Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Total Acid Number Reduction of Naphthenic Acids Using Supercritical Fluid and Ionic Liquids

Written By

Pradip Chandra Mandal and Mitsuru Sasaki

Submitted: 20 August 2017 Reviewed: 20 October 2017 Published: 07 February 2018

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.71812

From the Edited Volume

Recent Insights in Petroleum Science and Engineering

Edited by Mansoor Zoveidavianpoor

Chapter metrics overview

1,561 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Naphthenic acids (NAs) are complex mixture of predominately alkyl-substituted cycloaliphatic carboxylic acids and small amount of acyclic acids present in crude oil, heavy oil and in oil sands bitumen. They are toxic components in refinery wastewater and in oil sand extraction water and lead to corrosion problems within the oil refineries. Therefore, the amount of NAs needs to suppress in petroleum oils and wastewater came from petroleum industry. This paper reviews the supercritical fluids (SCFs)- and ionic liquids (ILs)-based acidity reduction process from heavy oils by reviewing open literature. The potential benefits of SCFs- and ILs-based acidity reduction process of heavy oils are also explored. The reviewed articles reveal that total acid number (TAN) removal increase with increasing reaction time and temperature by the action of SCF. Supercritical methanol (SC-MeOH) has higher potentiality for removing acidity of NAs than supercritical water (SCW) without deposition of coke. TAN removal from NAs using SCF follows first order kinetics on TAN removal. ILs can reduce acidity of heavy oil either forming zwitterionic species or building cage structure around NAs through specific chemical bonds. Thus, non-catalytic SCF- and ILs-based TAN reduction process can open a new window to reduce acidity of heavy oils.

Keywords

  • supercritical fluid
  • naphthenic acid
  • total acid number
  • ionic liquid

1. Introduction

Heavy oil is a type of unconventional oil deposit (global estimated reserve of heavy oil and bitumen is 6.2 trillion barrels) all over the world. Such type of oil reservoirs are vastly undeveloped due to the difficulties of production, transportation and refining efficiently and inexpensively. Heavy oils contain significant quantity of metals, sulfur and nitrogen heteroatom-containing compounds and naphthenic acids (NAs) as contaminants. NAs are a mixture of saturated aliphatic and alicyclic carboxylic acids. They are accountable for acidity of crude oils or heavy oils. NA content of heavy oil can be figured out in terms of total acid number (TAN), mg of KOH per g of oil. Crudes containing high TAN, specifically TAN ≥ 2, have lower demand [1, 2]. Moreover, their existence in crude oil creates multiple problems: they are corrosive [3, 4, 5, 6] in nature, lessen quality of product and make environmental disposal problems [7, 8, 9]. Therefore, their removal from heavy oils is considered as a pressing issue for petroleum industries.

A number of deacidification processes have been disclosed in open literature to deacidify acidic petroleum oil, such as non-catalytic non-destructive methods, non-catalytic destructive methods and catalytic destructive methods.

High TAN containing crudes are usually mixed off with low TAN containing crudes to eliminate excessive corrosion in refinery equipment. This process is obviously expensive and non-selective [7]. In a different way, polymeric compounds including adequate basicity may be used to entrap or neutralize NAs. This process, however, involves the use of costly neutralizing agents, which are difficult to recover from deacidified products. Another method, extractive separation, usually requires a multistage wash using various solvent to single NA compounds or their derivatives such as water-oil emulsion and salt [10, 11, 12]. But valuable hydrocarbon compounds are removed to do so making the process costly.

The metal oxide (such as magnesium oxide and aluminum oxide) solid solutions show high adsorption capacity and can readily remove at least 95% of the NAs present in a liquid hydrocarbon feedstock at temperatures of 30–80°C [12, 13]. Recent adsorption technology is only attainable for low temperature distillate fractions. The prior process requires a highly alkaline environment, a strong base such as alkali metal hydroxides (for example, caustic soda). Unfortunately, the caustic does not simply provide an alkaline environment but in time is neutralized by acidic components of the hydrocarbon stream. Therefore, this process requires its continuous replacement and replenishment. It is alarming that disposal of spent caustic solutions is itself an environmental problem [13].

Corrosion inhibitors such as organic poly sulfide or phosphites or phosphoric acid have been introduced to passivate metal surfaces by building a defensive layer on them. But, this process requires maintaining adequate thickness of the protective layer that enforces the costs of multiple inhibitor injections.

Esterification is a well-known process for removing NA compounds from petroleum oils. In this process, NAs reacts with alcohol in the presence or absence of catalyst to form ester [14]. Metal carboxylates [15] and metal oxides [16] are fruitfully applied in esterification at reaction temperatures of 250–350°C over enhanced reaction times [12].

Non-catalytic NA destruction methods, such as thermal decomposition [7, 17], have a limited success for acidity reduction of crude oil. High temperature, in excess of 400°C, is mostly required which can offer thermal cracking of the crude resulting coke formation [2]. In this regard, catalytic decarboxylation process [18] has come out as an alternative and economic process of NAs decomposition.

The success of zeolites [12] and metal oxides [19] for deacidification of crude oil is high. But the process still requires moderately high operating temperatures (300–400°C). Moreover, many of these applications require hydrogen [7] to increase deacidification rate. But, hydrogen is not usually available at a production site. Hydrotreating in the presence of alumina supported metal oxides such as cobalt, molybdenum or nickel oxides has been successfully used in this regard [20, 21]. Metal oxides saturated with copper [22] and nickels [23] in the liquid phase at moderate temperatures (greater than 200°C) have also been utilized for the decarboxylation of fatty acids. Catalytic process, however, would be less feasible in crude oil systems due to catalyst poisoning by aromatics compounds, nitrogen containing species, metals and sulfur containing species of crude oil.

Supported palladium and platinum catalysts are active to destruct NAs via decarboxylation [24] and decarbonylation [25] in the liquid or gas phase. It is seen that transition metals supported catalysts can efficiently decarboxylate a series of fatty acids at temperatures of 80–100°C even without hydrogen [26]. In addition, the same titania-based metal catalysts can resist sulfur significantly for fine chemical synthesis [27]. Though their activity and chemical stability is high, platinum group metal-based catalysts are cost-effective process for large scale operation.

