Riboswitch classes reported across all kingdom of life.
Current research is focusing on selecting potential genes that can alleviate stress and produce disease-tolerant crop variety. The novel paradigm is to investigate the potential of thiamine as a crop protection molecule in plants. Thiamine or vitamin B1 is important for primary metabolism for all living organisms. The active form, thiamine pyrophosphate (TPP), is a cofactor for the enzymes involved in the synthesis of amino acids, tricarboxylic acid cycle and pentose phosphate pathway. Recently, thiamine is shown to have a role in the processes underlying protection of plants against biotic and abiotic stresses. The aim of this chapter is to review the role of thiamine in plant growth and disease protection and also to highlight that TPP and its intermediates are involved in management of stress. The perspectives on its potential for manipulating the biosynthesis pathway in crop improvement will also be discussed.
- vitamin B1
- plant protection
Thiamine also known as vitamin B1 was the first vitamin type B identified . Free thiamine, thiamine monophosphate (TMP) and thiamine pyrophosphate (TPP) are the three most predominant forms of B1 that exist in the cells . Vitamin B1 is a colourless, water-soluble vitamin made solely by plants and microorganisms and act as essential micronutrient in the human diet .
Thiamine occurrence in plants is widely distributed across organs, namely, leaves, flowers, fruits, seeds, roots, tubers and bulb . Studies in
2. Role of thiamine
In plants, thiamine is known to have its role as a cofactor for important metabolic activities . Thiamine is known to be an essential regulator that plays an important role in plant’s primary regulatory system . Living organisms require the active form of thiamine which is known as thiamine pyrophosphate (TPP) in order to play the role as an important cofactor. TPP is a crucial component required in many metabolic activities such as acetyl-CoA biosynthesis, amino acid biosynthesis, Krebs cycle and Calvin cycle .
3. Role of thiamine in plant protection
In plants, thiamine plays a role as a response molecule towards abiotic and biotic stresses, and data from the literature suggest that boosting thiamine content could increase resistance to stresses . Biotic stress is usually involve in the damage of plants caused by living organisms, while abiotic stress is due to environmental factors which cause a series of morphological, physiological, biochemical and molecular changes to plants that will affect the plants’ growth, development and productivity .
Previous study that the effect of the infection of
Besides that, a study on the impact of
A study by Croft et al. revealed the declination of
Thiamine possesses an antioxidant capacity as it has O2−/OH− scavenger properties . Vitamin B1 is responsible for the recycling of vitamin C through the synthesis of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) . The antioxidant properties of thiamine were seen in a study on
Recently, it has been reported that thiamine formed an indirect role in enhancing anti-oxidative capacity in plants, which is important in defence responses . In addition, systemic acquired resistance (SAR) in
4. Thiamine biosynthesis is regulated by TPP riboswitch
In the past years, we recognise DNA as the main key on every single reaction that occurs in the cellular environment. The paradigm has been shifted to RNA nowadays. Since RNA sequences can carry out diverse tasks and are amenable to engineering both
5. Thiamine pyrophosphate: the dominant class of riboswitch
Riboswitch is a natural RNA sensor that allows the direct binding of small metabolites, thus regulating the expression of various metabolic genes without the needs of protein cofactor [29, 30]. Without the protein involvement, regulation of gene expression can still occur due to the direct metabolite binding at riboswitch sequence . RNA can specifically recognise and bind other molecules, including low molecular weight metabolites . This includes nucleobases, cofactors, amino acids, second messenger and metal ion . The metabolites are usually small, non-toxic molecule which exhibits a good cell permeability .
To date, there are about 15 riboswitch classes reported as shown in Table 1, and more of it is still unknown . Among all classes of riboswitches, TPP riboswitches are the most ubiquitous in three life domains . Thiamine pyrophosphate (TPP) is the most abundant riboswitch and is known to be present even in eukaryotes . It has an intermediate level of sequence conservation . So in many organisms (prokaryotes, algae, plants and fungi), riboswitch has been found to play the role of regulating thiamine biosynthesis .
|Amino acid derivatives||Purine|
|Enzyme cofactor||Flavin mononucleotide|
|Nucleotide precursor||Adenine, guanine|
In all plant taxa, the TPP riboswitch is present in the
From the perspective of evolution, the presence of TPP riboswitch in ancient plant taxa suggests that this mechanism is active 400 million years ago, in early emergence of vascular plants . The ancient plant taxa including ancient land plants consist of supplementary TPP riboswitch which ought to be found in the
|3′ UTR||Ancient plant (bryophytes, lycophytes)|||
Generally, riboswitches in bacteria can be found on the upstream 5′ region of the non-coding region of mRNA, while in plant and fungi, this regulatory element resides at the 3′ end of the untranslated region of a gene [20, 40, 41]. Although the location of TPP riboswitch in prokaryotes and eukaryotes might differ, its structure reveals a high similarity. This difference in location suggests a unique mode of action for the plant riboswitch .
