Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Formaldehyde Advantages and Disadvantages: Usage Areas and Harmful Effects on Human Beings

Written By

Nuriye Tuna Subasi

Submitted: 05 October 2018 Reviewed: 22 August 2019 Published: 24 January 2020

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.89299

From the Edited Volume

Biochemical Toxicology - Heavy Metals and Nanomaterials

Edited by Muharrem Ince, Olcay Kaplan Ince and Gabrijel Ondrasek

Chapter metrics overview

1,726 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Formaldehyde, a simple but important member of aldehydes, is highly reactive due to its strong electrophilic properties. It is a colorless, pungent, low molecular weight poisonous gas that can rapidly pass into gaseous phase at room temperature, can burn, and can dissolve very well in water. Formaldehyde, which is found in the natural structure of the organism, is used in many places from industrial areas to household materials and from the production of coatings in dentistry to the determination of cadavers in laboratories. In addition to having such a wide range of uses, it has harmful effects on human health as it can react spontaneously with various cellular elements. In this review, which is based on various sources, detailed information about the definition, properties, usage areas, and harmful effects of formaldehyde will be given.

Keywords

  • formaldehyde
  • properties of formaldehyde
  • benefits
  • harmful effects on human beings
  • source of formaldehyde

1. Introduction

Formaldehyde – a simple but important member of aldehydes – is a colorless, pungent, highly flammable, irritating, and poisonous low molecular weight gas in its pure form, meanwhile it dissolves very well in water, alcohols, and other polar solvents. Due to its strong electrophilic properties, it is highly reactive, readily undergoes polymerization, and can form explosive mixtures in air. It decomposes at temperatures above 150°C to methanol and carbon monoxide. In addition, it is easily photooxidized to carbon dioxide in sunlight.

Pure formaldehyde is produced as a liquid through catalytic oxidation of methanol. This process is carried out in a closed facility and results in a formaldehyde solution in the water together with methanol in various concentrations. This product may be further refined or converted to the paraformaldehyde (polymerized form of formaldehyde) which is in the form of a white powder or flake. Formaldehyde gas is slowly given by paraformaldehyde. Pure formaldehyde is not available commercially, so it is usually transported or stored as a 37% (by weight) aqueous solution, which is known as formalin [1, 2]. The technical (specific) properties of formaldehyde, which must be taken into account during use of it and also appropriate equipment should be used with it, are given in Table 1.

Formaldehyde (CH2O)
IUPAC nameMethanal
Chemical nameFormaldehyde, methylene oxide, oxymethylene, methyl aldehyde, oxomethane, formic aldehyde
Chemical formulaCH2O (HCHO)
Molecular weight30.026 g/mol
ColorClear, colorless liquid
Density0.8153 g/cm3 (−20°C)
Melting point93–96°C (at 37% concentration)
Boiling point−15°C (at 37% concentration)

Table 1.

Physical and chemical properties of formaldehyde.

The most common methods for formaldehyde detection are based on spectrophotometry. Besides spectrophotometric ways other methods such as high-performance liquid chromatography, gas chromatography, colorimetry, infrared detection, fluorimetry, polarography, and gas detector tubes are also used. Organic and inorganic chemicals, such as sulfur dioxide, other aldehydes, and amines, can interfere with these detection methods. The most sensitive of these methods is flow injection, which has a detection limit of 9 ppt (0.011 μg/m3) and is high-performance liquid chromatography, which offers a detection limit of 0.0017 ppm (0.002 mg/m3) [3, 4].

Formaldehyde is found in small quantities in every human cell because it is taken from outside the organism or it is derived from the metabolism of serine, glycine, choline, and methionine [5, 6]. Formaldehyde is excreted from the body through urine and stool, by metabolizing formic acid catalyzed formaldehyde dehydrogenase (FDH) enzyme in the liver and erythrocytes, or excreted through respiration by converting to carbon dioxide [7, 8, 9]. Formaldehyde tends to combine strongly with protein, nucleic acids, and unsaturated fatty acids in a nonenzymatic way. This combination causes cytotoxicity, inflammatory reaction, necrosis, allergy, and mutagenic effect to be seen by producing denaturation in proteins. In addition, formaldehyde shows antimicrobial activity and function detection in tissues that have lost their vitality [7, 10, 11].

