Comparison of
1. Introduction
Our current energy system is mainly based on carbon (C) intensive metabolisms, resulting in great effects on the earth’s biosphere. The majority of the energy sources are fossil (crude oil, coal, natural gas) and release CO2 in the combustion (oxidation) process which takes place during utilization of the energy. C released to the atmosphere was once sequestered by biomass over a time span of millions of years and is now being released back into the atmosphere within a period of just decades. Fossil energy is relatively cheap and has been fuelling the world economy since the industrial revolution. To date, fossil fuel emissions are still increasing despite a slight decrease in 2009 as a consequence of the world’s economic crisis. Recently, the increase is driven by emerging economies, from the production and international trade of goods and services [1].“If we don´t change direction soon, we´ll end up where we´re heading” is the headline of the first paragraph in the executive summary of the World Energy Outlook 2011 [2]. It unfortunately represents systematic failure in combating climate change and the emphatic introduction of a “green society”, leaving the fossil age behind. Certainly such far reaching transformations would take time, but recovery of the world economy since 2009, although uneven, again resulted in rising global primary energy demands [2]. It seems that more or less ambitious goals for climate change prevention are only resolved in phases of a relatively stable economy. Atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) is the second most important greenhouse warming agent after water vapour, corresponding to 26% and 60% of radiative forcing, respectively [3]. Together with other greenhouse gases (GHG’s) (e.g. methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) or ozone (O3)) they contribute to anthropogenic global warming. The industrialization has been driven by fossil sources of energy, emerging in the 17th and 18th century in England as a historical singularity, but soon spreading globally.
Today, our economies still rely on relatively cheap sources of fossil energy, mainly crude oil and natural gas, and consequently emitting as much as 10 PG C per year in 2010 [4]. The Mauna Loa Observatory in Hawaii carries out the most comprehensive and longest continuous monitoring of atmospheric CO2 concentration. It publishes the well-known Keeling Curve, representing the dynamic change since 1958. Observing the Keeling Curve, one can easily recognize the seasonal variability which is directly triggered by CO2 uptake of vegetation (biomass) in the northern hemisphere during the vegetation period and secondly, which is even more important in terms of global change, a steady increase of CO2 concentration from 315 ppmv in 1958 to 394 ppmv in March 2012 [5]. Earlier concentrations could still be derived from air occluded in ice cores. Neftel et al. [6] presents accurate gas concentration measurements for the past two centuries. However, the theoretical knowledge of the warming potential of CO2 in the atmosphere evolved in the late 19th century when a theory of climate change was proposed by Plass [7], pointing out the “influence of man’s activities on climate” as well as the CO2 exchange between oceans and atmosphere and subsequent acidification. He highlighted the radiative flux controlled by CO2 in the 12 to 18 micron frequency interval, agreeing with a number of studies published in the forthcoming decades, e.g. Kiehl and Trenberth [3]. In order to understand the fate of anthropogenic CO2 emissions, research soon focussed on estimating sources and sinks as well as their stability, since it was obvious that the atmospheric concentrations did not rise at the same magnitude as emissions. Available numbers on current fluxes are principally based on the work of Canadell et al., [8] and Le Quéré et al., [1]. In their studies, it is emphasized that the efficiency of the sinks of anthropogenic C is expected to decrease. Sink regions (of ocean and land) could have weakened, source regions could have intensified or sink regions could have transitioned to sources [8]. Another explanation might be the fact that the atmospheric CO2 concentration is increasing at a higher rate than the sequestration rate of sinks [1]. Moreover, CO2 fertilization on land is limited as the positive effect levels off and the carbonate concentration which buffers CO2 in the ocean steadily decreases according to Denman, K.L. et al. [1]. Fossil fuel combustion and land use change (LUC) are the major sources for anthropogenic C emissions (Figure 1). Land use change is usually associated with agricultural practices and intensified agriculture triggers deforestation in developing countries [9] and consequently causes additional emissions.
Another consideration is the availability of fossil fuel, which is limited by the fact that it is a non-renewable and therefore finite resource. Since the fossil energy system is based on globally traded sources with centralized structures, the vulnerability to disturbance is high. Recent examples of price fluctuations caused by political crises or other conflicts in producing countries or along transportation lines demonstrate potential risks. Moreover, a shift towards alternative energy sources and a decentralization of the energy system may contribute to system resilience and create domestic jobs. It prevents capital outflow to unstable political regimes and it helps to protect the environment not only by reducing GHG emissions, but also by reducing impacts of questionable methods of extracting fossil sources of energy (e.g. tar sands exploitation, fracking etc.).
Biomass could play a significant role in the renewable energy mix. It is a feedstock for bioenergy production and currently thermal utilization (combustion) is by far the most important conversion process, but research activities are focussed on a range of different processes. This includes, for instance, the Fischer-Tropsch synthesis where any kind of biomass may be used as feedstock to produce liquid biofuels. This process is known as biomass – to – liquid (BtL). Research is pushed by national and international regulations (e.g. the EU’s 2020 bioenergy target) and commitments, as a climate change mitigation strategy.
This chapter focuses on aspects of sustainable woody biomass production in
1.1. Biomass production and carbon sequestration
Terrestrial C sequestration accounts for approximately one quarter of the three main sinks as indicated in Figure 2, where forests contribute the largest share. An intact terrestrial sink might be more important in the future in terms of mitigating climate change, since the ocean sink is expected to decrease. Our current forests are capable of sequestering ~2.4 Pg C yr-1 (of 2.6 Pg in total), when excluding tropical land-use change areas [10]. Sequestration of C in forests is controlled by environmental conditions, disturbance and management. However, forests can principally act as a source or sink of C, depending on the balance between photosynthesis and respiration, decomposition, forest fire and harvesting operations. On both European and global scales, forests were estimated to act as sinks on average over the last few decades [11, 12].