The biosynthesis of thiamine is uncommon from other vitamins. This is because previous study by Guan et al. revealed that the energy cost of thiamine synthesis is higher as compared to other vitamin cofactors . Therefore, the location of riboswitch at the initial pathway strongly suggests that a novel riboswitch regulates the regulation of thiamine.
6. Thiamine biofortification in plants
As previously mentioned, thiamine has shown to act as cofactor and activator for plant stress and disease resistance. Furthermore, supplementation and accumulation of thiamine in plants showed no evidence of toxicity towards the plants as supported by the feeding studies . However, a review by Goyer in 2010 suggested that thiamine production will be regulated in order to perfectly match the production to the demand of the cofactor. The study also stated that thiamine biosynthesis is regulated via (1) riboswitch-dependent gene regulation and (2) tissue specificity, stress dependence and post-translational regulation. Tissue-specific transcription factors have been found in THI1 gene, and the regulation has been widely studied  at the promoter level. The promoter activity in the roots is not due to light regulation but rather to promoter tissue specificity. On the other hand, stress dependence can be seen in maize seedlings where under osmotic and oxidative stresses, TPK enzyme activity increased  but exhibited a decrease under normal condition . Furthermore, post-translational regulation or feedback inhibition has been identified in TH1 where excess of HMP-PP and ATP has shown to inhibit TH1 activity.
Total thiamine content in wild-type plants is mainly composed of thiamine, thiamine monophosphate (ThMP) and thiamine diphosphate (ThDP) . Overexpression of THIC and THI4 simultaneously has shown to increased thiamine levels up to sixfold and ThDP levels twofold compared to single overexpression of either THIC or THI4 which showed no elevation of total thiamine content . This shows the relationship between thiamine biosynthesis genes and thiamine production. Elevation of thiamine content and also the thiamine biosynthesis gene transcripts in plants have been demonstrated quite extensively via the application of biotic and abiotic stresses. Utilisation of these stresses may aid in the fortification of thiamine in crops. Table 3 shows the studies done in understanding the effects of the application of stress towards thiamine production in plants.
|Gene transcript/enzymes/thiamine derivatives||Stress||Outcomes||References|
|THIC||Oxidative, osmotic, temperature (cold), biotic (colonisation by endophyte)||Increase in expression||[15, 18, 25, 62, 63]|
|Exogenous thiamine||Decrease in expression|||
|THI4||Light, oxidative, biotic (colonisation by endophyte)||Increase in expression||[18, 25, 65, 66]|
|Dark||Decrease in expression|
|TH1||Oxidative, biotic (colonisation by endophyte)||Increase in expression||[18, 25, 45]|
|TPK||Osmotic, salinity, oxidative, biotic (colonisation by endophyte)||Enzyme activity increase||[18, 44, 45]|
|Total thiamine||Osmotic, salinity, oxidative, biotic (colonisation by endophyte)||Increase in concentration||[18, 25, 45]|
|Exogenous thiamine||Decrease in expression|||
Apart from that, higher possibilities of thiamine fortification in plants could be achieved via genetic manipulation. Genetic engineering via mutation of riboswitch coding sequence in plant model organism,
Overall, based on the extensive studies done, thiamine fortification in plants could be achieve via both abiotic and biotic stress and genetic engineering [20, 24, 25, 45]. Manipulation by the knowledge available on the riboswitch associated with THIC could likely be an effective strategy to manipulate thiamine levels in plants, especially in terms of biofortification. However, it is well agreed that the process on enhancing thiamine levels in plants is not as straightforward and as easy as it seems. Further understanding of the two key precursors (HMP and HET) will be required as this will lead to the accumulation of thiamine, with hopefully least side effects. These two intermediates have been shown to be not toxic to plants, and plant tolerance towards stress is expected to increase when the levels of these two intermediates are enhanced. However, the modification of this will still come with its own challenges since it involves highly complex enzymes which are regulated very tightly and there have not been much studies on the understanding of the mechanisms just yet.
Z.N. Balia Yusof gratefully acknowledges the support of the Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation of Malaysia (MOSTI) (ScienceFund Project No. 02-01-04-SF2234) as well as funding by the Ministry of Higher Education of Malaysia (MOHE) (FRGS Vote No. 5524589) and also Geran Putra Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM) (GP-IPM Vote No. 9425900) for the funding of the work described.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.