A common industrial method of NAs removal from the kerosene/diesel fractions is a dilute caustic wash of them using alkali/alkaline earth metals. In this process, NAs is separated from oil fraction as calcium or sodium naphthenates, which is dissolved in water soluble fraction. Then, it is possible to recover the water insoluble NAs by acidifying calcium or sodium naphthenates with a mineral acid [12]. This process is an uneconomical one; as it is considered inexpensive, incomplete removal of all NAs due to its poor solubility coupled with the formation of emulsion [12]. Treating of petroleum products for removing of NAs via a dilute caustic wash is a common industrial method. As an alternative of this process, the researchers are using organic bases such as glycolic solutions [28], monoethanolamine or 2-(Dibutylamino)ethanol [29] or imidazole derivatives [30] as alcoholic solutions. However, excess amount of organic base is required to reach good extraction process. This large excess of base resulted in carryover of amine into the petroleum phase and can create problem in the downstream catalyst units used for upgrading the oil [31].

Recently, specific ionic liquids (ILs) have been used in different applications including acidity removal from petroleum industry. For example, sulfur-containing acids are successfully extracted from crude oil using ILs containing a cation with a connected amino group [32]. In addition, amino acid ionic liquids (AAILs) can neutralize NAs by the reaction where one amino group of the amino acid-anion can react with one carboxylic acid group to form zwitterionic species. In this regard, lysine-derived AAILs indicated higher extraction capability compared to other AAILs because AAILs derived from lysine contain two amino groups [12]. Mandal et al. [2, 33] have disclosed a new supercritical fluid-based deacidification process at high temperatures and pressures.

This review paper examines the open literatures of petroleum oil deacidification process using environmental benign solvent, supercritical fluids and ionic liquids.

Advertisement

2. Naphthenic acid

NAs are complex mixtures of alkyl-substituted acyclic and cycloaliphatic carboxylic acids found in hydrocarbon deposits (petroleum, oil sands bitumen and crude oils) [34, 35, 36]. They are originally come from aerobic microbial degradation of petroleum hydrocarbon [34]. They are described by the general chemical formula CnH2n+zO2, where n indicates the number of carbon and z is either zero or a negative, even integer that secludes lack of hydrogen resulting from ring formation. The numbers of ring present in the compounds are obtained by dividing the absolute value of z by 2. The rings of NAS can be fused or bridged. Figure 1 depicts examples of typical structures of NAs, which have a different number of rings [36].

Figure 1.

General structure of naphthenic acid.

NAs are non-volatile, chemically stable and perform as surfactants. The polarity and non-volatility of NAs increase with increasing molecular weight delivering specific compounds with different physical, chemical, and toxicological properties [34, 36, 37, 38, 39]. NAs act as typical carboxylic acids having acid strength analogous with the higher fatty acids. NAs are little weaker acid than low molecular weight carboxylic acids like acetic acid [36, 40, 41, 42].

Commercial NAs, produced via extraction of petroleum distillates, have industrial applications as shown in Table 1 . Sodium salt of NAs is soluble in water.

NA metal salt Industrial applications
Na salt Emulsifying agent for agricultural insecticides
Additive for cutting oils emulsion breaker in oil industry
Ca naphthenate Additive for lubricating oil
Fe and Mn naphthenates Fuel additives for improved combustion and reduced corrosion
Pb and Ba salts Catalyst for oil-based paints
Cu and Zn naphthenate Wood preservatives
Co naphthenate Curing agent in rubbers and resins
Adhesion promoter of steel cord to rubber
Mn, Pb, Co, and Ca soap Oxidative catalysts

Table 1.

Industrial usage of NAs [36].

Steel alloys that can resist corrosion by sulfur-containing compounds can be suitable for corrosion by NAs [43, 44]. The process of NAs corrosion is obscure till now though it can chelate with the metal ion by the carboxylate forming hydrogen gas [45]. The amount of NA passing through the system together with operating temperature of 220–400°C favor corrosion [43, 46]. NAs decompose at temperatures above 400°C creating a protective film over the alloy [43, 46]. Corrosivity increases with increasing total acid number (TAN) of crude oil. Yet, the spread of corrosion by NAs rely not only on TAN but also on the availability of the carboxylic acid group and the type of compounds [43, 44, 46].

Very few reports have been disclosed discussing NAs in refinery wastewater due to their analytical difficulties although discharged wastewater from petroleum refineries. Low molecular weight NAs (typically <500 Daltons) are readily dissolved as their carboxylates in water at neutral and alkaline pH [34]. Bitumen extraction from the Athabasca oil sands deposit in northeastern Alberta, Canada releases NAs into tailings pond water [44]. Holowenko et al. [47] discovered that tailings pond water contain 20–120 mg NAs per liter, which is sufficient to create environmental pollution. Dorn [48] concluded that NAs concentrations greater than 2.5–5 mg per liter in refinery effluent would be toxic to fish. Rogers et al. [49] supposed that the liver was the primary target of NAs toxicity. The low molecular weight NAs are more capable to biodegradation than the high molecular weight NAs [35, 44]. Scott et al. [35] disclosed that the commercial NAs are more readily biodegradable compounds than the NAs present in the oil sand tailings water.

Advertisement

3. History of SCF and IL

3.1. History of SCF

Baron Charles Cagniard de la Tour in 1822 revealed supercritical phenomena [50] while carrying out experiments in a sealed cannon barrel filled with various fluids at various temperatures. G. Gore in 1861 showed that camphor and naphthalene dissolved in liquid carbon dioxide, whereas many carboxylic acids did not dissolved in liquid carbon dioxide. The term, critical point, was eventually coined by Thomas Andrew in 1869 [50] as the end of the vapor pressure curve in a phase diagram. The supercritical fluid (SCF) phenomena were first described by Hannay and Hogarth (1879) [50], who reported on the solubility of cobalt chloride in supercritical ethanol. Villard in 1896 [50] on his review of SCF solubility phenomena described the ability of methane, ethylene, carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide to dissolve a number of liquids and solid hydrocarbons such as carbon disulfide, camphor, stearic acid and paraffin wax. A few years later, E. H. Buchner (1906) [50] reviewed the literature and also made significant additions to the experimental database of high pressure SCF-solute mixtures. He became the first in a long line of researches to measure the solubility of a model compound, naphthalene, in supercritical carbon dioxide (sc-CO2). Chemists continued to experiment with SCF for almost a century, although they remained something of a curiosity until the 1970s, when rising energy costs led chemists to consider SCF as a cheaper alternative to liquid extraction and distillation. Industrial use of SCFs as solvent began in 1950s. Nowadays the uses of supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) are largely apparent in the decaffeination of green coffee, food, nutraceuticals, perfumes and cosmetics, pharmaceuticals, textile, electronics, aerogels, ceramic and innovative materials, oil industry, laundry dry cleaning, analytical processes, like, supercritical fluid chromatography, nanoparticle and microparticle formation, generation of co-crystals in pharmaceutical processes, biodiesel production and several other new and upcoming applications [51].