The most important process of net primary production is achieved by photosynthesis, which is the chemical transformation of atmospheric CO2 and water from the soil matrix into more complex carbohydrates and long chain molecules to build up cellulose, which is found in cell walls of woody tissue as well as hemicellulose and lignin. The C remains in the woody compound either until it is degraded by microorganisms, which use the C as source of energy, or until oxidation takes place (e.g. burning biomass, forest fire). In both cases, it becomes part of atmospheric CO2 again. A certain share, controlled mainly by climatic conditions [13], enters the soil pool as soil organic carbon (SOC). The ratio between aboveground and belowground pools depends on the current stand age, forest management and climate. In temperate managed forests, SOC stocks are typically similar to the aboveground stocks [14], which is confirmed in our own research [13]. SOC (and in particular O-horizon) stocks are typically higher in boreal forests and in high elevation coniferous forests as a consequence of reduced microbial activity and much lower in tropical environments. O-layer C pools are especially sensitive to changes in local climate. A traditional forest management regime in Austrian montane spruce forests is clear-cutting, typically from the top of a hill to the valley to facilitate cable skidding. An abrupt increase of radiative energy and water on the soil surface creates favourable conditions for soil microorganisms and a great amount of C stored in the O-layer will be released to the atmosphere by heterotrophic respiration. Other GHG’s, such as N2O are eventually emitted under moist and reductive conditions as excess nitrogen is removed by lateral water flows. Unfortunately, this effect is likely to happen on a large-scale where massive amounts of C might be released as the global temperature rises and thawing permafrost induces C emissions [15], potentially creating a strong feedback cycle, further accelerating global warming. However, Don et al. [14] found that SOC pools were surprisingly stable after a major disturbance (wind throw event), indicating low short-term vulnerability of forest floor and upper mineral horizons. They explained their findings with herbaceous vegetation and harvest residues, taking over the role of litter C input. The study covers a time-span of 3.5 years which might be too short to observe soil C changes. Likewise, we did not observe significant C stock decrease in our youngest sample plot of the coppice with standards (CS) chronosequence [13]. We expect that the N dynamics might have a profound influence on C retention and the impact of disturbance on SOC pools depends on environmental conditions. Successful long-term sequestration in terms of climate change mitigation is therefore only achieved if C becomes part of the recalcitrant fraction in the subsoil, which is typically between 1 000 and 10 000 years old [16, 17]. The C concentration is lower in the subsoil, but considerable amounts can still be found if one not only analyses the topsoil layer as recommended by a number of authors, e.g. by Diochon et al
2. Biomass from forests
There is an on-going debate regarding the potentials of obtaining biomass from forests on multiple scales, from stand to international levels. Biomass is often discussed in the context of a raw material for energetic utilization although it should be emphasized that total biomass figures account for the total harvestable amount of wood, regardless of its utilization or economic value. Especially in the context of energy, it is highlighted that biomass is an entirely CO2 neutral feedstock since the carbon stored in wood originates from the atmospheric CO2 pool and it was taken up during plant growth. This is, in principal, true despite biomass from forests not being free of CO2 emissions per se, since harvesting and further manipulation requires energy, which is currently provided by fossil fuels. However, it is difficult to estimate per-unit of CO2 emissions since there are many influential variables. Even a single variable could have a profound influence on the per-unit emissions as is shown for the case of chipped fuel [31]. In general, biomass requires a different treatment as compared to fossil sources of hydrocarbons. Chemical transformations over thousands of years under high pressure led to a higher density of yieldable energy per volume unit as compared to biomass, although hydrocarbons are ultimately a form of solar energy. Hence fossil infrastructure does not fit to sources of renewable energy because of intrinsic properties. Centralized structures of energy distribution might work for fossil fuels, but it is questionable if it makes sense to transport woodchips across large distances. The energy invested for (fossil based) transport eventually curbs the benefits of renewable energy resources in terms of C emissions. Biomass from forests to be used for energetic utilization in the context of conventional forestry is often seen as a by-product of silvicultural interventions and subsequent industrial processes. However, there are a number of woodland management systems focussing on woody biomass production for energetic utilization or a combination of traditional forestry and energy wood production. Table 1 compares a number of
In conventional forestry (high forest), residues from thinning and subsequent product cycles; e.g. slash and sawdust; are seen as the most important feedstock for energy wood. This opens the floor for controversial discussions and assumptions, based in principal on ecological and economic concerns. While residues of thinning operations are requested by traditional industries (e.g. paper mills), the extraction of slash and other harvest residues eventually leads to nutrient depletion with ecological impacts and ultimately detriment to increments in the long-term perspective. Inherent climate and soil properties control both magnitude and duration of such developments. “Residues” from forestry were traditionally harvested in ancient times. Most of the raw materials extracted from forests served as a source for thermal energy (fuel wood and charcoal) or other feedstock for industrial processes. Moreover, forests in central Europe provided nutrients for agro systems to sustain the human population [32]. Forest pasture, litter raking and lopping (sometimes referred to as pollarding) are some examples. Extraction of nutrients is still a common practice, e.g. litter collection in the Satoyama woodlands of Japan [33]. Since all of these practices tend to extract compartments with a relatively high nutrient content in comparison to wood, soil acidification and nutrient depletion was a common threat in Central European forest ecosystems. Forests only recovered gradually, mainly because of acidic depositions starting from the beginning of industrialization until the late 1980’s, when clear signs of forest dieback caused public awareness and subsequent installation of exhaust filters across Europe.
