Open Access is an initiative that aims to make scientific research freely available to all. To date our community has made over 100 million downloads. It’s based on principles of collaboration, unobstructed discovery, and, most importantly, scientific progression. As PhD students, we found it difficult to access the research we needed, so we decided to create a new Open Access publisher that levels the playing field for scientists across the world. How? By making research easy to access, and puts the academic needs of the researchers before the business interests of publishers.
We are a community of more than 103,000 authors and editors from 3,291 institutions spanning 160 countries, including Nobel Prize winners and some of the world’s most-cited researchers. Publishing on IntechOpen allows authors to earn citations and find new collaborators, meaning more people see your work not only from your own field of study, but from other related fields too.
To purchase hard copies of this book, please contact the representative in India:
CBS Publishers & Distributors Pvt. Ltd.
www.cbspd.com
|
customercare@cbspd.com
Tropical rainforests are the cradle of life (perfect conditions for life) on Earth, i.e., rich in plant species composition (>250 plant species/hectare) and fauna diversity (>50% of animal species in the world). Rainforests occur near the Earth's equator and cover 6% of the Earth's surface across the tropical regions and are characterized by wet climate, i.e., heavy rainfall (125—660 cm), relative humidity (77—88%) and temperature (20—34°C). They are dominated by a wide range of broad-leaved trees that form dense canopy and the most complex ecosystem. Currently, the tropical rainforest ecosystem is changing faster than ever in human history due to anthropogenic activities, such as habitat loss and degradation due to deforestation for timber and conversion into agriculture fields (oil palm plantation), mining, fire, climate change, etc. The habitat loss and degradation had adversely influenced the distribution and richness of the fauna species. The current information on the fauna diversity of tropical rainforest is not sufficient and in the future, more research is required to document the various community parameters of the fauna species in order to conserve and protect them. For better future, conservation, and management, we must identify the major drivers of changes and how these factors alter the tropical rainforest.
Faculty of Forestry, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Selangor, Malaysia
Muhammad Nawaz Rajpar
Sindh Wildlife Department, Sindh Centre Building, Saddar Karachi, Pakistan
Ibrahim Ozdemir
Department of Wildlife Ecology and Management, Faculty of Forestry, Suleyman Demirel University, Isparta, Turkey
Zamri Rosli
Forestry Science, Faculty of Agriculture and Food Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Sarawak, Malaysia
*Address all correspondence to: mzakaria@upm.edu.my
1. Introduction
Tropical rainforest usually occurs 10° north and south of the equator, where climate conditions are unique such as humid, warm, and wet. The monthly mean temperature is 18°C and the annual rainfall is not less than 168 cm. Tropical rainforest occurs in four main regions; Central and South America, Central and West Africa, Indo-Malaya and Australia [1]. They are storehouses of a range of food resources for a wide variety of fauna species as well as for human beings, raw material for buildings, and medicines [2, 3] and affect the climate [4, 5].
1.1. Ecological importance of tropical rainforest
Tropical rainforests are the most diverse in the vegetation structure and composition (Figure 1) that supported a diversity of fauna species such as birds, reptiles, mammals, amphibians, and invertebrates, which directly or indirectly depend on them for their survival and existence. They are rich in habitat diversity and provide a variety of resources for the avian species, such as food, habitat, and shelter [6]. Tropical rainforest is vital ecosystem, i.e., it provide crucial ecosystem services such as raw materials, reservoirs of biodiversity, soil protection, sources of timber, medicinal plants, carbon sequestration, and watershed protection [7–9].
Figure 1.
Aesthetic view of tropical rainforest.
1.2. Threats to tropical rainforest
Tropical rainforest covers less than 10% of the land area of the Earth, representing the largest biological diversity reservoir, i.e., >50% of known plant species grow in tropical rainforest. Despite being rich in fauna diversity, every year, huge areas of tropical rainforests are being lost and degraded due to human interference [10–15]. It has been stated that 25–50% of the world's tropical rainforest has been lost and degraded due to the land-use change such as deforestation for palm oil plantations, agriculture expansion, cattle ranches, mining, and development of housing societies [16–19], while the rest of the rainforest areas is under a major shift in the dynamic structure and productivity.
It has been reported that Southeast Asia had the highest rate of land-use change (such as deforestation of tropical rainforest for conversion into oil palm plantation, commercial logging for timber and development of human settlement) as compared to other regions [12, 20–22]. Deforestation and fragmentation due to agriculture expansion, human settlement, logging, and fire had altered the plant species composition, richness, and diversity [23–26]. Deforestation and fragmentation, over-exploitation, invasive species, and climate change are the major factors due to which the biodiversity of tropical forest had declined at an alarming rate. For example, some of the fauna species became extinct, while others became threatened and vulnerable due to habitat loss, fragmentation, and degradation.
Changes in the vegetation structure and composition due to deforestation and fragmentation may alter the habitat suitability and food productivity. Habitat suitability, i.e., vegetation structure, species composition, species richness, canopy layers, and food productivity are key drivers, which predominantly influence fauna community parameters such as species composition, relative abundance, species richness, species diversity, and the density of tropical rainforest. Furthermore, it has been stated that the deforestation in humid tropic may be in the range of 4.9–5.7 million ha/year. Likewise, each year, 2.3 million ha of humid forests had been degraded due to logging and fire activities. Similarly, around 2.2 million ha/year tropical moist deciduous and 0.7 million ha/year tropical dry forest has been deforested due to anthropogenic activities [27].