Supercritical water (SCW) is water at a temperature and pressure above its critical points (374°C and 22.1 MPa). It is known as an environmentally benign solvent for a comprehensive variety of chemical reactions; it takes part in a reaction not only as a solvent but also as a reactant [52, 53]; thus, SCW is a logical choice to obstruct the precipitation of AS at the elevated cracking temperature beyond 400°C [54]. In addition, aromatic bonds—ethers and esters—and aliphatic bonds are freely broken in SCW [52, 55, 56]. Thermal reactions of heavy oil have been studied in SCW, showing that two major reactions occur under supercritical conditions: oxidation and hydrolysis [57, 58, 59]. These reactions allow tar to be decomposed successfully into useful chemical compounds in SCW [60, 61]. Hu et al. [62] treated oil shale using SCW showing a higher conversion and a larger oil recovery than toluene extraction process. SCW also delivered easier decomposition of the polar components in oil shale likened with supercritical toluene [63]. Park and Son [64] studied extraction of Athabasca oil sand bitumen in a microreactor using SCW, achieving a maximum 24% conversion at a temperature of 380°C, pressure of 30 MPa and a reaction time of 90 min. These results show that SCW can be used as an effective green solvent for the extraction and decomposition of heavy hydrocarbons.

Methanol’s critical property data are Tc = 239.63°C, ρc = 277.49 kg/m3 and Pc = 8.08 MPa [65], becoming supercritical with disappearing phase boundaries between liquid and gas at these conditions. Yadav and Chandra [66] discovered that the hydrogen bonding between methanol molecules decreases significantly with moving to the supercritical state from the ambient one. Supercritical methanol (SC-MeOH) can degrade polyethylene terephthalate (PET), which can be used for recycling waste plastics [67, 68]. SC-MeOH can also be used to produce biodiesel [69, 70]. SC-MeOH can convert cellulose into methylated cellotriose, methylated cellobiose, methyl α- and β-D-glucosides, levoglucosan and 5-hydroxymethylfurfural [71]. Wang et al. [72] have studied the kinetics of esterification reaction between low-concentration NAs and methanol with or without using catalyst at temperatures of 180–280°C in an autoclave reactor. Acidity reduction of NAs using SC-MeOH without the addition of catalyst has been disclosed in open literature by Mandal et al. [33]. They have proved that approximately 100% TAN was reduced at a temperature of 350°C, a methanol partial pressure (MPP) of 10 MPa and a reaction time of 60 min. In addition, TAN reduction kinetics were followed first-order kinetics with Arrhenius parameters of activation energy 5.78 kcal/mol and a pre-exponential factor 1.56 s−1.

The SCF processes are the currently most interesting environmental benign process [73]. The sc-CO2 and the SCW have proved to be very efficient as a green extracting agent [74] and they are efficiently replacing harmful organic solvents nowadays. In addition, recent scientific reports have utilized sc-CO2 for the synthesis of graphene-related materials. Moreover, continuous hydrothermal systems offer the ability to carry out synthesis in a high-throughput mode, enabling the discovery of new materials [75]. Furthermore, SCW can remove heavy metals from metalloporphyrin compounds effectively and efficiently in an environmentally friendly way [76]. Thus, the sc-CO2 and the SCW have attracted tremendous interest among academia and industry in this modern era as a green process.

3.2. Ionic liquid (IL) and its history

An ionic liquid (IL) is ionic, slat-like materials. The ions in ILs are poorly coordinated resulting low melting point (below 100°C, or even at room temperature). An IL contains charged cation, a bulk organic structure with low symmetry and anion held together by Coulombic interactions. It is hard to break these bonds and make ILs evaporate. The extensively used cations are based on ammonium, sulfonium, phosphonium, imidazolium, pyridinium, picolinium, pyrrolidium, etc. with different substitutes. The anions of ILs may be halogen (first-generation ILs), organic ([CH3COO], [CF3CO2], [PhCOO], etc.) or inorganic ([BF4], [PF6], [AlCl4], etc.). The properties of ILs depend on mutual fit of cation and anion, size, geometry and charge distribution. Usually, the cation has an impact on the hydrophobicity or hydrogen bonding ability and the anion controls the water miscibility [77, 78]. The structures of some commonly used ionic liquid systems are tabulated in Figure 2 [78, 79].

Figure 2.

Some commonly used IL systems.

The field of ionic liquid (IL) is not new, but their application as solvents in chemical processes for synthesis and catalysis has recently become important. This interesting field began in 1914 after preparation of ethylammonium nitrate ([C2H5NH3][NO3]) with the melting point (mp) of 12°C by Paul Walden [78, 79, 80]. This compound is recognized as the first IL by many researchers [80] but due to its high reactivity has not really found a use. After two decades of silence, IL appears in an US patent no. 1943176 in 1934. The writer of this patent claimed that the cellulose has dissolved in halide salts of nitrogen-containing bases, such as 1-benzylpyridinium chloride, 1-ethylpyridinium chloride, etc. at the temperature above 100°C. After another declined phase in the history of IL, it re-emerged in the period just after World War II in 1948 as an another US patent [79]. It was basically appeared in the open literature in 1951 [79] as the application of mixture of aluminum (III) chloride and 1-ethylpyridinium bromide to the electrodeposition of aluminum. But they have failed to investigate the IL at that time due to the complicated mixture of bromide and chloride salts. Later the physical and chemical properties of this IL were studied by Osteryoung group in 1975, aided by Bernard Gilbert [79]. The IL was created international attention in 1970s as aluminum chloride-based molten salts were utilized in 1940s for preparation of nuclear warheads batteries. Wilkes in 1970 attempted to develop better batteries for nuclear warheads and space probes that needed molten salts to operate [78]. The chemists of that period searched new salts that can remain liquid at lower temperatures as the molten salts were sufficiently hot to damage the neighboring materials. Wilkes and his co-workers carried on improving their ILs for using as battery electrolytes and in the long run they identified one low melting point IL [78]. Wilkes and Hussey discovered the [C2mim]Cl-AlCl3 IL system, liquid at room temperature, which was the first genuine example of IL system [79]. ILs became one of the most promising chemicals as solvents in the late 1990s.

ILs are versatile compounds due to their interesting properties. The properties of ILs are variable and can be in theory adjusted for any application, i.e., they are not all non-corrosive, but they can be designed to be non-corrosive. In general, they are characterized to have low vapor pressure, thermal and chemical stability and non-flammability. The research areas on ILs are growing very rapidly and it has numerous potential applications, such as, microwave-assisted organic synthesis, catalysis, biocatalysis, separation, extraction, electrochemistry, nanomaterials synthesis, polymerization reactions and corrosion inhibitors [81]. ILs can also offer surprising efforts to reassess and optimize existing technologies and processes related to the petroleum industry. A large number of research studies on the assessment and utilization of ILs in pollutant removal including sulfur-, nitrogen- and flour-containing compounds; aromatics; naphthenic acids and asphaltene of refinery feeds are disclosed in open literature.