Coppice | Management target: traditional method of production of biomass for energetic utilization (fuelwood and charcoal) Vegetative regeneration Rotation period ~30 years Degree of mechanization: low to medium Extraction of nutrients from the soil: medium to high |
Coppice with standards | Management target: coppice (underwood) e.g. for biomass and an uneven-aged structure of standards (overwood) for timber of high quality. Standards provide shade and act as a back-up if vegetative regeneration is not successful (seed trees). Vegetative (coppice) and generative regeneration (standards) Rotation period ~30 years for coppice and 60-120+ years for standards Degree of mechanization: medium Extraction of nutrients from the soil: medium to high |
Short rotation woody crops (SRWC) | Management target: biomass for energetic utilization only, maximum increment will be harvested Vegetative regeneration Rotation period 2-10+ years (depending on the crop) Degree of mechanization: high Extraction of nutrients from the soil: very high |
High forest | Management target: production of high quality stems for trade, biomass for thermal utilization is a by-product (“residues”, thinning harvests, slash, sawdust) Generative regeneration Rotation period ~120 years Degree of mechanization: medium Extraction of nutrients from the soil: low to medium |
Satoyama | Management target: integrative approach, biomass for energetic utilization, fertilizer for agriculture (litter collection) habitat for wildlife, recreation opportunities, small scale Vegetative regeneration Rotation period 15-20 years Degree of mechanization: low Extraction of nutrients from the soil: high to very high |
Today, forest biomass stocks are increasing in most European countries, due to land use change (abandoned mountain pastures), shifting tree line as a consequence of global warming and elevated CO2 concentrations as well as atmospheric N deposition. However, this should not lead to short sighted assumptions that biomass can be harvested at levels of growth increment, since a large part of it grows in areas with unsuitable conditions for access. Easily accessible forests at highly productive sites in lowlands are already typically managed at harvesting rates close to increment or even higher, e.g. in cases of natural disasters such as wind throws. In some countries, such as Austria, access to specific land ownership structures might uncover greater potentials of additional harvests.
3. Short rotation woody crops (SRWC) – A model of agriculture in forestry business
The major challenges of shifting forest management goals from traditional forestry to biomass production are sustainability issues, relatively low value of the product in comparison to quality logs and expensive harvesting, being competitive only at a high degree of mechanization in developed nations. As a consequence, rotation periods were shortened and fast growing species are preferred in order to produce woody biomass in an agriculture-like manner. Since the increment is highest at the beginning of stand development and subsequently decreases, only the maximum increment is utilized, ensuring maximum biomass production capacities at a given site. Short-rotation woody crops (SRWC) are hence established, in Europe typically with fast growing willow (
4. Coppice with standards and high forest management in Austria
High forest (HF) and Coppice with standards (CS) are the most common silvicultural management systems for broadleaved forest ecosystems in northeastern Austria. These systems have evolved over a long period of traditional management and they are mainly determined by environmental conditions and economic considerations. However, these systems were locally adapted over time, resulting in a range of intermediate types. Divergent silvicultural structures with diffuse standards are the consequence and are very common in Austria [39].
The parent material of soils in our study region consists of gravel, sand and silt built up during the Pannonium (between 7.2 and 11.6 Ma before present) resulting from early formation of the Danube River. Consequently, a variety of soils can be found, e.g. Cambisols, Luvisols, Chernozems and even Stagnosols. Younger aeolian deposits of loess (Pleistocene) led to periglacial formation of Chernozems. The soils of our chronosequence series are classified as Eutric Cambisol with a considerable amount of coarse material (≤ 40% volume) in HF and sandy clay loam texture and both Haplic and Vermic Chernozems with loamy texture in CS [43]. Soils with lower fertility are derived from gravel and sand of the Danube River development, while Chernozems are derived from loess. The region receives approximately 500 mm of precipitation annually, with irregular periods of drought during summer. The water holding capacity of soils with a considerable amount of coarse material is lower as compared to loess derived soils, hence vegetative regeneration has the advantage of a fully functional root system at all times, supporting successful regeneration even in periods of drought. Generative regeneration might be obstructed under such conditions as a consequence of drying topsoil horizons. In our case study, we were able to include an outgrown coppice plot (i.e. a coppice with standards system that was not harvested at the theoretical end of the rotation period) aged 50 years to widen the scope for temporal dynamics. Irregular harvesting of standards and rotation periods up to 50 years (outgrown coppice) led to divergent silvicultural structures with diffuse standards [39], as previously mentioned. The plots were established during the summer of 2007 as permanent sample plots for aboveground biomass monitoring and are part of a framework to investigate biomass and carbon pools in this region [44].
4.1. Research methods
Studying temporal aspects of stand development is challenging because of the inherent duration of rotational cycles. Even in the case of CS in our example, it is theoretically 30 years but we included a 50-year-old outgrown stand. In HF, the rotational cycle is twice as long. Pickett [45] recommended a false chronosequence approach where he substitutes time for space. It is therefore crucial to find stands with similar management, species composition and other environmental conditions (microclimate, soil, topography), only differing in stand age. It must be assumed that the stands follow convergent succession trajectories [46], which was ensured in our case by use of inventory data from the past. The chronosequence approach is generally contested since it comes with a set of limitations (e.g. the problem of regional averaging, ignoring major disturbances or site-specific parameters as well as variation between hypothetical stands at the same age). Moreover, it assumes that there are no major disturbances (e.g. windthrows, insect attacks) during the rotational cycle. However, the method allows a researcher to successfully study temporal changes through the judicious use of chronosequences [46] and is often the only possible method to study long-term dynamics. Five plots were chosen for each chronosequence in HF and CS, ranging from 1-50 years in CS and 11-91 years in HF, respectively (Table 1).