Deforestation may cause habitat loss and fragmentation that adversely affect the population and the community parameters such as species composition, relative abundance, species richness, species diversity, and density of different wildlife species [28–30]. However, the effect of habitat loss and fragmentation on the wildlife species may vary depending on remaining vegetation and the surrounded landscape [31, 32].
Land-use change such as deforestation, i.e., depletion of tree crown cover due to conversion of forested areas in agricultural fields, human settlements, excessive logging, and road constructions are major factors of habitat loss and degradation [10, 33, 34]. The habitat loss and degradation are responsible for biodiversity loss [35], low production of food, and habitat fragmentation [27, 36, 37] that ultimately affects different fauna species. Due to deforestation, large areas become isolated, i.e., temporal refuge, which serves as corridors for different wildlife species, especially bird species [38–40].
1.3. Floral composition
Tropical rainforests are the most rich tree species forest on the Earth and encompasses of broad-leaved trees with large buttress, and covered with climbers, epiphytes, and hemi-epiphytes. They have multi-layered canopy, i.e., upper, middle, and dense understory vegetation composition and are rich in diversity of flora and fauna, especially birds, mammals, reptiles, amphibians, and invertebrates [41–44]. Tropical rainforest is blessed with an enormous variety of flora species. The vegetation species composition of rainforests encompasses of four distinct layers of trees, namely; emergent, upper canopy, understory, and forest floor.
1.3.1. Emergent vegetation layer
Emergent or sunlit layer is dominated by broad-leaved, hardwood and evergreen. The trees may attain the height from 30.48 to 76.2 m and a trunk size up to 4.48 m around. The winds and sunlight are major environmental factors, which play a significant role (such as pollination and seed dispersal) in the tropical rainforest management ecosystem. The emergent layer is rich in the fauna species, such as birds (hummingbirds, macaw, harpy eagle, etc.), mammals (i.e., monkeys, bats, etc.), snakes, and insects such as butterflies, moths, etc. The birds and insects play a crucial role in the pollination of tropical rainforest plant species. The microclimate of this layer often fluctuates from time to time depending upon temperature and wind speed.
1.3.2. Canopy layer
The canopy is the main layer of tropical rainforest ecosystems, which is thick and dense like an umbrella. This layer is composed of a variety of vegetation structures and tree species composition such as philodendron, strychnos toxifera, rattan palms, etc. The trees may grow up to 18.29—27.42 m above the forest floor. Epiphytes such as orchids, mosses, ferns, and lichens are a common feature of this layer, which grow on tree trunks and branches. The canopy layer is rich in food diversity and an ideal habitat for a wide range of fauna species such as birds, mammals, reptiles, amphibians, and diversity of insect species. The members of fauna species are often observed flying, jumping, gliding, and hoping for canopy gaps.
1.3.3. Understory layer
The understory layer encompasses usually small trees, shrubs, ferns, and native bananas, which may attain 3.66 m height. Mosses, fungi, and algae often grow on the trees. This layer is rich in insects, such as bees, stick insects, ants, beetles, and butterflies, which serve as sources of food for a wide array of birds and reptiles. The fauna species encompass bats, monkeys, snakes, lizards, jaguars, frogs, and invertebrates.
1.3.4. Forest floor
This is the bottom layer of tropical rainforest. This layer is dark due to dense ground vegetation and only 2% of sunlight reaches the floor. Due to less availability of sunlight, only few plant species can grow. This layer is rich in organic matter such as fallen leaves, seeds, fruits, and branches. Furthermore, this layer is rich in fungi and mosses. The fauna species of the forest floor include elephants, tigers, pumas, leopards, jaguars, ocelots, mongoose, tapirs, cassowaries, okapis, armadillos, pigs, and gorillas.
1.4. Environmental services provided by fauna in tropical rainforest
Faunas are the important component of the tropical rainforest ecosystem and provide a wide array of environmental services such as; they keep tropical rainforest systems in balance through pollinating a variety of plant species, dispersing seeds, controlling pest population and reducing the damage caused by different pest species, scavenging carcasses, and recycling nutrients back into the soil.
Fauna species are not only confined to specific habitats but also utilize various habitats in search of food, shelter, and reproduction. Tropical rainforest is rich in fauna species such as birds, reptiles, mammals, amphibians, and invertebrates.
2.1. Bird species composition of tropical rainforest
Birds are highly motile animals, i.e., they may fly to different areas in search of food, shelter, and for breeding purposes. They are ecologically diverse and had occupied a wide array of habitats. Bird species depend on the vegetation structure and composition (such as trees, shrubs, and herbs) and food resources for their survival and reproduction [45, 46]. They are the functional group of tropical rainforest ecosystems as seed dispersers, pollinators, top predators, pest control, and scavengers [47–50].