Advertisement

4. TAN removal using SCF

4.1. Effect of temperature on TAN reduction using SCF

The initial TAN of NA, used raw materials for potential experiments by Mandal et al. [2, 33], was 241.55 (mg of KOH/g of NA). TAN reduction takes place at high temperatures and pressures in the presence of SCW. But, SC-MeOH can reduce TAN at lower temperature and pressure than SCW. Temperature has a considerable effect on TAN reduction using SCF. For exploring temperature effect on TAN reduction using SCW, Mandal et al. [2] carried out a lot of experiments at temperatures of 400–490°C and water partial pressure (WPP) of 25–45 MPa. In addition, SC-MeOH effect on TAN reduction was explored at temperatures of 300–350°C and MPP of 10 MPa [33].

Figure 3 illustrates the high TAN removal which increased with increasing reaction time and temperature. Type of SCF was also an important factor on TAN reduction process. Mandal et al. [2] in 2012 disclosed that approximately 89% TAN is reduced at reaction temperature of 490°C and reaction time of 60 min in treatment without water depositing approximately 4.05% solid which was nothing but lean hydrogen content high molecular weight hydrocarbons. Solid formation is the indication of loss of valuable compounds and thus potential revenue. Thus, it is desirable to reduce solid deposition from the economical point of view. SCW have the capability to reduce solid formation. Mandal et al. [2] do not observe solid deposition during their experiments using SCW at temperatures of 400–450°C. Solid deposition is detected at a temperature of 490°C, but depends on WPP and reaction time. The amount of solid deposition falls to 1.79 and 0.10% at WPPs of 30 and 45 MPa, respectively, indicating the drastic reduction of solid deposition at a WPP of 45 MPa. At extreme operating conditions (at temperature of 490°C, reaction time of 60 min and WPP of 45 MPa) of SCW treatment, the TAN reduction is reduced to approximately 73% which is less than the value (89%) obtained during pyrolysis without water.

Figure 3.

Variation of TAN as a function of reaction times, temperatures and water or methanol partial pressures (symbols: ○, 400°C, WPP of 45 MPa; ∆, 450°C, WPP of 45 MPa; □, 490°C, WPP of 45 MPa; +, 490°C, no water; −, 490°C, no water (solid); ●, 300°C, MPP of 10 MPa; ▲, 325°C, MPP of 10 MPa; ■, 350°C, MPP of 10 MPa).

4.2. Reaction kinetic study and mechanism

In 2012, Mandal et al. [2] conducted pioneering study on TAN removal using SCW. Their study revealed that TAN removed from NAs using SCW followed first-order kinetics. Mandal et al. [33] on another study showed that TAN removal from NAs using SC-MeOH also followed first-order kinetics. Wang et al. showed that the esterification reaction between NAs and subcritical methanol follows second-order kinetics with or without SnO catalyst in their study. The feedstock used by Wang et al. was the second vacuum fraction processed by a Chinese corporation having TAN content 3.69 (mg of KOH/g of feed stock), which was a mixture of NAs and higher hydrocarbons. The feedstock used by Mandal et al. [2, 33] was basically a blend of carboxylic acids having a TAN content 241.55 (mg of KOH/g of NA). The variation of properties of feed stock and reaction operating conditions were responsible for the variation of reaction order. Figure 4 shows the Arrhenius type dependency of NAs removal rates on temperature. Based on such type of plot, Mandal et al. [2, 33] discovered the activation energy and pre-exponential factor. Thus, the temperature-dependent rate constant can be expressed by the following Arrhenius equations:

k T T = 1.43 × 10 5 e 66.24 RT , for SCW E1
k T T = 1.56 e 5.78 RT , for SC-MeOH E2

Figure 4.

Arrhenius plot for reaction between NAs and SCF (symbols: ○, SCW; ∆, SC-MeOH).

The respective activation energies of the reaction of NAs with SCW and SC-MeOH are 66.24 and 5.78 kcal per mol. The activation energy of NAs for reacting with SCW is 91.27% higher than the activation energy of NAs for reacting with SC-MeOH at lower pressure. This indicates that 91.27% higher energy is required for the reaction of NAs with SCW.

According to the study of Mandal et al. [2, 33], SCW and SC-MeOH reduce acidity of NAs in different reactions and pathways ( Figure 5 ). SCW acts as a hydrogen donor [82] and it can remove metal from metalloporphyrin where hydrogenation reaction is involved. NAs react with SCW to form stable compounds [2] and gaseous product (CO2, CO, petroleum gas) where hydrogenation reaction is happening to occur. Based on the analysis using GC/MS and MALDI TOF/MS, Mandal et al. in 2012 [2] showed that hydrocarbons are formed through decarboxylation of NA followed by long-chain scission and formation of high molecular weight hydrocarbons. It is also observed that SCW can produce low molecular weight hydrocarbons suppressing char formation and production of high molecular weight hydrocarbons from alkylbenzene and NAs [2, 82]. NA is not hindered the quality of petroleum oil except corrosion problem.

Figure 5.

Reaction mechanism of NAs with SCF.

On the other hand, SC-MeOH without a distinct catalyst can reduce acidity promptly by forming ester (like nonanoic acid, methyl ester; decanoic acid, methyl ester and so on), saturated alkylbenzene (like heptylbenzene) and alkane (like decosane). SC-MeOH as an excellent solvent can dissolve feedstock so that reactant molecules are in mutual close proximity to react readily. At the first step of reaction, SC-MeOH reacts with NAs to form ester and water. The thermal stability of ester depends on its carbon skeleton [33, 83]. Mandal et al. in 2013 [33] observed that concentration of saturated alkylbenzene and alkane is increasing with increasing reaction time. In the second step of reaction, the thermal effect of SC-MeOH can decompose unstable ester to form saturated alkylbenzene and alkane and produce new ester. In the third step of reaction, produced esters can react with SC-MeOH to form new ester and water.

Advertisement

5. TAN reduction using IL

Literature study revealed that NAs are successfully removed from crude fractions by aqueous base washing [84, 85]. But serious emulsion problems are experienced during operation.