A full biomass inventory was performed above- and belowground using allometric functions from Hochbichler [42]. In addition, belowground fine root biomass was determined to a depth of 50 cm by using soil cores. Additionally, soil macronutrient analysis was performed using these samples. Details for plot selection and setup as well as investigation of compartments and subsequent laboratory methods can be derived from Bruckman et al.[13]. The HF forest was chosen for comprehensive soil analysis, including exchangeable cations in soil and nutrient pools of different aboveground compartments, such as foliage, bark, wood and branches as well as regeneration and stems (see Figure 3). Exchangeable cations were determined at different soil horizons by using a BaCl2 extraction and subsequent Inductively Coupled Plasma – Optical Emission Spectroscopy (ICP-OES) analysis. Exchangeable phosphorus pools were estimated using data from the forest soil inventory of adjacent forest sites [47]. Macronutrients N, P and K were determined in biomass compartments (foliage, bark of stems > 8 cm diameter, wood of stems > 8 cm diameter, composite sample of stems <8 cm, branches > 2 cm diameter, branches < 2 cm diameter and regeneration < 1.3 m height) according to inventory data for the most abundant species at each forest site. Nutrient analysis is based on three full tree samples (aboveground compartments) for
4.2. Aboveground biomass
Aboveground biomass pools increased with stand age in both forest management systems as a consequence of steady accumulation (Figure 4). HF follows a typical pattern with high increments in the aggregation phase and marginal accumulation rates after 50 years. Thinning concentrates additional growth on selected individuals with the highest possible quality, while low quality stems are harvested and utilized as fuelwood or further chipped. Hence the silvicultural activities aim at refining the product instead of maximizing biomass production. Approximately 2/3 of the aboveground biomass corresponds to understorey in the youngest HF site (11 years), while its share decreases steadily with increasing stand age (Table 1). The slightly rising share in the oldest stand (from ~3 to ~5 %) could be explained by initiation of generative regeneration as the canopy opens after thinning operations, allowing seeds to germinate and initiate regeneration.
HF1 | 11 | 9.8 | 4.9 | 14.7 | 33.3 | 66.7 |
HF2 | 32 | 81 | 18.1 | 99.1 | 81.7 | 18.3 |
HF3 | 50 | 111.9 | 13.9 | 125.8 | 88.9 | 11.1 |
HF4 | 74 | 137.4 | 4.1 | 141.5 | 97.1 | 2.9 |
HF5 | 91 | 130.3 | 7.1 | 137.4 | 94.8 | 5.2 |
CS1 | 1 | 133.2 | 0 | 133.2 | 100 | 0 |
CS2 | 15 | 73.8 | 31 | 104.8 | 70.4 | 29.6 |
CS3 | 26 | 147.7 | 36.7 | 184.4 | 80.1 | 19.9 |
CS4 | 31 | 138.7 | 65 | 203.7 | 68.1 | 31.9 |
CS5 | 50 | 167.5 | 87.5 | 255 | 65.7 | 34.3 |
In CS, we found a steady increase until the end of the rotation as the stand is still in the aggradation phase. The 15 year old stand is an exception because standards were previously harvested (irregular cut) resulting in lower biomass stocks as compared to the one year old stand where the total biomass equals that of standards. The relationship between overstorey and understorey biomass stocks is typical for coppice with standards forest management. While the overstorey stocks remain relatively constant (between 133 and 168 t.ha-1), except in the 11 year old CS site where standards were recently harvested, the understorey coppice biomass pool constantly increases to 88 t.ha-1 at an age of 50 years (see Table 1). The relative share of coppice biomass increases from 20% in a 26-year-old stand to 34% in the oldest stand. This is an example for adaptive forest management since the demand for fuelwood has been low for decades and we were consequently able to find outgrown CS plots (50 years) and the share of coppice biomass is still relatively low. It could be increased under a different demand structure, where biomass for energetic utilization is in demand and commercialization becomes an interesting option for the forest owner.
On average, approximately 40% less biomass is stored in the HF system aboveground, and 7% less belowground (roots). Net primary production (NPP) is higher in CS which compensates lower basal area of the overstorey (DBH > 8 cm) with higher stand density [13]. The main reason of elevated NPP in CS is the higher fertility of chernozems as compared to cambisols in combination with a more effective water holding capacity as compared to the Eutric Cambisol in HF as a consequence of the coarse material content. The underlying silvicultural practices contribute to this biomass pool structure as thinning is performed at regular intervals in HF while typically only one intervention takes place in CS when harvesting coppice and selected standards at the end of the rotational cycle. As a consequence, additional C sequestration may only be achieved in CS when extending the rotation period. The second argument leads to higher productivity of the CS system, which allows higher C sequestration rates.