Advertisement

2. Formaldehyde, usage areas, and harmful effects

2.1 Usage areas

Formaldehyde is a chemical that is widely used due to its chemical properties and is also found in the natural structure of the organism. It is particularly important in the chemical industry because formaldehyde is an inexpensive starting material for a number of chemical reactions. It is used in the industrial field in the construction of plywood, chipboard, insulation materials, paint and plastic materials, textile industry, carpets, furniture, wall coverings, and household cleaning products [7, 12].

Formaldehyde is used in the storage of biological samples and mummification as it hardens proteins and prevents them from decomposition. Also, it is used as disinfectant because it kills insects and many microorganisms [13]. Formaldehyde, which has an important place in the field of medicine, is used in the anatomy laboratory for the determination of the cadaver and its long-term storage without decomposition and used in histology and pathology laboratories during the fixation stage of tissues. It is benefited from formaldehyde for the structure of coatings in dentistry, in the clinic for the treatment of persistent cystitis, and as a preservative in some drugs. In addition, the solution used in hemodialysis unit contains formalin [1, 14, 15, 16].

The use of formaldehyde in medical and other fields is 1.5% of the total production compared with its use in the manufacture of synthetic resins and chemical compounds. However, its use in these areas has great significance for human beings, because it can reach many people by means of various consumer goods. These products containing formaldehyde in medicinal and other technical areas are listed in Table 2 [7].

AreaUse
AgriculturePreservation of grain, seed dressing, soil disinfection, rot protection of feed, nitrogen fertilizer in soils, and protection of dietary protein in ruminants (animal nutrition)
Cleaning agent industryPreservative in soaps, detergents, and cleaning agents against microbial contamination
Cosmetics industryPreservative in soaps, deodorants, shampoos, etc. against microbial contamination; additive in nail hardeners, products for oral hygiene, makeup, hand cream, and shaving cream; and plant and equipment sanitation
Food industryPreservation of dried foods, disinfection of containers, and preservation of fish and certain oils and fats, modifying starch for cold swelling
Leather industryAdditive to tanning agents
MedicineDisinfection, sterilization, and preservation of preparations
Metal industryAnticorrosive agent; vehicle in vapor depositing and electroplating processes
Petroleum industryBiocide in oil well-drilling fluids and auxiliary agent in refining
Photographic industryDeveloping accelerator and hardener for gelatin layers
Rubber industryBiocide for latex, adhesive additive, and anti-oxidizer additive also for synthetic rubber
Sugar industryInfection inhibitor in producing juices
Textile industryFormaldehyde-releasing agentsa provide crease resistance, dimensional stability, and flame retardance and binders in textile printing
Wood industryPreservative

Table 2.

Use of products containing formaldehyde in medicinal and other technical areas.

Some preservatives are formaldehyde releasers. Formaldehyde release upon decomposition depends mainly on the temperature and pH. Industrial and household cleaning agents, soaps, shampoos, paints/lacquers, and cutting fluids have formed the most common product categories for formaldehyde releasers. The three most common recorded formaldehyde release agents are bromonitropropanediol, bromonitrodioxane, and 2-chloroallylhexaminium chloride [17].


2.2 Impact area and harmful effects

Formaldehyde contains significant harm to human health as well as widespread use. Formaldehyde has a sharp odor that can be detectable at low concentrations, and its vapor and solutions are known as skin and eye irritants in human beings. The common effects of formaldehyde exposure are various symptoms caused by irritation of the mucosa in the eyes and upper respiratory tract.

Formaldehyde is classified by the International Cancer Research Institute as a Group 2A carcinogenic agent in 1995. As a result of the studies, formaldehyde is reported to contribute to the development of cancer of the nose and upper respiratory tract and skin cancer [18, 19].

OSHA has identified 52 professions that are risky in terms of formaldehyde exposure. The most frequently studied groups were the ones who were at risk for the effect of formaldehyde, which are listed below:

  • Workers working at the production stage of formaldehyde-containing compounds

  • Industry workers working in formaldehyde-containing products and adhesives (furniture and goods produced from the chipboard, MDF, plywood, varnish, lacquer, fire retardants, etc.)

  • Workers in traffic or garages

  • Anatomy, pathology, and histology laboratory staff (medicine and veterinary)

  • Those who sterilize dialysis equipment and other medical supplies— dentists and nurses,

  • Foundry employees

  • Workers in paper, paper products, and recycling [20, 21, 22].

