Asthma-obese phenotype biomarkers.
Asthma is a very heterogeneous disease, with two major asthma phenotypes, the allergic and the late onset asthma, differentiated by the triggers, the cellular dominance, the Th1/Th2 inflammation pattern and the local and serological markers. As there were many overlapping biological markers between these two phenotypes, different types of tentative classification followed. A clinical one makes a difference between the predominant eosinophilic one (with better response to glucocorticoid) and the predominant neutrophilic one with more severe evolution and low rate of therapeutical improvement. Another approach was based on cluster analysis of asthma characteristics (onset, atopic status, and body mass index (BMI)), sensitivity to methacholine test, peak flow variability, bronchodilatation response, postbronchodilator level of FEV1, sputum eosinophil and neutrophil count, FeNO test, clinical symptom scores, treatment scheme to control symptoms, exacerbations, and severity. Emerging data suggest a distinct late onset obese-asthma phenotype, with a specific pathophysiology, comorbidities, and clinical evolution. This chapter reviews the main characteristics of this phenotype: the specific lung function impairment, the underlying inflammation, the adipokine profile, the comorbidities and the therapeutical approach. The mutual influence between obesity and asthma will be illustrated, whenever scientific data are available.
- asthma-obese phenotype
- metabolic changes in asthma
- inflammation in asthma
- asthma biomarkers
Obesity became in recent years a recurrence and one of the major concerns in asthma research. This chapter presents the relation between obesity and asthma, underlining the influences on pathological mechanisms, evolution, and treatment, in order to give an overview of the current knowledge about the asthma-obese phenotype (AOP). Inside the AOP, two distinct forms have been described: an early onset, atopic asthma with no gender differences in incidence and a late onset, non-atopic asthma predominantly in women . We interpret the first as an atopic asthma aggravated by obesity and the second as a form of asthma favored by obesity. They have common characteristics related to the pathological consequences of obesity, the subject of our review.
Worldwide, 15–20% of the population suffers from asthma [2, 3]. The prevalence have different slopes in different countries, with higher incidence in developing countries  and apparently constant rate in recent years or even with a tendency of reduction in current wheezing in countries with previous higher prevalence .
The trends of incidence of asthma and obesity are similar: a flat curve of high prevalence in developed countries and an increasing prevalence in less developed countries [2, 5]. However, the recently published analysis from the US national survey, comparing the 8.5% population attributable fraction for overweight/obesity between 1988 and 1994 with the 11.9% one, in 2011–2014, found this increase statistically non-significant . Studies from developing countries, in prospective cohorts, confirmed the parallel increase in incidence of obesity and asthma, , particularly in obese women .
The AOP could be, in fact, related not to obesity but to the metabolic syndrome. A Norway study confirmed, but another large longitudinal study with 25 years of follow-up contradicted this assumption and found that independent factors to the metabolic syndrome play significant roles in the association of asthma with obesity . Waist circumference was negatively associated with eosinophilia  and gave an odds ratio (OR) = 1.46 for asthma in females . The relation between asthma and metabolic syndrome seems to be reciprocal, as asthma increases the risk for metabolic syndrome  and for obesity .
High BMI is also associated with the severity of asthma, particularly in women , with a reduced FEV1 %, a higher readmission rate and longer hospitalization stay . In a large cross-sectional Israeli study, obesity was associated with mild and moderate to severe asthma in male, and to moderate to severe asthma in females . Differences in severity between obese and non-obese were maintained after adjustment for demographics, smoking status, medication or gastroesophageal reflux .
Genomic studies also support this association. A twin-based research concluded that 8% of the genetic component of the obesity is shared with asthma . A large case control sample of population with European origin revealed a protection for asthma-obesity co-occurrence with the 16p11.2 inversion . Several gene polymorphisms (TNF-α, -β or leptin receptors) with interrelated physiopathological mechanisms for the AOP seem to be involved in risk and/or the therapeutical response [20, 21, 22, 23].
3. Pathogenic pathways
Impressive research data have been accumulated to explain the relationship between obesity and asthma. Among them, two pathogenic processes draw special attention: the lung function impairment and the specific airways inflammation.