Shi et al. [86] has proposed a fancy method to isolate NAs from highly acidic crude oils by forming ILs. In this method, the researchers prepared BrØnsted ILs by acid-base reaction between basic imidazole and NAs to form naphthenates ILs according to the following reaction:

E3

The acid removal rate has been affected by the 2-methylimidazole content, reagent/oil ratio, reaction time and reaction temperature. All of them had a positive effect on the acid removal rate except the reagent/oil ratio which had a negative effect on the oil yield rate. The same approach was employed by Baden Aniline and Sida Factory (BASF), the largest Ludwigshafen, Germany based chemical company in the world to develop the first successful large-scale industrial application of ILs in 2003 [81] through the process biphasic acid scavenging ILs (BASIL). In this process, they are using N-alkylimidazole derivative to scavenge acid that is formed in the alkoxyphenylphosphines production process as a by-product forming ILs. The reaction results in the formation of the IL N-alkylimidazolium chloride having a melting point of 75°C. The IL separates as a clear liquid phase from the pure product and is reused.

Crude oil can be deacidified with a basic IL [87]. The basic IL is a liquid salt having the general formula [C+][A], where C+ is a cation having a basic moiety, preferably represented by a formula [Cat+-(Z-Bas)n], and/or A is an anion having a basic moiety, preferably represented by [An-(Z-Bas)]. Here, Cat+ is a positively charged moiety, An is an anionic moiety, Bas is a basic moiety, Z is a covalent bond joining Cat+/An and Bas or is a divalent linking group and n is an integer from 1 to 3. The Cat+ moiety comprises a heterocyclic ring structure selected from imidazolium, pyridinium, pyrazolium and so on. The An moiety comprises a CO2 or SO3 group. Base comprises at least one basic nitrogen, phosphorus, sulfur or oxygen atom and preferably selected from –N(R1)(R2), −P(R1)(R2), −S(R3), −O(R3), where R1 and R2 are independently selected from hydrogen, linear or branched alkyl, cycloalkyl, aryl and substituted ring and R3 is selected from linear or branched alkyl, cycloalkyl, aryl and substituted aryl. Z comprises divalent organic radical and preferably selected from a divalent alkylene radical, alkyleneoxyalkylene radical, polyoxyethylene radical and alkylenearylene or alkylenearylenealkylene radical.

Sun and Shi in 2012 [88] revealed that the ILs of imidazole anion having strong alkalinity had excellent performance on deacidification. They discovered that the lower the agent/oil mass ratio, the higher the NAs conversion and high temperature could decrease the reagent/oil ratio to achieve maximum deacidification rate with each IL. When [AMIm]Im is used, the performance of deacidification succeeded the order [OMIm]Im > [HMIm]Im > [BMIm]Im > [EMIm]Im. Duan et al. in 2013 [89] have studied on pyridinium, imidazolium and imidazolide-based ILs at different alkalinity. They showed that the stronger alkalinity of ILs was, the higher deacidification would be and the deacidification succeeded the order [AMIm]Im > [AMIm]Br > [APy]Br. In addition, when the length of alkyl chain increased, each kind of ILs would have more excellent performance on deacidification.

Sun et al. [88, 89] explained NAs removal mechanism using ILs with the help of techniques proposed by Holbrey et al. [90]. Holbrey et al. [90] revealed that IL molecules themselves could form cage structure through specific chemical bonds. In this cage, the target molecules would be captured through the formation of liquid clathrate due to the π-π interaction between ILs and target molecules. This phenomenon would be helpful to explain the following facts: (1) the larger the π interaction between ILs and NAs, the stronger the IL alkalinity which means of great electron density, the better the effect of deacidification would be. (2) For the same anion containing ILs, the longer alkyl chain of ILs, the higher the deacidification activity as well as alkalinity, the more inclusive for NAs by increasing the space of the cage. Thus, NAs conversion increased with the larger of alkyl chain of the ILs. (3) Unregenerated ILs indicated good performance on deacidification in the following iterative reactions because each ILs molecules could adapt more than one NA molecules. The NAs could not be withdrawn completely from low NA containing oil as the surrounding alkane molecules made NA molecule difficult to penetrate into the clathrate structure of ILs. When fresh acidic oil added into this system, the surrounding alkane structure was broken and ILs showed good performance again. (4) The NA molecules could easily escape from the cage structure at high temperature due to unfavorable adsorption process at this condition. So, the reuse of IL would be decreased at such temperature condition.

Andersen et al. [12] have studied a number of tetraalkylammonium and tetraalkylphosphonium amino acid-based ILs to remove NAs from crude oil. A model oil having TAN 4.00 mg KOH goil −1 has been charged in a glass vessel and heated the same at a temperature of 25°C for 1 h. An exact amount of ILs has then been mixed with the oil for reaction for 20 min. The percentage of NA removal obtained from the experiments is summarized in Table 2 .

IL anion NA Removal (%)
Tributylmethylammonium [N4441]+ Tetrabutylphosphonium [P4444]+
Bis (trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide ([NTf2]) 2 3
Serinate ([Ser]) 31 32
Threonate ([Thr]) 35 37
Valinate ([Val]) 21 31
Cystinate ([Cys]) 26 27
Prolinate ([Pro]) 36 38
Lysinate ([Lys]) 46 41
Taurinate ([Tau]) 37 32

Table 2.

Percentage of NA removal using a range of AAILs at a temperature of 25°C [12].

Table 2 revealed that all AAILs have showed excellent and swift acid removal after 20 min except [NTf2]-based ILs. The low extraction efficiency of [NTf2]-based ILs implies its weak interaction between the IL and the NA. There is a little effect of the cation type on acid removal although [P4444]+ have the pioneering extraction efficiency due to their lower viscosity than the other. It is noticeable that [N4441] [Val] have the lowest acid removal capability than [P4444][Val] due to the highest melting point of [N4441] [Val] compared to [P4444][Val]. [Lys]-based ILs have two amine groups per molecule of IL that can extend its acid removal capability. The other functional groups present on the anion such as hydroxyl group (−OH) in [Ser] and [Thr] and thiol (−SH) group in [Cys]-based ILs have a little impact on the corresponding extraction efficiency.

The following two reactions are the possible reactions for removing NA using AAIL:

Cation H 2 C R COO + R COOH Cation OOC C R N H 3 OOC R E4
Cation H 2 C R COO + R COOH Cation OOC R + N H 2 C R COOH E5

In the first reaction, the amino acid anion constructs IL-NA complex known as zwitterionic species by protonating the amino group and forming the carboxylate anion. In the second reaction, the protonation of amino acid anion and ion exchange with NA form the naphthenate salt releasing the amino acid. Andersen et al. [12] have confirmed based on infrared spectroscopy that the reaction mechanism involves a stoichiometric reaction between one amino group and one carboxylic acid group forming a zwitterionic species. Lysine anion contains two amino groups. Therefore, lysine-derived AAILs showed higher extraction capability compared to other AAILs.