Birds are conspicuous and an important component of tropical rainforest ecosystems, often exhibit distinction associated with vegetation structure and composition (Figures 2–4; Table 1). They are sensitive to habitat alteration and landscape modification [51–54]. This might be because the vegetation structure and composition may influence habitat selection and foraging efficiency of all birds. For example, large trees and ground dense herbaceous vegetation layers often harbor a higher avian abundance and diversity. This might be because old growth stands provide suitable nesting and breeding sites, plenty of food resources, and also provide protection from predators and harsh weather [55, 56]. Likewise, ground vegetation also offers ideal habitat and safe breeding sites and shelter for different fauna species residing in dense ground cover vegetation, such as birds, mammals, reptiles, and amphibians. It has been illustrated that height and density of the tree [57], dense understory vegetation [58, 59], and logs and snags [60] are key elements, which affect avian distribution, richness, and diversity in tropical rainforest.
List of bird species that occur in tropical rainforest.
Habitat alteration due to land change use may alter the avian community parameters such as relative abundance, species richness, species diversity, and density [65]. This might be that bird community structure strongly associated with canopy openness and understory vegetation cover. Forest logging [66–68], habitat degradation and fragmentation [69], slash-and-burn agriculture [61], and fires are major factors, which had adversely affected the population of the avian species in different forest ecosystems [51]. These factors altered the vegetation structure and composition, which affects the avian richness and diversity by affecting the food resources, increased nest predation and brood parasitism. The diversity and richness of food resources are closely associated with the vegetation structure and composition, such as foliage, flowers, fruits, and barks. Furthermore, large-scale logging for valuable timber harvesting, damage to forest, and replacement of native vegetation by exotic species [70] are the main problems, which affect the fauna species. Loss of forested areas is responsible for the loss of biodiversity.
2.2. Mammal species composition of tropical rainforest
Tropical rainforest had harbored rich mammal diversity and density due to richness of plant communities and higher productivity (Figures 5 and 6; Table 2). Mammals are a versatile group of animals and a major component of the tropical rainforest ecosystem, i.e., they serve a wide range of ecosystem functions; such as pollination, seed dispersal, pest control, herb control, food source for other animals and nutrient cycling. In addition to ecological functions, the mammals also provide a wide array of benefits to human beings, such as food, recreation, and source of income, i.e., various byproducts such as bush meat, skin, oil, musk, fur, etc. [71, 72].
Figure 5.
Bornean pygmy elephant—Elephas maximus borneensis.
List of mammal species that occur in tropical rainforest.
Unfortunately, these rich mammal communities are facing severe threats from human activities such as over exploitation (intensive hunting), land-use change (habitat loss and degradation), and climate change [76–78]. These populations of different mammal species had declined abruptly due to change in land use, i.e., habitat fragmentation and degradation due to logging, and deforestation and habitat loss due to agriculture expansion and excessive hunting [79–83]. It has been reported that around one-fifth of mammal species in the wild are at risk of extinction due to human activities such as deforestation for agriculture expansion, logging for timber, and excessive hunting [84]. It has been stated that changes in vegetation cover may affect the richness of food resources and habitat preferences of the mammalian species [85, 86]. This could be due to fact that home range preferences of the mammal species and their population are strongly associated with the vegetation structure and composition [87].
The primates residing in a rainforest are habitat specific, some occupy large continuous forested areas such as Diademed Sifakas—Propithecus diadema—while others prefer fragmented forested areas such as Black Howler Monkey—Alouatta pigra—for their survival and reproduction [25, 88–90]. Monkeys are diet specific, they consume a variety of food resources such as fruits, seeds, flowers, leaves, arthropods, etc. [91, 92], and their diet is strongly influenced by the plant species composition and richness of the particular dwelling habitat [93].
2.3. Reptile species composition of tropical rainforest
Reptiles are carnivorous in nature and play a significant role in controlling various pests present in the forest, such as beetles, arthropods, caterpillars, termites, bugs, rats, mice, etc., which may cause severe loss, such as defoliation, seed, and wood damage. Even though they are crucially important for tropical forest ecosystems (Table 3), they are facing critical threats from human induced factors such as land-use change (i.e., deforestation, fragmentation and degradation) that have altered the natural habitat of the reptile species that directly or indirectly depend upon tropical rainforests for their survival and reproduction.
List of reptile species that occur in tropical rainforest.
Reptiles are highly sensitive species compared to other fauna species, i.e., they become more vulnerable due to land use change, i.e., habitat alteration [95]. This might be because they have a small home range, which is adversely affected by habitat loss and degradation [96, 97]. For example, deforestation may cause severe habitat loss, fragmentation, and degradation which adversely affect the population, community parameters of reptiles inhabiting in a tropical rainforest ecosystem [98–100].
Anthropogenic activities had altered the reptilian intact habitat through land-use change, their habitats becomes degraded and lost thus ultimately becoming unsuitable for them. This is because forested reptile prefers dense and moist habitat, which provides them shelter and rich food resources for their survival, protection, and reproduction. Deforestation may disturb their breeding sites, reduce home range, and increase visibility for predators. Likewise, fragmentation reduced their home range, while degradation reduced their food resources and breeding behavior. Furthermore, land-use changes such as deforestation, fragmentation, and degradation may alter microclimatic conditions of particular dwelling habitats such as temperature, relative humidity, rainfall, and sunlight that ultimately modify the vegetation structure and composition.