3.1. Lung function impairment
3.1.1. Structural changes
In normal obese, forced vital capacity (FVC) is smaller than slow vital capacity (SVC), and this points to the possibility of even underdiagnosis obstruction, when using FEV1/FVC data .Reduced SVC and total lung capacity (TLC), increased inspiratory reserve volume, decreased expiratory reserve volume (ERV) and maximal voluntary ventilation volume (MVV) was found in severe obesity . The reduction in FVC%, FEV1%, MVV% was parallel with the BMI increase . The reduction in the functional residual capacity (FRC) was more pronounced than of the TLC until BMI exceeded 35 kg/m2, after which the decrease was proportionate . While VC and TLC are markers of restriction, the MVV integrates the endurance and strength of the respiratory muscles with the airway diameter and resistance and is interpreted as an obstructive dysfunction. Another argument against a pure restrictive pattern in obesity is that the FRC reduction is due to the ERV reduction, with normal or even increased RV and reflects a lower airways caliber . The volume of FRC is the expression of the equilibrium between the inward elastic recoil of the lung and outward elastic recoil of the chest wall. Obesity, particularly the abdominal one, reduces the expansion of the diaphragm and of the excursions of the thoracic cage, limiting the elastic recoil of the lung. Ventilation occurs at lower lung volumes, the transpulmonary pressure is lower. These changes affect the retractive forces of the lung parenchyma and the airways caliber and unload the airway smooth muscle (ASM); as consequence, the ASM shortens more in response to external stimuli. Even more, due to the decreased expansion of the airways, actin and myosin attach closer and are more difficult to detach during relaxation. A confirmation of these mechanisms is obtaining no difference in the fall of FEV1 after methacholine test with or without a previous avoidance of deep inspiration in nonasthmatic obese (NAO) persons .
3.1.2. Metabolic changes
Obesity increases the respiratory demand, with greater energy expenditure for breathing. Obesity-related inflammatory cytokines (such as TNF-α or leptin) and hormones (insulin) increase the ASM contractility. The insulin growth factor 1 stimulates the proliferation of the ASM. Insulin raises the expression of β1-containing laminins, promoting contractility .
Successful weight loss programs reverse the lung function changes and have an important role in asthma management in these patients. Weight loss reduces airway resistance, airways obstruction, improves peak expiratory flow (PEF) variability, and increases FRC and ERV .
Weight loss in obese asthmatics (OA) with high IgE and dominant Th2 inflammation improved the resting respiratory system mechanics, assessed by oscillometry, but had no effect on the sensitivity of air closure during the methacholine test, reflected by FVC % reduction. Certain differences in response, according to the underlying inflammation of the AOP subtypes, have been noticed  serving as argument that weight loss cumulates the benefit of the structural, the metabolic, and of the inflammatory improvement in OA.
3.2. Influences of the obesity inflammation pattern on asthma
Obesity generates a low-grade inflammation, switches blood monocytes and tissue macrophages to the M1 activation pathway, and impairs the ratio between regulatory T-lymphocytes (Treg) and Th17. Changes from the lean to obese pattern involve the switch of macrophages from M2 to M1 domination, switch from Th2 to Th1 cells, and switch from the Treg cells and NKT to B cells, mast cells and neutrophils. Together with the adipokine profile modification, a pro-inflammatory pattern develops (Figure 1).
3.2.1. Polarization of the macrophages
Macrophages are polarized to the M1 state by interferon-γ and by inducers of TNF-α, such as lipopolysaccharides (LPS). M1 macrophages upregulate pro-inflammatory cytokines as TNF-α, interleukin IL-1β, IL-6, IL-12, IL-15, and IL-23 and oxidative stress.
Lung macrophages are a heterogeneous population divided into alveolar and interstitial macrophages. In non-allergic asthma, M1 macrophages are increased and pathogenic, while in allergic forms, they seem to be protective. Due to their defense capacity against pathogens, they have a role in preventing the asthma exacerbation. The most extensively investigated negative effects of the M1 polarization specific cytokine signature are TNF-α and IL-1β in asthma. Exogenous administration of recombinant TNF-α shifts to the left the curve of responsiveness to methacholine in normal subjects . In asthma patients, high levels of TNF-α in bronchoalveolar lavage or bronchial biopsies are associated with severity . How TNF-α induces airways hypersensitivity is not completely understood, but experimental research showed that TNF-α increases ASM contractility by intracellular calcium increase. The intimate process involves a variety of G-protein coupled agonists (methacholine, histamine and serotonine). After binding to TNF receptor 2, TNF-α increases the Th17 differentiation and induces vascular modifications through endothelin and neurotrophic tyrosine kinase receptor type 2. Of interest for obesity, a condition associated with low ghrelin levels is that the raise of TNF-α level in the bronchoalveolar lavage after ovalbumin challenge is attenuated by this orexigenic factor .