Based on current studies, SCF process is more effective than IL-based process for reducing TAN of NAs. SC-MeOH without the addition of catalyst can reduce approximately 100% TAN at a temperature of 350°C, a methanol partial pressure (MPP) of 10 MPa and a reaction time of 60 min [33]. On the other hand, the IL, tributylmethylammonium lysinate, can reduce approximately 46% NA at a temperature of 25°C [12]. A lot of ILs are available in open market or possibility of production in laboratory that can be used to reduce TAN of NAs at room temperatures at high extent. The benefit of using ILs is needed room or low temperature to reduce TAN of NAs. In addition, it is possible to separate ILs after treatment reducing cost of process. Therefore, IL-based processes are attracting the researchers nowadays.

Advertisement

6. Conclusion

A number of TAN reduction methods have been developed for reducing the TAN content of crude oil to maintain TAN content of crude oil below the integer value 2. The SCF process and the IL-based process, known as environmental benign processes, are new processes in this area. SCF without the addition of catalyst can reduce TAN of NAs and substantial amounts of NAs are converted into non-acidic products. The reaction kinetics is consistent with first-order dependency on TAN removal. Like SCF, ILs can also reduce acidity of heavy oils either by forming zwitterionic species or creating cage structure around NAs through specific chemical bonds. In comparison, SCF process is more efficient than IL-based process for reducing TAN of NAs. Therefore, IL-based processes are attracting the researcher’s attention due to their availability in laboratory or in open market and separability tendency after using.

Advertisement

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Short-Term Internal Research Fund (STIRF), Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS (UTP), Malaysia.