2.4. Amphibian species composition of tropical rainforest
Amphibians are cold-blooded vertebrates and are carnivorous in nature. They play a key role to control the various pests, thus balancing the nature [101]. Amphibians are a significant component of the tropical rainforest ecosystem (Figure 7; Table 4) and play an important role in pest control. Habitat loss due highest deforestation is responsible for one-third population decline of the amphibians [10, 102–104]. One-fifth amphibians of Southeast Asia are reported as threatened species [105]. This is because they have small home ranges, i.e., specific aquatic habitat, higher vulnerability to habitat change, and visibility to predators. In addition, over-harvesting from natural habitat for food supply (human consumption), medicine (traditional use), and pet trade also had exerted great pressure on the population of amphibians [104].
List of amphibian species that occur in tropical rainforest.
2.5. Invertebrate species composition of tropical rainforest
In tropical rainforests, logging creates gaps and alters the habitat structure and microclimatic conditions, e.g., temperature, relative humidity, and light [107, 108], which influence on the invertebrate diversity and distribution. After logging, new habitat with a different microclimate may develop which tend to be unsuitable for a wide array of invertebrates [109, 110]. This indicates that land-use changes influence invertebrate diversity, richness, and distribution. It has been stated that disturbing the habitat affects invertebrate colonization and distribution [111, 112]. Basset [113] reported that the canopy of tropical rain forest is rich in Coleoptera, Hymenoptera, Lepidoptera, and Araneae taxa. However, their home range and foraging habitats may vary from species to species depending upon the types of vegetation, forest types, and bio-geographical regions.
Even though, faunas are a crucial component of tropical rainforest ecosystems, detailed information on different aspects of fauna community parameters such as species composition, distribution, diversity, richness and population trend, impact of anthropogenic activities, associated with microclimate and habitat variables is still lacking. The current review highlighted that tropical rainforest is an ideal productive habitat for a wide array of fauna species, i.e., birds, mammals, reptiles, amphibians, and invertebrates. These fauna are a major component of the food web of the rainforest ecosystem and functions. Furthermore, it was revealed that the diversity of rainforest fauna is facing many threats that directly or indirectly affected the population; community parameters of various fauna species inhabited the tropical rainforest. There is an urgent need to study various fauna species of tropical rainforest in order to reduce the impact of human activities and for future conservation and management. We hope that the findings of this chapter will provide the ways and means to conserve the fauna in and around the tropical rainforest.
References
1.Hill JL, Hill RA. Why are tropical rain forests so species rich? Classifying, reviewing and evaluating theories. Progress in Physical Geography, 2001; 25(3): 326–354.
2.Lawrence A, Phillips OL, Ismodes AR, Lopez M, Rose S, Wood D, Farfan AJ. Local values for harvested forest plants in Madre de Dios, Peru: towards a more contextualized interpretation of quantitative ethnobotanical data. Biodiversity Conservation, 2005; 14: 45–79.
3.Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis. World Resources Institute, Washington, DC. 2005.
4.Betts RA. Global vegetation and climate: self beneficial effects, climate forcing and climate feedbacks. Journal De Physique IV, 2004; 121: 37–60.
5.Delire C, Foley JA, Thompson S. Long-term variability in a coupled atmosphere-biosphere model. Journal of Climate, 2004; 17: 3947–3959.
6.Rajpar MN, Zakaria M. Assessing the effects of logging activities on avian richness and diversity in different aged post-harvested hill dipterocarp tropical rainforest of Malaysia. American Journal of Applied Sciences, 2014; 11(9): 1519–1529.
7.Foody GM, Cutler MEJ. Tree biodiversity in protected and logged Bornean tropical rain forests and its measurement by satellite remote sensing. Journal of Biogeography, 2003; 30: 1053–1066.
8.Dent DH, Wright SJ. The future of tropical species in secondary forests: a quantitative review. Biological Conservation, 2009; 142: 2833–2843.
9.Berry NJ, Phillip SL, Lewis SL, Hill JK, Edwards DP, Tawatao NB, Ahmed N, Magintan D, Ken CV, Maryati M, Ong RC, Hamer KC. The high value of logged tropical forests: lessons from northern Borneo. Biodiversity Conservation, 2010; 19: 985–997.
10.Achard F, Eva HD, Stibig H-J, Mayaux P, Gallego J, Richards T, Malingreau P. Determination of deforestation rates of the world’s humid tropical forests. Science, 2002; 297: 999–1002.
11.Curran LM, Trigg SN, McDonald AK, Astiani D, Hardiono YM, Siregar P, Caniago I, Kasischke E. Lowland forest loss in protected areas of Indonesian Borneo. Science, 2004; 303: 1000–1003.
12.Fitzeherbert EB, Struebig MJ, Morel A, Danielsen F, Bruhl CA, Donald PF, Phalan B. How will oil palm expansion affect biodiversity? Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 2008; 23: 538–545.
13.Clark CJ, Poulsen JR, Malonga R, Elkan PW. Logging concessions can extend the conservation estate for central African tropical forests. Conservation Biology, 2009; 23: 1281–1293.
14.Morris RJ. Anthropogenic impacts on tropical forest biodiversity: a network structure and ecosystem functioning perspective. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 2010; 365: 3709–3718.