Research on persons working in industrial areas where formaldehyde production is performed or used showed that there is an increase in the number of people dying from brain cancer, blood cancer, and colon cancer compared to the normal population [2, 13]. Furthermore, the use of formaldehyde-containing products in homes and workplaces in daily life (wall paint, furniture, lacquer coatings, deodorants, cleaning products, etc.) and exposure to environmental factors (such as fuel oil and wood burning, exhaust gas, and cigarette smoke) further increase the impact of formaldehyde. It has been shown that formaldehyde, which is emphasized as carcinogenic by experimental studies, has harmful effects on many systems such as the respiratory system, nervous system, and digestive system [1, 7, 23]. Furthermore, it is stated that formaldehyde, which has adverse effects on the reproductive system, causes fertility problems by damaging to germinal cells, disrupts the morphological structure of testicle, and decreases sperm count and serum testosterone levels [24, 25, 26].

Formaldehyde is a genotoxic, mutagenic, teratogenic, embryotoxic, and carcinogenic chemical that includes gene mutations, chromosomal errors, single-chain fractures, sister chromatid exchange, and cell changes [2, 27, 28]. Respiratory system toxicity of formaldehyde occurs even in low concentrations (0.5 ppm). It causes clinical symptoms such as burning sensation in the nose and throat, difficulty of breathing, coughing, and wheezing in acute effects. At higher concentrations, pulmonary edema, inflammation, and pneumonia are developing [2, 11, 12, 29]. It is stated that among workers exposed to formaldehyde, the mortality rate of lung cancer is 30% higher [30, 31].

Formaldehyde has been reported to have toxic effects on the central nervous system, skin, eyes, testes, and menstrual functions as well as the respiratory system [24, 32, 33]. After oral ingestion, formaldehyde produces a local corrosive effect in the upper gastrointestinal system. Necrosis, perforation, and bleeding develop after following symptoms such as nausea, severe diarrhea, and abdominal pain. Then, circulatory failure and severe metabolic acidosis occur and result in death within a few days [1]. In addition, in some studies, it has been stated that formaldehyde inhibits the activity of some enzymes and increases some enzyme activity [13, 34].

Formaldehyde tends to perform toxic effects by combining strongly with DNA, RNA, protein, and unsaturated fatty acids in a nonenzymatic way [10]. The neurotoxicity effects of formaldehyde are shown up in the form of headache, dizziness, depression, insomnia, and loss of appetite, while in long-term exposure, permanent neurotoxicity such as mood disorders, behavioral disorders, and epilepsy occur [32, 35, 36].

2.3 Formaldehyde sources in the environment

Formaldehyde enters to the environment from natural sources (including forest fires) and comes directly from human resources. Formaldehyde occurs naturally in large quantities in the troposphere during the oxidation of hydrocarbons. These hydrocarbons react with OH radicals and ozone forming formaldehyde and/or other aldehydes as intermediates in a series of reactions resulting in the formation of carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide, hydrogen, and water [37, 38]. In addition, terpenes and isoprene spread around by foliage and react with the OH radicals to form formaldehyde as an intermediate product. Because of their short lifetimes, this potentially important formaldehyde source is only important around the vegetation [39].

Human sources of formaldehyde include direct sources such as industrial uses in the field, fuel combustion, and off-gassing from building materials and consumer products. Formaldehyde, although is not present in gasoline, is an incomplete combustion product and consequently is released from internal combustion engines. The formaldehyde amount produced depends mainly on the composition of the fuel, the type of engine, the emission control applied, the operating temperature, and the age and condition of the vehicle being repaired. Therefore, emission rates are variable.

The major man-made sources affecting human beings are in the indoor environment. Primary sources (covering a range of fuels from wood to plastics) include cigarette smoke, chipboard and plywood, wood-burning stoves, fireplaces, furnaces, power plants, agricultural burns, furniture and fabrics, waste incinerators, gas from by heating systems, and cooking [40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47].