The IL-1β is a pro-inflammatory cytokine with special interest for bronchoconstriction, particularly if primed by IL-5. IL-1β is a result of activation of numerous lung cells, including lymphocytes, macrophages, mastocytes and even ASM. IL-1β could be the link between toll-like receptors (TLR) and nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-like receptors (NLR), the NLRP3 inflammasome and the activation of the TH17 cells, as both TLR and NLR that sense the external signals promote IL-1β secretion . From macrophages cytoplasm, IL-1 is secreted through lipid pores requiring the presence of gasdermin D (GSDMD), a protein identified from genomic-wide studies as a possible asthma marker . Experimental data showed that GSDMD expression regulates cell growth of ASM and promotes fibrosis with remodeling of airways . Cellular stress-related inflammation, with high extracellular release of adenosine triphosphate (ATP), uric acid crystals, and cholesterol also involve the IL-1β signal . The expression of IL-1β is upregulated by prolonged hyperglycemic state , with possible impact on AOP.
3.2.2. The predominant Th1/Th17 activation
The level of Th17 increases in obese, if a certain threshold of the BMI is achieved, in absence of an acute or chronic inflammation . An inhibition effect on adipogenesis in mesenchymal cells and on the adipocyte differentiation raised the hypothesis that IL-17 could be a regulatory cytokine of obesity itself, providing a negative feedback on the adipose tissue expansion . Several mechanisms have been proposed to explain how Th17 increases in obesity. The higher metabolic activity related to nutrients intake raises the ATP level and the release of ATP molecules to the extracellular space; ATP binds to P2X7, a purinergic receptor, capable of driving Th17 responses during inflammation and secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines . Unhealthy diet, with high pro-inflammatory, long chain, saturated free fatty acid (FFA), and low anti-inflammatory ω3- polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) and monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFA) activates the TLR in adipocytes and macrophages, and the Th1/Th17 pathways in dendritic cells . Micronutrient deficiencies, such as low levels of vitamin D, are also frequent in obese persons. The enhanced infection susceptibility is due to the decreased levels of cathelicidin in the primary defense cells, aggravating the clinical evolution.
In obesity, the adipocytes have a significant contribution to the circulating IL-6, promoting the differentiation of TH17 and naive CD4 T-cells. Leptin, another cytokine of the IL-6 family, is also increased, with many pathological implications for asthma. Among these, leptin modulates Th17 response by conditioning the signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) expression and phosphorylation in CD4 cells . Th1 and Th17 differentiation require mammalian Target of Rapamycin 1 (mTORC1) signals , which are known to be activated by growth factors, amino acids or insulin, all being raised at obesity.
Through IL-17 secretion, Th17 cells recruit and activate neutrophils to produce pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-6, IL-8) , chemokines, and adhesion molecules. IL-17 upregulates IL-8 secretion in airway epithelial cells and initiates airway remodeling, increasing the levels of fibroblast-derived inflammatory mediators, such as the α-chemokines, IL-8, and growth-related oncogene-α . Pathogenic Th17 cells express IL-1R1, a type of IL-1β receptor, with bronchoconstriction effect .
Epigenetic markers, such as promoter methylation of transcription factors associated with increased Th1 differentiation, were found in OA preadolescent compared to non obese asthmatic patients (NOA) .
3.2.3. Reduction of Treg
Tregs have a significant role in suppression of allergy and asthma, as they are sources of anti-inflammatory cytokines (IL-10, TGFβ1 and IL-35) and have suppressor function on a variety of immune cells (B cells, NK cells, CD4+, CD8+) and dendritic cells. Tregs are even able to kill effector lymphocytes in a perforin-dependent manner. The number of studies related to the Treg number and function in asthma is increasing but are far from being conclusive: in allergic inflammation, Tregs are generally low and less able to control the inflammation process. An increased number of Tregs were found in more severe asthma, an effect that could be also due to the inhaled corticoids .
Concerning AOP, a reduction of Treg is present in insulin resistance OA . Particularly with high amount of abdominal fat, Treg is reduced, contributing to the low-grade inflammation and insulin resistance development. Leptin has similar inhibitory effect on Treg . Treg expresses the insulin receptor, and hyperinsulinemia affects their IL-10 production and the suppressor functionality . As insulin levels are frequently elevated in obese subjects, the insulin effect on Treg could be a part of the explanation of the severity of asthma of the AOP.