4.3. Belowground biomass
As previously mentioned, fine root turnover might be the most important pathway of C sequestration in forest ecosystems. Therefore, it is crucial to study root dynamics and turnover in the context of forest management. Our case study confirms that on average, fine root biomass (FRB) decreased with increasing stand age in HF (R = -0.28; p<0.01) but remained constant in CS. This basically reflects aboveground biomass dynamics where the CS system has a relatively balanced stand structure throughout rotational cycles. It is partly a consequence of shorter rotation cycles and therefore retains the aggradation phase [49]. Another reason lays in the continuous growing stock, since standards are kept on site during and after understorey harvest. Considering a finer resolution one may observe dynamic changes in FRB corresponding to stand development stages. FRB increased after stand reorganization, culminated at an age of 31 (CS) and 50 years (HF) and subsequently decreased as stands aged. In accordance with increasing aboveground biomass stores, coarse root C pools increased with age in HF (R= 0.87; p= 0.53), accounting for 8.0 (0.9) % of total C pool and no trend was observed in CS, where coarse root C pools accounted for 7.8 (1.0) % respectively [13]. Although on average HF has lower total belowground biomass stores (7 % less), the FRB is 32% higher as compared to CS. The root-to-shoot ratio indicates higher belowground relative to aboveground biomass accumulation rates in early successional phases. A direct comparison between HF and CS reveals two major differences:
In comparison with HF, there was no initial major decrease of the ratio observed in CS
The ratio is always lower in CS than in HF
These differences may be due to significant aboveground biomass stocks represented by standards in CS and therefore comparatively low ratios, even in the stand reorganization phase. Consequently, root/shoot ratios are in equilibrium throughout the rotation period. More favourable soil conditions in CS may lead to lower ratios throughout stand development. It was shown that drought and limited soil resources (nutrient) availability promote FRB production [50, 51]. The effect of standards harvesting was observed in our case study as a slightly higher ratio in the 15-year old stand compared with the one-year old stand in CS. On average, the root C pool represented 28.0(3.0)% of total phytomass C stores when excluding the youngest HF stand where the root C pool was 1.6 times as high as aboveground phytomass stores [13].
4.4. Nutrient analysis
A comprehensive elemental analysis was performed for the HF system in both soil horizons and biomass compartments in the context of the framework for biomass investigations in northeastern Austria. HF was chosen because of lower soil fertility in comparison to the CS sites, which implies a higher sensitivity with regard to nutrient extraction.
The nutrient balance at a given site is an essential factor for stand productivity, species composition and biodiversity. Gains of nutrients that are in plant available forms and therefore could be incorporated in new plant tissue are limited to originate from weathering of bedrock material, atmospheric deposition as well as fertilization. The major processes of decreasing nutrient availability to plants are removal (biomass extraction and leaching) or chemical transformation processes, resulting in recalcitrant and thus plant unavailable fractions. Soil microbes play an important role in these processes and there is even a competition for some elements, e.g. N between microbes and plant roots [52]. Interfering nutrient cycles, e.g. by changing forest management practices therefore influences a complex system. The consequences are not usually recognized immediately, depending on the nutritional status of the soil. If nutrient pools and cation exchange capacity (CEC) are low, the consequences are seen within just a few years, as is the case in tropical soils, for instance.
Based on an analysis of nutrient contents in various compartments (Figure 5), the aim was to compare plant available (exchangeable) pools of nutrient elements in soil with aboveground pools. This was done in order to determine potential nutritional bottlenecks when the management goal shifts towards biomass production as a source for energy, which implies higher nutrient extraction rates as compared to conventional forestry or intermediate types (see Table 1). We focussed on the dominant tree species (
Figure 5 illustrates the macronutrients nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium (NPK) contents of different compartments. Foliage clearly has the highest contents of macronutrients, followed by bark and thin branches. In the 91-year-old stand, foliage only accounts for 1.7% of the aboveground biomass, but represents 8.2% of the N pool, while 23.3% represent 37.5% in the youngest stand respectively. Wood (sapwood and heartwood) had the lowest contents. Similar patterns of nutrient distribution were previously reported for the same species [53]. The nutrient content of composite samples (wood and bark) depends on the respective proportions of wood and bark. However, it seems different for the case of P where higher contents in the composite as compared to separate wood and bark samples indicate higher contents of P in bark of thin branches (Figure 5). The bark sample consists of bark from branches and stem where the latter is therefore expected to have lower P contents. Approximately 40% of the macronutrients are stored in stems > 8 cm in diameter from an age of 50 years onwards (Figure 6) while representing approximately 60% of the stand aboveground biomass. Bark accounts for another 10% of the 40% stem pools. Consequently it was suggested to consider oak stem debarking to limit nutrient exports (especially Ca in the case of
5. Sustainable coppice biomass production: the Japanese example of Satoyama
Satoyama forests have a long tradition in Japan. Directly translated “sato” means “village” and “yama” “mountain” [55]. The translation points at the conceptual meaning of Satoyama, which describes the typical landscape between villages and mountains (Okuyama). Although there are many definitions, one probably finds a suitable one in the Daijirin dictionary: “the woods close to the village which was a source of such resources as fuelwood and edible wild plants, and with which people traditionally had a high level of interaction” [56]. Satoyama could be understood as an integrative approach of landscape management, including the provision of raw materials such as wood, natural fertilizer (see the transfer from nutrients from forests to agricultural systems as previously mentioned), drinking water and recreational opportunities. Besides its inherent economic and ecological values, it provides a sphere for human-nature interactions and as such, it opens a window to see how Japanese perceive and value their natural environment over time [56]. As a consequence of small-scale structures and specific management, Satoyama woodlands represent hotspots of biodiversity [55]. They are pegged into a landscape of paddy fields, streams and villages. From a silvicultural point of view, Satoyama woodlands consist of mainly deciduous species, such as See http://satoyama-initiative.org/en/ for more details.