Furniture made from wood materials are widely used in indoor and outdoor living spaces. Depending on the developments in the glue sector, the rate of using synthetic materials in the furniture industry is increasing. This situation brings with it air pollution. Urea-formaldehyde (UF) glue, which is the most widely used adhesive for wood paneling and furniture production around the world, is one of the most common contaminants in indoor environments. For this reason, formaldehyde can be found in our daily indoor areas, in homes and in offices. Formaldehyde release value can be increased by increasing the ambient temperature and humidity. The formaldehyde level should normally be below 0.03 ppm in indoor environments. The level at which symptoms occurred was determined as 0.10–1.1 ppm range [18, 48].

Therefore, the indoor formaldehyde levels are clearly different from the concentrations in the outdoor air. Temperature, humidity, ventilation rate, age of the building, product usage, the presence of combustion sources, and the smoking habits of occupants affect indoor formaldehyde concentrations.

Advertisement

3. Conclusion

As a result, since formaldehyde has a harmful and even toxic effect on many tissues and organs in the body, it is necessary to keep the formaldehyde concentration below the 0.3 ppm level, which is the permitted limit in formaldehyde-working environments.

In macroscopic anatomy laboratories where formaldehyde is used more frequently, some precautions should be taken to prevent the harmful effects of formaldehyde. For this purpose, a sufficient concentration of 10% should not be exceeded for the determination of a suitable tissue. Materials waiting for detection should be closed in a way that does not contain air. The area in which the macroscopic examination is performed must be equipped to remove the formaldehyde vapor immediately from the environment. Laboratory personnel with chronic conjunctivitis and upper and lower respiratory diseases are removed from this environment until they are completely passed. The contact times of formaldehyde should be reduced as much as possible by providing appropriate conversions between laboratory personnel.

In addition, employees should be trained on environmental risk factors, toxic chemicals and protection from risk factors, and the use of gloves and masks, and it is also necessary to identify and map important emission areas and operations and to arrange/adjust the existing equipment [28, 49, 50]. Measures to be taken to against emission sources include increased ventilation, treatment of cadavers, and tissues with ammonium chloride in anatomy laboratories [51], covering machines, the use of local exhaust systems [52], and improvement of general ventilation [53]. Taking these measures in environments exposed to formaldehyde is necessary to reduce the exposure and minimize the health effects that may occur.

In spite of all these harmful effects, formaldehyde is still in use all over the world because of its cheap and good detection solution.