References

  1. 1. Bienstock MG, Matragrano JG, Patel RD, Bearden Jr. R. Thermal process for reducing total acid number of crude oil. US Pat. No.: 6,086,751; 2000
  2. 2. Mandal PC, Wahyudiono, Sasaki M, Goto M. Reduction of total acid number (TAN) of naphthenic acid (NA) using supercritical water for reducing corrosion problems of oil refineries. Fuel. 2012;92:288
  3. 3. Hau J. Predicting sulfidic and naphthenic acid corrosion. Corrosion. 2009;65(12):831-844
  4. 4. Blum SC, Olmstead WN, Bearden R. Thermal decomposition of naphthenic acids, US Pat No.: 5,820,750; 1998
  5. 5. Smith DF, Rodgers RP, Rahimi P, Teclemariam A, Marshall AG. Effect of thermal treatment on acidic organic species from Athabasca bitumen heavy vacuum gas oil, analyzed by negative-ion electrospray Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance (FT-ICR) mass spectrometry. Energy & Fuels. 2009;23:314-319
  6. 6. Petkova NB, Angelova MK, Tasheva JTS. Possibilities for substitution of the applied inhibiting system including copper-ammonia carbonate complex for blocking the corrosive components in the crude oil processing. Oxidation Communications. 2010;33(4):926-930
  7. 7. Blum SC, Olmstead WN, Bearden R. Thermal decomposition of naphthenic acids. US Pat. No.: 5,820,750; Oct., 1998
  8. 8. de O Gomes A, Guimaraes RCL, Batista IP. Total acid number distribution in a Brazilian refinery oil sample after exposure to different levels of heating in the process units, preprints-American Chemical Society. Division of Petroleum Chemistry. 2009;54(1):26-29
  9. 9. Petkova N, Angelova M, Petkov P. Establishing the reasons and type of the enhanced corrosion in the crude oil atmospheric distillation unit. Petroleum and Coal. 2009;51(4):286-292
  10. 10. Braccknell SND, Osborne CG. Naphthenic acid corrosion in oil refineries. U.S. Patent 6,464,859 (Oct. 15, 2002)
  11. 11. Duncum SN, Osborne CG. Process for deacidifying a crude oil system. US 6,464,859 B1 (Oct. 15, 2002)
  12. 12. Andersen K, Goodrich P, Hardacre C, Hussain A, Rooney DW, Wassell D. Removal of naphthenic acids from crude oil using amino acid ionic liquids. Fuel. 2013;108:715-722
  13. 13. Gillespie RD, Arena BJ. Naphthenic acid removal as an adjunct to liquid hydrocarbons sweeting, U.S. Patent 5,389,240; 1995
  14. 14. Huagn Y-Z, Zhu J-H, Wang Y-Y, Wu B-C. Removal of naphthenic acids from high acid crude oil through catalytic esterification on zinc-aluminum hydrotalcite-like compounds. Journal of China University of Petroleum (Edition of Natural Science). 2010;34(6) 147-150+156
  15. 15. Sartori G, Savage DW, Blum SC, Dalrymple DC, Wales WE. Metal compounds as accelerators for petroleum acid esterification, U.S. Patent 5,948,238; Sept. 7, 1999
  16. 16. Wang YZ, Liu YP, Liu CG. Removal of naphthenic acids of a second vacuum fraction by catalytic esterification. Petroleum Science and Technology. 2008;26:1424-1432
  17. 17. Lazar A, Evans JM. Process of treating hydrocarbon oils. U.S. Patent 1,953,353; Apr. 3, 1934
  18. 18. Takemura Y, Nakamura A, Taguchi H, Uchi K. Catalytic decarboxylation of benzoic acid. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Product Research and Development. 1985;24:213-215
  19. 19. Zhang A, Ma Q, Wang K, Liu X, Shuler P, Tang Y. Naphthenic acid removal from crude oil through catalytic decarboxylation on magnesium oxide. Applied Catalysis A. 2006;303:103-109
  20. 20. Halbert TR, Riley KL, Trachte KL, Vannauker DL. Process for reduction of total acid number in crude oil. U.S. Patent 5,910,242; 1999
  21. 21. Thomas R, Kenneth LR, Kenneth LT, David L. Contacting with a hydrotreating catalyst in the presence of hydrogen treat gas containing hydrogen sulfide. U.S. Patent 5,910,242 A; Jun 8, 1999
  22. 22. Natal Santiago MA, Sanchez-Castillo MA, Cortright RD, Dumesic JA. Catalytic reduction of acetic acid, methyl acetate, and ethyl acetate over silica-supported copper. Journal of Catalysis. 2000;193:16-28
  23. 23. Maier W, Roth W, Thies I, Van Rague Schleyer P. Gas phase decarboxylation of carboxylic acids. Chemische Berichte. 1982;115:808-812
  24. 24. Kubickova I, Snare M, Eranen K, Maki-Arvela P, Murzin DY. Hydrocarbons for diesel fuel via decarboxylation of vegetable oils. Catalysis Today. 2005;106:197-200
  25. 25. Snare M, Kubickova I, Maki-Arvela P, Eranen K, Murzin DY. Heterogeneous catalytic deoxygenation of stearic acid for production of biodiesel. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research. 2006;45:5708-5715
  26. 26. Manyar HG, Paun C, Pilus R, Rooney DW, Thompson JM, Hardacre C. Highly selective and efficient hydrogenation of carboxylic acids to alcohols using titania supported Pt catalysts, Chemical Communications 46 (2010) 6279-6281
  27. 27. Burch R, Paun C, Cao X-M, Crawford P, Goodrich P, Hardacre C, et al. Catalytic bimetallic Pt/re-based catalysts. Journal of Catalysis. 2011;283:89-97
  28. 28. Wang Y, Chu Z, Qiu B, Liu C, Zhang Y. Removal of naphthenic acids from a vacuum fraction oil with an ammonia solution of ethylene glycol. Fuel. 2006;(17-18):2489-2493
  29. 29. Lu R, Xu X, Yang J, Gao J. Reduction of total acid number of crude oil and distillate. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects. 2007;(1):47-57
  30. 30. Shi L, Shen B, Wang G. Removal of naphthenic acids from Beijing crude oil by forming ionic liquids. Energy & Fuels. 2008;(6):4177-4181
  31. 31. Laredo GC, Altamirano E, De los Reyes JA. Inhibition effects of nitrogen compounds on the hydrodesulfurization of dibenzothiophene: Part 2. Applied Catalaysis A. 2003;243:207-214
  32. 32. Collins IR, Plechkova N, Anderson K. Process for removing sulfur-containing acids from crude oil. WO Patent 138307:A2; 2007
  33. 33. Mandal PC, Wahyudiono, Sasaki M, Goto M, Non-catalytic reduction of total acid number (TAN) of naphthenic acids (NAs) using supercritical methanol. Fuel Processing Technology. 2013;106:641-644
  34. 34. Clemente JS, Prasad NGN, MacKinnon MD, Fedorak PM. A statistical comparison of naphthenic acids characterized by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Chemosphere. 2003;50:1265-1274
  35. 35. Scott AC, MacKinnon MD, Fedork PM. Naphthenic acids in Athabasca oil sands tailing waters are less biodegradable than commercial naphthenic acids. Environmental Science & Technology. 2005;39:8388-8394
  36. 36. Headley JV, McMartin DW. A review of the occurrence and fate on naphthenic acids in aquatic environments. Journal of Environmental Science and Health. 2004;39(8):1989-2010
  37. 37. Brient JA, Wessner PJ, Doyle MN. Naphthenic acids. In: 4th E, Kroschwitz JI, editors. Kirk-Othmer Encyclopaedia of Chemical Technology. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons; 1995. pp. 1017-1029
  38. 38. Herman DC, Fedorak PM, Costerton JW. Biodegradation of cycloalkane carboxylic acids in oil sands tailings. Canadian Journal of Microbiology. 1993;39:576-580
  39. 39. Headley JV, Peru KM, McMartin DW, Winkler M. Determination of dissolved naphthenic acids in natural waters using negative-ion electrospray mass spectrometry. Journal of AOAC International. 2002;85:182-187
  40. 40. Whelan JK, Farrington JW. Organic Matter: Productivity, Accumulation and Preservation in Recent and Ancient Sediments. New York, NY: Columbia University Press; 1992
  41. 41. Tissot BP, Welte DH. Petroleum Formation and Occurrence. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag; 1984
  42. 42. Snowdon L, Lloyd R, Powell TG. Immature oil and condensate — Modification of hydrocarbon generation model for terrestrial organic matter. AAPG Bulletin. 1982;66(6):755-788
  43. 43. Kane RD, Cayard MS. Understanding critical factors that influence refinery crude corrosiveness. Materials Performance. 1999;38(7):48-54
  44. 44. Clemente JS, Fedorak PM. A review of the occurrence, analyses, toxicity, and biodegradation of naphthenic acids. Chemosphere. 2005;60:585-600