6. Conclusion
Specific types of biomass, i.e. wood and wood-derived fuels, have a long history of being the major source of thermal energy since humanity learned to control fire, which was a turning point in human development. These sources have not lost their significance in many developing countries, especially in domestic settings. However, over-population, climatic conditions and low efficiency cause shortages of fuelwood in many regions, e.g. Ethiopia or Northern India. This would not be the major problem in developed nations, where biomass as a source for thermal energy and raw materials for industrial processes has recently gained increased attention as a renewable and greenhouse-friendly commodity. Hence, sustainable management is required to prevent adverse consequences for society and the environment. Paradoxically biomass is tagged to be sustainable per se, although this is by no means substantiated since it depends on the local conditions and management used. Compared to conventional fossil sources of energy where “sustainability” is only directed at a wise and efficient use of a finite resource, sustainability of biomass from forests has to be considered in a much wider context. Biomass represents just one of a multitude of other ecosystem services and the potential for its provision depends on the conditions of any given ecosystem. As a matter of fact, ecosystems are extremely heterogeneous from global to forest stand scale, mainly controlled by environmental conditions, such as climate, soils and resulting species composition and anthropogenic impacts. Likewise, society’s demands for specific ecosystem services are highly diverse. While recreation and the provision of a clean environment (water, air) are likely the most important service close to urban areas and settlements, the provision of wood and by-products as economic commodities might be important in more remote, but accessible regions. This also implies one of the major differences to the current energy system. Besides the fact that bio-energy is not capable of providing the same amount of sustainable energy we are currently receiving from fossil fuels, the infrastructure has to be decentralized, directed at local demands and supplies. Both, the economic stability as well as the benefits for environment and society are at risk in the case of large-scale bioenergy power plants. Based on a global review, Lattimore et al
Soils
Hydrology and water quality
Site productivity
Forest biodiversity
Greenhouse gas balances
Global and supply-chain impacts of bioenergy production
This listing elucidates the challenge of applying sustainability criteria to biomass production, since a large set of criteria and indicators for bioenergy production systems has to be implied. Consequently, sustainability comes at the cost of a high complexity of ensuring mechanisms. Nonetheless, a set of regionally adaptable principles, criteria, indicators and verifiers of sustainable forest management, as suggested by Lattimore et al
Short rotation woody crops (SRWC) have the potential to maximize biomass production, which comes at certain environmental costs. Utilizing the maximum possible increment, by using fast growing species including
Coppice with standards (CS) holds an intermediate position between SRWC and HF. It is capable of providing both higher quality timber logs and biomass for energetic utilization. The system has a long tradition in our study region and it is very flexible concerning different demands of the respective qualities and quantities. It was demonstrated that CS has the advantage of a fully functional root system at all times during the rotational cycles which is represented in the relatively stable root-to-shoot ratio and this is an advantage in relatively dry climates. Re-sprouting occurs relatively fast and is likely to be more successful as compared to planting or natural generative regeneration, especially under conditions of seasonal droughts. However, standards also act as seed trees where genetic selection is possible (promotion of individuals with high stem quality). They act as a backup if vegetative regeneration is unsuccessful and provide shade during summer. Nutritional bottlenecks are not expected under current management practices as the soils in our CS plots are relatively fertile and the forestland is surrounded by extensively managed agricultural land. However, if the management strategy is changed towards schemes of increased biomass extraction, the effects on soils have to be studied in order to ensure sustainability.
The Satoyama woodlands in Japan are an example of traditional sustainable woodland management, carefully balancing ecosystem services in regions with relatively high population density, thus implying a high level of social-nature interaction. Since this form of landscape management proved to be successful over centuries with a high degree of flexibility with regard to changing demands over time, it might be a model of sustainable land use for other regions in the world. However, the effects of cyclic litter removal from soil nutrient pools should be investigated since we demonstrated that foliage is the compartment holding the highest contents of macronutrients.
A sustainable future, entirely based on renewable sources of energy without harming our environment is possible. It will certainly base on decentralized structures with a large pool of different sources of renewable energy, which has another great advantage of a high level of resilience in comparison to our current system. Biomass can play a significant role in areas with sufficient supplies, as long as the production follows sustainability criteria and does not interfere with other environmental services essential for that region. The optimal future energy system consists of a range of different sources, in which biomass is eligible along with other renewable sources as long as it is produced in a sustainable manner. Certainly, changing lifestyles (reduced energy consumption, less meat in diets, higher efficiency) especially in the developed regions of the world may be a very important and effective step to reducing resource consumption, which should be taken immediately.
Acknowledgement
This study was funded by the Austrian Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, Environment and Water Management (Project No. 100185) and the Austrian Academy of Sciences (ÖAW), Commission for Interdisciplinary Ecological Studies (KIÖS) (Project No. P2007-07). We would like to thank Robert Jakl and Stephan Brabec for their unremitting support in fieldwork and lab analysis as well as Yoseph Delelegn and Arnold Bruckman for their invaluable efforts in collecting samples in the field. Toru Terada enriched our study with valuable discussions on coppice management in Japan. We would further like to express our gratitude to Christina Delaney for proofreading of the manuscript.
References
- 1.
Le Quere C Raupach MR, Canadell JG, Marland G, et al.Trends in the sources and sinks of carbon dioxide. Nature Geosci. [10.1038/ngeo689].2009 2 12 831 6 - 2.
International Energy Agency World Energy Outlook2011 2011 Executive Summary. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2011. - 3.
Earth’s Annual Global Mean Energy Budget. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society.Kiehl J. T Trenberth K. E 1997 78 2 197 208 - 4.
Le Quéré C, Boden T, Canadell P, Raupach M. An update of the global carbon budget: Emissions rebound after the Global Financial Crisis (GFC). Planet under PressurePeters G Marland G 2012 London, UK, 2012. - 5.
Trends in Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Earth System Research Laboratory (ESRL), USA;Tans P 2012 - 6.
Neftel A Moor E Oeschger H Stauffer B Evidence from polar ice cores for the increase in atmospheric CO2 in the past two centuries a0].1985 315 6014 45 7 - 7.
The Carbon Dioxide Theory of Climatic Change. Tellus.Plass G. N 1956 8 2 140 54 - 8.