References

  1. 1. Smith AE. Formaldehyde. Occupational Medicine. 1992;42:83-88
  2. 2. Shaham J, Bomstein Y, Meltzer A, Kaufman Z, Palma E, Ribak J. DNA-protein crosslinks, a biomark.er of exposure to formaldehyde in vitro and in vivo studies. Carcinogenesis. 1996;17:121-125
  3. 3. Fan Q , Dasgupta PK. Continuous automated determination of atmospheric formaldehyde at the parts per trillion level. Analytical Chemistry. 1994;66(4):551-556
  4. 4. IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Wood Dust and Formaldehyde. Vol. 62. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 1995. pp. 217-375
  5. 5. Unsaldi E, Ciftci MK. Formaldehyde and its using areas, risk group, harmful effects and protective precautions against it. YYU Journal of Veterinary Faculty. 2010;21(1):71-75
  6. 6. International Program on Chemical Safety (IPCS). Formaldehyde. In: Environmental Health Criteria. Vol. 89. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 1989. pp. 11-176
  7. 7. Usanmaz SE, Akarsu ES, Vural N. Neurotoxic effects of acute and subacute formaldehyde exposures in mice. Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology. 2002;11:93-100
  8. 8. Eells JT, Mc Martin KE, Black K, Vırayotha V, Tısdell RH, Tephly TR. Formaldehyde poisoning. Rapid metabolism to formic acid. Journal of the American Medical Association. 1981;246:1237-1238
  9. 9. Koivusalo M, Koivula T, Uotila L. Oxidation of formaldehyde by nicotinamid dependent dehydrogenases. Progress in Clinical and Biological Research. 1982;114:155-168
  10. 10. Bolt HM. Experimental toxicology of formaldehyde. Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology. 1987;113:305-309
  11. 11. Heck H, Casanova M. Pharmacodynamics of formaldehyde. Applications of a model for the arrest of DNA replication by DNA-protein cross- links. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology. 1999;160:86-100
  12. 12. Blair A, Stewart PA, Hoover RN. Mortality from lung cancer among workers employed in formaldehyde industries. American Journal of Industrial Medicine. 1990;17:683-699
  13. 13. Schlink K, Janßen K, Nitzsche S, Gebhard S, Hengstler JG, Klein S, et al. Activity of O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase in mononuclear blood cells of formaldehyde-exposed medical students. Archives of Toxicology. 1999;73:15-21
  14. 14. Khanzadeh FA, Vaquerano MU, Khanzadeh MA, Bisesi MS. Formaldehyde exposure, acute pulmoner response and exposure control options in a gross anatomy laboratory. American Journal of Industrial Medicine. 1994;26:61-68
  15. 15. Cohen BI, Pagnillo MK, Musikant BL, Deutsch AS. Formaldehyde evaluation from endodontic materials. Oral Health. 1998;88:37-39
  16. 16. Sarnak MJ, Long J, King AJ. Intravesicular formaldehyde instillation and renal complications. Clinical Nephrology. 1999;51:122-125
  17. 17. Flyvholm MA, Andersen P. Identification of formaldehyde releasers and occurrence of formaldehyde and formaldehyde releasers in registered chemical products. American Journal of Industrial Medicine. 1993;24:533-552
  18. 18. Soysal A, Demiral Y. Indoor air pollution. TAF Preventive Medicine Bulletin. 2007;6(3):221-226
  19. 19. Muzi G, Dell’omo M, Murgia N, Abritti G. Chemical pollution of indoor air and its effect on health. Giornale Italiano di Medicina del Lavoro ed Ergonomia. 2004;26(4):364-369
  20. 20. Rosenstock L, Cullen MR, Brodkin CA, Redlich CA. Textbook of Clinical Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2nd ed. China: Elsevier Saunders; 2005
  21. 21. Pecka I, Wiglusz R, Madeja-Gryzb A, DziewanowskaPudliszak A. Formaldehyde emissions from wooden products and office furniture. Roczniki Państwowego Zakładu Higieny. 2001;52(1):49-54
  22. 22. Tanaka K, Nishiyama K, Yaginuma H, Sasaki A, Maeda T, Kaneko SY, et al. Formaldehyde exposure levels and exposure control measures during an anatomy dissecting course. Kaibogaku Zasshi. 2003;78(2):43-51
  23. 23. Zararsiz I, Kus I, Akpolat N, Songur A, Ogeturk M, Sarsilmaz M. Protective effects of O-3 essential fatty acids against formaldehyde-induced neuronal damage in prefrontal cortex of rats. Cell Biochemistry and Function. 2006a;24:237-244
  24. 24. Chowdhury AR, Gautam AK, Patel KG, Trivedi HS. Steroidogenic inhibition in testicular tissue of formaldehyde exposed rats. Indian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology. 1992;36:162-168
  25. 25. Thrasher JD, Kilburn KH. Embryo toxicity and teratogenicity of formaldehyde. Archives of Environmental Health. 2001;56:300-311
  26. 26. Özen OA, Akpolat N, Songur A. Effect of formaldehyde inhalation on Hsp70 in seminiferous tubules of rat testes: An immunohistochemical study. Toxicology and Industrial Health. 2005;21:249-254
  27. 27. Casanova M, Heck HAD, Everitt JI, Harrington WW, Popp JA. Formaldehyde concentrations in the blood of rhesus monkeys after inhalation exposure. Food and Chemical Toxicology. 1988;26:715-716