15.Fisher B, Edwards DP, Larsen TH, Ansell FA, Hsu WW, Roberts CS, Wilcove DS. Cost-effective conservation: calculating biodiversity and logging tradeoffs in Southeast Asia. Conservation Letters, 2011; 84: 443–450.
16.Houghton RA. Why are estimates of the terrestrial carbon balance so different? Global Change Biology, 2003; 9: 500–509.
17.Lewis SL, Malhi Y, Phillips OL. Finger printing the impacts of global change on tropical forests. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 2004; 359: 437–462.
18.Castelletta M, Thiollay JM, Sodhi NS. The effects of extreme forest fragmentation on the bird community of Singapore Island. Biological Conservation, 2005; 121: 135–155.
19.Lewis LS. Tropical forests and the changing earth system. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 2006; 361: 195–210.
20.Wright SJ, Muller-Landau HC. The future of tropical forest species. Biotropica, 2006; 38: 287–301.
21.Sodhi NS, Koh LP, Clements R, Wanger TC, Hill JK, Hamer KC, Clough Y, Tscharntke T, Posa MRC, Lee TM. Conserving Southeast Asian forest biodiversity in human-modified landscapes. Biological Conservation, 2010; 143: 2375–2384.
22.Miettinen J, Shi C, Liew SC. Deforestation rates in insular Southeast Asia between 2000 and 2010. Global Change Biology, 2011; 17: 2261–2270.
23.Barlow J, Peres CA. Effects of single and recurrent wildfires on fruit production and large vertebrate abundance in a central Amazonian forest. Biodiversity and Conservation, 2006; 15: 985–1012.
24.Cristobal-Azkarate J, Arroyo-Rodriguez V. Diet and activity pattern of howler monkeys (Alouatta palliata) in Los Tuxtlas, Mexico: effects of habitat fragmentation and implications for conservation. American Journal of Primatology, 2007; 69: 1013–1029.
25.Irwin MT. Feeding ecology of Propithecus diadema in forest fragments and continuous forest. International Journal of Primatology, 2008; 29: 95–115.
26.Gonzalez-Zamora A, Arroyo-Rodriguez V, Chaves OM, Sanchez-Lopez S, Stoner KE, Riba-Hernandez P. Diet of spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi) in Mesoamerica: current knowledge and future directions. American Journal of Primatology, 2009; 71: 8–20.
27.Mayaux P, Holmgren P, Achard F, Eva H, Stibig H-J, Branthomme A. Tropical forests cover change in the 1990s and options for future monitoring. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 2005; 360: 373–384.
28.Chagnon FJF, Bras RL, Wang J. Climatic shift in patterns of shallow clouds over the Amazon. Geophysical Research Letters, 2004; 31.
29.Soh MC, Sodhi NS, Lim SL. High sensitivity of montane bird communities to habitat disturbance in Peninsular Malaysia. Biological Conservation, 2006; 129: 149–166.
30.Trainor CR. Changes in bird species composition on a remote and well-forested island, Wallacea, South-East Asia. Biological Conservation, 2007; 140: 373–385.
31.Sodhi NS, Lee TM, Warkentin IG. Effects of disturbance or loss of tropical rainforest on birds. The Auk, 2008; 125: 511–519.
32.Laurance WF, Camargo JLC, Luizão RCC, Laurance SG, Pimm SL, Bruna EM, Stouffer PC, Williamson GB, Benítez-Malvido J, Vasconcelos HL, Van Houtan KS, Zartman CE, Boyle SA, Didham RK, Andrade A, Lovejoy TE. The fate of Amazonian forest fragments: a 32-year investigation. Biological Conservation, 2011; 144: 56–67.
33.Geist HJ, Lambin EF. Proximate causes and underlying driving forces of tropical deforestation. BioScience, 2002; 52: 143–150.
34.Maas B, Putra DD, Waltert M, Clough Y, Tscharntke T, Schulze CH. Six years of habitat modification in a tropical rainforest margin of Indonesia do not affect bird diversity but endemic forest species. Biological Conservation, 2009; 142: 2665–2671.
35.Sala OE, Chapin FS, Armesto JJ, Berlow E, Bloomfield J, Dirzo R, Huber-Sanwald E, Huenneke LF, Jackson RB, Kinzig A, Leemans R, Lodge DM, Mooney HA, Oesterheld M, Poff NL, Sykes MT, Walker BH, Walker M, Wall DH. Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science, 2000; 287: 1770–1774.
36.Bagchi R, Philipson CD, Slade EM, Hector A, Phillip S, Villanueva JF, Lewis OT, Lyal CHC, Nilus R, Madran A, Scholes JD, Press MC. Impacts of logging on density-dependent predation of dipterocarp seeds in a South East Asian rainforest. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 2011; 366: 3246–3255.
37.Chaves ÓM, Stoner KE, Arroyo-Rodríguez V. Differences in diet between spider monkey groups living in forest fragments and continuous forest in Mexico. Biotropica, 2012; 44: 105–113.
38.Fischer J, Lindenmayer DB, Manning AD. Biodiversity, ecosystem function, and resilience: ten guiding principles for commodity production landscapes. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2006; 4: 80–86.
39.Arriaga-Weiss SL, Calmé S, Kampichler C. Bird communities in rainforest fragments: guild responses to habitat variables in Tabasco, Mexico. Biodiversity & Conservation. 2008; 17: 173–190.