Le Quéré C, Raupach MR, Field CB, Buitenhuis ET, Ciais P, et al.Canadell J. G Contributions to accelerating atmospheric CO2 growth from economic activity, carbon intensity, and efficiency of natural sinks. P Natl Acad Sci USA.2007 November 20, 2007;104 47 18866 70 - 9.
Global land use change, economic globalization, and the looming land scarcity. P Natl Acad Sci USA.Lambin E. F Meyfroidt P 2011 Mar 1;108 9 3465 72 - 10.
Pan Y Birdsey R. A Fang J Houghton R Kauppi P. E Kurz W. A et al A Large and Persistent Carbon Sink in the World’s Forests 2011 August 19, 2011;333 6045 988 93 - 11.
Nabuurs G. J Thurig E Heidema N Armolaitis K Biber P Cienciala E et al Hotspots of the European forests carbon cycle Forest Ecology and Management.2008 Jul 30;256 3 194 200 - 12.
Vetter M Wirth C Bottcher H Churkina G Schulze E. D Wutzler T et al Partitioning direct and indirect human-induced effects on carbon sequestration of managed coniferous forests using model simulations and forest inventories 2005 May;11 5 810 27 - 13.
Bruckman V. J Yan S Hochbichler E Glatzel G Carbon pools and temporal dynamics along a rotation period in Quercus dominated high forest and coppice with standards stands 2011 262 9 1853 62 - 14.
Don A Bärwolff M Kalbitz K Andruschkewitsch R Jungkunst H. F Schulze E-D No rapid soil carbon loss after a windthrow event in the High Tatra 2012 276 0 239 46 - 15.
Schuur EAG Abbott B.Climate change: High risk of permafrost thaw. a].2011 480 7375 32 3 - 16.
Schmidt MWI Torn MS, Abiven S, Dittmar T, Guggenberger G, Janssens IA, et al.Persistence of soil organic matter as an ecosystem property. 2011 Oct 6;478 7367 49 56 - 17.
Vertical distribution, age, and chemical composition of organic, carbon in two forest soils of different pedogenesis. Org Geochem.Rumpel C Kogel-knabner I Bruhn F 2002 33 10 1131 42 - 18.
Looking deeper: An investigation of soil carbon losses following harvesting from a managed northeastern red spruce (Picea rubens Sarg.) forest chronosequence. Forest Ecology and Management.Diochon A Kellman L Beltrami H 2009 Jan 31;257 2 413 20 - 19.
Potential C-sequestration rates under short-rotation coppiced willow and Miscanthus biomass crops: a modelling study. Aspects of Applied Biology.Matthews R Grogan P 2001 65 303 312 - 20.
A modelling analysis of the potential for soil carbon sequestration under short rotation coppice willow bioenergy plantations. Soil Use and Management.Grogan P Matthews R 2002 Sep;18 3 175 83 - 21.
Rapid accumulation and turnover of soil carbon in a re-establishing forest. Nature.Richter D. D Markewitz D Trumbore S. E Wells C. G 1999 400 56 8 - 22.
Is soil carbon mostly root carbon? Mechanisms for a specific stabilisation. Plant and Soil.Rasse D Rumpel C Dignac M-F 2005 269 1 341 56 - 23.
Mycorrhizal Hyphal Turnover as a Dominant Process for Carbon Input into Soil Organic Matter. Plant and Soil.Godbold D Hoosbeek M Lukac M Cotrufo M Janssens I Ceulemans R et al 2006 281 1 15 24 - 24.
Prasad Mohapatra K. Leaf litterfall, fine root production and turnover in four major tree species of the semi-arid region of India. Plant and Soil.Jha P 2010 326 1 481 91 - 25.
Managing Forests After Kyoto. Science.Schulze E-D Wirth C Heimann M 2000 September 22, 2000;289 5487 2058 9 - 26.
Large carbon uptake by an unmanagedKnohl A Schulze E. D Kolle O Buchmann N 250 year-old deciduous forest in Central Germany. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology.2003 Sep 30;118(3-4):151-67. - 27.
Old-growth forests as global carbon sinks. Nature. [10.1038/nature07276].Luyssaert S Schulze E. D Borner A Knohl A Hessenmoller D Law B. E et al 2008 455 7210 213 5 - 28.
Schulp CJE Nabulars GJ, Verburg PH, de Waal RW. Effect of tree species on carbon stocks in forest floor and mineral soil and implications for soil carbon inventories. Forest Ecology and Management.2008 Jul 30;256 3 482 90 - 29.
Assessing trade-offs between carbon sequestration and timber production within a framework of multi-purpose forestry in Austria. Forest Ecology and Management.Seidl R Rammer W Jager D Currie W. S Lexer M. J 2007 Aug 30;248(1-2):64-79. - 30.
Wiseman CLS Organic Carbon Sequestration in Soils: An Investigation of Five Profiles in Hesse, Germany [Dissertation]. Frankfurt am Main: Johann Wolfgang Goethe- Universität;2003 - 31.
A model to estimate fossil CO2 emissions during the harvesting of forest residues for energy-with an application on the case of chipping. Biomass & Bioenergy.Van Belle J. F 2006 Dec;30 12 1067 75 - 32.
The impact of historic land use and modern forestry on nutrient relations of Central European forest ecosystems. Nutr Cycl Agroecosys.Glatzel G 1991 27 1 1 8 - 33.
Refueling Satoyama Woodland Restoration in Japan: Enhancing Restoration Practice and Experiences through Woodfuel Utilization. Nature and Culture.Terada T Yokohari M Bolthouse J Tanaka N 2010 5 3 251 76 - 34.
