075 - 116.
Ruiz D. Poveda G. Vélez I. D. Quiñones M. L. Rúa G. L. Velásquez L. E. Zuluaga J. S. 2006 Modelling entomological-climatic interactions of Plasmodium falciparum malaria transmission in two Colombian endemic-regions: contributions to a National Malaria Early Warning System. ,5 66 1475-2875 - 117.
Schaeffer B. Mondet B. Touzeau S. 2008 Using a climate-dependent model to predict mosquito abundance: application to Aedes (Stegomyia) africanus and Aedes (Diceromyia) furcifer (Diptera: Culicidae). ,8 4 422 432 1567-1348 - 118.
Scheffer M. Carpenter S. Foley J. A. Folke C. Walker B. 2001 Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems. ,413 6856 591 596 0028-0836 - 119.
Sellers R. F. Pedgley D. E. 1985 Possible windborne spread to western Turkey of bluetongue virus in 1977 and of Akabane virus in 1979. ,95 1 149 158 0022-1724 - 120.
Semenza J. Menne B. 2009 Climate change and infectious diseases in Europe. ,9 6 365 375 1473-3099 - 121.
Service M. W. 1993 Mosquito ecology: field sampling methods (2nd edition), Elsevier Applied Science,1-85166-798-9 - 122.
Service M. W. 1977 Mortalities of the immature stages of species B of the Anopheles gambiae complex in Kenya: comparison between rice fields and temporary pools, identification of predators, and effects of insecticidal spraying. Journal of Medical Entomology,13 4-5 535 545 0022-2585 - 123.
Shaman J. Stieglitz M. Stark C. Le Blancq S. Cane M. 2002 Using a Dynamic Hydrology Model To Predict Mosquito Abundances in Flood and Swamp Water. ,8 1 8 13 1080-6040 - 124.
Slingo J. Bates K. Nikiforakis N. Piggott M. Roberts M. . Shaffrey L. 2009 Developing the next-generation climate system models: challenges and achievements. ,367 1890 815 831 0136-4503 X - 125.
Solow A. R. Steele J. H. 1990 On sample size, statistical power and the detection of density-dependence. Journal of Animal Ecology,59 1073 1076 - 126.
Summers B. A. 2009 Climate change and animal disease. ,46 6 1185 1186 - 127.
Sunahara T. Mogi M. 2002 Priority effects of bamboo-stump mosquito larae: influences of water exchange and leaf litter input. ,27 3 346 354 0307-6946 - 128.
Süss J. Klaus C. Gerstengarbe-W F. Werner P. 2008 What makes ticks tick? Climate change, ticks, and tick-borne diseases. ,15 1 January-08),39 45 1195-1982 - 129.
Sutherst R. W. 2004 Global Change and Human Vulnerability to Vector-Borne Diseases. ,17 1 Jan 2004),136 173 0893-8512 - 130.
Tebaldi C. Knutti R. 2007 The use of the multi-model ensemble in probabilistic climate projections. ,365 1857 Aug 2007),2053 2075 0136-4503 X - 131.
Thomson M. Mason S. Phindela T. Connor S. 2005 Use of rainfall and sea surface temperature monitoring for malaria early warning in Botswana. ,73 1 214 221 0002-9637 - 132.
Thomson M. C. Doblas Reyes. F. J. Mason S. J. Hagedorn R. Connor S. J. Phindela T. Morse A. P. Palmer T. N. 2006 Malaria early warnings based on seasonal climate forecasts from multi-model ensembles. ,439 7076 576 579 0028-0836 - 133.
Tol R. S. J. Dowlatabadi H. 2001 Vector-borne diseases, development & climate change. ,2 4 173 181 - 134.
Warrell D. A. Gilles H. M. 2002 (4th edition), Arnold,0-34074-064-7 - 135.
Watts D. Burke D. Harrison B. Whitmire R. Nisalak A. 1987 Effect of temperature on the vector efficiency of Aedes-aegypti for dengue-2 virus. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene,36 Jan 1987),143 152 0002-9637 - 136.
Whitehorn J. Farrar J. 2010 Dengue. ,95 1 161 Page: 161-173,0007-1420 - 137.
WHO (World Health Organisation). (1999 ). . WHO - 138.
WHO (World Health Organisation). 2008 . WHO - 139.
Willett K. Jones P. Gillett N. Thorne P. 2008 Recent changes in surface humidity: development of the HadCRUH dataset. ,21 20 5364 5383 0894-8755 - 140.
Willett K. Gillett N. Jones P. Thorne P. 2007 Attribution of observed surface humidity changes to human influence. ,449 7163 710 712 0028-0836 - 141.
Yang G. Vounatsou P. Zhou X. Tanner M. Utzinger J. 2005 A potential impact of climate change and water resource development on the transmission of Schistosoma japonicum in China. ,47 1 127 134 0048-2951 - 142.
Zhou G. Minakawa N. Githeko A. K. Yan G. 2004 Association between climate variability and malaria epidemics in the East African highlands. ,101 8 2375 2380 0027-8424