40.Höbinger T, Schindler S, Seaman BS, Wrbka T, Weissenhofer A. Impact of oil palm plantations on the structure of the agroforestry mosaic of La Gamba, southern Costa Rica: potential implications for biodiversity. Agroforestry Systems. 2012; 85: 367–381.
41.Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, Da Fonseca G, Kent J. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature, 2000; 403: 853–858.
42.Carmona, M, Armesto JJ, Aravena JC, Perez C. Coarse woody debris biomass in successional and primary temperate forests in Chiloe Island, Chile. Forest Ecology and Management, 2002; 164: 265–275.
43.Aravena JC, Carmona M, Perez CC, Armesto JJ. Changes in tree species richness, stand structure and soil properties in a successional chronosequence of forest fragments in northern Chiloe Island, Chile. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural, 2002; 75: 339–360.
44.Laurance WF, Oliveira AA, Laurance SG, Condit R, Nascimento HEM, Sanchez-Thorin AC, Lovejoy TE, Andreade A, D'Angelo S, Ribeiro JE, Dick CW. Pervasive alteration of tree communities in undisturbed Amazonian forests. Nature, 2004; 428: 171–175.
45.Poulsen BO. Avian richness and abundance in temperate Danish forests: tree variables important to birds and their conservation. Biodiversity and Conservation, 2002; 11: 1551–1566.
46.Nadkarni NM, Schaefer D, Matelson TJ, Solano R. Biomass and nutrient pools of canopy and terrestrial components in a primary and a secondary montane cloud forest, Costa Rica. Forest Ecology and Management, 2004; 198: 223–236.
47.Sekercioglu CH. Increasing awareness of avian ecological function. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 2006; 21: 464–471.
48.Lozada T, De Koning GHJ, Marche R, Klein AM, Tscharntke T. Tree recovery and seed dispersal by birds: comparing forest, agroforestry and abandoned agroforestry in coastal Ecuador. Perspectives in Plant Ecology Evolution and Systematics, 2007; 8: 131–140.
49.Kellermann JL, Johnson MD, Stercho AM, Hackett SC. Ecological and economic services provided by birds on Jamaican Blue Mountain coffee farms. Conservation Biology, 2008; 22: 1177–1185.
50.Whelan CJ, Wenny DG, Marquis RJ. Ecosystem services provided by birds. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2008; 1134: 25–60.
51.Sekercioglu CH, Ehrlich PR, Daily GC, Aygen D, Goehring D, Sandi RF. Disappearance of insectivorous birds from tropical forest fragments. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2002; 99: 263–267.
52.Raman TRS. Effects of habitat structure and adjacent habitats on birds in tropical rainforest fragments and shaded plantations in the Western Ghats, India. Biodiversity and Conservation, 2006; 15: 1577–1607.
53.Gomes LGL, Oostra V, Nijman V, Cleef AM, Kappelle M. Tolerance of frugivorous birds to habitat disturbance in a tropical cloud forest. Biological Conservation, 2008; 141: 860–871.
54.Tscharntke T, Sekercioglu CH, Dietsch TV, Sodhi NS, Hoehn P, Tylianakis JM.. Landscape constraints on functional diversity of birds and insects in tropical agro-ecosystems. Ecology, 2009; 89: 944–951.
55.Reid S, Dıaz IA, Armesto JJ, Willson MF. Importance of native bamboo for understory birds in Chilean temperate forests. The Auk, 2008; 121: 515–525.
56.Diaz IA, Armesto JJ, Reid S, Sieving KE, Willson MF. Linking forest structure and composition: avian diversity in successional forests of Chiloe Island, Chile. Biological Conservation, 2005; 123: 91–101.
57.Munoz AA, Chacon P, Perez F, Barnet ES, Armesto JJ. Diversity and host tree preferences of vascular epiphytes and vines in a temperate rainforest in southern Chile. Austral Ecology, 2004; 51: 381–391.
58.Sieving KE, Willson MF, De Santo TL. Defining corridors for endemic birds in fragmented south-temperate rainforest. Conservation Biology, 2000; 14: 1120–1132.
59.Cornelius C, Cofre H, Marquet PA. Effects of habitat fragmentation on bird species in a relict temperate forest in semiarid Chile. Conservation Biology, 2000; 14: 534–543.
60.DeSanto TL, Willson MF, Sieving KE, Armesto JJ. Nesting biology of Tapaculos (Rhinocryptidae) in fragmented south-temperate rainforests of Chile. The Condor, 2002; 104: 482–495.
61.Tvardíková K. Bird abundances in primary and secondary growths in Papua New Guinea: a preliminary assessment. Tropical Conservation Science, 2010; 3(4): 373–388.
62.Johnson DDP, Mighell JS. Dry-season bird diversity in tropical rainforest and surrounding habitats in North-east Australia. Emu, 1999; 99: 108–120.
63.Zakaria M, Rajpar MN, Moridi HW, Rosli Z. Comparison of understorey bird species in relation to edge-interior gradient in an isolated tropical rainforest of Malaysia. Environment, Sustainability and Development, 2014; 16(2): 375–392.
64.Shankar Raman TR, Joshi NV, Sukumar R. Tropical rainforest bird community structure in relation to altitude, tree species composition and null models in the Western Ghats, India. Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society, 2005; 102(2): 145–157.