Plant N Fluxes and Modulation by Nitrogen, Heat and Water Stresses: A Review Based on Comparison of Legumes and Non Legume Plants. In: Shanker AK, Wenkateswarlu B, editors. Abiotic Stress in Plants- Mechanisms and Adaptations: Intech Science;Salon C Avice J-C Alain O Prudent M Voisin A-S 2011 - 35.
Silviculture and biology of short-rotation woody crops in temperate regions: Then and now. Biomass & Bioenergy.Dickmann D. I 2006 Aug-Sep;30(8-9):696-705. - 36.
Elowson SNE. Long-term influence of intensively cultured short-rotation Willow Coppice on nitrogen concentrations in groundwater. Journal of Environmental Management.Aronsson P. G Bergstrom L. F 2000 Feb;58 2 135 45 - 37.
and model-based analysis of factors influencing soil carbon sequestration under hybrid poplar. Biomass & Bioenergy.Garten J C. T Wullschleger S. D Classen A. T Review 2011 35 214 26 - 38.
Changes in soil N mineralization and nitrification pathways along a mixed forest chronosequence. Forest Ecology and Management.Trap J Bureau F Vinceslas-akpa M Chevalier R Aubert M 2009 258 1284 92 - 39.
Methods of oak silviculture in Austria. Annals of Forest Science.Hochbichler E 1993 50 6 583 91 - 40.
Der Hochleithenwald, Einführung in die Wälderschau des Niederösterreichischen Forstvereins 1937 in das Rudolf Graf von Abensberg und Traunsche Forstrevier Wolkersdorf: Selbstverlag des NÖ. Forstvereins.Frank J 1937 - 41.
Silviculture: concepts and applications. 2. ed. New York: McGraw-Hill;Nyland R. D 2002 - 42.
Fallstudien zur Struktur, Produktion und Bewirtschaftung von Mittelwäldern im Osten Österreichs (Weinviertel). Wien: Österr. Ges. für Waldökosystemforschung und Experimentelle Baumforschung Univ. für Bodenkultur;Hochbichler E 2008 - 43.
IUSS Working Group WRB World reference bases for soil resources2006 Rome: FAO2006. - 44.
Untersuchungen zur Dynamik der Biomassen- und Kohlenstoffvorräte in Niederwäldern mit Überhälter, Mittel- und Hochwäldern. Vienna: University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Department for forest and soil sciencesHochbichler E Bruckman V. J Spinka S Glatzel G Grieshofer H 2009 Report100185 - 45.
Pickett STA Space-for-time substitutions as an alternative to long-term studies. In: Likens GE, editor. Long-term Studies in Ecology. New York: Springer;1989 110 135 - 46.
The use of chronosequences in studies of ecological succession and soil development. J Ecol.Walker L. R Wardle D. A Bardgett R. D Clarkson B. D 2010 Jul;98 4 725 36 - 47.
Österreichische Waldboden-Zustandsinventur. Teil III: Atmogene Hauptnährstoffe. Österreichische Waldboden-Zustandsinventur Ergebnisse. Vienna: Forstliche Bundesversuchsanstalt;Englisch M 1992 pages. - 48.
Chemical analyses of soils- Extraction of elements with aqua regia or nitric acid- perchloric acid mixture ÖNORM L 1085 (1999 - 49.
Pattern and process in a forested ecosystem disturbance, development and the steady state based on the Hubbard Brook ecosystem study. New York: Springer;Bormann F. H Likens G. E 1979 - 50.
Standing crop, production, and turnover of fine roots on dry, moderate, and wet sites of mature Douglas-fir in western Oregon. Annals of Forest Science.Santantonio D Hermann R. K 1985 42 2 113 42 - 51.
Biomass and production of fine roots in Japanese forests. J Forest Res-Jpn.Noguchi K Konopka B Satomura T Kaneko S Takahashi M 2007 Apr;12 2 83 95 - 52.
Knowledge gaps in soil carbon and nitrogen interactions- From molecular to global scale. Soil Biology and Biochemistry.Gärdenäs A. I Agren G. I Bird J. A Clarholm M Hallin S Ineson P et al 2011 43 4 702 17 - 53.
Comparison of biomass and nutrient content between oak (Quercus petraea) and hornbeam (Carpinus betulus) trees in a coppice-with-standards stand in Chimay (Belgium). Annals of Forest Science.Andre F Ponette Q 2003 Sep;60 6 489 502 - 54.
Nutrient cycling and fertility management in temperate short rotation forest systems. Biomass and Bioenergy.Heilman P Norby R. J 1998 14 4 361 70 - 55.
What is Satoyama? Points for discussion on its future direction. Landscape and Ecological Engineering.Morimoto Y 2011 7 2 163 71 - 56.
The Discourse of "Encultured Nature" in Japan: The Concept of Satoyama and its Role in 21st-Century Nature Conservation. Asian Studies Review.Knight C 2010 34 4 421 41 - 57.
Keep it alive, don’t freeze it: a conceptual perspective on the conservation of continuously evolving "Satoyama" landscapes. Landscape and Ecological Engineering.Yokohari M Bolthouse J 2011 7 2 207 16 - 58.
Environmental factors in woodfuel production: Opportunities, risks, and criteria and indicators for sustainable practices. Biomass and Bioenergy.Lattimore B Smith C. T Titus B. D Stupak I Egnell G 2009 33 10 1321 42 - 59.
editors. The Challenge of sustaining soils: Natural and social ramifications of biomass production in a changing world. Vienna: Austrian Academy of Sciences Press;Winiwarter V Gerzabek M. H 2012
Notes
- See http://satoyama-initiative.org/en/ for more details.