3.2.4. The adipokine profile
The inflammation pattern in obesity is closely related to the adipokine profile. A meta-analysis of 13 studies with 3642 patients concluded that the high leptin and low adiponectin are associated with the diagnosis of asthma .
The leptin receptor is constitutively expressed in epithelial lung cells but also on immune cells. Leptin directly stimulates respiratory centers, increases frequency, minute and tidal volume. These positive effects on the respiratory function are lost in obesity, a state of leptin resistance, but high dose of leptin administered to obese mice was able to restore the breathing pattern and the arterial CO2 .
Compared to obese non-asthmatic, leptin levels are increased in OA . The difference is higher in women  and in patients with lung neutrophilia . High leptin level upregulates the expression of inflammatory proteins, such as cPLA2-α  or phospholipase D1 , raises leukotrienes (LT) production  and bronchial responsiveness. Again, the effect was manifest particularly in obese women . LT synthesis in neutrophils depends on circulatory arachidonic acid, on nuclear localization of the 5-lipooxigenase , and on the level of extracellular signal regulated kinases (ERK) activity, significantly influenced by androgens. This might contribute to the gender differences in AOP.
Attenuation of the constitutive muscarinic activation of the ASM cells via the central nervous system (a normal dilatator effect and leptin) has been proposed as part of leptin resistance . Leptin resistance seems to be selective, as the pro-inflammatory effects are maintained in obesity. Leptin effects on airway remodeling could be related to reduction in α1-antitripsin expression, enhanced intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1) expression and increase in the CCL11, G-CSF, VEGF, and IL-6 production .
The circadian secretion of leptin is the highest at midnight; in obese subjects, the basal and the evening increase is higher than in lean subjects . This could be an influencer of the nocturnal asthma attacks and of the overall severity of asthma.
In contrast with leptin increase, plasma adiponectin is decreased in asthma , independent of the BMI . The adiponectin is correlated with the FEV1 decline, and with the high serum and sputum IgE . Adiponectin is able to polarize the macrophages to an M2 state , switches the balance by inhibition of pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNFα), stimulates the anti-inflammatory ones (IL10), diminishes Nf-Kb activation, and negatively correlates with protein C and IL6. Despite experimental data to confirm these actions, adiponectin’s role in predicting asthma severity remains controversial.
Adiponectin circulates as trimer (the low molecular weight form) or hexamers (the high molecular weight form), and the inconsistent findings of these studies could be explained by different serum adiponectin components that were measured, as only high low-molecular-weight isoform was strongly associated with the asthma risk and lung function decrease .
4. Clinical and therapeutic particularities of OA
The specific physiopathology of the AOP was translated in different attempts to define biomarkers. Particular biomarkers or different cut points for predicting airway inflammation were proposed. Classification and relevant examples of proposed biomarkers are summarized in Table 1. Most of these studies were not reproduced on larger scales, and currently there are no guidelines on their clinical utilization.
|Inflammatory biomarkers||Sputum||High MMP1, MMP2, and MMP8||Study design primarily for asthma severity: these MMP not found in other clusters |
|IL-5||Comparison between OA and LA inside the group of severe asthma |
|14 differentially expressed genes encoding proteins related to the cell cycle and growth factor regulating pathways (MAPK1, E2F1, and SPRY2) and to the interferon signaling pathway (OASL, OAS3 and TRIM14)||Study design for cluster identification; the results selected refer to the comparison between late onset asthma, severe, high proportion of atopic, nonsmokers and obese female asthmatics, high frequency of exacerbations despite near normal lung function, 73.6% atopy. |
|Gene expression of calcium signal transmission (S100P, S100A16), lymphocyte differentiation (MAL), and mucin (MUC1) increase||Comparison of diet (high fat meal)-induced metabolism in asthma and healthy controls. No specific analysis related to BMI, but mean BMI was in the obesity range in asthma and in overweight range in controls |
|Exhaled breath condensate||Increase in glucose, n-valerate, acetoin, isovalerate, and 1,2-propanediol levels and a decrease in formate, ethanol, methanol, acetone, propionate, acetate, lactate, and saturated fatty acid levels||Relatively small cross-sectional study, well designed to differentiate AOP from obese-non asthma and lean-asthma, strong statistical power of correlation |
|Bronchial submucosa||Increased eosinophil count||In a severe asthma population, eosinophil number in submucosa correlated with BMI |