65.Hughes JB, Daily GC, Ehrlich PR. Conservation of tropical forest birds in countryside habitats. Ecology Letters, 2002; 5: 121–129.
66.Lim HC, Sodhi NS. Responses of avian guilds to urbanization in a tropical city. Landscape Urban Planning, 2004; 66: 199–215.
67.Fraterrigo JM, Wiens JA. Bird communities of the Colorado Rocky Mountains along a gradient of exurban development. Landscape Urban Planning, 2005; 71: 263–275.
68.Campbell SP, Witham JW, Hunter Jr ML. Long-term effects of group selection timber harvesting on abundance of forest birds. Conservation Biology, 2007; 21: 1218–1229.
69.White JG, Antos MJ, Fitzsimons JA, Palmer GC. Non-uniform bird assemblages in urban environments: the influence of streetscape vegetation. Landscape Urban Planning, 2004; 71:123–135.
70.Atlegrim O, Sjoberg K. Selective felling as a potential tool for maintaining biodiversity in managed forests. Biodiversity and Conservation, 2004; 13: 1123–1133.
71.Archabald K, Naughton-Treves L. Tourism revenue- sharing around national parks in Western Uganda: early efforts to identify and reward local communities. Environmental Conservation, 2001; 28: 135–149.
72.Fa J, Currie D, Meeuwig J. Bushmeat and food security in the Congo Basin: linkages between wildlife and people’s future. Environmental Conservation, 2003; 30: 71–78.
73.Estrada A, Coates-Estrada R, Meritt Jr. D. Bat species richness and abundance in tropical rainforest fragments and in agricultural habitats at Los Tuxtlas, Mexico. Ecography, 1993; 16: 309–318.
74.Ruppert NB, Mansori A, Anuar SMS. Diversity and biomass of terrestrial small mammals at a Malaysian primary rainforest (Segari Melintang forest reserve, Peninsular Malaysia). Journal of Tropical Life Sciences, 2015; 5(1): 3–34.
75.Boubli JP, Grelle CEV, van Schaik CP. Small mammal species diversity and composition in two ecologically distinct rain forest sites in Northern Sumatra, Indonesia. Ecotropica, 2004; 10: 149–154.
76.Brodie JF, Gibbs H. Bushmeat hunting as climate threat. Science, 2009; 326: 364–365.
77.Jansen P, Muller-Landau HC, Wright S. Bushmeat hunting and climate: an indirect link. Science, 2010; 327, 30.
78.Visconti P, Pressey RL, Giorgini D, Maiorano L, Bakkenes M, Boitani L, Alkemade A, Falcucci A, Chiozza F, Rondinini C. Future hotspots of terrestrial mammal loss. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 2011; 366: 2693–2702.
79.Cardillo M, Mace GM, Jones KE, Bielby J, Bininda-Emonds ORP, Sechrest W, Orme CDL, Purvis A. Multiple causes of high extinction risk in large mammal species. Science, 2005; 309: 1239–1241.
80.Laurance WF, Croes BM, Tchignoumba L, Lahm SA, Alonso A, Lee ME, Campbell P, Ondzeano C. Impacts of roads and hunting on Central African rain forest mammals. Conservation Biology, 2006; 20: 1251–1261.
81.Western D, Russell S, Cuthill I. The status of wildlife in protected areas compared to non-protected areas of Kenya. PLoS One, 2009; 4: e6140.
82.Craigie ID, Baillie JEM, Balmford A, Carbone C, Collen B, Green RE, Hutton JM. Large mammal population declines in Africa’s protected areas. Biological Conservation, 2010; 143: 2221–2228.
83.Nijman, V. An overview of international wildlife trade from Southeast Asia. Biodiversity Conservation, 2010; 19: 1101–1114.
84.Hoffmann M, Belant JL, Chanson JS, Cox NA, Lamoreux J, Rodrigues ASL, Schipper J, Stuart SN. The changing fates of the world’s mammals. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 2011; 366: 2598–2610.
85.Ferraz G, Russell GJ, Stouffer PC, Bierregaard RO, Pimm SL, Lovejoy TE. Rates of species loss from Amazonian forest fragments. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2003; 100: 14069–14073.
86.Kinnaird M, Sanderson E, O’Brien TG, Wibisono H, Woolmer G. Deforestation trends in a tropical landscape and implications for endangered large mammals. Conservation Biology, 2010; 17: 245–257.
87.Henle K, Davies KF, Kleyer M, Margules C, Settele J. Predictors of species sensitivity to fragmentation. Biodiversity Conservation, 2004; 13: 207–251.
88.Felton AM, Felton A, Wood J, Lindenmayer DB. Diet and feeding ecology of Ateles chamek in a Bolivian semihumid forest: the importance of Ficus as a staple food resource. International Journal of Primatology, 2008; 29: 379–403.
89.Silva SSB, Ferrari SF. Behavior patterns of southern bearded sakis (Chiropotes satanas) in the fragmented landscape of eastern Brazilian Amazonia. American Journal of Primatology, 2009; 71: 1–7.
90.Boyle SA, Smith AT. Behavioral modifications in northern bearded saki monkeys (Chiropotes satanas chiropotes) in forest fragments of central Amazonia. Primates, 2010; 51: 43–51.