  45. 45. Slavcheva E, Shone R, Turnbull A. Review of naphthenic acid corrosion in oil refining. British Corrosion Journal. 1999;34:125-131
  46. 46. Turnbull A, Slavcheva E, Shone B. Factors controlling naphthenic acid corrosion. Corrosion. 1998;54:922-930
  47. 47. Holowenko FM, MacKinnon MD, Fedorak PM. Characterization of naphthenic acids in oil sands wastewaters by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Water Research. 2002;36:2843-2855
  48. 48. Dorn PB. Case histories – The petroleum industry. In: Toxicity reduction: Evaluation and control. In: Ford DL, editor. Water Quality Management Library. Vol. 3. Lancaster, PA: Technomic Publishing Company; 1992. pp. 183-223
  49. 49. Rogers VV, Wickstrom M, Liber K, MacKinnon MD. Acute and subchronic toxicity of naphthenic acids from oil sands tailings. Toxicological Sciences. 2002;66:347-355
  50. 50. Berche B, Henkel M, Kenna R. Critical phenomena: 150 years since Cagniard de la Tour. Journal of Physical Studies. 2009;13(3) 3001(4 p.)
  51. 51. Marchetto F, Aziz AA. A review of supercritical fluid extraction technology and application. Journal Teknologi. 2014;69(6):27-31
  52. 52. Savage PE. Organic chemical reactions in supercritical water. Chemical Reviews. 1999;99:603-622
  53. 53. Akiya N, Savage PE. Roles of water for chemical reactions in high-temperature water. Chemical Reviews. 2002;102:2725-2750
  54. 54. Cheng ZM, Ding Y, Zhao LQ, Yuan PQ, Yuan WK. Effect of supercritical water in vacuum residue upgrading. Energy & Fuels. 2009;23:3178-3183
  55. 55. Tagaya H, Suzuki Y, Kadokawa J, Karasu M, Chiba K. Decomposition of model compounds of phenol resin waste with supercritical water. Chemistry Letters. 1997;26:47-48
  56. 56. Lachance R, Paschkewitz J, DiNaro J, Tester JW. Thiodiglycol hydrolysis and oxidation in sub- and supercritical water. Journal of Supercritical Fluids. 1999;16:133-147
  57. 57. Goto M, Nada T, Ogata A, Kodama A, Hirose H. Supercritical water oxidation for the destruction of municipal excess sludge and alcohol distillery wastewater of molasses. Journal of Supercritical Fluids. 1998;13:277-282
  58. 58. Sasaki M, Kabyemela B, Malaluan R, Hirose S, Takeda N, Adschiri T. Cellulose hydrolysis in subcritical and supercritical water. Journal of Supercritical Fluids. 1998;13:261-268
  59. 59. Adschiri T, Shibata R, Arai K. Phenol recovery by BPA tar hydrolysis in supercritical water. Sekiyu Gakkaishi. 1997;40:291-297
  60. 60. Wahyudiono, Fujinaga S, Sasaki M, Goto M. Recovery of phenol through the decomposition of tar under hydrothermal alkaline conditions. Chemical Engineering and Technology. 2006;29:882-889
  61. 61. Wahyudiono MS, Goto M. Non-catalytic liquefaction of tar with low temperature hydrothermal treatment. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management. 2007;9:173-181
  62. 62. Hu H, Zhang J, Guo S, Chen G. Extraction of Huadian oil shale with water in sub- and supercritical states. Fuel. 1999;78:645-651
  63. 63. Funazukuri T, Yokoi S, Wakao N. Supercritical fluid extraction of Chinese Maoming oil shale with water and toluene. Fuel. 1988;67:10-14
  64. 64. Park JH, Son SH. Extraction of bitumen with sub- and supercritical water. Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering. 2011;28(2):455-460
  65. 65. Abdulagatov IM, Polikhronidi NG, Abdurashidova A, Kiselev SB, Ely JF. Thermodynamic properties of methanol in the critical and supercritical regions. International Journal of Thermophysics. 2005;26(5):1327-1368
  66. 66. Yadav VK, Chandra A. Dynamics of supercritical methanol of varying density from first principles simulations: Hydrogen bond fluctuations, vibrational spectral diffusion, and orientational relaxation. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 2013 Jun 14;138(22)
  67. 67. Goto M, Koyamoto H, Kodama A, Hirose T. Degradation kinetics of polyethylene terephthalate in supercritical methanol. AICHE Journal. 2002;48(1):136-144
  68. 68. Yang Y, Lu Y, Xiang H, Xu Y, Li Y. Study on methanolytic depolymerization of PET with supercritical methanol for chemical recycling. Polymer Degradation and Stability. 2002;75:185-191
  69. 69. Demirbas A. Biodiesel production from vegetable oil by supercritical methanol. Journal of Scientific & Industrial Research. 2005;64:858-965
  70. 70. Wei C-Y, Huang T-C, Chen H-H. Biodiesel production using supercritical methanol with carbon dioxide and acetic acid. Journal of Chemistry. 2013;2013:1-6
  71. 71. Ishikawa Y, Saka S. Chemical conversion of cellulose as treated in supercritical methanol. Cellulose. 2001;8(3):189-195
  72. 72. Wang Y-Z, Liu Y-P, Liu C-G. Kinetics of the esterification of low-concentration naphthenic acids and methanol in oils with or without SnO as a catalyst. Energy & Fuels. 2008;22:2203-2206
  73. 73. Knez Ž, Markočič E, Leitgeb M, Primožič M, Knez Hrnčič M, Škerget M. Industrial applications of supercritical fluids: A review. Energy. 2014;77:235-243. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2014.07.044
  74. 74. Andrade CKZ, Dar AR. Applying green processes and techniques to simplify reaction work-ups. Tetrahedron. 2016;72(47):7375-7391. DOI: 10.1016/j.tet.2016.09.055
  75. 75. Patel D, Kellici S, Saha B. Green process engineering as the key to future processes. PRO. 2014;2:311-332. DOI: 10.3390/pr2010311
  76. 76. Mandal PC, Goto M, Sasaki M. Removal of nickel and vanadium from heavy oils using supercritical water. J. Jpn. Petrol. Inst. 2014;57(1):18-28
  77. 77. Huddleston JG, Visser AE, Reichert WM, Willauer HD, Broker GA, Rogers RD.Charac-terization and comparison of hydrophilic and hydrophobic room temperature ionic liquids incorporating the imidazolium cation. Green Chemistry. 2001;3:156-164
  78. 78. Keskin S, Kayrak-Talay D, Akman U, Hortacsu O. A review of ionic liquids towards supercritical fluid applications. Journal of Supercritical Fluids. 2007;43:150-180
  79. 79. Plechkova NV, Seddon KR. Application of ionic liquid in the chemical industry. Chemical Society Reviews. 2008;37:123-150
  80. 80. Koel M. Ionic liquid in chemical analysis. CRC Press (ISBN 1-4200-4646-2); 2008. p. XXVII
  81. 81. Martinez-Palou R, Luque R. Applications of ionic liquids in the removal of contaminants from refinery feedstocks: An industrial perspective. Energy & Environmental Science. 2014;7:2414-2447
  82. 82. Mandal PC, Shiraishi T, Wahyudiono, Sasaki M, Goto M. Heptylbenzene decomposition in supercritical water: A simulation study. International Journal of Engineering & Technology (IJET). 2010;7(4):689-699
  83. 83. Shopova N, Milkova T. Thermal decomposition of cholesteryl esters of cinnamic acid derivatives and their effect on the a-tetralylhydroperoxide free-radical-induced decomposition. Thermochimica Acta. 2000;356:101-107
  84. 84. Varadaraj R, Savage DW. Process for neutralization of petroleum acids, U.S. Patent 6,030,523, 2000
  85. 85. Sartori G, Savage DW, Balinger BH. Process for decreased the acidity of crudes using crosslinked polymeric amines. U.S. Patent 6,121,411; 2000
  86. 86. Shi LJ, Shen BX, Wang GQ. Removal of naphthenic acids from Beijiang crude oil by forming ionic liquids. Energy & Fuels. 2008;22:4177-4181
  87. 87. Hamer CK et al. Process of deacidifying crude oil. EP patent 1, 911, 829A1, Bulletin 2008/16. pp. 1-20
  88. 88. Sun Y, Shi L. Basic ionic liquids with imidazole anion: New reagents to remove naphthenic acids from crude oil with high total acid number. Fuel. 2012;33:83-87
  89. 89. Duan J, Sun Y, Shi L. Three different types of heterocycle of nitrogen-containing alkaline ionic liquids treatment of acid oil to remove naphthenic acids. Catalysis Today. 2013;212:180-185
  90. 90. Holbrey JD, Reichert WM, Nieuwenhuyzen M, Sheppard O, Hardacre C, Rogers RD. Liquid clathrate formation in ionic liquid-aromatic mixtures. Chemical Communications. 2003:476-477

Written By

Pradip Chandra Mandal and Mitsuru Sasaki

Submitted: 20 August 2017 Reviewed: 20 October 2017 Published: 07 February 2018