|Bronchial submucosa||No increase in eosinophil count||In mild to moderate OA, eosinophil number in submucosa not different from obese without asthma |
|Blood||Low periostin l||Study design primarily for asthma severity: low levels found also in other clusters, no difference between OAP and other cluster presented |
|Blood||CCL17, IL-4, IL-13||Cross-sectional study. Comparison of lean asthma and obese asthma |
|Expired air||FeNO test||Large cross-sectional study; low FeNO associated with adiposity indicators; in high FeNO group, adiposity indicators associated with worse asthma severity or control |
|Adipokine profile||Blood||Leptin||Cross-sectional study, comparison to lean asthma AO, leptin mediates asthma control |
|Blood||Adiponectin||Review of the controversial epidemiological results in human studies mainly to heterogeneity of the design of these studies |
|Blood||Resistin||Post-weight management intervention Δ resistin negatively associated to Δ FRC and Δ RV |
|Functional test (bronchial reactivity)||Challenge test with ozone||Comparison between obese and non-obese; post-exposure decrease of FVC in obese, similar bronchial reactivity and IL-6 increase |
|Challenge test with mannitol||Airway hyper-responsiveness to mannitol in obese non-asthmatic without asthma comparative to non-obese subjects |
The clinical manifestations and the treatment response appear to be influenced by comorbidities. They can be summarized as allergic (rhinitis, eczema), smoking-related, psychogenic (hyperventilation, depression, and anxiety disorders), metabolic syndrome, gastroesophageal reflux disease and obstructive sleep apnea . Comorbidities become significant when there is reciprocal impact. As a disease is the expression of a certain number of dysregulated functional mechanisms, comorbidities, by cumulating more abnormalities, will always have a potential negative impact. Comorbidities might share co-determination factors or potentiate mechanisms for the related comorbidity. The asthma-obesity relation suits very well in these last categories.
In terms of co-determination factors, the chronic asthma inflammation is influenced by the metabolic inflammation, as previously described. Certain comorbidities, such as the gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) have an independent high prevalence in asthma and in obesity but aggravate each other when they coexist.
4.2.1. Gastroesophageal reflux disease
To evaluate prevalence, different definitions of Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) are used in the epidemiological studies: the presence of the reflux symptoms, the pH measurement, the endoscopic findings of the gastroesophageal mucosal disease or presence of the hiatal hernia. Despite the variation in methodology, the incidence was significantly higher than in the non-asthmatic population no matter what criteria were used. On the obesity side, a meta-analysis showed that the risk for GERD progressively increases with the increase in BMI . The asthma-GERD relation is bilateral. GERD is the cause for the abnormal acid reflux that leads to microaspiration into the airways, initiating reflex cough and bronchoconstriction via vago-vagal reflexes. Asthma bronchoconstriction triggers acid reflux, as happens in some patients during the methacholine test. Theophylline increases gastric acid secretion and lowers low esophagus sphincter tone . Both obesity and asthma increase the transdiaphragmatic and intragastric pressures and favor hiatal hernia.
Despite common agreement that GERD was associated with more severe asthma symptoms, apparently, no association between GERD and the severity of asthma was found in a subpopulation of OA . This emphasizes the need for dedicated studies to this particular phenotype.
Indirect arguments that asthma control might have positive influence on GERD are the presence of the silent reflux in asthma patients and the relative risk of development of GERD , but there are no published data to confirm this hypothesis.
GERD influences also obesity, by changing type and frequency of meals. Reduction in weight has favorable effects on GERD-related symptoms.
Due to the presence of the increased cholinergic tone in both asthma and GERD, the use of anticholinergic medication might be of interest.
4.2.2. Obstructive sleep apnea
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) has a higher prevalence in men, while OA is more prevalent in women. Due to the high association rate between OSA and asthma  and the worse asthma control in the presence of OSA, an overlap asthma-OSA syndrome was proposed . As with the GERD, asthma increases the risk of the new-onset OSA . Obesity is the major risk factor for OSA, but OSA also leads to obesity: impaired sleep architecture changes leptin signal with a reduction in satiety along with craving for high energy foods , modifies transcriptional networks in visceral fat, and reduces secretion of growth hormone. The excessive daytime sleepiness reduces physical activity, increases the proportion of the fat mass compared to the free fat mass and makes weight loss programs more difficult to succeed.