91.Palacios E, Rodriguez A. Ranging pattern and use of space in a group of red howler monkeys (Alouatta seniculus) in a southeastern Colombian rainforest. American Journal of Primatology, 2001; 55: 233–251.
92.Veiga LM, Ferrari SF. Predation of arthropods by southern bearded sakis (Chiropotes satanas) in eastern Brazilian Amazonia. American Journal of Primatology, 2006; 68: 209–215.
93.Boyle SA, Zartman CE, Spironello WR, Smith AT. Implications of habitat fragmentation on the diet of bearded saki monkeys in central Amazonian forest. Journal of Mammalogy, 2012; 93(4): 959–976.
94.Rolex RE, Leano EP, Ates-Camin FB. Herpetofaunal endemism and diversity in tropical forests of MT. Hamiguitan in the Philippines. Herpetological Conservation and Biology, 2010; 6(1): 107−113.
95.Brown GW. The influence of habitat disturbance on reptiles in a box-ironbark eucalypt forest of south-eastern Australia. Biodiversity and Conservation, 2001; 10: 161–176.
96.Irschick DJ, Carlisle E, Elstrott J, Ramos M, Buckley C, Vanhooydonck B, Meyers J, Herrel A. A comparison of habitat use, morphology, clinging performance and escape behaviour among two divergent Green Anole Lizard (Anolis carolinensis) populations. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 2005; 85: 223–234.
97.Kanowski JJ, Reis TM, Catterall, CP, Piper SD. Factors affecting the use of reforested sites by reptiles in cleared rainforest landscapes in tropical and subtropical Australia. Restoration Ecology, 2006; 14: 67–76.
98.Fahrig L. Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 2003; 34(1): 487–515.
99.Rocha CFD, Bergallo HG, Van Sluys M, Alves M, Jamel C. The remnants of restinga habitats in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest of Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil: habitat loss and risk of disappearance. Brazilian Journal of Biology, 2007; 67 (2): 263–273.
100.Rocha CFD, Vrcibradic D, Kiefer MC, Menezes VA, Fontes AF, Hatano FH, Galdino CAB, Bergallo HG, Van Sluys M. Species composition, richness and nestedness of lizard assemblages from Restinga habitats along the Brazilian coast. Brazilian Journal of Biology, 2014; 74(2): 349–354.
101.Rajpar MN, Zakaria M. Mangrove Fauna of Asia. In: Mangrove Ecosystems of Asia, Status, Challenges and Management Strategies Hanum, F., Mohamad, A.L., Hakeem, K.R., Ozturk, M. (Eds.). Springer Science + Business Media New York, USA. 2014; 500 p. ISBN: 978-1-4614-8581-0.
102.Stuart SN, Chanson JS, Cox NA, Young BE, Rodrigues ASL, Fischman DL, Waller RW. Status and trends of amphibian declines and extinctions worldwide. Science, 2004; 306: 1783–1786.
103.Rowley J, Brown R, Bain R, Kusrini M, Inger R, Stuart B, Wogan G, Thy N, Chanard T, Trung CT, Diesmos A, Iskandar DT, Lau M, Ming LT. Opinion piece; impending conservation crisis for Southeast Asian amphibians. Biology Letters, 2010; 6: 336–338.
104.Bickford D, Iskandar DT, Barlian A. A lungless frog discovered in Borneo. Current Biology, 2008; 18: 374–375.
105.International Union for Conservation Nature. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, Version 2009.1. Web accessed on 1st May, 2009 at URL: www.iucnredlist.org.
106.Gillespie GR, Ahmad E, Elahan B, Evans A, Ancrenaz M, Goossens B, Scroggie MP. Conservation of amphibians in Borneo: relative value of secondary tropical forest and non-forest habitats. Biological Conservation, 2012; 152: 136–144.
107.Schnitzer SA, Carson WP. Treefall gaps and maintenance of species diversity in a tropical forest. Ecology, 2001; 82: 913–919.
108.Laurance WF, Peres CA. Emerging threats to Tropical Forests. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, USA. 2005; 520 p. ISBN: 9780226470221.
109.Ewers RM, Didham RK. Confounding factors in the detection of species responses to habitat fragmentation. Biological Reviews, 2006; 81: 117–142.
110.Santos AB, Benitez-Malvido J. Insect herbivory and leaf disease in natural and human disturbed habitats: lesson from early-successional Heliconia herbs. Biotropica, 2012; 44: 53–62.
111.Laurance WF, Goosem M, Laurance SG. Impacts of roads and linear clearings on tropical forests. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 2009; 24: 659–669.
112.Sendoya SF, Silva PSD, Farji-Brener AG. Does inundation risk affect leaf-cutting ant distribution? A study along a topographic gradient of a Costa Rican tropical wet forest. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 2013; 30(1): 82–90.
113.Basset Y. Invertebrates in the canopy of tropical rain forests How much do we really know? Plant Ecology, 2001; 153: 87–107.
Written By
Mohamed Zakaria, Muhammad Nawaz Rajpar, Ibrahim Ozdemir
and Zamri Rosli
Submitted: 26 November 2015Reviewed: 19 July 2016Published: 09 November 2016
Open access peer-reviewed chapter