  28. 28. McLaughlin JK. Formaldehyde and cancer. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health. 1994;66:295-301
  29. 29. Kriebel D, Myers D, Cheng M, Woskie S, Cocanour B. Short term effect of formaldehyde on peak expiratory flow and irritant symptoms. Archives of Environmental Health. 2001;56:11-18
  30. 30. Halperin WE, Goodman M, Stayner L, Elliot LJ, Keenlyside RA, Landrigan PJ. Nasal cancer in a worker exposed to formaldehyde. Journal of the American Medical Association. 1983;249:510-512
  31. 31. Hayes RB, Raatgever JW, de Bruyn A, Gerin M. Cancer of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses and formaldehyde exposure. Indian Journal of Cancer. 1986;37:487-492
  32. 32. Kilburn KH, Warshaw R, Thornton JC. Formaldehyde impairs memory, equilibrium, and dexterity in histology technicians: Effects which persist for days after exposure. Archives of Environmental Health. 1987;42:117-120
  33. 33. Hayasaka Y, Hayasaka S, Nagaki Y. Ocular changes after intravitreal injection of methanol, formaldehyde, or formate in rabbits. Pharmacology & Toxicology. 2001;89(2):74-78
  34. 34. Cassee FR, Feron VJ. Biochemical and histopathological changes in nasal epithelium of rats after 3-day intermittent exposure to formaldehyde and ozone alone or in combination. Toxicology Letters. 1994;72:257-268
  35. 35. Stroup NE, Blair A, Erikson GE. Brain cancer and other causes of deaths in anatomists. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 1986;77:1217-1224
  36. 36. Kilburn KH. Neurobehavioral impairment and seizures from formaldehyde. Archives of Environmental Health. 1994;49:37-44
  37. 37. Zimmermann PR, Chatfield RB, Fishman J, Crutzen PJ, Hanst PL. Estimates on the production of CO and H2 from the oxidation of hydrocarbon emissions from vegetation. Geophysical Research Letters. 1978;5:679-682
  38. 38. Calvert JG. The Homogeneous Chemistry of Formaldehyde: Generation and Destruction within the Atmosphere. Washington, DC: Federal Aviation Agency; 1980. pp. 153-190
  39. 39. Lowe DC, Schmidt U, Ehhalt DH. The Tropospheric Distribution of Formaldehyde. Jülich: Kernforschungsanlage; 1981. (Chemie Institut 3: No. 1756)
  40. 40. Jermini C, Weber A, Grandjean E. Quantitative determination of various gas-phase components of the side-stream smoke of cigarettes in the room air as a contribution to the problem of passive smoking. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health. 1976;36:169-181
  41. 41. Kitchens JF, Casner RE, Edwards GS, Harward WE, Macri BJ Investigation of Selected Potential Environmental Contaminants: Formaldehyde. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency; 1976. p. 204. (EPA 560/2-76-009)
  42. 42. Klus H, Kuhn H. Distribution of different components of tobacco smoke between main-current and side-current smoke. Beiträge zur Tabakforschung International. 1982;11:229-265
  43. 43. Ramdahl T, Alfheim I, Rustad S, Olsen T. Chemical and biological characterization of emissions from small residential stove burning wood and charcoal. Chemosphere. 1982;11(4):601-611
  44. 44. Schriever E, Marutzky R, Merkel D. Examination of emissions from small wood-fired combustion furnaces. Staub - Reinhaltung der Luft. 1983;43:62-65
  45. 45. Lipari F, Dasch JM, Scruggs WF. Aldehyde emissions from wood-burning fireplaces. Environmental Science & Technology. 1984;18:326-330
  46. 46. Walker BL, Cooper CD. Air pollution emission factors for medical waste incinerators. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association. 1992;42:784-791
  47. 47. Baker DC. Projected emissions of hazardous air pollutants from a Shell coal gasification process-combined-cycle power plant. Fuel. 1994;73(7):1082-1086
  48. 48. Marutzky R. Release of Formaldehyde by Wood Products. Forest Product Society. Report No: 94RS100R; 1994
  49. 49. Rosen G, Andersson IM, Juringe L. Reduction of exposure to solvents and formaldehyde in surface-coating operations in the woodworking industry. The Annals of Occupational Hygiene. 1990;34(3):293-303
  50. 50. Priha E, Pennanen S, Rantio T, Uitti J, Liesivuori J. Exposure to and acute effects of medium-density fiber board dust. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene. 2004;1(11):738-744
  51. 51. Kawamata S, Kodera H. Reduction of formaldehyde concentrations in the air and cadaveric tissues by ammonium carbonate. Anatomical Science International. 2004;79(3):152-157
  52. 52. Linnainmaa M, Kiviranta H, Laitinen J, Laitinen S. Control of workers’ exposure to airborne endotoxins and formaldehyde during the use of metalworking fluids. AIHA Journal. 2003;64(4):496-500
  53. 53. Hiipakka DW, Dyrdahl KS, Garcia Cardenas M. Successful reduction of mortician’s exposure to formaldehyde during embalming procedures. AIHAJ-American Industrial Hygiene Association. 2001;62(6):689-696

Written By

Nuriye Tuna Subasi

Submitted: 05 October 2018 Reviewed: 22 August 2019 Published: 24 January 2020