OSA has negative impact on asthma. During apnea episodes, the upper way vibration and suction collapse, activate vagal tone, and induce reflex bronchoconstriction. The more negative intrathoracic pressure developed during apnea increases the pulmonary capillary volume. These pathological processes trigger asthma attacks. Repeated mechanical trauma is associated with upper and lower airway inflammation . OSA aggravates nocturnal asthma, lowers the quality of life, and leads to more frequent exacerbations.
Asthma has negative effects on OSA. In asthma patients, OSA is more severe, with lower apnea-hypopnea index (AHI). Sleep efficiency and arousal index were higher in severe asthma compared to moderate asthma, but apparently no correlation have been found between OSA severity and measures of the asthma severity evaluated by FEV1 or with the asthma quality of life score . High dose, long-term corticosteroid treatment, particularly in poorly controlled asthma could be a contributing factor to obesity and OSA .
Nocturnal GERD links asthma, GERD, and OSA under a common aggravating factor. The increase of the respiratory effort exacerbates asthma and OSA symptoms and is associated with higher AHI and inflammation in the exhaled breath condensate .
4.2.3. Metabolic syndrome-related comorbidities
Increased incidence of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular events (hypertension, ischemic heart disease, cerebrovascular disease) is also expected to happen, as directly influenced by obesity. In a very large adult study, elevated waist circumference and triglyceride (TG) and low high-density lipoprotein (HDL) were significantly associated with wheezing . In this respect, statins represent a potential treatment modality in severe asthma; their anti-inflammatory effects and the enhancement of the corticosteroid sensitivity make them good candidates for AO treatment, particularly in cases with metabolic syndrome .
4.3. Therapeutical challenges
AOP benefits from lifestyle changes: weight reduction is a priority goal, but all other general asthma interventions should be addressed: smoking cessation, allergen exposure avoidance, occupational risk assessment, and so on. Diet and/or bariatric surgery is correlated with reduction of exacerbations and improvements in the lung function, clinical manifestations, and quality of life [98, 99]. Successful interventions increase in efficacy of the inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) after smoking cessation  and after losing weight .
Treatment of comorbidities related to overweight directly impacting asthma. Positive effects on asthma control have been reported from continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy of OSA . There is also a benefit on the pulmonary function in OA with diabetes treated with dipeptydil-peptidase4 inhibitors related to the correction of the oxidative/antioxidative imbalances .
Proton pomp inhibitors and histamine H2 receptor improve GERD-related symptoms and quality of life but does not influence asthma control . However, improvement of symptoms in severe, selected cases was obtained from different surgical procedures [103, 104]. However, the common high cholinergic tone in GERD and asthma raised the hypothesis that anticholinergic therapy could be a common solution . A Cochrane systematic review provided some evidence that long-acting muscarinic antagonists added to ICS show some benefits on FEV1 , but prospective studies should confirm if there is also benefit in the AOP, and if this effect is higher in asthma-GERD association. The anti-inflammatory effect of statins in asthma is not consistent across studies . Whether their effect on asthma evolution is increased in those OA with dyslipidemia remains to be demonstrated.
If standard step-increase asthma medication is not efficient, specific endotype treatment (precision medicine approach) would be desirable.
OA is associated with some specific inflammatory pathways activation, one of which is 5-lipoxygenase pathway inflammation; leukotriene antagonists have similar efficacy with ICS in the presence of obesity . Some biological therapies for severe forms of asthma were proven beneficial also in OA. For example, in OA patients with raised eosinophils and high airways reversibility, Mepolizumab was more efficient in the reduction of exacerbations . Nevertheless, the ones that targeted commonly upregulated pathways were not successful. For example, a 12 weeks treatment with Brodalumab (a human anti-IL-17 receptor) had no clinically meaningful effects . Golimumab, an anti-THF-α humanized antibody, provided some improvements, but limited use due to the risks associated with this therapy: infections, congestive heart failure, malignancies, and demyelinating disorders . However, in a small selected group of overweight and obese severe asthma patients this treatment reduced the oral steroid dose and hospitalizations .
To conclude, the AOP is supported by epidemiological, pathophysiological, and clinical data. There are still many uncertainties about the OAP and even more about the two subtypes, described until now only from the epidemiological perspective; further research is needed to elucidate common and specific mechanisms and to improve our knowledge about the specific biomarkers and the therapeutical approaches for the subtypes of AOP.